Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Impact of preexisting digestive problems on the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 infection

  • Xinghuang Liu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xinghuang Liu, Bayasgalan Luvsandagva

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Bayasgalan Luvsandagva ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Xinghuang Liu, Bayasgalan Luvsandagva

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Dongke Wang,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Siran Zhu,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Zhiyue Xu,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Dan Zhou,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Xiaotian Xie,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Wei Qian,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Xiaohua Hou ,

    Roles Validation

    drbaitao@126.com (TB); houxh@hust.edu.cn (XH)

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

  • Tao Bai

    Roles Data curation, Validation

    drbaitao@126.com (TB); houxh@hust.edu.cn (XH)

    Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Abstract

Objective

This study focused on the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the omicron variant infection and the related factors based on digestive health.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on individuals infected with the omicron variant. A structured questionnaire was developed to gather their demographic characteristics, preexisting digestive problems (diseases & symptoms), and clinical manifestations during the infection.

Results

11,484 questionnaires were received from online platforms. 7,929 infected participants were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among them, 4,225 (53.3%) were females, and the mean age was 36.0±8.8 years old. In general, the proportion of GI symptoms in the omicron variant infection was 31.4% (62.6% and 25.0% in participants with pre-existing digestive problems and those without, respectively). The participants with pre-existing digestive problems exhibited more severe clinical manifestations during infection compared to those without. Notably, participants with gastrointestinal symptoms during the infection had more severe clinical manifestations, regardless of basic digestive health. Upper, rather than lower GI symptoms were more closely associated with the severity of the clinical manifestations. NSAIDs may increase the occurrence of GI symptoms in participants with a healthy digestive system but not in those with preexisting digestive problems.

Conclusion

Patients infected with the omicron variant may experience more severe clinical symptoms if they have gastrointestinal issues. Digestive health strongly influences the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms and the severity of clinical manifestations.

Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 was proven to be able to infiltrate the digestive system [1, 2]. A meta-analysis conducted in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic showed that the overall incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms was 17.6% [3]. As the virus mutates, the incidence of GI symptoms could also change, however, the published studies reported various results. Yang, et al found that found that the incidence of diarrhea in Delta (14.58%) was higher than that in the Omicron (3.23%) and Beta (3.36%) [4]. While Menni, et al. reported no significant differences in diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea between delta and omicron variant infections [5]. Whether mutations of the virus enhance its effect on the GI tract or diminish it may remain controversial. Besides, according to numerous published research studies, the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms varies widely in the general population, including diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain, ranging from 18.9% to 51.9% [68]. Therefore, more studies are needed to evaluate the GI symptoms caused by the omicron variant.

To our knowledge, the underlying gastrointestinal diseases were associated with more severe conditions during infection [9]. Maybe, the pre-existing GI problems, including digestive diseases and GI symptoms, may also influence GI symptoms during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Few studies have addressed this influence; therefore, further research is needed to investigate the occurrence of GI symptoms with the omicron variant infection and consider the baseline GI health status.

As for the clinical influence of GI complaints, published studies reported conflicting results. For example, some studies showed that the presence of GI complaints was significantly associated with a longer disease course [1012]. But other studies showed the presence of diarrhea associated with better outcomes [13, 14]. As a result, under the circumstance of the new variant, Omicron, it is valuable to discuss the related factors and the clinical influence of GI complaints.

Therefore, we conducted a large-scale survey to investigate the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in omicron variant infection. We also explored the associated factors and clinical influence of gastrointestinal symptoms based on the basic gastrointestinal health status.

Methods

Participants and design

A cross-sectional study was performed using an online structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent in electronic form to the non-selectively general public in China through WeChat (https://www.wechat.com/en/) from Mar 5st to 23rd, 2023. We included adult participants (age ≥ 18 years) who suffered from the SARS-CoV-2 infection with etiology diagnosis (RT-PCR/antigen test) during the epidemic wave of the omicron variant [15, 16]. Pregnant and lactating women were excluded. This project has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College.

Questionnaire design

General characteristics, including age, sex, height, weight, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, medication use for the infection (especially nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are widely used to reduce fever after infection), and chronic comorbidities were collected. Preexisting digestive illness was evaluated by collecting the previously gastrointestinal diseases (based on the history of previous gastrointestinal diagnosis and/or endoscopic findings) as well as the course and the frequency of the pre-existing GI symptoms, including dysphagia, early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, belching, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal distension/bloating, and other (such as fecal incontinence, rectal pain, and ruminant).

Participants were asked about the existence and severity (mild, moderate, and severe) of the above-mentioned GI symptoms during the infection. Other clinical manifestations, such as the respiratory symptoms, the severity of fever, whether having CT (computerized tomography) confirmed pneumonia, whether they need to take medication and/or to stay in the hospital, and the course of the illness, were collected. We also asked the patients about their COVID-19 vaccination and the COVID-19 infection history.

Preexisting digestive problems and comorbidities

We were planning to investigate the relationship between different types of digestive diseases and post-infection gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. However, due to the small number of participants with each specific digestive disease in our survey population (as indicated in S1 Fig, a total of 300 participants for all digestive diseases), conducting separate analyses for each disease proved to be unfeasible. The participant’s self-reported previous diagnosis and the endoscopic findings provided were referred to assess their organic digestive diseases. Of the 300 participants with preexisting digestive diseases, 289 underwent gastroscopy or colonoscopy, revealing consistent endoscopic findings.

In our study, we defined organic chronic digestive diseases (including Barrett’s esophagus, chronic gastritis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), unhealed peptic ulcer, chronic pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis, history of surgery to alter the structure of the digestive system (except appendectomy) and malignant tumor) as pre-existing digestive diseases. Asymptomatic hepatitis virus carriers, Helicobacter pylori infections and fatty liver are not considered to have pre-existing digestive diseases. Some participants with self-reported functional diseases (such as irritable bowel disease) will be designated as having previous GI symptoms based on their self-reported symptom profile. Preexisting symptoms were defined as frequently reoccurring (more than once per month) GI symptoms for at least three months before the infection.

As for chronic comorbidities, in the questionnaire, we asked participants about their hypertension, diabetes, chronic heart disease, chronic immune diseases, chronic skin diseases, chronic lung diseases, cerebrovascular disease, tumors, etc. Initially, our analysis planned to exclude participants with severe comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD, malignancy, heart failure, systemic lupus erythematosus, and stroke. In the questionnaires received, the number of participants with severe comorbidities was very small (data was not shown) and were excluded in the first step of exclusion (exclusion of participants with an unclear diagnosis of infection). Therefore, in our study, the comorbidities included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hyperuricemia, gout, chronic skin diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism.

Statistical analysis

The continuous variables were described with mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented as numbers and proportions. Comparisons between groups were conducted with the t-test (continuous variables with Normal distribution), Mann-Whitney U test (continuous variables without Normal distribution), or χ2 test (categorical variables) [17].

The propensity score for matching was estimated using a logistic regression model with the study data. The calculated propensity scores were then used for matching the groups using the nearest matching approach within a caliper distance of 0.02 of the standard deviation. The related factors of GI symptoms were estimated using Kendall’s tau-b correlation analysis. The independent factors of GI symptoms were analyzed by the logistic regression model. For all calculations, p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software.

Results

In total, 11,484 participants were submitting the questionnaires. After excluding 3,462 participants without an etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 and 93 pregnant or lactating women, 7,929 records were finally included (Fig 1). Among them, 1,298 participants were considered to have preexisting digestive problems.

General characteristics of the included participants

Among the 7,929 participants, 4,225 (53.3%) were females (Table 1). The mean age was 36.0±8.8 years old. Compared to participants without preexisting digestive problems, those with preexisting digestive problems were older and had a higher rate of smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and NSAID usage. Additionally, they had a higher incidence of prior infections and a greater number of comorbidities. There were no significant differences in terms of body mass index (BMI) or COVID-19 vaccination history.

thumbnail
Table 1. The general characteristics and clinical manifestations of participants based on basic digestive health.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.t001

The GI complaints during the omicron variant infection

In the study, 31.4% of the 7,929 participants reported GI symptoms. The most common GI symptoms were nausea (11.8%), followed by diarrhea (8.1%), vomiting (6.5%) and postprandial fullness (6.3%). More participants with preexisting digestive problems reported GI complaints than those without (62.6% vs 25.0%, p<0.001) (Table 1). The difference remained significant for all kinds of GI symptoms collected, including dysphagia, early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, belching, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal distension/bloating, and other GI complaints. After we eliminated the imbalance of the baseline general characteristics by propensity-score matching, all the above results remained (Table 1).

Besides, the GI symptoms during the omicron variant infection, including early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal distension/bloating, were more severe in participants with preexisting digestive problems (S2 Fig).

Other clinical manifestations during the omicron variant infection

Participants with preexisting digestive problems experienced higher levels of fever and respiratory symptoms, such as dry cough, productive cough, sore throat, nasal congestion/runny nose, and difficulty breathing, compared to those with healthy digestive systems (Table 1 and Fig 2). Additionally, they were more likely to experience a combination of fever, respiratory symptoms, and gastrointestinal symptoms.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Venn diagram of the three different types of symptoms.

RES symptoms donate respiratory symptoms. A Venn diagram consists of three overlapping circles, with each circle representing a kind of symptom (red for fever, green for GI symptoms; & blue for respiratory symptoms). The intersecting regions represent the intersection of those symptoms. And the number in each region represents the number of participants with those symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.g002

Additionally, a higher percentage of participants with preexisting digestive problems developed pneumonia (8.8% vs. 2.6%, p<0.001) and required hospitalization (6.4% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001) compared to those without. They also experienced a longer duration of infection. Even after we addressed the differences in the baseline general characteristics through propensity-score matching, the previously mentioned findings remained consistent (Table 1). We further categorized the participants with preexisting digestive problems into those with only GI diseases and with pre-existing symptoms, those with only preexisting GI symptoms and without GI diseases, and those with both pre-existing diseases and symptoms. All three groups of participants showed more severe clinical manifestations compared to matched control participants (S1 Table).

The GI symptoms during infection were significantly associated with more severe clinical manifestations

There was a significantly higher proportion of females and a significantly lower proportion of smokers in participants with GI symptoms, regardless of the basic GI health status (Table 2). Besides, comorbidities were closely associated with GI symptoms in participants without preexisting digestive problems. Furthermore, the participants with GI symptoms reported significantly higher proportions of all the symptoms collected (respiratory symptoms and fever) compared to those without, except for fever in participants with preexisting digestive problems.

thumbnail
Table 2. Univariate analyses on participants with GI symptoms and those without based on their basic GI health status.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.t002

In terms of severity, a higher percentage of participants with GI symptoms developed pneumonia compared to those without (10.7% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.002 in participants with preexisting digestive problems; 3.9% vs. 2.1%, p<0.001 in participants without preexisting digestive problems). Participants without pre-existing digestive problems showed a significantly higher rate of hospitalization (1.7% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.045) and longer infection duration if they experienced new GI symptoms.

After propensity-score matching on general characteristics, the results changed slightly (S2 Table). The difference in hospitalization rates was no longer significant among participants who did not have preexisting digestive problems.

Correlation between different GI symptoms and other clinical manifestations

The above results found that the presence of GI symptoms was strongly correlated with other symptoms and clinical severity. However, this association may be different for different types of GI symptoms. We, therefore, further analyzed the correlation between the different symptoms and other symptoms and clinical severity (Fig 3). Upper gastrointestinal complaints (dysphagia, early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, and belching), compared to lower gastrointestinal complaints (constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal distension/bloating), were more closely correlated with the incidence of respiratory symptoms and fever, the existing of pneumonia, hospitalization and course of infection, regardless of the GI health status.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Correlation heatmaps between the GI symptoms and other clinical manifestations.

The number showed the correlation coefficients, with the size of the dots matched the absolute value of the coefficients. Only significant correlations were displayed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.g003

The associated factors of GI symptoms

Logistic regression was performed to find the associated factors of GI symptoms in all the participants. It was found that females, alcohol consumption, and comorbidities were associated factors in participants with preexisting digestive problems (Table 3). Interestingly, the smoking habit was significantly negatively associated with GI complaints. As for new-emerging GI symptoms in participants without preexisting digestive problems, the associated factors were the same in participants with preexisting digestive problems, except for the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

thumbnail
Table 3. Binary logistic regression for GI symptoms in the participants with preexisting digestive problems and new GI symptoms in the participants without preexisting digestive problems.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.t003

Discussion

Our large-scale cross-sectional study investigated the GI symptoms and other clinical manifestations in Omicron infection based on the basic GI health status. In this study, we systematically evaluated the proportion of more than ten GI complaints (from upper GI to lower GI) in patients with omicron variant infection. We found that preexisting digestive problems were found to significantly influence the presence of GI symptoms during infection, while the presence of GI symptoms was strongly associated with more severe clinical manifestations.

In our study, the proportion of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the general population at 31.1% (25.0% for participants without preexisting digestive problems) was higher than previous reports (17.6%, 95% CI: 12.3–24.5) for the early COVID-19 epidemic [3]. This may not be an indication that Omicron has a greater impact on the digestive system than previous variants. Because, many earlier studies did not evaluate GI symptoms other than diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain [18]. On the contrary, a previous study reported the most common GI complaints were diarrhea (12.5%, 95%CI: 9.6–16.0), nausea/vomiting (10.2%, 95%CI: 6.6–15.3), and abdominal pain (9.2%, 95%CI: 5.7–14.5) with abdominal pain [3]. Thus, Omicron infection causes a lower proportion of many GI symptoms (diarrhea and abdominal pain) than prior variants. The omicron variant may have a lower impact on the GI tract compared with the early variant, consistent with previous reports suggesting a decreased virulence of the virus [19, 20].

As for the specific GI symptoms, we found the most common symptoms were nausea/vomiting (13.6%) and diarrhea (8.10%), while the incidence rate of abdominal pain was relatively low (2.2%). And the incidence of upper GI symptoms exceeded that of lower GI symptoms. In contrast, in previous studies, the incidence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea) tended to be the highest [3, 18, 21, 22] or comparable with the upper GI complaints (nausea and vomiting) [23, 24]. On the one hand, this suggests that the characteristics of GI symptoms caused by different variants are different, and Omicron is more likely to cause upper GI symptoms. On the other hand, our respondents had a very high rate of NSAIDs use, a class of medicines that can cause upper GI symptoms [25]. Our study also demonstrates that NSAIDs are indeed a risk factor for GI symptoms. Therefore, whether it is because the patients had more severe post-infectious symptoms that led them to choose to take the NSAIDs medication, thus partially contributing to the GI symptoms, needs to be further investigated. Caution needs to be exercised in the use of NSAIDs in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections.

As for the relationship between basic GI health status and the incidence of GI symptoms, as well as the severity of the clinical manifestations, previous studies have shown conflicting results. A meta-analysis found that clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in IBD patients were similar to the general population [26]. Another meta-analysis found that in IBD patients affected by COVID-19, the risk ratio (RR) of adverse outcomes was increased compared to patients without IBD [27]. In our study, preexisting digestive problems were assessed not only by diagnosing various digestive system diseases but also by evaluating the gastrointestinal symptoms of the general public, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of their GI health status.

As for the relationship between GI complaints and the severity of infection, some previous studies were also inconsistent. For example, Menon et al. showed an increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection in the presence of GI symptoms [28]. A meta-analysis found that patients with GI complaints had a higher risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome [29]. However, other studies reported different results. A study reported no difference in the length of hospital stay between patients with GI and non-GI manifestations [30]. Another study suggested that patients with GI manifestations were less likely to develop severe-critical COVID-19 infection and had better outcomes [31]. Our work found the participants with GI symptoms during the infection tended to have a higher rate of high fever, pneumonia, and hospitalization and a longer course of infection The differences may be explained by distinct patient populations and different viral variants. Our study simultaneously examined the relationship between GI complaints and multiple dimensions of disease severity, and the conclusions were all consistent, so the results were relatively stable. This association was also consistent with the trend of basic GI health status and disease severity, suggesting the impact of GI involvement on infection at multiple levels.

Furthermore, in our work, upper GI symptoms were more closely correlated with other symptoms (respiratory symptoms and fever) and severity of infection than lower GI complaints. However, many previous studies have focused on the relationship between lower gastrointestinal complaints (such as diarrhea) and disease severity. Studies showed that diarrhea was strongly associated with severe infection with COVID-19 in the early epidemic [32, 33]. Meanwhile, few studies discussed upper GI complaints (such as vomiting and nausea). Therefore, more attention should be paid to patients’ upper GI complaints of Omicron infection.

We believe that assessing post-infectious gastrointestinal symptoms is clinically important: it can help healthcare professionals to accurately determine the condition of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and identify patients with a poorer prognosis. Prevention of infections is even more important for people with pre-existing GI problems, as they are at risk of experiencing more severe GI injuries after contracting the virus. What’s more, several landmark studies have found that COVID-19 patients, particularly those who experienced reinfection, are at a higher risk of developing digestive diseases, including gastrointestinal tract and liver, gallbladder, and pancreas diseases [3436]. It remains uncertain whether patients presenting with postinfectious gastrointestinal symptoms exhibit a higher propensity for developing these gastrointestinal disorders. Anyway, post-covid care should involve attention to gastrointestinal health and disease.

There are many limitations in our study. Firstly, this was a cross-sectional study. Accordingly, it was impossible to draw a causal relationship between the GI symptoms and the severity of clinical manifestations, as well as the use of NSAIDs. Secondly, although we used propensity matching and multiple logistic regression to reduce selection bias, the selection bias still existed because of the convenience sampling adopted. Thirdly, the nature of the participants’ GI symptoms, such as duration, symptom frequency, and symptom intensity, was not meticulously collected because it was difficult to get participants to fill out lengthy questionnaires. Fourthly, this is only a preliminary study, and many of the details were not explored in depth. We have thought about following up on those participants to explore GI damage after a long COVID-19 infection. However, after following up with a small sample of participants, we eventually gave up due to low compliance. Finally, we started to prepare for the study and apply for ethical review immediately after the epidemic outbreak, but this still led to a lag of more than two months in our study, which may lead to recall bias of the participants.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal symptoms were common in individuals infected with the omicron variant. Patients with gastrointestinal complaints during the omicron variant infection had the potential to experience more severe clinical manifestations. Basic gastrointestinal health status is closely related to the incidence of gastrointestinal complaints and the severity of the clinical manifestations.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Venn diagram of the overlap of preexisting digestive illness and preexisting symptoms among the 1298 participants with preexisting digestive problems.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.s001

(PNG)

S2 Fig. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms for participants with and without preexisting digestive problems.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.s002

(PNG)

S1 Table. Univariate analyses on the three sub-group participants with preexisting digestive problems with the matched control group, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Univariate analyses on participants with new GI symptoms and those without based on their digestive health status after propensity-score matching.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.s004

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Raw questionnaire results with privacy information and some invalid questions that were not included in the analysis were removed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312545.s005

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Thank you to every participant who was willing to participate in this study. I am also very grateful to my supportive teachers, whose encouragement kept me going with this work at a time when I felt that the significance of this article would become small as the outbreak faded into obscurity and I was ready to give up. I am also grateful to the reviewers for their advice on this article.

References

  1. 1. Ma C, Cong Y, Zhang H. COVID-19 and the Digestive System. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(7):1003–6. pmid:32618648.
  2. 2. Livanos AE, Jha D, Cossarini F, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Tokuyama M, Aydillo T, et al. Intestinal Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Symptoms. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(7):2435–50.e34. Epub 20210304. pmid:33676971.
  3. 3. Cheung KS, Hung IFN, Chan PPY, Lung KC, Tso E, Liu R, et al. Gastrointestinal Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Virus Load in Fecal Samples From a Hong Kong Cohort: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):81–95. Epub 20200403. pmid:32251668.
  4. 4. Yang W, Yang S, Wang L, Zhou Y, Xin Y, Li H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 310 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant patients and comparison with Delta and Beta variant patients in China. Virol Sin. 2022;37(5):704–15. Epub 20220807. pmid:35948265.
  5. 5. Menni C, Valdes AM, Polidori L, Antonelli M, Penamakuri S, Nogal A, et al. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1618–24. Epub 20220407. pmid:35397851.
  6. 6. Colomier E, Melchior C, Algera JP, Hreinsson JP, Störsrud S, Törnblom H, et al. Global prevalence and burden of meal-related abdominal pain. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):71. Epub 20220217. pmid:35172840.
  7. 7. Salari N, Ghasemianrad M, Ammari-Allahyari M, Rasoulpoor S, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of constipation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023;135(15–16):389–98. Epub 20230224. pmid:36826591.
  8. 8. Cui P, Li J, Liu N, Duan ZJ. Incidence of acute diarrheal illness in Chinese communities: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):114. Epub 20180713. pmid:30005618.
  9. 9. Musa S. Hepatic and gastrointestinal involvement in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): What do we know till now? Arab Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020;21(1):3–8. pmid:32253172
  10. 10. Khan MU, Mushtaq K, Alsoub DH, Iqbal P, Ata F, Chaudhry HS, et al. Digestive system involvement and clinical outcomes among COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study from Qatar. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(46):7995–8009. pmid:35046626.
  11. 11. Han CQ, Duan CH, Zhang SY, Spiegel BN, Shi HY, Wang WJ, et al. Digestive Symptoms in COVID-19 Patients With Mild Disease Severity: Clinical Presentation, Stool Viral RNA Testing, and Outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(6):916–23. pmid:32301761
  12. 12. Shang HT, Bai T, Chen YH, Huang C, Zhang SY, Yang PC, et al. Outcomes and implications of diarrhea in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(9):1049–56. pmid:32749177
  13. 13. Singh S, Samanta J, Suri V, Bhalla A, Puri GD, Sehgal R, et al. Presence of diarrhea associated with better outcomes in patients with COVID-19—A prospective evaluation. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2022;40(3):404–8. Epub 20220426. pmid:35483999.
  14. 14. Schettino M, Pellegrini L, Picascia D, Saibeni S, Bezzio C, Bini F, et al. Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients With Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Northern Italy: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(2):306–10. pmid:33009054.
  15. 15. World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. 2022. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
  16. 16. Yu W, Guo Y, Zhang S, Kong Y, Shen Z, Zhang J. Proportion of asymptomatic infection and nonsevere disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: A systematic review and analysis. J Med Virol. 2022;94(12):5790–801. Epub 20220824. pmid:35961786.
  17. 17. Lee SW. Methods for testing statistical differences between groups in medical research: statistical standard and guideline of Life Cycle Committee. Life Cycle. 2022;2:e1.
  18. 18. Kariyawasam JC, Jayarajah U, Riza R, Abeysuriya V, Seneviratne SL. Gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(12):1362–88. pmid:33728439.
  19. 19. Meng B, Abdullahi A, Ferreira I, Goonawardane N, Saito A, Kimura I, et al. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. Nature. 2022;603(7902):706–14. Epub 20220201. pmid:35104837.
  20. 20. Hu FH, Jia YJ, Zhao DY, Fu XL, Zhang WQ, Tang W, et al. Clinical outcomes of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron and Delta variant: systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies covering 6 037 144 coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(7):835–44. Epub 20230318. pmid:36934872.
  21. 21. Parasa S, Desai M, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, Patel HK, Kennedy KF, Roesch T, et al. Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Fecal Viral Shedding in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2011335. Epub 20200601. pmid:32525549.
  22. 22. Jin B, Singh R, Ha SE, Zogg H, Park PJ, Ro S. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with COVID-19. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(19):2341–52. pmid:34040326.
  23. 23. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E, Villamizar-Peña R, Holguin-Rivera Y, Escalera-Antezana JP, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101623. Epub 20200313. pmid:32179124.
  24. 24. Li LQ, Huang T, Wang YQ, Wang ZP, Liang Y, Huang TB, et al. COVID-19 patients’ clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):577–83. Epub 20200323. pmid:32162702.
  25. 25. Baron JA, Senn S, Voelker M, Lanas A, Laurora I, Thielemann W, et al. Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects of Short-Term Aspirin Use: A Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials. Drugs in R&D. 2013;13(1):9–16. pmid:23532576
  26. 26. Singh AK, Jena A, Kumar MP, Jha DK, Sharma V. Clinical presentation of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intest Res. 2022;20(1):134–43. Epub 20210118. pmid:33440918.
  27. 27. Chen L, Hu K, Cheng C, Hu Q, Zhang L, An T, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37(11):2277–89. Epub 20221022. pmid:36271206.
  28. 28. Menon T, Sharma R, Earthineni G, Iftikhar H, Sondhi M, Shams S, et al. Association of Gastrointestinal System With Severity and Mortality of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2021;13(2):e13317. Epub 20210212. pmid:33738161.
  29. 29. Gul F, Lo KB, Peterson J, McCullough PA, Goyal A, Rangaswami J. Meta-analysis of outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection with versus without gastrointestinal symptoms. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020;33(3):366–9. Epub 20200529. pmid:32669979.
  30. 30. Ramachandran P, Onukogu I, Ghanta S, Gajendran M, Perisetti A, Goyal H, et al. Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Outcomes in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients. Dig Dis. 2020;38(5):373–9. Epub 20200629. pmid:32599601.
  31. 31. Al Argan RJ, Ismail MH, Alkhafaji DM, Alsulaiman RM, Ismaeel FE, AlSulaiman RS, et al. Gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19 in a single center in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(3):218–24. pmid:35042321.
  32. 32. Wan Y, Li J, Shen L, Zou Y, Hou L, Zhu L, et al. Enteric involvement in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 outside Wuhan. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):534–5. Epub 20200415. pmid:32304638.
  33. 33. Zhang L, Han C, Zhang S, Duan C, Shang H, Bai T, et al. Diarrhea and altered inflammatory cytokine pattern in severe coronavirus disease 2019: Impact on disease course and in-hospital mortality. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36(2):421–9. Epub 20200713. pmid:32602128.
  34. 34. Ma Y, Zhang L, Wei R, Dai W, Zeng R, Luo D, et al. Risks of digestive diseases in long COVID: evidence from a population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2024;22(1):14. Epub 20240110. pmid:38195495.
  35. 35. Lee K, Park J, Lee J, Lee M, Kim HJ, Son Y, et al. Long-term gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary outcomes of COVID-19: a multi-nationwide cohort study from South Korea, Japan, and the UK. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024. Epub 20240829. pmid:39205608.
  36. 36. Xu E, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z. Long-term gastrointestinal outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):983. Epub 20230307. pmid:36882400.