Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effects of ocean acidification on growth and photophysiology of two tropical reef macroalgae

  • Heather N. Page ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    hpage@sea.edu

    Affiliations Elizabeth Moore International Center for Coral Reef Research and Restoration, Mote Marine Laboratory, Summerland Key, FL, United States of America, Sea Education Association, Woods Hole, MA, United States of America

  • Sophie McCoy,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America

  • Robert G. M. Spencer,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America

  • Katherine A. Burnham,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Elizabeth Moore International Center for Coral Reef Research and Restoration, Mote Marine Laboratory, Summerland Key, FL, United States of America

  • Clay Hewett,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Elizabeth Moore International Center for Coral Reef Research and Restoration, Mote Marine Laboratory, Summerland Key, FL, United States of America, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, Fl, United States of America

  • Maggie Johnson

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia

    Affiliation Smithsonian Marine Station, Fort Pierce, FL, United States of America

Abstract

Macroalgae can modify coral reef community structure and ecosystem function through a variety of mechanisms, including mediation of biogeochemistry through photosynthesis and the associated production of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Ocean acidification has the potential to fuel macroalgal growth and photosynthesis and alter DOC production, but responses across taxa and regions are widely varied and difficult to predict. Focusing on algal taxa from two different functional groups on Caribbean coral reefs, we exposed fleshy (Dictyota spp.) and calcifying (Halimeda tuna) macroalgae to ambient and low seawater pH for 25 days in an outdoor experimental system in the Florida Keys. We quantified algal growth, calcification, photophysiology, and DOC production across pH treatments. We observed no significant differences in the growth or photophysiology of either species between treatments, except for lower chlorophyll b concentrations in Dictyota spp. in response to low pH. We were unable to quantify changes in DOC production. The tolerance of Dictyota and Halimeda to near-future seawater carbonate chemistry and stability of photophysiology, suggests that acidification alone is unlikely to change biogeochemical processes associated with algal photosynthesis in these species. Additional research is needed to fully understand how taxa from these functional groups sourced from a wide range of environmental conditions regulate photosynthesis (via carbon uptake strategies) and how this impacts their DOC production. Understanding these species-specific responses to future acidification will allow us to more accurately model and predict the indirect impacts of macroalgae on coral health and reef ecosystem processes.

Introduction

Benthic macroalgae play important roles in biogeochemical and ecological processes on coral reefs, exerting their influence on larger scale community structure and ecosystem function. By utilizing the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) available in seawater for photosynthesis, benthic macroalgae elevate seawater pH [1,2] and oxygen [3] during the day. Most of this carbon is fixed, or assimilated into biomass, and subsequently grazed by herbivores, decomposed by bacteria, and/or buried in sediments [4]. However, up to 50% of this fixed carbon, in the form of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), can ‘leak’ from algal cells into the water column as algal exudates [58]. The release of DOC by macroalgae can modify the outcome of coral-algal competition [912], shift coral microbial communities to favor pathogens [1215], and fuel sponge [1619] and microbial [7,8,2022] loops, all of which which decrease coral reef resilience to environmental stressors [23].

The influence of macroalgae on carbon cycling on tropical coral reefs may change in response to global climate change. The absorption of rapidly increasing atmospheric CO2 by global ocean surface waters [24] has led to a shift in seawater carbonate chemistry, increasing pCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide), lowering carbonate ion concentrations [CO32-], and decreasing the pH in a process known as ocean acidification [25]. Ocean acidification has been documented globally in open ocean surface waters since the 1980s [26,27], and seawater pH is now projected to decrease by an additional 0.05–0.4 units by the year 2100 under a range of trajectories for atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations [28]. Nearshore, shallow marine habitats like coral reefs may experience even more extreme changes in seawater carbonate chemistry and pH in response to coastal processes (i.e., coastal acidification) [29].

Ocean and coastal acidification have been shown to impact the growth and photo-physiology of reef macroalgae. Many studies demonstrate no change or increased growth rates and photosynthesis in non-calcifying (i.e., fleshy) macroalgae under elevated seawater pCO2 [3032]. This effect is of particular concern as fleshy macroalgae have stronger competitive strength against corals [33,34] than calcifying algae. In contrast, calcifying algae have generally been thought to respond negatively to ocean acidification due to lower seawater pH and ΩCaCO3 (saturation state with respect to calcium carbonate) that both facilitate CaCO3 dissolution and make it more difficult to build skeletal structures. Growth and/or calcification rates in these algae can be lower under acidification scenarios [31,35], especially at night (i.e., dark calcification) [36]. However, in a quantitative synthesis, Page et al. [37] found that almost half the studies on calcifying algae responses to ocean acidification report no change in calcification rates in laboratory experiments or field studies [35]. In other words, most calcifying algae maintain net photosynthesis and respiration rates when exposed to elevated seawater pCO2 and lower pH [3537]. Inconsistencies in the physiological response of various macroalgae species to acidification pose uncertainties for how coral reefs will respond to global climate change.

Impacts on algal growth and photo-physiology under acidification could easily scale up to influence coral reef community structure and ecosystem function [38], both of which have already undergone significant changes in recent years. In the Caribbean, coral cover has declined [3944] in the last few/couple of decades in response to local, regional, and global stressors, and these reefs are now being described as macroalgal dominated [41]. In addition to an increase in the abundance of benthic algae, the decline in coral cover on some reefs has been accompanied by greater presence of cyanobacterial mats and sponges [41,43,44]. Coral reef community structure, ecosystem processes and function, and reef resilience are therefore all impacted by macroalgal growth. Understanding the response of specific algal species and functional groups (i.e., non-calcifying and calcifying macroalgae) in the Caribbean is crucial for making informed predictions about the health of these reefs under global climate change. In this study, we investigated growth and photophysiology responses of non-calcifying (Dictyota spp., hereafter Dictyota) and calcifying (Halimeda tuna, hereafter Halimeda) macroalgae to short-term exposure (25 days) to elevated seawater pCO2 using an onshore ocean acidification simulator system in the Florida Keys.

Materials and methods

Specimen collection

Macroalgae were collected from rocky and coral reef environments nearshore to Summerland Key, Florida, USA. No permits are needed for collection of algae in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Specimens were transported to Mote Marine Laboratory’s Elizabeth Moore International Center for Coral Reef Research and Restoration (Summerland Key, FL), where they were cleaned of epiphytes and sediments before being placed in shaded, flow-through aquaria with filtered ambient seawater maintained at 27°C. Macroalgae were acclimated to these conditions for one week before initial data collection and the start of the experiment.

Experimental system and design: Climate and acidification ocean simulator

The acclimation and experiment were conducted in an outdoor experimental facility designed for climate change and ocean acidification studies. The Climate and Acidification Ocean Simulator (CAOS) contains six 5,000 L header (i.e., mixing) tanks and twelve 1,000 L raceways where experimental tanks are housed. Seawater was pumped from the Atlantic side of the Florida Keys through sand and 20 μm particle filters into a storage tank, where it could ‘off-gas’ excess CO2 to more closely mimic open ocean conditions (i.e., pH 8.0). The seawater was then pumped into two header tanks. The temperature and pH of each header tank were independently controlled and monitored using Walchem W900 controllers (Iwaki America Inc., Holliston, MA). Both header tanks were maintained at the same temperature (28.5°C). One tank contained seawater at ambient pH (~8.0) while the other was acidified to a target pH of 7.75 (ΔpH = 0.25). This pH offset represents an ocean acidification projection for the year 2100 under a moderate CO2 atmospheric concentration scenario (SSP2-4.5) [45]. Acidification was achieved by injecting CO2 into the header tank using a Venturi pump. Header tanks were rotated every two weeks to minimize any effects of biofouling on water quality. Seawater pH was gradually decreased to target levels over four days before the experiment began.

Seawater was delivered from the header tanks to 9.5 L flow-through experimental tanks using aquarium manifolds. Water flow into the experimental tanks was maintained daily at 180 mL min-1. These tanks were housed within two shallow raceways that served as a temperature-controlled water bath, which was maintained using a dual heat exchange system. The raceways were kept under a mesh shade cover to modulate light intensity. Mean (±1 sd) light within the raceways at 1330 EST (i.e., solar noon) was 377 ± 183 μE m-2 s-1. Each raceway contained twenty experimental tanks that received either ambient (pH 8.0) or acidified (pH 7.7) seawater (n = 40 tanks total). Tanks were cleaned bi-weekly to remove diatoms and other organisms that naturally recruited to and grew inside the tanks. In a balanced experimental design, each tank (n = 20 per pH treatment) contained one replicate Dictyota clump or Halimeda thallus that was tied to a small piece of pre-leached plastic eggcrate to keep the macroalgae submerged and in the proper orientation. Macroalgae were weighed at the start of the experiment to ensure similar biomass across all replicates (Dictyota: 1.905 ± 0.038 g; Halimeda: 0.924 ± 0.403 g). All replicates started the 25-day experiment healthy and with good coloration.

Water chemistry monitoring

Throughout the experiment, the temperature and pH of the header tanks and subset of experimental tanks (n = 8 out of 40) were continuously monitored using Walchem monitoring systems. The probes were cleaned and calibrated weekly. The pH probes were calibrated against National Bureau of Standards (NBS) buffers and replaced every other week to ensure good performance. Seawater temperature (±0.2°C), salinity (±1.0% of the reading), dissolved oxygen, and pHNBS of all tanks were measured daily at 0900 EST using a handheld YSI Professional Plus handheld multi-parameter instrument (Xylem Inc.). Salinity was calibrated weekly while dissolved oxygen and pHNBS were calibrated daily. Water samples were collected from each header tank (n = 2) and a random subset of experimental tanks (n = 20; five per species × pH treatment) every three days for carbonate chemistry measurements. Best practices for seawater CO2 measurements [46] were followed during sampling, preservation, and laboratory analyses.

Dissolved inorganic carbon was measured using an Apollo SciTech AS-C3 DIC Analyzer (Apollo SciTech, Newark, DE) equipped with a LI-COR LI-7000 gas analyzer (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Total alkalinity titrations were performed using a Metrohm 905 Titrando titrator (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). Accuracy and precision were regularly checked using Certified Reference Materials for Seawater CO2 Measurements (Dickson Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, San Diego, CA). Accuracy and precision were less than 2 μmol kg-1 for dissolved inorganic carbon and less than 4 μmol kg-1 for total alkalinity. Seawater temperature, salinity, dissolved inorganic carbon, and total alkalinity were used to calculate pHT, pCO2, CO2, HCO3-, CO32-, and Ωarag using the software program CO2SYS [47]. K1 and K2 constants from Mehrbach et al. (1973) refit by Dickson and Millero (1987) were used in these calculations [48,49]. The seawater conditions (mean ± 1 sd) measured in the experimental tanks are presented in Table 1.

Macroalgal photophysiological responses to ocean acidification

At the beginning and end of the experiment, we measured the wet weight of Dictyota replicates, after blotting excess water (blotted mass), to calculate growth. We measured the buoyant weight of Halimeda replicates at the beginning and end of the experiment to estimate growth as net calcification [50,51]. Buoyant weight was converted to actual weight by correcting for seawater density and density of aragonite (2.93 g cm-3), which is the polymorph of CaCO3 produced Halimeda [52]. Each Halimeda replicate was photographed and analyzed for surface area using ImageJ image processing software [53].

Net photosynthesis and respiration were measured by incubating macroalgal replicates in 300 mL respirometry chambers equipped with FireSting O2 optical oxygen sensors (PyroScience GmbH, Aachen, Germany) for 30 minutes. Control chambers (i.e., no algae) were included during each round of incubations to control for background oxygen fluxes in the water column (e.g., from microbial activity). The respirometry chambers were filled with fresh seawater from the same treatment as the algae’s experimental tank. Temperature was maintained at 27°C throughout the incubation using an external water bath. Magnetic stir bars isolated at the bottom of the chambers ensured mixing of seawater. Photosynthesis was measured under a mean light saturation of 122 ± 45 μE m-2 s-1 while respiration was measured in a dark room. Rates were calculated from the measured slope of oxygen change over time. For Halimeda and control incubations, total alkalinity was sampled at the beginning and end of the incubation to calculate light and dark calcification rates. Samples were analyzed immediately using the same procedures outlined for water chemistry monitoring. Net calcification rates were calculated from the change in total alkalinity over time. All physiological rates were standardized to algal biomass.

Maximum quantum yield provides an estimate of the photosynthetic efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) and serves as a proxy for algal photosynthetic performance. We measured the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of algae after exposure to treatment conditions using a red Pulse Amplitude Modulation Fluorometer (Diving PAM, Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Individuals were dark adapted for at least one hour, and three measurements were taken from each individual in total darkness. For Dictyota the probe was placed haphazardly in three locations on the algal sample. For Halimeda the probe was placed ~1 cm from the growing tip (on the second youngest segment) of three separate segments on an individual. We calculated an average of the three points to account for variation in fluorescence-based measurements within an individual and used this average in subsequent analyses. Measurement settings were adjusted for optimal instrument performance as the following: saturation intensity = 8, saturating pulse width = 0.8, frequency = 2, gain = 2, measuring light intensity = 9. Samples were frozen at -20°C after fluorescence measurements and transported to the Smithsonian Marine Station in Fort Pierce, FL for further analyses.

Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid pigments were extracted from algae using standard methods and equations [54,55]. In brief, pigments were extracted from 2 subsamples of each algal individual in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). Subsamples were homogenized in the DMF solvent with a handheld electric homogenizer and left to extract at 4°C for 24 hrs in total darkness. The extract was then centrifuged, and the supernatant was analyzed with a Genesys 180-UV Visible Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with 0.5 nm resolution. Pigment concentrations were normalized to subsample blotted mass and solvent volume.

Macroalgal DOC production

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is released throughout the day as a function of photosynthetic activity. Considering this, we measured DOC fluxes by incubating algae within the experimental tanks for 4 hours during midday (1000–1400 EST). DOC flux measurements were taken at the beginning and end of the 25-day exposure period to measure the effect of pH treatment on DOC production. The tanks were cleaned before the incubation started. Several control tanks were added to the raceways to account for DOC flux in the water column. Samples were collected using pre-leached plastic 50 mL syringes with an attached filter holder containing a pre-combusted (450°C >4 hrs) 0.7 μM GF/F filter. Samples were stored in pre-combusted (550°C >4 hrs) 50 mL glass vials with Teflon-lined lids. Samples were immediately acidified to pH 2 to remove dissolved inorganic carbon and stored in the dark at 4°C. Samples were then shipped to Florida State University for subsequent analysis.

Replicate measurements of DOC were taken by high-temperature combustion using a Shimadzu TOC-LCPH Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using the non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) methodology. The DOC concentration of each sample was calculated with standard methodology using a six-point standard curve as the mean of three to five injections using established protocols with a coefficient of variance less than 2% [56,57]. Deep seawater Consensus Reference Materials (CRMs) were analyzed to assess the precision and accuracy of the DOC analyses and deviated by < 5% from the reported values. DOC production by macroalgae was calculated as the change in DOC flux between the beginning and end of the exposure period and standardized by macroalgal biomass.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio v1.2.5033 [58]. Data were checked for assumptions of independence, normality, and homogeneity of variances. When data did not meet these assumptions, they were square root transformed (Table 2) to achieve normal distributions. All data met the assumption of equal variances. One-way analyses of variances (ANOVA) were used to test the effect of seawater pH treatment on each response variable by species. All data are reported as mean ± 1 sd.

Results

Macroalgal growth, calcification, net photosynthesis, and respiration

There were no significant differences in final wet weight (Dictyota), buoyant weight (Halimeda), or surface area (Halimeda) of either species between ambient and low pH treatments (Table 2 and Fig 1). For Halimeda, there were no significant differences in net, light, or dark calcification between ambient and low pH treatments. Net photosynthesis and respiration rates were consistent across pH treatments within species, although rates were different between species, with Dictyota’s rates being much higher than Halimeda’s.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Photophysiology of Dictyota and Halimeda after 25 days of exposure to ambient pH (blue) and low pH (orange) conditions.

Data are mean ± 1 sd. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences (p< 0.05) between ambient and low pH treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286661.g001

Macroalgal photophysiology and photosynthetic pigments

There were no significant differences in Fv/Fm, chlorophyll a concentration, or total carotenoids between ambient and low pH treatments in either species. However, there was a statistically significant difference in chlorophyll b concentration in Dictyota (F1,X = 5.844, p < 0.03). Dictyota reared in low pH had lower levels of chlorophyll b compared to Dictyota reared in ambient pH (13.875 ± 2.96 μg g-1 versus 18.490 ± 4.899 μg g-1).

Macroalgal DOC production

We did not detect a flux in the DOC produced by either species of macroalgae in the ambient or low pH treatment. With few exceptions, DOC fluxes were near zero and similar across control and algal incubations (S1 Fig). The minute differences between initial and final DOC measurements are most likely due to the seawater volume to algal biomass ratio being too high.

Discussion

Both macroalgae species generally showed no changes in their growth or photophysiology after response to short-term exposure to acidification. This contrasts with our prediction that fleshy macroalgae (Dictyota spp.) would respond positively to elevated seawater pCO2, while calcifying macroalgae (H. tuna) would respond negatively. We were unable to quantify DOC flux due to limitations in the experimental design. To date, there have been only two studies that quantified the effects of short-term acidification on DOC fluxes by reef macroalgae. After 16 days of exposure to elevated seawater pCO2, Halimeda opuntia had higher daytime DOC production while H. macroloba had slightly lower daytime DOC production. There was no change in nighttime DOC fluxes for either of these calcifying macroalgae [59]. A more recent study showed non-calcifying macroalgae from the Great Barrier Reef had mixed responses to acidification with some algae having increased DOC release rates in light and dark after 1 and 19 days of exposure to elevated seawater pCO2 conditions [60].

The lack of response to low pH measured in this study is probably due to a combination of plasticity in carbon uptake mechanisms and environmental history experienced by these individuals. Brown and green macroalgae can use passive diffusion of CO2 from the water column and/or actively uptake bicarbonate ions (HCO3-) using carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) [6163]. While CCMs are an energetically costly form of carbon acquisition, it allows algae to use the most abundant inorganic carbon species in seawater [64] for photosynthesis. Some macroalgae can preferentially downregulate CCM activity when seawater CO2 concentrations are higher [30,32,6567], thus saving energy which can be used for other physiological processes. The response of macroalgae to acidification also depends on its affinity for DIC (i.e., whether they are carbon-limited) and the environmental conditions that influence CCM function, such as light and nutrients [30,32,62,63,6872].

It is not clear whether the species of Dictyota and Halimeda used in this study have the ability to downregulate CCM activity or if they are carbon limited. However, macroalgae with CCMs present, high affinity for DIC, and no change in CCM activity would not be expected to benefit from ocean acidification [66]. We detected no changes in growth of Dictyota or Halimeda. Therefore, we hypothesize they may possess the ability to regulate their CCM activity and show high affinity for DIC in seawater.

The responses of the specimens used in this study to elevated seawater pCO2 also may have been influenced by the natural variability in seawater carbonate chemistry and pH in the environment they were sourced from. Though we did not sample the carbonate chemistry of the site

from which these individuals were collected, inshore sites in the Florida Keys demonstrate wide seasonal fluctuations in seawater carbonate chemistry [73,74]. The lack of significant responses in these species of macroalgae, therefore, may reflect preadaptation to this variability in seawater pCO2. Overall, 47% of marine organisms originating from variable habitats have higher tolerance to ocean acidification [75]. However, the effects of environmental history on the tolerance of reef taxa to acidification are still unclear [76]. A few studies have shown contrasting effects of environmental history on the responses of crustose coralline algae (CCA) to acidification, demonstrating both increased [77,78] and decreased [77,79,80] stress tolerance. Thus, we can only speculate whether the species used in this study are more tolerant to acidification due to the natural fluctuations in pCO2 and pH experienced within the Florida Reef Tract.

Although there have been numerous studies examining the response of fleshy macroalgae to ocean acidification, Dictyota represents an under-studied genus [70]. There have been eight studies, including the present study, examining the physiological responses of Dictyota species to artificial acidification in laboratory experiments and across natural seawater pH and pCO2 gradients (Table 3). Short-term laboratory experiments lasting 1–4 weeks generally reported no statistically significant change in growth (Table 3), while field observations across pH gradients show increased benthic cover and abundance of Dictyota (and other non-calcifying algae) in regions with lower seawater pH [66,8183]. This discrepancy may be due to several factors or, most likely, a combination of these factors. Dictyota may have increased reproduction and recruitment at sites with lower pH, either due to direct effects of increased pCO2 on algal physiology or indirect effects on outcomes of competitive interactions. Additionally, the increased benthic cover in the field represents generational effects with possible acclimation over generations, as demonstrated in coralline algae [84,85], thus leading to higher algal abundance closer to CO2 vents. Additionally, the magnitude of acidification may be responsible for the differences between studies; of the eight studies listed in Table 3, only one laboratory experiment [86] reported increased biomass of Dictyota under acidification, and this study used a pCO2 offset on the higher end of the ranges used. Field studies report similar or higher pCO2 gradients than those used in laboratory experiments. Macroalgae growing near CO2 vents also have likely experienced acidification for longer periods of time, possibly leading to different effects on growth (but see [87]). Field studies also include natural variations in other properties (i.e., light, temperature, and nutrients) that may enhance macroalgae growth in isolation or when combined with high seawater pCO2, so it is possible that the effects of these natural variations are not captured in laboratory experiments.

thumbnail
Table 3. Dictyota responses to elevated pCO2/lower pH in laboratory and field experiments.

Interactive effects were not included in this literature review (i.e., responses to acidification only are recorded).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286661.t003

The physiological responses of Halimeda, in contrast, have been well-studied since this macroalgae is an important contributor to calcium carbonate cycling and primary production in reef ecosystems. There have been 24 studies to date, including the present study, examining the biological responses of Halimeda species to seawater pH in experimental and natural settings (Table 4). Most studies reported the impacts of lower seawater pH on metabolic processes (e.g., calcification, photosynthesis, and respiration), with fewer studies documenting changes in photosynthetic pigments and efficiencies. With the exception of calcification rates, there were mostly no reported changes in the physiological responses of Halimeda species to elevated pCO2 and low pH (Table 4), as is shown in this study. Net calcification is the most well-documented response among Halimeda species with 60% of studies showing maintained rates under acidification and 40% of studies showing lower net calcification rates or net dissolution. Few species, including H. heteromorpha, H. macroloba, and H. tuna, appear to tolerate ocean acidification while other species like H. cylindricea are more sensitive to changes in carbonate chemistry. More research is needed to determine the physiological and environmental drivers of net calcification across species, including closely related ones.

thumbnail
Table 4. Halimeda responses to elevated pCO2/lower pH in laboratory and field experiments.

Interactive effects were not included in this literature review (i.e., responses to acidification only are recorded).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286661.t004

Conclusion

Ocean acidification will impact coral reef ecosystems through direct effects on organismal physiology and indirect effects on ecosystem processes. Biological responses of fleshy and calcifying macroalgae can modify reef biogeochemistry, potentially leading to impaired coral health and altered food web cycling via sponge and microbial loops [23]. In this study, we found that ocean acidification does not impact the photophysiology of two reef macroalgae found on the Florida Reef Tract, Dictyota and Halimeda. Our results build on previous literature that documents a lack of significant changes in biological responses to ocean acidification in these genera (Tables 3 and 4) and other benthic calcifying macroalgae [37]. However, the species used in this study, while common on coral reefs across the globe reefs, are under-studied. Therefore, additional research should be conducted to determine genera- and species-specific responses to ocean acidification across varying regions and environmental conditions to determine the physiological and environmental mechanisms driving growth and primary production in reef macroalgae. This will create a more informed pathway towards studying and modeling subsequent indirect effects of changing seawater biogeochemistry on coral reef ecosystem processes, including DOC cycling through microbial and sponge loops, coral-algal competition, and algal community structure on reefs.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. DOC fluxes.

DOC fluxes for control and algal (Dictyota and Halimeda) incubations under ambient (blue) and low pH (orange) at the beginning (left) and end (right) of the 25-day exposure period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286661.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mote Marine Laboratory Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Phycological Society of America Grant-In-Aid of Research. We appreciate help by the Ocean Acidification program staff (A. Fine) and interns for CAOS system operations and running total alkalinity samples during physiology incubations.

References

  1. 1. Kleypas JA, Anthony KRN, Gattuso J-P. 2011. Coral reefs modify their seawater carbon chemistry–case study from a barrier reef (Moorea, French Polynesia). Glob. Change Biol. 17(12): 3667–3678.
  2. 2. Page HN, Andersson AJ, Jokiel PL, Rodgers KS, Lebrato M, Yeakel K, et al. 2016. Differential modification of seawater carbonate chemistry by major coral reef benthic communities. Coral Reefs. 35(4): 1311–1325.
  3. 3. Pezner AK, Courtney TA, Barkley HC, Chou W-C, Chu H-C, Clements SM, et al. 2023. Increasing hypoxia on global coral reefs under ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Change. 13: 403–409.
  4. 4. Duarte CM & Cebrián J. 1996. The fate of marine autotrophic production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41(8): 1758–1766.
  5. 5. Khailov KM & Burlakova ZP. 1969. Release of dissolved organic matter by marine seaweeds and distribution of their total organic production to inshore communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14(4): 521–527.
  6. 6. Brylinsky M. 1977. Release of dissolved organic matter by some marine macrophytes. Mar. Biol. 39: 213–220.
  7. 7. Haas AF, Nelson CE, Kelly LW, Carlson CA, Rohwer F, Leichter JJ, et al. 2011. Effects of coral reef benthic primary producers on dissolved organic carbon and microbial activity. PLoS ONE. 6(11): e27973. pmid:22125645
  8. 8. Haas AF, Nelson CE, Rohwer F, Wegley-Kelly L, Quistad SD, Carlson CA, et al. 2013. Influence of coral and algal exudates on microbially mediated reef metabolism. PeerJ. 1: e108. pmid:23882445
  9. 9. McCook LJ, Jompa J, Diaz-Pulido G. 2001. Competition between corals and algae on coral reefs: a review of evidence and mechanisms. Coral Reefs. 19: 400–417.
  10. 10. Barott K, Smith J, Dinsdale E, Hatay M, Sandin S, Rohwer F. 2009. Hyperspectral and physiological analyses of coral-algal interactions. PLoS ONE. 4(11): e8043. pmid:19956632
  11. 11. Barott KL, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Youle M, Marhaver KL, Vermeij MJA, Smith JE, et al. 2012. Microbial to reef scale interactions between the reef-building coral Montastrea annularis and benthic algae. Proc. R. Soc. B. 279: 1655–1664.
  12. 12. Smith JE, Shaw M, Edwards RA, Obura D, Pantos O, Sala E, et al. 2006. Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae-mediated, microbe-induced coral mortality. Ecol. Lett. 9: 835–845. pmid:16796574
  13. 13. Vega Thurber R, Burkepile DE, Correa AMS, Thurber AR, Shantz AA, Welsh R, et al. 2012. Macroalgae decrease growth and alter microbial community structure of the reef-building coral, Porites astreoides. PLoS ONE. 7(9): e44246.
  14. 14. Kline DI, Kuntz NM, Breitbart M, Knowlton N, Rohwer F. 2006. Role of elevated organic carbon levels and microbial activity in coral mortality. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 314: 119–125.
  15. 15. Kuntz NM, Kline DI, Sandin SA, Rohwer F. 2005. Pathologies and mortality rates caused by organic carbon and nutrient stressors in three Caribbean coral species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 294: 173–180.
  16. 16. de Goeij JM, van Oevelen D, Vermeij MJA, Osinga R, Middelburg JJ, de Goeij AFPM, et al. 2013. Surviving in a marine desert: The sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science. 342: 108–110. pmid:24092742
  17. 17. Rix L, de Goeij JM, van Oevelen D, Struck U, Al-Horani FA, Wild C, et al. 2018. Reef sponges facilitate the transfer of coral-derived organic matter to their associate fauna via the sponge loop. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 589: 85–96.
  18. 18. Rix L, de Goeij JM, van Oevelen D, Struck U, Al-Horani FA, Wild C, et al. 2016. Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop. Functional Ecol. 31(3): 778–789.
  19. 19. Silbiger NJ. 2009. Impacts of sponge produced dissolved inorganic nitrogen on Caribbean coral reef seaweed communities. Master’s thesis. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  20. 20. Haas AF & Wild C. 2010. Composition analysis of organic matter released by cosmopolitan coral reef-associated green algae. Aquat. Biol. 10: 131–138.
  21. 21. Haas AF, Jantzen C, Naumann MS, Iglesias-Prieto , Wild C. 2010. Organic matter release by dominant primary producers in a Caribbean reef lagoon: implications for in situ O2 availability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 409: 27–39.
  22. 22. Wild C, Niggl W, Naumann MS, Haas AF. 2010. Organic matter release by Red Sea coral reef organisms–potential effects on microbial activity and in situ O2 availability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 411: 61–71.
  23. 23. Pawlik JR, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber R. 2016. A vicious cycle? Altered carbon and nutrient cycling may explain the low resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. BioScience. 66: 470–476.
  24. 24. Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Gregor L, Hauck J, et al. 2022. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 14(11): 4811–4900.
  25. 25. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA. 2009. Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1: 169–192.
  26. 26. Bates NR, Astor YM, Church MJ, Currie K, Dore JE, González-Dávila M, et al. 2014. A time-series view of changing surface ocean chemistry due to ocean uptake of anthropogenic CO2 and ocean acidification. Oceanography. 27(1): 126–141.
  27. 27. Gregor L & Gruber N. 2021. OceanSODA-ETHZ: a global gridded data set of the surface ocean carbonate system for seasonal to decadal studies of ocean acidification. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 13: 777–808.
  28. 28. Hartin CA, Bond-Lamberty B, Patel P, Mundra A. 2016. Ocean acidification over the next three centuries using a simple global climate carbon-cycle model: projections and sensitivities. Biogeosciences. 13: 4329–4342.
  29. 29. Hall ER, Wickes L, Burnett LE, Scott GI, Hernandez D, Yates KK, et al. 2020. Acidification in the U.S. Southeast: causes, potential consequences and the role of the southeast ocean and coastal acidification network. Front. Mar. Sci. 7: 548. pmid:32802822
  30. 30. Koch M, Bowes G, Ross C, Zhang X-H. 2013. Climate change and ocean acidification effects on seagrasses and marine macroalgae. Glob. Change Biol. 19(1): 103–132. pmid:23504724
  31. 31. Johnson MD, Price NN, Smith JE. 2014. Contrasting effects of ocean acidification on tropical fleshy and calcareous algae. PeerJ. 2: e411. pmid:24918033
  32. 32. Ho M, McBroom J, Bergstrom E, Diaz-Pulido G. 2021. Physiological responses to temperature and ocean acidification in tropical fleshy macroalgae with varying affinities for inorganic carbon. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 78(1): 89–100.
  33. 33. Diaz-Pulido G, Gouezo M, Tilbrook B, Dove S, Anthony KRN. 2011. High CO2 enhances the competitive strength of seaweeds over corals. Ecol Lett. 14(2): 156–162.
  34. 34. del Monaco C, Hay ME, Gartrell P, Mumby PJ, Diaz-Pulido G. 2017. Effects of ocean acidification on the potency of macroalgal allelopathy to a common coral. Sci Rep. 7: 41053. pmid:28145458
  35. 35. Hofmann LC & Bischof K. 2014. Ocean acidification effects on calcifying macroalgae. Aquat. Biol. 22: 261–279.
  36. 36. McNicholl C, Koch MS, Swarzenski PW, Oberhaensli FR, Taylor A, Gómez Batista M, et al. 2020. Ocean acidification effects on calcification and dissolution in tropical reef macroalgae. Coral Reefs. 39: 1635–1647.
  37. 37. Page HN, Bahr KD, Cyronak T, Jewett EB, Johnson MD, McCoy SJ. 2022. Responses of benthic calcifying algae to ocean acidification differ between laboratory and field settings. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 79(1): 1–11.
  38. 38. Edmunds PJ, Comeau S, Lantz C, Andersson A, Briggs C, Cohen A, et al. 2016. Integrating the effects of ocean acidification across functional scales on tropical coral reefs. Bioscience. 66(5): 350–362.
  39. 39. Gardner TA, Côte IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR. 2003. Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science. 301: 958–960. pmid:12869698
  40. 40. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Kench PS, Smithers SG, Edinger EN, Steneck RS, et al. 2013. Caribbean-wide decline in carbonate production threatens coral reef growth. Nat. Comm. 4: 1402. pmid:23360993
  41. 41. Loh T-L, McMurray SE, Henkel TP, Vicente J, Pawlik JR. 2015. Indirect effects of overfishing on Caribbean reefs: sponges overgrow reef-building corals. PeerJ. 3: e901. pmid:25945305
  42. 42. Cramer KL, Jackson JBC, Donovan MK, Greenstein BJ, Korpanty CA, Cook GM, et al. 2020. Widespread loss of Caribbean acroporid corals was underway before coral bleaching and disease outbreaks. Sci. Adv. 6: eaax9395. pmid:32426458
  43. 43. Schutte VGW, Selig ER, Bruno JF. 2010. Regional spatio-temporal trends in Caribbean coral reef benthic communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 402: 115–122.
  44. 44. de Bakker DM, van Duyl FC, Bak RPM, Nugues MM, Nieuwland G, Meesters EH. 2017. 40 years of benthic community change on the Caribbean reefs of Curaçao and Bonaire: the rise of slimy cyanobacterial mats. Coral Reefs. 36: 355–367.
  45. 45. IPCC. 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. (eds.)]. In Press.
  46. 46. Dickson AG, Sabine CL, Christian JR. [Eds.]. 2007. Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements. PICES Special Publication 3.
  47. 47. Lewis E & Wallace D. 1998. CO2SYS—program developed for the CO2 system calculations. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy.
  48. 48. Mehrbach C, Culberson CH, Hawley JE, Pytkowicx RM. 1973. Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18: 897–907.
  49. 49. Dickson AG & Millero FJ. 1987. A comparison of the equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media. Deep-Sea Res. Part A. 34: 1733–1743.
  50. 50. Jokiel PL, Maragos JE, Franzisket L. 1978. Coral growth: Buoyant weight technique. In Coral Reefs: Research Methods; Stoddart DR., Johannes RE, Eds.; UNESCO: Paris, France. p. 581.
  51. 51. Davies PS. 1989. Short-term growth measurements of corals using an accurate buoyant weighing technique. Mar. Biol. 101: 389–395.
  52. 52. Borowitzka MA, Larkum AWD. 1976. Calcification in the green alga Halimeda, III. The sources of inorganic carbon for photosynthesis and calcification and a model of the mechanism of calcification. J. Exp. Bot. 27: 879–893.
  53. 53. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 11(7): 36–42.
  54. 54. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. 1989. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 975(3): 384–394.
  55. 55. Wellburn A. 1994. The spectral determination of chlorophyll a and b using various solvents with spectrophotometers with different resolutions. J. Plant Physiol. 144: 307–313.
  56. 56. Johnston SE, Shorina N, Bulgina E, Vorobjeva T, Chupakova A, Klimov SI, et al. 2018. Flux and seasonality of dissolved organic matter from northern Dvina (Severnaya Dvina) River, Russia. J. Geophysical Res.: Biogeosci. 123(3): 1041–1056.
  57. 57. Holt AD, Kellerman AM, Li W, Stubbins A, Wagner S, McKenna A, et al. 2021. Assessing the role of photochemistry in driving the composition of dissolved organic matter in glacier runoff. J. Geophysical Res.: Biogeosci. 126(12): e2021JG006516.
  58. 58. R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  59. 59. Meyer FW, Vogel N, Teichberg M, Uthicke S, Wild C. 2015. The physiological response of two green calcifying algae from the Great Barrier Reef towards high dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC and DOC) availability. PLoS ONE. 10(8): e0133596.
  60. 60. Diaz-Pulido G & Barrón C. 2020. CO2 enrichment stimulates dissolved organic carbon release in coral reef macroalgae. J. Phycol. 56: 1039–1052.
  61. 61. Giordano M, Beardall J, Raven JA. 2005. CO2 concentrating mechanisms in algae: mechanisms, environmental modulation, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56: 99–131.
  62. 62. Raven JA & Hurd CL. 2012. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis in macroalgae. Photosynth. Res. 113: 105–125. pmid:22843100
  63. 63. Kübler JE & Dudgeon SR. 2015. Predicting effects of ocean acidification and warming on algae lacking carbon concentrating mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 10(7): e0132806.
  64. 64. Zeebe RE, Wolf-Gladrow DA. 2001. CO2 in seawater: equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes. Elsevier Oceanography Series 65, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
  65. 65. Cornwall CE, Hepburn CD, Pritchard D, Currie KI, McGraw CM, Hunter KA, et al. 2012. Carbon-use strategies in macroalgae: Differential responses to lowered pH and implications for ocean acidification. J. Phycol. 48: 137–144.
  66. 66. Cornwall CE, Revill AT, Hall-Spencer JM, Milazzo M, Raven JA, Hurd CL. 2017. Inorganic carbon physiology underpins macroalgal responses to elevated pCO2. Sci. Rep. 7: 46297.
  67. 67. Zweng RC, Koch MS, Bowes G. 2018. The role of irradiance and C-use strategies in tropical macroalgae photosynthetic response to ocean acidification. Sci Rep. 8: 9479.
  68. 68. Raven JA, Giordano M, Beardall J, Maberly SC. 2011. Algal and aquatic plant carbon concentrating mechanisms in relation to environmental change. Photosynth. Res. 109: 281–296.
  69. 69. Diaz-Pulido G, Cornwall C, Gartrell P, Hurd C, Tran DV. 2016. Strategies of dissolved inorganic carbon use in macroalgae across a gradient of terrestrial influence: implications for the Great Barrier Reef in the context of ocean acidification. Coral Reefs. 35: 1327–1341.
  70. 70. van der Loos LM, Schmid M, Leal PP, McGraw CM, Britton D, Revill AT, et al. 2018. Responses of macroalgae to CO2 enrichment cannot be inferred solely from their inorganic carbon uptake strategy. Ecol. Evol. 9(1): 125–140.
  71. 71. Britton D, Mundy CN, McGraw CM, Revill AT, Hurd CL. 2019. Responses of seaweeds that use CO2 as their sole inorganic carbon source to ocean acidification: differential effects of fluctuating pH but little benefit of CO2 enrichment. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76(6): 1860–1870.
  72. 72. Lovelock CE, Reef R, Raven JA, Pandolfi JM. 2020. Regional variation in δ13C of coral reef macroalgae. Limnol Oceanogr. 65: 2291–2302.
  73. 73. Muehllehner N, Langdon C, Venti A, Kadko D. 2016. Dynamics of carbonate chemistry, production, and calcification of the Florida Reef Tract (2009–2010): evidence for seasonal dissolution. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 30(5): 661–688.
  74. 74. Manzello DP, Enochs IC, Melo N, Gledhill DK, Johns EM. 2012. Ocean acidification refugia of the Florida Reef Tract. PLoS One. 7(7): 41715.
  75. 75. Kapsenberg L & Cyronak T. 2019. Ocean acidification refugia in variable environments. Glob. Change Biol. 25: 3201–3214.
  76. 76. Rivest EB, Comeau S, Cornwall CE. 2017. The role of natural variability in shaping the response of coral reef organisms to climate change. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 3: 271–281.
  77. 77. Noisette F, Egilsdottir H, Davoult D, Martin S. 2013. Physiological responses of three temperate coralline algae from contrasting habitats to near-future ocean acidification. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 448: 179–187.
  78. 78. Padilla-Gamiño JL, Gaitán-Espitia JD, Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. 2016. Physiological plasticity and local adaptation to elevated pCO2 in calcareous algae: an ontogenetic and geographic approach. Evol. Applications. 9: 1043–1053.
  79. 79. Johnson MD, Rodriguez Bravo LM, O’Connor SE, Varley NF, Altieri AH. 2019. pH variability exacerbates effects of ocean acidification on a Caribbean crustose coralline alga. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:150.
  80. 80. Johnson MD, Rodriguez Bravo LM, Lucey N, Altieri AH. 2021. Environmental legacy effects and acclimatization of a crustose coralline alga to ocean acidification. Clim. Change Ecol. 2: 100016.
  81. 81. Hall-Spencer JM, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Martin S, Ransome E, Fine M, Turner SM, et al. 2008. Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification. Nature. 454: 96–99. pmid:18536730
  82. 82. Porzio L, Buia MC, & Hall-Spencer JM. 2011. Effects of ocean acidification on macroalgal communities. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400: 278–287.
  83. 83. Porzio L, Arena C, Lorenti M, De Maio A, Buia MC. 2020. Long-term response of Dictyota dichotoma var. intricata (C. Agardh) Greville (Phaeophyceae) to ocean acidification: Insights from high pCO2 vents. Sci. Tot. Environ. 731: 138896.
  84. 84. Cornwall CE, Comeau S, DeCarlo TM, Larcombe E, Moore B, Giltrow K, et al. 2020. A coralline alga gains tolerance to ocean acidification over multiple generations of exposure. Nat. Clim. Change. 10: 143–146.
  85. 85. Moore B, Comeau S, Bekaert M, Cossais A, Purdy A, Larcombe E, et al. 2021. Rapid multi-generational acclimation of coralline reproductive structures to ocean acidification. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 288(1950): 20210130.
  86. 86. Burham KA, Nowicki RJ, Hall ER, Pi J, Page HN. 2022. Effects of ocean acidification on the performance and interaction of fleshy macroalgae and a grazing sea urchin. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.547: 151662.
  87. 87. Comeau S, Cornwall CE, DeCarlo TM, Doo SS, Carpenter RC, McCulloch MT. 2019. Resistance to ocean acidification in coral reef taxa is not gained by acclimatization. Nat. Clim. Change. 9: 477–483.
  88. 88. Asnaghi V, Chiantore M, Mangialajo L, Gazeau F, Francour P, Alliouane S, et al. 2013. Cascading effects of ocean acidification in a rocky subtidal community. PLoS ONE. 8(4): e61978.
  89. 89. Burnham KA, Nowicki RJ, Hall ER, Pi J, Page HN. 2022. Effects of ocean acidification on the performance and interaction of fleshy macroalgae and a grazing sea urchin. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 547: 151662.
  90. 90. Ho M, Carpenter RC. 2017. Differential growth responses to water flow and reduced pH in tropical marine macroalgae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 491: 58–65.
  91. 91. Page HN, Hewett C, Tompkins H, Hall ER. 2021. Ocean acidification and direct interactions affect coral, macroalga, and sponge growth in the Florida Keys. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9: 739.
  92. 92. Rodríguez A, Clemente S, Brito A, Hernández JC. 2018. Effects of ocean acidification on algae growth and feeding rates of juvenile sea urchins. Mar. Environ. Res. 140: 382–389. pmid:30032994
  93. 93. Brown KT, Bender-Champ D, Kenyon TM, Rémond C, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove S. 2019. Temporal effects of ocean warming and acidification on coral-algal competition. Coral Reefs. 38: 297–309.
  94. 94. Campbell JE, Craft JD, Muehllehner N, Langdon C, Paul VJ. 2014. Responses of calcifying algae (Halimeda spp.) to ocean acidification: implications for herbivores. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 514: 43–56.
  95. 95. Campbell JE, Fisch J, Langdon C, Paul VJ. 2016. Increased temperature mitigates the effects of ocean acidification in calcified green algae (Halimeda spp.). Coral Reefs. 35: 357–368.
  96. 96. Comeau S, Edmunds PJ, Spindel NB, Carpenter RC. 2013. The responses of eight coral reef calcifiers to increasing partial pressure of CO2 do not exhibit a tipping point. Limnol. Oceanogr. 58(1): 388–398.
  97. 97. Comeau S, Carpenter RC, Nojiri Y, Putnam HM, Sakai K, Edmunds PJ. 2014. Pacific-wide contrast highlights resistance of reef calcifiers to ocean acidification. Proc. R. Soc. 281: 20141339. pmid:25056628
  98. 98. Hofmann LC, Bischof K, Baggini C, Johnson A, Koop-Jakobsen K, Teichberg M. 2015. CO2 and inorganic nutrient enrichment affect the performance of a calcifying green alga and its noncalcifying epiphyte. Oecologia. 177: 1157–1169.
  99. 99. McNicholl C, Koch MS, Hofmann LC. 2019. Photosynthesis and light-dependent proton pumps increase boundary layer pH in tropical macroalgae: A proposed mechanism to sustain calcification under ocean acidification. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 521: 151208.
  100. 100. McNicholl C, Koch MS. 2021. Irradiance, photosynthesis and elevated pCO2 effects on net calcification in tropical reef macroalgae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 535: 151489.
  101. 101. Meyer FW, Vogel N, Teichberg M, Uthicke S, Wild C. 2015. The Physiological Response of Two Green Calcifying Algae from the Great Barrier Reef towards High Dissolved Inorganic and Organic Carbon (DIC and DOC) Availability. PLoS ONE. 10(8): e0133596. pmid:26267650
  102. 102. Meyer FW, Schubert N, Diele K, Teichberg M, Wild C, Enríquez S. 2016. Effect of Inorganic and Organic Carbon Enrichments (DIC and DOC) on the Photosynthesis and Calcification Rates of Two Calcifying Green Algae from a Caribbean Reef Lagoon. PLoS ONE. 11(8): e0160268. pmid:27487195
  103. 103. Peach KE, Koch MS, Blackwelder PL. 2016. Effects of elevated pCO2 and irradiance on growth, photosynthesis and calcification in Halimeda discoidea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 544: 143–158.
  104. 104. Peach KE, Koch MS, Blackwelder PL, Manfrino C. 2017. Calcification and photophysiology responses to elevated pCO2 in six Halimeda species from contrasting irradiance environments on Little Cayman Island reefs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 486: 114–126.
  105. 105. Price NN, Hamilton SL, Tootell JS, Smith JE. 2011. Species-specific consequences of ocean acidification for the calcareous tropical green algae Halimeda. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 440: 67–78.
  106. 106. Ries JB, Cohen AL, McCorkle DC. 2009. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology. 37(12): 1031–1134.
  107. 107. Scherner F, Pereira CM, Duarte G, Horta PA, Barreira e Castro C, Barufi JB, et al. 2016. Effects of ocean acidification and temperature increases on the photosynthesis of tropical reef calcified macroalgae. PLoS ONE. 11(5): e0154844. pmid:27158820
  108. 108. Sinutok S, Hill R, Doblin MA, Wuhrer R, Ralph PJ. 2011. Warmer more acidic conditions cause decreased productivity and calcification in subtropical coral reef sediment-dwelling calcifiers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56(4): 1200–1212.
  109. 109. Sinutok S, Hill R, Doblin MA, Kühl M, Ralph PJ. 2012. Microenvironmental changes support evidence of photosynthesis and calcification inhibition in Halimeda under ocean acidification and warming. Coral Reefs. 31: 1201–1213.
  110. 110. Vogel N, Fabricius KE, Strahl J, Noonan SHC, Wild C, Uthicke S. 2015a. Calcareous green alga Halimeda tolerates ocean acidification conditions at tropical carbon dioxide seeps. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60: 263–275.
  111. 111. Vogel N, Meyer FW, Wild C, Uthicke S. 2015b. Decreased light availability can amplify negative impacts of ocean acidification on calcifying coral reef organisms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 521: 49–61.
  112. 112. Wei Z, Long C, Yang F, Long L, Huo Y, Ding D, et al. 2020. Increased irradiance availability mitigates the physiological performance of species of the calcifying green macroalga Halimeda in response to ocean acidification. Algal Res. 48: 101906.