https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9916-2605
Figures
Abstract
Objective
The study examined whether rehabilitation using aerobic exercise is more appropriate for patients less than 3 months post-stroke or more appropriate for patients more than 3 months post-stroke.
Method
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CNKI databases were searched from inception to September 2023. All studies included must be written in English and grey literature was excluded. The quality of the study was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The primary outcomes are cognitive ability and walking ability. The intervention of the experimental group must be or include high-intensity aerobic training or moderate-intensity aerobic training. In addition, we required low intensity routine exercises in control group.
Result
Only 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that aerobic exercise has a positive rehabilitation effect on cognitive and walking ability of stroke patients. Global Cognitive Function (SMD = 0.81 95%CI 0.49–1.12), Walking Capacity (SMD = 1.19, 95%CI 0.75–1.62), VO2peak (SMD = 0.97, 95%CI 0.66–1.28), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (SMD = 2.73, 95%CI 2.03–3.43). We further observed that patients who suffered a stroke within the past three months exhibited superior rehabilitation outcomes compared to patients who suffered a stroke more than three months ago, specifically in terms of cognitive ability, walking tests, and cardiopulmonary function.
Citation: Li Z, Guo H, Yuan Y, Liu X (2024) The effect of moderate and vigorous aerobic exercise training on the cognitive and walking ability among stroke patients during different periods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 19(2): e0298339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298339
Editor: Mehrnaz Kajbafvala, Iran University of Medical Sciences, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Received: October 18, 2023; Accepted: January 23, 2024; Published: February 23, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Stroke is a common threat to mental and physical disability, which posed high burden on mortality and disability rate [1], with the incidence of stroke increasing from 1.1 million / year in 2000 to 1.5 million / year in 2025 [2, 3]. According to studies, stroke patients have a decline in their ability to live independently. Stroke causes serious damage to the patient’s cardiovascular function and brain. Moreover, in the United States, the risk of stroke has increased by 25% since 2010. More than 4 million people will be sick in 2030 predicted by previous studies [4]. Therefore, it is very important to explore effective treatment methods for stroke patients to improve their cognitive and living ability.
Previous studies have shown that appropriate physical exercise and physical activity are effective means for stroke patients to restore physical function [4–6]. Many researchers have carried out a lot of research on exercise interventions suitable for stroke patients [7, 8], the vast majority of experimental results show that the therapeutic effect of aerobic exercise is the most significant [9]. Compared with traditional rehabilitation training methods, aerobic exercise has more obvious stimulation on cardiopulmonary function and brain cognition, which can enhance the cognitive ability of stroke patients [10], reduce pain [11], relieve cardiovascular pressure [12], and improve walking ability [13, 14].
Although the use of aerobic exercise in post-stroke treatment and rehabilitation has been comprehensively explored, it is unclear how aerobic exercise differs in its therapeutic effects on post-stroke patients at different periods of rehabilitation. Due to the decline in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular function after stroke, there are differences in the level of physical function of stroke patients at different times. Therefore, when performing aerobic exercise interventions, therapists need to choose the appropriate exercise intensity according to the differences in stroke duration in stroke patients. In conclusion, what kind of stroke patients are most suitable for aerobic exercise therapy, and whether aerobic exercise is more suitable for patients with a shorter post-stroke duration or patients with a longer post-stroke duration are the main questions of this review.
Therefore, to address the gaps, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to divide patients into two subgroups of stroke time greater than 3 months and less than 3 months. On this basis, this study aims to provide exercise recommendations and programs suitable for the rehabilitation of patients with different stroke periods.
Method
Search strategy
This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The review protocol was registered with PROPERO (CRD42023463751).
Only randomized control trial (RCT) investigations were enrolled in this meta-analysis, and this research was conducted with Review Manager Software (RevMan5.4), using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CNKI databases, which were searched from inception to September 2023. Based on each database, different combinations of possible keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms were used. All studies included in the study must be written in English grey literature were excluded. We also checked the references of the included articles to find any missing article. The search strategy was shown in S1 Table.
Screening process
We followed the PICO standard to develop strict inclusion criteria. All RCTs must meet the inclusion criteria to be considered in this study. The title and abstract of the articles are reviewed by two authors respectively and the final decision is made by the third author. The studies meeting the criteria were moved to the subsequent full-text review. After the screening of the article, we still used two authors to screen, and the third author finally decided to judge the follow-up work such as literature quality assessment and risk assessment.
Eligibility criteria
For the participants, we required that all participants of the included studies be patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. According to the design of this meta-analysis, we required all patients to be sick for more than 3 months or less than 3 months, and the age must be more than 18 years. All the patients included in the study had no drug use records before and after the exercise intervention, so the influence of factors such as drugs on the results of the article can be excluded.
For the intervention, Li [15], Mah and Amoros-Aguilar [16, 17] proposed in the study that moderate and vigorous aerobic training has the best rehabilitation effect on stroke patients. And there is little difference between the therapeutic effect of moderate intensity aerobic exercise and the therapeutic effect of high intensity aerobic exercise. Hence, this study aims to set moderate and vigorous aerobic training as the intervention measure of the study. The intervention of the experimental group must be or include high-intensity aerobic training or moderate-intensity aerobic training. About the control group, we required the low intensity routine exercises. The routine exercise program consisted of stretching exercise, balance training, functional exercise, cognitive training and usual care with medicine.
The studies included must contain one or more of the following outcome indicators, otherwise it will be excluded.
The primary outcomes are cognitive ability and walking ability. We used the Mini-Mental State Examination score (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to measure the improvement of training effect on global cognitive function. In the study of cognitive function, Li [15] integrated MoCA, MMES and Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised (ACE-R) as a measurement tool to evaluate cognitive function, and showed its feasibility. Therefore, although there are differences in the cognitive domains measured by MoCA and MMES, they are all data tables for measuring cognitive level in the final analysis, and have been practiced by scholars. Therefore, in this study, we also used the results of MoCA and MMES as the basis for cognitive function tests. Then we used 6-minute walk test (6WMT) to evaluate walking capacity.
The secondary outcomes are brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BNDF) changes and VO2peak. It is well known that BNDF played a vital role in the development of nervous system cells such as glial cells, neuronal cells, hippocampus and cortical neurons [18]. In addition, some studies found that the cardiovascular health level of stroke patients can be expressed by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) [19, 20]. So, we evaluated the improvement effect of exercise therapy on some physiological indexes of stroke patients by BNDF and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak).
Data extraction
For study selection and data extraction, we followed the predetermined criteria to search related studies The following data were extracted from the included studies: information of participants (age, gender, numbers), intervention design (experimental and control), treatment condition (frequency and duration), outcome and drop-out. In addition, we created a table using this data (see S2 Table).
Risk-of-bias assessment
To assist the risk of bias, we evaluated the risk of bias for each included studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [21] and PEDro scale [22]. A third reviewer will be involved if two reviewers dispute the results.
For the publication bias, although the number of articles included in this article is more than 10, the publication bias analysis cannot be performed through the funnel plot as the number of articles in the subgroup is less than 10.
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, we used Review Manager Software (RevMan5.4) to analyze the post-intervention results of the studies we included. We chose the standardized mean difference (SMD) as a useful sign, and provided a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the variance. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and the I2 test, where P < 0.05 (2-tailed) or I2 values greater than 50% were considered significant. Since our data is random, we chose the random-effects (RE) model.
Result
Search and screening results
We retrieved a total of 1545 articles, after which we removed 742 and 43 duplicates through automated tools, then 612 articles were excluded following the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among them, the number of stroke patients greater than 3 months is more than that of stroke patients less than 3 months, and the age of the patients is concentrated in the 50–70 years old, which belongs to the middle-aged and elderly patients. The complete PRISMA flow chart is shown in Fig 1.
Study characteristics
A total of 15 articles were included in this study [23–36], of which 7 articles involved indicators related to cognitive ability (MMSE and MoCA), 8 articles applied 6WMT, 3 articles studied the numerical changes of BNDF and 6 articles measured the changes of VO2peak after exercise intervention.
In addition, Lapointe [31] set up two experimental intervention groups of moderate-intensity aerobic and high-intensity aerobic in the study. Liu [35] also set up two experimental groups according to the patient ’s stroke time in the study: stroke more than 3 months and stroke less than 3 months. The study of this meta-analysis involved the effect of moderate and high intensity aerobic exercise on stroke patients, and the rehabilitation effect of aerobic exercise on patients with stroke for more than 3 months and patients with stroke for less than 3 months were also studied. Therefore, we decided to record the two sets of experimental results of Lapointe and Liu as Lapointe (a), Lapointe (b), Liu (a), Liu (b), and included them in the study. See S2 Table for details.
Quality assessment and risk of bias
We used the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PEDro scale to evaluate the quality of inclusion studies. The detailed evaluated results are shown in S3 Table and Fig 2. Generally, the overall quality level of the literature is relatively high. The PEDro score of all studies were higher than 6 points, and the PEDro score of 3 studies were 10 points. Bias assessment shows that, only selection, performance, detection and attrition have a higher risk, and the other parts have no apparent risk of bias.
Outcomes of interest
Exercise strategy.
From the basic characteristics of the table included in the study, we found that most of the experimental interventions are aerobic exercise that will stimulate the patient ’s heart rate to a certain extent, and the exercise intervention time is not long, generally between 45–60 min.
In terms of intensity, although there are differences in the assessment methods used to determine the intensity of exercise, they are all based on the patient ’s heart rate. Additionally, most of the studies were based on 60% of the maximum heart rate as the average intervention intensity, only a small number of studies reached 80%–90% of the maximum heart rate intensity. See S2 Table for details.
Global cognitive function.
We used a random forest plot to display the results of data analysis, and divided the results into two subgroups according to the stroke time of patients: stroke time of more than 3 months and stroke time of less than 3 months.
The overall heterogeneity of the results after analysis was 72%, and the heterogeneity between subgroups was 0%. The improvement effect of patients with stroke time less than 3 months (SMD = 0.87, 95%CI 0.62–1.12) is proved to be higher than that of patients with stroke time more than 3 months (SMD = 0.68, 95%CI -0.08–1.43). See Fig 3 for all details.
Walking capacity.
We used 6WMT as an indicator to measure walking capacity, madding a random forest plot and performing sensitivity analysis on the results. The results of the experimental group are better than the control group (SMD = 1.19, 95%CI 0.75–1.62), less than 3 months of stroke patients treatment effect (SMD = 1.34, 95%CI 1.34–2.24) is better than more than 3 months of stroke patients (SMD = 0.99, 95%CI 0.50–1.47). See Fig 4 for all details.
VO2peak changes.
The overall heterogeneity of the results of VO2peak was very low (P < 0.00001, I2 = 9%), and overall results showed that the experimental group had a positive improvement effect on stroke patients (SMD = 0.97, 95%CI 0.66–1.28). See Fig 5 for all details.
BNDF changes.
Three studies measured the changes of BNDF. The analysis results showed that moderate and high intensity aerobic exercise promoted the increase of BNDF content in stroke patients (SMD = 2.73, 95%CI 2.03–3.43), Moreover the experimental results were significant and the heterogeneity was low (P<0.0001, I2 = 0%). See Fig 6 for all details.
Discussion
The results of this meta- analysis show that aerobic exercise has a positive rehabilitation effect on the cognitive and walking ability of stroke patients. After moderate or high-intensity exercise intervention, the exercise ability, cardiovascular health level and cognitive ability of stroke patients have been improved. Subjected to the limited number of the included studies, it is hard to ensure the similarity in the number of two subgroups when classifying subgroups, and it is difficult to make sure that the include studies were used unified training methods, the results are statistically heterogeneous.
Previous studies and results discussion
The results of this study on cognition, exercise capacity, cardiovascular function and brain neurotrophic factors are consistent with those of other scholars [8, 13, 14]. Our results show that appropriate walking training has a favorable effect on the rehabilitation of walking ability, which is consistent with the results of Pang [14] on the improvement of physical health of stroke patients by lower limb exercise. In addition, our results also echo the results of Anjos study on the improvement of walking speed in patients with aerobic exercise, and the conclusion that aerobic exercise promotes cardiopulmonary function in stroke patient [13]. Although there is a certain heterogeneity in the results of cognitive improvement, it has a positive effect on the improvement of patients ’ cognitive ability, which is similar to the results of Li [15] and Tiozzo [8].
In terms of cognitive function, we believe that combining the results of MoCA and MMSE and evaluating them will not affect the experimental results, but will lead to their heterogeneity. In addition, we found that the content of BNDF increased significantly after the experiment, and brain neurotrophic factors played an essential role in improving cognitive ability and brain development. Because exercise could promote the increase of BNDF content [37], we also believe that part of the reason for improving the cognitive ability in the experimental results lie in the exercise stimulation to the brain to produce more brain neurotrophic factors.
Walking endurance is a part of walking ability. It is an important index to evaluate the rehabilitation degree of stroke patients [38]. From the 6WMT results, aerobic exercise significantly improved the walking endurance of stroke patients (SMD = 1.19), but the heterogeneity is high. In order to further explore the source of heterogeneity, we re-examined research articles involving 6WMT. We found that the exercise methods of aerobic exercise intervention in the experimental group were not uniform. Most studies use treadmill exercise or aerobic cycling for aerobic exercise, but some studies have achieved the effect of aerobic exercise through strength training and resistance exercises. We believe that there are some differences in the degree of stimulation of patients with different exercise methods. Because 6WMT is a test of lower limb motor ability, the study group that takes treadmill exercise and bicycle training to exercise the lower limbs in the process of aerobic intervention should be superior to other exercise groups in the outcome indicators, which is the main reason for the high heterogeneity of 6WMT results.
As this paper primarily focuses on enhancing cognitive and walking capabilities, without delving into mitigating the risks of cardiovascular dysfunction, the literature incorporated herein does not concentrate on assessing cardiovascular function enhancement. Consequently, subgroup analyses of VO2peak outcomes are not performed. The findings reveal that aerobic exercise yields substantial and noteworthy benefits in boosting oxygen uptake for stroke patients.
Meaning and uniqueness
The most significant difference between this study and existing studies is that subgroup analysis is performed according to the patient ’s stroke time. Therefore, when discussing the results, we are more inclined to explore how to formulate corresponding exercise strategies according to the sick time of stroke patients. Pang has proposed different intensity of exercise therapy for the personality characteristics of stroke patients in previous studies. However, it is only a simple analysis which does not explore the relationship between the rehabilitation effect of aerobic exercise and the stroke time of patients [14].
From a deepening perspective, we explore the rehabilitation effect of aerobic exercise. The results showed that the rehabilitation effect of patients with stroke less than 3 months was better than that of patients with stroke more than 3 months in terms of cognitive ability, walking test and cardiopulmonary function. The results highlighted that exercise therapy is more suitable for the rehabilitation training of patients with early stroke. The reason was the brain spontaneously repairs damaged nerve connections within a certain period in the acute phase of stroke [39–41]. Over time, in the chronic phase of stroke, both the brain ’s neuroplasticity and the individual ’s ability to repair itself in the event of injury has been reduced [42].
Suggestions of exercise strategy
The early stage after stroke is a dynamic and changeable. Exercise intervention for early patients should fully consider the changes in all physiological systems and detect the adverse physiological reactions of patients in time. Great importance should be attached to the exercise therapy for the degree of elevated blood pressure during exercise and the consequent exercise hypotension [43], so the exercise strategy for patients with early stroke should be based on safety and reduce exercise intensity. When the exercise intensity reaches 60% -70% of the maximum oxygen uptake, the cerebral blood vessels will contract and make the cerebral blood flow tend to rest or decrease, thus playing a protective role in the brain. However, due to damage to the brain of stroke patients, it is often challenging to cause cerebrovascular contraction [44], resulting in higher risks in high-intensity exercise facing stroke patients.
Hence, it is crucial to regulate exercise intensity during exercise intervention. When engaging in moderate to high-intensity exercise, it is essential to maintain a heart rate between 120–140 beats per minute, while keeping the duration of each session within a reasonable limit. For patients who have suffered a stroke within the past three months, the duration of each exercise session should not exceed 30 minutes. For patients who have suffered a stroke for more than three months, the intensity and duration of exercise can be gradually increased, but should not exceed a maximum of 60 minutes per session.
Limitations
We analyzed the health indicators of cognition, exercise ability, cardiovascular and other aspects in order to explore the effect of moderate and high intensity aerobic exercise on the health promotion of stroke patients. Some limitations are important to note for this study. For cognitive function, we did not study the effect of executive function improvement, and did not evaluate memory and response ability. For cardiovascular function, there is still a gap in cardiac health promotion. In addition, this paper does not involve balance ability detection and gait analysis for daily walking ability. Therefore, we can only preliminarily prove that moderate and high-intensity aerobic exercise has a certain self-care ability improvement and health promotion function for stroke patients, which can be further studied in future research.
Moreover, the number of literatures included was restricted to 15. After subgroup analysis according to the patient ’s stroke time, there were only 2–3 literature data in some subgroups. Therefore, even if our study shows that exercise intervention is more effective for patients with early stroke, there is still a risk of bias, which can be supplemented in future studies and verified by more experimental data.
Conclusions
We concluded that moderate and high-intensity aerobic exercise is conducive to improving the cognitive ability and walking ability of stroke patients. Additionally, treating stroke patients in the early stages has a more effective outcome, which can improve their cognitive, walking, and cardiopulmonary functions. This can enhance patients’ aerobic potential energy and independent living ability of patients while reducing the risk of illness and morbidity. Therefore, it is recommended to provide aerobic exercise as treatment for related patients in the initial stages of stroke, and therapists need to focus on ensuring patient safety during the treatment process by monitoring exercise intensity.
References
- 1.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2007: a safer future: global public health security in the 21st century [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 [cited 2023 Sep 15]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43713
- 2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update A Report From the American Heart Association. CIRCULATION. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):434–41.
- 3. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jóźwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. European Journal of Neurology. 2006;13(6):581–98. pmid:16796582
- 4.
Han P, Zhang W, Kang L, Ma Y, Fu L, Jia L, et al. Clinical Evidence of Exercise Benefits for Stroke. In: Xiao J, editor. EXERCISE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: FROM MOLECULAR TO CLINICAL, PT 2 [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2017 [cited 2023 Sep 8]. p. 131–51. https://www.webofscience.com/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000753874600009
- 5. Howard VJ, McDonnell MN. Physical Activity in Primary Stroke Prevention: Just Do It! Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1735–9. pmid:25882053
- 6. Kramer SF, Hung SH, Brodtmann A. The Impact of Physical Activity Before and After Stroke on Stroke Risk and Recovery: a Narrative Review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Jun;19(6):28. pmid:31011851
- 7. Kendall BJ, Gothe NP. Effect of Aerobic Exercise Interventions on Mobility among Stroke Patients A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;95(3):214–24. pmid:26544857
- 8. Tiozzo E, Youbi M, Dave K, Perez-Pinzon M, Rundek T, Sacco RL, et al. Aerobic, Resistance, and Cognitive Exercise Training Poststroke. Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2012–6. pmid:26012638
- 9. Ploughman M, Kelly LP. Four birds with one stone? Reparative, neuroplastic, cardiorespiratory, and metabolic benefits of aerobic exercise poststroke. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2016 Dec;29(6):684–92. pmid:27661010
- 10. Yang B, Wang S. Meta-Analysis on Cognitive Benefit of Exercise after Stroke. Complexity. 2021 Apr 7;2021:5569346.
- 11. Ma Y, Luo J, Wang XQ. The effect and mechanism of exercise for post-stroke pain. Front Molec Neurosci. 2022 Dec 2;15:1074205. pmid:36533131
- 12. Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, Johnson L, Kramer S, Carter DD, et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2020 Mar 20 [cited 2023 Sep 16];2020(3). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub7 pmid:32196635
- 13. Anjos JM, Neto MG, Dos Santos FS, Almeida KDO, Bocchi EA, Lima Bitar YDS, et al. The impact Of high-intensity interval training On functioning And health-related quality Of life In post-stroke patients: A systematic review With meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2022 Jun;36(6):726–39. pmid:35290104
- 14. Pang MYC, Charlesworth SA, Lau RWK, Chung RCK. Using Aerobic Exercise to Improve Health Outcomes and Quality of Life in Stroke: Evidence-Based Exercise Prescription Recommendations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(1):7–22. pmid:23428993
- 15. Li X, Geng D, Wang S, Sun G. Aerobic exercises and cognitive function in post-stroke patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 14;101(41):e31121. pmid:36253969
- 16. Amoros-Aguilar L, Rodriguez-Quiroga E, Sanchez-Santolaya S, Coll-Andreu M. Effects of Combined Interventions with Aerobic Physical Exercise and Cognitive Training on Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2021 Apr;11(4):473. pmid:33917909
- 17. Mah SM, Goodwill AM, Seow HC, Teo WP. Evidence of High-Intensity Exercise on Lower Limb Functional Outcomes and Safety in Acute and Subacute Stroke Population: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan;20(1):153.
- 18. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. Neurotrophins: Roles in Neuronal Development and Function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;24(1):677–736. pmid:11520916
- 19. MacKay-Lyons MJ, Makrides L. Longitudinal changes in exercise capacity after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004 Oct;85(10):1608–12. pmid:15468019
- 20. Pang MYC, Eng JJ, Dawson AS. Relationship Between Ambulatory Capacity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Chronic Stroke—Influence of Stroke-Specific Impairments. Chest. 2005 Feb;127(2):495–501. pmid:15705987
- 21. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343(oct18 2):d5928–d5928. pmid:22008217
- 22. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials. Physical Therapy. 2003 Aug 1;83(8):713–21. pmid:12882612
- 23. Boyne P, Billinger SA, Reisman DS, Awosika OO, Buckley S, Burson J, et al. Optimal Intensity and Duration of Walking Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Stroke A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurology [Internet]. 2022 Aug 2 [cited 2023 Sep 2]; Available from: http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2022.08.01.22278246
- 24. Deijle IA, Hemmes R, Boss HM, de Melker EC, van den Berg BTJ, Kwakkel G, et al. Effect of an exercise intervention on global cognition after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke: the MoveIT randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):289. pmid:35927622
- 25. Eich HJ, Mach H, Werner C, Hesse S. Aerobic treadmill plus Bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Sep;18(6):640–51. pmid:15473116
- 26. El-Tamawy MS, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed SM, Darwish MH, Khalifa HA. Aerobic exercises enhance cognitive functions and brain derived neurotrophic factor in ischemic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation. 2014;34(1):209–13. pmid:24284463
- 27. Fang Y, Chen X, Li H, Lin J, Huang R, Zeng I. A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2003 Sep;17(6):608–17. pmid:12971705
- 28. Hsu CC, Fu TC, Huang SC, Chen CPC, Wang JS. Increased serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor with high-intensity interval training in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021 Jul;64(4):101385. pmid:32344098
- 29. Ihle-Hansen H, Langhammer B, Lydersen S, Gunnes M, Indredavik B, Askim T. A physical activity intervention to prevent cognitive decline after stroke: Secondary results from the Life After STroke study, an 18-month randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):646–51. pmid:31440765
- 30. Koch S, Tiozzo E, Simonetto M, Loewenstein D, Wright CB, Dong C, et al. Randomized Trial of Combined Aerobic, Resistance, and Cognitive Training to Improve Recovery From Stroke: Feasibility and Safety. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015377. pmid:32394777
- 31. Lapointe T, Houle J, Sia YT, Payette M, Trudeau F. Addition of high-intensity interval training to a moderate intensity continuous training cardiovascular rehabilitation program after ischemic cerebrovascular disease: A randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 4;13:963950. pmid:36686521
- 32. Munari D, Pedrinolla A, Smania N, Picelli A, Gandolfi M, Saltuari L, et al. High-intensity treadmill training improves gait ability, VO2peak and cost of walking in stroke survivors: preliminary results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):408–18. pmid:27575015
- 33. Quaney BM, Boyd LA, McDowd JM, Zahner LH, He J, Mayo MS, et al. Aerobic Exercise Improves Cognition and Motor Function Poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Nov 1;23(9):879–85. pmid:19541916
- 34. Vahlberg B, Cederholm T, Lindmark B, Zetterberg L, Hellström K. Short-term and long-term effects of a progressive resistance and balance exercise program in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Aug;39(16):1615–22. pmid:27415645
- 35. Liu G, Han K, Su W, Zhang H. Effects of different intensity aerobic treadmill training on exercise and cardiopulmonary fitness in patients with different courses of ischemic stroke. Chinese Journal of Stroke. 2022;17(11):1203–8.
- 36. Yeh TT, Chang KC, Wu CY, Chen CJ, Chuang IC. Clinical efficacy of aerobic exercise combined with computer-based cognitive training in stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 May;29(4):255–64. pmid:34340637
- 37. Soya H, Nakamura T, Deocaris CC, Kimpara A, Iimura M, Fujikawa T, et al. BDNF induction with mild exercise in the rat hippocampus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2007 Jul;358(4):961–7. pmid:17524360
- 38. Mayo N E., Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Carron G, Higgins J, Mcewen S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1999 Jan;21(5–6):258–68. pmid:10381238
- 39. Dromerick AW, Edwardson MA, Edwards DF, Giannetti ML, Barth J, Brady KP, et al. Critical periods after stroke study: translating animal stroke recovery experiments into a clinical trial. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 Apr 29 [cited 2023 Sep 27];9. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00231/abstract pmid:25972803
- 40. Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Oct 8];7. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00887/abstract pmid:24399951
- 41. Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke—bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Apr;13(4):244–55. pmid:28303914
- 42. Abraha B, Chaves AR, Kelly LP, Wallack EM, Wadden KP, McCarthy J, et al. A Bout of High Intensity Interval Training Lengthened Nerve Conduction Latency to the Non-exercised Affected Limb in Chronic Stroke. Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 2;9:827. pmid:30013489
- 43. Marzolini S, Robertson AD, Oh P, Goodman JM, Corbett D, Du X, et al. Aerobic Training and Mobilization Early Post-stroke: Cautions and Considerations. Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 15;10:1187. pmid:31803129
- 44. Smith KJ, Ainslie PN. Regulation of cerebral blood flow and metabolism during exercise: Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during exercise. Exp Physiol. 2017 Nov 1;102(11):1356–71.