Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Clock Gene Modulates Roles of OXTR and AVPR1b Genes in Prosociality

  • Haipeng Ci,

    Affiliation Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China

  • Nan Wu,

    Affiliations Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China, Teachers’ College of Beijing Union University, Beijing, P.R. China

  • Yanjie Su

    Affiliation Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, P.R. China



The arginine vasopressin receptor (AVPR) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) genes have been demonstrated to contribute to prosocial behavior. Recent research has focused on the manner by which these simple receptor genes influence prosociality, particularly with regard to the AVP system, which is modulated by the clock gene. The clock gene is responsible for regulating the human biological clock, affecting sleep, emotion and behavior. The current study examined in detail whether the influences of the OXTR and AVPR1b genes on prosociality are dependent on the clock gene.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This study assessed interactions between the clock gene (rs1801260, rs6832769) and the OXTR (rs1042778, rs237887) and AVPR1b (rs28373064) genes in association with individual differences in prosociality in healthy male Chinese subjects (n = 436). The Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM-R) was used to assess prosociality. Participants carrying both the GG/GA variant of AVPR1b rs28373064 and the AA variant of clock rs6832769 showed the highest scores on the Emotional PTM. Carriers of both the T allele of OXTR rs1042778 and the C allele of clock rs1801260 showed the lowest total PTM scores compared with the other groups.


The observed interaction effects provide converging evidence that the clock gene and OXT/AVP systems are intertwined and contribute to human prosociality.


Increasing evidence suggests that circadian rhythms are important regulatory processes. Most organisms form and maintain daily patterns of behavior to adapt to 24-h cycles of light and temperature in their environment [1], [2]. The molecular mechanisms of the circadian cycle involve at least 9 core circadian genes that control transcriptional and translational feedback loops [3], encoding activator and repressor proteins. Among these circadian genes, the circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (clock) gene is transcribed to produce the CLOCK protein, which is an essential element of the circadian pacemaker that plays a vital role in regulating human biological timing [4]. The circadian regulatory loop consists of positive elements CLOCK and BMAL1 which bind as a heterodimer to an enhancer element termed the E-box. Notably, to better anticipate and adapt to daily environmental changes, CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer expression levels rise to activate the transcription of clock-controlled genes during the day, whereas these levels decrease at night, thereby reducing the transcription of the clock-controlled genes [1], [3]. Clock mRNA and protein are constitutively expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which is the principle circadian oscillator [5]. Furthermore, the clock gene and SCN-mediated circadian clock output affect sleep and emotion [6]. For example, rs1801260 (3111T/C), which is a SNP located in the 3′-flanking region of the clock gene, has been shown to contribute to bipolar disorders and sleep disorders, whereas CC carriers are more likely to suffer from both bipolar and sleep disorders [7], [8]. Additionally, previous studies have reported that C allele carriers of rs1801260 display more emotional apathy than the TT carriers [9]. Furthermore, the C (minor) allele is associated with evening preference among Caucasian and Asian populations [10], [11], with evening hours being favored for novelty-seeking and impulsive activities, which leads to reduced affiliating emotions and prosocial behavior [12]. Moreover, a genome-wide association study by Terracciano et al. [13] indicated that the clock SNPs rs1801260 (3111T/C) and rs6832769 show the strongest associations with prosocial behavior as recognized by agreeableness, which is one of the five broad dimensions of human personality. Because the heritability of prosocial behavior has been emphasized both in twin-designed studies and molecular genetic studies [14], [15] and considering the aforementioned evidence, we aimed to explore the relationship between clock gene and prosocial behavior, although little direct evidence exists suggesting that they are linked.

Current knowledge indicates that the core clock mechanism involves E-box-regulated transcription. The transcriptional activators CLOCK and BMAL1 bind as heterodimers to CACGTG E-box enhancers located in the promoters of the per, cry, and clock-controlled genes, to modulate the functions of the central clock in the brain [1]. Indeed, the expression levels of many genes are regulated by CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimers acting through E-box elements [16]. The product of one such clock-controlled gene, arginine vasopressin (AVP), contributes to extracellular signaling and dopamine metabolism, controlling behavioral and neuroendocrine cycles [17]. Among the human vasopressin receptors, the arginine vasopressin V1b receptor (AVPR1b) is important in regulating the responsiveness of pituitary corticotrophins to vasopressin. AVPR1b is expressed primarily in the pituitary and discrete areas of the brain, including the SCN, which is a fundamental area where clock-controlled genes are also expressed [18]. Evidence suggests that the AVPR1b gene is closely related to anxiety and depression [19]. For example, changes in pituitary AVPR1b level contribute to corticotrophin responsiveness under chronic stress, and the up-regulation of the AVPR1b has been suggested in individuals with depression, which could contribute to the shift in the hypothalamic drive from corticotrophin-releasing hormone to AVP [20]. Furthermore, the genotypic variation AVPR1b rs28373064 may disturb the sleep-wake cycle and other circadian rhythms, which may cause problems with vasopressin, thus affecting mood [21]. Because prosociality may serve as a coping strategy for reducing depression and stress [22], we hypothesized that variations in the AVPR1b gene are related to prosociality and that this relation might be modulated by the clock gene.

Oxytocin (OT) is another nonapeptide that shares a similar chemical structure with AVP. The two most important social hormones, AVP and OT, are both nonapeptides synthesized in the hypothalamus and released into the bloodstream via axon terminals in the posterior pituitary or neurohypophysis. Most regions that express AVPR1b mRNA also express oxytocin receptor (OXTR) mRNA [18]. Furthermore, OT and AVP are known to mediate affiliative behaviors in mammals [23]. Recently, OT has increasingly been established as a prosocial neuropeptide in humans due to its close relationship with personal trust, generosity and charitable giving [23]. The OXTR gene contributes to empathy and prosociality. For example, carriers homozygous for the G allele of OXTR rs237887 display more emotional empathy than those with the A allele [24], and GG carriers are also more prosocial than AA carriers [15]. A significant association was also observed with carriers of the G allele of the rs1042778 SNP, who showed higher levels of giving in the dictator game [15]. Feldman et al. [25] showed that the GG genotype of the SNP rs1042778 is associated with increased affiliative behaviors and generosity. In these aforementioned studies, the individuals with the GG genotypes were found to display increased prosociality; thus, it is termed as the “generous” genotype. In contrast, individuals with the A allele exhibited decreased prosociality, and the associated genotype is termed the “mean” genotype. Therefore the genotypes (e.g., AA genotype of OXTR rs1042778) associated with decreased prosociality include the “risk alleles” for prosociality [24], [25]. Ebstein, Israel, Chew, Zhong, and Knafo [26] have advocated studies exploring gene × gene interactions in prosocial behavior; thus, we hypothesized that the link between the OXTR gene and prosocial behavior may be modulated by the clock gene.

Therefore, to address the impact of gene interactions on prosociality and to clarify the association between the clock gene and prosociality, 2 SNPs of the clock gene (rs1801260 and rs6832769) and an additional 3 SNPs of the OXTR (rs1042778 and rs237887) and AVPR1b (rs28373064) genes were selected. The present study had two hypotheses; first, that the clock gene is closely related to prosociality; and second, that the influences of the OXTR and AVPR1b genes on prosociality are modulated by the clock gene.

Materials and Methods


In total, 436 healthy male college students were recruited, the mean age was 21.84 (SD = 1.44). The participants first provided buccal swabs for the genotyping of OXTR rs1042778 and rs237887, AVPR1b rs28373064, and clock rs1801260 and rs6832769. Subsequently, all participants completed a paper-and-pencil version of the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (PTM-R). All participants gave written informed consent prior to the study. Upon completion of all tests, a gift was given for their participation. The study was approved by the local ethics committees of Peking University.

Prosocial Tendencies Measure

The PTM-R [27], [28] was used to assess six different prosocial behavioral tendencies that tend to vary according to situation (e.g., emergency situations) and motive (e.g., altruism). The 26-item version of the PTM-R was composed of 6 subscales: Public (4 items), Anonymous (5 items), Dire (3 items), Emotional (4 items), Compliant (5 items) and Altruism (4 items). The participants were asked to rate the extent to which the statements described themselves on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (does not describe me at all) to 5 (describes me greatly). Previous research demonstrated that the Chinese version of the PTM-R has adequate internal reliability and validity [28]. The present study also showed adequate internal reliability for this test, with alpha levels ranging from 0.67–0.82.


DNA was extracted from saliva collected into Oragene Saliva Kits (DNA Genotek Inc., Beijing, China) using the Agencourt DNAdvance Kit (TianGen Biotech Ltd., Beijing, China). Based on previous reports, the clock gene SNPs rs6832769 and rs1801260, OXTR gene SNPs rs1042778 and rs237887 and AVPR1b gene SNP rs28373064 were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis. The MassArray PCR primer and probe sets for the SNPs were obtained from Assays-On-Demand ( The SNPs were genotyped using the MassArray genotyping platform (following the manufacturer's protocol) in a 5-µl volume containing 2.5 µl GeneAmp PCR Master Mix, 0.25 µl 20× MassArray probe and 1 µl genomic DNA with HotStar Taq 500. Allele calling was performed using the Typer4.0 software.


The descriptive statistics of the PTM-R are presented in Table 1. Table 2 reports the genotype frequencies and information on the number of participants per allelic group, including the minor allele frequencies, number of individuals at each locus and p-values for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. The genotype distributions of all SNPs of clock, AVPR1b and OXTR were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 1. Mean scores and standard deviations of each component of Prosocial Tendencies Measure.

Table 2. OXTR, AVPR1b and clock SNP genotype frequencies.

We found a marginal main effect of OXTR rs1042778 on Compliant PTM scores [F (1, 434) = 3.35, p = 0.068, partial η2 = 0.008]; T allele (GT & TT) carriers had lower Compliant PTM scores than those with the GG genotype. No main effects of clock rs1801260/rs6832769, AVPR1b rs28373064 and OXTR rs237887 on the PTM-R or its subscales were detected.

Analysis of covariance models revealed a significant interaction effect of AVPR1b rs28373064 and clock rs6832769 on the Emotional PTM [F (1, 425) = 4.88, p = 0.028, partial η2 = 0.011], and significance was maintained after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Prosociality under emotionally evocative situations for the participants with combined genotype configuration of G+/G− (i.e., GG or GA for AVPR1b rs28373064 and AA for clock rs6832769, MG+/G = 3.91, SDG+/G = 0.68, n = 62) was the highest compared with the other groups (MG+/G+ = 3.66, SDG+/G+ = 0.77, n = 59; MG−/G+ = 3.74, SDG−/G+ = 0.66, n = 144; MG−/G = 3.67, SDG−/G = 0.64, n = 164; see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Means and SEMs of Emotional Prosocial Tendencies Measure depending on the interaction of AVPR1b rs28373064 and clock rs6832769.

G+/G+: Carriers of the genotype configuration G+/G+, GG or GA for AVPR1b rs28373064 and GG or GA for clock rs6832769; G+/G−: Carriers of GG or GA for AVPR1b rs28373064 and AA for clock rs6832769; G−/G+: Carriers of AA for AVPR1b rs28373064 and GG or GA for clock rs6832769; G−/G−: Carriers of AA for AVPR1b rs28373064 and AA for clock rs6832769.

There was a statistically significant interaction between OXTR rs1042778 and clock rs1801260 with regard to total PTM scores [F (1,432) = 5.18, p = 0.023, partial η2 = 0.012], which was maintained following Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Carriers of the genotype configuration T+/C+ (i.e., GT or TT for OXTR rs1042778 and CT or CC for clock rs1801260) showed the lowest total PTM scores (MT+/C+ = 19.00, SDT+/C+ = 3.22, n = 7) compared with the other groups (MT+/C− = 21.90, SDT+/C− = 3.13, n = 56; MT−/C+ = 22.32, SDT−/C+ = 3.08, n = 60; MT−/C− = 22.12, SDT−/C− = 3.24, n = 313; see Figure 2). Further testing revealed that the interaction involving the total PTM scores was influenced mainly by the Anonymous PTM [F (1,432) = 5.01, p = 0.026, partial η2 = 0.011] and Emotional PTM [F (1,432) = 3.94, p = 0.048, partial η2 = 0.009].

Figure 2. Means and standard deviations of total Prosocial Tendencies Measure depending on the interaction of OXTR rs1042778 and clock rs1801260.

T+/C+: Carriers of the genotype configuration T+/C+, GT or TT for OXTR rs1042778 and CT or CC for clock rs1801260; T+/C–: GT or TT for OXTR rs1042778 and TT for clock rs1801260; T−/C+: GG for OXTR rs1042778 and CT or CC for clock rs1801260; T−/C−: GG for OXTR rs1042778 and TT for clock rs1801260.

An additional interaction of OXTR rs237887 and clock rs6832769 on Public PTM was also detected [F (1,424) = 4.63, p = 0.032, partial η2 = 0.011], indicating that allele A (AA/AG) of OXTR rs237887 was associated with higher Public PTM scores (Bonferroni p = 0.049, partial η2 = 0.009) only for those individuals with the clock rs6832769 AA genotype. However, this association was not found for the G allele carriers (GG/GA) of clock rs6832769 (Bonferroni p = 0.288, partial η2 = 0.003; Table 3).

Table 3. Means and standard deviations of Public Prosocial Tendencies Measure depending on the interactions of OXTR rs237887 and clock rs6832769.


In the present study, we observed interaction effects of AVPR1b rs28373064 and clock rs6832769, OXTR rs1042778 and clock rs1801260, and OXTR rs237887 and clock rs6832769 on prosociality. These findings suggest that the influences of AVPR1b and OXTR on prosociality are dependent on the genetic variation of the clock gene. Our study also confirms the genotypic effect of OXTR rs1042778 on prosociality in complaint situations (i.e., when someone is asked to perform a prosocial behavior), which is in agreement with previous studies, indicating that the GG genotype is associated with high prosociality [15], [25].

Because it is central to circadian rhythms, the clock gene determines the biological timing of successful psychological adaption, which partially explains the biological correlates, such as mood and behavior [11]. For example, TT carriers of clock gene rs1801260 tend to be morning types and are more conscientious, agreeable and emotionally stable (confirmed as a prosocial personality) compared with C allele carriers, who tend to be evening types, are more impulsive and express emotional apathy [9]. However, we did not find a direct association between the clock gene and prosociality, although it has been well established that the formation and maintenance of sleep phase timing and diurnal preferences, such as morning/evening preferences, are regulated by the transcriptional activation of the clock gene [7], [11]. We propose that the clock gene may affect prosociality [13]. One possible explanation, which is based on the mechanism of CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer bindings to E-box enhancers, may be that the clock gene influences prosociality through indirect neurophysiological pathways involving other systems, such as OXT-AVP neural pathways, including OXTR and AVPR1b.

Indeed, our results demonstrated that combinations of clock and OXTR polymorphisms were associated with prosociality. For example, only the group carrying both risk alleles (CC/CT of clock rs1801260 and TT/GT of OXTR rs1042778) reported lower levels of prosociality, whereas those subjects with only one risk allele did not demonstrate these lower levels. The C allele of clock rs1801260 is characterized by an extreme evening inclination and a high risk of bipolar disorder as well as depression [11], [29], [30]. Additionally, bipolar disorder and depression are closely related to reduced prosocial behavior [31], and the rs1801260 C allele could possibly act as a risk allele of prosociality. Similarly, T allele carriers of OXTR rs1042778 display less prosocial behavior than GG carriers [15], suggesting that the T allele of OXTR rs1042778 may be another risk allele for prosociality. Our findings show that the combination of both risk alleles at clock rs1801260 and OXTR rs1042778 lead to lower levels of prosociality, which is consistent with the epistasis effects of genotype on social phenotype. An epistasis effect refers to the phenotypic effect of one locus being dependent on the genotype at a second locus [32], [33]. Previous data have shown that the GG carriers of OXTR rs237887 exhibit higher levels of prosociality than the AA carriers [15]. However, the present study found that individuals with the OXTR rs237887 A allele (risk allele) more frequently reported prosociality when they were also AA genotype carriers at clock rs6832769; the combination of the two genotypes decreased the probability of the reduced prosociality observed in the individuals who carried only the OXTR rs237887 risk allele. In general, OXTR mRNA expression in the SCN is most likely modulated by clock gene, which may affect the efficiencies of OXTR and lead to individual phenotypic differences in prosociality.

In addition, we also found that prosociality under emotionally evocative situations is strongest in carriers of the GG or the GA genotype of AVPR1b rs28373064 in combination with the AA genotype of clock rs6832769. This finding potentially demonstrates epistasis effects on phenotypes [32], Furthermore, the additive effects of genetic variants in both the clock and AVPR1b genes on prosociality may occur through emotional regulation. Intriguingly, both the clock gene and the AVPR1b gene are associated with depression and bipolar disorder [18], [34]. Furthermore, the clock gene regulates mood-related behaviors via a role in dopamine metabolism [35]; dopamine possibly stimulates AVP release in part based on receptor affinities, interacting to facilitate pair-bond formation [36]. Thus, this combination of clock and AVPR1b alleles may affect an individual’s emotional activation levels synchronously, leading to variations in prosocial behavior. Moreover, previous studies have reported many combined effects of circadian clock genes (or components) and other genes (or components). For example, clock genes influence mood by regulating monoamine oxidase A in dopamine metabolism [35] and resistance to weight loss in combination with the sirt1 gene [37]. It appears that the clock gene influences the expressions of other genes through the processes of cell metabolism and extracellular signaling [38], which may represent the underlying mechanism of the effects of the clock gene on social behavior.

In summary, we have provided the first evidence that human prosociality is affected by the combined effects of genetic variations in the clock gene and genes involved in the OXT and AVP systems. A limitation of our study was the small size of the combined group possessing the C allele of clock rs1801260 and the T allele of OXTR rs1042778 (n = 7, 1.6%); it is possible that the C allele frequency of clock rs1801260 is minor, especially within the Asian population (i.e., 8.0% in Han Chinese; 8.3–9.1% in Koreans) [39], [11]. The focus on male participants allowed us to avoid potential gender bias in our results [40], but it also limited the generalizability of the present findings. Further replication of these findings in independent study samples (including female subjects) and a meta-analysis to confirm the combined gene effects are needed. Future studies using situational prosocial behavior tasks will be necessary to confirm our results, which were based on self-reported data. The mechanisms underlying the observed associations of these combinations remain to be elucidated. The clock gene may be a point through which changes in cellular energy metabolism influence the functioning of the OXT and AVP systems. Future studies are necessary to determine these mechanisms.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates a link between clock genotypes and prosociality phenotypes, indicating that the combined effects of genetic variations in the clock gene and genes involved in the OXT and AVP systems may contribute to human prosociality. In addition, we provide genetic evidence that further explains the mechanisms underlying prosocial behavior.

Supporting Information

Data S1.

Data S1 is the raw data of our paper, including the raw data of each dimension of PTM scale, the genotypes of each participant as well as the demographic variables.



The authors wish to thank T. S. Ma and Z. Q. Liao for providing invaluable discussions, and S. Y. Shang for the statistical consulting.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HC YS. Performed the experiments: NW. Analyzed the data: HC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HC NW. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: HC NW.


  1. 1. Vatine G, Vallone D, Gothilf Y, Foulkes NS (2011) It's time to swim! Zebrafish and the circadian clock. FEBS Lett 585: 1485–1494.
  2. 2. Lahiri K, Vallone D, Gondi SB, Santoriello C, Dickmeis T, et al. (2005) Temperature regulates transcription in the zebrafish circadian clock. PLoS Biol 3: 2005–2016.
  3. 3. Lee C, Etchegaray JP, Cagampang FRA, Loudon ASI, Reppert SM (2001) Posttranslational mechanisms regulate the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 107: 855–867.
  4. 4. Doi M, Hirayama J, Sassone-Corsi P (2006) Circadian regulator CLOCK is a histone acetyltransferase. Cell 125: 497–508.
  5. 5. Maywood ES, O'Brien JA, Hastings MH (2003) Expression of mCLOCK and other circadian clock-relevant proteins in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei. J Neuroendocrinol 15: 329–334.
  6. 6. Benca R, Duncan MJ, Frank E, McClung C, Nelson RJ, et al. (2009) Biological rhythms, higher brain function, and behavior: Gaps, opportunities, and challenges. Brain Res Rev 62: 57–70.
  7. 7. Serretti A, Benedetti F, Mandelli L, Lorenzi C, Pirovano A, et al. (2003) Genetic dissection of psychopathological symptoms: Insomnia in mood disorders and CLOCK gene polymorphism. Am J Med Genet B 121B: 35–38.
  8. 8. Benedetti F, Dallaspezia S, Fulgosi MC, Lorenzi C, Serretti A, et al. (2007) Actimetric evidence that CLOCK 3111 T/C SNP influences sleep and activity patterns in patients affected by bipolar depression. Am J Med Genet B. 144B: 631–635.
  9. 9. Takao T, Tachikawa H, Kawanishi Y, Mizukami K, Asada T (2007) CLOCK gene T3111C polymorphism is associated with Japanese schizophrenics: A preliminary study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17: 273–276.
  10. 10. Garaulet M, Sanchez-Moreno C, Smith CE, Lee YC, Nicolas F, et al. (2011) Ghrelin, Sleep Reduction and Evening Preference: Relationships to CLOCK 3111 T/C SNP and Weight Loss. PLoS ONE. 6: e17435.
  11. 11. Lee KY, Song JY, Kim SH, Kim SC, Joo EJ, et al. (2010) Association between CLOCK 3111T/C and preferred circadian phase in Korean patients with bipolar disorder. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 34: 1196–1201.
  12. 12. Lange L, Randler C (2011) Morningness-eveningness and behavioural problems in adolescents. Sleep Biol Rhythms 9: 12–18.
  13. 13. Terracciano A, Sanna S, Uda M, Deiana B, Usala G, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association scan for five major dimensions of personality. Mol Psychiatr 15: 647–656.
  14. 14. Knafo A, Israel S, Darvasi A, Bachner - Melman R, Uzefovsky F, et al. (2008) Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA. Genes Brain Behav 7: 266–275.
  15. 15. Israel S, Lerer E, Shalev I, Uzefovsky F, Riebold M, et al. (2009) The oxytocin receptor (OXTR) contributes to prosocial fund allocations in the dictator game and the social value orientations task. PLoS ONE 4: e5535.
  16. 16. Jin XW, Shearman LP, Weaver DR, Zylka MJ, De Vries GJ, et al. (1999) A molecular mechanism regulating rhythmic output from the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Cell 96: 57–68.
  17. 17. Hastings MH, Reddy AB, Maywood ES (2003) A clockwork web: circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 649–661.
  18. 18. Vaccari C, Lolait SJ, Ostrowski NL (1998) Comparative distribution of vasopressin V1b and oxytocin receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in brain. Endocrinology 139: 5015–5033.
  19. 19. Ring RH (2005) The central vasopressinergic system: examining the opportunities for psychiatric drug development. Curr Pharm Design 11: 205–225.
  20. 20. Aguilera G, Rabadan-Diehl C (2000) Vasopressinergic regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: implications for stress adaptation. Regul Pept 96: 23–29.
  21. 21. Leszczyńska-Rodziewicz A, Szczepankiewicz A, Dmitrzak-Węglarz M, Skibińska M, Hauser J (2012) Association between functional polymorphism of the AVPR1b gene and polymorphism rs1293651 of the CRHR1 gene and bipolar disorder with psychotic features. J Affect Disord 138: 490–493.
  22. 22. Brown SL, Brown RM, House JS, Smith DM (2008) Coping with spousal loss: Potential buffering effects of self-reported helping behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34: 849–861.
  23. 23. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ (2008) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 322: 900–904.
  24. 24. Wu N, Li Z, Su Y (2012) The association between oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (OXTR) and trait empathy. J Affect Disord 138: 468–472.
  25. 25. Feldman R, Zagoory-Sharon O, Weisman O, Schneiderman I, Gordon I, et al. (2012) Sensitive parenting is associated with plasma Oxytocin and polymorphisms in the OXTR and CD38 genes. Biol Psychiatry 72: 175–181.
  26. 26. Ebstein RP, Israel S, Chew SH, Zhong S, Knafo A (2010) Genetics of human social behavior. Neuron 65: 831–844.
  27. 27. Carlo G, Randall BA (2002) The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 31: 31–44.
  28. 28. Kou Y, Zhang QP (2008) Conceptual representation of early adolescents' prosocial behavior. Int J Psychol 43: 250–250.
  29. 29. Mishima K, Tozawa T, Satoh K, Saitoh H, Mishima Y (2005) The 3111T/C polymorphism of hClock is associated with evening preference and delayed sleep timing in a Japanese population sample. Am J Med Genet B. 133B: 101–104.
  30. 30. Hasler BP, Allen JJB, Sbarra DA, Bootzin RR, Bernert RA (2010) Morningness-eveningness and depression: Preliminary evidence for the role of the behavioral activation system and positive affect. Psychiatry Res 176: 166–173.
  31. 31. Schreiter S, Pijnenborg GHM, aan het Rot M (2013) Empathy in adults with clinical or subclinical depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 150: 1–16.
  32. 32. Carlborg O, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5: 618–U614.
  33. 33. Montag C, Fiebach CJ, Kirsch P, Reuter M (2011) Interaction of 5-HTTLPR and a variation on the Oxytocin receptor gene influences negative emotionality. Biol Psychiatry 69: 601–603.
  34. 34. Partonen T (2012) Clock gene variants in mood and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm 119: 1133–1145.
  35. 35. Hampp G, Ripperger JA, Houben T, Schmutz I, Blex C, et al. (2008) Regulation of monoamine oxidase a by circadian-clock components implies clock influence on mood. Curr Biol 18: 678–683.
  36. 36. Young LJ, Wang ZX (2004) The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat Neurosci 7: 1048–1054.
  37. 37. Garaulet M, Tardido AE, Lee YC, Smith CE, Parnell LD, et al. (2012) SIRT1 and CLOCK 3111 T>C combined genotype is associated with evening preference and weight loss resistance in a behavioral therapy treatment for obesity. Int J Obes. 36: 1436–1441.
  38. 38. Rutter J, Reick M, McKnight SL (2002) Metabolism and the control of circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 307–331.
  39. 39. Ciarleglio CM, Ryckman KK, Servick SV, Hida A, Robbins S, et al. (2008) Genetic differences in human circadian clock genes among worldwide populations. J Biol Rhythms 23: 330–340.
  40. 40. Eagly AH (2009) The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. Am Psychol 64: 644–658.