Interferon inducible GBPs restrict Burkholderia thailandensis motility induced cell-cell fusion

Innate immunity responds to pathogens by producing alarm signals and activating pathways that make host cells inhospitable for pathogen replication. The intracellular bacterium Burkholderia thailandensis invades the cytosol, hijacks host actin, and induces cell fusion to spread to adjacent cells, forming multinucleated giant cells (MNGCs) which promote bacterial replication. We show that type I interferon (IFN) restricts macrophage MNGC formation during B. thailandensis infection. Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) expressed downstream of type I IFN were required to restrict MNGC formation through inhibition of bacterial Arp2/3-dependent actin motility during infection. GTPase activity and the CAAX prenylation domain were required for GBP2 recruitment to B. thailandensis, which restricted bacterial actin polymerization required for MNGC formation. Consistent with the effects in in vitro macrophages, Gbp2−/−, Gbp5−/−, GbpChr3-KO mice were more susceptible to intranasal infection with B. thailandensis than wildtype mice. Our findings reveal that IFN and GBPs play a critical role in restricting cell-cell fusion and bacteria-induced pathology during infection.

Introduction Interferon (IFN) signaling pathways are critical regulators of host immunity to many viral and bacterial infectious diseases, leading to the expression of a number of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) with antiviral, antibacterial, or pathogenic activities [1,2]. These ISGs include the dynamin-like GTPase myxovirus resistance 1 (Mx1), the IFN-inducible transmembrane (IFITM) proteins, the tripartite-motif family (TRIM) proteins, and the guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) that are highly upregulated in response to IFN signaling and are important for restricting intracellular infections [2][3][4]. While these responses are important for restricting many microbes in a cell-autonomous manner, many pathogens are able to overcome these defenses. Burkholderia thailandensis is an opportunistic intracellular pathogen that induces multinucleated giant cell (MNGC) formation in macrophage cell lines and is utilized as a model organism for the related and highly virulent B. pseudomallei and B. mallei, which are considered potential bioweapons [5][6][7]. Previous studies have also shown that Burkholderia infections are critically controlled by multiple inflammasomes, pyroptotic cell death, and the pyroptosisregulated inflammatory cytokine IL-18 [8][9][10]. Burkholderia infection-induced pathology is also mediated by excessive release of pyroptosis-regulated IL-1β. The balance of the beneficial and harmful consequences of inflammasome activation and how Burkholderia-mediated MNGC formation regulates inflammasome activation has not been well studied.
To drive membrane fusion between cells, B. thailandensis rapidly escapes from the endosomal compartment and hijacks the host Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization machinery to drive fusion with neighboring cells [11]. Many pathogens take advantage of the host machinery to induce membrane fusion, facilitating their intracellular or intercellular spread during infection; therefore, understanding how the host immune response counteracts these processes is critical. Because coordinated actin cytoskeleton remodeling is required for cell-cell fusion in multiple cell types and human GBP1 has been shown to regulate actin polymerization during infection by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and Shigella flexneri [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], we hypothesized that cell-cell fusion during B. thailandensis infection, a process requiring bacteria-mediated actin polymerization, could be restricted by the IFN signaling pathway through expression of GBPs [12,13,18].
In this study we find that GBPs regulated by the type I IFN pathway are required to restrict the formation of MNGCs during B. thailandensis infection. GBPs restrict B. thailandensis intercellular spread through the inhibition of bacterial actin-based motility, which is required for cell fusion. Mechanistically, the inhibitory activity of GBP2 required the GTPase activity and CAAX (C representing cysteine, AA two aliphatic residues, and X any C-terminal amino acid) membrane localization domain. Loss of either GBP2 or GBP5 alone was sufficient to render bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and mice highly susceptible to infection by B. thailandensis. The increased susceptibility of GBP-deficient BMDMs and mice also required the bacterial virulence factor VgrG5, which is required for MNGC fusion. Together, these data show that GBPs are potent cell-autonomous proteins that restrict the motility and spread of intracellular B. thailandensis to neighboring cells by MNGC formation through their ability to regulate actin cytoskeleton dynamics.

Type I IFN restricts MNGC formation during B. thailandensis infection
The role of type I IFNs in the immune response to B. thailandensis infections is poorly characterized. We first determined whether the type I IFN pathway was required to control B. thailandensis infection in unprimed BMDMs. Upon B. thailandensis infection, unprimed BMDMs lacking molecules involved in the expression of type I IFNs (TRIF, IRF3/IRF7), the type I IFN receptors (IFNAR1, IFNAR2), or downstream type I IFN signaling regulators (IRF9 and IRF1) clustered in large areas with tightly packed nuclei (Fig 1A, dashed yellow outline). This dense aggregation of nuclei suggested IFN signaling-deficient BMDMs underwent cell-cell fusion prior to lysis (Fig 1A). BMDMs deficient in MyD88, IRF3, or IRF7 alone, however, did not undergo increased cell-cell fusion (Fig 1A). To confirm and visualize the cell-cell fusion dynamics, we labeled BMDMs with two different cytosolic fluorescent dyes (CellTrace Far Red or CellTrace Violet) and utilized live cell fluorescence microscopy to monitor for cytoplasmic mixing of these dyes, indicating a fusion event. We observed that BMDMs lacking TRIF, IFNAR2, IRF9, and IRF1 underwent increased cell fusion (6-12 h), and this fusion preceded cell lysis and uptake of Sytox Green (12-16 h) (Fig 1B, S4B Fig). We also found that deletion of signaling molecules that act upstream of type I IFN production including multiple TLRs (2,3,4,5), RIPK2, cGAS/STING, or MAVS pathways, did not increase BMDM fusion during infection while control BMDMs lacking MyD88 and TRIF or IFNAR1 extensively fused (S1 Fig). Together these data suggest the critical downstream signaling molecules of type I IFN are important for regulating factors that restrict MNGC formation during B. thailandensis infection.

IFN-inducible GBPs are required to restrict B. thailandensis cell-cell fusion
To determine which ISGs confer resistance against cell fusion in macrophages, we performed microarray analysis on wildtype and Ifnar1 −/− BMDMs infected with B. thailandensis. Expression of multiple GBPs was decreased in Ifnar1 −/− macrophages compared with wildtype cells (Fig 2A). Consistent with the microarray, protein levels of GBP2 and GBP5 were reduced in the Ifnar1 −/− , Irf9 −/− , Irf1 −/− , Trif −/− , and Irf3 −/− Irf7 −/− macrophages that undergo extensive cell-cell fusion during infection but not in Myd88 −/− (Fig 2B). To determine whether GBPs were involved in limiting cell fusion during B. thailandensis infection, we used live cell fluorescence microscopy and found that Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs (lacking GBP2, GBP2b (GBP1), GBP3, GBP5, and GBP7) underwent increased cell fusion compared with wildtype BMDMs (Fig 2C,  S1 and S2 Videos). We further quantified the fusion in Gbp2 −/− , Gbp5 −/− , and Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs and found that all GBP-deficient BMDMs formed significantly more multinucleated cells than wildtype BMDMs did (Fig 2D). To determine whether intracellular bacterial numbers were similar between wildtype and Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs prior to cell fusion or at the start of observable MNGC formation, we quantified viable intracellular bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) at 2 or 6 h post-infection, respectively, and observed no differences compared to wildtype cells (Fig 2E). Because MNGC formation allows for an increase in the number of infected cells, we measured intracellular bacterial numbers at 12 h post-infection and observed that the increased cell fusion in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs led to an increase in intracellular bacterial replication (Fig 2E). We tested whether IRGB10, another ISG important for control of intracellular Francisella [19], was important for restricting B. thailandensis MNGC formation

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion and inflammasome activation and found no role for IRGB10 (S2A and S2B Fig). Except for the presence of multinucleated macrophages and mixing of cell cytoplasm, no apparent changes to the cellular ultrastructure were observed in infected Gbp Chr3 -KO macrophages (S3 Fig). Because previous studies have shown GBPs are required for inflammasome-mediated clearance of intracellular bacteria such as F. novicida, we also investigated whether GBPs were required for inflammasome activation during B. thailandensis infection by measuring caspase-1 cleavage in unprimed BMDMs over time [20,21]. We found that caspase-1 activation was in fact increased in Gbp Chr3 -KO compared with wildtype BMDMs at multiple time-points following infection, suggesting GBPs are not necessary for B. thailandensis inflammasome activation in unprimed BMDMs (Fig 2F). Increased cell-cell fusion and caspase-1 activation led to an increase in the cell death, as measured by BMDM uptake of Sytox Green during the course of infection in GBP and IFN signaling knockouts (S4A and S4B Fig). Together, these findings suggest that the increase in caspase-1 cleavage is a consequence of the increased cell-cell fusion that permits prolonged B. thailandensis intracellular replication in MNGCs. Priming of GBPdeficient BMDMs with IFNβ and IFNγ did not protect from B. thailandensis-induced cell-cell fusion or cell death, but IFNγ protected Ifnar1 −/− BMDMs (S4C-S4E Fig). Overall, these results demonstrate that GBPs are required for restricting B. thailandensis-induced cell fusion and intercellular spread.

GBPs inhibit Arp2/3-dependent actin motility required for MNGC formation
The precise host-pathogen mechanisms for MNGC formation during B. thailandensis infection are not completely understood, although the B. pseudomallei group (consisting of B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, and B. thailandensis) virulence protein BimA is known to hijack the host Arp2/3 actin polymerization machinery to polymerize F-actin and facilitate bacterial cell-cell spreading [11,[22][23][24]. In cooperation with F-actin polymerization, the bacterial factor VgrG5 is also required for B. thailandensis MNGC formation [6,7]. Specifically, the C-terminal domain (CTD) of VgrG5 is required to induce cell fusion [6,7]. To determine whether VgrG5 or host actin remodeling are necessary for the increased fusion in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs, or whether loss of GBPs alone is sufficient to increase fusion, we infected wildtype and Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs with B. thailandensis or B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD for 2 h, followed by treatment with the Arp2/3-specific inhibitor CK-666 [25]. Inhibition of Arp2/3 (CK-666 treatment) restricted increased cell fusion in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs, highlighting the critical role of Arp2/ 3-mediated actin polymerization in MNGC formation (Fig 3A). To dissect whether loss of GBPs alone may render BMDMs more likely to fuse in the absence of the B. thailandensis VgrG5 activity, we infected BMDMs and observed no increase in MNGC formation in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs (Fig 3B). Inhibition of Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization also limited the increased cell-cell fusion mediated increase in cell death in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs ( Fig  3C). Because we observed a role for both host cell Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization and the bacterial effector VgrG5, we examined bacteria-mediated actin tail formation during infection with B. thailandensis or B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD. Infected wildtype BMDMs contained significantly fewer bacteria with characteristic F-actin tails compared with Gbp Chr3 -KO

GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion
BMDMs, suggesting that GBPs inhibit bacterial F-actin polymerization (Fig 3D and 3G, yellow arrow). Furthermore, inhibition of Arp2/3 (CK-666) prevents cell fusion and F-actin tail formation in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs, confirming the critical role of Arp2/3-mediated F-actin tail formation in MNGC formation (Fig 3D and 3G). Notably, the CTD of VgrG5 is required for cell fusion but not actin tail formation [6,7], confirming that both actin remodeling and VgrG5 activity are required to drive cell fusion during infection with B. thailandensis in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs (Fig 3E and 3G). We also showed that actin polymerization and membrane protrusion by B. thailandensis is restricted in wildtype but not Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs using super-resolution microscopy (Fig 3F). Consistent with previous studies showing the involvement of actin polymerization in mediating fusion between cells [11,16,18], our data suggest that during B. thailandensis infection, GBPs restrict cell fusion via inhibition of Arp2/ 3-mediated actin remodeling.

GBP2 activity requires GTPase and CAAX domains to restrict B. thailandensis
Human GBP1 inhibits actin polymerization in an oligomerization-and GTPase activitydependent manner [14,26]. Further, human GBP1 was shown to localize to intracellular S. flexneri and restrict bacteria-mediated actin polymerization dependent upon its GTPase activity and prenylation domain [15,17,27]. A triple-arginine motif upstream of the CAAX domain of human GBP1 was required to inhibit actin tail formation in Shigella infected cells [15]. Unlike human GBP1, however, murine GBP1, GBP2, and GBP5 lack this triple-arginine motif (S5 Fig, red box) and murine GBP2 and GBP5 are both required to restrict B. thailandensisinduced cell fusion (Fig 2). Because of these differences between murine and human GBPs, we examined whether two other functional domains in the GBP proteins were required for recruitment to B. thailandensis and actin regulation. The Ras and Rho family GTPases contain GTPase and CAAX domains which regulate their localization and function, with accessory proteins further regulating their activity and ability to remodel the actin cytoskeleton [28,29]. The IFN-inducible GTPases that possess a C-terminal CAAX domain (GBP1 (GBP2b), GBP2, GBP5) have high homology with the Ras and Rho family GTPases (S5 Fig), suggesting a conserved function in regulating their localization and the actin cytoskeleton. To mechanistically determine how murine GBPs restrict bacteria-mediated actin remodeling, we examined whether murine GBP2 localizes to B. thailandensis and inhibits the polymerization of F-actin in fibroblasts transduced to express mCherry-tagged GBP2, GBP2 K51A (a GTPase activity-deficient mutant), or GBP2 ΔCAAX (required for prenylation and membrane localization). We observed that both the CAAX domain, required for prenylation, and the GTPase activity of GBP2 were required for localization to B. thailandensis (Fig 4A and 4B). Recruitment of GBP2 to bacteria restricted the formation of actin tails required for intracellular motility and fusion with neighboring cells (Fig 4C). To confirm that the reduction of actin tail formation restricted cell-cell fusion, each of the stably transduced fibroblasts expressing vector control, GBP2,

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion GBP2 ΔCAAX , or GBP2 K51A were stained with CellTrace Far Red or CellTrace Violet, seeded, and infected with B. thailandensis. After 24 h of infection, we observed that fibroblasts overexpressing GBP2 but not empty vector, GBP2 ΔCAAX , or GBP2 K51A were able to restrict bacteriainduced fusion (Fig 4D and 4E). Together, these data show that GBP2 localized to bacteria restricts bacterial actin-based motility dependent upon its GTPase activity and C-terminal CAAX prenylation domain, ultimately restricting bacteria-mediated cell-cell fusion.

GBPs are required to control B. thailandensis lung infection
Given our findings that GBPs inhibit actin polymerization-dependent MNGC fusion in vitro, we hypothesized that loss of GBPs and increased cell-cell fusion would render mice highly susceptible to B. thailandensis. Consistent with our hypothesis, intranasal infection of mice with B. thailandensis revealed that Gbp2 −/− , Gbp5 −/− , and Gbp Chr3 -KO mice were highly susceptible to infection (Fig 5A-5C). Furthermore, GBP-deficient mice harbored increased numbers of bacteria in the lungs and spleen (Fig 5D and 5E) and exhibited an increase in inflammatory pathology characterized by conspicuous multifocal lesions, increased interstitial inflammation, and edema (Fig 5F and 5G). These findings are consistent with our observation that inflammasome activation is increased during B. thailandensis infection of BMDMs, likely as a consequence of increased cell-cell spread and bacterial replication (Fig 2F) and previous studies showing that lethal pathology is driven by excessive IL-1β production during B. pseudomallei respiratory infection [8]. Because B. thailandensis induces inflammasome activation in BMDMs independent of GBPs (Fig 2F), we hypothesized that the larger infected cell mass following MNGC formation would lead to increased activation of the inflammasome and allow for greater replication of B. thailandensis. To further confirm whether bacterial VgrG5 was required to drive the increased fusion observed in Gbp2 −/− and Gbp5 −/− macrophages (Fig  2D), we infected BMDMs with wildtype B. thailandensis or B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD, a mutant of VgrG5 that is unable to induce cell-cell fusion [6,7]. Consistent with our previous results, we found that the VgrG5 CTD was required for the increased MNGC formation and inflammasome activation observed in GBP-deficient BMDMs (Fig 6A and 6B). To determine whether GBPs restrict bacterial replication through restriction of cell fusion, we infected wildtype or Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs with wildtype or the fusion-defective B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD and quantified intracellular bacteria after invasion (2 h), at the start of cell fusion (6 h), or after the initiation of fusion (12 h). We find similar numbers of intracellular bacteria after entry (2 h) and at the start of cell fusion (6 h) and VgrG5 CTD-dependent increases in bacterial replication in GBP-deficient macrophages (12 h) (Fig 6C). Infection of wildtype and Gbp Chr3 -KO mice with wildtype or fusion-defective B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD further substantiated our hypothesis that increased cell-cell fusion, bacterial replication, and VgrG5-induced pathology contribute to the susceptibility of GBP-deficient mice (Fig 6D). Histological analysis of infection in wildtype and Gbp2 −/− mice with wildtype B. thailandensis or B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD (5 x 10 3 ) showed that the increased pathology and bacterial replication  in (d) and (e)) or B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD (stained with DAPI, indicated by white arrows) were quantified from at least three fields per condition normalized to total bacterial counts. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with the Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons test, ���� P < 0.00001, ��� P < 0.0001 (c, g). Images and quantification are representative of (a,b,c) at least three independent repeats, (d,e,f) one representative of three experiments, or (g) quantified from at least three fields from one independent experiment. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008364.g003

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion observed in Gbp2 −/− mice requires the VgrG5 CTD (Fig 6E and 6F, S6A and S6B Fig). Infection with a 200-fold higher dose (1 x 10 6 ) was largely similar in terms of survival, although Gbp Chr3 -KO mice were slightly more susceptible to infection by B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD than Gbp2 −/− and Gbp5 −/− mice, suggesting that at this high dose GBPs may play a small role outside of their function to restrict cell-cell fusion-induced pathology (S6 Fig). Overall, our results suggest that GBPs are required to restrict B. thailandensis cell fusion-mediated pathogenesis in vivo.

Discussion
In this study, we showed that GBPs are essential for controlling B. thailandensis infection and that they act by restricting bacterial actin-based motility and fusion with neighboring cells, a unique strategy utilized by Burkholderia spp. (S7 Fig) [11,30]. Both the GTPase activity and CAAX prenylation domain of GBP2 were required for recruitment to B. thailandensis. Actin polymerization was restricted on bacteria coated with GBP2, suggesting GBPs directly or indirectly inhibit bacteria-mediated actin polymerization in infected cells. Mice lacking GBP2, GBP5, or multiple GBPs on chromosome 3 (GBP2, GBP2b (GBP1), GBP3, GBP5, GBP7) were significantly more susceptible to infection, revealing a critical role for these proteins in restricting bacterial infection. This susceptibility is in contrast to previous work showing that wildtype and Gbp Chr3 -KO mice were similar in their control of bacterial burden following intraperitoneal B. thailandensis infection, possibly due to the use of an intraperitoneal infection model [31]. Interestingly, the unique virulence strategy of fusion with neighboring cells used by B. thailandensis, which is shared with other members of the B. pseudomallei group and mediated by the bacterial protein VgrG5, was required to drive pathogenesis in cells and mice lacking these GBP proteins.
Earlier studies with human GBP1 revealed that GBP1 can bind globular actin and inhibit the polymerization of filamentous F-actin fibers [14]. More recently, human GBP1 was shown to inhibit actin dynamics during KSHV and Shigella infection [15,17,26]. The close association of GBP2 with non-motile intracellular B. thailandensis would suggest GBP2 directly, or through recruitment of accessory actin regulators, can limit bacteria-mediated actin polymerization, but the mechanism is still poorly understood. Human GBP1 was also shown to recruit to B. thailandensis, but no role for this association was described [15]. Comparatively less is known about how the murine GBPs function in regulating actin dynamics. The human and murine GBPs containing a CAAX domain (GBP1 (GBP2b), GBP2, GBP5) differ in their activity due to unique evolution with their associated pathogens [32,33]. Indeed, human GBP1 requires a triple-arginine motif for recruitment to S. flexneri and subsequent recruitment of GBP2, GBP3, GBP4, and GBP6, while murine GBPs lack this motif [15]. Pathogen virulence factors also determine the activity of GBPs, with S. flexneri secreting IpaH9.8, a ubiquitin ligase that targets a subset of GBPs for proteasomal degradation while leaving others [15,17,27]. Host specificity of pathogens also regulates the recruitment of GBPs, as C. muridarum fails to become targeted by murine GBP2 while human-adapted C. trachomatis does [33]. These  . (f, g) Combined semi-quantitative histological pathology scores (described in the Methods) and representative images of stained lung sections (n = 3-4) were generated by a trained pathologist (PV). Wildtype mice in (a-c) are the same group and same experiment as knockouts, separated for clarity. Statistical significance was determined by the log-rank test (a-c) or one-way ANOVA (d-f), � P < 0.05, ��� P < 0.001, ���� P < 0.0001. Data are representative of (a-c, f-g) at least three independent experiments or (d-e) pooled from three independent experiments. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008364.g005

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion differences between host and pathogen highlight the importance of using multiple model organisms to study cellular immunity.
During some intracellular infections, GBPs are recruited to pathogen-containing vacuoles, as observed during Toxoplasma, Mycobacterium bovis, and C. trachomatis infection, or directly to bacterial membranes in the case of cytosolic Francisella or Shigella infection [3,20,21,34,35]. Models suggest GBPs can restrict pathogens by exposing bacterial ligands from pathogen-containing vacuoles or directly from cytosolic bacteria for sensing by the inflammasome [19][20][21]36]. Murine GBP2 has been shown to promote caspase-11 and caspase-1 inflammasome activation in response to Gram-negative bacteria and intracellular LPS [36,37]. Far less is known about the role of murine GBP5 in bacterial immunity except for its role in activation of caspase-1 during F. novicida infection [20]. Early studies suggested that GBP5 is important for S. Typhimurium inflammasome activation and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, but follow-up studies using independently generated knockout mice on the C57BL6 background indicate that these original findings should be re-examined [2,36,[38][39][40]. Newer work suggests GBP5 may be important for activation of the inflammasome by bacterial OMVs [41]. Interestingly, GBPs are not required for B. thailandensis inflammasome activation in unprimed BMDMs, suggesting GBPs are not efficient at killing B. thailandensis, similar to previous findings with S. flexneri [15]. Of note, previous work found GBPs were not required for inflammasome activation during B. thailandensis infection in BMDMs using a different method of infection than used in this study [36]. Additionally, B. thailandensis does not target GBPs for proteasome degradation, as observed during S. flexneri infection [17,27]. These findings suggest that B. thailandensis is generally well controlled by cell-autonomous immunity in mammals. While GBPs appear to play a minor role in direct promotion of inflammasome activation, previous studies have established an important role for many inflammasome signaling components and the downstream inflammatory cytokines in both protection and immunopathology during B. thailandensis and B. pseudomallei infections [8][9][10]31,42]. Many pathogens encode bacterial factors that nucleate actin polymerization that is dependent upon the Arp2/3 complex [43]. While B. thailandensis also utilizes the host Arp2/3 actin polymerization machinery, the more virulent species B. pseudomallei and B. mallei mimic Ena/VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) actin nucleation factors for motility in eukaryotic cells, suggesting their relatively increased virulence may be a result of escaping GBP-mediated Arp2/3-dependent actin inhibition [11,[22][23][24]. Unlike in Listeria infection, where overexpression of the Arp2/3-binding domain of Scar1 inhibits motility, B. pseudomallei actin tail formation was not inhibited, suggesting there are unique pathogen-specific mechanisms for hijacking host actin polymerization and different host factors that are required to restrict motility [24]. Functionally, BimA can be swapped between the three B. pseudomallei group species and restore motility; however, BimA from B. pseudomallei and B. mallei generate distinct F-actin tails from that of B. thailandensis due to differences in their BimA protein-protein interaction domains [11,22,23]. Given the diversity between the B. pseudomallei group members, other actin hijacking pathogens likely have an even greater diversity in how they (e,f) Wildtype and Gbp2 −/− mice were inoculated with B. thailandensis (WT or vgrG5ΔCTD, 5 x 10 3 ) and lungs were fixed in formalin, stained with H&E, and scored (described in Methods) by a trained pathologist (PV). Statistical significance was determined by Dunnet's multiple comparison test (c), the log-rank test (d), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test (f), ���� P < 0.0001. Data are representative of (a,b,c) at least three independent experiments, (d) pooled from two independent repeats, or (e,f) a single experiment. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008364.g006

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion manipulate host actin and how the host immune system responds. Further studies on GBPs will help to reveal more about their mechanism of action during infection and how they mechanistically inhibit actin polymerization. As an intracellular bacterium that navigates from the endosomal compartment to the cytosol before driving fusion with neighboring cells, B. thailandensis is a useful model organism for studying how cell-autonomous immunity controls a dynamic pathogen that hijacks multiple eukaryotic cellular systems.

Bacterial Culture
B. thailandensis strain E264 (GFP + ) and B. thailandensis vgrG5ΔCTD (vgrG5 lacking the C-terminal domain required for fusion activity [6]), provided by Dr. Joseph Mougous (University of Washington, Seattle, WA), were cultured in LB broth (3002-031, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) overnight and subcultured into fresh LB media for 3 h at 37˚C to generate log-phase grown bacteria.

Mouse infections
B. thailandensis was grown as described above. For mouse infection experiments, quantified frozen aliquots of B. thailandensis were diluted in PBS before infection to inoculate at 5 x 10 3 bacteria per mouse unless otherwise indicated. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and administered B. thailandensis in a 50 μL PBS suspension via the nares. After two days, lungs and spleens were harvested for histology (tissues fixed in formalin and processed by the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Veterinary Pathology Core) or colony forming unit (CFU) analysis. Histological scoring was performed by a board certified veterinary pathologist (PV) and assigned a semi-quantitative score based on the following severity grades (grade = semi-quantitative score): (0 = 0) within normal limits, (1 = 1/1.5 = 8) minimal: rare or inconspicuous lesions, (2 = 15/2.5 = 25) mild: multifocal or small, focal, or widely separated but conspicuous lesions, (3 = 40/3.5 = 60) moderate: multifocal, prominent lesions, (4 = 80/4.5 = 90) marked: extensive to coalescing lesions or areas of inflammation with some loss of structure, and (5 = 100) severe: diffuse lesion with effacement of normal structure. CFUs were determined by homogenizing tissue in PBS with metal beads for 2 min using the QIAGEN Tissue-Lyser II apparatus and plating on LB agar plates incubated overnight at 37˚C.

Microscopy methods
For live cell imaging experiments to detect cell-cell fusion events, cells were stained with Cell-Trace Violet (C34557, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or CellTrace Far Red (C34564, Thermo Fisher Scientific) following manufacturer's protocol and mixed at a 1:1 ratio prior to seeding 0.8 x 10 6 BMDMs or 1 x 10 5 NIH3T3 cells per chamber of a 4-chamber μ-slide (80426, Ibidi). Chambers were infected as described above, and following the final wash, media containing kanamycin (250 μg/mL) and Sytox Green (25 nM) was added and the chamber slide cover was replaced by a sterile differential interference contrast (DIC)-compatible lid (80055, Ibidi) for live imaging with fluorescence and DIC. Colocalization analysis was performed using the ImarisColoc software (Oxford Instruments, Zurich, Switzerland). For fluorescence microscopy experiments, BMDMs and NIH3T3 cells were fixed in 4% PFA, washed with PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and stained with phalloidin-iFluor555 (ab176756, Abcam), phalloidin-iFluor647 (ab176759, Abcam), and DAPI, and coverslips were mounted in ProLong Diamond with DAPI (P36962, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For confocal images, a Nikon C2 microscope was used; for super-resolution structured illumination microscopy, a Zeiss Elyra PS.1 microscope

PLOS PATHOGENS
GBPs inhibit macrophage cell fusion was used as previously described [19]. Quantitative cell death measurements by Sytox Green uptake counts were collected hourly on an IncuCyte S3 system (Essen BioScience). For transmission electron microscopy images, BMDMs were fixed, processed, and imaged on an FEI Helios NanoLab focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM), with images from a single plane stitched together using the MAPS software package (FEI).

Microarray analysis
BMDMs were infected as described above, and RNA was collected at 3 h post-infection with Trizol (Ambion). Total RNA was submitted to the Hartwell Center core facility, and 200 ng total RNA was processed using the Affymetrix WT Plus protocol for use with the Mouse Clariom S Gene Chip array (902930, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Differential expression was defined by a 0.5-fold (log 2 signal) change between conditions.

Quantification and statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 6.0 software was used for data analysis. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by the Mann-Whitney test for two groups or one-way ANOVA for three or more groups with the Dunn's or Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test. The specific statistical testing for each experiment is indicated in the figure legends. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Amino acid sequences from the C-terminus of Rho, Ras, and GBP family proteins were aligned by CLUS-TAL Omega (EMBL-EMI) and visualized in AliView with the ClustalX color scheme (http:// ormbunkar.se/aliview/). The triple-arginine motif in human Gbp1 is outlined in red to highlight that the other GBPs lack this motif. The carboxyl-terminal CAAX box is highlighted to show conservation between GBPs and the small GTPases, which regulate actin dynamics. This conserved domain is post-translationally modified by prenylation on the conserved cysteine and cleavage of the final three amino acids, allowing these proteins to associate with membranes. Refers to  vgrG5ΔCTD). (a,b) B. thailandensis (5 x 10 3 )-infected mice at day 2 post-infection were used to quantify bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs) in the lungs and spleen by serially diluting and plating. (c) Survival following a high dose infectious challenge with B. thailandensis (1 x 10 6 ) was monitored in the indicated knockout mice. Statistical significance was determined by (a,b) one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test or (c) the log-rank test, n.s. not significant, � P < 0.05, �� P < 0.001, ���� P < 0.00001. Data are representative of a single experiment (a,b) or pooled from two experiments (c). Refers to Fig 6. (TIFF)

S7 Fig. Working model for GBP-mediated inhibition of B. thailandensis actin-mediated cell-cell fusion.
(TIFF) S1 Video. Cell fusion is restricted in wildtype BMDMs during B. thailandensis infection. Video was constructed from confocal images collected every 45 min on a Nikon C2 microscope in Nikon Elements software. Unprimed wildtype BMDMs were stained with CellTrace Far Red or CellTrace Violet and mixed at a 1:1 ratio before seeding on Ibidi coverslips. Sytox Green (25 nM) was added after final washes to stain nuclei of permeabilized cells. Video is representative of three independent fields of view. Video refers to data in Fig 2. (MOV) S2 Video. Cell fusion is increased in Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs during B. thailandensis infection. Video was constructed from confocal images collected every 45 min on a Nikon C2 microscope in Nikon Elements software. Unprimed Gbp Chr3 -KO BMDMs were stained with CellTrace Far Red or CellTrace Violet and mixed at a 1:1 ratio before seeding on Ibidi coverslips. Sytox Green (25 nM) was added after final washes to stain nuclei of permeabilized cells. Video is representative of three independent fields of view. Video refers to data in Fig 2. (MOV)