Abundance of Cysteine Endopeptidase Dionain in Digestive Fluid of Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) Is Regulated by Different Stimuli from Prey through Jasmonates

Michaela Libiaková; Kristýna Floková; Ondřej Novák; L'udmila Slováková; Andrej Pavlovič

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104424

Abstract

The trap of the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) catches prey by very rapid closure of its modified leaves. After the rapid closure secures the prey, repeated mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs by struggling prey and the generation of action potentials (APs) result in secretion of digestive fluid. Once the prey's movement stops, the secretion is maintained by chemical stimuli released from digested prey. We investigated the effect of mechanical and chemical stimulation (NH₄Cl, KH₂PO₄, further N(Cl) and P(K) stimulation) on enzyme activities in digestive fluid. Activities of β-D-glucosidases and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidases were not detected. Acid phosphatase activity was higher in N(Cl) stimulated traps while proteolytic activity was higher in both chemically induced traps in comparison to mechanical stimulation. This is in accordance with higher abundance of recently described enzyme cysteine endopeptidase dionain in digestive fluid of chemically induced traps. Mechanical stimulation induced high levels of cis-12-oxophytodienoic acid (cis-OPDA) but jasmonic acid (JA) and its isoleucine conjugate (JA-Ile) accumulated to higher level after chemical stimulation. The concentration of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA) did not change significantly. The external application of JA bypassed the mechanical and chemical stimulation and induced a high abundance of dionain and proteolytic activity in digestive fluid. These results document the role of jasmonates in regulation of proteolytic activity in response to different stimuli from captured prey. The double trigger mechanism in protein digestion is proposed.

Citation: Libiaková M, Floková K, Novák O, Slováková L, Pavlovič A (2014) Abundance of Cysteine Endopeptidase Dionain in Digestive Fluid of Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) Is Regulated by Different Stimuli from Prey through Jasmonates. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424

Editor: Dawn Sywassink Luthe, Pennsylvania State University, United States of America

Received: April 17, 2014; Accepted: July 8, 2014; Published: August 25, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Libiaková et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [VEGA 1/0520/12], Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0057] and grant LO1204 from the National Program of Sustainability I. The Internal Grant Agency of Palacký University [IGA_PrF_2014006] is also kindly acknowledged for financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Carnivorous plants have attracted the attention of scientists for centuries by the ability of these plants to catch and then digest animal prey by enzymes similar to those in the digestive system of vertebrate animals. Although the composition of digestive fluid in some carnivorous genera is now well recognized, the information about regulation of their activity by stimuli from prey are scarce. In this paper we focus on the regulation of proteolytic activity in the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis), which captures insect by rapid movement of its bilobed modified leaves called a trap. Charles Darwin was fascinated by this plant and he denoted it as the “most wonderful plant in the world” [1]. In response to Darwin‘s request, Burdon-Sanderson discovered electrical activity in this plant [2]. The trap closes in response to a mechanical stimulus delivered to the trigger hairs, protruding from trap epidermis. This initiates a receptor and then an action potential (AP). At least two APs within approximately 20 seconds are necessary for trap closure at room temperature [3], [4], [5]. An external electrical stimulus can also close the trap without mechanical stimulation of the trigger hair, and repeated application of a lower voltage demonstrates the existence of electrical memory in Dionaea [6], [7], [8], [9]. The exact mechanism of rapid trap closure remained obscure for many years. The driving force for closure is most probably elastic energy accumulated due to hydrostatic pressure differences between the upper and lower layers of the lobes [10], [11], [12]. Another plausible explanation is the expansion of the cell wall through acid growth [13]. Regardless the mechanism, after rapid closure secures the insect prey, the struggling of the entrapped prey in the closed trap results in generation of further APs which cease to occur when the prey stops moving. Over 100 APs were recorded in the trap with prey in the first 2 hours. This results in further closure and tightening the trap to a tightly appressed state called the narrowed phase. The force increases in the narrowed phase from zero to 450 mN with maximal constriction pressure created by the trap lobes reaching to 9 kPa [14]. Secretion of digestive fluid also appears to be triggered by APs. The narrowed phase and secretion of digestive fluid are also induced by chemical stimulation; Na⁺ and NH₄⁺ stimulate narrowing at very low concentration; both ions are present in insect haemolymph. As the body of the insect breaks down through the action of digestive enzymes, more chemical stimuli are released into the trap interior which maintains secretion of fluid and trap narrowing. When the prey dies, no APs are generated [15], [16], [17]. Ueda et al. have isolated trap-closing chemical factors from jasmonates, which induce trap closing without mechanical stimuli [18]. It has been proposed that the ‘touch’ hormone 12-oxophytodienoic acid (OPDA), which is a precursor of jasmonic acid (JA), induces the secretion of digestive fluid [19].

The digestive fluid released from Venus flytrap in response to different stimuli has proteinase, peptidase, peroxidase, esterase, glycosidase, chitinase and anhydrase activities [20], [21]. The action of the proteolytic enzymes has been researched by several laboratories. Robins and Juniper (1980) and Takahashi et al. (2009), for example, noted that proteinase activity is not completely inhibited by pepstatin, a powerful inhibitor of pepsin in vertebrate animals and aspartic proteases nepenthesin in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes, suggesting the involvement of other enzymes in proteolysis [21], [22], [23]. Takahashi et al. (2011) published the partial aminoacid sequence of cysteine endopeptidase belonging to the papain family from digestive fluid of Dionaea and proposed the name dionain [24]. Recently, Schulze et al. (2012) provided aminoacid sequences of four other cysteine endopeptidases in digestive fluid of Venus flytrap designed as dionain 1-4 and two less abundant aspartic proteases dionaeasin-1 and dionaeasin-2 [25]. The cysteine endopeptidase droserain in carnivorous sundew Drosera indica has also been recently proposed [26].

Although the enzymatic properties and composition of digestive fluid in Venus flytrap is now well recognized [20], [21], [25], there is little information on how the enzyme activity is regulated by different stimuli from prey. The aim of our study was to investigate the digestive capabilities of fluid released in response to mechanical and chemical stimuli, with particular interest in cysteine endopeptidase dionain. The role of jasmonates in induction of enzyme secretion was also investigated.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and experimental setup

Fifty Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) plants were cultivated in greenhouses as part of a collection of carnivorous plants at the Department of Plant Physiology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, and Department of Biophysics in Olomouc, Czech Republic in well-drained peat moss in plastic pots (10 x 10 x 10 cm) placed in container filled with distilled water to a depth 1–3 cm. Daily temperatures fluctuated between 15–35 °C, relative air humidity 50–100 % and maximum daily irradiance reached max. 1500 µmol m^-2 s^-1 PAR (photosynthetically active radiation). For experiments the plants were replaced to aquarium with 100% relative air humidity. Secretion of digestive fluid was stimulated by mechanical and chemical stimuli. For mechanical stimulation, the trigger hairs in closed trap were stimulated gently by moving the rounded pipette tip (melted by heat and then hardened at room temperature to exclude wound response) every 10–15 min for at least 3 hours. For chemical stimulation 50 mM NH₄Cl, KH₂PO₄, NH₄NO₃, NaCl, KCl and distilled H₂O were used. Potassium, nitrogen and phosphorus co-limit the growth of carnivorous plants in natural habitat and carnivorous plants can obtain significant amount of K, N and P from insect prey [27], [28]. The concentrations were chosen on the basis of Lichtner and Williams experiments who found that 50 mM concentration was the most effective in induction of trap narrowing [17]. A soaked strip of filter paper was placed on the trap surface inducing the trap to shut. The opposite side of the paper strip was submerged into a 2 mL Eppendorf tube containing particular salts. After 24 hours, the strip of filter paper was removed and the percentage of traps narrowed in response to different treatments was evaluated. For induction of trap narrowing by jasmonic acid (JA) (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 - 6 drops of 2 mM (±)-JA containing 0.001% Tween were applied on the trap surface. The pure 0.001% Tween had no effect on trap narrowing. The digestive fluid was collected 24 and 48 hours after mechanical and chemical treatments and 48 hours after JA-induced narrowed traps using a pipette forced in between the trap lobes for further analysis. It was found that the rate of secretion is the highest between 24 – 96 hours [20].

Measurements of electrical activity

The APs were recorded by a non-invasive device inside a Faraday cage. The APs were measured on the trap surface with non-polarizable Ag–AgCl surface electrodes (Scanlab systems, Prague, Czech Republic) fixed with a plastic clip and moistened with a drop of conductive EV gel (VUP, Prievidza, Slovakia) that is commonly used in electrocardiography. The reference electrode was taped to the side of the plastic pot containing the plant submerged in 1–2 cm of water in dish beneath the pot. The electrodes were connected to an amplifier made in-house (gain 1–1000, noise 2–3 µV, bandwidth [-3 dB] 10⁵ Hz, response time 10 µs, input impedance 10¹² Ω). The signals from the amplifier were transferred to an analog-digital PC data converter (eight analog inputs, 12-bit-converter, ±10 V, PCA-7228AL, supplied by TEDIA, Plzeň, Czech Republic), collected every 6 ms. The sensitivity of the device was 13 µV. Moistened electrodes were equilibrated on the measured leaves for about an hour before measurement [29]. The mechanical stimulation was done by touching the trigger hairs with a pipette tip protruding outside the closed trap. The chemical stimulation was done by placing the soaked strip of filter paper inside the open trap, which subsequently snaps shut. Long-term observations (∼ 50 hours) were made on the potential changes that occur during chemical stimulation. All measurements were done in closed traps.

Quantification of phytohormones

From 9 to 10 traps of given variant (including control open traps without any stimulation) were collected for hormone analysis in two independent experiments between 36 and 48 hours. Because it is known that wounding plant tissue caused by leaf cuts can increase the level of jasmonates, we used a fast method of sample collection [30]. The samples were cut and immediately (up to 10 seconds) frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until extractions. Frozen plant material (15–20mg) was homogenized using an MM 301 vibration mill (Retsch GmbH & Co. KG, Haan, Germany) at a frequency of 27 Hz for 3 min and extracted with 1 ml of ice cold 10% MeOH/H₂O (v/v) extraction solution in the presence of stable isotopically labelled internal standards ([²H₆]-(±)-JA, [²H₂]-(-)-JA-Ile, [²H₅]-IAA, [²H₄]-SA, [²H₆]-(+)-cis,trans-ABA), provided by Olchemim (Olomouc, Czech Republic). The samples were incubated 20 min at 4 °C by shaking using a laboratory rotator and centrifuged (3 min, 20000 rpm, 4 °C). Collected supernatants were further purified by solid-phase extraction (SPE). After sample application onto equilibrated 30 mg polymer-based solid-phase sorbent (Oasis HLB, Waters), columns were washed with 1 ml of extraction solution and analytes were eluted by 3 ml of 80% MeOH/H₂O (v/v). Samples were evaporated up to dryness under the stream of nitrogen and dissolved in 30 µl of mobile phase (15% acetonitrile: 85% 10 mM HCOOH, v/v). Final analysis of selected phytohormones was performed by an Acquity UPLC System (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to quadrupole mass spectrometer Xevo TQ MS (Waters MS Technologies, Manchester, UK) in the following conditions. Reversed-phase separation was performed using Acquity UPLC CSH C₁₈ (100 x 2.1 mm; 1.7 µm; Waters) column and analytes were eluted with linear (0 to 5 min, 15% A; 5 to 15 min; 45% A), logarithmic (15 to 28 min, 48.6% A) and linear (28 to 29 min; 100% A) gradient of acetonitrile (A) and 10 mM formic acid (B), as mobile phases, at a flow rate 0.4 ml min^-1. Phytohormones were determined in multiple reaction monitoring mode using mass transitions: 215.2 > 58.8, 326.2 > 151.1, 181.2 > 134.1, 141.1 > 96.8, 269.2 > 159.1, 209.2 > 58.8, 324.3 > 151.2, 293.3 > 275.3, 176.3 > 130.2, 137.1 > 92.8, 263.2 > 153.1 for [²H₆]-(±)-JA, [²H₂]-(-)-JA-Ile, [²H₅]-IAA, [²H₄]-SA, [²H₆]-(+)-cis,trans-ABA, (-)-JA, (-)-JA-Ile, cis-(+)-OPDA, IAA, SA and ABA, respectively. Optimized parameters of MS/MS measurements were following: capillary/cone voltage, 3 kV/23–30 V; source/desolvation temperature, 120/550 °C; cone/desolvation gas flow, 70/650 L h^-1; collision energy, 12–23 eV; collision gas flow, 0.21 mL min^-1. Quantification was carried out by using isotope dilution method and a calibration curves with a good correlation coefficients (0.9963–0.9999) were obtained. Three independent technical measurements were performed for at least nine biological replicates from two independent experiments.

Enzyme assay

To determine enzymatic activity of secreted digestive fluid in response to mechanical, chemical and JA stimulation, a common spectrophotometric method was used. We used three chromogenic substrates, 4-nitrophenyl phosphate, 4-nitrophenyl β-D-glucopyranoside, 4-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), to estimate the activity of acid phosphatases (APs), β-D-glucosidases (BGs), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidases (NAGs), respectively. All substrates were prepared in 50 mM (pH = 5.0) acetate buffer, and the concentration of each was 5, 5, 2 mM, respectively. Only fresh digestive fluids were used for measurements, because just one freeze-thaw cycle significantly decreased the phosphatase activity. Portion of 15 µL (for APs), and 200 µL (for BGs and NAGs) of collected fluid was added to 535 µL (for APs), and 350 µL (for BGs and NAGs) of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH = 5.0), and mixed with µL of a particular substrate. For controls, 400 µL of each substrate solution was mixed with 550 µL of the buffer. Mixed samples were incubated at 25 °C for 15 min (for APs) or 4 hours (for BGs and NAGs), and then 160 µL of 1.0 N NaOH was added to terminate the reaction. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm with spectrophotometer Jenway 6705 UV/Vis (Bibby Scientific Ltd, Essex, UK). A calibration curve was determined using 4-nitrophenol.

Because BG and NAG activity was not detected spectrophotometrically, we also used a more sensitive fluorometric method. Fluorogenic substrates 4-methylumbelliferyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide and 4-methylumbelliferyl β-D-glucoside were used to estimate the activity of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidases and β-D-glucosidases, respectively. We used black 96-well microplates for fluorescence detection (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). The wells were filled with 300 µL of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH = 5). Then 10 µL of digestive fluid was added and the wells were supplemented with one of the two above substrates at 50 µL each (300 µM final concentration) and mixed afterwards. Distilled water at 50 µL each was added to control wells to measure background fluorescence. Immediately after adding all substrates, the microplate was inserted into the microplate reader to detect the rate of hydrolysis of each substrate during the next 2 hours. Relative fluorescence in each well was measured (excitation/emission wavelengths were 365 nm and 450 nm) at 5-min intervals with fluorescence microplate reader Infinite F200 (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland). A linear increase in fluorescence over time indicated hydrolysis of the substrate. For calibration of the method, a microplate was filled with appropriate amounts of sample and buffer but, instead of the corresponding substrate, 50 µL of 4-methylumbelliferone was used as the standard. We determined the calibration factor as a slope of the regression line (R² = 0.99).

Proteolytic activity of leaf exudates was determined by incubating 150 µL of a sample (75 µL of secreted fluid + 75 µL of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH = 5.0) with 150 µL of 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 200 mM glycine-HCl (pH = 3.0) at 37 °C for 1 hour. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 450 µL of 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. Samples were incubated on ice for 10 min, and centrifuged at 20. 000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Absorbance of the supernatant at 280 nm was measured by spectrophotometer Jenway 6705 UV/Vis (Bibby Scientific Ltd, Essex, UK). For inhibitory studies, 3 µL of 1 mM cysteine peptidase inhibitor E-64 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to 297 µL [75 µL of secreted fluid + 72 µL of 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH = 5.0 with 150 µL of 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 200 mM glycine-HCl (pH = 3.0)] to have a final effective 10 µM inhibition concentration [24]. One unit of proteolytic activity is defined as an increase of 0.001 per min in the absorbance at 280 nm [31].

Total protein content in digestive fluid was determined using Bicinchoninic Acid Kit for Protein Determination (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) according to the instruction manual and absorbance was measured at 562 nm by spectrophotometer Jenway 6705 UV/Vis (Bibby Scientific Ltd, Essex, UK). The activities were recalculated into µmol mg^-1 proteins h^-1 or U mg^-1 proteins for phosphatase and proteolytic activity, respectively. All the experiments were repeated five times from independently collected fresh digestive fluid.

SDS-PAGE and Western blots

For detection and quantification of cysteine endopeptidase called dionain-1 [24], [25], the polyclonal antibody against this protein was raised in rabbits by Agrisera (Vännäs, Sweden). The following aminoacid sequence (epitope) was synthesized: (NH₂-) CAFQYVVNNQGIDTE (-CONH₂), coupled to a carrier protein (keyhole limpet hemocyanin, KLH) and injected into two rabbits. The terminal cysteine was used for conjugation. The serum was checked for the presence of antigen specific antibodies using the ELISA test.

The digestive fluid was denatured by adding the loading buffer and heated at 70 °C for 30 min. The same amount of protein (quantified by Bicinchoninic Acid Kit) was electrophoresed in 12% (v/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel followed by transfer to the Hybond-C membranes (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany) by Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). Because protein concentration in collected samples of digestive fluid was very low, below detectable level of Coomassie staining, the gels were visualized by silver staining (Proteosilver, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For protein immunodetection, the polyclonal primary antibody against dionain-1 was used. After blocking in TBS-T containing 5% skim milk, the membrane was incubated with the primary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing, the membrane was incubated with the secondary antibody; the goat antirabbit IgG (H + L)-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Blots were visualized using Immobilon Western chemiluminiscent HRP substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and medical X-ray film (FOMA BIOCHEMIA, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic).

Protease analysis by zymogram SDS-PAGE

Protease activities were determined after separation of 30 µL aliquots (digestive fluid sample mixed with zymogram sample buffer 1:1) in 12 % (v/v) SDS -polyacrylamide gel with casein as substrate in the separating gel. After separation, the proteins were renatured by placing the gels in 2.5 % Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. The gels were incubating in development solution at 37°C, and then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining solution, and destained until the clear band appeared against blue background indicating protease activity. Ready gel zymograms and all kits and reagents were purchased from Biorad (Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Throughout this paper, the mean with standard error (s.e.) is provided wherever possible. Enzymatic activities and hormone analysis among treatments were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey-test (Origin 8.5.1., OriginLab corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Comparison between mechanically and JA-induced traps was done using Student's t-test (Microsoft Excel). Prior to the statistical tests, the data were analysed for normality and homogeneity of variance. When a non-homogeneity was present, a t-test was employed with the appropriate corrected degrees of freedom. The statistical significance of the relationship between proteolytic activity and endogenous phytohormone level was evaluated by significance test for linear regression (Origin 8.5.1., OriginLab corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

Results

Factors affecting trap narrowing and releasing of digestive fluid

Mechanical stimulation was very effective in induction of the narrowing phase (Fig. 1A,B,C), with 99.2 ± 0.4 % of traps induced. In comparison, the chemical stimuli induced from 37.0 to 60 % of traps. Mechanical stimulation also induce trap narrowing much faster, usually within 3 hours. Both type of stimulation induced secretion of digestive fluid. If the closed traps were without any additional mechanical or chemical stimulation (dry filter paper placed inside trap), the traps re-open within 24 hours without secretion of digestive fluid (Fig. 2). For futher analyses, we chose two most effective substances: KH₂PO₄ and NH₄Cl (further P(K) and N(Cl) stimulation, respectively).

Download:

Figure 1. Traps of Dionaea muscipula in response to mechanical stimulation.

An open trap (A), the same trap 1 min after double mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs (B) and 3 hours later after repeated mechanical stimulation in narrowed phase (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g001

Download:

Figure 2. Narrowing response after different treatments.

As a control wet (distilled H₂O) and dry filter papers were applied. M – mechanical stimulation, Different letters denote significant differences at P < 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey-test), means ± s.e., n = 5–9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g002

Electrical activity

Periodic mechanical stimulation delivered at 10–15 min intervals induced a series of APs (Fig. 3A,B). Chemical stimulation by KH₂PO₄ and NH₄Cl did not induce any spontaneous APs (observation for 50 hours, 10 different traps, Fig. 3C).

Download:

Figure 3. Electrical activity measured by extracellular electrode on trap surface.

Mechanical irritation delivered in 10 minutes intervals (A), detailed view on action potentials (B) and chemical stimulation with NH₄Cl and KH₂PO₄ did not trigger any AP (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g003

Induction of enzymatic activities

In general, higher enzymatic activities were recorded after 48 hours in comparison to 24 hours after induction. Both mechanical and chemical stimulation induced acid phosphatase activity. The highest activity was found after N(Cl)-stimulation followed by mechanical and P(K)-stimulation (Fig. 4A). The total proteolytic activity in mechanically induced traps was several times lower in comparison to chemical stimulation (Fig. 4B). The relative differences between treatments remained the same regardless the activity expressed per mg proteins or per ml (not shown). The proteolytic activity was inhibited with 10 µM cysteine peptidase inhibitor E-64 by 26% (mechanical stimulation) followed by 79% (N(Cl)-stimulation) and 83% (P(K)-stimulation), Fig. 5. β-D-glucosidase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (exochitinase) activities were not detected regardless of type of stimulation and method used for detection (spectrophotometric or spectrofluorimetric). As a control we used water soaked papers which induced enzyme activities comparable to mechanical stimulation. Induction of proteolytic activity by KCl was comparable to P(K) and N(Cl) stimulation (Fig. S1).

Download:

Figure 4. Enzymatic activities in response to mechanical and chemical stimulation after 24 (black bars) and 48 hours (white bars).

Acid phosphatase activity (A) and proteolytic activity (B). Different letters denote significant differences at the same time interval at P < 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey-test), means ± s.e., n = 7–9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g004

Download:

Figure 5. Inhibition of cysteine peptidase activity after 48 hours.

Relative proteolytic activity measured after inhibition with 10 µM cysteine proteinase inhibitor E-64. Activity without inhibitor of given variant is 100 %. Different letters denote significant differences at P < 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey-test), means ± s.e., n = 6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g005

Protein pattern and abundance of cysteine endopeptidase dionain

There were no obvious qualitative differences in the protein profiles of digestive fluid released in response to mechanical or chemical stimulation (Fig. 6A). Although silver staining has a high sensitivity, it has also a narrow linear dynamic range, making it less suitable for protein band quantification. Therefore, the antibody against dionain-1 was raised for quantification of this crucial protein in two rabbits. We found two positive reactions around 40 kDa (Fig. 6B). The molecular weight 40 kDa is lower than found by Takahashi et al. (2011) [24] but agrees with that found by Scala et al. (1969) and Schulze et al. (2012) [20], [25]. We suggest that the lower band below 40 kDa may be due to degraded enzyme or enzyme with a lower degree of glycosylation (dionain contains several glycosylation sites). Another explantaion is that the antibody binds to the active and inactive forms of the peptidase, since the C1A enzymes including dionain have a propeptide that must be cleaved to obtain an active protein. Indeed, the dionain-1 was identified in three bands of lower molecular weight [25]. We cannot exclude the possibility that the antibody used binds to dionain-2, -3 or -4, which share 50% identity of our epitope against dionain-1 (the sequence of dionain 2, 3, 4 was not known at the time of our antibody production; published by Schulze et al., 2012 [25]). The abundance of dionain is obviously much higher in response to chemical than mechanical stimulation, that is in agreement with significantly higher proteolytic activity in digestive fluid released in response to chemical stimulation (Fig. 4B). The position of dionain approximately agrees with the position of clear bands on zymogram which is caused by protease mediated casein degradation. The clear bands around 70 kDa belong probably to serine carboxypeptidase-like 49 protein as was identified by Schulze et al. (2012) [25], and its activity is also higher after chemical in comparison to mechanical stimulation (Fig. 6C).

Download:

Figure 6. Protein pattern, Western blot and zymogram in response to mechanical and chemical stimulation.

Silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing proteins in D. muscipula digestive fluid after mechanical (M), P(K) and N(Cl) stimulation (A). The same amount of proteins was electrophoresed in 12% (v/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against dionain-1 (B). Detection of protease activity in 12% (v/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel with casein as a substrate (C). The clear bands against background indicate protease activity. Representative gels at least from 4 repetitions are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g006

Jasmonates accumulate in response to mechanical and chemical stimuli

The fact that jasmonic acid (JA) was not detected in any resting control trap tissue indicates that our sampling method was sufficiently fast [30]. Analysis of treated traps showed accumulation of JA in response to mechanical stimulation and especially to N(Cl) and P(K) stimulation. For isoleucine conjugate of jasmonic acid (JA-Ile) a significant but only very small increase (app. 50 %) was measured in N(Cl) and P(K) stimulated traps. The rise of cis-OPDA was also evident, especially in mechanically and P(K) induced traps. Taken into account the absolute concentration of all studied jasmonates in trap tissue, the cis-OPDA raised to the highest level, followed by JA and finally to very small level of JA-Ile. The accumulation of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), salicylic acid (SA) and abscisic acid (ABA) did not change significantly in response to mechanical or chemical stimulation (Fig. 7). The linear regression analysis showed that the relationship between phytohormone concentration and the proteolytic activity is significant only for JA (Fig. 8).

Download:

Figure 7. Endogenous concentration of phytohormones (JA, JA-Ile, IAA, ABA, cis-OPDA and SA) in trap tissue 36 - 48 hours after stimulation.

Note different scale on y-axis for cis-OPDA and SA. Control (C), mechanical (M), P(K) and N(Cl) stimulation. Different letters denote significant differences at P < 0.05 of particular phytohormone among treatments (ANOVA, Tukey test), means ± s.e., n = 9–10.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g007

Download:

Figure 8. Correlation between endogenous phytohormone level and proteolytic activity.

Correlation between endogenous concentration of JA (A), JA-Ile (B), IAA (C), ABA (D), cis-OPDA (E), SA (F) and proteolytic activity induced by mechanical and chemical stimulation. The linear relationship is significant only for JA (P = 0.048, significance test for linear regression), means ± s.e.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g008

Jasmonic acid triggers secretion of cysteine endopeptidase dionain

Application of (±)-JA on the trap surface induced trap closing within 12 hours and led to the formation of narrowed phase with 100% of traps induced. The digestive fluid released 48 hours after external application of JA significantly upregulated the proteolytic activity but not phosphatase activity (Fig. 9A,B). The proteolytic activity was supressed by application of 10 µM cysteine peptidase inhibitor E-64 (Fig. 9C). The Western blots confirmed a higher abundance of dionain in JA-treated plants in comparison to mechanical stimulation (Fig. 10A,B). This again agrees with the position of clear bands on the zymogram. The proteolytic activity around 70 kDa belonging probably to serine carboxypeptidase-like 49 protein was also upregulated in JA-treated traps (Fig. 10C).

Download:

Figure 9. Enzymatic activities in response to external JA application.

Acid phosphatase activities (A), proteolytic activities (B) and activities measured after inhibition with 10 µM cysteine proteinase inhibitor E-64. Activity without inhibitor of given variant is 100 % (C). ** - significant differences at P = 0.01 (Student's t-test), means ± s.e., n = 6–7.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g009

Download:

Figure 10. Protein pattern, Western blot and zymogram in response to external application of jasmonic acid.

Silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing proteins in D. muscipula digestive fluid after mechanical stimulation (M) and external application of jasmonic acid (JA), (A). The same amount of proteins was electrophoresed in 12% (v/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against dionain-1 (B). Detection of protease activity in 12% (v/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel with casein as a substrate (C). The clear bands against background indicate protease activity. Representative gels at least from 4 repetitions are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g010

Discussion

The trapping mechanism and electrical signalling in the Venus flytrap have intrigued scientist since they were first described by Burdon-Sanderson (1873) and Charles Darwin (1875) [1], [2]. The prey capture and digestion are usually mediated by two types of stimuli: mechanical and chemical. In this study we distinguish between these two stimuli to find out their regulatory role in enzyme secretion. The mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs is important mainly in the first hours after prey capture and is responsible for fast trap narrowing and releasing of the first digestive fluid (Fig. 1). This type of stimulation is coupled with the generation of APs (Fig. 3A,B) and increased cytosolic Ca²⁺ level [3], [19]. Although Juniper et al. (1989) [32] suggested that there is no enzyme release following mechanical stimulation, our study and that of Schulze et al. (2012) found the enzymes in digestive fluid [25]. Once the entrapped prey died, chemical stimuli released from prey decomposition keep the trap in narrowed phase with enzyme secretion [17]. Volkov et al. (2011) also noted rapid induction of narrowed phase after application of external charge [33]. No APs have been recorded in response to 50 mM NH₄Cl and KH₂PO₄ in our study (Fig. 3C). Although Balotin and DiPalma (1962) have demonstrated production of spontaneous APs in response to chemical stimulation (510 mM NaCl), these results are more likely due to osmotic shock rather than to chemical stimulation [17], [34]. Affolter and Olivo (1975) have clearly demonstrated that no APs were detectable on the trap surface after the death of an insect which previously stimulated and triggered more than one hundred APs [15]. However, recently, the depolarization of membrane potential and even AP in 2-days prey-activated digestive glands in response to 10 mM NH₄Cl was documented by current-clamp microelectrode caused by the activity of DmAMT1 ammonium channel [35].

Mechanical stimulation with subsequent electrical activity triggers secretion of digestive fluid but is not sufficient to trigger full proteolytic capacity in D. muscipula (Fig. 4B). Robins (1976) showed differences between quantities of fluid and proteins produced in response to different nitrogenous stimuli in D. muscipula, indicating that fluid and enzyme release are not under the same control [16]. It is tempting to assume that the APs trigger basal secretion of acid phospatases and proteolytic enzymes, which are later under the control of chemical stimuli released from prey. The range of chemical stimuli is wide and include different salts and nitrogenous compounds. Darwin tested 51 salts and found that 25 were effective in induction of tentacle movement in carnivorous sundew Drosera rotundifolia [1]. In the genus Drosera proteolytic, chitinase, phosphatase and phosphodiesterase activities were not or only slightly increased in response to mechanical stirring of sticky tentacles. However, application of chemical stimuli (live prey, gelatine or chitin) significantly increased the enzymatic activities [28], [31]. Acid phosphatase activity was not much induced by P(K)-stimulation in our study (Fig. 4A), that is probably caused by the fact that P is a known competitive inhibitor of acid phosphatases [36]. No induction of enzyme secretion was observed after mechanical stimulation of passive pitcher trap in Sarracenia purpurea. The passive traps are not able to generate APs in response to mechanical stimulation in contrast to Drosera or Dionaea, however chemical stimuli in the form of bovine serum albumin (BSA) or NH₄⁺ significantly increased phosphatase and proteolytic activity [37]. Induction of endochitinase activity by chitin was recently described in carnivorous pitcher plants of the genus Nepenthes [38], [39], [40], [41]. In accordance with our study, exochitinase (or N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) activity in carnivorous plants has not been detected in Dionaea, Drosera and Nepenthes [21], [28], [42]. Robins and Juniper (1980) showed using autoradiography for the first time that proteins released from the glands comes from a store but considerable de novo synthesis must also occur during the digestion period [43], [44]. This was recently confirmed by the presence of mRNA for dionain and VF chitinase I in stimulated trap tissue [25], [42]. Nishimura et al. (2013) found induced transcription of S-like RNase genes in response to application of BSA in Venus flytrap [45]. These studies have shown that enzyme secretion in carnivorous plants is precisely regulated in response to stimuli from prey at the level of transcription.

Aspartic proteinases have been involved in protein digestion in Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Drosera and Dionaea [22], [23], [25]. Stephenson and Hogan [46] were the first to suggest that cysteine proteinase is involved in Nepenthes ventricosa. However cysteine proteinase has not been found in digestive fluid of Nepenthes analysed by mass spectrometry [41], [47] on the contrary to the digestive fluid of D. muscipula [22], [25], suggesting that if cysteine endopeptidase occurs in digestive fluid of Nepenthes, it plays only the minor role in protein digestion. Schulze et al. (2012) concluded that the aspartic proteinase dionaeasin play only a minor role in protein degradation in D. muscipula [25]. The dominant role of cysteine endopeptidase in protein digestion in Venus flytrap is confirmed also by our inhibitory experiments (Fig. 5). Our western blot analysis showed its higher accumulation in response to chemical in comparison to mechanical stimulation (Fig. 6B).

The link between electrical signalling and jasmonate accumulation is now well recognized [29], [48], [49], [50]. Jasmonates are lipid-derived compounds acting as key signaling molecules in plant stress responses [51]. Recently, it has been shown that they play also an indispensable role in leaf bending and digestive fluid secretion in carnivorous plants [19], [42], [52], [53]. In this paper, the term jasmonates include not only JA and JA-Ile but also oxylipin cis-OPDA. Escalante-Pérez et al. (2011) found accumulation of OPDA already after 30 min from prey capture in Venus flytrap and its level remained high until one week [19]. Cis-OPDA accumulated also in our study in both type of stimulation (Fig. 7). Although they did not show their JA and JA-Ile data in response to prey capture, we found higher accumulation of JA in chemically induced traps in comparison to control resting traps (Fig. 7). Although we found an approximately 50% increase of JA-Ile, its concentration remained very low. This questioned its role in induction of enzyme secretion, but coronatine, structural mimic of JA-Ile (and not OPDA as was previously thought), induced secretion of digestive fluid and transcription of VF chitinase I in Venus flytrap [19], [42]. It is now generally accepted that JA-Ile instead of JA is ligand to the JA receptor. The perception of JA-Ile is achieved by the ubiquitin ligase SCF^COI1 complex. When the F-box protein Coronatine-Insensitive1 (COI1) recognizes JA-Ile, it triggers the ubiquitination and subsequent proteosomal degradation of Jasmonate Zim Domain proteins (JAZ). The degradation of JAZ proteins relieves JAZ mediated repression of gene expression, leading to the activation of JA response. Neither JA nor OPDA are the ligand for COI1-JAZ co-receptor [54], [55], [56], [57]. However, the hypothesis that JA is bioactive per se cannot be completely rule out, as indicate studies of Chung et al. (2008) and Wang et al. (2008) [58], [59]. Moreover, it has been shown that OPDA elicits the transcript levels of many JA-responsive and JA-nonresponsive genes in Arabidopsis in a COI1-JAZ dependent or COI1-JAZ independent manner [60], [61]. A distinct set of genes is expressed by OPDA, but a partial overlap appeared with the expression of JA-induced genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Transcript level of intracellular cysteine endopeptidase in A. thaliana from the same C1A enzyme subfamily as dionain increased 2.5 and 4.9 times in response to external application of OPDA and JA, respectively (supplemental data in [61]). The same holds for serine carboxypeptidase-like 49 protein from S10 family identified in digestive fluid of Dionaea [25]. The transcript level of serine carboxypeptidase-like 9 protein from the same S10 enzyme family in A. thaliana increased 2.3 and 3.1 in response to external application of OPDA and JA, respectively (supplemental data in [61]). In our study cis-OPDA accumulated to much higher level than JA and JA-Ile (e.g. for P(K)-stimulated traps cis-OPDA level is tenfold higher in comparison to JA, and 200-fold higher in comparison to JA-Ile, Fig. 7, 8), but the fact that high accumulation of cis-OPDA in mechanically induced traps did not trigger the full proteolytic activity indicates also the participation of JA and (or) JA-Ile in chemical induction. This suggestion is supported by Nakamura et al. (2013) and Mithöfer et al. (2014) who found increased accumulation of endogenous JA and JA-Ile, leaf bending and formation of ‘outer stomach’ in response to chemical stimulation of live and edible prey in sundew Drosera capensis and supposed that JA and JA-Ile might be involved in chemonastic reactions rather than in thigmonastic movements [52], [53]. Our unpublished data showed that external application of (±)-JA on the leaves of D. capensis also induced high proteolytic activity.

Our results clearly showed that external application of JA upregulated the proteolytic activity and abundance of cysteine endopeptidase dionain in digestive fluid (Fig. 9, 10). We must also take into account that exogenous application of JA and the structural mimic of JA-Ile, coronatine, also induces the accumulation of OPDA [19], [62]. The fact that the level of endogenous jasmonates increased in response to prey capture and applied JA can bypass mechanical and chemical stimuli from insect prey to trigger full proteolytic activity, highlight the importance of jasmonate signalling in carnivorous plants digestion with active trapping mechanism. It is tempting to assume that the coordinated action of cis-OPDA, JA and JA-Ile fine-tune production of proteolytic enzymes. Multiple signal pathways may interact functionally with one another to optimize the Venus flytrap response to edible prey. It remains to be elucidated whether the jasmonates accumulate in whole trap tissue or are spatially restricted to digestive glands, where the expression of carnivory-related genes occurs.

The cost/benefit model proposed by Givnish et al. [63] became a framework for interpretation of many results in carnivorous plant research and the Venus flytrap is not an exception. Trap closure, prey retention and digestion in Venus flytrap are carbon costly. Trap closure and generation of APs transiently inhibit photosynthesis and stimulate mitochondrial respiration [64], [65]. It has been proposed that the stimulation of respiration is connected with rapid consumption of ATP during trap closure and AP generation [13], [64], [66]. The digestive fluid is also costly in term of carbon and nitrogen. On the other hand, the benefit in the form of increased uptake of N and P from prey can later stimulate photosynthesis, as has been documented in many carnivorous genera [28], [67], [68], [69], [70]. Thus, the Venus flytrap has evolved several control mechanisms how to optimize benefit from carnivory by reducing its associated costs, if there is nothing too much eat (Fig. 11). The first control point, double-trigger mechanism for prey capture in Venus flytrap, has been known for decades. At least two touches and two APs are necessary for trap closure at room temperature [4]. The lack of response to the first touch benefits the plants by preventing accidental closure through wind-blown sands, raindrops etc. [32]. If the trap snaps, the small gaps between marginal teeth of the trap allow small prey to escape from the trap [1], [71]. This second control point can help to save energy because small prey do not provide sufficient amounts of nutrients to repay the costs associated with prey retention and digestion and the trap slowly opens again [64]. However, if the bigger prey is secured, repeated mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs by struggling prey results in generation of hundreds APs and cause trap narrowing [15], [17], [19]. The mechanical stimulation is very effective in narrowing response and APs result in accumulation of jasmonates, mainly cis-OPDA, and trigger the releasing of digestive fluid. It has been suggested that the potential link between APs and jasmonate accumulation in plants is increased cytosolic Ca²⁺ level [48]. The digestive fluid released in response to mechanical stimulation has not the full power to digest protein. There must be some chemical or osmotically active substances released from partially digested or live prey, to trigger the full proteolytic activity – the double trigger mechanism in protein digestion and the third control point which ensure effective production of enzymes. The membrane depolarization and APs in prey-activated digestive glands may play a role in this process [35]. The gradual release of digestive enzymes with several control mechanisms (neuronal and hormonal) is also typical for animal digestive system [1]. It is tempting to assume that coordinated action of different jasmonates (JA, JA-Ile and cis-OPDA) regulate the transcription/exocytosis of cysteine endopeptidase dionain and optimize the digestive process in D. muscipula. In this way the Venus flytrap growing in nutrient poor habitats obtains up to 75% percent of leaf nitrogen from prey [72]. The surplus nitrogen can stimulate rate of photosynthesis and outweigh associated costs with prey retention and digestion [70].

Download:

Figure 11. Double trigger mechanism for protein digestion.

Three control points in prey capture and digestion of Venus flytrap, which ensure effective production of digestive enzymes. For detailed description, see discussion. AP – action potential, the increase of phytohormone level is indicated by arrows: no increase (-), small (↑), moderate (↑↑), high (↑↑↑).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.g011

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Enzymatic activities in response to mechanical stimulation, papers soaked with water and KCl after 48 hours. Acid phosphatase activity (A) and proteolytic activity (B). Different letters denote significant differences at P < 0.05 (ANOVA, Tukey-test), means ± s.e., n = 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104424.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Assoc. prof. Jaroslav Vrba (University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic) for help with spectrofluorimetric measurements of enzymatic activities, Eva Hirnerová (Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic) for help with phytohormone analysis, prof. Thomas Rost (University of California, USA) for language corrections and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments which improved our manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AP. Performed the experiments: ML KF LS AP. Analyzed the data: ML KF AP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ON AP. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: ML AP.

References

1. Darwin C (1875) Insectivorous plants. John Murray, London.
2. Burdon-Sanderson JS (1873) Note on the electrical phenomena which accompany stimulation of the leaf of Dionaea muscipula. Proc R Soc 21: 495–496.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Krol E, Dziubinska H, Stolarz M, Trebacz K (2006) Effects of ion channel inhibitors on cold- and ellectrically-induced action potentials in Dionaea muscipula. Biol Plantarum 50: 411–416.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Brown WH (1916) The mechanism of movement and the duration of the effect of stimulation in the leaves of Dionaea. Am J Bot 3: 68–90.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Hodick D, Sievers A (1988) The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174: 8–18.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Jovanov E (2007) Closing of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation of motor cells. Plant Signal Behav 2: 139–145.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Markin VS, Jovanov E (2008) Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing. Plant Physiol 146: 694–702.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Baldwin A, Markin VS (2009) Electrical memory in Venus flytrap. Bioelectrochemistry 75: 142–147.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Markin VS (2009) Biologically closed electrical circuits in Venus Flytrap. Plant Physiol 149: 1661–1667.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Hodick D, Sievers A (1989) On the mechanism of trap closure of Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). Planta 179: 32–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Forterre Y, Skotheim JM, Dumais J, Mahadevan L (2005) How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature 433: 421–425.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Markin VS, Volkov AG, Jovanov E (2008) Active movements in plants: mechanism of trap closure by Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Plant Signal Behav 3: 778–783.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Williams ME, Bennett AB (1982) Leaf closure in the Venus flytrap: an acid growth response. Science 218: 1120–1121.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Volkov AG, Harris SL, Vilfranc CL, Murphy VA, Wooten JD, et al. (2013) Venus flytrap biomechanics: Forces in the Dionaea muscipula trap. J Plant Physiol 170: 25–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Affolter JM, Olivo RF (1975) Action potentials in Venus's-flytraps: long term observations following the capture of prey. Am Midl Nat 93: 443–445.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Robins RJ (1976) The nature of the stimuli causing digestive juice secretion in Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus‘s flytrap). Planta 128: 263–265.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Lichtner FT, Williams SE (1977) Prey capture and factors controlling trap narrowing in Dionaea (Droseraceae). Am J Bot 64: 881–886.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Ueda M, Tokunaga T, Okada M, Nakamura Y, Takada N, et al. (2010) Trap-closing chemical factors of the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). ChemBioChem 11: 2378–2383.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Escalante-Pérez M, Krol E, Stange A, Geiger D, Al-Rasheid KA, et al. (2011) A special pair of phytohormones controls excitability, slow closure, and external stomach formation in the Venus flytrap. PNAS USA 108: 15492–15497.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Scala J, Iott K, Schwab DW, Semersky FE (1969) Digestive secretion of Dionaea muscipula (Venus's-flytrap). Plant Physiol 44: 367–371.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. IV. The enzymology of the secretion. New Phytol 86: 401–412.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Takahashi K, Matsumoto K, Nishi W, Muramatsu M, Kubota K (2009) Comparative studies on the acid proteinase activities in the digestive fluids of Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Dionaea, and Drosera. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 38: 75–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Athauda SBP, Matsumoto K, Rajapakshe S, Kuribayashi M, Kojima M, et al. (2004) Enzymic and structural characterization of nepenthesin, a unique member of a novel subfamily of aspartic proteinases. Biochem J 381: 295–306.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Takahashi K, Suzuki T, Nishii W, Kubota K, Shibata C, et al. (2011) A cysteine endopeptidase (“Dionain”) is involved in the digestive fluid of Dionaea muscipula (Venus's flytrap). Biosci Biotech Biochem 75: 346–348.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Schulze WX, Sanggaard KW, Kreuzer I, Knudsen AD, Bemm F, et al. (2012) The protein composition of the digestive fluid from the Venus flytrap sheds light on prey digestion mechanisms. Mol Cell Proteom 11: 1306–1319.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Takahashi K, Nishii W, Shibata C (2012) The digestive fluid of Drosera indica contains a cysteine endopeptidase (“Droserain”) similar to Dionain from Dionaea muscipula. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 41: 132–134.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Ellison A (2006) Nutrient limitation and stoichiometry of carnivorous plants. Plant Biol 8: 740–747.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Pavlovič A, Krausko M, Libiaková M, Adamec L (2014) Feeding on prey increases photosynthetic efficiency in the carnivorous sundew Drosera capensis. Ann Bot 113: 69–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Hlaváčková V, Krchňák P, Nauš J, Novák O, Špundová M, et al. (2006) Electrical and chemical signals involved in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Planta 225: 235–244.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Glauser G, Grata E, Dubugnon L, Rudaz S, Farmer EE, et al. (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics of jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis in response to wounding. J Biol Chem 283: 16400–16407.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Matušíková I, Salaj J, Moravčíková J, Mlynárová L, Nap JP, et al. (2005) Tentacles of in vitro-grown round-leaf sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) show induction of chitinase activity upon mimicking the presence of prey. Planta 222: 1020–1027.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Juniper BE, Robins RJ, Joel DM (1989) The carnivorous plants. London, UK: Academic Press.
33. Volkov AG, Pinnock MR, Lowe DC, Gay MS, Markin VS (2011) Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties. J Plant Physiol 168: 109–120.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Balotin NM, DiPalma JR (1962) Spontaneous electrical activity of Dionaea muscipula. Science 138: 1338–1339.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Scherzer S, Krol E, Kreuzer I, Kruse J, Karl F, et al. (2013) The Dionaea muscipula ammonium channel DmAMT1 provides NH₄⁺ uptake associated with Venus flytrap's prey digestion. Curr Biol 23: 1649–1657.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Dick CF, Dos-Santos ALA, Meyer-Fernandes JR (2011). Inorganic phosphate as an important regulator of Phosphatases. Enzyme Res 2011: ID 103980.
37. Gallie DR, Chang SC (1997) Signal transduction in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea. Plant Physiol 115: 1461–1471.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Eilenberg H, Pnini-Cohen S, Schuster S, Movtchan A, Zilberstein A (2006) Isolation and characterization of chitinase genes from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes khasiana. J Exp Bot 57: 2775–2784.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Rottloff S, Stieber R, Maischak H, Turini FG, Heubl G, et al. (2011) Functional characterization of a class III acid endochitinase from the traps of the carnivorous pitcher plant genus, Nepenthes. J Exp Bot 62: 4639–4647.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Mithöfer A (2011) Carnivorous pitcher plants: insight in an old topic. Phytochemistry 72: 1678–1682.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Hatano N, Hamada T (2012) Proteomic analysis of secreted protein induced by a component of prey in pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J Proteom 75: 4844–4852.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Paszota P, Escalante-Perez M, Thomsen LR, Risør MW, Dembski A, et al. (2014) Secreted major Venus flytrap chitinase enables digestion of Arthropod prey. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844: 374–383.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. II. Storage and synthesis of the secretory proteins. New Phytol 86: 297–311.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. III. The mechanism of release of digestive fluid. New Phytol 86: 313–327.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Nishimura E, Kawahara M, Kodaira R, Kume M, Arai N, et al. (2013) S-like ribonuclease gene expression in carnivorous plants. Planta 238: 955–967.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Stephenson P, Hogan J (2006) Cloning and characterization of a ribonuclease, a cysteine proteinase, and an aspartic proteinase from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventricosa Blanco. Int J Plant Sci 167: 239–248.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Hatano N, Hamada T (2008) Proteome analysis of pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J Proteome Res 7: 809–816.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Peňa-Cortés H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca²⁺ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: Requirement of Ca²⁺ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45: 456–459.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Mousavi SAR, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE (2013) Glutamate receptor-like genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signals. Nature 500: 422–426.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Monshausen GB, Haswell ES (2013) A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants. J Exp Bot 64: 4663–4680.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Wasternack C, Hause B (2013) Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot 111: 1024–1058.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Nakamura Y, Reichelt M, Mayer VE, Mithöfer A (2013) Jasmonates trigger prey-induced formation of outer stomach in carnivorous sundew plants. Proc R Soc B 280: 20130228.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Mithöfer A, Reichelt M, Nakamura Y (2014) Wound and insect-induced jasmonate accumulation in carnivorous Drosera capensis: two sides of the same coin. Plant Biol DOI:10.1111/plb.12148.
54. Staswick PE, Tiryaki I (2004) The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16: 2117–2127.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Fonseca S, Chini A, Hamberg M, Adie B, Porzel A, et al. (2009) (+)-7-iso-Jasmonyl-L-isoleucine is the endogenous bioactive jasmonate. Nature Chem Biol 5: 344–350.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Sheard LB, Tan X, Mao H, Withers J, Ben-Nissan G, et al. (2010) Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI-JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468: 400–407.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Ballaré CL (2011) Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends Plant Sci 16: 249–257.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Chung HS, Koo AJK, Gao X, Jayanty S, Thines B, et al. (2008) Regulation and function of Arabidopsis JASMONATE ZIM-domain genes in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol 146: 952–964.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Wang L, Allmann S, Wu J, Baldwin IT (2008) Comparisons of LIPOXYGENASE3- and JASMONATE-RESISTANT4/6-silenced plants reveal that jasmonic acid and jasmonic acid-aminoacid conjugates play different roles in herbivore resistance of Nicotiana attenuatta. Plant Physiol 146: 904–915.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Stintzi A, Weber H, Reymond P, Browse J, Farmer EE (2001) Plants defense in the absence of jasmonic acid: The role of cyclopentenones. PNAS USA 98: 12837–12842.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Taki N, Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Obayashii T, Kikuta A, Kobayashi K, et al. (2005) 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid triggers expression of a distinct set of genes and plays a role in wound-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139: 1268–1283.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Stelmach BA, Müller A, Weiler EW (1999) 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in jasmonic acid-treated tendrils of Bryonia dioica. Phytochemistry 51: 187–192.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub JD (1984) Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient poor habitats. Am Nat 124: 479–497.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Pavlovič A, Demko V, Hudák J (2010) Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration. Ann Bot 105: 37–44.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Pavlovič A, Slováková L', Pandolfi C, Mancuso S (2011) On the mechanism underlying photosynthetic limitation upon trigger hair irritation in the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis.). J Exp Bot 62: 1991–2000.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Jaffe MJ (1973) The role of ATP in mechanically stimulated rapid closure of the Venus's-flytrap. Plant Physiol 51: 17–18.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
67. Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM (2008) Prey availability directly affects physiology, growth, nutrient allocation and scaling relationships among leaf traits in 10 carnivorous plant species. J Ecol 96: 213–221.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
68. Pavlovič A, Singerová L, Demko V, Hudák J (2009) Feeding enhances photosynthetic efficiency in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes talangensis. Ann Bot 104: 307–314.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
69. Pavlovič A, Slováková L', Šantrůček J (2011) Nutritional benefit from leaf litter utilization in the pitcher plant Nepenthes ampullaria. Plant Cell Environ 34: 1865–1873.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
70. Kruse J, Gao P, Honsel A, Kreuzwieser J, Burzlaff T, et al. (2014) Strategy of nitrogen acquisition and utilization by carnivorous Dionaea muscipula. Oecologia 174: 839–851.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
71. Gibson TC, Waller DM (2009) Evolving Darwin's ‘most wonderful’ plant: ecological steps to a snap-trap. New Phytol 183: 575–587.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
72. Schulze W, Schulze ED, Schulze I, Oren R (2001) Quantification of insect nitrogen utilization by the Venus flytrap Dionaea muscipula catching prey with highly variable isotope signatures. J Exp Bot 52: 1041–1049.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Darwin C (1875) Insectivorous plants. John Murray, London.

[ref2] 2. Burdon-Sanderson JS (1873) Note on the electrical phenomena which accompany stimulation of the leaf of Dionaea muscipula. Proc R Soc 21: 495–496.
View Article
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Krol E, Dziubinska H, Stolarz M, Trebacz K (2006) Effects of ion channel inhibitors on cold- and ellectrically-induced action potentials in Dionaea muscipula. Biol Plantarum 50: 411–416.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Brown WH (1916) The mechanism of movement and the duration of the effect of stimulation in the leaves of Dionaea. Am J Bot 3: 68–90.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Hodick D, Sievers A (1988) The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174: 8–18.
View Article
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Jovanov E (2007) Closing of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation of motor cells. Plant Signal Behav 2: 139–145.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Markin VS, Jovanov E (2008) Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing. Plant Physiol 146: 694–702.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Baldwin A, Markin VS (2009) Electrical memory in Venus flytrap. Bioelectrochemistry 75: 142–147.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Markin VS (2009) Biologically closed electrical circuits in Venus Flytrap. Plant Physiol 149: 1661–1667.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hodick D, Sievers A (1989) On the mechanism of trap closure of Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). Planta 179: 32–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Forterre Y, Skotheim JM, Dumais J, Mahadevan L (2005) How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature 433: 421–425.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Markin VS, Volkov AG, Jovanov E (2008) Active movements in plants: mechanism of trap closure by Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Plant Signal Behav 3: 778–783.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Williams ME, Bennett AB (1982) Leaf closure in the Venus flytrap: an acid growth response. Science 218: 1120–1121.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Volkov AG, Harris SL, Vilfranc CL, Murphy VA, Wooten JD, et al. (2013) Venus flytrap biomechanics: Forces in the Dionaea muscipula trap. J Plant Physiol 170: 25–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Affolter JM, Olivo RF (1975) Action potentials in Venus's-flytraps: long term observations following the capture of prey. Am Midl Nat 93: 443–445.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Robins RJ (1976) The nature of the stimuli causing digestive juice secretion in Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus‘s flytrap). Planta 128: 263–265.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Lichtner FT, Williams SE (1977) Prey capture and factors controlling trap narrowing in Dionaea (Droseraceae). Am J Bot 64: 881–886.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Ueda M, Tokunaga T, Okada M, Nakamura Y, Takada N, et al. (2010) Trap-closing chemical factors of the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). ChemBioChem 11: 2378–2383.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Escalante-Pérez M, Krol E, Stange A, Geiger D, Al-Rasheid KA, et al. (2011) A special pair of phytohormones controls excitability, slow closure, and external stomach formation in the Venus flytrap. PNAS USA 108: 15492–15497.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Scala J, Iott K, Schwab DW, Semersky FE (1969) Digestive secretion of Dionaea muscipula (Venus's-flytrap). Plant Physiol 44: 367–371.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. IV. The enzymology of the secretion. New Phytol 86: 401–412.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Takahashi K, Matsumoto K, Nishi W, Muramatsu M, Kubota K (2009) Comparative studies on the acid proteinase activities in the digestive fluids of Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Dionaea, and Drosera. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 38: 75–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Athauda SBP, Matsumoto K, Rajapakshe S, Kuribayashi M, Kojima M, et al. (2004) Enzymic and structural characterization of nepenthesin, a unique member of a novel subfamily of aspartic proteinases. Biochem J 381: 295–306.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Takahashi K, Suzuki T, Nishii W, Kubota K, Shibata C, et al. (2011) A cysteine endopeptidase (“Dionain”) is involved in the digestive fluid of Dionaea muscipula (Venus's flytrap). Biosci Biotech Biochem 75: 346–348.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Schulze WX, Sanggaard KW, Kreuzer I, Knudsen AD, Bemm F, et al. (2012) The protein composition of the digestive fluid from the Venus flytrap sheds light on prey digestion mechanisms. Mol Cell Proteom 11: 1306–1319.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Takahashi K, Nishii W, Shibata C (2012) The digestive fluid of Drosera indica contains a cysteine endopeptidase (“Droserain”) similar to Dionain from Dionaea muscipula. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 41: 132–134.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Ellison A (2006) Nutrient limitation and stoichiometry of carnivorous plants. Plant Biol 8: 740–747.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Pavlovič A, Krausko M, Libiaková M, Adamec L (2014) Feeding on prey increases photosynthetic efficiency in the carnivorous sundew Drosera capensis. Ann Bot 113: 69–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Hlaváčková V, Krchňák P, Nauš J, Novák O, Špundová M, et al. (2006) Electrical and chemical signals involved in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Planta 225: 235–244.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Glauser G, Grata E, Dubugnon L, Rudaz S, Farmer EE, et al. (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics of jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis in response to wounding. J Biol Chem 283: 16400–16407.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Matušíková I, Salaj J, Moravčíková J, Mlynárová L, Nap JP, et al. (2005) Tentacles of in vitro-grown round-leaf sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) show induction of chitinase activity upon mimicking the presence of prey. Planta 222: 1020–1027.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Juniper BE, Robins RJ, Joel DM (1989) The carnivorous plants. London, UK: Academic Press.

[ref33] 33. Volkov AG, Pinnock MR, Lowe DC, Gay MS, Markin VS (2011) Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties. J Plant Physiol 168: 109–120.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Balotin NM, DiPalma JR (1962) Spontaneous electrical activity of Dionaea muscipula. Science 138: 1338–1339.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Scherzer S, Krol E, Kreuzer I, Kruse J, Karl F, et al. (2013) The Dionaea muscipula ammonium channel DmAMT1 provides NH₄⁺ uptake associated with Venus flytrap's prey digestion. Curr Biol 23: 1649–1657.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Dick CF, Dos-Santos ALA, Meyer-Fernandes JR (2011). Inorganic phosphate as an important regulator of Phosphatases. Enzyme Res 2011: ID 103980.

[ref37] 37. Gallie DR, Chang SC (1997) Signal transduction in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia purpurea. Plant Physiol 115: 1461–1471.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Eilenberg H, Pnini-Cohen S, Schuster S, Movtchan A, Zilberstein A (2006) Isolation and characterization of chitinase genes from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes khasiana. J Exp Bot 57: 2775–2784.
View Article
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Rottloff S, Stieber R, Maischak H, Turini FG, Heubl G, et al. (2011) Functional characterization of a class III acid endochitinase from the traps of the carnivorous pitcher plant genus, Nepenthes. J Exp Bot 62: 4639–4647.
View Article
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Mithöfer A (2011) Carnivorous pitcher plants: insight in an old topic. Phytochemistry 72: 1678–1682.
View Article
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Hatano N, Hamada T (2012) Proteomic analysis of secreted protein induced by a component of prey in pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J Proteom 75: 4844–4852.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Paszota P, Escalante-Perez M, Thomsen LR, Risør MW, Dembski A, et al. (2014) Secreted major Venus flytrap chitinase enables digestion of Arthropod prey. Biochim Biophys Acta 1844: 374–383.
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. II. Storage and synthesis of the secretory proteins. New Phytol 86: 297–311.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Robins RJ, Juniper BE (1980) The secretory cycle of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. III. The mechanism of release of digestive fluid. New Phytol 86: 313–327.
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Nishimura E, Kawahara M, Kodaira R, Kume M, Arai N, et al. (2013) S-like ribonuclease gene expression in carnivorous plants. Planta 238: 955–967.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Stephenson P, Hogan J (2006) Cloning and characterization of a ribonuclease, a cysteine proteinase, and an aspartic proteinase from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventricosa Blanco. Int J Plant Sci 167: 239–248.
View Article
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hatano N, Hamada T (2008) Proteome analysis of pitcher fluid of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. J Proteome Res 7: 809–816.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Peňa-Cortés H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca²⁺ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: Requirement of Ca²⁺ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45: 456–459.
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Mousavi SAR, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE (2013) Glutamate receptor-like genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signals. Nature 500: 422–426.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Monshausen GB, Haswell ES (2013) A force of nature: molecular mechanisms of mechanoperception in plants. J Exp Bot 64: 4663–4680.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Wasternack C, Hause B (2013) Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot 111: 1024–1058.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Nakamura Y, Reichelt M, Mayer VE, Mithöfer A (2013) Jasmonates trigger prey-induced formation of outer stomach in carnivorous sundew plants. Proc R Soc B 280: 20130228.
View Article
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Mithöfer A, Reichelt M, Nakamura Y (2014) Wound and insect-induced jasmonate accumulation in carnivorous Drosera capensis: two sides of the same coin. Plant Biol DOI:10.1111/plb.12148.

[ref54] 54. Staswick PE, Tiryaki I (2004) The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16: 2117–2127.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Fonseca S, Chini A, Hamberg M, Adie B, Porzel A, et al. (2009) (+)-7-iso-Jasmonyl-L-isoleucine is the endogenous bioactive jasmonate. Nature Chem Biol 5: 344–350.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Sheard LB, Tan X, Mao H, Withers J, Ben-Nissan G, et al. (2010) Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI-JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468: 400–407.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Ballaré CL (2011) Jasmonate-induced defenses: a tale of intelligence, collaborators and rascals. Trends Plant Sci 16: 249–257.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Chung HS, Koo AJK, Gao X, Jayanty S, Thines B, et al. (2008) Regulation and function of Arabidopsis JASMONATE ZIM-domain genes in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol 146: 952–964.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Wang L, Allmann S, Wu J, Baldwin IT (2008) Comparisons of LIPOXYGENASE3- and JASMONATE-RESISTANT4/6-silenced plants reveal that jasmonic acid and jasmonic acid-aminoacid conjugates play different roles in herbivore resistance of Nicotiana attenuatta. Plant Physiol 146: 904–915.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Stintzi A, Weber H, Reymond P, Browse J, Farmer EE (2001) Plants defense in the absence of jasmonic acid: The role of cyclopentenones. PNAS USA 98: 12837–12842.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Taki N, Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Obayashii T, Kikuta A, Kobayashi K, et al. (2005) 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid triggers expression of a distinct set of genes and plays a role in wound-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139: 1268–1283.
View Article
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Stelmach BA, Müller A, Weiler EW (1999) 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in jasmonic acid-treated tendrils of Bryonia dioica. Phytochemistry 51: 187–192.
View Article
Google Scholar

[177] View Article

[178] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub JD (1984) Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient poor habitats. Am Nat 124: 479–497.
View Article
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Pavlovič A, Demko V, Hudák J (2010) Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration. Ann Bot 105: 37–44.
View Article
Google Scholar

[183] View Article

[184] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Pavlovič A, Slováková L', Pandolfi C, Mancuso S (2011) On the mechanism underlying photosynthetic limitation upon trigger hair irritation in the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis.). J Exp Bot 62: 1991–2000.
View Article
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Jaffe MJ (1973) The role of ATP in mechanically stimulated rapid closure of the Venus's-flytrap. Plant Physiol 51: 17–18.
View Article
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM (2008) Prey availability directly affects physiology, growth, nutrient allocation and scaling relationships among leaf traits in 10 carnivorous plant species. J Ecol 96: 213–221.
View Article
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Pavlovič A, Singerová L, Demko V, Hudák J (2009) Feeding enhances photosynthetic efficiency in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes talangensis. Ann Bot 104: 307–314.
View Article
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Pavlovič A, Slováková L', Šantrůček J (2011) Nutritional benefit from leaf litter utilization in the pitcher plant Nepenthes ampullaria. Plant Cell Environ 34: 1865–1873.
View Article
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Kruse J, Gao P, Honsel A, Kreuzwieser J, Burzlaff T, et al. (2014) Strategy of nitrogen acquisition and utilization by carnivorous Dionaea muscipula. Oecologia 174: 839–851.
View Article
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Gibson TC, Waller DM (2009) Evolving Darwin's ‘most wonderful’ plant: ecological steps to a snap-trap. New Phytol 183: 575–587.
View Article
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Schulze W, Schulze ED, Schulze I, Oren R (2001) Quantification of insect nitrogen utilization by the Venus flytrap Dionaea muscipula catching prey with highly variable isotope signatures. J Exp Bot 52: 1041–1049.
View Article
Google Scholar

[207] View Article

[208] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant material and experimental setup

Measurements of electrical activity

Quantification of phytohormones

Enzyme assay

SDS-PAGE and Western blots

Protease analysis by zymogram SDS-PAGE

Statistical analysis

Results

Factors affecting trap narrowing and releasing of digestive fluid

Electrical activity

Induction of enzymatic activities

Protein pattern and abundance of cysteine endopeptidase dionain

Jasmonates accumulate in response to mechanical and chemical stimuli

Jasmonic acid triggers secretion of cysteine endopeptidase dionain

Discussion

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References