Advertisement

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Review

Review Review articles synthesize the best available evidence on a topic relevant to the pathogens community.

See all article types »

New insights into the interactions between Blastocystis, the gut microbiota, and host immunity

Abstract

The human gut microbiota is a diverse and complex ecosystem that is involved in beneficial physiological functions as well as disease pathogenesis. Blastocystis is a common protistan parasite and is increasingly recognized as an important component of the gut microbiota. The correlations between Blastocystis and other communities of intestinal microbiota have been investigated, and, to a lesser extent, the role of this parasite in maintaining the host immunological homeostasis. Despite recent studies suggesting that Blastocystis decreases the abundance of beneficial bacteria, most reports indicate that Blastocystis is a common component of the healthy gut microbiome. This review covers recent finding on the potential interactions between Blastocystis and the gut microbiota communities and its roles in regulating host immune responses.

Citation: Deng L, Wojciech L, Gascoigne NRJ, Peng G, Tan KSW (2021) New insights into the interactions between Blastocystis, the gut microbiota, and host immunity. PLoS Pathog 17(2): e1009253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009253

Editor: James B. Lok, University of Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES

Published: February 25, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Deng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by a generous MOE grant to KSWT (R-571-000-037-114) and a faculty seed grant to NRG and LW (R-571-000-061-114). LD was a recipient of the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) scholarship with research supported by the Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation (CPF2017–12). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Blastocystis belongs to the stramenopile group and is a common single-celled intestinal parasite of humans and a wide range of animals. It is estimated that this parasite has colonized 1 to 2 billion people worldwide, based on epidemiological surveys [1]. Based on analyses of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of Blastocystis, 22 subtypes, which are possibly separate species, have been identified in humans and in a variety of animals [2]. Among them, ST1-9 and 12 have been reported in humans, but ST1-4 are the most common, accounting for more than 90% of human Blastocystis strains [3]. Interestingly, the prevalence of subtypes among regions seems to vary greatly (for a review, see [4]), and different subtypes exhibit remarkable differences in biology, such as drug resistance, immune response, pathogenicity, and effects on microbiota [5–7].

The development and application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled a better understanding of the role of Blastocystis in the context of the gut microbiome. Recent microbiome studies indicated that this parasite can colonize the human gut for long periods of time without provoking symptoms [8] and that Blastocystis carriers have higher bacterial diversity than non-Blastocystis carriers [9–11], suggesting that it should be considered a commensal rather than a pathogen. In contrast, other studies suggested that Blastocystis is commonly associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [12,13]. However, most of these studies have not thoroughly analyzed the etiological role of Blastocystis in the development of IBS or IBD and, in fact, some IBS and IBD patients are not Blastocystis carriers, which in itself should cast doubt on the etiological role of Blastocystis in these syndromes.

Interactions between Blastocystis and gut microbiota

The human gut microbiota consists of bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses, as well as single-celled eukaryotes [14]. These microbes have a profound impact on human health, metabolism, and the development of the immune system. The majority of human gut studies have focused on the more abundant bacterial components, even though homeostasis in the intestine is maintained through communication and interaction with a variety of microorganisms, such as eukaryotes [15]. Of particular interest is the relationship between single-celled eukaryotes, such as Blastocystis, with the gut microbiota, which has been an emerging research focus in recent years (Table 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Studies on associations between Blastocystis and gut microbiota compositions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009253.t001

The beneficial associations of Blastocystis on gut microbiota

A retrospective metagenomics approach to studying Blastocystis first revealed that the presence of Blastocystis was positively associated with the Prevotella- or Ruminococcus-driven enterotype and higher bacterial richness, whereas individuals with intestinal microbiota dominated by Bacteroides were much less likely to carry Blastocystis [16]. Moreover, the same research team verified these findings by analyzing another set of fecal samples, observing that individuals who were Blastocystis-colonized alone or along with Dientamoeba fragilis had relatively low abundance of Bacteroides and Clostridial cluster XIVa and high levels of Prevotella [17]. Another large-scale comparative metagenomics study of Blastocystis was recently conducted by Beghini and colleagues, where the presence of Blastocystis was negatively associated with Bacteroides and Proteobateria, whereas strong co-occurrence with Clostridiales, Firmicutes, and archaeal organisms (especially Methanobrevibacter smithii) was observed [19]. The increase of Bacteroides seems to be associated with lower bacterial diversity [26], colorectal cancer [27,28], celiac disease [29], and low-grade inflammation [30], showing that colonization with Blastocystis may be related to a healthy gut microbiota.

Interestingly, recent findings showed that colonization of Blastocystis was strongly associated with increased bacterial richness and various shifts in composition of the gut bacterial microbiota (Table 1). Tito and colleagues showed that the presence of Blastocystis was linked to microbial richness and diversity and found that Blastocystis was less prevalent in Bacteroides enterotyped samples [11]. Similarly, Blastocystis-colonized patients exhibited a higher bacterial diversity and a higher abundance of the Clostridia class, Ruminococcaceae, and Prevotellaceae families, as well as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia genera, while Enterobacteriaceae were enriched in Blastocystis-free patients [18]. Enterobacteriaceae, a family of large gram-negative bacteria, are typically found in a higher abundance in IBD [31]. A similar observation was also recorded by Kodio and colleagues who also observed increase in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia sp. in Blastocystis-colonized children [10]. The Faecalibacterium and Roseburia genera are able to produce butyrate, which is one of the most important metabolites for maintaining colonic health and is the major energy source of colonic epithelial cells [32]. Additionally, butyrate can induce the differentiation of T regulatory (Treg) cells via up-regulation of the Foxp3 gene, to suppress inflammatory and allergic responses [33].

Another study compared the relationship between 3 common intestinal parasites (Blastocystis, Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba spp.) and gut microbiota composition in humans. Interestingly, G. duodenalis–positive samples were correlated with a low F. prausnitzii/Escherichia coli ratio, while Blastocystis and Entamoeba spp.–positive individuals related to a higher F. prausnitzii/E. coli ratio [24]. F. prausnitzii is able to reduce the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) in vitro studies using peripheral blood lymphocytes-derived dendritic cells (DCs) [34]. In addition, Blastocystis was associated with high bacterial diversity and with Clostridiales vadin BB60, while the individuals without Blastocystis had a higher abundance of Bacteroidaceae and Escherichia–Shigella [9]. A previous study reported that high abundance of Escherichia–Shigella appeared to reduce the bacterial diversity and was associated with pro-inflammatory effects [35]. However, other studies revealed no significant bacterial composition differences between Blastocystis-positive and Blastocystis-negative IBS patients [20].

Relationships between Blastocystis and eukaryotic microbiota have also been demonstrated in recent years. Nieves-Ramírez and colleagues [22] evaluated the fecal bacterial and eukaryotic microbiota from 156 asymptomatic adult subjects by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and 18S rRNA genes, respectively, and further compared the composition differences between Blastocystis-colonized and Blastocystis-free individuals. Blastocystis carriers had a higher abundance of Prevotella copri and Ruminococcus bromii, which are commonly found in the human gut microbiome and are often described as either Prevotella-rich or Ruminococcus-rich [36]. Blastocystis colonization was also associated with increases in yeast and fungal species (Debaryomyces hansenii, Mucor mucedo, Aspergillus flavus, Mucor racemosus, and Issatchenkia terricola) and a decrease of Hymenolepis nana [22]. H. nana is a one of the most common cestodes in the human gut and is often associated with pathological consequences [37].

In general, these studies revealed that the presence of Blastocystis was associated with higher gut bacterial diversity and negatively correlated with the levels of Bacteroides. As the higher bacterial diversity is commonly associated with health and lower incidence of inflammatory diseases [38] and the Bacteroides community type has been linked to obesity, inflammation of the lower gastrointestinal tract, and reduced microbiota resilience [39], it suggests that Blastocystis colonization is associated with a healthy gut microbiome.

The adverse associations of Blastocystis on gut microbiota

Apart from these studies that propose a commensal role for Blastocystis, the pathogenic potential of Blastocystis has also been reported (for a review, see [40]). Nourrisson and colleagues suggested that the level of Bifidobacterium sp. was decreased in Blastocystis-colonized male IBS type C patients (IBS patients with constipation based on the Rome III classification [41]) and that healthy Blastocystis-positive individuals had a significant decrease in F. prausnitzii [23]. Similarly, a more recent mouse model study in our laboratory revealed that Blastocystis can decrease the abundance of beneficial bacteria Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus [6]. Bifidobacterium are known as protective bacteria that have anti-inflammatory properties [42]. Although some strains from Lactobacillus have been linked to sepsis, especially in immunocompromised hosts [43], bacteria belonging to Lactobacillus genus have also been used to prevent opportunistic pathogens infection in the gastrointestinal tract [44]. Blastocystis ST4 colonization in rats can increase the relative abundance of Oscillospira and decrease the level of Clostridium, which is linked to lower amounts of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [45]. In addition, Vega and colleagues showed a significant association between the presence of Blastocystis and Clostridium difficile infection in diarrhea patients [46]. Overall, although these studies reported that the presence of Blastocystis can reduce the abundance of beneficial bacteria, leading to a dysbiotic state, the etiological role of Blastocystis in the development of gastrointestinal diseases, especially IBS, needs further investigation.

Associations between specific Blastocystis subtypes and gut microbiota

There are currently 22 subtypes of Blastocystis, which are widely distributed across human and animals, with some subtypes specific to 1 group but not the other [3] (Table 2). Notably, in linking specific subtypes of Blastocystis to intestinal microbes, only a few subtypes have been well-documented when studying the interactions with gut microbes. For instance, the presence of ST4 in Swedish travelers was associated with higher abundances of the bacterial genera Sporolactobacillus and Candidatus carsonella, while ST3 did not show such significant relationships [21]. Similarly, ST3 and ST4 showed inverse (negative and positive, respectively) correlations to Akkermansia abundance in fecal samples from Flemish gut Flora Project (FgFP) [11], a bacteria that has been linked to delayed onset of obesity and its associated metabolic disorders in murine models [47]. A more recent study showed that ST3 was accompanied by potentially beneficial species, such as Prevotella, Methanobrevibacter, and Ruminococcus [25], whereas co-incubation with lactic acid bacteria has been shown to exhibit strong inhibitory effects on Blastocystis ST3 proliferation in vitro [48]. However, Yason and colleagues showed that presence of ST7 is associated with a decrease of the beneficial bacteria Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in a mouse model [6]. Collectively, these findings suggest differential associations between subtypes and host gut microbiota. In light of the enormous inter-genetic variation between different subtypes that exhibited different or even opposite effects [49,50] and only limited studies investigating links between Blastocystis subtypes to gut microbes, future studies should focus on the potential link among Blastocystis and both microbiota community structure and host health, at subtype resolution.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. The known hosts for various subtypes of Blastocystis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009253.t002

Interactions between Blastocystis and the immune system

The mechanisms of interaction between eukaryotic parasites and the host have long been the focus of research [61]. Coevolution of gut parasites with the mammalian immune system has promoted the development of complex parasite–host interactomes. In short, these interspecies ties may reveal mutualistic, commensal, or parasitic character alongside many intermediate scenarios, with no explicit cutoff defining the outcome of the host–parasite synergy. Although Blastocystis constitute the most common human-related protist, potentially beneficial or detrimental impacts of these parasites on the host immune system are still under debate [62].

Human-associated Blastocystis represent a genetically diverse component of the gut microbiome [63]. Our previous research demonstrated intra- and inter-subtype variability in terms of ST4 and ST7 pathogenicity [50]. The genetic diversity within the Blastocystis genus is plausibly a critical factor that dictates colonization susceptibility and determines interaction outcomes with the gut immune system. New insights into the Blastocystis–host interactome came from sequencing of the Blastocystis genome. The comparison of ST1-, ST4-, and ST7-derived genomes revealed considerable variation in respect to the genomes’ assembly size, guanine-cytosine (GC) pair content, and the number of protein-coding genes [49]. Proteases constitute an important component of the Blastocystis secretome. Beside engagement in many essential biological processes, proteases are suspected to be potential virulence factors [64]. Importantly, the number and type of protease genes among the subtypes varies greatly [49]. This could provide a possible explanation for the variable clinical significance of Blastocystis.

Most immunological studies on the interactions between Blastocystis and host immune system have focused on ST4 and ST7. The zoonotic subtypes ST4 and ST7 isolates were originally isolated from a Wistar rat and a patient with gastrointestinal symptoms in Singapore, respectively [65,66]. ST4 is the most common subtype in European individuals based on metagenomic studies of the human gut [11,19], while ST7 is rarely found in populations although it was isolated from human. Therefore, we need to note that studies of ST7’s potential pathogenicity may tell us little about how the majority of Blastocystis subtypes present in human gut, for example, ST1 and ST3, and to a lesser extent ST2 and ST4, interact with the human immune system.

Some in vitro studies over the past few decades have been designed to investigate the effects of Blastocystis on host intestinal cells (Fig 1). Cathepsin B, a cysteine protease produced by ST7, has been linked to increased Caco-2 cell monolayer permeability [67]. The trans-epithelial permeability was regulated by tight junctions, which play an essential role in controlling the polarization of epithelial cells and protecting deeper tissues from external microbial pathogen infections [68]. Our previous in vitro study indicated cysteine proteases produced by ST7 induce zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and F-actin compromise, in a rho-kinase (ROCK)-dependent manner, in intestinal epithelium [69]. Similarly, ST4 also has the ability to increase the epithelial permeability in IEC-6 cell monolayers [70]. The intestinal permeability of patients with Blastocystis infection was also significantly higher than that of healthy individuals [71]. It is worth noting that the effects of Blastocystis on intestinal cells are mainly based on in vitro studies and may have little bearing on what happens in the human intestine.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Blastocystis-mediated regulation of immune responses and homeostasis as characterized by studies using in vitro systems and experimental rodent models.

This illustration simplifies the many interactions and pathways involved in Blastocystis colonization or infection in host cells. Cysteine proteases produced by Blastocystis are able to degrade IgA and AMP (LL-37). Blastocystis can also influence the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by regulating the NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Blastocystis evades host NO antiparasitic response by inhibiting iNOS to convert arginine to NO. Blastocystis can induce Th1 and Th17 cells responses and their signature cytokines release. AMP, antimicrobial peptide; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFNγ, interferon gamma; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; L-Arg, L-Arginine; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NO, nitric oxide; Th, T helper; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; ZO1, zonula occludens-1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009253.g001

Interactions between Blastocystis and the innate immune system

The innate immune system constitutes the first line of host defense and plays a crucial role in preventing microbial pathogen infection, while tolerating the normal host flora [72]. Long and colleagues reported that incubation with ST1 modulated the immune response by stimulating the release of the cytokine IL-8 in vitro [73]. IL-8 is a chemokine regulating neutrophil movement as well as, to a lesser extent, other granulocytes [74]. More detailed, mechanistic studies revealed that cysteine proteases produced by ST4-WR1 activate IL-8 gene expression in human colonic epithelial T84 cells in a nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-dependent process [75]. Another feature of Blastocystis ST7-B and ST4-WR1-derived cysteine proteases is an ability to degrade immunoglobulin A (IgA), a major immunoglobulin class involved in mucosal defense [76]. Thus, the secretion of cysteine proteases might constitute a parasite’s adaptation mechanism, facilitating colonization by protecting protists in the intestinal milieu against the host’s immune system.

One of the most ancient elements of innate immunity is represented by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). LL-37 is a 37-amino acid fragment of the human AMP cathelicidin, which exhibits antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activity [77]. In a recent study, employing mouse intestinal explants and the human intestinal epithelial cell line HT-29, it was shown that Blastocystis (ST1, ST4, and ST7) are able to induce intestinal epithelial cells to secrete LL-37 [78]. ST1 and ST4 are susceptible to the effects of LL-37, while ST7 was resistant to the cytotoxic effects of LL-37 through secretion of proteases to degrade LL-37 and an acidified environment to attenuate LL-37 activity [78].

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a major family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that play an essential role for protective immunity against infection. TLRs activate downstream signaling cascades which mediate the activation of transcription factors such as NF-κB [79]. In a recent in vitro study, Blastocystis exhibited pleiotropic effects in the modulation of TLR activation by specific ligands (zymosan, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and flagellin) [80]. Specifically, Blastocystis ST7-B and ST4-WR1 significantly inhibited zymosan-mediated NF-κB activation in human TLR reporter monocytic cell line (THP1-Blue), and neither subtype had any significant effect on flagellin-mediated activation [80]. Interestingly, Blastocystis ST4-WR1 was able to inhibit LPS-mediated NF-κB activation in THP1-Blue cells, while ST7-B was found to augment the effect of LPS-mediated NF-κB activation [80]. However, it should be noted that these results only observed in vitro systems, and future studies should focus on human hosts or other naturally colonized hosts to better understand the role of Blastocystis in host innate immunity.

Blastocystis ST7, but not ST4, induces strong expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, and TNFα in murine macrophages mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [7]. The MAPK cascade is one of the most important and evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways and plays an essential role in innate immunity [81]. The MAPKs of mammals can be divided into 3 main families: the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 MAP kinases [81]. Blastocystis ST7 triggered ERK and JNK pathways to regulate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages in vitro, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα [7]. Interestingly, Blastocystis-derived serine proteases increase the pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in a MAPK-dependent manner, while cysteine proteases were able to induce these pro-inflammatory cytokines in a MAPK-independent pathway [7].

Nitric oxide (NO), an endogenously produced molecule, constitutes an important element of the innate intestinal response against luminal pathogens [82]. NO has a strong antimicrobial activity by reacting with a large spectrum of molecules such as DNA, proteins, and lipids [82]. In vitro experiments revealed that ST7-B but not ST4-WR1 is able to inhibit NO production, and this was associated with down-regulation of the transcriptional expression of host cell inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [83]. Although Blastocystis inhibits an intestinal epithelial NO response in vitro, whether the effect happens in the intact human intestine or in a human intestine damaged by other pathogens (bacterial or viral or parasitic) needs further investigation.

Interactions between Blastocystis and the adaptive immune system

In addition to the impact on innate immune function, recent research also uncovered that Blastocystis plays a role in the adaptive immune system. T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cells and their signature cytokines (e.g., interferon gamma (IFNγ), TNFα, and IL-12 for Th1 and IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 for Th2 lineage) are important for protection against parasites, intracellular and extracellular pathogens, such as viruses and bacteria [84]. At the same time, potent Th1 or Th2 response at the site of infection may overwhelm the regulatory compartment, which in consequence might lead to chronic inflammation [85]. Yoshikawa and colleagues demonstrated that upon Blastocystis ST4 colonization, rats did not show any pathological lesions; however RNA transcripts for IFNγ, IL-12, and TNFα underwent substantial increases in intestinal tissue of colonized rats [86]. Interestingly, Blastocystis ST4 chronic colonization induces noninflammatory colonic hypersensitivity in rats [45]. Importantly, the colonic levels of IL-6, lipocalin-2 proteins, and GATA-3, a Th2 lineage master regulator, were not changed significantly in Blastocystis-colonized rats [45]. Thus, all these reports indicate a rather controlled engagement of these 2 T helper lineages in an immune response in the context of Blastocystis ST4.

Another more recently identified component of the intestinal T helper compartment comprises CD4 T cells expressing RORγ-T and producing the cytokine IL-17. RORγ-T is a key transcription factor for promoting T cells differentiation into T helper 17 (Th17) cells [87]. IL-17 is known as the signature cytokine of Th17 cells, a CD4 subset contributing to the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases [88]. What is important is that the recruitment of CD4 cells toward conventional Th17 phenotype occurs in peripheral organs particularly in the large intestine [89,90]. Furthermore, the site of Th17 lineage polarization does not define a terminal niche for this subset as these cells after differentiation can migrate to the distal locations in respect to the organs of Th17 origin [91,92]. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) represents an autoimmune disorder with a Th17 lineage playing an essential role in thyroid’s pathogenesis [93,94]. El-Zawawy and colleagues investigated the relationship of Blastocystis and IL-17 in patients with HT. Blastocystis-colonized HT patients had more IL-17 compared to Blastocystis-free HT patients, whereas the amount of IL-17 was significantly decreased after Blastocystis eradication [95]. All these observations correlate with other work in which authors showed increased IL-17 and IL-23 expression in the intestinal mucosa of mice colonized with Blastocystis [96]. Although these 2 studies lack information regarding Blastocystis subtypes, the patterns of cytokine makeup in Blastocystis-colonized HT patients and in intestines of Blastocystis-colonized rodents indicate the potential links between some subtypes and generation of pro-inflammatory Th17 compartment. Hence, functional remodeling of gut microbiomes upon particular Blastocystis subtype colonization or direct interaction of these protists with a host CD4 T immune compartment might lead to the enhanced development and induction of the Th17 pro-inflammatory subset.

In summary, Blastocystis appears to interact with the host immune system at several levels (Fig 1). Although some reports demonstrate that Blastocystis colonization might result in Th1 and Th17 cell responses, the precise mechanism and role of these lineages in controlling colonization-associated pathogenicity has not been clearly explained. The microbiome plays a pivotal role in the shaping and development of the host’s innate and adaptive immune system [97]. Alterations in the composition of the commensal microbiota can influence the frequency of mucosal Treg cells [98]. Indeed, the genus Clostridium, particularly clusters IV and XIVa, can promote accumulation of Tregs, and Clostridium-colonized mice markedly enhanced the differentiation of Foxp3-expressing cells [99]. The immune changes induced by Blastocystis colonization may directly influence the host gut microbiota composition. On the other hand, the remodeling of the intestinal microbiome upon Blastocystis colonization may indirectly modulate the host immune system. Therefore, the complex interactions of the Blastocystis microbiome-immune network requires in-depth studies, which are currently lacking, for mechanistic insights into their roles in gut health and disease.

Conclusion and future perspectives

Based on the above summary of work carried out on Blastocystis, the evidence overwhelmingly points to Blastocystis as a commensal, although a rare subtype (ST7) has shown pathogenicity in in vitro systems and experimental rodent models. Several in vitro and a handful of in vivo rodent experiments reveal that that the common ST4 exhibits mild inflammation and pathology to host tissues. However, we cannot simply regard or designate Blastocystis as a commensal considering numerous genetic variations among subtypes. More microbiome and immunological research should be conducted on humans or other natural hosts at the subtype level to determine if it is a commensal or a pathogen. Furthermore, the mechanisms of the interactions between Blastocystis and gut microbiota are still relatively poorly defined. Since it has been determined that Cryptosporidium infections can affect the metabolite profiling in mouse model [100,101], it would appear appropriate to also ascertain whether Blastocystis colonization is able to affect gut microbial-derived metabolites, such as SCFAs, bile acids (BAs), tryptophan, and/or other metabolites, to maintain the host health and immune homeostasis should be the focus of future research. Importantly, Blastocystis research has mainly used in vitro systems and the experimental rodent models that harbor a divergent microbiota from humans. Therefore, exploring the roles of Blastocystis in impacting immunity requires more mechanistic studies based on human hosts or in other animals with natural colonization.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Eileen Koh for critical reading and comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis: getting to grips with our guileful guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013; 29: 523–9. Epub 2013/10/02. pmid:24080063.
  2. 2. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Pre-empting Pandora’s Box: Blastocystis Subtypes Revisited. Trends Parasitol. 2020; 36: 229–32. Epub 2020/02/01. pmid:32001133.
  3. 3. Stensvold CR, Tan KSW, Clark CG. Blastocystis. Trends Parasitol. 2020; 36: 315–6. Epub 2020/02/01. pmid:32001134.
  4. 4. Clark CG, van der Giezen M, Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR. Recent developments in Blastocystis research. Adv Parasitol. 2013; 82: 1–32. Epub 2013/04/04. pmid:23548084.
  5. 5. Ajjampur SS, Tan KS. Pathogenic mechanisms in Blastocystis spp.—Interpreting results from in vitro and in vivo studies. Parasitol Int. 2016; 65: 772–9. Epub 2016/05/18. pmid:27181702.
  6. 6. Yason JA, Liang YR, Png CW, Zhang Y, Tan KSW. Interactions between a pathogenic Blastocystis subtype and gut microbiota: in vitro and in vivo studies. Microbiome. 2019; 7: 30. Epub 2019/03/12. pmid:30853028.
  7. 7. Lim MX, Png CW, Tay CY, Teo JD, Jiao H, Lehming N, et al. Differential regulation of proinflammatory cytokine expression by mitogen-activated protein kinases in macrophages in response to intestinal parasite infection. Infect Immun. 2014; 82: 4789–801. Epub 2014/08/27. pmid:25156742.
  8. 8. Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Heilig HG, De Vos WM, O’Toole PW, et al. The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014; 90(1): 326–30. Epub 2014/08/01. pmid:25077936.
  9. 9. Lappan R, Classon C, Kumar S, Singh OP, de Almeida RV, Chakravarty J, et al. Meta-taxonomic analysis of prokaryotic and eukaryotic gut flora in stool samples from visceral leishmaniasis cases and endemic controls in Bihar State India. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(9): e0007444. Epub 2019/09/07. pmid:31490933.
  10. 10. Kodio A, Coulibaly D, Koné AK, Konaté S, Doumbo S, Guindo A, et al. Blastocystis colonization is associated with increased diversity and altered gut bacterial communities in healthy Malian children. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(12). Epub 2019/12/11. pmid:31817168.
  11. 11. Tito RY, Chaffron S, Caenepeel C, Lima-Mendez G, Wang J, Vieira-Silva S, et al. Population-level analysis of Blastocystis subtype prevalence and variation in the human gut microbiota. Gut. 2019; 68(7): 1180–9. Epub 2018/09/02. pmid:30171064.
  12. 12. Shirvani G, Fasihi-Harandi M, Raiesi O, Bazargan N, Zahedi MJ, Sharifi I, et al. Prevalence and molecular subtyping of Blastocystis from patients with irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and Chronic Urticaria in Iran. Acta Parasitol. 2020; 65(1): 90–6. Epub 2019/10/12. pmid:31602552.
  13. 13. Peña S, Carrasco G, Rojas P, Castillo D, Ozaki LS, Mercado R. Determination of subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in Chilean patients with and without inflammatory bowel syndrome, A preliminary report. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020; 8: e00125. Epub 2020/01/01. pmid:31890923.
  14. 14. Proctor LM, Creasy HH, Fettweis JM, Lloyd-Price J, Mahurkar A, Zhou W, et al. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2019; 569(7758): 641–8. Epub 2019/05/31. pmid:31142853.
  15. 15. Lukes J, Stensvold CR, Jirku-Pomajbikova K, Wegener Parfrey L. Are Human Intestinal Eukaryotes Beneficial or Commensals? PLoS Pathog. 2015; 11(8): e1005039. Epub 2015/08/14. pmid:26270819.
  16. 16. Andersen LOB, Bonde I, Nielsen HB, Stensvold CR. A retrospective metagenomics approach to studying Blastocystis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015; 91(7): 1–9. pmid:26130823
  17. 17. O’Brien Andersen L, Karim AB, Roager HM, Vigsnæs LK, Krogfelt KA, Licht TR, et al. Associations between common intestinal parasites and bacteria in humans as revealed by qPCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016; 35(9): 1427–31. Epub 2016/05/28. pmid:27230509.
  18. 18. Audebert C, Even G, Cian A, Group BI, Loywick A, Merlin S, et al. Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 25255. pmid:27147260
  19. 19. Beghini F, Pasolli E, Truong TD, Putignani L, Caccio SM, Segata N. Large-scale comparative metagenomics of Blastocystis, a common member of the human gut microbiome. ISME J. 2017; 11(12): 2848–63. Epub 2017/08/25. pmid:28837129.
  20. 20. Nagel R, Traub RJ, Allcock RJN. Comparison of faecal microbiota in Blastocystis-positive and Blastocystis-negative irritable bowel syndrome patients. Microbiome. 2016; 4(1): 47. pmid:27580855
  21. 21. Forsell J, Bengtsson-Palme J, Angelin M, Johansson A, Evengård B, Granlund M. The relation between Blastocystis and the intestinal microbiota in Swedish travellers. BMC Microbiol. 2017; 17(1): 231. Epub 2017/12/13. pmid:29228901.
  22. 22. Nieves-Ramírez ME, Partida-Rodríguez O, Laforest-Lapointe I, Reynolds LA, Brown EM, Valdez-Salazar A, et al. \. mSystems. 2018; 3(3). Epub 2018/07/03. pmid:29963639.
  23. 23. Céline N, Julien S, Bruno P, Christina NM, Ivan W, Amandine C, et al. Blastocystis is associated with decrease of fecal microbiota protective bacteria: comparative analysis between patients with irritable bowel syndrome and control subjects. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(11): e111868. pmid:25365580
  24. 24. Iebba V, Santangelo F, Totino V, Pantanella F, Monsia A, Di Cristanziano V, et al. Gut microbiota related to Giardia duodenalis, Entamoeba spp. and Blastocystis hominis infections in humans from Côte d’Ivoire. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016; 10(9): 1035–41. Epub 2016/10/04. pmid:27694739.
  25. 25. Gabrielli S, Furzi F, Fontanelli Sulekova L, Taliani G, Mattiucci S. Occurrence of Blastocystis-subtypes in patients from Italy revealed association of ST3 with a healthy gut microbiota. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020; 9: e00134. Epub 2020/04/08. pmid:32258445.
  26. 26. Costea PI, Hildebrand F, Arumugam M, Bäckhed F, Blaser MJ, Bushman FD, et al. Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition. Nat Microbiol. 2018; 3(1): 8–16. Epub 2017/12/20. pmid:29255284.
  27. 27. Ou J, Carbonero F, Zoetendal EG, DeLany JP, Wang M, Newton K, et al. Diet, microbiota, and microbial metabolites in colon cancer risk in rural Africans and African Americans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013; 98(1): 111–20. Epub 2013/05/31. pmid:23719549.
  28. 28. Sobhani I, Tap J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roperch JP, Letulle S, Langella P, et al. Microbial dysbiosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(1): e16393. Epub 2011/02/08. pmid:21297998.
  29. 29. De Palma G, Nadal I, Medina M, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10: 63. Epub 2010/02/26. pmid:20181275.
  30. 30. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013; 500(7464): 541–6. Epub 2013/08/30. pmid:23985870.
  31. 31. Zhai Z, Zhang F, Cao R, Ni X, Xin Z, Deng J, et al. Cecropin A alleviates inflammation through modulating the gut microbiota of C57BL/6 mice with DSS-induced IBD. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10: 1595. Epub 2019/07/30. pmid:31354682
  32. 32. Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR, Macia L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol. 2014; 121: 91–119. Epub 2014/01/07. pmid:24388214.
  33. 33. Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013; 504(7480):446–50. Epub 2013/11/15. pmid:24226770.
  34. 34. Alameddine J, Godefroy E, Papargyris L, Sarrabayrouse G, Tabiasco J, Bridonneau C, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii skews human DC to prime IL10-producing T cells through TLR2/6/JNK signaling and IL-10, IL-27, CD39, and IDO-1 induction. Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 143. Epub 2019/02/23. pmid:30787928.
  35. 35. Castaño-Rodríguez N, Underwood AP, Merif J, Riordan SM, Rawlinson WD, Mitchell HM, et al. Gut microbiome analysis identifies potential etiological factors in acute gastroenteritis. Infect Immun. 2018; 86(7). Epub 2018/04/25. pmid:29685983
  36. 36. Gorvitovskaia A, Holmes SP, Huse SM. Interpreting Prevotella and Bacteroides as biomarkers of diet and lifestyle. Microbiome. 2016; 4:15. Epub 2016/04/14. pmid:27068581.
  37. 37. Conn DB. Malignant transformation of Hymenolepis nana in a human host. New Engl J Med. 2016; 374(13): 1293. Epub 2016/03/31. pmid:27028926.
  38. 38. Loh G, Blaut M. Role of commensal gut bacteria in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut Microb. 2012; 3(6): 544–55. Epub 2012/10/13. pmid:23060017.
  39. 39. Vieira-Silva S, Falony G, Darzi Y, Lima-Mendez G, Garcia Yunta R, Okuda S, et al. Species-function relationships shape ecological properties of the human gut microbiome. Nature Microbiol. 2016; 1(8): 16088. Epub 2016/08/31. pmid:27573110.
  40. 40. Poirier P, Wawrzyniak I, Vivarès CP, Delbac F, El Alaoui H. New insights into Blastocystis spp.: a potential link with irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(3):e1002545. pmid:22438803
  41. 41. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130(5): 1480–91. Epub 2006/05/09. pmid:16678561.
  42. 42. Plaza-Díaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ, Vilchez-Padial LM, Gil A. Evidence of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Probiotics and Synbiotics in Intestinal Chronic Diseases. Nutrients. 2017; 9(6). Epub 2017/05/31. pmid:28555037.
  43. 43. Yelin I, Flett KB, Merakou C, Mehrotra P, Stam J, Snesrud E, et al. Genomic and epidemiological evidence of bacterial transmission from probiotic capsule to blood in ICU patients. Nat Med. 2019; 25(11): 1728–32. Epub 2019/11/09. pmid:31700189.
  44. 44. Sales-Campos H, Soares SC, Oliveira CJF. An introduction of the role of probiotics in human infections and autoimmune diseases. Critical Rev Microbiol. 2019; 45(4): 413–32. Epub 2019/06/04. pmid:31157574.
  45. 45. Defaye M, Nourrisson C, Baudu E, Lashermes A, Meynier M, Meleine M, et al. Fecal dysbiosis associated with colonic hypersensitivity and behavioral alterations in chronically Blastocystis-infected rats. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 9146. Epub 2020/06/06. pmid:32499543.
  46. 46. Vega L, Herrera G, Muñoz M, Patarroyo MA, Ramírez JD. Occurrence of Blastocystis in Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection. Pathogens. 2020; 9(4). Epub 2020/04/17. pmid:32295242.
  47. 47. Plovier H, Everard A, Druart C, Depommier C, Van Hul M, Geurts L, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat Med. 2017; 23(1): 107–13. Epub 2016/11/29. pmid:27892954.
  48. 48. Lepczyńska M, Dzika E. The influence of probiotic bacteria and human gut microorganisms causing opportunistic infections on Blastocystis ST3. Gut Pathog. 2019; 11: 6. Epub 2019/03/01. pmid:30815037.
  49. 49. Gentekaki E, Curtis BA, Stairs CW, Klimeš V, Eliáš M, Salas-Leiva DE, et al. Extreme genome diversity in the hyper-prevalent parasitic eukaryote Blastocystis. PLoS Biol. 2017; 15(9): e2003769. pmid:28892507
  50. 50. Wu Z, Mirza H, Tan KS. Intra-subtype variation in enteroadhesion accounts for differences in epithelial barrier disruption and is associated with metronidazole resistance in Blastocystis subtype-7. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8(5): e2885. Epub 2014/05/24. pmid:24851944.
  51. 51. Jiménez PA, Jaimes JE, Ramírez JD. A summary of Blastocystis subtypes in North and South America. Parasit Vectors. 2019; 12(1): 376. Epub 2019/07/31. pmid:31358042.
  52. 52. Gantois N, Lamot A, Seesao Y, Creusy C, Li LL, Monchy S, et al. First report on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in edible marine fish and marine mammals: A large scale-study conducted in Atlantic Northeast and on the coasts of Northern France. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(3). Epub 2020/03/28. pmid:32213897.
  53. 53. Deng L, Chai Y, Zhou Z, Liu H, Zhong Z, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. infection in China: a systematic review. Parasite. 2019; 26: 41. Epub 2019/07/17. pmid:31309925.
  54. 54. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view. Parasitol Int. 2016; 65(6):763–71. pmid:27247124.
  55. 55. Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from a variety of animals from New South Wales, Australia. Vet Parasitol. 2013; 196(1–2):85–9. Epub 2013/02/13. pmid:23398989.
  56. 56. Zhao GH, Hu XF, Liu TL, Hu RS, Yu ZQ, Yang WB, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in captive wild animals in Qinling Mountains. Parasitol Res. 2017; 116(8):2327–33. pmid:28540508.
  57. 57. Betts EL, Gentekaki E, Tsaousis AD. Exploring micro-eukaryotic diversity in the gut: co-occurrence of Blastocystis subtypes and other protists in zoo animals. Front Microbiol. 2020; 11: 288. Epub 2020/03/13. pmid:32161577.
  58. 58. Wawrzyniak I, Poirier P, Viscogliosi E, Dionigia M, Texier C, Delbac F, et al. Blastocystis, an unrecognized parasite: an overview of pathogenesis and diagnosis. Therap Adv Infect Dis. 2013; 1(5):167. pmid:25165551
  59. 59. Maloney JG, Lombard JE, Urie NJ, Shivley CB, Santin M. Zoonotic and genetically diverse subtypes of Blastocystis in US pre-weaned dairy heifer calves. Parasitol Res. 2019; 118(2): 575–82. Epub 2018/11/30. pmid:30483890.
  60. 60. Maloney JG, Molokin A, Santin M. Next generation amplicon sequencing improves detection of Blastocystis mixed subtype infections. Infect Gene Evol. 2019; 73: 119–25. Epub 2019/04/27. pmid:31026606.
  61. 61. Kapczuk P, Kosik-Bogacka D, Kupnicka P, Metryka E, Simińska D, Rogulska K, et al. The influence of selected gastrointestinal parasites on apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(5): 647 Epub 2020/05/01. pmid:32349424
  62. 62. Andersen LO, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis in health and disease: Are we moving from a clinical to a public health perspective? J Clin Microbiol. 2016; 54(3): 524–8. Epub 2015/12/18. pmid:26677249.
  63. 63. Stensvold CR, van der Giezen M. Associations between gut microbiota and common luminal intestinal parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2018; 34(5): 369–77. Epub 2018/03/24. pmid:29567298.
  64. 64. Tan KS, Mirza H, Teo JD, Wu B, Macary PA. Current views on the clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010; 12(1): 28–35. Epub 2011/02/11. pmid:21308496.
  65. 65. Ho LC, Singh M, Suresh G, Ng GC, Yap EH. Axenic culture of Blastocystis hominis in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium. Parasitol Res. 1993; 79(7): 614–6. Epub 1993/01/01. pmid:8278347.
  66. 66. Chen XQ, Singh M, Ho LC, Moe KT, Tan SW, Yap EH. A survey of Blastocystis sp. in rodents. Lab Anim Sci. 1997; 47(1): 91–4. Epub 1997/02/01. pmid:9051654.
  67. 67. Nourrisson C, Wawrzyniak I, Cian A, Livrelli V, Viscogliosi E, Delbac F, et al. On Blastocystis secreted cysteine proteases: a legumain-activated cathepsin B increases paracellular permeability of intestinal Caco-2 cell monolayers. Parasitol. 2016; 143(13): 1713–22. Epub 2016/09/10. pmid:27609526.
  68. 68. Zihni C, Mills C, Matter K, Balda MS. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17(9): 564–80. Epub 2016/06/30. pmid:27353478.
  69. 69. Mirza H, Wu Z, Teo JD, Tan KS. Statin pleiotropy prevents rho kinase-mediated intestinal epithelial barrier compromise induced by Blastocystis cysteine proteases. Cell Microbiol. 2012; 14(9): 1474–84. Epub 2012/05/17. pmid:22587300.
  70. 70. Puthia MK, Sio SW, Lu J, Tan KS. Blastocystis ratti induces contact-independent apoptosis, F-actin rearrangement, and barrier function disruption in IEC-6 cells. Infect Immun. 2006; 74(7): 4114–23. Epub 2006/06/23. pmid:16790785.
  71. 71. Dagci H, Ustun S, Taner MS, Ersoz G, Karacasu F, Budak S. Protozoon infections and intestinal permeability. Acta Trop. 2002; 81(1): 1–5. Epub 2002/01/05. pmid:11755426.
  72. 72. Mogensen TH. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009; 22(2):240–73. Epub 2009/04/16. pmid:19366914.
  73. 73. Long HY, Handschack A, König W, Ambrosch A. Blastocystis hominis modulates immune responses and cytokine release in colonic epithelial cells. Parasitol Res. 2001; 87(12):1029–30. Epub 2002/01/05. pmid:11763434.
  74. 74. Russo RC, Garcia CC, Teixeira MM, Amaral FA. The CXCL8/IL-8 chemokine family and its receptors in inflammatory diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014; 10(5):593–619. Epub 2014/04/01. pmid:24678812.
  75. 75. Puthia MK, Lu J, Tan KS. Blastocystis ratti contains cysteine proteases that mediate interleukin-8 response from human intestinal epithelial cells in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Eukaryot Cell. 2008; 7(3):435–43. Epub 2007/12/25. pmid:18156286.
  76. 76. Puthia MK, Vaithilingam A, Lu J, Tan KS. Degradation of human secretory immunoglobulin A by Blastocystis. Parasitol Res. 2005; 97(5):386–9. Epub 2005/09/10. pmid:16151742.
  77. 77. Kahlenberg JM, Kaplan MJ. Little peptide, big effects: the role of LL-37 in inflammation and autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 2013; 191(10):4895–901. Epub 2013/11/05. pmid:24185823.
  78. 78. Yason JA, Ajjampur SSR, Tan KSW. Blastocystis isolate B exhibits multiple modes of resistance against antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Infect Immun. 2016; 84(8):2220–32. Epub 2016/05/25. pmid:27217421.
  79. 79. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010; 11(5):373–84. Epub 2010/04/21. pmid:20404851.
  80. 80. Teo JD, Macary PA, Tan KS. Pleiotropic effects of Blastocystis spp. Subtypes 4 and 7 on ligand-specific toll-like receptor signaling and NF-κB activation in a human monocyte cell line. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(2): e89036. Epub 2014/02/20. pmid:24551212.
  81. 81. Morrison DK. MAP kinase pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012; 4(11): a011254. pmid:23125017.
  82. 82. Schairer DO, Chouake JS, Nosanchuk JD, Friedman AJ. The potential of nitric oxide releasing therapies as antimicrobial agents. Virulence. 2012; 3(3): 271–9. Epub 2012/05/02. pmid:22546899.
  83. 83. Mirza H, Wu Z, Kidwai F, Tan KS. A metronidazole-resistant isolate of Blastocystis spp. is susceptible to nitric oxide and downregulates intestinal epithelial inducible nitric oxide synthase by a novel parasite survival mechanism. Infect Immun. 2011; 79(12): 5019–26. Epub 2011/09/21. pmid:21930763.
  84. 84. Filyk HA, Osborne LC. The Multibiome: The intestinal ecosystem’s influence on immune homeostasis, health, and disease. EBioMedicine. 2016; 13:46–54. Epub 2016/11/20. pmid:27863931.
  85. 85. Imam T, Park S, Kaplan MH, Olson MR. Effector T helper cell subsets in inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 1212. Epub 2018/06/19. pmid:29910812.
  86. 86. Iguchi A, Yoshikawa H, Yamada M, Kimata I, Arizono N. Expression of interferon gamma and proinflammatory cytokines in the cecal mucosa of rats experimentally infected with Blastocystis sp. strain RN94-9. Parasitol Res. 2009; 105(1): 135–40. Epub 2009/03/04. pmid:19255785.
  87. 87. Eberl G. RORγt, A multitask nuclear receptor at mucosal surfaces. Mucosal Immunol. 2017; 10(1): 27–34. Epub 2016/10/06. pmid:27706126.
  88. 88. Lee JY, Hall JA, Kroehling L, Wu L, Najar T, Nguyen HH, et al. Serum amyloid a proteins induce pathogenic Th17 cells and promote inflammatory disease. Cell. 2020; 180(1): 79–91.e16. Epub 2019/12/24. pmid:31866067.
  89. 89. Ivanov II, Frutos Rde L, Manel N, Yoshinaga K, Rifkin DB, Sartor RB, et al. Specific microbiota direct the differentiation of IL-17-producing T-helper cells in the mucosa of the small intestine. Cell Host Microb. 2008; 4(4): 337–49. Epub 2008/10/16. pmid:18854238.
  90. 90. Kim JS, Jordan MS. Diversity of IL-17-producing T lymphocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 70(13): 2271–90. Epub 2012/10/12. pmid:23052209.
  91. 91. Lee YK, Menezes JS, Umesaki Y, Mazmanian SK. Proinflammatory T-cell responses to gut microbiota promote experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 4615–22. Epub 2010/07/28. pmid:20660719.
  92. 92. Wu HJ, Ivanov II, Darce J, Hattori K, Shima T, Umesaki Y, et al. Gut-residing segmented filamentous bacteria drive autoimmune arthritis via T helper 17 cells. Immunity. 2010; 32(6): 815–27. Epub 2010/07/14. pmid:20620945
  93. 93. Zake T, Skuja S, Kalere I, Konrade I, Groma V. Upregulated tissue expression of T helper (Th) 17 pathogenic interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-1β in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis but not in Graves’ disease. Endocr J. 2019; 66(5): 423–30. Epub 2019/03/01. pmid:30814438.
  94. 94. Figueroa-Vega N, Alfonso-Pérez M, Benedicto I, Sánchez-Madrid F, González-Amaro R, Marazuela M. Increased circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and Th17 lymphocytes in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2010; 95(2): 953–62. Epub 2009/12/18. pmid:20016049.
  95. 95. El-Zawawy HT, Farag HF, Tolba MM, Abdalsamea HA. Improving Hashimoto’s thyroiditis by eradicating Blastocystis hominis: Relation to IL-17. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 11: 2042018820907013. Epub 2020/03/05. pmid:32128107.
  96. 96. Wu LY, Fu RJ, Lu ZC, Tang LL, Zhang F, Liu DY. Expressions and significance of IL-17 and IL-23 in intestinal mucosa of mice infected with Blastocystis hominis. Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2012; 24(6): 676–80. Epub 2013/04/19. pmid:23593840.
  97. 97. Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020. Epub 2020/05/21. pmid:32433595.
  98. 98. Yamada A, Arakaki R, Saito M, Tsunematsu T, Kudo Y, Ishimaru N. Role of regulatory T cell in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(7): 2195–205. Epub 2016/02/24. pmid:26900284.
  99. 99. Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, Imaoka A, Kuwahara T, Momose Y, et al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science. 2011; 331(6015): 337–41. Epub 2011/01/06. pmid:21205640.
  100. 100. Ng Hublin JS, Ryan U, Trengove R, Maker G. Metabolomic profiling of faecal extracts from Cryptosporidium parvum infection in experimental mouse models. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(10): e77803. Epub 2013/11/10. pmid:24204976.
  101. 101. Miller CN, Panagos CG, Mosedale WRT, Kváč M, Howard MJ, Tsaousis AD. NMR metabolomics reveals effects of Cryptosporidium infections on host cell metabolome. Gut Pathog. 2019; 11: 13. Epub 2019/04/16. pmid:30984292.