Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Rethinking host range in Pneumocystis

Rethinking host range in Pneumocystis

  • Spenser J. Babb-Biernacki, 
  • Jacob A. Esselstyn, 
  • Vinson P. Doyle
PLOS
x

Introduction

Fungi in the genus Pneumocystis are obligate biotrophs and opportunistic pathogens of mammal lungs. They are notable for their high degree of host specificity; it is often argued that Pneumocystis species are restricted to a single host species (i.e., monoxenous) [1, 2]. This monoxenous hypothesis, combined with their ubiquitous presence across mammal diversity, suggests that there may be one Pneumocystis species for each of the 6399 extant mammal species. However, only a small percentage of mammal species have been tested for Pneumocystis, and only five Pneumocystis species have been formally described. Despite our massive knowledge gaps, the notion of monoxenism in Pneumocystis is so pervasive that evidence to the contrary is often described as rare exceptions to a rule [1, 2]. Here, we review the literature on host distribution of Pneumocystis and argue that monoxenism is not supported by the available, albeit limited, data. We emphasize the importance of species discovery and studies of Pneumocystis host range as a prerequisite to the pursuit of other biological questions in these and other medically important fungi.

Crossinfection experiments

Our primary interest here is Pneumocystis host range: Are Pneumocystis species monoxenous (which is the dominant perspective) or are they commonly stenoxenous (inhabiting a narrow range of multiple host species; Fig 1)? To understand the host niche of any symbiont, we must identify species boundaries. Genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR), which interprets transitions between concordance and discordance of multiple gene trees as species boundaries [3], is a widely applied, well-supported method to recognize fungal species. However, the difficulty of sequencing multiple unlinked, nuclear loci in samples with low fungal loads has largely precluded the application of GCPSR to Pneumocystis. Our understanding of Pneumocystis species boundaries is thus informed by other recognition methods, historically beginning with crossinfection experiments.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Various parasite host range hypotheses.

Hypothetical host and parasite phylogenies illustrating scenarios that can lead to two forms of host specificity: monoxenism and stenoxenism. Dotted branches indicate a single parasite species residing in multiple host species. These patterns may all occur in a single parasite clade, such as Pneumocystis, and distinguishing between them requires thorough host sampling and robust phylogenetic analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008824.g001

From the discovery of Pneumocystis carinii in 1912 until 1976, Pneumocystis was thought to be a single species capable of living in a variety of mammals [4]. Morphological and immunological work [5] as well as crossinfection experiments challenged this. In 1993, researchers failed to infect laboratory mice with Pneumocystis from ferrets [6], suggesting that ferret-inhabiting Pneumocystis is distinct from the species known from mice. This failure of heterospecific transmission was soon observed in reciprocal transmission experiments among laboratory mice (Mus musculus), rats (Rattus norvegicus), and rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) [7] and from humans to owl monkeys (Aotus nancymaae) [8], all species known at the time to host Pneumocystis. In a case used to argue for strong host specificity outside the laboratory, Pneumocystis was not transmitted between cohoused Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and Rodrigues flying foxes (Pteropus rodricensis) in a zoo [9]. These results led researchers to conclude that Pneumocystis is a diverse genus of host-specific species, but the host pairs tested for crossinfection are distant relatives that have been evolving independently for many millions of years.

These experiments demonstrated that Pneumocystis species exhibit host specificity, but because transfer experiments used distantly related hosts, the true degree of this specificity remains untested. The most closely related hosts involved in these transmission experiments, Mus and Rattus, are in the same subfamily (Murinae), but they are separated by approximately 11 million years of evolution [10]. More closely related hosts may share Pneumocystis species because generic or tribal host affinity is common in many pathogenic fungi [11]. Transmission attempts between closely related host species could reveal the true specificity of Pneumocystis, but sustaining laboratory populations of wild animals is often infeasible, and host specificity may also vary widely within Pneumocystis. As such, examining many natural mammal populations is necessary to assess host specificity.

Discovery of multihost associated Pneumocystis

Compelling genetic evidence has emerged that Pneumocystis species occupy host niches broader than are commonly appreciated. In 2004, Guillot and colleagues [12] studied Pneumocystis in rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and long-tailed (M. fascicularis) macaques. Both species were infected with Pneumocystis organisms identical in sequence at the mitochondrial large subunit (mtLSU) locus, implying that they harbor the same Pneumocystis species [12]. Very similar Pneumocystis sequences (uncorrected p-distance < 1%; Table 1) that may belong to the same species have since been recovered from the southern pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) [13]. Several additional examples of crosshost Pneumocystis come from rodents. These include two species of Eurasian field mice, Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis, which carried phylogenetically indistinguishable Pneumocystis [14]. Most striking is a study exploring Pneumocystis in wild populations of Southeast Asian rodents, which included excellent sampling from many congeneric species in related genera [15]. Pneumocystis carinii and P. wakefieldiae were detected in several species of Rattus, which challenged the belief that these species could only colonize Rattus norvegicus). More surprisingly, the red spiny rat (Maxomys surifer) and Herbert’s giant rat (Leopoldamys herberti), which are separated by approximately 7 million years of evolution [10], were found to harbor identical Pneumocystis genetic sequences [15]. Nevertheless, the notion of monoxenism has persisted, and cases such as these are described as rare potential exceptions [1, 2]. However, these findings suggest that host range is constrained by host divergence time rather than the speciation process per se, which leads us to scrutinize the evidence used to conclude that Pneumocystis species are primarily monoxenous.

thumbnail
Table 1. Genetic distances (expressed as percentages) of mtLSU and mtSSU between Pneumocystis from closely related hosts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008824.t001

Expected divergence at Pneumocystis barcodes

As previously mentioned, the difficulty of sequencing nuclear loci from Pneumocystis in wild animals has prevented robust study of species boundaries. Two easily sequenced mitochondrial loci, the mitochondrial large subunit (mtLSU) and small subunit (mtSSU), have thus become de facto Pneumocystis barcodes [14,16]. Although single-locus studies are subject to the idiosyncrasies (e.g., introgression and strong selection) of small sample sizes [17], these loci are the only data available from many undescribed Pneumocystis species [e.g. 9, 15, 18] and are often the basis of claims about monoxenism. Therefore, we must critically examine how mtLSU and mtSSU variation has been used to understand species boundaries in Pneumocystis.

One problem to consider when using mtLSU and mtSSU as Pneumocystis barcodes is that, although the “barcode gap” is considered indicative of plausible species boundaries, we do not know how much inter- and intraspecific distance to expect in Pneumocystis. Here, we summarize the few available examples of intraspecific genetic sampling of Pneumocystis from multiple localities across a host range. In two well-studied Pneumocystis species, the human-associated P. jirovecii and mouse (Mus musculus)-associated P. murina, variation has been observed at only two or three bases out of the approximately 250 bp long mtLSU fragment (0.8% to 1.2%) [19, 20]. Pneumocystis sequences were recovered from populations of Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) from Mexico and Argentina, with maximum divergence of 0.78% at mtLSU and 1.83% at mtSSU; in the common pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), no divergence was observed among individuals at mtLSU, but 0.49% divergence was seen at mtSSU [9]. In Finnish and English populations of the common shrew (Sorex araneus), Pneumocystis mtLSU was 0.89% divergent [21]. These results suggest genetic variation at these loci within Pneumocystis species is generally lower than 2% and that samples exhibiting higher divergence may represent distinct species.

However, findings from wild populations of the genus Rattus challenge this. Comparatively high levels of divergence were identified in mtLSU sequences from wild P. wakefieldiae (up to 3.82%) and P. carinii (up to 1.95%) as well as mtSSU in P. wakefieldiae (up to 2.78%; uncorrected p-distances were not included in original study and calculated for this publication) across several Southeast Asian countries, much higher diversity than had ever been observed in these species in the lab [15]. Comparable levels of genetic variation were recovered from Pneumocystis found in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) across its European range: up to 3.8% in a concatenated mtLSU and mtSSU alignment [18]. The cases of bats, shrews, and wood mice demonstrate that geographically isolated Pneumocystis populations can exhibit marked divergence that may reflect the phylogeography of their hosts.

Pneumocystis from other host species present striking heterogeneity at mtLSU and mtSSU. A diverse population of Pneumocystis was discovered in laboratory macaques (Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis), possibly representing two species. Mean divergence within these two Pneumocystis clades was reported as 2.5% and 2.3% [12], respectively, but individual pairwise intraclade distances reached 5.0% by our p-distance calculations. Pig (Sus scrofa domesticus)-associated Pneumocystis is another heterogenous population in which mtLSU and mtSSU pairwise divergence ranges from 0.5% to over 15%, with no readily discernible phylogenetic clusters which could represent species boundaries (i.e., no barcode gap) [22]. Macaque and pig-associated Pneumocystis thus require study of multiple nuclear genes to locate plausible species boundaries. These examples demonstrate that without additional data, a clear, consistent barcode gap cannot yet be known for Pneumocystis, complicating our ability to interpret mtLSU and mtSSU variation as evidence of species boundaries.

Reexamination of cospeciation

Because strong host specificity drives cospeciation in host-symbiont assemblages [23], the inference of significant cospeciation between Pneumocystis and their mammal hosts has been used to support the monoxenous hypothesis. However, successful cophylogenetic analysis requires accurate delimitation of symbiont species, independent of host identity. Oversplitting symbiont species using host identity leads to overestimation of cospeciation [24] and host specificity. In the case of Pneumocystis, cophylogenies have largely been inferred that include undescribed putative Pneumocystis species, with species assignments based on mitochondrial divergence and host identity. Here, we revisit the evidence used for Pneumocystis species assignment in two influential cophylogeny studies.

Important Pneumocystis research in primates and bats demonstrated significant host-symbiont phylogenetic concordance, but conclusions about host specificity based on these findings require a better understanding of species limits in Pneumocystis. In a study of 18 primate species, every host taxon harbored Pneumocystis with unique mtLSU sequences, which was taken as evidence that primate-associated Pneumocystis are monoxenous [13]. However, unique genetic sequences do not necessarily represent unique species, and many Pneumocystis organisms from closely related primates exhibit extreme similarity at mtLSU and mtSSU that may reflect intraspecific variation. A noteworthy example are the marmosets (genus Callithrix). Pneumocystis from the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) and white-headed marmoset (C. geoffroyi), which differ by only 1.27% at mtLSU by our p-distance calculations and are identical at mtSSU (Table 1). Low levels of divergence between Pneumocystis from other primate hosts (Table 1) questions the interpretation of separate species, because isolation by distance can occur in Pneumocystis from allopatric host populations, as previously established. The same phenomenon is observed in bats [9], often cited as the best example of highly host-specific Pneumocystis [e.g. 2, 15, 18]. In the only instance of successful intrageneric Pneumocystis sampling in bats, mtSSU was sequenced from two species of long-eared bat, Plecotus auritus and P. austriacus, and found to be only 0.49% divergent [9]. This is less than the intraspecific variation observed at mtSSU collected from Pneumocystis in the Mexican free-tailed bat (1.83%). Without further investigation, it is inappropriate to assume that slightly divergent sequences from two Plecotus species belong to unique Pneumocystis species, while more divergent sequences from the Mexican free-tailed bat represent the same Pneumocystis species.

In both primates and bats, the combination of limited sampling and similarity of Pneumocystis sequences from closely related hosts demands more rigorous assessment before drawing conclusions about cospeciation and host specificity. It seems no coincidence that bat-associated Pneumocystis is regarded as the best example of highly host-specific organisms, while also being the group with the least data from congeneric hosts. This recapitulates our primary criticism of crossinfection experiments: Because closely related hosts are not well sampled, the inferred monoxenism of Pneumocystis may be a sampling artifact.

Additionally, most Pneumocystis cophylogeny analyses have yet to test synchrony of host and Pneumocystis speciation, a requisite characteristic of true cospeciation. The emergence of Pneumocystis genomic data is changing this, as analysis of several genomes suggests that Pneumocystis species fail to diverge simultaneously with their hosts [25]. This is consistent with the more holistic view that Pneumocystis are generally stenoxenous, persisting in multiple descendants of their ancestral hosts.

Cospeciation analyses will be useful only in clades with robust species boundaries for both hosts and parasites. To achieve this, we recommend a perspective shift toward a new null hypothesis: Similar Pneumocystis populations belong to the same species, even if they are found in heterospecific hosts. Tests of this null hypothesis should employ data streams independent of host identity.

Conclusions

The question of monoxenous versus stenoxenous host range in Pneumocystis is not merely semantic; the community’s understanding of host niche in Pneumocystis evolution has profound impacts on our understanding of their ecology and transmission potential [24, 26]. Overestimating cospeciation and host specificity can lead researchers to discount the role of host switching in a parasite’s evolutionary history, as has happened with some lineages of Pneumocystis that switched between rodent subfamilies [27] and between pigs and carnivorans [28]. Since most emerging diseases in humans result from zoonotic host switches [29], understanding past rates of host switches is a critical priority.

Certainly, these data are incomplete and reveal no hard truths about Pneumocystis host specificity, especially given the challenges of basing hypotheses on limited mitochondrial data from a limited number of host species. However, no experimental or genetic evidence has conclusively demonstrated single-host specificity in Pneumocystis, although this claim continues to be repeated [1, 2]. Pneumocystis is poorly sampled, with thousands of mammal host species untested; that we have already encountered many probable exceptions to monoxenism suggests that multihost range is not rare. The evolution of Pneumocystis host niche is certainly complex, as a recent study in African rodents suggested a mix of monoxenous and stenoxenous Pneumocystis species and several host switching events [27].

Echoing others [2], we urge researchers to focus on collecting more sequence data from Pneumocystis from more host taxa. Sequences from nuclear loci will be particularly important and will allow us to move past barcoding-based species hypotheses, enable formal identification of Pneumocystis species, and give us a deeper understanding of how fungal species boundaries correspond to those of their hosts. Of course, we acknowledge that this is a challenge in wild animal specimens with low Pneumocystis loads. Still, it is necessary if we are to understand the evolutionary history of these important fungi.

References

  1. 1. Hauser PM. Is the unique camouflage strategy of Pneumocystis associated with its particular niche within host lungs? PLoS Pathog. 2019;15: e1007480. pmid:30677096
  2. 2. Demanche C, Guillot J, Chabé M. Pneumocystis species co-evolution: A state-of-the-art review. OBM Genet. 2019;3:
  3. 3. Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, et al. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2000;31: 21–32. pmid:11118132
  4. 4. Delanoë P and Delanoë E. Sur les rapports des kystes de carinii du poumon des rats avec le Trypanosoma lewisi. CR Acad Sci. 1912;155: 658–660.
  5. 5. Frenkel JK. Pneumocystis jiroveci n. sp. from man: morphology, physiology, and immunology in relation to pathology. Natl Cancer I Monogr. 1976;43: 13–30.
  6. 6. Gigliotti F, Harmsen AG, Haidaris CG, Haidaris PJ. Pneumocystis carinii is not universally transmissible between mammalian species. Infect Immun. 1993;61: 2886–2890. pmid:8514391
  7. 7. Aliouat EM, Mazars E, Dei-Cas E, Cesbron JY, Camus D. Intranasal inoculation of mouse, rat, or rabbit-derived Pneumocystis to SCID mice. J Protozool Res. 1993;3: 94–98.
  8. 8. Beard CB, Jennings VM, Teague GW, Carter JL, Mabry J, Moura H, et al. Experimental inoculation of immunosuppressed owl monkeys with Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis. J. Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999;46: 113S–115S. pmid:10519274
  9. 9. Akbar H, Pincon C, Aliouat-Denis C, Deroiche S, Taylor M, Pottier M, et al. Characterizing Pneumocystis in the lungs of bats: understanding Pneumocystis evolution and the spread of Pneumocystis organisms in mammal populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78: 8122–8136. pmid:23001662
  10. 10. Kimura Y, Hawkins MTR, McDonough MM, Jacobs LL, Flynn LJ. Corrected placement of Mus-Rattus fossil calibration forces precision in the molecular tree of rodents. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: pmid:26411391
  11. 11. Parleviet JE. 1986. Coevolution of host resistance and pathogen virulence: possible implications for taxonomy. In: Stone AR, Hawksworth DL, editors. Coevolution and Systematics. Oxfordshire, UK: Clarendon Press; 1986.
  12. 12. Guillot J, Demanche C, Norris K, Wildschutte H, Wanert F, Berthelemy M, et al. Phylogenetic relationships among Pneumocystis from Asian macaques inferred from mitochondrial rRNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;31: 988–996. pmid:15120396
  13. 13. Demanche C, Berthelemy M, Petit T, Polack B, Wakefield AE, Dei–Cas E, et al. Phylogeny of Pneumocystis carinii from 18 primate species confirms host specificity and suggests coevolution. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39: 2126–2133. pmid:11376046
  14. 14. Danesi P, Rold GD, Rizzoli A, Hauffe HC, Marangon S, Samerpitak K, et al. Barcoding markers for Pneumocystis species in wildlife. Fungal Biol. 2015;120: 191–206. pmid:26781376
  15. 15. Latinne A, Bexe F, Delhaes L, Pottier M, Gantois N, Nguyen J, et al. Genetic diversity and evolution of Pneumocystis fungi infecting wild Southeast Asian murid rodents. Parasitology 2018;145: 885–900. pmid:29117878
  16. 16. Stringer JR, Cushion MT, Wakefield AE. New nomenclature for the genus Pneumocystis. J. Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48: 184S–189S.
  17. 17. Dupuis JR, Roe AD, Sperling FAH. Multi-locus species delimitation in closely related animals and fungi: one marker is not enough. Mol Ecol. 2012;21: 4422–4436. pmid:22891635
  18. 18. Demanche C, Deville M, Michaux J, Barriel V, Pinçon C, Aliouat-Denis CM, et al. What do Pneumocystis organisms tell us about the phylogeography of their hosts? The case of the woodmouse Apodemus sylvaticus in continental Europe and western Mediterranean islands. PLoS ONE 2015;10: pmid:25830289
  19. 19. Beard CB, Roux P, Nevez G, Hauser PM, Kovacs JA, Unnasch TP, et al. Strain typing methods and molecular epidemiology of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10: 1729–1735. pmid:15504257
  20. 20. De Bellocq JG, Wasimuddin , Ribas A, Bryja J, Piálek J, Baird SJE. Holobiont suture zones: Parasite evidence across the European house mouse hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 2018;27: 5214–5227. pmid:30427096
  21. 21. Peters SE, English K, Laakkonen J, Gurnell J. DNA analysis of Pneumocystis carinii infecting Finnish and English shrews. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1994;41: 108S. pmid:7804201
  22. 22. Sanches EMC, Ferreiro L, Borba MR, Spanamber A, Ravazzalo AP, Santurio JM, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Pneumocystis from pig lungs obtained from slaughterhouses in southern and midwestern regions of Brazil. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2011;63: 1154–1159.
  23. 23. Reed DL and Hafner MS. Host specificity of chewing lice on pocket gophers: a potential mechanism for cospeciation. J Mammal. 1997;78: 655–660.
  24. 24. Refrégier G, Le Gac M, Jabbour F, Widmer A, Shykoff JA, Yockteng R, et al. Cophylogeny of the anther smut fungi and their caryophyllaceous hosts: Prevalence of host shifts and importance of delimiting parasite species for inferring cospeciation. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8: 100. pmid:18371215
  25. 25. Cissé OH, Ma L, Wei Huang D, Khil PP, Dekker JP, Kutty G, et al. Comparative population genomics analysis of the mammalian fungal pathogen Pneumocystis. mBio 2018;9: pmid:29739910
  26. 26. Poulin R, Krasnov B, Mouillot D. Host specificity in phylogenetic and geographic space. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27: 355–361. pmid:21680245
  27. 27. Petružela J, Bryja J, Bryjová A, Katakweba A, Sabuni C, Baird SJE, et al. Evolutionary history of Pneumocystis fungi in their African rodent hosts. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75: pmid:31247340
  28. 28. Danesi P, Corrò M, Falcaro C, Carminato A, Furlanello T, Cocchi M, et al. Molecular detection of Pneumocystis in the lungs of cats. Med Mycol. 2019;57: 1–12.
  29. 29. World Health Organization. Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases and Public Health Emergencies (APSED III): Advancing implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005). Manila: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2017. pp. 1–75.