Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Bank Vole Prion Protein As an Apparently Universal Substrate for RT-QuIC-Based Detection and Discrimination of Prion Strains

  • Christina D. Orrú ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Christina D. Orrú, Bradley R. Groveman

    Affiliation Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hamilton, Montana, United States of America

  • Bradley R. Groveman ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Christina D. Orrú, Bradley R. Groveman

    Affiliation Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hamilton, Montana, United States of America

  • Lynne D. Raymond,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hamilton, Montana, United States of America

  • Andrew G. Hughson,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hamilton, Montana, United States of America

  • Romolo Nonno,

    Affiliation Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

  • Wenquan Zou,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Bernardino Ghetti,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America

  • Pierluigi Gambetti,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Byron Caughey

    Affiliation Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Hamilton, Montana, United States of America


18 Aug 2015: Orrú CD, Groveman BR, Raymond LD, Hughson AG, Nonno R, et al. (2015) Correction: Bank Vole Prion Protein As an Apparently Universal Substrate for RT-QuIC-Based Detection and Discrimination of Prion Strains. PLOS Pathogens 11(8): e1005117. View correction


Prions propagate as multiple strains in a wide variety of mammalian species. The detection of all such strains by a single ultrasensitive assay such as Real Time Quaking-induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) would facilitate prion disease diagnosis, surveillance and research. Previous studies have shown that bank voles, and transgenic mice expressing bank vole prion protein, are susceptible to most, if not all, types of prions. Here we show that bacterially expressed recombinant bank vole prion protein (residues 23-230) is an effective substrate for the sensitive RT-QuIC detection of all of the different prion types that we have tested so far – a total of 28 from humans, cattle, sheep, cervids and rodents, including several that have previously been undetectable by RT-QuIC or Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification. Furthermore, comparison of the relative abilities of different prions to seed positive RT-QuIC reactions with bank vole and not other recombinant prion proteins allowed discrimination of prion strains such as classical and atypical L-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy, classical and atypical Nor98 scrapie in sheep, and sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. Comparison of protease-resistant RT-QuIC conversion products also aided strain discrimination and suggested the existence of several distinct classes of prion templates among the many strains tested.

Author Summary

Prion diseases are neurodegenerative disorders that propagate as multiple strains in a variety of mammalian species. The detection of all such prion types by a single ultrasensitive assay, such as the Real Time Quaking-induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) assay, would facilitate prion disease diagnosis, surveillance, and research. Here we show detection of minute amounts of 28 different prion types from humans, cattle, sheep, cervids and rodents, some of which were previously undetectable, using a single recombinant bank vole prion protein substrate. We also demonstrate the generation of prion type-dependent RT-QuIC conversion products which may help with prion strain discrimination and the characterization of distinct classes of prion templates. Finally, we describe a practical strategy for prion strain discrimination, e.g. classical and atypical L-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy; classical and atypical Nor98 sheep scrapie; and human sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Thus, our study provides a basis for wide-ranging prion detection and strain discrimination.


Prion diseases, or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, are neurodegenerative disorders that include Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheincker syndrome (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI) and sporadic fatal insomnia (sFI) in humans, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, scrapie in sheep, and chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids. The origin of prion diseases can be infectious, genetic or sporadic. Many prion diseases also have subtypes or strains that can be distinguished based on the PRNP (prion protein) genotype, transmission characteristics, clinical manifestations, neuropathological lesion profiles and/or biochemical properties of the disease-associated forms of prion protein (PrPD) [19]. PrPD, or a subset thereof, is the predominant molecular component of the infectious agent, or prion, which propagates itself by inducing misfolding of the hosts’ normal protease-sensitive prion protein, PrPC or PrPSen, into additional PrPD. This propagation mechanism appears to involve seeded, or templated, polymerization in which the given PrPD conformation is imposed upon normally monomeric PrPSen molecules as they are recruited into growing PrPD multimers [3,4].

PrPD usually includes forms called PrPRes that, unlike the normal PrPSen, are partially resistant to digestion by proteinase K (PK). The banding pattern of PrPRes in immunoblots can vary distinctively depending on the prion strain, host species and/or PRNP genotype. With most prion diseases the predominant 21-32-kDa variably glycosylated PrPRes fragments observed on immunoblots extend from ragged N-termini between residues ~80–96 to the GPI-anchored C-terminus (e.g., at residue 231 in humans). In contrast, the PrPRes associated with sheep Nor98 scrapie and human GSS linked to the P102L, F198S, A117V and H187R PRNP mutations include much smaller 6–14 kDa bands [1012]. These bands are internal fragments with ragged N-and C-termini within residues ~80-~160 [13]. In cases of P102L GSS, brain tissue from some individuals can also give 21–32 kDa PrPRes bands with the 7–8 kDa bands, while others give the 21–32 kDa PrPRes bands but lack the 7–8 kDa bands. Hereafter, we will refer to the former cases as GSS P102L* and the latter as GSS P102L.

A major challenge for the prion disease field is the development of sufficiently practical and sensitive tests for routine prion disease detection and strain discrimination in medicine, agriculture, wildlife management and research. The Real Time Quaking Induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) assay, which is based on prion-seeded fibrillization of recombinant prion protein (rPrPSen), is known to be highly specific and ultra-sensitive for detection of multiple human and animal prion diseases [1420]. Moreover, like the amyloid seeding assay [21], RT-QuIC is more practical than comparably ultra-sensitive assays by being relatively rapid and based on a 96-well plate format with fluorescence readout [14,16]. Appropriate combinations of prion type and rPrPSen substrate have been important in the performance of various RT-QuIC assays [14,1820,2225]. For several types of prion disease, however, no effective rPrPSen substrate has been identified; these types include human GSS arising from P102L*, F198S, A117V and H187R PRNP mutations and the atypical sheep scrapie strain Nor98. Moreover, no single substrate has yet been shown to detect all of the different prion variants of humans, cattle, sheep, cervids and rodents.

One potential rPrPSen substrate that has not been described for RT-QuIC assays is based on the bank vole sequence. Bank voles [26], and transgenic mice that express bank vole (BV) PrPSen [27], are susceptible to an unusually wide range of prion strains from different species. Furthermore, PrPSen in bank vole brain tissue homogenates is a broadly reactive, but not universal, substrate for the highly sensitive protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) assay for prions [28]. Here we have tested the suitability of recombinant bank vole PrPSen (BV rPrPSen), when expressed in E. coli and purified, as an RT-QuIC substrate. We have found so far that BV rPrPSen is a universally effective substrate for multiple prion strains from multiple species, and, most notably, for prions for which no effective substrate has been available. Furthermore, we have found that BV rPrPSen-based RT-QuIC reactions give strain-dependent PK-resistant products in a manner that should further facilitate prion strain discrimination.


Lack of detection of GSS and atypical scrapie subtypes associated with 6–14 kDa PrPRes fragments using previously described rPrPSen constructs

Most mammalian PrPRes types with predominant 21–32 kDa PrPRes bands can seed Thioflavin T-positive (ThT) amyloid formation in RT-QuIC reactions [17,22,2932] using at least one of the following substrates: Syrian golden hamster rPrPSen residues 90–231 [14,30,31], Syrian golden hamster rPrPSen 23–231 [18], human rPrPSen 23–231 [16], murine rPrPSen 23–231 [24] or hamster-sheep chimeric rPrPSen 23–231 [19,22]. For example, detection of human P102L GSS brain tissue using hamster rPrPSen 90–231 is shown in Fig 1. However, to date, no detection of RT-QuIC seeding activity has been reported using these rPrPSen substrates with cases of human GSS or sheep scrapie that give prominent low molecular weight PrPRes fragments in immunoblots, despite extensive efforts. Specifically, these cases include human GSS with the F198S, A117V or H187R mutations and sheep Nor98 scrapie types giving 6–14 kDa PrPRes fragments [1013], and the human P102L-GSS with an ~8 kDa PrPRes fragment (P102L*) [10]. Our inability to detect these prion types is exemplified in Fig 1 using 10-3 brain tissue dilutions of human GSS F198S and P102L* and sheep Nor98 scrapie with the hamster rPrPSen 90–231. In contrast, P102L GSS (without the ~8-kDa fragment) gave positive reactions with 1,000,000-fold smaller amounts of brain tissue.

Fig 1. RT-QuIC detection of GSS P102L and lack of detection for GSS F198S, P102L* and sheep atypical Nor98 scrapie using hamster rPrPSen 90–231.

Serial dilutions (10-6 to 10-9) of GSS P102L brain tissue dilutions were used to seed quadruplicate RT-QuIC reactions (red lines) with hamster 90–231 rPrPSen as the substrate, 300mM NaCl, 0.002% SDS. The same rPrPSen and RT-QuIC conditions listed above were used in reactions seeded with the designated brain tissue dilutions of GSS human patients with F198S (green line) or P102L* (gray line) PRNP point mutations, Alzheimer’s disease (AD, blue line), sheep without prion disease (blue line) or with Nor98 scrapie (orange line). Average ThT fluorescence readings from replicate wells for each type of sample were plotted as a function of time. Results are representative of similar findings from at least 10 independent experiments using hamster 90–231, hamster 23–231, human or hamster-sheep chimeric rPrPSen substrates.

Detection of GSS F198S and A117V prion seeding activity using BV rPrPSen

We then tested bank vole rPrPSen residues 23–230 (BV rPrPSen) as a substrate to detect seeding activity of two human prion subtypes that have not been detectable previously by RT-QuIC, namely F198S- and A117V-GSS. Concurrently, we varied two parameters that we have shown to be influential, namely the concentrations of NaCl [14] and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) [30]. Each reaction was seeded with 10-4 dilutions of frontal cortex brain tissue from confirmed GSS cases carrying either the F198S or A117V mutation of the prion protein gene. We found that our standard concentrations of SDS (0.002%) in combination with either 130 or 300mM NaCl failed to allow a distinction in lag phase between prion positive and uninfected brain homogenate (BH) seeded reactions (Fig 2A and 2B). Lowering the SDS concentration to 0.001% with either 130 or 300mM NaCl improved this distinction between prion positive and uninfected BH seeded reactions (Fig 2C and 2D). However, using final concentrations of 300 mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS, provided much shorter lag phases in reactions seeded with the two GSS subtypes than with the cerebral ischemia negative control (Fig 2D). These results indicated that under these latter RT-QuIC conditions BV rPrPSen detected seeding activity associated with PrPD conformers that had not otherwise been detectable by RT-QuIC or PMCA prion seed amplification techniques [33].

Fig 2. Detection of GSS P102L, F198S and A117V PrPD types by RT-QuIC using BV rPrPSen, 300mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS.

Quadruplicate RT-QuIC reactions were seeded with 10-4 dilutions of human frontal cortex brain tissue from GSS patients with the P102L (red lines), F198S (green lines), or A117V (magenta lines) PRNP mutation. Negative control reaction were seeded with 10-4 dilutions of frontal cortex brain tissue from a cerebral ischemia patient (blue lines). A final SDS concentration of 0.002% (A and B) or 0.001% (C and D) in combination with 130 mM (A and C) or 300 mM (B and D) NaCl were used with BV rPrPSen. Similar results were seen in three independent experiments. Traces from representative RT-QuIC experiments are the average of four replicate wells.

Next, we assessed the sensitivity of this new RT-QuIC assay for detecting GSS-associated prion seeding activity. Reactions were seeded with 10-4 to 10-9 dilutions of brain tissue from GSS patients carrying the P102L, P102L*, A117V, F198S and H187R mutation of the prion gene (Fig 3A3E). A reaction time cutoff of 50h was chosen because in more than 20 independent RT-QuIC experiments seeded with negative control Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or cerebral ischemia brain homogenates, no positive RT-QuIC reactions were observed until after 55h (in rare wells). We detected GSS P102L, P102L*, A117V and F198S and H187R prion seeding activity in as little as 10-9, 10-4, 10-8, 10-8 and 10-6 dilutions of brain (frontal cortex) tissue dilutions, respectively (Fig 3).

Fig 3. RT-QuIC sensitivity for detection of human GSS P102L, P102L*, A117V, F198S, and H187R seeding activity using BV rPrPSen.

The designated dilutions of frontal cortex brain tissue from the designated GSS P102L (A), P102L* (B), A117V (C), F198S (D), and H187R (E) patients were used to seed RT-QuIC reactions with 0.001% SDS and 300mM NaCl. Negative control reactions were seeded with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain tissue (A-E, blue lines). Representative data from one of three independent experiments is shown as the averages of fluorescence values from four replicate wells.

Detection of 28 different prion types/strains of human, sheep, cattle, deer, elk, mouse and hamster using BV rPrPSen

After finding that BV rPrPSen supported RT-QuIC detection of prion seeding activity from previously undetectable types of GSS, we tested whether BV rPrPSen could be used to detect other types of prion diseases. We tested 28 different types of prions in brain tissue from humans, sheep, mouse, hamster, cattle, elk, and deer (Tables 1 and 2) and found that all of them gave faster and stronger positive ThT fluorescence responses than a variety of uninfected negative control brain specimens (Fig 4). Among the 28 were the five prion types that have not been detectable by RT-QuIC under other conditions, namely human GSS F198S, A117V, H187R, and P102L* and sheep Nor98 scrapie (Fig 4, red traces). These results indicated that under these conditions, BV rPrPSen is the most broadly prion-seeded RT-QuIC substrate described to date.

Fig 4. RT-QuIC detection of 28 types of prion seeds from 5 different species using new BV rPrPSen substrate.

RT-QuIC reactions were seeded with 10-4 brain tissue dilutions of the indicated human and animal prion types in the presence of 300mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS. Equivalent dilutions of species- and brain region-matched samples from uninfected individuals were used as specificity controls (green). Prion types that have been detected previously by RT-QuIC using other substrate are indicated in black, whereas those that have only been detectable using our selected set of conditions and BV PrPSen are indicated in red. The traces show the average fluorescence from four replicate wells. Similar data were obtained from a minimum of three independent experiments with each prion type.

Table 1. Human samples: diagnosis, PRNP genotype and brain regions.

Table 2. Animal samples: prion disease, Prnp genotype and brain region.

Prion strain/type-dependent RT-QuIC products from reactions using BV rPrPSen

Prion strain-dependence has not been observed previously in the immunoblot banding profile of PK-treated recombinant PrPRes (rPrPRes) products of RT-QuIC reactions. However, using BV rPrPSen we observed consistently distinct products of RT-QuIC reactions seeded with different types of human prions (Fig 5 and Table 1). The observed banding patterns could be grouped based on the type of seed: GSS cases (F198S, A117V, H187R) with the ~8–14 Kda protease-resistant bands and sFI gave 2 bands: a major ~10kDa band and a ~6-9kDa band; the GSS (P102L), gCJD (E200K, V210I, six octarepeat insertion), and the iatrogenic CJD (iCJD) cases with ~21–32 kDa PrPRes bands gave multiple bands with a major ~12 Kda band and multiple minor bands between ~6–10 kDa; variant CJD, GSS (P102L*) and FFI (D178N) cases gave a single predominant band at ~10 kDa; and sporadic CJD in some cases gave two bands between ~10–12 kDa, while in other cases gave a predominant band at ~ 10 kDa. Repeated analyses (>4) of individual sCJD cases indicated that they consistently seeded the formation of only one or the other of the latter two rPrPRes products. This observation provided evidence that the different sCJD-seeded rPrPRes products were dictated by differential templating activity in the tissue samples rather than stochastic events during the RT-QuIC reaction. Additionally, because these immunoblots used an antiserum to the C-terminus of PrP, the fragments likely differed primarily at their N-termini.

Fig 5. Western blot of BV rPrPRes products from RT-QuIC reactions seeded with various human prion types.

Reaction products were digested with 10μg/mL of PK. Immunoblots were probed with the C-terminal antibody R20 (hamster PrP epitope residues 218–231). Molecular mass (MM) is indicated in kilodaltons. Immunoblots are representative of one biological replicate (n = total biological replicates tested) each giving rPrPRes banding profiles similar to that/those shown. (#) Samples for which cerebellum, frontal cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus from the same patient were analyzed. A minimum of two sets of RT-QuIC bank vole rPrPRes products were generated from a given prion type and independently subjected to immunoblotting analysis.

We further compared the BV rPrPRes products of reactions seeded with different rodent, bovine, cervine and ovine prion strains (Table 2). As with the human prion seeds, we observed distinct strain-dependent BV rPrPRes banding profiles from reactions seeded with different prion types. Mouse 22L scrapie-seeded BV rPrPRes products consistently showed a ~10 and ~12 kDa PK-resistant band, whereas BV rPrPRes products from reactions seeded with Chandler, ME7, 87V and anchorless 22L (22L GPI-) scrapie displayed a predominant ~10 kDa band (Fig 6A). The lack of the GPI anchor in the 22L GPI- scrapie seed resulted in an RT-QuIC product that was distinct from the wild-type GPI-anchored 22L scrapie. Additionally, closely related hamster prion strains (Hyper and 263K; Fig 6B) showed similar BV rPrPRes banding profiles (~10 and ~12 kDa PK-resistant bands) which were distinct from the Drowsy-seeded BV rPrPRes products (primarily a ~10 kDa band; Fig 6B). Deer and elk CWD-seeded reactions each gave ~8, 9, 10, and 12 kDa bands, but differed in the relative intensities of the top two bands between the two (Fig 6C). Furthermore, distinct strain-dependent BV rPrPRes banding profiles were observed between classical (C-BSE) and atypical (L-BSE) (~10 kDa vs. ~9, 10, and 12 kDa bands, respectively; Fig 6C), as well as between classical and atypical Nor98 sheep scrapie (~10 kDa vs. ~9, 10, and 12 kDa bands, respectively; Fig 6D). Collectively, these immunoblotting results suggested that certain human and animal prion diseases can be discriminated in part based on analysis of the rPrPRes products of BV rPrPSen-based RT-QuIC reactions.

Fig 6. Western blot of BV rPrPRes from RT-QuIC reactions seeded with rodent, bovine, cervine and sheep prion types.

PK-treated RT-QuIC products from mouse (A), hamster (B), cattle (C), deer (C), elk (C) and sheep (D) prion seeds were probed with R20 (hamster PrP epitope residues 218–231). In (D), the classical scrapie-seeded reactions include those seeded with samples from PRNP VRQ/VRQ and ARQ/ARQ sheep (not designated). The Nor98-seeded reactions were seeded with samples from ARR/ARR, ARQ/AHQ and ARQ/ARQ sheep. RT-QuIC reactions and immunoblotting analysis for each of these types of prions were performed at least twice with similar results. The banding profiles shown are representative of multiple (n) independently tested biological replicates.

Detection and discrimination of classical and atypical BSE using BV and hamster rPrPSen substrates

We previously reported that classical and atypical L-type BSE strains can be discriminated on the basis of relative RT-QuIC reactivities with hamster rPrPSen 90–231 and hamster-sheep chimeric rPrPSen 23–231 substrates [22]. Here we found that BV rPrPSen can similarly detect both classical and L-type BSE, providing an alternative substrate for discrimination between the two bovine strains. Specifically, detection of seeding activity with BV rPrPSen (Fig 7) but not with three other rPrPSen substrates that detected only L-type BSE, namely human 23–231, hamster 23–231 or hamster 90–231 [22], can be used to differentiate these two bovine prion types.

Fig 7. Detection of Classical (C-BSE) and atypical (L-type BSE) with BV rPrPSen substrate.

RT-QuIC reactions were seeded with 10-4 brain tissue dilutions of brain stem (C-BSE, blue) or frontal cortex (L type-BSE, magenta) from Italian cattle. Negative control reactions (NBH, green) were seeded with 10-4 dilutions of frontal cortex or brain stem from uninfected cattle. BV rPrPSen was used as a substrate with 300mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS. RT-QuIC analysis was performed at least twice for each sample with similar results. Results are plotted as the averages from four replicate wells.

Discrimination of classical and Nor98 sheep scrapie using BV and hamster-sheep chimeric rPrPSen substrates

Having detected Nor98 sheep scrapie with BV rPrPSen, (Fig 4) we tested whether a strategy similar to the one described above for C- vs. L-type BSE using different rPrPSen substrates would allow discrimination of Nor98 and classical sheep scrapie. Brain tissue from eight sheep with classical scrapie [ARQ/ARQ (n = 6), VRQ/VRQ (n = 2) PrP genotypes, Table 2] were readily detected using the hamster-sheep chimeric rPrPSen 23–231 within ~40hs (Fig 8A). However, brain tissue from eight cases of Nor98 scrapie [ARR/AHQ (n = 1), ARQ/ARQ (n = 4), ARQ/AHQ (n = 2) and ARR/ARR (n = 1) genotypes, Table 2] gave no positive responses using the same substrate (Fig 8B). In contrast, consistent with the results in Fig 4, seven of these cases gave positive responses when BV rPrPSen was used in reactions seeded with 10-4 brain tissue dilutions (Fig 8A8E, orange lines) and those that were weaker or not detected were positive when seeded with 10-3 dilutions (Fig 8A8E, red lines). To compare the sensitivities of the assay for detection of classical and atypical scrapie using these two substrates, we diluted representative brain homogenates from classical and Nor98 scrapie positive sheep (Fig 8G8J) and tested them using both BV and Ha-S rPrPSen. We detected classical scrapie down to 10-8 dilutions using Ha-S rPrPSen and down to 10-6 using BV rPrPSen. Consistent with the data in Fig 8, no fluorescence increases were seen in reactions seeded with the same dilutions of a Nor98 atypical scrapie sample when using Ha-S rPrPSen. In contrast, parallel reactions with BV rPrPSen gave positive reactions when seeded with Nor98 brain dilutions down to 10-6–10-7, indicating that BV rPrPSen is ~1,000-fold more sensitive at detecting Nor98 scrapie than is Ha-S rPrPSen. Collectively, these results suggest that if an ovine brain sample gives a positive RT-QuIC response with BV rPrPSen, it should give a stronger positive reaction with Ha-S rPrPSen if it contains classical scrapie, but a negative, or at least much weaker, reaction if it contains Nor98 scrapie.

Fig 8. Detection, discrimination and sensitivities for detection of classical and Nor98 sheep scrapie with BV and Ha-S rPrPSen substrates.

RT-QuIC reactions were seeded with dilutions of cerebellum or cerebral cortex from uninfected, classical or Nor98 atypical scrapie positive sheep. The Nor98 (ARR/AHQ, ARQ/ARQ, ARQ/AHQ and ARR/ARR PRNP genotypes) reactions were seeded with 10-4 (orange) brain tissue dilutions. Additional 10-3 (red) brain tissue dilutions are also shown for weaker samples. Classical sheep scrapie brain tissue from eight animals (ARQ/ARQ, VRQ/VRQ PRNP genotypes) was diluted 10-4 (green, A and D). Equivalent dilutions of cerebellum or frontal cortex brain tissue dilutions (ARQ/ARQ PRNP genotypes) were used as specificity controls (blue, C and F). Either Ha-S rPrPSen (300mM NaCl and 0.002% SDS; A-C) or BV rPrPSen (300mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS; D-F) were used as substrates. Brain homogenates from classical scrapie positive sheep (green, VRQ/VRQ) and atypical Nor98 scrapie positive sheep (orange, ARR/AHQ) were serially diluted (10-4 to 10-8) for RT-QuIC analysis using Ha-S rPrPSen with 300mM NaCl and 0.002% SDS (G and H) or BV rPrPSen with 300mM NaCl and 0.001% SDS (I and J) substrates. RT-QuIC testing was performed independently twice with similar results. Traces show averages of quadruplicate wells.

Detection and discrimination of human sCJD and vCJD using BV and hamster 23–231 rPrPSen substrates

To investigate the discrimination of two non-genetic human prion strains, we tested 10-4 brain tissue dilutions from two confirmed cases of Type 1 sCJD (Fig 9A and 9B, Cases a and b, green lines) and two cases of vCJD (Fig 9A and 9B, Cases c and d, orange lines). We used previously described SDS conditions (0.002% final concentration of SDS; [23]) with hamster 23–231 rPrPSen, and 0.001% SDS with BV rPrPSen, both in the presence of 300mM NaCl. We observed rapid amplification of prion seeding activity in the two Type 1 sCJD samples when using either hamster 23–231 or BV rPrPSen (Fig 9A and 9B). Our detection of the sCJD samples with the hamster 23–231 substrate was consistent with previous demonstrations that all sCJD subtypes are detectable with this substrate [23,30,34]. No increase in ThT fluorescence was seen in vCJD-seeded hamster 23–231 rPrPSen RT-QuIC reactions (Fig 9A). However, in accordance with the results shown in Fig 4, seeding activity was detected in both vCJD samples using BV rPrPSen (Fig 9B). Thus, sporadic and variant CJD sample were discriminated by differential reactivities with the BV and hamster 23–231 rPrPSen substrates.

Fig 9. Detection, discrimination and sensitivities for detection of human sCJD and vCJD with hamster 23–231 and BV rPrPSen substrates.

Dilutions (10-4) of frontal cortex brain tissue from two confirmed sCJD (Case a and b, green) and two vCJD cases (Case c and d, orange) were used to seed RT-QuIC reactions. Testing was performed using either hamster (23–231) in the presence of 300mM NaCl and 0.002% SDS (A) or BV PrPSen in the presence of 300mM NaCl and 0.001%SDS (B). Brain homogenates from one sCJD (Case a) and one vCJD (Case c) patient were serially diluted (10-5 to 10-8) for RT-QuIC analysis. Hamster 23–231 (C and E) and BV rPrPSen (D and F) were used as a substrate. These samples were tested in three independent experiments with similar results. Traces represent the averages of four replicate wells.

Next we compared the RT-QuIC sensitivities for detection of sCJD and vCJD brain homogenates using hamster and BV rPrPSen. We performed end-point dilution RT-QuIC analysis of brain tissue from sCJD (Case a) and vCJD (Case c) (Fig 9C9F, green and orange lines, respectively). We detected sCJD down to 10-8/10-9 with hamster 23–231 rPrPSen, (Fig 9C) and 10-8 with BV rPrPSen (Fig 9D). Although sCJD gave slightly slower amplification kinetics with hamster 23–231 rPrPSen (Fig 9C) compared to BV rPrPSen (Fig 9D), the overall sensitivities using the two substrates were comparable. In contrast, markedly different sensitivities were observed with the two substrates in the vCJD-seeded reactions. Specifically, only weak seeding activity was occasionally detected in 10-4 or 10-5 brain dilutions with hamster 23–231 rPrPSen (representative data in Fig 9E), but fast and sensitive detection of vCJD seeding activity down to 10-7 brain tissue dilution was observed using BV rPrPSen (Fig 9F). These results suggest that BV rPrPSen is 100–10,000-fold more sensitive than hamster 23–231 rPrPSen in detecting vCJD brain derived prion seeding activity. Collectively, these findings further support the potential broad applicability of a BV rPrPSen prion discrimination strategy to a variety of prion types.


The lack of practical and cost-effective tests that are sensitive enough to detect the lowest infectious levels of prions has long been a major impediment in coping with prion diseases. Rapid commercially available immunoassays have allowed post-mortem detection of prion infections in high-titered tissues such as brain or lymphoid tissues, but diagnostic specimens that are most readily accessible in living hosts, such as blood, CSF and nasal brushings, have much lower prion titers that are undetectable with these assays. In contrast, RT-QuIC assays have been highly effective in detecting prion seeding activity in such low-titered specimens, and are being widely implemented as state-of-the-art diagnostic tests for humans and animals [16,1820,25,3437]. Moreover, recent improvements have increased the speed and sensitivity of RT-QuIC assays such that sCJD testing based on human CSF samples can now be performed in a matter of hours rather than days [30].

In our experience, the most demanding and costly requirement for RT-QuIC testing is the availability of suitable rPrPSen substrates. Prior to the present study, testing facilities would typically have to produce or procure multiple rPrPSen sequences to be able to test for multiple prion types. However, we have now shown that all of the prion diseases that we have tested so far from humans and other mammals can be detected sensitively by using BV rPrPSen (Fig 4). This provides a useful platform for broad-based prion detection and strain discrimination. Thus, we envision that most initial screening for the presence of a wide variety of prions could be performed using BV rPrPSen. Once a prion-infected sample from a given host species is identified, one could then often discriminate between strains by targeted use of another rPrPSen substrate that is known to be differentially sensitive to seeding by prion strains of that host species (Figs 79) and/or by performing immunoblots of the PK-resistant RT-QuIC products of the reactions (Figs 5 and 6).

Although we have demonstrated detection of a wide variety of prion types, the relative sensitivities of BV rPrPSen-based RT-QuIC for brain homogenates of hosts with different prion diseases is presumably dependent on the concentrations of PrPD in the tissue samples. Clearly PrPD concentrations may vary markedly between individuals and different regions of the brain as a function of strain. Furthermore, because PrPD can vary markedly in its properties, e.g. amyloid vs. non-amyloid, protease-sensitive vs. resistant, small vs. large particles, infectious vs. non-infectious, it is probable that the RT-QuIC seeding activity will vary per unit PrPD between different prion strains and tissue sources. Thus, although we have shown the potential for BV rPrPSen-based RT-QuIC to detect and help discriminate prion strains, much additional work with each type of prion and sample type will be required to better establish the quantitative relationships between RT-QuIC seeding activity and the levels of various types of PrPD in different tissues of diagnostic or scientific interest.

Since the inception of prion-seeded cell-free PrP conversion reactions [38], striking sequence- and strain-specificities have been observed that appeared to correlate, at least largely, with transmission barriers and strain phenotypes of prion diseases in vivo [3,3941]. Indeed, sequence differences of as little as a single residue between the PrPD seed and PrPSen substrate can block PrPRes formation in such cell-free reactions [42], as it can in scrapie-infected cells [43] and in vivo [44]. However, RT-QuIC assays have tended to be less constrained by such sequence differences [14]. We reason that this is due in part to the fact that in RT-QuIC reactions, it is only the C-terminal residues ~160–231 of the substrate molecules that must refold into the PK-resistant amyloid core [45] to give a positive reaction, i.e., an increase in ThT fluorescence. In contrast, earlier cell-free conversion [38,46,47] and PMCA reactions [48] have used the immunoblot-based detection of much larger PK-resistant cores, typically comprised of residues ~90–231, as a positive readout. Thus, much more extensive packing of more N-proximal residues is required in the latter reactions, as it is in vivo, giving more opportunities for sequence differences between seed and substrate to influence conversion. Nonetheless, despite the lower sequence specificity of RT-QuIC reactions, we and others have observed multiple examples of rPrPSen substrates that can be converted by some types of prion seeds and not others [22,23]. Therefore, we were surprised to find that BV rPrPSen can be induced to convert to ThT-positive amyloid by every type of prion-associated seed that we have tried so far (n = 28), including several that had never before been detected by RT-QuIC or PMCA. We also did not anticipate that different PK-resistant BV rPrPRes products of RT-QuIC reactions would be seeded with different prion strains from a single host species, because we had never seen such distinct templating with the many other rPrPSen substrates that we have tested. These findings suggest that BV rPrPSen-based RT-QuIC reactions may provide a new means of probing the strain-dependent heterogeneity of prion seeding activities and conformational templates. However, overall, the RT-QuIC technology has been established largely for the practical purposes of rapid, sensitive prion disease-associated seed detection rather than the in vitro recapitulation of prion propagation. As such, the RT-QuIC tests have not been developed to reflect prion transmission barriers or strain-specificities. In any case, the availability of BV rPrPSen as an apparently universal RT-QuIC substrate may markedly improve the practicality, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of detecting and discriminating prions.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Brain tissue from scrapie-infected mice and hamsters (Table 2) were collected under Protocols 2013–030 and 2010–045, respectively, that were approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Animal Care and Use Committee. Human brain tissues (Table 1) were obtained from the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center (USA). Brain tissue from humans with vCJD (Table 1) was obtained from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls (UK) repository. No human samples were collected expressly for this study, but were instead obtained from the existing collections noted above with approval, as needed, under exemption #1197 from the NIH Office of Human Subjects Research. All human samples were, and remain, anonymized to the investigators at Rocky Mountain Laboratories where the RT-QuIC testing was performed.

Protein expression and purification

Recombinant prion protein (rPrPSen) substrates were purified as previously described [49]. Briefly, PrP DNA sequences encoding for Syrian golden hamster (residues 23 to 231; accession no. K02234; or residues 90–231), Bank Vole (residues 23 to 230; Methionine at residue 109; accession no. AF367624) or hamster-sheep chimera (Syrian hamster residues 23 to 137 followed by sheep residues 141 to 234 of the R154Q171 polymorph [accession no. AY907689]) prion protein genes were ligated into the pET41 vector (EMD Biosciences). Vectors were transformed into Rosetta (DE3) Escherichia coli and were grown in Luria broth medium in the presence of kanamycin and chloramphenicol. Protein expression was induced using the autoinduction system [50,51] and was purified from inclusion bodies under denaturing conditions using Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) superflow resin (Qiagen) with an ÄKTA fast protein liquid chromatographer (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The protein was refolded on the column using a guanidine HCl reduction gradient and eluted using an imidazole gradient as described [49]. The eluted protein was extensively dialyzed into 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), filtered (0.22-μm syringe filter [Fisher]) and stored at -80°C. Protein concentration was determined by measuring absorbance at 280 nm.

Brain homogenate preparations

Brain homogenates (BH; 10% w/v, Tables 1 and 2) were prepared as previously described [14] and stored at -80°C. For RT-QuIC analysis BHs were serially diluted in 0.1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate, Sigma)/N2 (Gibco)/PBS as previously reported (25), or where indicated the last dilutions were performed to a final concentration of 0.05% SDS/N2/PBS.

RT-QuIC protocol

RT-QuIC reactions were performed as previously described [14]. Reaction mix was composed of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 300 or 130 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/ml rPrPSen, 10 μM thioflavin T (ThT), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt (EDTA), and 0.002% or 0.001% SDS. NaCl and SDS concentrations were varied where indicated. Aliquots of the reaction mix (98 μL) were loaded into each well of a black 96-well plate with a clear bottom (Nunc) and seeded with 2 μL of indicated BH dilutions. The plate was then sealed with a plate sealer film (Nalgene Nunc International) and incubated at 42°C in a BMG FLUOstar Omega plate reader with cycles of 1 min shaking (700 rpm double orbital) and 1 min rest throughout the indicated incubation time. ThT fluorescence measurements (450 +/-10 nm excitation and 480 +/-10 nm emission; bottom read) were taken every 45 min.

To compensate for minor differences in baselines between fluorescent plate readers and across multiple experiments, data sets were normalized to a percentage of the maximal fluorescence response (260,000 rfu) of the plate readers after subtraction of the baseline, as described [34], and plotted versus reaction time. Reactions were classified as RT-QuIC positive base on criteria similar to those previously described for RT-QuIC analyses of brain specimens [14,34].

Proteinase K (PK) digestion of RT-QuIC products and immunoblotting

RT-QuIC reaction products were collected from the plates by extensive scraping and pipetting and treated with 10 μg/ml Proteinase K (PK) for 1 hour at 37°C with 400 rpm orbital shaking. Equal volumes of PK-treated reactions were run on 12% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred to an Immobilon P membrane (Millipore) using the iBlot Gel Transfer System (Invitrogen). Membranes were probed with R20 primary antiserum (hamster epitope: residues 218–231) [52] diluted 1:15,000 and visualized with the Attophos AP fluorescent substrate system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.


We thank Drs. Suzette Priola, Brent Race and Robert Faris for critical review of this manuscript. We thank Gregory Raymond for helping to acquire the human, bovine, sheep and rodent samples and Brent Race for providing us with deer brain samples. We thank Drs. Jillian Cooper and Phil Minor at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls repository (UK) for providing us with human CJD-infected brain tissue. We thank Dr. Christina Casalone at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Italy for brain samples from cattle with C-BSE and L-BSE and Dr.Ciriaco Ligios (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, Italy) for brain samples from uninfected and scrapie-infected sheep.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BC CDO BRG. Performed the experiments: CDO BRG. Analyzed the data: CDO BRG BC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LDR AGH RN WZ BG PG. Wrote the paper: BC CDO BRG LDR AGH.


  1. 1. Bruce M, Dickinson AG (1979) Biological stability of different classes of scrapie agent. In: Prusiner SB, Hadlow WJ, editors. Slow transmissible diseases of the nervous system. New York: Academic Press. pp. 71–86.
  2. 2. Bessen RA, Marsh RF (1994) Distinct PrP properties suggest the molecular basis of strain variation in transmissible mink encephalopathy. JVirol 68: 7859–7868. pmid:7966576
  3. 3. Bessen RA, Kocisko DA, Raymond GJ, Nandan S, Lansbury PT Jr., et al. (1995) Nongenetic propagation of strain-specific phenotypes of scrapie prion protein. Nature 375: 698–700. pmid:7791905
  4. 4. Telling GC, Parchi P, DeArmond SJ, Cortelli P, Montagna P, et al. (1996) Evidence for the conformation of the pathologic isoform of the prion protein enciphering and propagating prion diversity. Science 274: 2079–2082. pmid:8953038
  5. 5. Caughey B, Raymond GJ, Bessen RA (1998) Strain-dependent differences in beta-sheet conformations of abnormal prion protein. JBiolChem 273: 32230–32235. pmid:9822701
  6. 6. Safar J, Wille H, Itri V, Groth D, Serban H, et al. (1998) Eight prion strains have PrP(Sc) molecules with different conformations [see comments]. NatMed 4: 1157–1165. pmid:9771749
  7. 7. Parchi P, Giese A, Capellari S, Brown P, Schulz-Schaeffer W, et al. (1999) Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. AnnNeurol 46: 224–233. pmid:10443888
  8. 8. Parchi P, Zou W, Wang W, Brown P, Capellari S, et al. (2000) Genetic influence on the structural variations of the abnormal prion protein. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 97: 10168–10172. pmid:10963679
  9. 9. Collinge J, Clarke AR (2007) A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science 318: 930–936. pmid:17991853
  10. 10. Monaco S, Fiorini M, Farinazzo A, Ferrari S, Gelati M, et al. (2012) Allelic origin of protease-sensitive and protease-resistant prion protein isoforms in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease with the P102L mutation. PLoS One 7: e32382. pmid:22384235
  11. 11. Piccardo P, Liepnieks JJ, William A, Dlouhy SR, Farlow MR, et al. (2001) Prion proteins with different conformations accumulate in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease caused by A117V and F198S mutations. AmJPathol 158: 2201–2207. pmid:11395398
  12. 12. Gotte DR, Benestad SL, Laude H, Zurbriggen A, Oevermann A, et al. (2011) Atypical scrapie isolates involve a uniform prion species with a complex molecular signature. PLoS One 6: e27510. pmid:22096587
  13. 13. Pirisinu L, Nonno R, Esposito E, Benestad SL, Gambetti P, et al. (2013) Small ruminant nor98 prions share biochemical features with human gerstmann-straussler-scheinker disease and variably protease-sensitive prionopathy. PLoS One 8: e66405. pmid:23826096
  14. 14. Wilham JM, Orrú CD, Bessen RA, Atarashi R, Sano K, et al. (2010) Rapid End-Point Quantitation of Prion Seeding Activity with Sensitivity Comparable to Bioassays. PLoS Pathogens 6: e1001217. pmid:21152012
  15. 15. Atarashi R, Sano K, Satoh K, Nishida N (2011) Real-time quaking-induced conversion: A highly sensitive assay for prion detection. Prion 5: 150–153. pmid:21778820
  16. 16. Atarashi R, Satoh K, Sano K, Fuse T, Yamaguchi N, et al. (2011) Ultrasensitive human prion detection in cerebrospinal fluid by real-time quaking-induced conversion. Nature Medicine 17: 175–178. pmid:21278748
  17. 17. Orru CD, Wilham JM, Vascellari S, Hughson AG, Caughey B (2012) New generation QuIC assays for prion seeding activity. Prion 6: 147–152. pmid:22421206
  18. 18. McGuire LI, Peden AH, Orru CD, Wilham JM, Appleford NE, et al. (2012) RT-QuIC analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Annals of Neurology 72: 278–285. pmid:22926858
  19. 19. Cramm M, Schmitz M, Karch A, Zafar S, Varges D, et al. (2015) Characteristic CSF prion seeding efficiency in humans with prion diseases. Mol Neurobiol 51: 396–405. pmid:24809690
  20. 20. Cramm M, Schmitz M, Karch A, Mitrova E, Kuhn F, et al. (2015) Stability and Reproducibility Underscore Utility of RT-QuIC for Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Mol Neurobiol.
  21. 21. Colby DW, Zhang Q, Wang S, Groth D, Legname G, et al. (2007) Prion detection by an amyloid seeding assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 20914–20919. pmid:18096717
  22. 22. Orru CD, Favole A, Corona C, Mazza M, Manca M, et al. (2015) Detection and Discrimination of Classical and Atypical L-type Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy by Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion. J Clin Microbiol.
  23. 23. Peden AH, McGuire LI, Appleford NE, Mallinson G, Wilham JM, et al. (2012) Sensitive and specific detection of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brain prion protein using real-time quaking induced conversion. JGenVirol 93: 438–449.
  24. 24. Vascellari S, Orru CD, Hughson AG, King D, Barron R, et al. (2012) Prion seeding activities of mouse scrapie strains with divergent PrPSc protease sensitivities and amyloid plaque content using RT-QuIC and eQuIC. PLoS ONE 7: e48969. pmid:23139828
  25. 25. Sano K, Satoh K, Atarashi R, Takashima H, Iwasaki Y, et al. (2013) Early detection of abnormal prion protein in genetic human prion diseases now possible using real-time QUIC assay. PLoSONE 8: e54915. pmid:23372790
  26. 26. Nonno R, Di Bari MA, Cardone F, Vaccari G, Fazzi P, et al. (2006) Efficient transmission and characterization of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease strains in bank voles. PLoS Pathog 2: e12. pmid:16518470
  27. 27. Watts JC, Giles K, Patel S, Oehler A, DeArmond SJ, et al. (2014) Evidence that bank vole PrP is a universal acceptor for prions. PLoS Pathog 10: e1003990. pmid:24699458
  28. 28. Cosseddu GM, Nonno R, Vaccari G, Bucalossi C, Fernandez-Borges N, et al. (2011) Ultra-efficient PrP(Sc) amplification highlights potentialities and pitfalls of PMCA technology. PLoSPathog 7: e1002370.
  29. 29. Orru CD, Caughey B (2011) Prion seeded conversion and amplification assays. TopCurrChem 305: 121–133.
  30. 30. Orru CD, Groveman BR, Hughson AG, Zanusso G, Coulthart MB, et al. (2015) Rapid and Sensitive RT-QuIC Detection of Human Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Using Cerebrospinal Fluid. MBio 6.
  31. 31. Orru CD, Hughson AG, Race B, Raymond GJ, Caughey B (2012) Time course of prion seeding activity in cerebrospinal fluid of scrapie-infected hamsters after intratongue and intracerebral inoculations. JClinMicrobiol 50: 1464–1466.
  32. 32. Orrú CD, Wilham JM, Hughson AG, Raymond LD, McNally KL, et al. (2009) Human variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and sheep scrapie PrP(res) detection using seeded conversion of recombinant prion protein. Protein Eng Des Sel 22: 515–521. pmid:19570812
  33. 33. Peden AH, Sarode DP, Mulholland CR, Barria MA, Ritchie DL, et al. (2014) The prion protein protease sensitivity, stability and seeding activity in variably protease sensitive prionopathy brain tissue suggests molecular overlaps with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2: 152. pmid:25331173
  34. 34. Orru CD, Bongianni M, Tonoli G, Ferrari S, Hughson AG, et al. (2014) A test for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using nasal brushings. New England Journal of Medicine 371: 519–529. pmid:25099576
  35. 35. Henderson DM, Manca M, Haley NJ, Denkers ND, Nalls AV, et al. (2013) Rapid antemortem detection of CWD prions in deer saliva. PLoSONE 8: e74377. pmid:24040235
  36. 36. Elder AM, Henderson DM, Nalls AV, Wilham JM, Caughey BW, et al. (2013) In vitro detection of prionemia in TSE-infected cervids and hamsters. PLoS ONE 8: e80203. pmid:24224043
  37. 37. Haley NJ, Carver S, Hoon-Hanks LL, Henderson DM, Davenport KA, et al. (2014) Detection of chronic wasting disease in the lymph nodes of free-ranging cervids by real-time quaking-induced conversion. J Clin Microbiol 52: 3237–3243. pmid:24958799
  38. 38. Kocisko DA, Come JH, Priola SA, Chesebro B, Raymond GJ, et al. (1994) Cell-free formation of protease-resistant prion protein. Nature 370: 471–474. pmid:7913989
  39. 39. Kocisko DA, Priola SA, Raymond GJ, Chesebro B, Lansbury PT Jr., et al. (1995) Species specificity in the cell-free conversion of prion protein to protease-resistant forms: a model for the scrapie species barrier. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 92: 3923–3927.
  40. 40. Raymond GJ, Hope J, Kocisko DA, Priola SA, Raymond LD, et al. (1997) Molecular assessment of the transmissibilities of BSE and scrapie to humans. Nature 388: 285–288. pmid:9230438
  41. 41. Raymond GJ, Bossers A, Raymond LD, O'Rourke KI, McHolland LE, et al. (2000) Evidence of a molecular barrier limiting susceptibility of humans, cattle and sheep to chronic wasting disease. EMBO J 19: 4425–4430. pmid:10970836
  42. 42. Bossers A, Belt PBGM, Raymond GJ, Caughey B, de Vries R, et al. (1997) Scrapie susceptibility-linked polymorphisms modulate the in vitro conversion of sheep prion protein to protease-resistant forms. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 94: 4931–4936.
  43. 43. Priola SA, Chesebro B (1995) A single hamster amino acid blocks conversion to protease-resistant PrP in scrapie-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells. JVirol 69: 7754–7758. pmid:7494285
  44. 44. Goldmann W, Hunter N, Benson G, Foster JD, Hope J (1991) Different scrapie-associated fibril proteins (PrP) are encoded by lines of sheep selected for different alleles of the Sip gene. J Gen Virol 72 (Pt 10): 2411–2417. pmid:1681027
  45. 45. Groveman BR, Dolan MA, Taubner LM, Kraus A, Wickner RB, et al. (2014) Parallel in-register intermolecular beta-sheet architectures for prion-seeded prion protein (PrP) amyloids. J Biol Chem 289: 24129–24142. pmid:25028516
  46. 46. Atarashi R, Moore RA, Sim VL, Hughson AG, Dorward DW, et al. (2007) Ultrasensitive detection of scrapie prion protein using seeded conversion of recombinant prion protein. NatMethods 4: 645–650. pmid:17643109
  47. 47. Atarashi R, Wilham JM, Christensen L, Hughson AG, Moore RA, et al. (2008) Simplified ultrasensitive prion detection by recombinant PrP conversion with shaking. NatMethods 5: 211–212. pmid:18309304
  48. 48. Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C (2001) Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature 411: 810–813. pmid:11459061
  49. 49. Groveman BR, Kraus A, Raymond LD, Dolan MA, Anson KJ, et al. (2015) Charge neutralization of the central lysine cluster in prion protein (PrP) promotes PrP(Sc)-like folding of recombinant PrP amyloids. J Biol Chem 290: 1119–1128. pmid:25416779
  50. 50. Fox BG, Blommel PG (2009) Autoinduction of protein expression. Curr Protoc Protein Sci Chapter 5: Unit 5 23. pmid:19365792
  51. 51. Studier FW (2005) Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein ExprPurif 41: 207–234. pmid:15915565
  52. 52. Caughey B, Raymond GJ, Ernst D, Race RE (1991) N-terminal truncation of the scrapie-associated form of PrP by lysosomal protease(s): implications regarding the site of conversion of PrP to the protease-resistant state. JVirol 65: 6597–6603. pmid:1682507