Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Rho factor mediates flagellum and toxin phase variation and impacts virulence in Clostridioides difficile

  • Dominika Trzilova,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Brandon R. Anjuwon-Foster,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Dariana Torres Rivera,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Rita Tamayo

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    rita_tamayo@med.unc.edu

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America

Rho factor mediates flagellum and toxin phase variation and impacts virulence in Clostridioides difficile

  • Dominika Trzilova, 
  • Brandon R. Anjuwon-Foster, 
  • Dariana Torres Rivera, 
  • Rita Tamayo
PLOS
x

Abstract

The intestinal pathogen Clostridioides difficile exhibits heterogeneity in motility and toxin production. This phenotypic heterogeneity is achieved through phase variation by site-specific recombination via the DNA recombinase RecV, which reversibly inverts the “flagellar switch” upstream of the flgB operon. A recV mutation prevents flagellar switch inversion and results in phenotypically locked strains. The orientation of the flagellar switch influences expression of the flgB operon post-transcription initiation, but the specific molecular mechanism is unknown. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of spontaneous suppressor mutants in the non-motile, non-toxigenic recV flg OFF background that regained motility and toxin production. The restored phenotypes corresponded with increased expression of flagellum and toxin genes. The motile suppressor mutants contained single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in rho, which encodes the bacterial transcription terminator Rho factor. Analyses using transcriptional reporters indicate that Rho contributes to heterogeneity in flagellar gene expression by preferentially terminating transcription of flg OFF mRNA within the 5’ leader sequence. Additionally, Rho is important for initial colonization of the intestine in a mouse model of infection, which may in part be due to the sporulation and growth defects observed in the rho mutants. Together these data implicate Rho factor as a regulator of gene expression affecting phase variation of important virulence factors of C. difficile.

Author summary

Phenotypic heterogeneity maintained by phase variation allows bacterial subpopulations to overcome potentially detrimental stresses in the environment, contributing to bacterial survival. Phase variation of flagella and toxins in C. difficile suggests that maintaining heterogeneity of their production may be important for survival and virulence. In this study, we identified Rho as a trans-acting factor that mediates the differential gene expression that imparts heterogeneity in flagellum and toxin production. These results reveal a new role for Rho-mediated transcription termination in regulation of gene expression.

Introduction

Clostridioides difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobe and the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrheal disease [1]. C. difficile infections (CDI) are currently among the most common hospital-acquired infections and exhibit a high rate of recurrence [2]. Disease is largely mediated by two large glucosylating exotoxins, TcdA and TcdB [35]. These toxins inactivate members of the Rho family of GTPases, causing a loss of interaction between the GTPase and its downstream effectors including those controlling the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton [6, 7]. In cell culture, toxin activity results in disruption of tight junctions, cell rounding, and eventually cell death [8, 9]. During infection of a host intestine, the toxins cause disruption of the epithelial barrier, leading to development of diarrheal symptoms, immune cell recruitment, and inflammation [10]. These toxins are also necessary for development of diarrheal disease in animal models of infection [4, 11, 12].

C. difficile encodes multiple surface appendages that contribute to cell adherence and/or colonization of the intestine, including fibronectin-binding protein Fbp68, type IV pili, and flagella [1317]. Flagella are required for swimming motility and are also important for adherence to intestinal epithelial cells, colonization, and virulence in animal models of infection [1820]. Similar to Bacillus subtilis and numerous gram-negative bacteria, the flagellar genes are expressed in a hierarchical manner to ensure the coordinated assembly of the complex structure [2123]. C. difficile contains flagellar genes in at least four operons [24]. The early stage (flgB) flagellar operon includes the gene encoding SigD, a sigma factor essential for expression of late stage flagellar genes [23, 25, 26]. SigD also positively regulates the expression of toxin genes by activating transcription of tcdR, which encodes a positive regulator of tcdA and tcdB expression [23, 27]. Accordingly, factors that regulate expression of the flgB operon, such as cyclic diguanylate, impact toxin production via SigD [22, 25]. Other regulators, including Agr, SinR, and RstA, also affect both flagellum and toxin gene expression [2832]. For example, SinR activates both flagellar and toxin gene expression [29, 30], while RstA acts as a negative regulator of both flagellum and toxin genes [31, 32].

We recently demonstrated the phase variation of flagella and toxins in multiple C. difficile ribotypes [33, 34]. Phase variation is a process that generates phenotypic heterogeneity in a bacterial population to help ensure the survival of the population as a whole in response to environmental selective pressures [35]. Typically, phase variation modulates the production of surface structures that directly interface with the bacterium’s environment. Several mucosal pathogens use phase variation to promote immune evasion and persistence in the host [36]. Phase variation occurs stochastically and is also fully reversible to maintain heterogeneity [35]. Multiple genetic and epigenetic mechanisms can lead to phase variation. One mechanisms is conservative site-specific DNA recombination, which involves recombinase-mediated inversion of a specific DNA sequence [37]. The invertible sequence typically contains regulatory information, such as a promoter element, that affects downstream gene expression [38]. DNA inversion requires the action of one or multiple serine or tyrosine recombinases that recognize inverted repeats flanking the invertible genetic sequence and catalyze DNA strand exchange that results in inversion of the intervening sequence [37, 39].

Recent work suggests that C. difficile employs recombination-mediated phase variation to generate an extensive degree of phenotypic heterogeneity. The first biologically characterized example of phase variation involved the cell wall protein V (CwpV) [40, 41]. Two additional potential DNA inversions were identified upstream of genes involved in cyclic diguanylate metabolism [42]. Most recently, high-throughput sequencing was used to identify a total of seven invertible sequences flanked by inverted repeats in the C. difficile NAP1/B1/027 ribotype strain R20291, and an eighth in several 017 ribotype strains [43, 44]. The identified sequences were shown to undergo inversion, and the sequence upstream of the cmrRST operon was confirmed to regulate expression of the downstream genes in a manner consistent with phase variation [44, 45]. We subsequently showed that site-specific recombination also mediates phase variation of flagella and toxins by inversion of a genetic sequence called the “flagellar switch” [33]. The 154 bp flagellar switch is flanked by imperfect inverted repeats and is located upstream of the flgB operon. In one orientation, the flagellar switch is permissive for expression of the flgB operon, resulting in “flg ON” bacteria exhibiting flagellum biosynthesis, swimming motility, and toxin production. Conversely, the inverse orientation reduces flgB operon transcription, yielding “flg OFF” bacteria that are aflagellate, non-motile, and attenuated for toxin production. Inversion of the flagellar switch requires the site-specific tyrosine recombinase RecV. Mutation of recV leads to genotypically and phenotypically “phase locked” strains that no longer undergo phase variation [33]. In contrast to these phase locked mutants, wild-type C. difficile R20291 in broth culture consists of a heterogeneous population of flg ON and OFF bacteria. Notably, RecV is also required for inversion of the cwpV switch, as well as two of the other identified invertible sequences including one shown to impact multiple phenotypes including virulence [40, 44, 45].

The canonical regulatory mechanism of phase variation by site-specific recombination involves an invertible promoter element that, when correctly oriented, promotes gene transcription in cis. For example, production of fimbriae by Escherichia coli and related species is regulated by the invertible fimbrial switch fimS, which contains a promoter for the adjacent fimA gene that encodes the fimbrial subunit [46, 47]. The flagellar switch in C. difficile lies in the 5’ untranslated region of the mRNA, between the previously identified σA-dependent promoter and the flgB coding sequence. Previous work showed that the flagellar switch does not contain a functional promoter [33]. Instead, regulation occurs post-transcription initiation and involves an unidentified trans-acting posttranscriptional regulator specific to C. difficile.

In this study, we sought to identify the mechanism by which the flagellar switch controls expression of flagellum and toxin genes. Specifically, how does the orientation of the flagellar switch mediate the phase variable expression of the flgB operon? To answer this question, we used a non-motile recV phase-locked OFF strain in a suppressor analysis to identify factor(s) involved in inhibiting flgB operon transcription, swimming motility, and virulence characteristics. We recovered suppressor mutants that retained the flagellar switch in the OFF orientation but gained extragenic mutations that restored swimming motility, toxin production, and expression of flagellum and toxin genes. The extragenic mutations conferring the suppressor phenotypes mapped to rho, which encodes the transcription termination factor Rho. Using a series of reporter fusions in C. difficile with or without an intact rho allele, we determined that Rho inhibits transcription from the 5’ leader sequence of flgB mRNA with the flagellar switch in the OFF orientation but not the ON orientation. These results suggest that Rho can discriminate between flg ON and flg OFF mRNA to selectively inhibit transcription in flagellar phase OFF variants, and reveal a role for Rho-mediated transcription termination phase variation of C. difficile flagella and toxins. Further phenotypic characterization of rho mutants additionally linked the loss of Rho to altered sporulation and ability to colonize the intestine in a murine model of infection, indicating a broader role for Rho-mediated transcription termination in C. difficile physiology.

Results

Motile suppressors arise from a non-motile recV flg OFF mutant

In C. difficile strain R20291 (ribotype 027), the DNA recombinase RecV is required for flagellar switch inversion, and loss of recV leads to phenotypically-locked bacteria [33]. These recV locked ON (recV flg ON, RT1702) and locked OFF (recV flg OFF, RT1693) strains are phenotypically distinct. As previously shown, recV flg ON bacteria are motile in soft agar, while recV flg OFF bacteria typically remain non-motile even after 72 hours (Fig 1A); in a subset of experiments, we observed spreading of the recV flg OFF mutant after prolonged incubation in soft agar (≥72 hours) (Fig 1A, right panel) [33]. In contrast to the uniform motility exhibited by WT and recV flg ON bacteria, these ‘motile flares’ were irregular and asymmetrical. The same phenomenon was observed for an independent recV flg OFF mutant, RT1694, which differs from RT1693 in the orientation of the invertible sequence upstream of cwpV, another phase variable locus (S1 Fig) [33, 48]. To recover the motile bacteria, which we term motile suppressors (MS) hereafter, we collected growth from the outer edge of the motile flares and subcultured on BHIS agar to obtain isolated colonies. When inoculated into soft agar, these MS showed motility similar to that of WT bacteria; an example is shown in Fig 1B. A total of 14 MS isolated from RT1693 and RT1694 were assayed for swimming motility in soft agar. All 14 MS regained swimming motility to the level of the recV flg ON strain, while the recV flg OFF and non-motile sigD-null control remained non-motile (S2 Fig); the results for 6 representative MS are shown in Fig 1C. Consistent with these phenotypes, production of the flagellin FliC was restored in these 6 representative MS, with FliC levels equivalent to or higher than recV flg ON (Fig 1D). FliC was undetectable in the recV flg OFF parental strain.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Motile suppressor mutants arise from a non-motile recV flg OFF strain.

(A) Swimming motility in soft agar medium of C. difficile R20291 (WT), recV flg ON (RT1702), recV flg OFF (RT1693), and sigD-null non-motile control. Images were taken of representative plates after 24, 48 and 72 h. The arrow on the 72 h image points to a motile flare arising from recV flg OFF. (B) Swimming motility in soft agar medium of C. difficile R20291 (WT), recV flg OFF (RT1694), MS5, and sigD-null non-motile control. Image of a representative plate at 48 h. (C) Quantification of swimming motility of 6 motile suppressors (MS) selected for further characterization. Swim diameter was measured after 48 h. The means and standard deviation from 4 biological replicates are shown. ****p<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test compared to recV flg OFF. (D) Immunoblot detection of FliC in recV flg ON and OFF and select MS. Shown is a representative image of three independent experiments. Numbers represent quantification of band intensity expressed as fold-change relative to recV flg ON. ND–non-detectable. (E) Orientation-specific PCR for flagellar switch in six motile suppressors, WT, and recV flg ON and OFF controls. Band sizes– 280bp (OFF) or 375bp (ON). Shown is a representative image of three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g001

This observation suggested that the recV flg OFF mutant is capable of recovering motility. One possible explanation is that a recombinase other than recV catalyzed inversion of the flagellar switch. To test this possibility, we used orientation-specific polymerase chain reaction (OS-PCR), which employs primer pairs that specifically amplify one orientation of an invertible sequence or the other (S1 Table) [33]. Wild-type C. difficile R20291 grown in BHIS broth consists of a heterogeneous population. Accordingly, both OFF and ON flagellar switch orientations were detected by OS-PCR (Fig 1E). As determined previously, the recV flg OFF and recV flg ON strains yielded 280bp and 375bp product sizes, respectively, which correspond to the known flagellar switch orientations in these mutants [33]. The 14 MS contained the flagellar switch exclusively in the OFF orientation, with a representative 6 MS shown in Fig 1D. These results indicate that flagellar switch inversion did not occur, and the MS retain the flg OFF genotype despite their motile phenotype (Fig 1B). We also sequenced the promoter region and 5’ UTR of the flgB operon and did not find any mutations in the MS compared to the parental strains. Together, these results suggest that additional mechanisms are involved in inhibiting motility in C. difficile when the flagellar switch is in the OFF orientation.

Identification of Rho as a negative regulator of flagellar motility

Soft agar swimming motility assays provide a strong selective pressure for bacterial self-propulsion to enable access to nutrients as they become depleted locally. The results above suggest that extragenic mutations arose in the MS that alleviated the negative effect of the flg OFF genotype on swimming motility in this assay. We postulated that a suppressor mutation occurred in a gene(s) involved in inhibiting flagellar gene expression in recV flg OFF bacteria. We thus performed whole genome sequencing of seven motile suppressors (MS 1–7) to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) compared to the R20291 wild type reference genome (detailed in S2 Table, S1 Data). Compared to the recV flg OFF strain, five of seven MS carried SNPs upstream of CDR20291_1465, which encodes a putative Mn2+-containing catalase. The same five MS (MS 2–6) also carried SNPs in the region between CDR20291_1414 and 1415, which are convergently transcribed and encode the putative acetolactate synthase subunit IlvB and a phage-associated integrase, respectively. Additional SNPs appeared within the inverted repeats of switches upstream of cwpV and the flgB operon, in accordance with these strains containing inversions in the cwpV and flg switches relative to the R20291 reference genome. Similarly, SNPs were also present in the inverted repeats flanking the invertible sequence upstream of CDR20291_0685, which was previously shown to be heterogeneous compared to the R20291 reference [44, 45].

A single locus, CDR20291_3324, contained SNPs in MS 1–7 compared to the allele in R20291 (Table 1, S1 Data); SNPs in this gene did not appear in either recV flg OFF parent. These SNPs showed a high frequency (89% or greater) in the sequencing reads. In lieu of whole genome sequencing, we Sanger sequenced CDR20291_3324 in MS 8–14 and identified additional SNPs in all of them. CDR20291_3324 encodes Rho factor, a transcriptional terminator known to act at the 3’ ends of genes or operons as an alternative mechanism to the use of an intrinsic terminator [49]. Rho binds nascent transcripts at Rho utilization (rut) sites, cytosine-rich sequences with poor consensus [49]. Hexameric Rho then uses ATPase activity to translocate 5’ to 3’ along the RNA. Although the mechanism of Rho-dependent transcription termination is not fully understood, it is thought to occur when Rho reaches the RNA polymerase, e.g. at an RNAP pause site, and forces its movement on template DNA without nucleotide addition, leading to destabilization of the transcription complex and mRNA release [50]. The SNPs identified in rho mapped to different domains of the Rho protein, including an N-terminal insertion domain (NID), primary binding site (PBS), and the C-terminal ATPase domain (Fig 2A). Mutations included substitutions (e.g. R206I, G284E) as well as nonsense mutations resulting either from a SNP creating a stop codon (e.g. E113-Stop) or a frameshift (e.g. N66-FS, resulting in a stop codon at residue 73).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Rho is a negative regulator of flagellar motility.

(A) Diagram of Rho factor domains and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in the motile suppressors (MS). NHB–N-terminal helix bundle, NID–N-terminal insertion domain, PBS–primary binding site, FS–frameshift, St–stop codon. N66-FS results in a stop codon at residue 73. (B) Swimming motility in soft agar medium of motile suppressor 5 (MS5; N66-FS) and 10 (MS10; E113-St) expressing wild-type rho (pRho) or bearing vector at 48 hours. Controls included recV flg ON, recV flg OFF and non-motile sigD mutant carrying vector. (C) Quantification of swimming motility after 48 h of strains in (B). The means and standard deviation from 3 independent experiments are shown. ****p<0.0001, *p<0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test. (D) Immunoblot detection of FliC by strains in (B, C). Shown is a representative image of three independent experiments. Numbers represent quantification of band intensity expressed as the fold change compared to recV flg ON for the image shown. ND–non-detectable. (E) Relative transcript abundance of flgB and fliC measured by qRT-PCR. The means and standard deviation from 4 biological replicates are shown. **p<0.01, *p<0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test compared to recV flg OFF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of single nucleotide polymorphisms in recV flg OFF motile suppressor mutants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.t001

Rho is essential for viability in gram-negative bacteria but dispensable in gram-positive bacteria studied to date, such as Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus [51, 52]. Based on a transposon mutagenesis screen, Rho is not essential for viability in C. difficile [53]. However, loss of Rho can cause growth defects potentially due to inappropriate, pervasive read-through transcription [5456]. Therefore, we assessed the growth of the 14 motile suppressors in BHIS broth. All motile suppressors reached a lower final optical density (OD600) compared to recV flg OFF (S3 Fig). While doubling times during exponential growth for the recV flg ON and OFF strains were 56.5 ± 6.0 and 63.6 ± 3.5, respectively, growth rates for the MS ranged from 71.8 to 129.9 minutes, and 10 of the MS showed significant attenuation of doubling time (Table 2).

Because the rho mutations restored motility to the recV flg OFF mutants, we next tested the effect of expressing the wild-type rho allele in rho-null strains. We were unsuccessful in generating an in-frame deletion of rho, likely because of the associated growth defects. In lieu of a targeted mutant, we utilized MS5 and MS10, which contain stop codons early in the rho coding sequence: N66-FS (stop codon at position 73) and E113-St, respectively (Fig 2A). A plasmid carrying wild-type rho under control of an inducible promoter, pRho, was introduced into these MS, and the resulting strains were assayed for swimming motility. The vector control strains showed the expected swimming motility behaviors after 48 hours (Fig 2B and 2C). Expression of rho in MS5 and MS10 significantly inhibited swimming motility compared to the respective vector controls, effectively complementing the effects of the SNPs in rho. Consistent with these phenotypes, expression of rho led to 3- to 4-fold decreases in FliC levels in MS5 and MS10 compared to vector controls (Fig 2D). To examine whether changes in protein production and swimming were due to changes in flagellar gene transcription, we used quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) to measure the transcript abundance of flgB, the first gene of the operon controlled by the flagellar switch, and fliC, which encodes flagellin and is regulated by SigD [22, 25]. The flgB transcript abundance was higher in MS5 and MS10 than recV flg OFF, though the differences were not significant (Fig 2E, left). Both MS5 and MS10 had significantly increased fliC transcript levels compared to recV flg OFF (Fig 2E, right). Providing rho in trans reduced flgB and fliC transcript abundance compared to the vector control. Notably, expression of rho also corrected the growth defect of MS5 and MS10 to the level of recV flg OFF parent with vector (S4 Fig). Together these results indicate that Rho regulates flagellum production and swimming motility in C. difficile by directly or indirectly inhibiting transcription of flagellar genes.

Rho inhibits heterogeneous flagellar gene expression

Analysis of flagellar gene expression by qRT-PCR reflects the transcript abundance averaged across the bacterial population. Yet, phase variation generates a heterogeneous population of bacteria, some of which express flagellar genes, and some of which do not. To analyze the effects of Rho on flagellar gene expression at the single cell level, we used fluorescence microscopy with a red fluorescence protein (mCherryOpt) reporter gene under the control of the flgM promoter (PflgM), which is a SigD-dependent promoter in the late stage flagellar operon [22, 23]. Expression of mCherryOpt from the flgM promoter is thus an indirect indication of the flagellar switch orientation. As previously observed, a population of wild-type C. difficile R20291 exhibited heterogeneity in fluorescence, with the majority of cells expressing mCherryOpt (Fig 3) [33]. In contrast, virtually no red cells were detectable for recV flg OFF C. difficile. Heterogeneous fluorescence was restored in MS5 and MS10 carrying PflgM::mCherryOpt (Fig 3). Thus, Rho is necessary for suppression of flagellar gene expression in recV flg OFF bacteria.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Rho inhibits heterogeneous flagellar gene expression in a recV flg OFF background.

Micrographs of C. difficile R20291 (WT), MS5 and its recV flg OFF cwpV ON parent (RT1694), and MS10 and its recV flg OFF cwpV OFF parent (RT1693) transformed with the pPflgM::mCherryOpt reporter plasmid. Representative images for three independent experiments. Channels used are indicated for each column. White bars = 10 microns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g003

Rho negatively impacts toxin production

The alternative sigma factor SigD, encoded in the flgB operon, positively regulates the expression of tcdR, tcdA, and tcdB [23, 27]. We therefore predicted that inhibition of flgB operon transcription by Rho would concomitantly inhibit toxin gene expression. We evaluated TcdA production in MS5 and MS10 carrying vector or pRho by immunoblot. MS5 and MS10 showed a 3- to 4-fold increase in TcdA production, respectively, compared to the recV flg OFF parent (Fig 4A). Expression of wild-type rho in MS5 and MS10 decreased TcdA levels, resulting in TcdA levels comparable to recV flg OFF bacteria. To determine whether changes in protein levels correlate with changes in transcript abundance, we examined expression of tcdR, tcdA, and tcdB by qRT-PCR. As observed previously, tcdA and tcdB transcript abundance was significantly higher in recV flg ON than recV flg OFF bacteria; tcdR was similarly altered, though the difference was not statistically significant (Fig 4B) [33]. Consistent with the negative impact of Rho on flagellar gene expression, tcdA, tcdB, and tcdR transcript levels were higher in MS5 and MS10 than in the recV flg OFF parent (Fig 4B). Providing rho in trans decreased tcdA, tcdB, and tcdR transcript abundances of MS5 and MS10 to the parental recV flg OFF levels. Therefore, in addition to inhibiting motility and growth, Rho negatively affects toxin gene expression and production. This effect is likely mediated through SigD encoded in the flgB operon [23, 27].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Mutations in rho impact toxin production.

(A) Immunoblot detection of TcdA by MS5 and MS10 bearing pRho for expression of wild-type rho or bearing vector. Controls included recV flg ON, recV flg OFF and sigD mutant carrying vector. Shown is a representative image for three independent experiments. Numbers represent quantification of band intensity expressed as the fold change compared to recV flg ON for the image shown. (B) Relative transcript abundance of tcdA, tcdB, and tcdR measured by qRT-PCR. The means and standard deviation from 3 to 5 biological replicates per strain are shown. ****p<0.0001, ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test compared to recV flg OFF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g004

Mutant rho alleles confer dominant negative motility phenotypes

Rho factor functions as a homohexamer [57]. We hypothesized that overexpression of mutant rho alleles could result in incorporation of aberrant subunits into the hexamer, interfering with Rho function. To test for this dominant negative effect, we introduced mutant rho alleles from six different MS into the recV flg OFF strain, with the expectation that incorporation of non-functional Rho monomers would prevent inhibition of swimming motility by the wild-type, chromosomally-encoded Rho. The wild-type rho allele was also introduced as a control. To achieve overexpression of the cloned alleles, the genes were placed under the control of an anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-inducible promoter in the multi-copy plasmid pRPF185. Strains bearing these expression plasmids were assayed for swimming motility in soft agar medium. Expression of five of the six of the mutant rho alleles restored swimming motility to varying extents, while the wild-type allele did not alter motility (Fig 5A and 5B). These results were obtained regardless of ATc induction, suggesting leaky expression from the Ptet promoter as previously reported [58, 59]. The only mutant allele that did not lead to a dominant negative motility phenotype was N66-FS derived from MS5 (Fig 2A). Because this rho allele contains a nonsense mutation resulting in an early stop codon at residue 73, the truncated gene product may be unstable or unable to incorporate into the Rho hexamer, further justifying the use of the MS5 strain as a rho-null mutant.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Mutant rho alleles confer dominant negative motility phenotypes.

(A) Swimming motility in soft agar medium after 72 hours for the recV flg OFF (RT1693) expressing rho alleles encoding the indicated Rho proteins. Labels correspond to SNPs in rho (Fig 2A), and WT corresponds to the wild-type rho allele. Dominant negative effects are present regardless of anhydrotetracycline (ATc) induction suggesting leaky expression from the Ptet promoter. (B) Quantification of swim diameter from soft agar plates containing 15ng/mL ATc after 72 hours. The means and standard deviation of three biological replicates are shown. ****p<0.0001, ***p<0.001, **p<0.01 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-test compared to recV flg OFF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g005

Rho preferentially inhibits transcription of flg OFF mRNA

Our prior work suggests that transcription termination of flg OFF bacteria is mediated by a trans-acting factor specific to C. difficile [33]. This role could be fulfilled by Rho. While Rho typically terminates transcription of genes and operons 3’ of coding sequences, recent studies have shown that Rho can also terminate transcription in some 5’ leader regions in gram-negative bacteria [6063]. This mechanism would have a regulatory effect on the downstream gene(s). We therefore hypothesized that Rho is this trans-acting factor affecting transcription of the flgB operon, preferentially inhibiting transcription in flgB transcripts containing the flagellar switch in the OFF orientation. To test this hypothesis, we transcriptionally fused a phoZ reporter gene to the flgB coding sequence and the upstream regulatory region of the flgB operon. This 1045 bp region includes the σA-dependent promoter and the 498 bp 5’ untranslated region containing with the flagellar switch in either the ON or OFF orientation: PflgB-UTRON::phoZ and PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ respectively. Promoterless (::phoZ) and promoter-only constructs (PflgB::phoZ) were included as controls. These plasmid-borne reporters were introduced into recV flg ON and OFF strains, which encode wild-type Rho, and MS5 and MS10, which contain mutant rho alleles, and alkaline phosphatase activity was assayed [64]. As anticipated, the no-promoter control lacked activity in all strains, and no differences were observed for activity of the promoter only reporter suggesting that Rho does not regulate transcription at the level of promoter (S5 Fig). For the PflgB-UTRON::phoZ reporter, activity was modestly (~3-fold) higher in MS5 and MS10 compared to the recV flg OFF parent (Fig 6A). In comparison, activity was ~15-fold higher in MS5 and MS10 compared to recV flg OFF for the PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ reporter. Therefore, mutation of rho had a greater effect on flagellar gene transcription for bacteria with the flagellar switch in the OFF orientation, suggesting that Rho preferentially inhibits transcription of the flg OFF transcript.

thumbnail
Fig 6. C. difficile Rho directly inhibits flagellar gene expression in flg OFF orientation.

(A) Alkaline phosphatase (phoZ) reporter fusions to the flgB operon regulatory region, with the flagellar switch in either the ON or OFF orientation, were introduced into the recV flg ON (RT1702), recV flg OFF (RT1693), MS5 and MS10 strains. Alkaline phosphatase activity was normalized to the recV flg OFF values. The means and standard deviation of 5 biological replicates are shown. ****p<0.0001 by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test. (B) The C. difficile rho gene was introduced into Bacillus subtilis bearing the phoZ fusions to the flgB regulatory region with the flagellar switch in either the ON or OFF orientation. C. difficile rho (Cd-rho) was introduced, and alkaline phosphatase activity was assayed. Control–B. subtilis reporter without Cd-rho; BCM–bicyclomycin, 50 μg/mL. The means and standard deviation of three biological replicates are shown. ****p<0.0001, *p<0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-test comparing strains with the same reporter construct.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g006

The results of alkaline phosphatase assays in C. difficile imply that Rho negatively regulates flgB operon transcription, but do not distinguish between a direct and indirect mechanism of regulation. Rho could directly act on the flgB UTR to terminate transcription from flgB OFF mRNA, or Rho could impact the production of another protein involved in flgB regulation. We previously showed that, whereas the PflgB-UTRON::phoZ reporter resulted in significantly higher activity than the PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ reporter in C. difficile, the difference was lost when these reporters were assayed in B. subtilis [33]. These results indicate that B. subtilis does not encode the factor that mediates regulation. We postulated that if Rho directly terminates transcription within the flgB 5’ UTR, introducing C. difficile rho (Cd-rho) into B. subtilis strains carrying the PflgB-UTRON::phoZ and PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ reporters would restore the regulation seen in C. difficile. To test this idea, the wild-type Cd-rho allele was introduced into the previously constructed B. subtilis reporter strains [33], and alkaline phosphatase activity was assayed. As seen previously, reporter activity was the same in B. subtilis with PflgB-UTRON::phoZ and PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ (Fig 6B). Expression of Cd-rho resulted in decreased activity only in B. subtilis with the PflgB-UTROFF::phoZ reporter. Finally, the addition of bicyclomycin, a specific inhibitor of Rho ATPase activity [65], abrogated this effect. These data indicate that Rho, and not another C. difficile protein, is the trans-acting factor which directly inhibits flagellar gene expression, and that Rho selectively prevents transcription in flg OFF bacteria.

Rho is important for early colonization in a mouse model of infection and efficient sporulation

In vitro, Rho affects several phenotypes including growth, motility, and toxin production. Because these characteristics are important during CDI, we analyzed the effect of a rho mutation in a mouse model of infection. MS5 and MS10 were derived from two recV mutant strains that differ in cwpV status–MS5 was derived from RT1694 (cwpV ON) while MS10 was derived from RT1693 (cwpV OFF) [48]. The role of cwpV in vivo has not been previously reported, so both recV flg OFF parental strains were tested. RecV is required for site-specific recombination of multiple invertible sequences, not only the flagellar and cwpV switches [44, 45, 48]. To ensure appropriate attribution of phenotypes, we confirmed that the parental strains and motile suppressors are isogenic for the other sequences and only differ in the cwpV switch (S6A Fig). Male and female C57BL/6 mice were treated with antibiotics to render them susceptible to C. difficile and then inoculated by oral gavage with 105 spores of wild-type R20291, MS5, MS10, and their respective parent strains.

As observed previously, wild-type R20291 colonized the mice within 1 day post-inoculation (reaching more than 106 CFU/g feces), maintained this level of colonization for 1–3 days, then was gradually cleared typically between days 3 and 7 post-inoculation (S6B Fig). A similar, but not identical pattern of colonization was seen for both recV flg OFF strains, suggesting that cwpV expression does not consistently impact colonization in this model. For MS5 and MS10, the bacterial burden in feces was significantly lower on day 1 post-inoculation compared to the respective recV flg OFF parents and wild-type R20291 (Fig 7A). About 50% of the animals inoculated with MS5 or MS10 had undetectable levels of C. difficile in their feces; most of the remaining animals showed intermediate or parental levels of colonization. Interestingly, colonization of both MS5 and MS10 recovered to parental levels starting at day 2 post infection and were cleared within a similar time frame (S6B Fig), suggesting that Rho is important for initial colonization in a mouse model of infection. Notably, although the recV flg ON, MS5, and MS10 strains differ in toxin production compared to the recV flg OFF strain in vitro, we did not observe significant differences in weight loss or diarrheal symptoms between the groups of infected animals. These results may be attributable to the subclinical colitis caused by R20291 in this animal model, as previously reported [6668]. It is also possible that other regulators of toxin gene expression, such as CodY and CcpA, unlink co-expression of the toxin and flagellar genes [6972].

thumbnail
Fig 7. Rho is important for early colonization in a mouse model of infection and efficient sporulation.

(A) Antibiotic-treated male and female C57BL6 mice were inoculated with 105 spores of the indicated C. difficile strain. CFU in feces collected at 24 hours post inoculation were enumerated. Data are combined from two independent infection studies that each included 3 male and 3 female mice for 12 total mice per strain. Symbols indicate CFU from individual animals, and bars indicate the medians. ****p<0.0001, *p<0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test comparing motile suppressors to their parent strains: RT1694 (recV flg OFF cwpV ON) and MS5, RT1693 (recV flg OFF cwpV OFF) and MS10. Dotted line represents a limit of detection. (B) Sporulation efficiency was evaluated by ethanol resistance and calculated as the total number of spores divided by the total number of viable cells (spores plus vegetative). A sporulation-deficient spo0A mutant was included as a control. The means and standard deviation of four biological replicates are shown. ****p<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test comparing all strains. n.d.–non-detectable.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g007

Sporulation and germination are important for colonization of the mouse model [73]. Because both MS5 and MS10 were attenuated for colonization on day 1 of infection, we considered that this difference is attributable to a germination and/or sporulation defect. We assessed sporulation and spore viability by enumerating ethanol resistant spores as a percentage of total cells (spore plus vegetative) [74]. While the sporulation efficiency for the wild type and both recV flg OFF strains was between 10 and 15%, sporulation efficiency was <1% for both motile suppressors (Fig 7B). Our data implicate Rho as an important factor that positively regulates sporulation, which may contribute to the colonization defect observed in the mouse model. It is possible that additional SNPs in the motile suppressors also contribute to the sporulation defect.

To examine germination, purified spores of wild-type R20291, both recV flg OFF strains, MS5, and MS10 were assayed in buffer supplemented with the spore germinant 10 mM taurocholic acid (TA) as previously described [75]. In the absence of TA, no germination was detected. In the presence of TA, all strains germinated to the same level, indicating that Rho does not influence germination rate (S7 Fig).

Discussion

In this study, we identified Rho as a trans-acting factor that controls phase variation of flagella and toxins in vitro. The regulation exerted by Rho contributes to the ability of a population of C. difficile to continually maintain motile, toxin-producing flg ON cells as well as non-motile, atoxigenic flg OFF cells. Comparative transcriptional analyses using C. difficile as well as B. subtilis as a heterologous system support that Rho inhibits flagellar gene transcription selectively in flg OFF bacteria. These results implicate Rho as an important regulatory component mediating phase variation of flagella, and by extension toxins, and reveal a new role for Rho-mediated transcription termination in regulation of gene expression.

All of the 14 motile suppressors (MS) contained nucleotide polymorphisms in Rho conferring a missense or nonsense mutation that presumably abrogated Rho function. Five of six rho alleles, which correlated with a range of growth defects in the respective MS, led to a dominant negative effect and relieved inhibition of motility in flg OFF bacteria when over expressed. In E. coli, a dominant negative effect resulted from less efficient binding of mRNA to the Rho secondary binding site and decreased translocation of Rho along the mRNA towards RNA polymerase [76]. In C. difficile, incorporation of mutant subunits into the Rho homohexamer could negatively affect mRNA binding, ATP processing and/or resulting helicase activity. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive–mutations in different domains of Rho may affect Rho activity by different mechanisms while imparting the same effect on motility. We note that we were unable to generate an independent mutation in rho in a wild-type R20291 background, however the MS5 and MS10 strains with truncated Rho represent useful mutants for characterization of rho-null C. difficile. Further studies will determine how the mutant Rho proteins are altered in function and the mechanism by which mutant rho alleles interfere with function of wild-type Rho.

Rho suppressor mutants exhibit restored motility compared to the flg OFF bacteria from which they were derived. The increased motility of motile suppressors corresponds with increased expression of flagellar genes flgB and fliC and higher levels of the major flagellin FliC. Furthermore, Rho contributes to heterogeneity of flagellar expression at the single cell level as evidenced by differences in mCherry signal driven by the SigD-dependent flgM promoter. Unlike the recV flg OFF strain that lacks fluorescence, motile suppressors derived from flg OFF bacteria are mCherry positive and appear similar to a wild-type population. That loss of Rho in the MS resulted in heterogenous fluorescence intensity among individual cells indicates that another factor influences expression. A c-di-GMP riboswitch is encoded between the flgB transcriptional start site and the flagellar switch, and we speculate that fluorescence intensity reflects varying levels of c-di-GMP [77, 78].

Experiments with transcriptional phoZ fusions in C. difficile and B. subtilis indicate that Rho strongly inhibits transcription when the flagellar switch is in the OFF orientation. We propose two alternative models for direct control of phase variable expression of the flgB operon by Rho through the selective, premature termination of flg OFF transcripts (Fig 8). In model 1, Rho distinguishes between flg ON and OFF mRNA by preferentially binding to flg OFF mRNA due to the presence of rut sequences that are absent in the flg ON. In model 2, Rho binds flg ON and OFF mRNAs equally, 5’ of the flagellar switch. Transcription termination may then be differentially influenced by the presence of an additional sequence required for termination. For example, an RNA polymerase pause site may appear only in flg OFF mRNA [61]. In either model, Rho would selectively terminate flgB operon transcription and inhibit linked phenotypes in bacteria with the flagellar switch in the OFF orientation. More work is needed to distinguish between these two models. Using the RhoTermPredict algorithm [79], we were unable to identify any predicted rut sites within the flgB leader sequence of either flg ON or OFF sequences. RhoTermPredict is based on E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. enterica databases and searches for rut sites with regularly spaced C residues and C>G content followed by a putative RNA polymerase pause site [79]. However, the C. difficile genome has low G+C content (<30%) [80], and the flgB leader sequence has 23% G+C content. The rut site characteristics in C. difficile therefore may be different from those previously described in other bacteria, so the RhoTermPredict algorithm may be unsuitable for predicting rut sites in C. difficile.

thumbnail
Fig 8. Proposed models of direct Rho binding and inhibition of transcription readthrough of flg OFF mRNA.

Model 1: Rho distinguishes between flg ON and OFF mRNA by preferentially binding to flg OFF mRNA. This may be due to the presence of rut sequences that are absent in the flg ON. Model 2: Rho binds flg ON and OFF mRNAs equally, 5’ of the flagellar switch. Transcription termination may then be differentially influenced by the presence of an additional sequence required for termination (e.g. a RNA polymerase pause site) only in flg OFF mRNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.g008

There are several examples of Rho exerting regulation on 5’ leader sequences in gram-negative bacteria, where gene regulation by Rho is achieved by multiple mechanisms involving other proteins, small RNAs, and potentially yet unidentified factors. In E. coli, Rho seems to preferentially regulate expression of >250 genes with long 5’ UTRs [81]. In addition, the RNA-binding protein CsrA binds to the 5’ UTR of pgaA to prevent the formation of an RNA secondary structure that otherwise sequesters the rut site [82]. In S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, Rho binds within the leader sequences of three genes encoding Mg2+ transporters to control expression [60, 62, 83], and the small RNA ChiX inhibits expression of the chiPQ operon by inducing premature Rho-dependent termination [84]. Finally, most known E. coli riboswitches modulate gene expression by either translational regulation or Rho-dependent termination [60, 85]. However, riboswitches in C. difficile, including the c-di-GMP riboswitch upstream of the flgB operon, appear to act through Rho-independent mechanisms [77, 78]. To our knowledge, this is the first example of Rho-mediated transcription termination within a 5’ UTR that results in modulation of downstream gene expression in a gram-positive species.

In E. coli, Rho requires cofactors NusA and NusG to terminate transcription at many sites [86]. NusG and NusA are essential for growth of C. difficile R20291 [53], but the cofactor requirements for C. difficile Rho are currently unknown. Introduction of C. difficile rho into a heterologous host B. subtilis did not alter the ability of C. difficile Rho to terminate transcription of the flg OFF construct. These data suggest that either Rho is able to terminate flagellar transcription without additional cofactors, or it is able to use homologs of NusA, NusG, or other potential cofactors present in B. subtilis. Interestingly, while both C. difficile and B. subtilis encode Rho, only the C. difficile factor terminates flg OFF transcription. This difference could be caused by a difference in structure of these two proteins. Although many of the features of Rho are conserved across bacteria, in ~35% of species, including C. difficile, Rho contains an N-terminal insertion domain (NID) whose length and composition are not conserved among species [87]. In other bacterial species with an NID-containing Rho, the NID imparts diverse functions [8890]. It is therefore possible that the insertion domain of C. difficile Rho confers the ability to terminate flg OFF transcription.

Mutations in rho negatively affect initial colonization in a mouse model of infection, resulting in a delay in colonization. We ruled out contributions from other phase-variable loci by ensuring that MS5 and MS10 are isogenic with the parental strains at these sites. The rho mutations likely have pleiotropic effects that impact colonization [91, 92], however the delayed colonization may be due in part to the defects in growth and sporulation of the motile suppressor mutants. Interestingly, a high-throughput screen in C. difficile R20291 did not identify rho as a gene required for sporulation [53]. How Rho affects growth and sporulation in C. difficile is unknown, but may arise from pervasive transcription, particularly loss of suppression of antisense transcription, or other potential consequences of loss of Rho [86, 9395]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effects of Rho on global transcription in C. difficile to determine the cause of the observed growth defects as well as other phenotypes affected by Rho.

Materials and methods

Growth and maintenance of bacterial strains

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S3 Table. C. difficile was maintained in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratories) in an atmosphere of 85% N2, 5% CO2, and 10% H2. C. difficile and B. subtilis were routinely cultivated in Brain Heart Infusion medium (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with 5% yeast extract (Becton Dickinson) (BHIS) at 37°C. Where indicated, bacteria were cultured in Tryptone Yeast (TY) broth. All C. difficile broth cultures were grown statically, with 10 μg/mL thiamphenicol (Tm) for plasmid maintenance as needed. E. coli DH5α and HB101(pRK24) were cultured under aerobic conditions at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. For selection of plasmids in E. coli, 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp) and/or 10 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Cm) was used, as indicated. Kanamycin (Kan) 100 μg/mL was used to select against E. coli after conjugations with C. difficile. Spectinomycin (Spec) 100 μg/mL was used to select for B. subtilis transformants containing Cd-rho.

Soft agar swimming motility assay

Flagellum-dependent swimming motility was assayed in 0.5X BHIS-0.3% agar as previously described [25]. When appropriate, Tm was added for plasmid maintenance, and 10 ng/mL anhydrotetracycline (ATc) was added to induce gene expression. The diameter of motile growth was measured after 24, 48, and 72 hours. Three independent experiments were performed, each with six technical replicates. Images were taken using the G:BOX Chemi imaging system with the Upper White Light illuminator.

Isolation and sequencing of motile suppressor mutants

The recV flg OFF mutants RT1693 and RT1694 (which contain the cwpV switch in the OFF or ON orientation, respectively) were grown in BHIS broth until OD600 of 1, then 1.5 μL were inoculated into 0.5X BHIS-0.3% agar motility medium and incubated at 37°C for 48–96 hours. Each plate included a non-motile sigD negative control (RT1566) and recV flg ON (RT1702) and recV flg OFF controls. Plates were examined for expansion of the recV flg OFF colonies, which appeared in a subset of plates. Bacteria were collected from the outer edge of motile growth and subcultured on BHIS agar.

Genomic DNA was extracted from seven motile isolates (RT1705 to RT1711 (MS 1–7), S3 Table) and the parental recV flg OFF strains (RT1693, RT1694) as previously described [96]. Genomic DNA of MS 1–7 was prepared using the KAPA HyperPrep Kit (Roche) and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 Rapid Run platform with paired ends and 100X coverage by the UNC-CH High Throughput Genomic Sequencing Facility. The sequencing data is available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive Database, accession number PRJNA630461. Sequencing reads were mapped to the reference C. difficile R20291 genome (Accession No. FN545816.1) using CLC Genomics Workbench v. 9 software (Qiagen), and nucleotide polymorphisms were identified using the fixed ploidy variant detector function with default parameters. Whole genome sequencing was not performed for MS 8–14. Instead, for MS 8–14 (RT1939-1945), the rho gene (CDR20291_3324) was amplified by PCR with primers R2307 and R2308, and the products were Sanger sequenced using primers R2307, R2308, R2366, and R2367. Primer sequences are provided in S1 Table. Nucleotide polymorphisms were identified by alignment with the wild-type sequence from R20291 using ClustalOmega [97].

Determination of invertible switch orientation by orientation-specific PCR

C. difficile was cultured from glycerol stocks on BHIS agar for 24 hours at 37°C. A single colony was suspended in 20 μL of dH2O and heated at 100°C for 10 minutes. These lysates served as templates for PCR using primers that discriminate between each flagellar switch sequence orientation in R20291 (S1 Table). Primers R1614 and R857 were used to amplify the ON orientation of the flagellar switch, which corresponds to the published sequence of R20291. Primers R1615 and R857 were used to amplify the OFF orientation of the flagellar switch. Similarly, orientation-specific PCR was used to determine the orientations of the other invertible sequences using primers listed in S1 Table, which follow the naming pattern LOCUS_pubF and LOCUS_R for detection of the orientation in R20291 reference genome, and LOCUS_invF and LOCUS_R for the inverse orientations. Three independent experiments were done.

Detection of FliC and TcdA by immunoblot

Western blots for TcdA and FliC production were performed as previously described [33, 34]. Cultures for TcdA immunoblotting were grown in TY broth overnight (~16 hours), diluted 1:50 in fresh TY broth, and grown until late stationary phase (OD600 of 1.8 to 2.0). Cultures for immunoblotting FliC were grown overnight (~16 hours) in BHIS broth. For complementation experiments, Tm was included in all growth media, and 10 ng/mL ATc was added to induce gene expression. For both FliC and TcdA detection, samples were normalized to an OD600 1.0, and then cells were collected by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 5 minutes (TcdA) or 2,000 x g for 10 minutes (FliC). Bacterial pellets were suspended in 1x SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The lysates were separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for FliC detection or on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for TcdA detection, then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were stained with Ponceau S (Sigma) to assess equal loading and imaged using the G:Box Chemi imaging system. FliC was detected using α-FliC hamster sera (generous gift from Dr. Ghose-Paul) [34, 98] followed by goat anti-hamster IgG (H+L) secondary antibody conjugated to DyLight 800 (Novus Biologicals). TcdA was detected using mouse α-TcdA antibody (Novus Biologicals) followed by goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody conjugated to DyLight 800 4x PEG (Invitrogen). Blots were imaged using the Odyssey imaging system (LI-COR), and quantification was performed with Image Studio Software. All strains were assayed in at least three independent experiments.

Growth curves

Overnight cultures were diluted 1:50 into BHIS medium including 10 μg/mL Tm and 10 ng/mL ATc as needed. Optical density (OD600) was measured every 30 minutes for 8 hours. Doubling times were calculated based on the change in optical density during exponential growth. Six biological replicates were assayed in two independent experiments.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR

Overnight cultures were diluted in BHIS medium containing thiamphenicol as needed. Cells were grown to mid-exponential phase (OD600 0.8–1) or stationary phase (OD600~1.5) for analysis of flagellum (flgB, fliC) and toxin (tcdA, tcdB, tcdR) gene expression, respectively. RNA was isolated as described previously [33, 96]. Briefly, cells were collected by centrifugation and stored in ethanol:acetone (1:1) at -80°C overnight. Cells were lysed by bead beating in cold TriSURE (Bioline). Nucleic acids were extracted with chloroform, precipitated from the aqueous phase with isopropanol, washed with ethanol, and suspended in RNase-free water. RNA was treated with TURBO DNase (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Synthesis of cDNA was done using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) and random hexamers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. No-reverse transcriptase controls were included in all experiments. Real-time PCR was performed using 10 ng of cDNA, a final primer concentration of 1 μM, and SYBR Green Real-Time qPCR reagents (Bioline). Relative transcript abundance was calculated using the ΔΔCt method, with rpoC as the control gene and the indicated reference condition/strain. Primers used are listed in S1 Table, with forward and reverse primers named according to the pattern gene-qF and–qR, respectively.

Visualizing heterogeneity using fluorescent reporters

To visually examine population heterogeneity, we used a previously described protocol [99, 100]. Briefly, overnight cultures of strains containing the PflgM::mCherryOpt reporter were diluted 1:100 into BHIS-Tm. Bacteria were grown anaerobically at 37°C until OD600 ~0.5, 1 mL of culture was collected by centrifugation, and the remaining steps were performed aerobically. Cell pellets were washed with PBS, then suspended in 500 μl PBS and 120 μl 5x fixative (20 μl NaPO4, pH 7.4; 100 μl 16% paraformaldehyde) [99]. The solution was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes followed by 30 minutes at 4°C. After the fixative was removed, cells were washed three times with PBS before suspension in 500 μl PBS and incubation overnight in the dark at 4°C to allow for fluorophore maturation. Slides for microscopy were prepared by placing 10 μl of concentrated culture onto a thin layer of 1% agarose applied directly to the surface of the slide. Microscopy was performed using a 60x oil immersion Nikon Plan Apo objective on a Keyence BZ-X810 equipped with Chroma 49005-UF1 for RFP detection.

Generation of strains

To generate rho expression plasmids, wild-type and mutant rho alleles were amplified from genomic DNA of recV flg OFF (RT1693) bacteria and 6 selected motile suppressors by PCR using primers R2308 and R2307 [96]. PCR products were cloned via the EcoRV and BamHI sites in pRT1611, a derivative of pRPF185 in which the gusA reporter gene was removed [33, 58]. After transformation into E. coli DH5α, Cm-resistant clones were recovered at 30°C to hinder additional mutations in rho. The presence of the rho insert and its sequence integrity were confirmed using primers R2308, R2307, R2366, and R2367. The expression plasmids and the pRT1611 control were introduced into C. difficile strains RT1693 (recV flg OFF), RT1702 (recV flg ON), RT1709 (MS5), and RT1941 (MS10) via conjugation with E. coli HB101(pRK24). The presence of the expected plasmid was confirmed by PCR with vector-specific primers R1832 and R1833.

Plasmids containing transcriptional fusions of the phoZ alkaline phosphatase gene to flgB and iterations of the upstream regulatory region were created previously [33]. These plasmids were introduced into heat-shocked RT1693, RT1702, MS5, and MS10 [101]. For fluorescence microscopy, pRT1676, a pDSW1728 derivative carrying PflgM::mCherryOpt [33], was introduced into RT1693, RT1694, MS5, and MS10 by conjugation with E. coli HB101(pRK24) and confirmed by PCR.

To introduce C. difficile rho (Cd-rho) into B. subtilis BS49, Cd-rho including its native ribosomal binding site (RBS) was amplified from R20291 genomic DNA by PCR using R2656 and R2657, digested with HindIII and SphI, and ligated into similarly digested pDR111, which allows for integration at the amyE site [102]. The resulting plasmid was transformed into B. subtilis BS49 strains bearing previously described transcriptional fusions of phoZ to flgB and its upstream regulatory region, and transformants were selected on LB-Spec agar.

Alkaline phosphatase assays

Overnight (~16 h) cultures of B. subtilis BS49 and C. difficile phoZ reporter strains were diluted 1:50 (C. difficile) or 1:100 (B. subtilis) into BHIS medium. Thiamphenicol was added to C. difficile growth media for plasmid maintenance. To induce expression of Cd-rho in B. subtilis, 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to the growth medium when cultures reached OD600 ~0.3. Controls without induction were processed in parallel. Where indicated, bicyclomycin (Cayman Chemical) was used at 50 μg/mL. Mid-exponential phase cells (OD600 0.8–1.3, 1 mL) were collected by centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and pellets were stored at -20°C overnight. Frozen pellets were thawed on ice, and the alkaline phosphatase (AP) assay was performed as previously described [64].

Spore purification

Overnight cultures (100 μL) were plated on ten 70:30 agar plates [103]. After 72 hours of growth at 37°C, bacterial growth was scraped, suspended in 10 mL DPBS (Gibco) and kept at room temperature overnight. Spores were purified by collection of the growth in DPBS, then washing of the suspension four times with DPBS before purification using a sucrose gradient as described [104]. After discarding supernatant containing cell debris, the spore pellet was washed five more times with DPBS + 1% BSA. Spores were stored at room temperature until use.

Germination assay

Spore germination was analyzed at room temperature (27°C) by measuring the change in OD600 [75]. Germination was carried out in clear 96-well flat bottom plates (Corning) in a final volume of 100 μl and final concentration of 30 mM glycine, 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. Spores were heat-activated at 65°C for 30 minutes, cooled on ice and suspended to a final OD600 of 0.7. At the initiation of the experiment, 10 mM sodium taurocholate (Sigma Aldrich) (TA) was added to induce germination; no-taurocholate controls were done in parallel. Optical density at 600 nm was measured every 2 minutes for 1 hour using a BioTek Synergy plate reader.

Sporulation assay

Sporulation assays were performed as described previously [74]. Briefly, C. difficile cultures were grown overnight in BHIS broth supplemented with 0.1% TA and 0.2% fructose to prevent spore accumulation. Cultures were diluted 1:30 in BHIS-0.1% TA-0.2% fructose, grown to an OD600 of 0.5 and 250 μl of culture applied to 70:30 agar as a lawn [103]. A control ethanol resistance sporulation assay was performed at this point to ensure no spores were present in exponential phase cultures. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, cells were suspended in BHIS to an OD600 of 1.0, and an ethanol resistance sporulation assay was performed. A 0.5 ml aliquot was mixed with 0.5 ml of 57% ethanol to achieve a final concentration of 28.5% ethanol, vortexed, and incubated for 15 minutes to eliminate all vegetative cells. Serial dilutions were made in PBS-0.1% TA and plated on BHIS-0.1% TA agar for spore enumeration. Vegetative cells were enumerated by plating serial dilutions of the BHIS cell suspension on BHIS agar. Sporulation efficiency was calculated as the total number of spores divided by the total number of viable cells (spores plus vegetative).

Ethics statement

All animal studies were done in compliance with protocols approved by the UNC-CH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Animal experiments

Groups of eight- to ten-week-old female and male C57BL/6 mice (Charles River) were given a cocktail of antibiotics in their drinking water provided ab libitum for 3 days [105]. The antibiotic cocktail consisted of kanamycin (400 mg/L), gentamicin (35 mg/L), colistin (850,000 units/L), vancomycin (45 mg/L), and metronidazole (215 mg/L) [105]. Four days prior to inoculation, the mice were switched to regular water for the remainder of the experiment. Clindamycin (10 μg/g body weight) was administered by intraperitoneal injection 48 hours prior to infection [14]. Mice were inoculated with 105 spores by oral gavage; control mice received PBS only. Inoculums were quantified by plating serial dilution on BHIS-0.1% TA agar and enumerating CFU. The animals were subsequently monitored for weight loss and diarrheal disease. Fecal samples were collected in pre-weighed tubes every 24 hours for 9 days. Fecal pellets were suspended in 1 mL DPBS and heated at 55°C for 30 minutes. Serial dilutions were plated on TCCFA to enumerate CFU per gram feces [14]. Two independent experiments were done, each with 3 male and 3 female mice per C. difficile strain tested, for a total of 12 mice inoculated with each strain.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Single nucleotide polymorphisms identified in the MS1-7 and recV flg OFF strains compared to the R20291 reference genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s001

(XLS)

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Complete analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MS1-7 and recV flg OFF parent.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Strains and plasmids used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s004

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. recV flg OFF strains differ in status of cwpV switch.

Orientation-specific PCR for the cwpV switch in recV flg OFF strains RT1693 and RT1694. Band sizes– 469bp (OFF) or 322bp (ON).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s005

(TIF)

S2 Fig. All 14 motile suppressors have restored motility.

Quantification of swimming motility assays for the 14 MS, RT1693 (recV flg OFF), and RT1702 (recV flg ON). A non-motile sigD mutant was included as a control. The means and standard deviation of four biological replicates are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s006

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Motile suppressors have altered growth.

Growth curves of MS1-14, recV flg ON (RT1702), the recV flg OFF parents (values combined for RT1694 (parent of MS1-7) and RT1693 (parent of MS8-14)). Shown are the means and standard deviation for 3 biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s007

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Expression of wild-type rho in MS5 and MS10 restores growth.

Growth curves of MS5 and MS10 expressing wild-type rho (pRho) or bearing vector. The recV flg OFF and recV flg ON strains carrying vector were included. Expression of rho was induced with 10 ng/mL anhydrotetracycline (ATc). The means and standard deviation of three biological replicates are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s008

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Rho does not affect flagellar gene expression at the level of promoter.

An alkaline phosphatase (phoZ) reporter fusion to the flgB promoter (PflgB) and a promoterless:: phoZ construct were introduced into recV flg ON (RT1702), recV flg OFF (RT1693), MS5, and MS10. The means and standard deviation of 5 biological replicates are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s009

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Supporting data for animal studies.

(A) Orientation-specific PCR for the 6 additional invertible sequences found in R20291, in recV flg OFF (RT1693), MS5, and MS10. WT R20291 was included as a control. Orientation is labelled as ON/OFF for the three invertible sequences whose regulation has been studied (cwpV, flg, cmrRST) or as published (pub) or inverse (inv) based on the R20291 reference genome for the Cdi2, Cdi3, and Cdi5 sequences whose effects on gene expression are not known. (B) Antibiotic-treated male and female C57BL6 mice were inoculated with 105 spores of the indicated C. difficile strain. CFU in feces collected every 24 hours post inoculation were enumerated as an indication of intestinal burden of C. difficile. Shown are the full courses of infection for two independent experiments that each included 3 male and 3 female mice. The data are separated by motile suppressor and its respective parent strain for clarity with the same data for wildtype R20291 in both upper and lower panels, with means and standard deviation shown. Dotted line represents a limit of detection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s010

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Rho is dispensable for C. difficile spore germination.

Purified spores of indicated strains were germinated in the presence of taurocholate (+) or in buffer without germinant as a control (-), and optical density (OD600) was measured. Germination was plotted as the ratio of optical density (OD600) at a given time point (tx) versus initial OD600 (t0). A representative germination plot of four independent experiments is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008708.s011

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Kathleen Furtado for analysis using the RhoTermPredict algorithm, Elizabeth Shank for sharing pDR111, and Chandrabali Ghose-Paul and David Ho for gifting the hamster anti-FliC serum.

References

  1. 1. Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kuehne SA, Cockayne A, Minton NP. The emergence of 'hypervirulence' in Clostridium difficile. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010; 300:387–95. pmid:20547099
  2. 2. McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:1769–75. pmid:12135033
  3. 3. Carter GP, Awad MM, Kelly ML, Rood JI, Lyras D. TcdB or not TcdB: a tale of two Clostridium difficile toxins. Future Microbiol. 2011; 6:121–3. pmid:21366410
  4. 4. Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature. 2010; 467:711–3. pmid:20844489
  5. 5. Chandrasekaran R, Lacy DB. The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017; 41:723–50. pmid:29048477
  6. 6. Just I, Selzer J, Wilm M, von Eichel-Streiber C, Mann M, Aktories K. Glucosylation of Rho proteins by Clostridium difficile toxin B. Nature. 1995; 375:500–3. pmid:7777059
  7. 7. Just I, Wilm M, Selzer J, Rex G, von Eichel-Streiber C, Mann M, et al. The enterotoxin from Clostridium difficile (ToxA) monoglucosylates the Rho proteins. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270:13932–6. pmid:7775453
  8. 8. Nusrat A, von Eichel-Streiber C, Turner JR, Verkade P, Madara JL, Parkos CA. Clostridium difficile toxins disrupt epithelial barrier function by altering membrane microdomain localization of tight junction proteins. Infect Immun. 2001; 69:1329–36. pmid:11179295
  9. 9. Kasendra M, Barrile R, Leuzzi R, Soriani M. Clostridium difficile toxins facilitate bacterial colonization by modulating the fence and gate function of colonic epithelium. J Infect Dis. 2014; 209:1095–104. pmid:24273043
  10. 10. Shen A. Clostridium difficile toxins: mediators of inflammation. J Innate Immun. 2012; 4:149–58. pmid:22237401
  11. 11. Lyras D, O'Connor JR, Howarth PM, Sambol SP, Carter GP, Phumoonna T, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2009; 458:1176–9. pmid:19252482
  12. 12. Carter GP, Chakravorty A, Pham Nguyen TA, Mileto S, Schreiber F, Li L, et al. Defining the Roles of TcdA and TcdB in Localized Gastrointestinal Disease, Systemic Organ Damage, and the Host Response during Clostridium difficile Infections. mBio. 2015; 6:e00551–15. pmid:26037121
  13. 13. Hennequin C, Janoir C, Barc MC, Collignon A, Karjalainen T. Identification and characterization of a fibronectin-binding protein from Clostridium difficile. Microbiology. 2003; 149:2779–87. pmid:14523111
  14. 14. McKee RW, Aleksanyan N, Garrett EM, Tamayo R. Type IV pili promote Clostridium difficile adherence and persistence in a mouse model of infection. Infect Immun. 2018; 86: e00943–17. pmid:29483294
  15. 15. Tasteyre A, Barc MC, Collignon A, Boureau H, Karjalainen T. Role of FliC and FliD flagellar proteins of Clostridium difficile in adherence and gut colonization. Infect Immun. 2001; 69:7937–40. pmid:11705981
  16. 16. Purcell EB, McKee RW, Bordeleau E, Burrus V, Tamayo R. Regulation of Type IV Pili Contributes to Surface Behaviors of Historical and Epidemic Strains of Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2015; 198:565–77. pmid:26598364
  17. 17. Bordeleau E, Purcell EB, Lafontaine DA, Fortier LC, Tamayo R, Burrus V. Cyclic di-GMP riboswitch-regulated type IV pili contribute to aggregation of Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2015; 197:819–32. pmid:25512308
  18. 18. Aubry A, Hussack G, Chen W, Kuolee R, Twine SM, Fulton KM, et al. Modulation of toxin production by the flagellar regulon in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun. 2012; 80:3521–32. pmid:22851750
  19. 19. Faulds-Pain A, Twine SM, Vinogradov E, Strong PC, Dell A, Buckley AM, et al. The post-translational modification of the Clostridium difficile flagellin affects motility, cell surface properties and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2014; 94:272–89. pmid:25135277
  20. 20. Baban ST, Kuehne SA, Barketi-Klai A, Cartman ST, Kelly ML, Hardie KR, et al. The role of flagella in Clostridium difficile pathogenesis: comparison between a non-epidemic and an epidemic strain. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e73026. pmid:24086268
  21. 21. Mukherjee S, Kearns DB. The structure and regulation of flagella in Bacillus subtilis. Annu Rev Genet. 2014; 48:319–40. pmid:25251856
  22. 22. McKee RW, Mangalea MR, Purcell EB, Borchardt EK, Tamayo R. The second messenger cyclic Di-GMP regulates Clostridium difficile toxin production by controlling expression of sigD. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195:5174–85. pmid:24039264
  23. 23. El Meouche I, Peltier J, Monot M, Soutourina O, Pestel-Caron M, Dupuy B, et al. Characterization of the SigD regulon of C. difficile and its positive control of toxin production through the regulation of tcdR. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e83748. pmid:24358307
  24. 24. Stabler RA, He M, Dawson L, Martin M, Valiente E, Corton C, et al. Comparative genome and phenotypic analysis of Clostridium difficile 027 strains provides insight into the evolution of a hypervirulent bacterium. Genome Biol. 2009; 10:R102. pmid:19781061
  25. 25. Purcell EB, McKee RW, McBride SM, Waters CM, Tamayo R. Cyclic diguanylate inversely regulates motility and aggregation in Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2012; 194:3307–16. pmid:22522894
  26. 26. Marquez LM, Helmann JD, Ferrari E, Parker HM, Ordal GW, Chamberlin MJ. Studies of sigma D-dependent functions in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1990; 172:3435–43. pmid:2111808
  27. 27. Mani N, Dupuy B. Regulation of toxin synthesis in Clostridium difficile by an alternative RNA polymerase sigma factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98:5844–9. pmid:11320220
  28. 28. Martin MJ, Clare S, Goulding D, Faulds-Pain A, Barquist L, Browne HP, et al. The agr Locus Regulates Virulence and Colonization Genes in Clostridium difficile 027. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195:3672–81. pmid:23772065
  29. 29. Ciftci Y, Girinathan BP, Dhungel BA, Hasan MK, Govind R. Clostridioides difficile SinR' regulates toxin, sporulation and motility through protein-protein interaction with SinR. Anaerobe. 2019; 59:1–7. pmid:31077800
  30. 30. Girinathan BP, Ou J, Dupuy B, Govind R. Pleiotropic roles of Clostridium difficile sin locus. PLoS Pathog. 2018; 14:e1006940. pmid:29529083
  31. 31. Edwards AN, Anjuwon-Foster BR, McBride SM. RstA Is a Major Regulator of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Production and Motility. mBio. 2019; 10:954–71.
  32. 32. Edwards AN, Tamayo R, McBride SM. A novel regulator controls Clostridium difficile sporulation, motility and toxin production. Mol Microbiol. 2016; 100:954–71. pmid:26915493
  33. 33. Anjuwon-Foster BR, Tamayo R. A genetic switch controls the production of flagella and toxins in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet. 2017; 13:e1006701. pmid:28346491
  34. 34. Anjuwon-Foster BR, Maldonado-Vazquez N, Tamayo R. Characterization of flagellar and toxin phase variation in Clostridiodes difficile ribotype 012 isolates. J Bacteriol. 2018; 200:e00056–18. pmid:29735765
  35. 35. van der Woude MW. Phase variation: how to create and coordinate population diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011; 14:205–11. pmid:21292543
  36. 36. van der Woude MW, Baumler AJ. Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004; 17:581–611. pmid:15258095
  37. 37. Grindley ND, Whiteson KL, Rice PA. Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006; 75:567–605. pmid:16756503
  38. 38. Bayliss CD. Determinants of phase variation rate and the fitness implications of differing rates for bacterial pathogens and commensals. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009; 33:504–20. pmid:19222587
  39. 39. Johnson RC. Site-specific DNA Inversion by Serine Recombinases. Microbiolog Spectr. 2015; 3:MDNA3-0047-2014.
  40. 40. Emerson JE, Reynolds CB, Fagan RP, Shaw HA, Goulding D, Fairweather NF. A novel genetic switch controls phase variable expression of CwpV, a Clostridium difficile cell wall protein. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 74:541–56. pmid:19656296
  41. 41. Reynolds CB, Emerson JE, de la Riva L, Fagan RP, Fairweather NF. The Clostridium difficile cell wall protein CwpV is antigenically variable between strains, but exhibits conserved aggregation-promoting function. PLoS Pathog. 2011; 7:e1002024. pmid:21533071
  42. 42. Stabler RA, Valiente E, Dawson LF, He M, Parkhill J, Wren BW. In-depth genetic analysis of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 027 strains reveals high genome fluidity including point mutations and inversions. Gut Microbes. 2010; 1:269–76. pmid:21327033
  43. 43. Sekulovic O, Bourgeois J, Shen A, Camilli A. Expanding the repertoire of conservative site-specific recombination in Clostridioides difficile. Anaerobe. 2019; 60:102073. pmid:31323290
  44. 44. Sekulovic O, Mathias Garrett E, Bourgeois J, Tamayo R, Shen A, Camilli A. Genome-wide detection of conservative site-specific recombination in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14:e1007332. pmid:29621238
  45. 45. Garrett EM, Sekulovic O, Wetzel D, Jones JB, Edwards AN, Vargas-Cuebas G, et al. Phase variation of a signal transduction system controls Clostridioides difficile colony morphology, motility, and virulence. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17:e3000379. pmid:31658249
  46. 46. Abraham JM, Freitag CS, Clements JR, Eisenstein BI. An invertible element of DNA controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82:5724–7. pmid:2863818
  47. 47. Clegg S, Hancox LS, Yeh KS. Salmonella typhimurium fimbrial phase variation and FimA expression. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178:542–5. pmid:8550478
  48. 48. Sekulovic O, Ospina Bedoya M, Fivian-Hughes AS, Fairweather NF, Fortier LC. The Clostridium difficile cell wall protein CwpV confers phase-variable phage resistance. Mol Microbiol. 2015; 98:329–42. pmid:26179020
  49. 49. Ray-Soni A, Bellecourt MJ, Landick R. Mechanisms of Bacterial Transcription Termination: All Good Things Must End. Annu Rev Biochem. 2016; 85:319–47. pmid:27023849
  50. 50. Park JS, Roberts JW. Role of DNA bubble rewinding in enzymatic transcription termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103:4870–5. pmid:16551743
  51. 51. Washburn RS, Marra A, Bryant AP, Rosenberg M, Gentry DR. rho is not essential for viability or virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45:1099–103. pmid:11257021; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC90430.
  52. 52. Quirk PG, Dunkley EA Jr., Lee P, Krulwich TA. Identification of a putative Bacillus subtilis rho gene. J Bacteriol. 1993; 175:8053. pmid:8253694
  53. 53. Dembek M, Barquist L, Boinett CJ, Cain AK, Mayho M, Lawley TD, et al. High-throughput analysis of gene essentiality and sporulation in Clostridium difficile. mBio. 2015; 6:e02383–14. pmid:25714712
  54. 54. Nicolas P, Mader U, Dervyn E, Rochat T, Leduc A, Pigeonneau N, et al. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science. 2012; 335:1103–6. pmid:22383849
  55. 55. Botella L, Vaubourgeix J, Livny J, Schnappinger D. Depleting Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the transcription termination factor Rho causes pervasive transcription and rapid death. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14731. pmid:28348398
  56. 56. Mader U, Nicolas P, Depke M, Pane-Farre J, Debarbouille M, van der Kooi-Pol MM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Transcriptome Architecture: From Laboratory to Infection-Mimicking Conditions. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12:e1005962. pmid:27035918
  57. 57. Mitra P, Ghosh G, Hafeezunnisa M, Sen R. Rho Protein: Roles and Mechanisms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2017; 71:687–709. pmid:28731845
  58. 58. Fagan RP, Fairweather NF. Clostridium difficile has two parallel and essential Sec secretion systems. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286:27483–93. pmid:21659510
  59. 59. Oliveira Paiva AM, Friggen AH, Hossein-Javaheri S, Smits WK. The Signal Sequence of the Abundant Extracellular Metalloprotease PPEP-1 Can Be Used to Secrete Synthetic Reporter Proteins in Clostridium difficile. ACS Synth Biol. 2016; 5:1376–82. pmid:27333161
  60. 60. Hollands K, Proshkin S, Sklyarova S, Epshtein V, Mironov A, Nudler E, et al. Riboswitch control of Rho-dependent transcription termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:5376–81. pmid:22431636
  61. 61. Hollands K, Sevostiyanova A, Groisman EA. Unusually long-lived pause required for regulation of a Rho-dependent transcription terminator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:E1999–2007. pmid:24778260
  62. 62. Kriner MA, Groisman EA. The Bacterial Transcription Termination Factor Rho Coordinates Mg(2+) Homeostasis with Translational Signals. J Mol Biol. 2015; 427:3834–49. pmid:26523680
  63. 63. Kriner MA, Groisman EA. RNA secondary structures regulate three steps of Rho-dependent transcription termination within a bacterial mRNA leader. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45:631–42. pmid:28123036
  64. 64. Edwards AN, Pascual RA, Childress KO, Nawrocki KL, Woods EC, McBride SM. An alkaline phosphatase reporter for use in Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe. 2015; 32:98–104. pmid:25576237
  65. 65. Kohn H, Widger W. The molecular basis for the mode of action of bicyclomycin. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord. 2005; 5:273–95. pmid:16181146
  66. 66. Theriot CM, Koumpouras CC, Carlson PE, Bergin II, Aronoff DM, Young VB. Cefoperazone-treated mice as an experimental platform to assess differential virulence of Clostridium difficile strains. Gut Microbes. 2011; 2:326–34. pmid:22198617
  67. 67. Winston JA, Thanissery R, Montgomery SA, Theriot CM. Cefoperazone-treated Mouse Model of Clinically-relevant Clostridium difficile Strain R20291. J Vis Exp. 2016;(118).
  68. 68. Castro-Cordova P, Diaz-Yanez F, Munoz-Miralles J, Gil F, Paredes-Sabja D. Effect of antibiotic to induce Clostridioides difficile-susceptibility and infectious strain in a mouse model of Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence. Anaerobe. 2020; 62:102149. pmid:31940467
  69. 69. Antunes A, Martin-Verstraete I, Dupuy B. CcpA-mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 2011; 79:882–99. pmid:21299645
  70. 70. Antunes A, Camiade E, Monot M, Courtois E, Barbut F, Sernova NV, et al. Global transcriptional control by glucose and carbon regulator CcpA in Clostridium difficile. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:10701–18. pmid:22989714
  71. 71. Dineen SS, Villapakkam AC, Nordman JT, Sonenshein AL. Repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression by CodY. Mol Microbiol. 2007; 66:206–19. pmid:17725558
  72. 72. Dineen SS, McBride SM, Sonenshein AL. Integration of metabolism and virulence by Clostridium difficile CodY. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192:5350–62. pmid:20709897
  73. 73. Deakin LJ, Clare S, Fagan RP, Dawson LF, Pickard DJ, West MR, et al. The Clostridium difficile spo0A Gene Is a Persistence and Transmission Factor. Infect Immun. 2012; 80:2704–11. pmid:22615253
  74. 74. Edwards AN, McBride SM. Determination of the in vitro Sporulation Frequency of Clostridium difficile. Bio Protoc. 2017; 7:e2125.
  75. 75. Shrestha R, Sorg JA. Hierarchical recognition of amino acid co-germinants during Clostridioides difficile spore germination. Anaerobe. 2018; 49:41–7. pmid:29221987
  76. 76. Xu Y, Kohn H, Widger WR. Mutations in the rho transcription termination factor that affect RNA tracking. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:30023–30. pmid:12034708
  77. 77. McKee RW, Harvest CK, Tamayo R. Cyclic Diguanylate Regulates Virulence Factor Genes via Multiple Riboswitches in Clostridium difficile. mSphere. 2018; 3:e00423–18. pmid:30355665
  78. 78. Tamayo R. Cyclic diguanylate riboswitches control bacterial pathogenesis mechanisms. PLoS Pathog. 2019; 15:e1007529. pmid:30730989
  79. 79. Di Salvo M, Puccio S, Peano C, Lacour S, Alifano P. RhoTermPredict: an algorithm for predicting Rho-dependent transcription terminators based on Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Salmonella enterica databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20:117. pmid:30845912
  80. 80. Sebaihia M, Wren BW, Mullany P, Fairweather NF, Minton N, Stabler R, et al. The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nature Genet. 2006; 38:779–86. pmid:16804543
  81. 81. Sedlyarova N, Shamovsky I, Bharati BK, Epshtein V, Chen J, Gottesman S, et al. sRNA-Mediated Control of Transcription Termination in E. coli. Cell. 2016; 167:111–21. pmid:27662085
  82. 82. Figueroa-Bossi N, Schwartz A, Guillemardet B, D'Heygere F, Bossi L, Boudvillain M. RNA remodeling by bacterial global regulator CsrA promotes Rho-dependent transcription termination. Genes Dev. 2014; 28:1239–51. pmid:24888591
  83. 83. Sevostyanova A, Groisman EA. An RNA motif advances transcription by preventing Rho-dependent termination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112:E6835–43. pmid:26630006
  84. 84. Bossi L, Schwartz A, Guillemardet B, Boudvillain M, Figueroa-Bossi N. A role for Rho-dependent polarity in gene regulation by a noncoding small RNA. Genes Dev. 2012; 26:1864–73. pmid:22895254
  85. 85. Bastet L, Chauvier A, Singh N, Lussier A, Lamontagne AM, Prevost K, et al. Translational control and Rho-dependent transcription termination are intimately linked in riboswitch regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45:7474–86. pmid:28520932
  86. 86. Leela JK, Syeda AH, Anupama K, Gowrishankar J. Rho-dependent transcription termination is essential to prevent excessive genome-wide R-loops in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110:258–63. pmid:23251031
  87. 87. D'Heygere F, Rabhi M, Boudvillain M. Phyletic distribution and conservation of the bacterial transcription termination factor Rho. Microbiology. 2013; 159:1423–36. pmid:23704790
  88. 88. Nowatzke WL, Richardson JP. Characterization of an unusual Rho factor from the high G + C gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271:742–7. pmid:8557681
  89. 89. Kalarickal NC, Ranjan A, Kalyani BS, Wal M, Sen R. A bacterial transcription terminator with inefficient molecular motor action but with a robust transcription termination function. J Mol Biol. 2010; 858 395:966–82. pmid:20026069
  90. 90. Yuan AH, Hochschild A. A bacterial global regulator forms a prion. Science. 2017; 355:198–201. pmid:28082594
  91. 91. Bidnenko V, Nicolas P, Grylak-Mielnicka A, Delumeau O, Auger S, Aucouturier A, et al. Termination factor Rho: From the control of pervasive transcription to cell fate determination in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet. 2017; 13:e1006909. pmid:28723971
  92. 92. Nagel A, Michalik S, Debarbouille M, Hertlein T, Gesell Salazar M, Rath H, et al. Inhibition of Rho Activity Increases Expression of SaeRS-Dependent Virulence Factor Genes in Staphylococcus aureus, Showing a Link between Transcription Termination, Antibiotic Action, and Virulence. mBio. 2018; 9:e01332–18. pmid:30228237
  93. 93. Dutta D, Shatalin K, Epshtein V, Gottesman ME, Nudler E. Linking RNA polymerase backtracking to genome instability in E. coli. Cell. 2011; 146:533–43. pmid:21854980
  94. 94. Washburn RS, Gottesman ME. Transcription termination maintains chromosome integrity. Proc 870 Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:792–7.
  95. 95. Peters JM, Mooney RA, Grass JA, Jessen ED, Tran F, Landick R. Rho and NusG suppress pervasive antisense transcription in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2012; 26:2621–33. pmid:23207917
  96. 96. Bouillaut L, McBride SM, Sorg JA. Genetic Manipulation of Clostridium difficile. Curr Protoc Microbiol Unit 9A.2:1–17.
  97. 97. Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1079:105–16. pmid:24170397
  98. 98. Ghose C, Eugenis I, Sun X, Edwards AN, McBride SM, Pride DT, et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of recombinant Clostridium difficile flagellar protein FliC. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016; 5:e8. pmid:26839147
  99. 99. Ransom EM, Weiss DS, Ellermeier CD. Use of mCherryOpt Fluorescent Protein in Clostridium difficile. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1476:53–67. pmid:27507333
  100. 100. Ransom EM, Ellermeier CD, Weiss DS. Use of mCherry Red fluorescent protein for studies of protein localization and gene expression in Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(5):1652–60. pmid:25527559
  101. 101. Kirk JA, Fagan RP. Heat shock increases conjugation efficiency in Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe. 2016; 42:1–5. pmid:27377776
  102. 102. Ben-Yehuda S, Rudner DZ, Losick R. RacA, a bacterial protein that anchors chromosomes to the cell poles. Science. 2003; 299:532–6. pmid:12493822
  103. 103. Putnam EE, Nock AM, Lawley TD, Shen A. SpoIVA and SipL are Clostridium difficile spore morphogenetic proteins. J Bacteriol. 2013; 195:1214–25. pmid:23292781
  104. 104. Edwards AN, McBride SM. Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile Spores. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1476:117–28. pmid:27507337
  105. 105. Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, Nanthakumar N, Cheknis A, Gerding DN, et al. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135:1984–92. pmid:18848941