Figures
Abstract
Background
Recent evidence suggests the experience of menopausal symptoms (i.e., perimenopausal symptoms) may be associated with cognitive and behavioural changes. We investigated these two relationships in a sample of postmenopausal females.
Setting
Participant data was collected from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN-PROTECT) study.
Methods
Menopausal symptom burden was operationalized by summing the total number of recalled perimenopausal symptoms experienced. Cognitive function was measured using the Everyday Cognition (ECog-II) Scale, with higher scores reflecting greater severity. Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) was measured using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C), with higher scores reflecting greater severity. A negative-binomial regression model examined the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and cognitive function, while a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model examined the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and MBI symptoms. Models adjusted for age, years of education, age of menopausal onset, type of menopause, and hormone therapy (HT). Age of menopausal onset and use of HT in the two associations were investigated with moderation analyses.
Results
Greater menopausal symptom burden was associated with higher ECog-II total scores (b [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 5.37 [2.85, 7.97]) and higher MBI-C total scores (b [95% CI] = 6.09 [2.50, 9.80]). Use of HT did not significantly associate with ECog-II total scores (b [95% CI] = -10.98 [-25.33, 6.35]), however, HT was significantly associated with lower MBI-C total scores (b [95% CI] = -26.90 [-43.35, -5.67]).
Conclusions
Menopausal symptom burden is associated with poorer cognitive function and more MBI symptoms in mid- to late life. HT may help mitigate symptoms of MBI. These findings suggest that the experience of menopause may indicate susceptibility to cognitive and behavioural changes, both markers of dementia.
Citation: Crockford JFE, Guan DX, Einstein G, Ballard C, Creese B, Corbett A, et al. (2025) Menopausal symptom burden as a predictor of mid- to late-life cognitive function and mild behavioral impairment symptoms: A CAN-PROTECT study. PLoS ONE 20(3): e0301165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301165
Editor: Luiz F. Baccaro, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, BRAZIL
Received: March 11, 2024; Accepted: November 4, 2024; Published: March 5, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Crockford et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: At this time, the authors do not have ethical or legal permission to share the study data, including de-identified data. The study is still in its early stages, and a data access committee has not yet been established, nor has a data sharing policy been finalized. Upon study completion, the authors will seek legal review and submit an amendment to the ethics board. Addressing data sharing is a priority, contingent on obtaining stable funding for all study activities. While the authors are unable to publicly post the data at this time, they are open to sharing data with qualified investigators for validation purposes. Interested researchers may contact ismailz@ucalgary.ca to request access to the data.
Funding: CAN-PROTECT has been supported by Gordie Howe CARES (https://www.gordiehowecares.com/) and the Evans Family fund via the Hotchkiss Brain Institute (https://hbi.ucalgary.ca/) at the University of Calgary. ZI is supported by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Exeter Biomedical Research Centre (https://www.exeter.ac.uk/research/biomedicalresearchcentre/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
As the number of older adults continues to rise, those living with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias globally are estimated to increase threefold from 50 million in 2015 to 152 million by 2050 [1]. Females (i.e., assigned female sex at birth) have a three-fold greater risk of developing AD [2], and will be disproportionately affected by this increasing global dementia burden [3]. As prevalence of dementia increases with age [4], the primary explanation offered for the sex discrepancy is greater longevity in females [5]. However, whether longevity alone explains this sex difference remains uncertain; extant literature has proposed there are unique factors that may increase female risk [4]. One proposed factor that may confer special risk to females is the loss of estradiol at menopause.
Menopause describes the permanent cessation of menses [6]. There are “many menopauses”, each with their own cognitive sequelae [7], which can occur either spontaneously (i.e., naturally) or due to medical or surgical reasons (e.g., cancer treatments, oophorectomy, hysterectomy) in mid-adulthood [8]. Menopause comprises physiological, cognitive, and behavioural symptoms, likely related to declining 17-beta-estradiol (17β-estradiol) levels–the most common type of estrogen [9]. Menopausal symptoms (e.g., poor sleep, depression, etc.) may themselves create risk of later brain pathology, such as the development of AD-related neuropathologies [10–13].
Later-life decline in cognitive function can signal risk of incident dementia [14, 15] and menopause is associated with cognitive changes [7, 8, 16, 17]. Recent cross-sectional studies have found spontaneous menopause to be associated with poorer cognitive performance in the domains of language [18, 19], memory [8, 20–23], visuo-spatial [24], and executive function [20, 24–28]. However, studies have not determined the nature of this association—whether cognition is related to ovarian cessation, itself, or to an additive effect of multiple menopausal symptoms. Longitudinally, earlier entry into menopause, whether spontaneously or surgically, has been linked to greater risk of cognitive impairment, AD, and other dementias [16, 17, 29–31]. Hormone therapies (HT) composed of estrogen variations and hormonal contraceptives, including oral contraceptive, have long been used to ameliorate menopausal symptoms. However, whether HT use is associated with improvement in cognition or reduced incidence of dementia remains unclear [8, 32–35].
Analogous to cognitive changes, later-life behavioural changes can also signal risk for incident dementia. The International Society to Advance Alzheimer’s Research and Treatment’s criteria for the syndrome Mild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) [36] operationalizes risk by identifying behavioural and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) that are later-life emergent and persistent. NPS meeting these criteria confer significantly higher risk of incident cognitive decline and dementia compared to conventionally measured behavioural and psychiatric symptomatology [37–47] However, unlike the relationship between ovarian cessation (i.e., any type of menopause) and cognition, evidence is sparse on the association between ovarian cessation and MBI. This evidence gap warrants further investigation.
We investigated the relationship between menopausal symptoms and later-life changes in cognitive function and behaviour; both risk factors for dementia, which may also represent preclinical/prodromal AD [14, 15, 42, 43, 48–55]. We hypothesized that individuals who experienced a greater number of menopausal symptoms (i.e., greater menopausal symptom burden) would subsequently experience poorer cognitive function and greater MBI symptom burden compared to individuals who experienced fewer menopausal symptoms.
Methods
CAN-PROTECT study
Data were collected from the ongoing Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN-PROTECT) study [56]. CAN-PROTECT is a Canada-wide online observational cohort study of brain aging that seeks to assess the roles of demographic, medical, environmental, and lifestyle factors on risk and resilience. To participate in CAN-PROTECT, individuals must be dementia-free residents of Canada, aged ≥18 years, with access to an internet-connected computer or tablet. In CAN-PROTECT, participants complete a detailed demographics questionnaire, and an annual series of mandatory and optional online assessments of cognition, behaviour, function, health, wellness, quality of life, medical/psychiatric history, and lifestyle. CAN-PROTECT was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary and began participant recruitment on March 8, 2023. Informed consent was obtained from all participants at registration.
Participants
Baseline participant responses pertaining to demographics, cognition, and emotional/psychiatric symptoms were analyzed, in addition to the optional fertility and menopause questionnaire. From the initial sample of 1984 participants (77.7% female), 896 (99.9% female and 0.1% two-spirit) who completed demographic, cognitive, and behavioural assessments and reported being post-menopausal were included here. To establish whether an association exists between menopausal symptom burden and cognitive function and MBI symptoms, participants with certain lifestyle factors (i.e., history of smoking, alcohol consumption, etc.) and medical history factors (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, etc.) were not excluded. Of these, 667 had spontaneous menopause, 162 menopause due to hysterectomy/oophorectomy, and 67 menopause due to other medical reasons (Fig 1).
Abbreviations: CAN-PROTECT, Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging.
Measurements
Menopausal symptom burden scale.
The recalled presence or absence of 11 perimenopausal symptoms reflecting vasomotor, cognitive, and behavioural/neuropsychiatric symptoms was assessed in postmenopausal females using the fertility and menopause questionnaire. The scale comprised 11 symptoms including irregular periods, hot flashes, chills, vaginal dryness, weight gain, slowed metabolism, night sweats, sleep problems, mood symptoms, inattention or forgetfulness, and other unnamed symptoms. A number of core perimenopausal symptoms have been reported including vasomotor symptoms (i.e., hot flashes, chills, and night sweats), genitourinary symptoms (i.e., vaginal dryness, urinary incontinence, atrophy of the vulva and vagina), sleep changes, mood changes, cognitive changes (i.e., inattention or forgetfulness), and weight changes (i.e., weight gain, slowed metabolism) [6, 10, 57]. To capture this diverse perimenopausal experience we included 10 representative symptoms across the broad spectrum and included a response of “other unnamed symptoms” for any other symptoms participants may have experienced. Total menopausal symptom burden was calculated by summing the number of self-reported menopausal symptoms experienced by participants. Menopausal symptom burden scores ranged from 0 to 11, with 0 representing the least burden (i.e., no symptoms present) and 11 representing the greatest burden (i.e., presence of all 11 symptoms).
Hormone therapy and birth control pill use.
Hormone therapy or birth control pills taken to alleviate symptoms of menopause were organized into two groups including HT and Progestin and Unnamed HT. The therapies, estradiol, conjugated estrogen, combination estrogen progesterone, and combination estrogen progestin were included in the HT variable. Birth control pills consisting of progestin and HT forms that were not previously identified in the fertility and menopause questionnaire were combined into a separate group.
Everyday cognition scale.
Cognitive function was measured with the revised Everyday Cognition (ECog-II) Scale [58], developed to identify new onset cognitive symptoms in dementia at-risk populations. The scale consists of 41 questions that assess changes in memory (9 items), language (8 items), visual-spatial and perceptual abilities (8 items), planning (5 items), organization (4 items), and executive function (4 items). Questions are rated from 0–3 (0 = no change, 1 = occasionally worse, 2 = consistently a little worse, 3 = much worse) relative to a participant’s own baseline, with higher scores reflecting more consistent impairment. Total ECog-II scores were calculated by summing all item scores. Thus, a higher ECog-II total score indicate worse cognitive function.
Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist.
Current MBI symptoms were assessed using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) [59, 60], developed to identify new onset behavioural symptoms in dementia at-risk populations. According to the MBI-C, for a symptom to be reported as MBI, it must be emergent in later life (≥ 50 years of age), impactful, persistent for at least 6 months, and not attributable to other psychiatric conditions or diagnoses [59]. MBI symptoms represent significant changes in a person’s normal behaviour and personality that may predict underlying neurodegenerative disease and incident dementia [47, 61–63]. This contrasts with behavioural symptoms experienced during perimenopause, which arise from hormonal and fertility changes rather than neurodegenerative disease. It is crucial to differentiate affective symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, from mood changes emerging due to perimenopause. The MBI-C consists of 34 items that evaluate later-life emergent and persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms in five domains: apathy (6 items), affect (6 items), impulse dyscontrol (12 items), social cognition (5 items), and psychosis (5 items). Like the ECog-II, MBI-C items are scored from 0–3, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom change from baseline. A total MBI symptom burden score was calculated by summing all item responses to create a total out of 102. Higher MBI-C total scores reflected greater MBI symptom burden.
Statistical analysis
Participant characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics (count, percentages, mean, and standard deviation). The data were over dispersed counts (i.e., variance > mean). To assess the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and cognitive function, a negative binomial regression model was used. Menopausal symptom burden was treated as the exposure variable and ECog-II total score as the outcome variable.
Similarly, to assess the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and MBI symptoms, a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used. Menopausal symptom burden was treated as the exposure variable and MBI-C total score as the outcome variable. Both models were adjusted for age, total years of education, type of menopause, age of menopausal onset, and use of HT. Type of menopause was categorized into two conditions: 1) spontaneous and 2) due to surgical or medical reasons. Age of menopausal onset was dichotomized based on the mean age of menopausal onset; onset before the mean age was considered premature, while onset after the mean age was considered late. Additionally, HT use was categorized into three conditions: 1) no HT use, 2) use of progestin or unnamed HT forms, and 3) use of HT. Both models included two interaction terms: 1) age of menopausal onset and 2) use of HT.
Results
Of the 896 participants assigned female sex at birth, 895 identified as women, while one participant identified as two-spirit. The mean (±standard deviation; SD) age of participants was 64.2 ± 7.3 years, with an average of 15.5 ± 5.0 years of education. Menopause onset was reported at a mean age of 49.4 ± 6.5 years. Specifically, spontaneous menopause, menopause due to hysterectomy/oophorectomy, and menopause due to other medical reasons occurred at mean ages of 51.3 ± 4.2 years, 42.0 ± 8.7 years, and 47.3 ± 5.2 years, respectively.
A total of 666 participants (74.3%) reported experiencing menopausal symptoms. To manage these symptoms, 166 participants (24.9%) used hormone therapy (HT). The HT included estradiol-based therapy (n = 41, 6.2%), conjugated estrogens (n = 34, 5.1%), estrogen-progesterone combinations (n = 73, 11.0%), and estrogen-progestin combinations (n = 18, 2.7%). Additionally, 12 participants (1.8%) used progestin alone, and 47 participants (7.1%) used unnamed HT types (see Table 1 for details of participant demographics).
From the list of 11 menopausal symptoms, participants endorsed between 0 to 10 symptoms (see Fig 2). The mean menopausal symptom burden of 3.7±2.8 (spontaneous = 3.8±2.8, due to surgical or medical reasons = 3.5±2.8). The most frequently endorsed perimenopausal symptom was hot flashes (n = 583, 88%) followed by night sweats (n = 496, 70%). The least endorsed perimenopausal symptoms were chills (n = 92, 14%) and other symptoms not listed (n = 31, 5%).
Frequency comparison of participant endorsed and not endorsed perimenopausal symptoms, reported from the CAN-PROTECT fertility and menopause questionnaire. Red bars indicate the number of participants who endorsed a perimenopausal symptom, while grey bars indicate the number of participants who did not.
Everyday cognition and Mild Behavioral Impairment
Collectively, participants reported a mean ECog-II total score of 11.1±10.5, with a range of 0 to 88. Mean MBI-C total symptom burden score was 5.4±7.6, with a range of 0 to 65.
Menopausal symptom burden and cognitive function
Menopausal symptom burden was associated with poorer cognitive function, according to the results of the negative binomial regression model (see Table 2 and Fig 3). Every additional menopausal symptom was associated with a 5.37% higher ECog-II total score, indicating more consistent symptoms of cognitive dysfunction (95%CI[2.85, 7.97], p < .001). Neither the type of menopause (b = 2.78%, 95%CI[-13.10, 21.91], p = .75) nor the age of menopausal onset (b = -1.05%, 95%CI[-2.13, 0.013], p = .068) was significantly associated with ECog-II total score. Similarly, neither HT (b = -10.98%, 95%CI[-25.33, 6.54], p = .20) nor use of progestin or unnamed HT (b = 16.93%, 95%CI[-10.93, 56.13], p = .27) were significantly associated with ECog-II total score.
Negative-binomial regression coefficient plot of the relationship between menopausal symptom burden (predictor variable) and ECog-II total score (outcome variable). Lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals for the estimate. Predictor variables whose confidence intervals cross the reference line at 1.00 are not significant. Significant predictor variables are indicated with an asterisk.
None of age of menopausal onset (b = 0.070%, 95%CI[-0.26, 0.40], p = .69), use of HT (b = 0.50%, 95%CI[-7.30, 9.09], p = .13), or use of progestin or unnamed HT (b = 2.95%,95%CI[-8.83, 16.87], p = .48) moderated the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and ECog-II total score.
Menopausal symptom burden and Mild Behavioral Impairment
Menopausal symptom burden was associated with greater MBI symptom burden, according to the results of the zero-inflated negative binomial regression (see Table 3 and Fig 4). Every additional menopausal symptom was associated with a 6.09% higher MBI-C total score (95%CI[2.50, 9.80], p < .001), indicating more consistent symptoms of MBI. HT use was associated with a 26.90% lower MBI-C total score (95%CI[-43.35, -5.67], p < .016). None of type of menopause (b = 4.56%, 95%CI[-18.17, 33.60], p = .72), age of menopausal onset (b = -0.83%, 95%CI[-2.36, 0.74], p = .30), or use of progestin or unnamed HT (b = -19.12%, 95%CI[-44.60, 18.07], p = .27) were significantly associated with MBI-C total score.
Zero-inflated negative-binomial regression coefficient plot of the relationship between menopausal symptom burden (predictor variable) and MBI-C total score (outcome variable). The count model coefficient estimates are indicated by the conditional title, while the zero-inflated coefficient estimates are indicated by the zero-inflated title. Lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals for the estimate. Predictor variables whose confidence intervals cross the reference line at 1.00 are not significant and indicated by the colour red. Significant predictor variables are indicated by the colour blue.
Despite the main effect of HT use and lower MBI-C total score, use of HT did not moderate the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and MBI-C total score (b = -0.20%, 95%CI[-11.21, 12.17], p = .97). Similarly, neither the age of menopausal onset (b = 0.066%, 95%CI[-0.50, 0.37], p = .77) nor use of progestin or unnamed HT (b = 7.22%, 95%CI[-8.01, 25.63], p = .37) significantly moderated the relationship between menopausal symptom burden and MBI-C total score.
Discussion
The experience of menopause can include persistent changes in cognitive function and behaviour, which may extend into later life and identify those at greater risk for incident dementia. In this study, we showed that greater menopausal symptom burden was associated with significantly poorer cognitive function and greater MBI symptom burden, adjusted for age, education, age of menopausal onset, type of menopause, use of HT, and use of progestin or unnamed HT. While use of either HT or progestins or unnamed HT was not significantly associated with changes in cognitive function, use of HT was associated with significantly fewer MBI symptoms. Subsequent analyses revealed that age of menopausal onset and use of HT or progestin or unnamed HT did not moderate the observed associations between menopausal symptom burden and cognition or MBI.
Changes in cognitive function are a defining feature of the normal aging process in females and males [64]. However, Alzheimer disease starts long before diagnosis and understanding the earliest factors influencing its progression is critical. Therefore, identifying later-life emergent and persistent changes in cognitive function may aid in assessing risk for dementia. Other studies have shown that select perimenopausal symptoms may be associated with cognitive changes. For instance, evidence from cross-sectional studies have found perimenopausal females who experienced specific symptoms were more likely to report poorer cognitive function in the domains of attention [24, 26], working memory [8, 23], verbal memory [18, 21, 24], visuo-spatial skills [24], and processing speed [26, 27]. However, whether the additive effect of experiencing more than one menopausal symptom is related to later-life changes in cognitive function had yet to be determined. Our first analysis suggests that the degree of menopausal symptom burden (i.e., greater number of menopausal symptoms) is indeed associated with poorer mid-to-later life cognitive function. Thus, our findings are novel in that they show not only are specific menopausal symptoms related to changes in cognitive function, but the overall number of menopausal symptoms experienced are important as well.
Few studies have investigated the association between multiple perimenopausal symptoms (i.e., menopausal symptom burden) with risk of dementia as determined by both cognitive and behavioural changes. Studies have shown that select perimenopausal symptoms may be related to AD-related neuropathological changes in the brain. For instance, perimenopausal females who experienced night sweats (i.e., a vasomotor symptom) had greater brain amyloid beta pathology than perimenopausal females who did not [65]. While such findings suggest that perimenopausal symptoms may be related to risk of dementia, given that participants in our study reported an average of 3.7 perimenopausal symptoms, it is important to recognize that measuring only one symptom does not tell the whole story; symptomatic perimenopausal females may experience more than one symptom at a time. The experience of multiple menopausal symptoms may estimate dementia risk in a way not accounted for by analysis of a single menopausal symptom, as evidenced by the dose effect we found. Further, to identify whether the experience of multiple menopausal symptoms is related to dementia risk, both markers of cognitive change and behavioural change should be used.
While changes in cognitive function may act as one marker of dementia risk, later-life emergent and persistent changes in behaviour consistent with MBI are another marker, which complements cognition [36]. Several studies have linked MBI with cognitive decline and dementia. A longitudinal study of MBI in cognitively normal older persons, using sex-stratified analyses, described MBI effects for cognitive decline in both females and males [41]. In a mixed sex study that explored progression to dementia in a neuropsychiatry clinic sample, participants with MBI had a higher progression-rate to dementia than those with psychiatric disorders. Additionally, in both female and male patients with MCI, those with comorbid MBI had a higher progression rate than those without [66]. These findings have been replicated in a geriatric psychiatry clinic sample [47] and in observational cohorts of older adults with normal cognition and subjective cognitive decline [37, 67, 68], with MCI [37, 38], and in mixed cognitively unimpaired/MCI samples [42, 44–46]. These findings support MBI as an effect modifier in the relationship between cognitive function and incident dementia. Our cross-sectional study shows that this may also be the case in a cohort of females, alone. This emerging body of evidence highlights the importance of including assessment of behavioural changes, consistent with MBI, in conjunction with the well-established practice of determining cognitive status in dementia risk assessment [69]. Despite the importance of the link, sparse research has explored the relationship between menopause and MBI and none exploring dose effects, i.e., number of perimenopausal symptoms and later-life MBI symptoms (let alone cognitive symptoms). Our findings of a dose effect encourage further investigations of this link.
Why some perimenopausal females and not others may experience symptoms has not been elucidated; however, recent evidence suggests that differences in the experience of menopause, such as in menopausal symptoms, may be linked to physiological stressors [10–13]. Estradiol is known to lead to synapse formation, neurite outgrowth, and neurogenesis, all of which decline in neurodegenerative diseases and dementia. However, in menopause, estradiol naturally declines [6, 10]. Thus, the experience of menopausal symptoms may act as an indicator of how well females tolerate estradiol changes [16, 70–73]. Indeed, in a 10-year longitudinal study of Vitamin D exposure and incident dementia, the effect of Vitamin D for lower hazard of incident dementia was greater in females, thought to be secondary to the role of estrogen in activating Vitamin D [70]. This evidence suggests two possible mechanisms for how menopause may be related to risk for AD. The first mechanism may be the direct effect of estrogens on neurons [17, 71] with greater decline in estrogens increasing risk for cognitive decline and dementia. The second mechanism may be indirect and dependent on how body systems other than the brain in individual females respond to estrogen decline, modifying risk of developing AD-related neuropathological changes in the brain. Although further exploration is required, it is likely that both mechanisms contribute to the association between estradiol loss, perimenopausal symptoms, and AD.
HT are amongst the most effective treatments for alleviating perimenopausal symptoms by mitigating menopause-related estradiol decline [8, 72]. Thus, they are essential to understanding physiological responses to menopause. Given that estrogens have been shown to mitigate against AD cognitive and brain changes [16, 71, 73–76], some research speculates they may help to reduce to the risk of dementia [8, 16, 32, 77]. Despite this hypothesis, evidence remains conflicted as studies continue to report mitigating [8, 32, 33], neutral [34, 35], and harmful [35, 78, 79] associations with dementia risk for females. Additionally, factors such as the age at start of therapy, duration, genetic interactions, and type of HT likely complicate the association, making the relationship highly complex and variable person to person [8, 16, 33, 74, 77].
In our cognitive analysis, we found neither direct nor interaction effects of HT for cognitive function in females independent of menopause type or age at menopause. These findings contradict studies that support the role of HT to ameliorate cognitive decline in females with perimenopausal symptoms [8, 32, 33]. This may be due to the highly variable response of individual females to estradiol loss and replacement and the direction of effect in our study does suggest potential enhancement of cognitive performance. Indeed, our behavioural analysis revealed a main effect for HT and behaviour without an interaction effect, suggesting potential links between HT taken during perimenopause and subsequent behavioural risk for dementia in our cohort. Although research remains sparse, other studies show that the use of HT has been implicated in the improvement of behavioural symptoms during perimenopause, including emotional symptoms [78, 80–83]. One study found that compared to females who experienced no symptoms of menopause, perimenopausal females who used HT had improved depression severity, but only in those who also experienced hot flashes suggesting that the beneficial effects were due to treatment of the hot flashes [80]. Altogether, these findings suggest that HT may mitigate MBI symptoms differently from cognitive symptoms.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the cross-sectional design of the study limits conclusions about causality. To determine temporal relationships, longitudinal data are required, ideally with biomarker data (i.e., blood estradiol, phosphorylated-tau, and amyloid beta levels) to further explore potential mechanisms. Second, menopausal symptom burden was operationalized objectively as a symptom count, (i.e., number of menopausal symptoms) rather than severity, which might be more subjective. Nonetheless, recent evidence suggests that menopausal symptom severity is associated with poorer cognitive performance [24]. Additional research is required to incorporate severity into symptom count, to explore these relationships further. Third, our menopausal symptom burden scale included 10 of the most reported perimenopausal symptoms [6, 10, 57] but may not account for the number of other unnamed symptoms participants experienced. Although our symptom, “other unnamed symptoms” seeks to account for other perimenopausal symptoms experienced, it may be that participants had multiple unnamed perimenopausal symptoms in addition to the ones listed. This would limit our investigation of the number of other perimenopausal symptoms participants experienced in our menopausal symptom burden total scores. Fourth, we did not differentiate between participants who underwent oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or both; type of oophorectomy or hysterectomy was also not specified. This limited our investigations of possible differences between females who underwent different types of menopause, specifically those who underwent oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or both. Given that bilateral oophorectomy confers greater risk of cognitive decline and incident dementia than hysterectomy, our results may have been affected [16, 17]. Fifth, there is emerging evidence that suggests premature menopause (i.e., menopause at 40 years of age or younger) and early menopause (i.e., menopause between 40 and 45 years) may be associated with poor cognitive function in later life [7, 84, 85]. In our analyses, we dichotomized the variable, age of menopausal onset, based on the mean age of menopause, defining premature menopause as occurring before the mean age and late menopause as occurring after the mean age. Our definitions of the age of menopausal onset variable limits investigations into the possible associations between premature, early, and late menopause with cognitive and behavioural changes. Future studies should investigate if different definitions of premature, early, and late age of menopausal onset influence later-life cognitive and behavioural change outcomes. Future studies should investigate if different definitions of premature, early, and late age of menopausal onset influence later life cognitive and behavioural change outcomes. Sixth, sample size limitations precluded analyses of differences between types and formulations of HT and progestogens. A growing number of studies suggest that 17β-estradiol HT may exert the greatest of neuroprotective effects on cognitive function and risk for AD as compared to other HT estrogens [86, 87]. We did not find a significant association of HT with cognitive function, and combining different HT estrogens into one group, with progestin and unnamed HT in another group may have skewed the results. Additionally, participants who took HT forms not identified in CAN-PROTECT’s fertility and menopause questionnaire (i.e., unnamed HT) could not be further investigated. As CAN-PROTECT data accumulate, we may be able to address these two limitations in the future. Nonetheless, there are also multiple strengths to this study. The experience of menopause and its association with dementia is highly complex and likely influenced by several variables such as type of menopause, age of onset, and use of HT and progestogens [8, 16, 33, 74, 77]. Our study included each of these variables to represent more accurately the experience of menopause. Finally, contributing to the novelty of our study, we included behaviour, operationalized as the validated construct of MBI to assess risk. Together, changes in cognitive function and behaviour represent two important markers for risk of dementia. Therefore, broadening our understanding of how the experience of menopause may be associated with both cognition and behaviour could have clinical applications for risk for incident dementia.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that recalled greater menopausal symptom burden is associated with poorer current cognitive function and greater current MBI symptom burden in mid-to-late life. Use of HT control may help to mitigate MBI symptoms more than cognitive symptoms. These findings suggest menopausal symptom burden may predict susceptibility to dementia, as evidenced by greater cognitive and behavioural factors in those with greater menopausal symptom burden.
Acknowledgments
All authors contributed to the study design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript revisions. All authors gave approval for the final submission.
References
- 1. Nichols E, Steinmetz JD, Vollset SE, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–e125. pmid:34998485
- 2. Subramaniapillai S, Almey A, Rajah MN, Einstein G. Sex and gender differences in cognitive and brain reserve: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease in women. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2021;60:100879. pmid:33137359
- 3. Andersen K, Launer LJ, Dewey ME, et al. Gender differences in the incidence of AD and vascular dementia: The EURODEM Studies. Neurology. 1999;53(9):1992–1992.
- 4. Beam CR, Kaneshiro C, Jang JY, Reynolds CA, Pedersen NL, Gatz M. Differences between women and men in incidence rates of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2018;64(4):1077–1083. pmid:30010124
- 5. Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clinical epidemiology. 2014:37–48. pmid:24470773
- 6. Santoro N, Roeca C, Peters BA, Neal-Perry G. The menopause transition: signs, symptoms, and management options. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2021;106(1):1–15. pmid:33095879
- 7. Edwards H, Duchesne A, Au AS, Einstein G. The many menopauses: searching the cognitive research literature for menopause types. Menopause (New York, NY). 2019;26(1):45. pmid:29994973
- 8. Conde DM, Verdade RC, Valadares AL, Mella LF, Pedro AO, Costa-Paiva L. Menopause and cognitive impairment: A narrative review of current knowledge. World Journal of Psychiatry. 2021;11(8):412. pmid:34513605
- 9. Al-Azzawi F, Palacios S. Hormonal changes during menopause. Maturitas. 2009;63(2):135–137. pmid:19372016
- 10. Santoro N, Epperson CN, Mathews SB. Menopausal symptoms and their management. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics. 2015;44(3):497–515. pmid:26316239
- 11. Lobo RA, Davis SR, De Villiers T, et al. Prevention of diseases after menopause. Climacteric. 2014;17(5):540–556. pmid:24969415
- 12. Faleschini S, Tiemeier H, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Longitudinal associations of psychosocial stressors with menopausal symptoms and well-being among women in midlife. Menopause. 2022;29(11):1247–1253. pmid:36099555
- 13. Simpson EE. Stress and Coping in the Menopause. Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior. Elsevier; 2016:451–455.
- 14. Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, et al. The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(4):531. pmid:18590364
- 15. Silverberg NB, Ryan LM, Carrillo MC, et al. Assessment of cognition in early dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2011;7(3):e60–e76. pmid:23559893
- 16. Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, Shuster LT. Oophorectomy, estrogen, and dementia: a 2014 update. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2014;389(1–2):7–12. pmid:24508665
- 17. Rocca W, Bower J, Maraganore D, et al. Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology. 2007;69(11):1074–1083. pmid:17761551
- 18. Maki PM, Rubin LH, Savarese A, et al. Stellate ganglion blockade and verbal memory in midlife women: evidence from a randomized trial. Maturitas. 2016;92:123–129. pmid:27621249
- 19. Maki P, Thurston R. Menopause and brain health: hormonal changes are only part of the story. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 562275. 2020.
- 20. Gava G, Orsili I, Alvisi S, Mancini I, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Cognition, mood and sleep in menopausal transition: the role of menopause hormone therapy. Medicina. 2019;55(10):668. pmid:31581598
- 21. Maki PM, Drogos LL, Rubin LH, Banuvar S, Shulman LP, Geller SE. Objective hot flashes are negatively related to verbal memory performance in midlife women. Menopause (New York, NY). 2008;15(5):848. pmid:18562950
- 22. Weber MT, Maki PM, McDermott MP. Cognition and mood in perimenopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2014;142:90–98. pmid:23770320
- 23. Estrogens Hampson E., aging, and working memory. Current psychiatry reports. 2018;20:1–9.
- 24. Kaur M, Kaur M. Is cognitive performance of women sensitive to the severity of menopausal symptoms? Menopause. 2022;29(2):170–177. pmid:35013054
- 25. Fuh J-L, Wang S-J, Lu S-R, Juang K-D, Chiu LM. The Kinmen women-health investigation (KIWI): a menopausal study of a population aged 40–54. Maturitas. 2001;39(2):117–124. pmid:11514110
- 26. Zhu C, Thomas N, Arunogiri S, Gurvich C. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of cognition in perimenopause: The role of risk factors and menopausal symptoms. Maturitas. 2022;164:76–86. pmid:35878526
- 27. Jaff NG, Rubin LH, Crowther NJ, Norris SA, Maki PM. Menopausal symptoms, menopausal stage and cognitive functioning in black urban African women. Climacteric. 2020;23(1):38–45. pmid:31455107
- 28. Huang W, Jiang S, Geng L, Li C, Tao M. Correlation between menopausal symptoms and everyday cognition in Chinese (peri) menopausal women. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021;37(7):655–659. pmid:33645380
- 29. Faubion SS, Kuhle CL, Shuster LT, Rocca WA. Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management. Climacteric. 2015;18(4):483–491. pmid:25845383
- 30. Georgakis MK, Beskou-Kontou T, Theodoridis I, Skalkidou A, Petridou ET. Surgical menopause in association with cognitive function and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;106:9–19. pmid:30928686
- 31. Wedatilake Y, Myrstad C, Tom S, Strand B, Bergh S, Selbæk G. Female Reproductive Factors and Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The HUNT Study. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2024:1–10.
- 32. Shao H, Breitner JC, Whitmer RA, et al. Hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease dementia: new findings from the Cache County Study. Neurology. 2012;79(18):1846–1852. pmid:23100399
- 33. Resnick SM, Henderson VW. Hormone therapy and risk of Alzheimer disease: a critical time. Jama. 2002;288(17):2170–2172. pmid:12413378
- 34. Seshadri S, Zornberg GL, Derby LE, Myers MW, Jick H, Drachman DA. Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of Alzheimer disease. Archives of neurology. 2001;58(3):435–440. pmid:11255447
- 35. Imtiaz B, Tuppurainen M, Rikkonen T, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and Alzheimer disease: A prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2017;88(11):1062–1068. pmid:28202700
- 36. Ismail Z, Smith EE, Geda Y, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2016;12(2):195–202.
- 37. Ismail Z, McGirr A, Gill S, Hu S, Forkert ND, Smith EE. Mild behavioral impairment and subjective cognitive decline predict cognitive and functional decline. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2021;80(1):459–469. pmid:33554909
- 38. McGirr A, Nathan S, Ghahremani M, Gill S, Smith EE, Ismail Z. Progression to dementia or reversion to normal cognition in mild cognitive impairment as a function of late-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms. Neurology. 2022;98(21):e2132–e2139. pmid:35351783
- 39. Rouse HJ, Ismail Z, Andel R, Molinari VA, Schinka JA, Small BJ. Impact of mild behavioral impairment on longitudinal changes in cognition. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2024;79(1):glad098. pmid:37052173
- 40. Kan CN, Cano J, Zhao X, Ismail Z, Chen CL-H, Xu X. Prevalence, Clinical Correlates, Cognitive Trajectories, and Dementia Risk Associated With Mild Behavioral Impairment in Asians. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2022;83(3):40123. pmid:36036661
- 41. Wolfova K, Creese B, Aarsland D, et al. Gender/sex differences in the association of mild behavioral impairment with cognitive aging. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. May 16 2022;88(1):345–355. pmid:35599483
- 42. Ghahremani M, Wang M, Chen H-Y, et al. Plasma Phosphorylated Tau at Threonine 181 and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Preclinical and Prodromal Alzheimer Disease. Neurology. 2023;100(7):e683–e693. pmid:36323521
- 43. Ismail Z, Leon R, Creese B, Ballard C, Robert P, Smith EE. Optimizing detection of Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment: a 4-year biomarker study of mild behavioral impairment in ADNI and MEMENTO. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2023;18(1):50. pmid:37516848
- 44. Ismail Z, Ghahremani M, Amlish Munir M, Fischer CE, Smith EE, Creese B. A longitudinal study of late-life psychosis and incident dementia and the potential effects of race and cognition. Nature Mental Health. 2023;1(4):273–283.
- 45. Ebrahim IM, Ghahremani M, Camicioli R, Smith EE, Ismail Z. Effects of race, baseline cognition, and APOE on the association of affective dysregulation with incident dementia: A longitudinal study of dementia-free older adults. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023;332:9–18. pmid:36997127
- 46. Vellone D, Ghahremani M, Goodarzi Z, Forkert ND, Smith EE, Ismail Z. Apathy and APOE in mild behavioral impairment, and risk for incident dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 2022;8(1):e12370. pmid:36544988
- 47. Matsuoka T, Ismail Z, Narumoto J. Prevalence of mild behavioral impairment and risk of dementia in a psychiatric outpatient clinic. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2019;70(2):505–513. pmid:31177229
- 48. Naude JP, Gill S, Hu S, et al. Plasma neurofilament light: a marker of neurodegeneration in mild behavioral impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2020;76(3):1017–1027. pmid:32597801
- 49. Matuskova V, Ismail Z, Nikolai T, et al. Mild behavioral impairment is associated with atrophy of entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in a memory clinic cohort. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2021;13:643271. pmid:34108874
- 50. Ghahremani M, Nathan S, Smith EE, McGirr A, Goodyear B, Ismail Z. Functional connectivity and mild behavioral impairment in dementia‐free elderly. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 2023;9(1):e12371. pmid:36698771
- 51. Wilson RS, Segawa E, Boyle PA, Anagnos SE, Hizel LP, Bennett DA. The natural history of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and aging. 2012;27(4):1008. pmid:22946521
- 52. Hall CB, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M, Stewart WF. A change point model for estimating the onset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Statistics in medicine. 2000;19(11‐12):1555–1566. pmid:10844718
- 53. Amieva H, Le Goff M, Millet X, et al. Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: successive emergence of the clinical symptoms. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society. 2008;64(5):492–498. pmid:19067364
- 54. Johnson DK, Storandt M, Morris JC, Galvin JE. Longitudinal study of the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer disease. Archives of neurology. 2009;66(10):1254–1259. pmid:19822781
- 55. Grober E, Hall CB, Lipton RB, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM, Kawas C. Memory impairment, executive dysfunction, and intellectual decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2008;14(2):266–278. pmid:18282324
- 56. Ismail Z, Guan DX, Vellone D, et al. The Canadian platform for research online to investigate health, quality of life, cognition, behaviour, function, and caregiving in aging (CAN-PROTECT): study protocol, platform description, and preliminary analyses. medRxiv. 2023:2023.12.16.
- 57. Santoro N. Perimenopause: from research to practice. Journal of women’s health. 2016;25(4):332–339. pmid:26653408
- 58. Farias ST, Weakley A, Harvey D, Chandler J, Huss O, Mungas D. The measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog): revisions and updates. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2021;35(3):258. pmid:33901047
- 59. Ismail Z, Agüera-Ortiz L, Brodaty H, et al. The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C): a rating scale for neuropsychiatric symptoms in pre-dementia populations. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2017;56(3):929–938.
- 60. Hu S, Patten S, Charlton A, et al. Validating the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in a Cognitive Clinic: Comparisons With the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. Mar 2023;36(2):107–120. pmid:35430902
- 61. Jiang F, Cheng C, Huang J, Chen Q, Le W. Mild behavioral impairment: an early sign and predictor of Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Current Alzheimer Research. 2022;19(6):407–419. pmid:35929623
- 62. Tapiainen V, Hartikainen S, Taipale H, Tiihonen J, Tolppanen A-M. Hospital-treated mental and behavioral disorders and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a nationwide nested case-control study. European Psychiatry. 2017;43:92–98. pmid:28388490
- 63. Taragano FE, Allegri RF, Krupitzki H, et al. Mild behavioral impairment and risk of dementia: a prospective cohort study of 358 patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2009;70(4):584. pmid:19323967
- 64. Kester JD, Benjamin AS, Castel AD, Craik FI. Memory in elderly people. Handbook of memory disorders. 2002;2:543–567.
- 65. Thurston RC, Pauline M, Chang Y, et al. Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms and Plasma Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023;
- 66. Taragano FE, Allegri RF, Heisecke SL, et al. Risk of conversion to dementia in a mild behavioral impairment group compared to a psychiatric group and to a mild cognitive impairment group. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2018;62(1):227–238. pmid:29439333
- 67. Mallo SC, Ismail Z, Pereiro AX, et al. Assessing mild behavioral impairment with the mild behavioral impairment checklist in people with subjective cognitive decline. International psychogeriatrics. 2019;31(2):231–239. pmid:30017017
- 68. Creese B, Brooker H, Ismail Z, et al. Mild behavioral impairment as a marker of cognitive decline in cognitively normal older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2019;27(8):823–834. pmid:30902566
- 69. Ismail Z, Black SE, Camicioli R, et al. Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2020;16(8):1182–1195. pmid:32725777
- 70. Ghahremani M, Smith EE, Chen HY, Creese B, Goodarzi Z, Ismail Z. Vitamin D supplementation and incident dementia: Effects of sex, APOE, and baseline cognitive status. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2023;15(1):e12404. pmid:36874594
- 71. Norbury R, Cutter WJ, Compton J, et al. The neuroprotective effects of estrogen on the aging brain. Experimental gerontology. 2003;38(1–2):109–117. pmid:12543268
- 72. Kaunitz AM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;126(4):859. pmid:26348174
- 73. C Correia S X Santos R, Cardoso S, et al. Effects of estrogen in the brain: is it a neuroprotective agent in Alzheimer’s disease? Current aging science. 2010;3(2):113–126. pmid:20167003
- 74. Pertesi S, Coughlan G, Puthusseryppady V, Morris E, Hornberger M. Menopause, cognition and dementia–A review. Post reproductive health. 2019;25(4):200–206. pmid:31690174
- 75. Rahman A, Schelbaum E, Hoffman K, et al. Sex-driven modifiers of Alzheimer risk: a multimodality brain imaging study. Neurology. 2020;95(2):e166–e178. pmid:32580974
- 76. Uddin MS, Rahman MM, Jakaria M, et al. Estrogen signaling in Alzheimer’s disease: molecular insights and therapeutic targets for Alzheimer’s dementia. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020;57:2654–2670. pmid:32297302
- 77. Yaffe K, Sawaya G, Lieberburg I, Grady D. Estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women: effects on cognitive function and dementia. Jama. 1998;279(9):688–695. pmid:9496988
- 78. Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Wharton W, et al. Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood in recently postmenopausal women: findings from the randomized, controlled KEEPS–cognitive and affective study. PLoS medicine. 2015;12(6):e1001833. pmid:26035291
- 79. Savolainen-Peltonen H, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Hoti F, et al. Use of postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of Alzheimer’s disease in Finland: nationwide case-control study. bmj. 2019;364 pmid:30842086
- 80. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd D, Vittinghoff E, et al. Quality-of-life and depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women after receiving hormone therapy: results from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) trial. Jama. 2002;287(5):591–597. pmid:11829697
- 81. Toffol E, Heikinheimo O, Partonen T. Hormone therapy and mood in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a narrative review. Menopause. 2015;22(5):564–578. pmid:25203891
- 82. Kirkham C, Hahn P, VAN VUG D, Carmichael J, Reid R. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess the side effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate in hormone replacement therapy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1991;78(1):93–97. pmid:1828550
- 83. Gambacciani M, Ciaponi M, Cappagli B, et al. Effects of low-dose, continuous combined estradiol and noretisterone acetate on menopausal quality of life in early postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2003;44(2):157–163. pmid:12590012
- 84. Ryan J, Scali J, Carriere I, et al. Impact of a premature menopause on cognitive function in later life. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;121(13):1729–1739. pmid:24802975
- 85. Karamitrou EK, Anagnostis P, Vaitsi K, Athanasiadis L, Goulis DG. Early menopause and premature ovarian insufficiency are associated with increased risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Maturitas. 2023:107792. pmid:37393661
- 86. Baker LD, Sambamurti K, Craft S, et al. 17β-Estradiol reduces plasma Aβ40 for HRT-naive postmenopausal women with Alzheimer disease: a preliminary study. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2003;11(2):239–244.
- 87. Petrovska S, Dejanova B, Jurisic V. Estrogens: mechanisms of neuroprotective effects. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012;68:455–460. pmid:22371015