Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Binding of Tau-derived peptide-fused GFP to plant microtubules in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Hiroshi Inaba ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hiroshi Inaba, Kazusato Oikawa

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    numata.keiji.3n@kyoto-u.ac.jp (KN); hinaba@tottori-u.ac.jp (HI)

    Affiliations Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan, Centre for Research on Green Sustainable Chemistry, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan

  • Kazusato Oikawa ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hiroshi Inaba, Kazusato Oikawa

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Material Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Kazuya Ishikawa,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Center for Bioscience Research and Education, Utsunomiya University, Tochigi, Japan

  • Yutaka Kodama,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Center for Bioscience Research and Education, Utsunomiya University, Tochigi, Japan, Biomacromolecules Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama, Japan

  • Kazunori Matsuura,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan, Centre for Research on Green Sustainable Chemistry, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan

  • Keiji Numata

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    numata.keiji.3n@kyoto-u.ac.jp (KN); hinaba@tottori-u.ac.jp (HI)

    Affiliations Department of Material Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Biomacromolecules Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama, Japan

Abstract

Studies on how exogenous molecules modulate properties of plant microtubules, such as their stability, structure, and dynamics, are important for understanding and modulating microtubule functions in plants. We have developed a Tau-derived peptide (TP) that binds to microtubules and modulates their properties by binding of TP-conjugated molecules in vitro. However, there was no investigation of TPs on microtubules in planta. Here, we generated transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants stably expressing TP-fused superfolder GFP (sfGFP-TP) and explored the binding properties and effects of sfGFP-TP on plant microtubules. Our results indicate that the expressed sfGFP-TP binds to the plant microtubules without inhibiting plant growth. A transgenic line strongly expressing sfGFP-TP produced thick fibrous structures that were stable under conditions where microtubules normally depolymerize. This study generates a new tool for analyzing and modulating plant microtubules.

1. Introduction

Microtubules are tubular cytoskeletons composed of tubulin dimers that serve fundamental and crucial roles in the biological processes of various eukaryotes including animals, plants, fungi, and protists. Microtubules play diverse roles in cell morphology, intracellular transport, cell growth and division, and in the formation of the mitotic and cytokinetic apparatus [17]. Because of the importance of plant microtubules, small-molecule drugs such as oryzalin, propyzamide, and taxol have been used to regulate their dynamics, organization, and stability, and have also been developed as potential herbicides [2, 3]. In nature, microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) modulate the structures and functions of microtubules, including their stability, polymerization, bending, and bundling, and their ability to deliver cargo [8, 9]. In addition to MAPs that bind to the outer surface of microtubules, microtubule inner proteins (MIPs) that bind to the inner surface of microtubules have recently been discovered [10, 11]. The binding of MIPs to the inner surface of microtubules possibly increases the mechanical rigidity and stability of microtubule structures. Fluorescent protein-fused MAPs have been widely used for visualization of microtubules in plants [12, 13]. Pioneering works by Cyr et al. showed the binding of microtubule-binding domain of the human MAP-4 fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) to microtubules in plants [1416]. Other MAPs such as MAP65-1, MAP65-2, MAP65-4, and MAP70 are also used for the visualization [1721]. Interestingly, the expression of the fluorescent protein-fused MAPs may affect the properties of microtubules such as stability and bundling [12, 13, 15, 18, 20]. These findings suggest that the development of exogenous proteins that bind to plant microtubules could be a new approach to modulate microtubule function in plants.

Previously, we developed a Tau-derived peptide, TP (CGGGKKHVPGGGSVQIVYKPVDL) as a binding motif for the inner surface of microtubules [22]. The design of TP was based on a repeat domain of the Tau protein, which is conserved from nematodes to humans and is known to bind to the inner pocket of microtubules [23]. TP was derived from R2-interrepeat (298–312) of human 4R-Tau. When TP is pre-incubated with tubulin followed by the polymerization of the TP-tubulin complex, it binds to the inner surface of microtubules. Using this method, TP has been used to encapsulate various nano-sized materials such as superfolder GFP (sfGFP) [24], Azami-Green protein (a tetrameric fluorescent protein) [25], magnetic cobalt–platinum nanoparticles [26], and gold nanoparticles [22, 27] in microtubules. Encapsulation of these nanomaterials changed the properties of microtubules in vitro [11]. For example, binding of TP-fused sfGFP (sfGFP-TP) to the inner surface of microtubules increased the contour length, rigidity, and velocity on kinesin-coated substrates, as well as microtubule stability [24]. In that case, binding of both TP and the sfGFP scaffold were possibly important for the stabilization of microtubules. In contrast, sfGFP-TP binds to the outer surface of microtubules when it is incubated with pre-formed microtubules [24]. In addition, TP can bind to microtubules in human hepatoma HepG2 cells without cytotoxicity [28, 29]. These properties suggest that binding of exogenous proteins to microtubules via TP has great potential to modulate the structures and functions of plant microtubules. To date, however, there have been no attempts to introduce TP-conjugated molecules into plants. There are potential applications of TP-fused fluorescent proteins in plants because they can be stably expressed, and their inherent fluorescence makes them visible under a microscope. Compared with the transient effects of microtubule-targeted drugs, stably expressed sfGFP-TP in plants may permanently alter the structure and functions of plant microtubules and make it easier to visualize the altered structures due to its fluorescence. Here, we analyzed the binding of sfGFP-TP to microtubules in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and its stabilizing effect (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Schematic illustration of binding of Tau-derived peptide (TP)-fused superfolder GFP (sfGFP-TP) to microtubules of Arabidopsis thaliana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g001

2. Material and methods

2.1. Generation of transgenic plants expressing sfGFP-TP

A synthetic DNA fragment encoding sfGFP was cloned into pDONR207 using the BP reaction following the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A linear pDONR207-sfGFP-TP sequence fragment was amplified by inverse PCR using pDONR207-sfGFP as the template with the following primers: 5′-CATGTTCCAGGAGGTGGTTCAGTCCAGATCGTTTATAAACCTGTGGATCTTTGAGACCCAGCTTTCTTG-3′ and 5′-GACTGAACCACCTCCTGGAACATGTTTTTTACCGCCACCAGAACCTCCACCAGTGATCCCGGCGGCGGT-3′. The resulting fragment was circularized using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) to generate a pDONR207-sfGFP-TP plasmid. The cloned sfGFP-TP fragment was recombined into the pGWB602 binary vector using the LR reaction [30] following to manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transgenic A. thaliana plants stably expressing sfGFP-TP were produced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (GV3101)-mediated transformation using the floral-dip method [31]. The plants were grown at 23°C on 0.8% agar plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium with 1% w/v sucrose (pH 5.7) in an incubator (Nihonika, Osaka, Japan) under a 16-light/8-h dark cycle at 100 μmol photons m-2 s-1 after vernalization. The leaf length was directly measured from the plant and the primary root length was measured by pulling the roots out of the agar plates, laying them on a flat agar medium, and stretching them in a straight line. The confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analyses were conducted on 2–3-week-old plants. To examine the relationship between sfGFP-TP and microtubules, transgenic lines stably expressing sfGFP-TP and mCherry-fused tubulin (mCherry-TUB6) [32] were crossed and F3 homozygous lines were generated.

The insertion of the sfGFP-TP gene into the A. thaliana genome was confirmed by PCR using the following primer set: Forward, 5′-ACGTAAACGGCCACAAGT-3′, and reverse, 5′-AACGATCTGGACTGAACC-3′. Genomic DNA was extracted from each transgenic A. thaliana line using plant DNAzol™ Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified by washing with ethanol. The PCR analyses were performed using a C1000 Touch™ Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) with PrimeSTAR® GXL DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa) following the manufacturer’s protocol. An amplified DNA (approx. 1 kb) corresponded to a part of sfGFP-TP in the transgenic lines (Fig 2B). The sfGFP-TP lines were classified according to the strength of the fluorescence signal (No. 1–5) detected using a Leica M165 FC fluorescence stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Tokyo, Japan). Two lines, No. 1 and No. 3, were selected for subsequent experiments.

thumbnail
Fig 2.

(a) CLSM images of selected sfGFP-TP-expressing Arabidopsis lines (No. 1–5), with green fluorescence of sfGFP-TP visible. (b) Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of extracted genomic DNA corresponding to sfGFP-TP gene from each transgenic plant. Control is from a representative wild-type plant. (c) Images showing detailed structures of leaf epidermis of No. 1 line (strong fluorescence) and No. 3 line (weak fluorescence). White arrows indicate representative thick fibers. Inset: expanded images. Scale bars: 20 μm for (a) and (c). See S1, S2 Movies for cross-sectional scans acquired at different focal planes. The fluorescence intensity of sfGFP-TP in all lines was modified to be equal using Brightness/Contrast in Image J. Original CLSM images of No. 1 and No. 3 lines are shown in S3 Fig in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g002

2.2. Imaging analysis

Light-adapted adult rosette leaves were deaerated and placed on a glass coverslip in pure water for CLSM analyses. Etiolated-hypocotyl and -root epidermis after 3–5-days-old-dark-adaptatuion were placed on a glass coverslip in pure water for CLSM analyses. The images of A. thaliana plants expressing sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 were captured under a CLSM (Zeiss LSM880, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a 63× oil immersion objective (Plan-Apochromat 40× and 63×/1.4 Oil DIC M27; Carl Zeiss). An argon laser was used for excitation of sfGFP-TP (488 nm) and mCherry-TUB6 (561 nm). Emission wavelengths at 507–525 nm and 580–630 nm were used for detection of sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 fluorescence, respectively. Z-axis sections were taken every 0.35 or 0.5 μm from the surface of epidermis cells, with a total thickness of at least 10 μm, to include the whole epidermal cell. The images were modified to be the same fluorescence intensity among sfGFP-TP lines using Brightness/Contrast tool in Fiji (ImageJ, NIH public domain). The images were stacked to be clear using Z projection in Fiji for epidermal cells of roots.

2.3. Analysis of effects of depolymerization conditions

The deaerated-leaf sections were immersed in a solution containing 10, 25, 50, or 100 μM oryzalin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) or 0.1, 1.0, or 10 μM Latrunculin B (Wako Pure Chemical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for 3 h under white light conditions. Alternatively, leaf sections were kept at 4°C for 1 h. Images were captured as Z-sections by CLSM. The number of individual fibers visualized by sfGFP-TP in a cell was manually counted by using Cell Counter tool in Fiji (ImageJ, NIH public domain) (S5 Fig in S1 Data). At least 11 cells from three different sections were quantified.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation of the transgenic plants stably expressing sfGFP-TP

In this work, we designed the whole sequence of sfGFP-TP consisting of sfGFP, which shows strong fluorescence even in plants [33, 34], joined with a GGGS linker to the TP sequence for expression in plants (S1 Fig in S1 Data). Compared with the previous reconstructed system [24], this system with the whole sfGFP-TP sequence is suitable for stable expression in plants and binding to plant microtubules without the requirement for translocation across the barriers of plant cell walls and plasma membranes. Transgenic plants stably expressing sfGFP-TP were generated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation with the floral-dip method [31]. The expression of sfGFP-TP in the plants was confirmed by observing sfGFP fluorescence under a fluorescence stereomicroscope (S2 Fig in S1 Data). From the primary transformants expressing sfGFP-TP, we selected the five independent transgenic plants (No. 1–5) showing the highest fluorescence intensity in the leaf cells, as observed by CLSM (Fig 2A). The genomic insertion of the sfGFP-TP gene was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the extracted genomic DNA from each transgenic plant. The presence of an amplified DNA (around 1 kb), corresponding to a part of sfGFP-TP in the transgenic lines (Fig 2B), confirmed the successful insertion of the sfGFP-TP gene. In this study, two of the five lines, No. 1 (strongest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) and No. 3 (weakest sfGFP-TP fluorescence), were selected for subsequent experiments (S3 Fig in S1 Data). In both lines, expression of sfGFP-TP had no apparent effects on plant growth (Fig 3). Thick fibrous structures, which could be cytosolic strands (Fig 2C, left, white arrows, S1 Movie) were present in cells of the No. 1 line, whereas thin fibrous structures were present in cells of the No. 3 line (Fig 2C, right, S2 Movie). Since the structures and morphologies in the No. 3 line were similar to those reported previously for plant microtubules [35], we evaluated the binding of sfGFP-TP in the No. 3 line to epidermal cells of hypocotyl and root hair, where cortical microtubules are abundant in an orderly pattern. The transverse microtubule arrays were observed in the sfGFP-TP channel (Fig 4), indicating the binding of sfGFP-TP to the plant microtubules. In contrast, the thick fibers in the No. 1 line were different from typical plant microtubules observed in the No. 3 line. Also, the strong fluorescence of sfGFP-TP in the No. 1 line was observed in regions that appeared to be either cytoplasmic strands or cortical endoplasmic reticulum (Fig 2C, S3 Fig in S1 Data, and S1 Movie), suggesting that a portion of the overexpressed sfGFP-TP is localized in these areas.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Plant growth test of sfGFP-TP-expressing Arabidopsis thaliana (No 1; strongest sfGFP-TP fluorescence, No. 3; weakest sfGFP-TP fluorescence).

(a) Plants grown on agar plate under white light at 100 μmol photons m-2 s-1 for 4 weeks. Scale bar: 1 cm. The length of (b) leaf and (c) main root estimated from the plants are represented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (N = 6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4.

CLSM images of epidermal cells of (a) hypocotyl and (b) root hair of the sfGFP-TP-expressing Arabidopsis line (No. 3) with green fluorescence of sfGFP-TP visible. The images were stacked using Z projection in Fiji for (b). Scale bars: 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g004

3.2. Co-visualization of sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6-labeled microtubules

To co-visualize sfGFP-TP and microtubules, the No. 1 line (strongest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) was crossed with a line expressing mCherry-fused tubulin (mCherry-TUB6) [32] to generate a homozygous line. Colocalization of sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 was observed in the thick fibrous structures (Fig 5A, S3 Movie), confirming the binding of sfGFP-TP to microtubules in the thick fibers. However, a partial lack of colocalization of sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 suggested the localization of a certain fraction of sfGFP-TP in either cytoplasmic strands or cortical endoplasmic reticulum. Next, the effects of a microtubule-depolymerizing drug (oryzalin) [32, 36] on the thick fibers were evaluated. Even after treatment with 50 μM oryzalin for 3 h, the thick fibrous structures were still partially intact and the colocalization of sfGFP and mCherry fluorescence signals was maintained (Fig 5B, S4 Movie). When oryzalin was treated to the line expressing only mCherry-TUB6, the thick fibers were not observed (S4 Fig in S1 Data). These results indicate that the thick fibers bound to sfGFP-TP were stable against depolymerization conditions of microtubules.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Colocalization assay of sfGFP-TP and mCherry-fused tubulin (mCherry-TUB6).

CLSM images of homozygous plants expressing sfGFP-TP (No. 1 line) and mCherry-TUB6 with (a) no treatment and (b) treatment with 50 μM oryzalin for 3 h. White arrows indicate representative thick fibers. Scale bars: 10 μm for (a) and (b). See S3, S4 Movies for cross-sectional scans acquired at different focal planes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g005

3.3. Characterizations of the fiber structures with oryzalin and latrunculin B

Next, the structures of the thick fibers in the No. 1 line (strongest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) were further assessed by analyzing the concentration-dependent effects of depolymerizing drugs on microtubules and actin filaments (other parts of the cytoskeleton). Although microtubules and actin filaments fulfill many functions independently, they also interact, and this crosstalk is important for plant growth [3639]. For instance, microtubules and actin filaments form dynamic associations during interphase in plant cells [36]. Thus, the effects of both a microtubule-depolymerizing chemical (oryzalin) [32, 36] and an actin filament-disrupting chemical (latrunculin B) [32, 36] on the fibers in the No. 1 line were evaluated. Typically, low concentrations of oryzalin (no more than 250 nM) were used to partially depolymerize cortical microtubules [40, 41]. In this study, higher concentrations of oryzalin (10–100 μM) were used to evaluate the stability of microtubules. To evaluate the effects of the chemicals, the number of fibers per cell was counted and compared with the control cells (no treatment of the chemicals) (S5 Fig in S1 Data). Oryzalin treatment decreased the number of fibers in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 6A), indicating that the fibers were composed of microtubules, as shown in Fig 5. Although treatment with 20 μM oryzalin is known to depolymerize microtubules in plants [32, 36], the thick fibers remained largely intact at this concentration (Fig 6A). In contrast, the number of thin fibrous structures in the No. 3 line (weakest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) was significantly decreased by treatment with 10 μM oryzalin (Fig 7). Thus, the thick fibers in the No. 1 line were considerably more stable against oryzalin-induced depolymerization compared with the general microtubules and thin fibers in the No. 3 line. The thick fibers in the No. 1 line were not significantly lost after treatment with 1 μM latrunculin B, a concentration normally used to disrupt actin filaments (Fig 6B) [32, 36]. These results indicate that the fibers were bundled structures mainly formed by the interaction between microtubules.

thumbnail
Fig 6.

Effects of inhibitors of (a) microtubules and (b) actin filaments on sfGFP-TP-incorporated fibrous structures in the No. 1 line. CLSM images of leaf cells of plants treated with (a) oryzalin or (b) latrunculin B for 3 h (left). Scale bars: 50 μm for (a) and (b). Percentage of number of fibers per cell compared with the control cells (no oryzalin or latrunculin B treatment) (right). The number of fibers counted from three CLSM images are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (N = 15 for (a) and N = 11 for (b)). *P < 0.01 compared with number of fibers in the control, as determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. Effects of inhibitors of microtubules on the sfGFP-TP-incorporated fibrous structures in the sfGFP-TP-expressing Arabidopsis line (No. 3).

(a) CLSM images of leaf cells of the plant treated with oryzalin for 3 h. Scale bars: 10 μm. (b) Percentage of number of fibers per cell compared with the control cells (no oryzalin treatment). The number of fibers counted from three CLSM images is represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (N = 15). *P < 0.01 compared with number of fibers in the control cells, as determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.g007

4. Discussion

Two transgenic lines expressing sfGFP-TP (No. 1 and 3) in this study showed different localization of sfGFP-TP. The No. 3 line (weakest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) showed thin fibrous structures as similar to typical plant microtubules (Figs 2C and 4), showing the binding of sfGFP-TP to plant microtubules. In contrast, the No. 1 line (strongest sfGFP-TP fluorescence) showed thick fibers that were different from typical plant microtubules. In addition, strong fluorescence of sfGFP-TP was observed to different regions, possibly cytoplasmic strands or cortical endoplasmic reticulum (Figs 2C, 5A, S3 Fig in S1 Data, and S1 and S3 Movies). It is possible that a portion of the overexpressed sfGFP-TP in the No. 1 line is localized in these areas, whereas the moderate expression in the No. 3 line showed that sfGFP-TP was mainly bound to microtubules.

In the No. 1 line, the number of fibers were decreased by the oryzalin treatment but not dramatically decreased by the latrunculin B treatment (Fig 6), indicating that the fibers were bundled structures mainly formed by the interaction between microtubules. Since high concentration (10 μM) of latrunculin B partially disrupted the bundled structures (Fig 6B), it is also possible that the bundled structures contain actin filaments. In plants, this kind of bundled structures composed of microtubules [20] and microtubules/actin filaments [42] is generated by the binding of MAPs to microtubules. Also, the natural Tau protein can crosslink microtubules and actin filaments in vitro [43]. Because sfGFP-TP binds the outer surface of preformed microtubules [24], it is possible that the large amount of sfGFP-TP expressed in the No. 1 line mediates similar physical interactions between microtubules and/or microtubules and actin filaments to form stable bundles, like natural MAPs and Tau. Also, it is possible that disruption of actin filaments by latrunculin B treatment altered the organization of microtubules as reported in preprophase bands [39]. In further research, detailed analyses of the sfGFP-TP-incorporated fibers and the binding sites of sfGFP-TP should be conducted to determine their exact composition.

In the previous study, we used purified TP conjugates for binding to microtubules. The generation of genetically transformed plants expressing sfGFP-TP that binds to microtubules in vivo is an important advance for future applications. The stable expression of sfGFP-TP enables long-term stabilization of microtubules and their visualization. Compared with conventional studies that have investigated the short-term effects of microtubule-targeted small molecules, longer-term analyses of materials stably expressing sfGFP-TP can explore the effects of microtubule structures on plants without inhibiting plant growth (Fig 3).

In conclusion, we constructed an expression system of sfGFP-TP in the model plant A. thaliana and showed that the binding of sfGFP-TP to microtubule-based fibers. As discussed above, the No. 3 line showed the binding of sfGFP-TP to microtubules like MAPs [12, 13], whereas the No. 1 line generated thick fibers. By controlling the expression levels of sfGFP-TP, this system will be a new in vivo tool not only for imaging of plant microtubules, but also for elucidation and modulation of plant microtubules, which are still largely unknown compared with those of microtubules in other eukaryotes.

Supporting information

S1 Movie. Cross sectional scans of the sfGFP-TP-expressing plant line (No. 1) in Fig 2C acquired at different focal planes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.s002

(MOV)

S2 Movie. Cross sectional scans of the sfGFP-TP-expressing plant line (No. 3) in Fig 2C acquired at different focal planes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.s003

(MOV)

S3 Movie. Cross sectional scans of the plant line (No. 1) expressing sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 without any treatment in Fig 5A acquired at different focal planes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.s004

(MOV)

S4 Movie. Cross sectional scans of the plant line (No. 1) expressing sfGFP-TP and mCherry-TUB6 treated with 50 μM oryzalin for 3 h in Fig 5B acquired at different focal planes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286421.s005

(MOV)

Acknowledgments

We thank Masayoshi Nakamura (Nagoya University) to provide a transgenic plant expressing mCherry-TUB6. We thank Jennifer Smith, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Kost B, Mathur J, Chua N-H. Cytoskeleton in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999;2:462–470. pmid:10607658
  2. 2. Nick P, editor. Plant Microtubules, Development and Flexibility. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.
  3. 3. Hashimoto T. Microtubules in Plants. Arabidopsis Book. 2015;13:e0179.
  4. 4. Wasteneys GO. Microtubule organization in the green kingdom: chaos or self-order? J Cell Sci. 2002;115:1345–1354. pmid:11896182
  5. 5. Lloyd C, Chan J. Microtubules and the shape of plants to come. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:13–23. pmid:14708006
  6. 6. Landrein B, Hamant O. How mechanical stress controls microtubule behavior and morphogenesis in plants: history, experiments and revisited theories. Plant J. 2013;75:324–338. pmid:23551516
  7. 7. Horio T, Murata T. The role of dynamic instability in microtubule organization. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:511. pmid:25339962
  8. 8. Hamada T. Microtubule-associated proteins in higher plants. J Plant Res. 2007;120:79–98. pmid:17285404
  9. 9. Struk S, Dhonukshe P. MAPs: cellular navigators for microtubule array orientations in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:1–21. pmid:23903948
  10. 10. Ichikawa M, Bui KH. Microtubule inner proteins: a meshwork of luminal proteins stabilizing the doublet microtubule. BioEssays. 2018;40:1700209. pmid:29430673
  11. 11. Inaba H, Matsuura K. Modulation of microtubule properties and functions by encapsulation of nanomaterials using a Tau-derived peptide. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2021;94:2100–2112.
  12. 12. Yoneda A, Kutsuna N, Higaki T, Oda Y, Sano T, Hasezawa S. Recent progress in living cell imaging of plant cytoskeleton and vacuole using fluorescent-protein transgenic lines and three-dimensional imaging. Protoplasma. 2007;230:129–139. pmid:17458628
  13. 13. Colin L, Martin-Arevalillo R, Bovio S, Bauer A, Vernoux T, Caillaud M-C, et al. Imaging the living plant cell: From probes to quantification. Plant Cell. 2022;34:247–272. pmid:34586412
  14. 14. Marc J, Granger CL, Brincat J, Fisher DD, Kao T, McCubbin AG, et al. A GFP–MAP4 reporter gene for visualizing cortical microtubule rearrangements in living epidermal cells. Plant Cell. 1998;10:1927–1939. pmid:9811799
  15. 15. Granger CL, Cyr RJ. Microtubule reorganization in tobacco BY-2 cells stably expressing GFP-MBD. Planta. 2000;210:502–509. pmid:10750909
  16. 16. Granger CL, Cyr RJ. Spatiotemporal relationships between growth and microtubule orientation as revealed in living root cells ofArabidopsis thaliana transformed with green-fluorescent-protein gene construct GFP-MBD. Protoplasma. 2001;216:201–214. pmid:11732188
  17. 17. Van Damme D, Van Poucke K, Boutant E, Ritzenthaler C, Inzé D, Geelen D. In vivo dynamics and differential microtubule-binding activities of MAP65 proteins. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:3956–3967. pmid:15557096
  18. 18. Mao G, Chan J, Calder G, Doonan JH, Lloyd CW. Modulated targeting of GFP-AtMAP65-1 to central spindle microtubules during division. Plant J. 2005;43:469–478. pmid:16098102
  19. 19. Korolev AV, Chan J, Naldrett MJ, Doonan JH, Lloyd CW. Identification of a novel family of 70 kDa microtubule-associated proteins in Arabidopsis cells. Plant J. 2005;42:547–555. pmid:15860013
  20. 20. Fache V, Gaillard J, Van Damme D, Geelen D, Neumann E, Stoppin-Mellet V, et al. Arabidopsis kinetochore fiber-associated MAP65-4 cross-links microtubules and promotes microtubule bundle elongation. Plant Cell. 2010;22:3804–3815. pmid:21119057
  21. 21. Lucas JR, Courtney S, Hassfurder M, Dhingra S, Bryant A, Shaw SL. Microtubule-associated proteins MAP65-1 and MAP65-2 positively regulate axial cell growth in etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyls. Plant Cell. 2011;23:1889–1903. pmid:21551389
  22. 22. Inaba H, Yamamoto T, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, Matsuura K. Molecular encapsulation inside microtubules based on Tau-derived peptides. Chem Eur J. 2018;24:14958–14967. pmid:30088680
  23. 23. Kar S, Fan J, Smith MJ, Goedert M, Amos LA. Repeat motifs of tau bind to the insides of microtubules in the absence of taxol. EMBO J. 2003;22:70–77. pmid:12505985
  24. 24. Inaba H, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki T, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, et al. Stabilization of microtubules by encapsulation of the GFP using a Tau-derived peptide. Chem Commun. 2019;55:9072–9075. pmid:31268098
  25. 25. Inaba H, Sueki Y, Ichikawa M, Kabir AMR, Iwasaki T, Shigematsu H, et al. Generation of stable microtubule superstructures by binding of peptide-fused tetrameric proteins to inside and outside. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabq3817. pmid:36070375
  26. 26. Inaba H, Yamada M, Rashid MR, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, et al. Magnetic force-induced alignment of microtubules by encapsulation of CoPt nanoparticles using a Tau-derived peptide. Nano Lett. 2020;20:5251–5258. pmid:32525681
  27. 27. Inaba H, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, Matsuura K. Structural changes of microtubules by encapsulation of gold nanoparticles using a Tau-derived peptide. Chem Lett. 2022;51:348–351.
  28. 28. Inaba H, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki T, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, et al. Fluorescent Tau-derived peptide for monitoring microtubules in living cells. ACS Omega. 2019;4:11245–11250. pmid:31460226
  29. 29. Watari S, Inaba H, Tamura T, Kabir AMR, Kakugo A, Sada K, et al. Light-induced stabilization of microtubules by photo-crosslinking of a Tau-derived peptide. Chem Commun. 2022;58:9190–9193. pmid:35929838
  30. 30. Nakagawa T, Kurose T, Hino T, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Niwa Y, et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;104:34–41. pmid:17697981
  31. 31. Zhang X, Henriques R, Lin S-S, Niu Q-W, Chua N-H. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:641–646. pmid:17406292
  32. 32. Nakamura M, Ehrhardt DW, Hashimoto T. Microtubule and katanin-dependent dynamics of microtubule nucleation complexes in the acentrosomal Arabidopsis cortical array. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:1064–1070. pmid:20935636
  33. 33. Pédelacq J-D, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:79–88. pmid:16369541
  34. 34. Fujii Y, Kodama Y. In planta comparative analysis of improved green fluorescent proteins with reference to fluorescence intensity and bimolecular fluorescence complementation ability. Plant Biotechnol. 2015;32:81–87.
  35. 35. Vavrdová T, Šamajová O, Křenek P, Ovečka M, Floková P, Šnaurová R, et al. Multicolour three dimensional structured illumination microscopy of immunolabeled plant microtubules and associated proteins. Plant Methods. 2019;15:22. pmid:30899319
  36. 36. Sampathkumar A, Lindeboom JJ, Debolt S, Gutierrez R, Ehrhardt DW, Ketelaar T, et al. Live cell imaging reveals structural associations between the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2302–2313. pmid:21693695
  37. 37. Tian J, Han L, Feng Z, Wang G, Liu W, Ma Y, et al. Orchestration of microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton in trichome cell shape determination by a plant-unique kinesin. McCormick S, editor. eLife. 2015;4:e09351. pmid:26287478
  38. 38. Petrášek J, Schwarzerová K. Actin and microtubule cytoskeleton interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12:728–734. pmid:19854097
  39. 39. Takeuchi M, Staehelin LA, Mineyuki Y. Actin-microtubule interaction in plants. cytoskeleton—structure, dynamics, function and disease. IntechOpen; 2017.
  40. 40. Nakamura M, Naoi K, Shoji T, Hashimoto T. Low concentrations of propyzamide and oryzalin alter microtubule dynamics in Arabidopsis epidermal cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1330–1334. pmid:15509858
  41. 41. Somssich M, Vandenbussche F, Ivakov A, Funke N, Ruprecht C, Vissenberg K, et al. Brassinosteroids influence Arabidopsis hypocotyl graviresponses through changes in mannans and cellulose. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021;62:678–692. pmid:33570567
  42. 42. Huang S, Jin L, Du J, Li H, Zhao Q, Ou G, et al. SB401, a pollen-specific protein from Solanum berthaultii, binds to and bundles microtubules and F-actin. Plant J. 2007;51:406–418. pmid:17559515
  43. 43. Cabrales Fontela Y, Kadavath H, Biernat J, Riedel D, Mandelkow E, Zweckstetter M. Multivalent cross-linking of actin filaments and microtubules through the microtubule-associated protein Tau. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1981. pmid:29215007