https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-6993
Figures
Abstract
Astaxanthin is a powerful antioxidant known to enhance skin, cardiovascular, eye, and brain health. In this study, the genome insights and astaxanthin production of two newly isolated astaxanthin-producing yeasts (TL35-5 and PL61-2) were evaluated and compared. Based on their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, TL35-5 and PL61-2 were identified as basidiomycetous yeasts belonging to Rhodotorula paludigena and Rhodotorula sampaioana, respectively. To optimize astaxanthin production, the effects of cultural medium composition and cultivation conditions were examined. The optimal conditions for astaxanthin production in R. paludigena TL35-5 involved cultivation in AP medium containing 10 g/L glucose as the sole carbon source, supplemented with 1.92 g/L potassium nitrate, pH 6.5, and incubation at 20°C for 3 days with shaking at 200 rpm. For R. sampaioana PL61-2, the optimal medium composition for astaxanthin production consisted of AP medium with 40 g/L glucose, supplemented with 0.67 g/L urea, pH 7.5, and the fermentation was carried out at 20°C for 3 days with agitating at 200 rpm. Under their optimal conditions, R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 gave the highest astaxanthin yields of 3.689 ± 0.031 and 4.680 ± 0.019 mg/L, respectively. The genome of TL35-5 was 20,982,417 bp in length, with a GC content of 64.20%. A total of 6,789 protein-encoding genes were predicted. Similarly, the genome of PL61-2 was 21,374,169 bp long, with a GC content of 64.88%. It contained 6,802 predicted protein-encoding genes. Furthermore, all essential genes involved in astaxanthin biosynthesis, including CrtE, CrtYB, CrtI, CrtS, and CrtR, were identified in both R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, providing evidence for their ability to produce astaxanthin.
Citation: Hoondee P, Phuengjayaem S, Kingkaew E, Rojsitthisak P, Sritularak B, Thompho S, et al. (2024) Comparative genomic analysis and optimization of astaxanthin production of Rhodotorula paludigena TL35-5 and Rhodotorula sampaioana PL61-2. PLoS ONE 19(7): e0304699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699
Editor: Md. Asraful Alam, Zhengzhou University, CHINA
Received: March 3, 2024; Accepted: May 17, 2024; Published: July 12, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Hoondee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This research project is supported by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund of Chulalongkorn University (grant number CU_FRB65_hea (51) 060_33_04), and P.H. was financially supported by the Ratchadapiseksomphot Endowment Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Introduction
Nowadays, the global health, wellness, and nutraceuticals market is expanding as people become more concerned about their health in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Carotenoids are among the various bioactive compounds used commercially as food supplements, animal feed supplements, natural food colorants, nutritional supplements, and nutraceuticals for cosmetic and pharmaceutical purposes [2, 3].
Astaxanthin (3,3’-dihydroxy-4,4’-diketo-β-β carotene) is a red-colored carotenoid belonging to the xanthophyll class. This compound is likely the most important of the highly valued ketocarotenoids because it is a powerful antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agent with a significant impact on human health. It improves the immune system, prevents cardiovascular disease, various cancers, diabetes, liver disease, stomach problems, obesity, and cell aging [2, 4–7]. Due to its many biological activities, astaxanthin is widely used in various fields such as pharmaceuticals, food, cosmetics, health care, and aquaculture [5]. According to recent estimates, the global astaxanthin market is projected to grow at a 17.1% annual rate, reaching $7.28 billion by 2030, up from $2.83 billion in 2023 [8]. However, most commercially available astaxanthin and other high-value carotenoids, such as β-carotene and canthaxanthin, are primarily synthesized chemically [3]. Some research suggests that synthetic carotene is carcinogenic [9]. Moreover, natural astaxanthin derived from Haematococcus pluvialis has a greater effect on antioxidant enzyme levels in rats than synthetic astaxanthin [10]. This has been a major reason for exploring alternative methods of producing natural astaxanthin and other carotenoids.
Various microorganisms have been reported as natural astaxanthin producers [11]. Among them, the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis is the major commercial astaxanthin-producing microorganism [12]. Although H. pluvialis has high concentrations of astaxanthin, industrial applications are limited by lengthy autotrophic cultivation in open freshwater ponds and the necessity of disrupting the cell wall to liberate the astaxanthin. The pigmented yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (formerly Phaffia rhodozyma) is a promising producer of astaxanthin [11, 13]. Yeast has advantages over microalgae because it grows quickly without being affected by changing climatic or seasonal conditions, requires less land for cultivation than plant cultivation, and is easier to scale up production than single-celled algae due to its ability to use diverse carbon sources [14]. Besides X. dendrorhous, another pigmented yeast, Rhodosporiidium toruloides VN1, and Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2, are able to produce astaxanthin naturally [15, 16]. However, little is known about the whole genome sequence of Rhodotorula species and its genes involved in astaxanthin biosynthesis. In addition, fermentation optimization has been extensively explored as a potent method to enhance titers, yields, and productivities. Astaxanthin production is generally influenced by various parameters of medium composition and cultural conditions. Optimization is a powerful tool that can rapidly improve titers, yields, and productivities, as well as reduce production costs, which was the goal of basic research for industrial applications. The "One-factor-at-a-time" technique is favored and widely used for fermentation optimization. This method involves changing one factor while keeping the others constant. Although simple, it frequently necessitates a significant amount of time and effort. Thus, understanding the effect of medium composition and cultural conditions on the growth and astaxanthin production is necessary.
During a study of the diversity of culturable yeast associated with flowers in Thailand, two pigmented yeast strains (TL35-5 and PL61-2) were isolated, and their astaxanthin-producing potential was investigated. As a result, they were identified as astaxanthin-producing yeast. Therefore, this study aims to identify and characterize two newly isolated astaxanthin-producing yeasts, TL35-5 and PL61-2. Additionally, we sequenced their entire genome and performed comparative genomic analysis to gain insight into the astaxanthin biosynthesis pathway of their species and, more broadly, the genus Rhodotorula. Furthermore, the medium composition and cultural condition parameters that could influence the growth and astaxanthin production of these specific yeasts were optimized for the first time.
Materials and methods
Isolation and identification of astaxanthin-producing yeasts
Two yeast isolates, TL35-5 and PL61-2, were isolated and maintained on Yeast extract malt extract (YM) agar plates with a pH of 5.5. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 72 h. For long-term storage, the cultures were preserved in the skim milk and glycerol stocks at -20 °C for further studies.
Yeast morphological and physiological characteristics were determined by the standard method [17]. Cell and colony morphology were studied using yeast grown on 5% (w/v) malt extract agar at 25 °C for 7 days. Yeast cell morphology was observed under light microscopy at ×400 magnifications, and colony morphology characteristics were visually recorded. Carbon assimilation tests were conducted using ID 32 C kit (BioMerieux, France) by following manufacture instruction. Pseudo hyphae or true hyphae production was examined on corn meal agar using the Dalmau slide culture technique and incubated at 25 °C for 21 days.
For genotypic identification, genomic DNA was extracted from three-day-old yeast using a modified version of the method reported by Pranimit et al. [18]. The LSU D1/D2 domain (26S rRNA gene) was amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the NL1 (5’-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3’) and NL4 (5’-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3’) primers under previously described conditions [19]. The PCR product obtained was purified using the Gel/PCR DNA fragment extraction kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., Taiwan). Purified PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally using the BT sequencing technique (Celemics, Inc., Republic of Korea). The resulting sequences were manually edited using the BioEdit program and compared to those available in the online database of the NCBI GenBank using the BLASTn program. The sequences of the isolates and related strains were aligned using the MUSCLE program [20]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 11, employing the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with the Kimura two-parameter model and 1000 bootstrap replications [21–23]. The nucleotide sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database.
Optimization of astaxanthin production
Inoculum preparation and astaxanthin production procedure.
The one loopful of the two-day-old yeast grown on YM agar at 25 °C was inoculated into YM broth (50 mL) in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask and incubated at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 48 h [24]. The resultant culture was collected by centrifugation (6,500 × g, 10 min). The obtained cells were resuspended in 0.85% normal saline until the OD660 reached 1.00 ± 0.1. Then, 10% (v/v) of inoculum were transferred into 50 ml of astaxanthin production (AP) medium (10 g/L of glucose, 3 g/L of yeast extract, 3 g/L of malt extract, and 5 g/L of peptone, pH 5.5) in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask, and incubated at 25 °C and 200 rpm for 3 d. Cells were collected by centrifugation (4 °C, 7,745 × g, 10 min) and were then washed twice with sterile distilled water. The obtained cells were dried by lyophilization and weighed to obtain the dry cell weight (DCW). The lyophilized cells were subjected to further analysis.
Astaxanthin production optimization. The optimization of astaxanthin production of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 in the AP medium was investigated using the one factor at a time method by: 1) varying the type of carbon source, including 10 g/L of glucose, 10 g/L of sucrose, 10 g/L of fructose, or 10 g/L of maltose; 2) varying concentration of the selected carbon source (10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 g/L); 3) varying nitrogen supplementation by adding various nitrogen sources at the same concentration calculated based on their nitrogen equivalence (1.92 g/L potassium nitrate (KNO3), 1.5 g/L ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4), or 0.67 g/L of urea) into the AP medium; 4) varying the incubation temperature at 15, 20, 25, and 30 °C; 5) varying the initial pH (4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, or 8.5) of the AP medium; and 6) varying the incubation time at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days. The condition that gave the highest astaxanthin yield was selected for the following experiments.
Analytical procedures
Quantitative analysis of astaxanthin production.
Astaxanthin content was quantitatively analyzed using previously described methods [25] with slight modifications. In brief, 50 mg of lyophilized cells were suspended in 5 mL of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), ultrasonicated at 37 kHz, 50 °C for 30 min (Elmasonic, E60H model, Germany), and centrifuged at 12.300 × g, for 5 min. The extraction process was repeated until the cell pellet became colorless. The obtained supernatant was analyzed for astaxanthin concentration using an Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 530 nm against a pure DMSO blank [26]. A standard curve of absorbance versus astaxanthin concentrations was created by dissolving the following concentrations in DMSO: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 μg/ml. The concentration of astaxanthin was calculated using the equation of the astaxanthin standard calibration curve. The results were explained as the mean of three measurements taken in triplicate.
Statistical analysis.
The obtained results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA, and a multiple comparison test (Duncan’s test) was performed using SPSS Statistic 22.0 Software. A P-value less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. Supporting information on statistical analysis is shown in the S1 and S2 Files.
Genomic DNA sequencing, genome assembly and annotation, and gene analysis
Genomic DNA sequencing.
The genomic DNA was extracted using the methods previously described [27]. The quality of the DNA was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The whole genome was sequenced pair end PE150 on the IlluminaHiseq Xten/Novaseq/MGI2000 platforms at Vishuo Biomedical Pte. Ltd. (Beijing, China).
Genome assembly and annotation.
The obtained single-end reads were trimmed to remove adapters and low-quality bases using fastp (v0.23.0), and then the optimized data were assembled into contigs using Velvet de novo assembler version 1.2.10 [28]. Subsequently, SSPACE (version 3.0) was used to assemble the contigs into scaffolds. Gaps were filled by GapFiller versions 1–10. Gene prediction was performed using Augustus version 3.3 [29]. The program Barrnap (v0.9) and tRNAscan-SE (v1.3.1) were used for determining ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNAs) in the assembly genome, respectively. The other Non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) were predicted using the mapping Rfam method (v12.2). The coding genes were annotated with National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nr database by BLAST. Then, gene function prediction was performed by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) [30] and KofamKOALA tools [31] using the default parameters and all hits. The circular genome mapping was created using Proksee server. The Venn diagram was constructed using the OrthoVenn.
Results
Isolation and identification of astaxanthin-producing yeasts
During the study of yeast diversity in flowers, two pigment yeast isolates, TL35-5 and PL61-2, were isolated from marigold flowers (Tagetes erecta) and white desert rose flowers (Plumeria obtusa) samples collected from Lampang province, Thailand, respectively. In the preliminary screening phase, isolates TL35-5 and PL61-2 displayed a positive spot on the thin-layer chromatography (TLC) silica gel G plate, resembling the astaxanthin standard (with an Rf value of 0.28). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses were conducted to confirm this, following previously described methods [16]. The HPLC chromatogram verified the peaks corresponding to the extracted astaxanthin from TL35-5 and PL 61–2, which were identified with a retention time of 2.063. Furthermore, LC-MS analysis employing MS/MS detection in negative scan mode revealed that the astaxanthin extracted from TL35-5 and PL61-2 contained product ions resembling those of the astaxanthin standard.
Additionally, quantitative analysis showed significant intracellular astaxanthin accumulation in both isolates. TL35-5 cultivated in YM broth medium at 25°C for 72 hours had an astaxanthin content and yield of 0.28 ± 0.16 mg/g dry cell weight (DCW) and 2.34 ± 0.0015 mg/L, respectively. Under the same conditions, isolate PL61-2 exhibited an astaxanthin content and yield of 0.058 ± 0.11 mg/g DCW and 0.43 ± 0.0009 mg/L, respectively.
The TL35-5 and PL61-2 isolates were identified as molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) through 26S rRNA (LSU D1/D2 domain) gene sequencing and further assigned to species by comparing them to entries in the NCBI GenBank database using the BLASTn program. The strains TL35-5 and PL61-2 showed 100% identity and were identified as Rhodotorula paludigena and R. sampaioana, respectively. The accession numbers of the LSU D1/D2 domain sequences for strains TL35-5 and PL61-2 submitted to the NCBI/GenBank database were OP547860 and OP547865, respectively.
The morphological and physiological characteristics of each strain were examined (S1 Fig). TL35-5 cells were ovoid to ellipsoidal in shape, measuring 1.80–4.02 μm in length and 2.90–7.21 μm in width, with predominantly polar budding. The colony cultures appeared raised, round, shiny, butyrous, smooth, and had an entire margin. The streak culture exhibited a red-orange color. The cells of PL61-2 were predominantly ovoid, with a size of 2.68–4.22 μm in length and 3.47–5.45 μm in width. They occurred singly, with polar budding, while the colonies displayed a raised, round morphology with a light peach color, shiny and smooth surface, and entire margin. Neither pseudohyphae nor true mycelium were observed in any of the examined strains. The carbon assimilation characteristics of TL35-5 and PL61-2, compared with their closest related species, are summarized and presented in S1 Table. Phylogenetic analysis using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with Kimura two-parameter distances based on the D1/D2 domain sequence confirmed the clustering of TL35-5 with R. paludigena (100% bootstrap values for branch placements), while PL61-2 was clustered with R. sampaioana (99% bootstrap values for branch positions) (Fig 1).
Phylogenetic tree of the LSU D1/D2 sequences showing the placement of R. paludigena TL35-5, R. sampaioana PL61-2 and the related taxa. Sporobolomyces sasicola was used as the outgroup species. Bootstrap values equal to and more than 50%, determined from 1000 replicates are shown next to branches GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses. Bar 0.20 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Optimization of astaxanthin production of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2
Effects of different carbon sources.
The production of astaxanthin in AP medium with the same concentration (10 g/L) of four different carbon sources, namely glucose, maltose, fructose, or sucrose, was examined. The highest astaxanthin content and yield for TL35-5 were 0.338 ± 0.002 mg/g DCW and 2.087 ± 0.011 mg/L, respectively, which were obtained when glucose (10 g/L) was used as the sole carbon source (Fig 2A). Similarly, as shown in Fig 3A, the maximum astaxanthin content and yield for PL61-2 were 0.201 ± 0.001 mg/g DCW and 0.464 ± 0.002 mg/L, respectively, when the yeast was cultured in AP medium supplemented with 40 g/L glucose. Additionally, TL35-5 exhibited the highest biomass (9.281 ± 0.001 g/L) when cultivated in AP medium with sucrose, while PL61-2 achieved the highest biomass (5.283 ± 0.003 g/L) with maltose. However, the focus was primarily on product yield. Therefore, glucose was selected as the optimal carbon source for further optimization of both strains.
Effect of carbon source (A), glucose concentration (B), nitrogen supplementation (C), incubation temperature (D), pH (E), and incubation time (F) on astaxanthin (AX) content, AX yield, biomass, and AX production of R. paludigena TL35-5. The data are displayed as the mean ± SD, and are derived from triplicate experiments. According to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05), the levels that are not linked by the same letter are statistically different.
Effect of carbon source (A), glucose concentration (B), nitrogen supplementation (C), incubation temperature (D), pH (E), and incubation time (F) on astaxanthin (AX) content, astaxanthin yield, biomass, and astaxanthin production of R. sampaioana PL61-2. The data are displayed as the mean ± SD, and are derived from triplicate experiments. According to Duncan’s test (p > 0.05), the levels that are not linked by the same letter are statistically different.
The glucose concentration in the AP medium was varied at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 g/L to investigate its effect on astaxanthin production. For TL35-5, the optimum concentration for maximum astaxanthin production was found to be 10 g/L of glucose (astaxanthin content of 0.282 ± 0.010 mg/g DCW and astaxanthin yield of 2.149 ± 0.079 mg/L) (Fig 2B). Interestingly, the astaxanthin content and yield of PL61-2 increased and reached their maximum (0.207 ± 0.002 mg/g DCW and 1.987 ± 0.016 mg/L, respectively) when the glucose concentration in the AP medium was increased to 40 g/L (Fig 3B). Therefore, the AP medium containing 40 g/L of glucose was used for further study on astaxanthin production in PL61-2.
Effect of nitrogen sources.
Nitrogen was identified as one of the most critical factors influencing microbial growth and product production. An examination of the effects of three different nitrogen supplements, namely potassium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, and urea, was conducted. It was observed that the addition of 1.92 g/L of potassium nitrate (KNO3) to the AP medium containing 10 g/L glucose significantly increased the highest astaxanthin content and yield of TL35-5 to 0.420 ± 0.001 mg/g DCW and 2.558 ± 0.009 mg/L, respectively, compared to the control AP medium without any nitrogen supplementation (Fig 2C). Additionally, the highest astaxanthin content (0.237 ± 0.0004 mg/g DCW), astaxanthin yield (2.36 ± 0.005 mg/L), and biomass (9.9965 ± 0.008 g/L) of PL61-2 were obtained when cultivated in AP medium supplemented with 0.67 g/L urea (Fig 3C).
Effect of temperature.
The influence of incubation temperature (15, 20, 25, or 30 °C) on astaxanthin production in TL35-5 and PL61-2 was investigated using their optimized AP medium from the previous study. It was observed that TL35-5 and PL61-2 exhibited the highest astaxanthin yield (2.381 ± 0.015 and 3.521 ± 0.158 mg/L, respectively) when cultured at 20 °C. Therefore, this temperature was selected as the optimal condition for astaxanthin production in both TL35-5 and PL61-2 (Figs 2D and 3D).
Effect of pH.
The impact of initial pH on astaxanthin production was investigated in the optimized AP medium. The pH was varied to 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, or 8.5, and the cultures were incubated at 20 °C and 200 rpm for 7 days. TL35-5 showed the highest astaxanthin yield (2.461 ± 0.033 mg/L) at pH 6.5 (Fig 2E). On the other hand, PL61-2 exhibited maximum astaxanthin production (astaxanthin content of 0.344 ± 0.010 mg/g DCW, astaxanthin yield of 3.477 ± 0.104 mg/L) at pH 7.5 (Fig 3E). These pH values were determined to be the optimal conditions for astaxanthin production in TL35-5 and PL61-2, respectively.
Effect of incubation time.
The effect of incubation times ranging from 1 to 7 days on astaxanthin accumulation in TL35-5 and PL61-2 was investigated. The TL35-5 had the highest astaxanthin content (0.534 ± 0.004 mg/g DCW) and astaxanthin yield (3.689 ± 0.031 mg/L) when cultivated in optimum AP medium for 5 days (Fig 2F). The PL61-2 also gave the highest content and yield of astaxanthin (0.355 ± 0.001 g/g DCW and 4.680 ± 0.019 mg/L, respectively) on day 5 (Fig 3F). However, the highest astaxanthin productivity of TL35-5 (0.738 ± 0.03 mg/L/day) and PL61-2 (1.461 ± 0.076 mg/L/day) was obtained on day 3. Therefore, the optimal incubation time for astaxanthin production of TL35-5 and PL61-2 was 5 days.
Genome sequencing, functional annotation, and comparative analysis of protein families
The genome data of two newly isolated astaxanthin-producing yeasts, R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, are presented in Table 1. The circular genomic maps of TL35-5 and PL61-2 are shown in Fig 4. TL35-5 has a genome size of 20,982,417 bp with a GC content of 64.20%. It consists of 188 scaffolds with an N50 value of 399,886 bp and an L50 value of 18 bp. The longest and shortest scaffolds are 1,173,495 bp and 329 bp, respectively. TL35-5 genome contains a total of 162 non-coding RNAs, including 9 rRNA, 139 tRNA, and 14 other ncRNA. In strain PL61-2, the estimated genome size is 21,374,169 bp distributed across 291 scaffolds. The assembled genome has a GC content of 64.88%, an N50 length of 339,562 bp, and an L50 length of 23 bp. The longest scaffold in PL61-2 is 892,677 bp, while the shortest scaffold is 360 bp. PL61-2 genome contains 6 rRNA, 171 tRNA, and 10 other ncRNA. The genome sequences of TL35-5 and PL61-2 have been deposited in the NCBI/GenBank database under the BioProject of PRJNA916389 and PRJNA916391, BioSample of SAMN32424969 and SAMN32425014, and GenBank accession numbers JAQRHP000000000 and JAPZQE000000000, respectively.
R. paludigena TL35-5 (A) and R. sampaioana PL61-2 (B). The information is indicated as follows: GC content (orange), GC skew (+) (green), GC skew (−) (purple), and open reading frames (ORFs) (blue).
Protein-coding genes were also predicted and annotated in this study. Out of the 6,789 predicted genes in the TL35-5 genome, 6,316 genes (93.03%) were annotated using the NCBI Nr databases based on sequence homology. Additionally, 2,367 genes (34.87%) were annotated with the KEGG database. In PL61-2 genome, 6,803 genes were predicted, of which 6,218 genes (91.40%) and 2,319 genes (34.09%) were annotated with their homologs in the Nr database and KEGG metabolic pathway, respectively. The annotated genes of TL35-5 and PL61-2 genomes mapped to the KEGG metabolism pathway are shown in S2 Fig. The top three KEGG pathways for annotated genes in TL35-5 and PL61-2 genomes are "Genetic information processing," "Cellular processes," and "Carbohydrate metabolism."
Furthermore, a comparative genomic analysis was performed between TL35-5, PL61-2, and three other well-known Rhodotorula species: R. toluroides NP11, R. graminis WP1, and R. taiwanensis MD1149, to identify species-specific protein families. As shown in Fig 5A, 6,394, 6,029, 5,905, 5,819, and 5,788 protein families were identified for NP11, WP1, MD1149, PL61-2, and TL35-5, respectively. Among them, 28, 33, 104, 32, and 41 protein families were found to be species-specific for PL35-5, PL61-2, NP11, WP1, and MD1149, respectively (Fig 5B).
Whole-genome comparison between Rhodotorula paludigena TL35-5, R. sampaioana PL61-2, R. toruloides NP11, R. graminis WP1, and R. taiwanensis MD1149. The number of proteins, protein families, and unassigned proteins of each Rhodotorula species (A). Venn diagram representation of shared or unique protein clusters (B).
Identification of a gene involved in the astaxanthin biosynthesis
Due to the potential of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 as astaxanthin-producing yeasts, we conducted an analysis of genes involved in astaxanthin biosynthesis in their genomes. This study aimed to identify all the probable essential genes required for astaxanthin production in TL35-5 and PL61-2, which are listed in Table 2. Interestingly, we discovered the presence of the astaxanthin synthetase gene (CrtS) and the cytochrome P450 reductase (CrtR) gene in the genomes of TL35-5 and PL61-2. These genes are known to be key and conserved in X. dendrorhous and are involved in astaxanthin synthesis.
Based on the gene data obtained, we propose a possible bioconversion process of TL35-5 and PL61-2, starting from the geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate obtained from terpenoid backbone synthesis, leading to the production of astaxanthin (as illustrated in Fig 6). Similar to other carotenoid biosynthesis yeasts, the biosynthesis mechanism begins with the synthesis of the precursor, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), through the mevalonate pathway of terpenoid backbone synthesis. Subsequently, two putative key enzymes, phytoene desaturase (CrtI) (EC:1.3.99.30) and the bifunctional phytoene synthase/lycopene cyclase (CrtYB) (EC:2.5.1.32 5.5.1.19), play active roles in carotenoid biosynthesis, resulting in the formation of β-carotene and torulene. Finally, the synthesis of astaxanthin takes place with the involvement of the key enzyme astaxanthin synthetase and its helper enzyme, cytochrome P450 reductase (encoded by the CrtS and CrtR genes, respectively). These enzymes facilitate the formation of astaxanthin and other xanthophyll derivatives.
Metabolites are shown in bold, while the genes encoding enzymes responsible for relative bioconversions are indicated in italics at corresponding arrows.
Discussion
Several Rhodotorula species, pigmented basidiomycetous yeasts, have been identified as biotechnologically significant carotenoid producers. The carotenoid profile of most yeast species belonging to the genus Rhodotorula primarily consists of β-carotene, γ-carotene, torulene, and torularhodin. Interestingly, some Rhodotorula species, such as Rhodotorula toruloides VN1 [15, 32], and Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2 [16], have been reported as natural astaxanthin producers, similar to the red yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous.
In this study, two pigmented yeasts belonging to the Basidiomycota phylum and the genus Rhodotorula were examined: Rhodotorula paludigena strain TL35-5 and Rhodotorula sampaioana strain PL61-2. TL35-5 was isolated from Marigold flowers (Tagetes erecta), while PL61-2 was isolated from white desert rose flowers (Plumeria obtusa). R. paludigena has previously been identified as a marine yeast frequently isolated from various marine samples, including deep-sea sediment [33], mangrove soil, and mangrove water [19, 34]. However, R. paludigena is not limited to marine habitats as it has also been found in other biological samples such as plant nectar [35], and castor beans [36]. R. sampaioana was originally isolated from two different habitats: subsurface waters of Lake Negra in Argentina and the gut of a xylophagous termite in India [37]. Surprisingly, our preliminary study revealed that both TL35-5 and PL61-2 have the ability to produce astaxanthin, which is a rare and unique characteristic among Rhodotorula yeasts. TL35-5 exhibited an astaxanthin content and yield of 0.28 ± 0.16 mg/g dry cell weight (DCW) and 2.34 ± 0.0015 mg/L, respectively. Meanwhile, PL61-2 produced astaxanthin with a content and yield of 0.058 ± 0.11 mg/g DCW and 0.43 ± 0.0009 mg/L, respectively. Although R. paludigena has been acknowledged for its production of carotenoids, single-cell oil, and biosurfactants [36, 38, 39], research on its capacity to synthesize astaxanthin remains limited [40]. On the other hand, the biotechnological potential of R. sampaioana has not been reported, making this the first study on astaxanthin production from R. sampaioana specie.
Astaxanthin production, which is a secondary metabolite produced by pigmented yeast, is affected by various cultivation factors such as media composition, environmental conditions, and cultivation parameters [5]. Nutrient availability and composition in the cultivation medium play a crucial role in astaxanthin biosynthesis. Carbon and nitrogen sources, minerals, vitamins, and other micronutrients must be carefully balanced to support yeast growth and stimulate astaxanthin production. Furthermore, temperature and pH conditions, light intensity and wavelength, and agitation and aeration levels in the fermentation vessel profoundly influence astaxanthin production. To maximize astaxanthin production in R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, we optimized the medium composition and environmental factors using the one-factor-at-a-time method. Among the tested carbon sources, glucose was found to be the optimal carbon source for astaxanthin production in both TL35-5 and PL61-2. Their astaxanthin content and yield reached their maximum when cultured in AP medium with glucose (10 g/L) as the sole carbon source. This finding confirms that glucose is the best carbon source for astaxanthin production. Although the highest biomass for TL35-5 and PL61-2 was achieved when sucrose and maltose were used as carbon sources, respectively, it is important to note that astaxanthin production, being a secondary metabolite, does not necessarily require optimal cell growth conditions. Previous studies have shown that astaxanthin biosynthesis depends on various environmental stressors that are not conducive to optimal cell growth [41]. In contrast, Guo et al. [42] reported that the maximum cell biomass and astaxanthin yield (7.6 g/L and 3.22 mg/L, respectively) of Phaffia rhodozyma CGMCC As 2.1557 were both observed in a sucrose medium.
In addition, the concentration of glucose has also been identified as an important factor in astaxanthin production. The optimal glucose concentration in AP medium for TL35-5 astaxanthin production was found to be 10 g/L. Under these conditions, the content and yield of astaxanthin reached their maximum values at 2.282 ± 0.010 mg/g DCW and 2.149 ± 0.079 mg/L, respectively. However, when the glucose concentration was increased to 50 g/L, astaxanthin production decreased while cell biomass increased. This observation suggests that the fermentation process, occurring under aerated conditions with high glucose concentrations, may be suppressed due to the Crabtree effect. The Crabtree effect can inhibit aerobic metabolism in yeast, including catabolism and respiration [43, 44], resulting in some yeast strains fermenting glucose into ethanol under aerobic conditions [45] or producing more biomass. Additionally, the higher osmotic pressure associated with increased glucose concentration may also contribute to these effects. For PL61-2, increasing the glucose concentration from 10 to 40 g/L in the AP medium led to a 3.65-fold increase in astaxanthin yield and a 2.65-fold increase in biomass. Tran et al. [15] reported that the optimal glucose concentration for astaxanthin production in R. toruloides is 83.74 g/L.
Among the three nitrogen sources evaluated, it was found that AP medium supplemented with 1.92 g/L potassium nitrate, an inorganic nitrogen source, was the most favorable for TL35-5 astaxanthin production. Interestingly, our findings revealed that under nitrogen-excess conditions, TL35-5 cell proliferation decreased while astaxanthin production increased. On the other hand, the addition of 0.67 g/L urea, an organic nitrogen source, was identified as the optimal nitrogen supplementation for astaxanthin production in PL61-2. It has been reported that nitrogen limitation can effectively induce astaxanthin production in the alga H. pluvialis [46]. Some studies have also highlighted low-cost nitrogen sources like corn steep liquor as alternatives for astaxanthin production in P. rhodozyma D3 [47]. Additionally, yeast extract, which is an organic nitrogen source, has been found to be the optimal nitrogen source for astaxanthin production in P. rhodozyma CGMCC As 2.1557 [42]. For P. rhodozyme 7B12, the optimal nitrogen sources for astaxanthin production were determined to be 0.28 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.49 g/L KNO3, and 1.19 g/L beef extract, resulting in the highest astaxanthin yield of 7.71 mg/L under these optimal conditions [48].
Temperature is a crucial factor that influences all living organisms and plays a role in regulating growth and metabolite biosynthesis. Changes in temperature can significantly impact enzymatic activities, thereby affecting cell growth and astaxanthin production [41]. However, the effect of temperature on carotenoid production varies depending on the strain [49, 50]. Hayman et al. [51] reported that temperature influences the regulation of two key enzymes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis, β-carotene synthase and torulene synthase, in R. glutinis. However, there is limited research on the effect of temperature on astaxanthin production. In our study, we found that the optimal temperature for astaxanthin production in R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 was 20 °C. This finding aligns with Polulyakh et al. [52], who reported that the optimal temperature for astaxanthin biosynthesis in P. rhodozyma is also 20 °C. Under these conditions, P. rhodozyma produced a higher amount of astaxanthin, accounting for up to 85% of total carotenoids. Johnson and Lewis [53] similarly reported that the temperature range of 20–22 °C was optimal for X. dendrorhous astaxanthin production. Additionally, the other Rhodotorula species showed the highest astaxanthin synthesis at 25 °C [16, 40].
The initial pH value is a crucial environmental factor that significantly affects the final yield of astaxanthin production. Similarly, the production of astaxanthin in R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 is influenced by the pH of the medium. The highest astaxanthin content and yield for TL35-5 and PL61-2 were achieved when cultured in the optimal AP medium with initial pH values of 6.5 and 7.5, respectively. According with Phuengjayaem et al. [40], the optimal pH condition for astaxanthin production of R. paludigena SP9-15 was 7.5. These results suggest that an alkaline environment (pH 6.5–7.5) promotes astaxanthin synthesis in both Rhodotorula species. In contrast, Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2 showed optimal astaxanthin production in an acidic environment (pH 4.5). These findings indicate that the optimal pH for astaxanthin production in Rhodotorula species is strain-dependent, similar to X. dendrorhous [41]. For X. dendrorhous UCD 67–210, the optimal pH for growth and astaxanthin production was 4.5 [53]. In the case of X. dendrorhous J4-3, a mutant strain, the optimal pH for astaxanthin biosynthesis was 5.0, while the optimum pH for growth was 6.0 [54]. According to Ambati et al. [5], optimal temperature and pH ranges for yeast growth and astaxanthin synthesis vary depending on the yeast strain and cultivation conditions but typically fall within specific ranges conducive to both growth and astaxanthin accumulation.
Aside from medium composition and fermentation conditions, the incubation period is another crucial factor that influences pigment synthesis. In various yeast species, carotenoid production typically initiates in the late logarithmic phase and continues into the stationary phase. In this study, the patterns of astaxanthin biosynthesis in TL35-5 and PL61-2 were similar. On the first day of incubation, low levels of astaxanthin were detected. The astaxanthin yields on day 3 increased by 9-fold and 2-fold compared to the first day in TL35-5 and PL61-2, respectively. Subsequently, the astaxanthin yield slightly increased until it reached its peak on day 5 and then gradually decreased. Although the results indicated that the highest astaxanthin yields and biomass for TL35-5 and PL61-2 were obtained on day 5 (120 hours), similar to other previous studies on carotenoid biosynthesis [55, 56], the astaxanthin productivities (mg/L/day) were lower than those obtained on day 3. High astaxanthin productivity is a critical characteristic from a practical production perspective. Therefore, the optimal cultivation period for TL35-5 and PL61-2 was determined to be three days of incubation. This finding reveals that both the cultural medium composition and fermentation conditions affect the growth and astaxanthin production of TL35-5 and PL61-2. However, optimizing all parameters that influence astaxanthin production allows them to reach their maximum production capacity.
In this present study, the maximum astaxanthin yield produced by TL35-5 and PL61-2 under the optimum conditions was 3.689 ± 0.031 and 4.680 ± 0.0.019 mg/L, respectively, which surpasses some previously reported yields. For example, Spirulina platensis produced 0.038 mg/L astaxanthin [56], X. dendrorhous yielded 0.64 mg/L [57], R. toruloides (wild strain) produced 0.93 mg/L [15], Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2 reached 4.13 mg/L [16], and R. paludigena SP9-15 produced 6.565 ± 0.238 mg/L [40]. Additionally, the mutant strain G17 of R. toruloides produced 3.02 mg/L astaxanthin when the medium composition was optimized [58]. These findings indicate that the two newly isolated pigmented yeast strains, R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, have the potential to be natural astaxanthin-producing yeasts.
Here, we present the genome sequences of two newly isolated astaxanthin-producing yeasts, R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, and analyze the essential genes to provide evidence of their astaxanthin biosynthesis capabilities. The genome size and GC content (%) of TL35-5 (20,982,417 bp and 64.20%) are consistent with R. paludigena CM33, which had a genome length of 20,657,327 bp and a GC content of 64.3%. Additionally, we successfully assembled the genome of R. sampaioana PL61-2, which consists of 21,374,169 bp with a GC content of 64.88%. Comparative genomic analysis revealed a close relationship between the genome GC content of PL61-2 (64.88%) and TL35-5 (64.20%), while the predicted number of protein-coding genes in PL61-2 (6,802) is slightly higher than that in TL35-5 (6,789). The number of annotated genes mapped to each KEGG metabolism pathway in TL35-5 and PL61-2 genomes is quite similar. Based on the functional annotation of the genome, we identified several key genes involved in astaxanthin biosynthesis and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis. The following is a summary of the candidate genes: 1) terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, including ACAT (Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase), HMGCS (Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase), HMGCR (Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase), MVD (Mevalonate kinase), PMK (Phosphomevalonate kinase), DPMDC (Diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase), IDI (Isopentenyl-diphosphate delta isomerase), GGDPS (Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase), and FDPS (Farnesyl diphosphate synthase); 2) Astaxanthin biosynthesis, including CrtE (Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase), CrtYB (Phytoene synthase/lycopene β-cyclase), CrtI (Phytoene desaturase), CrtS (β-carotene 4-ketolase/3-hydroxylase), and CrtR (Cytochrome P450 reductase).
Astaxanthin is a metabolite derived from zeaxanthin and canthaxanthin, containing hydroxyl and ketone functional groups. In X. dendrorhous, astaxanthin is synthesized from β-carotene through the action of the astaxanthin synthetase (CrtS) gene, which exhibits both ketolase and hydroxylase activities [4, 59]. Additionally, the cytochrome P450 reductase (CrtR) serves as an auxiliary enzyme [60]. Unlike in bacteria and microalgae, the CrtZ gene (also known as CrtR-b or Chy) is responsible for β-carotene hydroxylation, while the CrtW gene (also known as BKT) is responsible for β-carotenoid ketolation [61]. A recent study identified putative candidate genes associated with astaxanthin biosynthesis, including CrtE, CrtYB, CrtI, CrtS, CrtR, CrtW, CrtO, and CrtZ, in Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2 [16] and R. paludigena SP9-15 [40].
Our findings suggest that the putative astaxanthin synthesis pathway in R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 follows a three-step process, similar to X. dendrorhous, a commercially significant astaxanthin producer [62]. The first step involves the production of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) from acetyl-CoA in the mevalonate (MVA) pathway, which is part of the terpenoid backbone biosynthesis pathway. IPP is then used for the synthesis of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). Notably, IPP can be synthesized naturally through either the MVA or the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways. The MVA pathway is found in fungi, plants (cytosol), and archaea, while the MEP pathway is utilized by bacteria, algae, and higher plants [63]. In the second step, two molecules of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate are condensed to form phytoene by the enzyme CrtYB, which catalyzes four desaturation steps. In certain fungal species, the CrtB and CrtY genes are fused, resulting in a bifunctional protein with lycopene cyclase and phytoene synthase activities [64, 65]. Subsequently, the enzymes CrtYB and CrtI cyclize to form β-ionone groups. At this point, the pathway diverges into two branches: the formation of β-carotene and its xanthophyll derivatives, and the synthesis of torulene. The final step involves the production of astaxanthin and other xanthophyll derivatives, such as zeaxanthin, canthaxanthin, and violaxanthin. Astaxanthin synthetase (CrtS) catalyzes the last steps of astaxanthin production from β-carotene, exclusively utilizing the reductase activity of cytochrome P450 reductase (encoded by the CrtR gene) as an electron donor [66].
These findings offer valuable resources for advancing the biotechnological applications of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2. While the genomes of these yeast strains contain the key genes, CrtS and CrtR, involved in astaxanthin production, limited knowledge exists regarding their functions, as well as the biosynthesis and regulation processes in Rhodotorula yeast species. Therefore, conducting in vivo functional characterization of these genes remains a crucial prerequisite for future research.
Supporting information
S1 Fig.
The vegetative cells morphology under light microscopy (100X magnification) (A, D), colony characteristics on 5% malt extract agar (B, E), and Dalmau slide culture on corn meal agar under light microscopy (100X magnification) (C, F) of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. The number of annotated genes of (A) TL35-5 and (B) PL61-2 mapped to the KEGG functional category.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699.s002
(TIF)
S1 Table. Carbon assimilation characteristics of R. paludigena TL35-5 and R. sampaioana PL61-2 compared with their closely related species, Rhodotorula paludigena CBS6566T [17] and Rhodotorula sampaioana CRUB1124T [37].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699.s003
(DOCX)
S1 File. The supporting results of the statistical analysis on astaxanthin content, astaxanthin yield, and biomass of R. paludigena TL35-5.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699.s004
(DOCX)
S2 File. The supporting results of the statistical analysis on astaxanthin content, astaxanthin yield, and biomass of R. sampaioana PL61-2.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304699.s005
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the Pharmaceutical Research Instrument Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, for the facilities.
References
- 1. Lordan R. Dietary supplements and nutraceuticals market growth during the coronavirus pandemic–implications for consumers and regulatory oversight. Pharma Nutrition. 2021 Dec 18. pmid:34513589
- 2. Bera S. Carotenoids: Updates on legal statutory and competence for nutraceutical properties. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2019 Aug 1;7(2): 300–319.
- 3. Jaswir I, Noviendri D, Hasrini RF, Octavianti F. Carotenoids: Sources, medicinal properties and their application in food and nutraceutical industry. J Med Plants Res. 2011 Dec 31;5(33):7119–7131.
- 4. Visser H, van Ooyen AJ, Verdoes JC. Metabolic engineering of the astaxanthin-biosynthetic pathway of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. FEMS yeast research. 2003 Dec 1;4(3):221–231. pmid:14654426
- 5. Ambati RR, Phang SM, Ravi S, Aswathanarayana RG. Astaxanthin: Sources, extraction, stability, biological activities and its commercial applications—A review. Marine drugs. 2014 Jan;12(1):128–152. pmid:24402174
- 6. Kowshik J, Baba AB, Giri H, Deepak Reddy G, Dixit M, Nagini S. Astaxanthin inhibits JAK/STAT-3 signaling to abrogate cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis in a hamster model of oral cancer. PloS one. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e109114. pmid:25296162
- 7. Yeh PT, Huang HW, Yang CM, Yang WS, Yang CH. Astaxanthin inhibits expression of retinal oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 14;11(1):e0146438. pmid:26765843
- 8.
Grand view research. Astaxanthin market size, share & trends analysis report by product (dried algae meal or biomass, oil, softgel, liquid), by source (natural, synthetic), by application, by region, and segment forecasts, 2024–2030. Market analysis report. 2024. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-astaxanthin-market.
- 9. Black HS. Pro-carcinogenic activity of β-carotene, a putative systemic photoprotectant. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2004 Aug;3:753–758. pmid:15295631
- 10. Rao AR, Sarada R, Shylaja MD, Ravishankar GA. Evaluation of hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters from microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Oct;52:6703–6710. pmid:26396419
- 11. Dursun D, Dalgıç AC. Optimization of astaxanthin pigment bioprocessing by four different yeast species using wheat wastes. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2016 Jul 1;7:1–6.
- 12. Collins AM, Jones HD, Han D, Hu Q, Beechem TE, Timlin JA. Carotenoid distribution in living cells of Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae). PloS one. 2011 Sep 6;6(9):e24302. pmid:21915307
- 13. Kikukawa H, Shimizu C, Hirono-Hara Y, Hara KY. Screening of plant oils promoting growth of the red yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous with astaxanthin and fatty acid production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021 Aug 1;35:102101.
- 14. Kim JH, Kang SW, Kim SW, Chang HI. High-level production of astaxanthin by Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous mutant JH1 using statistical experimental designs. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005;69(9):1743–1748. pmid:16195593
- 15. Tran TN, Quang-Vinh TR, Huynh HT, Hoang NS, Nguyen HC, Dai-Nghiep NG. Astaxanthin production by newly isolated Rhodosporidium toruloides: optimization of medium compositions by response surface methodology. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2019;47(2):320–327.
- 16. Kingkaew E, Tedsree N, Phuengjayaem S, Rojsitthisak P, Sritularak B, Thitikornpong W, et al. Genomic insight and optimization of astaxanthin production from a new Rhodotorula sp. CP72-2. Fermentation. 2023 May 24;9(6):501.
- 17.
Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, Robert V. Methods for isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts. In: Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, editors. The yeasts: a taxonomix study, 5th eidition. Elsevier; 2011. pp. 87–110.
- 18. Pranimita R, Hoondee P, Tanasupawat S, Savarajara A. Hydrolysate from phosphate supplemented sugarcane leaves for enhanced oil accumulation in Candida sp. NG17. BioRes. 2019;14(1):1014–1032.
- 19. Hoondee P, Wattanagonniyom T, Weeraphan T, Tanasupawat S, Savarajara A. Occurrence of oleaginous yeast from mangrove forest in Thailand. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;35:1–7. pmid:31267227
- 20. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 1;32(5):1792–1797. pmid:15034147
- 21. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Jun;16:111–120. pmid:7463489
- 22. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol. 1985 Jul 1;39(4):783–791. pmid:28561359
- 23. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Jul 1;38(7):3022–3027. pmid:33892491
- 24. Zeni J, Colet R, Cence K, Tiggemann L, Toniazzo G, Cansian RL, et al. Screening of microorganisms for production of carotenoids Selección de microorganismos para la producción de carotenoides. CyTA-J Food. 2011 Aug 1;9(2):160–166.
- 25. Ushakumari UN, Ramanujan R. Isolation of astaxanthin from marine yeast and study of its pharmacological activity. Int Curr Pharm J. 2013 Feb 2;2(3):67–69.
- 26. Casella P, Iovine A, Mehariya S, Marino T, Musmarra D, Molino A. Smart method for carotenoids characterization in Haematococcus pluvialis red phase and evaluation of astaxanthin thermal stability. Antioxidants. 2020 May 13;9(5):422. pmid:32414186
- 27.
Gardner JM, Jaspersen SL. Manipulating the yeast genome: deletion, mutation, and tagging by PCR. In: Smith J, Burke DJ, editors. Yeast Genetics: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; 2014. pp. 45–78.
- 28. Zerbino DR, McEwen GK, Margulies EH, Birney E. Pebble and rock band: heuristic resolution of repeats and scaffolding in the velvet short-read de novo assembler. PloS one. 2009 Dec 22;4(12):e8407. pmid:20027311
- 29. Stanke M, Schöffmann O, Morgenstern B, Waack S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC bioinform. 2006 Dec;7(1):1–1. pmid:16469098
- 30. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016 Feb 22;428(4):726–731. pmid:26585406
- 31. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 1;36(7):2251–2252. pmid:31742321
- 32. Tran TN, Ngo DH, Nguyen NT, Ngo DN. Draft genome sequence data of Rhodosporidium toruloides VN1, a strain capable of producing natural astaxanthin. Data Br. 2019 Oct 1;26:104443. pmid:31528677
- 33. Wang M, Mao W, Wang X, Li F, Wang J, Chi Z, et al. Efficient simultaneous production of extracellular polyol esters of fatty acids and intracellular lipids from inulin by a deep-sea yeast Rhodotorula paludigena P4R5. Microb Cell Fact. 2019 Dec;18:1–3. pmid:31481079
- 34. Rekha R, Nimsi KA, Manjusha K, Sirajudheen TK. Marine yeast Rhodotorula paludigena VA 242 a pigment enhancing feed additive for the ornamental fish koi carp. Aquac Fish. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):66–70.
- 35. Canto A, Herrera CM, Rodriguez R. Nectar-living yeasts of a tropical host plant community: diversity and effects on community-wide floral nectar traits. PeerJ. 2017 Jul 14;5:e3517. pmid:28717591
- 36. Gosalawit C, Imsoonthornruksa S, Gilroyed BH, Mcnea L, Boontawan A, Ketudat-Cairns M. The potential of the oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula paludigena CM33 to produce biolipids. J Biotechnol. 2021 Mar 10;329:56–64. pmid:33549673
- 37. Tiwari S, Baghela A, Libkind D. Rhodotorula sampaioana fa, sp. nov., a novel red yeast of the order Sporidiobolales isolated from Argentina and India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2021 Aug;114(8):1237–1244. pmid:34043114
- 38. Aksu Z, Eren AT. Carotenoids production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: use of agricultural wastes as a carbon source. Process Biochem. 2005 Sep 1;40(9):2985–2991.
- 39. Gharaghani M, Mahmoudabadi AZ. Halvaeezadeh M, Evaluation of Laboratory-Produced Biosurfactant by Rhodotorula Species and Its Antifungal Activity. Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products. 2019 Dec 23; 15(1):e11846.
- 40. Phuengjayaem S, Kingkaew E, Hoondee P, Rojsitthisak P, Sritularak B, Thitikornpong W, et al. Diversity, astaxanthin production, and genomic analysis of Rhodotorula paludigena SP9-15. Heliyon. 2023 Jul 1;9(7). pmid:37539266
- 41. Basiony M, Ouyang L, Wang D, Yu J, Zhou L, Zhu M, et al. Optimization of microbial cell factories for astaxanthin production: Biosynthesis and regulations, engineering strategies and fermentation optimization strategies. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 1;7(2):689–704. pmid:35261927
- 42.
Guo X, Li X, Xiao D. Optimization of culture conditions for production of astaxanthin by Phaffia rhodozyma. In 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 2010 Jun 18; 1–4.
- 43. El-Banna AA, El-Razek AAM, El-Mahdy AR. Some factors affecting the production of carotenoids by Rhodotorula glutinis var. glutinis. Food Nutr Sci. 2012 Jan 9;3(1): 64–71.
- 44. Reynders MB, Rawlings DE, Harrison ST. Demonstration of the Crabtree effect in Phaffia rhodozyma during continuous and fed-batch cultivation. Biotechnol Lett. 1997 Jun;19:549–552.
- 45. Bura R, Vajzovic A, Doty SL. Novel endophytic yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain PTD3 I: production of xylitol and ethanol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Jul 1;39(7):1003–1011. pmid:22399239
- 46. Scibilia L, Girolomoni L, Berteotti S, Alboresi A, Ballottari M. Photosynthetic response to nitrogen starvation and high light in Haematococcus pluvialis. Algal Res. 2015 Nov 1;12:170–181.
- 47. Guan X, Zhang J, Xu N, Cai C, Lu Y, Liu Y, et al. Optimization of culture medium and scale-up production of astaxanthin using corn steep liquor as substrate by response surface methodology. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 3;53(4):443–453. pmid:35838518
- 48. Ni H, Chen QH, Ruan H, Yang YF, Li LJ, Wu GB, et al. Studies on optimization of nitrogen sources for astaxanthin production by Phaffia rhodozyma. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007 Apr;8:365–370. pmid:17542066
- 49. Martin AM, Lu C, Patel TR. Growth parameters for the yeast Rhodotorula rubra grown in peat extracts. J Ferment Bioeng. 1993 Jan 1;76(4):321–325.
- 50. Kusdiyantini E, Gaudin P, Goma G, Blanc PJ. Growth kinetics and astaxanthin production of Phaffia rhodozyma on glycerol as a carbon source during batch fermentation. Biotechnol Lett. 1998 Oct;20:929–934.
- 51. Hayman EP, Yokoyama H, Chichester CO, Simpson KL. Carotenoid biosynthesis in Rhodotorula glutinis. J Bacteriol. 1974 Dec;120(3):1339–1343.
- 52. Polulyakh OV, Podoprigora OI, Eliseev SA, Ershov YU, Bykhovsky V, Dmitrovsky AA. Biosynthesis of torulene and torularhodin in the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma. Prikladnaia Biokhimiia i Mikrobiologiia. 1991;27(4):541–545.
- 53. Johnson EA, Lewis MJ. Astaxanthin formation by the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma. Microbiology. 1979 Nov;115(1):173–183.
- 54. Meyer PS, Du Preez JC. Effect of culture conditions on astaxanthin production by a mutant of Phaffia rhodozyma in batch and chemostat culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994 Feb;40:780–785.
- 55. Hewedy MA, Ashour SM. Production of a melanin like pigment by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Streptomyces chibaensis. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2009;3(2):920–927.
- 56. An J, Gao F, Ma Q, Xiang Y, Ren D, Lu J. Screening for enhanced astaxanthin accumulation among Spirulina platensis mutants generated by atmospheric and room temperature plasmas. Algal Res. 2017 Jul 1;25:464–472.
- 57. Xie H, Zhou Y, Hu J, Chen Y, Liang J. Production of astaxanthin by a mutant strain of Phaffia rhodozyma and optimization of culture conditions using response surface methodology. Ann Microbiol. 2014 Dec;64(4):1473–1481.
- 58. Tran TN, Ngo DH, Tran QT, Nguyen HC, Su CH, Ngo DN. Enhancing astaxanthin biosynthesis by Rhodosporidium toruloides mutants and optimization of medium compositions using response surface methodology. Processes. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):497.
- 59. Ojima K, Breitenbach J, Visser H, Setoguchi Y, Tabata K, Hoshino T, et al. Cloning of the astaxanthin synthase gene from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma) and its assignment as a β-carotene 3-hydroxylase/4-ketolase. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 Feb;275:148–58. pmid:16416328
- 60. Tao L, Wilczek J, Odom JM, Cheng Q. Engineering a β-carotene ketolase for astaxanthin production. Metab Eng. 2006 Nov 1;8(6):523–31. pmid:16890469
- 61. Wan X, Zhou XR, Moncalian G, Su L, Chen WC, Zhu HZ, et al. Reprogramming microorganisms for the biosynthesis of astaxanthin via metabolic engineering. Prog Lipid Res. 2021 Jan 1;81:101083. pmid:33373616
- 62. Frengova GI, Beshkova DM. Carotenoids from Rhodotorula and Phaffia: yeasts of biotechnological importance. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Feb 1;36(2):163. pmid:18982370
- 63. Zhao L, Chang WC, Xiao Y, Liu HW, Liu P. Methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013 Jun 2;82:497–530. pmid:23746261
- 64. Arrach N, Fernández-Martín R, Cerdá-Olmedo E, Avalos J. A single gene for lycopene cyclase, phytoene synthase, and regulation of carotene biosynthesis in Phycomyces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):1687–1692. pmid:11172012
- 65. Sanz C, Velayos A, Álvarez MI, Benito EP, Eslava AP. Functional analysis of the Phycomyces carRA gene encoding the enzymes phytoene synthase and lycopene cyclase. PLoS One. 2011 Aug 9;6(8):e23102. pmid:21858003
- 66. Barredo JL, García-Estrada C, Kosalkova K, Barreiro C. Biosynthesis of astaxanthin as a main carotenoid in the heterobasidiomycetous yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. J Fungi. 2017 Jul 30;3(3):44. pmid:29371561