Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Exposure to opposing temperature extremes causes comparable effects on Cardinium density but contrasting effects on Cardinium-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility

  • Matthew R. Doremus ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Entomology and Insect Science Graduate Interdisciplinary Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America

  • Suzanne E. Kelly,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Entomology and Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America

  • Martha S. Hunter

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Entomology and Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America


Terrestrial arthropods, including insects, commonly harbor maternally inherited intracellular symbionts that confer benefits to the host or manipulate host reproduction to favor infected female progeny. These symbionts may be especially vulnerable to thermal stress, potentially leading to destabilization of the symbiosis and imposing costs to the host. For example, increased temperatures can reduce the density of a common reproductive manipulator, Wolbachia, and the strength of its crossing incompatibility (cytoplasmic incompatibility, or CI) phenotype. Another manipulative symbiont, Cardinium hertigii, infects ~ 6–10% of Arthropods, and also can induce CI, but there is little homology between the molecular mechanisms of CI induced by Cardinium and Wolbachia. Here we investigated whether temperature disrupts the CI phenotype of Cardinium in a parasitic wasp host, Encarsia suzannae. We examined the effects of both warm (32°C day/ 29°C night) and cool (20°C day/ 17°C night) temperatures on Cardinium CI and found that both types of temperature stress modified aspects of this symbiosis. Warm temperatures reduced symbiont density, pupal developmental time, vertical transmission rate, and the strength of both CI modification and rescue. Cool temperatures also reduced symbiont density, however this resulted in stronger CI, likely due to cool temperatures prolonging the host pupal stage. The opposing effects of cool and warm-mediated reductions in symbiont density on the resulting CI phenotype indicates that CI strength may be independent of density in this system. Temperature stress also modified the CI phenotype only if it occurred during the pupal stage, highlighting the likely importance of this stage for CI induction in this symbiosis.

Author summary

Insects often harbor heritable symbiotic bacteria that infect their cells and/or bodily fluids. These heritable bacteria are passed from mother to offspring and can have substantial effects on host insect biology, and include bacteria like Cardinium that cause mating incompatibilities between symbiont-infected and uninfected individuals. Often, the extent of these symbiont-conferred modifications correlates with the bacterial density in the host. The appearance of these phenotypes is also affected by temperature stress, which often reduces bacterial density. However, here we find that temperature-altered strength of Cardinium-induced mating incompatibility in a whitefly parasitoid wasp can be independent of Cardinium density. While heat treatment reduced the symbiont density and the phenotype, as expected, cold treatment also reduced symbiont density but increased the degree of mating incompatibility. Here, the prolonged duration of the host pupal development in the cold treatments appeared to be more important for phenotype strength. These results suggest that the connection between bacterial density and phenotype strength may not be as general as previously thought. Furthermore, the modification of this manipulative phenotype has implications for the effectiveness of the host, Encarsia suzannae, as a biological control agent.


Temperature has profound effects on the biology of ectothermic organisms as well as on the microbiota inhabiting these organisms [14]. The heritable symbionts of arthropods, which are primarily vertically transmitted from mother to offspring, are closely integrated with host biology [5], and may be particularly vulnerable to temperature stress [4, 6]. These symbionts rely on strategies, ranging from mutualistic to parasitic, to modify host phenotype in ways that increase the likelihood of their maternal transmission [5]. While transmission of these symbionts and their phenotypic effects are usually stable under benign conditions, both aspects may be threatened as the environment becomes less hospitable [4]. Extreme temperatures can reduce symbiont density [7, 8, 9], induce phenotypic failure [710], and/or reduce rates of vertical transmission, resulting in uninfected offspring [8, 9]. From the host’s perspective, the limited thermotolerance of the symbiont compared to the host is a vulnerability, since long-term associations are likely to make hosts metabolically or reproductively dependent on these symbionts, even those that originally acted as reproductive parasites [1114]. In these cases, temperature-induced disruption of these symbioses can be disastrous for the host, reducing host fitness by rendering hosts vulnerable to natural enemies [10, 15] or causing reproductive failure [13, 16, 17].

Temperature extremes thus pose a clear challenge to heritable symbioses, including those involving one of the best-studied symbionts, Wolbachia, a diverse genus of widespread bacteria (Phylum Alphaproteobacteria). Wolbachia typically acts as a reproductive parasite of hosts using one of four major strategies, the most common of which is cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI)[18]. CI is a mating incompatibility between symbiont-infected males and uninfected females, resulting in inviable offspring. Offspring viability is restored (or “rescued”) in crosses with infected females [18]. CI increases infected female fitness at the cost of uninfected female fitness, thus driving the symbiont infection through a population [1921]. Some Wolbachia strains also improve host resistance to viruses and macroparasites, including several important human pathogens, instigating the use of this symbiont as a means of controlling important human diseases, including dengue fever, zika, and chikungunya [2224].

Multiple studies using different host species and Wolbachia strains have found that Wolbachia’s CI phenotype can be modified by temperature [7, 8, 25]. These changes to CI appear to be generally mediated by changes in Wolbachia density, which in turn influences CI strength [26]. Temperature stress reduces Wolbachia density, thereby weakening CI [8, 25]. Temperature-induced Wolbachia reduction also leads to partial failure of the rescue phenotype and reduced efficacy of vertical transmission [8, 27]. From these studies, it seems that temperature stress in some habitats could limit the ability of some Wolbachia strains to maintain high levels of infection or spread through novel populations, limiting both the natural spread of this symbiont as well as efforts to use this symbiont in disease vector control [8].

While there is well over three decades of research studying the effects of temperature on Wolbachia symbioses [2830], we know very little about how temperature effects a widespread and unrelated bacterium, Cardinium hertigii (Phylum Bacteroidetes; [31, 32]), that also induces CI in its hosts [3337]. A CI-inducing Cardinium strain infects the parasitoid wasp, Encarsia suzannae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae, = Encarsia pergandiella; [33, 38]). Genome and transcriptome comparisons between this CI-Cardinium strain from E. suzannae, cEper1, and CI-Wolbachia strains found little homology between the two bacterial genomes, indicating that CI arose independently in these distantly related symbionts [39, 40]. Despite the two bacteria using different molecular mechanisms to induce CI, the resulting phenotype is strikingly similar; both CI mechanisms ultimately kill embryos by inhibiting proper chromosome pairing in early mitotic cycles, leading to chromatin bridging between daughter cells, eventually triggering widespread aneuploidy and embryonic mortality [41, 42].

Although Cardinium symbioses present an alternative study system for the study of CI, research concerning the impact of environmental factors upon this manipulative symbiont is limited to a handful of studies investigating Cardinium presence or absence at various temperatures. One such study found that Cardinium prevalence was reduced in natural populations of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogidae) occupying arid regions, offering evidence for a destabilizing effect on the symbiosis attributed to extreme temperature fluctuations in those regions [43]. More recently, an analysis of global Cardinium infection frequencies found increased Cardinium prevalence in insect host populations occupying warmer regions (mean temperature of ~25°C) compared to cooler ones [44]. Other studies using laboratory cultures of the spider mite, Metaseiulus occidentalis, found that mite cultures held at 34°C for >1 year were either uninfected with Cardinium or had a reduced amount of the symbiont compared to cultures maintained at room temperature [45, 46]. Together, these studies provide some evidence for a general destabilizing effect of extreme temperatures on Cardinium-host symbioses; yet we still do not know if temperature modifies other aspects of Cardinium symbioses, particularly the CI phenotype.

Here we examined how temperature stress modifies this manipulative symbiosis. We tested the effects of prolonged exposure, including one or more host stages, to either high or low temperatures on both Cardinium CI modification (in males) and rescue (in females; Fig 1). We next tested whether observed temperature-induced changes to Cardinium’s CI modification machinery and rescue capabilities were due to changes in symbiont density. We also tested the effect of temperature stress on the duration of host pupal development, a host factor that appeared to correlate with Cardinium’s CI strength in a previous study [47]. We next used temperature shock treatments during specific life stages to test whether temperature’s influence on CI was life-stage dependent. Finally, we tested the effect of temperature stress on vertical transmission rates of this heritable symbiont.

Fig 1. Experimental design for testing the effects of prolonged temperature exposure on Cardinium’s CI phenotype.

Color of bars denotes temperature range experienced at that life stage (no bar = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). This experimental design was modified slightly for temperature shock and vertical transmission assays. In shock assays, temperature shocks did not extend to multiple life stages. Only the control and larval treatments were performed in the vertical transmission experiment.


Warm and cool temperatures modify CI strength of Cardinium

Similar to previous studies of this system, we found that at the constant temperature of 27°C, the CI cross resulted in ~70% offspring mortality (Fig 2; [33, 4749]). We also found that prolonged exposure of male hosts to either warm (32°C day/29°C night; 16:8 h) or cool (20°C day/17°C night; 16:8 h) temperatures caused dramatically different levels of CI-induced offspring mortality compared to males reared at 27°C (Fig 2). Prolonged exposure to warm temperatures, beginning either when the host was a larva or pupa, resulted in a significant decrease in CI-induced offspring mortality (Fig 2; S1 Table; Logistic regression F1,32larva = 7.15, p = 0.01; F1,31pupa = 7.49, p = 0.01). Interestingly, exposure to cool temperatures beginning in the pupal stage had an opposite effect on CI strength and resulted in an increase in CI-induced mortality (F1,38 = 9.98, p = 0.003). In this treatment, the CI phenotype became not only stronger but also less variable than CI typical of this Cardinium strain (Fig 2). However, we found that neither warm nor cool temperatures affected CI strength when the exposure period only included the adult stage (Fig 2; F1,37cool-adult = 0.04, p = 0.85; F1,30warm-adult = 0.85, p = 0.36). We found no effect of temperature on offspring viability in control (“N”) crosses, in which no CI-induced mortality is expected, showing that changes in offspring mortality in warm and cool treatments are not due to a general effect on male viability (Fig 2; Logistic regression F1,40cold-larva = 0.26, p = 0.62; F1,39cold-pupa = 2.31, p = 0.14; F1,38cold-adult = 0.08, p = 0.77; F1,31warm-larva = 0.43, p = 0.52; F1,30warm-pupa = 0.0002, p = 0.99; F1,29warm-adult = 2.56, p = 0.12).

Fig 2. Proportion of arrested whiteflies (proxy for CI-mortality) generated from crosses involving male wasps exposed to different temperatures.

Color of bars denotes temperature range (grey = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at which the temperature exposure began. R = rescue cross, C+ female x C+ male. CI = CI cross, C- female x C+ male. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to crosses of the same type performed at 27°C. Numbers above whisker plots denote replicate number. N = 5–12 males, with a mean offspring per male = 17.7.

Warm and cool temperatures modify Cardinium’s ability to rescue CI

When we tested the effectiveness of the ability of Cardinium in females to rescue Cardinium-modified sperm, the 27°C control treatment showed comparable offspring survival between the rescue cross (“R”; infected mother x infected father) and the control cross (“N”; infected mother x uninfected father), indicating that cEper1 reliably rescues CI when mating individuals bear the same Cardinium strain (Fig 3; [33, 47]). We found that exposure of females to warm temperatures (32°C day/29°C night; 16:8 h) beginning during the pupal and adult stages decreased offspring survival in both R and N crosses compared to those same crosses at 27°C (Fig 3, S1 Table; Logistic regression F1,54pupa-N = 11.78, p = 0.001; F1,53adult-N = 18.26, p = <0.0001; F1,53pupa-R = 19.02, p = <0.0001; F1,52adult-R = 15.74, p = 0.0002). The heat-exposed control (N) crosses showed lower offspring survival rates than the 27°C controls, which suggests that heat reduced the viability of the experimental females independent of the CI phenotype. To account for this general reduction in viability, we subsequently compared offspring survival between the rescue (R) cross and its corresponding control (N) cross for each heat treatment. We then found an additional significant reduction in offspring survival in the R cross compared with its corresponding N cross when females were exposed to heat starting in the larval stage (Fig 3; F1,28 = 20.13, p = 0.0001). These results suggest a partial failure of the rescue phenotype with heat, although pupal and adult exposure to heat did not significantly influence rescue beyond the general reduction in viability (F1,28pupa = 2.85, p = 0.1; F1,25adult = 0.11, p = 0.74). Cool temperatures (20°C day/17°C night; 16:8 h) did not decrease offspring survival in N crosses, suggesting no effect of cold on the viability of females (F1,52larva = 2.53, p = 0.12; F1,51pupa = 0.89, p = 0.35; F1,50adult = 0.54, p = 0.47). For this reason, we compared cold R rescue crosses to the R cross of females kept at the 27°C control temperature (Fig 3). Like the heat treatment, the longest cold exposure resulted in reduced offspring survival in R crosses, indicative of partial rescue failure (Fig 3; F1,56 = 10.65, p = 0.002), but neither exposure at pupal or adult stages reduced rescue significantly (F1,55pupa = 3.21, p = 0.08; F1,54adult = 0.25, p = 0.62).

Fig 3. Proportion of surviving offspring (developed pupae) generated from crosses involving female wasps exposed to different temperatures.

Color of bars denotes temperature range (grey = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at which temperature exposure began. N = control cross: C+ female x C- male. R = rescue cross: C+ female x C+ male. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to respective crosses at 27C. § denotes significant differences to the N cross within that temperature treatment. N = 15 females for each treatment, with the mean number of offspring per female = 9.25.

Warm and cool temperatures reduce Cardinium density in male and female hosts

We tested the effect of temperature stress on Cardinium density in male and female hosts. We found that Cardinium reached variable densities in adult males at the control rearing temperature of 27°C, with densities ranging from 0.25 Cardinium: host cells to about 2:1 Cardinium:host cell (Fig 4a). Both warm and cool temperatures reduced Cardinium density in the male larval and pupal treatments (Fig 4a, S2 Table; Mann-Whitney U-test pwarm-larva = 0.009; pwarm-pupa = 0.04; pcool-larva = 0.004; pcool-pupa = 0.04), although we found no significant changes to Cardinium density in either of the male adult treatments, which also did not show evidence of temperature-modified CI strength (Figs 2 and 4a). While warm and cool treatments both suppressed Cardinium density in male hosts, these temperature treatments showed contrasting effects on CI strength. Furthermore, the Cardinium density of individuals across treatments did not correlate with CI strength (Spearmen’s rho = 0.05, p = 0.72).

Fig 4. Density of Cardinium infection in adult a) male E. suzannae and b) female E. suzannae.

Densities were measured by estimating the amount of single copy Cardinium gyrB genes relative to single copy host ef1-alpa genes with qPCR. N = 5–10 for males (denoted by numbers above whisker plots) and N = 5 for females. Each sample was run with three technical replicates. Color of bars denotes temperature range (grey = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at which temperature exposure began. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to the symbiont density at 27°C.

In female wasps reared at 27°C, Cardinium density was less variable than in males, with females harboring about 2.5 Cardinium: 1 host cell (Fig 4b). Temperature treatments all significantly reduced Cardinium density in females relative to those kept at 27°C, regardless of temperature range or exposure period (Fig 4b, S3 Table; Mann-Whitney U-test p = 0.012 for all comparisons to control).

Temperature exposure during pupal stage modifies E. suzannae pupal developmental time

Because cool temperatures simultaneously reduced Cardinium density yet resulted in significantly stronger CI, we looked for another factor that could be responsible for the cold-modified CI phenotype. We found that cool temperatures significantly prolonged the duration of the pupal stage from ~6 days at 27°C to ~14 days (Fig 5, S4 Table; Mann-Whitney U-test p = <0.0001). Additionally, we found that warm temperatures significantly reduced pupal developmental time (from ~6 days to ~ 4 days) when those exposures began in the larval or pupal stage (Fig 5, S4 Table; p = <0.01). The adult treatments underwent their temperature exposure after the pupal stage, and we found no difference in pupal duration between adult-exposed wasps and control wasps kept at 27°C (Fig 5). As in [47], we also found that the duration of the pupal stage positively correlated with CI strength (Fig 6; Spearman’s rho = 0.57, p = <0.0001).

Fig 5. Duration of male E. suzannae pupal stage (in days) at different temperatures.

Color of bars denotes temperature range (grey = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at which temperature exposure began. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to the duration of the pupal stage at 27°C. Numbers above plots denotes replicates. N = 12–22 male wasps.

Fig 6. Correlation between CI strength (as denoted by the proportion of arrested whiteflies) and the duration of the pupal stage of male E. suzannae.

Points refer to development time and corresponding offspring mortality for individual males used in CI crosses. The color of points denotes temperature range (black = 27°C, red = 32–29°C, blue = 20–17°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at which temperature exposure began (□ = Larva, Δ = Pupa, O = Adult).

Heat-shock during the male pupal, but not adult, stage weakens CI

We designed a second experiment using temperature-shocks of equal duration to test whether temperature effects on Cardinium’s CI were dependent on host life stage. We found that heat shock (40°C for 2 hours) during the pupal, but not the adult stage, reduced offspring mortality in CI crosses (Fig 7, S1 Table; F1,24pupa = 5.48 p = 0.03; F1,23adult = 0.04, p = 0.84). Unlike our previous experiment (Fig 2), we found no difference in CI-induced mortality between the control and either the pupal or adult cold-shock (4°C for 2 hours) treatments (Fig 7, S1 Table; F1,25pupa = 1.76, p = 0.2; F1,24adult = 0.23, p = 0.64). Perhaps notably, cold-shock during the pupal stage did not prolong pupal development (S1 Fig). While Cardinium density was slightly reduced in males that experienced shocks during the pupal stage, this difference was not significantly different compared to control densities (S2 Fig).

Fig 7. Proportion of arrested whiteflies (proxy for CI-mortality) generated from crosses involving male wasps exposed to different temperature shocks.

Color of bars denotes temperature treatment (grey = 27°C, red = heat shock at 40°C, blue = cold shock at 4°C). Treatments are also separated by the stage at stage temperature exposure began. R = rescue cross, C(+) female x C(+) male. CI = CI cross, C(-) female x C(+) male. Asterisks denote significant differences compared to respective crosses at 27°C. Numbers represent replicates for each cross. N = 8–10, with the mean offspring per male = 15.3.

High temperatures reduce vertical transmission efficiency

Prolonged exposure to high and low temperatures resulted in a reduction of the ability of Cardinium to rescue its CI (Fig 3) and a reduction of the density in female hosts (Fig 4b). This rescue failure could have resulted from vertical transmission failure, which would generate uninfected eggs susceptible to CI. To test this hypothesis, we exposed female hosts to one of three temperature treatments that started during their larval stage: a warm (32°C day/29°C night; 16:8 h), cool (20°C day/17°C night; 16:8 h), and intermediate control (27°C) treatment, and then examined their offspring for Cardinium infection. We found that vertical transmission was perfect (100% of offspring were infected) at the 27°C control temperature and the cool temperature treatment (Table 1). However, heat treated wasps showed a significant reduction in the number of infected offspring, which translated to a 90% transmission rate (Table 1; Exact binomial test p = <0.0001).

Table 1. Vertical transmission rates of cEper1 at various temperature ranges.

Proportion of infected offspring are presented along with 95% Confidence Intervals from Exact binomial tests.


We tested the effect of temperature stress on a symbiosis between a minute parasitoid wasp, E. suzannae, and its CI-inducing heritable symbiont, Cardinium. Male hosts exposed to warm temperatures during the larval or pupal life stages showed faster pupal development, as well as reduced Cardinium density and reduced expression of the CI phenotype relative to hosts kept at a benign temperature. On the other hand, exposure to cool temperatures beginning during the pupal stage strengthened CI expression, despite also reducing Cardinium density. This stronger CI likely resulted from the prolonged pupal stage of cold-treated males, as cold shock treatments that did not prolong the pupal stage or modify Cardinium density also did not result in stronger CI. We also found that lifetime exposure to both warm and cool temperatures reduced Cardinium density in female hosts. Although both temperature ranges reduced Cardinium density in female hosts, heat exposure weakened the CI rescue phenotype more than cold. Why heat exposure caused more rescue failure is unclear, although the decreased vertical transmission rates we observed from heat-treated females to their offspring could account for additional mortality in these rescue crosses.

The symbiosis between Cardinium and E. suzannae, like other heritable symbioses, is vulnerable to environmental stress [4]. Specifically, warm temperatures can weaken the CI phenotype of this manipulative symbiont, with lifetime exposure to higher temperatures almost completely nullifying the phenotype. Like most symbionts, Cardinium infection is expected to carry a fitness cost to infected females under neutral conditions, and, like other symbionts, Cardinium is expected to rely on its CI phenotype to compensate for maintenance costs, allowing it to successfully invade new host populations when above the unstable equilibrium threshold [1921, 48, 49]. With its CI phenotype weakened, the cost of harboring Cardinium could prevent its spread into regions experiencing prolonged bouts of warmer temperatures.

Warm temperatures also caused Cardinium transmission rates to drop from essentially perfect (100% of offspring infected) to a 90% infection rate. Such a decrease, coupled with modification and rescue failure, may be enough to destabilize the Cardinium symbiosis and cause a drop in Cardinium frequency in an infected population. A similar scenario occurs with Wolbachia that infect Trichogramma wasps, in which the Wolbachia falls in frequency during warm periods and re-invades populations in cooler months [50]. However, given that symbiont strains can show substantial variation in their susceptibility to temperature [8, 10], we caution against applying our results concerning cEper1 (the Cardinium strain used in this study) to other strains of Cardinium. If a strain of Cardinium is thermally sensitive, like cEper1, it may have dynamic infection frequencies that vary seasonally, although this should be investigated further using population-level studies and seasonal field collections.

Our study highlights the importance of the male pupal stage for this Cardinium strain’s CI modification step, which has mechanistic implications for Cardinium CI modification. Temperature exposure only affected CI strength if it occurred throughout the pupal stage, suggesting that this symbiont is actively modifying male sperm as the testes develop during the pupal stage. Furthermore, E. suzannae adult males emerge with more than enough mature sperm for ~14 successive matings in a laboratory setting (MRD, personal observation). During spermatogenesis the cytological contents, including any heritable symbionts, are dumped, leaving mature sperm bacteria-free [51, 52]. Given that male E. suzannae emerge with most of the sperm they will use in their lifetime, and that these sperm likely don’t contain Cardinium, we suspect that the majority of Cardinium’s active modification of male chromatin occurs in the pupal stage. Indeed, adult males of many parasitoid species emerge with a majority of their lifetime sperm, and the pupal stage is potentially of prime importance for the modification step of CI symbionts in these hosts [7, 53]. Future gene expression studies on EncarsiaCardinium symbioses should focus on the pupal stage to catch expression of all possible bacterial genes involved in CI modification.

The strength of Wolbachia CI is generally dependent on its within-host density [8, 21, 26, 50, 52]. Reduction of Wolbachia density, whether by temperature or some other means, results in loss or weakening of the CI phenotype [8, 25, 54]. Wolbachia also harbors a bacteriophage, WO, which may further modify Wolbachia density and CI strength in response to extreme temperatures [7]. While we found that Cardinium density is also reduced by warm and cold temperature stress, this density reduction did not result in consistent changes to the CI phenotype. Instead, the duration of the pupal stage of male hosts seems to have a larger impact on this symbiont’s phenotype. This can be seen most clearly in the case of cold exposure, which prolonged the pupal stage and increased CI mortality. A similar scenario occurs in Wolbachia-infected Nasonia vitripennis, a species of parasitic wasp, that also shows prolonged pupal development and stronger CI after long-term exposure to cool temperatures. However, this Wolbachia strain harbors the WO phage and it’s possible that increased phage densities may also be responsible for the stronger CI phenotype [7]. It’s not known whether Cardinium must be present within a spermatid in order to modify it or whether the CI factors employed by Cardinium diffuse across membranes of developing sperm, as has been shown for Wolbachia [55]; either case is compatible with a time-limited mechanism for modifying sperm during the pupal stage. Extension of the pupal stage may grant time for Cardinium to modify a greater proportion of sperm and generate stronger CI. This contrasts with what is observed in Drosophila melanogaster-Wolbachia symbioses, in which slower developing males exhibit weaker CI through an unknown mechanism that is also independent of density [56]. Time could be a limiting factor for modification steps in CI symbioses which occur in host organisms that produce most of their lifetime sperm prior to adult emergence, like many parasitic wasps [7, 53, 57], but not for hosts that continuously mature sperm, like Drosophila flies [56, 58].

One caveat to the apparent lack of dependence of CI strength on density in the current study is that qPCR, our method and the standard method for estimating symbiont density, does not give any indication of symbiont health. It’s possible that while the warm and cool treatments equally depressed Cardinium density, the heat treatment may have damaged Cardinium or denatured proteins and other effector molecules involved in expression of CI, while the cold treatment only repressed Cardinium replication. Nevertheless, while density may be a reliable indicator of phenotypic strength for some symbionts, more examples are emerging in which phenotype strength and symbiont density are decoupled, and this rule may not be as general as originally thought [7, 9, 10, 56, 59]. In the case of low-density symbionts, like the CI-Cardinium strains infecting Encarsia wasps and citrus thrips (Pezothrips kellyanus) [37] or some CI-Wolbachia strains [59], other factors may be of equal or greater importance than symbiont density. These include host factors, like developmental time in this study, or the density of extrachromosomal elements harbored by many heritable bacteria [7]. These phages or plasmids can harbor genes responsible for the symbiont-conferred phenotype [6063], replicate independently of the host bacterium [7, 10], and may respond differently from their host bacterium to environmental stress [7, 10]. In the case of Wolbachia, temperature stress inversely modifies the density of Wolbachia and its WO phage, which harbors the genes required for CI expression [7, 62]. The cEper1 strain of Cardinium does not have a phage but does harbor a plasmid [39]. The role of the plasmid in Cardinium symbioses and temperature stress is not yet clear.

With a rapidly changing climate, the susceptibility of heritable symbionts to temperature stress confers similar vulnerability to the insect hosts that often depend on them, including hosts of economic or medical importance. Here, we show that a symbiosis involving Cardinium and its wasp host is modified by temperature. Whether this has cascading effects upon the host population remains to be seen. However, Encarsia spp. are used as widespread biological control agents for agricultural pests like whiteflies and armored scales [6468]. Given the potential for temperature to disrupt these symbioses, further investigations into how environmentally susceptible Cardinium-Encarsia symbioses impact wasp and whitefly populations are warranted.

Materials and methods

Insect and symbiont cultures

Encarsia suzannae (= E. pergandiella [38]) is a species of autoparasitic wasp (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Like all Hymenoptera, these wasps are haplodiploid; females develop from fertilized, diploid eggs and males develop from haploid, unfertilized eggs. In autoparasitic wasps, females lay diploid eggs within whitefly nymphs, where they develop as solitary primary parasitoids. Male eggs are laid within developing aphelinid whitefly parasitoids enclosed within the remnant whitefly cuticle, and male E. suzannae develop obligately as hyperparasitoids [69]. Laboratory cultures of female E. suzannae were maintained on Bemisia tabaci (sweet potato whitefly) grown on Vigna unguiculata (cowpea); male wasps were maintained by exposing pupae of a second parasitoid species, Eretmocerus emiratus, to virgin E. suzannae females. Wasp cultures were kept at 27°C and 16 D: 8 N photoperiod at ambient humidity unless otherwise noted.

The E. suzannae culture of this study was collected from the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, USA [33]. This wasp naturally harbors a CI-inducing strain of Cardinium hertigii, cEper1 [33, 39, 40]. Additionally, an uninfected wasp culture was established by feeding adults antibiotic-spiked honey, allowing for mating crosses between uninfected C(-) and cEper1 infected C(+) individuals [33]. Uninfected individuals used in this study were from a culture that had been antibiotically-cured at least 10 generations previously. The Er. emiratus used for generating male E. suzannae were not infected with Cardinium.

Testing the effect of temperature stress on Cardinium-induced CI

Male C(+) wasps were generated by placing several (~5–7) virgin C(+) E. suzannae in a 35mm Petri dish with 25 Er. emiratus pupae on moist filter paper along with a small amount of honey. We observed females parasitize for 3 hours, removing parasitized Er. emiratus with a fine paint brush to limit superparasitism (multiple eggs oviposited in a single host). Parasitized Er. emiratus (i.e. developing male E. suzannae) were placed into individual 1.2 ml vials. Then, using an experimental design modified from [7], we tested the effect of temperature stress on Cardinium’s ability to induce CI in crosses between C(+) males and C(-) females by exposing these developing males to a variety of temperature treatments (Fig 1). One subset of males was kept at 27°C in a Percival incubator throughout development to serve as a control group. Other males were kept in Percival incubators set to either a “warm” or “cool” temperature range of 32°C day/ 29°C night or 20°C day/ 17°C night, respectively. We monitored internal incubator temperatures with HOBO data loggers. These ranges, particularly the “warm” temperatures, reflect the temperature extremes at which E. suzannae will tolerate constant exposure in the laboratory (MRD, personal observation). Temperature treatments were further split into three groups that began at either the larval 1st instar (4-day old wasps), pupal (7-day old), or adult (upon emergence) stage [70]. All temperature treatments continued until two days post-adult emergence. This resulted in a total of seven temperature treatments that differed in their temperature range as well as the host life stages that they included (Fig 1). As cEper1’s CI phenotype was previously found to positively correlate with male pupal developmental time [47], we also recorded the duration of the pupal stage for each individual male.

Two days after male adult emergence, males were mated either with virgin C(+) females for the control cross (“N”), to test for temperature-induced effects on general male viability, or with virgin C(-) females for the inviable “CI” cross to test for the effect of temperature on the strength of Cardinium’s CI phenotype. Mating was visually confirmed by observing male and female wasps confined in a 1.2 ml vial plugged with cotton for ~5 minutes or until mating. Mating typically occurred < 1 min after bringing the pair together, but in cases where mating had not yet occurred after 5 minutes, the female was removed, discarded, and replaced. After mating, males were stored at -80°C and females were transferred to individual arenas to parasitize whiteflies. The arenas consisted of a 35mm Petri dish with a ventilated lid, containing a cowpea leaf disc resting on 1% agar. The cowpea leaf disc bore ~50 2nd– 3rd instar B. tabaci nymphs. Females were allowed to parasitize whiteflies in these arenas for 24hrs and the dish was then incubated at 27°C. Ten days later, we counted the number of whiteflies that either contained a developing E. suzannae pupa (resulting from a successful cross) or were developmentally arrested (i.e. parasitized by E. suzannae but the wasp failed to develop–a reliable proxy for the dead wasp embryos indicative of CI [33]). We then compared the proportion of arrested whiteflies across treatments using logistic regression with a quasibinomial distribution. We compared male pupal developmental time using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc multiple pairwise Mann-Whitney U Tests with Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p-values in R v 3.3.1 [71]. We also compared male pupal developmental time and CI strength using Spearmen’s rho correlation.

Testing the effect of temperature stress on Cardinium’s rescue phenotype

To test the effect of temperature stress of Cardinium’s ability to rescue its CI phenotype, we first generated female C(+) E. suzannae by allowing mated C+ female E. suzannae to parasitize leaf dishes with 2nd-3rd instar whiteflies for 24hrs. Leaf discs with developing female wasps were then exposed to one of seven temperature treatments in Percival incubators as previously described. Two-days after adult emergence, experimental females were mated with either C(-) males (N; control cross) to test for temperature-induced effects on female viability, or C(+) males (R; rescue cross) that developed at 27°C to test for effects on Cardinium’s rescue phenotype. Here a decrease in offspring survival relative to the control would indicate a reduction in the rescue ability of Cardinium in the temperature treated female host. After mating observations, females were transferred to individual parasitism arenas and given 24hrs to parasitize whitefly hosts. Females were then removed and stored at -80°C. Ten days later, we counted the number of surviving wasp pupae and arrested whiteflies and analyzed rescue efficiency across temperature treatments using logistic regression with a quasibinomial distribution, as in the CI experiment.

Quantifying Cardinium relative density post-temperature exposure

After the crossing experiments, we next tested whether changes in Cardinium’s CI modification and rescue phenotypes were due to changes in the within-host density of this symbiont. Experimental wasps (both male and female) had been stored at -80°C for DNA extraction. Extractions consisted of homogenizing a single wasp in 3 μL of 20 mg ml -1 proteinase k, then adding the homogenate to 50 μL of 5–10% w/v Chelex [72]. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour with periodic vortexing, followed by incubation at 97°C for 8 min and storage at -20°C. We estimated Cardinium density relative to host cells by performing quantitative PCR (qPCR) using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (2×) (ThermoFisher Scientific) with primers for the single-copy Cardinium gyrB gene [47] and the host Ef1a gene on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time cycler [73]. We also created standards via serial dilutions of PCR products from both primer sets. PCR products were diluted to a concentration of 1.0 ng/μL DNA, which was confirmed with a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer prior to serial dilution. Samples were run in triplicate and each qPCR plate included standards for both primer sets to correct for between-plate differences in reaction efficiency. Raw Cq values were averaged and corrected before conversion to relative density [47].

We then compared Cardinium density across temperature treatments for male and female wasps using the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test with post hoc multiple pairwise Mann-Whitney U Tests with Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p-values. We also compared Cardinium density and CI strength using Spearmen’s rho correlation. All statistical analyses were performed in R v. 3.3.1 [71].

Using temperature-shocks to standardize exposure period

The experiments described in the current study tested the effect of prolonged temperature stress on the Cardinium CI phenotype and thus included one or more host life stages and different durations of temperature exposure. To test for life stage-specific effects of temperature stress on the CI phenotype, we performed temperature “shocks” of uniform duration on male C(+) E. suzannae, during either their pupal stage or upon adult emergence. Temperature shocks consisted of a two-hour ramping step, where temperatures increased from 27°C to 40°C (heat shock) or decreased from 27°C to 4°C (cold shock), followed by a two-hour period at 40°C or 4°C, and then a two-hour ramp back to 27°C in a Percival incubator. After the temperature shock, males were maintained at 27°C until mating two days after emergence. As in the previous CI experiment, males were kept in individual 1.2 ml vials with a small amount of honey throughout development. Mating and parasitism were otherwise performed and analyzed as in the first experiments, and males were kept at -80°C for DNA extractions and Cardinium density estimates using qPCR.

Testing the effects of temperature on vertical transmission efficiency

In addition to modifying symbiont-induced phenotype and/or density, temperature stress can destabilize symbiont vertical transmission [8]. Inefficient or “leaky” vertical transmission can slow the spread or cause the loss of symbionts within a population. We tested the effect of temperature stress on Cardinium vertical transmission by exposing C(+) female E. suzannae to one of three temperature treatments: a 27°C control, 32°Cday/29°Cnight (warm), or 20°Cday/17°Cnight (cool). Female wasps were generated as previously described and kept at 27°C until they were 4-days old (1st instar larvae), when they were moved to their respective temperature treatments. Exposure continued through their development until two-days post adult emergence, when the females were mated to C(-) males, a control cross that should generate viable progeny regardless of female infection status. After mating, females were placed on arenas with whitefly nymphs and given 24hrs to parasitize hosts. These offspring were kept at 27°C until adult emergence, at which point they were frozen at -80°C. Offspring DNA was extracted and tested for the presence of Cardinium DNA using Cardinium-specific 16S rRNA primers [49]. PCRs included a positive and negative control and were run on a 1% agarose gel with SYBR Safe to visualize the product. Negative samples were re-run with the Cardinium primers. We next confirmed the presence of wasp DNA in negative samples using general CO1 primers [74]. Negative samples that failed to show DNA bands with the CO1 primers were discarded from the final analysis. We then tested whether the vertical transmission rates were significantly lower than 1.0 (perfect transmission) using the Exact Binomial test with 95% confidence intervals.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Logistic regression equations for comparisons of offspring mortality in temperature assays.

Significance values and/or test statistics (F-value) for equation coefficients and model tests presented.


S2 Table. Significance values from post-hoc multiple pairwise Mann-Whitney tests with Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values comparing Cardinium density in male adult hosts exposed to different temperature treatments.

Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 29.05, df = 6, p = <0.0001.


S3 Table. Significance values from post-hoc multiple pairwise Mann-Whitney tests with Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values comparing Cardinium density in female adult hosts exposed to different temperature treatments.

Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 29.99, df = 6, p = <0.0001.


S4 Table. Significance values from post-hoc multiple pairwise Mann-Whitney tests with Benjamini-Hochberg corrected values comparing male pupal developmental time at different temperature treatments.

Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 43.31, df = 6, p = <0.0001.


S5 Table. Information on primers used in qPCR for estimating Cardinium density or PCR in vertical transmission studies.


S1 Fig. Pupal developmental time for males in the heat-shock experiments.

Pupal development was measured in days. Error bars show standard error. N = 17–19 for all treatments.


S2 Fig. Cardinium relative density in adult wasps post-temperature shock treatments.

Density was measured by estimating the amount of Cardinium gyrB compared to host ef1a genes. N = 5 for all treatments. There were no significant differences between treatments (Mann-Whitney U-tests).



Thanks are due to Liz Bondy for helping set up parasitism assays and Corinne Stouthamer for help with analysis of qPCR data.


  1. 1. Seebacher F, Franklin CE. Physiological mechanisms of thermoregulation in reptiles: a review. J Comp Physiol B. 2005;175(8): 533–41. pmid:16047177
  2. 2. Hance T, van Baaren J, Vernon P, Boivin G. Impact of extreme temperatures on parasitoids in a climate change perspective. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;52(1): 107–26.
  3. 3. Thurber RV, Willner-Hall D, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Desnues C, Edwards RA, Angly F, et al. Metagenomic analysis of stressed coral holobionts. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(8): 2148–63. pmid:19397678
  4. 4. Corbin C, Heyworth ER, Ferrari J, Hurst GDD. Heritable symbionts in a world of varying temperature. Heredity. 2017; 118: 10–20. pmid:27703153
  5. 5. Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42: 165–90. pmid:18983256
  6. 6. Wernegreen JJ. Mutualism meltdown in insects: bacteria constrain thermal adaptation. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(3): 255–62. pmid:22381679
  7. 7. Bordenstein SR, Bordenstein SR. Temperature affects the tripartite interactions between bacteriophage WO, Wolbachia, and cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS One. 2011;6(12): e29106. pmid:22194999
  8. 8. Ross PA, Wiwatanaratanabutr I, Axford JK, White VL, Endersby-Harshman NM, Hoffmann AA. Wolbachia infections in Aedes aegypti differ markedly in their response to cyclical heat stress. PLOS Pathog. 2017;13(1): e1006006. pmid:28056065
  9. 9. Anbutsu H, Goto S, Fukatsu T. High and low temperatures differently affect infection density and vertical transmission of male-killing Spiroplasma symbionts in Drosophila hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(19): 6053–6059. pmid:18708518
  10. 10. Doremus MR, Smith AH, Kim KL, Holder AJ, Russell JA, Oliver KM. Breakdown of a defensive symbiosis, but not endogenous defenses, at elevated temperatures. Mol Ecol. 2018;27(8): 2138–51. pmid:29087015
  11. 11. Zchori-Fein E, Roush RT, Hunter MS. Male production induced by antibiotic treatment in Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an asexual species. Experientia. 1992;48(1): 102–5.
  12. 12. Zchori-Fein E, Faktor O, Zeidan M, Gottlieb Y, Czosnek H, Rosen D. Parthenogenesis- inducing microorganisms in Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Insect Mol Biol. 1995;4(3): 173–8. pmid:8589844
  13. 13. Arakaki N, Miyoshi T, Noda H. Wolbachia–mediated parthenogenesis in the predatory thrips Franklinothrips vespiformis (Thysanoptera: Insecta). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2001;268(1471): 1011–1016.
  14. 14. Dedeine F, Vavre F, Fleury F, Loppin B, Hochberg ME, Boulétreau M. Removing symbiotic Wolbachia bacteria specifically inhibits oogenesis in a parasitic wasp. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(11): 6247–6252. pmid:11353833
  15. 15. Guay J-F, Boudreault S, Michaud D, Cloutier C. Impact of environmental stress on aphid clonal resistance to parasitoids: Role of Hamiltonella defensa bacterial symbiosis in association with a new facultative symbiont of the pea aphid. J Insect Physiol. 2009;55(10): 919–26. pmid:19545573
  16. 16. Ohtaka C. Effects of heat treatment on the symbiotic system of an aphid mycetocyte. Symbiosis. 1991;11: 19–30.
  17. 17. Chen C-Y, Lai C-Y, Kuo M-H. Temperature effect on the growth of Buchnera endosymbiont in Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Symbiosis. 2009;49(1): 53.
  18. 18. Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat Rev Micro. 2008;6(10): 741–51.
  19. 19. Caspari E, Watson GS. On the evolutionary importance of cytoplasmic sterility in mosquitoes. Evolution. 1959;13(4): 568–70.
  20. 20. Engelstädter J, Telschow A. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and host population structure. Heredity. 2009;103: 196. pmid:19436325
  21. 21. Hoffman AA and Turelli M. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. In: O’Neill SL, Hoffman AA, and Werren JH. Influential Passengers. Oxford University Press; 1997. pp. 42–80.
  22. 22. Teixeira L, Ferreira Á, Ashburner M. The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Biol. 2008;6(12): e1000002.
  23. 23. Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu G, Pyke AT, Hedges LM, et al. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with Dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell. 2009;139(7): 1268–78. pmid:20064373
  24. 24. Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Walker T, O’Neill SL. Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito-borne disease. EMBO Rep. 2011;12(6): 508–18. pmid:21546911
  25. 25. Clancy DJ, Hoffmann AA. Environmental effects on cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial load in Wolbachia-infected Drosophila simulans. Entomol Exp Appl. 2003;86(1): 13–24.
  26. 26. Breeuwer JA, Werren JH. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial density in Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics. 1993;135(2): 565–574. pmid:8244014
  27. 27. Van Opijnen T, Breeuwer JAJ. High temperatures eliminate Wolbachia, a cytoplasmic incompatibility inducing endosymbiont, from the two-spotted spider mite. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999;23(11): 871–81. pmid:10668862
  28. 28. Wright JD, Wang B-T. Observations on Wolbachiae in mosquitoes. J Invertebr Pathol. 1980;35(2):200–8.
  29. 29. Trpis M, Perrone JB, Reissig M, Parker KL. Control of cytoplasmic incompatibility in the Aedes scutellaris complex: Incompatible crosses become compatible by treatment of larvae with heat or antibiotics. J Hered. 1981 Sep 1;72(5):313–7.
  30. 30. Hoffmann AA, Turelli M, Simmons GM. Unidirectional incompatibility between populations of Drosophila simulans. Evolution. 1986 May 30;40(4):692–701. pmid:28556160
  31. 31. Zchori-Fein E, Perlman SJ, Kelly SE, Katzir N, Hunter MS. Characterization of a “Bacteroidetes” symbiont in Encarsia wasps (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): proposal of “Candidatus Cardinium hertigii”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(3): 961–8.
  32. 32. Weinert LA, Araujo-Jnr E V, Ahmed MZ, Welch JJ. The incidence of bacterial endosymbionts in terrestrial arthropods. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282(1807): 20150249.
  33. 33. Hunter MS, Perlman SJ, Kelly SE. A bacterial symbiont in the Bacteroidetes induces cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitoid wasp Encarsia pergandiella. Proc R Soc B Biol. 2003; 270(1529): 2185–90.
  34. 34. Gotoh T, Noda H, Ito S. Cardinium symbionts cause cytoplasmic incompatibility in spider mites. Heredity. 2006;98: 13. pmid:17035954
  35. 35. Nakamura Y, Yukuhiro F, Matsumura M, Noda H. Cytoplasmic incompatibility involving Cardinium and Wolbachia in the white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool. 2012;47(3): 273–83.
  36. 36. Wu K, Hoy MA. Cardinium is associated with reproductive incompatibility in the predatory mite Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;110(3): 359–65. pmid:22504433
  37. 37. Nguyen DT, Morrow JL, Spooner-Hart RN, Riegler M. Independent cytoplasmic incompatibility induced by Cardinium and Wolbachia maintains endosymbiont coinfections in haplodiploid thrips populations. Evolution. 2017;71(4): 995–1008. pmid:28181227
  38. 38. Gebiola M, Monti MM, Johnson RC, Woolley JB, Hunter MS, Giorgini M, et al. A revision of the Encarsia pergandiella species complex (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) shows cryptic diversity in parasitoids of whitefly pests. Syst Entomol. 2017;42(1): 31–59.
  39. 39. Penz T, Schmitz-Esser S, Kelly SE, Cass BN, Müller A, Woyke T, et al. Comparative genomics suggests an independent origin of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Cardinium hertigii. PLOS Genet. 2012;8(10): e1003012. pmid:23133394
  40. 40. Mann E, Stouthamer CM, Kelly SE, Dzieciol M, Hunter MS, Schmitz-Esser S. Transcriptome sequencing reveals novel candidate genes for Cardinium hertigii-caused cytoplasmic incompatibility and host-cell interaction. mSystems. 2017;2(6): e00141–17. pmid:29181449
  41. 41. Gebiola M, Giorgini M, Kelly SE, Doremus MR, Ferree PM, Hunter MS. Cytological analysis of cytoplasmic incompatibility induced by Cardinium suggests convergent evolution with its distant cousin Wolbachia. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1862).
  42. 42. Tram U, Ferree PM, Sullivan W. Identification of Wolbachia—host interacting factors through cytological analysis. Microbes Infect. 2003;5(11): 999–1011. pmid:12941392
  43. 43. Morag N, Klement E, Saroya Y, Lensky I, Gottlieb Y. Prevalence of the symbiont Cardinium in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vector species is associated with land surface temperature. FASEB J. 2012;26(10): 4025–34. pmid:22700874
  44. 44. Charlesworth J, Weinert LA, Araujo-Jnr. E V, Welch JJ. Wolbachia, Cardinium and climate: an analysis of global data. bioRxiv. 2018; 490284.
  45. 45. Jeyaprakash A, Hoy MA. Real-Time PCR reveals endosymbiont titer fluctuations in Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) colonies held at different temperatures. Florida Entomol. 2010; 93(3): 464–6.
  46. 46. Wu K, Hoy MA. Extended starvation reduced and eliminated Wolbachia, but not Cardinium, from Metaseiulus occidentalis females (Acari: Phytoseiidae): A need to reassess Wolbachia’s status in this predatory mite? J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;109(1): 20– 6. pmid:21946455
  47. 47. Perlman SJ, Dowdy NJ, Harris LR, Khalid M, Kelly SE, Hunter MS. Factors affecting the strength of Cardinium-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitic wasp Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Microb Ecol. 2014;67(3): 671–8. pmid:24402369
  48. 48. Perlman SJ, Kelly SE, Hunter MS. Population biology of cytoplasmic incompatibility: maintenance and spread of Cardinium symbionts in a parasitic wasp. Genetics. 2008;178(2): 1003–1011. pmid:18245338
  49. 49. Harris LR, Kelly SE, Hunter MS, Perlman SJ. Population dynamics and rapid spread of Cardinium, a bacterial endosymbiont causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Encarsia pergandiella (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Heredity. 2009;104(3): 239–46. pmid:19812617
  50. 50. Pintureau B, Lassablière F, Daumal J, Grenier S. Does a cyclic natural thermal cure occur in Wolbachia-infected Trichogramma species? Ecol Entomol. 2002;27(3): 366–72.
  51. 51. Binnington KC, Hoffmann AA. Wolbachia-like organisms and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. J Invertebr Pathol. 1989;54(3): 344–52.
  52. 52. Snook RR, Cleland SY, Wolfner MF, Karr TL. Offsetting effects of Wolbachia Infection and heat shock on sperm production in Drosophila simulans: Analyses of fecundity, fertility and accessory gland proteins. Genetics. 2000;155(1): 167–178. pmid:10790392
  53. 53. Boivin G, Jacob S, Damiens D. Spermatogeny as a life-history index in parasitoid wasps. Oecologia. 2005;143(2): 198–202. pmid:15657761
  54. 54. Reynolds KT, Hoffmann AA. Male age, host effects and the weak expression or non- expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains infected by maternally transmitted Wolbachia. Genet Res. 2002;80(2): 79–87. pmid:12534211
  55. 55. Clark ME, Bailey-Jourdain C, Ferree PM, England SJ, Sullivan W, Windsor DM, et al. Wolbachia modification of sperm does not always require residence within developing sperm. Heredity. 2008;101: 420. pmid:18648384
  56. 56. Yamada R, Floate KD, Riegler M, O’Neill SL. Male development time influences the strength of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2007;177(2):801–808. pmid:17660578
  57. 57. Chirault M, Van de Zande L, Hidalgo K, Chevrier C, Bressac C, Lécureuil C. The spatio- temporal partitioning of sperm by males of the prospermatogenic parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis is in line with its gregarious lifestyle. J Insect Physiol. 2016;91–92:10–7. pmid:27269614
  58. 58. Clark ME, Veneti Z, Bourtzis K, Karr TL. The distribution and proliferation of the intracellular bacteria Wolbachia during spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Mech Dev. 2002;111(1–2):3–15. pmid:11804774
  59. 59. Richardson KM, Griffin PC, Lee SF, Ross PA, Endersby-Harshman NM, Schiffer M, et al. A Wolbachia infection from Drosophila that causes cytoplasmic incompatibility despite low prevalence and densities in males. Heredity. 2018;10.
  60. 60. Degnan PH, Yu Y, Sisneros N, Wing RA, Moran NA. Hamiltonella defensa, genome evolution of protective bacterial endosymbiont from pathogenic ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(22): 9063–8. pmid:19451630
  61. 61. Brandt JW, Chevignon G, Oliver KM, Strand MR. Culture of an aphid heritable symbiont demonstrates its direct role in defence against parasitoids. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017;284(1866).
  62. 62. LePage DP, Metcalf JA, Bordenstein SR, On J, Perlmutter JI, Shropshire JD, et al. Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature. 2017; 543(7644): 243–7. pmid:28241146
  63. 63. Harumoto T, Lemaitre B. Male-killing toxin in a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila. Nature. 2018;557(7704): 252–5. pmid:29720654
  64. 64. Stouthamer R, Luck RF. Transition from bisexual to unisexual cultures in Encarsia perniciosi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): New data and a reinterpretation. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1991;84(2): 150–7.
  65. 65. Gould JR, Bellows TS Jr, Paine TD. Population dynamics of Siphoninus philyreae in California in the presence and absence of a parasitoid, Encarsia partenopea. Ecol Entomol. 1992;17(2): 127–34.
  66. 66. Pickett CH, Ball JC, Casanave KC, Klonsky KM, Jetter KM, Bezark LG, et al. Establishment of the ash whitefly parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Walker) and its economic benefit to ornamental street trees in California. Biol Control. 1996;6(2): 260–72.
  67. 67. Hoddle MS, Van Driesche RG, Sanderson JP. Biology and use of the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43(1): 645–69.
  68. 68. Hoelmer K, Goolsby J. Release, establishment and monitoring of Bemisia tabaci natural enemies in the United States. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 2002. p. 14–8.
  69. 69. Hunter MS, Woolley JB. Evolution and behavioral ecology of heteronomous aphelinid parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46(1): 251–90.
  70. 70. Gerling D. Studies with whitefly parasites of southern California: I. Encarsia pergandiella Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Can Entomol. 1966;98(7): 707–24.
  71. 71. R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
  72. 72. White JA, Kelly SE, Perlman SJ, Hunter MS. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitic wasp Encarsia inaron: disentangling the roles of Cardinium and Wolbachia symbionts. Heredity. 2009; 102(5): 483–9. pmid:19223921
  73. 73. Stouthamer CM, Kelly S, Hunter MS. Enrichment of low-density symbiont DNA from minute insects. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;151: 16–9. pmid:29792944
  74. 74. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. A, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3(5): 294–9. pmid:7881515