Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The risks of hepatocellular carcinoma development after HCV eradication are similar between patients treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin and direct-acting antiviral therapy

  • Yuko Nagaoki,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Michio Imamura,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Hiroshi Aikata,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Kana Daijo,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Yuji Teraoka,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Fumi Honda,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Yuki Nakamura,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Masahiro Hatooka,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Reona Morio,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Kei Morio,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Hiromi Kan,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Hatsue Fujino,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Tomoki Kobayashi,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Keiichi Masaki,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Atsushi Ono,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Takashi Nakahara,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Tomokazu Kawaoka,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Masataka Tsuge,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Akira Hiramatsu,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Yoshiiku Kawakami,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • C. Nelson Hayes,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Daiki Miki,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliations Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Laboratory for Digestive Diseases, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

  • Hidenori Ochi,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Laboratory for Digestive Diseases, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

  •  [ ... ],
  • Kazuaki Chayama

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration

    chayama@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

    Affiliations Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Science, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Liver Research Project Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Laboratory for Digestive Diseases, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development is reduced following viral elimination by interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. However, the risk in patients treated with interferon-free direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is unknown. We evaluated chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved viral eradication by pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV, n = 244) or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV, n = 154) therapy. None of the patients had prior history of HCC or antiviral therapy. The median observation period after the end of treatment for the PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups were 96 (range 10–196) and 23 (range 4–78) months, respectively. During the observation period, HCC developed in 13 (5.3%) and 7 (4.5%) patients in the PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups, respectively. The cumulative HCC development rate after 1-, 3- and 5-years (0.4%, 3% and 5% for the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 0.6%, 9% and 9% for the DAA group, respectively) were similar between the two groups. Propensity score matching analysis also showed no significant difference in HCC development rates between the two groups. Serum AFP levels decreased to similar levels between PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups following the achievement of viral eradication. The risk for HCC development following viral eradication by IFN-free DAA therapy may be similar to that in IFN-based therapy.

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1, 2]. Particularly among cirrhotic patients with HCV infection, the HCC incidence rate steadily increases, with a yearly reported incidence of 1.4% to 7% [3, 4]. The goal of chronic HCV infection treatment is eradication of the virus in order to prevent HCC development. Interferon (IFN) has long been used for anti-HCV therapy, and achievement of sustained virological response (SVR) by peg-interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy could reduce the incidence of HCC development in patients with chronic HCV infection by reducing liver inflammation, fibrosis, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels [510].

Recently, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) that selectively inhibit HCV proteins, such as nonstructural protein (NS)3/4A protease, NS5A, and NS5B polymerase, have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients in many parts of the world. In Japan, an IFN-free DAA therapy with daclatasvir, an NS5A replication complex inhibitor, and asunaprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, was first approved for treatment of genotype 1 HCV-infected patients in 2014 [11]. Real-world study results from daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) therapy showed an approximately 95% SVR rate [12]. Subsequently, new DAA combination therapies such as sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir [13] ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir [14,15] and elbasvir plus grazoprevir have also recently been approved in Japan.

Similar to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, achievement of SVR by IFN-free DCV/ASV therapy has been shown to result in reduction of liver fibrosis markers and serum alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) levels [16]. A recent report showed a reduction in the incidence [17,18] and the occurrence [19] of HCC after HCV eradication in patients treated with DAA therapy. However, it is not known whether or not IFN-free DCV/ASV therapy reduces the risk of HCC development to the same extent as PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. In this study, we compared the risks of HCC development in patients who achieved SVR by DAA treatment to that in patients treated by PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.

Materials and methods

Patients

We reviewed 398 consecutive patients with genotype 1 HCV infection who achieved viral eradication by antiviral therapy at Hiroshima University Hospital between January 1995 and April 2015. The PEG-IFN/RBV group included 244 consecutive patients who achieved viral eradication with PEG-IFN/RBV for 48 to 72 weeks between 1995 and 2013. The standard treatment was as follows: PEG-IFNα2b (PEG-Intron, MSD, Tokyo, Japan) was injected subcutaneously at a median dose of 1.5 μg/kg once per week. RBV (Rebetol, MSD) was administered after breakfast and dinner. The RBV dose was adjusted by body weight (600 mg for <60 kg; 800 mg for 60–80 kg; and 1,000 mg for >80 kg). Twenty-six out of 154 patients in the DCV/ASV group participated in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01051414 and NCT01497834, respectively) conducted between 2010 and 2012 in which they received 60 mg of daclatasvir plus 200–600 mg BID of asunaprevir daily for 24 weeks. The remaining 128 patients received 24 weeks of treatment with 60 mg once daily of daclatasvir (Daklinza, Bristol-Myers, NY) and 200 mg twice daily of asunaprevir (Sunvepra, Bristol-Myers) between 2014 and 2015.

Patients with prior history of HCC before beginning antiviral therapy were excluded from the study. All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study according to the process approved by the ethical committee of Hiroshima University Hospital and conforming to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical and laboratory assessments

Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed before treatment. HCV RNA levels were measured using COBAS 135 TaqMan HCV test (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). The detection limit for the assay was 1.2 log IU/mL. HCV genotype was determined by sequence determination of the 5' non-structural region of the HCV genome, followed by phylogenetic analysis. FIB4 index was calculated as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis [19]. FIB4 index = age (years) × aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [IU/L] / (platelet count [109/l] × (ALT [IU/L])1/2). According to Sterling et al [20], we considered a FIB4 index of ≥3.25 as severe fibrosis.

HCC surveillance

All patients underwent HCC surveillance using tumor markers, ultrasonography, and/or dynamic computed tomography at least biannually after HCV eradication. The diagnosis of HCC was based on the hypervascular staining pattern of the arterial phase and the hypovascular staining pattern of the portal phase, and was confirmed by dynamic CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or angiography. Tumors without enhancement upon imaging were diagnosed by fine-needle biopsy.

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping

We genotyped each patient for two SNPs: rs8099917 in the IL28B locus, which is associated with response to IFN therapy [21, 22]; and rs1012068 in the DEPDC5 locus, which is associated with the risk of HCC development in chronic HCV-infected Japanese patients [23]. Samples were genotyped using the Invader assay, as described previously [24].

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The incidence of HCC was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted with a Cox proportional hazard model using the stepwise selection of variables or with two logistic analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package (version SPSS 23.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of patients

The clinical characteristics of the 398 patients are shown in Table 1. Patients in the DAA group were older (median age 73 vs. 59 years), mainly female (62.3% vs. 52.2%), had lower platelet counts, leukocyte counts and hemoglobin levels, and had lower serum ALT and albumin levels than patients in the PEG-IFN/RBV group. HbA1c levels and history of diabetes mellitus were significantly higher, and histories of alcohol intake, hypertension and hyperlipidemia were also higher in the DCV/ASV group compared with the PEG-IFN/RBV group. HCV-RNA level was higher in the DCV/ASV group compared with the PEG-IFN/RBV group. AFP levels were higher, and liver fibrosis was more severe in the DAA group compared with the PEG-IFN/RBV group.

HCC development rate

The median observation period after the end of treatment for the PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups were 96 (range 10–196) and 23 (range 4–78) months, respectively. During the observation period, HCC developed in 13 out of 244 (5.3%) patients in the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 7 out of 154 (4.5%) patients in the DCV/ASV group. The median period from the end of treatment to diagnosis of HCC was 35 (range 10–57) months in the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 22 (range 4–67) months in the DCV/ASV groups (P = 0.54). The cumulative HCC development rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 0.4%, 3% and 5% for the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 0.6%, 9% and 9% for the DCV/ASV group, respectively (P = 0.053) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development.

Patients who achieved viral eradication by peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) therapies were analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.g001

Propensity score matching analysis

To overcome bias due to differences in the distributions of covariates among patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV or DCV/ASV, one-to-one matches were created using propensity score analysis [25, 26]. Variables entered in the propensity model included age, gender, platelet counts, leukocyte counts, hemoglobin levels, serum albumin and ALT levels, HbA1c, histories of diabetes mellitus and alcohol intake, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The model was then used to obtain a one to-one match by using the nearest-neighbor matching method [27, 28] in 244 PEG-IFN/RBV-treated and 154 DCV/ASV-treated patients, resulting in a sample size of 66 patients per cohort (Table 2). The cumulative HCC development rate at 1-, 3- and 5-year were 1.5%, 10% and 19% for the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 1.5%, 10% and 12% for the DCV/ASV group, respectively (P = 0.886) (Fig 2A). Propensity score matching analysis also showed similar HCC development rates in the two groups.

thumbnail
Table 2. Characteristics of propensity score-matched patient treated with PEG-IFN plus RBV or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.t002

thumbnail
Fig 2. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in propensity score matched patients.

(a) 66 propensity score-matched patients in each of peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) groups were analyzed. (b) Patients were grouped by FIB4 index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.g002

To compare the HCC development rate between PEG-IFN/RBV- and DCV/ASV-treated patients according to liver fibrosis, patients were grouped by FIB4 index. Cumulative HCC development rates were similar between PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV groups both in patients with FIB4 index of <3.25 (P = 0.796) and ≥3.25 (P = 0.675) (Fig 2B).

Risk factors for the development of HCC in patients treated with DAAs

Risk factors for the development of HCC in patients who achieved viral eradication by DCV/ASV were analyzed. Univariate analysis showed that gender (P = 0.019) and serum AFP levels (P = 0.046) were significantly correlated with HCC development after HCV eradication. However, no factor was identified as an independent risk factor for HCC development. The SNPs within IL28B and DEPDC5 were also not associated with HCC development.

AFP levels before and after antiviral therapy

Serum AFP levels are associated with hepatocarcinogenesis; therefore, sequential changes in serum AFP levels were analyzed in patients without HCC development. The levels decreased significantly and to similar levels following achievement of HCV eradication both in patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV and DCV/ASV (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Sequential changes of serum alfa-fetoprotein (AFP).

Serum AFP levels before therapy and six months after the end of the treatment in patients treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV). In these box-and-whisker plots, lines within the boxes represent median values; the upper and lower lines of the boxes represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively; the upper and lower bars outside the boxes represent the 90th and 10th percentiles, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.g003

HCC development rate according to the timing of DCV/ASV therapy

In the present study, 26 out of 154 patients in the DCV/ASV group were treated between 2010 and 2012, and the remaining 128 patients were treated between 2014 and 2015. The median observation period after the end of treatment for each groups were 56 (range 29–78) and 22 (range 4–28) months, respectively. We analyzed HCC development rates in each group. Propensity score matching resulted in the selection of 18 patients in each of DCV/ASV between 2010 and 2012 and PEG-IFN/RBV groups, and 61 patients in each of DCV/ASV between 2014 and 2015 and PEG-IFN/RBV groups, respectively (S1 and S2 Tables). The cumulative HCC development rates were similar to PEG-IFN/RBV-treated patients in DCV/ASV-treated patients both in between 2010 and 2012 (P = 0.616) and between 2014 and 2015 (P = 0.525) groups (S1 Fig).

Discussion

This study examined the cumulative incidence of HCC development after HCV eradication by PEG-IFN/RBV or DCV/ASV treatment. During the follow-up period, HCC developed in 13 out of 244 (5.3%) of the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 7 out of 154 (4.5%) of the DCV/ASV group, and the cumulative HCC development rate tended to be high in DCV/ASV groups (P = 0.053). To overcome bias due to the different distributions of covariates among patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV or DCV/ASV, one-to-one matches were created using propensity score analysis. The cumulative HCC development rate after 1-, 3- and 5-years were 1.5%, 10% and 19% for the PEG-IFN/RBV group and 1.5%, 10% and 12% for the DCV/ASV group, respectively. Propensity score matching analysis also showed similar rates of HCC development in the two groups. Based on the results of this analysis, one can argue that the risk of HCC development after HCV eradication achieved by DCV/ASV is similar to that of IFN therapy. In the present study, HCC development risk was similar between the PEG-IFN/RBV and the DCV/ASV groups in both patients with and without advanced liver fibrosis. In contrast, Conti, et al. reported that virus eradication by DAAs treatment did not reduce occurrence of HCC development in HCV-infected cirrhosis patients [29]. Further analysis is needed to clarify the relationship between HCC development risk after HCV eradication by DAAs treatment and liver fibrosis.

A recent study showed a high rate and unexpected pattern of HCC recurrence after HCV eradication by IFN-free DAA therapy in patients with HCV-related HCC [30]. Although the mechanism underlying this unexpected early HCC recurrence is unknown, it is possible that HCV eradication by DAA therapy could enhance HCC development or recurrence in patients who have elevated risk for HCC. However, the present study showed no evidence for an increase in HCC development following achievement of HCV eradication by DAA therapy.

The present study has several limitations. First, the observation period was relatively short in the DCV/ASV group; the median observation period was only 23 months in this group compared with 96 months in the PEG-IFN/RBV group. Furthermore, only 7 patients developed HCC in DCV/ASV group. This short observation period and the small number of patients who developed HCC might underlie the lack of significance between the two groups.

Second, patients who were treated with PEG-IFN/RBV and those treated with DCV/ASV differ with respect to many host and viral factors that potentially affect HCC development. Although propensity score analysis showed a similar HCC development risk between the two groups, the propensity score matching may not completely compensate for these differences among the patient populations. Large-scale, long-term follow-up studies that include patients treated with other DAA regimens, such as sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, and elbasvir plus grazoprevir, should be performed.

Previous studies have shown that advanced liver fibrosis, male gender, older age, high AFP levels, greater alcohol intake, complications from diabetes mellitus, and obesity were risk factors for HCC development after HCV eradication by IFN treatment [17,18, 3134]. The present study showed that male gender and AFP levels ≥10 ng/mL were associated with HCC development after HCV eradication by DCV/ASV therapy; however, no factor was identified for independent risk for HCC development. The small number of patients who developed HCC might be associated with the absence of independent factors. AFP is a surrogate marker for risk of HCC development. Previous reports showed that AFP levels after the completion of IFN treatment were useful predictors for HCC development in chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved viral eradication [10, 34]. In the present study, serum AFP levels decreased to similar levels following achievement of SVR both in the PEG-IFN/RBV and the DCV/ASV groups, suggesting the possibility of reduced potential for HCC development. Future analysis to identify predictors for HCC development after HCV eradication to examine whether AFP levels could be a surrogate marker for HCC development in patients who achieved SVR by IFN-free DAA therapy using a larger number of patients is needed.

Previous studies showed that IL28B and DEPDC5 genotypes were strongly associated with IFN treatment response and HCC development in chronic hepatitis C patients, respectively [2123]. However, the present study showed that IL28B and DEPDC5 genotypes were not independent risk factors for HCC after HCV eradication. Recent genome-wide association study identified the association between the SNP rs17047200 in the TLL1 locus and HCC development after HCV eradication in patients treated with IFN-based treatments [35]. Future analysis is expected to identify SNPs associated with HCC development after HCV eradication, particularly in patients treated with DAAs.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that the risk of HCC development in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 after achieving viral eradication with DAA therapy is similar to that for PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in propensity score matched patients.

Patients treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) were analyzed. Patients were grouped by the timing of DCV/ASV treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.s001

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Characteristics of propensity score-matched patient treated with PEG-IFN plus RBV or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir between 2010 and 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Characteristics of propensity score-matched patient treated with PEG-IFN plus RBV or daclatasvir plus asunaprevir between 2014 and 2015.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182710.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nobuko Yokoyama, Akemi Sada and Emi Nishio for clerical assistance.

References

  1. 1. Kiyosawa K, Sodeyama T, Tanaka E, Gibo Y, Yoshizawa K, Nakano Y, et al. Interrelationship of blood transfusion, non-A, non-B hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis by detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 1990; 12(4 PT 1):671–5. pmid:2170265
  2. 2. Niederau C, Lange S, Heintges T, Erhardt A, Buschkamp M, Hürter D, et al. Prognosis of chronic hepatitis C: results of a large, prospective cohort study. Hepatology. 1998; 28(6):1687–95. pmid:9828236
  3. 3. Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Koida I, Arase Y, Tsubota A, Chayama K, et al. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinogenesis: a prospective observation of 795 patients with viral and alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1993; 18(1):47–53. pmid:7686879
  4. 4. Fattovich G, Giustina G, Degos F, Tremolada F, Diodati G, Almasio P, et al. Morbidity and mortality in compensated cirrhosis type C: a retrospective follow-up study of 384 patients. Gastroenterology 1997; 112(2):463–72. pmid:9024300
  5. 5. Kasahara A, Hayashi N, Mochizuki K, Takayanagi M, Yoshioka K, Kakumu S, et al. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma and its incidence after interferon treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Osaka Liver Disease Study Group. Hepatology. 1998; 27(5):1394–402. pmid:9581697
  6. 6. Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Arase Y Chayama K, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Effect of interferon therapy on hepatocellular carcinogenesis in patients with chronic hepatitis type C: a long-term observation study of 1643 patients using statistical bias correction with proportional hazard analysis. Hepatology. 1999; 29(4):1124–30. pmid:10094956
  7. 7. Poynard T, Moussalli J, Ratziu V, Regimbeau C, Opolon P. Effect of interferon therapy on the natural history of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 1999; 3(4):869–81. pmid:11291256
  8. 8. Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, Arakawa Y, Ide T, Sata M, et al. Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131(3):174–81. pmid:10428733
  9. 9. Yoshida H, Tateishi R, Arakawa Y, Sata M, Fujiyama S, Nishiguchi S, et al. Benefit of interferon therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma prevention for individual patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2004; 53(3):425–30. pmid:14960528
  10. 10. Nagaoki Y,Aikata H,Nakao N, Shinohara F, Nakamura Y, Hatooka M, et al. Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who achieved sustained virological response following interferon therapy: A large-scale, long-term cohort study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 31(5):1009–15. pmid:26584407
  11. 11. Kumada H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda K, Toyota J, Karino Y, Chayama K, et al. Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic HCV genotype 1b infection. Hepatology. 2014; 59(6):2083–91. pmid:24604476
  12. 12. Morio R, Imamura M, Kawakami Y, Morio K, Kobayashi T, Yokoyama S, et al. Safety and efficacy of dual therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir for older patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2017; 52(4):504–11. pmid:27631593
  13. 13. Mizokami M, Yokosuka O, Takehara T, Sakamoto N, Korenaga M, Mochizuki H, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination with and without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive and previously treated Japanese patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15(6):645–53. pmid:25863559
  14. 14. Kumada H, Chayama K, Rodrigues L Jr, Suzuki F, Ikeda K, Toyoda H, et al. Randomized phase 3 trial of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b-infected Japanese patients with or without cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2015; 62(4):1037–46. pmid:26147154
  15. 15. Chayama K, Notsumata K, Kurosaki M, Sato K, Rodrigues L Jr, Setze C, et al. Randomized trial of interferon- and ribavirin-free ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Hepatology. 2015; 61(5):1523–32. pmid:25644279
  16. 16. Miyaki E, Imamura M, Hiraga N, Murakami E, Kawaoka T, Tsuge M, et al. Daclatasvir and asunaprevir treatment improves liver function parameters and reduces liver fibrosis markers in chronic hepatitis C patients. Hepatol Res. 2016; 46(8):758–64. pmid:26574180
  17. 17. Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Fujiyama S, Kawamura Y, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, et al. Sustained virologic response by direct antiviral agents reduces the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV infection. J Med Virol. 2017; 89(3):476–83. pmid:27531586
  18. 18. Akuta N, Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Sezaki H, Fujiyama S, Kawamura Y, et al. Liver Fibrosis and Body Mass Index Predict Hepatocarcinogenesis following Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus RNA by Direct-Acting Antivirals. Oncology. 2016; 91(6):341–7. pmid:27694754
  19. 19. Petta S, Cabibbo G, Barbara M, Attardo S, Bucci L, Farinati F, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with curative resection or ablation: impact of HCV eradication does not depend on the use of interferon. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 45(1):160–8. pmid:27790734
  20. 20. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006; 43(6):1317–25. pmid:16729309
  21. 21. Tanaka Y, Nishida N, Sugiyama M, Kurosaki M, Matsuura K, Sakamoto N, et al. Genome-wide association of IL28B with response to pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C.Nat Genet. 2009; 41(10):1105–9. pmid:19749757
  22. 22. Ochi H, Miki D, Hayes CN, Abe H, Hayashida Y, Kubo M, et al. IFNL4/IL-28B haplotype structure and its impact on susceptibility to hepatitis C virus and treatment response in the Japanese population. J Gen Virol. 2014; 95(Pt 6):1297–306. pmid:24646752
  23. 23. Miki D, Ochi H, Hayes CN, Abe H, Yoshima T, Aikata H, et al. Variation in the DEPDC5 locus is associated with progression to hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C virus carriers. Nat Genet. 2011; 43(8):797–800. pmid:21725309
  24. 24. Ochi H, Maekawa T, Abe H, Hayashida Y, Nakano R, Kubo M, et al. ITPA polymorphism affects ribavirin-induced anemia and outcomes of therapy—a genome-wide study of Japanese HCV virus patients. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139(4):1190–7. pmid:20637204
  25. 25. Zinsmeister AR, Connor JT. Ten common statistical errors and how to avoid them. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(2):262–6. pmid:18289193
  26. 26. Layer P, Zinsmeister AR, DiMagno EP. Effects of decreasing intraluminal amylase activity on starch digestion and postprandial gastrointestinal function in humans. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91(1):41–8. pmid:2423408
  27. 27. Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127(8 Pt 2):757–63. pmid:9382394
  28. 28. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17(19):2265–81. pmid:9802183
  29. 29. Conti F, Buonfiglioli F, Scuteri A, Crespi C, Bolondi L, Caraceni P, et al. Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. J Hepatol. 2016; 65(4):727–33. pmid:27349488
  30. 30. Reig M, Mariño Z, Perelló C, Iñarrairaegui M, Ribeiro A, Lens S, et al. Unexpected high rate of early tumor recurrence in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing interferon-free therapy. J Hepatol. 2016; 65(4):719–26. pmid:27084592
  31. 31. El-Serag HB, Kanwal F, Richardson , Kramer J. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virological response in veterans with hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2016; 64(1):130–7. pmid:26946190
  32. 32. Ikeda K, Kobayashi M, Saitoh S, Someya T, Hosaka T, Akuta N, et al. Recurrence rate and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that developed after elimination of hepatitis C virus RNA by interferon therapy. A closed cohort study including matched control patients. Oncology. 2003; 65(3):204–10. 74472 pmid:14657593
  33. 33. Kobayashi S, Takeda T, Enomoto M, Tamori A, Kawada N, Habu D, et al. Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had a sustained virological response to interferon therapy: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 1,124 patients. Liver Int. 2007; 27(2):186–91. pmid:17311612
  34. 34. Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Nishimura T, Muraoka M, Suzuki Y, Tamaki N, et al. α-fetoprotein levels after interferon therapy and risk of hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2013; 58(4):1253–62. pmid:23564522
  35. 35. Matsuura K, Sawai H, Ikeo K, Ogawa S, Iio E, Isogawa M, Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies TLL1 Variant Associated With Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(6):1383–94. pmid:28163062