Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Melanism in Peromyscus Is Caused by Independent Mutations in Agouti

  • Evan P. Kingsley ,

    Affiliation Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Marie Manceau,

    Affiliation Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Christopher D. Wiley,

    Current address: Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato, California, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America

  • Hopi E. Hoekstra

    Affiliation Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America


Identifying the molecular basis of phenotypes that have evolved independently can provide insight into the ways genetic and developmental constraints influence the maintenance of phenotypic diversity. Melanic (darkly pigmented) phenotypes in mammals provide a potent system in which to study the genetic basis of naturally occurring mutant phenotypes because melanism occurs in many mammals, and the mammalian pigmentation pathway is well understood. Spontaneous alleles of a few key pigmentation loci are known to cause melanism in domestic or laboratory populations of mammals, but in natural populations, mutations at one gene, the melanocortin-1 receptor (Mc1r), have been implicated in the vast majority of cases, possibly due to its minimal pleiotropic effects. To investigate whether mutations in this or other genes cause melanism in the wild, we investigated the genetic basis of melanism in the rodent genus Peromyscus, in which melanic mice have been reported in several populations. We focused on two genes known to cause melanism in other taxa, Mc1r and its antagonist, the agouti signaling protein (Agouti). While variation in the Mc1r coding region does not correlate with melanism in any population, in a New Hampshire population, we find that a 125-kb deletion, which includes the upstream regulatory region and exons 1 and 2 of Agouti, results in a loss of Agouti expression and is perfectly associated with melanic color. In a second population from Alaska, we find that a premature stop codon in exon 3 of Agouti is associated with a similar melanic phenotype. These results show that melanism has evolved independently in these populations through mutations in the same gene, and suggest that melanism produced by mutations in genes other than Mc1r may be more common than previously thought.


From complex patterns, like the stripes of a tiger, to the simple changes in the presence/absence of pigment, as in arctic hares, the diversity in mammalian pigmentation is vast [1]. But in addition to diversity among species, there is often appreciable variation in pigmentation within species. Because members of the same species that differ in their pigmentation phenotype can be crossed, this within-species variation is amenable to traditional genetic analyses. In addition, the molecular genetic factors that regulate mammalian pigmentation are relatively well known [reviewed in 2][4], thus enabling the genetic bases of these phenotypes to be explored. Furthermore, a nontrivial advantage to studying pigmentation traits is that variation is often easily detectable by eye. Mutant phenotypes that affect the coloration of the entire body are especially conspicuous and are easily recognized by both captive breeders and field biologists. One such phenotype is dark pigmentation or melanism. It is clear that melanism has evolved many times in wide variety of animal taxa [5].

The genes that can cause darkening of coat color have been studied most thoroughly in the laboratory mouse. Although experimentally induced mutations in over 25 genes can produce dark fur in lab mice [6], spontaneous coat-darkening mutations have been reported in only four genes: the Agouti signaling protein (Agouti), attractin (Atrn), melanocortin-1 receptor (Mc1r), and mahogunin (Mgrn) [7][10]. The protein products of three of these genes, Mc1r, Agouti, and Atrn, interact at the surface of pigment-producing cells (melanocytes) and constitute the machinery responsible for “pigment type switching,” the ability of melanocytes to switch between the production of dark brown/black (eumelanin) and light yellow/red pigment (pheomelanin). Mc1r is a membrane-bound receptor that, when active, signals the melanocyte to produce eumelanin, whereas Agouti is a paracrine signaling protein that antagonizes Mc1r, causing the melanocyte to produce pheomelanin. Thus, mutations that cause either constitutive- or hyper-activation of Mc1r or loss-of-function of Agouti will result in a melanic phenotype. The functions of Atrn and Mgrn are not as well understood, although Atrn is thought to stabilize interactions between Mc1r and Agouti [11]. Here, we focus on Mc1r and Agouti because their interaction has been well characterized in the lab mouse and thus can be extended to the study of melanism in other taxa.

Melanic phenotypes have evolved both in nature and in captivity in a wide diversity of animals and in some cases their genetic basis has been identified. In captive vertebrates, spontaneous mutants of Agouti, Mc1r, Mgrn, and Atrn have all been found to cause melanism [e.g.], [12], [13], [10,8]. In natural populations, however, mutations in Mc1r are most commonly associated with melanism [e.g. 12], [14][16], although both Agouti and Atrn are larger mutational targets. In addition, mutations in Agouti or Atrn that reduce protein expression or activity lead to melanism; these knock-out mutations are certainly more likely to occur than the gain-of-function Mc1r mutations that cause melanism because there are more ways to “break” a gene than to “improve” a gene's activity. Thus, it is unclear why Mc1r has repeatedly been shown to be associated with melanism in nature and a key question is: are melanism-inducing mutations in Agouti not found because they occur less often, or are they simply more difficult to detect?

To address this question, we studied melanism in the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus (Figure 1). Melanism has been reported in several populations of Peromyscus; melanic individuals have been captured in a number of locations in North America, including New Hampshire [17], California [18], Michigan [P. Myers, pers. comm.], and Alaska [C. Conroy, pers. comm.]. Although it is unclear if these melanic phenotypes affect fitness, their repeated occurrence provides us with multiple comparisons of the same phenotype in the same genetic system (i.e. species). Horner et al. [17] showed that, in mice from New Hampshire, melanism is caused by a recessive allele at a single locus. The authors suggested the locus might be Agouti, based on its similarity to the nonagouti phenotype in Mus. Here we uncover the molecular variation that causes melanism in P. maniculatus from New Hampshire and show that the Agouti gene is responsible. We also investigate the molecular basis of melanic phenotypes from geographically distant populations of P. maniculatus and find that melanism has independently arisen at least three times and by different mutations in the same gene, Agouti, in two of those cases.

Figure 1. Pigmentation phenotypes of P. maniculatus.

(A) Typical wild type individual, dorsal hairs are banded (containing both pheomelanin and eumelanin) and ventral hairs are white with a light grey base. This phenotype is dominant to the melanic phenotype. (B) Melanic individual with completely eumelanic hairs. These mice were captured in Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH.


Melanism caused by a single, recessive locus

The inheritance of the melanic phenotype in the New Hampshire strain of P. maniculatus was previously investigated by Horner et al. [17]. We confirmed their results with two crosses that clearly demonstrate that a single autosomal recessive allele is responsible for the melanic phenotype (Table S1).

Agouti is a candidate gene for Peromyscus melanism

The phenotypic similarity between melanic Peromyscus and mouse (Mus) Agouti mutants and the recessive nature of the melanic allele in P. maniculatus suggested that Agouti is a strong candidate gene. We sequenced a 180 kb BAC clone containing Agouti from P. maniculatus rufinus and compared it to the corresponding sequence from the Mus genome. In Mus, the Agouti gene consists of four non-coding exons (1A, 1A′, 1B, and 1C) and three protein-coding exons (2, 3, and 4); this arrangement appears to be conserved in other mammals, including rat (Rattus). Sequences orthologous to the exons in Mus and Rattus are conserved in the P. maniculatus sequence (Figure 2). However, when compared to the published genome sequences of Mus and Rattus, an inversion of the region containing exons 1A and 1A' is present in P. maniculatus. Inversions in this region are sometimes associated with differences in ventral pigmentation in different strains of Mus [19].

Figure 2. Schematic and VISTA alignment of the Mc1r and Agouti loci in Mus, Rattus, and Peromyscus.

Dark blocks represent coding sequences; light blocks represent untranslated exons. Mc1r consists of a single exon that spans approximately 1.5 kb similar to its Mus ortholog. The Agouti locus spans over 100 kb. Grey arrows indicate a duplication present in all three taxa; brackets indicate the inversion of the duplicated region in Peromyscus. Asterisks mark the location of a conserved region that is necessary for Agouti expression (Y. Chen and G. S. Barsh, pers. comm.). The red line and red arrowhead mark the locations of the aΔ125kb deletion and the aQ65term premature stop codon, respectively. The conservation plot was generated by aligning Peromyscus BAC sequence and sequence from the Rattus genome using LAGAN [75] and plotting conservation with mVISTA [76].

To determine whether a mutation(s) in the Agouti locus is associated with melanism, we genotyped the 49 offspring of an A+/a×A+/a cross. We found a perfect association between successful amplification of exon 2 and phenotype: we always produced an exon 2 product of the expected size in wild type individuals (A+/−, N = 34) but never in melanic (a/a, N = 15) individuals. In addition, while we amplified all the Agouti exons (untranslated 1A, 1A', 1B, 1C and translated 2–4) in all wild type offspring, we were able to amplify only exons 3 and 4 from melanic mice. By contrast, we did not find any amino acid differences between wild type and melanic individuals in the entire Mc1r coding region. These results strongly suggest, first, that melanism is caused by variation at the Agouti locus and second, that a large deletion in Agouti may be responsible for the melanic phenotype.

Large deletion in Agouti associated with melanism

To determine if there was a deletion in the a allele and if so, its size, we used genome-walking PCR to sequence upstream (5′) of exon 3. We found that sequence identity between the wild type BAC sequence and the melanic Agouti allele extends about 1.3 kb 5′ of exon 3. Thereafter, the melanic Agouti allele sequence is identical to the sequence 125 kb upstream in the wild type BAC (Figure 2). Thus, melanic P. maniculatus are homozygous for an allele with a large 125 kb deletion (aΔ125kb), which eliminates the main regulatory region, the noncoding exons 1A, 1A', 1B, 1C, and coding exon 2.

To test whether this 125 kb deletion affects the abundance of Agouti transcript, we measured Agouti mRNA in the skin of P4 pups. In animals heterozygous for the wild type and the aΔ125kb alleles, levels of Agouti expression were significantly higher than those of animals homozygous for aΔ125kb (Figure 3A). These data show that the aΔ125kb allele produces significantly less Agouti mRNA transcript and is thus likely the cause of melanism. Mc1r transcript levels, on the other hand, were not significantly different between melanic and wild type individuals (Figure 3B). In addition, we performed in situ hybridizations on 12.5 day-old embryos to determine whether Agouti is expressed in melanic embryos. At this stage, wild type embryos express Agouti in the whisker plate and in parts of the limbs (Figure 3C), an expression pattern similar to that seen in Mus [20]. We did not detect any Agouti expression in melanic embryos (Figure 3D).

Figure 3. Agouti and Mc1r expression in wild type and melanic mice.

(A, B) Relative expression of Agouti and Mc1r transcripts in dorsal skin of P4 P. maniculatus was measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Expression level of the target gene is standardized with that of β-actin. We compared relative expression levels of each gene with Student's t-test (two-tailed, unequal variance). For each phenotype class, N = 5. (A) Agouti expression is significantly higher in the dorsal skin of wild type mice than in melanic mice; expression level in melanic mice is not significantly different from zero. (B) Mc1r expression in wild type and melanic mice does not significantly differ. Bars indicate standard error. (C,D) Lateral views of whole-mount in situ hybridizations for Agouti in E12.5 embryos. (C) Wild type embryos express Agouti in the whisker plate and the limbs (arrows). (D) Agouti expression is not detected in aΔ125kb homozygote embryos.

Molecular basis of melanism in Alaskan mice

To determine if the same gene and same mutation was responsible for melanism in other populations of P. maniculatus, we sequenced both Mc1r and Agouti in melanic and wild type mice from an additional population. First, we sequenced Mc1r in melanic (N = 2) and non-melanic (N = 4) P. maniculatus from Alaska and found four amino acid polymorphisms segregating in the sample (Figure 4). None of these polymorphisms likely cause the melanic phenotype for several reasons: (1) none of these mutations overlaps with any previously described darkening mutations, (2) all four amino acids appear in other, non-melanic individuals from other populations of P. maniculatus (Figure 4), and (3) none of the polymorphisms correlate with the melanic phenotype in this population.

Figure 4. Melanism evolved multiple times independently in P. maniculatus, twice by mutations in the Agouti gene.

(A) Wild type and melanic museum skins from Shrubby Island, AK (C. Conroy, pers. comm.) and Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH [17]. Illustrations of the dorsal hair pattern are shown above each specimen. Black stars represent locales included in this study; white star denotes another location where melanic Peromyscus were reported [18]. (B) Table of polymorphism for Mc1r and Agouti coding sequences. Arrows indicate two sites harboring mutations that are perfectly correlated with melanism.

In the same sample, we also sequenced the coding exons of Agouti and found one segregating amino acid polymorphism, a mutation at nucleotide position 193 (in exon 3) that results in a change from glutamine to a stop codon at amino acid position 65 (aQ65term). This premature stop codon eliminates exon 4, which contains a cysteine-rich region that is integral to the function of the Agouti protein (Figure 4; [21], [22]). Thus, this mutation very likely results in a non-functional protein. Individuals both homozygous and heterozygous for the aQ65term allele had the wild type phenotype, consistent with the aQ65term allele being recessive and its being a null allele. Though the small number of animals sampled does not allow us to rule out the involvement of other loci, these data strongly suggest that the aQ65term allele is the cause of the melanic phenotype in the Alaskan population.

Melanism also has been reported in a third population, P. m. gracilis from the upper peninsula of Michigan [P. Myers, pers. comm.]. We sequenced the complete coding regions of Agouti in a single melanic individual. The Agouti sequence possesses neither the aQ65term nor the aΔ125kb mutation, nor does it contain any obvious melanism-causing mutations in Mc1r, demonstrating a third independent origin of melanism in P. maniculatus.


The results of our laboratory crosses confirmed that melanism in New Hampshire P. maniculatus is caused by a single, recessive allele. In laboratory mice, dominant melanism is usually caused by alleles of Mc1r, while recessive melanism is usually caused by alleles of Agouti. Consistent with this dominance hierarchy, we found that melanism in P. maniculatus is perfectly correlated with the presence of an allele (aΔ125kb) with a large deletion at the Agouti locus. When mice are homozygous for this allele, the abundance of Agouti transcript in the skin is significantly lower than that in individuals with a single copy of the wild type Agouti allele. This accords with the observation that the deleted region contains the 5′ untranslated regions that are important for temporal and spatial regulation of Agouti and probably any associated cis-regulatory information. The deletion also encompasses exon 2, which contains the start of the Agouti protein (amino acids 1–54). Together, this evidence strongly suggests that the aΔ125kb allele causes melanism in P. maniculatus from New Hampshire.

Sequencing of Agouti and Mc1r coding regions in melanic individuals from other geographic locations shows that melanism arose independently at least three times in P. maniculatus. Melanic individuals from Shrubby Island, AK are homozygous for an allele (aQ65term) of Agouti that contains a premature stop codon in exon 3. This mutation is predicted to result in a non-functional protein. Although we cannot rule out contributions of linked variation to the melanic phenotypes possessed by mice from New Hampshire and Alaska, given the likely effects of the Δ125kb and Q65term mutations and the known effects of null Agouti alleles in other taxa, it is very likely that these mutations represent the causative variation underlying these melanic phenotypes. The melanic individual from Michigan possesses neither the aΔ125kb allele nor the aQ65term allele; melanism in this population must be caused either by variation at another locus or possibly by unexamined variation at the Agouti or Mc1r loci.

This study presents two cases in which a specific molecular variant at the Agouti locus appears to cause melanism in a natural population. Mc1r mutants represent the vast majority of cases of melanism in natural populations of mammals, despite many occurrences of melanic Agouti mutants in captive and domestic stocks (Table 1). There are a number of possible explanations for this discrepancy.

Table 1. Spontaneous alleles causing melanic phenotypes in mammals and birds.

One possible explanation involves dominance. Haldane [23] suggested that, when natural selection acts on new (i.e., rare) beneficial mutations, adaptation will be biased toward fixing dominant alleles, which are immediately visible to selection (but see [24]). Thus, we expect that when melanism is adaptive, we may see a prevalence of melanic Mc1r mutants. On the other hand, if melanism is deleterious and is being held at mutation-selection equilibrium, we might expect melanism caused by mutations in Agouti if they are recessive. Thus, depending on environmental conditions, expectations regarding the fixation probabilities of Mc1r versus Agouti alleles are different. In Peromyscus, the melanic alleles in both populations described in this study were found at low frequencies – 3–7% assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ([17]; data not shown) – and there is no obvious association between melanism and environmental conditions as observed in other species (e.g., pocket mice; [25]), suggesting these alleles may not be adaptive. Thus, if melanic phenotypes are often fixed from new dominant mutations rather than standing genetic variation, this may explain the prevalence of melanism caused by Mc1r.

Second, if mutations in Agouti have greater negative pleiotropic effects than mutations in Mc1r, then we would expect to see more evolution in the latter. Having fewer negative pleiotropic consequences of mutations at a locus translates to less evolutionary constraint (or higher net selection coefficients). While deleterious effects may be tolerated when organisms are raised in captivity, they could have important fitness consequences in nature. Whether differing amounts of pleiotropy of mutations at these loci affects the evolution of melanism is difficult to say, because mutations in both Agouti and Mc1r may affect traits other than pigmentation. Mutations in Mc1r, for example, have recently been discovered to have effects in the nervous system [26]. Pleiotropy is especially well documented in Agouti: ectopic expression of Agouti in Mus can result in obesity and lethality [27], [28] and null mutants in Rattus and Peromyscus exhibit behavioral differences [29], [30]. But pleiotropic consequences may be mitigated by the precise type and location of mutations. It has been predicted that for any given gene, mutations in the cis-regulatory elements may minimize antagonist pleiotropic effects relative to those in coding regions because such mutations can alter the time or place of gene expression in some tissues while preserving gene function in others [31][33]. Our data provide examples of mutations that are associated with morphological diversity: in one case, a premature stop codon, and in a second, a large deletion of both regulatory and exonic DNA. Thus, our data show, despite potential pleiotropic effects, both cis-regulatory and coding mutations in a highly pleiotropic gene, Agouti, cause a visible melanic phenotype that segregates in natural populations. Alternatively, it is possible that the melanic alleles in this study do generate negative pleiotropic effects that prevent them from increasing in frequency.

The third possibility is that a bias exists toward detecting mutations in the small Mc1r locus versus the larger, more complex Agouti locus. In fact, one would expect that there are more possible mutations that can cause a null Agouti allele than a constitutively active Mc1r allele. Many cases of melanism that have not yet been assigned a precise mutational cause (e.g., some populations of pocket mice [34]; pocket gophers [35]; leaf warblers [36]) may be caused by variation at Agouti, or indeed other loci.

Understanding the genetic basis of phenotypes that have arisen independently underpins studies of convergence by natural selection. While the fitness consequences of the melanic phenotypes in this study are unknown, studies of pigmentation may be uniquely positioned to identify convergence and to uncover its molecular basis because pigmentation traits are easily recognizable and many of the genes involved in producing pigments are well characterized. As the number of cases of convergence on a particular phenotype increases, so does our understanding of the constraints limiting the ways that phenotypes can evolve. In some cases, like stomach lysozyme [37], [38], pelvic reduction in sticklebacks [39], [40], or cyclodiene resistance in a number of insect taxa (reviewed in [41]), evolution appears to be tightly constrained, and the same gene is the repeated target of natural selection. In other cases, such as pigmentation, many different genetic mechansims can produce the same phenotype (beach mice [42], [43]; pocket mice [34]; Drosophila [44]; cavefish [45], [46]; Heliconius [47]). However, in these cases and others, it seems that a handful of proteins at key regulatory points in the pigmentation pathway are major targets of evolution change (e.g., Mc1r/Agouti in vertebrates; ebony/yellow in Drosophila; DFR in flowering plants [48]) Thus, natural selection may repeatedly target either the same key points in a genetic pathway or even the same genes to produce the most beneficial phenotype while minimizing deleterious pleiotropy. Future work on additional phenotypes in additional taxa will shed light on the myriad ways that evolution can generate morphological diversity.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Experiments were approved by the Harvard University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health regulations governing the humane treatment of vertebrate animals.

Animal samples

For this study, we first focused on mice from a wild-derived captive strain of melanic Peromyscus maintained at the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center (Columbia, South Carolina). These melanic animals (P. maniculatus gracilis) are derived from mice captured in 1977 at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire [17]. Second, to study the genetic basis of other melanic phenotypes, we obtained tissue samples of melanic mice from natural history collections originally captured in two additional populations in Alaska (P. m. keeni) and Michigan (P. m. gracilis).

Genetic Crosses

To determine the genetic basis of melanism in P. maniculatus from New Hampshire, we conducted two types of genetic crosses. First, to confirm dominance, we set up four mating pairs of wild type P. maniculatus bairdii and melanic P. m. gracilis [17]. Second, for the single-locus test, we established three mating pairs and backcrossed mice that were heterozygous for the melanic allele to the wild type. We then scored the phenotypes of the resulting offspring by eye.

Tissue Samples

We acquired tissue samples from two additional populations of P. maniculatus that harbor melanic individuals. First, we received tissue samples from mice (P. m. keeni) inhabiting Shrubby Island in southeastern Alaska (University of Alaska Museum of the North, accession numbers UAM20875, 20876, 20878, 20880, 20882), although the status of P. m. keeni as a subspecies of P. maniculatus [49] or its sister species, P. keeni, [50] is unresolved. We also acquired a tissue sample of a single melanic individual of P. m. gracilis from Macinac County, Michigan (University of Michigan Museum of Zoology). Tissue samples from another melanic population (P. m. gambeli) in California [18] were not available.

PCR amplification and sequencing

We extracted genomic DNA from liver using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Primers and PCR conditions used to amplify the complete Agouti coding exons are shown in Table S2; these amplification primers were also used in the sequencing reactions. Primers to amplify the Mc1r coding region were used as previously described [51]. We used ABI3730xl and 3130xl sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and aligned all sequences in Sequencher (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). When a deletion was identified, we used genome-walking to identify the breakpoint (GenomeWalker Universal kit; Clontech, Mountain View, CA); primers are shown in Table S3. Once we identified the precise deletion breakpoint, we designed primers across the deletion to genotype individuals; these primers are listed in Table S2.

BAC sequencing

To examine the Mc1r and Agouti loci in Peromyscus, we screened an available BAC library for P. m. rufinus. For the Agouti locus, we captured the entire described regulatory region [52] by using two probes representing untranslated exon 1A/1A' and the last coding region, exon 4, which span approximately 100 kb in Mus. A 160 kb BAC containing Mc1r and a 180 kb BAC containing Agouti were then shotgun sequenced by Agencourt (Beverly, MA) until sequences from each BAC could be assembled into a single contig for each locus and all gaps were filled.

Real time quantitative PCR

To quantify Mc1r and Agouti transcript levels in wild type and melanic mice from New Hampshire, we used quantitative real-time PCR to detect Mc1r and Agouti mRNA in the skin of 4-day-old (P4) pups, a time when Agouti expression is high [52]. First, we extracted total RNA from dorsal skin that had been frozen in liquid nitrogen with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Next, we generated cDNA pools by reverse transcribing from ∼1ug total RNA with Superscript II reverse transcriptase and poly-dT(20) primer. Finally, we measured transcript abundances with TaqMan custom probe based on exon-4 sequence (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [53] on a Mastercycler Realplex2 (Eppendorf North America, New York, NY). We compared expression of the target transcript to that of β-actin by calculating 2ΔCT in which ΔCT is the difference between the target and β-actin CTs for a given sample. We assayed expression level for each individual in duplicate.

In situ hybridization

We generated a cDNA pool from Peromyscus embryonic skin at E13, and amplified the entire coding region of Agouti (exons 2 to 4). An Agouti anti-sense riboprobe was obtained by RNA synthesis reaction and used to perform in situ hybridization on wild type and melanic embryos at E12.5 as previously described [54].

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Melanism is caused by a single autosomal recessive allele in P. maniculatus. We found complete recessivity of the melanic phenotype in the New Hampshire strain of P. maniculatus consistent with previous observations [17]. Offspring resulting from crosses between homozygous wild type mice (A+/A+) and homozygous melanic mice (a/a) were all phenotypically indistinguishable from wild type (N = 64), confirming that the allele(s) causing the melanic phenotype is recessive to the wild type allele. In a second experiment, offspring that were heterozygous for the melanic allele (A+/a; although phenotypically wild type) – were intercrossed, resulting in 49 offspring, of which 34 (69%) were the wild type phenotype, 15 (31%) were melanic, and none had an intermediate phenotype. The ratio of phenotypes is not significantly different from 3∶1 (χ2 = 0.82, 1 d.f., p>0.35), confirming that a recessive allele at a single locus is responsible for the melanic phenotype in this strain of P. maniculatus. Subsequent genotyping of these offspring revealed a ratio of homozygous wild type:heterozygote:homozygote melanic ratio not significantly different from 1∶2∶1 (χ2 = 0.88, 2 d.f., p>0.6).

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S2.

Standard PCR primer sequences and conditions

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S3.

Genome walking PCR primer sequences

(0.03 MB DOC)


We wish to thank the University of Alaska Museum of the North, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, P. Myers, and C. Conroy for their assistance with tissue loans, and the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center for maintaining our crosses. M. Chin, B. Hehli, K. Hogan and C. Steiner contributed to the molecular work. BAC screening was performed in the lab of P. Vrana. W. Parson provided photographs of the mice. V. Domingues, C. Linnen, J. Losos, M. Shapiro and P. Wittkopp provided thoughtful discussion and comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EK MCM HEH. Performed the experiments: EK MCM CDW. Analyzed the data: EK MCM HEH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CDW HEH. Wrote the paper: EK HEH.


  1. 1. Cott HB (1940) Adaptive Coloration in Animals. Methuen, London..
  2. 2. Barsh GS (1996) The genetics of pigmentation: From fancy genes to complex traits. Trends in Genetics 12: 299–305.
  3. 3. Bennett DC, Lamoreux ML (2003) The color loci of mice - A genetic century. Pigment Cell Research 16: 333–344.
  4. 4. Hoekstra HE (2006) Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates. Heredity 97: 222–234.
  5. 5. Majerus MEN (1998) Melanism: evolution in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. 6. Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Blake JA, et al. (2008) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): Mouse biology and model systems. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D724–D728.
  7. 7. Bultman SJ, Klebig ML, Michaud EJ, Sweet HO, Davisson MT, et al. (1994) Molecular analysis of reverse mutations from nonagouti (a) to black-and-tan (a(t)) and white-bellied agouti (A(w)) reveals alternative forms of agouti transcripts. Genes & Development 8: 481–490.
  8. 8. Nagle DL, McGrail SH, Vitale J, Woolf EA, Dussault BJ, et al. (1999) The mahogany protein is a receptor involved in suppression of obesity. Nature 398: 148–152.
  9. 9. Robbins LS, Nadeau JH, Johnson KR, Kelly MA, Rosellirehfuss L, et al. (1993) Pigmentation phenotypes of variant extension locus alleles result from point mutations that alter MSH receptor function. Cell 72: 827–834.
  10. 10. Phan LK, Lin F, LeDuc CA, Chung WK, Leibel RL (2002) The mouse mahoganoid coat color mutation disrupts a novel C3HC4 RING domain protein. Journal of Clinical Investigation 110: 1449–1459.
  11. 11. He L, Gunn TM, Bouley DM, Lu XY, Watson SJ, et al. (2001) A biochemical function for attractin in agouti-induced pigmentation and obesity. Nature Genetics 27: 40–47.
  12. 12. Eizirik E, Yuhki N, Johnson WE, Menotti-Raymond M, Hannah SS, et al. (2003) Molecular genetics and evolution of melanism in the cat family. Current Biology 13: 448–453.
  13. 13. Nadeau NJ, Minvielle F, Mundy NI (2006) Association of a Glu92Lys substitution in MC1R with extended brown in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Animal Genetics 37: 287–289.
  14. 14. Mundy NI, Badcock NS, Hart T, Scribner K, Janssen K, et al. (2004) Conserved genetic basis of a quantitative plumage trait involved in mate choice. Science 303: 1870–1873.
  15. 15. Nachman MW, Hoekstra HE, D'Agostino SL (2003) The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 5268–5273.
  16. 16. Theron E, Hawkins K, Bermingham E, Ricklefs RE, Mundy NI (2001) The molecular basis of an avian plumage polymorphism in the wild: A melanocortin-1-receptor point mutation is perfectly associated with the melanic plumage morph of the bananaquit, Coereba flaveola. Current Biology 11: 550–557.
  17. 17. Horner BE, Potter GL, Vanooteghem S (1980) A new black coat color mutation in Peromyscus. Journal of Heredity 71: 49–51.
  18. 18. Howard WE (1957) Melanism in Peromyscus boylei. J Mammal 38: 417.
  19. 19. Chen YR, Duhl DMJ, Barsh GS (1996) Opposite orientations of an inverted duplication and allelic variation at the mouse agouti locus. Genetics 144: 265–277.
  20. 20. Millar SE, Miller MW, Stevens ME, Barsh GS (1995) Expression and transgenic studies of the mouse agouti gene provide insight into the mechanisms by which mammalian coat color patterns are generated. Development 121: 3223–3232.
  21. 21. Perry WL, Nakamura T, Swing DA, Secrest L, Eagleson B, et al. (1996) Coupled site-directed mutagenesis/transgenesis identifies important functional domains of the mouse agouti protein. Genetics 144: 255–264.
  22. 22. Ollmann MM, Barsh GS (1999) Down-regulation of melanocortin receptor signaling mediated by the amino terminus of Agouti protein in Xenopus melanophores. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 15837–15846.
  23. 23. Haldane JBS (1927) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, Part V: Selection and mutation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23: 838–844.
  24. 24. Orr HA, Betancourt AJ (2001) Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157: 875–884.
  25. 25. Hoekstra HE, Drumm KE, Nachman MW (2004) Ecological genetics of adaptive color polymorphism in pocket mice: geographic variation in selected and neutral genes. Evolution 58: 1329–1341.
  26. 26. Mogil JS, Wilson SG, Chesler EJ, Rankin AL, Nemmani KVS, et al. (2003) The melanocortin-1 receptor gene mediates female-specific mechanisms of analgesia in mice and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 4867–4872.
  27. 27. Dickie MM (1969) Mutations at the agouti locus in the mouse. Journal of Heredity 60: 20–25.
  28. 28. Michaud EJ, Bultman SJ, Klebig ML, Vanvugt MJ, Stubbs LJ, et al. (1994) A molecular-model for the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of the mouse lethal yellow (A(y)) mutation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 2562–2566.
  29. 29. Cottle CA, Price EO (1987) Effects of the nonagouti pelage-color allele on the behavior of captive wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 101: 390–394.
  30. 30. Hayssen V (1997) Effects of the nonagouti coat-color allele on behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): A comparison with Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 111: 419–423.
  31. 31. Stern DL (2000) Perspective: Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution 54: 1079–1091.
  32. 32. Carroll SB (2005) Evolution at two levels: On genes and form. PLoS Biology 3: 1159–1166.
  33. 33. Carroll SB (2008) Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134: 25–36.
  34. 34. Hoekstra HE, Nachman MW (2003) Different genes underlie adaptive melanism in different populations of rock pocket mice. Molecular Ecology 12: 1185–1194.
  35. 35. Wlasiuk G, Nachman MW (2007) The genetics of adaptive coat color in gophers: Coding variation at Mc1r is not responsible for dorsal color differences. Journal of Heredity 98: 567–574.
  36. 36. MacDougall-Shackleton EA, Blanchard L, Gibbs HL (2003) Unmelanized plumage patterns in old world leaf warblers do not correspond to sequence variation at the melanocortin-1 receptor locus (MC1R). Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1675–1681.
  37. 37. Stewart CB, Schilling JW, Wilson AC (1987) Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters. Nature 330: 401–404.
  38. 38. Kornegay JR, Schilling JW, Wilson AC (1994) Molecular adaptation of a leaf-eating bird - stomach lysozyme of the hoatzin. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 921–928.
  39. 39. Shapiro MD, Marks ME, Peichel CL, Blackman BK, Nereng KS, et al. (2004) Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 428: 717–723.
  40. 40. Shapiro MD, Bell MA, Kingsley DM (2006) Parallel genetic origins of pelvic reduction in vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 13753–13758.
  41. 41. ffrench-Constant RH, Anthony N, Aronstein K, Rocheleau T, Stilwell G (2000) Cyclodiene insecticide resistance: From molecular to population genetics. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 449–466.
  42. 42. Hoekstra HE, Hirschmann RJ, Bundey RA, Insel PA, Crossland JP (2006) A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313: 101–104.
  43. 43. Steiner CC, Rompler H, Boettger LM, Schoneberg T, Hoekstra HE (2009) The genetic basis of phenotypic convergence in beach mice: Similar pigment patterns but different genes. Mol Biol Evol 26: 35–45.
  44. 44. Wittkopp PJ, Williams BL, Selegue JE, Carroll SB (2003) Drosophila pigmentation evolution: Divergent genotypes underlying convergent phenotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 1808–1813.
  45. 45. Protas ME, Hersey C, Kochanek D, Zhou Y, Wilkens H, et al. (2006) Genetic analysis of cavefish reveals molecular convergence in the evolution of albinism. Nature Genetics 38: 107–111.
  46. 46. Gross JB, Borowsky R, Tabin CJ (2009) A novel role for Mc1r in the parallel evolution of depigmentation in independent populations of the cavefish Astyanax mexicanus. PLoS Genet 5: e1000326.
  47. 47. Baxter SW, Papa R, Chamberlain N, Humphray SJ, Joron M, et al. (2008) Convergent evolution in the genetic basis of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Genetics 180: 1567–1577.
  48. 48. Rausher MD (2008) Evolutionary transitions in floral color. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 7–21.
  49. 49. Osgood WH (1909) Revision of the Mice of the American Genus Peromyscus; Survey. Govt. print. off., Washington.
  50. 50. Hogan KM, Hedin MC, Koh HS, Davis SK, Greenbaum IF (1993) Systematic and taxonomic implications of karyotypic, electrophoretic, and mitochondrial-DNA variation in Peromyscus from the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 819–831.
  51. 51. Turner LM, Hoekstra HE (2006) Adaptive evolution of fertilization proteins within a genus: Variation in ZP2 and ZP3 in deer mice (Peromyscus). Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1656–1669.
  52. 52. Vrieling H, Duhl DMJ, Millar SE, Miller KA, Barsh GS (1994) Differences in dorsal and ventral pigmentation result from regional expression of the mouse agouti gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 5667–5671.
  53. 53. Steiner CC, Weber JN, Hoekstra HE (2007) Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biology 5: 1880–1889.
  54. 54. Henrique D, Adam J, Myat A, Chitnis A, Lewis J, et al. (1995) Expression of a delta-homolog in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375: 787–790.
  55. 55. Kerns JA, Newton J, Berryere TG, Rubin EM, Cheng JF, et al. (2004) Characterization of the dog Agouti gene and a nonagouti mutation in German Shepherd Dogs. Mammalian Genome 15: 798–808.
  56. 56. Hiragaki T, Inoue-Murayama M, Miwa M, Fujiwara A, Mizutani M, et al. (2008) Recessive black is allelic to the yellow plumage locus in Japanese quail and associated with a frameshift deletion in the ASIP gene. Genetics 178: 771–775.
  57. 57. Rieder S, Taourit S, Mariat D, Langlois B, Guerin G (2001) Mutations in the agouti (ASIP), the extension (MC1R), and the brown (TYRP1) loci and their association to coat color phenotypes in horses (Equus caballus). Mammalian Genome 12: 450–455.
  58. 58. Ludwig A, Pruvost M, Reissmann M, Benecke N, Brockmann GA, et al. (2009) Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication. Science 324(5926): 485.
  59. 59. Miltenberger RJ, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Woychik RP, Russell LB, et al. (2002) Molecular and phenotypic analysis of 25 recessive, homozygous-viable alleles at the mouse agouti locus. Genetics 160: 659–674.
  60. 60. Norris BJ, Whan VA (2008) A gene duplication affecting expression of the ovine ASIP gene is responsible for white and black sheep. Genome Research 18: 1282–1293.
  61. 61. Kuramoto T, Nomoto T, Sugimura T, Ushijima T (2001) Cloning of the rat agouti gene and identification of the rat nonagouti mutation. Mammalian Genome 12: 469–471.
  62. 62. Våge DI, Lu DS, Klungland H, Lien S, Adalsteinsson S, et al. (1997) A non-epistatic interaction of agouti and extension in the fox, Vulpes vulpes. Nature Genetics 15: 311–315.
  63. 63. Gunn TM, Miller KA, He L, Hyman RV, Davis RW, et al. (1999) The mouse mahogany locus encodes a transmembrane form of human attractin. Nature 398: 152–156.
  64. 64. Bronson RT, Donahue LR, Samples R, Naggert JK (2001) Mice with mutations in the mahogany gene Atrn have cerebral spongiform changes. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 60: 724–730.
  65. 65. Candille SI, Kaelin CB, Cattanach BM, Yu B, Thompson DA, et al. (2007) A beta-defensin mutation causes black coat color in domestic dogs. Science 318: 1418–1423.
  66. 66. Anderson TM, vonHoldt BM, Candille SI, Musiani M, Greco C, et al. (2009) Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves. Science 323: 1339–1343.
  67. 67. Klungland H, Vage DI, Gomezraya L, Adalsteinsson S, Lien S (1995) The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination. Mammalian Genome 6: 636–639.
  68. 68. Takeuchi S, Suzuki H, Yabuuchi M, Takahashi S (1996) A possible involvement of melanocortin 1-receptor in regulating feather color pigmentation in the chicken. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Gene Structure and Expression 1308: 164–168.
  69. 69. Ling MK, Lagerstrom MC, Fredriksson R, Okimoto R, Mundy NI, et al. (2003) Association of feather colour with constitutively active melanocortin 1 receptors in chicken. European Journal of Biochemistry 270: 1441–1449.
  70. 70. Lu DS, Vage DI, Cone RD (1998) A ligand-mimetic model for constitutive activation of the melanocortin-1 receptor. Molecular Endocrinology 12: 592–604.
  71. 71. Våge DI, Klungland H, Lu D, Cone RD (1999) Molecular and pharmacological characterization of dominant black coat color in sheep. Mammalian Genome 10: 39–43.
  72. 72. Kijas JMH, Wales R, Tornsten A, Chardon P, Moller M, et al. (1998) Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat color in pigs. Genetics 150: 1177–1185.
  73. 73. Vage DI, Fuglei E, Snipstad K, Beheirn J, Landsem VM, et al. (2005) Two cysteine substitutions in the MC1R generate the blue variant of the arctic fox (Alopex lagopus) and prevent expression of the white winter coat. Peptides 26: 1814–1817.
  74. 74. Baião PC, Schreiber FA, Parker PG (2007) The genetic basis of the plumage polymorphism in red-footed boobies (Sula sula): a Melanocortin-1 Receptor (MC1R) analysis. Journal of Heredity 98: 287–292.
  75. 75. Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, et al. (2003) LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: Efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Research 13: 721–731.
  76. 76. Mayor C, Brudno M, Schwartz JR, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, et al. (2000) VISTA: visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length. Bioinformatics 16: 1046–1047.