Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Advanced Application of Porcine Intramuscular Adipocytes for Evaluating Anti-Adipogenic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Immunobiotics

  • Masahiko Suzuki ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Masahiko Suzuki, Asuka Tada, Paulraj Kanmani

    Affiliation Food and Feed Immunology Group, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Asuka Tada ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Masahiko Suzuki, Asuka Tada, Paulraj Kanmani

    Affiliation Food and Feed Immunology Group, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Paulraj Kanmani ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Masahiko Suzuki, Asuka Tada, Paulraj Kanmani

    Affiliation Food and Feed Immunology Group, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Hitoshi Watanabe,

    Affiliation Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Hisashi Aso,

    Affiliation Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Yoshihito Suda,

    Affiliation Department of Food, Agriculture and Environment, Miyagi University, Sendai 982-0215, Japan

  • Tomonori Nochi,

    Affiliation Cell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Kenji Miyazawa,

    Affiliation Technical Research Laboratory, Takanashi Milk Products Co., Ltd, Yokohama Kanagawa, 241-0023, Japan

  • Kazutoyo Yoda,

    Affiliation Technical Research Laboratory, Takanashi Milk Products Co., Ltd, Yokohama Kanagawa, 241-0023, Japan

  • Fang He,

    Affiliation Technical Research Laboratory, Takanashi Milk Products Co., Ltd, Yokohama Kanagawa, 241-0023, Japan

  • Masataka Hosoda,

    Affiliation Technical Research Laboratory, Takanashi Milk Products Co., Ltd, Yokohama Kanagawa, 241-0023, Japan

  • Tadao Saito,

    Affiliation Food and Feed Immunology Group, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

  • Julio Villena ,

    haruki@bios.tohoku.ac.jp (HK); jcvillena@cerela.org.ar (JV)

    Affiliation Laboratory of Immunobiotechnology, Reference Centre for Lactobacilli (CERELA-CONICET), Tucuman, Argentina

  • Haruki Kitazawa

    haruki@bios.tohoku.ac.jp (HK); jcvillena@cerela.org.ar (JV)

    Affiliation Food and Feed Immunology Group, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 981-8555, Japan

Abstract

We previously established a clonal porcine intramuscular preadipocyte (PIP) line and we were able to establish a protocol to obtain functional mature adipocytes from PIP cells. We hypothesized that both PIP cells and mature adipocytes are likely to be useful in vitro tools for increasing our understanding of immunobiology of adipose tissue, and for the selection and study of immunoregulatory probiotics (immunobiotics) able to modulate adipocytes immune responses. In this study, we investigated the immunobiology of PIP cells and mature adipocytes in relation to their response to TNF-α stimulation. In addition, we evaluated the possibility that immunobiotic microorganisms modify adipogenesis and immune functions of porcine adipose tissue through Peyer’s patches (PPs) immune-competent cells. We treated the porcine PPs immune cells with different probiotic strains; and we evaluated the effect of conditioned media from probiotic-stimulated immune cells in PIP cells and mature adipocytes. The Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 showed remarkable effects, and were able to significantly reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory factors and negative regulators (A20, Bcl-3, and MKP-1) in adipocytes challenged with TNF-α. The results of this study demonstrated that the evaluation of IL-6, and MCP-1 production, and A20 and Bcl-3 down-regulation in TNF-α-challenged adipocytes could function as biomarkers to screen and select potential immunobiotic strains. Taking into consideration that several in vivo and in vitro studies clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 in adipose inflammation, the results presented in this work indicate that the PIP cells and porcine adipocytes could be used for the screening and the selection of new immunobiotic strains with the potential to functionally modulate adipose inflammation when orally administered.

Introduction

The incidence of obesity has risen continuously over the last decades, and the associated medical and economic costs to society are substantial. Obesity is often accompanied with metabolic syndromes and increased risk for development of various life threatening health complications such as inflammation, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, hypercholesterolaemia, cancer, hypertension, and respiratory problems [13]. Adipose tissue inflammation is proposed as a central factor connecting obesity with its metabolic and vascular complications. In fact, obesity-induced inflammation exerts profound effects on metabolic pathways, playing one of the central roles in the development of insulin resistance [4, 5].

Adipose tissue is considered as a major storage compartment for lipid accumulation in mammals. This tissue is not homogenous, it contains various cellular components such as preadipocytes, mature adipocytes, fibroblasts, macrophages and endothelial cells; capable of differentiate into other cell types; being mature adipocytes the dominant cell type [6, 7]. Preadipocytes are able to proliferate and differentiate into lipid-laden or insulin responsive mature adipocyte, determining the number of fat cells that will exist throughout the entire lifespan [7]. Adipose tissue is constituted by remarkable active endocrine cells that secrets a number of adipokines: adiponectins, leptin, visfatin, resistin, serum amyloid A3, omentin and RBP4, and inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and interferon (IFN)-γ. Those factors play pivotal roles in the regulation of various physiological and pathological processes in which adipose tissue is involved [6, 8].

TNF-α is a multifactorial regulatory cytokine, which has been implicated as mediator in induction of insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation [911]. This cytokine is elevated in the adipose tissues of obese mice and humans [10]. TNF-α is believed to regulate adipocyte metabolism and immune activities by modulating glucose and fatty acid metabolism, inflammatory genes expression, transcriptional regulation and hormone receptor signaling [8, 9]. Studies reported that administration of TNF-α increased the glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in animals and humans [12, 13]. Moreover, some reports described that deletion or lacking of TNF-α gene allowed the protection against the development of insulin resistance in obese mice [14]. Some human studies demonstrated that treatment of obese subjects with TNF-α antagonists is able to beneficially modulate glucose metabolism and inflammation [15, 16]. Then, regulation of TNF-α signaling pathway in adipocytes could be one strategy to control undesirable metabolic and immune effects of obesity.

Healthy food and life style habits have been recommended to avoid obesity-associated diseases. Thus, finding natural and safe dietary supplements able to modulate adipocytes function in general, and TNF-α signaling pathway in particular, would be of value to prevent obesity associated diseases. Probiotics are one of the functionally proved effective and safe dietary supplements to restrain body obesity and insulin resistance. Some scientific in vivo studies reported that probiotics supplementation reduced high fat diet induced obesity, decreased insulin resistance, and beneficially modulated inflammatory response in rodent models [17, 18]. High-fat diet induced obese mice treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG improved insulin sensitivity and reduced lipid accumulation. Those effects were associated to reductions of glucose transporter (GLUT4) expression and secretion of adiponectin [17]. Recently, it was reported that the administration of L. coryniformis CECT5711 to obese mice induced marked changes in microbiota composition, reduced the metabolic endotoxaemia as it decreased lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TNF-α plasma levels, and improved endothelial dysfunction and vascular oxidative stress [18].

In a previous work, we demonstrated that the murine macrophage-like cell line J774.1 treated with L. rhamnosus GG or L. gasseri TMC0356 improved the production of IL-6 and IL-12 [19]. The conditioned medium from lactobacilli-cultured J774.1 cells transferred to the preadipocyte cell line 3T3-L1 significantly suppressed lipid accumulation and decreased peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) [19]. Similarly, Park et al. [20] showed that exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes to L. brevis OPK-3 inhibited intracellular lipid accumulation by decreasing PPAR-γ and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α. Development of established preadipocyte cell lines, such as 3T3-L1, greatly facilitated the study of molecular mechanisms of adipocyte differentiation and inflammatory response under defined conditions. These cell lines are derived from mouse, and preadipocyte cell lines of other species have not yet been maintained in culture long enough to study differentiation or immune responses. Some porcine preadipocytes cell lines have been developed which maintain a normal phenotype without transforming spontaneously even after long-term maintenance in culture [21, 22]. In this regard, we have established a clonal porcine intramuscular preadipocyte (PIP) line from the Musculus longissimus thoractis of a Duroc pig. Moreover, we used this cell line for the investigation of adipogenic differentiation and we were able to establish a protocol to obtain functional mature adipocytes from PIP cells [21]. Both PIP cells and mature adipocytes are likely to be useful in vitro tools for increasing our understanding of adipogenesis and immunobiology of adipose tissue.

In this study, we investigated the immunobiology of PIP cells and mature adipocytes in relation to their response to TNF-α stimulation. In addition, we investigated the possibility of immunoregulatory probiotics that modify adipogenesis and immune functions of porcine adipose tissue through Peyer´s patches (PPs) immune-competent cells. We treated the porcine PPs immune cells with different immunobiotic strains [23]; and we evaluated the effect of conditioned media from immunobiotic-stimulated immune cells in porcine preadipocytes (PIP cells) and mature adipocytes.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and induction of adipogenesis

Porcine intramuscular preadipocyte (PIP) cells, which are derived from marbling muscle tissue of the musculus longissimus thoracis from female Duroc pig [21], were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco, Paisley, Scotland, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 mg/ml penicillin, and 100 U/ml streptomycin as a growth medium. PIP cells were plated at density of 2.5×104/cm2 in 6-well cell culture plates (BD Falcon, Tokyo, Japan) and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The 4-day post-confluent PIP cells were fed with differentiation medium for another 4 more days to induce differentiated adipocyte. The differentiation medium was DMEM containing 10% FBS, 50 ng/ml insulin (swine, Sigma), 0.25 μM dexamethasone (Sigma), 2 mM octanoate (Wako), 200 μM oleate (Ardorich, Milwaukee, WI, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The medium was changed every day. All experiments were performed between the 26th and 35th passages of PIP cells.

Oil red O and hematoxylin stain

Accumulation of intracellular lipid droplets in PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes were quantified after staining with Oil red O. Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed on ice with 10% formaline for 30 minutes, and then cells were dissolved in isopropanol for 1 minute and stained with Oil red O (SIGMA-ALDRICH, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 minute at 37°C. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with deionized water (DW) and stained with Mayer's Hematoxylin Solution (MERCK, Darmstadt, Germany). The stained cells were then washed with DW and immersed in aqueous ammonia. Then, the cells were dried to observe and photograph lipid droplet accumulation under the biological microscope (OLYMPUS IX70). Photographs of cells were also imaged using Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and measured Oil red O stained area and evaluated area per cell.

Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

The expression of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), cytokines and chemokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1) and negative regulators (MKP-1, A20 and Bcl-3) in both PIP and differentiated adipocyte were evaluated by RT-PCR under non-inflammatory conditions and after the challenge with different concentration of TNF-α (2.5, 25, 250 ng/ml) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from each cell sample using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and cDNAs were synthesized using a Quantitect reverse transcription (RT) kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Real-time quantitative PCR was carried out using a 7300 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) and the Platinum SYBR green qPCR SuperMix uracil-DNA glycosylase with 6-carboxyl-X-rhodamine (Invitrogen). The primer sequences for TNF receptors are as follows: TNFR1 (sense 5’-GGTCCATTTGCTGCACGAA-3’, antisense 5’-GGGCCCAGACAGTCATTGTG-3’), TNFR2, (sense 5’- GCTCCACGAGGGACACAGA-3’, antisense 5’- AAGGGACCTGCTCATCTTTGG-3’), Nod1 (Sense 5’-CTGTCGTCAACACCGATCCA-3’), antisense 5’-CCAGTTGGTGACGCAGCTT-3, and Nod2 (sense 5’-GAGCGCATCCTCTTAACTTTCG-3’, antisense 5’- ACGCTCGTGATCCGTGAAC-3’). The primers used for the analysis of PRRs, cytokines, chemokines and TLR negative regulators were described previously [24, 25]. The PCR cycling conditions were 5 minutes at 50°C, followed by 5 minutes at 95°C, and then 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C, 30 seconds at 60°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C. The volume of reaction mixtures was 10 μl, which contains 2.5 μl of cDNA and 7.5 μl of master mix included the sense and antisense primers. Expression of β-actin in each sample was assessed, and the β-actin data was used as an internal control to normalize differences between samples and to calculate relative expression levels.

Preparation of lactic acid bacterial (LAB) strains

Lactobacillus gasseri TMC0356, L. rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus LA-2, L. paracasei TMC0409, Streptococcus thermophilus TMC1543, Bifidobacterium bifidum TMC3108, and B. bifidum TMC3115 were used in this study, which were kindly gifted by Takanashi milk product company, Japan. The lactobacilli and bifidobacterial strains were grown in deMan-Rogosa-Sharp (MRS, Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) medium for 16 hours at 37°C. S. thermophilus were cultured in Elliker medium (Difco) at 37°C for 16 hours. All these bacterial strains were washed with PBS and sterilized by heating at 60°C for 30 minutes. After washing twice with PBS, the cells resuspended in DMEM (10% FCS, 1% streptomycin/penicillin) and adjusted cell concentration with 2.5×109 cells/ml.

Immunomodulatory activity of LAB in PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes

For the evaluation of anti-inflammatory and anti-adipogenic activity of LAB strains, we performed several in vitro steps to simulate LAB-immune cells-adipocytes interaction. For this purpose, we first stimulated mononuclear cells isolated from porcine Peyer’s patches with the different LAB strains. The immunocompetent cells isolated from porcine Peyer’s patches according to our previous method [26] were placed in a 6-well cell culture plate (BD Falcon, 1 x 106 cells/well). Then the cells were stimulated with LAB (5 x 107 cells /well) at 5% CO2, 37°C, for 24 hours, in a complete RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FCS). After stimulation, cell free supernatant (CFS) was collected for further experiments. Both PIP and differentiated adipocyte were pre-stimulated for 48 hours with CFS. Then, cells were post-stimulated with TNF-α for 3, 6, and 12 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Accumulation of intracellular lipid droplets were quantified after staining with Oil red O. In addition, the expression of immune receptors, cytokines and negative regulators was quantified by RT-PCR.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) was performed by GLM procedure of SAS programs (Version 9.1). The mean comparisons between the PIP cells and adipocyte copy numbers, and mean comparisons among the values of relative indices, and the normalized fold expressions were carried out using tukey-kramer’s method. Relative indices were calculated as the ratio of fat deposition in adipocyte cells; and the values are normalized by common logarithmic transformation and confirmed as approximate values included significantly into normal distribution. Then, they were adjusted similarly to the mean of control groups. The mRNA expression in the stimulated time showed as the ratio of cytokine expressions induced by TNF-α, which was normalized by common logarithmic transformation.

Results

Immune characterization of PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes

We first aimed to morphologically characterize PIP cells and differentiated porcine adipocytes. Fresh cells as well as cells stained with Oil red O were observed. As shown in Fig. 1, remarkable differences were observed between PIP cells and adipocytes. PIP cells were found to be small cells with a clear nucleus at the center surrounded by abundant cytoplasm. On the contrary, differentiated adipocytes were observed as bigger cells than PIP cells and showed lipid droplets that pushed nucleus to the periphery.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Photographic pictures of PIP and adipocyte cells.

The PIP cells were grown at 37°C for 4 days, and subsequently fed with differentiation medium for another 4 days to differentiate into adipocyte cells. Before and after adipocyte differentiation, the cells were stained with Oil red O stain. Presence of red and blue color indicates accumulation of lipid droplets and nucleus in the adipocyte cells at 8 day.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g001

In addition, expression of various PRRs (TLR1–9, NOD-1 and 2) and TNFR-1 and 2 were analyzed in PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes (Fig. 2). Both PIP cells and adipocytes expressed TLR1–9, NOD-1, NOD-2, TNFR-1 and TNFR-2. However, TNFR-1 and TNFR-2 were highly expressed when compared with other receptors in both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes. We also observed that PIP cells showed a higher expression of NOD-1 and TLR3 when compared with adipocytes (Fig. 2). No significant differences were observed in the expression of TLR1, TLR5, TLR7–9 and NOD-2; while the expression of TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, TNFR-1 and TNFR-2 was higher in adipocytes than in PIP cells (Fig. 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Expression of pattern of PPRs (TLR1–9, NOD 1, 2) and TNFR1, 2 in PIP, and differentiated adipocyte cells.

Copy number of mRNA in 25 ng of cDNA prepared from PIP and adipocyte cells were calculated. Three independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented. The presence of stars (*) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g002

Response of PIP cells and adipocytes to TNF-α stimulation

We next aimed to evaluate the effect of TNF-α in the induction of inflammatory cytokines by PIP cells and adipocytes. Fig. 3 shows the expression of cytokines in PIP and adipocyte cells. The expressions of all cytokines were significantly up-regulated when cells were stimulated with TNF-α. For all the pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines studied, the maximum expression was observed with concentration of 25 ng/ml of TNF-α. In addition, significant differences in the expressions of cytokines were observed between PIP cells and adipocytes. IL-1β, and IL-8 mRNA levels were significantly higher in PIP cells than in adipocytes after TNF-α stimulation. On the contrary, IL-1α and MCP-1 expressions were higher in adipocytes than in PIP cells (Fig. 3). In particular, the MCP-1 expression was highest in this assay. We also evaluated the effect of TNF-α in the expressions of the negative regulators MKP-1, A20 and Bcl-3 in both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes (Fig. 4). Challenge of PIP cells with TNF-α significantly increased the expression of A20 and Bcl-3 while no effect was observed in the expression of MKP-1. Similarly, stimulation of differentiated adipocytes with TNF-α increased the expression of A20 and Bcl-3 reaching levels that were significantly higher than those observed in PIP cells (Fig. 4). Moreover, TNF-α increased mRNA levels of MKP-1 in differentiated adipocytes. As observed with cytokines, for negative regulators, higher levels of expression were also observed with 25 ng/ml of TNF-α. Therefore, this concentration of TNF-α was selected for further experiments.

thumbnail
Fig 3. TNF-α induced inflammatory cytokines in PIP and differentiated adipocyte cells.

Both PIP cells and adipocytes were incubated with different concentrations of TNF-α (2.5, 25, 250 ng/ml) for 24 hours and the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1) were determined. Cells without addition of TNF-α were used as controls. Three independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as inflammatory effect of TNF-α. The presence of various stars (*, ** and ***) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Expression of negative regulators in PIP and differentiated adipocyte cells.

Both PIP cells and adipocytes were challenged with different concentrations of TNF-α (2.5, 25, and 250 ng/ml) for 24 hours and the level of negative regulators (MKP-1, A20, and Bcl-3) were determined. Cells without TNF-α stimulation were used as controls. Three independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as inflammatory effect of TNF-α. The presence of various stars (*, ** and ***) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g004

Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and anti-adipogenic activity of LAB strains

For the evaluation of the anti-adipogenic and immunoregulatory activity of LAB, we performed several in vitro steps to simulate LAB-immune cells-adipocytes interaction as described in materials and methods. Then, PIP cells and adipocytes were stimulated with CFS from porcine Peyer’s patche immunocompetent cell cultures stimulated with different LAB strains. PIP cells and adipocytes were pre-stimulated with the different CFS for 48 hours and then challenged with TNF-α for 3, 6, and 12 hours. The effect of LAB on PIP cells differentiation and adipogenesis was investigated by using Oil red O staining (Fig. 5). The deposition of fats in the mature adipocytes was quantified by image J. Deposition of lipids increased with differentiation of PIP cells into mature adipocytes, and fat deposit were significantly increased after stimulation with TNF-α (Fig. 5). In mature adipocytes coming from PIP cells treated with culture free supernatants from LA-2 and TMC0409 strains, significantly lower deposition of lipids was observed when compared to control cells (Fig. 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Anti-adipogenic activity of various LABs.

The PIP and differentiated adipocytes were incubated with CFS of various LABs treated with PPs at 37°C for 48 hours. Mature adipocyte cells were Oil red O stained and deposition of lipid droplets in the mature adipocytes was quantified by image J. (A) Oil red O stained mature adipocytes. (B) Photograph of image J with lipid accumulation. (C) Anti-adipogenic activity of LABs. Three independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as anti-adipogenic effect of LABs. The presence of stars (*) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g005

In addition, the mRNA levels of TLR2, TLR4, IL-6, MCP-1, and TGF-β were determined in PIP cells and adipocytes as shown in Fig. 6. As mentioned earlier, TNF-α was capable to induce mRNA expressions of IL-6, MCP-1, TLR2 and TLR4 in both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes (Fig. 3), while no modification was observed in the expression of TGF-β (data not shown). A strain dependent effect was observed in the levels of IL-6, MCP-1, and TGF-β when PIP cells were pretreated with cell free supernatants. PIP cells pretreated with cell free supernatant from L. rhamnosus GG, L. paracasei TMC0409 or B. bifidum TMC3108 showed increased expression of TGF-β earlier at hour 6 post-TNF-α challenge, while those cells showed reduced levels of IL-6 and MCP-1 at hour 12 (Fig. 6). L. rhamnosus LA-2 was able to significantly reduce levels of IL-6 and MCP-1 but did not induce changes in TGF-β expression (Fig. 6). L. gasseri TMC0356 significantly increased MCP-1. In addition, S. thermophilus TMC1543 reduced IL-6 levels but increased the expression of MCP-1; while B. bifidum TMC3115 reduced IL-6 and MCP-1 levels (Fig. 6). Interestingly, almost all the studied LAB strains induced similar effects in differentiated adipocytes after TNF-α challenge. L. gasseri TMC0356, L. rhamnosus GG, L. paracasei TMC0409, S. thermophilus TMC1543 and B. bifidum TMC3108 significantly reduced levels of IL-6, MCP-1, and TGF-β in TNF-α-challenged porcine adipocytes (Fig. 6). On the contrary, L. rhamnosus LA-2 significantly increased levels of TGF-β in adipocytes.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Anti-inflammatory activity of various LABs in PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes.

Both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes were pre-stimulated with CFS of various LABs for 48 h and then post-stimulated with TNF-α for 3, 6, and 12 hours. Cells without any TNF-α stimulation were used as cell controls. The expressions of IL-6, MCP-1, and TGF-β mRNAs were evaluated. Cells treated only with TNF-α were used as TNF-α controls. Three or four independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as immunomodulatory effect of LABs. The presence of stars (*) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g006

Strain dependent effects were also observed when analyzing TLR2 and TLR4 expressions in PIP cells and adipocytes pretreated with cell free supernatants (Fig. 7). L. gasseri TMC0356, S. thermophilus TMC1543 and B. bifidum TMC3108 significantly increased TLR2 expression in PIP cells, while L. rhamnosus GG augmented mRNA levels of TLR4. In addition, L. gasseri TMC0356 and L. rhamnosus GG reduced TLR2 levels in differentiated adipocytes while no significant changes were observed in the expression of TLR4 in these cells with CFS treatments (Fig. 7).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Induction of TLRs expression in PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes.

Both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes were pre-stimulated with CFS of various LABs for 48 h and then post-stimulated with TNF-α for 3, 6, and 12 hours. The expressions of TLR2 and TLR4 were evaluated. Cells treated only with TNF-α were used as TNF-α controls. Three or four independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as immunomodulatory effect of LABs. The presence of stars (*) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g007

Finally we aimed to evaluate whether CFS was able to modulate the expressions of negative regulators after TNF-α challenge in porcine adipocytes (Fig. 8). Again, strain dependent effects were observed. L. gasseri TMC0356 and L. rhamnosus GG significantly reduced the expression of A20 and Bcl-3; S. thermophilus TMC1543 and B. bifidum TMC3108 reduced levels of Bcl-3 and; B. bifidum TMC3115 reduced Bcl-3 and MKP-1 (Fig. 8). On the contrary, L. rhamnosus LA-2 significantly increased levels of A20 and MKP-1 in adipocytes while L. paracasei TMC0409 increased A20 and Bcl-3.

thumbnail
Fig 8. Expression of negative regulators in differentiated adipocytes.

PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes were pre-stimulated with CFS of various LABs for 48 h and then post-stimulated with TNF-α for 3, 6, and 12 hours. The expressions of A20, Bcl-3, and MKP-1 were evaluated. Cells treated only with TNF-α were used as TNF-α control. Three or four independent experiments were conducted for each case and the average values (mean ± S.D) were represented as regulatory effect of LABs. The presence of stars (*) indicates statistical differences with significant levels of p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g008

Discussion

From the histological point of view, adipose tissue is composed of adipocytes (mature fat cells) and the interadipocytar stromal-vascular fraction formed by extracellular matrix with dispersed fibroblasts, preadipocytes, endothelial, and immune cells [27]. Excessive growth of adipose tissue in obesity is the result from enlargement of existing adipocytes (hypertrophy) and formation of new adipocytes (hyperplasia) through differentiation of stromal preadipocytes (adipogenesis) [28]. Mature adipocytes represent 50–85% of the total cellular components of adipose tissue. Obese subjects are characterized by a higher total adipocyte number than lean individuals [29]. Moreover, the hypertrophic adipocytes in obese individuals shift their immune balance towards the production of pro-inflammatory molecules [30, 31]. Accordingly, microarray profiling of isolated adipocytes from obese versus non-obese Pima Indians revealed an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in obese adipocytes [32].

In this work, the expression profile of immune receptors and pro-inflammatory cytokines were examined in porcine preadipocytes (PIP cells) and differentiated adipocytes. TLRs that are usually expressed immune cells, but their expression has been also documented in non-immune cells like intestinal epithelial cells [23, 24, 26]. The expression of TLRs was also observed in adipose tissue [33], although this expression was mainly attributed to infiltrated macrophages [34]. However, murine derived preadipocyte and differentiated adipocyte cell lines (3T3-L1) have been shown to express TLRs in response to TLR ligands [33, 35]. Khazen et al. [36] reported an augmented expression of TLRs when 3T3-F442A cells were differentiated into adipocytes. TLRs are also expressed and are functional in human adipose tissue [37]. That work demonstrated that TLR2 and TLR4 were expressed at relatively high levels (compared to a monocyte cell line) on the surface of human adipose cells. Moreover, stimulation of human adipocytes with LPS, or with lipoteichoic acid, two specific ligands of TLR4 and TLR2, respectively, induced a strong increase in TNF-α production. Our results are in line with these previous observations since mRNAs from TLR1 to TLR9 were detected in both porcine adipose cells. Some preliminary experiments with TLRs agonists showed that these receptors are functional in porcine adipocytes, however further experiments are needed to fully evaluate TLRs signaling pathways in PIP cells and mature adipocytes.

Our work also demonstrated the expression of TNF-α receptors (TNFR-1 and TNFR-2) in both PIP cells and mature porcine adipocytes. Since the first description of enhanced expression and secretion of TNF-α by adipose tissue of obese rodents that linked inflammation to obesity and insulin resistance [38], several works have clearly demonstrated that TNF-α has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of inflammation and insulin resistance by promoting immune and metabolic complications. It is known that most effects of TNF-α on adipose tissue are mediated by the TNFR-1 and subsequent activation of various transduction pathways [11]. Two transcription factor-signaling pathways have been linked to the pro-inflammatory effects of obesity and insulin resistance: the NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB) pathway and the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway. It is believed that overproduction of TNF-α in obesity is an ultimate attempt to control adiposity, since increased TNF-α may help at limiting further weight gain through lipolysis and insulin resistance, impaired preadipocyte differentiation and increased adipocyte apoptosis [39]. However, these effects of TNF-α occur at the expense of worsening insulin resistance and inflammation. TNF-α produced by adipocytes further up-regulate pro-inflammatory adipokines and cytokines [40, 41]. Culturing human adipocytes in media previously conditioned by TNF-α resulted in pro-inflammatory adipokine overproduction. This was abrogated by immunoneutralization of TNF-α in these media, indicating that TNF-α is a crucial and proximal contributor to adipokine dysregulation in adipocytes [40]. Activation of TNFR-1 pathway in adipocytes increases the production of other inflammatory factors such as IL-6 and MCP-1. The in vivo release of IL-6 by whole-body adipose tissue could contribute to 15–35% of the systemic IL-6 in human and circulating levels and adipocytes production of IL-6 are increased in obesity [42]. Infiltration of adipose tissue by macrophages is an important event in the increased inflammatory process in obesity. MCP-1 and its receptor (CCR2) are required for macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue. MCP-1-or CCR2-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet exhibited fewer macrophages and a lower inflammatory gene profile in adipose tissue together with reduced insulin resistance [43]. Treatment of 3T3-L1 differentiated adipocytes with MCP-1 decreased insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and the expression of several adipogenic genes [44]. Also, they report that the capacity of TNF-α to increase pro-inflammatory factors in adipose cells. Similarly, both PIP cells and mature adipocytes showed significant up-regulation in the expressions of MCP-1, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8.

Additionally, stimulation of porcine mature adipocytes with TNF-α significantly changed the expression of negative regulators of the TNFR-1 pathway. The zinc-finger protein A20 is a key player in the negative feedback regulation of the NF-κB pathway in response to multiple stimuli. It is known that TNF-α dramatically increases A20 expression in all tissues, including adipose tissue [45]. Interestingly, it was reported that the NADPH oxidase Nox4 acts as a switch from insulin-induced proliferation to differentiation by controlling MKP-1 expression, which limits ERK1/2 signaling in human and mouse preadipocytes [46]. The work clearly showed that Nox4 controls the expression of MKP-1 and thereby limits the contribution of the proliferative Ras–Raf-ERK1/2 pathway to insulin signaling. ERK1/2 phosphorylates IRS-1 on serine-residues and thereby prevents IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The Nox4-dependent induction of MKP-1 prevents this effect and therefore promotes insulin-induced differentiation but attenuated insulin-induced proliferation. Those works demonstrated that negative regulators have important roles in the biology of adipocytes, with impacts not only in immune responses but in proliferation and differentiation as well.

The data presented in this work showed that our porcine in vitro systems (PIP cells and mature adipocytes) share all the immunological characteristics that have been attributed to these cells in other species, especially human. Then PIP cells and the porcine mature adipocytes obtained from them, could be useful laboratory tools to gain insight into the immunobiology of adipose tissue, as well as for the screening and evaluation of potential therapies aimed to beneficially modulate adipose immune response. In relation to this last assumption, we demonstrated here that our porcine in vitro systems are of value for the evaluation of immunobiotic effects.

Recently, gut microbiota has been identified as an important modifier of systemic inflammatory reactions influencing remote tissues [47]. Interestingly, different gut microbiota-derived products can exert both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects. It was described that translocation of LPS and peptidoglycans from microbiota into systemic circulation leads to metabolic endotoxemia, suggested as one of the main triggers of adipose tissue and systemic low-grade inflammation [47, 48]. On the contrary, products of gut bacterial fermentation such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and influence energy homeostasis [49]. In addition, several works demonstrated that orally administered probiotics are able to modulate tissues distant from the gut including the respiratory tract [50], blood [51], bone marrow [52], and adipose tissue [17, 18]. These studies showed that in addition to translocated microbial products, immunobiotics are able to modulate distant tissues through their ability to modify cytokine’s profiles [5052].

In this work we investigated the possibility that LAB modify the response of porcine adipocytes to TNF-α stimulation through host’ intestinal immune-competent cells. We treated the porcine immune cells from Peyer’s patches with different LAB strains and, tested conditioned media from LAB-stimulated immune cells to determine the regulatory effects on porcine preadipocytes (PIP cells) and differentiated adipocytes. As it is described for other probiotics’ effects, we found strain specific effects of LAB on PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes.

The Lactobacillus GG, L. gasseri TMC0356, and L. rhmanosus LA-2 showed remarkable effects with significant reduction in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in adipocytes challenged with TNF-α (Fig. 9). The strains Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 reduced the expression of TLR2, A20 and Bcl-3, while A20, MKP-1 and TGF-β were up-regulated by L. rhmanosus LA-2 in adipocyte cells. The results of Lactobacillus GG or L. gasseri TMC0356 mediated down-regulation were expected since some previous publications documented the capacity of these two strains to influence adipocytes immunobiology. However, a mechanism behind the L. rhmanosus LA-2 mediated up-regulation was unknown. In addition, we previously used the conditioned medium of murine macrophage-like cell line J774.1 cultured with LGG or TMC0356 strains to stimulate mouse preadipocyte cell line 3T3-L1 and found a suppressed lipid accumulation and reduced PPAR-γ mRNA expression [19]. Moreover, the J774 cells treated with Lactobacillus GG or L. gasseri TMC0356 increased production of cytokines IL-6 and IL-1, suggesting that lactobacilli may suppress differentiation of preadipocytes through macrophage activation and production of Th1 cytokines. Several in vivo studies have comparatively evaluated the immunoregulatory effects of L. gasseri TMC0356 and Lactobacillus GG. Kawase et al. [53] demonstrated that oral administration of Lactobacillus GG or L. gasseri TMC0356 alleviate nasal allergic symptoms by suppressing the increase in nasal vascular permeability caused by local inflammation associated with allergic rhinitis in rodents. Moreover, in an allergic rhinitis guinea pig model, both LAB strains were able to decrease the total numbers of leukocytes, particularly eosinophils and neutrophils from the nasal cavity lavage fluid, and the OVA-specific IgE concentration in the serum [54]. In vitro studies of the immune responses of murine Peyer's patches stimulated with Lactobacillus GG or L. gasseri TMC0356 showed the capacity of both strains to increase the production of IL-6, IL-12 and IFN-γ by intestinal immune cells [55]. Those studies clearly indicate that both Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 are equally effective in improving Th1 response not only in the gut by in the systemic compartment as well. Similarly, in this work, CFS from cultures of porcine Peyer's patches with GG or TMC0356 strains were able to functionally modulate the response of differentiated porcine adipocytes to TNF-α challenge. Then, our data suggest that Th1 cytokines produced by intestinal immune cells will be also capable of downregulating expression of pro-inflammatory genes in mature adipocytes (Fig. 9). In line with this assumption, L. gasseri TMC0356 was found to be able to stimulate the respiratory immune responses in a diet-induced obese mouse model, indicating that this immunobiotic strain may protect host animals from the lung immune dysfunction caused by obesity [56].

thumbnail
Fig 9. Possible immunomodulatory activity of L. rhamnosus GG, L. gasseri TMC0356, and L. rhamnosus LA-2 in both PIP cells and differentiated adipocytes after stimulation with TNF-α.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119644.g009

Concluding Remarks

Taking into consideration that several in vivo and in vitro studies clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 in adipose inflammation, the results presented in this work indicate that the PIP cells and porcine adipocytes could be used for the screening and the selection of new immunobiotic strains with the potential to functionally modulate adipose inflammation when orally administered. Moreover, the results of this work demonstrated that the regulation of IL-6, MCP-1, A20 and Bcl-3 induction in TNF-α-challenged porcine adipocytes could be certain biomarkers to screen and select potential immunobiotic strains.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thanks Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Development of Agricultural Products and Foods with Health-promoting benefits (NARO), and all our colleagues who cooperate this study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MS AT PK FH HA TN TS JV HK. Performed the experiments: MS AT PK HW. Analyzed the data: MS AT PK YS JV HK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HW AT KM KY MH. Wrote the paper: MS AT PK JV HK.

References

  1. 1. DiBaise JK, Zhang H, Crowell M, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Decker GA, Ritmann BE. Gut microbiota and its possible relationship with obesity. Mayo Clinic Proceed. 2008;83: 460–469.
  2. 2. Huebner L, Engeli S, Wrann CD, Goudeva L, Laue T, Kielstein H. Human NK cell subset functions are differentially affected by adipokines. PLoS One. 2013;8(9): e75703. pmid:24098717
  3. 3. Chi W, Dao D, Lau TC, Henriksbo BD, Cavallari JF, Foley KP, et al. Bacterial peptidoglycan stimulates adipocyte lipolysis via NOD1. PLoS One. 2014;9(5): e97675. pmid:24828250
  4. 4. Heilbronn LK, Campbell LV. Adipose tissue macrophages, low grade inflammation and insulin resistance in human obesity. Cur Pharma Design. 2008;14: 1225–1230.
  5. 5. Oliver E, McGillicuddy F, Phillips C, Toomey S, Roche HM. The role of inflammation and macrophage accumulation in the development of obesity-induced type 2 diabetes mellitus and the possible therapeutic effects of long-chain n-3 PUFA. Proceed Nut Soc. 2010;69: 232–243.
  6. 6. Desruisseaux MS, Nagajyothi , Trujillo ME, Tanowitz HB, Scherer PE. Adipocyte, adipose tissue, and infectious disease. Infect. Immunit. 2007;75: 1066–1078. pmid:17118983
  7. 7. Zhu HJ, Ding HJ, Deng JY, Pan H, Wang LJ, Li NS, et al. Inhibition of preadipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis by zinc-a2-glycoprotein treatment in 3T3-L1 cells. J. Diabet Invest. 2013;4: 252–260.
  8. 8. Tsai YT, Cheng PC, Pan TM. Anti-obesity effects of gut microbiota are associated with lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98: 1–10. pmid:24232731
  9. 9. Sethi JK, Hotamisligil GS. The role of TNF-α in adipocyte metabolism. Sem Cell. Develop Biol. 1999;10: 19–29.
  10. 10. Moller DE. Potential Role of TNF-α in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. Trend Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;11: 212–217. pmid:10878750
  11. 11. Cawthorn WP, Sethi JK. TNF-a and adipocyte biology. FEBS Lett. 2008;582: 117–131. pmid:18037376
  12. 12. Cheung AT, Ree D, Kolls JK, Fuselier J, Coy DH, Bryerash M. An in vivo model for elucidation of the mechanism of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-α (TNF-α)- induced insulin resistance: Evidence for a differential regulation of insulin signaling by TNFα. Endocrinol. 1998;139: 4928–4935.
  13. 13. Van der Poll T, Romijn OA, Endert E, Borm JJJ, Buller HR, Buller HR. Tumor necro- sis factor mimics the metabolic response to acute infection in healthy humans. Am. J. Physiol. 19991;261: E457–E465 pmid:1928337
  14. 14. Uysal KT, Wiesbrock SM, Marino MW, Hotamisligil GS. Protection from obesity-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking TNF-α function. Nature. 1997;389: 610–614. pmid:9335502
  15. 15. Stanley TL, Zanni MV, Johnsen S, Rasheed S, Makimura H, Lee H, et al. TNF-alpha antagonism with etanercept decreases glucose and increases the proportion of high molecular weight adiponectin in obese subjects with features of the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96: E146–E150. pmid:21047923
  16. 16. Lo J, Bernstein LE, Canavan B, Torriani M, Jackson MB, Ahima RS, et al. Effects of TNF-alpha neutralization on adipocytokines and skeletal muscle adiposity in the metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293: E102–E109. pmid:17374698
  17. 17. Kim SW, Park KY, Kim B, Kim E, Hyun CK. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG improves insulin sensitivity and reduces adiposity in high-fat diet-fed mice through enhancement of adiponectin production. Biochem. Biophy Res Comm. 2013;431: 258–263. pmid:23313485
  18. 18. Toral M, Gómez-Guzmán M, Jiménez R, Romero M, Sánchez M, Utrilla MP, et al. The probiotic Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 reduces the vascular pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory status in obese mice. Clin Sci (Lond). 2014;127(1): 33–45. pmid:24410749
  19. 19. Miyazawa K, He F, Yoda K, Hiramatsu M. Potent effects of, and mechanisms for, modification of crosstalk between macrophages and adipocytes by lactobacilli. Microbiol Immunol. 2012;56: 847–854. pmid:23017059
  20. 20. Park JE, Oh SH, Cha YS. Lactobacillus brevis OPK-3 isolated from kimchi inhibits adipogenesis and exerts anti-inflammation in 3T3-L1 adipocyte. J. Sci Food Agric. 2014;94(12): 2514–2520. pmid:24453065
  21. 21. Sanosaka M, Minashima T, Suzuki K, Watanabe K, Ohwada S, Hagio A, et al. A combination of octanoate and oleate promotes in vitro differentiation of porcine intramuscular adipocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol A. 2008;149: 285–292. pmid:17977041
  22. 22. Nobusue H, Kano K. Establishment and characteristics of porcine preadipocyte cell lines derived from mature adipocytes. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109(3): 542–552. pmid:20013788
  23. 23. Villena J, Kitazawa H. Role of Toll-like Receptors in the Modulation of Intestinal Inflammation by Immunobiotics, Probiotics. In: Kitazawa H, Villena J, Alvarez S, editors. Immunobiotics and Immunogenics. CRC Press; 2013. pp. 89–127.
  24. 24. Moue M, Tohno M, Shimazu T, Kido T, Aso H, Suda Y, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 and cytokine expression involved in functional immune response in an originally established porcine intestinal epitheliocyte cell line. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1780: 134–144. pmid:18082146
  25. 25. Shimazu T, Villena J, Tohno M, Fujie H, Hosoya S, Shimosato T, Aso H, et al. Immunobiotic Lactobacillus jensenii elicit anti-inflammatory activity in porcine intestinal epithelial cells by modulating negative regulators of the toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Infect Immun. 2012;80: 276–288. pmid:22083706
  26. 26. Tomosada Y, Villena J, Murata K, Chiba E, Shimazu T, Aso H, et al. Immunoregulatory effect of bifidobacteria strains in porcine intestinal epithelial cells through modulation of ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 expression. PLoS One. 2013;8(3): e59259. pmid:23555642
  27. 27. Curat CA, Miranville A, Sengenes C, Diehl M, Tonus C, Busse R, et al. From blood monocytes to adipose tissue-resident macrophages: induction of diapedesis by human mature adipocytes. Diabetes. 2004;53: 1285–1292. pmid:15111498
  28. 28. Constant VA, Gagnon A, Landry A, Sorisky A. Macrophage-conditioned medium inhibits the differentiation of 3T3-L1 and human abdominal preadipocytes. Diabetologia. 2006;49: 1402–1411. pmid:16609875
  29. 29. Spalding KL, Arner E, Westermark PO, Bernard S, Buchholz BA, Bergmann O, et al. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature. 2008;453: 783–787. pmid:18454136
  30. 30. Jernas M, Palming J, Sjoholm K, Jennische E, Svensson PA, Gabrielsson BG, et al. Separation of human adipocytes by size: hypertrophic fat cells display distinct gene expression. FASEB J. 2006;20: 1540–1542. pmid:16754744
  31. 31. Skurk T, Alberti-Huber C, Herder C, Hauner H. Relationship between adipocyte size and adipokine expression and secretion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92: 1023–1033. pmid:17164304
  32. 32. Lee YH, Nair S, Rousseau E, Allison DB, Page GP, Tataranni PA, et al. Microarray profiling of isolated abdominal subcutaneous adipocytes from obese vs non-obese Pima Indians: increased expression of inflammation-related genes. Diabetologia. 2005;48: 1776–1783. pmid:16059715
  33. 33. Poulain-Godefroy O, Bacquer OL, Plancq P, Lecœur C, Pattou F, Fruhbeck G, et al. Inflammatory role of Toll-like receptors in human and murine adipose tissue. Medi. Inflam. 2010;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/823486
  34. 34. Zhang HM, Chen LL, Wang L, Xu S, Wang X, Yi LL, et al. Macrophage infiltrates with high levels of Toll-like receptor 4 expression in white adipose tissues of male Chinese. Nut. Metab. Card Dis. 2009;19: 736–743.
  35. 35. Batra A, Pietsch J, Fedke I, Glauben R, Okur B, Stroh T, et al. Leptin-dependent toll-like receptor expression and responsiveness in preadipocytes and adipocytes. Am J. Pathol. 2007;170: 1931–1941. pmid:17525261
  36. 36. Khazen W, M’Bika JP, Collinet M, Tramoni M, Chany C, Achour A, et al. Differentiation-dependent expression of interferon gamma and toll-like receptor 9 in 3T3-F442A adipocytes. Biochimie. 2007;89: 669–675. pmid:17331636
  37. 37. Bes-Houtmann S, Roche R, Hoareau L, Gonthier MP, Festy F, Caillens H, et al. Presence of functional TLR2 and TLR4 on human adipocytes. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007;127: 131–137. pmid:16988837
  38. 38. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-α: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259: 87–91. pmid:7678183
  39. 39. Prins JB, Niesler CU, Winterford CM, Bright NA, Siddle K, O’Rahilly S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces apoptosis of human adipose cells. Diabetes. 1997;46: 1939–1944. pmid:9392477
  40. 40. Maury E, Noel L, Detry R, Brichard SM. In vitro hyper-responsiveness to TNF-{alpha}contributes to adipokine dysregulation in omental adipocytes of obese subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94: 1393–1400. pmid:19174496
  41. 41. Bruun JM, Lihn AS, Verdich C, Pedersen SB, Toubro S, Astrup A, et al. Regulation of adiponectin by adipose tissue-derived cytokines: in vivo and in vitro investigations in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;285: E527–E533. pmid:12736161
  42. 42. Bastard JP, Lagathu C, Caron M, Capeau J. Point-counterpoint: interleukin-6 does/does not have a beneficial role in insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;102: 821–822. pmid:17323465
  43. 43. Kanda H, Tateya S, Tamori Y, Kotani K, Hiasa K, Kitazawa R, et al. MCP-1 contributes to macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis in obesity. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116: 1494–1505. pmid:16691291
  44. 44. Sartipy P, Loskutoff DJ. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in obesity and insulin resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100: 7265–7270. pmid:12756299
  45. 45. Dorronsoro A, Lang V, Jakobsson E, Ferrin I, Salcedo JM, Fernandez-Rueda J, et al. Identification of the NF-κB inhibitor A20 as a key regulator for human adipogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2013;19: 972.
  46. 46. Schroder K, Wandzioch K, Helmcke I, Brandes RP. Nox4 acts as a switch between differentiation and proliferation in preadipocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(2): 239–245. pmid:19057021
  47. 47. Burcelin R, Serino M, Chabo C, Garidou L, Pomie C, Courtney M, et al. Metagenome and metabolism: the tissue microbiota hypothesis. Diab. Obes. Metab. 2013;15: 61–70.
  48. 48. Carvalho BM, Saad MJ. Influence of gut microbiota on subclinical inflammation and insulin resistance. Med Inflam. 2013; 1–13.
  49. 49. Kim S, Kim JH, Park BO, Kwak YS. Perspectives on the therapeutic potential of short-chain fatty acid receptors. BMB Reports. 2014;47: 173–178. pmid:24499669
  50. 50. Villena J, Chiba E, Tomosada Y, Salva S, Marranzino G, Kitazawa H, et al. Orally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus modulates the respiratory immune response triggered by the viral pathogen-associated molecular pattern poly(I:C). BMC Immunol. 2012;13: 53. pmid:22989047
  51. 51. Salva S, Villena J, Alvarez S. Differential immunomodulatory activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from goat milk: impact on intestinal and respiratory infections. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;141: 82–89. pmid:20395002
  52. 52. Salva S, Marranzino G, Villena J, Agüero G, Alvarez S. Probiotic Lactobacillus strains protect against myelosuppression and immunosuppression in cyclophosphamide-treated mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014;22(1): 209–221. pmid:24975836
  53. 53. Kawase M, He F, Kubota A, Hata JY, Kobayakawa S, Hiramatsu M. Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus gasseri TMC0356 and Lactobacillus GG on enhanced vascular permeability of nasal mucosa in experimental allergic rhinitis of rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70(12): 3025–3030. pmid:17151443
  54. 54. Kawase M, He F, Kubota A, Harata G, Hiramatsu M. Orally administrated Lactobacillus gasseri TMC0356 and Lactobacillus GG alleviated nasal blockage of guinea pig with allergic rhinitis. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51(11): 1109–1114. pmid:18037788
  55. 55. Harata G, He F, Kawase M, Hosono A, Takahashi K, Kaminogawa S. Differentiated implication of Lactobacillus GG and L. gasseri TMC0356 to immune responses of murine Peyer's patch. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53(8): 475–480. pmid:19659932
  56. 56. Yoda K, He F, Miyazawa K, Kawase M, Kubota A, Hiramatsu, M. Orally administered heat-killed Lactobacillus gasseri TMC0356 alters respiratory immune responses and intestinal microbiota of diet-induced obese mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(1): 155–162. pmid:22519947