Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Experimental transmission of Leishmania (Mundinia) parasites by biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

Experimental transmission of Leishmania (Mundinia) parasites by biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae)

  • Tomas Becvar, 
  • Barbora Vojtkova, 
  • Padet Siriyasatien, 
  • Jan Votypka, 
  • David Modry, 
  • Petr Jahn, 
  • Paul Bates, 
  • Simon Carpenter, 
  • Petr Volf, 
  • Jovana Sadlova
PLOS
x

Abstract

Leishmania parasites, causative agents of leishmaniasis, are currently divided into four subgenera: Leishmania, Viannia, Sauroleishmania and Mundinia. The recently established subgenus Mundinia has a wide geographical distribution and contains five species, three of which have the potential to infect and cause disease in humans. While the other Leishmania subgenera are transmitted exclusively by phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae), natural vectors of Mundinia remain uncertain. This study investigates the potential of sand flies and biting midges of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to transmit Leishmania parasites of the subgenus Mundinia. Sand flies (Phlebotomus argentipes, P. duboscqi and Lutzomyia migonei) and Culicoides biting midges (Culicoides sonorensis) were exposed to five Mundinia species through a chicken skin membrane and dissected at specific time intervals post bloodmeal. Potentially infected insects were also allowed to feed on ear pinnae of anaesthetized BALB/c mice and the presence of Leishmania DNA was subsequently confirmed in the mice using polymerase chain reaction analyses. In C. sonorensis, all Mundinia species tested were able to establish infection at a high rate, successfully colonize the stomodeal valve and produce a higher proportion of metacyclic forms than in sand flies. Subsequently, three parasite species, L. martiniquensis, L. orientalis and L. sp. from Ghana, were transmitted to the host mouse ear by C. sonorensis bite. In contrast, transmission experiments entirely failed with P. argentipes, although colonisation of the stomodeal valve was observed for L. orientalis and L. martiniquensis and metacyclic forms of L. orientalis were recorded. This laboratory-based transmission of Mundinia species highlights that Culicoides are potential vectors of members of this ancestral subgenus of Leishmania and we suggest further studies in endemic areas to confirm their role in the lifecycles of neglected pathogens.

Author summary

Leishmania parasites are causative agents of leishmaniasis, a disease affecting millions of humans worldwide. It is widely accepted that these flagellates are transmitted exclusively by phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae). Reservoir hosts and insect vectors for the newly established Leishmania subgenus Mundinia, however, remain poorly understood. Preliminary evidence from field-based studies discovered biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) that were naturally infected by L. (Mundinia) macropodum in Australia. This surprising finding led us to carry out a detailed laboratory study aimed at comparison of the development of all currently known species of the subgenus Mundinia in both putative vector families. We found that all five Mundinia species developed successfully in C. sonorensis and the successful transmission of three Mundinia species from infected insects to mice was demonstrated for the first time. This is the first detailed in vivo evidence that biting midges can act as competent vectors of Leishmania parasites of the subgenus Mundinia and has considerable epidemiological implications for control of these neglected pathogens.

Introduction

Leishmaniases are a group of diseases whose etiological agents are the protozoan parasites Leishmania (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae). Leishmania circulate between a wide range of natural reservoir hosts and phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Phlebotominae) and most commonly cause zoonotic disease in humans, although occurrence of anthroponotic cycles has also been described [1]. The signs of the human disease range from single self-healing cutaneous lesions, diffuse cutaneous and mucocutaneous forms, to the most severe visceral leishmaniasis, which can be fatal if untreated. Over 20 human infecting Leishmania species have been recognized and leishmaniasis is present in more than 80 countries worldwide, with around 1 million new cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis and 50 000 to 90 000 cases of visceral leishmaniasis occurring annually. These data are likely to underestimate the true burden of the disease since cases are most common in countries with a low level of infrastructure and healthcare development, so the majority of the cases remain unreported, in addition to the potential impact of asymptomatic or mild cases of infection [2].

The genus Leishmania is currently divided into four subgenera: Leishmania, Viannia, Sauroleishmania and Mundinia [3]. Subgenera Leishmania and Viannia include species most frequently detected in humans such as L. infantum, L. donovani, L. braziliensis, L. major and are transmitted by sand flies of genera Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia (Diptera: Psychodidae). The subgenus Sauroleishmania includes species infecting reptiles as the primary host, which are transmitted by sand flies of the genus Sergentomyia (Diptera: Psychodidae). Finally, the most recently described subgenus Mundinia [3] includes five species previously known as the L. enriettii complex. While L. enriettii [4] and L. macropodum [56] have only been detected in wildlife kept in captivity, three others, namely L. orientalis [7], L. martiniquensis [89] and an isolate from Ghana that is still formally undescribed [10], have been detected in humans and have the potential to cause disease.

According to phylogenetic analyses, the Mundinia subgenus diverges at the base of a phylogenetic tree of the Leishmania genus, which points to the ancestral origin of these parasites [6,10] (Fig 1A). This hypothesis is also supported by a worldwide distribution of the subgenus: L. enriettii is present in Brazil, L. macropodum in Australia, L. sp. strain GH5 in Africa (Ghana) and L. orientalis in south-east Asia [1113] (Fig 1B). Leishmania martiniquensis is also a widely distributed species described first from a human case in Martinique island [8], with autochthonous cattle or horse infections reported from Florida [14], Switzerland [15] and Germany [16] and frequently causing human infections in south-east Asia [1720]. In case of L. martiniquensis, however, recent emergence and anthropogenic spread cannot be ruled out, as the infection is known only from humans and domestic animals.

thumbnail
Fig 1.

(A) Phylogenetic relationships of the four genera of the subfamily Leishmaniinae and subgenera of the genus Leishmania, based on [3,6,37]. (B) Geographical distribution of L. (Mundinia) species, based on [45,78,10,1417]. The blank map source - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Atlasof the_world/. (C) Female sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi feeding on the mouse demonstrating prediuresis which allows rapid concentration of proteins and restoring water and weight balance (a) and Culicoides biting midge feeding on a human host while also performing prediuresis (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g001

The transmission ecology of the Mundinia subgenus is enigmatic, with no certain identity of the reservoir hosts and insect vectors of any species. Leishmania enriettii has been isolated from domestic guinea pigs, but subsequent experimental infections of wild guinea pigs as a proposed reservoir species failed [4]. Leishmania macropodum was described from four kangaroo species in captivity, but no reports of CL in the wild populations have been published [5,21]. In the remaining species, there is no definitive indication of reservoir or vector, an issue exacerbated by the fact that these may cause asymptomatic infections and hence detection is reliant on either random sampling or experimental studies [22]. Similarly, experimental models enabling research of Leishmania pathology are scarce; guinea pigs and golden hamsters were proven to be susceptible to L. enriettii [4,2327] and L. martiniquensis was reported to widely disseminate and visceralize in BALB/c mice [2830]. The only previous study to systematically examine susceptibility to infection for all five Mundinia species was carried out in guinea pigs and only L. enriettii demonstrated an ability to infect this host [31].

The paradigm that Leishmania species pathogenic to humans are transmitted exclusively by phlebotomine sand flies of the genus Phlebotomus in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World has considerable weight in the literature [3233]. However, observations published in the last decade have raised the possibility that non-sand fly vectors may contribute to the transmission of species within the Mundinia subgenus. Leishmania macropodum has been detected in biting midges of the genus Forcipomyia collected in areas of Australian Leishmania transmission [34]. While no Leishmania-positive specimens were detected among nearly 2000 sand fly females of four species, DNA was detected in 6% females of three species of Forcipomyia and, importantly, heavy late infections were confirmed microscopically [34]. More recently, laboratory experiments have revealed susceptibility of C. sonorensis to infection with L. enriettii [25] and L. orientalis [35].

Based on these studies, biting midges have met three of the four Killick-Kendrick´s criteria necessary to incriminate Leishmania vector [36]. However, the most important criterion—the demonstration of transmission by vector bite—was still lacking. Therefore, we compared the development of all 5 currently known Mundinia species in biting midge C. sonorensis and three sand fly species sharing geographical distribution with respective Mundinia species (Fig 1C). Importantly, we demonstrated experimental transmissions of Leishmania parasites by biting midges to the host for the first time.

Results

Mundinia development in sand flies

Sand fly species sharing the geographical area with four Mundinia species were used: Brazilian L. migonei were infected with L. enriettii, Sub-Saharan P. duboscqi with L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana and South Asian P. argentipes with L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis. As Australian sand fly species have never been colonized, L. migonei permissive to various Leishmania species [3839] was used for L. macropodum infections. For each experiment, Leishmania species known already to be transmitted by the respective sand fly species was used as the control.

Development of L. enriettii and L. macropodum in Lutzomyia migonei

Both Mundinia species possessed heavy infections (more than 1000 parasites per gut) and high infection rates (more than 80% infected specimens) in sand flies on day 1 post bloodmeal (PBM) only. On day 5 PBM, post defecation by sand fly females, infection rates dropped radically below 9%, and parasites were present in low or moderate numbers (under 100 or 1000 parasites per gut), localized mainly in the abdominal midgut (AMG) or in the beginning of the thoracic midgut (TMG). At eight days PBM, none of the dissected females exposed to L. enriettii contained detectable infections and only 2 females infected with L. macropodum showed low or moderate infections in AMG and TMG (Fig 2). In contrast, L. infantum used as a positive control developed consistently in L. migonei, causing 77% infection rate with heavy infections and colonization of the stomodeal valve in 65% of infected females on day 8 PBM (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Mundinia development in the sand fly Lutzomyia migonei.

Intensity (A) and localization (B) of L. enriettii (ENR), L. macropodum (MAC) and L. infantum (INF) infections. SV, stomodeal valve; AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; E. sp., endoperitrophic space; PBM, post blood meal. Intensity of infection (parasite load) was categorized as light, <100 parasites per gut; moderate, 100–1000 parasites per gut and heavy, >1000 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are displayed above the columns. Statistical differences in intensities of infection among Leishmania species were not significant on day 1 PBM (P = 0.860, X2 = 2.571, d.f. = 6) while significant on day 5 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 49.922, d.f. = 6) and day 8 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 44.950, d.f. = 6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g002

Development of Leishmania sp. strain GH5 from Ghana in Phlebotomus duboscqi

Leishmania sp. from Ghana showed low infection rates (33%) on day 3 PBM, during the bloodmeal digestion. Infection rate was reduced substantially by defecation following the bloodmeal to 9% and then was further reduced to zero over time until day 11 PBM. The few surviving parasites (less than 100 per gut) did not migrate anteriorly, remained localised in the AMG or in the beginning of the TMG (Fig 3). Under the same experimental conditions, control L. major developed heavy late-stage infections in 60% of P. duboscqi females (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Mundinia development in the sand fly Phlebotomus duboscqi.

Intensity (A) and localization (B) of L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana (GHA) and L. major (MAJ) infections. SV, stomodeal valve; AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; E. sp., endoperitrophic space; PBM, post blood meal. Intensity of infection (parasite load) was categorized as light, <100 parasites per gut; moderate, 100–1000 parasites per gut and heavy, >1000 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are displayed above the columns. Differences among Leishmania species were significant and increased from day 3 PBM (P = 0.039, X2 = 8.352, d.f. = 3) to day 4 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 34.008, d.f. = 3), 7 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 54.884, d.f. = 3) and day 11 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 57.711, d.f. = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g003

Development of L. orientalis and four L. martiniquensis strains in Phlebotomus argentipes

During early infections, on day 1 PBM, infection rates and parasite loads of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis were comparable with the control L. donovani. In later time intervals PBM, L. donovani developed heavy infections in almost 80% of P. argentipes females, while infection rates of all Mundinia strains fell with time, less or more markedly. Leishmania martiniquensis MAR1 survived blood digestion and subsequent defecation in 39% of sand fly females and colonised the stomodeal valve as early as on day 4 PBM. Heavy late-stage infections (more than 1000 parasites per gut) were observed in 7% of dissected females 8 days PBM (Fig 4A and 4B). Leishmania martiniquensis CU1 survived defecation in 19% of females, but the infection rate further decreased to 15% on day 8 PBM. At this time point most infections were light (less than 100 parasites per gut) and did not reach the cardia region. The experimental infections of P. argentipes with L. martiniquensis CU2 showed the same trend in reductions in parasite load over time. Leishmania martiniquensis Aig1 did not survive defecation of blood remnants in P. argentipes as all the females dissected on days 4 and 8 PBM were free of visible infection. On the contrary, L. orientalis survived the defecation in relatively high proportion (50%) of P. argentipes and heavy late-stage infections with the colonization of the stomodeal valve occurred in 22% of dissected females on day 8 PBM (Fig 4A and 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Leishmania development in the sand fly P. argentipes.

Intensity (A) and localization (B) of L. martiniquensis (MAR; MAR1, Cu1, Cu2, Aig1), L. orientalis (ORI) and L. donovani (DON) infections assessed by light microscopy. SV, stomodeal valve; AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; E. sp., endoperitrophic space; PBM, post blood meal. Intensity of infection (parasite load) was categorized as light, <100 parasites per gut; moderate, 100–1000 parasites per gut and heavy, >1000 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are displayed above the columns. Differences among Leishmania species/strains were significant and increased from day 1 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 97.997, d.f. = 15) to day 4 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 207.642, d.f. = 15) and day 8 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 214.778, d.f. = 15).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g004

Mundinia development in the biting midge Culicoides sonorensis

Five Mundinia species (8 strains) were tested for development in C. sonorensis: L. enriettii, L. macropodum, L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana, L. orientalis and four strains of L. martiniquensis (MAR1, CU1, Cu2 and Aig1). On day 1 PBM, the control dissections (3 females per strain) revealed heavy infections and 100% infection rate in all Leishmania strains tested. Parasites were enclosed within the peritrophic matrix with the ingested bloodmeal. On day 3 PBM, the digestion of the engorged blood was completed and the bloodmeal remnants passed out with defecation. With the exception of L. martiniquensis Aig1, all Mundinia species and strains were at least partially successful in surviving defecation: L. enriettii, L. macropodum and L. martiniquensis MAR1 in about 30% of C. sonorensis females tested, L. martiniquensis Cu2 in more than 50% of females, L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana in 69% and L. orientalis and L. martiniquensis Cu1 in more than 80% of females (Fig 5A). Parasites were present in the abdominal and thoracic midgut and three species, L. orientalis, L. martiniquensis Cu2 and L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana, colonized the stomodeal valve in at least some individuals. Hindgut localization of parasites was not observed in any parasite strain (Fig 5B).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Mundinia development in the biting midge C. sonorensis.

Intensity (A, C, E) and localization (B, D, F) of L. enriettii (ENR), L. macropodum (MAC), L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana (GHA), L. orientalis (ORI) and L. martiniquensis (MAR/MAR1, MAR/Cu1, MAR/Cu2, MAR/Aig1) infections assessed by light microscopy. SV, stomodeal valve; AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; E. sp., endoperitrophic space; PBM, post blood meal. Intensity of infection (parasite load) was categorized as light, <100 parasites per gut; moderate, 100–1000 parasites per gut and heavy, >1000 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are written above the columns. Differences among Leishmania species/strains were significant on day 3 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 181.173, d.f. = 21), day 6 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 70.048, d.f. = 21) and day 10 PBM (P < 0.0001, X2 = 117.932, d.f. = 21).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g005

By day 6 PBM, the focus of infection had moved anteriorly, the quantity of parasites had increased (Fig 5C) and five (out of eight) strains had colonized the stomodeal valve in at least some C. sonorensis examined (Fig 5D). On the other hand, no infections were observed in midges infected with L. martiniquensis Aig1 and L. enriettii, as parasites did not resist defecation and were either lost or survived in the very small proportion of females. Finally, on day 10 PBM, heavy infections prevailed and the stomodeal valve was colonized in almost all females infected with the 7 strains (Figs 5E and 5F, 6A and 6B). Colonization of the stomodeal valve was usually associated with heavy infection (more than 1000 parasites per gut), however some females had midgut free of parasites, apart from the cardia region packed with haptomonad forms (Fig 6A and 6B). The highest proportion of females C. sonorensis with heavy infections including successful colonization of the stomodeal valve were found in L. orientalis, L. martiniquensis Cu2 and the Ghanaian species, comprising more than 60% of all dissected females (Fig 5E and 5F). Five Mundinia species developed significantly heavier late infections in C. sonorensis compare to sand fly vector (Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Localisation and morphology of Mundinia in biting midge C. sonorensis on day 10 PBM.

A-B, colonization of the stomodeal valve with the part of the thoracic midgut filled with parasites, the region is marked by a red dotted line: (A) mature infection with L. martiniquensis Cu1; (B) mature infection with L. orientalis. C-G, various morphological forms present in the midgut on day 10 PBM: (C) metacyclic form of L. martiniquensis Cu2; (D) metacyclic form of L. orientalis; (E) nectomonad form of L. martiniquensis MAR1; (F) leptomonad form of L. martiniquensis Cu2; (G) haptomonad form of L. martiniquensis Cu2. Scale bar = 20μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.g006

thumbnail
Table 1. Comparison of intensities of late infections between C. sonorensis and sand fly species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.t001

Metacyclic forms

Presence of infective metacyclic forms was evaluated from Giemsa-stained gut smears in 5 strains showing the high infection rate on day 10 PBM in C. sonorensis (L. martiniquensis MAR1, Cu1, Cu2, L. orientalis and L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana) and in 2 species producing the highest infection rates on day 8 PBM in P. argentipes (L. martiniquensis MAR1 and L. orientalis). Infective stages were detected in C. sonorensis infected with L. martiniquensis MAR1 and Cu2, L. orientalis and L. sp. from Ghana (Table 2), but not with L. martiniquensis Cu1 infected midges. The highest representation of metacyclics (5% and 10% respectively) was observed in C. sonorensis infected with L. orientalis and L. martiniquensis Cu2 (Fig 6C and 6D), i.e., the strains which developed heavy late-stage infections in the highest percentage of Culicoides females (Fig 5E). The spectrum of other morphological forms produced by Mundinia species in C. sonorensis is showed in Fig 6E–6G.

thumbnail
Table 2. Proportion of metacyclic forms developing in C. sonorensis guts 10 days PBM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.t002

In contrast, a lower proportion of metacyclic forms was observed in Mundinia infections in sand flies. Two species producing heavy late-stage infections in P. argentipes (L. orientalis and L. martiniquensis MAR1) were analysed. The metacyclics comprised 3% from L. orientalis promastigotes (N = 132) and no metacyclic stages were detected in gut smears from females infected with MAR1 (N = 130) 8 days PBM.

Transmission experiments

Transmission experiments were done with four species of Leishmania showing heavy late-stage infections in C. sonorensis: L. orientalis, L. martiniquensis, L. macropodum and L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana, and with two species: L. orientalis and L. martiniquensis, producing heavy late-stage infections in P. argentipes. In total, 71 midges and 107 sand flies were allowed to feed on the ear pinnae of anaesthetized BALB/c mice 8–11 days post infective blood meal. Immediately post exposure, mice were sacrificed, their ears stored for PCR analysis, and vector infections were confirmed by microscopical observation. Presence of Leishmania infection in engorged vectors was confirmed microscopically in all the experimental groups except in C. sonorensis infected with L. macropodum (Table 3). Table 3 also illustrates unfed females with mature infections characterized by colonisation of the stomodeal valve, as these females may also contribute at least theoretically to transmission by probing, even without taking a blood meal.

thumbnail
Table 3. Microscopical examination of C. sonorensis and P. argentipes females exposed to BALB/c mice for transmission of parasites and result of PCR detection of Leishmania minicircle kDNA in mouse ears.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.t003

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with primers flanking a 116 bp segment of the minicircle kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) was used to detect Leishmania in mice ear tissues. PCR amplification showed the presence of Leishmania minicircle kDNA in mice exposed to C. sonorensis infected with two strains of L. martiniquensis (Cu1, Cu2), L. orientalis and L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana. The samples gathered from transmission experiments performed with P. argentipes were negative for both Mundinia species in two independent experiments. On the other hand, positive transmission was achieved for control L. donovani (S1 Fig and Table 3).

Discussion

The paradigm that Leishmania parasites are transmitted solely by sand flies has been undermined in recent years by the apparent transmission of L. macropodum by biting midges of the subgenus Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) [34]. Later, successful development of L. orientalis, L. enriettii and L. macropodum was also observed in the biting midge C. sonorensis in laboratory conditions [25,35]. Among sand flies, Leishmania of the subgenus Mundinia were detected only in Thailand where L. orientalis DNA was PCR-detected in Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) gemmea and S. iyengari [12,40]. However, without microscopy, it is not possible to distinguish late mature infections from early ones which are non-specific and may be lost with defecation in refractory vectors. Therefore, these molecular findings cannot be considered as a proof of the vector identification [41].

In the current study we have convincingly demonstrated successful infection, propagation and transmission of Leishmania species of the subgenus Mundinia in C. sonorensis under laboratory conditions. In parallel, infection and transmission experiments with epidemiologically relevant sand fly species conducted under the same laboratory conditions and using the same Leishmania lines provided only limited evidence of infection and propagation and no evidence of transmission using the in vivo mouse model. This study therefore provides the strong underpinning evidence that biting midges may play a role in the transmission of Leishmania strains within the subgenus Mundinia and highlights the importance of further field-based studies to define this role in areas of pathogen transmission. This is particularly required in the context of the unique geographical distribution of Leishmania martiniquensis which is the only Leishmania species that occurs in Central or Eastern Europe (the isolate Aig1 used in this study originated from a horse infected either in the Czech Republic or in Ukraine).

Culicoides sonorensis is a member of the monophyletic subgenus Monoculicoides, which has 24 identified species worldwide and in Europe is represented by five species [42]. A key limitation in research on the Culicoides genus as a whole is the lack of availability of epidemiologically relevant colony lines and C. sonorensis, which transmits a range of arboviruses in North America, is currently the only major vector species available [4344]. This limitation is exacerbated by a lack of knowledge regarding the major anthropophilic Culicoides species in regions where transmission of Leishmania strains occurs, particularly given that these are likely to differ significantly from those adapted for feeding on livestock, both in biology and ecology. The evidence presented in the current paper provides a fundamental reason for studies aimed at both providing resources for laboratory experimentation and defining transmission ecology of the subgenus Mundinia.

Within the studies conducted, L. enriettii originating from Brazil was tested in L. migonei, a sand fly species widespread in South America [4546] and known to support development of L. infantum, L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis [3839]. Our results demonstrated that L. migonei possessed limited susceptibility to L. enriettii, since none of dissected females developed mature infections. In a majority of females, parasites were defecated with blood remnants and in case parasites survived defecation, they were present in very low numbers in abdominal or thoracic midgut with a very low probability of transmission to the mammalian host. Similar failure of the development was described for L. enriettii in L. longipalpis [25], the proven vector of L. infantum and the most important permissive vector in Latin America [47]. On the other hand, L. enriettii colonized the stomodeal valve in 5% of C. sonorensis, which corresponds to previously published results [25].

The Ghanaian Mundinia species shares the distribution of P. duboscqi [48], a proven vector of L. major [33]. Our experimental results showed that this member of the Mundinia subgenus is not adapted to survive in this sand fly since parasites were lost with defecation of bloodmeal remnants. Nevertheless, this species developed heavy infections and colonized the stomodeal valve in 40% of C. sonorensis and were transmitted to mice via feeding on the ear, leading to the potential that this species may also be adapted to biting midge infection and transmission.

Leishmania macropodum from Australia did not generate mature infection in L. migonei in this study, although it was previously reported to develop in L. longipalpis more successfully than L. enriettii, showing colonization of the SV in 6% of females [25]. Vector competence of both Lutzomyia species tested may be different from those Sergentomyia and Phlebotomus species that are native to Australia [49], but not available in captivity [50]. In C. sonorensis, however, L. macropodum colonized the SV in just 7% of females and no infection was detected in females exposed to mice in transmission experiment. However, the transmission may be substantially more effective in biting midges of the subgenus Lasiohelea, which were found to be naturally infected in Australia, but which have not been colonised to date [34].

Development of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis was assessed in the sand fly species P. argentipes, a proven vector of L. donovani [51], with a distribution from the Indian peninsula to south-east Asia including Sri-Lanka [52]. We performed experimental infections with L. orientalis originating from Thailand and with 4 strains of L. martiniquensis—MAR1 originating from the human case in the Martinique island, Cu1 and Cu2 isolated from humans in Thailand and strain Aig1 isolated in the Czech Republic from the four-year-old grey Akchal teke mare horse, imported to the Czech Republic two years ago from Ukraine. Both Thai strains Cu1 and Cu2 survived poorly in P. argentipes, failing to develop mature infections, but colonized the SV in 22% and 69% of C. sonorensis females, respectively. The strain from the Martinique Island MAR1 generated heavy mature infections in both vector types—colonization of the SV was observed in 7% of P. argentipes and 29% of C. sonorensis females. Thus, interestingly, the geographically distant isolate of L. martiniquensis developed better in P. argentipes than sympatric isolates. Importantly, three human L. martiniquensis isolates developed late-stage infections in C. sonorensis and Thai isolates Cu1 and Cu2 were transmitted to the mouse by C. sonorensis bite, while the Aig1 isolate failed to develop.

Leishmania orientalis developed heavy late-stage infections with colonization of the SV in 20% of P. argentipes, although the same L. orientalis strain was reported to be unable to establish infection in Lu. longipalpis [35]. In C. sonorensis, the SV was colonized even in 63% of females, a much higher rate than previously reported [35]. Metacyclic stages were present in both vector groups, but transmission by bite was demonstrated only for C. sonorensis. Thus, the involvement of biting midges in L. orientalis transmission is highly likely, although the role of Phlebotomus species was not convincingly excluded. Generally, transmission of Mundinia by sand flies must be still considered as various sand fly species present in endemic localities cannot be included into the laboratory study being never colonized, particularly South American and South Asian members of the genus Sergentomyia. The only species of the genus Sergentomyia where vector competence has been directly tested by experimental infections, S. schwetzi, was demonstrated to be refractory to Leishmania parasites [5354]. However, the vector competence of other species of this large genus of sand flies may differ (reviewed by [55]).

One of the basic traits characterizing Leishmania subgenera is the mode of their development in the vector. Members of the Viannia subgenus undergo peripylarian development, (the hindgut infection is followed by anterior migration of the parasites to the midgut and foregut) while the suprapylarian development in the Leishmania subgenus takes place only in the midgut and foregut. Both suprapylarian and peripylarian modes result in transmission by bite contrary to the hypopylarian development in the Sauroleishmania subgenus, restricted to the hindgut and resulting in contaminative transmission [56]. In this study, development of all Mundinia species tested was purely suprapylarian in both biting midges and sand flies; we did not observe attachment of haptomonad stages in the hindgut, typical for peripylarian development in any sand fly species, nor in C. sonorensis. According to the basal position of the subgenus Mundinia on the phylogenetic tree of the genus [6], the suprapylarian development may thus represent the ancestral type. However, this finding must be confirmed after identification and colonization of natural vectors of the respective Mundinia species.

Within this study, the highest proportion of infective metacyclic forms in mature infections were 10% in C. sonorensis infected with L. martiniquensis Cu2, 5% of C. sonorensis infected with L. orientalis and 3% in P. argentipes infected with L. orientalis. Although these frequencies might look low, similar proportions were reported for mature infections of L. donovani in P. argentipes; 3–5% of metacyclics were apparently sufficient to transmit the infections to mice [57]. As reported recently, population of metacyclic forms may increase with second and further bloodmeals in natural infections, resulting in greater potential to transmit parasites [58]. Besides metacyclics, other morphological forms are equally important for successful transmission—haptomonads attached to the chitin surface of the stomodeal valve and leptomonads producing promastigote secretory gel create the blocked fly, which forces infected female to regurgitate parasites into the skin (reviewed in [59]).

Taken together, our results strongly suggest potential involvement of biting midges in transmission of Mundinia parasites. All five tested species developed better in C. sonorensis than in a range of sand fly species, based on survival of vector defecation, the higher rate of the stomodeal valve colonisation and the successful production of metacyclic stages. Most importantly, the transmission to an in vivo mouse model was achieved using C. sonorensis infected with L. orientalis, L. martiniquensis and L. sp. strain GH5 from Ghana and failed entirely with the sand fly lines used. Adaptation of Mundinia to biting midges is most probably specific to this subgenus, as human pathogens L. donovani, L. major and L. infantum of the subgenus Leishmania do not establish mature infections in C. sonorensis or C. nubeculosus [25,60]. Although the results presented here support the significant role of biting midges in Mundinia transmission, many aspects of this vector—parasite interaction remain to be resolved.

Methods

Ethics statement

BALB/c mice were maintained and handled in the animal facility of Charles University in Prague in accordance with institutional guidelines and Czech legislation (Act No. 246/1992 and 359/2012 coll. on Protection of Animals against Cruelty in present statutes at large), which complies with all relevant European Union and international guidelines for experimental animals. All the experiments were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Laboratory Experiments of the Charles University in Prague and were performed under permission no. MSMT-7831/2020-3 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. Investigators are certificated for experimentation with animals by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.

Sand flies, biting midges and Mundinia parasites

Sand fly colonies (Lutzomyia migonei, originating from Brazil, Phlebotomus duboscqi, originating from Senegal and Phlebotomus argentipes, originating from India) were maintained in the Insectary of the Department of Parasitology, Charles University, under the standard conditions (26°C, humidity in the insectary 60–70%, photoperiod 14 h light/ 10 h dark and fed with 50% sucrose) as described previously [61]. Culicoides sonorensis (subgenus Monoculicoides) were sent to Charles University from the Pirbright Institute, UK and kept at 25°C before exposure to feeding. All insects were given free access to 50% sucrose.

Leishmania enriettii (MCAV/BR/45/LV90), L. macropodum (MMAC/AU/2004/AM-2004), L. sp. from Ghana (MHOM/GH/2012/GH5), L. orientalis (MHOM/TH/2014/LSCM4), four strains of L. martiniquensis (MHOM/MQ/1992/MAR1; MHOM/TH/2011/CU1; MHOM/TH/2019/Cu2 and MEQU/CZ/2019/Aig1), L. major (MARV/SN/XX/RV24; LV109) and L. donovani s. lat. (L. infantum/donovani hybrid (ITOB/TR/2005/TOB2) [62] and L. infantum (MHOM/TR/2000/OG-VL) were used. Parasites were maintained at 28°C in M199 medium supplemented with 20% foetal calf serum (Gibco, Prague, Czech Republic), 1% BME vitamins (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic), 2% sterile urine and 250 μg/ml amikacin (Amikin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Prague, Czech Republic). Before experimental infection, parasites were washed by centrifugation (2400 x g for 5 min), resuspended in saline solution and counted using haemocytometer (Bürker chamber).

Experimental infections of insects

Female biting midges and sand flies (3–5 days old) were infected by feeding through a chick-skin membrane with promastigotes from log-phase cultures resuspended 1:10 in a heat-inactivated rabbit blood (LabMediaServis) at a final concentration of 1 × 106 promastigotes/ml. Engorged females were separated and maintained in the same conditions as the colony for subsequent dissections at various time intervals. Intensity and localisation of infection were evaluated under the light microscope; the infections were scored as light (<100 parasites per gut), moderate (100–1000 parasites per gut) or heavy (>1000 parasites per gut) [63]. Differences in intensities of infections were tested by Chi-Square test using the software SPSS version 23. Morphology of parasites from insect guts was evaluated from gut smears fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. Promastigotes were examined by light microscopy with an oil immersion objective and photographed using Olympus DP70 camera. Body length and flagellar length of parasites were measured using Image J software. Promastigotes were scored as metacyclic forms when flagellar length ≥ 2 times body length and body length < 14 μm, leptomonad forms when body length < 14 μm and flagellar length > 2 μm and < 2 times body length; nectomonads when body length > 14 μm and haptomonads when flagellum ≤ 2 μm, according to [64].

Transmission experiments

Experimentally infected insects were maintained for 10 days at 25°C and then allowed to feed on the naive BALB/c mouse. Animals were anaesthetized with the mixture of ketamin and xylazine (62 mg/kg and 25 mg/kg). Insect females were placed into small plastic tubes covered with fine mesh and the tubes were held on the ear pinnae of the anaesthetized mouse for one hour. Mice were euthanized immediately post experiment by cervical dislocation under anesthesia. The ear pinnae (the place of biting) were dissected and stored at -20°C. Insects were dissected immediately post bloodmeal and checked for the presence of Leishmania under the light microscope.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay

DNA extraction from ear pinnae was performed using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total DNA was used as a template for conventional PCR targeting Leishmania minicircle kDNA.

Conventional PCR targeting Leishmania minicircle kDNA was performed using EmeraldAmp GT PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa) and cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 94°C for 3 min; step 2, 94°C for 20 s; step 3, 63°C for 20 s; step 4, 72°C for 5 s; step 5, 72°C for 5 min; followed by cooling at 12°C. Steps 2–4 were repeated 40 times. Product length was 116 bp and primers sequences were: Forward- 5´- AGA TTA TGG AGC TGT GCG ACA A- 3´ and Reverse- 5´- TAG TTC GTC TTG GTG CGG TC- 3´ [65]. Samples were analysed using 2% agarose gels.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Amplification of a 116 bp Leishmania minicircle kDNA fragment.

1, Positive control from cultured parasites; 2, Negative control; 3–8, Mouse ear exposed to biting midges (Culicoides sonorensis) infected with L. martiniquensis Mar1 (3), L. martiniquensis Cu1 (4), L. martiniquensis Cu2 (5), L. orientalis (6), L. sp. from Ghana (7), L. macropodum (8); 9–13, Mouse ear exposed to P. argentipes infected with L. orientalis (9, 10), L. martiniquensis Mar1 (11, 12) and L. donovani (13).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Milena Svobodova for providing Leishmania donovani/infantum hybrid and Eric Denison and Jenny Lennon for Culicoides production and supply. We also thank to Helena Kulikova, Lenka Krejcirikova and Kristyna Srstkova for the administrative and technical support.

References

  1. 1. Ashford RW. The leishmaniases as emerging and reemerging zoonoses. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30(12–13): 1269–1281. pmid:11113254
  2. 2. WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis. 2020.
  3. 3. Espinosa OA, Serrano MG, Camargo EP, Teixeira MMG, Shaw JJ. An appraisal of the taxonomy and nomenclature of trypanosomatids presently classified as Leishmania and Endotrypanum. Parasitology. 2016;145(Special Issue 4): 430–442. pmid:27976601
  4. 4. Muniz J, Medina H. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Guineapig. Hospital (Rio J). 1948;33(1): 7–25.
  5. 5. Rose K, Curtis J, Baldwin T, Mathis A, Kumar B, Sakthianandeswaren A, et al. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in red kangaroos: isolation and characterisation of the causative organisms. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34(6): 655–664. pmid:15111087
  6. 6. Barratt J, Kaufer A, Peters B, Craig D, Lawrence A, Roberts T, et al. Isolation of Novel Trypanosomatid, Zelonia australiensis sp. nov. (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) Provides Support for a Gondwanan Origin of Dixenous Parasitism in the Leishmaniinae. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1):1–26. pmid:28081121
  7. 7. Jariyapan N, Daroontum T, Jaiwong K, Chanmol W, Intakhan N, Sor-suwan S, et al. Leishmania (Mundinia) orientalis n. sp. (Trypanosomatidae), a parasite from Thailand responsible for localised cutaneous leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2018;11(1): 351. Available from: https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-018-2908-3 pmid:29914526
  8. 8. Dedet JP, Roche B, Pratlong F, Caies-Quist D, Jouannelle J, Benichou JC, et al. Diffuse cutaneous infection caused by a presumed monoxenous trypanosomatid in a patient infected with HIV. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(6): 644–646. pmid:8594682
  9. 9. Desbois N, Pratlong F, Quist D, Dedet J-P. Leishmania (Leishmania) martiniquensis n. sp. (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), description of the parasite responsible for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Martinique Island (French West Indies). Parasite [Internet]. 2014;21: 12. Available from: http://www.parasite-journal.org/10.1051/parasite/2014011 pmid:24626346
  10. 10. Kwakye-Nuako G, Mosore MT, Duplessis C, Bates MD, Puplampu N, Mensah-Attipoe I, et al. First isolation of a new species of Leishmania responsible for human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ghana and classification in the Leishmania enriettii complex. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45(11): 679–684. pmid:26099650
  11. 11. Bualert L, Charungkiattikul W, Thongsuksai P, Mungthin M, Siripattanapipong S, Khositnithikul R, et al. Case report: Autochthonous disseminated dermal and visceral leishmaniasis in an AIDS patient, Southern Thailand, caused by Leishmania siamensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(5): 821–824. pmid:22556080
  12. 12. Siripattanapipong S, Leelayoova S, Ninsaeng U, Mungthin M. Detection of DNA of Leishmania siamensis in Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) iyengari (Diptera: Psychodidae) and molecular identification of blood meals of sand flies in an affected area, Southern Thailand. J Med Entomol. 2018;55(5): 1277–1283. pmid:29688539
  13. 13. Supsrisunjai C, Kootiratrakarn T, Puangpet P, Bunnag T, Chaowalit P, Wessagowit V. Case report: Disseminated autochthonous dermal leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania siamensis (PCM2 Trang) in a patient from central Thailand infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96(5): 1160–1163. pmid:28138050
  14. 14. Reuss SM, Dunbar MD, Calderwood Mays MB, Owen JL, Mallicote MF, Archer LL, et al. Autochthonous Leishmania siamensis in horse, Florida, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(9): 1545–1547. pmid:22932732
  15. 15. Lobsiger L, Müller N, Schweizer T, Frey CF, Wiederkehr D, Zumkehr B, et al. An autochthonous case of cutaneous bovine leishmaniasis in Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169(3–4): 408–414. pmid:20153118
  16. 16. Müller N, Welle M, Lobsiger L, Stoffel MH, Boghenbor KK, Hilbe M, et al. Occurrence of Leishmania sp. in cutaneous lesions of horses in Central Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166(3–4): 346–351. pmid:19800739
  17. 17. Pothirat T, Tantiworawit A, Chaiwarith R, Jariyapan N, Wannasan A, Siriyasatien P, et al. First Isolation of Leishmania from Northern Thailand: Case Report, Identification as Leishmania martiniquensis and Phylogenetic Position within the Leishmania enriettii Complex. 2014;8(12): e3339.
  18. 18. Jungudomjaroen S, Phumee A, Chusri S, Kraivichian K, Jariyapan N, Payungporn S, et al. Detection of Leishmania martiniquensis DNA in various clinical samples by quantitative PCR. Trop Biomed. 2015;32(4): 736–744. pmid:33557466
  19. 19. Boisseau-Garsaud AM, Cales-Quist D, Desbois N, Jouannelle J, Jouannelle A, Pratlong F, et al. A new case of cutaneous infection by a presumed monoxenous trypanosomatid in the island of Martinique (French West Indies). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94: 51–52. pmid:10748898
  20. 20. Liautaud B, Vignier N, Miossec C, Plumelle Y, Kone M, Delta D, et al. First case of visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania martiniquensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(2): 317–319. pmid:25404076
  21. 21. Dougall A, Shilton C, Low Choy J, Alexander B, Walton S. New reports of Australian cutaneous leishmaniasis in Northern Australian macropods. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(10): 1516–1520. pmid:19288959
  22. 22. Sadlova J, Vojtkova B, Becvar T, Lestinova T, Spitzova T, Bates P, et al. Host competence of the African rodents Arvicanthis neumanni, A. niloticus and Mastomys natalensis for Leishmania donovani from Ethiopia and L. (Mundinia) sp. from Ghana. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020; 11: 40–45. pmid:31879594
  23. 23. Belehu A, Turk JL. Establishment of cutaneous Leishmania enriettii infection in hamsters. Infect Immun. 1976;13(4): 1235–1241. pmid:1279005
  24. 24. Thomaz-Soccol V, Pratlong F, Langue R, Castro E, Luz E, Dedet JP. New isolation of Leishmania enriettii Muniz and Medina, 1948 in Paraná State, Brazil, 50 years after the first description, and isoenzymatic polymorphism of the L. enriettii taxon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996 Jan;90(5): 491–495. pmid:8915125
  25. 25. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Vojtkova B, Votypka J, Carpenter S, Bates PA, et al. The biting midge Culicoides sonorensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) is capable of developing late stage infections of Leishmania enriettii. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(9): 1–15. pmid:26367424
  26. 26. Paranaiba LF, Pinheiro LJ, Macedo DH, Menezes-Neto A, Torrecilhas AC, Tafuri WL, et al. An overview on Leishmania (Mundinia) enriettii: biology, immunopathology, LRV and extracellular vesicles during the host–parasite interaction. Parasitology. 2018 Sep;145(10): 1265–1273. pmid:29223169
  27. 27. Paraense WL. The Spread of Leishmania enriettii through the Body of the Guineapig. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1953;47(6): 556–560. pmid:13113665
  28. 28. Garin YJF, Sulahian A, Méneceur P, Pratlong F, Prina E, Gangneux JP, et al. Experimental pathogenicity of a presumed monoxenous trypanosomatid isolated from humans in a murine model. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48(2): 170–176. pmid:12095104
  29. 29. Somboonpoonpol N. Parasite burden, distribution and imunopathology of Leishmania martiniquensis—infected BALB/c mice in different routes and time points. M. Sc. Thesis, Chulalongkorn University. 2016. Available from http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/60706
  30. 30. Intakhan N, Chanmol W, Kongkaew A, Somboon P, Bates MD, Bates PA, et al. Experimental infection of Leishmania (Mundinia) martiniquensis in BALB/c mice and Syrian golden hamsters. Parasitol Res. 2020;119(9): 3041–3051. pmid:32779021
  31. 31. Becvar T, Siriyasatien P, Bates P, Volf P, Sádlová J. Development of Leishmania (Mundinia) in guinea pigs. Parasites and Vectors. 2020;13: 181 Available from: pmid:32268916
  32. 32. Killick-Kendrick R. Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Med Vet Entomol. 1990;4(1): 1–24. pmid:2132963
  33. 33. Maroli M, Feliciangeli MD, Bichaud L, Charrel RN, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013;27(2): 123–147. pmid:22924419
  34. 34. Dougall AM, Alexander B, Holt DC, Harris T, Sultan AH, Bates PA, et al. Evidence incriminating midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as potential vectors of Leishmania in Australia. Int J Parasitol [Internet]. 2011;41(5): 571–579. Available from: pmid:21251914
  35. 35. Chanmol W, Jariyapan N, Somboon P, Bates MD, Bates PA. Development of Leishmania orientalis in the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) and the biting midge Culicoides soronensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Acta Trop. 2019;199 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105157
  36. 36. Killick-Kendrick R. The biology and control of Phlebotomine sand flies. Clin Dermatol. 1999;17(3): 279–289. pmid:10384867
  37. 37. Kostygov AY, Yurchenko V. Revised classification of the subfamily Leishmaniinae (Trypanosomatidae). Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2017;64: 1–5.
  38. 38. Nieves E, Pimenta PFP. Development of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis in the sand fly Lutzomyia migonei (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 2000;37(1): 134–140. pmid:15218917
  39. 39. Guimarães VCFV, Pruzinova K, Sadlova J, Volfova V, Myskova J, Filho SPB, et al. Lutzomyia migonei is a permissive vector competent for Leishmania infantum. Parasite Vector [Internet]. 2016;9(1):1–6. Available from: pmid:26988559
  40. 40. Kanjanopas K, Siripattanapipong S, Ninsaeng U, Hitakarun A, Jitkaew S, Kaewtaphaya P, et al. Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) gemmea, a potential vector of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13(1): 13–6. pmid:23870062
  41. 41. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Carpenter S, Volf P. Speculations on biting midges and other bloodsucking arthropods as alternative vectors of Leishmania. Parasite Vector. 2014;7(1): 222. pmid:24884857
  42. 42. Borkent A, Dominiak P. Catalog of the Biting Midges of the World (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa. 2020;4787(1): 001–377.
  43. 43. Nayduch D, Cohnstaedt LW, Saski C, Lawson D, Kersey P, Fife M, et al. Studying Culicoides vectors of BTV in the post-genomic era: Resources, bottlenecks to progress and future directions. Virus Res [Internet]. 2014;182: 43–9. Available from: pmid:24355835
  44. 44. Carpenter S, Groschup MH, Garros C, Felippe-Bauer ML, Purse B V. Culicoides biting midges, arboviruses and public health in Europe. Antiviral Res [Internet]. 2013;100(1): 102–113. Available from: pmid:23933421
  45. 45. Rangel EF, Lainson R. Proven and putative vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil: Aspects of their biology and vectorial competence. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(7). Available from: pmid:20027458
  46. 46. de Carvalho MR, Valença HF, da Silva FJ, de Pita-Pereira D, de Araújo Pereira T, Britto C, et al. Natural Leishmania infantum infection in Migonemyia migonei (França, 1920) (Diptera:Psychodidae:Phlebotominae) the putative vector of visceral leishmaniasis in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2010;116(1): 108–110. pmid:20457120
  47. 47. Lainson R, Rangel EF. Lutzomyia longipalpis and the eco-epidemiology of American visceral leishmaniasis, with particular reference to Brazil—a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005;100: 811–827. pmid:16444411
  48. 48. Kweku MA, Odoom S, Puplampu N, Desewu K, Nuako GK, Gyan B, et al. An outbreak of suspected cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ghana: lessons learnt and preparation for future outbreaks. Glob Health Action. 2011;4. Available from: pmid:21765823
  49. 49. Lewis DJ, Dyce AL. Taxonomy of the australasian phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) with revision of genus Sergentomyia from the region. Invertebr Syst. 1988;2(6): 755–804.
  50. 50. Lawyer P, Killick-Kendrick M, Rowland T, Rowton E, Volf P. Laboratory colonization and mass rearing of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae). Parasite. 2017; 24: 42. pmid:29139377
  51. 51. Maia C, Seblova V, Sadlova J, Votypka J, Volf P. Experimental transmission of Leishmania infantum by two major vectors: A comparison between a viscerotropic and a dermotropic strain. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(6): e1181. pmid:21695108
  52. 52. Ozbel Y, Sanjoba C, Alten B, Asada M, Depaquit J, Matsumoto Y, et al. Distribution and ecological aspects of sand fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) species in Sri Lanka. J Vector Ecol. 2011; 36(s1). Available from: pmid:21366784
  53. 53. Sadlova J, Dvorak V, Seblova V, Warburg A, Votypka J, Volf P. Sergentomyia schwetzi is not a competent vector for Leishmania donovani and other Leishmania species pathogenic to humans. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1): 186. Available from: http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/6/1/186. pmid:23786805
  54. 54. Sadlova J, Homola M, Myskova J, Jancarova M, Volf P. Refractoriness of Sergentomyia schwetzi to Leishmania spp. is mediated by the peritrophic matrix. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(4): e0006382. pmid:29617364
  55. 55. Maia C, Depaquit J. Can Sergentomyia (Diptera, Psychodidae) play a role in the transmission of mammal-infecting Leishmania? Parasite [Internet]. 2016;23:55. Available from: pmid:27921993
  56. 56. Lainson R, Shaw JJ. The Role of Animals in the Epidemiology of South American Leishmaniasis. In: Lumsden WHR, Ewans DA, editors. Biology of the Kinetoplastida Vol 2. London, New York: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 1–116.
  57. 57. Sadlova J, Myskova J, Lestinova T, Votypka J, Yeo M, Volf P. (2017): Leishmania donovani development in Phlebotomus argentipes: comparison of promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections. Parasitology. 2017;144(4): 403–410. pmid:27876097
  58. 58. Serafim TD, Coutinho-Abreu IV, Oliveira F., Meneses C, Kamhawi S, Valenzuela JG. Sequential blood meals promote Leishmania replication and reverse metacyclogenesis augmenting vector infectivity. 2018; Nat Microbiol 3: 548–555. pmid:29556108
  59. 59. Bates PA. Revising Leishmania’s life cycle. Nat Microbiol. 2018; 3: 529–530. pmid:29693656
  60. 60. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Carpenter S, Volf P. Development of Leishmania parasites in Culicoides nubeculosus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and implications for screening vector competence. J Med Entomol [Internet]. 2012;49(5):967–70. Available from: pmid:23025175
  61. 61. Volf P, Volfova V. Establishment and maintenance of sand fly colonies. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36: 1–9. pmid:21366760
  62. 62. Rogers MB, Downing T, Smith BA, Imamura H, Sanders M, Svobodova M, et al. Genomic Confirmation of Hybridisation and Recent Inbreeding in a Vector-Isolated Leishmania Population. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1): e1004092. pmid:24453988
  63. 63. Myskova J, Votypka J, Volf P. Leishmania in Sand Flies: Comparison of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction with Other Techniques to Determine the Intensity of Infection. J Med Entomol. 2008;45(1): 133–1388. pmid:18283954
  64. 64. Sádlová J, Price HP, Smith BA, Votýpka J, Volf P, Smith DF. The stage-regulated HASPB and SHERP proteins are essential for differentiation of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major in its sand fly vector, Phlebotomus papatasi. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12(12): 1765–1779. pmid:20636473
  65. 65. Rodgers MR, Popper SJ, Wirth DF. Amplification of kinetoplast DNA as a tool in the detection and diagnosis of Leishmania. Exp Parasitol. 1990;71(3): 267–275. pmid:2170165