RNASeq Based Transcriptional Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 after Short- and Long-Term Anoxic Cultivation in Synthetic Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Medium

Muralidhar Tata; Michael T. Wolfinger; Fabian Amman; Nicole Roschanski; Andreas Dötsch; Elisabeth Sonnleitner; Susanne Häussler; Udo Bläsi

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147811

Abstract

The opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa can thrive under microaerophilic to anaerobic conditions in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. RNA_Seq based comparative RNA profiling of the clinical isolate PA14 cultured in synthetic cystic fibrosis medium was performed after planktonic growth (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0; P), 30 min after shift to anaerobiosis (A-30) and after anaerobic biofilm growth for 96h (B-96) with the aim to reveal differentially regulated functions impacting on sustained anoxic biofilm formation as well as on tolerance towards different antibiotics. Most notably, functions involved in sulfur metabolism were found to be up-regulated in B-96 cells when compared to A-30 cells. Based on the transcriptome studies a set of transposon mutants were screened, which revealed novel functions involved in anoxic biofilm growth.In addition, these studies revealed a decreased and an increased abundance of the oprD and the mexCD-oprJ operon transcripts, respectively, in B-96 cells, which may explain their increased tolerance towards meropenem and to antibiotics that are expelled by the MexCD-OprD efflux pump. The OprI protein has been implicated as a target for cationic antimicrobial peptides, such as SMAP-29. The transcriptome and subsequent Northern-blot analyses showed that the abundance of the oprI transcript encoding the OprI protein is strongly decreased in B-96 cells. However, follow up studies revealed that the susceptibility of a constructed PA14ΔoprI mutant towards SMAP-29 was indistinguishable from the parental wild-type strain, which questions OprI as a target for this antimicrobial peptide in strain PA14.

Citation: Tata M, Wolfinger MT, Amman F, Roschanski N, Dötsch A, Sonnleitner E, et al. (2016) RNA_Seq Based Transcriptional Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 after Short- and Long-Term Anoxic Cultivation in Synthetic Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Medium. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147811. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811

Editor: Roy Martin Roop II, East Carolina University School of Medicine, UNITED STATES

Received: September 23, 2015; Accepted: January 8, 2016; Published: January 28, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Tata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (www.fwf.ac.at/en) through the Special Research Program RNA-REG F43, subproject AF4311(UB), and the doctoral program RNA-Biology W-1207 (MT).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Pseudomonas spp. infects plants, nematodes and mammals. In humans the opportunistic pathogen P. aeruginosa can thrive under microaerophilic to anaerobic conditions in the lungs of patients suffering from cystic fibrosis [1], a genetic disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Mutations in the CFTR gene may result in formation of thick mucus in the respiratory airways, which leads to reduced oxygen availability [2].

In the absence of oxygen, P. aeruginosa can utilize nitrate, nitrite or nitrous oxide as terminal electron acceptors in an ATP generating pathway known as nitrate respiration [3]. In the absence of these compounds, energy can be generated via substrate level phosphorylation by arginine fermentation [4]. In addition, pyruvate can serve as an energy source to sustain long-term survival during anaerobiosis [5]. The transition between aerobic to anaerobic growth is regulated by the global transcriptional regulator Anr, which responds to oxygen limitation through an [4Fe-4S]²⁺ cluster [6]. Regulation by Anr alone is required and sufficient for the survival of P. aeruginosa during anoxic growth utilizing pyruvate or arginine as an energy source. In contrast, the expression of genes, encoding enzymes for the denitrification pathway requires in addition the transcriptional regulators Dnr and the nitrate responsive two-component system NarX/NarL [7].

P. aeruginosa is notorious for its high level intrinsic resistance towards several antibiotics. Intrinsic resistance can result from a reduced permeability to given antibiotics [8]. In addition, antibiotic detoxifying mechanisms can contribute to intrinsic resistance such as chromosomally encoded antibiotic-inactivating enzymes [9], multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux pumps [10] or target-protecting factors such as chromosomally encoded Qnr proteins [11]. In addition, P. aeruginosa tolerance to antibiotics can be affected by phenotypic variation [12], the formation of specialized persister cells [13], by quorum sensing [14], and by the overproduction of the matrix polysaccharide alginate [15]. Moreover, the ability of P. aeruginosa to form robust biofilms during anoxic growth contributes to an increased antibiotic tolerance [16].

Biofilm formation is a complex process, which involves different stages; initial attachment of the cells to the surface [17], micro colony formation [18], formation of the extracellular matrix and biofilm maturation [18]. Several transcriptome studies with P. aeruginosa revealed regulatory mechanisms involved in biofilm formation and adaptation. In the majority of these studies, P. aeruginosa strains were aerobically grown in LB broth [19–24]. In contrast, Tielen et al. [25] compared the transcriptomes of P. aeruginosa O1 (PAO1) after anoxic growth in artificial urine medium and in 10-fold diluted LB medium, which revealed regulatory and metabolic networks for the adaptation of P. aeruginosa biofilms to urinary tract-like conditions. Only one study was reported wherein a comparative transcriptome analysis was performed with PAO1 after growth in the presence and absence of oxygen in minimal medium [26]. Eichner et al. identified PAO1 genes that are predominantly expressed during hypoxic growth in artificial cystic fibrosis sputum medium [27]. In addition, several proteome studies were conducted with P. aeruginosa after aerobic and anoxic growth in LB broth [28–33] to assess alterations in the bacterial protein content.

In the present study, we performed RNA_Seq based comparative RNA profiling of the clinical isolate PA14 cultured in synthetic cystic fibrosis medium (SCFM) [34] after planktonic growth in the presence of oxygen (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0), 30 min after shift to anaerobiosis and after anaerobic biofilm growth for 96h with the aim to unravel functions required for sustained anoxic biofilm formation. In addition, we sought to analyze the differential abundance of known antibiotic-resistance genes during planktonic growth (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0) and after anaerobic biofilm growth for 96h with the objective to shed more light on the increased tolerance to antibiotics of anoxic biofilms.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PA14, was used in all experiments. The synthetic cystic fibrosis sputum medium was prepared a described by Palmer et al. [34] except that the concentration of FeSO₄·7H₂O was increased to 100 μM and that of KNO₃ to 100 mM. This was done to allow for increased anaerobic biofilm formation after 96h, which was required for the extraction of sufficient amounts of RNA for subsequent RNA_Seq analysis.

RNA_Seq library construction and sequence analysis

Total RNA was prepared from two biological replicates of PA14 after planktonic growth in the presence of oxygen (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0; P), 30 min after shift to anaerobiosis (A-30) and after anaerobic biofilm growth for 96h (B-96). P: 25 ml of SCFM were inoculated at an initial OD₆₀₀ of 0.05 and grown under aeration (shaking at 165 rpm) at 37°C. The cells were harvested for RNA preparation at an OD₆₀₀ of 2.0. A-30: 25 ml of SCFM were inoculated as described above. When the cells reached an OD₆₀₀ of 0.4, cultivation was continued for 30 min in an anaerobic chamber and the cells were harvested thereafter for RNA preparation. Under these conditions anaerobiosis was confirmed by employing an anaerobic indicator strip (Oxoid). B-96: 5 ml polypropylene tubes were filled with 1 ml of SCFM medium, which was inoculated with PA14 (OD₆₀₀ = 0.05). The cultures were then incubated for 96 hours at 37°C in a 2.5-liter anaerobic jar containing a gas pack (AN25; AnaeroGen, Oxoid, United Kingdom). The total content of the polypropylene tube was used for RNA preparation. Total RNA from all samples was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were DNase I treated, followed by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction and ethanol precipitation. The MICROBExpress Kit (Ambion) was used to deplete rRNA from total RNA samples. Libraries were constructed using NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit from Illumina. 100 bp single end sequence reads were generated using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at the Vienna Biocenter Campus Science Support Facility (http://www.csf.ac.at). Quality control assessment of the raw reads using FastqQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) obviated further pre-processing. Sequencing adapter removal was performed with cutadapt [35]. Mapping of the samples against the PA14 reference genome (NCBI accession number NC_008463.1) was performed with Segemehl [36] with default parameters. Reads mapping to regions annotated as either rRNA or tRNA were discarded from all data and ignored for all follow up analysis steps. The mapped sequencing data were prepared for visualization using the ViennaNGS tool box and visualized within the UCSC Genome Browser [37]. Reads per genes were counted using BEDTools [38] and the Refseq annotation of P. aeruginosa (NC_008463.1). Differential gene expression analysis was performed with DESeq (version 1) [39]. All genes with a fold change greater than 2.5 and a multiple testing adjusted p-value below 0.05 were considered to be significantly modulated. The raw sequencing reads were deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA) as a study under the accession number SRP062593.

RNA isolation and Northern-blot analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the samples using the TRIzol Reagent (Ambion). For Northern- blot analysis, 8 μg of total RNA were heated at 65°C for 5 minutes in loading buffer (5 mM EDTA, 0.025% xylene cyanol, 0.025% bromophenol blue dissolved in formamide) and resolved on 8% polyacrylamide/8 M urea gels. The RNA was transferred onto Hybond N+ nylon membranes (GEHealthcare) using a semi-dry electroblotting apparatus (Trans blot SD cell, BioRad) set at 13 V for 45 min and then UV-cross-linked. All DNA oligonucleotide probes (S1 Table) were 5'-end labeled with [γ-³²P] ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. The respective [³²P]-labelled oligonucleotides were heated at 95°C for 2 min, added to the pre-hybridized membrane and incubated at 52°C overnight. Pre-hybridization and hybridization were performed in Roti®Hybrid Quick (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA. As loading control, a 5S rRNA-specific oligonucleotide was used (S1 Table). The hybridization signals were visualized using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).

Determination of MICs

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for different antibiotic (Table 1) were determined using the broth micro-dilution method. Antimicrobial agents were prepared in serial dilutions in SCFM medium within the dilution range stated in Table 1. Briefly, for aerobic growth, the bacterial cultures were grown at 37°C in SCFM with an agitation rate of 165 rpm to an OD₆₀₀ of 2.0. Then, different concentrations of the antibiotics resuspended in 100 μl SCFM were added to 200 μl aliquots of bacterial cultures and incubation was continued for 14h in 96 well plates. For determination of the MICs in anoxic biofilms, 200 μl bacterial cultures were grown anaerobically in SCFM for 96 hours in 96 well plates using the anaerobic chamber. After 96 hours different concentrations of the antibiotics resuspended in 100 μl SCFM were added and incubation was continued for 14h. The MICs were determined as the lowest concentration of each antimicrobial agent that inhibited growth.

Download:

Table 1. MICs of different antibiotics for B-96 cells versus P cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.t001

Biofilm assays

A static crystal violet assay [40] was used to assess biofilm formation of PA14 and of different transposon mutants thereof after anoxic growth. The cultures were inoculated as described above and incubated for 96h. Then, the contents of tubes were removed and washed 3 times with water and air dried. The tubes were stained with 1ml of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The tubes were washed and air dried. The stain attached to the tubes was solubilized using 95% ethanol. Biofilm formation was assessed by measuring the optical density of each sample at a wavelength of 595 nm. The results of 3 individual experiments were averaged.

Construction of a PA14 oprI deletion mutant and susceptibility test towards SMAP-29

An oprI inframe deletion mutant was constructed by homologous recombination [6]. Briefly, the upstream (703 bp) and downstream (715 bp) flanking sequences of the oprI gene were PCR-amplified using the oligonucleotide pair F95/H95 (upstream region) and G95/I95 (downstream region) (S1 Table). Recombinant PCR was employed to generate a DNA fragment containing the in frame deletion in oprI. The fragment was cloned into the KpnI and XbaI sites of plasmid pME3087 [6]. Sequencing of the resulting plasmid verified the deletion between nucleotides 2.362.200–2.362.540 (PA14 genome coordinates). The plasmid was transformed into PA14 and chromosomally integrated through selection for tetracycline resistance as previously described [6]. Double crossover mutants were then selected for the loss of plasmid (tetracycline sensitivity). The deletion of the oprI coding region was confirmed by PCR.

PA14 and PA14ΔoprI strains were grown aerobically in LB medium. Approximately 1 x 10⁵ cells were treated with different concentrations of SMAP-29 for 3h. Serial dilutions were then plated on LB agar plates and the CFU´s were determined after overnight growth at 37°C.

Construction of plasmids pTLoprI and pTLoprD

To construct the translational oprI::lacZ fusion gene, a 261bp fragment (nt -225 to nt +36 with regard to the A (+1) of the start codon of oprI) including the oprI promoter [41] was amplified by PCR using the oligonucleotide pair K99/M99 (S1 Table) and chromosomal DNA of strain PA14 as template. The PCR fragment was cleaved with EcoRI and PstI and then ligated into the corresponding sites of plasmid pME6015 [42], abutting the 12^th codon of oprI to the 8^th codon of the lacZ gene.

For construction of of the oprD::lacZ chimeric gene, a 461-bp fragment (nt -440 to nt +21 with regard to the A(+1) of start codon of oprD) including the oprD promoter [43] was amplified by PCR using the oligonucleotide pair F112/H112 (S1 Table) and chromosomal DNA of strain PA14 as template. The PCR fragment was cleaved with EcoRI and PstI and then ligated into the corresponding sites of plasmid pME6015 [42], abutting the 7^th codon of oprD to the 8^th codon of lacZ.

RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from P- and B-96 cells as described above for the RNA_Seq analyses. Total RNA from M-96 cells was isolated after growth of the culture under aerobic / microaerophilic conditions without shaking for 96 hours. For cDNA synthesis, 1 μg RNA template was mixed with 0.5 μg of random primers (Promega). The mixture was then treated at 65°C for 5 min, followed by 5 min incubation on ice. cDNA synthesis was performed with AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. 5μl of 8-fold diluted cDNA was used as a template for PCR performed with 5 x HOT FIREPol EvaGreen® qPCR Mix Plus (Medibena). Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were used for each experiment. The primers (S1 Table) were designed with Primer 3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3). The transcript levels of the rpoD gene were used for normalization [44]. Changes in the mRNA levels were estimated as previously described [45].

β-galactosidase assay

Strain PA14 harbouring plasmids pTLoprI and pTLoprD, respectively, was grown at 37°C in SCFM in the presence of 100 μg/ml tetracyline. Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD₆₀₀ 0.05 in fresh medium and allowed to grow either to an OD₆₀₀ of 2.0 (P) or under anoxic conditions for 96h (B-96). The cells were then permeabilized with 5% toulene and the β-galactosidase activity was determined as described [46].

Results and Discussion

Up-regulated pathways at 30 min after anaerobic shift and after 96h of anoxic biofilm formation

First, we compared the PA14 transcriptomes after a shift for 30 min to anaerobiosis (A-30) and after 96h of anoxic biofilm formation (B-96) with planktonically growing cells (P; OD₆₀₀ = 2.0). All genes, annotated in the NCBI database were included in the differential gene expression analysis. A p-value (adjusted for multiple testing) of 0.05 was set as a threshold for significance and the change in abundance (fold-change) had to exceed +/-2.5 for a given transcript in order to be considered differentially abundant. When compared with condition P, 1843 transcripts were found to be differentially abundant under the conditions A-30 and B-96, whereby with 1500 transcripts a significant overlap was observed between A-30 and B-96. Transcripts found to be down-regulated under the conditions A-30 and B-96 or both with respect to P (Fig 1; Table A in S2 Table) were not included in our quest for functions impacting on sustained anoxic biofilm formation in SCFM.

Download:

Fig 1. Meta-analysis of normalized expression of differentially abundant transcripts under the conditions A-30 and B-96 when compared with condition P.

The genes are grouped into the corresponding pathways (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=pau). For each group the overall behavior was summarized by the averaged log₂ fold change of its significantly modulated members. The column denotes A-30 versus P and B-96 versus P, respectively. The color code shown in the scale at the right denotes log₂-fold changes. Red indicates an overall decrease and green indicates an overall increase in the mRNA levels of genes in a particular pathway. The numbers of genes within each group are indicated by the numbers given in parenthesis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.g001

To identify functional classes of genes / pathways that are up-regulated under both conditions, A-30 and B-96 when compared with P, all log₂ transformed fold-changes of significantly modulated genes belonging to previously characterized pathways (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=pau) were compared. The following up-regulated pathways were identified under the conditions A-30 and B-96 when compared with P.

Monobactam biosynthesis.

Transcripts encoding proteins involved in monobactam biosynthesis are significantly more abundant. (Fig 1; S2 Table). Monobactam synthesis is required for balancing peptidoglycan synthesis [47] and has also been suggested to have antibacterial effects [48]. The up-regulation of the monobactum biosynthesis pathway during anaerobiosis could therefore play a role in survival of Pseudomonas in competitive environments.

Biosynthesis of cofactors.

Transcripts encoding functions required for the biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups and carriers are significantly more abundant (Fig 1; S2 Table), indicating their requirement in numerous anaerobic oxidation and reduction reactions required for anaerobic growth [49].

Energy metabolism.

During anoxic growth, P. aeruginosa can use nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor [3]. As anticipated, the transcripts encoding enzymes required for the denitrification pathway, viz the nitrate reductase encoding nar-operon, the nitrite reductase encoding nir-operon, the NO reductase encoding nor-operon, the nitrous dioxide reductase encoding nos-operon and the regulator nosR, are highly abundant (Fig 1; S2 Table). The transcripts encoding proteins required for molybdenum cofactor (MoCo) synthesis, which is required for nitrate reductase activity are also significantly more abundant [50]. The transcripts coding for the succinate dehydrogenase complex (sdhABCD), which is required for electron tunneling during nitrate respiration [51], and the atpIBEFHAGFC cluster transcripts encoding the only ATP synthase complex of P. aeruginosa were also significantly increased (Fig 1; S2 Table).

Protein secretion.

The observed increase of transcripts encoding proteins for export apparatuses (Fig 1; S2 Table) might be attributed to their role in release of cellular material as a result of metabolic turnover, cell-cell communication, virulence, antibiotic resistance etc. [52].

Sulphur metabolism.

The majority of transcripts encoding functions involved in sulfur assimilation are up-regulated in A-30 and B-96 cells when compared with condition P. However, it should be noted that these transcripts were significantly more abundant in B-96 cells when compared with A-30 cells (Fig 1; S2 Table). Bacteria acquire sulfur through the sulfate assimilation pathway leading to the production of sulfide, which is then incorporated into sulfur containing organic molecules [53]. Sulfur is essential for cofactor synthesis required for the anaerobic regulators Anr and Dnr as well as for several enzymes involved in denitrification [54, 55].

Since genes involved in sulfur metabolism are known to be up-regulated in response to sulfate starvation [56] and as the B-96 cells were incubated without addition of fresh medium, it was possible that changes in the abundance of the transcripts resulted from sulfur starvation rather than from the anoxic environment. To distinguish between these possibilities, we monitored the expression levels of one representative transcript, msuE, in P and B-96 cells. As shown in S1 Fig, when compared with B-96 cells the msuE transcript was not up-regulated in M-96 biofilms after oxygenic / microaerophilic growth for 96h without shaking, indicating that the observed up-regulation of the genes involved in sulfur metabolism is indeed induced during prolonged anaerobiosis.

Transcription / Translation / RNA processing.

Transcripts encoding functions required for RNA processing and in particular transcripts encoding tRNA synthases were also significantly more abundant (Fig 1; S2 Table) during anaerobiosis.

Next, we compared our data set with a recent transcriptome analysis [27] and with previous proteome data [30, 33], all of which were performed during anaerobic growth. Most of the marker transcripts deemed to be required for metabolic adaptation to the hypoxic lung environment [27] showed either no difference or were even less abundant in our data set. Only the transcript abundance of accB (A-30), idh (B-96) and nuoA (B-96) were likewise increased under the conditions examined here. When compared with the proteome analyses of Wu et al. [30] and Platt et al. [33], we detected 384 and 60 concurrent transcripts with differential abundance (marked in Table A in S2 Table), respectively. The variations observed with the omics studies can be most likely ascribed to the different conditions and media used under / in which the experiments were performed. Nevertheless, the up-regulation of the mreB transcript, those for molybdenum cofactor synthesis, the sdhABCD, the atpIBEFHAGFC, the nar, the nir and the nos operon transcripts in A-30 cells and/or in B-96 cells concurred with proteome studies, wherein the levels of the corresponding proteins were found to be increased during anaerobic growth [30, 33].

Up-regulated transcripts in B-96 biofilms that impact on anoxic biofilm formation

To identify functions required for sustained anoxic biofilm formation we next focused on transcripts that were up-regulated under condition B-96 when compared with condition P, and which showed no differential abundance between condition A-30 and condition P. Among them, we selected either single genes or genes that represent the first gene of an operon that were (i) at least 10-fold up-regulated under condition B-96 versus P, that were (ii) not differentially abundant under condition A-30 versus P, and (iii) for which insertion mutants were available from the PA14 transposon library [57]. The 26 selected genes for which insertion mutants were available are listed in S3 Table. Out of the corresponding 26 transposon mutants tested for anoxic biofilm formation, one showed no (PA14_30460) and three showed reduced (ygfU; pyeR; PA14_46620) anoxic biofilm formation, whereas insertional inactivation of the pstA and msuE genes caused increased anoxic biofilm formation (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Biofilm formation of PA14 and transposon mutants thereof after anaerobic growth in SCFM medium after 96h.

Biofilm formation was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm after crystal violet staining. The results are averaged from three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.g002

The inactivation of the putative flavin-dependent oxidoreductase (PA14_30460 / PA2600) gene abolished anoxic biofilm formation. According to the Kegg pathway (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=pau), this enzyme is predicted to be involved in converting organosulfonates into the corresponding aldehyde and sulfite. In contrast, the inactivation of the msuE gene resulted in increased anoxic biofilm formation. The musE gene is the first gene of the msuEDC operon encoding the NADH-dependent flavin mononucleotide (FMN) reductase, which provides reduced FMN to flavin mononucleotide (FMNH2)-dependent monooxygenases (MsuD), which in turn catalyzes the desulfonation of organosulfonates in the presence of oxygen [56]. The MsuE and PA14_30640 proteins are both involved in metabolizing organosulfonates, which are absent in SCFM. Thus, it is rather obscure why the inactivation of these functions has an opposite effect on anoxic biofilm formation. We can only speculate that these proteins have an additional function(s) that impacts on anoxic biofilm growth.

Inactivation of PA14_46620 (no homologue in PAO1) resulted in reduced anoxic biofilm formation. PA14_46620 encodes a putative FAD dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase [58], which catalyzes disulfide bond formation. Forty proteins containing disulfide bonds were identified in P. aeruginosa [59]. Some of these including the molybdopterin biosynthetic protein B2 [60] and the ATPase synthase alpha chain [59] play an important role in anaerobic metabolism or in initial stages of biofilm formation (Type 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein PilE and PilA) [19]. It is thus formally possible that inactivation of PA14_46620 impacts on the functionality of these proteins.

The ygfU transposon mutant formed less biofilms, which was also observed under aerobic conditions in LB medium [61]. The gene encodes a putative purine permease [62]. As uracil is known to impact on biofilm formation [63], the biofilm phenotype of the ygfU transposon mutant could result from a defect in uracil uptake.

The pyeR transposon mutant was impaired in anoxic biofilm formation. The pyeR gene encodes a transcriptional regulator belonging to the ArsR family. It is located within an operon coding for an uncharacterized transporter (PA14_56620) that belongs to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). PyeR was shown to be required for tight micro-colony formation [64].

The pstA gene is part of the phosphate-specific transport operon (pstABC), which is de-repressed under phosphate limitation. The inactivation of the pstA gene resulted in increased anoxic biofilm formation. This phenotype seems to contrast that reported for P. aureofaciens, in which aerobic biofilm formation is inhibited under phosphate starvation conditions [65]. However, Müsken et al. [61] reported likewise an impaired aerobic biofilm formation of a pstC transposon mutant after growth in LB medium.

Differential abundance of PA14 antibiotic resistance genes in anoxic biofilms: correlation with the susceptibility towards different antimicrobials

Next, we sought to correlate the differential abundance of transcripts encoding known or putative resistance functions in B-96 cells with the tolerance of anoxic biofilms towards different antimicrobials. The identified transcripts that showed at least a +/- 5-fold change (p-value < 0.05) in anoxic biofilms (B-96) when compared with planktonically growing cells (P) are listed in Table 2. Transcripts with a fold change lower than +/-5 are only listed if they are part of an operon, wherein the majority of transcripts showed a fold change higher than +/- 5. The majority of the differentially abundant transcripts encode either regulators or structural components of RND drug efflux pumps (Table 2).

Download:

Table 2. Altered abundance of transcripts encoding antibiotic tolerance functions.

Fold change under the condition B-96 when compared with P. Only ≥ ± 5 fold change was considered.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.t002

The genes constituting the MexGHI-opmD efflux pump were down-regulated in B-96 cells when compared with P. This pump was shown to be involved in the export of the antibiotic norfloxacin [67]. When tested for norfloxacin susceptibility under the conditions P and B-96, we observed an increased tolerance to the antibiotic in anoxic biofilms when compared with planktonically growing cells (Table 1), which apparently conflicts with the reduced abundance of the mexGHI-opmD transcripts. However, gyrase inhibitors such as norfloxacin primarily affect fast growing cells [75]. We therefore hypothesize that the slow growth of B-96 cells effects intrinsic resistance and accounts for their decreased susceptibility towards norfloxacin rather than the variations in the level of the mexGHI-opmD transcripts.

The genes encoding the MexCD-OprJ efflux pump were up-regulated in B-96 cells versus P cells. When over-produced, this pump was shown to provide resistance to several classes of antibiotics including fluoroquinolones, ß-lactams, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, macrolides, trimethoprim and novobiocin [43]. Accordingly, we observed an increased tolerance to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin and tetracycline (Table 1). The observed susceptibility pattern concurred with the observed up-regulation of the mexCD-oprJ transcripts (Table 2). The RNA_Seq results were representatively verified for the mexD gene by RT-qPCR. This analysis showed that the mexD transcript levels were approximately 5-fold increased in B-96 cells (S2 Fig), which was in accordance with the RNA_Seq data. Nevertheless, as noted above we cannot exclude that other factors may also account for the increased tolerance to these antibiotics.

The oprD gene transcript, which was ~ 5-fold reduced (Table 2) in B-96 anoxic biofilm, encodes an outer membrane porin serving as an entry port for carbapenems [71]. In line with the transcriptome data, B-96 cells displayed a > 16-fold increased MIC towards meropenem when compared with planktonically growing cells. To verify that oprD expression is indeed down-regulated in anoxic biofilms, we made use of a translational oprD::lacZ reporter gene as a means to monitor the production of OprD. The ß-galactosidase activity conferred by the OprD-LacZ protein in strain PA14(pTLoprD) was determined during planktonic growth (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0) and in anoxic biofilms (B-96). As shown in S3 Fig, OprD-LacZ production was reduced in B-96 anoxic biofilms, which can explain the increased tolerance to meropenem (Table 1).

The highly abundant 8-kDa outer membrane lipoprotein OprI can exist in free and peptidoglycan-bound form [76]. It has been reported that OprI is targeted by cationic antimicrobial peptides / proteins such as SMAP-29, LL37 or human RNase7 in P. aeruginosa O1 [74]. The encoded OprI protein was shown to be produced in PA14 and is 100% homologous to that of PAO1 [77]. The RNA_Seq analysis revealed that the oprI transcript is ~ 18-fold down-regulated in B-96 cells (Table 2). For verification, Northern-blot analyses were performed with total RNA isolated from P-cells and from B-96 cells using a radio-labelled probe for oprI mRNA. A strong oprI specific signal was observed in the RNA sample purified from planktonically growing cells, whereas no signal was detected in that isolated from B-96 cells, indicating that oprI is not expressed in anoxic biofilms (Fig 3A). In addition, we employed a translational oprI::lacZ reporter gene, transcription of which is directed by the authentic oprI promoter, to assess the synthesis of OprI under conditions P and B-96 in strain PA14 (pTLoprI), respectively. When compared with condition P, OprI-LacZ synthesis was strongly reduced in B-96 anoxic biofilms (Fig 3B), which suggested that B-96 cells might exhibit resistance or at least highly increased tolerance towards SMAP-29, whereas P-cells would be assumed to be sensitive. To test this, P-cells (OD₆₀₀ = 2.0) and B-96 cells grown in SCFM medium were further incubated for 14 h in the presence of different concentrations (0.1 μM– 1.6 μM) of the antimicrobial peptide SMAP-29. Despite the presence of the oprI transcript and translation of the oprI::lacZ fusion gene in P-cells (Fig 3A and 3B), the addition of SMAP-29 did not inhibit growth of either culture in SCFM medium (not shown). However, as the bactericidal activity of antimicrobial peptides is affected by divalent cations [74] it was possible that the composition of the SCFM medium impacted on the susceptibility towards SMAP-29.

Download:

Fig 3. OprI is not required for susceptibility of PA14 towards the antimicrobial peptide SMAP-29.

A) Determination of the levels of oprI mRNA in P cells (P) and B-96 cells (B-96) by Northern-blot analysis. In-vitro transcribed oprI mRNA (0.5 ng) was used as a control (C). 5S rRNA served as a loading control. B) The strains were grown planktonically to an OD₆₀₀ of 2.0 in SCFM (P) and for 96 hours under anaerobic conditions (B-96). Then, the cultures were harvested and the β-galactosidase activities were determined. The bars depict β-galactosidase values conferred by the translational OprI-LacZ protein in strain PA14(pTLoprI) under the conditions P and B-96. The error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments. C) Susceptibility of PA14 (red) and PA14ΔoprI (green) towards the cationic peptide, SMAP-29, under aerobic conditions. The experiment was performed as outlined in Materials and Methods. D) Determination of the oprI mRNA levels by Northern-blot analysis in strains PA14 and PA14∆oprI at the time of addition of SMAP-29 to the cultures. In vitro transcribed oprI mRNA (1 ng) was used as a control (C). 5S rRNA served as a loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.g003

This prompted us to revisit the role of OprI as a target for SMAP-29 in strain PA14 under the same condition as previously described for strain PAO1 [74]. In addition, an in frame PA14 oprI deletion mutant was constructed to unambiguously check whether OprI is required as a target for SMAP-29 in strain PA14. The strains PA14 and PA14ΔoprI were grown aerobically in LB medium and approximately 1 x 10⁵ cells were treated with different concentrations of SMAP-29 for 3h as previously reported for strain PAO1 [74]. The CFU was determined after overnight growth and plating of serial dilutions on LB plates. Under these conditions both strains were equally susceptible to SMAP-29 (Fig 3C) although the oprI transcript was only detectable in the wild-type strain (Fig 3D). Hence, these results clearly question OprI as a cellular target for SMAP-29 in strain PA14.

Conclusions

The RNA_Seq based comparative RNA profiling of the clinical isolate PA14 cultured in SCFM under the conditions P, A-30 and B-96 not only highlighted again known functions required for anaerobiosis, but revealed also functions involved in the sulfur metabolism that impact on anoxic biofilm formation. In addition, these studies revealed a decreased and increased abundance of the oprD gene and the mexCD-oprJ operon genes, respectively, in B-96 cells. This observation can explain the increased tolerance towards meropenem and to antibiotics which are expelled by the MexCD-OprJ efflux pump. Arguably, the SCFM medium used here only approximates to the conditions of the cystic fibrosis lung. It remains thus open whether the same correlations apply to the natural setting in the patient.

The vast difference in abundance of the oprI transcript in P- and B-96 cells prompted us to revisit the requirement of OprI as a target for cationic antimicrobial peptides. The sensitivity of the PA14ΔoprI mutant towards SMAP-29 was found to be indistinguishable from the parental wild-type strain during logarithmic oxygenic growth. This observation obviously questions OprI as a target for this antimicrobial peptide in strain PA14.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Levels of the msuE transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

Total RNA was prepared from PA14 grown under the conditions P (red bars), B-96 (blue bars) and M-96 (green bars). The levels of the msuE transcript were determined by RT-qPCR using the primer pair X124/Y124 (S1 Table) and after normalization to the rpoD mRNA levels. The values represent the means and SDs (standard deviations) of changes in comparison with the msuE transcript level in anoxic biofilms (B-96), which was set to one. All results are the average of at least three independent experiments and the error bars represent SDs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Levels of the mexD transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

Total RNA was prepared from PA14 grown under the conditions P (red bars) and B-96 (blue bars). The levels of the mexD transcript were determined by RT-qPCR using the primer pair J124/K124 (S1 Table) and after normalization to the rpoD mRNA levels. The values represent the means and SDs (standard deviations) of changes in comparison with the mexD transcript level in anoxic biofilms (B-96), which was set to one. All results are the average of at least three independent experiments and the error bars represent SDs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. OprD-LacZ production during planktonic growth and in anoxic biofilms.

The strains were grown planktonically to an OD₆₀₀ of 2.0 in SCFM (P) and for 96 hours under anaerobic conditions (B-96). Then, the cultures were harvested and the β-galactosidase activities were determined. The bars depict β-galactosidase values conferred by the translational OprD-LacZ protein in strain PA14 (pTLoprD) under the conditions P and B-96. The error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s003

(TIF)

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. A) Functional classification of transcripts that are differentially abundant under the conditions A-30 and B-96 when compared with condition P. B) Up-regulated metabolic pathways under anoxic conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s005

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Selected up-regulated functions in B-96 cells scrutinized for anoxic biofilm formation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147811.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Pusic for providing plasmid pTLoprD.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MT SH UB. Performed the experiments: MT NR. Analyzed the data: MT NR MW FA AD SH ES UB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MT SH UB. Wrote the paper: MT UB.

References

1. Kolpen M, Kühl M, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Hansen CR, Liengaard L, et al. Nitrous oxide production in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84353. Epub 2014/01/28. pmid:24465406; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3894955.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Ratjen F, Döring G. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9358):681–9. Epub 2003/02/28. pmid:12606185.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Schreiber K, Krieger R, Benkert B, Eschbach M, Arai H, Schobert M, et al. The Anaerobic Regulatory Network Required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nitrate Respiration. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189(11):4310–4. pmid:17400734
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Vander Wauven C, Piérard A, Kley-Raymann M, Haas D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants affected in anaerobic growth on arginine: evidence for a four-gene cluster encoding the arginine deiminase pathway. Journal of Bacteriology. 1984;160(3):928–34. pmid:6438064
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Eschbach M, Schreiber K, Trunk K, Buer J, Jahn D, Schobert M. Long-Term Anaerobic Survival of the Opportunistic Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa via Pyruvate Fermentation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186(14):4596–604. pmid:15231792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Ye RW, Haas D, Ka JO, Krishnapillai V, Zimmermann A, Baird C, et al. Anaerobic activation of the entire denitrification pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires Anr, an analog of Fnr. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177(12):3606–9. pmid:7768875
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Arai H, Kodama T, Igarashi Y. Cascade regulation of the two CRP/FNR-related transcriptional regulators (ANR and DNR) and the denitrification enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;25(6):1141–8. pmid:9350869
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Sheldon AT Jr. Antibiotic resistance: a survival strategy. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18(3):170–80. Epub 2005/09/02. pmid:16134477.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Li X- Z, Zhang L, McKay GA, Poole K. Role of the acetyltransferase AAC(6′)-Iz modifying enzyme in aminoglycoside resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2003;51(4):803–11. pmid:12654758
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Hogan D, Kolter R. Why are bacteria refractory to antimicrobials? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5(5):472–7. Epub 2002/10/02. pmid:12354553.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Sánchez MB, Hernández A, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Martínez-Martínez L, Martínez J. Predictive analysis of transmissible quinolone resistance indicates Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as a potential source of a novel family of Qnr determinants. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:148. Epub 2008/09/17. pmid:18793450; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2556341.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Drenkard E, Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;416(6882):740–3. Epub 2002/04/19. pmid:11961556.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Spoering AL, Lewis K. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(23):6746–51. Epub 2001/11/08. pmid:11698361; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC95513.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Shih PC, Huang CT. Effects of quorum-sensing deficiency on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49(2):309–14. Epub 2002/01/30. pmid:11815572.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ, Heydorn A, Molin S, Givskov M, et al. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(18):5395–401. Epub 2001/08/22. pmid:11514525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC95424.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Hill D, Rose B, Pajkos A, Robinson M, Bye P, Bell S, et al. Antibiotic susceptabilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates derived from patients with cystic fibrosis under aerobic, anaerobic, and biofilm conditions. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5085–90. Epub 2005/10/07. pmid:16207967; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1248524.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30(2):295–304. Epub 1998/10/29. pmid:9791175.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Sriramulu DD, Lünsdorf H, Lam JS, Römling U. Microcolony formation: a novel biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the cystic fibrosis lung. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2005;54(7):667–76.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM, Lory S, et al. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2001;413(6858):860–4. pmid:11677611
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Waite RD, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Littler E, Curtis MA. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth: comparison of gene expression in planktonic cultures and developing and mature biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(18):6571–6. Epub 2005/09/15. pmid:16159792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1236618.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Waite RD, Paccanaro A, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Hurst JM, Saqi M, Littler E, et al. Clustering of Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptomes from planktonic cultures, developing and mature biofilms reveals distinct expression profiles. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:162. Epub 2006/06/28. pmid:16800888; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1525188.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Lenz AP, Williamson KS, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. Localized gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(14):4463–71. Epub 2008/05/20. pmid:18487401; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2493172.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Manos J, Arthur J, Rose B, Bell S, Tingpej P, Hu H, et al. Gene expression characteristics of a cystic fibrosis epidemic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm and planktonic growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;292(1):107–14. Epub 2009/02/19. pmid:19222585.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Dötsch A, Eckweiler D, Schniederjans M, Zimmermann A, Jensen V, Scharfe M, et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome in planktonic cultures and static biofilms using RNA sequencing. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31092. Epub 2012/02/10. pmid:22319605; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3272035.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Tielen P, Rosin N, Meyer AK, Dohnt K, Haddad I, Jänsch L, et al. Regulatory and metabolic networks for the adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to urinary tract-like conditions. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71845. Epub 2013/08/24. pmid:23967252; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3742457.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. He FQ, Wang W, Zheng P, Sudhakar P, Sun J, Zeng AP. Essential O2-responsive genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their network revealed by integrating dynamic data from inverted conditions. Integr Biol (Camb). 2014;6(2):215–23. Epub 2014/01/15. pmid:24413814.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Eichner A, Günther N, Arnold M, Schobert M, Heesemann J, Hogardt M. Marker genes for the metabolic adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the hypoxic cystic fibrosis lung environment. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(8):1050–61. Epub 2014/08/19. pmid:25130702.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(4):1140–54. Epub 2002/01/25. pmid:11807075; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC134825.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Vilain S, Cosette P, Hubert M, Lange C, Junter GA, Jouenne T. Comparative proteomic analysis of planktonic and immobilized Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: a multivariate statistical approach. Anal Biochem. 2004;329(1):120–30. Epub 2004/05/12. pmid:15136174.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Wu M, Guina T, Brittnacher M, Nguyen H, Eng J, Miller SI. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa proteome during anaerobic growth. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):8185–90. Epub 2005/11/18. pmid:16291692; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1291291.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Southey-Pillig CJ, Davies DG, Sauer K. Characterization of temporal protein production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):8114–26. Epub 2005/11/18. pmid:16291684; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1291272.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Mikkelsen H, Duck Z, Lilley KS, Welch M. Interrelationships between colonies, biofilms, and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(6):2411–6. Epub 2007/01/16. pmid:17220232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1899361.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Platt MD, Schurr MJ, Sauer K, Vazquez G, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Potvin E, et al. Proteomic, microarray, and signature-tagged mutagenesis analyses of anaerobic Pseudomonas aeruginosa at pH 6.5, likely representing chronic, late-stage cystic fibrosis airway conditions. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(8):2739–58. Epub 2008/01/22. pmid:18203836; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2293228.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Palmer KL, Aye LM, Whiteley M. Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(22):8079–87. Epub 2007/09/18. pmid:17873029; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2168676.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011. 2011;17(1). 10–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Hoffmann S, Otto C, Kurtz S, Sharma CM, Khaitovich P, Vogel J, et al. Fast mapping of short sequences with mismatches, insertions and deletions using index structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(9):e1000502. Epub 2009/09/15. pmid:19750212; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2730575.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Wolfinger MT, Fallmann J, Eggenhofer F, Amman F. ViennaNGS: A toolbox for building efficient next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines F1000Res. 2015;4:50. Epub 2015/08/04. pmid:26236465.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–2. Epub 2010/01/30. pmid:20110278; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2832824.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106. Epub 2010/10/29. pmid:20979621; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3218662.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Merritt JH, Kadouri DE, O'Toole GA. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005;Chapter 1:Unit 1B Epub 2008/09/05. pmid:18770545.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Duchêne M, Barron C, Schweizer A, von Specht BU, Domdey H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane lipoprotein I gene: molecular cloning, sequence, and expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(8):4130–7. Epub 1989/08/01. pmid:2502533; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC210182.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Schnider-Keel U, Seematter A, Maurhofer M, Blumer C, Duffy B, Gigot-Bonnefoy C, et al. Autoinduction of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis in the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 and repression by the bacterial metabolites salicylate and pyoluteorin. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(5):1215–25. Epub 2000/02/15. pmid:10671440; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC94405.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(4):582–610. Epub 2009/10/14. pmid:19822890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2772362.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Lee KM, Go J, Yoon MY, Park Y, Kim SC, Yong DE, et al. Vitamin B12-mediated restoration of defective anaerobic growth leads to reduced biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. 2012;80(5):1639–49. Epub 2012/03/01. pmid:22371376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3347431.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45. Epub 2001/05/09. pmid:11328886; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC55695.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor. 1972.
47. Allison DG, Nolan RD. Influence of growth rate and nutrient limitation on monobactam production and peptidoglycan synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Basic Microbiol. 1994;34(4):217–24. Epub 1994/01/01. pmid:7932106.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Katz E, Demain AL. The peptide antibiotics of Bacillus: chemistry, biogenesis, and possible functions. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;41(2):449–74. Epub 1977/06/01. pmid:70202; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC414008.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Broderick JB. Coenzymes and Cofactors. 2001.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Iobbi-Nivol C, Leimkühler S. Molybdenum enzymes, their maturation and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1827(8–9):1086–101. Epub 2012/12/04. pmid:23201473.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Maklashina E, Berthold DA, Cecchini G. Anaerobic expression of Escherichia coli succinate dehydrogenase: Functional replacement of fumarate reductase in the respiratory chain during anaerobic growth. Journal Bacteriol. 1998;180(22):5989–96.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Bleves S, Viarre V, Salacha R, Michel GP, Filloux A, Voulhoux R. Protein secretion systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A wealth of pathogenic weapons. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(8):534–43. Epub 2010/10/16. pmid:20947426.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. van der Ploeg JR, Eichhorn E, Leisinger T. Sulfonate-sulfur metabolism and its regulation in Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol. 2001;176(1–2):1–8. Epub 2001/08/02. pmid:11479697.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Zumft WG. Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1997;61(4):533–616. pmid:9409151
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Campanini B, Pieroni M, Raboni S, Bettati S, Benoni R, Pecchini C, et al. Inhibitors of the sulfur assimilation pathway in bacterial pathogens as enhancers of antibiotic therapy. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(2):187–213. Epub 2014/11/13. pmid:25388010.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Kertesz MA, Schmidt-Larbig K, Wüest T. A novel reduced flavin mononucleotide-dependent methanesulfonate sulfonatase encoded by the sulfur-regulated msu operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(5):1464–73. Epub 1999/02/27. pmid:10049377; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC93535.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Liberati NT, Urbach JM, Miyata S, Lee DG, Drenkard E, Wu G, et al. An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(8):2833–8. Epub 2006/02/16. pmid:16477005; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1413827.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Winsor GL, Lam DK, Fleming L, Lo R, Whiteside MD, Yu NY, et al. Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D596–600. Epub 2010/10/12. pmid:20929876; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3013766.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. An BC, Lee SS, Lee EM, Wi SG, Park W, Chung BY. Global analysis of disulfide bond proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to hydrogen peroxide and gamma rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(5):400–8. Epub 2010/04/20. pmid:20397845.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Rivers SL, McNairn E, Blasco F, Giordano G, Boxer DH. Molecular genetic analysis of the moa operon of Escherichia coli K-12 required for molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8(6):1071–81. Epub 1993/06/01. pmid:8361352.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Müsken M, Di Fiore S, Dötsch A, Fischer R, Häussler S. Genetic determinants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm establishment. Microbiology. 2010;156(Pt 2):431–41. Epub 2009/10/24. pmid:19850623.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Yin Y, Withers TR, Niles RM, Johnson SL, Yu HD. Draft Genome Sequences of Two Alginate-Overproducing Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PAO1-VE2 and PAO1-VE13. Genome Announc. 2013;1(6). Epub 2013/12/18. pmid:24336371; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3861424.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Ueda A, Attila C, Whiteley M, Wood TK. Uracil influences quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fluorouracil is an antagonist. Microb Biotechnol. 2009;2(1):62–74. Epub 2009/01/01. pmid:21261882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3815422.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Mac Aogáin M, Mooij MJ, McCarthy RR, Plower E, Wang YP, Tian ZX, et al. The non-classical ArsR-family repressor PyeR (PA4354) modulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 10):2598–609. Epub 2012/07/24. pmid:22820840.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Monds RD, Silby MW, Mahanty HK. Expression of the Pho regulon negatively regulates biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aureofaciens PA147-2. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(2):415–26. Epub 2001/11/13. pmid:11703664.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
66. Aendekerk S, Ghysels B, Cornelis P, Baysse C. Characterization of a new efflux pump, MexGHI-OpmD, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that confers resistance to vanadium. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 8):2371–81. Epub 2002/08/15. pmid:12177331.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
67. Sekiya H, Mima T, Morita Y, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Functional cloning and characterization of a multidrug efflux pump, mexHI-opmD, from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(9):2990–2. Epub 2003/08/26. pmid:12937010; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC182609.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
68. Aendekerk S, Diggle SP, Song Z, Høiby N, Cornelis P, Williams P, et al. The MexGHI-OpmD multidrug efflux pump controls growth, antibiotic susceptibility and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa via 4-quinolone-dependent cell-to-cell communication. Microbiology. 2005;151(Pt 4):1113–25. Epub 2005/04/09. pmid:15817779.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
69. Srikumar R, Li XZ, Poole K. Inner membrane efflux components are responsible for beta-lactam specificity of multidrug efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(24):7875–81. Epub 1997/12/24. pmid:9401051; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC179755.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
70. Morita Y, Komori Y, Mima T, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Construction of a series of mutants lacking all of the four major mex operons for multidrug efflux pumps or possessing each one of the operons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: MexCD-OprJ is an inducible pump. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;202(1):139–43. Epub 2001/08/17. pmid:11506922.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
71. Trias J, Nikaido H. Outer membrane protein D2 catalyzes facilitated diffusion of carbapenems and penems through the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34(1):52–7. Epub 1990/01/01. pmid:2109575; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC171519.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
72. Moreno R, Martínez-Gomariz M, Yuste L, Gil C, Rojo F. The Pseudomonas putida Crc global regulator controls the hierarchical assimilation of amino acids in a complete medium: evidence from proteomic and genomic analyses. Proteomics. 2009;9(11):2910–28. Epub 2009/06/16. pmid:19526543.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
73. Linares JF, Moreno R, Fajardo A, Martínez-Solano L, Escalante R, Rojo F, et al. The global regulator Crc modulates metabolism, susceptibility to antibiotics and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(12):3196–212. Epub 2010/07/16. pmid:20626455.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
74. Lin YM, Wu SJ, Chang TW, Wang CF, Suen CS, Hwang MJ, et al. Outer membrane protein I of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a target of cationic antimicrobial peptide/protein. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(12):8985–94. Epub 2010/01/27. pmid:20100832; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2838320.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
75. Su HC, Ramkissoon K, Doolittle J, Clark M, Khatun J, Secrest A, et al. The development of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involves multiple response stages and multiple proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(11):4626–35. Epub 2010/08/11. pmid:20696867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2976116.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
76. Mizuno T, Kageyama M. Isolation and characterization of a major outer membrane protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evidence for the occurrence of a lipoprotein. J Biochem. 1979;85(1):115–22. Epub 1979/01/01. pmid:104984.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
77. Wessel AK, Liew J, Kwon T, Marcotte EM, Whiteley M. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa peptidoglycan-associated outer membrane proteins in vesicle formation. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(2):213–9. Epub 2012/11/06. pmid:23123904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3553829.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Kolpen M, Kühl M, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Hansen CR, Liengaard L, et al. Nitrous oxide production in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84353. Epub 2014/01/28. pmid:24465406; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3894955.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Ratjen F, Döring G. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9358):681–9. Epub 2003/02/28. pmid:12606185.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Schreiber K, Krieger R, Benkert B, Eschbach M, Arai H, Schobert M, et al. The Anaerobic Regulatory Network Required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Nitrate Respiration. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189(11):4310–4. pmid:17400734
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Vander Wauven C, Piérard A, Kley-Raymann M, Haas D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants affected in anaerobic growth on arginine: evidence for a four-gene cluster encoding the arginine deiminase pathway. Journal of Bacteriology. 1984;160(3):928–34. pmid:6438064
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Eschbach M, Schreiber K, Trunk K, Buer J, Jahn D, Schobert M. Long-Term Anaerobic Survival of the Opportunistic Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa via Pyruvate Fermentation. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186(14):4596–604. pmid:15231792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Ye RW, Haas D, Ka JO, Krishnapillai V, Zimmermann A, Baird C, et al. Anaerobic activation of the entire denitrification pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires Anr, an analog of Fnr. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177(12):3606–9. pmid:7768875
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Arai H, Kodama T, Igarashi Y. Cascade regulation of the two CRP/FNR-related transcriptional regulators (ANR and DNR) and the denitrification enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecular Microbiology. 1997;25(6):1141–8. pmid:9350869
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Sheldon AT Jr. Antibiotic resistance: a survival strategy. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18(3):170–80. Epub 2005/09/02. pmid:16134477.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Li X- Z, Zhang L, McKay GA, Poole K. Role of the acetyltransferase AAC(6′)-Iz modifying enzyme in aminoglycoside resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2003;51(4):803–11. pmid:12654758
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hogan D, Kolter R. Why are bacteria refractory to antimicrobials? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5(5):472–7. Epub 2002/10/02. pmid:12354553.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Sánchez MB, Hernández A, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Martínez-Martínez L, Martínez J. Predictive analysis of transmissible quinolone resistance indicates Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as a potential source of a novel family of Qnr determinants. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:148. Epub 2008/09/17. pmid:18793450; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2556341.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Drenkard E, Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;416(6882):740–3. Epub 2002/04/19. pmid:11961556.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Spoering AL, Lewis K. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(23):6746–51. Epub 2001/11/08. pmid:11698361; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC95513.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Shih PC, Huang CT. Effects of quorum-sensing deficiency on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49(2):309–14. Epub 2002/01/30. pmid:11815572.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ, Heydorn A, Molin S, Givskov M, et al. Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(18):5395–401. Epub 2001/08/22. pmid:11514525; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC95424.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Hill D, Rose B, Pajkos A, Robinson M, Bye P, Bell S, et al. Antibiotic susceptabilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates derived from patients with cystic fibrosis under aerobic, anaerobic, and biofilm conditions. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5085–90. Epub 2005/10/07. pmid:16207967; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1248524.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30(2):295–304. Epub 1998/10/29. pmid:9791175.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Sriramulu DD, Lünsdorf H, Lam JS, Römling U. Microcolony formation: a novel biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the cystic fibrosis lung. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2005;54(7):667–76.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM, Lory S, et al. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2001;413(6858):860–4. pmid:11677611
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Waite RD, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Littler E, Curtis MA. Transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth: comparison of gene expression in planktonic cultures and developing and mature biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(18):6571–6. Epub 2005/09/15. pmid:16159792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1236618.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Waite RD, Paccanaro A, Papakonstantinopoulou A, Hurst JM, Saqi M, Littler E, et al. Clustering of Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptomes from planktonic cultures, developing and mature biofilms reveals distinct expression profiles. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:162. Epub 2006/06/28. pmid:16800888; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1525188.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Lenz AP, Williamson KS, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. Localized gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(14):4463–71. Epub 2008/05/20. pmid:18487401; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2493172.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Manos J, Arthur J, Rose B, Bell S, Tingpej P, Hu H, et al. Gene expression characteristics of a cystic fibrosis epidemic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm and planktonic growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;292(1):107–14. Epub 2009/02/19. pmid:19222585.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Dötsch A, Eckweiler D, Schniederjans M, Zimmermann A, Jensen V, Scharfe M, et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome in planktonic cultures and static biofilms using RNA sequencing. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31092. Epub 2012/02/10. pmid:22319605; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3272035.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Tielen P, Rosin N, Meyer AK, Dohnt K, Haddad I, Jänsch L, et al. Regulatory and metabolic networks for the adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to urinary tract-like conditions. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71845. Epub 2013/08/24. pmid:23967252; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3742457.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. He FQ, Wang W, Zheng P, Sudhakar P, Sun J, Zeng AP. Essential O2-responsive genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their network revealed by integrating dynamic data from inverted conditions. Integr Biol (Camb). 2014;6(2):215–23. Epub 2014/01/15. pmid:24413814.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Eichner A, Günther N, Arnold M, Schobert M, Heesemann J, Hogardt M. Marker genes for the metabolic adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the hypoxic cystic fibrosis lung environment. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(8):1050–61. Epub 2014/08/19. pmid:25130702.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(4):1140–54. Epub 2002/01/25. pmid:11807075; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC134825.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Vilain S, Cosette P, Hubert M, Lange C, Junter GA, Jouenne T. Comparative proteomic analysis of planktonic and immobilized Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: a multivariate statistical approach. Anal Biochem. 2004;329(1):120–30. Epub 2004/05/12. pmid:15136174.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Wu M, Guina T, Brittnacher M, Nguyen H, Eng J, Miller SI. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa proteome during anaerobic growth. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):8185–90. Epub 2005/11/18. pmid:16291692; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1291291.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Southey-Pillig CJ, Davies DG, Sauer K. Characterization of temporal protein production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):8114–26. Epub 2005/11/18. pmid:16291684; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1291272.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Mikkelsen H, Duck Z, Lilley KS, Welch M. Interrelationships between colonies, biofilms, and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(6):2411–6. Epub 2007/01/16. pmid:17220232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1899361.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Platt MD, Schurr MJ, Sauer K, Vazquez G, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Potvin E, et al. Proteomic, microarray, and signature-tagged mutagenesis analyses of anaerobic Pseudomonas aeruginosa at pH 6.5, likely representing chronic, late-stage cystic fibrosis airway conditions. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(8):2739–58. Epub 2008/01/22. pmid:18203836; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2293228.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Palmer KL, Aye LM, Whiteley M. Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(22):8079–87. Epub 2007/09/18. pmid:17873029; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2168676.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011. 2011;17(1). 10–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Hoffmann S, Otto C, Kurtz S, Sharma CM, Khaitovich P, Vogel J, et al. Fast mapping of short sequences with mismatches, insertions and deletions using index structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(9):e1000502. Epub 2009/09/15. pmid:19750212; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2730575.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Wolfinger MT, Fallmann J, Eggenhofer F, Amman F. ViennaNGS: A toolbox for building efficient next-generation sequencing analysis pipelines F1000Res. 2015;4:50. Epub 2015/08/04. pmid:26236465.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–2. Epub 2010/01/30. pmid:20110278; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2832824.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106. Epub 2010/10/29. pmid:20979621; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3218662.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Merritt JH, Kadouri DE, O'Toole GA. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005;Chapter 1:Unit 1B Epub 2008/09/05. pmid:18770545.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Duchêne M, Barron C, Schweizer A, von Specht BU, Domdey H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane lipoprotein I gene: molecular cloning, sequence, and expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(8):4130–7. Epub 1989/08/01. pmid:2502533; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC210182.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Schnider-Keel U, Seematter A, Maurhofer M, Blumer C, Duffy B, Gigot-Bonnefoy C, et al. Autoinduction of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis in the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 and repression by the bacterial metabolites salicylate and pyoluteorin. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(5):1215–25. Epub 2000/02/15. pmid:10671440; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC94405.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(4):582–610. Epub 2009/10/14. pmid:19822890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2772362.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Lee KM, Go J, Yoon MY, Park Y, Kim SC, Yong DE, et al. Vitamin B12-mediated restoration of defective anaerobic growth leads to reduced biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. 2012;80(5):1639–49. Epub 2012/03/01. pmid:22371376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3347431.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45. Epub 2001/05/09. pmid:11328886; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC55695.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor. 1972.

[ref47] 47. Allison DG, Nolan RD. Influence of growth rate and nutrient limitation on monobactam production and peptidoglycan synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Basic Microbiol. 1994;34(4):217–24. Epub 1994/01/01. pmid:7932106.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] PubMed/NCBI

[183] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Katz E, Demain AL. The peptide antibiotics of Bacillus: chemistry, biogenesis, and possible functions. Bacteriol Rev. 1977;41(2):449–74. Epub 1977/06/01. pmid:70202; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC414008.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] PubMed/NCBI

[187] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Broderick JB. Coenzymes and Cofactors. 2001.
View Article
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Iobbi-Nivol C, Leimkühler S. Molybdenum enzymes, their maturation and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1827(8–9):1086–101. Epub 2012/12/04. pmid:23201473.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Maklashina E, Berthold DA, Cecchini G. Anaerobic expression of Escherichia coli succinate dehydrogenase: Functional replacement of fumarate reductase in the respiratory chain during anaerobic growth. Journal Bacteriol. 1998;180(22):5989–96.
View Article
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Bleves S, Viarre V, Salacha R, Michel GP, Filloux A, Voulhoux R. Protein secretion systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A wealth of pathogenic weapons. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(8):534–43. Epub 2010/10/16. pmid:20947426.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] PubMed/NCBI

[201] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. van der Ploeg JR, Eichhorn E, Leisinger T. Sulfonate-sulfur metabolism and its regulation in Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol. 2001;176(1–2):1–8. Epub 2001/08/02. pmid:11479697.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[203] View Article

[204] PubMed/NCBI

[205] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Zumft WG. Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1997;61(4):533–616. pmid:9409151
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] PubMed/NCBI

[209] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Campanini B, Pieroni M, Raboni S, Bettati S, Benoni R, Pecchini C, et al. Inhibitors of the sulfur assimilation pathway in bacterial pathogens as enhancers of antibiotic therapy. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(2):187–213. Epub 2014/11/13. pmid:25388010.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[211] View Article

[212] PubMed/NCBI

[213] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Kertesz MA, Schmidt-Larbig K, Wüest T. A novel reduced flavin mononucleotide-dependent methanesulfonate sulfonatase encoded by the sulfur-regulated msu operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(5):1464–73. Epub 1999/02/27. pmid:10049377; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC93535.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[215] View Article

[216] PubMed/NCBI

[217] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Liberati NT, Urbach JM, Miyata S, Lee DG, Drenkard E, Wu G, et al. An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(8):2833–8. Epub 2006/02/16. pmid:16477005; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1413827.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] PubMed/NCBI

[221] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Winsor GL, Lam DK, Fleming L, Lo R, Whiteside MD, Yu NY, et al. Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D596–600. Epub 2010/10/12. pmid:20929876; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3013766.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[223] View Article

[224] PubMed/NCBI

[225] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. An BC, Lee SS, Lee EM, Wi SG, Park W, Chung BY. Global analysis of disulfide bond proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to hydrogen peroxide and gamma rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(5):400–8. Epub 2010/04/20. pmid:20397845.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[227] View Article

[228] PubMed/NCBI

[229] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Rivers SL, McNairn E, Blasco F, Giordano G, Boxer DH. Molecular genetic analysis of the moa operon of Escherichia coli K-12 required for molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8(6):1071–81. Epub 1993/06/01. pmid:8361352.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[231] View Article

[232] PubMed/NCBI

[233] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Müsken M, Di Fiore S, Dötsch A, Fischer R, Häussler S. Genetic determinants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm establishment. Microbiology. 2010;156(Pt 2):431–41. Epub 2009/10/24. pmid:19850623.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[235] View Article

[236] PubMed/NCBI

[237] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Yin Y, Withers TR, Niles RM, Johnson SL, Yu HD. Draft Genome Sequences of Two Alginate-Overproducing Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PAO1-VE2 and PAO1-VE13. Genome Announc. 2013;1(6). Epub 2013/12/18. pmid:24336371; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3861424.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[239] View Article

[240] PubMed/NCBI

[241] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Ueda A, Attila C, Whiteley M, Wood TK. Uracil influences quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fluorouracil is an antagonist. Microb Biotechnol. 2009;2(1):62–74. Epub 2009/01/01. pmid:21261882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3815422.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[243] View Article

[244] PubMed/NCBI

[245] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Mac Aogáin M, Mooij MJ, McCarthy RR, Plower E, Wang YP, Tian ZX, et al. The non-classical ArsR-family repressor PyeR (PA4354) modulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 10):2598–609. Epub 2012/07/24. pmid:22820840.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[247] View Article

[248] PubMed/NCBI

[249] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Monds RD, Silby MW, Mahanty HK. Expression of the Pho regulon negatively regulates biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aureofaciens PA147-2. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(2):415–26. Epub 2001/11/13. pmid:11703664.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[251] View Article

[252] PubMed/NCBI

[253] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Aendekerk S, Ghysels B, Cornelis P, Baysse C. Characterization of a new efflux pump, MexGHI-OpmD, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that confers resistance to vanadium. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 8):2371–81. Epub 2002/08/15. pmid:12177331.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[255] View Article

[256] PubMed/NCBI

[257] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Sekiya H, Mima T, Morita Y, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Functional cloning and characterization of a multidrug efflux pump, mexHI-opmD, from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(9):2990–2. Epub 2003/08/26. pmid:12937010; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC182609.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[259] View Article

[260] PubMed/NCBI

[261] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Aendekerk S, Diggle SP, Song Z, Høiby N, Cornelis P, Williams P, et al. The MexGHI-OpmD multidrug efflux pump controls growth, antibiotic susceptibility and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa via 4-quinolone-dependent cell-to-cell communication. Microbiology. 2005;151(Pt 4):1113–25. Epub 2005/04/09. pmid:15817779.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[263] View Article

[264] PubMed/NCBI

[265] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Srikumar R, Li XZ, Poole K. Inner membrane efflux components are responsible for beta-lactam specificity of multidrug efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(24):7875–81. Epub 1997/12/24. pmid:9401051; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC179755.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[267] View Article

[268] PubMed/NCBI

[269] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Morita Y, Komori Y, Mima T, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Construction of a series of mutants lacking all of the four major mex operons for multidrug efflux pumps or possessing each one of the operons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: MexCD-OprJ is an inducible pump. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;202(1):139–43. Epub 2001/08/17. pmid:11506922.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[271] View Article

[272] PubMed/NCBI

[273] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Trias J, Nikaido H. Outer membrane protein D2 catalyzes facilitated diffusion of carbapenems and penems through the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34(1):52–7. Epub 1990/01/01. pmid:2109575; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC171519.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[275] View Article

[276] PubMed/NCBI

[277] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Moreno R, Martínez-Gomariz M, Yuste L, Gil C, Rojo F. The Pseudomonas putida Crc global regulator controls the hierarchical assimilation of amino acids in a complete medium: evidence from proteomic and genomic analyses. Proteomics. 2009;9(11):2910–28. Epub 2009/06/16. pmid:19526543.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[279] View Article

[280] PubMed/NCBI

[281] Google Scholar

[ref73] 73. Linares JF, Moreno R, Fajardo A, Martínez-Solano L, Escalante R, Rojo F, et al. The global regulator Crc modulates metabolism, susceptibility to antibiotics and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(12):3196–212. Epub 2010/07/16. pmid:20626455.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[283] View Article

[284] PubMed/NCBI

[285] Google Scholar

[ref74] 74. Lin YM, Wu SJ, Chang TW, Wang CF, Suen CS, Hwang MJ, et al. Outer membrane protein I of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a target of cationic antimicrobial peptide/protein. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(12):8985–94. Epub 2010/01/27. pmid:20100832; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2838320.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[287] View Article

[288] PubMed/NCBI

[289] Google Scholar

[ref75] 75. Su HC, Ramkissoon K, Doolittle J, Clark M, Khatun J, Secrest A, et al. The development of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involves multiple response stages and multiple proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(11):4626–35. Epub 2010/08/11. pmid:20696867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2976116.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[291] View Article

[292] PubMed/NCBI

[293] Google Scholar

[ref76] 76. Mizuno T, Kageyama M. Isolation and characterization of a major outer membrane protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evidence for the occurrence of a lipoprotein. J Biochem. 1979;85(1):115–22. Epub 1979/01/01. pmid:104984.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[295] View Article

[296] PubMed/NCBI

[297] Google Scholar

[ref77] 77. Wessel AK, Liew J, Kwon T, Marcotte EM, Whiteley M. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa peptidoglycan-associated outer membrane proteins in vesicle formation. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(2):213–9. Epub 2012/11/06. pmid:23123904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3553829.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[299] View Article

[300] PubMed/NCBI

[301] Google Scholar

RNA_Seq Based Transcriptional Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 after Short- and Long-Term Anoxic Cultivation in Synthetic Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Medium

RNA_Seq Based Transcriptional Profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 after Short- and Long-Term Anoxic Cultivation in Synthetic Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Medium

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

RNA_Seq library construction and sequence analysis

RNA isolation and Northern-blot analysis

Determination of MICs

Biofilm assays

Construction of a PA14 oprI deletion mutant and susceptibility test towards SMAP-29

Construction of plasmids pTLoprI and pTLoprD

RT-qPCR

β-galactosidase assay

Results and Discussion

Up-regulated pathways at 30 min after anaerobic shift and after 96h of anoxic biofilm formation

Monobactam biosynthesis.

Biosynthesis of cofactors.

Energy metabolism.

Protein secretion.

Sulphur metabolism.

Transcription / Translation / RNA processing.

Up-regulated transcripts in B-96 biofilms that impact on anoxic biofilm formation

Differential abundance of PA14 antibiotic resistance genes in anoxic biofilms: correlation with the susceptibility towards different antimicrobials

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Levels of the msuE transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

S2 Fig. Levels of the mexD transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

S3 Fig. OprD-LacZ production during planktonic growth and in anoxic biofilms.

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

S2 Table. A) Functional classification of transcripts that are differentially abundant under the conditions A-30 and B-96 when compared with condition P. B) Up-regulated metabolic pathways under anoxic conditions.

S3 Table. Selected up-regulated functions in B-96 cells scrutinized for anoxic biofilm formation.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

RNASeq library construction and sequence analysis

RNA isolation and Northern-blot analysis

Determination of MICs

Biofilm assays

Construction of a PA14 oprI deletion mutant and susceptibility test towards SMAP-29

Construction of plasmids pTLoprI and pTLoprD

RT-qPCR

β-galactosidase assay

Results and Discussion

Up-regulated pathways at 30 min after anaerobic shift and after 96h of anoxic biofilm formation

Monobactam biosynthesis.

Biosynthesis of cofactors.

Energy metabolism.

Protein secretion.

Sulphur metabolism.

Transcription / Translation / RNA processing.

Up-regulated transcripts in B-96 biofilms that impact on anoxic biofilm formation

Differential abundance of PA14 antibiotic resistance genes in anoxic biofilms: correlation with the susceptibility towards different antimicrobials

Conclusions

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Levels of the msuE transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

S2 Fig. Levels of the mexD transcript determined by RT-qPCR.

S3 Fig. OprD-LacZ production during planktonic growth and in anoxic biofilms.

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

S2 Table. A) Functional classification of transcripts that are differentially abundant under the conditions A-30 and B-96 when compared with condition P. B) Up-regulated metabolic pathways under anoxic conditions.

S3 Table. Selected up-regulated functions in B-96 cells scrutinized for anoxic biofilm formation.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

RNA_Seq library construction and sequence analysis