Histone demethylase LSD1 promotes RIG-I poly-ubiquitination and anti-viral gene expression

Under RNA virus infection, retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) in host cells recognizes viral RNA and activates the expression of type I IFN. To investigate the roles of protein methyltransferases and demethylases in RIG-I antiviral signaling pathway, we screened all the known related enzymes with a siRNA library and identified LSD1 as a positive regulator for RIG-I signaling. Exogenous expression of LSD1 enhances RIG-I signaling activated by virus stimulation, whereas its deficiency restricts it. LSD1 interacts with RIG-I, promotes its K63-linked polyubiquitination and interaction with VISA/MAVS. Interestingly, LSD1 exerts its function in antiviral response not dependent on its demethylase activity but through enhancing the interaction between RIG-I with E3 ligases, especially TRIM25. Furthermore, we provide in vivo evidence that LSD1 increases antiviral gene expression and inhibits viral replication. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that LSD1 is a positive regulator of signaling pathway triggered by RNA-virus through mediating RIG-I polyubiquitination.


Ethics statement
Mice were maintained in the special pathogen-free facility of College of Life Sciences at Wuhan University. All the animal operations were following the laboratory animal guidelines of Wuhan University and approved by the Animal Experimentations Ethics Committee of Wuhan University (Protocol NO. 14110B). No patient study was involved and the consent to participate is not applicable.

Cell lines, tissue culture and transfection
HEK293T cells, L929 cells and Vero cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy and were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Biological Industries) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (HyClone). HEK293T cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) or calcium phosphate. SeV and VSV-GFP were gifted by Dr. Hong-Bing Shu of Wuhan University, and then amplified in our lab.
Transfection of 293T was performed with a standard calcium phosphate precipitation method [53]. Transfection of siRNAs and other cell lines was performed with lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with the manufacturer's protocol.

RNA interference, reverse transcription and quantitative RT-PCR
The indicated cells were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA, LSD1 siRNA 1#: AAGGAAAGCUAGAAGAAAAUU, 2#: CAGAAGGCCUAGACAUUAAUU) and were scraped down and collected by centrifugation. Total RNA was extracted with an RNA extraction kit (Aidlab or CWBIO) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 1 ug total RNA was used for reverse transcription with a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Vazyme). The amount of mRNA was assayed by quantitative PCR. Data shown are the relative abundance of the indicated mRNAs normalized to that of ACTB mRNA (Homo sapiens) or Gapdh mRNA (Mus musculus). The sequences of primers are shown in S1 Table. Assays were repeated at least three times.

Co-immunoprecipitation and ubiquitination analysis
HEK293T cells were harvested and lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40) with proteinase inhibitors. For ubiquitination assays, cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) with proteinase inhibitors and then sonicated for 1 minute. The supernatant was then incubated with protein G beads (GE Healthcare) and desired antibodies at 4˚C for 4 h. The beads were spun down and washed three times with lysis buffer. The final drop of wash buffer was vacuumed out and SDS loading buffer was added to the beads, followed by immunoblotting.

Immunoblotting analysis
Protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes. After blocking with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween (TBS-T), the membranes were incubated with the desired primary antibodies overnight at 4˚C. Then the membranes were washed and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. The blots were detected by Clarity Western ECL Substrate (BIO-RAD). For cell assay, at least triplicate biological experiments were performed.

Preparations of BMDMs, BMDCs and MLFs
For preparation of BMDMs, bone marrow cells were cultured in 10% M-CSF-containing conditional medium from L929 cells for 3-5 days. For preparation of BMDCs, bone marrow cells were cultured in medium containing murine GM-CSF (50 ng/mL) for 6-8 days. Primary lung fibroblasts were isolated from lungs of 8-week old mice. In brief, lungs were minced and digested in calcium and magnesium free HBSS containing 10 mg/mL type II collagenase and 20 mg/mL DNase I for 1 hour at 37˚C. Cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. The cells were then plated in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin and streptomycin.

Plaque forming unit (PFU) assay
Vero cells were seeded into 12-well plates 1 day before measurement. Supernatants of VSVinfected cells were frozen and thawed twice, then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. Supernatants were serially diluted on the monolayer of Vero cells for 2 days, and PFU was measured.

H&E staining
Tissues were isolated from indicated male mice, rinsed in ice-cold PBS, fixed in 4% poly-formaldehyde for 48 h at 4˚C, then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. 4 μm tissue sections were used for staining. The tissue sections were deparaffinized and then rehydrated. After staining with Mayer's hematoxylin dye for 5-7 min, the sections were washed with water, sealed with neutral gum after air drying, and finally examined with Olympus BX51 microscope.

LSD1 is required for activation of RIG-I signal pathway
To investigate novel mechanisms regulating RIG-I pathway, we screened a siRNA library targeting all the known methyltransferases and demethylases for genes regulating the activation of RIG-I signaling pathway. The library was designed in the lab and synthesized by the company, which contains all known and predicted protein methyltransferases and demethylases, as well as their related genes. WDR82 and TTLL12 were identified from the screen and reported as repressors of the pathway [54,55]. LSD1/KDM1A, a demethylase of histone H3K4 and H3K9, was also identified from the screen. To confirm the discovery, two independent siRNAs were used to knock down LSD1 in HEK293T cells, and quantitative RT-PCR result indicated that the mRNA levels of IFN-β and two IFN-induced genes (ISG54 and ISG56) PLOS PATHOGENS LSD1 promotes RIG-I poly-ubiquitination induced by SeV decreased after LSD1 depletion (Fig 1A-1C). Similarly, knockdown of LSD1 impaired poly(I:C)-induced expression of IFNB1, ISG54 and ISG56 in HEK293T cells (Fig 1B  and 1C). To further confirm the role of LSD1 in the innate immune response to RNA viruses, a HEK293T cell line with stable-expressed HA-LSD1 was constructed ( Fig 1D). Consistently, exogenous expression of LSD1 enhanced SeV-induced expression of IFNB1, ISG54 and ISG56 in cells (Fig 1E). Similar results were observed in cells induced by poly(I:C) treatment ( Fig 1F). These data together demonstrated that LSD1 is involved in regulation of IFNB1 and ISGs expression.

LSD1 impairs virus replication in cultured cells
To investigate whether LSD1 affects virus replication in cells, we used an engineered VSV virus with GFP integration in the genome. HEK293T cells were transfected with LSD1 siRNAs and infected with VSV-GFP. The depletion of LSD1 significantly increased the amount of green fluorescence, which represented VSV-GFP in cells (Fig 2A). Western blotting was performed to

PLOS PATHOGENS
LSD1 promotes RIG-I poly-ubiquitination verify GFP expression (Fig 2B and 2C). The viral titers of VSV were measured with plaque assay which also showed that the virus amount was higher in LSD1-depleted cells (Fig 2D). Consistently, exogenous expression of LSD1 significantly decreased the amount of VSV-GFP fluorescence and GFP protein (Fig 2E and 2F), as well as the viral titers ( Fig 2G). Experiments in A549 cells showed that LSD1 also regulates IFNB1 expression in A549 cells (S1A-S1C Fig). These data indicated that LSD1 represses the replication of RNA viruses in cells.

LSD1 interacts with RIG-I
To figure out the mechanisms of LSD1 in regulating RIG-I signal pathway, we first analyzed the activation of TBK1 and IRF3, two critical factors of RIG-I pathway, by measuring their phosphorylation with western blot. LSD1 depletion decreased the poly(I:C)-induced TBK1 and IRF3 phosphorylation in HEK293T cells (Figs 3A and S1D). Consistently, the poly(I:C)induced TBK1 and IRF3 phosphorylation were higher when LSD1 was over expressed (Figs 3B and S1E). These suggest LSD1 is involved in TBK1 and IRF3 phosphorylation upon pathway activation and perhaps at the upstream of TBK1.
Then an immunoprecipitation survey was carried out to identify the proteins associated with LSD1 in RIG-I pathway. The results indicated that LSD1 specifically interacts with RIG-I ( Fig 3C). The interaction between endogenous LSD1 and RIG-I was successfully detected with or without SeV treatment ( Fig 3D). The interaction between exogenous expressed LSD1 and VISA was also detected, but not that between endogenous proteins. So, we think probably LSD1 only interacts with RIG-I, but not with VISA at the endogenous level. To characterize the domains responsible for the interaction, we made a series of RIG-I truncations ( Fig 3E). The data of immunoprecipitation assays indicated that LSD1 interacted both CARD and dCARD fragments and full-length RIG-I, among which CARD fragment was the strongest (Fig 3F). Four LSD1 truncations were then constructed, and the co-immunoprecipitation results suggested LSD1 interacts with RIG-I independent of its SWIRM domain (Fig 3G and  3H). Collectively, these data indicate that LSD1 interacts with multiple domains of RIG-I.

LSD1 enhances K63-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I
RIG-I is a key molecule to initiate the cascade of RIG-I signaling pathway, and its K63-linked polyubiquitination is required for MAVS/VISA recruitment and downstream events. Modifications on RIG-I by different forms of polyubiquitination chains emerged as critical for the pathway activation [15,[56][57][58][59][60]. We investigated the impact of LSD1 on RIG-I polyubiquitination by different ubiquitin chains. HA-LSD1, Flag-RIG-I, and Myc-ubiquitin (Ub) were coexpressed in cells, and in vivo ubiquitination assay was performed with anti-Flag IP and anti-Myc western blotting. The result indicated that exogenous expressed LSD1 promotes RIG-I polyubiquitination dramatically (Fig 4A). Further characterization indicated that LSD1 promotes the K63-linked polyubiquitination chain on RIG-I, but not the K48-linked (Fig 4B). To investigate whether LSD1 regulates MDA5, we used EMCV, one virus known to activate signaling through MDA5, to treat cells and LSD1 knockdown did not cause difference in IFNB1 expression (S2A Fig). Further studies showed that although over-expressed LSD1 interacted with MDA5, it could not enhance MDA5 ubiquitination (S2B-S2D Fig). These indicated that LSD1 specifically functions on RIG-I, but not MDA5. A gradual increasing dose of HA-LSD1 was expressed in cells, and the result indicated the level of RIG-I K63-linked polyubiquitination increased along with LSD1 expression (Fig 4C). We then investigated whether LSD1 regulates the interaction between RIG-I and VISA interaction. HA-LSD1, HA-VISA and Flag-RIG-I plasmids were co-transfected in cells and co-immunoprecipitation was performed. The result showed that LSD1 promoted RIG-I and VISA interaction (Fig 4D).

LSD1 promotes RIG-I poly-ubiquitination
To map the residues of RIG-I whose polyubiquitination are regulated by LSD1, we first determined the domains regulated by LSD1. Two truncations of RIG-I, Flag-CARD or Flag-dCARD, were co-expressed with HA-LSD1 and Myc-Ub in cells, respectively. The result of   (Fig 4G). We further examined the functions of LSD1 truncations, and found that LSD1-C and -E fragments could up-regulate IFNB1 expression and repress VSV, but not LSD1-A, which was consistent with their ability in regulating RIG-I ubiquitination (S4A-S4C Fig). Taken together, our results proved that LSD1 promotes the activation of RIG-I signaling pathway through facilitating RIG-I K63-linked polyubiquitination and VISA/MAVS recruitment. These data suggest that exogenous expressed LSD1 is capable of promoted ubiquitination of multiple residues, and binding and ubiquitination of RIG-I by LSD1 seem to be two separate events.

RIG-I polyubiquitination regulated by LSD1 is not dependent on demethylation
LSD1 is reported to demethylate mono-/di-methylation of histone H3K4 and H3K9, as well as non-histone proteins [40,62]. To determine whether the demethylase activity is required for LSD1 in regulating RIG-I polyubiquitination, an enzymatic dead K661A mutant of LSD1 is constructed [63,64]. Co-immunoprecipitation of HA-LSD1 and Flag-RIG-I showed no difference between LSD1 wild type (WT) and mutant (Fig 5A). Ubiquitination assay indicated K661A was able to increase RIG-I polyubiquitination, similar to LSD1 WT (Fig 5B). Overexpression of WT or K661A LSD1 in HEK293T cells both enhanced SeV-or poly(I:C)-induced transcription of IFNB1, ISG54 and ISG56 (Figs 5C, S5A and S5B), and no significant difference was detected between WT and K661A mutant. For further validation, LSD1 and K661A mutant were expressed in LSD1 knockdown cells, and quantitative RT-PCR results indicated both WT and mutant LSD1 rescued the phenotype caused by LSD1 knockdown (S5C Fig). Both WT and mutated LSD1 suppressed viral replication as well (S5D Fig). However, K661A mutant showed weaker inhibitory effect than WT (S5D Fig). As recently reported, LSD1 restricts RNA virus infection by erasing IFITM3-K88 monomethylation, which is an IFNinduced antiviral protein disrupting the entry of viruses to host cells [40,50]. These data indicated LSD1 represses virus replication through multiple pathways, and LSD1 functions on RIG-I polyubiquitination independent of its demethylase activity. HA-LSD1 for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis with the indicated antibodies. (D) HEK293T were transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis. (E) HEK293T cells were transfected with Myc-K63O-Ub (ubiquitin with all lysine mutated to arginine except K63) and Flag-RIG-I or its truncations together with a control or HA-LSD1 expression plasmid for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis as indicated. The relative amount of ubiquitinated RIG-I was quantified with ImageJ software and labelled under the corresponding bands. L.E. means long exposure, and S.E. for short exposure. (F) HEK293T cells were transfected with Myc-K63O-Ub and Flag-RIG-I or its mutants together with control or HA-LSD1 for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting as indicated. 5KR refers to K849R, K851R, K888R, K907R and K909R; 3KR for K154R, K164R and K172R; 8KR for all the above 8 sites. The relative amount of ubiquitinated RIG-I was quantified with ImageJ software and labelled under the corresponding bands. (G) HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-RIG-I and Myc-K63O-Ub together with control or HA-LSD1 truncations for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis as indicated. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009918.g004

LSD1 promotes the interaction between RIG-I and specific E3 ligases
E3 ubiquitin ligases TRIM4, TRIM25 and RNF135 are reported involved in RIG-I K63-linked polyubiquitination under RNA virus invasion [25,[30][31][32][33]61]. TRIM4 targets K154, K164 and K172 of RIG-I, K172 for TRIM25, and K849, K851, K888, K907 and K909 for RNF135. Based on these discoveries, we speculated that LSD1 might regulate the interaction between RIG-I and ubiquitin K63-linked E3 ligases. Flag-LSD1 and HA-E3 ligases were co-expressed in cells respectively, and co-immunoprecipitation assay indicated exogenous expressed LSD1 interacts with all the three E3 ligases (Fig 5D). Co-immunoprecipitation assays suggested all of LSD1 truncations interacted with three E3 ligases except its SWIRM domain (S6A Fig). The coimmunoprecipitation of LSD1 and E3 truncations showed LSD1 probably interacted with E3 ligases through their C-terminals but not RING domain (S6B and S6C Fig). Then, we studied the interaction between RIG-I and TRIM4, TRIM25 or RNF135 with or without LSD1 exogenous expression. The results showed that when co-expressed with LSD1, RIG-I pulled down more TRIM4, TRIM25 and RNF135 (Fig 5E). It is consistent with the result about polyubiquitinated residue survey (Fig 4F). When exogenous expressed, LSD1 showed a pan effect of RIG-I polyubiquitination enhancement, as a result all the 8 lysine polyubiquitination could be promoted by LSD1. Moreover, all the three E3 ligases did not affect the interaction of RIG-I and LSD1 (S6D Fig), which indicates LSD1 interacts with RIG-I without E3 ligases.
It is quite surprising that LSD1 regulates the interaction between RIG-I and all three E3s. Thus, we investigated the interaction of RIG-I with three E3s in absence of endogenous LSD1. The result indicated when LSD1 was knocked down, RIG-I recruited much less TRIM25, whereas TRIM4 and RNF135 were not affected (Figs 5F and S7A), suggesting that at the endogenous protein level, LSD1 mainly promotes the interaction between RIG-I and TRIM25. TRIM25 mainly catalyzes poly-ubiquitination on lysine 172 on RIG-I [25]. To confirm the above result, we generated LSD1 knockdown HEK293 cell line with CRISPR technique, and examined the poly-ubiquitination level in the absence of LSD1. The results showed that LSD1 deficiency impaired poly-ubiquitination of RIG-I wild type and most of the tested mutants, but not K172R, which further supported that LSD1 mainly regulates LSD1 through TRIM25 and K172 ubiquitination in vivo (Figs 5G and S7B). We then utilized a TRIM25 knockout cell line and found that RIG-I poly ubiquitination promoted by LSD1 was impaired in the absence of TRIM25 (S7C Fig); and LSD1 expression could enhance RIG-I polyubiquitination catalyzed by low amount of TRIM25 (S7D Fig). We then expressed TRIM25 or RNF135 in wild type or

Fig 5. LSD1 enhances the interaction between RIG-I and E3 ligases. (A)
Flag-RIG-I plasmids and HA-LSD1 or K661A mutant were expressed in HEK293T for 24h. Lysates were co-immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted analysis with indicated Abs. (B) HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-RIG-I and Myc-K63O-Ub together with a control or HA-LSD1 or K661A mutant expression plasmid for 24 h, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis with the indicated Abs. (C) Control 293T, LSD1-293T and K661A-293T cells were infected with SeV for 12 hr (left) or transfected with poly(I:C) for 10h (right). The relative mRNA levels of IFNB1 were detected by RT-qPCR. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-tagged LSD1 and three HA-tagged E3 ligases respectively for 24 hr, followed by co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis with indicated Abs. (E) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids for 24 hr, followed by co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analysis. (F) HEK293T cells were lipo-transfected with siNC or LSD1 siRNA. After 12 hr, HEK293T cells were transfected with indicated plasmids for 24 hr, and interactions between RIG-I and E3 ligases were examined by co-immunoprecipitation. The relative amount of LSD1 was quantified with ImageJ software and labelled under the corresponding bands. � means nonspecific bands. (G) Myc-Ub-K63O (ubiquitin with all lysine mutated to arginine except K63) and Flag wild type and indicated mutants were co-expressed in HEK293 wild type or LSD1 knockdown cells. Ubiquitination assay was then performed. 5KR refers to K849R, K851R, K888R, K907R and K909R. (H) Wide-type and LSD1-KD HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-RIG-I and Myc-K63O-Ub together with control plasmid or HA-TRIM25, HA-RNF135 for 24 hr, followed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting as indicated. (I&J) Wide-type and TRIM25 KO cells were transfected with negative control siRNA (siNC) or LSD1 siRNAs 1#. Cells were transfected with indicated plasmids for 24h, and infected with SeV for 10 hr before immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting (I); or cells were treated with SeV for 12 hr, IFNB1 relative mRNA level of were detected by RT-qPCR (J). Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. Student's t test was used for statistical calculation. ns, no significance. � P < 0.05, �� P < 0.01, and ��� P < 0.001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009918.g005

PLOS PATHOGENS
LSD1 promotes RIG-I poly-ubiquitination LSD1 knockdown cells, and found that the ability of TRIM25 to ubiquitinate RIG-I was greatly impaired without LSD1, but RNF135 did not change obviously (Fig 5H). We further knocked down LSD1 in TRIM25 knockout cells, and found that LSD1 deficiency decreased RIG-I polyubiquitination and IFNB1 expression in wild type cells, but not in TRIM25 knockout cells ( Fig  5I and 5J). Co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that interaction between LSD1 and RIG-I was not dependent on TRIM25 or RIG-I ubiquitination (S8A-S8C Fig). These data together demonstrated LSD1 promoted RIG-I K63-linked polyubiquitination through enhancing the interaction of RIG-I and ubiquitin E3 ligase TRIM25, probably not TRIM4 or RNF135.

Lsd1 deficiency inhibits RNA virus-triggered RIG-I signaling in vivo
We next investigated the role of Lsd1 in antiviral response in vivo. We generated Lsd1 conditional knockout mice by crossing Lsd1 f/+ with lyz2-cre mice. We isolated lung fibroblasts (MLFs), bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from the above mouse model and infected with VSV and SeV, respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR experiments indicated that Lsd1 deficiency impaired virus-induced transcription of Ifnb1, Isg56, Il-6 and Cxcl10 genes in MLFs, BMDMs and BMDCs (Figs 6A and 6B; S9A-S9D). Consistently, Lsd1 deficiency inhibited the phosphorylation of Tbk1and Irf3 induced by SeV infection in MLFs, BMDCs and BMDMs (Figs 6C, S9E and S9F). Collectively, these data suggest that LSD1 is required for the proper activation of RNA virus-stimulated RIG-I signaling pathway in primary murine cells.
To further explore the roles of LSD1 in host defense against viral infection in vivo, we used VSV to infect Lsd1 f/+ with and without Lyz2-cre mice by tail-intravenous injection. Quantitative RT-PCR results indicated VSV-induced transcription of Ifnb1, Isg54, Il-6 and Cxcl10 in blood were impaired in Lsd1 f/+ Lyz2-cre mice compared to the control mice. Similar results were obtained in mice liver, lung and spleen (Figs 6D, S10A-S10C). Moreover, viral titer and number of genomic copies of VSV in the lung and spleen were much higher in Lsd1 f/+ Lyz2-cre mice than those in the control group (Fig 6E and 6F). Meanwhile, pathological analysis revealed that VSV infection resulted in increased alveolar wall thickening, and severe edema in the lungs of Lsd1 f/+ Lys2-cre mice compared with Lsd1 f/+ mice (Fig 6G). Lsd1 deficient mice also had much lower survival rate upon VSV challenge ( Fig 6H). Together, these results suggest that LSD1 is required for RIG-I signaling and host defense against RNA virus in vivo.

Discussion
In the current study, we reveal a novel role of LSD1 in regulating antiviral RIG-I signaling. LSD1 promotes the activation of RIG-I pathway and represses the replication of RNA virus in vivo and in vitro. It interacts with RIG-I and enhances K63-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I to promote signal transduction. Shan et al. reported LSD1 restricts RNA virus invasion by erasing IFITM3-K88 monomethylation [40]. Our study demonstrates that LSD1 not only regulates one of the antiviral products, but also acts as a critical positive regulator of RIG-I signaling pathway, which actually affects the expression of much more anti-viral genes. Thus, our study illustrates it as one of the important players in innate immunity.
Many literatures have shown that LSD1 exerts its roles through its demethylase activity. Our study proved that LSD1 promotes RIG-I polyubiquitination through facilitating the interaction between RIG-I and TRIM25. Both wild type and mutant LSD1 were able to inhibit virus replication compared to control samples. Based on our results, we speculate it is possible that the interaction between LSD1 and RIG-I changes RIG-I conformation and then facilitates the recognition by ubiquitin E3 ligases. Recently, several studies have also showed that LSD1 functions independent of its enzyme activity [65]. These studies together expand the functions of LSD1 beyond a demethylase.
LSD1 was generally considered as a protein functioning in nuclei; however, our immunestaining assays showed that it was also localized both in nuclei and cytoplasm in some cells. Then it is possible for it to interact with RIG-I, which is localized in cytoplasm. Then it is interesting what the regulatory mechanism is to control LSD1 localization, which is critical for its cellular functions.
Our data showed exogenous expression of LSD1 enhanced TRIM4, TRIM25 and RNF135-linked RIG-I polyubiquitination. However, LSD1 depletion mainly impaired the interaction between RIG-I and TRIM25, but not TRIM4 or RNF135. The results observed with exogenous expressed LSD1 were probably some artifacts caused by gene over expression. Interestingly, we found that LSD1 interacts with RIG-I without virus treatment, and it promoted RIG-I poly-ubiquitination but did not activate IFNB1 expression without virus. These indicated that RIG-I polyubiquitination activated by LSD1 alone is not sufficient to activate the pathway, and some other factors are required, which should be investigated in the future studies. Taken together, our results indicate that LSD1 regulates RIG-I signaling mainly via recruiting TRIM25 and promoting K172-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I. Of course, we cannot exclude the possibility that LSD1 may function through other E3 ligases during certain circumstance.
To sum up, our study demonstrates LSD1 as a positive regulator of RIG-I signaling through promoting RIG-I K63 polyubiquitination and the interaction between RIG-I and TRIM25. Considering the abnormal activation of immune response is connected with many diseases, such as COVID-19, our study may provide important theoretical information for developing novel clinical strategies. left un-infected or infected with SeV for the indicated times, followed by immunoblotting analysis with indicated Abs. (D) 8-week-old Lyz2-Lsd1 fl/+ and Lyz2 + Lsd1 fl/+ mice were tail-intravenous injected with VSV at 10^8 PFU per mouse (n = 5 for each genotype group) for 12h. Total RNA from mice liver, lung and spleen were extracted and the relative mRNA level of Ifnb1 were detected by RT-qPCR. (E&F) VSV genome RNA (E) and VSV titers(F) of tissues from infected mice in (A-C) were tested with qPCR and PFU analysis, respectively. (G) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of lung sections from mice in (A). Scale bars, 100 μm (for 10×) and 50 μm (for 20×). (H) Lsd1 fl/+ Lyz2-cre-and Lsd1 fl/+ Lyz2-cre+ mice were intraperitoneal injected with VSV at 10^8 PFU per mouse (n = 10 for each genotype group). The survival rates of mice were recorded. Data are means ± SEM and are representative of three biological replicates. Student's t test was used for statistical calculation. ns, no significance. � P < 0.05, �� P < 0.01, and ��� P < 0.001.