Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Alcohol outlet density and adolescent drinking behaviors in Thailand, 2007–2017: A spatiotemporal mixed model analysis

  • Polathep Vichitkunakorn,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

  • Sawitri Assanangkornchai,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

  • Kanittha Thaikla,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation

    Affiliation Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

  • Suhaimee Buya,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliations School of Information, Computer and Communication Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand, School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Ishikawa, Japan

  • Supeecha Rungruang,

    Roles Project administration

    Affiliation Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

  • Mfahmee Talib,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology

    Affiliation Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, Muang, Pattani, Thailand

  • Warangkhana Duangpaen,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla, University, Songkhla, Thailand

  • Warintorn Bunyanukul,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

  • Monsicha Sittisombut

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    6210310175@psu.ac.th

    Affiliation School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationship between alcohol outlet density and the proportion of alcohol consumption among Thai adolescents. We utilized the alcohol consumption data from the 2007, 2011, and 2017 Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption Survey in Thailand. We analyzed the relationships between alcohol sales license figures and consumption behavior using a spatiotemporal mixed model. Our data had two levels. The upper (provincial) level featured alcohol sales license density (spatial effect), the years of survey (temporal effect), and the social deprivation index. The lower (individual) level included the demographic data of the adolescents. A total of 9,566 Thai adolescents participated in this study, based on surveys conducted in 2007 (n = 4,731), 2011 (n = 3,466), and 2017 (n = 1,369). The density of alcohol sales licenses increased the odds for the one-year current drinker category (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.45), especially in male adolescents (OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04–1.14). Furthermore, it increased the odds for the heavy episodic drinker category for female adolescents (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.05–1.44). Increased alcohol sales licenses are associated with higher alcohol consumption among Thai adolescents. This highlights the need for government organizations to develop and apply strategies to reduce the number of licenses for the sale of alcohol.

Introduction

Alcohol is a major threat to the individual and society as a whole. The effects on individual health range from cardiovascular diseases and infectious diseases to injuries [1]. It can lead to suicide and interpersonal violence [2]. Specifically, alcohol consumption in adolescents can lead to cognitive function deficit [3], an increased risk of psychological distress [4], development of severe liver disease [5], and alcohol dependence in adulthood [6]. To exacerbate the situation, there has been an increase in various marketing efforts from the alcohol industry, including mass media commercials, in-store displays, merchandise, and online marketing [7, 8].

The World Health Organization has introduced SAFER strategies as alcohol control interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use. The strategies consist of the following: (1) Strengthen restriction on alcohol availability; (2) Advance and enforce drunk driving countermeasures; (3) Facilitate access to screening, brief interventions, and treatment; (4) Enforce bans or comprehensive restrictions on alcohol advertising, sponsorship, and promotion; and (5) Raise prices on alcohol through excise taxes and pricing policies [9].

Currently, Thailand has three major national laws that are in accordance with the SAFER strategies: the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008), Excise Act B.E. 2560 (2017), and Road Traffic Act B.E. 2522 (1979) [10]. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008) is Thailand’s first legislative effort aimed specifically at controlling the consumption and distribution of alcoholic beverages [11]. The Excise Act B.E. 2560 (2017) regulates the taxation and licensing of production, and the sales and import of products and services, including alcoholic products [12]. In the context of alcohol regulation, the Road Traffic Act B.E.2522 (1979) sets limits on the alcohol blood content (BAC) for drivers [10].

The alcohol industry targets adolescents [7]. Thailand’s National Statistical Office reported in the 2021 survey that 11.6% of participants aged 15–19 had consumed an alcoholic beverage at least once in their lifetime [13] despite the fact that Section 29 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008) [11] prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 20. Moreover, a study has shown that Thai adolescents are inclined to start drinking earlier than in the past [14].

In addition to causing health problems, alcohol consumption is one of the risk factors for road accidents [15, 16]. Road accidents are more common among adolescents, and are associated with alcohol use [1723]. According to the World Health Organization, Thailand has the highest number of road accidents in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and ranks in the top 10 worldwide, primarily owing to speed and binge drinking [24].

Restriction of physical availability, which is a part of SAFER strategies, has been proven effective [2]. Physical availability refers to the availability of alcohol within a person’s immediate surroundings, influenced by the likelihood that a person can encounter alcohol outlets [25]. The higher the alcohol outlet density, the easier it is for adolescents to access alcohol [22]. The density of alcohol sale outlets can be monitored using the “density of alcohol sales licenses” per 1,000 people. In the Thai context, the density of alcohol licenses can be determined from the number of sales licenses registered with the Excise Department. According to the Excise Act B.E. 2560 (2017), any person who intends to sell liquor needs permission, in the form of an alcohol sales license, from the excise authority. A study in New Zealand [26] examined the relationship between alcohol consumption and licenses granted within a 3 km radius of six university campuses and found that alcohol license density was positively correlated with drinkers and alcohol-related problems as well as alcohol consumption among adolescents.

Although a growing body of studies has documented the relationship between alcohol license density and alcohol consumption behaviors in adolescents, there remains a marked gap in the literature regarding the effects in the context of developing countries. The existing studies were predominantly single-center studies conducted mostly in developed countries [27, 28]. A critical review, focusing primarily on literature from developed countries, highlighted the need for diverse research settings as different jurisdictions have varying norms and legislation [29]. Furthermore, much of the existing research in developing countries has been limited due to the methodological constraints. For instance, they are mostly based on single-year data [3032]. Moreover, most studies have used longitudinal or panel data to track temporal changes [33], with outcomes including intimate partner violence [3437], drunk driving [38], motorcycle accidents [39], and hospitalization rates [33], rather than focusing directly on alcohol consumption as the outcome.

To address this gap in knowledge, we aimed to examine the relationship between alcohol license density and the proportion of alcohol consumption among adolescents at the provincial level from 2007 to 2017 in Thailand. Our hypothesis was as follows: the higher the alcohol density, the higher the proportion of adolescents’ alcohol use. Our findings will help bridge the gap between existing research in developed and developing countries as well as inform policymakers of measures for controlling liquor licenses in Thailand.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study involving an analysis of secondary data: nationally representative surveys and pre-existing sales license data. For the alcohol consumption data, we utilized data from the 2007, 2011, and 2017 waves of the Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption Surveys. They are nation-wide alcohol consumption surveys that have been conducted every four years by Thailand’s National Statistical Office since 2001.

For the alcohol outlet data, we employed the aggregate data on the number of alcohol sales licenses, involving the total number of licenses approved by Thailand’s Excise Department, Ministry of Finance, for each province in the years 2007, 2011 and 2017. The dataset also included the annual statistical information report on the population and households from the official statistics registration systems of the Department of Provincial Administration, Ministry of the Interior, Thailand.

The authors have applied for an amendment regarding protocols for analyses of anonymized secondary data. All obtained data were anonymous. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (REC. 62-054-18-1).

Participants

Our sample population, aged 15–19 years, was extracted from the original surveys, which recruited participants aged 15 years and older. Of the three waves, the survey in 2007 involved data collection from 4,731 adolescents. In the subsequent wave in 2011, 3,466 adolescents were recruited. The most recent wave in 2017 included 1,369 participants. Cumulatively, these surveys represent a total of 9,566 Thai adolescents. We acknowledge that our study includes participants below the legal drinking age.

Data collection

We obtained the secondary data concerning alcohol consumption and alcohol sales licenses directly from the Thai National Statistical Office and the Excise Department, respectively. Originally, all alcohol consumption survey waves employed a two-stage stratified sampling approach. The provinces were chosen as strata. The units for the first and second stages were villages and households, respectively. The villages were chosen in proportion to the population of each province. The households were systematically selected. However, notably, despite these methodological differences, the survey population and data collection procedures remained consistent across all three waves. In each instance, data were collected through face-to-face interviews, encompassing individuals aged 15 years and older from all geographical regions, provinces, and districts within Thailand. All data were accessed online on January 11, 2021.

Dependent variable: Proportion of alcohol consumption.

The outcome variable was proportion of alcohol consumption, including the proportion of current drinkers, regular drinkers, and heavy episodic drinkers (HEDs). To categorize the drinkers, we collected drinking frequency and the quantity of alcohol consumed as variables. The proportion was calculated as follows:

  • We calculated the proportion of current drinkers as the number of participants who drank at least one standard drink of alcohol during the 12 months preceding the interview and divided by the number of all participants.
  • We calculated the proportion of regular drinkers using the number of current drinkers who drank alcohol at least once per week or more, divided by the number of all current drinkers. Regular drinking is related to the lifetime risk of hospitalization for alcohol-related problems [40, 41].
  • We calculated the proportion of HEDs by dividing the number of current drinkers—those who drank at least four to five standard alcoholic drinks on at least one occasion—by the number of all current drinkers. This is one of the most important indicators of acute alcohol-related harm (e.g., injuries, accidents, and acute social consequences) [42] and chronic diseases (e.g., tuberculosis, epilepsy, ischemic heart disease, and cirrhosis) [43]. These can be provided by alcohol intoxication and drinking intensity [44].

Independent variables: Density of alcohol outlets or alcohol sales licenses.

In this study, we measured alcohol outlet density by alcohol sales license density and by population size, following the recommendations of the United States Department of Health and Human Services [45]. This index reflects the density of alcohol sales licenses in each province. We used the following formula: (1)

Potential confounding variable: Social deprivation index and other demographics.

The potential confounding variables include the social deprivation index, survey year, region of residence, household area, number of household members, marital status, educational level, monthly household income, and smoking status. The social deprivation index (SDI) is a socioeconomic indicator of social disparity, derived by integrating 18 economic and social variables from eight domains (location, demography, education, disability, employment, housing, crowdedness, and residential mobility). The relationships among the variables were explained using principal component analysis. We applied the SDI for each province in Thailand [46]. We then categorized all provinces into five equal SDI groups (quintiles). In the fifth quintile, the group with the highest values was the poorest. The group with the lowest value (first quintile) was the wealthiest. All confounding variables were collected and analyzed for each participant.

Statistical analysis

We applied a spatiotemporal mixed model using the following formula. The spatiotemporal mixed model forms a two-level nested structure by imposing alcohol consumption—including current, regular, and HEDs—as dependent variables. The independent variables contained two levels of information. At the upper (provincial) level, the major independent variables were the following: density of alcohol sales licenses in each province (spatial effect), survey year (temporal effect), and SDI. This model allowed us to analyze how the temporal dynamics—reflected through the survey years—impact alcohol consumption patterns across different provinces, alongside the spatial distribution of alcohol sales licenses. The confounding variables were collected at the lower (individual) level. They include survey year, region of residence, SDI, household area, number of household members, marital status, educational level, monthly household income, and smoking status. (2) where: B00 is a constant

B10 is a fixed slope

u1j is the deviation of the cluster-specific slope from the fixed slope

u0j is the random intercept variance

Xij represents the observations of the independent variable sequence I to group j

We applied a heatmap to visualize the distribution of the dependent (density of alcohol sales licenses in each province) and independent variables (proportion of alcohol consumption). We used different colors on the heatmap to show the statistical values in the different provinces. The colors illustrate the density of drinkers and their behavior patterns; dark colors indicate a high proportion of adolescent alcohol consumption, and light colors indicate a low proportion.

We analyzed the data using R software and the “openxlsx,” “epiDisplay,” “epicalc,” “data.table,” “DescTools,” “MASS,” “lme4,” “MCMCglmm,” and “plyr” contributed packages. We created the map using “QGIS,” an open source Geographic Information System (GIS) [47].

Results

Demographic data

The study surveyed Thai adolescents in 2007 (n = 4,731), 2011 (n = 3,466), and 2017 (n = 1,369), cumulatively comprising 9,566 participants (Table 1). The proportion of current drinkers increased from 24.4% in 2007 to 33.2% in 2017. The proportion varied significantly by region, from 38.3% in the north-east to 15.4% in the south. Current drinking rates were higher among the poor quintiles, small households, singles, and especially smokers.

thumbnail
Table 1. Percentage of alcohol drinking behavior with demographic and socioeconomic factors among Thai adolescents (n = 9,566).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308184.t001

For HEDs, the data show a significant fluctuation over the survey years (p < 0.001), with 79.3% of current drinkers experiencing heavy episodic drinking in 2007, 80.5% in 2011, and 45.2% in 2017. Heavy episodic drinking rates also varied by region. The proportion of HEDs significantly varied by household size (p < 0.001), marital status (p = 0.097), and smoking status (p < 0.001), with smokers having a significantly higher rate (77.0%).

For regular drinkers, there was a stable trend over the survey years, with no significant variation between regions, SDI quintiles, household area, educational level, or monthly household income (p > 0.05). Notably, smoking status significantly influenced regular drinking behavior, with smokers having a higher rate (45.7%, p < 0.001) compared to non-smokers.

Trend of alcohol sales licenses in 2007–2018 in Thailand

Fig 1 shows the number of alcohol sales licenses per 1,000 people from 2007 to 2018, an average of nine. In 2007 and 2008, the density of alcohol sales licenses was lower than in other years, while in 2015, it was higher than in other years. We concluded that the number of alcohol sales licenses showed steady density adjustments and no decline.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Number of liquor licenses per 1,000 Inhabitants in 2007–2018 in Thailand.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308184.g001

Relationship between alcohol sales licenses and proportion of alcohol consumption

The spatiotemporal mixed model analysis showed that an increase of one outlet per 1,000 population would increase the proportion of current drinkers among adolescents by 8% (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.45), especially in male adolescents (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14) (Table 2). However, it affected HEDs only among female adolescents (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05–1.44).

thumbnail
Table 2. Association of density of alcohol sales licenses, survey year, and social deprivation index with proportion of alcohol consumption among Thai adolescents: Results from a spatiotemporal mixed model analysis (N = 9,566).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308184.t002

In the survey year (temporal effect), the proportion of current drinkers in female adolescents continuously increased from 2007 to 2017 (for 2017, OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.66–3.75). The proportion of HEDs decreased by five times compared to 2007. In all the survey years, the drinking behaviors of current drinkers, HEDs, and regular drinkers were not associated with the SDI, except for female regular drinkers in the third quintile. They significantly consumed less alcohol than their counterparts in the first quintile, the richest participants (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.65).

Fig 2 presents the heatmaps for the number of alcohol sales licenses per 1,000 people and Thai adolescents’ proportion of alcohol consumption, which are the percentages of current drinkers and HEDs in each province in 2007, 2011, and 2017. In the 10-year period, the density of alcohol sales licenses was high in the same provinces (e.g., Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Phuket, Surat Thani, and their surrounding areas). When compared visually on a year-by-year basis, the density of alcohol sales licenses and Thai adolescents’ proportion of alcohol consumption showed no apparent relationship. Moreover, despite the overall trends in percentage and distribution of current drinkers being similar in all three waves, we found a decrease in heavy episodic drinking in 2017. The rate of heavy episodic drinking remained constant across all survey waves in provinces with previously high proportions.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Map of the density of alcohol sales licenses and proportion of alcohol consumption among Thai adolescents in 2007, 2011, and 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308184.g002

Discussion

Principal findings and previous studies

We found that the density of alcohol sales licenses increased the likelihood of current adolescent drinking, especially in male participants. This result was consistent with our hypothesis that the higher the density, the more adolescents would drink. Density increased the odds of heavy episodic drinking in female adolescents. The average number of alcohol sales licenses from 2007 to 2018 was nine per 1,000 people. The density of alcohol sales licenses was higher in 2015 compared with 2007 and 2008. We concluded that the number of alcohol sales licenses showed steady density adjustments and no decline. The number of alcohol sales licenses, at nine per 1,000 people, is alarmingly high compared to the average of 1.9 outlets per 1,000 adults in Japan [48] and 5.17 outlets per 1,000 residents in Wisconsin in the United States [49]. However, notably, the alcohol outlet licensing policy regarding the type of premises that need a license to sell alcohol differs from one jurisdiction to another.

The spatiotemporal mixed model analysis found no association between drinking patterns and the SDI in adolescents. However, existing research has suggested that adults with lower socioeconomic status tend to exhibit higher alcohol consumption compared to their higher socioeconomic counterparts [50, 51].

From the heatmap, we observed a markedly high density of alcohol outlets in Chon Buri Province in the central region, Chiang Mai Province in the northern region, Phuket Province, and Surat Thani Province in the southern region, as well as the surrounding areas of these four provinces in all three waves. These four provinces are well-known tourist destinations (e.g., Pattaya, located in Chon Buri Province) and ranked in the top 10 provinces with the most tourism revenue in 2017 [52]. However, we found fewer current drinkers in these areas compared to the other areas with lower alcohol outlet density. This result is in contrast to a previous study suggesting that the youth would be the population affected by the tourism drinking culture [53]. We hypothesized that this result is owing to industries concentrating more on tourists than on local residents, as evidenced by a previous study that found a high density of alcohol outlets in the vicinity of tourist attractions in Chon Buri Province [54].

Heavy episodic drinking among adolescents was associated with the density of sales licenses because the environment stimulates alcohol consumption. Paschall et al. proposed that this association was mediated by perceived alcohol availability and perceived approval of alcohol use [55]. Other studies have suggested that high outlet density was associated with alcohol supply by parents and the early initiation of alcohol consumption [5658]. These mechanisms might also explain our results. Although some findings differ [59, 60], our results corroborate those of previous studies that reported an association between outlet density and alcohol consumption in New Zealand, Brazil, and Australia [26, 32, 61]. Moreover, considering the results from previous studies showing that Thai adolescents often purchase alcoholic beverages from local vendors [62, 63], it is clear that more outlets mean more access to alcohol, which likely leads to more consumption.

Although the density of alcohol sales licenses changed consistently over time, the total number did not decrease. This supports Thaikla’s study [64], which found that the total number of alcohol outlets and alcohol outlet density between 2009 and 2011 were relatively stable. However, an increasing trend of alcohol outlets and the density of outlets were observed in 2014. This trend has also been reported in Canada and Los Angeles County in the United States [65, 66].

We found an increased incidence of heavy episodic drinking in female adolescents. Considering that the vigorous marketing efforts targeting women [67] and the modern Western lifestyle, characterized by shifted gender roles due to higher education and economic empowerment [68], influenced young Thai women to engage in heavy episodic drinking [69], we proposed that the abundant availability of alcohol could further encourage consumption. Nonetheless, our result contradicts data from Korea, where a decrease in alcohol consumption in the same group was observed [70]. In England, there has been a decline in alcohol consumption among female adolescents, albeit at a slower rate than in male adolescents [71]. A review of studies in high-income countries supports the findings of a declining trend in youth drinking that was more prevalent in male than female adolescents [72]. However, there is limited evidence regarding how female adolescent drinking has changed over the years in middle- and low-income countries with socioeconomic backgrounds similar to Thailand, despite the pronounced increase in drinking in countries such as Vietnam [73]. It should be noted that the increased consumption in Thai female adolescents is concerning as an early onset of alcohol use correlates with a higher likelihood of heavy episodic drinking among Thai females. Those who begin drinking before the age of 20 show greater odds of engaging in heavy episodic drinking compared to those who start at 25 or older. This relationship appears stronger among females than males [74].

Limitations and strengths

This study had several limitations. First, the causal relationship between the density of alcohol sales licenses and drinking behaviors may not provide a rational explanation. This is a common limitation in this type of research. Thus, the results of this study must be communicated cautiously to the public. Second, there were confounding factors because decisions on alcohol consumption might be influenced by factors other than access to sales licenses, such as types of outlets. As the types of outlets are not recorded in the registration form, our recommendation to the Excise Department is to collect these data. Further, the study included temporal relations and used information from a national survey of the National Statistical Office of Thailand, which dates back 10 years and does not concern prospective data. However, the researchers addressed the problem by collecting as many variables as possible—at both the individual and community levels—to mitigate these factors. Finally, we combined data from two sources, which can generate illusory relationships because of distinctive research methodologies and time lags. Thus, the information must be interpreted with caution.

This study’s strength lies in identifying a provincial driving force. The research team presented provincial data on key variables over a decade, including the density of sales licenses in each province and the proportion of alcohol consumption by province. This provides a reference for related agencies in other provinces to proceed with a relevant mechanism. Another strength of this study is the relatively high reliability of the data owing to the information concerning sales licenses covering up to 89% of the total.

Implications and further studies

Any policy and operational agency can apply our findings. The approach is relevant for the Office of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee, the Department of Disease Control, and the Ministry of Public Health. They can use our findings to make the Excise Department’s alcohol licensing control laws stricter. In addition, the Stop Drinking Network can benefit from campaigning at the local level. This study reports on each province separately to emphasize spatial management or area-based intervention in promoting the management measures of its local people and government agencies. It also highlights the necessity for those who make legislative decisions to provide academic evidence that the density of alcohol sales outlets affects behavior. They should highlight the impact of alcohol consumption in Thailand and advocate for a rigorous review of the rules for issuing and renewing licenses. These measures could reduce the detrimental effects of having numerous distribution points. At a practical level, it is recommended that future research focus on a smaller geographic area, such as the provincial level, to examine the difference in each neighborhood. We believe that the smaller the area, the easier it is for local governments to tackle these problems.

We should exercise caution when referring to the causal relationship between the density of alcohol sales licenses and drinking behaviors using prospective data in future studies. Similarly, analyzing information by combining databases should be performed cautiously. As we could not identify the types of outlets (e.g., local vendors, bars, and restaurants) and their relationship with consumption owing to our limited data, these topics are reserved for future work.

Conclusion

We found a correlation between increased alcohol sales licenses and alcohol consumption among Thai adolescents. Therefore, government organizations should devise and implement targeted strategies to reduce the number of licenses issued for the sale of alcohol and limit adolescent alcohol consumption. Moreover, Thailand can reduce adolescent alcohol use by strengthening the SAFER strategies: enforcing stricter sales and age restrictions, enhancing drink-driving enforcement, expanding youth-targeted treatments, banning appealing alcohol ads to youths, and raising alcohol prices. These steps will make alcohol less accessible and appealing to young people.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Editage and the International Affairs Department, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, for proofreading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/274603/9789241565639-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
  2. 2. Babor TF, Casswell S, Graham K, Huckle T, Livingston M, Rehm J, et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity—a summary of the third edition. Addiction. 2022;117(12):3024–36. pmid:36321607
  3. 3. Spear LP. Effects of adolescent alcohol consumption on the brain and behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2018;19(4):197–214. pmid:29467469
  4. 4. Balogun O, Koyanagi A, Stickley A, Gilmour S, Shibuya K. Alcohol Consumption and Psychological Distress in Adolescents: A Multi-Country Study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014;54(2):228–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.034.
  5. 5. Hagström H, Hemmingsson T, Discacciati A, Andreasson A. Alcohol consumption in late adolescence is associated with an increased risk of severe liver disease later in life. Journal of Hepatology. 2018;68(3):505–10. pmid:29395457
  6. 6. McCambridge J, McAlaney J, Rowe R. Adult Consequences of Late Adolescent Alcohol Consumption: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies. PLOS Medicine. 2011;8(2):e1000413. pmid:21346802
  7. 7. Scott S, Muirhead C, Shucksmith J, Tyrrell R, Kaner E. Does Industry-Driven Alcohol Marketing Influence Adolescent Drinking Behaviour? A Systematic Review. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2017;52(1):84–94. Epub 2016/11/20. pmid:27864186; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5169036.
  8. 8. Nelson JP. ALCOHOL MARKETING, ADOLESCENT DRINKING AND PUBLICATION BIAS IN LONGITUDINAL STUDIES: A CRITICAL SURVEY USING META-ANALYSIS. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2011;25(2):191–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00627.x.
  9. 9. World Health Organization. The SAFER technical package: five areas of intervention at national and subnational levels 2019 [cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516419.
  10. 10. Assanangkornchai S, Vichitkunakorn P. Facts and Figures Alcohol in Thailand 2019–2021. Songkhla 2022 [cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://cas.or.th/?p=10460.
  11. 11. Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008)[cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/files/14020220209072300.pdf.
  12. 12. Excise Act B.E. 2560 (2017)[cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://www.excise.go.th/cs/groups/public/documents/document/dwnt/mjk4/~edisp/uatucm298729.pdf.
  13. 13. National Statistical Office. The 2021 Health Behavior of Population Survey. Bangkok2021 [cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/nso/survey_detail/w6?set_lang=en.
  14. 14. Assanangkornchai S, Vichitkunakorn P. Does Drinking Initiation of Young Thai Drinkers Vary Over Time and Generation? Results of the National Surveys on Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption of the Thai Populations 2007 to 2017. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2020;44(11):2239–46. pmid:32890438
  15. 15. Waleewong O, Laslett AM, Chenhall R, Room R. Harm from others’ drinking-related aggression, violence and misconduct in five Asian countries and the implications. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;56:101–7. Epub 2018/04/06. pmid:29621741.
  16. 16. Suriyawongpaisal P, Kanchanasut S. Road traffic injuries in Thailand: Trends, selected underlying determinants and status of intervention. Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2003;10(1–2):95–104. pmid:12772492
  17. 17. Bedendo A, Andrade ALM, Opaleye ES, Noto AR. Binge drinking: a pattern associated with a risk of problems of alcohol use among university students. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem. 2017;25:e2925. Epub 2017/09/14. pmid:28902931; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5599070.
  18. 18. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Drinking and Driving among University Students in 22 Low, Middle Income and Emerging Economy Countries. Iranian journal of public health. 2015;44(10):1330–8. Epub 2015/11/18. pmid:26576345; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4644577.
  19. 19. Caetano R, Vaeth PAC, Romano E, Canino G. Drinking and Driving in Puerto Rico. Substance use & misuse. 2018;53(9):1492–500. Epub 2018/01/10. pmid:29313741; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6384005.
  20. 20. Li K, Simons-Morton BG, Hingson R. Impaired-driving prevalence among US high school students: associations with substance use and risky driving behaviors. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(11):e71–7. Epub 2013/09/14. pmid:24028236; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3828696.
  21. 21. Evans-Polce RJ, Patrick ME, O’Malley PM. Prospective Associations of 12th-Grade Drinking Intensity and Age 19/20 Driving-Related Consequences. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2017;61(3):389–91. Epub 2017/08/27. pmid:28842067; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5600484.
  22. 22. Goncalves PD, Cunha PJ, Malbergier A, do Amaral RA, de Oliveira LG, Yang JJ, et al. The association between low alcohol use and traffic risk behaviors among Brazilian college students. Alcohol (Fayetteville, NY). 2012;46(7):673–9. Epub 2012/08/28. pmid:22921955.
  23. 23. Li K, Simons-Morton BG, Vaca FE, Hingson R. Association between riding with an impaired driver and driving while impaired. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):620–6. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24639277; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3966504.
  24. 24. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2024 May 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684.
  25. 25. Stockwell T, Gruenewald PJ. Controls on the physical availability of alcohol. The essential handbook of treatment and prevention of alcohol problems. 2004:213–33.
  26. 26. Kypri K, Bell ML, Hay GC, Baxter J. Alcohol outlet density and university student drinking: a national study. Addiction. 2008;103(7):1131–8. pmid:18554346.
  27. 27. Huckle T, Huakau J, Sweetsur P, Huisman O, Casswell S. Density of alcohol outlets and teenage drinking: living in an alcogenic environment is associated with higher consumption in a metropolitan setting. Addiction. 2008;103(10):1614–21. pmid:18821871
  28. 28. Mori-Gamarra F, Moure-Rodríguez L, Sureda X, Carbia C, Royé D, Montes-Martínez A, et al. [Alcohol outlet density and alcohol consumption in Galician youth]. Gac Sanit. 2020;34(1):15–20. Epub 20181221. pmid:30583974.
  29. 29. Holmes J, Guo Y, Maheswaran R, Nicholls J, Meier PS, Brennan A. The impact of spatial and temporal availability of alcohol on its consumption and related harms: A critical review in the context of UK licensing policies. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014;33(5):515–25. pmid:25186193
  30. 30. Nakkash R, Ghandour LA, Anouti S, Nicolas J, Chalak A, Yassin N, et al. Surveying Alcohol Outlet Density in Four Neighborhoods of Beirut Lebanon: Implications for Future Research and National Policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9). Epub 20180914. pmid:30223460; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6164322.
  31. 31. Prasit N, Laohasiriwong W, Sornlorm K, Pimha S. Spatial Association Patterns of Binge Drinking, Alcohol Outlet Density, and Early Started Drinking in Thailand. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. 2021;56(4).
  32. 32. Carvalho BGC, Andrade ACS, Andrade RG, Mendes LL, Velasquez-Melendez G, Xavier CC, et al. Is alcohol outlet density in the residential area associated with alcohol consumption among adolescents? Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020;23:e200089. Epub 20200727. pmid:32725091.
  33. 33. Stockwell T, Zhao J, Martin G, Macdonald S, Vallance K, Treno A, et al. Minimum alcohol prices and outlet densities in British Columbia, Canada: estimated impacts on alcohol-attributable hospital admissions. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(11):2014–20. Epub 2013/04/18. pmid:23597383.
  34. 34. Waller MW, Iritani BJ, Christ SL, Tucker Halpern C, Moracco KE, Flewelling RL. Perpetration of intimate partner violence by young adult males: the association with alcohol outlet density and drinking behavior. Health & place. 2013;21:10–9. Epub 2013/01/17. pmid:23395919.
  35. 35. Slep AMS, Foran HM, Heyman RE, Snarr JD. Unique risk and protective factors for partner aggression in a large scale air force survey. J Community Health. 2010;35(4):375–83. pmid:20373136.
  36. 36. Stappenbeck CA, Fromme K. A longitudinal investigation of heavy drinking and physical dating violence in men and women. Addictive behaviors. 2010;35(5):479–85. Epub 2010/01/04. pmid:20079971.
  37. 37. Schofield TP, Denson TF. Alcohol Outlet Business Hours and Violent Crime in New York State. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2013;48(3):363–9. pmid:23349067
  38. 38. Schofield TP, Denson TF. Temporal alcohol availability predicts first-time drunk driving, but not repeat offending. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71169–e. pmid:23940711.
  39. 39. Ponicki WR, Gruenewald PJ, Remer LG. Spatial panel analyses of alcohol outlets and motor vehicle crashes in California: 1999–2008. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;55:135–43. Epub 2013/03/13. pmid:23537623.
  40. 40. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009 [cited 2023 Oct 10]. Available from: https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/212153/NHMRC-Alcohol-guidelines.pdf.
  41. 41. Rehm J, Room R, Taylor B. Method for moderation: measuring lifetime risk of alcohol‐attributable mortality as a basis for drinking guidelines. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2008;17(3):141–51. pmid:18763694
  42. 42. Global Health Observatory of the World Health Organization [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho.
  43. 43. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Borges GL, Graham K, Irving H, Kehoe T, et al. The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2010;105(5):817–43. Epub 2010/03/25. pmid:20331573; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3306013.
  44. 44. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2003;98(9):1209–28. pmid:12930209
  45. 45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide for measuring alcohol outlet density. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017 [cited 2023 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/pdfs/cdc-guide-for-measuring-alcohol-outlet-density.pdf.
  46. 46. Aungkulanon S, Tangcharoensathien V, Shibuya K, Bundhamcharoen K, Chongsuvivatwong V. Area-level socioeconomic deprivation and mortality differentials in Thailand: results from principal component analysis and cluster analysis. International journal for equity in health. 2017;16(1):117. Epub 2017/07/05. pmid:28673302; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5496369.
  47. 47. QGIS.org;. QGIS geographic information system. QGIS Association2024.
  48. 48. Koyama Y, Fujiwara T. Impact of Alcohol Outlet Density on Reported Cases of Child Maltreatment in Japan: Fixed Effects Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7. pmid:31637225
  49. 49. Milam AJ, Barajas CB, Buchalski Z, Wang L, Sadler RC, Furr-Holden CDM. Discrepancies in Local, State, and National Alcohol Outlet Listings: Implications for Research and Interventions. Substance Use & Misuse. 2020;55(14):2348–56. pmid:32917123
  50. 50. Lewer D, Meier P, Beard E, Boniface S, Kaner E. Unravelling the alcohol harm paradox: a population-based study of social gradients across very heavy drinking thresholds. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:599. Epub 20160719. pmid:27430342; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4950253.
  51. 51. Ng Fat L, Scholes S, Jivraj S. The Relationship Between Drinking Pattern, Social Capital, and Area-Deprivation: Findings From the Health Survey for England. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(1):20–9. pmid:27936361.
  52. 52. Ranking of Thailand Tourism Revenue by Province [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 15]. Available from: http://123.242.168.130/krabisys/travel_income_krabi/graph/b27.
  53. 53. Örnberg JC, Room R. Impacts of Tourism on Drinking and Alcohol Policy in Low-And Middle-Income Countries: A Selective Thematic Review. Contemporary Drug Problems. 2014;41(2):145–69.
  54. 54. Pleerux N. Distribution of alcohol outlets around educational institutes in Chon Buri province 2020.
  55. 55. Paschall MJ, Lipperman-Kreda S, Grube JW. Effects of the local alcohol environment on adolescents’ drinking behaviors and beliefs. Addiction. 2014;109(3):407–16. Epub 20131210. pmid:24320952; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3945163.
  56. 56. Rowland B, Toumbourou JW, Satyen L, Livingston M, Williams J. The relationship between the density of alcohol outlets and parental supply of alcohol to adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 2014;39(12):1898–903. pmid:25150657
  57. 57. Rowland B, Evans-Whipp T, Hemphill S, Leung R, Livingston M, Toumbourou JW. The density of alcohol outlets and adolescent alcohol consumption: An Australian longitudinal analysis. Health Place. 2016;37:43–9. Epub 20151217. pmid:26706310.
  58. 58. Chen MJ, Grube JW, Gruenewald PJ. Community alcohol outlet density and underage drinking. Addiction. 2010;105(2):270–8. pmid:20078485; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2810108.
  59. 59. Connor JL, Kypri K, Bell ML, Cousins K. Alcohol outlet density, levels of drinking and alcohol-related harm in New Zealand: a national study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(10):841–6. Epub 20101014. pmid:20947871.
  60. 60. Tanumihardjo J, Shoff SM, Koenings M, Zhang Z, Lai HJ. Association Between Alcohol Use Among College Students and Alcohol Outlet Proximity and Densities. Wmj. 2015;114(4):143–7. pmid:26436182.
  61. 61. Azar D, White V, Coomber K, Faulkner A, Livingston M, Chikritzhs T, et al. The association between alcohol outlet density and alcohol use among urban and regional Australian adolescents. Addiction. 2016;111(1):65–72. pmid:26332165
  62. 62. Luecha T, Peremans L, Dilles T, Van Rompaey B. The prevalence of alcohol consumption during early adolescence: a cross-sectional study in an eastern province, Thailand. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 2019;24(2):160–76.
  63. 63. Pramaunururut P, Anuntakulnathee P, Wangroongsarb P, Vongchansathapat T, Romsaithong K, Rangwanich J, et al. Alcohol consumption and its associated factors among adolescents in a rural community in central Thailand: a mixed-methods study. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):19605. pmid:36380057
  64. 64. Thaikla K, Jiraporncharoen W, Semmahasak S, Likhitsathian S, Angkurawaranon C. Recent trends in alcohol outlet density, distances from educational institutions and sales campaigns in Chiang Mai Municipality (Metropolitan), Thailand: should we be worried for our youths? Alcohol and alcoholism. 2016;51(2):210–4. pmid:26210116
  65. 65. Al-hamdani M, Smith S. Alcohol warning label perceptions: Emerging evidence for alcohol policy. Can J Public Health. 2015;106(6):e395–400. Epub 2015/12/19. pmid:26680431; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6972042.
  66. 66. Substance Abuse Prevention and Control Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Alcohol Outlet Density and Alcohol-Related Consequences by City and Community in Los Angeles County, 2020. 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 10]. Available from: http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/sapc/MDU/SpecialReport/AODReport2020.pdf.
  67. 67. Feeny E, Dain K, Varghese C, Atiim GA, Rekve D, Gouda HN. Protecting women and girls from tobacco and alcohol promotion. BMJ. 2021;374:n1516. pmid:34281828
  68. 68. Keyes KM, Li G, Hasin DS. Birth Cohort Effects and Gender Differences in Alcohol Epidemiology: A Review and Synthesis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2011;35(12):2101–12. pmid:21919918
  69. 69. Wakabayashi M, McKetin R, Banwell C, Yiengprugsawan V, Kelly M, Seubsman S-a, et al. Alcohol consumption patterns in Thailand and their relationship with non-communicable disease. BMC public health. 2015;15:1297–. pmid:26704520.
  70. 70. Park S, Yon H, Ban CY, Shin H, Eum S, Lee SW, et al. National trends in alcohol and substance use among adolescents from 2005 to 2021: a Korean serial cross-sectional study of one million adolescents. World J Pediatr. 2023:1–11. Epub 20230329. pmid:36977821; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10049906.
  71. 71. Oldham M, Callinan S, Whitaker V, Fairbrother H, Curtis P, Meier P, et al. The decline in youth drinking in England-is everyone drinking less? A quantile regression analysis. Addiction. 2020;115(2):230–8. Epub 20191201. pmid:31560404; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7004203.
  72. 72. Pape H, Rossow I, Brunborg GS. Adolescents drink less: How, who and why? A review of the recent research literature. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37 Suppl 1:S98–s114. Epub 20180324. pmid:29573020.
  73. 73. Nguyen TT, Trevisan M. Vietnam a country in transition: health challenges. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020;3(1):60–6. Epub 20200506. pmid:33235972; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7664505.
  74. 74. Sonthon P, Janma N, Saengow U. Association between age at first alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking: An analysis of Thailand’s smoking and alcohol drinking behavior survey 2017. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259589. pmid:34748599