Figures
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize a Triticum aestivum-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng (2n = 2x = 14, NsNs) disomic addition line 2-1-6-3. Individual line 2-1-6-3 plants were analyzed using cytological, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), EST-SSR, and EST-STS techniques. The alien addition line 2-1-6-3 was shown to have two P. huashanica chromosomes, with a meiotic configuration of 2n = 44 = 22 II. We tested 55 EST-SSR and 336 EST-STS primer pairs that mapped onto seven different wheat chromosomes using DNA from parents and the P. huashanica addition line. One EST-SSR and nine EST-STS primer pairs indicated that the additional chromosome of P. huashanica belonged to homoeologous group 7, the diagnostic fragments of five EST-STS markers (BE404955, BE591127, BE637663, BF482781 and CD452422) were cloned, sequenced and compared. The results showed that the amplified polymorphic bands of P. huashanica and disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 shared 100% sequence identity, which was designated as the 7Ns disomic addition line. Disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 was evaluated to test the leaf rust resistance of adult stages in the field. We found that one pair of the 7Ns genome chromosomes carried new leaf rust resistance gene(s). Moreover, wheat line 2-1-6-3 had a superior numbers of florets and grains per spike, which were associated with the introgression of the paired P. huashanica chromosomes. These high levels of disease resistance and stable, excellent agronomic traits suggest that this line could be utilized as a novel donor in wheat breeding programs.
Citation: Du W, Wang J, Wang L, Zhang J, Chen X, Zhao J, et al. (2013) Development and Characterization of a Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 7Ns Chromosome Addition Line with Leaf Rust Resistance. PLoS ONE 8(8): e70879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070879
Editor: Randall P. Niedz, United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America
Received: January 22, 2013; Accepted: June 24, 2013; Published: August 19, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Du et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Financial support was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (No. 2011AA10010203) and Northwest A&F University (No. Z109021002, A212020716).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The leaf rust caused by Puccinia recondita Roberge ex Desmaz. f. sp. tritici Eriks. & E. Henn leads to high annual losses because of its widespread occurrence, although leaf rusts generally produce fewer losses than stem rust and stripe rust. [1]. Over 50 leaf rust resistance (Lr) genes have been cataloged and mapped to specific chromosomes [2], almost half of which are derived from wheat relatives, including Aegilops [3], Agropyron [4], Hordeum [5], Secale cereale L. [6], Thinopyrum [7], and Lophopyrum ponticum [8]. Many different addition lines, substitution lines, translocation lines, and introgression lines have been developed in wheat, and their desirable traits have been characterized to facilitate the study of alien chromosomes or segments that carry excellent traits.
Psathyrostachys is a small genus containing no more than ten perennial species, which are distributed throughout central Asia, from east Turkey to central China and Mongolia. Psathyrostachys species are known to be diploid (2n = 14) with the basic genome Ns [9]. Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng (2n = 2x = 14, NsNs) is morphologically distinct from all other species in the genus and it is also geographically isolated because it grows only in a narrow area of the mountainous rocky slopes of Mount Huashan, Shaanxi Province, central China [10], [11], [12]. P. huashanica has attracted considerable attention from wheat breeders as an outcrossing material because of its early maturity and resistance to cold, drought, disease, barren soil, and salinity [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].
Interspecific hybridization between common wheat and its wild relatives is an effective and economic method for introducing agronomically desirable characters into available wheat cultivars [21], [22]. The production of addition lines is an important step during the successful transfer of alien genes into wheat. In 1991, our research team successfully produced the hybrid H881 (2n = 28, ABDNs) from common wheat cultivar 7182 and P. huashanica via embryo culture, and backcrossing induced the spontaneous doubling of chromosomes, which generated the heptaploid hybrid H8911 (2n = 49, AABBDDNs) [23]. A batch of wheat-P. huashanica monosomic addition lines were then developed after a second backcrossing [24], followed by strict generations of selfing accompanied by cytology, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) screening, molecular marker analysis, and morphological observation. We identified the BC2F2 line 2-1-6-3 as having a pair of 7Ns chromosomes. An evaluation of leaf rust resistance during the adult stages showed that this added pair of 7Ns chromosomes carried leaf rust resistance gene(s) in a wheat background, which may be useful for comparative research and for the exploitation of desirable P. huashanica genes in wheat improvement. The superior numbers of florets and grains per spike in wheat line 2-1-6-3 were also related to the introgression of the pair of P. huashanica chromosomes.
The objectives of this study were: a) to identify and characterize the chromosome constitution of 7Ns disomic addition lines based on mitotic and meiotic cytogenetics and GISH; b) to develop and characterize EST-SSR and EST-STS markers for 7Ns based on the collinearity between wheat and P. huashanica; c) to evaluate the leaf rust resistance and agronomic traits attributed to 7Ns after their addition to common wheat.
Results
Development and cytological characterization of the wheat-P. huashanica disomic addition line A wheat-P. huashanica heptaploid hybrid H8911 was obtained in 1991, which was backcrossed continuously with common wheat cv. 7182, followed by one generation of selfing. Twenty 2-1-6-3 plants were shown to have a pair of alien chromosomes from P. huashanica according to the mitosis and meiosis analysis, and the chromosome number and configuration were 2n = 44 = 22 II (Figs. 1a and 1b). The chromosome pairing behavior was characterized in the pollen mother cells (PMCs) during metaphase I and 100 2-1-6-3 cells were monitored regularly to detect the average numbers of univalents (0.61), ring bivalents (17.74), and rod bivalents (3.18) (Table 1). No trivalents or quadrivalents were detected. Complete homologous chromosome pairing was observed in 92% of the PMCs. These results suggest that the wheat-P. huashanica disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 was cytologically stable.
a Somatic chromosomes in the root tips, 2n = 44. b Chromosome behavior of pollen mother cells during metaphase I, 2n = 22 II.
GISH analysis
Mitotic and meiotic GISH were conducted using the whole genomic DNA of P. huashanica as a probe to monitor the chromosomal constitution of addition line 2-1-6-3. Two distinctive alien chromosomes with strong hybridization signals were detected in the root tip cells of 2-1-6-3 (Fig. 2a). Similarly, one rod bivalent was detected with a yellowish-green hybridization signal in the PMCs during metaphase I (Fig. 2b). These results suggest that 2-1-6-3 contained two alien chromosomes from P. huashanica and that these two chromosomes paired to form ring bivalents. Thus, the addition line 2-1-6-3 had 42 wheat chromosomes and two chromosomes from P. huashanica.
a Somatic metaphase indicating two Psathyrostachys huashanica chromosomes (yellowish-green color). b Pollen mother cells during meiotic metaphase I, showing a ring bivalent chromosome from Psathyrostachys huashanica (color figure online).
Development of P. huashanica chromosome-specific markers
Wheat EST-SSR multi-loci markers were developed for discriminating P. huashanica chromosomes. After screening 55 EST-SSR markers, we obtained 20 EST-SSR primer pairs, which were polymorphic in 7182 and P. huashanica, and located on different wheat chromosomes. These polymorphic markers were then used to analyze the addition line 2-1-6-3. Only one primer, Swes22, which mapped onto chromosomes 7A and 7B, produced stable and clear polymorphic bands in 7182, P. huashanica, and 2-1-6-3 (Fig. 3a; Table 2).
PCR was used to amplify specific bands in the addition line, which were attributable to chromosome 7Ns from Psathyrostachys huashanica (arrows). M marker, 1 Psathyrostachys huashanica, 2 7182, 3 chromosome addition line 2-1-6-3. Arrows indicate the diagnostic amplification products for Psathyrostachys huashanica (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i and j).
One hundred and fifty EST-STS makers from 336 pairs produced polymorphic bands in 7182 and P. huashanica. Nine of these 150 markers produced stable and clear polymorphic bands in addition line 2-1-6-3 and they could be used to trace the corresponding P. huashanica chromosomes. The primers BE404955, BE591127, BE591737, BE637663, BF482781, BF482530, BG274576, BQ168298 and CD452422, which were located on different chromosomal arms of the seventh homoeologous group, amplified polymorphic bands in P. huashanica and addition line 2-1-6-3, but not in the female parent 7182 (Fig. 3b–3j; Table 2). This indicated that one pair of the P. huashanica chromosomes added to addition line 2-1-6-3 could be separated into the seventh homoeologous group, i.e., 7Ns, and one EST-SSR marker and nine EST-STS markers could be used as specific markers to detect P. huashanica chromosome 7Ns in a wheat background.
Sequence analysis
We randomly selected five EST-STS markers (BE404955, BE591127, BE637663, BF482781 and CD452422). The polymorphic DNA fragments of the markers from P. huashanica and disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 were cloned and sequenced (Fig. 3b, 3c, 3e, 3f and 3j). The sequences of those polymorphic markers were conserved to the (File S1: S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10). Sequence homology searches were also conducted using DNASTAR 6.0 (SeqMan). The results showed that the amplified polymorphic bands of P. huashanica and disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 shared 100% sequence identity, which demonstrated that P. huashanica chromosome 7Ns had been introduced into wheat.
Leaf rust evaluation
We tested P. huashanica, 7182, 2-1-6-3, and sensitive cultivar Shaan 229 using mixed spore leaf rust cultures in the field. Fungal plaques usually appeared on the lower leaves whereas the flag leaves were rust-free until senescence when traces of leaf rust appeared. After three years of observation and testing, we found that the female parent 7182 and control cultivar Shaan 229 exhibited type 3 infection responses (see Materials and Methods), indicating their susceptibility to leaf rust. By contrast, P. huashanica and addition line 2-1-6-3 displayed type 0 infection responses, indicating that they were resistant to leaf rust (Fig. 4; Table 3). This suggested that disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 had inherited the leaf rust resistance gene(s) from P. huashanica.
1 Psathyrostachys huashanica, 2 and 3 2-1-6-3 (resistant to leaf rust), 4 7182, 5 Shaan 229 (susceptible to leaf rust).
Agronomic traits of disomic addition line 2-1-6-3
Disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 was tested for three years in the field and the plants appeared to be similar to wheat, except spike length, number of spikelets per spike and kernels per spikelet were greater than those of their parents, whereas the plant height was lower compared with the parents. The spikes of 2-1-6-3 plants had a full awn and they were very similar to 7182, which distinguished it from the male parent P. huashanica with its small tip awns. The 2-1-6-3 spikes were also bulkier and their lengths reached 11 cm, i.e., about 2 cm and 3 cm longer than the spike lengths of 7182 and P. huashanica, respectively. As expected, 2-1-6-3 had a number of excellent traits. In particular, there were six kernels per spikelet in the main spike. It produced plump red seeds, which were similar to those of the female parent 7182, except they had a higher 1000-kernel weight (about 50 g) (Fig. 5). According to Duncan's multiple range test (P<0.01 and P<0.05), there were significant differences between the disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 and its parents, 7182 and P. huashanica, in terms of the number of kernels per spike and thousand-grain weight (Table 3).
a adult plants, b spikes, c spikelets and seeds. 1 Psathyrostachys huashanica, 2 7182, 3 2-1-6-3.
Discussion
After successfully transferring an alien chromosome(s) or chromosome segment(s) into wheat, the next step is to identify the actual alien chromatin [3]. GISH is an efficient and accurate tool for tracking alien chromosomes or smaller fragments in a wheat background [25]. Therefore, it was employed to identify the chromosomal configuration and composition of the 2-1-6-3 line, which had a superior numbers of florets and grains per spike. During the mitotic and meiotic phases, P. huashanica was used as a probe and Chinese Spring as a blocker. To demonstrate that genes have been incorporated from a wild species into wheat, the most important prerequisite is detect normal meiotic pairing and recombination between corresponding genomes in the F1 hybrids and in their subsequent selfed and backcrossed progeny [26]. The cytogenetic observations and GISH analysis of 2-1-6-3 confirmed its cytogenetic stability and its chromosomal composition was 2n = 44 (Figs. 1 and 2). Two chromosomes from P. huashanica were detected during meiotic metaphase I in PMCs and they formed bivalents with no lagging in the equatorial plate (Fig. 2b). This showed that the P. huashanica chromosomes could engage in normal synapsis, pairing, and separation in a wheat background, which could facilitate the expression of its excellent agronomic traits in correlated homologous groups. Indeed, the production of alien addition lines is an important step during the successful transfer of genes into wheat because it plays a bridging role in the creation of alien substitution lines and translocation lines.
The transferability of EST-based PCR markers among related species allows introduced alien chromatin to be tracked easily [27], [28]. EST-SSR is recognized as an efficient and stable method for developing chromosomal molecular markers based on their association with conserved expressed sequences [29]. EST sequences derived from gene transcripts are likely to be conserved in wheat and related species so they are used widely for identifying homoeologous relationships between wheat chromosomes and those of aliens, including Secale cereale L. [30], Aegilops tauschii. [31], Dasypyrum villosum [32], Hordeum chilense [33], and Thinopyrum ponticum [8], [34]. To further confirm the transfer of chromosomes from P. huashanica, we screened 55 EST-SSR and 336 EST-STS multiple-loci pair primers from wheat. One EST-SSR and nine EST-STS markers were tested successfully in the wheat-P. huashanica 7Ns disomic addition line. One EST-SSR marker, Swes22, which was located on wheat chromosomes 7A and 7B, specifically amplified polymorphic bands in P. huashanica and 2-1-6-3 (Fig. 3a). This indicated that the addition line possessed a wheat background but it also expressed unique bands from P. huashanica, which was supported by the cytogenetic analysis and GISH results (Figs. 1 and 2). Nine EST-STS makers, which mapped onto the short arm, long arm, and centromere of wheat homoeologous group 7, produced specific bands in 2-1-6-3 and the alien parent (Fig. 3b–3j). These results demonstrated that the chromosome from P. huashanica had a homoeologous relationship with the seventh group. The makers identified here could also be used as a rapid and direct method for screening progeny lines containing 7Ns. These P. huashanica-specific chromosome markers will be useful for the accurate and rapid screening of large populations of alien chromosome lines during wheat breeding programs. These markers could also be employed for comparative gene mapping, chromosomal evolutionary analysis, and gene introgression during wheat improvement using P. huashanica accessions as gene donors.
The wild relatives of wheat are reservoirs of genetic variability for various traits, including resistance to rust diseases [35]. Over 17 known Lr genes have been introgressed into common wheat from Aegilops (goatgrass) [3]. Similarly, four leaf rust resistance genes were transferred from Agropyron, i.e., Lr19, Lr24, Lr29, and Lr38 [4], while five Pr genes and three Lr genes were derived from cultivated rye (Secale cereale L.) [4], [36], [37]. A previous study indicated that leaf rust resistance genes were closely linked to homoeologous group 7, i.e., the leaf, stem, and stripe rust resistant line (Z4) carried an additional group 7 chromosome from Thinopyrum intermedium [38]. Wheat-Hordeum addition lines possessed common bunt and septoria leaf blotch resistance, which was conferred by gene(s) on chromosome 7 in field experiments [39], [40]. Chromosome 7E from Lophopyrum ponticum also carries a valuable leaf rust resistance gene designated Lr19 [41]. In the present study, we demonstrated the transfer of putative new leaf rust resistance gene(s) from a wild species, P. huashanica, to common wheat by the development of the 7Ns chromosome addition line 2-1-6-3. This novel addition line will provide a solid foundation for isolating resistance gene(s) from 7Ns, as well as for developing highly specific diagnostic markers. This is the first time that a progeny line from P. huashanica has shown resistance to leaf rust and it will provide a new resource for the development of rust resistance in current breeding programs, eventually leading to the development of resistant cultivars.
In this study, the presence of P. huashanica chromosome 7Ns demonstrated that homoeologous group 7 was associated with yield enhancement, particularly high numbers of kernels per spike and a higher thousand-grain weight. It has also been reported that the incorporation of a 7DL/7Ag translocation from Agropyron elongatum (Host) Beauv. caused a significant increase (9%) in biomass at harvest during non-moisture stress trials [42]. The 7DL.7Ag translocation line from Lophopyrum elongatum carried Lr19, a leaf rust resistance gene, and it was found to be associated with a significant increase in the grain yield in irrigated, disease-free conditions [43]. The results described in this previous study demonstrated that the introgression of chromosome 7Ag increased the grain yield and it also carried a leaf rust resistance gene, Lr19, which matched the results obtained using our P. huashanica 7Ns disomic addition line 2-1-6-3. The superior spike trait of addition line 2-1-6-3 will be particularly significant for enhancing the crop yield because it allows more kernels to be formed per spike. Duncan's multiple range test showed that the thousand-grain weight differed significantly between 7182 and 2-1-6-3 (Table 3). This suggests that addition line 2-1-6-3 confers resistance to leaf rust but it may also increase the wheat yield. Therefore, our study showed that new gene(s) located on 7Ns of P. huashanica and introduced into a wheat background increased the leaf rust resistance during the adult age and also enhanced the potential yield. In addition, this study also provides novel insights into the utilization of homoeologous group seven chromosomes by P. huashanica in a wheat background.
Materials and Methods
Plant material
Common wheat cv. 7182 (2n = 42, AABBDD), P. huashanica (2n = 14, NsNs), and the progeny of 2-1-6-3 (2n = 44) were used in this study. We selected the disomic addition line 2-1-6-3 (BC2F2), which had a chromosome number of 2n = 44, a high thousand-grain weight, a superior numbers of florets and grains per spike, and resistance to leaf rust. The parental wheat cultivar 7182 and P. huashanica were included as controls to assess their agronomic traits and leaf rust resistance, and were used in the EST-SSR and EST-STS analysis. Wheat cv. Shaan 229 was used as a susceptible control in the leaf rust disease response tests. Chinese Spring was used as a source of blocking DNA during the GISH analysis. These plant materials are deposited at the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering for Plant Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Shaanxi, China.
Ethics statement
The plant collection of Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng was approved in 1987 by the Wildlife Conservation and Nature Reserve Management Office of Shaanxi Province, China. The field studies were also permitted by Laboratory Management, Northwest A&F University. The study was carried out in strict accordance with the regulation of the Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering for Plant Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University.
Cytogenetic analysis
Seeds were germinated in the dark at 23°C until the roots reached 1–2 cm. The roots were cut and incubated in ice-cold water overnight, and then they were fixed in Carnoy's solution with 95% ethanol-acetic acid (3∶1, v/v). PMCs were collected from young panicles and fixed in absolute ethanol-chloroform-glacial acetic acid (6∶3∶1, v/v). Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes were squashed on a slide in a drop of acetocarmine and 45% acetic acid, before they were used for cytological observations and GISH, respectively. The cover slips were removed from the GISH slides after freezing with liquid nitrogen, followed by air drying and storage at −20°C.
GISH
The total genomic DNA were extracted from the fresh leaves of P. huashanica using the improved CTAB method [44]. GISH was performed using a published method [45] with a minor modification. The P. huashanica DNA probe was labeled with digoxigenin (digoxigenin-11-dUTP, DIG; Roche, Germany) via the nick translation method. A total of 40 µl hybridization solution was overlaid on a slide, which contained 4 µl 20× SSC, 1 µl ssDNA (salmon sperm DNA 5 µg/µl), 1 µl 10% (W/V) SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate), 8 µl 50% (W/V) dextran sulfate, 20 µl deionized formamide, and 100 ng probe DNA, and it was made up to 40 µl using autoclaved deionized water. Denaturation was conducted at 95°C for 10 min. The hybridization conditions were 80°C for 5 min and 37°C for 16 h using a hybrite system (ThermoBrite, USA). Next, 50 µl of FITC with Anti-dig antibody was added to detect and visualize the labeled chromosomes. Fluorescence signals were viewed and photographed using a microscope (Olympus BX60) with a Photometrics SenSys CCD camera.
EST-SSR and EST-STS analysis
EST-SSR and EST-STS markers were used to determine the homoeologous relationships among the added P. huashanica chromosomes. Genomic DNA was isolated from the wheat-P. huashanica addition line and both parents, as previously described [44]. To characterize the genomic composition of the wheat-P. huashanica addition lines, we used 55 EST-SSR and 336 EST-STS multiple-loci primer pairs (based on published sources [46], [47], [48] and http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/SNP/new/pcr_primers.shtml), which were distributed evenly among seven wheat homoeologous groups. PCR amplification was conducted in a 20 µl reaction mixture that contained 2 µl 10× PCR buffer, 2 µl primer (2.5 µmol/ml), 2 µl DNA template (40–60 ng/µl), 1.6 µl dNTPs (2.5 µmol/ml), 1.6 µl MgCl2 (2.5 mmol/ml), 0.1 µl Taq polymerase (5 U/µl), and 10.7 µl ddH2O. The amplification procedure was as follows: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 50 s at 60°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were separated in standard conditions using 8% non-denatured PAGE gels, which were visualized by silver staining.
Cloning and sequencing of the EST-STS product
The putative PCR bands were excised from the 8% non-denatured PAGE gels and extracted using a gel extraction kit. The recovered DNA fragments were cloned into the pMD19-T vector and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5a-competent cells by heat shock transformation. Positive colonies were determined by blue/white screening. The white colonies were picked from LB-ampicillin plates and the recombinant DNA was extracted from each overnight cultured colony using a plasmid kit. DNA sequencing was performed at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Sequence homology searches were performed using DNASTAR 6.0 (SeqMan).
Leaf rust and morphological evaluation
Adult plant reactions to leaf rust were determined during the 2009, 2010, and 2011 field growing seasons in Yangling, Shaanxi, China (N 34°16′56.24″, E 108°4′27.95″), which has a relatively warm climate, abundant rainfall, constant sun, and rich soil. The plants were arranged separately in a completely randomized block design using two replicates and artificial inoculations were conducted on several occasions by dusting a mixture of leaf rust pathotypes (FHTT, PHST, and FHST) evenly over leaves until the susceptible checks were fully infected. The inoculation procedure and evaluations of reactions followed published methods [49]. Plants that presented response types 0, 1, 2, and X were considered to be resistant (R), whereas plants with type 3 and 4 responses were sensitive (S).
During the 2009, 2010, and 2011 sowing seasons, completely randomized block designs with two replicates were used to evaluate all of the traits of 7182, P. huashanica and the disomic addition line 2-1-6-3, i.e., plant height, tillering, spike length, kernels per spike, spikelets per spike, kernels per spikelet, thousand-grain weight, and awn length. After harvesting, 20 plants were examined in each plot to assess each trait and they were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (P<0.01 and P<0.05), which was conducted using the General Linear Model procedure in the SAS package (version 9, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All of the parameters were means and they were compared with their parental species.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr Duncan E. Jackson for useful advice and English language editing of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: WD J. Wu. Performed the experiments: WD J. Wang LW JZ XC. Analyzed the data: JZ QY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: J. Wang XC JZ QY. Wrote the paper: WD. NO.
Reference
- 1. Huerta-Espino J, Singh RP, Germán S, McCallum BD, Park RF, et al. (2011) Global status of wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina. Euphytica 179: 143–160.
- 2.
McIntosh RA, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Morris CF, Appels R, et al.. (2010) Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat: 2009 suppl. Available at. http://wwwgrsnigacjp/wheat/komugi/genes/macgene/supplement2010 pdf.
- 3. Schneider A, Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M (2008) Utilisation of Aegilops (goatgrass) species to widen the genetic diversity of cultivated wheat. Euphytica 163: 1–19.
- 4. Mebrate SA, Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Pillen K (2008) Mapping of the leaf rust resistance gene Lr38 on wheat chromosome arm 6DL using SSR markers. Euphytica 162: 457–466.
- 5. König J, Kopahnke D, Steffenson BJ, Przulj N, Romeis T, et al. (2012) Genetic mapping of a leaf rust resistance gene in the former Yugoslavian barley landrace MBR1012. Mol Breeding 30: 1253–1264.
- 6. Singh A, Pallavi JK, Gupta P, Prabhu KV (2012) Identification of microsatellite markers linked to leaf rust resistance gene Lr25 in wheat. J Appl Genet 53: 19–25.
- 7. Gennaro A, Koebner RMD, Ceoloni C (2009) A candidate for Lr19, an exotic gene conditioning leaf rust resistance in wheat. Funct Integr Genomic 9: 325–334.
- 8. Zhang XL, Shen XR, Hao YF, Cai JJ, Ohm HW, et al. (2011) A genetic map of Lophopyrum ponticum chromosome 7E, harboring resistance genes to Fusarium head blight and leaf rust. Theor Appl Genet 122: 263–270.
- 9.
Wang RR-C (2011) Chapter 2. Agropyron and Psathyrostachys. In: Chittaranjan Kole (ed.), Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Cereals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg. Pp. 77–108.
- 10. Baden C (1991) A taxonomic revision of Psathyrostachys (Poaceae). Nord J Bot 11: 3–26.
- 11. Lu BR (1995) Diversity and conservation of Triticum genetic resource. Chinese Biodiversity 3: 63–68.
- 12.
Kuo PC (1987) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 51–104.
- 13. Kang HY, Wang Y, Sun GL, Zhang HQ, Fan X, et al. (2009) Production and characterization of an amphiploid between common wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng ex Kuo. Plant Breeding 128: 36–40.
- 14. Kang HY, Chen Q, Wang Y, Zhong MY, Zhang HQ, et al. (2010) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the amphiploid between bread wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57: 111–118.
- 15. Zhao JX, Ji WQ, Wu J, Chen XH, Cheng XN, et al. (2010) Development and identification of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica addition line carrying HMW-GS, LMW-GS and gliadin genes. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57: 387–394.
- 16. Kang HY, Wang Y, Fedak G, Cao WG, Zhang HQ, et al. (2011) Introgression of chromosome 3Ns from Psathyrostachys huashanica into wheat specifying resistance to stripe rust. Plos One 6: e21802.
- 17. Kang HY, Zhong MY, Xie Q, Zhang HQ, Fan X, et al. (2011) Production and cytogenetics of trigeneric hybrid involving Triticum, Psathyrostachys and Secale. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59: 445–453.
- 18. Wang Y, Xie Q, Yu KY, Poysa V, Lin LJ, et al. (2011) Development and characterization of wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica partial amphiploids for resistance to stripe rust. Biotechnol Lett 33: 1233–1238.
- 19. Wang Y, Yu KF, Xie Q, Kang HY, Lin LJ, et al. (2011) Cytogenetic, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and agronomic characterization of alien addition lines derived from wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica. Afr J Biotechnol 10: 2201–2211.
- 20. Kang HY, Zeng J, Xie Q, Tao S, Zhong MY, et al. (2012) Molecular cytogenetic characterization and stripe rust response of a trigeneric hybrid involving Triticum, Psathyrostachys, and Thinopyrum. Genome 55: 383–390.
- 21. Able JA, Langridge P, Milligan AS (2007) Capturing diversity in the cereals: many options but little promiscuity. Trends Plant Sci 12: 71–79.
- 22. Sepsi A, Molnár I, Szalay D, Molnár-Láng M (2008) Characterization of a leaf rust-resistant wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid BE-1, using sequential multicolor GISH and FISH. Theor Appl Genet 116: 825–834.
- 23. Chen SY, Zhang AJ, Fu J (1991) The hybridization between Triticum aestivum and Psathyrotachys huashanica. Acta Genet Sin 18: 508–512.
- 24. Chen SY, Hou WS, Zhang AJ, Fu J, Yang QH (1996) Breeding and cytogenetic study of Triticum aestivum-Psathyrostachys huashanica alien addition lines. Acta Genet Sin 23: 447–452.
- 25. Molnár-Láng M, Linc G, Friebe B, Sutka J (2000) Detection of wheat-barley translocations by genomic in situ hybridization in derivatives of hybrids multiplied in vitro. Euphytica 112: 117–123.
- 26. Cifuentes M, Benavente E (2009) Wheat-alien metaphase I pairing of individual wheat genomes and D genome chromosomes in interspecific hybrids between Triticum aestivum L. and Aegilops geniculata Roth. Theor Appl Genet 119: 805–813.
- 27. Varshney RK, Sigmund R, Borner A, Korzun V, Stein N, et al. (2005) Interspecific transferability and comparative mapping of barley EST-SSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci 168: 195–202.
- 28. Sim SC, Yu JK, Jo YK, Sorrels ME, Jung G (2009) Transferability of cereal EST-SSR markers to ryegrass. Genome 52: 431–437.
- 29. Hu LJ, Liu C, Zeng ZX, Li GR, Song XJ, et al. (2012) Genomic rearrangement between wheat and Thinopyrum elongatum revealed by mapped functional molecular markers. Genes Genom 34: 67–75.
- 30. Wang CM, Li LH, Zhang XT, Gao Q, Wang RF, et al. (2009) Development and application of EST-STS markers specific to chromosme 1RS of Secale cereal. Cereal Res Commun 37: 13–21.
- 31. Azhaguvel P, Rudd JC, Ma YQ, Luo MC, Weng YQ (2012) Fine genetic mapping of greenbug aphid-resistance gene Gb3 in Aegilops tauschii. Theor Appl Genet 124: 555–564.
- 32. Qi LL, Pumphrey MO, Friebe B, Zhang P, Qian C, et al. (2011) A novel Robertsonian translocation event leads to transfer of a stem rust resistance gene (Sr52) effective against race Ug99 from Dasypyrum villosum into bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 123: 159–167.
- 33. Said M, Cabrera A (2009) A physical map of chromosome 4Hch from H. chilense containing SSR, STS and EST-SSR molecular markers. Euphytica 167: 253–259.
- 34. Chen GL, Zheng Q, Bao YG, Liu SB, Wang HG, et al. (2012) Molecular cytogenetic identification of a novel dwarf wheat line with introgressed Thinopyrum ponticum chromatin. J Biosci 37: 149–155.
- 35. Bansal UK, Saini RG, Khanna R (2008) Inheritance of leaf rust resistance in wheat lines carrying Aegilops speltoides Tausch. translocation in Chinese Spring background. J Appl Genet 49: 141–145.
- 36. Wehling P, Linz A, Hackauf B, Roux SR, Ruge B, et al. (2003) Leaf-rust resistance in rye (Secale cereale L.). 1. Genetic analysis and mapping of resistance genes Pr1 and Pr2. Theor Appl Genet 107: 432–438.
- 37. Roux SR, Hackauf B, Linz A, Ruge B, Klocke B, et al. (2004) Leaf-rust resistance in rye (Secale cereale L.). 2. Genetic analysis and mapping of resistance genes Pr3, Pr4, and Pr5. Theor Appl Genet 110: 192–201.
- 38. Larkin PJ, Banks PM, Lagudah ES, Appels R, Chen XH, et al. (1995) Disomic Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines in wheat with barley yellow dwarf virus resistance and with rust resistances. Genome 38: 385–394.
- 39. Rubiales D, Martín A (1999) Chromosomal location in H. chilense and expression of common bunt resistance in wheat addition lines. Euphytica 109: 157–159.
- 40. Rubiales D, Moral A, Martín A (2001) Chromosome location of resistance to septoria leaf blotch and common bunt in wheat-barley addition lines. Euphytica 122: 369–372.
- 41. Zhang WJ, Lukaszewski AJ, Kolmer J, Soria MA, Goyal S, et al. (2005) Molecular characterization of durum and common wheat recombinant lines carrying leaf rust resistance (Lr19) and yellow pigment (Y) genes from Lophopyrum ponticum. Theor Appl Genet 111: 573–582.
- 42. Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rajaram S, Crossa J (1998) Agronomic effects from chromosome translocations 7DL.7Ag and 1BL.1RS in spring wheat. Crop Sci 38: 27–33.
- 43. Monneveux P, Reynolds MP, González Aguilar J, Singh RP (2003) Effects of the 7DL.7Ag translocation from Lophopyrum elongatum on wheat yield and related morphophysiological traits under different environments. Plant Breeding 22: 379–384.
- 44. Cota-Sanchez JH, Remarchuk K, Ubayasena K (2006) Ready-to-use DNA extracted with a CTAB method adapted for herbarium specimens and mucilaginous plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 24: 161–167.
- 45. Walling JG, Pires JC, Jackson SA (2005) Preparation of samples for comparative studies of plant chromosomes using in situ hybridization methods. Molecular Evolution: Producing the Biochemical Data, Part B 395: 443–460.
- 46. Yu JK, La Rota M, Kantety RV, Sorrells ME (2004) EST derived SSR markers for comparative mapping in wheat and rice. Mol Genet Genomics 271: 742–751.
- 47. Chen HM, Li LZ, Wei XY, Li SS, Lei TD, et al. (2005) Development, chromosome location and genetic mapping of EST-SSR markers in wheat. Chinese Sci Bull 50: 2328–2336.
- 48. Peng JH, Lapitan NLV (2005) Characterization of EST-derived microsatellites in the wheat genome and development of eSSR markers. Funct Integr Genomic 5: 80–96.
- 49.
McIntosh RA, Wellings CR, Park RF (1995) Wheat rusts: an atlas of resistance genes. CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, Australia, Pp 29–82.