Figures
Abstract
Female pubertal development is tightly controlled by complex mechanisms, including neuroendocrine and epigenetic regulatory pathways. Specific gene expression patterns can be influenced by DNA methylation changes in the hypothalamus, which can in turn regulate timing of puberty onset. In order to understand the relationship between DNA methylation changes and gene expression patterns in the hypothalamus of pubertal goats, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and RNA-sequencing analyses were carried out. There was a decline in DNA methylation levels in the hypothalamus during puberty and 268 differentially methylated regions (DMR) in the genome, with differential patterns in different gene regions. There were 1049 genes identified with distinct expression patterns. High levels of DNA methylation were detected in promoters, introns and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs). Levels of methylation decreased gradually from promoters to 5′-UTRs and increased from 5′-UTRs to introns. Methylation density analysis demonstrated that methylation level variation was consistent with the density in the promoter, exon, intron, 5′-UTRs and 3′-UTRs. Analyses of CpG island (CGI) sites showed that the enriched gene contents were gene bodies, intergenic regions and introns, and these CGI sites were hypermethylated. Our study demonstrated that DNA methylation changes may influence gene expression profiles in the hypothalamus of goats during the onset of puberty, which may provide new insights into the mechanisms involved in pubertal onset.
Citation: Yang C, Ye J, Li X, Gao X, Zhang K, Luo L, et al. (2016) DNA Methylation Patterns in the Hypothalamus of Female Pubertal Goats. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0165327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327
Editor: Qiong Wu, Harbin Institute of Technology, CHINA
Received: July 13, 2016; Accepted: October 10, 2016; Published: October 27, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data are available from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and the accession number is SRP077789.
Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31472096], the National Transgenenic New Species Breeding Program of China [grant number 2014ZX08008-005-004], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31301934], and the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [grant number 1508085MC54].
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis plays a critical role in the onset of puberty. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is secreted by neurosecretory neurons located in the hypothalamus in primates and in the preoptic region in rodents. GnRH secretion is inhibited in embryos and infants and later reactivated, with pulsatile secretion before the onset of puberty [1, 2].
A complex network of genes is responsible for the control of puberty[1, 3–5], and epigenetic regulation has emerged as playing an important role in the regulation of puberty onset in recent years. Several studies have indicated that the reactivation of GnRH secretion with pubertal initiation may be associated with downregulation of the Makorin ring finger 3 gene (MKRN3)[2, 3, 6–8]. Kisspeptin, a GnRH agonist encoded by the KISS1 gene, also plays an essential role in regulating the timing of puberty[9–11]. In female rodents, kisspeptin neurons in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus are critical for GnRH positive feedback regulation[12–14]. In addition, monogenic mutations in several genes, including KISS1, MKRN, TAC3 (tachykinin 3), and GPR54 (G-protein-coupled receptor 54) have also been associated with pubertal initiation failure[9, 10, 15–17]. Furthermore, several central nodes have been identified in previous reports, including the zinc finger–containing gene EAP1 (enhanced at puberty 1), the POU-domain gene Oct2 and the homeodomain gene TFT1[1, 5].
While there have been a number of reports describing epigenetic changes associated with differential gene patterns and the regulation of pubertal onset, the present study provides the first whole-genome DNA methylation analysis during puberty. In order to understand the methylation patterns in the hypothalamus during puberty, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) to determine DNA methylation and gene expression changes during puberty in goats. Our results demonstrate very low global DNA methylation in prepubertal and pubertal stages which both showed positive and negative correlations with gene expression patterns in the goat hypothalamus.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All goats in this study were housed in open sheepfolds and fed ad libitum. The sacrifice of goats used sodium barbital after anesthesia. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Anhui Agricultural University.
Sample collection and preparation
Three pubertal Anhuai goats aged 4.5–5 months, weighing 17.43 ± 1.63 kg, were used in this study. Animals were monitored daily by observing vaginal physiological changes and rams test conditions[18]. Rams test conditions were performed twice at 08:00 and 16:00 hours. The cunnus of pubertal goats was inflamed, with histological observation of some mature follicles in the ovaries. Three prepubertal goats (aged 2.5 months, weighing 9.60 ± 2.36 kg) were sacrificed after anesthesia with 0.1 ml xylazine hydrochloride injection (Muhua China, Lot number 150804). Hypothalami were collected and stored at −80°C until use. DNA was extracted using an AxyPrep™ Multisource Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Corning, APMNMSGDNA-50) and purity checked using a NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (Implen, West Lake Village, CA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. The genomic DNA was fragmented by sonication and bisulfite modification used the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research, D5005 & D5006). RNA was extracted using an E.Z.N.A.® Total RNA Kit II (Omega Bio-tek, R6934-01) and purity was checked using the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer. RNA concentration was measured with a Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA).
Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation, quantification and sequencing
Genomic DNA (5.2 μg), spiked with 26 ng λ DNA, was fragmented by sonication to 200–300 bp with a S220 focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), which was followed by adenylation and end-repair. Cytosine-methylated barcodes were ligated to sonicated DNA and these DNA fragments were treated with an EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research, D5005 & D5006) to achieve single-stranded DNA fragments, which were then amplified by PCR using KAPA HiFi HotStart Uracil+ ReadyMix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Library concentration was quantified by quantitative PCR (Life Technologies, San Francisco, CA, USA), and insert size was inspected using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). DNA methylation analysis was performed using a HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
DNA methylation data analysis
The bisulfite conversion rate as determined by the analysis of λ DNA was ≥99.55% and the rate of reads mapping to the reference genome was ≥77%. To identify methylation sites, we performed a sliding-window approach that is conceptually similar to approaches used for bulk bisulfite sequencing (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/bsseq.html), with a step size of 600 bp and window size w = 3,000 bp[19]; the sum of unmethylated and methylated reads counts were calculated in each window. The swDMR software (http://122.228.158.106/swDMR/) that uses a sliding-window approach was used to identify differentially methylated regions. The Fisher test was implemented for detecting the DMRs.
RNA-Seq library preparation, quantification and sequencing
Total RNA (3 μg per sample) was used for sample preparation. Ribosomal RNA was removed with a Ribo-zero™ rRNA Removal Kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA), and the rRNA free residue was cleaned up by ethanol precipitation. Secondly, using the rRNA-depleted RNA, sequencing libraries were generated by using a NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. In order to choose 150−200 bp cDNA fragments preferentially, the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, CA, USA) was used to purify the library fragments. cDNA adaptor-ligation was performed using 3 μl USER enzyme (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 15 min followed by 95°C for 5 min before PCR. PCR was then performed with universal PCR primers, Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase, and Index Primer. Finally, the purity of products was checked with an AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and library quality evaluated using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies). A HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina) was used to sequence and generate 100-bp paired-end reads.
RNA-Seq data analysis
Cuffdiff (v2.1.1) was used to calculate fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads (FPKMs) of genes in each sample[20]. In each gene group, gene FPKMs were computed by summing the FPKMs of transcripts. For biological replicates, transcripts or genes with a P-adjust <0.05 were assigned as differentially expressed.
GO and KEGG enrichment analysis
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses of genes related to DMRs was implemented by the GOseq R package[21]. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. In Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, KOBAS software[22] was used to test the statistical enrichment of DMR-related differential gene expression.
Results
Methylation profiles during puberty
Global DNA methylation analysis of the hypothalamus was performed with 30× genome coverage and >99% conversion efficiency by WGBS. Between prepubertal and pubertal stages of development, >18,000,000 methylcytosines (mCs) were detected, and the average percentage of mC methylation estimated in the whole genome was 1.91% in prepuberty and 1.87% in puberty (S1 Table). In line with previous reports[23], the percentage of methylated CpG dinucleotides (mCG) exceeded 98% and there was only 2% non-CpG methylation (mCHG) from prepuberty to puberty (S1 Fig). There was 0.5–0.9 kb/bin prepubertal and pubertal methylation, with hypermethylated cytosines (S2 Fig). Analyses of methylation profiles of each chromosome demonstrated more mCG (0.6–0.8 kb/bin), compared with <0.01 kb/bin mCHG and mCHH (H = adenine, thymine, or cytosine; S2 Fig).
DNA methylation in CpG islands
As indicated by previous studies, DNA methylation predominantly occurs in CGI sites, which is consistent in the current study. We investigated the distribution of CGI in different gene elements, and found the most enriched elements were gene bodies, exons, introns and intergenic regions (Fig 1A), with hypermethylated CGI sites in both prepubertal and pubertal stages of development (S1 and S2 Files). From the prepubertal stage to puberty, the methylation level in CGI sites decreased in CG sites, coinciding with the global methylation pattern in the hypothalamus (Fig 1B, S3 File). Interestingly, the hypermethylated C sites were located at the edge of CGI sites. Compared with mCG, mCHG and mCHH showed fluctuating profiles, and both of them increased at 20 bin of CGI.
In CGI analysis, every CGI was divided into 20 bin for evaluating the methylation level. (A) Distribution of CGI sites in different gene elements. (B) Different methylation levels of cytosine (percentage) between prepubertal and pubertal stages. Prepub = prepuberty; Pub = puberty; CGI = CpG island.
Methylation patterns in different gene contents
DNA methylation has various functions, and methylation can occur in different locations. We evaluated the methylation level affecting different functions of genes. In promoters (the region from 2 kb upstream of the transcription start site), introns and 3′-UTRs, the level of methylation was higher than that in 5′-UTRs and exons during puberty (Fig 2A and 2B). Levels of methylation decreased gradually from promoter to 5′-UTR in the genome, promoting gene expression. In the 5′-UTRs, exons and introns, the methylation level of C sites showed relatively stable patterns. There was stable DNA methylation in CG sites in the 3′-UTRs, but an increase from 3′-UTRs to introns in the genome with an increased trend in mCHG and mCHH. Methylation density analysis identified analogous trends to the methylation level changes from prepuberty to puberty in the gene contents (Fig 2C and 2D), indicating a close relationship between level of methylation and methylation density. Interestingly, methylation of exons was low compared with introns in the gene content (Fig 2C and 2D), which was consistent with a previous report[24]. The function of DNA methylation is usually to repress gene expression. In the gene region, the activity of transcription of exons is higher than that of introns during gene transcription. This could be the reason why the methylation level of introns is higher than that of exons.
Prepub = prepuberty; Pub = puberty.
Different methylation regions between prepuberty and puberty
Specific methylation patterns were analyzed across the whole genome during the prepubertal and pubertal stages, and 268 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified. DMR length was approximately 0–1000 bp (Fig 3A, S4 File), and the methylation level in the hypothalamus was lower in puberty than that in prepuberty. Nine of these DMRs were methylated in puberty but unmethylated in prepuberty, while nine other DMRs were identified in which methylation disappeared from prepuberty to puberty. Upon analysis of these specific DMRs, two genes (NLRC5, PLCXD3) were found to be hypermethylated and five genes (PPM1D, CD226, SMOC1, GRID1 and LOC10219031) became hypomethylated during the onset of puberty (S5 File). Interestingly, the regions displaying different methylation levels were the introns rather than the promoters (Fig 3B). To characterize genes that were detected in the DMRs, GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. GO analyses revealed that the differentially methylated genes were most enriched in localization, protein binding, binding, heterocyclic compound binding and organic cyclic compound binding (Fig 3C). KEGG pathway analyses identified genes involved in the oxytocin signaling pathway, estrogen signaling pathway, GnRH signaling pathway and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic synapse pathway, which is closely related to the timing of puberty, including RYR1, ABAT, MAP3K4 and FKBP52.
(A) The relationship between DMR length and count. (B) Distribution of methylated genes in DMRs. (C) The pathways enriched in differentially methylated genes in DMRs, as determined by GO analysis. Prepub = prepuberty; Pub = puberty; DMR = differentially methylated region; GO = gene ontology.
Relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression
To investigate the relationship between DNA methylation changes and gene expression, RNA-Seq analysis was performed to study the changes in gene expression during puberty. A total of 1048 differentially expressed genes were detected, with 21.95% downregulation (all others were upregulated, S6 File). Through GO and KEGG pathway analyses, these genes were found to be enriched in pathways such as the protein binding pathway, extracellular matrix pathway and receptor binding pathway (Fig 4A and 4B). Three of these genes were only expressed in puberty and have been implicated in pubertal onset (GNG13, GH1 and LOC102171600) although methylation patterns of these genes did not change from prepuberty to puberty. Five genes (DHRS3, NLRC5, CIB4, DOCK6 and SCO-spondin) that showed various methylation patterns during puberty, had altered expression levels (Fig 4C). Interestingly, DHRS3, NLRC5, CIB4 and SCO-spondin showed a positive correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression, and DOCK6 showed a negative correlation (Fig 4D and 4E).
(A) The enriched pathways on the basis of different gene expression, as determined by GO analysis. (B) The enriched pathway on the basis of different gene expression, as determined by KEGG analysis. Rich factor refers to the ratio between the number of genes enriched in a pathway and annotated in DMR. Rich factor and enrichment are positively correlated. Q-value is the P-value that was corrected after multiple hypothesis testing. Q-value and enrichment are negatively correlated. (C) Five genes were detected, and their expression and methylation patterns were both altered during puberty onset. (D) Methylation level changes in DHRS3, NLRC5, CIB4, DOCK6 and SCO-spondin during prepubertal and pubertal stages. (E) The ratio of mRNA between prepubertal and pubertal stages. A positive ratio represents upregulation and a negative ratio represents downregulation. Prepub = prepuberty; Pub = puberty; BP = biological process; CC = cellular component; MR = molecular function; GO = gene ontology; KEGG = Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DMR = differentially methylated regions.
Discussion
In the present study, the genome-wide DNA methylation of the goat hypothalamus during the prepubertal and pubertal stages of development was analyzed for the first time. Through WGBS, 268 DMR and 117 differentially methylated genes were found in the hypothalamus genome, and we identified different DNA methylation patterns from prepuberty to puberty. Two genes, GnRH and KISS1, which play important roles in the onset of puberty[9–11], showed no changes in methylation patterns in the present study. A differential methylation profile of the KISS1 promoter has previously been demonstrated[25], and previous studies have indicated that the methylation of CpG sites in the promoter of the gene body of the GnRH gene showed decreased patterns across puberty[26, 27]. The reason for the differences in methylation variation of KISS1 and GnRH compared with the results in the present study may be that our study analyzed the global DNA methylation patterns of genes, rather than promoter or gene body DNA methylation patterns. In addition, our study found that the methylated region of genes was mostly intronic instead of in the promoter, which has been the focus of several previous reports, perhaps because of the effect of enrichment of CpG on transcription[25, 28, 29]. However, the function of methylated introns is not well understood.
Several genes were methylated (NLRC5, PLCXD3) and some genes were demethylated (PPM1D, CD226, SMOC1, GRID1, LOC102190311), from prepuberty to puberty. These genes may play important roles in the pathways that may be associated with the onset of puberty, although further studies are necessary to elucidate the functional roles of these genes during puberty. In vertebrates, CGI sites are usually unmethylated or display low levels of methylation[30]. Methylated CpG sites in promoter regions could repress the combination of transcription factors and promoters to inhibit the expression of genes. CpG sites can regulate the effect of transcription via changing methylation states[31–33]. In the current study, analyses of CGI sites demonstrated that the gene regions whose methylation level changed from prepuberty to puberty were gene bodies, intergenic regions, introns and exons, rather than promoter regions, which is not consistent with previous reports[34]. These CGI sites that were not located in the promoter may exert an important effect on regulating gene expression[35]. For example, a study by Sleutels et al. found that Air, a noncoding RNA initiated at a CGI site within intron 2 of the Igf2r gene, is crucial for silencing of the paternal allele[36]. Similarly, another study reported that intron 10 of the Kcnq1 gene was the origin of a noncoding transcript, which is necessary for imprinting of several genes in this domain[37, 38]. The majority of CGI sites were hypermethylated in the present study, indicating the low methylation level of CGI sites in prepuberty and puberty. Previous studies have shown that DNA methylation positively[39, 40] or negatively correlated[41] with gene expression. RNA-Seq revealed that different genes display differential expression patterns from prepuberty to puberty in our study, likely influenced by DNA methylation changes. Most of these genes showed different methylated regions in the gene body instead of the promoter, and genes with hypermethylation often showed higher expression. This coincided with previous studies which showed that methylation in gene bodies may have a positive effect on gene expression[40]. However, further studies are required to confirm whether differential gene expression is indeed caused by DNA methylation changes.
To our knowledge, our study presents the first genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation profiles of the goat hypothalamus during puberty, and the relationship between epigenetic changes and resultant gene expression has also been determined. These data will be informative in providing a basis for better understanding of the epigenetic regulation of pubertal onset.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Percentage of methylated cytosines in prepubertal and pubertal stages.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. DNA methylation levels in prepuberty and puberty.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s002
(DOCX)
S1 File. Methylation level of CGI sites in prepuberty.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s003
(XLSX)
S2 File. Methylation level of CGI sites in puberty.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s004
(XLSX)
S3 File. CGI methylation level per window in prepuberty and puberty.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s005
(XLSX)
S5 File. List of hypomethylated and hypermethylated genes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s007
(XLSX)
S6 File. List of differentially expressed genes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s008
(XLS)
S1 Table. The number and percentage of different mC contents in samples from goats in prepuberty and puberty.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165327.s009
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the native English speaking scientists of Elixigen Company (Huntington Beach, California) for editing our manuscript.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: CY JY FGF.
- Data curation: XXG.
- Formal analysis: YSL HGC.
- Funding acquisition: FGF.
- Investigation: HGC YHL.
- Methodology: FGF XXG.
- Project administration: FGF.
- Resources: XRZ YL.
- Software: XML KFZ LL.
- Supervision: FGF.
- Validation: JPD YHZ.
- Visualization: FGF.
- Writing – original draft: CY.
- Writing – review & editing: FGF YL.
References
- 1. Lomniczi A, Wright H, Ojeda SR. Epigenetic regulation of female puberty. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2015;36:90–107. pmid:25171849
- 2. Abreu AP, Macedo DB, Brito VN, Kaiser UB, Latronico AC. A new pathway in the control of the initiation of puberty: the MKRN3 gene. J Mol Endocrinol. 2015;54(3):R131–9. pmid:25957321
- 3. de Vries L, Gat-Yablonski G, Dror N, Singer A, Phillip M. A novel MKRN3 missense mutation causing familial precocious puberty. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2838–43. pmid:25316453
- 4. Teles MG, Bianco SDC, Brito VN, Trarbach EB, Kuohung W, Xu S, et al. A GPR54-activating mutation in a patient with central precocious pubert. N Engl J Med. 2015;358:709–15.
- 5. Elks CE, Perry JR, Sulem P, Chasman DI, Franceschini N, He C, et al. Thirty new loci for age at menarche identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42(12):1077–85. pmid:21102462
- 6. Macedo DB, Abreu AP, Reis ACS, Montenegro LR, Dauber A, Beneduzzi D, et al. Central Precocious Puberty That Appears to Be Sporadic Caused by Paternally Inherited Mutations in the Imprinted Gene Makorin Ring Finger 3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):E1097–E103. pmid:24628548
- 7. Abreu AP, Dauber A, Macedo DB, Noel SD, Brito VN, Gill JC, et al. Central precocious puberty caused by mutations in the imprinted gene MKRN3. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26):2467–75. pmid:23738509
- 8. Kansakoski J, Raivio T, Juul A, Tommiska J. A missense mutation in MKRN3 in a Danish girl with central precocious puberty and her brother with early puberty. Pediatr Res. 2015. pmid:26331766
- 9. Cortes ME, Carrera B, Rioseco H, Pablo del Rio J, Vigil P. The Role of Kisspeptin in the Onset of Puberty and in the Ovulatory Mechanism: A Mini-review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(5):286–91. pmid:26231608
- 10. Nd Roux, Genin E, Carel JC, Matsuda F, Chaussain JL, Milgrom E. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the KiSS1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19):10972–6. pmid:12944565
- 11. Mazaheri A, Hashemipour M, Salehi M, Behnam M, Hovsepian S, Hassanzadeh A. Mutation of kisspeptin 1 gene in children with precocious puberty in isfahan city. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:41. pmid:26015864
- 12. Smith JT, Cunningham MJ, Rissman EF, Clifton DK, Steiner RA. Regulation of Kiss1 gene expression in the brain of the female mouse. Endocrinology. 2005;146(9):3686–92. pmid:15919741
- 13. Smith JT, Popa SM, Clifton DK, Hoffman GE, Steiner RA. Kiss1 neurons in the forebrain as central processors for generating the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. J Neurosci. 2006;26(25):6687–94. pmid:16793876
- 14. Hu MH, Li XF, McCausland B, Li SY, Gresham R, Kinsey-Jones JS, et al. Relative Importance of the Arcuate and Anteroventral Periventricular Kisspeptin Neurons in Control of Puberty and Reproductive Function in Female Rats. Endocrinology. 2015;156(7):2619–31. pmid:25875299
- 15. Topaloglu AK, Reimann F, Guclu M, Yalin AS, Kotan LD, Porter KM, et al. TAC3 and TACR3 mutations in familial hypogonadotropic hypogonadism reveal a key role for Neurokinin B in the central control of reproduction. Nat Genet. 2008;41(3):354–8. pmid:19079066
- 16. Luan X, Yu H, Wei X, Zhou Y, Wang W, Li P, et al. GPR54 polymorphisms in Chinese girls with central precocious puberty. Neuroendocrinology. 2007;86(2):77–83. pmid:17700012
- 17. Grandone A, Cantelmi Grazia, Cirillo G, Marzuillo P, Luongo C, Giudice EMd, et al. A case of familial central precocious puberty caused by a novel mutation in the makorin RING finger protein 3 gene. BMC Endocr Disord. 2015;15:60. pmid:26499472
- 18. Dantas A, Siqueira ER, Fernandes S, Oba E, Castilho AM, Meirelles PRL, et al. Influence of feeding differentiation on the age at onset of puberty in Brazilian__Bergamasca dairy ewe lambs Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2016;68:22–8.
- 19. Smallwood SA, Lee HJ, Angermueller C, Krueger F, Saadeh H, Peat J, et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nature methods. 2014;11(8):817–20. pmid:25042786
- 20. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5. pmid:20436464
- 21. Young MD, JWakefield M, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14. pmid:20132535
- 22. Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(19):3787–93. pmid:15817693
- 23. Gkountela S, Zhang KX, Shafiq TA, Liao WW, Hargan-Calvopina J, Chen PY, et al. DNA Demethylation Dynamics in the Human Prenatal Germline. Cell. 2015;161(6):1425–36. pmid:26004067
- 24. Lokk K, Modhukur V, Rajashekar B, Martens K, Magi R, Kolde R, et al. DNA methylome profiling of human tissues identifies global and tissue-specific methylation patterns. Genome Biol. 2014;15(4):r54. pmid:24690455
- 25. Wyatt AK, Zavodna M, Viljoen JL, Stanton JA, Gemmell NJ, Jasoni CL. Changes in methylation patterns of kiss1 and kiss1r gene promoters across puberty. Genetics & epigenetics. 2013;5:51–62. pmid:25512707
- 26. Kurian JR, Keen KL, Terasawa E. Epigenetic changes coincide with in vitro primate GnRH neuronal maturation. Endocrinology. 2010;151(11):5359–68. pmid:20861233
- 27. Kurian JR, Terasawa E. Epigenetic control of gonadotropin releasing hormone neurons. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;4:61. pmid:23750154
- 28. Stueve TR, Wolff MS, Pajak A, Teitelbaum SL, Chen J. CYP19A1 promoter methylation in saliva associated with milestones of pubertal timing in urban girls. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:78. pmid:24649863
- 29. Dong W, Yin X, Sun L, Wang J, Sun S, Zhu G, et al. Age-associated methylation change of TAP1 promoter in piglet. Gene. 2015;573(1):70–4. pmid:26169022
- 30. Cohen Netta M, Kenigsberg E, Tanay A. Primate CpG Islands Are Maintained by Heterogeneous Evolutionary Regimes Involving Minimal Selection. Cell. 2011;145(5):773–86. pmid:21620139
- 31. Ito S, Shen L, Dai Q, Wu SC, Collins LB, Swenberg JA, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science. 2011;333(6047):1300–3. pmid:21778364
- 32. Nabel CS, Kohli RM. Molecular biology. Demystifying DNA demethylation. Science. 2011;333(6047):1229–30. pmid:21885763
- 33. Nagaraju GP, El-Rayes BF. SPARC and DNA methylation: possible diagnostic and therapeutic implications in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Lett. 2013;328(1):10–7. pmid:22939997
- 34. Sahin K, Yilmaz S, Gozukirmizi N. Changes in human sirtuin 6 gene promoter methylation during aging. Biomedical Reports. 2014. pmid:24944811
- 35. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 2011;25(10):1010–22. pmid:21576262
- 36. Sleutels F, Zwart R, Barlow DP. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature. 2002;415(6873):810–3. pmid:11845212
- 37. Mancini-DiNardo D, Steele SJS, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM. A differentially methylated region within the gene Kcnq1 functions as an imprinted promoter and silencer. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(3):283–94. pmid:12554682
- 38. Mancini-DiNardo D, Steele SJS, Levorse JM, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM. Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes. Genes Dev. 2006;20(10):1268–82. pmid:16702402
- 39. Rakyan VK, Down TA, Thorne NP, Flicek P, Kulesha E, Graf S, et al. An integrated resource for genome-wide identification and analysis of human tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (tDMRs). Genome Res. 2008;18(9):1518–29. pmid:18577705
- 40. Fan S, Zhang X. CpG island methylation pattern in different human tissues and its correlation with gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;383(4):421–5. pmid:19364493
- 41. Si Y, Ding Y, He F, Wen H, Li J, Zhao J, et al. DNA methylation level of cyp19a1a and Foxl2 gene related to their expression patterns and reproduction traits during ovary development stages of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Gene. 2016;575(2 Pt 1):321–30. pmid:26343797