Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Activation of Human Monocytes by Live Borrelia burgdorferi Generates TLR2-Dependent and -Independent Responses Which Include Induction of IFN-β

  • Juan C. Salazar ,

    Affiliations Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Star Duhnam-Ems,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Carson La Vake,

    Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Adriana R. Cruz,

    Affiliation Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas, Cali, Colombia

  • Meagan W. Moore,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Melissa J. Caimano,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Leonor Velez-Climent,

    Affiliations Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Jonathan Shupe,

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Winfried Krueger,

    Affiliation Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Justin D. Radolf

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America, Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America


It is widely believed that innate immune responses to Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) are primarily triggered by the spirochete's outer membrane lipoproteins signaling through cell surface TLR1/2. We recently challenged this notion by demonstrating that phagocytosis of live Bb by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) elicited greater production of proinflammatory cytokines than did equivalent bacterial lysates. Using whole genome microarrays, we show herein that, compared to lysates, live spirochetes elicited a more intense and much broader transcriptional response involving genes associated with diverse cellular processes; among these were IFN-β and a number of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), which are not known to result from TLR2 signaling. Using isolated monocytes, we demonstrated that cell activation signals elicited by live Bb result from cell surface interactions and uptake and degradation of organisms within phagosomes. As with PBCMs, live Bb induced markedly greater transcription and secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1β in monocytes than did lysates. Secreted IL-18, which, like IL-1β, also requires cleavage by activated caspase-1, was generated only in response to live Bb. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production by TLR2-deficient murine macrophages was only moderately diminished in response to live Bb but was drastically impaired against lysates; TLR2 deficiency had no significant effect on uptake and degradation of spirochetes. As with PBMCs, live Bb was a much more potent inducer of IFN-β and ISGs in isolated monocytes than were lysates or a synthetic TLR2 agonist. Collectively, our results indicate that the enhanced innate immune responses of monocytes following phagocytosis of live Bb have both TLR2-dependent and -independent components and that the latter induce transcription of type I IFNs and ISGs.

Author Summary

Lyme disease is a tick-borne infectious disorder caused by the spirochetal pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb). Innate immune responses to Bb are thought to be triggered by the spirochete's outer membrane lipoproteins signaling through cell surface toll-like receptors (TLR1/2). Using a whole genome microarray technique, we showed that live spirochetes elicited a more intense and broader immune response in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) than could be explained simply by TLR1/2 cell surface stimulation. Of particular interest, live Bb also uniquely induced transcription of type I interferons. In similarly stimulated isolated human monocytes, live Bb generated a greater production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1β), as well as interferon-β (IFN-β). Secreted IL-18, which like IL-1β requires cytosolic cleavage of its inactive form by activated caspase-1, was generated only in response to live Bb. The cytosolic responses occurred despite evidence that phagocytosed spirochetes were rapidly degraded in phagosomal vacuoles, and unable to escape unscathed into the cell cytosol. We conclude that the innate immune signals generated in human monocytes by phagocytosed spirochetes allow the host to control the bacterium through a number of non-exclusive pathways, that are both TLR2-dependent and -independent, and include a type I interferon response.


Lyme disease (LD), the most commonly reported vector-borne illness in the United States, is a tick-borne, multi-system, inflammatory, infectious disorder caused by the spirochetal bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) [1]. The disease is often heralded in its early stage by erythema migrans (EM), an expanding annular rash which develops following inoculation of spirochetes into the skin at the site of tick feeding and is frequently accompanied by ‘flu like’ symptoms, including myalgias, arthralgias, and fever [1][3]. If treated appropriately, the prognosis is excellent [3],[4]; however, if untreated, hematogenous dissemination of spirochetes may give rise to a wide range of clinical manifestations, most commonly involving the central nervous system, joints and heart [1]. Within days of treatment, the signs and symptoms associated with the disease typically begin to subside, although in some individuals a complete recovery can take several weeks or even months [5]. A minority of treated patients may go on to develop a poorly defined fibromyalgia-like illness, which is not responsive to prolonged antimicrobial therapy [6],[7]. Understanding the ontogeny of the immune response to the bacterium may provide insights into why some patients remain persistently symptomatic while others recover more rapidly.

Until recently, most efforts to understand how Bb initiates innate immune cell activation have focused on the pro-inflammatory attributes of spirochetal lipoproteins [8][15], while less has been done to define the mechanisms underlying immune recognition elicited by live spirochetes. The emphasis on borrelial lipoproteins (BLPs) as innate immune agonists emerged from the discovery that spirochetes expresses an abundance of these molecules, many on their outer membrane, and that the borrelial cell envelope lacks the potent gram negative proinflammatory glycolipid, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [16][19]. Unlike LPS, which signals through the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 and CD14 [20], lipoproteins signal through TLR1/2 heterodimers [10], [13], [21][23], also in a CD14 dependent manner [12],[24],[25]. Intradermal injection of spirochetal lipoprotein analogs (lipopeptides), in both animals [8] and humans [15],[26], confirmed in situ that BLPs indeed have the capability to activate macrophages and induce dendritic cell (DC) maturation. Collectively, these prior studies led to the viewpoint that innate immune cell activation in LD occurs predominantly through the interaction of spirochetal lipoproteins with CD14 and/or TLR1/2 on the surfaces of macrophages and DCs.

The findings that experimentally infected mice deficient in CD14 [25],[27], TLR2 [14],[28] developed even more severe arthritis than their wild type counterparts, and that mice lacking the TLR adapter protein myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MYD88) [29] also developed arthritis, provided the first clear indication that intact spirochetes may employ additional TLRs and/or TLR-independent pathways to induce acute inflammation. Further evidence that spirochetes generate TLR2 independent signals in both humans and mice has been obtained using ex vivo stimulation models. Behera et al [30] demonstrated that blocking of TLR2 on the surface of human chondrocytes eliminated the inflammatory response to purified lipoproteins but not to intact spirochetes. The same group [31] recently confirmed using a mouse model that proinflammatory cytokine production was only partially reduced in TLR2 deficient bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) stimulated with live Bb and showed that maximal TLR2 stimulation is dependent on phagocytosis. Using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) we previously provided evidence that phagocytosed live bacteria initiate activation programs in monocytes and DCs that differ both quantitatively and qualitatively from those evoked by cell surface-mediated signals generated by lipoprotein rich bacterial lysates [32],[33]. The marked increases in IL-1β secretion in response to live bacteria were indicative that phagocytosis of the spirochete generates phagolysosomal signals that result in much greater activation of caspase-1 than could be elicited by cell surface mediated TLR1/2 stimulation by bacterial lysates. In the same experiments heat killed spirochetes were readily phagocytosed and also induced a stronger pro-inflammatory response than bacterial lysates. The greater complexity of the signaling events triggered by internalized spirochetes was further underscored by their ability to induce programmed cell death responses in monocytes.

The current study was conducted to further elucidate the multifaceted mechanisms by which live Bb initiates and maintains innate immune responses in human monocytes. We focused on monocytes because of the seminal role these cells have in the recognition and killing of spirochetes during the course of LD [34][39]. We began by using microarray methods to compare the global transcriptional responses elicited in PBMCs by live Bb and equivalent amounts of borrelial lysates. The arrays provided unambiguous evidence that live bacteria elicit a proinflammatory response that is not just more intense but also broader, involving genes associated with diverse cellular processes including immune activation, ion transport, protein ubiquitination, and cell damage and repair. The finding that live bacteria induced transcription of interferon β (IFN-β), along with a number of Type I interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), was of particular relevance given that TLR2-derived signals alone cannot induce type I interferons [40],[41]. Interestingly, type I interferons have recently been shown to have an important role in the development of arthritis in a murine LD model [42],[43]. Using isolated human monocytes, we demonstrated that this cell is indeed the primary source of the many unique inflammatory signals engendered by live Bb, and that these signaling pathways, including activation of caspase-1 and induction of IFN-β and associated genes, arise under conditions in which spirochetes manifest no capacity to escape vacuolar confinement and degradation. Collectively our results highlight the ability of LD spirochetes to induce diverse signals which coincide with degradation of spirochetes within phagolysosomes that are both stronger and distinct from those generated by spirochetal lipoproteins and which cannot be entirely attributed to the canonical prototypic TLR1/2 dependent signaling.


Identification of distinct PBMC transcriptional responses to live vs. lysed Borrelia burgdorferi

We previously showed in a PBMC-Bb stimulation model that phagocytosed live bacteria initiate activation programs in monocytes and dendritic cells (DCs) that differ both quantitatively and qualitatively from those evoked by cell surface-mediated signals generated by equivalent amounts of lipoprotein rich bacterial lysates [32],[33]. We also demonstrated that abrogation of phagocytosis by Cytochalasin D diminished the production of inflammatory cytokines by live bacteria to levels comparable to those induced by lysates [32]. In this study, we used a whole genome microarray method to more completely characterize the transcriptional responses generated by live or lysed spirochetes in the PBMC-Bb stimulation model. Equivalence between input live and lysed Bb used for each individual experiment was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and silver staining (data not shown). PBMCs also were incubated with fluorescent microspheres (beads) to evaluate the transcriptional events associated with the cytoskeletal changes that are known to follow the binding and internalization of inert particles [44]. Gene intensity values generated in response to each of the three conditions studied then were compared to those from unstimulated cells.

The statistical analysis revealed that 529 genes were differentially regulated in one or more of the three conditions studied (live and lysed Bb and beads). Of the total group of 529 genes, 400 encode molecules with identified biologic functions, and these were selected for further analysis. Based on a ratio determined by directly comparing individual gene transcript intensity values generated from beads, live and lysed vs. unstimulated PBMCs, we considered genes to be either differentially up-regulated (ratio >1.5), differentially down-regulated (ratio <0.7) or unchanged. With few exceptions, the transcriptional profile of PBMCs stimulated with beads was very similar to that obtained from unstimulated cells. In contrast, 213 of the 400 genes studied were differentially up-regulated (Fig. 1A) and 187 were down-regulated (Fig. 1B) in response to either live and/or lysed Bb. Genes within this group of 400 were then classified into four different sub-groups. The first, designated the “core group”, was comprised of 184 genes whose intensity values compared to unstimulated cells were similarly up- or down-regulated in response to either live or lysed spirochetes (Table S1). The second group included genes classified as being either more intensely or exclusively up-regulated (Table 1) in response to live Bb. The third group contained genes more intensely down-regulated in response to live spirochetes, in some cases exclusively in response to live bacteria (Table S2). The final group consisted of a small number of genes that were either strongly or solely up-regulated in response to borrelial lysates (Table S3).

Figure 1. Distinct gene expression profiles obtained from human PBMCs stimulated with either live or lysed Borrelia burgdorferi.

Genes whose normalized intensity values were deemed to be statistically significant in the PBMC array, and had a known biologic function, were used to determine the total number of genes whose intensity values were proportionately higher or lower in PBMCs in response to either live Bb and/or lysed Bb vs. unstimulated conditions. The top half of the Venn diagrams show the total number of gene transcripts that were more intensely or exclusively regulated by live and/or lysed Bb vs. unstimulated conditions (N = 213 genes) (A), or less intensely or exclusively down-regulated by live and/or lysed Bb vs. unstimulated cells (N = 187) (B). For similarly up-regulated (N = 177) or down-regulated (N = 170) genes, the arrows point down to a direct comparative analysis between live or lysed Bb generated gene intensity values. Genes in this category were further stratified depending on whether or not they were proportionately higher (live to lysed ratio >1.5), lower (live to lysed ratio <1.5) or equal between live vs lysed Bb stimulated cells.

Table 1. Genes classified as being either more intensely or exclusively up-regulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with live Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) MOI (10∶1) in comparison to similar concentrations of borrelial lysates.

Core transcriptional responses are largely representative of cell surface TLR signals

The “core group” of genes provided a snapshot of the various innate immune signaling pathways which are triggered from the cell surface in response to intact spirochetes or spirochetal constituents (lysates) (Table S1). Based on prior work, we considered several of these genes to be largely representative of downstream TLR2-mediated signals. Within this core group there also were several chemokine associated genes, including IL-8 and CCL2. IL-8 has been shown to be secreted in response to TLR1/2 mediated signals induced by either spirochetal lipoproteins [45],[46] or Bb lysates [47]. Moreover, synthesis of this chemokine in response to borrelial lysates can be partially abrogated by TLR2 blockade [47]. The TLR-induced neutrophil chemoattractant CCL2 (also known as MCP-1) is over expressed in LD erythema migrans (EM) dermal infiltrates [48] and in joint tissues from Lyme arthritis susceptible mice [49]. The gene for the suppressor of cytokine signaling protein 3 (SOCS3), a negative regulator of cytokines that signal through the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway [50], also was induced in response to both stimuli. Of interest, decreased SOCS activity in CD14-deficient murine macrophages has been associated with an exaggerated TLR mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine response to phagocytosed Bb (personal communication from Dr. Tim Sellati).

A surprisingly large number of genes associated with diverse metabolic functions were also contained in this core group. This finding indicates that immune cells have the capacity to down-regulate various genes associated with metabolic functions which are not critically needed during inflammatory responses. Some genes which encode cell surface receptors associated with immune signals were also down-regulated. This was the case for CCR2, which is linked to the cell surface chemokine receptor for MCP-1 [51], and for IFNGR1, which encodes the IFN-γ receptor-1 protein [52]. Of note, mouse macrophages TLR2 stimulation with a synthetic ligand caused a similar decrease in IFNGR-1 transcription [52] Conversely, NALP12 (Monarch1/PYPAF7) which is a negative regulator of TLR-induced inflammatory responses [53] was down-regulated by both stimuli.

Genes exclusively or more intensely up-regulated by live Borrelia burgdorferi (Table 1)

As already noted above, a large number of genes were either exclusively or more intensely up-regulated by live as opposed to lysed Bb. Within this group we found several genes that encode for monocyte-derived chemokines (CCl3L1, CCL3, CCL3L) [54], as well as two monocyte/macrophage-associated growth factors (GMCSF and GCSF) [55]. This group also encompassed a number of genes which are known to be directly or indirectly associated with phagocytosis and/or assembly of phagolysosomes. PI4K2B, a cytosolic phosphoinositol kinase which regulates vesicular trafficking during phagocytosis [56] and LAMP3 (lysosome associated membrane protein 3), a late endosomal maturation marker [57], were both strongly up-regulated. TNF-α and IL-6, which encode for two cytokines previously shown to be secreted in large quantities in response to live Bb in the PBMC stimulation model [32], were also included in this group. In that prior study we also showed that phagocytosed Bb generated signals that activated natural killer (NK)-cells inducing them to produce INF-γ. Herein, the transcript for INF-γ was more than 40-fold higher in PBMCs exposed to live spirochetes. Correspondingly, the genes for CD69 [58] and SLAMF7 (also known as CS1) [59], which are both associated with NK cell activation, also were intensely up-regulated by live bacteria. As a likely consequence from the paracrine effects of INF-γ, STAT1 was robustly up-regulated by live spirochetes. In agreement with this assumption, the gene for NMI (N-myc STAT1 interactor) which is directly involved in STAT-dependent transcription of IFN-γ [60], was exclusively regulated by live Bb. The transcript for FXYD6, which codes for a protein that regulates Na,K-ATPase channels by altering their affinity for Na+ and K+ ions [61], was up-regulated only by live spirochetes. The latter is particularly noteworthy given that phagocytosed Bb markedly enhanced secretion of active IL-1β by monocytes [32], a process which first requires TLR stimulation trailed by a series of complex signaling events that lead to assembly of the inflammasome, activation of caspase-1 and cytosolic cleavage of pro-IL-1β [62]. Changes in cytosolic ionic composition following phagocytosis, particularly loss of intracellular K+, could thus provide the necessary signals required to activate the NALP3 inflammasome [63],[64].

Live spirochetes also more intensely or exclusively regulated several genes associated with cell damage and repair than bacterial lysates. This finding is in accord with our prior demonstration that phagocytosed Bb, but not bacterial lysates, has the capacity to initiate programmed cell death responses in human monocytes [33]. Gene transcripts within this group included PARP9 (Poly ADP-ribose polymerase9); PARP10, PARP12, PARP14 and Galectin9 (LGALS9). The catalytic activity of PARPs has been shown to be stimulated by DNA strand breaks which occur during programmed cell death. Within this cluster, PARP9 and PARP10 were exclusively up-regulated by live Bb. These two PARPs have not been previously associated with apoptosis [65], suggesting that phagocytosis of Bb may initiate novel mechanism of cell damage and repair. Galectin9 is a β-galactosidase binding lectin which is present in activated macrophages and DCs [66], and has the capacity to incite apoptosis via the calcium-calpain-caspase-1 dependent pathway [67].

Canonical TLR1/2 signals are not known to promote transcription of type I interferons [40],[41]. It was, therefore, particularly noteworthy that live Bb induced transcription of IFN-β and several type I interferon-associated genes in human PBMCs (Table 1). Within this cluster there were multiple interferon-induced protein transcripts (Mx1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, IFI16 and RSD2), as well as several interferon-regulated genes known to code for molecules involved with protein ubiquitination or ubiquitin-like functions (ISG15, HERC5, UBE2L6 and USP18). The transcript for ISG15, which featured prominently within this cluster, codes for a ubiquitin-like molecule that is conjugated to intracellular target proteins after type I interferon stimulation [68]. HERC5 is an IFN-β-inducible E3 protein ligase [69] which localizes to the cytoplasm and perinuclear region of cells and is required for ISGylation of ISG15 [68]. UBE2L6 is a conjugating enzyme also responsible for protein ISGylation, while USP18 is a protease that specifically removes ISG15 [70]. The gene for ISGF3G (also known as IRF9), a translational regulator known to associate with phosphorylated STAT1/2 heterodymers to form a complex termed ISGF3 transcription factor, also was up-regulated by live Bb. ISGF3 enters the cell nucleus and binds to the IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) to activate the transcription of interferon stimulated genes [71]. IRF7, which was up-regulated by live Bb but not by lysates, is expressed constitutively in monocytes and DCs but can be induced following single-stranded RNA mediated activation of endosomal TLR7 or TLR8 [72]. IRF7 also can be up-regulated by IFN-β through a cell surface initiated paracrine loop that activates STAT1 [73].

Genes exclusively or more intensely down-regulated by live Borrelia burgdorferi

Several genes associated with cell signaling, ion and metal transport systems, and cytoskeleton architecture were more intensely or exclusively down-regulated by live Bb (Table S2). The gene for TLR6, which together with TLR1 recognizes diacylated lipoproteins [74], was intensely down-regulated by both stimuli, but much more so by the live spirochetes. Since Bb does not have diacylated lipoproteins on its outer membrane [16], this finding suggests that inflammatory cells are capable of fine-tuning transcriptional responses depending on the biochemical configuration of the lipoproteins encountered. The transcript for CD91 (LRP1), a transmembrane receptor which is known to bind the anti-apoptotic molecule α-2-microglobulin and the heat shock protein gp96 [75], was also in this group. This suggests that in response to live Bb innate immune effector cells shift inflammatory responses away from those that are associated with exogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).

Genes found to be more strongly or solely up-regulated in response to borrelial lysates

A small group of genes were more intensely or exclusively up-regulated by bacterial lysates (Table S3). Of particular interest we found three genes that encode for matrix metallopeptidases (MMP1, MMP10 and MMP19). MMP-9 has been previously shown to be induced in both human and murine monocytic cells in a TLR2 dependent manner [76],[77]. MMP10 was also previously found to be up-regulated in mouse cells infected with live Bb [78]. Several genes associated with structural molecules, including two which are involved in keratin formation (KRT2A and KRTAP17), were exclusively up-regulated by the lysates. Similar structural genes have been shown to be up-regulated in joint tissue obtained from a murine Bb induced arthritis model [79].

Quantitative Real Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmation of select genes differentially regulated in stimulated PBMCs

We previously demonstrated by quantitative real time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) that the transcripts for TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ were more intensely up-regulated by live Bb than bacterial lysates [33]. As shown in Table 2, herein we also confirmed by qRT-PCR that live bacteria induced IRF-7, IFN-β, STAT-1, and LGALS9. Although the transcript for galectin-9 was confirmed to be up-regulated by live spirochetes, exclusive down-regulation of this transcript by the lysates as shown in the array could not be corroborated by qRT-PCR. Excluding LGALS9, the live to lysed transcriptional values determined for each individual gene correlated well between the two methods used (R2 = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.93–0.99, p<0.001). IL-1β which was intensely up-regulated by live Bb stimulated PBMCs, was not significantly regulated in the PBMC array analysis. On the other hand, as will be discussed below, several type I interferon genes differentially up- or down-regulated in the array were identically regulated in isolated monocytes stimulated under comparable conditions (Table S4). Biologic validation for the transcriptional responses denoted in the PBMC array also could be ascertained from prior experiments where we utilized the Bb-PBMC stimulation model [32],[33]. For instance the revelation that Bb induced programmed cell death in monocytes is in accord with the finding herein that several genes associated with apoptosis were up-regulated by live spirochetes. The sizable increase in the transcript for CD69 shown in the array is also consistent with the prior demonstration that NK-cells express this cell surface activation marker when exposed to live Bb [32].

Table 2. RT-PCR confirmation of array generated transcriptional responses.

Live Borrelia burgdorferi enhances pro-inflammatory cytokine transcription and secretion in isolated human monocytes

The transcriptional responses in the PBMC whole genome array, in conjunction with results from our prior ex vivo stimulation studies [32],[33], provided substantial evidence that phagocytosis of live Bb triggers inflammatory responses in PBMCs that differ quantitatively and qualitatively from those generated by bacterial lysates at the cell surface. In this study we used the isolated monocytes to verify that this cell was indeed a major source of the transcriptional responses generated by live Bb and that the enhanced responses elicited by viable spirochetes were not dependent on signals or cytokines derived from other mononuclear cells in the PBMC mixture. We first had to verify that uptake of the spirochetes by highly purified human monocytes was equivalent to the uptake previously shown in the PBMC-Bb stimulation model. Not surprisingly, a large percentage of the monocytes (Mean 63%: SE+/−9.6%) cultured with Bb (MOI 100∶1) contained fully or partially degraded fluorescent bacteria (see microscopy section below). Additionally, a similar percentage of CD14+ monocytes were also GFP+ by flow cytometry (data not shown). We then confirmed that live Bb was significantly more potent than borrelial lysates for inducing transcription and secretion of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 (Fig. 2). Live spirochetes also induced higher levels of IL-10 (data not shown); indicating that the enhanced response associated with phagocytosed spirochetes also includes the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines which others have shown to be important for control of LD [42],[80],[81]. The marked increases in the amount of secreted IL-1β suggest that phagocytosed live spirochetes induce signals resulting in the activation of caspase-1, which is a known mechanism for cleavage of pro-IL-1β [82]. Additional evidence for caspase-1 activation was obtained by the demonstration that live Bb also induced monocytes to secrete IL-18, which though constitutively expressed also requires proteolytic processing by activated caspase-1 [83]. Of particular importance, neither bacterial lysates nor the TLR-4 ligand LPS were capable of inducing monocytes to secrete IL-18 (Fig. 3). Alternatively, IL-1β could be secreted in response to other caspases which are linked to the initiation of apoptosis.

Figure 2. Live Borrelia burgdorferi elicits greater cytokine transcription and secretion from isolated human monocytes than borrelial lysates.

Monocytes were incubated with live or lysed Bb at various MOIs (1∶10∶100), 100 ng/ml of lipopolysacharide (LPS) and 10 µg/ml the TLR2 synthetic ligand MMP (Mitogenic pentapeptide). Transcription (4 hour stimulation experiments) and secretion (8 hour stimulation experiments) of IL1-β, TNF-α and IL-6 was determined by either qRT-PCR (fold increased in transcript copies compared to unstimulated cells) or bead array cytokine concentrations (pg/ml) in supernatants. Bars depict the means+/−standard error of the mean from a minimum of four independent experiments. P-values for transcriptional and translational comparisons between live and lysed Bb for each of the equivalent MOIs (1, 10 and 100) are shown above the corresponding bar.

Figure 3. IL-18 is secreted in response to live Bb but not lysates.

Monocytes were either unstimulated or incubated with live or lysed Bb at various MOIs (1∶10∶100) and 100 ng/ml lipopolysacharide (LPS). Secreted IL-18 was determined by ELISA as described in the Methods. Bars depict the mean value (pg/ml)+/−standard error of the mean from three independent experiments. P-values calculated for comparative cytokine production between cells stimulated by live and lysed Bb at equivalent MOI are shown above the corresponding bars. NS = not significant.

Live Bb induces Type I interferons in isolated human monocytes

One of the most significant findings from the PBMC array analysis, and subsequently substantiated by qRT-PCR (Table 2), was the discovery that live Bb induced transcription of type I interferons. As shown in Fig. 4, live Bb was also capable of inducing a distinct increase in transcription of IFN-β in isolated human monocytes, while a similar response was not observed with borrelial lysates or a high concentration of a synthetic TLR2 ligand (MMP 50 µg/ml). The finding that LPS induced transcription of IFN-β is in line with prior observations demonstrating that TLR4 activation can generate type I interferons through the MyD88-independent TRIF-dependent pathway [84]. To better characterize the breadth of the type I interferon responses generated by live or lysed spirochetes in monocytes, we then utilized a Type I interferon RT2 profiler array. This method allows simultaneous, quantitative measurement of 84 Type I interferon associated gene transcripts. Although some overlap did occur in the type I interferon transcriptional responses generated by live and lysed Bb, without exception the response was of greater intensity in monocytes stimulated by live bacteria (Fig. 5A and 5B and Table S4). Live Bb not only exclusively induced transcription of IFN-β, but also transcription of the gene that encodes for IFN-κ, whose functional profile resembles that of IFN-β [85]. The gene for the interferon inducible CXCL10 (IP-10), which encodes the ligand for CXCR3, also was significantly up-regulated by live Bb. Increases in CXCL10 mRNA have been shown in dermal lesions [86] and joint fluid [87] of LD patients. Several other type I interferon inducible genes including ISG15, IFIT1, IFIT2 and IFIT3 also were strongly up-regulated by live Bb in monocytes, as in the PBMC system. IL-6 was induced by both live and lysed Bb, which is not surprising since this cytokine is known to be secreted in response to stimuli other than those associated with type I interferons; including TLR2 ligands as well as borrelial lysates [33].

Figure 4. Live Bb, but not borrelial lysates or synthetic TLR2 ligands, induce IFN-β transcription in isolated human monocytes.

Monocytes were incubated with live or lysed Bb MOI (10), 100 ng/ml of lipopolysacharide (LPS) and the 10 µg/ml of the TLR2 ligand MMP (Mitogenic pentapeptide). Transcription of IFN-β was determined by qRT-PCR. Bars depict the means+/−standard error of the mean from a minimum of four independent experiments. P value shown corresponds to the statistical comparison between live and lysed Bb (MOI 10∶1) induced IFN-β transcripts.

Figure 5. Differentially regulated type I interferons genes monocytes were incubated with live or lysed Bb MOI (10∶1) and gene intensity values were determined by a type I interferon.

RT2 Profiler Array system. (A) The figure shows comparative analysis between gene transcript values generated by monocytes stimulated with live Bb vs unstimulated cells. Genes depicted outside the lines were 4 fold higher or lower and deemed to be statistically significantly differentially regulated (p<0.01) in the array. (B) Comparative analysis between gene transcript values generated by bacterial lysates vs unstimulated cells.

Isolated monocytes contain phagocytosed and degraded B burgdorferi but not intact spirochetes

The unique transcriptional responses and cytokine outputs demonstrated here highlight two distinct consequences resulting from the interaction of Bb with human phagocytic cells: (1) a markedly intensified TLR mediated pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokine output, (2) activation of signaling pathways generally associated with intracellular bacteria (i.e. Listeria monocytogenes and Franciscella tularensis [88],[89]) and some extracellular pathogens (i.e. group B streptococcus [90]), which can escape the confines of the phagosome to trigger cytosolic inflammatory responses. Although phagocytic cells have been shown to internalize and degrade Bb [32],[33],[35],[39],[91], consideration of the signaling issues raised above prompted us to visually re-examine the fate of the spirochete when it comes into contact with the monocyte. Epifluorescent microscopy revealed that individual monocytes contained several fluorescent vacuoles with either bacterial coils and/or partially or fully degraded spirochetes (Fig. 6A). Of interest, and in concert with our prior demonstration that live Bb induces programmed cell death in monocytes [33], cells also exhibited various stages of nuclear fragmentation (Fig. 6A). This finding, which is traditionally associated with apoptosis, correlated with a dose dependent decrease seen in monocyte counts in response to live Bb (data not shown). Because it was not always possible to determine if intact spirochetes were located intra- or extracellularly using epifluorescent images, we then used confocal microscopy which is better suited for such purpose (Fig. 6B–F). The representative horizontal optical slices shown in the figure reveal two intact spirochetes that are in close association with the monocyte and several degraded bacteria contained within intracellular vacuoles. Colocalization of GFP fluorescent bodies with Lyso-Tracker dye (red) provided evidence that some of the digested bacteria were inside phagolysosomes. To determine the precise location of intact spirochetes in relation to the intracellular vacuoles, optical slices were then assembled into stacks and cut perpendicularly (y,z axes) and transversally (x,z axes) to the imaged planes generating an orthogonal view of the spirochetes. The resulting side and top views of several hundred reconstructed images allowed us to conclude that intact spirochetes, when present, were not within the cell cytosol.

Figure 6. Isolated monocytes contain phagocytosed and degraded B. burgdorferi but not intact spirochetes.

(A) Epifluorescence image (100×) acquired from human monocytes incubated for 4-hours with Bb-GFP (MOI 100∶1) and labeled with the cell membrane marker FM4-64 (red) and the nuclear dye DAPI (blue). Phagocytosed (both coiled and degraded) Bb-GFP and fragmented nuclei were observed. (B–F) Orthogonal view (y,z and x,z axes) of optical sections (x,y axes) through a confocal stack of isolated monocytes incubated with Bb-GFP (MOI 100∶1) and labeled with lysotracker (red). (B) Digital enlargement of an extracellular spirochete (labeled # 1) in close proximity to a monocyte. Panels C–F are presented in 2 µm increments [(C) 6 µm, (D) 8 µm (E) 10 µm and (F) 12 µm] through the depth of the monocytes (total depth = 14 µm). Arrows and asterisks point to several internalized and degraded Bb-GFP, whereas colocalized phagolysosomes and fluorescent spirochetes shown in yellow are indicated by the arrowhead. The numbers 1 and 2 are placed next to individual extracellular Bb-GFP. Shapes within x,y axes are represented with their corresponding position in the x,z and y,z axes.

Macrophages from TLR2 deficient mice are activated in response to live B. burgdorferi but not borrelial lysates

The finding that live Bb generates greater transcription and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines than similar amounts of bacterial lysates can have two possible explanations. One is that TLR2 signaling proceeds more efficiently or intensely when spirochetes are phagocytosed. The other is that induction of the cytokine responses resulting from internalization of Bb is not exclusively TLR2-dependent. Both of these possibilities are supported by prior work demonstrating that upon phagocytosis of microbial pathogens or bacterial products, TLRs that are on the cell surface can also be recruited to the phagosome and thus become available for signaling [92],[93]. The most straightforward approach to distinguish between these two possibilities was to examine the cytokine responses to Bb in TLR2−/− murine macrophages. Because the source of the mouse macrophages (bone marrow vs peritoneal derived) has been previously shown to be linked to differing uptake as well as cytokine outputs, in this study we elected to use each cell lines under separate experiments. Consistent with prior observations [31] we demonstrated by using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy that uptake and degradation of spirochetes was not significantly affected despite the absence of TLR2 (Fig. 7A and 7B). WT and TLR2−/− macrophages were then stimulated with live or lysed spirochetes (MOI 10∶1) to appraise the output of selected cytokines. Compared to their WT counterparts, macrophages harvested from TLR2-deficient mice and stimulated with live Bb secreted only moderately diminished amounts of TNF-α (∼25% less) (Fig. 7C). Decrease responses were slightly more pronounced for IL-6 (1611 pg/ml vs. 604 pg/ml) and IL-10 (248 pg/ml vs. 58 pg/ml). In contrast, at similar MOIs the response to lysates was virtually eliminated in TLR2−/− cells (Fig. 7D). While bacterial sonicates have numerous structural components available for cell signaling, the severely impaired cytokine output in TLR2−/− macrophages indicates that the response to the lysates is principally due to spirochetal lipoproteins. Although transcription of IL-1β in TLR2−/− macrophages stimulated with live Bb was not as robust as compared to the WT cells, the absence of TLR2 once again did not eliminate the response. Whereas induction of IL-1β in TLR2−/− cells was absent upon stimulation with bacterial lysates. Unlike human monocytes which were capable of secreting large quantities of IL-1β in response to live bacteria, neither WT nor TLR2 deficient murine macrophages were able to secrete detectable amounts of this cytokine (data not shown). On the other hand, phagocytosed live Bb (MOI 10∶1) was able to similarly induce transcription of IFN-β in both WT and TLR2 deficient bone marrow derived macrophages (Fig. 8).

Figure 7. TLR2 deficient and wild type murine macrophages (peritoneal macrophages or bone marrow derived macrophages) internalize Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), and generate similar cytokine responses.

(A) Wild type (WT) or TLR2-deficient (TLR2−/−) mouse derived peritoneal macrophages were incubated for six hours with Bb-GFP (MOI 100∶1) and analyzed for GFP expression by flow cytometry. Individual macrophage populations shown in the cytograms were selectively gated for analysis based on F4/80 PE expression and Bb-GFP signal. (B) Representative confocal image of internalized Bb-GFP also labeled with lysotracker in TLR2−/− bone marrow derived macrophages incubated for six-hours with live Bb (MOI 100∶1). Inset shows a bar graph depicting the percentage of WT or TLR2−/− macrophages that had spirochetes contained within phagosomal vacuoles. (C) Murine peritoneal macrophages were stimulated for six-hours with: 100 ng/ml of LPS, 10 µg/ml of Mitogenic Pentapeptide (MMP), live Bb-GFP or spirochetal lysates (MOI 10∶1) and compared to unstimulated (UN) cells. The bars represent the average TNF-α concentration (pg/ml) and standard error of the mean calculated from five independent experiments. (D) RNA from similarly stimulated bone marrow derived macrophages (MOI 10∶1) was extracted for qRT-PCR pro-IL-1β quantitation. Fold increase in transcript copies between each of the stimuli is compared to unstimulated cells. Bars depict the means+/−standard error of the mean from a minimum of three independent experiments. P values shown in both C and D correspond to the statistical comparison between WT and TLR2 −/− stimulated macrophages.

Figure 8. Wild type (WT) and TLR2 deficient bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) generate similar IFN-β responses to Bb.

WT or TLR2−/− mouse BMDMs were incubated for six hours with Bb (MOI 10∶1). Fold increase in IFN-β transcript copies measured from Bb stimulated BMDMs are compared to control values from unstimulated cells. Bars depict the means+/−standard error of the mean. Values were not statistically significantly different.

Proinflammatory cytokines responses to Bb are not TLR5-dependent

TLR5 can be expressed in endosomal structures [94],[95] and can be activated by bacterial flagellin to induce synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines [96]. Although not exposed on B burgdorferi's outer membrane, flagellin is a major constituent of the spirochete's periplasmic flagellar structures [97] and thus can become accessible for endosomal TLR5 signaling following degradation of the spirochete within phagolysosomal vacuoles. In concert with this premise, two previous animal studies provided evidence that TLR5 may be partially responsible in generating pro-inflammatory responses to phagocytosed Bb [31],[95]. Thus to examine the contribution of TLR5 ligation with TLR2 mediated signals, herein we measured human monocyte cytokine output in response to a Bb strain known to be deficient in flagellin [98]. Despite the elongated structure, the mutant spirochetes were readily phagocytosed and degraded within phagolysosomes (data not shown). The flagellin deficient spirochetes were also capable of inducing human monocytes to secrete very similar levels of IL1-β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 (Fig. 9), than elicited by wild type Bb (Fig. 2). This finding indicates that when TLR2 is available for signaling, TLR5 does not appear a play a significant role in production of cytokines in response to phagocytosed live Bb.

Figure 9. Flagellin deficient Bb induces NF-κB mediated cytokine responses in human monocytes.

Isolated human monocytes were incubated with live flagellin deficient Bb at various MOIs (1∶10∶100), 100 ng/ml of lipopolysacharide (LPS) and 10 µg/ml of the synthetic TLR2 ligand MMP (Mitogenic pentapeptide). IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 protein concentrations (pg/ml) were quantitated (see Methods) in supernatants obtained from 8 hour stimulation experiments. Bars depict the means (pg/ml)+/−standard error of the mean for each cytokine measured from two independent experiments.


In the course of natural infection with the extracellular pathogen B. burgdorferi phagocytic cells are considered to be the first-line of host defense against the bacterium [2],[25],[32],[33],[99]. Immune cell activation by the spirochete has generally been ascribed to outer membrane lipoprotein-TLR1/2 mediated inflammatory responses [8][15]. Evidence ascertained herein from the PBMC array, and subsequently corroborated using similarly stimulated monocytes, corroborated the important contribution of Bb-cell surface TLR1/2 mediated activation in response to the spirochete. Our study results also make obvious that a far more intense and diversified innate immune response coincides transcriptionally and microscopically with phagocytosis and degradation of live spirochetes and maturation of the phagosome. Most prominently, the innate immune signals generated by phagocytosed live Bb led to an enhanced TLR-mediated pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine output, secretion of active IL-1β and IL-18, as well as induction of type I interferons.

TLRs continuously sample the extracellular environment and inform the cell to react to PRRs by facilitating cellular responses via inflammatory pathways which culminate in cytokine production and cell activation [11],[41]. Human macrophages, which originate as monocytes in the peripheral blood, express a substantial complement of both cell surface as well as endosomal TLRs [100]. These cells thus have the capacity to sense B. burgdorferi's extensive lattice of outer membrane lipoproteins [23],[101]. Although the stimulation experiments were not done under conditions designed to prevent uptake of live spirochetes or bacterial components, the transcriptional responses elicited by both live and lysed Bb in PBMCs, for the most part were representative of cell surface TLR1/2 mediated activation. These responses were perhaps best exemplified by the differential regulation of IL-8 as well as several other chemokines. IL-8 is known to be secreted in response to purified spirochetal lipoproteins [45],[46] as well as Bb lysates [47]. Surface signals were also capable of up-regulating several genes associated with molecules that regulate TLR responses, including PI3K [102],[103] and SOCS3 [50]. Interestingly, PI3K is also associated with non-opsonic phagocytosis [102] and thus may play an important role facilitating spirochetal binding to the bacterium's putative cell surface phagocytic receptor. Overall, these core responses suggest that TLR-cell surface activation, probably in concert with the engagement of the spirochetes putative phagocytic receptor, set the stage for the more intense TLR-dependent and -independent responses generated by phagocytosed spirochetes.

The enhanced TLR-mediated cytokine production could be the result of several nonexclusive mechanisms broadly divided into three categories; (1) a more efficient activation of recruited cell surface and endosomal TLR1/2 receptors by spirochetal lipoproteins, (2) engagement of additional endosomal TLRs by internalized and degraded spirochetes, and (3) cooperation between multiple TLR receptors from within the phagosomal vacuole. Although TLR-PAMP interactions were originally studied as cell surface phenomena; it is now well documented that surface TLRs, including TLR2 and TLR5, can be recruited to endosomal membranes where they become available for signaling [79],[92],[93],[95],[104]. The visualization of bacterial coils contained within phagosomal vacuoles provided a snapshot for the intimate physical interactions that very likely take place between the spirochete and vacuolar structures (Fig. 6A). The very close proximity between spirochetal lipoproteins and recruited TLRs can be envisioned as a mechanism that facilitates activation of TLR receptors. Following degradation of the bacterium, liberated lipoproteins then would also be available to more efficiently engage of their cognate TLR receptors. Because TLR2 did not appear to be necessary for phagocytosis, or critically required for cytokine secretion in response to live spirochetes, we propose that other TLRs are involved in generating these responses. Two previous studies, one using stimulated murine macrophages and RAW cells, and the other rhesus microglia, demonstrated that TLR5 signals do contribute to cytokine production in response to phagocytosed Bb [31],[95]. Our demonstration that the flaA mutant Bb induced similar levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 in human monocytes, compared to its wild type counterpart, suggests that as long as TLR2 is available for signaling, TLR5 is not necessary for enhanced cytokine production. Consistent with this theory, silencing of TLR5 in a recent study had no effect on the production of TNF-α, IL-8, or IL-6 by a monocytic cell line stimulated with live Bb [105]. TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9, all of which are known to be expressed in endosomal membranes [106], may also play an important role in generating the enhanced cytokine responses to internalized Bb. In the end, spirochetes almost certainly engage multiple TLRs concurrently from within the phagosomal vacuole, a conjecture that has been previously demonstrated to occur in response to other bacterial infections [107].

Particularly important for the development of the concept of phagosomal signaling was the markedly enhanced secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 in response to live Bb. Unlike other pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e. TNF-α), which are linearly induced by TLR activation, the production of biologically active IL-1β requires the integration of NF-κB-mediated transcription of pro-IL-1β followed by activated caspase-1 cleavage of the inactive cytokine [62]. Unlike pro-IL-1β, pro-IL-18 is constitutively expressed in resting monocytes and macrophages [83]; however, like pro-IL-1β it also requires processing into its active form by activated caspase-1. Caspase-1 is activated within a multiprotein complex called the inflammasome [89],[108] in response to a diverse stimuli including intracellular bacteria [89], uric acid crystals [108], toxins, and changes in the ionic composition of the cell [63],[64]. Stimulation of cell surface purinergic receptors by exogenous ATP, following human monocyte activation, is a known mechanism by which bacterial pathogens can lead to cleavage of caspase-1 [64]. Released ATP engages the cell's purinergic ion channel receptors (P2X7) inciting release of intracellular K+ which in turn generates signals that lead to assembly of the inflammasome and activation of caspase-1. Consistent with this theory, the transcript for FXYD6, which encodes for a protein that regulates Na+,K+-ATPase channels by altering their affinity for both ions [109], was exclusively up-regulated in PBMCs stimulated by live spirochetes (see Table 1). In similarly stimulated mouse macrophages Bb also induced far greater transcription of IL-1β than bacterial lysates; however unlike human monocytes, murine macrophages were unable to secrete the active cytokine. The disparity in IL-1β secretion between mouse and human cells is due to the inability of murine macrophages to produce endogenous ATP following their activation [110]. These differences not only highlight the importance of studying inflammatory responses in human cells, but also provide indirect evidence for the potential role of P2X7 mediated activation of the inflammasome by phagocytosed Bb. Alternatively, caspase-1 could be activated in response to bacterial flagellin leaking from the phagosome into the cell cytosol. Two prior studies demonstrated that flagellin deficient Salmonella typhimurium [111] and Legionella pneumophila [112] failed to activate the inflammasome, thus providing clear evidence that flagellin needs to gain access to the cytosol in order to directly activate assembly of the inflammasome. This mechanism is unlikely to be responsible for activation of caspase-1 in the case of Bb, first and foremost because the spirochete does not have the required cellular machinery to secrete noxious molecules into its surrounding environment. Furthermore, the high concentrations of secreted IL-1β in response to flagellin deficient Bb provides further proof that this molecule is unlikely to be directly responsible for activation of caspase-1. In other models activation of caspase-1 was achieved by intracellular bacteria that have the ability to escape unscathed from the phagosome into the cytosolic compartment to directly engage cytosolic receptors and activate the inflammasome [113],[114]. Although the translocation of small amounts of spirochetal components cannot be ruled out in the current study, the evidence presented here demonstrates that intact Bb remains enclosed within phagocytic vacuoles. Interestingly, secretion of IL-1β was greatly impaired in human monocytes infected with a Francisella strain when its natural ability to escape the phagosome was blocked experimentally [115]. Why Bb generates signals that lead to activation of caspase-1 in human monocytes from within the phagosome, while other pathogens do not, requires further analysis.

A principal and novel finding in our study was that type I interferons were differentially regulated in both PBMCs and isolated human monocytes stimulated with live Bb. Type I interferon associated genes were previously shown to be strongly up-regulated in joint tissues of Bb infected mice [43],[79]. The same group provided experimental evidence that type I interferons probably play a very important role in the development of arthritis [43]. These responses are of particular relevance given that lipoprotein mediated TLR2-derived signals do not induce type I interferons [40],[41]. Several other TLRs, including TLR7, TLR8 ad TLR9, are able to launch distinct signaling pathways from within phagosomal vacuoles that differentially regulate type I interferons [116]. Intracellular bacterial deoxycytidylate-phosphate-deoxyguanylate (CpG)-DNA can induce type I interferon transcription through TLR9 [117]; however TLR9 is only expressed at very low levels in human monocytes [106]. Both TLR7 and TLR8 detect ssRNA [100] and thus could also explain the type I interferon responses to Bb upon release of bacterial RNA from degraded spirochetes in the phagosomal vacuole. Human TLR7 is predominantly expressed in lung, placenta and spleen, whereas TLR8 is more abundant in peripheral blood leukocytes, including monocytes [100]. Endosomal TLR8 activates IRF7 via MyD88-dependentpathways involving IRAK1/4 and TRAF6 [72]. Although IRF7 was strongly up-regulated by live Bb in the PBMC array, we were unable to confirm a similar up-regulation of this interferon regulator in human monocytes (data not shown). The latter result could be an indication that in the PBMC model dendritic cells are the principal source of IRF7. Of note, transcription of type I interferon associated genes in response to Bb was recently found to be MYD88 independent in stimulated murine derived bone marrow derived macrophages [43]. Whether or not transcription of type I interferons in response to Bb is MYD88 dependent in human cells has not yet been fully characterized.

Type I IFNs had generally been associated with antiviral immune responses. More recently, an increasing body of evidence points out that induction of these cytokines also occurs in response to infection with both intracellular [88],[118],[119] and extracellular bacteria [90],[120]. IFN-inducing bacterial ligands are primarily detected, with few exceptions, following entry of the bacterium into the cell cytosol. For the most part, the specific cytosolic receptors activated to generate the type I interferons are not known. The intracellular bacterium L. monocytogenes induces type I interferons through an MYD88-independent pathway [88],[116], and to generate this response it requires Listeriolysin O (LLO) mediated escape from the phagosome into the cell cytosol [116],[121]. Neither the ligand presented by cytoplasmic LM nor the receptor associated with the type I interferon response has been fully characterized. Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS), an extracellular pathogen associated with severe perinatal infections, also induces type I interferons in human monocytes [90]. However, unlike Bb, GBS can generate toxins that affect the integrity of the phagosome allowing bacterial components to escape into the cytosol to engage cytosolic receptors. Released GBS DNA can activate the serine-threonine kinase TBK1 causing phosphorylation of IRF3 and induction of IFN-β. In the case of Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), induction of type I interferons was shown to be MYD88-independent [120]; and like Bb, GAS did not require escape into the cytosol to generate this response. Whether or not Bb induced type I interferon responses are initiated from within the phagosome, or by signals generated by released bacterial products into the cell cytosol is not known at this time. It is also not known if Bb initiated programmed cell death responses have a role in generating type I interferons through cross priming of cytosolic receptors.

Collectively our results highlight the ability of phagocytosed Bb to induce diverse and more intense innate immune signals which are mechanistically distinct from those generated when spirochetal lipoproteins engage cell surface PRRs. They also demonstrate that human monocytes are a major source of the transcriptional responses generated by live Bb in a mixed cell system (PBMCs), and that these responses are not dependent on inflammatory signals or cytokines derived from other immune cells. It is our contention that the phagosomal signals generated in response to live Bb allow the host to control the spirochete through a number of non-exclusive pathways, that are both TLR2 dependent and independent, and include a type I interferon response. Whether or not the type I IFN response is favorable to the human host, or detrimental as in the mouse arthritis model, remains unknown and deserves additional study.


Human subjects

Eligible participants were healthy volunteers of either sex, between 18 and 60 years of age, and without a clinical or prior history of reactive laboratory tests for LD. After obtaining written informed consent, blood was collected by the University of Connecticut Health Center's (UCHC), General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) personnel using standard venipuncture techniques. Volunteers were confirmed to be sero-negative for LD by standard serological tests performed by the UCHC clinical laboratory. Individuals were considered ineligible if they had underlying chronic diseases, were acutely ill, and/or were taking anti-inflammatory medications or any form of immunosuppressive agents. All procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board at UCHC.

Bacterial strains

Low-passage Bb 297 transformed with a shuttle vector harboring the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) constitutively expressed from flaB promoter [122], was propagated in commercially available Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) complete medium containing 6% rabbit serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) which is certified to be endotoxin free. Spirochetes grown at 33°C were temperature-shifted to 37°C prior to use; organisms were harvested at mid- to late-log phase (4–8×107/ml) by centrifugation at 8,000×g, washed twice in CMRL (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and resuspended in RPMI medium (Invitrogen). A high passage strain B31 flaB mutant (1571), which completely lacks the filamentous portion of the flagellar apparatus (44), was grown and harvested in similar fashion. Spirochetal lysates were prepared by sonicating live organisms for 40 seconds using four separate 10-s bursts with a 550-Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). The equivalence of live and lysed spirochetes was confirmed for each experiment by SDS-PAGE and silver staining.

PBMC global gene expression microarray analysis

Freshly isolated PBMCs were obtained by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation from three healthy volunteers as previously described [33]. PBMCs were then incubated 4 hours at 37°C/5% CO2 with either live or lysed Bb 297 at an MOI of 10, with 1 µm Fluoresbrite carboxylated polystyrene microspheres (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) at a bead-to-cell ratio of 10, or without a stimulant. At the conclusion of the incubation period, cells were harvested and RNA was extracted using TRIzol according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). RNA samples were then submitted to the Translational Genomics Core facility at UCHC for gene expression profiling using the Illumina Sentrix Human-6 Expression BeadChip microarray system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). A total of 500 ng of RNA per stimulation condition was converted into complimentary DNA (cDNA) and labeled according to the manufacturer's instructions and then assayed in triplicate for each stimulation condition. For statistical analysis, raw gene intensity values generated for each transcript were background-corrected and normalized using the Qspline option in the Beadstudio software (Illumina Inc.). Statistical analysis was conducted using the R/MAANOVA open source software (Version 1.4) as part of the Bioconductor and R language open source software library (version 2.4.0). The ANOVA analysis was carried out with a fixed effect permutation ANOVA model consisting of the independent variable treatment (live Bb versus lysed Bb). To identify differentially regulated genes, we performed the F-tests F1, F2, F3 and Fs that are implemented in the R/MAANOVA software and assessed gene-centric (F1-test) and array centric (F3 test) variance through comparison of the respective lists of regulated genes with those provided by the F2 and Fs-tests which interpolate between gene centric and array centric variance. R/MAANOVA uses the Benjamini-Hochberg test [123] to perform the false discovery rate, which was set to a p value of <0.005, and pooled across all gene list to create an inclusive master list and selected the subset of highly significantly differentially regulated genes through filtering for genes that demonstrated a change in their expression level of at least 1.3 fold. The differentially regulated genes were organized into clusters using the hierarchical clustering module of D-Chip software (revised 2006) [124] for both genes and samples with the clustering parameter set to (a) Euclidian distance and (b) a p-value of 0.05. Differentially expressed genes were annotated using all publicly available databases including the GenBank, GO and IHOP databases.

Monocyte isolation and stimulation

Isolated PBMCs were washed 3 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), using low speed spins to avoid platelet contamination, then counted using a hemocytometer and resuspended in 30 µl of ice-cold sorting buffer (PBS, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% BSA, pH 7.2) per 1×10e7 total cells. Monocytes were isolated from the pelleted PBMCs using a magnetic cell sorting monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA). PBMCs were first incubated with metallic bead-conjugated antibodies specific for CD3, CD19, CD123 and CD56. Antibody labeled PBMCs were then passed through two separate ferromagnetic columns. The collected flow-through contained CD14+ monocytes (average purity 96.7%), which then were counted, spun and resuspended at 1×10e6 per ml in RPMI (Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Monocytes were plated and incubated for either 4 or 8 hours at 37°C/5% CO2 with live GFP-Bb or equal amounts of lysed spirochetes at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 1, 10, and 100 (except were noted in the text), 100 ng/ml of LPS (Sigma-Aldrich), or 10 µg/ml of Mitogenic Pentapeptide (MMP), a synthetic lipohexapeptide corresponding to the N-terminus of Escherichia coli murine lipoprotein (Bachem Bioscience, King of Prussia, PA). At the end of the incubation period, culture supernatants were collected and store at −70°C for later cytokine analysis. Monocytes also were harvested for flow cytometry, confocal microscopy and/or RNA extraction depending on the experiment. All culture media and reagents utilized in the stimulation experiments were confirmed to be essentially free of LPS contamination (<10 pg/ml) by Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay quantification (Cambrex, MA).

Quantitative Real Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)

Up- or down-regulation of selected transcripts generated from the PBMC array was also verified in cDNA from stimulated PBMCs and isolated human monocytes for selected genes by qRT-PCR analysis. RNA was extracted from both stimulated and unstimulated cells using the Paxgene blood RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The quality of the RNA was verified both with the DU 530, Life Science spectrophotometer (Beckman, Fullerton, CA) and Agillent bioanalyzer. Complementary DNA was prepared from extracted RNA samples using a high capacity cDNA RT kit. (Qiagen, Foster City, CA). PCR amplification was performed using 25-µl reaction mixtures which contained 2.5 µl of cDNA, 12.5 µl of universal master mix (Applied Biosystems), 8.75 µl of water and 1.25 µl of each primer probe of interest (20×). Commercially available gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems) were used for amplification of the following transcripts; TNF-α (Hs00174128_m1), IL-1β (Hs00174097_m1), IL-6 (Hs00985639_m1), IL10 (Hs00174086_m1Hs), IRF-7 (Hs00185375_m1); IFN-β (Hs00277188_s1), STAT1 (Hs01014002_m1), USP18 (Hs00276441_m1), LGALS9 (Hs00371321_m1), and FXYD6 (Hs01121135_m1). Internal standard curves for each gene were generated using equal volumes of reverse-transcribed quantitative PCR human reference total RNA (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA) diluted 10-fold to obtain concentrations ranging from 125 to 0.125 ng/µl. Quantitative RT-PCR gene expression assays for the house keeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Hs99999905_m1), were performed using identical aliquots of each cDNA as normalization controls. All amplification reactions were performed in triplicate; control reactions without reverse transcriptase also were performed to confirm the absence of contaminating DNA. Amplification reactions were performed with the iCyclerIQ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) using the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Cycle threshold (Ct) values for each gene were determined from the linear region of the corresponding amplification plots using software supplied by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad). Expression levels of all transcripts studied were normalized to the GAPDH level and the relative changes in gene expression generated were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [125].

Isolated monocyte quantitative real-time targeted array analysis for type I interferons

A 102 µl aliquot of cDNA obtained from unstimulated or stimulated monocytes (live or lysed Bb at an MOI of 10∶1) served as the template for qRT-PCR analysis using a human type I interferon signaling pathway array (Superarray Bioscience, Frederick MD). These arrays contain primer pairs for 84 genes implicated in type I interferon signal transduction as well as housekeeping genes and controls in 96-well microtiter plates. This qRT-PCR methodology directly quantifies transcript levels based upon the 2−ΔΔCT [125] method through measurement of SYBR green fluorescence using nan iQ5 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Flow cytometry techniques

Human monocyte purity evaluation by flow cytometry.

Antibody conjugates were purchased from BD Biosciences Immunocytometry Systems (BDIS) (San Jose, CA) or e-Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Monocytes were harvested from tissue culture plates and washed once in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (PBS, 0.1% BSA, 0.055% NaN3) in preparation for flow cytometry. Cells were incubated for 10 minutes at 4°C with 10 µg of purified human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) for Fc receptor (FcR) blocking followed by 20 minute incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies. After a final wash in FACS buffer, cells were fixed in FACS buffer + 1% paraformaldehyde. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur dual-laser flow cytometer (BD); a minimum of 50,000 events were collected for analysis. Monocyte purity was determined by flow cytometry based on CD14 expression and lack of expression of CD3 and/or CD19. Multiparameter files were analyzed using WinMDI v2.8 software (Joseph Trotter, Scripps Clinic). Individual monocyte populations were also selectively gated for analysis based on CD14 expression or Bb-GFP signal.

Flow cytometric assessment of spirochete uptake.

Mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) were aliquoted into 5 ml Polystyrene round-bottom tubes (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) at a concentration of 5×105 cells/600 µl/tube, centrifuged at 250×g for 10 minutes followed by 6 hour incubation with GFP-Bb at an MOI of 10. Cells and bacteria were coincubated for 6 hours and then washed twice in FA buffer (BD Microbiological Systems, Sparks, MD) and were fixed in FA buffer containing 1% paraformaldehyde. Sample data was acquired on FACSCalibur dual-laser flow cytometer (BD) and results were analyzed using using WinMDI v2.8 software (Joseph Trotter, Scripps Clinic).

Cytokine analysis

The Cytokine Bead Array kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) was used as previously described [2] for simultaneous measurement of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-12 in supernatants from stimulated and control human monocytes. A similar kit was used to measure TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in stimulated mouse macrophages. IL-18 was measured by ELISA using a commercial kit (Bender Med Systems Inc, Burlington, CA).


Isolated human monocytes or mouse macrophages (where indicated) were incubated with 75 nmol/ml LysoTracker Red (Invitrogen) plus live Bb-GFP or lysates for a total of four hours (human monocytes) or six hours (mouse macrophages). For membrane labeling, isolated cells plus live Bb-GFP were incubated with 5 µg/ml FM4-64 (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes on ice. Stimulated cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, briefly dried onto slides and mounted in Vectashield containing DAPI (Invitrogen). Cells were visualized using epifluorescence or confocal microscopy. Fluorescent images were acquired on an epifluorescent Olympus BX-41 microscope using a 100× (1.4NA) oil immersion objective equipped with a Retiga Exi CCD camera (Q Imaging, Tucson, AZ) and the following Omega filter sets: DAPI, FITC, and Rhodamine. Confocal images were acquired using a LSM-510 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with argon and HeNe lasers. Images were acquired using a 63× (1.3 NA) oil immersion objective (512×512 pixel resolution) at 1 µm intervals. Image processing and analysis were performed using ImageJ (NIH, v1.41b) and LSM Image Browser (Zeiss, v4.2.0.121). The percentage of monocytes or murine macrophages containing intact or degraded fluorescent spirochetes was systematically quantified in an equivalent number of monocytes for each of the conditions studied.

Mouse macrophage isolation and stimulation experiments

All animal work was approved by the UCHC animal care committee and the research conducted according to institutional guidelines. C57Bl/6 mice deficient in TLR2 were kindly provided by Timothy Sellati, PhD., Albany Medical School. Sex and age-matched wild type (WT) C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories. Experiments were done using either mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) or bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs).

Isolation of MPMs.

Cohorts of TLR2 knockout and WT mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 ml of 15% Proteose Peptone (BD) three days prior to sacrifice and collection of peritoneal exudate cells by lavage with sterile PBS. Two 5 ml lavages were performed per mouse and kept on ice to prevent adherence to polypropylene tubes. The collections from each mouse were checked for the absence of coliform bacteria by microscopy and clean harvests from the same mouse phenotype were pooled prior to cell counting on a hemocytometer. Pooled cells were washed and suspended in RPMI plus Penn/Strep, plated at 1×106/ml in 24 well plates, and incubated overnight. The wells were washed with warm RPMI to remove non-adherent cells and antibiotics, then replenished with fresh RPMI/10% FBS (1 ml per well). This adherent cell fraction was used in 6 hour stimulation experiments as described below.

Isolation of BMDMs.

Bone marrow cells from C57Bl/6 mice deficient in TLR2 as well as WT mice were recovered by flushing femurs and tibias with DMEM and then incubated in tissue culture-treated 25 cm2-flasks (BD Falcon, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2 to eliminate adherent fibroblasts, granulocytes, and any contaminating macrophages. The following day, 1×107 suspension cells were maintained in 10-cm2 bacteriological Petri dishes (BD-Falcon) for three days with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 20% L292-cell conditioned media, 0.01% HEPES, 0.01% sodium pyruvate, and 0.01% L-glutamine. Cultures were supplemented with five ml of the above-described medium and seven days after isolation, cell monolayers were exposed to ice-cold PBS and were recovered by scraping to be used in stimulation experiments. Single cell macrophage suspensions (MPMs or BMDMs) were seeded into 6-well tissue culture-treated plates at a concentration of 1×106 cells/2 ml/well and allowed to adhere overnight. The following day old media was replaced with the supplemented DMEM media and then spirochetes were added at an MOI of 10 and co-incubated for 61 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. TLR2−/− and WT macrophages were then stimulated with live Bb at MOIs of 10, LPS (100 ng/ml) and MMP (10 µg/ml). MPMs were also analyzed by flow cytometry to detect uptake of fluorescent Bb as described above. Supernatants were assayed for cytokine production using a mouse Cytokine Bead Array kit. RNA was extracted after the six hour incubation period from both stimulated and unstimulated BMDMs using a commercial extraction kit. RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA for qRT-PCR analysis. Commercially available mouse gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems) were used for amplification of IL-1β (Mm01336189_m1), TNF-α (Mm00443258_m1) and IFN-β (Mm00439546_s1). Expression levels for both transcripts were normalized to the GAPDH (Mm99999915_g1) level and the relative changes in gene expression generated were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [125].

Statistical methods

General statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Fold increase or decrease for each specific gene transcript assayed by qRT-PCR and cytokine concentrations were compared amongst the different stimulus by using either a paired or unpaired Student t test or the equivalent non-parametric methods (i.e. Wilcoxon). For each experiment, both the standard deviation and the standard error of the mean were calculated. p values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

(A) Genes similarly up-regulated by live and lysed B. burgdorferi (Bb). (B) Genes similarly down-regulated by live and lysed B. burgdorferi (Bb).

(0.08 MB PDF)

Table S2.

Genes classified as being down-regulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stimulated with live Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) MOI (10∶1), in comparison to cells stimulated with similar concentrations of borrelial lysates.

(0.10 MB PDF)

Table S3.

Genes more intensely or exclusively up-regulated by lysed B. burgdorferi.

(0.06 MB PDF)

Table S4.

Differentially regulated type I interferon associated genes.

(0.07 MB PDF)


We wish to thank the staff at the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) at UCHC for their support and collaboration with recruitment and enrollment of healthy volunteers. We acknowledge the contribution of the members of the core molecular facility at UCHC for providing technical advice and performing the microarray analysis. We are grateful for the contribution of members of the Research Department at CCMC for their administrative support and technical assistance with statistical analysis. Finally, we wish to thank Drs. Timothy Sellati, Dan Desrosier, Juan Anguita, Eicke Latz and Egil Lien for providing valuable scientific insight and advice.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JCS ARC MWM JDR. Performed the experiments: SDE CLV ARC MWM LVC WK. Analyzed the data: JCS SDE CLV MJC JS WK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SDE MJC JDR. Wrote the paper: JCS. Whole genome array analysis: WK.


  1. 1. Steere AC, Coburn J, Glickstein L (2004) The emergence of Lyme disease. J Clin Invest 113: 1093–1101.
  2. 2. Salazar JC, Pope CD, Sellati TJ, Feder HM Jr, Kiely TG, et al. (2003) Coevolution of markers of innate and adaptive immunity in skin and peripheral blood of patients with erythema migrans. J Immunol 171: 2660–2670.
  3. 3. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin JJ, Steere AC, et al. (2006) The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 43: 1089–1134.
  4. 4. Feder HM Jr, Johnson BJ, O'Connell S, Shapiro ED, Steere AC, et al. (2007) A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease”. N Engl J Med 357: 1422–1430.
  5. 5. Smith RP, Schoen RT, Rahn DW, Sikand VK, Nowakowski J, et al. (2002) Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of early Lyme disease in patients with microbiologically confirmed erythema migrans. Ann Intern Med 136: 421–428.
  6. 6. Asch ES, Bujak DI, Weiss M, Peterson MG, Weinstein A (1994) Lyme disease: an infectious and postinfectious syndrome. J Rheum 21: 454–461.
  7. 7. Klempner MS, Hu LT, Evans J, Schmid CH, Johnson GM, et al. (2001) Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent symptoms and a history of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med 345: 85–92.
  8. 8. Norgard MV, Riley BS, Richardson JA, Radolf JD (1995) Dermal inflammation elicited by synthetic analogs of Treponema pallidum and Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins. Infect Immun 63: 1507–1515.
  9. 9. Norgard MV, Arndt LL, Akins DR, Curetty LL, Harrich DA, Radolf JD (1996) Activation of human monocytic cells by Treponema pallidum and Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins and synthetic lipopeptides proceeds via a pathway distinct from that of lipopolysaccharide but involves the transcriptional activator NF-κB. Infect Immun 64: 3845–3852.
  10. 10. Aliprantis AO, Yang RB, Mark MR, Suggett S, Devaux B, et al. (1999) Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through toll-like receptor-2. Science 285: 736–739.
  11. 11. Lien E, Sellati TJ, Yoshimura A, Flo TH, Rawadi G, et al. (1999) Toll-like receptor 2 functions as a pattern recognition receptor for diverse bacterial products. J Biol Chem 274: 33419–33425.
  12. 12. Sellati TJ, Bouis DA, Caimano MJ, Feulner JA, Ayers C, et al. (1999) Activation of human monocytic cells by Borrelia burgdorferi and Treponema pallidum is facilitated by CD14 and correlates with surface exposure of spirochetal lipoproteins. J Immunol 163: 2049–2056.
  13. 13. Brightbill HD, Libraty DH, Krutzik SR, Yang RB, Belisle JT, et al. (1999) Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through toll-like receptors. Science 285: 732–736.
  14. 14. Wooten RM, Ma Y, Yoder RA, Brown JP, Weis JH, et al. (2002) Toll-like receptor 2 is required for innate, but not acquired, host defense to Borrelia burgdorferi. J Immunol 168: 348–355.
  15. 15. Salazar JC, Pope CD, Moore MW, Pope J, Kiely TG, et al. (2005) Lipoprotein-dependent and -independent immune responses to spirochetal infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12: 949–958.
  16. 16. Brandt ME, Riley BS, Radolf JD, Norgard MV (1990) Immunogenic integral membrane proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi are lipoproteins. Infect Immun 58: 983–991.
  17. 17. Radolf JD, Goldberg MS, Bourell KW, Baker SI, Jones JD, et al. (1995) Characterization of outer membranes isolated from Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Infect Immun 63: 2154–2163.
  18. 18. Fraser CM, Casjens S, Huang WM, Sutton GG, Clayton R, et al. (1997) Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390: 580–586.
  19. 19. Takayama K, Rothenberg RJ, Barbour AG (1987) Absence of lipopolysaccharide in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 55: 2311–2313.
  20. 20. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O (2006) Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124: 783–801.
  21. 21. Wooten RM, Ying MA, Yoder RA, Brown JP, Weis JH, et al. (2002) Toll-like receptor 2 plays a pivotal role in host defense and inflammatory response to Borrelia burgdorferi. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2: 275–278.
  22. 22. Hirschfeld M, Kirschning CJ, Schwandner R, Wesche H, Weis JH, et al. (1999) Inflammatory signaling by Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. J Immunol 163: 2382–2386.
  23. 23. Alexopoulou L, Thomas V, Schnare M, Lobet Y, Anguita J, et al. (2002) Hyporesponsiveness to vaccination with Borrelia burgdorferi OspA in humans and in TLR1- and TLR2-deficient mice. Nat Med 8: 878–884.
  24. 24. Wooten RM, Morrison TB, Weis JH, Wright SD, Thieringer R, et al. (1998) The role of CD14 in signaling mediated by outer membrane lipoproteins of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Immunol 160: 5485–5492.
  25. 25. Benhnia MR, Wroblewski D, Akhtar MN, Patel RA, Lavezzi W, et al. (2005) Signaling through CD14 attenuates the inflammatory response to Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease. J Immunol 174: 1539–1548.
  26. 26. Sellati TJ, Waldrop SL, Salazar JC, Bergstresser PR, Picker LJ, et al. (2001) The cutaneous response in humans to Treponema pallidum lipoprotein analogues involves cellular elements of both innate and adaptive immunity. J Immunol 166: 4131–4140.
  27. 27. Giambartolomei GH, Dennis VA, Lasater BL, Philipp MT (1999) Induction of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins in monocytes is mediated by CD14. Infect Immun 67: 140–147.
  28. 28. Wang G, Ma Y, Buyuk A, McClain S, Weis JJ, et al. (2004) Impaired host defense to infection and Toll-like receptor 2-independent killing of Borrelia burgdorferi clinical isolates in TLR2-deficient C3H/HeJ mice. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231: 219–225.
  29. 29. Liu N, Montgomery RR, Barthold SW, Bockenstedt LK (2004) Myeloid Differentiation Antigen 88 Deficiency Impairs Pathogen Clearance but Does Not Alter Inflammation in Borrelia burgdorferi-Infected Mice. Infect Immun 72: 3195–3203.
  30. 30. Behera AK, Hildebrand E, Uematsu S, Akira S, Coburn J, et al. (2006) Identification of a TLR-independent pathway for Borrelia burgdorferi-induced expression of matrix metalloproteinases and inflammatory mediators through binding to integrin alpha 3 beta 1. J Immunol 177: 657–664.
  31. 31. Shin OS, Isberg R, Akira S, Uematsu S, Behera AK, et al. (2008) Distinct roles for MyD88, TLR2, TLR5, and TLR9 in phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi and inflammatory signaling. Infect Immun 76: 2341–2351.
  32. 32. Moore MW, Cruz AR, LaVake CJ, Marzo AL, Eggers CH, et al. (2007) Phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi and Treponema pallidum Potentiates Innate Immune Activation and Induces Gamma Interferon Production. Infect Immun 75: 2046–2062.
  33. 33. Cruz AR, Moore MW, La Vake CJ, Eggers CH, Salazar JC, et al. (2008) Phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete, potentiates innate immune activation and induces apoptosis in human monocytes. Infect Immun 76: 56–70.
  34. 34. Benach JL, Habicht GS, Gocinski BL, Coleman JL (1984) Phagocytic cell responses to in vivo and in vitro exposure to the Lyme disease spirochete. Yale J Biol Med 57: 599–605.
  35. 35. Rittig MG, Krause A, Haupl T, Schaible UE, Modolell M, et al. (1992) Coiling phagocytosis is the preferential phagocytic mechanism for Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun 60: 4205–4212.
  36. 36. Montgomery RR, Nathanson MH, Malawista SE (1994) Fc- and non-Fc mediated phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Infect Dis 170: 890–893.
  37. 37. Montgomery RR, Malawista SE (1996) Entry of Borrelia burgdorferi into macrophages is end-on and leads to degradation in lysosomes. Infect Immun 64: 2867–2872.
  38. 38. Montgomery RR, Booth CJ, Wang X, Blaho VA, Malawista SE, et al. (2007) Recruitment of macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes in Lyme carditis. Infect Immun 75: 613–620.
  39. 39. Montgomery RR, Lusitani D, de Boisfleury CA, Malawista SE (2002) Human phagocytic cells in the early innate immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi. J Infect Dis 185: 1773–1779.
  40. 40. Toshchakov V, Jones BW, Perera PY, Thomas K, Cody MJ, Zhang S, et al. (2002) TLR4, but not TLR2, mediates IFN-beta-induced STAT1alpha/beta-dependent gene expression in macrophages. Nat Immunol 3: 392–398.
  41. 41. Kawai T, Akira S (2007) TLR signaling. Semin Immunol 19: 24–32.
  42. 42. Miller JC, Ma Y, Crandall H, Wang X, Weis JJ (2008) Gene expression profiling provides insights into the pathways involved in inflammatory arthritis development: murine model of Lyme disease. Exp Mol Pathol 85: 20–27.
  43. 43. Miller JC, Ma Y, Bian J, Sheehan KC, Zachary JF, et al. (2008) A Critical Role for Type I IFN in Arthritis Development following Borrelia burgdorferi Infection of Mice. J Immunol 181: 8492–8503.
  44. 44. Blander JM (2007) Signalling and phagocytosis in the orchestration of host defence. Cell Microbiol 9: 290–299.
  45. 45. Sellati TJ, Bouis DA, Kitchens RL, Darveau RP, Pugin J, et al. (1998) Treponema pallidum and Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins and synthetic lipopeptides activate monocytic cells via a CD14-dependent pathway distinct from that used by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 160: 5455–5464.
  46. 46. Cabral ES, Gelderblom H, Hornung RL, Munson PJ, Martin R, et al. (2006) Borrelia burgdorferi lipoprotein-mediated TLR2 stimulation causes the down-regulation of TLR5 in human monocytes. J Infect Dis 193: 849–859.
  47. 47. Sadik CD, Hunfeld KP, Bachmann M, Kraiczy P, Eberhardt W, et al. (2008) Systematic analysis highlights the key role of TLR2/NF-kappaB/MAP kinase signaling for IL-8 induction by macrophage-like THP-1 cells under influence of Borrelia burgdorferi lysates. Int J Biochem Cell Biol.
  48. 48. Zhao Z, McCloud B, Fleming R, Klempner MS (2007) Borrelia burgdorferi-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 528–533.
  49. 49. Brown CR, Blaho VA, Loiacono CM (2003) Susceptibility to experimental Lyme arthritis correlates with KC and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production in joints and requires neutrophil recruitment via CXCR2. J Immunol 171: 893–901.
  50. 50. Yasukawa H, Ohishi M, Mori H, Murakami M, Chinen T, et al. (2003) IL-6 induces an anti-inflammatory response in the absence of SOCS3 in macrophages. Nat Immunol 4: 551–556.
  51. 51. Sato N, Ahuja SK, Quinones M, Kostecki V, Redick RL, et al. (2000) CC chemokine receptor (CCR)2 is required for Langerhans cell migration and localization T helper cell type 1 (Th1)-inducing dendritic cells: absence of CCR2 shifts the Leishmania major-resistant phenotype to a susceptible state dominated by the cytokines, B cell outgrowth, and sustained neutrophilic infiltration. J Exp Med 192: 205–218.
  52. 52. Curry H, Alvarez GR, Zwilling BS, Lafuse WP (2004) Toll-like receptor 2 stimulation decreases IFN-gamma receptor expression in mouse RAW264.7 macrophages. J Interferon Cytokine Res 24: 699–710.
  53. 53. Lich JD, Ting JP (2007) Monarch-1/PYPAF7 and other CATERPILLER (CLR, NOD, NLR) proteins with negative regulatory functions. Microbes Infect 9: 672–676.
  54. 54. Santis AG, Lopez-Cabrera M, Hamann J, Strauss M, Sanchez-Madrid F (1994) Structure of the gene coding for the human early lymphocyte activation antigen CD69: a C-type lectin receptor evolutionarily related with the gene families of natural killer cell-specific receptors. Eur J Immunol 24: 1692–1697.
  55. 55. Hamilton JA (2008) Colony-stimulating factors in inflammation and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 533–544.
  56. 56. Wei YJ, Sun HQ, Yamamoto M, Wlodarski P, Kunii K, et al. (2002) Type II Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase beta Is a Cytosolic and Peripheral Membrane Protein That Is Recruited to the Plasma Membrane and Activated by Rac-GTP. J Biol Chem 277: 46586–46593.
  57. 57. Kobayashi T, Vischer UM, Rosnoblet C, Lebrand C, Lindsay M, et al. (2000) The tetraspanin CD63/lamp3 cycles between endocytic and secretory compartments in human endothelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 11: 1829–1843.
  58. 58. Marzio R, Mauel J, Betz-Corradin S (1999) CD69 and regulation of the immune function. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 21: 565–582.
  59. 59. Kumaresan PR, Lai WC, Chuang SS, Bennett M, Mathew PA (2002) CS1, a novel member of the CD2 family, is homophilic and regulates NK cell function. Molec Immunol 39: 1–8.
  60. 60. Zhu M, John S, Berg M, Leonard WJ (1999) Functional association of Nmi with Stat5 and Stat1 in IL-2- and IFNgamma-mediated signaling. Cell 96: 121–130.
  61. 61. Delprat B, Schaer D, Roy S, Wang J, Puel JL, et al. (2007) FXYD6 Is a Novel Regulator of Na,K-ATPase Expressed in the Inner Ear. J Biol Chem 282: 7450–7456.
  62. 62. Ogura Y, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA (2006) The inflammasome: first line of the immune response to cell stress. Cell 126: 659–662.
  63. 63. Drenth JP, Van der Meer JW (2006) The inflammasome–a linebacker of innate defense. N Engl J Med 355: 730–732.
  64. 64. Piccini A, Carta S, Tassi S, Lasiglie D, Fossati G, et al. (2008) ATP is released by monocytes stimulated with pathogen-sensing receptor ligands and induces IL-1beta and IL-18 secretion in an autocrine way. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 8067–8072.
  65. 65. Kleine H, Poreba E, Lesniewicz K, Hassa PO, Hottiger MO, et al. (2008) Substrate-Assisted Catalysis by PARP10 Limits Its Activity to Mono-ADP-Ribosylation. Molecular Cell 32: 57–69.
  66. 66. Hirashima M, Kashio Y, Nishi N, Yamauchi A, Imaizumi TA, et al. (2004) Galectin-9 in physiological and pathological conditions. Glycoconj J 19: 593–600.
  67. 67. Kashio Y, Nakamura K, Abedin MJ, Seki M, Nishi N, et al. (2003) Galectin-9 Induces Apoptosis Through the Calcium-Calpain-Caspase-1 Pathway. The Journal of Immunology 170: 3631–3636.
  68. 68. Malakhova OA, Zhang DE (2008) ISG15 Inhibits Nedd4 Ubiquitin E3 Activity and Enhances the Innate Antiviral Response. J Biol Chem 283: 8783–8787.
  69. 69. Wong JJY, Pung YF, Sze NS-K, Chin KC (2006) HERC5 is an IFN-induced HECT-type E3 protein ligase that mediates type I IFN-induced ISGylation of protein targets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 10735–10740.
  70. 70. Malakhov MP, Malakhova OA, Kim KI, Ritchie KJ, Zhang DE (2002) UBP43 (USP18) Specifically Removes ISG15 from Conjugated Proteins. J Biol Chem 277: 9976–9981.
  71. 71. Reich NC (2007) STAT dynamics. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 18: 511–518.
  72. 72. Diebold SS, Kaisho T, Hemmi H, Akira S, Reis ESousa (2004) Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 303: 1529–1531.
  73. 73. Kawai T, Sato S, Ishii KJ, Coban C, Hemmi H, et al. (2004) Interferon-alpha induction through Toll-like receptors involves a direct interaction of IRF7 with MyD88 and TRAF6. Nat Immunol 5: 1061–1068.
  74. 74. Nakao Y, Funami K, Kikkawa S, Taniguchi M, Nishiguchi M, et al. (2005) Surface-expressed TLR6 participates in the recognition of diacylated lipopeptide and peptidoglycan in human cells. J Immunol 174: 1566–1573.
  75. 75. Binder RJ, Karimeddini D, Srivastava PK (2001) Adjuvanticity of alpha 2-macroglobulin, an independent ligand for the heat shock protein receptor CD91. J Immunol 166: 4968–4972.
  76. 76. Gebbia JA, Coleman JL, Benach JL (2001) Borrelia spirochetes upregulate release and activation of matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase B (MMP-9) and collagenase 1 (MMP-1) in human cells. Infect Immun 69: 456–462.
  77. 77. Gebbia JA, Coleman JL, Benach JL (2004) Selective Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinases by Borrelia burgdorferi via Toll-Like Receptor 2 in Monocytes. J Infect Dis 189: 113–119.
  78. 78. Behera AK, Hildebrand E, Scagliotti J, Steere AC, Hu LT (2005) Induction of host matrix metalloproteinases by Borrelia burgdorferi differs in human and murine lyme arthritis. Infect Immun 73: 126–134.
  79. 79. Crandall H, Dunn DM, Ma Y, Wooten RM, Zachary JF, et al. (2006) Gene expression profiling reveals unique pathways associated with differential severity of lyme arthritis. J Immunol 177: 7930–7942.
  80. 80. Brown JP, Zachary JF, Teuscher C, Weis JJ, Wooten RM (1999) Dual role of interleukin-10 in murine Lyme disease: regulation of arthritis severity and host defense. Infect Immun 67: 5142–5150.
  81. 81. Lisinski TJ, Furie MB (2002) Interleukin-10 inhibits proinflammatory activation of endothelium in response to Borrelia burgdorferi or lipopolysaccharide but not interleukin-1beta or tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Leukoc Biol 72: 503–511.
  82. 82. Honda K, Yanai H, Negishi H, Asagiri M, Sato M, et al. (2005) IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature 434: 772–777.
  83. 83. Akira S (2000) The role of IL-18 in innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 12: 59–63.
  84. 84. Sato S, Sugiyama M, Yamamoto M, Watanabe Y, Kawai T, et al. (2003) Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-beta (TRIF) associates with TNF receptor-associated factor 6 and TANK-binding kinase 1, and activates two distinct transcription factors, NF-kappa B and IFN-regulatory factor-3, in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J Immunol 171: 4304–4310.
  85. 85. Nardelli B, Zaritskaya L, Semenuk M, Cho YH, LaFleur Dw, et al. (2002) Regulatory effect of IFN-kappa, a novel type I IFN, on cytokine production by cells of the innate immune system. J Immunol 169: 4822–4830.
  86. 86. Jones KL, Muellegger RR, Means TK, Lee M, Glickstein LJ, et al. (2008) Higher mRNA levels of chemokines and cytokines associated with macrophage activation in erythema migrans skin lesions in patients from the United States than in patients from Austria with Lyme borreliosis. Clin Infect Dis 46: 85–92.
  87. 87. Shin JJ, Glickstein LJ, Steere AC (2007) High levels of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines in joint fluid and synovial tissue throughout the course of antibiotic-refractory lyme arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 56: 1325–1335.
  88. 88. Reimer T, Schweizer M, Jungi TW (2007) Type I IFN induction in response to Listeria monocytogenes in human macrophages: evidence for a differential activation of IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3). J Immunol 179: 1166–1177.
  89. 89. Weiss DS, Henry T, Monack DM (2007) Francisella tularensis: activation of the inflammasome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105: 219–237.
  90. 90. Charrel-Dennis M, Latz E, Halmen KA, Trieu-Cuot P, Fitzgerald KA, et al. (2008) TLR-Independent Type I Interferon Induction in Response to an Extracellular Bacterial Pathogen via Intracellular Recognition of Its DNA. Cell Host Microbe 4: 543–554.
  91. 91. Linder S, Heimerl C, Fingerle V, Aepfelbacher M, Wilske B (2001) Coiling phagocytosis of Borrelia burgdorferi by primary human macrophages is controlled by CDC42Hs and Rac1 and involves recruitment of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and Arp2/3 complex. Infect Immun 69: 1739–1746.
  92. 92. Nilsen N, Nonstad U, Khan N, Knetter CF, Akira S, et al. (2004) Lipopolysaccharide and double-stranded RNA up-regulate toll-like receptor 2 independently of myeloid differentiation factor 88. J Biol Chem 279: 39727–39735.
  93. 93. Underhill DM, Ozinsky A, Hajjar AM, Stevens A, Wilson CB, et al. (1999) The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens. Nature 401: 811–815.
  94. 94. O'Mahony DS, Pham U, Iyer R, Hawn TR, Liles WC (2008) Differential constitutive and cytokine-modulated expression of human Toll-like receptors in primary neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages. Int J Med Sci 5: 1–8.
  95. 95. Bernardino AL, Myers TA, Alvarez X, Hasegawa A, Philipp MT (2008) Toll-like receptors: insights into their possible role in the pathogenesis of lyme neuroborreliosis. Infect Immun 76: 4385–4395.
  96. 96. Hayashi F, Smith KD, Ozinsky A, Hawn TR, Yi EC, et al. (2001) The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll- like receptor 5. Nature 410: 1099–1103.
  97. 97. Wallich R, Moter SE, Simon MM, Ebnet K, Heiberger A, et al. (1990) The Borrelia burgdorferi flagellum-associated 41-kilodalton antigen (flagellin): molecular cloning, expression, and amplification of the gene. Infect Immun 58: 1711–1719.
  98. 98. Motaleb MA, Sal MS, Charon NW (2004) The decrease in FlaA observed in a flaB mutant of Borrelia burgdorferi occurs posttranscriptionally. J Bacteriol 186: 3703–3711.
  99. 99. Montgomery RR, Nathanson MH, Malawista SE (1993) The fate of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent for Lyme disease, in mouse macrophages. Destruction, survival, recovery. J Immunol 150: 909–915.
  100. 100. Chuang TH, Ulevitch RJ (2000) Cloning and characterization of a sub-family of human toll-like receptors: hTLR7, hTLR8 and hTLR9. Eur Cytokine Netw 11: 372–378.
  101. 101. Takeda K, Akira S (2005) Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol 17: 1–14.
  102. 102. Sasaki T, Suzuki A, Sasaki J, Penninger JM (2002) Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases in Inunimity: Lessons from Knockout Mice. J Biochem 131: 495–501.
  103. 103. Fukao T, Koyasu S (2003) PI3K and negative regulation of TLR signaling. Trends Immunol 24: 358–363.
  104. 104. Ozinsky A, Underhill DM, Fontenot JD, Hajjar AM, Smith KD, et al. (2000) The repertoire for pattern recognition of pathogens by the innate immune system is defined by cooperation between toll-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 13766–13771.
  105. 105. Dennis VA, Dixit S, O'Brien SM, Alvarez X, Pahar B, et al. (2009) Live Borrelia burgdorferi Spirochetes Elicit Inflammatory Mediators from Human Monocytes via the Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Pathway. Infect Immun 77: 1238–1245.
  106. 106. Kawai T, Akira S (2006) TLR signaling. Cell Death Differ 13: 816–825.
  107. 107. Gantner BN, Simmons RM, Canavera SJ, Akira S, Underhill DM (2003) Collaborative induction of inflammatory responses by dectin-1 and Toll-like receptor 2. J Exp Med 197: 1107–1117.
  108. 108. Drenth JP, Van der Meer JW (2006) The inflammasome–a linebacker of innate defense. N Engl J Med 355: 730–732.
  109. 109. Delprat B, Schaer D, Roy S, Wang J, Puel JL, et al. (2007) FXYD6 is a novel regulator of Na,K-ATPase expressed in the inner ear. J Biol Chem 282: 7450–7456.
  110. 110. Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad EO, Kono H, et al. (2008) Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol 9: 847–856.
  111. 111. Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O'Rourke K, et al. (2006) Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature 440: 228–232.
  112. 112. Ren T, Zamboni DS, Roy CR, Dietrich WF, Vance RE (2006) Flagellin-deficient Legionella mutants evade caspase-1- and Naip5-mediated macrophage immunity. PLoS Pathog 2: e18.
  113. 113. Miao EA, Puche-Aranda CM, Dors M, Clark AE, Bader MW, et al. (2006) Cytoplasmic flagellin activates caspase-1 and secretion of interleukin 1B via Ipaf. Nat Immunol 7: 569–575.
  114. 114. Lara-Tejero M, Sutterwala FS, Ogura Y, Grant EP, Bertin J, et al. (2006) Role of the caspase-1 inflammasome in Salmonella typhimurium pathogenesis. J Exp Med 203: 1407–1412.
  115. 115. Gavrilin MA, Bouakl IJ, Knatz NL, Duncan MD, Hall MW, et al. (2006) Internalization and phagosome escape required for Francisella to induce human monocyte IL-1β processing and release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 141–146.
  116. 116. Stockinger S, Decker T (2008) Novel functions of type I interferons revealed by infection studies with Listeria monocytogenes. Immunobiol 213: 889–897.
  117. 117. Yasuda K, Yu P, Kirschning CJ, Schlatter B, Schmitz F, et al. (2005) Endosomal translocation of vertebrate DNA activates dendritic cells via TLR9-dependent and -independent pathways. J Immunol 174: 6129–6136.
  118. 118. Nagarajan UM, Ojcius DM, Stahl L, Rank RG, Darville T (2005) Chlamydia trachomatis induces expression of IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 and IFN-beta independent of TLR2 and TLR4, but largely dependent on MyD88. J Immunol 175: 450–460.
  119. 119. Opitz B, Vinzing M, Van LV, Schmeck B, Heine G, et al. (2006) Legionella pneumophila induces IFNbeta in lung epithelial cells via IPS-1 and IRF3, which also control bacterial replication. J Biol Chem 281: 36173–36179.
  120. 120. Gratz N, Siller M, Schaljo B, Pirzada ZA, Gattermeier I, et al. (2008) Group A streptococcus activates type I interferon production and MyD88-dependent signaling without involvement of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9. J Biol Chem 283: 19879–19887.
  121. 121. O'Riordan M, Yi CH, Gonzales R, Lee KD, Portnoy DA (2002) Innate recognition of bacteria by a macrophage cytosolic surveillance pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 13861–13866.
  122. 122. Eggers CH, Caimano MJ, Clawson ML, Miller WG, Samuels DS, et al. (2002) Identification of loci critical for replication and compatibility of a Borrelia burgdorferi cp32 plasmid and use of a cp32-based shuttle vector for the expression of fluorescent reporters in the Lyme disease spirochaete. Mol Microbiol 43: 281–295.
  123. 123. Klipper-Aurbach Y, Wasserman M, Braunspiegel-Weintrob N, Borstein D, Peleg S, et al. (1995) Mathematical formulae for the prediction of the residual beta cell function during the first two years of disease in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Hypotheses 45: 486–490.
  124. 124. Dunning M, Barbosa-Morais N, Lynch A, Tavare S, Ritchie M (2008) Statistical issues in the analysis of Illumina data. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 85.
  125. 125. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25: 402–408.