https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0008-7172
Figures
Abstract
Introduction
To evaluate the impact of a novel design “Star Home” on the incidence of malaria, respiratory tract infections and diarrheal diseases among children, randomly selected households in Mtwara, Tanzania were offered a free, new Star Home. Drawing on longitudinal qualitative research that accompanied the Star Homes study, this article describes the experiences of residents and the wider community of living with these buildings.
Methods
A total of four rounds of face-to-face interviews were undertaken with residents of Star Homes (n = 37), control (wattle/daub) homes (n = 21), neighboring households n = 6), community members (n = 17) and community leaders (n = 6). The use of Star Homes was also observed over these four time periods between 2021 and 2023. Interviews were conducted in Swahili, transcribed, and translated into English for thematic analysis.
Results
Star Homes residents appreciated several aspects of the Star Homes, including overall comfort, access to water and electricity, and clean toilets. There were concerns about some design elements, such as poorly closing doors, stoves perceived as inefficient, and the façade, which was susceptible to rainwater ingress. The houses were not always used as intended by their developers, for example, residents were sleeping downstairs instead of upstairs because of cold floors or difficulties using the stairs. Star Homes residents described how the structures triggered praise but also envy from other community members.
Citation: Mshamu S, Meta J, Adhikari B, Halifa S, Mmbando A, Wood HS, et al. (2025) Community responses to a novel house design: A qualitative study of “Star Homes” in Mtwara, southeastern Tanzania. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0309518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309518
Editor: Yitagesu Habtu Aweke, Addis Ababa University, ETHIOPIA
Received: February 15, 2024; Accepted: August 14, 2024; Published: January 22, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Mshamu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Because of the nature of the qualitative data in this study, even if the data are anonymized, potential respondents are identifiable. Both MORU and local ethics committee restricts the sharing of data that can potentially identify the respondents. The data is available upon request to the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit Data Access Committee (datasharing@tropmedres.ac) complying with the data access policy on case-by-case analysis (https://www.tropmedres.ac/units/moru-bangkok/bioethics-engagement/data-sharing/moru-tropical-network-policy-on-sharing-data-and-other-outputs).
Funding: This study was funded by Hanako foundation, Singapore. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: ARIs, acute respiratory tract infections; COVID-19, Corona Virus Infectious Diseases-2019; ITN, Insecticide Treated bed Nets; SDG, Sustainable Development Goals; SSA, Sub Saharan Africa
Introduction
Malaria, acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs), and diarrheal diseases are responsible for more than a third of all childhood deaths in sub-Saharan Africa [1–3]. Nearly five children under the age of five years old die every minute due to these preventable causes of deaths [4]. In sub-Saharan Africa, around 80% of all malaria deaths occur among under-five children: 400,000 deaths annually [5]. Together with Nigeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Niger, The United Republic of Tanzania was among the countries that accounted for over half of global malaria deaths in 2022 [6].
Although many of these infections can be treated in healthcare facilities, in places where there are strained healthcare systems and limited access to care, community-based interventions are considered key to reducing morbidity and mortality [7, 8]. Environmental factors are major contributors to the transmission of infectious diseases—unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene, and indoor air pollution—remain major risks for health and well-being globally [9–11]. Indeed, many of the greatest advances in human health have focused on addressing the environmental causes of infectious diseases, particularly through cleaner water and improved sanitation [12].
The large-scale distribution of insecticide treated bed nets (ITNs) around the turn of the 21st century had an unprecedented impact on malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. More recently, however, this trend has reversed [13, 14]. Part of this is likely a result of the poor coverage of ITNs, deterioration of the bio-efficiency and quality of ITNs, and reticence to sleep under the ITNs in the high indoor temperatures of many African homes [15–17]. The periodic distribution of ITNs also raises environmental concerns around production, distribution, and disposal including its contribution to plastic pollution [18]. A more sustainable approach to reducing contact with malaria vectors is therefore needed.
Housing interventions are a promising long-term strategy to reduce contact with malaria vectors and to prevent other infectious diseases, in a comfortable living environment that ultimately can improve wellbeing [19, 20]. Observational studies found that, living in improved housing offered a 47% lower risk of malaria infection, with 45–65% fewer malaria cases compared to traditional homes [20, 21]. Although most housing projects make modifications of existing structures, researchers have begun to explore the impact of entire ‘novel design homes’ on disease transmission [22]. Given the key role that housing plays in our everyday lives and its embedding in specific social, cultural, and environmental contexts, the practicality and acceptability of whole-house interventions are essential pre-conditions for scaling up and roll-out of this new intervention [10]. Human dwellings are coded by cultural traditions, historical developments, the local ecology, environment, personal preferences, and wealth [23]. Their design and construction also have important ramifications on how people perform their daily practices [24].
In Magoda, northeastern Tanzania, a pilot project demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of novel house designs [25], which have been in use without interruption or significant reconfiguration. More research is needed to generate evidence on the health impact and acceptability of whole-house interventions. The Star Homes Project, a multi-disciplinary collaboration, aims to address this gap by developing and evaluating a novel house design in Mtwara Region, southeastern Tanzania [20, 26].
The Star Home design (Fig 1) was developed to protect against malaria, ARIs, and diarrhoeal diseases [22, 27–29]. The design process utilized an iterative approach of prototyping, evaluation, and improvement. The project team created a prototyping site in the Mtwara town, to test different design iterations, construction methods, building components, and to gather feedback prior to construction of the 110 houses. The principal evaluation is a randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of the three diseases in children under 13 years living in Star Homes compared with traditional wattle-daub houses. Social science studies support the main study by assessing the acceptability and feasibility of the study [22].
A total of 110 Star Homes were built across 60 villages in Mtwara in 2021 and handed over to randomly selected households. For most households, the transfer into the new homes was uneventful, although a subset of households was reticent to move into new dwellings [30]. Questions remain how these new houses are used by their occupants and the response of the wider community to the longer-term presence of Star Homes. Drawing on several qualitative research methods, this article examines the response among residents of Star Homes and the wider community to the homes. We examine how Star Homes residents make use of the spaces and design elements and attitudes to the houses. The overall aim is to inform future iterations of such houses, with a view to ensuring their long-term use.
Methods
Study design
This descriptive, qualitative study incorporated a combination of methods that included observations, focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews over several phases of data collection (S1 Table). The study was designed by a multidisciplinary team, including social scientists, public health specialists, entomologists, and architects. The data were collected by a Tanzanian social scientist with more than 10 years of experience in qualitative methods (JM) with the assistance of Tanzanian field researchers. The data were analyzed by a team of experienced social scientists with backgrounds in low- and high-income settings (BA, JM, and CP) with input from the wider Star Homes team.
Study setting
Mtwara is one of Tanzania’s 31 administrative regions. The Makonde and Makua are the region’s dominant ethnic groups and the region’s economy is based mostly on farming. Around 85% of the land in Mtwara Region is arable, yet only about a quarter of this is used for cultivation. Livestock rearing is not popular and its contribution to the economy is negligible. Cassava, millet, and sorghum are important food crops. Cashew nuts are the most important cash crops. One fourth of the region’s gross domestic product comes from cashew nut farming and makes up 40% of the country’s total cashew nut production. Study communities were spread across the district. Eligible households within a village cluster were offered the opportunity to win a Star Home in a fair and transparent lottery. This was the first project of its kind in the region where few health-related research or development initiatives had been implemented previously.
The design and development of the Star Homes was informed by the results of the pilot project in Magoda [11]. The Star Homes’ design was implemented by Danish architecture firm Ingvartsen (http://ingvartsen.dk/) in consultation with clinicians, entomologists, public health practitioners and social scientists. The light gauge steel structures were constructed by the Dar es Salaam based engineering firm Ecohomes (https://ecohomes.co.tz/). Where possible, novel elements were tested at 1:1 for occupant feedback as part of an iterative design process prior to the commencement of construction for the trial. This included three full houses and two latrine prototypes with different design, construction methods, and materials.
The health interventions of a two-storey Star Home are illustrated in Fig 2. The house and ventilated pit latrine design were developed around a lightweight steel frame, with large openings and a mono pitch roof. The openings are screened with shade net reinforced by wire mesh. The spatial layout was informed by a study of vernacular houses in the region and includes a screened kitchen living area, and first floor bedrooms, accessed through a locked store [31]. The Star Homes were designed for a rural context and function off-grid. They can be constructed and maintained with components available locally in Tanzania, including solar panels and rainwater harvesting.
Most houses in the study villages are wattle and daub constructions (aka mud huts or traditional homes), with earth floors, and a thatched roof. These houses lack piped water and electricity. A total of 110 Star Homes were built and are compared with 440 wattle/daub homes. A dynamic cohort of children was established whereby at least two children under 13 years per each house were enrolled for clinical surveillance, and any new child in the age range were enrolled afterwards for three years [22].
Sampling
Residents of Star Homes and traditional homes were recruited for the current qualitative study because of issues they had reported to the research team who regularly visited the homes. Data collection occurred at approximately six-monthly intervals to capture changing perspectives as residents became accustomed to the Star Homes. Respondents were initially recruited by a research assistant with the help of District Malaria Focal Person who is Government employee and coordinates malaria control and prevention activities. Study respondents were familiar with the interviewer because of her previous interactions and was independently conducting the interviews and discussions guided by the research questions. The interviews were followed by observations and informal interactions with a total of four Star Homes to document the diverse spectrum of experience of living in the Star Homes. These four Star Homes were purposively selected based on the distinctive issues and problems faced by the residents.
Data collection
In depth interviews (IDIs), focus group discussions (FGDs) and observations were conducted with residents of study homes using interview topic guides adapted from the previous round of interviews that explored the residents’ reticence to enter Star Homes (S2 Table) [30]. The guides were modified to explore the use of the Star Homes, likes and dislikes of the structural components of the houses, overall living experience and adapted behavior when living in the houses. Respondents were visited in their houses for face-to-face interviews. Each interview lasted between 45 minutes to 1 hour. In addition, follow-up interviews and observations (including four case studies based on the discussions with residents) were carried out during November to explore the details related to their experience of living in Star Homes. The number of respondents for the interviews were guided by the principle of data saturation that meant no new information was generated after certain number of interviews [32].
After three rounds of data collection (round I: Oct-Nov 2021; round II: Apr-May 2022; round III: Oct-Nov 2022), a total of 43 IDIs and four FGDs were conducted with heads of households (Table 1). These included 33 IDIs with heads of Star Home, four IDIs with heads of wattle/daub control homes and six IDIs with heads of neighboring households outside the study cohort. The four focus group discussions were conducted with 30 participants consisting of 13 heads of wattle/daub control homes, and 17 heads of community members’ homes outside the study cohort. The last round of interviews (round IV: Apr-May 2023) included eight interviews (four Star Homes and four control traditional home residents).
Data management and analysis
Interviews and discussions were conducted in Swahili or Makonde and were audio-recorded. Audio-recorded conversations were transcribed into English for thematic analysis. Transcripts were read line by line and coded in QSR NVivo based on the codebook that was developed for the initial interviews and was adapted for the data. The codebook was modified to respond to research questions related to the use of Star Homes, challenges, and opportunities. Codes were coalesced to form themes supported by quotes (S3 Table).
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee of Tanzania on 17 June 2021 (reference NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/3695) and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee on 2 July 2020 (reference #533–20). All respondents provided written informed consent to participate in the study (S4 Table). The individual pictured in Fig 3 has provided written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish their image alongside the manuscript.
The issue of water ingress on the ground floor was also raised by residents. This was despite occasional holes in the shade nets being fixed by the Star Homes team. Sometimes, the stove fire was extinguished by the rainwater coming into the kitchen.
Results
Overview
Star Home residents described several benefits of the new homes, including more comfortable living conditions, better ventilation, water and sanitation systems, and lighter rooms. They also reported issues related to several design elements of the houses. For instance, the ingress of rainwater, uncomfortably cold floors during the colder months, inability to keep door closed, and the need for continued use of ITNs. There were issues related to the functionality of the stove (e.g. stoves required more time to cook certain foods, burnt more fuel, and produced inadequate heat). Residents therefore continued to use their traditional houses and/or outside spaces for cooking and eating. Some residents with small children preferred to sleep downstairs because it was closer to the toilet, and the difficulties that young children faced when trying to climb down the stairs on their own. In some cases, winning a new house also triggered jealousy within the family members and among other community members, which affected their relationship by inciting arguments, violence, and resentment.
Overall comfort of Star Homes
The main benefit of the Star Home was the comfortable living conditions for the entire family (Table 2). Respondents spontaneously and favorably compared the comfort of Star Homes to that of the wattle/daub houses. For example, they reflected on the need to collect grass for seasonal roofing, trying to keep the earth floors clean, and the time and energy that these activities required. Furthermore, residents explained that living in wattle/daub house required cleaning the bugs, dirt, dust, and sometimes fallen roofing materials and reptiles. In contrast, Star Homes required no such additional labor and resources for cleanliness. The overall structure of the house, concrete floors, the access to a reliable and close source of water, and the fact that the living space was distributed across two floors added to the perceived comfort and was positively contrasted with the crowded living conditions in their previous homes. Respondents emphasized that this comfortable living space had been provided free of charge.
Entering and leaving the dwelling
Residents were accustomed to unrestricted movement between the space inside and outside wattle/daub houses. Many wattle/daub houses had no lockable or closable doors and, when present, residents were observed rarely closing the door, especially during the daytime. Thus, going along with the request of the Star Homes project staff to keep the doors closed as much as possible—to reduce the ingress of mosquitos—required a change in their daily practices. Aware of this issue, the Star Homes were fitted with sprung, self-closing doors. At times, these doors were observed propped open (Table 3). Moreover, their hinges and locks required frequent repair, which was undertaken by the project and took longer than hoped. Hence the Star Home doors sometimes had to be closed manually. And respondents reported that their children were incapable of keeping doors closed, and left doors open despite their constant reminders—indeed, parents were aware that mosquitoes entered the house when the door was left open. Furthermore, when parents were away at their farms, children remained in the house and door closure was not supervised.
I: What do you think are the reasons that led to frequently unclosed doors into this house?
R: Children
IDI3 HAC MAG 042_270423
Sleeping inside
As part of the study, the recipients of Star Homes, were asked to sleep upstairs, and under the bed nets. Interviews with Star Homes household heads, however, found that this was not always the case, for several reasons, including: (1) the shade-netting in the upstairs windows leaking badly during heavy rains; (2) the transparency of the shade netting raising concerns about privacy; (3) the upstairs space was described as cold during the cooler months; (4) fears among parents and children of using the stairs at night because the lights in this space were not always operational (affected by the ingress of water, limited solar charging and their extended using during nighttime period). The Star Homes project team was observed to be responsive to such concerns, for instance, providing curtains, blankets, and mattresses.
Another reason why sleeping upstairs was not popular among the residents, particularly young children, and pregnant woman was the difficulties that children and residents experienced in descending the stairs when going to the toilet during the night (Table 4). Children urinating upstairs was an issue for some families because the concrete bedroom floors—in contrast to earth floors—do not absorb urine.
I: Why do you sleep downstairs with infant?
R: Because of going outside now and then, to take care of young child is challenging sometimes may poo, you need water to clean so she will need to go down to throw feces in latrine, that is why we decided to sleep downstairs
IDI8_ASN_NJU_036_081122 (Results-III)
Water, sanitation, and cooking
Each Star Home had a 2000L water tank, placed adjacent to the house. This water tank collected rainwater from the roof, which had been specially designed with a first flush system to minimize debris from the roof entering into the tank. Residents were able to drain the water tank through an outlet tap and were seen collecting water in the bucket and/or large basin for washing vegetables, fish, meat, clothes and utensils after cooking. The water tank and its large capacity was a point of particular praise among Star Homes residents: they were impressed by the durability of the water collected in the tank that allowed them to use water for a wide variety of activities without having to replenish it. Star Homes residents appreciated the ventilated pit latrines, which were located close to the house. Some explained their preference for the new toilets because of the ease of access.
Even though Star Homes were fitted with a specifically designed stove (Fig 3), integrated into the indoor cooking area, some residents described cooking food outside of the home or in their previous traditional house which were not completely abandoned. Foods that required prolonged heat, such as cassava stiff porridge, especially when cooking for a large family size, were said to be cooked on traditional stoves but were dined at Star Homes (Tables 3 and 4). Switching the stoves between Star Homes and traditional homes was common because of the concerns residents shared with us. Respondents suggested that stoves in Star Homes consume more fuel, and produces less heat than their traditional way of cooking. The cooking stoves were therefore not popular among the residents.
I: And when you cook, you are cooking in the old house.
R: Yes, we cook there because cooking cassava ugali is difficult.
I: Yes, I say that’s why you cook there and eat there
R: No, we cook there and eat here
IDI4_SAM_MANGO_038_041122
Upon further probing the reasons for the underuse of stoves, residents described additional slippery metal brackets used to hold the pots for cooking, the small size of the stove’s burner, and the long distance between the firewood and the potholder, the latter reportedly meant that more firewood was consumed. Some described the impact of wind and rainwater on the burning of the firewood, which led them to add a shield on the shadenet wall.
The issue of water ingress on the ground floor was also raised by residents. This was despite occasional holes in the shade nets being fixed by the Star Homes team. Sometimes, the stove fire was extinguished by the rainwater coming into the kitchen.
R: When it rains, all the rainwater pours in the stove place and the fire was put out.
I: But when it happens like that, the fire always goes out?
R: Yes, because of the water.
I: Aaaah
R: When there is heavy rain; you can find a lot of water there.
I: Aaah!
R: The downstairs will be full of water due to the heavy rain.
IDI2 HAK2 MAK-A_031_260423
Response of the wider community
The responses of the wider communities to the Star Homes (and their residents) were mixed. Star Homes and control home residents described comments by their neighbors that indicated jealousy on their part. Neighbors were jealous because the study participants were perceived to be lucky to have been selected to participate in the study and benefit from the free health care that came with it, regular health checks and gifts. In contrast to the early phase of the study, when neighbors made malicious comments about winning star homes and staying in the houses, in later months, they offered positive comments and feedback. During daily interactions with their neighbors, residents were reminded that they were ‘lucky’ and ‘blessed’ to be study participants (Table 5). Neighbors also perceived research staff to have encroached into their private spaces in off hours, particularly referring to their early morning visits as a part of the research procedure. Neighbors often alleged research staff as bad people.
I: Your neighbor?
R: Yes, the neighbors, …… some of them they said that we’re being reared like local chickens.
I: Being reared like a chicken?
R: Yes, being reared like a chicken but receiving health services on time.
IDI1 ASN MAK-A 201
Star Homes residents were asked if they were stigmatized or discriminated against by neighbors just because they won a Star Home. Some respondents reported neighbors made comments that the Star Home residents were living on aid and made negative comments such as the houses were only for Christians. However, the residents indicated that many of these comments had subsided after living in the house for some months.
Discussion
Participants in the Star Home study appreciated the opportunity to participate in the project. Star Home residents particularly valued their features and comfort they offered, such as water, lights, ventilation, and toilet. Nonetheless, there were issues related to several aspects of the house, such as rainwater ingress, functionality of the stove, and smoke production. Because of the sampling approach, with the over sampling of households that reported problems, this is likely an over-reporting of issues with the design elements. Star Homes residents and controls residing in waddle/daub homes received both compliments and jealousy from their neighbors.
Wattle/daub versus Star Homes
Star Home residents emphasized the benefits of the house in terms of comfort and additional features. For instance, the ventilated spaces, water storage system and latrine, which were absent in wattle/daub houses. Wattle/daub houses are often dark, minimally ventilated, grubby, and invariably single storied building [25], although there is diversity among the more conventional houses seen in rural (peri-urban and urban) sub-Saharan Africa [33]. Elsewhere in Tanzania, researchers have highlighted the need to improve housing to facilitate malaria control, pointing to the limitations of existing structures, such as broken windows, holes in the walls, door covers, eave spaces, and roofs [34]. A strong preference for improved housing in contrast to traditional housing was also found in The Gambia [35].
Although living in Star Homes was considered a privilege, components of the house required maintenance and repair for which the residents relied on project staff. The residents were advised not to attempt repairs and to contact the project, although this sometimes meant that repairs took longer than desired. Based on the willingness to learn new skills within the community, building capacity to maintain houses would be a shrewd solution to mitigate the waiting time and resources required for repairs. Building a maintenance culture through participatory methods, including co-learning, and skills transfer aligns with the principles and elements of community engagement [36–38] and can engender independence and sustainability of the home [39]. Although the breakdown of building elements (e.g. door locks, shade nets, cooking stoves, light bulbs, and water tanks) were minor problems, their impacts on daily living were high. In a longitudinal study in Gambia that examined the durability and functionality of house modifications designed to reduce the entry of malaria mosquitoes, the major issues were found around the door and its use, that included poorly functioning door locks, handles and loss of automatic closure mechanism [40]. In future, maintenance and repairing mechanisms should be resourced within the community to shorten the repair cycle.
Internal and external spaces
Star Homes are intended to protect against malaria through preventing vectors entering the structure, particularly the sleeping area. The façade openings are screened with shadenet, the sleeping area is located upstairs and, when closed, internal and external (self-closing) doors are mosquito proof. The results indicate that the protection against mosquito bites was compromised when the residents did not sleep upstairs, did not sleep under the ITNs, or keep the doors open. This was despite sensitization and instructions from the Star Homes team, and the provision of ITNs at the start of the study. The finding underlines the need for multi-disciplinary research on housing interventions that incorporates analysis of residents’ use of spaces. Such research can potentially contribute to explaining the impact (or lack thereof) of housing interventions on health outcomes, such as malaria, respiratory tract infections and diarrheal diseases and is currently being evaluated by the clinical study [22, 29].
The tendency not to sleep upstairs or under ITNs highlights how human behavior remains a central determinant in the effectiveness of malaria prevention interventions [41]. The finding reflects a wider trend of sub-optimal ITN use: research in Tanzania has indicated that only 55% of under five children sleep under ITNs [42]. In the Star Homes Project, gifts and incentives together with messages on the health benefits seemed to motivate children and parents to sleep under bed nets. Such an approach was necessary to evaluate the impact of Star Homes when used as intended. However, this is unlikely to be sustainable outside of study conditions. The findings highlight how changes in daily practices—for example, sleeping location—can be highly contingent on design details (such as staircase lights and cold urine-resistant concrete floors). Under appropriate conditions, changes occur.
Envy
As a result of its study design, the communities where the Star Home project was conducted were divided into three categories: Star Home residents (intervention households); residents of the control wattle/daub homes, and other community members. Beyond providing a new dwelling to the intervention households, participation in the Star Home project also entailed additional benefits, including health insurance and incentives to sleep upstairs and use the ITNs. These benefits—combined with the new homes—triggered accusations towards the project staff and participants, which indicated envy in the wider community, particularly during the early phase of the project [30]. Envy stems from the desire to acquire something possessed by another person (as opposed to jealousy, which is rooted in the fear of losing something already possessed) [43]. Envy is often expressed to third persons (i.e. neighbors/community members) through gossips, backbiting, criticisms, as a potential tool to dissuade people who have achieved the wealth, material or status, more than theirs [43]. In the months after construction was completed, Star Homes study staff were accused of being ‘freemasons’ and of malicious intentions towards the participants; participating families were reproached for putting their children in harm’s way [28, 30]. However, the interviews conducted after a year of residency indicated that, although respondents still described some persisting envy, the ill feeling had subsided. The response of the wider community echoed that of other randomized controlled trials in which participants are offered ancillary healthcare (whether in the control or intervention group) [44–49]. Given the scale of benefits that participants received i.e. a new house at least in the initial stage the jealousies were even greater than those that can accompany a more conventional clinical trial in poor communities.
The Star Homes project employed commonly used strategies to address the accusations: conducting qualitative research to understand the “rumours”, and undertaking a responsive program of community engagement, including football and netball tournaments to disseminate information about the project and to humanize project staff [50, 51]. Future large-scale community-based vector control interventions, particularly those focused on housing, can learn from this study and ensure that there are appropriate mechanisms for community listening, as part of an adaptive and tailored approach to community engagement.
Strengths and limitations
In contrast to the cross-sectional exploration of an exposure to an event or an intervention, this study captured at several timepoints over years the lived experiences of the residents in Star Homes and the waddle/daub houses. Star Home residents’ experience and interactions with the house, and those of the wider community, are dynamic and vary over time, and this was captured using a longitudinal approach. Collecting data at multiple time points allowed the study to adapt to emerging issues and to the need to inform the wider ongoing study of health impact. Another strength was the maximum diversity sampling approach, whereby Star Homes residents and members of various communities were interviewed, which included seeking outliers and extreme cases based on the suggestions from the project team. In terms of limitations: although the interviewer was a researcher (who came from outside the study team), study residents may have been affected by desirability bias, and thus the perspectives in this study may not necessarily represent their actual opinion. Nonetheless, respondents were quite candid about their experiences and the interviewer often probed to explore their challenges of living in Star Homes.
Conclusions
Residents appreciated living in Star Homes, mostly because of the comfort they offered as well as the water and sanitation system, lights, and ventilation. They raised concerns around some of the novel design elements and highlighted the need for regular repair and maintenance. In some houses, the potential health benefits of the novel designs were impacted by residents not sleeping upstairs, or under ITNs and leaving doors open. This highlights that, even with close attention to the building design and careful sensitization around the potential benefits of dwellings, it can be difficult to ensure the intended health impacts of interventions for all. With concerted efforts to incentive sleeping upstairs, changes in practices were observed. Although the response of the wider community was not always positive, particularly during the initial stages of the project, jealousies had seemingly eased over time. The jealousies and negative reactions were entwined with unease about the wider benefits of project participation and the poverty in which many community members lived.
Supporting information
S1 Table. COREQ: COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309518.s001
(PDF)
S2 Table. Interview guide adapted for the study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309518.s002
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the respondents who participated in the interviews and permitted the researchers to enter their homes. We would also like to thank the wider Star Homes team and the communities where the Star Homes were located.
References
- 1. Tizifa TA, Kabaghe AN, McCann RS, Nkhono W, Mtengula S, Takken W, et al: Incidence of clinical malaria, acute respiratory illness, and diarrhoea in children in southern Malawi: a prospective cohort study. Malar J 2021, 20:473. pmid:34930300
- 2. Reiner RC Jr., Collaborators LBDTB, Hay SI: The overlapping burden of the three leading causes of disability and death in sub-Saharan African children. Nat Commun 2022, 13:7457. pmid:36473841
- 3. Simen-Kapeu A, Bogler L, Weber AC, Ntambi J, Zagre NM, Vollmer S, et al: Prevalence of diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections, and malaria over time (1995–2017): A regional analysis of 23 countries in West and Central Africa. J Glob Health 2021, 11:13008. pmid:34484715
- 4.
WHO: 5 children under age 5 die every minute in the African Region. https://bit.ly/3OexAAp (accessed on 1st August 2023). 2015.
- 5.
WHO: Vector-borne diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases (accessed on 8th November 2023). 2023.
- 6.
WHO: World Malaria Report 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/374472/9789240086173-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 18th January 2024). 2023.
- 7. Adhikari B, Bayo M, Peto TJ, Callery JJ, Tripura R, Dysoley L, et al: Comparing the roles of community health workers for malaria control and elimination in Cambodia and Tanzania. BMJ Glob Health 2023, 8. pmid:38070880
- 8. Salam RA, Das JK, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA: Impact of community-based interventions for the prevention and control of malaria on intervention coverage and health outcomes for the prevention and control of malaria. Infect Dis Poverty 2014, 3:25. pmid:25114795
- 9.
McGranahan G: Housing, water, sanitation and health ― the persistent environmental health challenge of urban poverty? In Urban environments, wealth and health:. pp. 14–25: International Institute for Environment and Development; 2007:14–25.
- 10. Baker RE, Mahmud AS, Miller IF, Rajeev M, Rasambainarivo F, Rice BL, et al: Infectious disease in an era of global change. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022, 20:193–205. pmid:34646006
- 11.
WHO: Disease outbreaks. https://bit.ly/453KBEp (accessed on 1st August, 2023). 2023.
- 12. Mara D, Lane J, Scott B, Trouba D: Sanitation and health. PLoS Med 2010, 7:e1000363. pmid:21125018
- 13. Nalinya S, Musoke D, Deane K: Malaria prevention interventions beyond long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Malar J 2022, 21:31. pmid:35109848
- 14. Castro MC: Malaria Transmission and Prospects for Malaria Eradication: The Role of the Environment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2017, 7. pmid:28490534
- 15.
Ladu HI, Shuaibu U, Pulford J: Reasons for mosquito net non-use in malaria-endemic countries: A review of qualitative research published between 2011 and 2021. medRxiv 2023:2023.2005. 2016.23290037.
- 16. Koenker H, Kumoji EK, Erskine M, Opoku R, Sternberg E, Taylor C: Reported reasons for non-use of insecticide-treated nets in large national household surveys, 2009–2021. Malar J 2023, 22:61. pmid:36810015
- 17. Lindsay SW, Thomas MB, Kleinschmidt I: Threats to the effectiveness of insecticide-treated bednets for malaria control: thinking beyond insecticide resistance. Lancet Glob Health 2021, 9:e1325–e1331. pmid:34216565
- 18. Santos EM, Curtis TM: The Unsustainability of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021, 105:876–878. pmid:34370706
- 19. Tusting LS, Bottomley C, Gibson H, Kleinschmidt I, Tatem AJ, Lindsay SW, et al: Housing Improvements and Malaria Risk in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multi-Country Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS Med 2017, 14:e1002234. pmid:28222094
- 20. Lindsay SW, Davies M, Alabaster G, Altamirano H, Jatta E, Jawara M, et al: Recommendations for building out mosquito-transmitted diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: the DELIVER mnemonic. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021, 376: pmid:33357059.
- 21. Tusting LS, Ippolito MM, Willey BA, Kleinschmidt I, Dorsey G, Gosling RD, et al: The evidence for improving housing to reduce malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malaria journal 2015, 14:1–12.
- 22. Mshamu S, Mmbando A, Meta J, Bradley J, Bojstrup TC, Day NPJ, et al: Assessing the impact of a novel house design on the incidence of malaria in children in rural Africa: study protocol for a household-cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. Trials 2022, 23:519. pmid:35725486
- 23. Cook EM, Hall SJ, Larson KL: Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: a synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment. Urban Ecosystems 2012, 15:19–52.
- 24. Chowdhury S, Noguchi M, Doloi H: Defining domestic environmental experience for occupants’ mental health and wellbeing. Designs 2020, 4:26.
- 25. von Seidlein L, Ikonomidis K, Mshamu S, Nkya TE, Mukaka M, Pell C, et al: Affordable house designs to improve health in rural Africa: a field study from northeastern Tanzania. Lancet Planet Health 2017, 1:e188–e199. pmid:29851640
- 26. von Seidlein L, Wood H, Brittain OS, Tusting L, Bednarz A, Mshamu S, et al: Knowledge gaps in the construction of rural healthy homes: A research agenda for improved low-cost housing in hot-humid Africa. PLoS Med 2019, 16:e1002909.
- 27. GBD Collaborators: Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396:1160–1203. pmid:33069325
- 28. Mshamu S, Halifa S, Meta J, Mmbando A, Lindsay SW, Okumu F, et al: Studying the health benefits of improved housing in rural Tanzania: challenges and progress. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2023.
- 29. Mshamu S, Meta J, Sanga C, Day N, Mukaka M, Adhikari B, et al: Care seeking for childhood illnesses in rural Mtwara, south-east Tanzania: a mixed methods study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2024. pmid:38700078
- 30. Meta J, Mshamu S, Halifa S, Mmbando A, Wood HS, Wood OS, et al: Understanding reticence to occupy free, novel-design homes: A qualitative study in Mtwara, Southeast Tanzania. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023, 3:e0002307. pmid:37992017
- 31.
Knudsen J, von Seidlein L: Healthy homes in tropical zones: improving rural housing in Asia and Africa. Edition Axel Menges Berlin; 2014.
- 32. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al: Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018, 52:1893–1907. pmid:29937585
- 33. Knudsen JB, Pinder M, Jatta E, Jawara M, Yousuf MA, Sondergaard AT, et al: Measuring ventilation in different typologies of rural Gambian houses: a pilot experimental study. Malar J 2020, 19:273. pmid:32736629
- 34. Bofu RM, Santos EM, Msugupakulya BJ, Kahamba NF, Swilla JD, Njalambaha R, et al: The needs and opportunities for housing improvement for malaria control in southern Tanzania. Malar J 2023, 22:69. pmid:36849883
- 35. Jones C, Matta A, Pinder M, D’Alessandro U, Knudsen J, Lindsay SW: House screening for malaria control: views and experiences of participants in the RooPfs trial. Malar J 2022, 21:294. pmid:36271422
- 36. Adhikari B, Pell C, Phommasone K, Soundala X, Kommarasy P, Pongvongsa T, et al: Elements of effective community engagement: lessons from a targeted malaria elimination study in Lao PDR (Laos). Glob Health Action 2017, 10:1366136. pmid:28914184
- 37.
CDC: Principles of Community Engagement. NIH Publication No 11–7782 2011, 2nd edition.
- 38. Klingberg S, Adhikari B, Draper CE, Bosire E, Nyirenda D, Tiigah P, et al: Enhanced or hindered research benefits? A realist review of community engagement and participatory research practices for non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2024, 9. pmid:38341191
- 39. Hacker K, Tendulkar SA, Rideout C, Bhuiya N, Trinh-Shevrin C, Savage CP, et al: Community capacity building and sustainability: outcomes of community-based participatory research. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2012, 6:349–360. pmid:22982848
- 40. Shenton FC, Jawara M, Carrasco-Tenezaca M, Knudsen J, D’Alessandro U, Lindsay SW: The durability, functionality and acceptability of novel screened doors and windows after 4 years of use in a Gambian village: a cross-sectional survey. Malar J 2022, 21:64. pmid:35197072
- 41. Monroe A, Olapeju B, Moore S, Hunter G, Merritt AP, Okumu F, et al: Improving malaria control by understanding human behaviour. Bull World Health Organ 2021, 99:837–839. pmid:34737477
- 42.
WHO: Proportion of children under five years of age who slept under an insecticide treated mosquito net. https://bit.ly/47gWIzp (accessed on 1st August, 2023). 2023.
- 43.
Foster GM: The Anatomy of Envy: A Study In Symbolic Behavior1.
- 44. Vincent R, Adhikari B, Duddy C, Richardson E, Wong G, Lavery J, et al: ‘Working relationships’ across difference-a realist review of community engagement with malaria research. Wellcome Open Research 2022, 7:13. pmid:37621950
- 45. Gikonyo C, Bejon P, Marsh V, Molyneux S: Taking social relationships seriously: lessons learned from the informed consent practices of a vaccine trial on the Kenyan Coast. Soc Sci Med 2008, 67:708–720. pmid:18362046
- 46. Njue M, Molyneux S, Kombe F, Mwalukore S, Kamuya D, Marsh V: Benefits in cash or in kind? A community consultation on types of benefits in health research on the Kenyan Coast. PLoS One 2015, 10:e0127842. pmid:26010783
- 47. Njue M, Kombe F, Mwalukore S, Molyneux S, Marsh V: What are fair study benefits in international health research? Consulting community members in Kenya. PLoS One 2014, 9:e113112. pmid:25470596
- 48. Stadler J, Saethre E: Rumours about blood and reimbursements in a microbicide gel trial. African Journal of AIDS Research 2010, 9:345–353. pmid:25875883
- 49. Sullivan K, Mtande T, Jaffe E, Rosenberg N, Zimba C, Hoffman I, et al: Views among Malawian women about joining HIV prevention clinical trials when pregnant. AIDS research and therapy 2020, 17:1–12.
- 50. Adhikari B, Yeong Cheah P, von Seidlein L: Trust is the common denominator for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A literature review. Vaccine X 2022, 12:100213. pmid:36217424
- 51.
WHO: Rumour Tracker Programme: A community-based approach to address information gaps and misinformation on COVID-19. https://bit.ly/3OEJODS (accessed on 2nd August, 2023). 2022.