Reader Comments (35)
Post a new comment on this article
-
0 Responses11 Oct 2019
23:59 GMT
Most RecentGlad to pay an efficiency cost to avoid Word corrupting my document Posted by pkarp on 11 Oct 2019 at 23:59 GMT -
0 Responses10 Oct 2019
06:15 GMT
Most RecentSex Differences, Editor Variety, Language Specificity Posted by fmielke on 10 Oct 2019 at 06:15 GMT -
0 Responses18 Jun 2019
16:11 GMT
Most RecentArticle about LaTeX in NATURE Posted by knauff on 18 Jun 2019 at 16:11 GMT -
0 Responses04 Dec 2018
10:50 GMT
Most RecentA different point of view Posted by gpiredda on 04 Dec 2018 at 10:50 GMT -
0 Responses29 Jun 2015
20:13 GMT
Most RecentFatal methodological errors Posted by kmacdowell on 29 Jun 2015 at 20:13 GMT -
0 Responses01 Apr 2015
18:03 GMT
Most RecentPublisher’s Note: Notice of Republication Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 01 Apr 2015 at 18:03 GMT -
1 Response13 Mar 2015
16:12 GMT
Most RecentFormatting errors in LaTeX? Posted by roche on 26 Dec 2014 at 09:02 GMT -
0 Responses14 Jan 2015
21:45 GMT
Most RecentOpinion piece, not science Posted by lemire on 14 Jan 2015 at 21:45 GMT -
0 Responses13 Jan 2015
18:23 GMT
Most RecentWas that necessary? Posted by mkitzbichler on 13 Jan 2015 at 18:23 GMT -
1 Response11 Jan 2015
21:17 GMT
Most RecentAuthor’s response to comments! Posted by knauff on 11 Jan 2015 at 16:37 GMT -
0 Responses10 Jan 2015
00:10 GMT
Most RecentUnfair comparision Posted by jsha129 on 10 Jan 2015 at 00:10 GMT -
0 Responses08 Jan 2015
09:01 GMT
Most RecentThe paper is discussed in NATURE Posted by knauff on 08 Jan 2015 at 09:01 GMT -
0 Responses05 Jan 2015
16:43 GMT
Most RecentPoor experimental task Posted by rschuetzler on 05 Jan 2015 at 16:43 GMT -
0 Responses31 Dec 2014
19:50 GMT
Most RecentLibreoffice, openoffice, abiword... Posted by AndyMunpi on 31 Dec 2014 at 19:50 GMT -
0 Responses29 Dec 2014
00:43 GMT
Most RecentError rates are interesting, speed not so much Posted by cben on 29 Dec 2014 at 00:43 GMT -
0 Responses28 Dec 2014
23:35 GMT
Most RecentLaTeX is not a text editor Posted by noahdiewald on 28 Dec 2014 at 23:35 GMT -
1 Response28 Dec 2014
14:48 GMT
Most RecentCopying ≠ writing, but some interesting data despite this Posted by jpeloquin on 27 Dec 2014 at 02:59 GMT -
0 Responses28 Dec 2014
14:42 GMT
Most RecentThe data show the opposite of what the authors claim, when math is involved... Posted by lucaferretti on 28 Dec 2014 at 14:42 GMT -
1 Response27 Dec 2014
19:54 GMT
Most RecentTypos in the article Posted by bbeeton on 27 Dec 2014 at 17:55 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
17:15 GMT
Most RecentLatex vs. Word from a reviewers perspective Posted by nbusch on 27 Dec 2014 at 17:15 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
15:32 GMT
Most RecentSome discussuion about the paper by Economists Posted by brunosalcedo on 27 Dec 2014 at 15:32 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
13:00 GMT
Most RecentSupporting information is disappointing Posted by hans_adler on 27 Dec 2014 at 13:00 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
12:42 GMT
Most RecentScience as copywriting Posted by jjmerelo on 27 Dec 2014 at 12:42 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
08:03 GMT
Most RecentMath Posted by albertg on 27 Dec 2014 at 08:03 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
03:01 GMT
Most RecentPage level efficiency is not document level efficiency Posted by djao on 27 Dec 2014 at 03:01 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
02:38 GMT
Most RecentStudy metrics are flawed Posted by djao on 27 Dec 2014 at 02:38 GMT -
0 Responses27 Dec 2014
00:37 GMT
Most RecentTeX bugs? Posted by tdye on 27 Dec 2014 at 00:37 GMT -
0 Responses26 Dec 2014
15:11 GMT
Most RecentDubious conclusions Posted by hinowp on 26 Dec 2014 at 15:11 GMT -
0 Responses26 Dec 2014
12:44 GMT
Most RecentSome Questions Regarding the Paper Posted by batmuffino on 26 Dec 2014 at 12:44 GMT -
0 Responses26 Dec 2014
12:07 GMT
Most RecentThank you for studying this! Posted by arjunraj on 26 Dec 2014 at 12:07 GMT -
0 Responses26 Dec 2014
08:46 GMT
Most RecentWord ./. LaTeX Posted by nnielsen on 26 Dec 2014 at 08:46 GMT