Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The COVID-19 pandemic and food insecurity in households with children: A systematic review

  • Anna Williams,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

  • Nisreen A. Alwan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom

  • Elizabeth Taylor,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

  • Dianna Smith,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

  • Nida Ziauddeen

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Nida.Ziauddeen@soton.ac.uk

    Affiliations School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, Southampton, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background

Food insecurity is defined as not having safe and regular access to nutritious food to meet basic needs. This review aimed to systematically examine the evidence analysing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on food insecurity and diet quality in households with children <18 years in high-income countries.

Methods

EMBASE, Cochrane Library, International Bibliography of Social Science, and Web of Science; and relevant sites for grey literature were searched on 01/09/2023. Observational studies published from 01/01/2020 until 31/08/2023 in English were included. Systematic reviews and conference abstracts were excluded. Studies with population from countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development were included. Studies were excluded if their population did not include households with children under 18 years. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute (NIH) tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was used for quality assessment. The results are presented as a narrative review.

Results

5,626 records were identified and 19 studies were included. Thirteen were cross-sectional, and six cohorts. Twelve studies were based in the USA, three in Canada, one each in Italy and Australia and two in the UK. Twelve studies reported that the COVID-19 pandemic worsened food insecurity in households with children. One study reported that very low food security had improved likely due to increase in benefits as part of responsive actions to the pandemic by the government.

Conclusion

Although studies measured food insecurity using different tools, most showed that the pandemic worsened food security in households with children. Lack of diversity in recruited population groups and oversampling of high-risk groups leads to a non-representative sample limiting the generalisability. Food insecure families should be supported, and interventions targeting food insecurity should be developed to improve long-term health.

Introduction

Lockdowns and other strategies to prevent the spread of SARSCoV2 led to disruptions in employment and increasing experience of adversities [1, 2]. Data from the Office for National Statistics showed that there were 220,000 fewer people in employment between April to June 2020 (first three months of lockdown) than between January and March 2020 in the UK [3]. Older and younger workers, part-time workers and self-employed were the worst affected [3].

The Food and Agriculture organisation of the United Nations describes a person to be food insecure when they “lack regular access to safe and nutritious food for normal growth and development and an active and healthy life” [4]. Global food insecurity has been increasing since 2014 (21.2%) but increased sharply (equivalent to the rise in the previous five years) in 2020 (29.5%) and remained high in 2021 [5]. While the prevalence of overall food security remained constant in 2021, the prevalence of severe food insecurity increased significantly implying that those previously facing moderate food insecurity were pushed into severe food insecurity. A total of 2.3 billion people faced food insecurity in 2021 [5]. In the UK, approximately 8% of the population were food insecure at this time, according to government estimates [6].

Adults with income losses resulting from COVID-19 measures were at increased risk of experiencing food insecurity than adults whose income had not been affected [7]. Households that were already food insecure experienced greater limits on diet quantity and quality during the pandemic, with negative impacts on physical and mental health or wellbeing [710]. Food insecurity is associated with lower dietary quality in adults but not consistently in children, potentially due to adults compromising their diet quality to shield children [11]. Food insecurity during early childhood can impair cognitive development due to poor nutrient intake. Exposure to increased anxiety and stress because of food insecurity could also impact development through physiological and psychological mechanisms. Children would also be less likely to take part in extracurricular activities due to low monetary resource further impacting their development [12].

To our knowledge, no systematic reviews have looked at rates of food insecurity in households with children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in high income countries. We aimed to systematically review the current literature to describe the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and food insecurity in households with children (<18 years) from countries that are part of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), used as a proxy for high income countries.

Methods

The PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework was used to develop a search strategy. The population was households with children under 18 years. The intervention was the direct and indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The comparator was the prevalence of food insecurity before the COVID-19 pandemic, or comparison to a different geographical area. The primary outcome was household food insecurity. Secondary outcomes were poverty status, mental health, diet quality and weight status.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. Observational studies that examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household food insecurity in households with children were included. Studies with population from countries in the OECD [13] were included. Studies published after 01/01/2020 until the search date and in English were included. The search was run on 31/08/2022 and updated to 31/08/2023 in September 2023. Systematic reviews and conference abstracts were excluded. Studies were excluded if their population did not include households with children under 18 years. The search strategy was developed with input from a research librarian and is presented in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308699.t001

Four electronic databases were searched: EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane library, International Bibliography of Social Science and Web of Science. Snowball sampling was also undertaken and reference lists were hand searched for relevant articles to be included into the screening process. A search of the grey literature was undertaken on the following organisation websites: Food Foundation, Sustain, Christians against Poverty, Trussell trust, Nourish Scotland, Independent Food Aid Network, Evidence and Network on UK Household Food Insecurity (ENUF), Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Citizen’s Advice. The review was not registered.

The screening management software Rayyan [14] was used for the screening of titles and abstracts for eligibility. A 10% random sample of the titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers (AW, NZ). The agreement between reviewers was 92% and one author then screened the remaining titles and abstracts (AW). Conflicting decisions were mediated by a third reviewer (NAA). Full-text screening was completed by AW and NZ. Any conflicts were discussed, and reviewers had an agreement rate of 100%. Data was extracted independently from all included studies by two reviewers (AW, NZ) except for articles included through the updated search which was done by NZ. Agreement rate for data extraction was 100% between the reviewers. Items extracted from studies included study design, study location, sample size, data collection period, population, ethnicity, child age, exposure/comparison group, outcome measurement tools and outcome data.

The quality of each study was independently assessed by two reviewers (AW, NZ), using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [15]. Any disagreements were resolved in discussion. The grey literature study was excluded from the quality assessment as it was not applicable to the quality assessment tool.

Results

A PRISMA flow diagram was used to document the screening process (Fig 1) [16]. 5617 records were identified through the electronic database search, 775 of which were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 4842 records were screened, of these 4804 records were excluded, leaving 38 records for full-text screening. An additional eight records were included in full-text screening—five from grey literature searching, and three from reference searching. A total of 46 full-text records were screened and 15 were originally included in this narrative review with three articles being added from the updated search [1735].

Study characteristics are described in Table 3. Thirteen studies were cross-sectional and six were cohorts. Of the 19 included studies, twelve studies were based in the USA [1720, 25, 28, 29, 3135], three in Canada [22, 23, 30], one each in Italy [24] and Australia [27], and two studies used data from both UK and Great Britain populations [21, 26].

The included studies used different measures for the outcome of food insecurity. Eight studies used the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) food security survey modules [36], seven of which used the six-item [1820, 27, 3133] and one used the 18-item [25]. One study [26] captured moderate and severe experiences of food insecurity in adults using three modified items from the ten-item USDA Adult Food Security [36] and measured child food insecurity using four questions also used by the USDA. Six studies [17, 24, 2830, 34] used the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign (HVS) [37]. One study [22] adapted the HVS question related to not having enough money to buy food to capture food security in the last month and over the next 6 months. One study [23] used Health Canada’s 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module. One study [35] assessed food insecurity by asking a yes/no question about “worry about the amount or type of food available to you at home due to money or lack of availability”. One study [21] asked one question each about quantity and access to sufficient food as proxy for food security based on the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations definition [4].

Food Insecurity in households with children

All studies included food insecurity as an outcome of which thirteen studies compared the prevalence before and during the pandemic (Table 4, Fig 2). Twelve studies reported an increase in food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic [1820, 2325, 2830, 3234]. One of the twelve studies conducted three surveys during the course of the pandemic [1820] and found that the prevalence of food security in the study population had returned to pre-pandemic levels but the prevalence of very low food security remained higher (9.6% pre-pandemic to 16.8% in May 2021) but had decreased from earlier pandemic survey time-points [20]. One study examined the prevalence of very low food insecurity in low-income households with children in the US [31] and reported a decrease of 5.3% from 2020 pre-COVID-19 restrictions and 8.2% from 2019. This decrease was likely due to an increase in nutritional assistance benefits as part of responsive actions to the pandemic by the government.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The prevalence of food insecurity in the included studies before and during the pandemic.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308699.g002

thumbnail
Table 4. Summary of results reported across the included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308699.t004

Three studies examined prevalence of food insecurity at different time-points during the pandemic [26, 27, 35] (Table 3). Two studies used repeated cross-sectional surveys, one at five time-points [26] in the UK beginning from the first two weeks of lockdown (March/April 2020) till January 2021 and the other [27] at three time-points in Australia beginning from May 2020 till May 2021. Both studies found that prevalence was highest at the first time-point early in the pandemic and decreased over time. The study in the UK [26] found that the prevalence in households with children was higher at all time-points than in households without children (20.8% compared to 13.7% in the first two weeks of lockdown and 9.6% compared to 6.6% in January 2021). The third study [35] recruited middle school students in the US and found that prevalence of food insecurity had increased from 28.4% in October 2020 to 30.3% in April/May 2021 however both time-points were analysed as cross-sectional data as only 56% (n = 49) responded to the survey at both time-points.

Three studies reported on food insecurity during the pandemic only [17, 21, 22]. Among 200 families screened for food insecurity during routine paediatric visits in April/May 2020, 47% reported food insecurity, 94% of whom indicated that this had begun or worsened during the pandemic [17]. Analysis of data from three waves of the UK Understanding Society Covid Survey showed that 13% of households reported any person in the household being unable to eat healthy and nutritious food and 2% reported being hungry but not eating [21]. A cross-sectional online survey of participants from a longitudinal family-based cohort in April/May 2020 found that 8.5% of mothers and 4.8% of fathers had concerns about food security during the past month and were concerned about food security over the next six months [22].

Job disruption/loss of income

No studies reported on poverty status explicitly, but there are proxy indicators of possible financial strain in households as it may impact on food insecurity. Overall, seven studies reported on some aspect of pandemic- related job disruption and/or loss of income [18, 19, 21, 24, 26, 28, 32] and one study provided an indication of financial stress [22]. Four of these studies reported on job loss and/or furlough (suspended from employment with pay). Three studies reported similar proportions respondents being affected by factors related to job disruption or loss of income (40% [28], 40.9% [18] and 42.7% [24]). The proportion of the population affected by job/income disruption was lower in the fourth study (18%) [21].

Four studies reported on decrease in income during the pandemic in the study population [18, 19, 26, 28]. This ranged from 22% who reported a drop in income across the course of the pandemic (March 2020 to January 2021) [26] to 60.1% who lost income early in the pandemic (April/May 2020) [18]. However, on follow-up, the proportion who reported a recent decrease in income had reduced to 39.7% in September 2020 [19]. Finally, one study reported a combined percentage of 35.3% who experienced job disruption or decrease in income [32].

In the study that reported on financial stress [22], 19% of mothers and 14% of fathers reported financial stress in the past month with a higher proportion expecting to experience financial stress over the next six months (22% of mothers and 18% of fathers).

Prevalence of food insecurity was higher among participants facing job disruption/loss of income [18, 32]. Respondents who reported financial issues only as a reason for food insecurity over the course of the pandemic experienced an increase in food insecurity from 16% in the first two weeks of lockdown (March 2020) to 26% in May 2020 and 42% in January 2021 [26]. Families who were food secure pre-pandemic that faced decreased income, job loss or reduction in working hours were more than twice as likely to be at risk of early pandemic food insecurity [28] as were furloughed participants [21].

Mental health

Two studies considered mental health outcomes [22, 29]. One study [22] asked parents to self-report stress by rating on a scale from 1 (no stress) to 10 (extreme stress) and found that parents reported moderately high levels of stress, with an average score of 6.0 (standard deviation (SD) 2.5) in fathers and 6.8 (SD 1.9) in mothers. Parents were also asked to report on their child’s stress about COVID-19 with a three-item scale with 45% reporting their child was “somewhat concerned” or “very concerned”. The other study [29] assessed mental health using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (two questions each on anxiety and depression) and found an increase in depression (17.5% during the pandemic, 13.4% before the pandemic), anxiety (22.0% during, 17.7% before) and abnormal mental health screen (24.2% during 19.6% before) in their sample compared to before the pandemic. Food insecure participants were found to be more likely to have depression and anxiety than food insecure participants, both before and during the pandemic. Both food secure and insecure participants reported worsening of mental health during the pandemic but the change in prevalence was more in food insecure participants.

Diet quality

Five studies included some aspect of diet quality [18, 19, 22, 24, 35]. Two studies assessed the home food environment [18, 19], two studies reported on change in diet behaviours [22, 24] and one study assessed fruit and vegetable and sugar sweetened beverage intake [35].

Two studies assessed the family’s home food environment at two time points by asking questions about the availability of high calorie snack food, desserts and sweets, fresh foods, non-perishable processed food and total amount of food [18, 19]. Total amount of food increased for 56% of food secure families, but decreased for 53% of families who experienced very low food security. Non-perishable, processed food items increased the most in households with very low food security during the pandemic (55.9%), compared to an increase of 46.0% in households experiencing low food security and 40.6% in food secure households. Fresh foods in the home increased by 36% of food secure households and 38% in food insecure households, but decreased in households with low food security (24%) and in households with very low food security (36%) [18]. The follow-up survey in September 2020 [19] found that about half of families did not change the amount of different types of food available. Among families that reported change, a greater percentage decreased the amount of high-calorie snack food and desserts and sweets, and a greater percentage increased the amount of fresh foods and non-perishable processed foods [19].

In one of the studies that assessed diet behaviours [22], parents self-reported their own and their child’s change in eating. Most parents reported change (70% of mothers, 60% fathers, 51% children). The most common changes in children were eating more food of any type (42%) and eating more snack food (55%). In the other study [24], parents reported their child’s change in eating with 27.3% eating more food of any type. Parents specifically reported an increase in consumption of snacks (60.3%), fruit juice (14%) and soft drinks (10.4%).

One further study [35] asked participants (students aged 10–14 years) to indicate portions of fruit and vegetables and sugar sweetened beverages consumed per day in the previous two weeks. Less than a third met the 5-a-day recommendation for fruit and vegetables and about 30% reported consuming less than one portion per day. Over 80% reported consuming one or more sugar sweetened beverages per day [35].

Weight status

No studies assessed weight change.

Discussion

This systematic review included 19 studies that examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on food security in households with children. Most studies that compared prevalence of food insecurity before and during the COVID-19 pandemic found that food insecurity increased in households with children. A high proportion of participants reported job and income losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. One study [31] reported a decrease in food insecurity likely due to pandemic responsive actions by the government as part of which nutritional assistance benefits increased. This review builds on existing evidence exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on food insecurity. A review of nine studies on the effects of the pandemic in Australia found an increase of food insecurity in independent participants of all ages due to multiple economic and physical barriers due to the COVID-19 pandemic [38]. These included the government travel restrictions and consumer stockpiling, which reduced the ability of people to access sufficient food of the right nutritional balance for a healthy diet [38]. Our review expands on these findings by widening the range of countries included and by focusing on households with children as our population.

The findings on mental health in this review complement the findings of a review of 28 studies about mental health issues linked to COVID-19 which found an increase in symptoms of depression, stress and anxiety attributed to quarantine and disruption, economic worries, and fear of illness [39].

Although our findings suggest that diet composition had changed for households with children during the COVID-19 pandemic, this conflicts with a systematic review of 38 studies which concluded there was insufficient evidence to infer changes in diet quality during the pandemic, however, only four studies included children in their study population [40]. Our review shows that food insecurity in households with children increased during the pandemic. The studies that examined the prevalence during the course of the pandemic found that the prevalence of food insecurity was highest when restrictions were first implemented and improved during the course of the pandemic when restrictions were eased. The prevalence of very low food security remained high later in the pandemic even though the prevalence of food security had returned to pre-pandemic levels [20].

Future research should focus on how food insecurity changed over the course of the pandemic, impact of the discontinuation of pandemic responsive actions and to identify adaptations to current support schemes to address food insecurity. Research into the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on food insecurity in households with children is recommended to see if the effects are maintained, worsened, or improved; and to identify factors associated with any changes. Strategies to address the risk factors and improve the long-term prognosis of those with food insecurity could involve government organisations mandating a liveable wage in proportion to inflation and cost of living increase.

The strengths of this review include a comprehensive search strategy, using a range of electronic databases as well as a search of the grey literature surrounding the topic, to collate as many studies as possible. Use of a second reviewer for both screening and quality assessment is a strength as this reduces risk of bias in this review. However, limitations of this review include excluding studies that were not published in English, as this may lead to relevant literature not being included. This is particularly relevant as our review included countries from the OECD [13], and many of these countries do not have English as their primary language. This review looks at populations in countries in the OECD. However, nearly two-thirds (63.2%) of the studies included in this review, were based in the USA [1720, 25, 28, 29, 3135]. This impacts the generalisability of our findings due to the lack of diversity in countries. Additionally, lack of diversity in recruited population groups and oversampling of high-risk groups leads to a non-representative sample, also limiting the generalisability. Multiplicity of the population included in each study made it difficult for comparison. Although the specified population for this review was households with children under 18 years, some studies used a smaller age group or households as their population, with children as a subgroup. Over two-thirds of the studies included in this review were cross-sectional and relied on retrospective report of food insecurity prior to the pandemic. Although studies used different measures for food insecurity, the measures used were commonly used in research and/or practice with the exception of three studies which adapted questions to capture aspects of food insecurity. Other outcomes assessed in this review were measured through study specific questions and thus were not comparable across different studies.

In summary, this review found that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with worsening of food security in households with children. Increase in stress and worsening of mental health outcomes during the pandemic was reported in the studies that examined these outcomes. Schemes that improve food access could be protective against food insecurity but high rates of food insecurity were found in those accessing food benefit schemes highlighting the need to review the level of support provided by these schemes. Protection against food insecurity should be factored in pandemic preparation.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2020 for abstracts checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308699.s001

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. The Lancet. Redefining vulnerability in the era of COVID-19. The Lancet. 2020 Apr;395(10230):1089. pmid:32247378
  2. 2. Wright L, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Does thinking make it so? Differential associations between adversity worries and experiences and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Sep;75(9):817–23. pmid:33483341
  3. 3. Office for National Statistics. Employment in the UK: August 2020 [Internet]. 2020 Aug. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/employmentintheuk/august2020
  4. 4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Hunger and food insecurity [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 8]. https://www.fao.org/hunger/en/
  5. 5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. SDG Indicators Data Portal [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 8]. https://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals-data-portal/data/indicators/212-prevalence-of-moderate-or-severe-food-insecurity-in-the-population-based-on-the-food-insecurity-experience-scale/en
  6. 6. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. United Kingdom Food Security Report 2021: Theme 4: Food Security at Household Level [Internet]. 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021-theme-4-food-security-at-household-level
  7. 7. Loopstra R. Vulnerability to food insecurity since the COVID-19 lockdown [Internet]. The Food Foundation; 2020. https://foodfoundation.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-10/Report_COVID19FoodInsecurity-final.pdf
  8. 8. Connors C, Malan L, Canavan S, Sissoko F, Carmo M, Sheppard C, et al. The lived experience of food insecurity under Covid-19 [Internet]. Food Standards Agency; 2020. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/fsa-food-insecurity-2020_-report-v5.pdf
  9. 9. Koltai J, Toffolutti V, McKee M, Stuckler D. Prevalence and changes in food-related hardships by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A longitudinal panel study. Lancet Reg Health—Eur. 2021 Jul;6:100125. pmid:34308408
  10. 10. Mattioli AV, Sciomer S, Cocchi C, Maffei S, Gallina S. Quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak: Changes in diet and physical activity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis NMCD. 2020 Aug 28;30(9):1409–17. pmid:32571612
  11. 11. Hanson KL, Connor LM. Food insecurity and dietary quality in US adults and children: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):684–92. pmid:24944059
  12. 12. Gallegos D, Eivers A, Sondergeld P, Pattinson C. Food Insecurity and Child Development: A State-of-the-Art Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8990. pmid:34501578
  13. 13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [Internet]. https://www.oecd.org
  14. 14. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec;5(1):210. pmid:27919275
  15. 15. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools [Internet]. 2013. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
  16. 16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;n71. pmid:33782057
  17. 17. Abrams SA, Avalos A, Gray M, Hawthorne KM. High Level of Food Insecurity among Families with Children Seeking Routine Care at Federally Qualified Health Centers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. J Pediatr X. 2020;4:100044. pmid:32864604
  18. 18. Adams EL, Caccavale LJ, Smith D, Bean MK. Food Insecurity, the Home Food Environment, and Parent Feeding Practices in the Era of COVID-19. Obesity. 2020 Nov;28(11):2056–63. pmid:32762129
  19. 19. Adams EL, Caccavale LJ, Smith D, Bean MK. Longitudinal patterns of food insecurity, the home food environment, and parent feeding practices during COVID-19. Obes Sci Pract. 2021 Aug;7(4):415–24. pmid:34230855
  20. 20. Adams EL, Caccavale LJ, Smith DI, Bean MK. Food Insecurity, Federal Nutrition Support, and Parent Feeding Practices During COVID-19: A 1-Year Follow-up Study. Public Health Rep. 2023 Mar;138(2):323–32. pmid:36416035
  21. 21. Brown H, Mills S, Albani V. Socioeconomic risks of food insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK: findings from the Understanding Society Covid Survey. BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec;22(1):590. pmid:35346131
  22. 22. Carroll N, Sadowski A, Laila A, Hruska V, Nixon M, Ma D, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on Health Behavior, Stress, Financial and Food Security among Middle to High Income Canadian Families with Young Children. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 7;12(8):2352. pmid:32784530
  23. 23. Cyrenne-Dussault M, Sirois M, St-Pierre J, Drouin-Chartier JP. Food insecurity in households of children receiving care at a paediatric obesity management clinic in Montreal: Overall prevalence and changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Dec 9;27(7):396–402. pmid:36518818
  24. 24. Dondi A, Candela E, Morigi F, Lenzi J, Pierantoni L, Lanari M. Parents’ Perception of Food Insecurity and of Its Effects on Their Children in Italy Six Months after the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak. Nutrients. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):121. pmid:33396310
  25. 25. Escobar M, Mendez AD, Encinas MR, Villagomez S, Wojcicki JM. High food insecurity in Latinx families and associated COVID-19 infection in the Greater Bay Area, California. BMC Nutr. 2021 Dec;7(1):23. pmid:34112257
  26. 26. Goudie S, McIntyre Z. A crisis within a crisis: The Impact of Covid-19 on Household Food Security [Internet]. The Food Foundation; 2021. https://foodfoundation.org.uk/publication/crisis-within-crisis-impact-covid-19-household-food-security
  27. 27. Kent K, Murray S, Penrose B, Auckland S, Horton E, Lester E, et al. The new normal for food insecurity? A repeated cross-sectional survey over 1 year during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 6;19(1):115.
  28. 28. Kowalski AJ, Kuhn AP, Lane HG, Trude AC, Selam H, Hager ER, et al. Pre-pandemic to early-pandemic changes in risk of household food insecurity among Maryland families with children. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jun;25(6):1701–10.
  29. 29. Lim JT, Ly NP, Willen SM, Iwanaga K, Gibb ER, Chan M, et al. Food insecurity and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in cystic fibrosis households. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 May;57(5):1238–44. pmid:35112507
  30. 30. MacBain E, Eltorki M, Marjerrison S, Pardhan A, Wahi G, Ngo QN. Prevalence and characterization of food insecurity in a Canadian paediatric emergency department. Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jun 6;28(4):229–34. pmid:37287481
  31. 31. Molitor F, Doerr C. Very Low Food Security Among Low-Income Households With Children in California Before and Shortly After the Economic Downturn From COVID-19. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Jan 7;18:200517.
  32. 32. Niles MT, Beavers AW, Clay LA, Dougan MM, Pignotti GA, Rogus S, et al. A Multi-Site Analysis of the Prevalence of Food Insecurity in the United States, before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Dec;5(12):nzab135. pmid:34934898
  33. 33. Parekh N, Ali SH, O’Connor J, Tozan Y, Jones AM, Capasso A, et al. Food insecurity among households with children during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a study among social media users across the United States. Nutr J. 2021 Dec;20(1):73. pmid:34461913
  34. 34. Sharma SV, Chuang RJ, Rushing M, Naylor B, Ranjit N, Pomeroy M, et al. Social Determinants of Health–Related Needs During COVID-19 Among Low-Income Households With Children. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 1;17:200322. pmid:33006541
  35. 35. St. Pierre C, Guan W, Merrill J, Sacheck JM. Urban Youth Perspectives on Food Insecurity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the COACHES Study. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 20;14(3):455. pmid:35276814
  36. 36. United States Department of Agriculture. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module [Internet]. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/survey-tools/#six
  37. 37. Hager ER, Quigg AM, Black MM, Coleman SM, Heeren T, Rose-Jacobs R, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e26–32. pmid:20595453
  38. 38. Louie S, Shi Y, Allman-Farinelli M. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on food security in Australia: A scoping review. Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;79(1):28–47. pmid:35233911
  39. 39. Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S, Nordentoft M, Crossley N, Jones N, et al. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):813–24. pmid:32682460
  40. 40. Campbell H, Wood AC. Challenges in Feeding Children Posed by the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review of Changes in Dietary Intake Combined with a Dietitian’s Perspective. Curr Nutr Rep. 2021 Sep;10(3):155–65. pmid:33993426