Reader Comments (46)
Post a new comment on this article
-
0 Responses14 Aug 2021
18:21 GMT
Most RecentIoannidis was wrong Posted by uschimmack on 14 Aug 2021 at 18:21 GMT -
0 Responses17 Jun 2020
14:26 GMT
Most RecentDr Richard House, Chartered Psychologist, UK Posted by rhouse on 17 Jun 2020 at 14:26 GMT -
0 Responses07 Dec 2019
01:59 GMT
Most RecentHard to believe Posted by srenneberg on 07 Dec 2019 at 01:59 GMT -
0 Responses26 Apr 2017
10:24 GMT
Most RecentHelpful article Posted by bdy on 26 Apr 2017 at 10:24 GMT -
0 Responses14 Feb 2017
09:25 GMT
Most RecentInteractive app for visualization Posted by fschönbrodt on 14 Feb 2017 at 09:25 GMT -
0 Responses09 Jan 2017
21:25 GMT
Most RecentI'm wondering whether the conclusion of this article applies to itself Posted by alexrrus on 09 Jan 2017 at 21:25 GMT -
0 Responses08 Dec 2016
02:10 GMT
Most RecentValidation of Skepticism Posted by okhan on 08 Dec 2016 at 02:10 GMT -
6 Responses26 Jun 2015
02:35 GMT
Most RecentWhy most published research findings are true but so many are useless Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:51 GMT -
0 Responses18 Jun 2015
18:06 GMT
Most Recent--"Fraud and Freud is There Association in Scientific Misconduct?" Please check this link. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/... Posted by ho7285 on 18 Jun 2015 at 18:06 GMT -
0 Responses18 Jun 2015
18:01 GMT
Most RecentIt Might Be Interesting to Read This Please Check The Link --"Fraud and Freud is There an Association in Scientific Misconduct ?" Posted by ho7285 on 18 Jun 2015 at 18:01 GMT -
0 Responses27 Oct 2013
22:03 GMT
Most RecentA small group research. Posted by samgul on 27 Oct 2013 at 22:03 GMT -
0 Responses30 Jul 2013
15:29 GMT
Most RecentSurely the answer is Bayes theorem? Posted by mickofemsworth on 30 Jul 2013 at 15:29 GMT -
0 Responses19 Jan 2013
10:01 GMT
Most RecentA Critique of Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med 2(8) II: proposals Posted by vetter on 19 Jan 2013 at 10:01 GMT -
0 Responses17 Jan 2013
16:55 GMT
Most RecentA Critique of Ioannidis JPA (2005) Posted by vetter on 17 Jan 2013 at 16:55 GMT -
0 Responses27 Jun 2011
23:08 GMT
Most Recentcomplex experiments require advanced statistics Posted by lazarillo on 27 Jun 2011 at 23:08 GMT -
0 Responses27 Jun 2011
22:52 GMT
Most Recenttrue existing relationships to true non-existent relationships Posted by lazarillo on 27 Jun 2011 at 22:52 GMT -
0 Responses10 Mar 2011
16:12 GMT
Most Recentp values for significance must be more strict (as p=<0.005) to decrease false positives Posted by sogino on 10 Mar 2011 at 16:12 GMT -
0 Responses14 Jan 2010
10:17 GMT
Most RecentWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False Posted by keithkojo on 14 Jan 2010 at 10:17 GMT -
0 Responses13 Oct 2009
12:10 GMT
Most RecentThis only applies for p-values not corrected for multiple testing Posted by barwil on 13 Oct 2009 at 12:10 GMT -
0 Responses17 Sep 2009
15:13 GMT
Most Recent -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:31 GMT
Most RecentOpen Access and the Skewness of Science: It Can't Be Cream All the Way Down Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:31 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:15 GMT
Most RecentWhy most published research findings are false Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:15 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:15 GMT
Most RecentHealthy Skepticism Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:15 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:15 GMT
Most RecentResponce Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:15 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:15 GMT
Most RecentTruth Is Hard to Find Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:15 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:14 GMT
Most RecentLet Truth Bare Sway Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:14 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:14 GMT
Most RecentMy Opinion Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:14 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:14 GMT
Most RecentIndependent Teams Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:14 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:14 GMT
Most RecentGreek Common Sense Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:14 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:10 GMT
Most RecentWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False: How about Functional Brain Mapping? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:10 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:06 GMT
Most RecentIn reply Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:06 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:06 GMT
Most RecentProblems in the underlying analysis Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:06 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:06 GMT
Most RecentMedicine only? Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:06 GMT -
0 Responses31 Mar 2009
00:00 GMT
Most RecentMultiple research teams with multiple research findings Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:00 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:58 GMT
Most RecentTitle of paper is erroneous: most published studies are not false Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:58 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:46 GMT
Most RecentError in "Why most published research findings are false" Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:46 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:46 GMT
Most RecentPower, Reliability and Heterogeneous Results Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:46 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:45 GMT
Most RecentClinical trials on human subjects can never be definitively conclusive Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:45 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:45 GMT
Most RecentTruth, probability and frameworks Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:45 GMT -
0 Responses30 Mar 2009
23:45 GMT
Most RecentThe Clinical Interpretation of Research Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:45 GMT