Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The relationship between the ethical attitudes and holistic competence levels of intensive care nurses: A cross-sectional study

  • Nihal Taşkıran ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Nihal Taşkıran, Gulengun Turk

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    nihal_tas@hotmail.com.tr

    Affiliation Department of Fundamentals of Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University College of Nursing, Aydın, Turkey

  • Gulengun Turk

    Contributed equally to this work with: Nihal Taşkıran, Gulengun Turk

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Fundamentals of Nursing, Aydın Adnan Menderes University College of Nursing, Aydın, Turkey

Abstract

Background

Intensive care units are directly associated with the competency level of nurses and are units where ethical problems are frequently experienced. This research aims to determine the relationship between intensive care nurses’ ethical attitudes and holistic competence levels.

Methods

This study was conducted as a cross-sectional design using self-report questionnaires distributed to 131 intensive care nurses in Turkey. The data of the study were collected with the “Nurses Information Form,” “Holistic Nursing Competence Scale” and “Ethical Attitude Scale for Nursing Care”.

Results

The total mean score of the Holistic Nursing Competence of the nurses was 6.89±0.95. Holistic Nursing Competence level was significantly lower for those who had experienced less than one year in the profession, and it was higher for those who worked in the emergency intensive care unit and the nurses whose clinics had 21 and above nurses. The total mean score of the nurses’ ethics attitude toward nursing care was 59.36±29.09. Ethical Attitude for Nursing Care was significantly lower for those who had a master’s degree, and the nurses whose clinics had 21 and above nurses scored higher. There was a weak and negative correlation between the nurses’ Holistic Nursing Competence Scale and the total mean score of the Ethical Attitude Scale for Nursing Care. The ethical attitude was predicted in 13.2% of the Holistic Nursing Competence of nurses.

Conclusions

It was concluded that nurses’ holistic competence levels were high, their ethical attitudes were negative, and there was a weak negative correlation between their holistic competence levels and their ethical attitudes toward care.

Introduction

Ethical attitude in nursing care is the internalization of professional, ethical principles and values and reflecting them in the behavior and care delivered to the patient [1, 2]. A moral process occurs between the nurse and the patient during caregiving [3]. The ethical attitude of the nurse in care practices is essential for the quality of care [4]. Nursing competence is the ability to effectively reflect a range of characteristics, such as the attitude, knowledge, and skills of a nurse, into care to fulfill their professional responsibilities, and it is a crucial attribute for assuring high-quality, ethical, and safe nursing care [5]. Nurses require to enhance their competencies to deliver the patient care expected from them in the most accurately, safely and ethicaly [68].

Nurses’ awareness of their ethical values and the effect of these values on their behavior is a core part of holistic and humanistic nursing care [9]. Moreover, one of the criteria for being a professional is to adopt professional, ethical principles in patient care. Nursing competency requires providing safe and high-quality nursing care by ethical principles. These ethical principles in nursing can be ranked as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, veracity, confidentiality, justice, and fidelity [10, 11].

Competency is a dynamic process that begins with vocational training and continues throughout working life. Benner defined competence as the ability to perform nursing tasks with the integration of knowledge to achieve desirable outcomes [12]. Meanwhile, the concept of "holistic competence" in nursing includes all nursing skills, as well as the nursing process, ethically oriented care, cooperation with team members, leadership, experience, intuition, critical thinking, knowledge level, education, and their professional roles and responsibilities [1315]. In literature stated that nurses’ patient-centered care competence and holistic nursing competence levels were high [1618]. Lu (2018) reported that holistic nursing practices improve the quality of care and satisfaction in patients [19]. Additionally, Aydın and Hicdurmaz (2019) stated that holistic nursing is an essential element of nursing care, as it enhances the quality of nursing care [20].

Intensive care units (ICUs) are clinics where ethical problems are common, such as using autonomy, inexperience about ethical problems, fairness in resource use, ethical decision-making, and giving information to the patient [3, 4, 21, 22]. Critical care nurses are at high risk for moral distress due to ethical conflicts created by technological advancement, high-intensity work environments, and frequent exposure to life and death decisions in the intensive care unit. Implicit rationing by nurses may reduce the standards of care offered, increasing the risk of adverse patient outcomes, threatening patient safety, reducing care quality, and directly contradicting ethical codes [23, 24]. Suhonen et al. (2018) stated that nurses attempt to prioritize nursing care based on a desire to satisfy all the needs of their patients holistically and comprehensively. However, when resources are low and with environmental constraints, nurses have difficulties fulfilling their professional, ethical roles [23]. A study conducted with intensive care nurses in Turkey concluded that 60.8% of the nurses experienced ethical dilemmas [25]. In a study, nurses considered leaving critical care because of moral distress [3]. The problems experienced may have a negative impact on the holistic competence levels of nurses by affecting the patient care behaviors of nurses in the ICU [26]. Nurses are responsible for making the best decisions for patients, and being a nurse requires assuming ethical responsibility in the ICU [27]. Holistic nurses should be experts in embodying nursing’s ethical tenets [28].

When the literature on the subject is reviewed, it is noticed that there are limited studies investigating the spiritual care competencies, essential competencies, holistic care perceptions, and ethical attitudes of intensive care nurses [16, 17, 2931]. However, no study was found in which the ethical attitudes and holistic competencies of nurses were analyzed together, and the relationship between them was investigated. Holistic competence in care has a significant role in accelerating the recovery process in the ICU [31]. Since intensive care nurses face more ethical problems than in other nursing practice areas, the competence and ethical attitudes of nurses gain more significance in the ICU [3, 32].

Based on the STROBE checklist [S1 File], this research aims to determine the relationship between the ethical attitudes and holistic competence levels of intensive care nurses in a hospital in Turkey.

Research questions:

  1. What are the holistic competency levels of intensive care nurses in Turkey?
  2. What are the ethical attitudes levels of intensive care nurses in Turkey?
  3. What is the relationship between the holistic competence levels and ethical attitudes of intensive care nurses?

Methodology

Design

This was a cross-sectional study employing self-report questionnaires.

Setting and sample

The universe of the study consisted of 220 nurses who worked in intensive care units at a university hospital in Aydın, Turkey. These intensive care units were general, internal, general surgery, neurosurgery, cardiovascular surgery, thoracic, anesthesia and reanimation, emergency, coronary, and neurology intensive care. The “G. The Power-3.1.9.2” program was used to estimate the appropriate number of nurses needed for a study sample with reference to Pai (2015) [33]. It was calculated through power analysis that a sample size must include at least 121 nurses (p<0.05 significance) to provide an 80% theoretical power with 95% confidence and 0.33 effect size.

131 nurses above 18 years old who worked in intensive care for at least six months, offered adult patient care, and consented to participate were included in the present study.

This study conducted self-administered questionnaires between June and December 2021 at a university hospital in Aydın, Turkey. The questionnaire forms included no information on the identification of the participants.

Data collection tools

Data for the current study were collected utilizing the “Nurses Information Form,” “Holistic Nursing Competence Scale” and “Ethical Attitude Scale for Nursing Care” [S2 File]. It took approximately 25 minutes for nurses to fill out the questionnaires.

Nurses Information Form

This form was developed by the researchers in line with the literature to determine their demographic characteristics [4, 34, 35]. The form contained 13 questions that investigated the sociodemographic characteristics of the nurses (e.g., age, gender, marital status, educational level, professional status, and working time).

Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (HNCS)

The HNCS is a 7-point Likert-type scale that was developed by Takase & Teraoka [36]. It comprises two parts, five subscales, and 36 items in total. The first part (A) involves only the ’General Aptitude’ subscale of the HNCS, which consists of questions related to general behaviors as a person rather than as a nurse. This part comprises seven questions in total, and the items are scored from 1 (never) to 7 (always). The second part (B) measures the competence of a nurse and consists of the remaining four subscales of the HNCS, which are as follows: ’Staff Education and Management’, ‘Ethically Oriented Practice’, ‘Nursing Care in Team’ and ‘Professional Development’. This part (B) consists of 29 items that are scored from 1 (not competent at all) to 7 (very competent). The scale contains no inversely scored item or cutoff point. The final HNCS score is ascertained from the simple addition of the subscale scores [36]. There is no grading in the evaluation of the scale. A high total mean score on the scale indicates high nursing competency. The Turkish adaptation of the scale was performed by Saldiroglu and Turk [35]. The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was 0.98, and in the present study, the total scale item internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.98.

Ethical Attitude Scale for Nursing Care (EASNC)

This scale was developed by Ozciftci and Akın (2020) to determine the ethical attitudes of nurses during care [34]. The scale has 34 items and uses a five-point Likert scale, where participants scored from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree.” Possible scores range from 34 to 170. A high score on the scale indicates a positive ethical attitude. The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was 0.96, and in the present study, the total scale item internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.99.

Data collection

The nurses who agreed to participate in the study completed the self-administered questionnaires between June and December 2021. Those working in a hospital were invited to take part in the survey on a voluntary basis upon permission from the head of the hospital and the nurse managers. All nurses working in the ICUs were given the questionnaires by the researchers. Each of the participants was given a questionnaire form along with an envelope and a letter explaining the complete research study, the instructions for filling out the questionnaire, and written assurance stating that participation was voluntary. After filling out the questionnaires, the participants put them in envelopes and gave them to the nurse manager. Following this, the researchers obtained the questionnaires from the nurse manager.

Data analysis

To perform the statistical analysis for the present study, the authors utilized the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 22.0) software program. The descriptive statistics were provided in a number and percentage format, and the skewness and kurtosis values were used to examine the normal distribution of variables. Between -2 and +2 values were accepted as a normal distribution [37]. The comparison between the nurses’ profile and key variables of the present study was analyzed using the Mann‒Whitney U or independent-samples t test for binary groups and the Kruskal‒Wallis or one-way ANOVA test for triple groups. The correlation between holistic nursing competence and ethical attitudes toward nursing care was analyzed by Pearson’s rho coefficients. Linear regression was used to assess the predictive power of the variables of the study. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirm that all procedures utilized in this study were conducted following the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Ethical clearance and approval letters were secured from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Aydın Adnan Menderes University of Nursing Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 2021–246). All nurses agreed to voluntarily participate in the present study, verbal consent was obtained from all of them, and they were informed about the purpose of this study. During the data collection, the issue of confidentiality and privacy was assured by maintaining the anonymity of participants. Participants could withdraw from the study at any time if they were not happy with the survey. Written approval was obtained from hospital administrators to carry out the study. The necessary permission to utilize the scales discussed previously in this study was received from the authors.

Results

The average age of the nurse participants was 28.22±4.44, most of them (81.7%) were female, and more than half of the nurses were single (51.9%) and had a bachelor’s degree (67.9%). The mean years of working experience of the nurses was 2.67±0.82 (Median = 3.00) years, and the mean working intensive care experience was 2.29±0.75 (Median = 2.00) years. Approximately a quarter of the nurses (19.8%) were working in the internal intensive care unit. A majority of the nurses (69.5%) reported that they worked with a total of 16–20 nurses in their clinics. Additionally, almost all of the nurses (90.1%) gave care to 1–3 patients for each shift. Most of the nurses (87%) reported that they had received training on ethics (Table 1).

The total mean score of the HNCS of the nurses was 6.89±0.95, and the total mean scores of the subscale for "General Aptitude" was 5.53±0.90, for “Staff Education and Management” was 5.36±0.94 and for “Ethically oriented practice and professional development” was 5.64±0.80. The total mean score of the EASNC of the nurses was 59.36±29.09 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and indicators related to scales.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287648.t002

There was a weak and negative correlation between the nurses’ HNCS and the total mean score of the EASNC (r = -0.363, p = 0.000). The results revealed that ethics attitude toward nursing care negatively affects nurses’ holistic nursing competence (β = -0.363, p = 0.000) (Table 3). The linear regression model revealed that ethical attitude for nursing care could explain 13.2% of the holistic competence of nurses (R2 = 0.132).

thumbnail
Table 3. Effect of the ethic attitude for nursing care on holistic nursing competence of nurses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287648.t003

The total mean score of the HNCS was significantly lower for nurses who had less than one year of experience in the profession (p<0.05). The HNCS mean scores of nurses who worked in internal intensive care were significantly lower than those of nurses who worked in the emergency intensive care unit (p<0.05). On the other hand, the HNCS mean scores of the nurses, where their clinics had 21 and above nurses in total, were significantly higher (Table 4). Gender, marital status, education level, experience in the intensive care unit, professional status, and number of patients caring in a shift did not have a statistically significant effect on the level of holistic nursing competence (p>0.05). The subscale “General aptitude” mean score was significantly higher for those who had a master’s degree. The “Staff education and management” subscale mean score was significantly higher for those who had more than 11 years of experience in professional and intensive care.

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparison of nurses HNCS with EASNC scores according to descriptive features.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287648.t004

The total mean score of the nurses at EASNC was significantly lower who had a master’s degree, and the nurses whose clinics had 21 and above nurses scored higher (p<0.05) (Table 4). Gender, marital status, experience in the profession and intensive care unit, professional status, working intensive care unit and shift, working times within night shift, and taking a course on ethics did not have a statistically significant effect on the ethical attitude for nursing care (p>0.05).

Discussion

This study investigated the relationship between the ethical attitudes and holistic competence levels of intensive care nurses at a university hospital in Turkey. Evaluating the competence of nurses is essential to determine professional development and training needs and provide the best nursing care. Our study showed that the holistic nursing competence levels of nursing were high. In literature stated that nurses holistic competence levels of nursing were high [1618]. Our study findings are in parallel with the findings of a limited number of studies on the subject. Lu (2018) reported that holistic nursing practices improve the quality of care and satisfaction in patients [19]. Additionally, Aydın and Hicdurmaz (2019) stated that holistic nursing is an essential element of nursing care, as it enhances the quality of nursing care [20]. The high level of holistic competence of the nurses in our study suggests that they provide care with a holistic approach to intensive care patients.

It is of great importance to adopt ethical attitudes, professional, ethical principles, and values in nursing care in ICUs and reflect this on behavior and patient care [3]. Ethical tensions, particularly those related to death and dying and life-sustaining interventions, frequently occur in the intensive care unit. Patients in intensive care units require a high level of nursing care for reasons such as their clinical course, changes in consciousness level, and being bedridden. For this reason, intensive care nurses may encounter situations that require urgent and critical decisions more frequently. Unresolved ethical conflict can lead to nurse moral distress and burnout, which may subsequently influence the care of patients [38]. Our study showed that nurses’ ethical attitude levels were low. In a study, nurses stated that they were insufficient in acting in accordance with ethical principles in patient care [39]. In another study, the moral sensibility of intensive care nurses in the study was moderate [40]. In another study, nurses estimated their own ethical competence to be at an average level [41]. Our study findings are in line with the literature [39, 42, 43]. The negative (low levels ethical attitude) ethical attitudes of the nurses who participated in our research may have resulted from the complex ethical problems experienced due to the critical importance of the patient group provided care for and the high workload and stress of the nurses. It is thought that this situation may directly affect the quality of nursing care to be delivered to intensive care patients. As of 2020, 198,465 nurses are serving in Turkey. Accordingly, the number of nurses per 1000 people is approximately 2.4, which is 70% below the OECD countries [44]. The high number of patients per nurse may lead to burnout for nurses working with intensive care patients, whose care is challenging and stressful. It is also considered that the burnout experienced may adversely affect nurses’ ability to make ethical decisions in patient care.

The ICU is an ethically charged environment: life and death decisions are made daily, in acute, highly emotional situations that often involve legally incompetent patients and their family. This responsibility requires the nurse to have a high level of competence [21, 45, 46]. A competent nurse can develop a more effective solution skill at the stage of assessing the existing ethical problem [15]. It is important to note that in our study, a 13.2% correlation was found between ethical attitudes and holistic competencies of nurses, although it was negative. However, it is suggested that a high level of competence has a favorable impact on developing a positive ethical attitude in intensive care nurses [15, 47]. It is thought that the negative correlation between ethical attitude and holistic competence in our study, contrary to the existing data in the literature, may have resulted from the fact that most nurses have low levels of ethical attitudes.

In our study, although the number of nurses with less than one year of professional experience was considerably low, it was found that these nurses had low holistic competency levels. It is reported in the literature that there is a positive correlation between the duration of professional experience and the level of nursing competency [48, 49]. A requirement of critical care registered nurse credentialing calls for at least two years of experience practicing in adult intensive care unit areas [50]. Our study finding is similar to the findings in the literature and supports the positive correlation between the duration of professional experience and the level of holistic competency.

The skills that a nurse needs to be qualified may vary depending on the field in which the nurse works. ICUs are clinics where nurses can exercise their autonomy at the highest level and thus reflect their competencies in patient care [51]. In our study, it is noteworthy that emergency intensive care nurses have the highest competency level, whereas the mean score of ethical attitudes is the lowest, although it is not significant. Fırat et al. (2017) reported that in the emergency department, nurses’ ethical sensitivity was moderate [52]. Factors such as the urgent and critical conditions of patients in emergency care and the high number of complex cases allow intensive care nurses to gain experience and improve their competence levels, but they also cause various ethical problems [52]. The low ethical attitude levels of nurses can be associated with their lack of time to solve ethical problems and the need for quick decision-making in the emergency ICU.

Likewise, in our study, it was revealed that both the holistic competence levels and ethical attitudes of the nurses in the ICUs, where the number of patients per nurse is low, are significantly higher. This finding is expected. It is considered that the low number of patients per nurse positively affects nurses’ ability to provide care with holistic competence and to make ethical decisions.

The results of the studies on the impact of education on ethical sensitivity and ethical attitudes in nurses show variability. In the studies of Yilmaz et al. (2018) and Kırca and Özgönül (2020), no significant difference was found between the education levels of nurses and their ethical sensitivity levels [53, 54]. Meanwhile, in the study of Kahriman and Yesilcicek-Çalık (2017), it was suggested that as the education level of nurses increased, ethical sensitivity increased [55]. In the same study, it was also determined that the ethical sensitivities of nurses who received training on ethics were lower than those who did not receive training. On the other hand, in the study of Yılmaz et al. (2018), it was found that receiving a course on nursing ethics did not make a positive contribution to ethical sensitivity [53]. In our study, although the majority of nurses reported that they received training on ethics, no significant correlation was found between education and ethical attitude. However, in our study, the ethical attitudes of nurses with a master’s degree were significantly negative. Saberi et al. (2019) found that nurses with a master’s degree were exposed to more ethical conflicts than other nurses [56]. In our study this result may be because only 6.9% of the nurses in the sample had a master’s degree and because the majority of the nurses with a master’s degree had insufficient professional experience.

Limitations

The limitations of the present study include the fact that the nurses’ holistic competence levels and ethics attitudes were questioned via the questionnaire given, that the results of the study were based on the nurses’ self-reports and that no observational assessment was carried out. Since the current study was conducted at only one hospital in Turkey, these findings cannot be generalized.

Conclusion

Based on our research findings, it has been concluded that nurses have high holistic competence levels but negative ethical attitudes, and there is a weak negative correlation between nurses’ holistic competence levels and their ethical attitudes. Holistic competence and ethical attitudes increase as the number of patients per nurse decreases and as professional experience and education increase.

It is recommended to periodically organize practical training that will contribute to the positive development of the ethical attitudes of intensive care nurses, providing ethical consultation when the nurses’ needs and assessing the holistic competencies and ethical attitudes of nurses at regular intervals. The reasons for the low ethical attitudes of nurses should be examined in future studies.

Acknowledgments

The author(s) would like to thank all nurses who participated in this study.

References

  1. 1. Schmidt BJ, & McArthur EC. Professional nursing values: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum. 2018; 53(1): 69–75. pmid:29419942
  2. 2. Rooddehghan Z, Yekta ZP, & Nasrabadi AN. Ethics of rationing of nursing care. Nursing Ethics. 2018; 25(5): 591–600. pmid:27653513
  3. 3. McAndrew NS, Leske J, & Schroeter K. Moral distress in critical care nursing: The state of the science. Nursing Ethics. 2018; 25(5): 552–570. pmid:27660185
  4. 4. Rızalar S, Baltacı N, Yıldızeli Topçu S, & Sanioğlu G. Ethical decision-making among intensive care unit and operating room nurses. Arch Health Sci Res. 2020; 7(2): 129–36.
  5. 5. World Health Organization, (WHO). (2013). Transforming and Scaling up Health Professional Education and Training. Policy Brief on Regulation of Health Professions Education.Accessed:http://whoeducationguidelines.org/sites/default/files/uploads/whoeduguidelines_PolicyBrief_Regulation.pdf Accessed date: 16 February 2022.
  6. 6. Karahan A, & Kav S. Professional competency in nursing. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2018; 5(2): 160–8.
  7. 7. Koç Z, Çınarlı T, Şener A, Kızıltepe SK. Patricia Benner: Clinical wisdom and skill acquisition in nursing practices. Acıbadem University Health Sciences Journal. 2018; 9(1): 1–12.
  8. 8. Takase M, Yamamoto M, & Sato Y. Effects of nurses’ personality traits and their environmental characteristics on their workplace learning and nursing competence. Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 2018; 15(2): 167–80. pmid:28707387
  9. 9. Shahriari M, Mohammadi E, Abbaszadeh A, & Bahrami M. Nursing ethical values and definitions: A literature review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013; 18(1): 1–8. pmid:23983720
  10. 10. Burkhardt MA, & Nathaniel AK. Guides for Principled Behavior. In: Ethics & Issues in Contemporary Nursing. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019. https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=htvWDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Ethics+%26+issues+in+contemporary+nursing&ots=G3G5p5h_ZZ&sig=Q_UpzbauXwbZyaW1DayR2KJBslk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Ethics%20%26%20issues%20in%20contemporary%20nursing&f=false. Accessed: 10.11.2022.
  11. 11. Tia MB, Aziato L, & Dzansi G. Exploring Ghanaian nurses knowledge and application of bio-ethical principles in postoperative pain management. PloS One. 2022; 17(10): e0276422. pmid:36260628
  12. 12. Benner PE, Hooper-Kyriakidis PL, & Stannard D. Clinical wisdom and interventions in acute and critical care: A thinking-in-action approach. Second Edition. Springer Publishing Company, New York; 2011.
  13. 13. Lakanmaa RL, Suominen T, Perttilä J, Ritmala‐Castrèn M, Vahlberg T, & Leino‐Kilpi H. Graduating nursing students’ basic competence in intensive and critical care nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2014; 23(5–6): 645–53. pmid:23786502
  14. 14. Liu Y, & Aungsuroch Y. Current literature review of registered nurses’ competency in the global community. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2018; 50(2): 191–9. pmid:29314612
  15. 15. Fukada M. Nursing competency: Definition, structure, and development. Yonago Acta Medica. 2018; 61(1): 1–7. pmid:29599616
  16. 16. Azarsa T, Davoodi A, Markani AK, Gahramanian A, & Vargaeei A. Spiritual wellbeing, attitude toward spiritual care and its relationship with spiritual care competence among critical care nurses. Journal of Caring Sciences. 2015; 4(4): 309. pmid:26744730
  17. 17. Lakanmaa RL, Suominen T, Ritmala-Castrén M, Vahlberg T, & Leino-Kilpi H. Basic competence of intensive care unit nurses: cross-sectional survey study. BioMed Research International 2015; Article ID 536724: 1–12. pmid:26557676
  18. 18. Bakır N, & Demir C. Patient-centered care competency and holistic nursing competence of nurses. Cumhuriyet University Institute of Health Sciences Journal. 2020; 5(3): 109–17.
  19. 19. Lu H. Application of holistic nursing in care for cranial neurointervention. Biomedical Research. 2018; Special Issue 29: 426–429.
  20. 20. Aydin A, & Hiçdurmaz D. Holistic nursing competence scale: Turkish translation and psychometric testing. International Nursing Review. 2019; 66(3): 425–433. pmid:31049974
  21. 21. Oerlemans AJ, Sluisveld van N, Leeuwen van ES, Wollersheim H, Dekkers WJ, & Zegers M. Ethical problems in intensive care unit admission and discharge decisions: a qualitative study among physicians and nurses in the Netherlands. BMC Medical Ethics. 2015; 16(1): 1–10. pmid:25880418
  22. 22. Kırşan M, Yıldırım D, Ceylan B, Akın Korhan E, & Uyar M. Ethical problems in intensive care units: A systematic review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics. 2018; 26(2): 57–65.
  23. 23. Suhonen R, Stolt M, Habermann M, Hjaltadottir I, Vryonides S, Tonnessen S, et al. Ethical elements in priority setting in nursing care: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018; 88: 25–42. pmid:30179768
  24. 24. Pishgooie AH, Barkhordari-Sharifabad M, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F, & Falcó-Pegueroles A. Ethical conflict among nurses working in the intensive care units. Nursing Ethics. 2019; 26(7–8): 2225–2238. pmid:30336767
  25. 25. Kavurmaci M, & Tan M. Determining the moral sensitivities of intensive care nurses. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2019; 42(3): 278–284. pmid:31135478
  26. 26. Haahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, & Dreyer P. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: A review. Nursing Ethics. 2020; 27(1): 258–272. pmid:30975034
  27. 27. Yıldız E. Ethics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspective. Nursing Ethics, 2019; 26(4): 1128–1148. pmid:29166840
  28. 28. Rosa WE, Dossey BM, Watson J, Beck DM, & Upvall MJ. The United Nations sustainable development goals: the ethic and ethos of holistic nursing. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 2019; 37(4): 381–93. pmid:31064259
  29. 29. Alfieri E, Mori M, Barbui V, Sarli L. Advanced competencies mapping of critical care nursing: a qualitative research in two intensive care units. Acta Biomed for Health Professions 2017; 88(3): 67–74. pmid:28752835
  30. 30. Riahi S, Goudarzi F, Hasanvand S, Abdollahzadeh H, Ebrahimzadeh F, & Dadvari Z. Assessing the effect of spiritual intelligence training on spiritual care competency in critical care nurses. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2018; 11(4): 346. pmid:30894893
  31. 31. Rajabpour S, & Rayyani M. The relationship between Iranian patients’ perception of holistic care and satisfaction with nursing care. BMC Nursing. 2019; 18(1): 1–7. pmid:31673246
  32. 32. Whitehead PB, Herbertson RK, Hamric AB, et al. Moral distress among healthcare professionals: report of an institution-wide survey. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015; 47: 117–125. pmid:25440758
  33. 33. Pai HC. The effect of a self-reflection and insight program on the nursing competence of nursing students: a longitudinal study. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2015; 31(5): 424–431. pmid:26428348
  34. 34. Özçiftçi S, & Akın E. Development of ethical attitude scale in nursing care. İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Fundamentals, Master’s Thesis. Turkey, İzmir, 2020.
  35. 35. Saldiroğlu E, & Türk G. Validity and reliability of the holistic nursing competence scale. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2021; 8(1): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.906944
  36. 36. Takase M, & Teraoka S. Development of the holistic nursing competence scale. Nursing & Health Sciences. 2011; 13(4): 396–403. pmid:21883769
  37. 37. George D., Mallery M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed). Boston:Pearson.
  38. 38. McAndrew NS, & Hardin JB. Giving nurses a voice during ethical conflict in the intensive care unit. Nursing Ethics 2020; 27(8): 1631–1644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020934148
  39. 39. Gül Ş, Genç Kuzucu İ, Yalım NY. The ideas of nurses about the reflection of ethic education in their professional life. Turkish Journal of Bioethics. 2016; 3(2): 85–97.
  40. 40. Başak T, Uzun Ş, Arslan F. Investigation of the moral sensibility of intensive care nurses. Gulhane Med J. 2010; 52: 76–81.
  41. 41. Poikkeus T, Suhonen R, Katajisto J, & Leino-Kilpi H. Organizational and individual support for nurses’ ethical competence: A cross-sectional survey. Nursing Ethics. 2016; 25: 376– 92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733016642627.
  42. 42. Momennasab M, Ghanbari M, & Rivaz M. Improving nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance in relation to ethical codes through group reflection strategy. BMC Nursing. 2021; 20(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00749-2
  43. 43. Wang S, Jiang Z, Zhang Z, Chen L, Zhao X, Fei W, et al. The status of ethical behaviour in clinical nursing in three Chinese hospitals: A qualitative interview study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2022; 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13810
  44. 44. Turkish Statistics Institute, (TUIK). (2020). Statistics Data Portal. Accessed: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Saglik-ve-Sosyal-Koruma-101. Accessed date: 03.04.2022.
  45. 45. Kaldan G, Nordentoft S, Herling SF, Larsen A, Thomsen T, & Egerod I. Evidence characterizing skills, competencies and policies in advanced practice critical care nursing in Europe: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(9): e031504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031504
  46. 46. Koskenvuori J, Stolt M, Suhonen R, & Leino‐Kilpi H. Healthcare professionals’ ethical competence: A scoping review. Nursing Open. 2019; 6(1): 5–17. pmid:30534390
  47. 47. Yilmaz MC, Uysal N, & Pirhan H. Does attitude towards evidence-based nursing affect holistic nursing competence? International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2022; 15(1): 371–380.
  48. 48. Flinkman M, Leino‐Kilpi H, Numminen O, Jeon Y, Kuokkanen L, & Meretoja R. Nurse Competence Scale: a systematic and psychometric review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017;73(5):1035–50. pmid:27731918
  49. 49. Kim SO, & Choi YJ. Nursing competency and educational needs for clinical practice of Korean nurses. Nurse Education in Practice. 2019; 34: 43–7. pmid:30445293
  50. 50. American Association of Critical Care Nurses, (AACN), (2017). CCRN adult initial eligibility requirements and fees, Retrieved from https://www.aacn.org/certification/get-certified/ccrn-adult. Acessed date: 15.03.2022
  51. 51. Gunawan J, Aungsuroch Y, Fisher ML, Marzilli C, & Liu Y. Factors related to the clinical competence of registered nurses: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2020; 52(6): 623–33. pmid:32862486
  52. 52. Fırat B, Karataş G, Barut A, Metin G, & Sarı D. Investigation of ethical sensitivities of emergency service nurses. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty. 2017; 10(4): 229–35.
  53. 53. Yılmaz D, Düzgün F, Uzelli Yılmaz D, Akın Korhan E, Dikmen Ö. Examination of ethical sensitivity and related factors of nurses in ınternal clinics: An example of university hospital. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty. 2018; 11(2): 157–63.
  54. 54. Kırca N, & Özgönül ML. Ethical attitude and affecting factors in nursing care of nurses working in obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Turkish Journal of Bioethics. 2020; 7(2): 70–9.
  55. 55. Kahriman İ, Yeşilçiçek Çalık K. Ethical sensitivity of clinical nurses Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2017; 6(3): 111–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018796686
  56. 56. Saberi Z, Shahriari M, & Yazdannik AR. The relationship between ethical conflict and nurses’ personal and organisational characteristics. Nursing Ethics. 2019; 26(7–8): 2427–2437. pmid:30134760