Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Environmental reservoirs of the drug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris

  • Ayorinde B. Akinbobola ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

  • Ryan Kean,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom

  • Syed Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Health System and Population Studies Division, Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Richard S. Quilliam

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom


Candia auris is an emerging human pathogenic yeast; yet, despite phenotypic attributes and genomic evidence suggesting that it probably emerged from a natural reservoir, we know nothing about the environmental phase of its life cycle and the transmission pathways associated with it. The thermotolerant characteristics of C. auris have been hypothesised to be an environmental adaptation to increasing temperatures due to global warming (which may have facilitated its ability to tolerate the mammalian thermal barrier that is considered a protective strategy for humans against colonisation by environmental fungi with pathogenic potential). Thus, C. auris may be the first human pathogenic fungus to have emerged as a result of climate change. In addition, the release of antifungal chemicals, such as azoles, into the environment (from both pharmaceutical and agricultural sources) is likely to be responsible for the environmental enrichment of resistant strains of C. auris; however, the survival and dissemination of C. auris in the natural environment is poorly understood. In this paper, we critically review the possible pathways through which C. auris can be introduced into the environment and evaluate the environmental characteristics that can influence its persistence and transmission in natural environments. Identifying potential environmental niches and reservoirs of C. auris and understanding its emergence against a backdrop of climate change and environmental pollution will be crucial for the development of effective epidemiological and environmental management responses.

Author summary

The natural environment can play a significant role in the epidemiology of infectious diseases as pathogens persist and evolve in environmental niches from where they can be transferred to new hosts. Therefore, understanding the interaction of pathogens with potential environmental reservoirs is crucial to the control of pathogenic diseases. Pathogenic Candida species have been widely isolated from nonclinical environmental sources such as soil, freshwater, seawater, and animals such as birds. The persistence and dissemination of C. auris, a recently emerged human pathogenic yeast, in the environment is still poorly understood. Here, we identify the potential pathways through which C. auris can be introduced into the natural environment and the characteristics that can influence its survival in various environmental matrices. In conclusion, we review the current knowledge gaps and identify the future research needed to understand the epidemiological implications of C. auris in the natural environment.


Candia auris is a human pathogenic yeast commonly resistant to multiple antifungal drugs. The first report of C. auris being isolated was in 2009 from the ear of a 70-year-old patient in Tokyo, Japan [1]; however, retroactive detection of C. auris has subsequently been reported from samples collected in South Korea, Japan, and Pakistan [24]. Since 2014, there has been a sharp rise in the number of countries reporting C. auris detection for the first time (Fig 1) and it has now been detected in more than 45 countries [58]. This global spread of C. auris has prompted the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to discontinue updating data on first case detection in new countries [8]. Increasing global temperatures have been implicated for the almost simultaneous emergence of this pathogen on 3 continents [9]. Thus, it has been hypothesised that C. auris is the first human pathogenic fungus to have emerged as a result of climate change [9,10].

Fig 1. Cumulative number of countries with reported detection of Candida auris.

Pathogenic Candida species cause candidiasis, which can range from superficial conditions such as oral thrush to life-threatening invasive diseases. Globally, candidiasis is the third most common healthcare-associated infection with invasive candidiasis responsible for about 20% of infections in intensive care units worldwide [11,12]. While there are millions of new cases of candidiasis of the mucosa each year, the annual global incidence of life-threatening invasive candidiasis is approximately 750,000 and is associated with a high mortality rate, particularly in critically ill patients and those with compromised immunity [11,13]. Although Candida albicans is the most common aetiological agent of candidiasis, there has been an increase in cases of candidiasis caused by a range of other Candida species such as C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and more recently C. auris [11,12,14].

C. auris infections, like many other Candida infections, are opportunistic [15]. Underlining health conditions such as diabetes, kidney disease, and HIV/AIDS can be risk factors for C. auris infections [5,16,17], as can long-term use of antimicrobial drugs, extended hospital stays, surgery, and the use of a central venous catheter [5,16]. Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has also been suggested as a risk factor for severe C. auris infection based on the high mortality rate recorded in COVID-19 patients with C. auris infection [6,18]. Although a meta-analysis of available data on COVID-19–associated C. auris infections indicated that COVID-19 has no significant impact on the prevalence of C. auris infection [19,20].

An emerging resistance to multiple antifungal drugs (such as fluconazole and amphotericin B) and the ability to persist in nosocomial settings (together with poor prognoses) have made C. auris infections a serious global health concern. The CDC and the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) have both declared C. auris an urgent health threat that needs a prompt and vigorous response [21,22]. Likewise, the World Health Organisation (WHO) have recently classified C. auris as a fungal pathogen of critical concern on its “fungal pathogen priority list” compiled to guide research, development, and public health action [23]. Infection control measures stipulate colonisation screening if a case of C. auris is detected in healthcare facilities, and many national guidelines now require cases of C. auris infection to be reported to central infection control agencies [21,22,24]. Although C. auris has largely been isolated in healthcare facilities, there have also been limited cases of asymptomatic community colonisation [5]. However, the emergence of C. auris is likely to be a fairly recent event as it has not been retroactively detected in collections of fungi isolated from humans prior to 1996 [25].

In contrast to pathogenic moulds and non-Candida human pathogenic yeast (such as Cryptococcus neoformans), which are known to inhabit diverse environmental niches, pathogenic Candida species primarily exist as human commensals or as contaminants in clinical environments from where they can cause opportunistic infections. However, several species of pathogenic Candida have been isolated from nonhuman or nonclinical environmental samples [26,27], which could provide novel exposure routes for human infection [26,2830]. Candida albicans was previously thought to exist mainly as a human commensal [30], but has now been widely isolated from nonclinical environmental samples, e.g., soil, wetlands, and plants (Table 1). In addition, the 5 most common pathogenic Candida species [31] as well as C. lusitaniae and C. haemulonii, 2 human pathogenic Candida species closely related to C. auris [5], have also been isolated from nonclinical environmental samples (Table 1). Despite the common isolation of pathogenic Candida species from environmental samples, the significance of environmental persistence and cycling on the epidemiology of candidiasis is not yet fully understood. Therefore, identifying potential environmental niches and reservoirs of C. auris is crucial for the development of effective epidemiological and management responses.

Table 1. Reported isolation of common pathogenic Candida species from environmental samples.

Recent studies have increased our understanding of the biology, genome, pathogenicity, and phenotypic characteristics of C. auris [5,16,55], yet the role of the natural environment in the emergence and transmission of C. auris remains largely unexplored. The environment can provide suitable conditions for human pathogens to persist and provides a diversity of human exposure routes (either directly or via secondary hosts or fomites). Importantly, environmental interactions can also lead to the acquisition of both novel genes and phenotypic characteristics that can significantly impact pathogenicity [56,57]. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to determine potential interactions of C. auris with the environment and explore those environmental characteristics and pathways that could facilitate increased human exposure to C. auris.

Sources and input pathways of Candida auris in the environment

Clinical strains of C. auris can be introduced into the environment through shedding from colonised humans or animals or through the release of contaminated clinical wastes (Fig 2). C. auris persists on the skin, nostrils, and ear cavity of colonised humans, which are widely documented routes for contamination of clinical environments by infected patients and healthcare workers [58,59]. The detection of C. auris in indoor swimming pools demonstrates that colonised individuals can shed the yeast into nonclinical environments, where the cells can persist and be subsequently transferred to other people [60]. C. auris has been detected in human urine and faecal samples [4,61], as well as rectal swabs from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals [62]. Thus, open defecation, which is widely practiced in rural communities in low- and medium-income countries, could also be a significant pathway for the environmental loading of C. auris. Likewise, C. auris in human excreta could contaminate the environment via effluent from wastewater treatment plants. Although C. auris detection in wastewater has not yet been reported, other pathogenic yeasts such as C. albicans are often detected in hospital wastewater [63] and in the influent and effluent of wastewater treatment plants [64]. In all cases, the environmental survival and subsequent persistence of C. auris will be affected by the intrinsic characteristics of the receiving environment following wastewater discharge.

Fig 2. Possible pathways for Candida auris introduction into the environment.

Contaminated clinical solid waste is a proven pathway for the introduction of pathogenic microorganisms into the environment [65], and clinical wastes contaminated with pathogenic species of Candida, e.g., C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, have previously been reported [66]. C. auris shows an increased ability to persist on dry inanimate surfaces compared to C. albicans [67] and can persist in biofilms on inanimate surfaces, e.g., plastics, for significant periods [6870]. In developing countries where clinical wastes are often not properly managed due to limited resources, safe disposal of contaminated wastes remains a serious challenge.

Although no animal reservoir has yet been established for C. auris, this thermotolerant yeast can colonise warm-blooded nonhuman animals, for example, human pathogenic Candida species are often isolated from birds, with subsequent faecal shedding into the environment [71,72]. The most common pathogenic Candida species (e.g., C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei) have been isolated from bird droppings [73], and other pathogenic yeasts have been isolated from mammals such as bats and dogs [74,75].

Candida auris persistence and cycling in the environment

Populations of C. auris have both thermotolerant and halotolerant capacity and are commonly resistant to one or more antifungals [68,76,77]. Based on these phenotypic attributes, it has been suggested that C. auris probably emerged from a natural reservoir [25,70,78,79], which is supported by genomic evidence, and the ecology of related fungal species; however, specific reservoirs of C. auris in the natural environment have still not been properly defined. Potential environmental reservoirs for C. auris include terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems (Table 2), with specific niches in soil, plants, and animals. C. auris can tolerate high salt concentrations (of up to 10% NaCl) [77], and evidence suggests that human pathogenic C. auris evolved in niches in marine ecosystems [25,78,80]. Support for this comes from isolates of C. auris that have recently been discovered in an area of coastal wetland in the Andaman Islands with no known human activity and from an estuary in Colombia [80,81].

C. auris has the ability to grow at temperatures of up to 42°C, where phylogenetically related species, e.g., C. haemulonii, cannot grow [82]. The thermotolerant characteristics of C. auris have been attributed to environmental adaptation to increasing temperature due to global warming. It is hypothesised that this has facilitated its emergence as a human pathogen due to its ability to tolerate the mammalian thermal barrier, which is considered a protective strategy for humans against colonisation by environmental pathogens [9,83]. The ability of C. auris to tolerate higher temperatures may also enable the colonisation of birds, which has been suggested as a transmission pathway from environmental reservoirs to humans [25,84]. Although there is currently no direct evidence of C. auris isolation from birds, the detection of other human pathogenic Candida species in birds has been widely reported [85,86].

Phenotypic characteristics that support the hypothesis of C. auris emergence from an environmental niche include the intrinsic resistance to antifungal drugs (most commonly fluconazole) by most C. auris isolates. The large-scale introduction of antifungal chemicals such as azoles into the environment (from both pharmaceutical and agricultural sources) has likely played a role in the environmental enrichment of fluconazole resistant strains of C. auris [70,78]. Azole antifungal agents are widely used to control fungal crop diseases and thus inadvertently contaminate the environment and can persist for months in different environmental matrices [87,88]. Similarly, it has been hypothesised that increasing the shelf life of stored fruits with antifungal chemicals has led to the selection of antifungal resistance in environmental C. auris strains [79]. Comparable selection pressure from antifungals in the environment has been associated with the emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus [89].

Genomic evidence also supports the hypothesis that C. auris originated from, and diversified in, environmental reservoirs. For example, there is a high occurrence (i.e., tens of thousands) of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 5 C. auris clades that have originated in different geographical locations in South America, South Africa, South Asia, East Asia, and most recently in Iran [16,55,90], in contrast to the low (i.e., less than 70 SNPs) intra-clade genetic diversity [16]. The high inter-clade genomic difference has been attributed to the selective pressure of specific environmental conditions at the different geographical locations where each C. auris clade emerged. The C. auris genome also provides evidence for the environmental selection of antifungal resistance genes in C. auris [91]. Recently, searches of the Sequence Read Archive of the NCBI database detected C. auris sequences from historic environmental samples [92] and identified 7 C. auris metabarcoding datasets, some of which were obtained from environmental samples collected from different parts of the world. Taken together, the available evidence strongly supports the hypothesis that C. auris emerged from reservoirs in the natural environment under various environmental stress including selection pressure from antifungals.

Soil can support the survival of a wide range of human pathogens, including C. albicans that can persist in soil for more than 30 days [30]; however, the ability of C. auris to persist in soil has not yet been examined. Lower pH and higher minerals (aluminium, manganese, and sodium) can increase survival of C. albicans during the early stages of soil contamination, while cation exchange capacity (CEC) and clay content, which influences the exchangeable minerals in soil, appears to be crucial for longer-term survival in soil [30]. C. auris can thrive between a pH range of 4 to 13, [93] and can withstand cationic stress, so could potentially persist in high mineral soils. The ability of C. auris to persist in biofilms in water-limited conditions [67,68] indicates that it could survive desiccation in soil; however, the persistence of C. auris in soil under a range of environmental conditions is still unknown.

Pathogenic species of Candida have been widely isolated from freshwater sources [39,94,95], although the only reported isolation of C. auris is from the water of an indoor swimming pool in the Netherlands [60]. C. albicans can persist for significant periods in filtered or sterile water [96,97], although these studies do not account for the influence of background microbial communities and other biotic factors that would be present in environmental freshwaters. Microbial diversity in freshwater is influenced by biotic factors and a wide range of abiotic components, e.g., nutrient availability, dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, all of which are subject to wide variations [98]. Yeasts are generally tolerant of environmental stressors, although it has been demonstrated that C. auris has a poor ability to survive in anaerobic conditions compared to other pathogenic Candida species like C. albicans and C. glabrata [99], which may affect its ability to persist in freshwater environments with low dissolved oxygen.

A major determinant of the ability of microbial species to persist in marine environments is the ability to withstand cationic stress due to high salt concentration, and several species of Candida species are frequently found in marine environments [37,41,44,45,100,101]. The halotolerance of C. auris (and its hypothesised emergence from the marine environment) could facilitate the survival of C. auris and its subsequent dissemination over large distances [77,80,99].

Future research focus

Current knowledge of C. auris persistence has focused on clinical settings due to the potential for infection outbreaks in healthcare settings. However, knowledge of the survival and dissemination of C. auris through the environment is now urgently needed to give a more complete assessment of the risk of C. auris transmission from environmental reservoirs to humans. The focus of future research on C. auris in the environment should be divided into 2 broad themes: (1) understanding environmental distribution and dissemination; and (2) quantifying survival and persistence in the environment.

There is a need to develop environmental surveillance tools to rapidly detect and quantify C. auris, but importantly, these must be developed in tandem with tools for community-scale surveillance. Tools such as wastewater-based epidemiology, which has been so effective for surveillance of diseases like COVID-19 [102] allows an understanding of community levels of infection (including asymptomatic carriage). C. auris contaminated wastewater from healthcare facilities may be discharged into the environment if C. auris is able to survive wastewater treatment processes. Although there are no reports of C. auris detection in wastewater, it is often detected in clinical faecal samples and other pathogenic Candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, and C. dubliniensis, have been detected at different wastewater treatment stages [103]. However, effective surveillance is not possible without specific detection methods. Most of the currently available methods have primarily focused on the detection of C. auris in clinical samples rather than complex environmental samples [104]. Therefore, before surveillance methods can be widely applied, there is an urgent need to optimise the specificity of both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods to detect C. auris in samples that may contain relatively high levels of other Candida species. This is especially important as the difficulty of distinguishing C. auris from other closely related Candida species has previously led to the misidentification of C. auris [2,16].

While C. auris can tolerate stresses associated with the infection process (physiological stress such as oxidative stress and cationic stress) and from colonising clinical surfaces (disinfection, temperature, and cell wall stress), the ability of C. auris to tolerate environmental stresses such as solar radiation, salinity, temperature extremes, competition, and predation have not yet been examined under natural environmental conditions. The ability of C. auris to tolerate environmental stressors will determine its fate when released into the environment and its potential for subsequent dissemination pathways and human exposure. A common strategy used by microorganisms to resist environment stress is to form biofilms. C. auris are known for their ability to form persistent biofilms [69,105] and as such could form multispecies biofilms with other environmental fungi and bacteria species, e.g., Staphylococcus spp. [106]. It has recently been demonstrated that free-living protozoans commonly found in hospital water pipes can enhance the persistence of C. auris [107]. Clearly, the impact of such close interactions with microbial species in multispecies biofilms on the persistence and pathogenicity of C. auris in the environment is an area that needs urgent investigation.

Although the environmental reservoirs for C. auris are not yet well known, the release of antifungals into the environment from activities such as agricultural usage and industrial waste disposal could be facilitating novel reservoirs in the environment. Importantly, drug resistance could theoretically be transferred between compatible mating types of C. auris, or even with other species of Candida, leading to the potential for novel antifungal and pathogenicity genotypes with increased virulence. A recently recognised phenomenon for the transport of human pathogens in the environment (and the exchange of antimicrobial resistance genes) is their ability to attach and persist on plastic wastes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [108,109]. Plastic wastes are increasingly being introduced into the environment and can be dispersed over long distances. C. auris can colonise and persist on plastic surfaces in healthcare settings for more than 28 days [68]; therefore, the ability of C. auris to persist on environmental plastic pollutants (e.g., from clinical waste) and be disseminated within the environment could be a novel transport mechanism for spreading the pathogen.

The natural environment is an important component of the infection cycle for a wide variety of pathogenic diseases, and C. auris has various potential pathways of introduction into the environment. Understanding the environmental interactions of C. auris will provide the insight required to understand the role that the natural environment played in the emergence of these pathogenic fungi and provide a better understanding of the factors that can influence the persistence and dissemination of C. auris in the environment.


We would like to thank Chloe Pow for drawing Fig 2.


  1. 1. Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53:41–4. pmid:19161556
  2. 2. Kim M, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim E, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:e57–61. pmid:19193113
  3. 3. Lee WG, Shin JH, Uh Y, Kang MG, Kim SH, Park KH, et al. First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3139–42. pmid:21715586
  4. 4. Forsberg K, Woodworth K, Walters M, Berkow EL, Jackson B, Chiller T, et al. Candida auris: The recent emergence of a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. Med Mycol. 2019;57:1–12. pmid:30085270
  5. 5. Du H, Bing J, Hu T, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008921. pmid:33091071
  6. 6. Villanueva-Lozano H, Treviño-Rangel RJ, González GM, Ramírez-Elizondo MT, Lara-Medrano R, Aleman-Bocanegra MC, et al. Outbreak of Candida auris infection in a COVID-19 hospital in Mexico. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27:813–6. pmid:33429028
  7. 7. Allaw F, Kara Zahreddine N, Ibrahim A, Tannous J, Taleb H, Bizri AR, et al. First Candida auris outbreak during a COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-care center in Lebanon. Pathogens. 2021;10:157. pmid:33546137
  8. 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tracking Candida auris. Available from: (accessed December 31, 2019). 2019.
  9. 9. Casadevall A, Kontoyiannis DP, Robert V. Environmental Candida auris and the global warming emergence hypothesis. MBio. 2021;12:360. pmid:33727350
  10. 10. Nnadi NE, Carter DA. Climate change and the emergence of fungal pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009503. pmid:33914854
  11. 11. Quindós G, Marcos-Arias C, San-Millán R, Mateo E, Eraso E. The continuous changes in the aetiology and epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: from familiar Candida albicans to multiresistant Candida auris. Int Microbiol. 2018;21:107–19. pmid:30810955
  12. 12. Cortegiani A, Misseri G, Chowdhary A. What’s new on emerging resistant Candida species. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:512–5. pmid:30191295
  13. 13. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases—estimate precision. J Fungi. 2017;3:57. pmid:29371573
  14. 14. Eliaš D, Gbelská Y. Candida glabrata-basic characteristics, virulence, treatment, and resistance. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2022;71:118–34.
  15. 15. Pristov KE, Ghannoum MA. Resistance of Candida to azoles and echinocandins worldwide. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:792–8. pmid:30965100
  16. 16. Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:134–40. pmid:27988485
  17. 17. Sarma S, Upadhyay S. Current perspective on emergence, diagnosis and drug resistance in Candida auris. Infect Drug Resist. 2017;10:155. pmid:28652784
  18. 18. Hoenigl M, Seidel D, Sprute R, Cunha C, Oliverio M, Goldman GH, et al. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:1127–40. pmid:35918423
  19. 19. Vaseghi N, Sharifisooraki J, Khodadadi H, Nami S, Safari F, Ahangarkani F, et al. Global Prevalence and Subgroup Analyses of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Associated Candida auris infections (CACa): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mycoses. 2022. pmid:35555921
  20. 20. Vinayagamoorthy K, Pentapati KC, Prakash H. Prevalence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of multidrug resistance Candida auris infections in Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients: A systematic review. Mycoses. 2022;65:613–24. pmid:35441748
  21. 21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019.
  22. 22. Plachouras D, Lötsch F, Kohlenberg A, Monnet DL, Candida auris survey collaborative group. Candida auris: epidemiological situation, laboratory capacity and preparedness in the European Union and European Economic Area*, January 2018 to May 2019. Euro Surveill. 2020;25:2000240. pmid:32234118
  23. 23. World Health Organization. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. 2022.
  24. 24. Bishop L, Cummins M, Guy R, Hoffman P, Jeffery K, Jeffery-Smith A, et al. Guidance for the laboratory investigation, management and infection prevention and control for cases of Candida auris. Public Health England. Updated. 2017;11.
  25. 25. Casadevall A, Kontoyiannis DP, Robert V. On the emergence of Candida auris: climate change, azoles, swamps, and birds. MBio. 2019;10:1397. pmid:31337723
  26. 26. Nunn MA, Schäfer SM, Petrou MA, Brown JR. Environmental source of Candida dubliniensis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:747. pmid:17553256
  27. 27. Castelo-Branco D, Lockhart SR, Chen Y, Santos DA, Hagen F, Hawkins NJ, et al. Collateral consequences of agricultural fungicides on pathogenic yeasts: A One Health perspective to tackle azole resistance. Mycoses. 2022;65:303–11. pmid:34821412
  28. 28. Yang Y, Lin C, Chang T, Lauderdale T, Chen H, Lee C, et al. Comparison of human and soil Candida tropicalis isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e34609. pmid:22496832
  29. 29. Opulente DA, Opulente DA, Langdon QK, Buh KV. Pathogenic budding yeasts isolated outside of clinical settings. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019;19:foz032. pmid:31076749
  30. 30. Sautour M, Lemaître J, Ranjard L, Truntzer C, Basmaciyan L, Depret G, et al. Detection and survival of Candida albicans in soils. Environmental DNA. 2021;3:1093–101.
  31. 31. Douglass AP, Offei B, Braun-Galleani S, Coughlan AY, Martos AA, Ortiz-Merino RA, et al. Population genomics shows no distinction between pathogenic Candida krusei and environmental Pichia kudriavzevii: one species, four names. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007138. pmid:30024981
  32. 32. Yamaguchi MU, Rampazzo RCP, Yamada-Ogatta SF, Nakamura CV, Ueda-Nakamura T, Dias Filho BP, et al. Yeasts and filamentous fungi in bottled mineral water and tap water from municipal supplies. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2007;50:1–9.
  33. 33. Stone W, Jones B, Wilsenach J, Botha A. External ecological niche for Candida albicans within reducing, oxygen-limited zones of wetlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:2443–5. pmid:22247177
  34. 34. Medeiros AO, Missagia BS, Brandão LR, Callisto M, Barbosa FA, Rosa CA. Water quality and diversity of yeasts from tropical lakes and rivers from the Rio Doce basin in Southeastern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:1582–94. pmid:24031990
  35. 35. Gugnani HC, Hagen F, Meis JF, Chakrabarti A. Occurrence of Cryptococcus neoformans and other yeast-like fungi in environmental sources in Bonaire (Dutch Caribbean). Germs. 2020;10:195. pmid:33134197
  36. 36. Monapathi M, Bezuidenhout C, Rhode O. Physico-chemical parameters and culturable yeast diversity in surface water: a consequence of pollution. Water SA. 2020;46:593–601.
  37. 37. Fotedar R, Chatting M, Kolecka A, Zeyara A, Al Malki A, Kaul R, et al. Communities of culturable yeasts and yeast-like fungi in oligotrophic hypersaline coastal waters of the Arabian Gulf surrounding Qatar. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2022;115:609–33. pmid:35322327
  38. 38. Sláviková E, Vadkertiová R. Seasonal occurrence of yeasts and yeast-like organisms in the river Danube. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997;72:77–80. pmid:9298185
  39. 39. Brandao LR, Medeiros AO, Duarte MC, Barbosa AC, Rosa CA. Diversity and antifungal susceptibility of yeasts isolated by multiple-tube fermentation from three freshwater lakes in Brazil. J Water Health. 2010;8:279–89. pmid:20154391
  40. 40. Coelho MA, Almeida JM, Martins IM, Jorge da Silva A, Sampaio JP. The dynamics of the yeast community of the Tagus river estuary: testing the hypothesis of the multiple origins of estuarine yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010;98:331–42. pmid:20422287
  41. 41. Brilhante RSN, Rodrigues dA, Henrique P, de Alencar LP, Riello GB, Ribeiro JF, et al. Evidence of fluconazole-resistant Candida species in tortoises and sea turtles. Mycopathologia. 2015;180:421–6. pmid:26363919
  42. 42. Lo H, Tsai S, Chu W, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Chen H, et al. Fruits as the vehicle of drug resistant pathogenic yeasts. J Infect. 2017;75:254–62. pmid:28648496
  43. 43. Kaewkrajay C, Chanmethakul T, Limtong S. Assessment of diversity of culturable marine yeasts associated with corals and zoanthids in the Gulf of Thailand, South China Sea. Microorganisms. 2020;8:474. pmid:32225058
  44. 44. Kaewkrajay C, Putchakarn S, Limtong S. Cultivable yeasts associated with marine sponges in the Gulf of Thailand, South China Sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2021;114:253–74. pmid:33575960
  45. 45. Yan K, Zhang Y, Chi Z. Distribution and diversity of Candida tropicalis strains in different marine environments. J Ocean Univ China. 2010;9:139–44.
  46. 46. Pérez-Brito D, Magaña-Alvarez A, Lappe-Oliveras P, Cortes-Velazquez A, Torres-Calzada C, Herrera-Suarez T, et al. Genetic diversity of Clavispora lusitaniae isolated from Agave fourcroydes Lem, as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. J Microbiol. 2015;53:14–20. pmid:25557477
  47. 47. Brilhante RSN, Silva AL, Monteiro FOB, Guedes GM, de Melo SJA, Oliveira JS, et al. Yeasts from Scarlet ibises (Eudocimus ruber): A focus on monitoring the antifungal susceptibility of Candida famata and closely related species. Med Mycol. 2017;55:725–32. pmid:28204651
  48. 48. Dakhmouche Djekrif S, Bennamoun L, Labbani FZK, Ait Kaki A, Nouadri T, Pauss A, et al. An alkalothermophilic amylopullulanase from the yeast Clavispora lusitaniae ABS7: purification, characterization and potential application in laundry detergent. Catalysts. 2021;11:1438.
  49. 49. Madden AA, Lahue C, Gordy CL, Little JL, Nichols LM, Calvert MD, et al. Sugar-seeking insects as a source of diverse bread-making yeasts with enhanced attributes. Yeast. 2022;39:108–27. pmid:34687090
  50. 50. Pereyra MM, Díaz MA, Soliz-Santander FF, Poehlein A, Meinhardt F, Daniel R, et al. Screening Methods for Isolation of Biocontrol Epiphytic Yeasts against Penicillium digitatum in Lemons. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7:166. pmid:33669096
  51. 51. Loosová G, Jindrák L, Kopácek P. Mortality caused by experimental infection with the yeast Candida haemulonii in the adults of Ornithodoros moubata (Acarina: Argasidae). Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2001;48:149–53. pmid:11437130
  52. 52. Ferreira N, Ferreira N, Belloch C, Querol A, Manzanares P. Yeast microflora isolated from brazilian cassava roots: taxonomical classification based on molecular identification. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60:287–93. pmid:19924478
  53. 53. Pagani DM, Heidrich D, Paulino GV, de Oliveira AK, Dalbem PT, de Oliveira CF, et al. Susceptibility to antifungal agents and enzymatic activity of Candida haemulonii and Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis isolated from soft corals on the Brazilian reefs. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198:963–71. pmid:27282152
  54. 54. Antony SP, Singh IB, Sudheer NS, Vrinda S, Priyaja P, Philip R. Molecular characterization of a crustin-like antimicrobial peptide in the giant tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, and its expression profile in response to various immunostimulants and challenge with WSSV. Immunobiology. 2011;216:184–94. pmid:20580462
  55. 55. Chow NA, de Groot T, Badali H, Abastabar M, Chiller TM, Meis JF. Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1780. pmid:31310230
  56. 56. Frey-Klett P, Burlinson P, Deveau A, Barret M, Tarkka M, Sarniguet A. Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:583–609. pmid:22126995
  57. 57. Moran GP, Coleman DC, Sullivan DJ. Comparative genomics and the evolution of pathogenicity in human pathogenic fungi. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10:34–42. pmid:21076011
  58. 58. Mulet Bayona JV, Tormo Palop N, Salvador García C, Herrero Rodríguez P, López A, de Medrano V, et al. Characteristics and management of candidaemia episodes in an established Candida auris outbreak. Antibiotics. 2020;9:558. pmid:32872580
  59. 59. Proctor DM, Dangana T, Sexton DJ, Fukuda C, Yelin RD, Stanley M, et al. Integrated genomic, epidemiologic investigation of Candida auris skin colonization in a skilled nursing facility. Nat Med. 2021;27:1401–9. pmid:34155414
  60. 60. Ekowati Y, Ferrero G, Kennedy MD, de Roda Husman AM, Schets FM. Potential transmission pathways of clinically relevant fungi in indoor swimming pool facilities. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221:1107–15. pmid:30145117
  61. 61. Zuo T, Zhan H, Zhang F, Liu Q, Tso EY, Lui GC, et al. Alterations in fecal fungal microbiome of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization until discharge. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1302–1310):e5. pmid:32598884
  62. 62. Piatti G, Sartini M, Cusato C, Schito AM. Colonization by Candida auris in critically ill patients: role of cutaneous and rectal localization during an outbreak. J Hosp Infect. 2022;120:85–9. pmid:34785292
  63. 63. Mataraci-Kara E, Ataman M, Yilmaz G, Ozbek-Celik B. Evaluation of antifungal and disinfectant-resistant Candida species isolated from hospital wastewater. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202:2543–50. pmid:32656678
  64. 64. Assress HA, Selvarajan R, Nyoni H, Ntushelo K, Mamba BB, Msagati TA. Diversity, co-occurrence and implications of fungal communities in wastewater treatment plants. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–15.
  65. 65. Hossain MS, Santhanam A, Norulaini NN, Omar AM. Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment–A review. Waste Manag. 2011;31:754–66. pmid:21186116
  66. 66. Vieira CD, Tagliaferri TL, de Carvalho M, Roque A, de Resende-Stoianoff MA, Holanda RA, et al. Investigating cross-contamination by yeast strains from dental solid waste to waste-handling workers by DNA sequencing. MicrobiologyOpen. 2018;7:e00554. pmid:29277980
  67. 67. Piedrahita CT, Cadnum JL, Jencson AL, Shaikh AA, Ghannoum MA, Donskey CJ. Environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities are a potential source for transmission of Candida auris and other Candida species. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:1107–9. pmid:28693657
  68. 68. Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, et al. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic health care surface. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2996–3005. pmid:28747370
  69. 69. Horton MV, Johnson CJ, Kernien JF, Patel TD, Lam BC, Cheong JA, et al. Candida auris forms high-burden biofilms in skin niche conditions and on porcine skin. MSphere. 2020;5:910. pmid:31969479
  70. 70. Chakrabarti A, Sood P. On the emergence, spread and resistance of Candida auris: host, pathogen and environmental tipping points. J Med Microbiol. 2021;70. pmid:33599604
  71. 71. Lord AT, Mohandas K, Somanath S, Ambu S. Multidrug resistant yeasts in synanthropic wild birds. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2010;9:1–5.
  72. 72. Foti M, Rinaldo D, Guercio A, Giacopello C, Aleo A, De Leo F, et al. Pathogenic microorganisms carried by migratory birds passing through the territory of the island of Ustica, Sicily (Italy). Avian Pathol. 2011;40:405–9. pmid:21812720
  73. 73. Pinto LM, de Assis Bezerra Neto F, Araújo Paulo de Medeiros M, Alves DLZ, Chaves GM. Candida species isolated from pigeon (Columbia livia) droppings may express virulence factors and resistance to azoles. Vet Microbiol. 2019;235:43–52. pmid:31282378
  74. 74. Botelho NS, de Paula SB, Panagio LA, Pinge-Filho P, Yamauchi LM, Yamada-Ogatta SF. Candida Species Isolated from Urban Bats of Londrina-Paraná, Brazil and their Potential Virulence. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59:16–22.
  75. 75. Castelo-Branco DSC, Paiva MAN, Teixeira CEC, Caetano ÉP, Guedes GMM, Cordeiro RdA, et al. Azole resistance in Candida from animals calls for the One Health approach to tackle the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Med Mycol. 2020;58:896–905. pmid:31950176
  76. 76. Spivak ES, Hanson KE. Candida auris: an emerging fungal pathogen. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:1588. pmid:29167291
  77. 77. Allert S, Schulz D, Kämmer P, Großmann P, Wolf T, Schäuble S, et al. From environmental adaptation to host survival: Attributes that mediate pathogenicity of Candida auris. Virulence. 2022;13:191–214. pmid:35142597
  78. 78. Jackson BR, Chow N, Forsberg K, Litvintseva AP, Lockhart SR, Welsh R, et al. On the origins of a species: what might explain the rise of Candida auris? J Fungi. 2019;5:58. pmid:31284576
  79. 79. Yadav A, Jain K, Wang Y, Pawar K, Kaur H, Sharma KK, et al. Candida auris on apples: diversity and clinical significance. MBio. 2022;13:518. pmid:35357170
  80. 80. Arora P, Singh P, Wang Y, Yadav A, Pawar K, Singh A, et al. Environmental isolation of Candida auris from the coastal wetlands of Andaman Islands, India. MBio. 2021;12:3181. pmid:33727354
  81. 81. Escandón P. Novel Environmental Niches for Candida auris: Isolation from a Coastal Habitat in Colombia. J Fungi. 2022;8:748. pmid:35887503
  82. 82. Ben-Ami R, Berman J, Novikov A, Bash E, Shachor-Meyouhas Y, Zakin S, et al. Multidrug-resistant candida haemulonii and C. Auris, Tel Aviv, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:195. pmid:28098529
  83. 83. Garcia-Bustos V, Cabanero-Navalon MD, Ruiz-Saurí A, Ruiz-Gaitán AC, Salavert M, Tormo MÁ, et al. What Do We Know about Candida auris? State of the Art, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2177. pmid:34683498
  84. 84. Al-Yasiri MH, Normand A, L’ollivier C, Lachaud L, Bourgeois N, Rebaudet S, et al. Opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida glabrata circulates between humans and yellow-legged gulls. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–8.
  85. 85. Domán M, Makrai L, Lengyel G, Kovács R, Majoros L, Bányai K. Molecular Diversity and Genetic Relatedness of Candida albicans Isolates from Birds in Hungary. Mycopathologia. 2021;186:237–44. pmid:33512664
  86. 86. Talazadeh F, Ghorbanpoor M, Shahriyari A. Candidiasis in Birds (Galliformes, Anseriformes, Psittaciformes, Passeriformes, and Columbiformes): A Focus on Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida albicans and Non-albicans Isolates in Avian Clinical Specimens. Top Companion Anim Med. 2022;46:100598. pmid:34700027
  87. 87. Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Xu J, Meis JF. Emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains due to agricultural azole use creates an increasing threat to human health. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003633. pmid:24204249
  88. 88. Zhang J, Lopez Jimenez L, Snelders E, Debets AJ, Rietveld AG, Zwaan BJ, et al. Dynamics of Aspergillus fumigatus in azole fungicide-containing plant waste in the Netherlands (2016–2017). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:2295. pmid:33127811
  89. 89. Berger S, El Chazli Y, Babu AF, Coste AT. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a consequence of antifungal use in agriculture? Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1024. pmid:28638374
  90. 90. Spruijtenburg B, Badali H, Abastabar M, Mirhendi H, Khodavaisy S, Sharifisooraki J, et al. Confirmation of fifth Candida auris clade by whole genome sequencing. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11:2405–11. pmid:36154919
  91. 91. Chow NA, Muñoz JF, Gade L, Berkow EL, Li X, Welsh RM, et al. Tracing the evolutionary history and global expansion of Candida auris using population genomic analyses. MBio. 2020;11:3364. pmid:32345637
  92. 92. Irinyi L, Roper M, Malik R, Meyer W. Finding a needle in a haystack–in silico search for environmental traces of Candida auris. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2022:2022.068.
  93. 93. Heaney H, Laing J, Paterson L, Walker AW, Gow NA, Johnson EM, et al. The environmental stress sensitivities of pathogenic Candida species, including Candida auris, and implications for their spread in the hospital setting. Med Mycol. 2020;58:744–55. pmid:31912151
  94. 94. Valdes-Collazo L, Schultz AJ, Hazen TC. Survival of Candida albicans in tropical marine and fresh waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:1762–1767. pmid:3310885
  95. 95. Medeiros AO, Kohler LM, Hamdan JS, Missagia BS, Barbosa FA, Rosa CA. Diversity and antifungal susceptibility of yeasts from tropical freshwater environments in Southeastern Brazil. Water Res. 2008;42:3921–3929. pmid:18678387
  96. 96. Chaieb K, Kouidhi B, Zmantar T, Mahdouani K, Bakhrouf A. Starvation survival of Candida albicans in various water microcosms. J Basic Microbiol. 2011;51:357–363. pmid:21656797
  97. 97. Richards D, Davies JK, Figdor D. Starvation survival and recovery in serum of Candida albicans compared with Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:125–130. pmid:20610302
  98. 98. Shang Y, Wu X, Wang X, Wei Q, Ma S, Sun G, et al. Factors affecting seasonal variation of microbial community structure in Hulun Lake, China. Sci Total Environ. 2022;805:150294. pmid:34536882
  99. 99. Day AM, McNiff MM, da Silva Dantas A, Gow NA, Quinn J. Hog1 regulates stress tolerance and virulence in the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. MSphere. 2018;3:506. pmid:30355673
  100. 100. Chen Y, Yanagida F, Chen L. Isolation of marine yeasts from coastal waters of northeastern Taiwan. Aquat Biol. 2009;8:55–60.
  101. 101. Oliveira MM, Proenca AM, Moreira-Silva E, Dos Santos FM, Marconatto L, de Castro AM, et al. Biochemical features and early adhesion of marine Candida parapsilosis strains on high-density polyethylene. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132:1954–1966. pmid:34787949
  102. 102. Prado T, Fumian TM, Mannarino CF, Resende PC, Motta FC, Eppinghaus ALF, et al. Wastewater-based epidemiology as a useful tool to track SARS-CoV-2 and support public health policies at municipal level in Brazil. Water Res. 2021;191:116810. pmid:33434709
  103. 103. Biedunkiewicz A, Ozimek T. Qualitative and Quantitative Changes of Potentially Pathogenic Fungi in a Hydrophyte Wastewater Treatment Plant. Pol J Environ Stud. 2009;18.
  104. 104. Lockhart SR, Lyman MM, Sexton DJ. Tools for Detecting a “Superbug”: Updates on Candida auris Testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2022:808. pmid:34985980
  105. 105. Kean R, Ramage G. Combined antifungal resistance and biofilm tolerance: the global threat of Candida auris. Msphere. 2019;4:458. pmid:31366705
  106. 106. Gülmez D, Brown JL, Butcher MC, Delaney C, Kean R, Ramage G, et al. Investigating Dual-Species Candida auris and Staphylococcal Biofilm Antiseptic Challenge. Antibiotics. 2022;11:931. pmid:35884184
  107. 107. Hubert F, Rodier M, Minoza A, Portet-Sulla V, Cateau E, Brunet K. Free-living amoebae promote Candida auris survival and proliferation in water. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021;72:82–89. pmid:32978979
  108. 108. Metcalf R, Oliver DM, Moresco V, Quilliam RS. Quantifying the importance of plastic pollution for the dissemination of human pathogens: The challenges of choosing an appropriate ‘control’ material. Sci Total Environ. 2022;810:152292. pmid:34896491
  109. 109. Gkoutselis G, Rohrbach S, Harjes J, Obst M, Brachmann A, Horn MA, et al. Microplastics accumulate fungal pathogens in terrestrial ecosystems. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–13.