Ectopic Expression of Retrotransposon-Derived PEG11/RTL1 Contributes to the Callipyge Muscular Hypertrophy

Xuewen Xu; Fabien Ectors; Erica E. Davis; Dimitri Pirottin; Huijun Cheng; Frédéric Farnir; Tracy Hadfield; Noelle Cockett; Carole Charlier; Michel Georges; Haruko Takeda

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140594

Abstract

The callipyge phenotype is an ovine muscular hypertrophy characterized by polar overdominance: only heterozygous +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals receiving the CLPG mutation from their father express the phenotype. +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals are characterized by postnatal, ectopic expression of Delta-like 1 homologue (DLK1) and Paternally expressed gene 11/Retrotransposon-like 1 (PEG11/RTL1) proteins in skeletal muscle. We showed previously in transgenic mice that ectopic expression of DLK1 alone induces a muscular hypertrophy, hence demonstrating a role for DLK1 in determining the callipyge hypertrophy. We herein describe newly generated transgenic mice that ectopically express PEG11 in skeletal muscle, and show that they also exhibit a muscular hypertrophy phenotype. Our data suggest that both DLK1 and PEG11 act together in causing the muscular hypertrophy of callipyge sheep.

Citation: Xu X, Ectors F, Davis EE, Pirottin D, Cheng H, Farnir F, et al. (2015) Ectopic Expression of Retrotransposon-Derived PEG11/RTL1 Contributes to the Callipyge Muscular Hypertrophy. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0140594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594

Editor: Atsushi Asakura, University of Minnesota Medical School, UNITED STATES

Received: November 24, 2014; Accepted: September 27, 2015; Published: October 16, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (project 2.4544.11), the Communauté Française de Belgique (ARC Mirage), the European Union (FP7 Callimir project), the China state-sponsored post-graduate study abroad program (to HC), and the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (postdoctoral fellowship to XX).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The callipyge phenotype

The callipyge phenotype is a muscular hypertrophy described in sheep. The augmented muscle mass (less than or equal to 50% increase) characterizing callipyge animals results from the larger proportion and diameter of glycolytic, fast twitch type II muscle fibers. The callipyge phenotype manifests itself at approximately one month of age and is characterized by a rostro-caudal gradient (i.e. more pronounced in the posterior than in the anterior part of the body). Callipyge meat is tougher, and this has precluded its large-scale commercial use (reviewed in [1] and references therein).

Cis-effects of the CLPG mutation

The callipyge phenotype is determined entirely by the CLPG mutation, an A to G transition in a highly conserved dodecamer motif located in the 90-Kb intergenic region separating the Delta-like 1 homologue (DLK1) and Gene trap locus 2 (GTL2) genes in the eponymous imprinted domain [2, 3]. The CLPG mutation is thought to inactivate a muscle-specific silencer thereby causing prolonged, ectopic expression of DLK1, GTL2, Paternally expressed gene 11/Retrotransposon-like 1 (PEG11/RTL1), Antisense PEG11 (anti-PEG11), RNA imprinted and accumulated in nucleus (RIAN), miRNA containing gene (MIRG) and associated small RNAs in postnatal skeletal muscle. The CLPG mutation does not affect imprinting control of the DLK1-GTL2 domain: the protein-encoding DLK1 and PEG11 remain preferentially expressed from the paternal allele, while the non-coding long RNAs, GTL2, anti-PEG11, RIAN, and MIRG, with more than 47 C/D snoRNAs and more than 110 embedded microRNAs, remain preferentially expressed from the maternal allele (f.i. [4, 5]). The expression of the more distantly located Brain-enriched guanylate kinase-associated (BEGAIN) and Deiodinase iodothyronine type III (DIO3) imprinted genes in the same domain is not affected by the callipyge mutation [6]. As a result of this cis-effect of the callipyge mutation, the expression pattern of the affected core cluster of genes in the DLK1-GTL2 domain is distinct in the four genotypes: (i) all target genes are silenced after birth in skeletal muscle of +/+ animals, (ii) all target genes are expressed ectopically in skeletal muscle of CLPG/CLPG animals, (iii) all maternally expressed (long and small) non-coding RNAs are expressed ectopically in skeletal muscle of CLPG^Mat/+^Pat animals, and (iv) the paternally expressed protein encoding DLK1 and PEG11 genes are ectopically expressed in skeletal muscle of +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals (reviewed in [1]).

Trans-effects underlying polar overdominance

The most remarkable feature of the callipyge phenomenon is the fact that only +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals display the muscular hypertrophy. This non-Mendelian mode of inheritance is referred to as polar overdominance [7]. It differs from regular parental imprinting as homozygous CLPG/CLPG animals do not express the phenotype. This is thought to result from the post-transcriptional trans-inactivation of the paternally expressed protein-coding DLK1 and PEG11 genes by one or more of the long and/or small non-coding maternally expressed RNAs from the domain [8]. As a consequence, DLK1 and PEG11 are expressed at the protein level only in postnatal skeletal muscle of +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals, the only individuals expressing the callipyge phenotype [9–11]. The trans-inactivation of PEG11 in CLPG/CLPG animals has been shown to result from the RISC-mediated cleavage of PEG11 mRNA by at least three perfectly complementary miRNAs (oar-miR-136, -127 and -432) processed from the maternally expressed anti-PEG11 non-coding RNA [12]. The molecular mechanisms underlying the trans-inactivation of DLK1 remain elusive [13].

Role of DLK1 and/or PEG11 protein in causing the callipyge phenotype

The distinctive features of +^Mat/CLPG^Pat animals (i.e. (i) the only genotype expressing the callipyge phenotype, and (ii) the only genotype expressing DLK1 and PEG11 protein in skeletal muscle after birth), strongly suggest that ectopic expression of DLK1 and/or PEG11 protein causes the callipyge muscular hypertrophy. DLK1 encodes a member of the Notch-Delta family of membrane receptors/ligands, which is known to be involved in adipogenesis, haematopoiesis, neurogenesis and adaptation to independent life (f.i. [1]). DLK1 has been implicated directly in causing the callipyge muscular hypertrophy in a murine model; transgenic mice expressing ovine DLK1 (C2 isoform) under the dependence of the muscle specific murine Myosin light chain 3F promoter and 2E enhancer (Mlc 3F/2E) exhibit a muscular hypertrophy [9].

PEG11 is an “exapted” protein derived from a eutherian-specific sushi-ichi retrotransposon, which is essential for the maintenance of the feto-maternal placental interface [14]. Notably, enhanced expression of PEG11 was shown recently to drive hepatocarcinogenesis [15]. Whether PEG11 participates in producing the callipyge phenotype has remained undetermined so far.

Here, we describe the generation of transgenic mice expressing ovine PEG11 under the dependence of the same Mlc 3F/2E promoter and enhancer combination to study the contribution of PEG11 in producing the callipyge phenotype.

Results

Generating transgenic mice expressing ovine PEG11 in skeletal muscle

First, we cloned the ovine PEG11 open reading frame (oPEG11 ORF), encoding 1,333 amino acids, into a modified pMlc3F-nlacz-2E vector, placing it under the dependence of the Mlc 3F/2E [9]. The corresponding regulatory elements are expected to drive expression of the transgene preferentially in type IIB fast twitch muscle fibers (affected predominantly in callipyge sheep) throughout pre- and postnatal development [16]. The 7.6 Kb insert was released from the remainder of the vector by digestion with NotI and SmaI, gel-purified and microinjected into fertilized inbred FVB/N murine eggs, which were re-implanted into pseudo-pregnant foster mothers. Among 41 offspring, eight had genomic integration of the transgene. Six out of the eight founders transmitted the transgene to their offspring. We performed RT-PCR to amplify the oPEG11 ORF using total RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris muscle of two offspring per transmitting founder. Transgene expression was observed for two mouse lines (referred to as 126 and 127; data not shown) and these were analyzed further.

We combined Southern blotting, regular PCR, and “splinkerette” PCR [17] to characterize the transgene insertions in mouse lines 126 and 127. Line 126 was shown to harbor a single-copy transgene that was integrated into an intergenic region on chromosome 16, at ∼407 Kb from Roundabout homolog 2 (Robo2) and ∼722 Kb from Lipase, member I (Lipi) (Fig 1; S1 Fig). Unexpectedly, the transgene comprised both the Mlc/oPEG11 insert, as well as the remainder of the vector including a 0.22 Kb duplicated segment flanking the transgene on either end (Fig 1). This indicated that the microinjected insert preparation was contaminated with undigested vector. The restriction patterns obtained by Southern blotting suggest that the transgene insertion was accompanied by a more than or equal to 1.6 Kb deletion at the integration site (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Characterization of the oPEG11 transgene.

A. Organization of the oPEG11 transgene (T_P) integration site in mouse oPEG11 line 126 and endogenous mouse Myosin light chain (Mlc) locus. Thick black lines correspond to upstream, intronic and downstream sequences of the Mlc gene including the 3F promotor (Mlc3F) and 2E enhancer (Mlc2E); the numbered black boxes to Mlc exons; the thick grey line to vector-specific sequences including a 220 bp duplicated segment marked by a small white box (dup); the light gray boxes to the open reading frame of ovine PEG11 (oPEG11 ORF) and bovine GH polyadenylation site (pA), respectively; the thin black lines to the transgene integration site flanked by Robo2 at 407 Kb on the proximal site, and Lipi at 722 Kb on the distal site. The positions of the NotI and SmaI sites in the vector intended to excise the insert DNA for microinjection are shown, as are the positions of the SpeI and MfeI sites determining the size of the restriction fragments detected with the indicated probe (probe) in Southern blotting for the transgene integration site and endogenous Mlc gene. The position of greater than or equal to 1.6 Kb deletion at the integration site is indicated (del). The position of the primers used for PCR and RT-PCR are shown. B. Results of Southern blotting of genomic DNA of homozygous +/+, heterozygous +/T_P, and homozygous T_P/T_P mice (oPEG11 line 126), digested with SpeI (left) or SpeI + MfeI (right), using the probe with position as shown in A. The bands corresponding to the transgene (T_P), and endogenous Mlc gene (mMlc) are marked. C. Results of PCRs performed using genomic DNAs and the primers shown in A to clarify the transgene organization in mouse oPEG11 lines 126 and 127A.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.g001

Mouse line 127 was shown to harbor two distinct integration sites (127A and 127B), both comprising a similar, complex array thought to encompass multiple tandem copies of digested insert and undigested full-length vector, confirming the contamination of the insert preparation with undigested vector (Fig 1C; S2 Fig). Expression of the transgene was only observed in mice with the 127A integration, not in mice with the 127B integration (data not shown). The 127A integration site was shown to correspond to the last intron of Coiled-coil domain containing 91 (Ccdc91) on chromosome 6 (S1 Fig). Ccdc91 was shown to be highly expressed in skeletal muscle, and its expression to be reduced strongly by the transgene insertion (p = 5.6x10^-5; Fig 2A).

Download:

Fig 2. Expression analysis of the oPEG11 transgenes.

A. Relative expression levels of Ccdc91 (mean ± 1.96 x standard error of the mean (s.e.m.)) measured by QRT-PCR using RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris muscles of +/+ and +/T_P mice from oPEG11 line 127A. The nearly 1.5-fold reduction in +/T_P animals suggests an inactivation of the Ccdc91 gene and likely explains the absence of T_P/T_P mice in this cross. B. Northern blotting of mRNA extracted from quadriceps femoris of +/+, +/T_P, and T_P/T_P mice from oPEG11 lines 126 and 127A using RNA probes corresponding to the ovine PEG11 transgene (oPEG11) and mouse β–actin for control (Actb). The bands have the approximate size expected for transcripts derived from the oPEG11 transgene (4.3 Kb, arrow) in the both mouse lines plus a larger band (~7 Kb, arrow head) in line 127. C. RT-PCR (or PCR) performed using total RNA (or DNA) extracted from quadriceps femoris (or tail) of +/+, +/T_P, and T_P/T_P mice from lines 126 and 127A using primer combinations shown in Fig 1A. The extra-bands corresponding to unspliced transcripts observed in line 127A are differentiated from the bands expected for spliced transcripts observed in lines 126 and 127A. D. Results of 5’ and 3’ RACE experiments conducted with total RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris of +/+, and +/T_P mice from lines 126 and 127A. Sequencing the PCR products marked by the arrows confirmed the use of the vector-specific transcription start and polyadenylation sites (data not shown). E. Relative expression level of oPEG11 (mean ± 1.96 x s.e.m.) in line 126 measured by QRT-PCR using total RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris from animals of indicated genotypes and ages, and from tissues at 10 weeks of age. Expression levels of +/T_P animals were used for references. The numbers of tested samples are shown in parentheses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.g002

We used RT-PCR, rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), and Northern blotting to analyze further the transgene expression in mouse lines 126 and 127A. Northern blotting with total RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris of 10-week old animals revealed transgene-specific bands of expected size (∼4.3 Kb) and intensity (∼2:1 homozygote:heterozygote ratio) in line 126. In addition to the same band, a stronger and larger (∼7 Kb) band was observed in line 127A (Fig 2B). RT-PCR analysis with overlapping amplicons encompassing the complete oPEG11 ORF revealed amplification products of expected size and sequence for line 126 (Fig 2C). Similar results were obtained for line 127A with, however, extra amplification products for the 5’ amplicon (S2/A3 in Fig 2C). The largest of these was shown by sequencing to result from retention of the construct’s intron (733 bp between Mlc exon 2 and oPEG11 ORF) introducing premature termination codons. 5’ and 3’ RACE uncovered the expected, vector-dependent transcription start and polyadenylation sites in both lines (Fig 2D).

Because of the complex structure of the transgene insertion, the occurrence of multiple abnormal PEG11 transcripts, and the deleterious effect on Ccdc91 expression precluding the attainment of homozygous mice (data not shown) in line 127A, we decided to pursue detailed analysis of line 126 only. RT-PCR analysis indicated that the line 126 transgene was expressed preferentially in skeletal muscle, and that expression increased from birth to 10 weeks in this tissue (Fig 2E).

Ectopic expression of ovine PEG11 causes a muscular hypertrophy in transgenic mice

Sixteen F1 pairs carrying the oPEG11 line 126 transgene in a pure FVB background were intercrossed to generate 245 F2 offspring from 28 litters. The average number of offspring per litter was 9, ranging from 4 to 12, hence within the normal range for FVB mice. Sex ratios and genotype frequencies (+/+, +/T(ransgene)_P and T_P/T_P) did not deviate significantly from expectations (S1 Table). All animals were weighted weekly after weaning, euthanized at ~10 weeks of age (range: 70–74 days) and dissected. For each animal, we recorded live weight, carcass weight, the weight of the hind legs, quadriceps femoris muscles, triceps brachialis muscles, kidney, spleen, liver and heart. The weight of the hind leg is primarily determined by the mass of the muscle (85.6 ± 1.9%, n = 3). Phenotypic values were analyzed with a mixed model including sex and genotype as fixed effects, and litter as random effect (Model-1, S2 Table). Sex-by-genotype interactions were considered but never significant and therefore not included in the model. Transgene genotype significantly affected the weight of the carcass (p = 1.5x10^-4), hind legs (p = 2.0x10^-7), quadriceps (p = 2.8x10^-6), and triceps (p = 2.5x10^-3) (Fig 3; S2 Table). More specifically, one and two copies of the transgene increased carcass weight by 2.3% (p = 6.4x10^-3) and 3.7% (p = 7.4x10^-5), and the weight of the hind legs by 3.0% (p = 2.6x10^-4) and 5.2% (p = 3.4x10^-8), respectively. For individual muscles the corresponding increases were 3.0% (p = 1.4x10^-3) and 5.3% (p = 1.4x10^-6) for quadriceps, and 1.7% (not significant) and 3.7% (p = 1.3x10^-3) for triceps.

Download:

Fig 3. Phenotypic effects of one (+/T_P) and two (T_P/T_P) copies of the oPEG11 transgene (line 126) in the oPEG11 F1 mouse cross (+/T_P x +/T_P) at 10 weeks of age.

The eight graphs show the distribution of individual phenotypic values corrected for sex and litter effects (carcass weight, the weight of the hind legs, quadriceps and lung and their ratios to live weight (LW)) of mice sorted by transgene genotype. Ratios were subject to angular transformation. Genotype means are shown by black dots with error bars (± 1.96 s.e.m.). Statistically significant differences between the possible combinations of genotype computed with the mixed model and Tukey honest significant difference test are marked by braces; ***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05 (S2 Table); n = 68 (+/+), 122 (+/T_P) and 55 (T_P/T_P).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.g003

Transgene genotype marginally increased live weight at 10 weeks of age (p = 0.03), as well as the weight of organs (kidney and lung, p > 0.04), although these effects were not significant when accounting for the realization of multiple tests (p ≥ 0.27 after Šidák correction, S2 Table). To verify further whether the effect on muscularity might just reflect a systemic growth effect rather than being genuinely muscle-specific, we tested the effect of transgene genotype on the weight of individual body parts relative to live weight either by dividing the phenotypic values by live weight (Model-1) or by adding live weight as a covariate in the mixed model (Model-2, S2 Table). The effect on hind legs and quadriceps remained highly significant (Šidák corrected p ≤3.7x10^-3). The effect on organs, however, became non-significant (Šidák corrected p ≥ 0.13) and their relative weight didn’t increase consistently with transgene copy number (Fig 3; S2 Table).

We next examined the effect of the oPEG11 transgene on myofiber size distribution. In callipyge sheep, myofiber diameter was increased by 24%, 20% and 7% in longissimus, gluteus medius and supraspinatus muscles, respectively [18]. The ovine DLK1 transgenic mice exhibited increase of the quadriceps myofiber diameter by 7.4%, 8.7% and 10.5% in +/T and T/T (line A), and +/T (line D) genotypes, respectively [9]. We here selected to use extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus (SL) muscles that are known to be rich and poor in type IIB myofibers, respectively (55.7–86.6% for EDL, 0.0–3.1% for SL [19, 20]) where the Mlc 3F/2E regulatory elements are expected to be most active [16]. We dissected the two muscles from ten male mice in two litters at 7 and 10 months of age (n = 3, 5, 2 for +/+, +/T_P and T_P/T_P, respectively) and performed hematoxylin and eosin staining of transverse sections. We measured the minimal Feret’s diameter of myofibers [21] (on average 1,062 myofibers per animal-muscle combination) so as to cover the entire cross-sectional muscle area (Fig 4; S3 Fig). EDL myofiber size was increased by 15.7% and 24.6% in +/T_P and T_P/T_P mice, respectively, compared to +/+ (p < 2.0x10^-16). The contrast between +/T_P and T_P/T_P genotypes was also significant (+7.7%, p < 2.0x10^-16). On the other hand, none of the corresponding contrasts in SL muscle was significant (p > 5.9x10^-2), consistent with the lower contribution of type IIB fibers in SL muscle. Skewness of the myofiber diameter distribution in EDL muscle was changed from right- to left-tailed by increasing the transgene copy number (+/+ = 0.22, +/T_P = -0.05, T_P/T_P = -0.17). This implies that part of the myofibers in EDL muscle (supposedly glycolytic fast twitch fibers) is enlarged by the oPEG11 transgene expression. We did not observe any apparent histological abnormality in these samples (f.i. necrosis, fibrosis, fat deposition, increase of myofibers with centrally located nuclei) (S3 Fig).

Download:

Fig 4. Relative frequency distribution of myofiber cross-sectional size of extensor digitorum longus (A) and soleus (B) muscle sorted by transgene genotype.

The minimal Feret’s diameters of on average 1,062 fibers were measured for each animal-muscle type combination so as to cover the entire cross-sectional area of the muscle. Y-axis shows means of relative frequencies among animals with the same genotype. X-axis shows myofiber cross-sectional size ranging from 0 to 75 μm with a bin width 3. Color used for each genotype class, genotype means of myofober diameter (± 1.96 x s.e.m.) and statistical significance of the contrasts between genotypes computed with the Tukey honest significant difference test are shown in the upper right corner of each Fig ***: p < 0.001; n = 3 (+/+), 5 (+/T_P) and 2 (T_P/T_P).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.g004

Together, our data indicate that postnatal ectopic expression of ovine PEG11 in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice enhances muscle growth, and this strongly supports a contributing role for PEG11 in the muscular hypertrophy of callipyge sheep. The magnitude of the effects observed on muscle weight (less than or equal to 5.3% increase (T_P/T_P quadriceps)) are modest when compared to those reported in callipyge sheep (f.i. 18.8–21.0% increase in quadriceps [22, 23]). To gain some insights in the possible causes of this discrepancy, we evaluated simultaneously the expression level of ovine PEG11 in +^Mat/CLPG^Pat sheep as well as +/T_P and T_P/T_P transgenic mice by Northern blotting (Fig 5). While the ovine PEG11 transcripts were clearly detectable in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice, their abundance (estimated by densitometry) was ∼10-fold lower than in callipyge sheep (mouse T_P/T_P versus sheep +^mat/C^pat, Fig 5), and this, in addition to the absence of ectopic expression of DLK1, may explain the differences in terms of effect size between mice and sheep.

Download:

Fig 5. Comparison of PEG11 expression levels in sheep (at 8 weeks of age) and transgenic mice (at 10 weeks of age).

Northern blotting performed with 20 μg of total RNA extracted from longissimus dorsi muscles of sheep of the four possible CLPG genotypes (+/+, CLPG^Mat/+^Pat, +^Mat/CLPG^Pat and CLPG/CLPG), or quadriceps femoris muscles of +/+, +/T_P, and T_P/T_P mice from oPEG11 line 126 and probed with a strand-specific RNA probe corresponding first to ovine PEG11, and secondly to mouse β–actin. The bands corresponding presumably to the endogenous ovine PEG11 (sheep PEG11), transgene-derived ovine PEG11 (oPEG11), or β–actin (ACTB/Actb) are marked. Relative quantities were estimated by densitometric analysis of the autoradiograms (a bar graph on the right) suggesting that expression levels of ovine PEG11 are ∼10-fold lower in T_P/T_P mice from oPEG11 line 126 than in callipyge +^Mat/CLPG^Pat sheep.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.g005

Following Vuocolo et al. [24], we attempted to demonstrate a change in myofiber type composition in +/T_P and T_P/T_P transgenic mice by performing QRT-PCR using quadriceps muscle RNA for Myosin heavy chain 1 (Myh1), Myh2, Myh4 and Myh7, which are specific for type IIx, IIa, IIb and I myofibers, respectively. We observed no significant effect of transgene genotype on the relative amounts of any one of these myosin heavy chain isoforms (S4 Fig).

Discussion

The question of whether ectopic expression of DLK1 and/or PEG11 is responsible for the callipyge muscular hypertrophy has been a matter of debate for some time. The notion that imprinted genes from the DLK1-GTL2 domain might affect muscle development is supported by both the observed increase in the number of myofibers with centrally located nuclei and also the enlargement of myofiber cross-sectional area in fetuses with paternal uniparental disomy of mouse chromosome 12 (f.i. [25]), and fetuses inheriting a deletion of the Dlk1-Gtl2 intergenic germline-derived differentially methylated region (IG-DMR) on their maternal chromosome [26, 27]. However, these models perturb the dosage of at least three genes: Dlk1, Peg11 and Dio3. As DIO3 is not affected by the CLPG mutation in callipyge sheep, DLK1 and PEG11 remained the two most plausible candidates.

A role for DLK1 appeared well established when it was shown in transgenic mice that ectopic expression of ovine DLK1 (transmembrane C2 isoform) in pre- and postnatal skeletal muscle caused a muscular hypertrophy [9]. However, the validity of this conclusion was challenged by the observation that BAC-transgenic mice with double or triple Dlk1 dosage did not exhibit the expected skeletal muscle anomalies [28]. This discrepancy may be explained in part by the fact that the natural spatio-temporal gene expression profile is maintained in the da Rocha et al. [28] model, but not in the Davis et al. [9] model, in which DLK1 is re-expressed in a tissue (muscle) and at a developmental stage (postnatal) where it is normally silenced completely.

Direct evidence for a role of PEG11 in modulating muscle phenotype has not been reported previously. Sekita et al. [14] generated transgenic mice overexpressing Rtl1 (Peg11) alone (respecting its normal spatio-temporal expression pattern), but did not report any effect on skeletal muscle. It is noteworthy that the majority of these animals died before or just after birth with severe placental anomalies, and that–in surviving animals–PEG11 expression would likely have rapidly been downregulated in skeletal muscle. In this study, although presenting results for one line only (oPEG11 mouse line 126), we strongly believe that the observed increase in muscle mass is due to ectopic expression of the oPEG11 transgene in skeletal muscle rather than to an unintended side-effect of the transgene insertion. First of all, the phenotype is the most prominent where (skeletal muscle) and when (after 7 weeks of age) the Mlc 3F/2E promoter and enhancer is expected to be most active and is independent of live weight [16, 19]. Secondly, we observe a strong effect on the diameter of myofibers in the fast twitch muscle. Thirdly, the integration site is in the middle of a large intergenic region at more than 400 Kb from the closest annotated gene.

Our data indicate that ectopic expression of PEG11 controlled by the Mlc3f/2E promoter and enhancer elements in mice affects muscle growth and development, but the precise molecular mechanisms remain elusive. PEG11/RTL1 is a sushi-ichi-related retrotransposon homolog and predicted to have a gag (capsid-like), an aspartyl protease, and two transmembrane domains [29, 30]. PEG11 appears to be preferentially localized proximal to nuclei of the endothelial cells of fetal capillaries in the labyrinth zone of placenta [14], and associated with the nuclear fraction in skeletal muscle of callipyge sheep [11]. It has been speculated that the hepatocarcinogenic effect of PEG11 overexpression might result from cleavage of an extracellular matrix component mediated by a speculative aspartyl protease activity of PEG11 [15]. Possible connections, if any, between these observations and an effect on muscle mass are unclear.

In conclusion, this work provides the first direct evidence that excess PEG11 as well as DLK1 in post-natal skeletal muscle contributes to the muscular hypertrophy of callipyge sheep. Additional transgenic mouse lines expressing PEG11 and/or DLK1 at levels equivalent to callipyge sheep would facilitate further analyses to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the muscular hypertrophy in adult skeletal muscle. That might provide new insight useful for animal breeding as well as finding new therapeutic targets to treat muscle loss related to disease and age.

Materials and Methods

Oligonucleotide information

All oligonucleotide sequences are listed in S4 Table.

Transgene construction

The complete ovine PEG11 ORF was amplified by PCR as seven partially overlapping fragments from BAC 229G11 [6, 31, 32]. These were digested at endogenous restriction enzyme sites (BspeI, BglI, NsiI, AatII, BspHI, MluI) to generate paired cohesive ends which allowed for the reconstitution by ligation of a 4,178 bp fragment spanning from codon two to 175 bp downstream of the TGA stop codon of the ovine PEG11 gene (oPEG11). The corresponding fragment was digested with BglII and ligated in frame with the vector’s ATG initiation codon of the pMlc3F-nlacZ-2E vector [9]. A 7.5 Kb fragment encompassing Mlc 3F promotor, oPEG11 ORF, bovine GH polyadenylation signal and Mlc 2E enhancer was released from the remainder of the vector by digestion with NotI and SmaI, subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, and purified with the Geneclean Spin kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA).

Generation of transgenic mice

Transgenic mice were generated as described previously by Davis et al. [9]. Briefly, the purified DNA fragment was microinjected into the pronuclei of fertilized inbred FVB/N (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) mouse eggs at the concentration of 1 ng/μl via standard techniques. Injected eggs were then surgically implanted into pseudopregnant B6CBAF1 (Charles River) foster mothers. The transgene-positive founders were mated with wild type FVB mice to confirm transmission of the transgene upon PCR analysis of tail DNAs from their offspring. To evaluate transgene expression, we performed RT-PCR targeting the oPEG11 ORF using total RNA extracted from quadriceps femoris skeletal muscles of two offspring per transmitting founder.

Ethical statement

All animal procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of University of Liège and approved by the Animal Ethics Committees of University of Liège (Permit Number: LA1610002).

Characterizing the transgene insertion sites

Southern blotting.

Genomic DNA was extracted from mouse spleen using standard procedures; proteinase K digestion followed by phenol/chloroform purification and ethanol precipitation. Ten micrograms of genomic DNA were digested with SpeI and/or MfeI overnight at 37°C, and separated on a 0.8% agarose gel. The gel was equilibrated in the transfer buffer (0.4N NaOH and 1M NaCl), and DNA was then capillary-transferred to the Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). DNA probes for Southern hybridization were obtained by PCR amplifications of the vector used for generating transgenic mouse using primers; PEG11-probe1-S1 and–A1 (mouse line 126), or PEG11-probe2-S1 and–S2 (line 127A). The PCR products were then labeled with [α-³²P] dCTP with the Prime-It II random primer labeling kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). The membrane was hybridized with approximately 10⁶ cpm/ml of the probe in the ULTRAhyb ultrasensitive hybridization buffer (Ambion, Austin, TX) at 55°C overnight. After washing twice with 2 × SSC and 0.1% SDS buffer at 55°C for 5 min and three times at 60°C for 15 min with 0.1 × SSC and 0.1% SDS, the membrane was exposed overnight to a phosphor screen which was subsequently scanned with the Typhoon 9400 instrument (GE Healthcare).

PCR.

PCR amplifications using genomic DNAs or the vector DNA were conducted with the Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions under the following conditions: (1) 98°C 2 min, (2) 5 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 62°C for 20 s and 72°C for 50 s, (3) 5 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 50 s, (4) 25 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 58°C for 10 s and 72°C for 40 s, followed by (5) a 5 min final extension at 72°C. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel.

Splinkerette PCR.

Splinkerette PCR was performed according to Potter & Luo [17]. Briefly, 1 μg of genomic DNA was digested with FatI (for line 126) or ApoI (for line 127A), and ligated to a corresponding linker consisting of double stranded splinkerette oligonucleotides with a stable hairpin loop at one side and a compatible cohesive end at another side (SPLK-A and SPLK-B oligonucleotides were used for FatI digestion, and SPLK-A and SPLK-E for ApoI digestion, respectively). Two rounds of nested PCRs were conducted using primers; SPLA1 with either S7 (line 126) or S9 (line 127A) for the first round of PCR, and SPLA2 with either S8 (line 126) or S10 (line 127A) for the second round of PCR. The PCR products were gel-purified and sequenced using a standard Sanger sequencing procedure to determine integration sites of the oPEG11 transgene in the mouse genome.

Genotyping assays for mouse lines 126 and 127A

According to the information of the 126 and 127A transgene integration sites, we designed allele-specific PCR assays for both lines (S1 Fig). PCRs targeting wild-type and transgene alleles were performed separately using the Go-Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) under the following condition: (1) 95°C 3 min, (2) 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, followed by (3) a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Amplification products were pooled and detected by electrophoresis on a 2.5% agarose gel.

Characterizing the expression of oPEG11 transgenes in mouse lines 126 and 127A at the RNA level

RNA extraction.

Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and treated with the Turbo DNase (Ambion) prior to RT-PCR or RACE according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Northern blotting.

Northern blotting was performed essentially by following Green and Sambrook [33]. Briefly, 20 μg of total RNA was denatured at 65°C for 15 min in three volumes of the NorthernMax formaldehyde load dye (Ambion) and subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel containing 2.4 M formaldehyde in 1 x MOPS buffer (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) at 5 V/cm for ~5 h. The gel was soaked in 0.01 N NaOH/3 M NaCl for 20 min, and RNA was transferred to the Hybond N+ membrane using upward capillary flow of 10 × SSC buffer (150 mM sodium citrate, 1.5 M NaCl, pH 7.0) for 1 hr. RNA was cross-linked on the membrane using the Stratalinker UV crosslinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). For preparing probes, part of oPEG11 ORF (199-bp) was PCR-amplified using sheep muscle cDNA and primers (antisense primers were appended with a T7 RNA polymerase promoter), ovPEG_P_sen1 and _ans1_T7, and purified with the DNA Clean & Concentrator-5 (Zymo research, Irvine, CA). RNA probe was synthesized using the MAXIscript kit (Ambion) from one microgram of the PCR product with T7 RNA polymerase with [α-³²P] UTP according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After DNase I treatment and column purification using the ProbeQuant G-50 micro column (GE Healthcare), approximately 1 × 10⁶ cpm/ml of the RNA probe was used for hybridization at 68°C overnight. The membrane was washed twice at 70°C for 10 min in 2 x SSC and 0.1% SDS, then 3~5 times at 70°C for 30 min in 0.1 x SSC and 0.1% SDS, exposed to a phosphor screen for a few days and scanned with the Typhoon 9400 instrument. RNA probe targeting mouse β–actin (for control) was prepared from a plasmid DNA supplied in the MAXIscript kit.

RT-PCR.

cDNA synthesis was performed using 1 μg of total RNA with 40 pmol of oligo (dT)₁₈, 40 pmol of random hexamer and 1 pmol each of two oPEG11-specific primers (A4 and PEG-cDNA2) using the RevertAid H Minus First Stand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas, Burlington, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was performed using the Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase under the following conditions: (1) 98°C 1 min, (2) 5 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 20 s and 72°C for 90 s, (3) 5 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 80 s, (4) 25 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 58°C for 10 s and 72°C for 70 s, followed by (5) 5 min final extension at 72°C. The PCR products were purified after electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and validated by sequencing.

qRT-PCR.

cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using 50 pmol each of oligo (dT)₁₈ and random hexamers. QRT-PCR assay was performed using the Absolute Blue QPCR SYBR Green ROX Mix (ABgene, Surrey, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on the 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) under the following conditions: (1) initial denaturing at 95°C for 15 min, followed by (2) 40 cycles of 95°C 15 s, 60°C 30 s, and 72°C 30 s, and (3) a melting curve analysis with 95°C 15 s, 60°C 15 s, and 95°C 15 s. Expression levels of target genes were normalized relatively to the expression levels of two control genes (Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 and Actin gamma 1) that were selected out of five tested housekeeping genes (Splicing factor 3a subunit 1, Actin beta, Topoisomerase DNA II beta) using 2- and 10-week old mouse quadriceps muscles according to Vandesompele et al. [34].

RACE.

cDNAs for 5’ and 3’ RACE were synthesized with the GeneRacer Kit (invitrogen) from five and one micrograms of total RNA, respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To identify a 5’ end of transcript (5’ RACE), cDNA was amplified using GeneRACE 5’ and oPEG11-specific 5GSP-O primers for the first round of PCR, and GeneRACE 5’ Nested and oPEG11-specific 5GSP-I primers for the second round of PCR. To identify a polyadenylation site (3’ RACE), GeneRACE 3’ and oPEG11-specific 3GSP primers were used. The PCR amplification was performed by using the Phusion Hot Start II High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase under the following conditions: (1) 98°C 30 s, (2) 4 cycles of 98°C 10 s, 70°C 30 s, (3) 4 cycles of 98°C 10 s, 68°C 30 s, (4) 25 cycles of 98°C 10 s, 65°C 10 s, 72°C 30 s and (5) a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The RACE products were gel-purified after electrophoresis and sequenced by standard procedures.

Phenotyping

Mice were weaned at 21 days of age and kept with 4~5 mice per cage. Mice were weighted at weaning and then weekly until 10 weeks of age. Animals were euthanized at 10 weeks of age (range: 70–74 days) and dissected. We measured carcass (corresponding to skinned body with head, ankles, tail, internal organs, and associated fat removed), hind legs (corresponding to skinned limbs between hip and ankle), quadriceps femoris muscles, triceps brachialis muscles, kidney, spleen, liver and heart weights. Experimentalists were unaware of the animals’ genotypes upon dissection.

Statistical analysis of mouse phenotype

Data points for which the residuals (i.e. phenotype corrected for fixed and random effects) were greater or equal to 3 or less than or equal to -3 times the residual standard deviation were considered as outliers and omitted from further analyses. Ratios (phenotypes divided by live weight) were subject to angular transformation (i.e. ) prior to analysis. Phenotypic values were analyzed with a mixed model including sex and genotype (and live weight) as fixed effects and litter as random effect. The effect of genotype accounted for multiple comparisons was calculated with the Šidák correction. Effects in possible contrasts of genotypes were computed with the Tukey honest signifcant difference test. Statistical analyses were conducted with R [35] (packages: lme4 [36], lmerTest [37], multcomp [38]) and SAS (SAS, Cary, NC).

Morphometric analysis

Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus (SL) muscles were dissected from male mice at 7 and 10 months of age. Both muscles from an individual were pinned up on a cork plate, fixed in 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for approximately four hours, cut at the midpoint perpendicularly to the long axis of the muscles, and embedded in a paraffin block so that the cutting planes were oriented for sectioning. Transverse sections (two sections per muscle) were prepared at a thickness of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin by a standard procedure. Digital images of the entire muscle cross-sectional area were acquired at 20x magnification using the FSX100 microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA). To estimate myofiber cross-sectional size, approximately 500 myofibers per section so as to cover the entire area of the muscle were manually framed and their minimal Feret’s diameters were measured as a geometrical parameter for myofiber cross-sectional size [21] using the ImageJ software [39]. The fiber diameter was analyzed using a linear regression model containing genotype as a fixed effect and its statistical significance of contrasts between genotypes was computed using the Tukey’s honest significant difference method using R (package stat [40]).

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Identification of transgene integration sites and genotyping of mice.

A&C. Results of “splinkerete PCR” experiments conducted to identify the genomic sequence flanking the transgenes in mouse lines 126 and 127A, respectively. Sequencing the PCR products yielded the highlighted sequences (red: transgene-specific sequences; blue: mouse sequences at the integration sites) located in the genome by BLAT analysis. The corresponding locations are shown on screen captures of the UCSC genome browser. B&D. Results of the genotyping tests generated for lines 126 and 127A, respectively, on the basis of the obtained integration sites as described in Materials and Methods, and allowing unambiguous discrimination of the three possible genotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Characterization of oPEG11 transgene in mouse line 127.

A. Organization of the oPEG11 transgene (T_P) integration site and endogenous Myosin light chain (Mlc) gene in mouse lines 127A and 127B. The thick black lines correspond to upstream, intronic and downstream sequence of the Mlc gene including the 3F promotor (Mlc3F) and 2E enhancer (Mlc2E); the numbered black boxes to Mlc exons; the thick grey line to vector-specific sequences; the light gray boxes to the open reading frame of ovine PEG11 (oPEG11 ORF) and bovine GH polyadenylation site (pA) respectively. The positions of the NotI and SmaI sites in the vector intended to excise the insert are shown, as are the positions of the SpeI sites determining the size of the restriction fragments detected with the indicated probe (probe) in Southern blotting for the transgene integration site and endogenous Mlc gene. The position of the primers used for PCR and RT-PCR (Figs 1C and 2C) are shown and labeled as in S4 Table. B. Results of Southern blotting of genomic DNA of +/+, +/A, +/B, and A/B mice, digested with SpeI, using the probe with position as shown in A. Bands with ∼10.7 Kb corresponding to tandem transgene copies of the type shown in blue in A, ∼7.5 Kb bands corresponding to tandem transgene copies of the type shown in red in A, ∼9.0 Kb and ∼4.1 Kb bands presumably corresponding to transgene copies flanking the tandem repeats, and 3.9 Kb bands corresponding to the endogenous Mlc3F genes are marked.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Morphological analyses of extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus (SL) muscles of the oPEG11 line 126 F2 mice.

(A) Box plots show distributions of the myofiber cross-sectional size (minimal Feret’s diameter) sorted by animal and muscle. Frequency distributions sorted by genotype using the same data are shown in Fig 4. The box plots are colored according to its genotype class as is in Fig 4. Age of animal (month) is shown in parenthesis. n = 3 (+/+), 5 (+/T_P) and 2 (T_P/T_P). (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of transverse sections of EDL and SL muscles. Scale bar represents 50 μm. No apparent histological abnormality such as necrosis, fibrosis, fat deposition or increase in myofiber with centrally located nuclei was observed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. RNA expression analysis of Myosin heavy chain isoforms.

Results of QRT-PCR experiments conducted using quadriceps femoris muscle RNA and targeting endogenous mouse Myosin heavy chain isoforms Myh1, Myh2, Myh4 and Myh7 to identify putative myofiber type alterations as a result of oPEG11 transgene expression. None of the changes were statistically significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Sex-specific and pooled genotypic proportions and associated probabilities under the null hypothesis of Mendelian segregation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s005

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Transgene effects in the oPEG11 (line 126) F2 mice at 10 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s006

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Live weights of the oPEG11 (line 126) F2 mice between weaning and 10 weeks of age.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s007

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Oligonucleotide information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140594.s008

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Rodrigo Gularte Mérida and Dr. Ming Fang (University of Liège) for their kind help to X. Xu, and Dr. Ross Tellam for kindly providing anti PEG11 antibodies. We also thank the GIGA Transgenics Mice, ImmunoHistology and GenoTranscriptomics facilities (University of Liège) for their support. This work was funded by the FNRS (project 2.4544.11), the Communauté Française de Belgique (ARC Mirage), the European Union (FP7 Callimir project), the China state-sponsored post-graduate study abroad program (to HC), and the BELSPO (postdoctoral fellowship to XX).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XX EED CC MG HT. Performed the experiments: XX FE EED DP HC HT. Analyzed the data: XX EED FF CC MG HT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FF TH NC. Wrote the paper: XX MG HT.

References

1. Georges M, Takeda H, Cheng H, Xu X, Hadfield-Shay T, Cockett N, et al. Cis- and trans-effects underlying polar overdominance at the callipyge locus. In: Naumova AK, Greenwood CMT, editors. Epigenetics and Complex Traits. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013. pp. 89–106.
2. Freking BA, Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Rhodes SJ, Keele JW, Leymaster KA, et al. Identification of the single base change causing the callipyge muscle hypertrophy phenotype, the only known example of polar overdominance in mammals. Genome research. 2002;12(10):1496–506. pmid:12368241
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Smit M, Segers K, Carrascosa LG, Shay T, Baraldi F, Gyapay G, et al. Mosaicism of Solid Gold supports the causality of a noncoding A-to-G transition in the determinism of the callipyge phenotype. Genetics. 2003;163(1):453–6. pmid:12586730
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Charlier C, Segers K, Karim L, Shay T, Gyapay G, Cockett N, et al. The callipyge mutation enhances the expression of coregulated imprinted genes in cis without affecting their imprinting status. Nature genetics. 2001;27(4):367–9. pmid:11279514
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Caiment F, Charlier C, Hadfield T, Cockett N, Georges M, Baurain D. Assessing the effect of the CLPG mutation on the microRNA catalog of skeletal muscle using high-throughput sequencing. Genome research. 2010;20(12):1651–62. pmid:20944086
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Smit MA, Tordoir X, Gyapay G, Cockett NE, Georges M, Charlier C. BEGAIN: a novel imprinted gene that generates paternally expressed transcripts in a tissue- and promoter-specific manner in sheep. Mammalian genome. 2005;16(10):801–14. pmid:16261422
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Cockett NE, Jackson SP, Shay TL, Farnir F, Berghmans S, Snowder GD, et al. Polar overdominance at the ovine callipyge locus. Science. 1996;273(5272):236–8. pmid:8662506
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Georges M, Charlier C, Cockett N. The callipyge locus: evidence for the trans interaction of reciprocally imprinted genes. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2003;19(5):248–52. pmid:12711215
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Davis E, Jensen CH, Schroder HD, Farnir F, Shay-Hadfield T, Kliem A, et al. Ectopic expression of DLK1 protein in skeletal muscle of padumnal heterozygotes causes the callipyge phenotype. Current biology: CB. 2004;14(20):1858–62. pmid:15498495
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. White JD, Vuocolo T, McDonagh M, Grounds MD, Harper GS, Cockett NE, et al. Analysis of the callipyge phenotype through skeletal muscle development; association of Dlk1 with muscle precursor cells. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2008;76(3):283–98. pmid:17697128
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Byrne K, Colgrave ML, Vuocolo T, Pearson R, Bidwell CA, Cockett NE, et al. The imprinted retrotransposon-like gene PEG11 (RTL1) is expressed as a full-length protein in skeletal muscle from Callipyge sheep. PloS one. 2010;5(1):e8638. pmid:20072617
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Davis E, Caiment F, Tordoir X, Cavaille J, Ferguson-Smith A, Cockett N, et al. RNAi-mediated allelic trans-interaction at the imprinted Rtl1/Peg11 locus. Current biology: CB. 2005;15(8):743–9. pmid:15854907
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Cheng H, Xu X, Hadfield T, Cockett N, Charlier C, Georges M, et al. Experimental evaluation does not reveal a direct effect of microRNA from the callipyge locus on DLK1 expression. BMC genomics. 2014;15:944. pmid:25359221
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Sekita Y, Wagatsuma H, Nakamura K, Ono R, Kagami M, Wakisaka N, et al. Role of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, Rtl1, in the feto-maternal interface of mouse placenta. Nature genetics. 2008;40(2):243–8. pmid:18176565
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Riordan JD, Keng VW, Tschida BR, Scheetz TE, Bell JB, Podetz-Pedersen KM, et al. Identification of rtl1, a retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, as a novel driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(4):e1003441. pmid:23593033
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Kelly R, Alonso S, Tajbakhsh S, Cossu G, Buckingham M. Myosin light chain 3F regulatory sequences confer regionalized cardiac and skeletal muscle expression in transgenic mice. The Journal of cell biology. 1995;129(2):383–96. pmid:7721942
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Potter CJ, Luo L. Splinkerette PCR for mapping transposable elements in Drosophila. PloS one. 2010;5(4):e10168. pmid:20405015
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Carpenter CE, Rice OD, Cockett NE, Snowder GD. Histology and composition of muscles from normal and callipyge lambs. Journal of animal science. 1996;74(2):388–93. pmid:8690675
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Agbulut O, Noirez P, Beaumont F, Butler-Browne G. Myosin heavy chain isoforms in postnatal muscle development of mice. Biology of the cell / under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization. 2003;95(6):399–406. pmid:14519557
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Bloemberg D, Quadrilatero J. Rapid determination of myosin heavy chain expression in rat, mouse, and human skeletal muscle using multicolor immunofluorescence analysis. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e35273. pmid:22530000
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Briguet A, Courdier-Fruh I, Foster M, Meier T, Magyar JP. Histological parameters for the quantitative assessment of muscular dystrophy in the mdx-mouse. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 2004;14(10):675–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Koohmaraie M, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Lonergan SM, Doumit ME. A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits. Journal of animal science. 1995;73(12):3596–607. pmid:8655433
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Jackson SP, Miller MF, Green RD. Phenotypic characterization of rambouillet sheep expression the callipyge gene: III. Muscle weights and muscle weight distribution. Journal of animal science. 1997;75(1):133–8. pmid:9027558
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Vuocolo T, Byrne K, White J, McWilliam S, Reverter A, Cockett NE, et al. Identification of a gene network contributing to hypertrophy in callipyge skeletal muscle. Physiological genomics. 2007;28(3):253–72. pmid:17077277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Georgiades P, Watkins M, Surani MA, Ferguson-Smith AC. Parental origin-specific developmental defects in mice with uniparental disomy for chromosome 12. Development. 2000;127(21):4719–28. pmid:11023874
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Lin SP, Youngson N, Takada S, Seitz H, Reik W, Paulsen M, et al. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12. Nature genetics. 2003;35(1):97–102. pmid:12937418
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Lin SP, Coan P, da Rocha ST, Seitz H, Cavaille J, Teng PW, et al. Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting control region. Development. 2007;134(2):417–26. pmid:17166925
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. da Rocha ST, Charalambous M, Lin SP, Gutteridge I, Ito Y, Gray D, et al. Gene dosage effects of the imprinted delta-like homologue 1 (dlk1/pref1) in development: implications for the evolution of imprinting. PLoS genetics. 2009;5(2):e1000392. pmid:19247431
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Lynch C, Tristem M. A co-opted gypsy-type LTR-retrotransposon is conserved in the genomes of humans, sheep, mice, and rats. Current biology: CB. 2003;13(17):1518–23. pmid:12956954
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Seitz H, Youngson N, Lin SP, Dalbert S, Paulsen M, Bachellerie JP, et al. Imprinted microRNA genes transcribed antisense to a reciprocally imprinted retrotransposon-like gene. Nature genetics. 2003;34(3):261–2. pmid:12796779
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Segers K, Vaiman D, Berghmans S, Shay T, Meyers S, Beever J, et al. Construction and characterization of an ovine BAC contig spanning the callipyge locus. Animal genetics. 2000;31(6):352–9. pmid:11167521
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Charlier C, Segers K, Wagenaar D, Karim L, Berghmans S, Jaillon O, et al. Human-ovine comparative sequencing of a 250-kb imprinted domain encompassing the callipyge (clpg) locus and identification of six imprinted transcripts: DLK1, DAT, GTL2, PEG11, antiPEG11, and MEG8. Genome research. 2001;11(5):850–62. pmid:11337479
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring harbor Laboratory Press; 2012.
34. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome biology. 2002;3(7):RESEARCH0034. pmid:12184808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2014. Available: http://www.R-project.org/.
36. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/.
37. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0–6. 2014. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
38. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical journal Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2008;50(3):346–63. pmid:18481363
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Rasband WS. ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 1997–2014. Available: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
40. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. Available: http://www.R-project.org/.

[ref1] 1. Georges M, Takeda H, Cheng H, Xu X, Hadfield-Shay T, Cockett N, et al. Cis- and trans-effects underlying polar overdominance at the callipyge locus. In: Naumova AK, Greenwood CMT, editors. Epigenetics and Complex Traits. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013. pp. 89–106.

[ref2] 2. Freking BA, Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Rhodes SJ, Keele JW, Leymaster KA, et al. Identification of the single base change causing the callipyge muscle hypertrophy phenotype, the only known example of polar overdominance in mammals. Genome research. 2002;12(10):1496–506. pmid:12368241
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Smit M, Segers K, Carrascosa LG, Shay T, Baraldi F, Gyapay G, et al. Mosaicism of Solid Gold supports the causality of a noncoding A-to-G transition in the determinism of the callipyge phenotype. Genetics. 2003;163(1):453–6. pmid:12586730
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Charlier C, Segers K, Karim L, Shay T, Gyapay G, Cockett N, et al. The callipyge mutation enhances the expression of coregulated imprinted genes in cis without affecting their imprinting status. Nature genetics. 2001;27(4):367–9. pmid:11279514
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] PubMed/NCBI

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Caiment F, Charlier C, Hadfield T, Cockett N, Georges M, Baurain D. Assessing the effect of the CLPG mutation on the microRNA catalog of skeletal muscle using high-throughput sequencing. Genome research. 2010;20(12):1651–62. pmid:20944086
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Smit MA, Tordoir X, Gyapay G, Cockett NE, Georges M, Charlier C. BEGAIN: a novel imprinted gene that generates paternally expressed transcripts in a tissue- and promoter-specific manner in sheep. Mammalian genome. 2005;16(10):801–14. pmid:16261422
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] PubMed/NCBI

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Cockett NE, Jackson SP, Shay TL, Farnir F, Berghmans S, Snowder GD, et al. Polar overdominance at the ovine callipyge locus. Science. 1996;273(5272):236–8. pmid:8662506
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] PubMed/NCBI

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Georges M, Charlier C, Cockett N. The callipyge locus: evidence for the trans interaction of reciprocally imprinted genes. Trends in genetics: TIG. 2003;19(5):248–52. pmid:12711215
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Davis E, Jensen CH, Schroder HD, Farnir F, Shay-Hadfield T, Kliem A, et al. Ectopic expression of DLK1 protein in skeletal muscle of padumnal heterozygotes causes the callipyge phenotype. Current biology: CB. 2004;14(20):1858–62. pmid:15498495
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] PubMed/NCBI

[33] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. White JD, Vuocolo T, McDonagh M, Grounds MD, Harper GS, Cockett NE, et al. Analysis of the callipyge phenotype through skeletal muscle development; association of Dlk1 with muscle precursor cells. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2008;76(3):283–98. pmid:17697128
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Byrne K, Colgrave ML, Vuocolo T, Pearson R, Bidwell CA, Cockett NE, et al. The imprinted retrotransposon-like gene PEG11 (RTL1) is expressed as a full-length protein in skeletal muscle from Callipyge sheep. PloS one. 2010;5(1):e8638. pmid:20072617
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Davis E, Caiment F, Tordoir X, Cavaille J, Ferguson-Smith A, Cockett N, et al. RNAi-mediated allelic trans-interaction at the imprinted Rtl1/Peg11 locus. Current biology: CB. 2005;15(8):743–9. pmid:15854907
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] PubMed/NCBI

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Cheng H, Xu X, Hadfield T, Cockett N, Charlier C, Georges M, et al. Experimental evaluation does not reveal a direct effect of microRNA from the callipyge locus on DLK1 expression. BMC genomics. 2014;15:944. pmid:25359221
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Sekita Y, Wagatsuma H, Nakamura K, Ono R, Kagami M, Wakisaka N, et al. Role of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, Rtl1, in the feto-maternal interface of mouse placenta. Nature genetics. 2008;40(2):243–8. pmid:18176565
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Riordan JD, Keng VW, Tschida BR, Scheetz TE, Bell JB, Podetz-Pedersen KM, et al. Identification of rtl1, a retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene, as a novel driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(4):e1003441. pmid:23593033
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Kelly R, Alonso S, Tajbakhsh S, Cossu G, Buckingham M. Myosin light chain 3F regulatory sequences confer regionalized cardiac and skeletal muscle expression in transgenic mice. The Journal of cell biology. 1995;129(2):383–96. pmid:7721942
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Potter CJ, Luo L. Splinkerette PCR for mapping transposable elements in Drosophila. PloS one. 2010;5(4):e10168. pmid:20405015
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Carpenter CE, Rice OD, Cockett NE, Snowder GD. Histology and composition of muscles from normal and callipyge lambs. Journal of animal science. 1996;74(2):388–93. pmid:8690675
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Agbulut O, Noirez P, Beaumont F, Butler-Browne G. Myosin heavy chain isoforms in postnatal muscle development of mice. Biology of the cell / under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization. 2003;95(6):399–406. pmid:14519557
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] PubMed/NCBI

[73] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Bloemberg D, Quadrilatero J. Rapid determination of myosin heavy chain expression in rat, mouse, and human skeletal muscle using multicolor immunofluorescence analysis. PloS one. 2012;7(4):e35273. pmid:22530000
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Briguet A, Courdier-Fruh I, Foster M, Meier T, Magyar JP. Histological parameters for the quantitative assessment of muscular dystrophy in the mdx-mouse. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 2004;14(10):675–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Koohmaraie M, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Lonergan SM, Doumit ME. A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits. Journal of animal science. 1995;73(12):3596–607. pmid:8655433
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Jackson SP, Miller MF, Green RD. Phenotypic characterization of rambouillet sheep expression the callipyge gene: III. Muscle weights and muscle weight distribution. Journal of animal science. 1997;75(1):133–8. pmid:9027558
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Vuocolo T, Byrne K, White J, McWilliam S, Reverter A, Cockett NE, et al. Identification of a gene network contributing to hypertrophy in callipyge skeletal muscle. Physiological genomics. 2007;28(3):253–72. pmid:17077277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Georgiades P, Watkins M, Surani MA, Ferguson-Smith AC. Parental origin-specific developmental defects in mice with uniparental disomy for chromosome 12. Development. 2000;127(21):4719–28. pmid:11023874
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Lin SP, Youngson N, Takada S, Seitz H, Reik W, Paulsen M, et al. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12. Nature genetics. 2003;35(1):97–102. pmid:12937418
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Lin SP, Coan P, da Rocha ST, Seitz H, Cavaille J, Teng PW, et al. Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting control region. Development. 2007;134(2):417–26. pmid:17166925
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. da Rocha ST, Charalambous M, Lin SP, Gutteridge I, Ito Y, Gray D, et al. Gene dosage effects of the imprinted delta-like homologue 1 (dlk1/pref1) in development: implications for the evolution of imprinting. PLoS genetics. 2009;5(2):e1000392. pmid:19247431
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Lynch C, Tristem M. A co-opted gypsy-type LTR-retrotransposon is conserved in the genomes of humans, sheep, mice, and rats. Current biology: CB. 2003;13(17):1518–23. pmid:12956954
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Seitz H, Youngson N, Lin SP, Dalbert S, Paulsen M, Bachellerie JP, et al. Imprinted microRNA genes transcribed antisense to a reciprocally imprinted retrotransposon-like gene. Nature genetics. 2003;34(3):261–2. pmid:12796779
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Segers K, Vaiman D, Berghmans S, Shay T, Meyers S, Beever J, et al. Construction and characterization of an ovine BAC contig spanning the callipyge locus. Animal genetics. 2000;31(6):352–9. pmid:11167521
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Charlier C, Segers K, Wagenaar D, Karim L, Berghmans S, Jaillon O, et al. Human-ovine comparative sequencing of a 250-kb imprinted domain encompassing the callipyge (clpg) locus and identification of six imprinted transcripts: DLK1, DAT, GTL2, PEG11, antiPEG11, and MEG8. Genome research. 2001;11(5):850–62. pmid:11337479
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring harbor Laboratory Press; 2012.

[ref34] 34. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome biology. 2002;3(7):RESEARCH0034. pmid:12184808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2014. Available: http://www.R-project.org/.

[ref36] 36. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/.

[ref37] 37. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0–6. 2014. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.

[ref38] 38. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical journal Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2008;50(3):346–63. pmid:18481363
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Rasband WS. ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 1997–2014. Available: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.

[ref40] 40. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. Available: http://www.R-project.org/.

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

The callipyge phenotype

Cis-effects of the CLPG mutation

Trans-effects underlying polar overdominance

Role of DLK1 and/or PEG11 protein in causing the callipyge phenotype

Results

Generating transgenic mice expressing ovine PEG11 in skeletal muscle

Ectopic expression of ovine PEG11 causes a muscular hypertrophy in transgenic mice

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Oligonucleotide information

Transgene construction

Generation of transgenic mice

Ethical statement

Characterizing the transgene insertion sites

Southern blotting.

PCR.

Splinkerette PCR.

Genotyping assays for mouse lines 126 and 127A

Characterizing the expression of oPEG11 transgenes in mouse lines 126 and 127A at the RNA level

RNA extraction.

Northern blotting.

RT-PCR.

qRT-PCR.

RACE.

Phenotyping

Statistical analysis of mouse phenotype

Morphometric analysis

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Identification of transgene integration sites and genotyping of mice.

S2 Fig. Characterization of oPEG11 transgene in mouse line 127.

S3 Fig. Morphological analyses of extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus (SL) muscles of the oPEG11 line 126 F2 mice.

S4 Fig. RNA expression analysis of Myosin heavy chain isoforms.

S1 Table. Sex-specific and pooled genotypic proportions and associated probabilities under the null hypothesis of Mendelian segregation.

S2 Table. Transgene effects in the oPEG11 (line 126) F2 mice at 10 weeks of age.

S3 Table. Live weights of the oPEG11 (line 126) F2 mice between weaning and 10 weeks of age.

S4 Table. Oligonucleotide information.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References