Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence


First described in 2009 in Japan, the emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen Candida auris is becoming a worldwide public health threat that has been attracting considerable attention due to its rapid and widespread emergence over the past decade. The reasons behind the recent emergence of this fungus remain a mystery to date. Genetic analyses indicate that this fungal pathogen emerged simultaneously in several different continents, where 5 genetically distinct clades of C. auris were isolated from distinct geographical locations. Although C. auris belongs to the CTG clade (its constituent species translate the CTG codon as serine instead of leucine, as in the standard code), C. auris is a haploid fungal species that is more closely related to the haploid and often multidrug-resistant species Candida haemulonii and Candida lusitaniae and is distantly related to the diploid and clinically common fungal pathogens Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. Infections and outbreaks caused by C. auris in hospitals settings have been rising over the past several years. Difficulty in its identification, multidrug resistance properties, evolution of virulence factors, associated high mortality rates in patients, and long-term survival on surfaces in the environment make C. auris particularly problematic in clinical settings. Here, we review progress made over the past decade on the biological and clinical aspects of C. auris. Future efforts should be directed toward understanding the mechanistic details of its biology, epidemiology, antifungal resistance, and pathogenesis with a goal of developing novel tools and methods for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of C. auris infections.


Fungal infections are increasingly recognized as a worldwide threat to human health. About 1.7 billion people worldwide suffer from a fungal infection, most of which are superficial infections of the skin and mucosa (reviewed by [1]). Candida species are the predominant cause of nosocomial fungal infections and are the fourth leading cause of all hospital-acquired infections [2]. Annually, there are approximately 400,000 bloodstream infections caused by Candida species globally, with mortality rates exceeding 40% [1]. The most frequently encountered Candida species is Candida albicans; however, the incidence of non-albicans species, such as Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata, has increased over recent decades due to the long-term use and limited options of antifungal drugs [3,4].

Candida auris is a newly emerged member of the Candida/Clavispora clade, first isolated in Japan in 2009 from the ear discharge of a female patient [5]. In the past decade, infections caused by C. auris have become a global threat due to its rapid emergence worldwide and multidrug resistance properties. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a clinical alert to healthcare facilities warning of the international emergence of C. auris infections with high mortality rates, and in 2017 provided an update on C. auris spread throughout the United States of America with disinfection information and treatment recommendations. From its discovery in 2009 until June 2020, C. auris has attracted considerable attention from both clinical and basic science research fields. Indeed, within that time frame, nearly 500 scientific articles have been published related to C. auris based on PubMed and Web of Science databases (Fig 1). As of this year, based on published literature and data from the CDC (, C. auris has been isolated in over 40 countries across 6 continents (Fig 2). It has also led to several recent outbreaks in hospitals across the globe [69]. Of further concern is the fact that most clinical isolates are resistant to 1 or more classes of the antifungal drugs typically used to treat Candida infections [10,11]. Taken together, its multidrug resistance, rapid global emergence, and high mortality rates make C. auris a particularly problematic pathogen that has garnered considerable attention from the public, medical community, and basic research scientists. Here, we review the identification, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, risk factors, biology, antifungal resistance mechanisms, virulence, genomics and genetics, and origins of C. auris.

Fig 1. A review of published literature on C. auris between January 2009 and June 2020.

(A) Literature published on topics pertaining to C. auris since its first identification. (B) Number of published articles in each year. Data for the months January to June were collected for the year 2020. A search of published papers between January 2009 and June 2020 was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. The terms “Candida auris” or “C. auris” were used as keywords for database searches. Non-related studies and studies not published in English were excluded from this analysis.

Fig 2. Countries with reported cases of C. auris infection or colonization from January 2009 to June 2020.

(A) Number of countries belonging to each continent that have reported infection or colonization with C. auris. (B) Countries with reported cases from January 2009 to June 2020. The first reported case from each country is denoted in red text. ARE, United Arab Emirates; AUS, Australia; AUT, Austria; BEL, Belgium; BGD, Bangladesh; CAN, Canada; CHE, Switzerland; CHL, Chile; CHN, China; COL, Colombia; CRI, Costa Rica; DEU, Germany; EGY, Egypt; ESP, Spain; FRA, France; GBR, United Kingdom; GRC, Greece; IND, India; IRN, Iran; ISR, Israel; ITA, Italy; JPN, Japan; KEN, Kenya; KOR, Korea (South); KWT, Kuwait; MYS, Malaysia; NLD, the Netherlands; NOR, Norway; OMN, Oman; PAK, Pakistan; PAN, Panama; POL, Poland; RUS, Russia; SAU, Saudi Arabia; SDN, Sudan; SGP, Singapore; THA, Thailand; USA, United States of America; VEN, Venezuela; ZAF, South Africa.


C. auris was first isolated from the ear canal of a Japanese patient and thus named “auris” [5]. A retrospective study revealed that the earliest isolate of C. auris dates back to 1996, where it was initially misidentified in South Korea as Candida haemulonii [12]. Cases of C. auris infections, however, were rare before 2009, suggesting that this fungus is a newly evolved pathogen.

Analysis of rDNA sequences of the 28S D1/D2 and 18S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and 50 protein sequences indicates that C. auris belongs to the Metschnikowiaceae family within the Candida/Clavispora clade (Fig 3) [5,13,14]. C. auris, like other species of the Candida/Clavispora clade, such as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. haemulonii, and Candida lusitaniae, is a member of the CTG clade. Species within this clade translate the CTG codon as serine rather than leucine [15].

Fig 3. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny of the CTG and WGD clade species.

The phylogenic tree was generated using the program RAxML v7.3.2 using 50 protein sequences aligned with Mafft-homologs. The GTR model, gamma distribution, and 1,000 bootstraps were used to construct the phylogenetic relationships. Pathogenic characteristics (P), ploidy (H or D), and multidrug resistance (M) for each species are also shown. CTG, the CTG clade; Deb, Debaryomycetaceae; GTR, generalized time reversible; Met, Metschnikowiaceae; WGD, the Whole Genomic Duplication clade.

C. auris can be easily misidentified as C. haemolonii or other yeast species using conventional phenotypic and biochemical methods [16,17]. The growth of C. auris on commercial CHROMagar medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France) at temperatures up to 42°C results in white, pink, or dark purple colonies [1820]. Unlike other Candida species, C. auris grows well at 42°C, and thus this thermal tolerance property is being used to differentiate C. auris from other Candida species [21]. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) devices can accurately differentiate C. auris from other fungal species; however, the accurate identification of C. auris is dependent on the reference databases included with the MS device [16,22,23]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and molecular techniques are also widely used for C. auris identification [6,2427]. Molecular methods based on sequencing of genetic loci, such as the D1/D2 region of the 28S rDNA or the ITS region of rDNA, can accurately detect C. auris isolates. Future efforts should combine the rapid identification of C. auris isolates with an assessment of their antifungal drug resistance properties.

Trends in epidemiology: The rapid global emergence of C. auris

After the first reports of C. auris infections in clinical settings, a retrospective study was performed in South Korea that found that the earliest isolates of C. auris date back to 1996 [17]. These isolates were previously misidentified as C. haemulonii. Analysis of an international surveillance culture collection of Candida isolates (by the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 15,271 Candida isolates, collected between 2004 and 2015) identified 4 C. auris isolates that were collected in 2009, 2013, 2014, and 2015, indicating that C. auris appears to be a recently emerged pathogen [10,28]. This idea is further supported by genomic analyses estimating that the most recent common ancestor of C. auris arose as late as 360 years ago and as early as 38 years ago for different C. auris subclades. Two studies in India have reported the identification of several new clonal strains of C. auris as well as amphotericine B- and fluconazole-resistant isolates [29,30]. Subsequently, C. auris–associated infections have been reported in South Africa, Europe, and America [3133]. In 2016, the CDC, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and Public Health England released a series of alerts to inform healthcare providers about C. auris as a new infectious agent. Lockhart and colleagues (2017) published the landmark study reporting the genomic and epidemiological analyses of different genetic populations of C. auris strains that emerged nearly simultaneously across 3 different continents [10]. C. auris isolates have since emerged worldwide in at least 40 countries to date (Fig 2).

There are 4 major discrete genetic clades of C. auris based on genetic and genomic information and locations of first isolates: the South Asia Clade (I), the East Asia Clade (II), the South Africa Clade (III), and the South America Clade (IV) (Fig 4). Within each clade, sequencing data indicate that there are very few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), typically less than 70 SNPs [10]. Recently, a potential new C. auris clade (Clade V, Fig 4) has been reported in Iran; interestingly, this clade is separated from the other clades by greater than 200,000 SNPs [34].

Fig 4. Five clades of C. auris.

The phylogenic tree was generated with the program RAxML v7.3.2 using SNPs. The GTR model, gamma distribution, and 1,000 bootstraps were used to construct the phylogenetic relationships. The MTL are also included for each clade. CHN, China; COL, Colombia; DEU, Germany; GBR, United Kingdom; GTR, generalized time reversible; IND, India; IRN, Iran; JPN, Japan; KOR, Korea (South); MTL, mating type loci; NLD, the Netherlands; PAK, Pakistan; RUS, Russia; SGP, Singapore; SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms; USA, United States of America; VEN, Venezuela describe the country where the strain was first isolated; ZAF, South Africa.

Clinical manifestations

C. auris has been isolated from multiple infection sites throughout the body and is generally hospital acquired. Clinicians have isolated it from urine, bile, blood, wounds, the nares, the axilla, the skin, and the rectum of infected individuals (reviewed by [16,35]). Unlike C. albicans, which colonizes the gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary tracts of the most healthy individuals, C. auris is hypothesized to predominantly colonize the skin; however, in rare instances, it has been isolated from the gut, oral, and esophageal mucosa of infected individuals [10]. Consistent with the rarity of isolating C. auris in the gut, clinical manifestations and in vivo experiments together suggest that C. auris is incapable of colonizing anaerobic environments like the gut [36]. In terms of the oral mucosa, a recent study found that the salivary antimicrobial peptide histatin 5 has a potent antifungal effect on C. auris [37]. This peptide may limit the colonization of the C. auris in the oral mucosa and explain with it is rarely isolated from this area. In clinical settings, C. auris is most commonly associated with bloodstream infections [22]. One study found that approximately 5% of candidemia cases in intensive care units (ICUs) in India were caused by C. auris [38]. Invasive infections caused by C. auris occur more frequent in critically ill patients in ICUs. Similar to other invasive Candida infections, invasive C. auris infections are associated with high global mortality rates ranging from 30% to 60% [10,39,40].

Risk factors

Risk factors for C. auris infections are similar to those for other Candida species. This is not surprising given that many Candida species are opportunistic pathogens and are primarily associated with critically ill and immunocompromised patients. Risk factors for C. auris infections include elderly age, diabetes mellitus, recent surgery, the presence of an indwelling medical device (e.g., central venous catheter), an immunosuppressed state, the use of hemodialysis, a neutropenic state, chronic renal disease, or the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic and/or antifungal drugs [6,7,23,38,41,42]. In a study that retrospectively analyzed available patient data, it was determined that an increase in C. auris colonization or infection was associated with diarrhea and the use of the broad-spectrum antibiotic tetracycline as well as the second-generation tetracycline derivatives minocycline and tigecycline [42]. These studies highlight a diverse set of risk factors associated with C. auris infections.


Pathogenic Candida species, such as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. auris, but not C. glabrata, belong to the CTG clade. Species within this clade translate the CTG codon into serine instead of leucine [15]. Similar to other Candida species, C. auris can form biofilms, undergo filamentation, and phenotypically change between specific cell types [12,32,4345]. These characteristics may be associated with virulence, antifungal tolerance, and survival in natural and host niches.

Adaptation to environmental stresses.

There are an estimated 1.5–5.1 million fungal species on Earth ranging from single-celled yeasts to multicellular fungi [46]. Interestingly, most fungi are unable to survive at human physiological temperatures (36.5–37.5°C and up to 40°C during a fever) and are thus unable to colonize humans and cause infections. Strikingly, it has been found that unlike its closely related Candida species, C. auris can grow at high temperatures (>40°C) [41,47,48]. Indeed, a recent study comparing the temperature tolerance of C. auris to other Candida species hypothesized that climate change, specifically global warming, may have contributed to the evolution of C. auris as a human pathogen and to its ability to grow at high temperatures [21].

Another trait of C. auris is its ability to tolerate high salt concentrations (>10% NaCl, wt/vol) compared to other Candida species [41,48]. Two studies found that C. auris forms pseudohyphae-like morphologies in response to high salt concentrations, which suggests that this morphological transition may be adaptive under stressful conditions [41,48].

Thermotolerance and osmotolerance are characteristics that may contribute to the persistence and survival of C. auris on biotic and abiotic surfaces for long periods of time [8,49,50]. Indeed, C. auris is known to survive on human skin and environmental surfaces for several weeks and can even tolerate being exposed to some commonly used disinfectants. Persistence on surfaces may contribute to the frequently observed intrahospital transmission of C. auris within healthcare settings. For example, an outbreak of C. auris at the neurosciences ICU of the Oxford University Hospitals in the United Kingdom was linked to the use of reusable axillary temperature probes [51]. Persistence in harsh environmental conditions is a hallmark feature of C. auris that distinguishes it from the majority of other human fungal pathogens.

Morphological transitions.

Morphological plasticity is a common strategy used by microorganisms to rapidly adapt to environmental changes [52,53]. Both bacterial and fungal species can undergo morphological transitions under certain environmental conditions. Pathogenic Candida species such as C. albicans and C. tropicalis can undergo a number of morphological transitions [5456]. They can switch between several different cell types spontaneously or in response to environmental cues. Two well-characterized morphological transitions in C. albicans and C. tropicalis, for example, are the yeast–hyphal transition and the white-opaque switch. In these species, morphological plasticity plays critical roles in pathogenesis and mating [5456].

Like other pathogenic Candida species, C. auris also has several morphological phenotypes [12,19,41,43], although the regulatory mechanisms and roles of each morphology in C. auris are largely unknown. Many isolates of C. auris exist in the single-cell yeast form. However, a portion of natural C. auris isolates can form large aggregates of pseudohyphal-like cells, where mother and daughter cells remain attached [32,44]. These aggregates are generally more tolerant to antifungal agents than their non-aggregating counterparts; however, aggregating cells display reduced virulence compared to non-aggregating cells in the Galleria mellonella infection model [32]. The formation of these pseudohyphal-like aggregates in C. auris could be due to a defect in cell division. Consistent with this hypothesis, a recent study demonstrated that induction of DNA damage and perturbation of replication forks by genotoxic stresses promoted pseudohyphal-like formation in C. auris [57].

Colony phenotypic switching.

It was recently demonstrated that C. auris colonies can undergo morphological transitions between pink, white, and dark purple colony phenotypes when grown on CHROMagar [19]. The switch frequencies observed for transitioning between these distinct C. auris phenotypes appear to be higher than the white-opaque switch frequencies observed for C. albicans [54,58]. In C. albicans, white-opaque switching is a heritable transition between 2 different cell types called “white” and “opaque” that have distinct virulence properties, mating competencies, and antifungal resistance properties [59]. White cells are round; are smaller than opaque cells; and form smooth, white, and shiny colonies on nutrient agar medium containing the red dye phloxine B; opaque cells, on the other hand, are elongated; are larger than white cells; and form pink, flat, and rough colonies on nutrient agar medium containing phloxine B [58]. It is unclear whether the phenotypic switch between pink, white, and dark purple colonies observed in C. auris is heritable. The initial report of this phenotypic switch in C. auris did not provide cellular images of the morphologies of the cells within the different colored colonies [19]. Based on the reported colony morphologies, we believe that it is possible that this phenotypic switch observed in C. auris is likely similar to the core phenotypic switch system observed in C. glabrata when it is grown on nutrient agar medium containing copper(II) sulfate or phloxine B [60]. In C. glabrata, 4 colony phenotypes were observed, namely the white, light brown, dark brown, and very dark brown phenotypes. The gradation of colors across colonies is believed to reflect the accumulation of copper sulfite, the by-product of copper(II) sulfate reduction. Similarly, the phenotypic switch between pink, white, and dark purple colonies observed in C. auris could also reflect distinct cellular oxidative/reductive states [19]. However, it is unknown whether this C. auris colony phenotypic switch is heritable and whether it is associated with virulence and/or antifungal resistance. Given the similarities observed between colony phenotypic switches of C. auris and C. glabrata, it seems likely that this switch in C. auris could be associated with the regulation of cellular redox states and adaptation to environmental stresses.


Filamentous (hyphal or pseudohyphal) cell growth of pathogenic Candida species is critical for fungal invasion of host tissues [55,56]. The transition between the yeast and filamentous growth forms of C. albicans has been intensively investigated. It was initially hypothesized that C. auris was unable to form true hyphae, but rather only developed pseudohyphae [32,44]. However, increasing evidence indicates that C. auris isolates can form true hyphae under specific circumstances.

Environmental factors including serum, N-acetyglucosamine (GlcNAc), and high levels of CO2 are potent inducers of filamentous growth in C. albicans [56]. It was recently determined that these factors did not induce filamentous growth in C. auris [41]. Thermotolerance and osmotolerance are distinguishing characteristics of C. auris. In 1 recent study, C. auris was grown on yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) medium supplemented with 10% NaCl. This condition induced the formation of elongated and pseudohyphal-like cells at both 37°C and 42°C [41]. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is an essential molecular chaperone that controls temperature-dependent filamentation in C. albicans [61]. Another study recently reported that treatment of C. auris cells with an Hsp90 inhibitor resulted in the formation of pseudohyphal-like cells [62]. Similar inhibition of Hsp90 in C. albicans resulted in filamentous growth, suggesting that certain regulatory mechanisms of filamentation are conserved, at least in part, between C. albicans and C. auris. These studies also indicate that certain C. auris isolates have the potential to undergo filamentation under specific environmental conditions.

It was recently found that a subset of C. auris cells gained the ability to undergo filamentation after passage through the mouse in a systemic infection model ([43] and Fig 5). Three distinct cellular phenotypes were described in this study: typical yeast cells, filamentation-competent yeast cells, and filamentous-form cells. The typical yeast cells were locked in the yeast form and were unable to filament under in vitro culture conditions or upon filament-inducing environmental stimuli (e.g., medium and temperature changes or treatment with filamentation inducers for C. albicans). After passage through the mouse, a small proportion of typical yeast cells gained the ability to form filaments and were termed as “filamentation-competent yeast cells.” After recovering these yeast cells from mouse tissues and growing them on YPD or Lee’s medium at temperatures of 25°C or lower, these C. auris cells underwent robust filamentation and were termed as “filamentous-form cells.” Surprisingly, microscopy analysis indicated that these filamentous-form C. auris cells appeared morphologically similar to true hyphae formed by C. albicans [43]. Interestingly, of the conditions tested, the low temperature condition (<25°C) was most conducive for filamentous growth, while the human physiological temperature (37°C) repressed filamentous growth in C. auris. This phenomenon is in contrast to that observed in C. albicans where cells predominantly grow in the yeast form at low temperatures and the filamentous form at human physiological temperatures [56]. These findings suggest that filamentous morphologies of C. auris could exist in the environment and on the host skin surface where the temperature is lower than inside the host.

Fig 5. Morphological transitions in C. auris.

(A) Colony and cellular morphologies of C. auris typical yeast form and filamentous-form phenotypes. Cells were grown on YPD medium. Images were adapted from [43]. (B) Known mechanisms for in vivo and in vitro phenotypic switching. Passage through the mouse mediates the switch between the typical yeast form and the filamentous competent yeast forms, whereas temperature mediates the in vitro switch between the filamentous competent yeast form and the filamentous forms. YPD, yeast extract peptone dextrose.

Switching between the typical yeast form and the filamentation-competent yeast form of C. auris was a rare event, but when it did occur, it was heritable [43]. Switching between the filamentation-competent yeast cells and filamentous-form cells, on the other hand, was nonheritable and dependent on the environment [43]. These findings indicate that once C. auris cells obtain the ability to filament, they can develop robust filamentous cells upon environmental stimuli (e.g., growth at low temperatures). This heritable switch between the typical yeast form cells and filamentation-competent yeast form cells is akin to the white-opaque phenotypic switching system in C. albicans [63]. Similar to the filamentation-competent yeast form cells of C. auris, both white and opaque cells of C. albicans can maintain their cell identities for many generations. It remains to be investigated whether the mechanisms of this cellular memory in C. auris are genetically or epigenetically regulated. Nonetheless, these 3 C. auris cell types appear to form a 3-way phenotypic switching system that consists of a heritable transition between the typical yeast cells and the filamentation-competent yeast cells and a nonheritable transition between the filamentation-competent yeast cells and the filamentous-form cells (Fig 5B).

The yeast and filamentous cells of C. auris differ in a number of biological aspects including global gene expression profiles, expression of virulence factors, and virulence in a mouse infection model [43]. Interestingly, a large set of metabolism-related genes was differentially expressed between C. auris yeast and filamentous cells. Genes involved in sugar transportation, glycolysis, and the Krebs cycle were up-regulated in filamentous cells, suggesting that general metabolic processes are more active in filamentous cells relative to yeast cells of C. auris.

Based on yeast carbon base–BSA (YCB–BSA) assays that detect secreted aspartyl protease (Sap) activity, C. auris typical yeast cells and filamentation-competent yeast cells displayed higher levels of Sap production relative to filamentous-form cells when grown at 25°C [43]. All 3 cell types exhibited similar levels of Sap secretion at 37°C, likely due to the fact that filamentous-form cells converted “en masse” to filamentation-competent yeast cells at this temperature [43]. This notable difference in Sap secretion may influence the abilities of the typical yeast and filamentous-form cells to adapt to diverse ecological niches. Given that filamentous-form cells compared to typical yeast form cells of C. auris produce lower levels of Saps, which are important virulence factors, the filamentous form may be better adapted to colonizing the skin of the host as a commensal. Consistent with this idea, it has been suggested that C. auris, unlike C. albicans, is a primary colonizer of the skin rather than the GI tract of humans [10].

Why has C. auris evolved a filamentation-competent yeast form? This is an important unanswered question that should be explored in future studies. One possible explanation is that the 3-way phenotypic switching system in C. auris consisting of the typical yeast, filamentation-competent yeast, and filamentous forms is much more complex and versatile than the 2-way switching systems observed in C. albicans, such as the yeast filament and the white-opaque transitions. Compared to C. albicans, this added phenotypic plasticity could allow C. auris to more efficiently adapt to the ever-changing environment.

Biofilm development.

Biofilms are structured microbial communities that form on abiotic and biotic surfaces and are embedded in an extracellular matrix [64]. The biofilm mode of growth is the preferred state for microorganisms in natural ecological niches. In a clinical setting, a biofilm formed on human tissue (e.g., on a mucosal layer) or on an implanted medical device (e.g., a central venous catheter) can serve as a source of infection that can spread to other parts of the body [65]. It has been found that C. auris can develop biofilms on surfaces, although its biofilms are relatively weak compared to those formed by C. albicans [12]. C. auris biofilm cells, similar to C. albicans biofilm cells, however, have been shown to exhibit high levels of resistance to antifungal agents compared to their free-floating (planktonic) cell counterparts.

Biofilm formation abilities vary across C. auris isolates and clades [44]. Although both the aggregated and non-aggregated C. auris cell types are able to develop biofilms, the latter have been shown to form more robust biofilms [44]. Interestingly, time course RNA-sequencing experiments identified genes encoding putative adhesins, efflux pumps, and virulence factors to be up-regulated during C. auris biofilm development [66]. Although the roles of C. auris biofilms are less understood than those of biofilms formed by other Candida species, C. auris biofilms certainly contribute to the virulence, antifungal resistance, and survival properties of C. auris in the environment and likely in the host. Therefore, the development of therapeutic approaches to target C. auris biofilms both in patients and in the environment is an important area for future research.

Antifungal resistance mechanisms

One important reason that C. auris is considered to be a “superbug” and is increasingly becoming a threat to human health is its intrinsic resistance to 1 or more classes of antifungal drugs available in the clinic [22,35]. Based on the conservative antifungal drug break points for C. albicans and other Candida species, most isolates of C. auris are resistant to fluconazole. A subset of C. auris isolates has high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) than that of amphotericin B and echinocandin compounds, and some C. auris strains are resistant to all available classes of antifungal drugs [10,11]. A comparative study of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods revealed that C. auris isolates have a remarkably similar fluconazole resistance but a wide range of MICs for the other antifungal drug classes [67]. It is noteworthy that the closely related species to C. auris, C. haemulonii, and C. lusitaniae are also often resistant to 1 or multiple antifungal drug classes [11,68]. This observation suggests that C. auris, C. haemulonii, and C. lusitaniae have similar genetic mechanisms for their antifungal resistance properties; C. haemulonii and C. lusitaniae, however, are infrequently isolated as infectious agents.

Ergosterol is the major sterol component of fungal membranes and is the target of the azoles (e.g., fluconazole) and the polyenes (e.g., amphotericin B) [69,70]. The first-line antifungal drug in the clinic, fluconazole, inhibits cellular ergosterol biosynthesis by targeting the fungal cytochrome P450-dependent enzyme lanosterol demethylase that is essential for the production of ergosterol. ERG11 encodes lanosterol demethylase in the Candida species. Interestingly, 3 hot spot mutations (Y132F, K143R, and F126L or VF125AL) have been found in Erg11 in fluconazole resistant C. auris strains of different genetic clades [10].

Although isolates of C. auris that are resistant to fluconazole and amphotericin B are common, echinocandin-resistant isolates (e.g., caspofungin) are relatively rare [71]. FKS1 encodes the catalytic subunit of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase that is critical for cell wall synthesis and maintenance in Candida species [72,73]. Isolates of C. auris with an S639F mutation in Fks1 were caspofungin resistant, while other isolates harboring a wild-type Fks1 were susceptible to caspofungin at human therapeutic doses [74].

Virulence and animal models

Infections by C. auris can occur at multiple body sites, including the skin, urogenital tract, and respiratory tract of humans. C. auris infections can disseminate to the bloodstream, and when this occurs, they are associated with high mortality rates [7,16,23,35,39]. Recent reports have demonstrated that C. auris, similar to C. albicans, expresses several known virulence factors, including Saps and lipases to degrade and invade host tissues [41,43]. Comparative studies in animal models indicate that C. auris is less virulent than C. albicans, both in the murine disseminated infection model and in the invertebrate G. mellonella infection model [32,41]. However, C. auris is significantly more virulent than C. glabrata and C. haemulonii in the murine infection model [75,76]. This decrease in virulence relative to C. albicans is likely due to the fact that C. auris, along with C. glabrata and C. haemulonii, is unable to develop hyphae or pseudohyphae in the mammalian host that play critical roles in tissue invasion during infections [43]. Another possible reason for the relatively low virulence of these 3 species compared to C. albicans is that they are all haploid microorganisms, while natural C. albicans isolates are diploid. Consistent with this idea, a fluconazole-induced haploid C. albicans strain was found to be much less virulent than its diploid counterpart [77]. In 1 recent study, all cell types of C. auris that were initially injected into a mouse (regardless of whether they changed into another cell type) exhibited similar levels of virulence [43]. We propose that filamentous cells of C. auris are unlikely to contribute to virulence in systemic infections but are more likely to play roles in colonizing the skin and environmental surfaces. This idea is supported by a study that found that C. auris filamentous cells produce fewer virulence factors (e.g., Saps) compared to C. auris yeast-form cells [43].

Some isolates of C. auris can form aggregates under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. Cell aggregation could benefit C. auris by allowing fungal cells to evade the host immune system, persist in host tissues, and have increased levels of antifungal tolerance [75]. Unlike C. albicans cells, neutrophils are poorly recruited to C. auris cells, are not effective at killing C. auris cells, and do not form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [78]. Evasion of the host neutrophil attack seems to be an important C. auris survival strategy within the host. The ability of C. auris cells to form aggregates seems likely to hinder the host innate immune response by creating a protective physical barrier for C. auris cells from the environment.

Given that C. auris is such an important and emerging pathogen in clinical settings, effective animal models are needed to investigate its pathogenesis and biology. Other than the murine model and the G. mellonella model, several other animal models, including Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans invertebrate models, have been used to evaluate C. auris pathogenesis and the effects of antifungal therapies on treating C. auris infections [79,80]. A study on the use of Toll-deficient flies to model C. auris and C. albicans infections found that C. auris infections had significantly higher mortality rates than those of C. albicans [79]. Using a C. elegans model, another study found that sulfamethoxazole and itraconazole synergistic treatment was effective against C. auris infections caused by specific multidrug-resistant C. auris strains [80]. Overall, invertebrate animal infection models are useful in providing a fast and inexpensive means to study pathogenesis and antifungal resistance in C. auris.

Genomics and genetics

C. auris is a haploid fungus. As of April 2020, the genomic sequences of over 700 C. auris isolates are available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database ( [81]. The genome of C. auris B8441 was sequenced by the CDC [10], and its sequence information and annotation is available on the Candida Genome Database (CGD) database ( C. auris has 7 chromosomes, and the genome sizes of isolates range from 12.1 Mb to 12.7 Mb [13]. Based on genomic and RNA-sequencing information, it is estimated that C. auris has approximately 5,500 predicted genes [13,14].

Although sexual reproduction has not been observed in C. auris to date, the mating type loci (MTLa and MTLα) and most mating and meiosis genes are found in the C. auris genome [13]. These loci are generally well conserved and share high structural and sequence similarities within the CTG clade species [13]. The MTL loci of C. auris, similar to MTL loci of other CTG clade species, contain several “non-sexual” genes such as the phosphatidylinositol kinase encoding gene PIK1, the oxysterol binding protein encoding gene OBP1, and the poly(A) polymerase encoding gene PAP1. All C. auris strains isolated to date have contained either the MTLa or the MTLα locus. Isolates of clades I and IV have an “a” mating type (MTLa), whereas isolates of clades II and III have an “α” mating type (MTLα) [13]. Given that both MTL are present in C. auris, it seems likely that C. auris should be able to mate, but that we have simply not yet identified a mating conducive niche for this fungus.

Comparative genomic analyses indicate that the C. auris genome contains conserved genes within the CTG clade that are associated with virulence and antifungal resistance [13,14]. For example, genes encoding the Saps, components of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, the MFS transporter Mdr1, and the transcriptional regulators Upc2 and Tac1 (including Tac1A and Tac1B) are all present in the C. auris genome. Intriguingly, a recent study found that mutations in TAC1B are associated with increased fluconazole resistance in C. auris [82]. In addition, there are only a small number of unique genes in C. auris that are absent in its closely related CTG clade species. These C. auris-specific genes include genes encoding oligopeptide and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, further contributing to its intrinsic antifungal-resistant nature [13].


Four major clades of C. auris (I, II, III, and IV initially isolated from South Asia, East Asia, South America, and South Africa, respectively) and a potential fifth clade isolated from Iran have been described to date [10,34]. Whole-genome sequencing analysis revealed that the first 4 genetically distinct clades of C. auris emerged independently and nearly simultaneously at different locations across 3 continents [10]. Although C. auris is closely related to other pathogenic Candida species that can be found in the environment, C. auris has not been found to exist in natural environmental settings. One study from the Netherlands reported isolating C. auris from swimming pools [83], but in these cases, the fungus likely originated from pool visitors. Two recently published perspective articles have comprehensively discussed hypothetical ecological origins of C. auris [21,47]. It has been proposed that the emergence of C. auris may have resulted from climate change, specifically global warming [21]. The authors propose that C. auris was an environmental fungus before it evolved to be a human pathogen as the climate increased in temperature. Since C. auris is highly tolerant of high ambient temperatures and hypersaline conditions, the authors suggest that wetlands could be the natural ecological niche of C. auris before it became associated with warm-blooded animals and humans. Moreover, the increased use of antifungal agents in medicine and agriculture likely further contributed to the emergence of C. auris as well as other antifungal-resistant and antifungal-tolerant fungal species [21].

Over the past several decades, more and more fungal pathogens have been emerging to threaten humans, animals, and plants. Human activities, including those that result in global warming, may be supporting environments that allow for the evolution of fungal characteristics that are conducive to host colonization and infection. It seems likely that novel fungal pathogens will similarly emerge in the future due to changes in global temperatures, atmospheric CO2 levels, humidity, and other alterations to natural environmental niches [84].

Conclusion and open questions

C. auris is a new public global health threat. Despite the close phylogenetic relationship of C. auris to other pathogenic Candida species, C. auris has many unique characteristics in its biology, genetics, epidemiology, antifungal resistance, virulence, host adaptation, and transmission.

While C. auris has garnered significant scientific attention recently, there are many unanswered questions related to its emergence and biology. What are the original environmental reservoirs for C. auris? How did isolates with different genetic backgrounds emerge nearly simultaneously worldwide? How did multidrug resistance evolve in C. auris? What enables C. auris to persist in clinical settings for long periods of time? Is C. auris capable of sexual or parasexual reproduction and, if so, did this contribute to its emergence as a pathogen? Significant research efforts are needed to begin to answer these questions. We need to explore the basic biology and genetic bases of antifungal resistance and pathogenicity in C. auris. As we gain mechanistic knowledge on C. auris, we should be able to develop rapid and accurate detection methods to distinguish C. auris from other Candida species, which will help with diagnosing C. auris infections. We will also be able to develop new disinfection protocols for the effective removal of C. auris from surfaces, which will prevent future outbreaks. Finally, we need to develop novel, safe, and effective antifungals and treatment strategies with diverse drug targets to combat infections cause by C. auris as well as other existing and soon-to-be emerging fungal pathogens.


The authors thank all members of the Huang and Nobile labs for their comments on the manuscript.


  1. 1. Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(165):165rv13. pmid:23253612.
  2. 2. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(3):309–317. Epub 2004 Aug 13. pmid:15306996.
  3. 3. Pfaller MA. Epidemiology of candidiasis. J Hosp Infect. 1995;30:329–338. pmid:7560969.
  4. 4. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(1):133–163. pmid:17223626
  5. 5. Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53(1):41–44. pmid:19161556.
  6. 6. Ruiz-Gaitan A, Martinez H, Moret AM, Calabuig E, Tasias M, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, et al. Detection and treatment of Candida auris in an outbreak situation: risk factors for developing colonization and candidemia by this new species in critically ill patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2019;17(4):295–305. pmid:30922129
  7. 7. Ruiz-Gaitan A, Moret AM, Tasias-Pitarch M, Aleixandre-Lopez AI, Martinez-Morel H, Calabuig E, et al. An outbreak due to Candida auris with prolonged colonisation and candidaemia in a tertiary care European hospital. Mycoses. 2018. pmid:29655180.
  8. 8. Biswal M, Rudramurthy SM, Jain N, Shamanth AS, Sharma D, Jain K, et al. Controlling a possible outbreak of Candida auris infection: lessons learnt from multiple interventions. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97(4):363–370. pmid:28939316.
  9. 9. Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A, Hall A, et al. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5:35. pmid:27777756.
  10. 10. Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(2):134–140. pmid:27988485.
  11. 11. Chowdhary A, Anil Kumar V, Sharma C, Prakash A, Agarwal K, Babu R, et al. Multidrug-resistant endemic clonal strain of Candida auris in India. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(6):919–926. pmid:24357342.
  12. 12. Oh BJ, Shin JH, Kim MN, Sung H, Lee K, Joo MY, et al. Biofilm formation and genotyping of Candida haemulonii, Candida pseudohaemulonii, and a proposed new species (Candida auris) isolates from Korea. Med Mycol. 2011;49(1):98–102. pmid:20560864.
  13. 13. Munoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, Loparev VN, Juieng P, Berkow EL, et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5346. Epub 2018 Dec 19. pmid:30559369.
  14. 14. Chatterjee S, Alampalli SV, Nageshan RK, Chettiar ST, Joshi S, Tatu US. Draft genome of a commonly misdiagnosed multidrug resistant pathogen Candida auris. BMC Genomics. 2015;16. pmid:26346253
  15. 15. Santos MA, Gomes AC, Santos MC, Carreto LC, Moura GR. The genetic code of the fungal CTG clade. C R Biol. 2011;334(8–9):607–611. pmid:21819941.
  16. 16. Jeffery-Smith A, Taori SK, Schelenz S, Jeffery K, Johnson EM, Borman A, et al. Candida auris: a review of the literature. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(1). pmid:29142078.
  17. 17. Lee WG, Shin JH, Uh Y, Kang MG, Kim SH, Park KH, et al. First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(9):3139–3142. pmid:21715586.
  18. 18. Kumar A, Sachu A, Mohan K, Vinod V, Dinesh K, Karim S. Simple low cost differentiation of Candida auris from Candida haemulonii complex using CHROMagar Candida medium supplemented with Pal’s medium. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2017;34(2):109–111. Epub 2017 Apr 11. pmid:28392225.
  19. 19. Bentz ML, Sexton DJ, Welsh RM, Litvintseva AP. Phenotypic switching in newly emerged multidrug-resistant pathogen Candida auris. Med Mycol. 2018. Epub 2018 Oct 18. pmid:30329075.
  20. 20. Iguchi S, Itakura Y, Yoshida A, Kamada K, Mizushima R, Arai Y, et al. Candida auris: a pathogen difficult to identify, treat, and eradicate and its characteristics in Japanese strains. J Infect Chemother. 2019;25(10):743–749. Epub 2019 Jul 2. pmid:31257156.
  21. 21. Casadevall A, Kontoyiannis DP, Robert V. On the emergence of Candida auris: climate change, azoles, swamps, and birds. mBio. 2019;10(4). pmid:31337723
  22. 22. Spivak ES, Hanson KE. Candida auris: an emerging fungal pathogen. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(2). pmid:29167291.
  23. 23. Sardi JDO, Silva DR, Mendes-Giannini MJS, Rosalen PL. Candida auris: epidemiology, risk factors, virulence, resistance, and therapeutic options. Microb Pathog. 2018;125:116–121. pmid:30205192
  24. 24. Ruiz-Gaitan AC, Fernandez-Pereira J, Valentin E, Tormo-Mas MA, Eraso E, Peman J, et al. Molecular identification of Candida auris by PCR amplification of species-specific GPI protein-encoding genes. Int J Med Microbiol. 2018;308(7):812–818. Epub 2018 Jul 22. pmid:30025998.
  25. 25. Leach L, Zhu Y, Chaturvedi S. Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Candida auris from surveillance samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(2). pmid:29187562
  26. 26. Kathuria S, Singh PK, Sharma C, Prakash A, Masih A, Kumar A, et al. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek 2, CLSI broth microdilution, and etest method. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(6):1823–1830. pmid:25809970.
  27. 27. Kordalewska M, Zhao Y, Lockhart SR, Chowdhary A, Berrio I, Perlin DS. Rapid and accurate molecular identification of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(8):2445–2452. Epub 2017 May 26. pmid:28539346.
  28. 28. Lamoth F, Kontoyiannis DP. The Candida auris Alert: facts and perspectives. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(4):516–520. Epub 2018 Feb 2. pmid:29390110.
  29. 29. Sarma S, Kumar N, Sharma S, Govil D, Ali T, Mehta Y, et al. Candidemia caused by amphotericin B and fluconazole resistant Candida auris. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31(1):90–91. pmid:23508441.
  30. 30. Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Duggal S, Agarwal K, Prakash A, Singh PK, et al. New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1670–1673. pmid:24048006.
  31. 31. Calvo B, Melo AS, Perozo-Mena A, Hernandez M, Francisco EC, Hagen F, et al. First report of Candida auris in America: clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J Infect. 2016;73(4):369–374. pmid:27452195.
  32. 32. Borman AM, Szekely A, Johnson EM. Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere. 2016;1(4). pmid:27547827.
  33. 33. Magobo RE, Corcoran C, Seetharam S, Govender NP. Candida auris-associated candidemia, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(7):1250–1251. pmid:24963796.
  34. 34. Chow NA, de Groot T, Badali H, Abastabar M, Chiller TM, Meis JF. Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(9):1780–1781. Epub 2019 Jul 17. pmid:31310230.
  35. 35. Hata DJ, Humphries R, Lockhart SR, College of American Pathologists Microbiology Committee. Candida auris: an emerging yeast pathogen posing distinct challenges for laboratory diagnostics, treatment, and infection prevention. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(1):107–114. Epub 2019 Jun 07. pmid:31169997.
  36. 36. Day AM, McNiff MM, da Silva Dantas A, Gow NAR, Quinn J. Hog1 regulates stress tolerance and virulence in the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. mSphere. 2018;3(5). Epub 2018 Oct 26. pmid:30355673.
  37. 37. Pathirana RU, Friedman J, Norris HL, Salvatori O, McCall AD, Kay J, et al. Fluconazole-resistant Candida auris is susceptible to salivary histatin 5 killing and to intrinsic host defenses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(2). Epub 2017 Nov 22. pmid:29158282.
  38. 38. Rudramurthy SM, Chakrabarti A, Paul RA, Sood P, Kaur H, Capoor MR, et al. Candida auris candidaemia in Indian ICUs: analysis of risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(6):1794–1801. pmid:28333181
  39. 39. Arensman K, Miller JL, Chiang A, Mai N, Levato J, LaChance E, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients treated for Candida auris infections in a multisite health system, Illinois, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):876–880. Epub 2020 Apr 21. pmid:32310077.
  40. 40. Taori SK, Khonyongwa K, Hayden I, Athukorala GDA, Letters A, Fife A, et al. Candida auris outbreak: mortality, interventions and cost of sustaining control. J Infect. 2019;79(6):601–611. pmid:31557493
  41. 41. Wang X, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang F, Liu J, Yue H, et al. The first isolate of Candida auris in China: clinical and biological aspects. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):93. pmid:29777096.
  42. 42. Tian S, Rong C, Nian H, Li F, Chu Y, Cheng S, et al. First cases and risk factors of super yeast Candida auris infection or colonization from Shenyang, China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):128. Epub 2018 Jul 12. pmid:29992959.
  43. 43. Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, et al. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):188. Epub 2018 Nov 30. pmid:30482894.
  44. 44. Singh R, Kaur M, Chakrabarti A, Shankarnarayan SA, Rudramurthy SM. Biofilm formation by Candida auris isolated from colonising sites and candidemia cases. Mycoses. 2019;62(8):706–709. Epub 2019 May 28. pmid:31132181.
  45. 45. Sherry L, Ramage G, Kean R, Borman A, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, et al. biofilm-forming capability of highly virulent, multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(2):328–331. pmid:28098553.
  46. 46. Blackwell M. The Fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? Am J Bot. 2011;98(3):426–438. pmid:21613136
  47. 47. Jackson BR, Chow N, Forsberg K, Litvintseva AP, Lockhart SR, Welsh R, et al. On the origins of a species: what might explain the rise of Candida auris? J Fungi (Basel). 2019;5(3). pmid:31284576
  48. 48. Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, et al. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic health care surface. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(10):2996–3005. Epub 2017 Jul 28. pmid:28747370.
  49. 49. Sekyere JO. Candida auris: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current updates on an emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen. Microbiologyopen. 2018;7(4):e00578. Epub 2018 Jan 19. pmid:29345117.
  50. 50. Kean R, Sherry L, Townsend E, McKloud E, Short B, Akinbobola A, et al. Surface disinfection challenges for Candida auris: an in-vitro study. J Hosp Infect. 2018;98(4):433–436. pmid:29203448.
  51. 51. Eyre DW, Sheppard AE, Madder H, Moir I, Moroney R, Quan TP, et al. A Candida auris outbreak and its control in an intensive care setting. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1322–1331. Epub 2018 Oct 4. pmid:30281988.
  52. 52. Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Cegelski L, Hultgren SJ. Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(2):162–168. pmid:18157153.
  53. 53. Jain N, Hasan F, Fries BC. Phenotypic switching in fungi. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2008;2(3):180–188. pmid:19768140
  54. 54. Huang G. Regulation of phenotypic transitions in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Virulence. 2012;3(3):251–261. pmid:22546903.
  55. 55. Whiteway M, Bachewich C. Morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:529–553. Epub 2007 May 18. pmid:17506678.
  56. 56. Biswas S, Van Dijck P, Datta A. Environmental sensing and signal transduction pathways regulating morphopathogenic determinants of Candida albicans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(2):348–376. Epub 2007 Jun 8. pmid:17554048
  57. 57. Bravo Ruiz G, Ross ZK, Gow NAR, Lorenz A. Pseudohyphal growth of the emerging pathogen Candida auris is triggered by genotoxic stress through the S phase checkpoint. mSphere. 2020;5(2). Epub 2020 Mar 13. pmid:32161147.
  58. 58. Anderson JM, Soll DR. Unique phenotype of opaque cells in the white-opaque transition of Candida albicans. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(12):5579–5588. Epub 1987 Dec 1. pmid:3316187
  59. 59. Soll DR. The role of phenotypic switching in the basic biology and pathogenesis of Candida albicans. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6. pmid:24455104
  60. 60. Lachke SA, Joly S, Daniels K, Soll DR. Phenotypic switching and filamentation in Candida glabrata. Microbiology (Reading). 2002;148:2661–2674. pmid:12213913
  61. 61. Shapiro RS, Uppuluri P, Zaas AK, Collins C, Senn H, Perfect JR, et al. Hsp90 orchestrates temperature-dependent Candida albicans morphogenesis via Ras1-PKA signaling. Curr Biol. 2009;19(8):621–629. pmid:19327993.
  62. 62. Kim SH, Iyer KR, Pardeshi L, Munoz JF, Robbins N, Cuomo CA, et al. Genetic analysis of Candida auris implicates Hsp90 in morphogenesis and azole tolerance and Cdr1 in azole resistance. mBio. 2019;10(1). Epub 2019 Jan 31. pmid:30696744.
  63. 63. Slutsky B, Staebell M, Anderson J, Risen L, Pfaller M, Soll DR. "White-opaque transition": a second high-frequency switching system in Candida albicans. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(1):189–197. Epub 1987 Jan 1. pmid:3539914.
  64. 64. Nobile CJ, Johnson AD. Candida albicans biofilms and human disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:71–92. pmid:26488273.
  65. 65. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):95–108. Epub 2004 Mar 26. pmid:15040259.
  66. 66. Kean R, Delaney C, Sherry L, Borman A, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, et al. Transcriptome assembly and profiling of Candida auris reveals novel insights into biofilm-mediated resistance. mSphere. 2018;3(4). Epub 2018 Jul 13. pmid:29997121.
  67. 67. Arendrup MC, Prakash A, Meletiadis J, Sharma C, Chowdhary A. Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI reference microdilution MICs of eight antifungal compounds for Candida auris and associated tentative epidemiological cutoff values. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(6):e00485–17. pmid:28416539
  68. 68. Kim MN, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim EC, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(6):e57–e61. Epub 2009 Feb 6. pmid:19193113.
  69. 69. Rodrigues ML. The multifunctional fungal ergosterol. mBio. 2018;9(5). Epub 2018 Sep 20. pmid:30228244.
  70. 70. Gray KC, Palacios DS, Dailey I, Endo MM, Uno BE, Wilcock BC, et al. Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(7):2234–2239. Epub 2012 Feb 7. pmid:22308411.
  71. 71. Ostrowsky B, Greenko J, Adams E, Quinn M, O’Brien B, Chaturvedi V, et al. Candida auris isolates resistant to three classes of antifungal medications—New York, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(1):6–9. Epub 2020 Jan 10. pmid:31917780.
  72. 72. Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Raoux D, Hoinard D, Dromer F, Dannaoui E, et al. Mutations in the fks1 gene in Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei correlate with elevated caspofungin MICs uncovered in AM3 medium using the method of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(9):3092–3098. Epub 2008 Jul 2. pmid:18591282.
  73. 73. Sanglard D. Emerging threats in antifungal-resistant fungal pathogens. Front Med (Lausanne). 2016;3. pmid:27014694
  74. 74. Kordalewska M, Lee A, Park S, Berrio I, Chowdhary A, Zhao Y, et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(6). Epub 2018 Apr 11. pmid:29632013.
  75. 75. Fakhim H, Vaezi A, Dannaoui E, Chowdhary A, Nasiry D, Faeli L, et al. Comparative virulence of Candida auris with Candida haemulonii, Candida glabrata and Candida albicans in a murine model. Mycoses. 2018. pmid:29460345.
  76. 76. Rossato L, Colombo AL. Candida auris: what have we learned about its mechanisms of pathogenicity? Front Microbiol. 2018;9. pmid:30631313
  77. 77. Hickman MA, Zeng G, Forche A, Hirakawa MP, Abbey D, Harrison BD, et al. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature. 2013;494(7435):55–59. pmid:23364695
  78. 78. Johnson CJ, Davis JM, Huttenlocher A, Kernien JF, Nett JE. Emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris evades neutrophil attack. mBio. 2018;9(4). Epub 2018 Aug 23. pmid:30131360.
  79. 79. Wurster S, Bandi A, Beyda ND, Albert ND, Raman NM, Raad II, et al. Drosophila melanogaster as a model to study virulence and azole treatment of the emerging pathogen Candida auris. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(7):1904–1910. pmid:31225606
  80. 80. Eldesouky HE, Li XY, Abutaleb NS, Mohammad H, Seleem MN. Synergistic interactions of sulfamethoxazole and azole antifungal drugs against emerging multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52(6):754–761. pmid:30145250
  81. 81. Cuomo CA, Alanio A. Tracking a global threat: a new genotyping method for Candida auris. mBio. 2020;11(2). Epub 2020 Mar 12. pmid:32156818.
  82. 82. Rybak JM, Munoz JF, Barker KS, Parker JE, Esquivel BD, Berkow EL, et al. Mutations in TAC1B: a novel genetic determinant of clinical fluconazole resistance in Candida auris. mBio. 2020;11(3). Epub 2020 May 14. pmid:32398311.
  83. 83. Ekowati Y, Ferrero G, Kennedy MD, Husman AMD, Schets FM. Potential transmission pathways of clinically relevant fungi in indoor swimming pool facilities. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(8):1107–1115. pmid:30145117
  84. 84. Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ, Brownstein JS, Madoff LC, McCraw SL, et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature. 2012;484(7393):186–194. Epub 2012 Apr 14. pmid:22498624.