Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Trends in dental care utilisation among the elderly using longitudinal data from 14 European countries: A multilevel analysis

  • Nóra Kovács ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

  • Orsolya Liska,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Faculty of Dentistry, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

  • Enoabasi Omonigho Idara-Umoren,

    Roles Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

  • Nour Mahrouseh,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

  • Orsolya Varga

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, Office for Supported Research Groups, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Budapest, Hungary



The use of dental care among older people is low compared to other forms of health care, with significant health consequences. However, the evidence on the extent to which countries’ welfare systems and socio-economic factors influence the uptake of dental care by older people is limited. This study aimed to describe trends of dental care utilisation, and to compare use of dental care with other types of healthcare services among the elderly, considering different socio-economic factors and welfare systems in European countries.


Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed using longitudinal data from four waves (between Wave 5 and 8) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe database, with a follow-up period of 7 years. The study sample included 20,803 respondents aged 50 years or older from 14 European countries.


The annual dental care attendance was the highest in Scandinavian countries (85.7%), however, improving trends of dental attendance was recognized in Southern and Bismarckian countries (p<0.001). The difference in use of dental care services between socio-economic groups was expanding over time regarding low- and high-income level and residential area. A more marked difference was observed between social groups in dental care utilisation compared to other forms of care. Income level and unemployed status had significant effect on forgoing dental care due to cost and unavailability.


The observed differences between socioeconomic groups may highlight the health consequences of the different organization and financing of dental care. The elderly population could benefit from adopting policies aiming to reduce the financial barriers to dental care usage, especially in Southern and Eastern European countries.


In the high- and middle-income member states of the European Union (EU), oral diseases are still representing a major public health challenge: dental caries in permanent teeth, periodontal diseases, edentulousness, and other oral conditions accounted for 2.31 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years in 2019 [1, 2]. The more economically developed countries, generally, have the lowest rates of untreated tooth decay and severe periodontitis. Accordingly, within the EU, dental caries is a problem mostly for people from Eastern Europe and socio-economically disadvantaged groups covering elderly [3]. Oral diseases are not evenly distributed in society, over 50% of the European population have a form of periodontitis and it is increasing with age [3]. Natural ageing makes the elderly more susceptible to oral diseases, yet regular use of dental care is rare for several reasons including high costs of treatment, fear, availability and accessibility of services, or lack of perception of need [46]. This creates a population with a high prevalence of oral and dental diseases such as dental caries, periodontal disease and multiple tooth loss. The EU has increasingly ageing population [7], and a healthy ageing population can be achieved with better access to healthcare services including dental care [8].

Chronic oral diseases influence the quality of life due to pain, chewing, speaking and aesthetic functions of the teeth [911]. Moreover, oral health is an important part of the general health and the two can affect each other [12]. Poor oral health is associated with general health and a range of chronic conditions, including frailty [13]. Frailty, which is considered a significant public health concern related to the ageing population, is defined as a state of increased vulnerability to stressors leading to adverse health outcomes such as dependency, disability and cognitive impairment [14]. Frailty has also been shown to have a negative impact on the use of dental services and oral self-care among older people [15].

There are no consistent statistics on the frequency of dental screening for different age groups in different countries. In general, older adults need more frequent dental screening because of the increased risk of age-related oral changes. Although older people are less likely to visit the dentist in several countries [4, 16], there are some countries where a higher frequency of use of dental care can be observed among elderly compared with younger people [17]. The frequency of dental check-ups can vary greatly from one individual to another, and there are many factors that could affect the use of dental services, including the type of health care system, dental insurance coverage, and socio-economic status (SES) including household income and education level [5, 18]. People with lower SES fail to seek dental care due to the lack of financial resources [19], that may result in multiple tooth loss and thus impaired quality of life. Catastrophic oral health expenditure can be prevented if access to dental care is guaranteed. In the EU, expenditure on dental care is more constrained, due to limited service packages and higher level of cost sharing. On average, only around 30% of dental treatment costs are paid for by national schemes or compulsory insurance [1]. In only three EU countries (Croatia, Germany, and Slovakia) more than half of total expenditure due to dental care is covered, and there are countries (Greece and Spain) where the costs of dental care for adults without a specific entitlement are not paid at all [1]. However, voluntary health insurance can play an important financial protection role when dental care is not included in a comprehensive care package but this depends significantly on income, which is typically lower among older people [1].

To compare health outcomes or health inequalities between countries, using the concept of the welfare state may serve the purpose better than relying on the health system alone, as health is highly dependent on socio-economic factors that governments influence through a complex network of policies. Despite the heterogeneity of functional capacity in older age groups, ageing is often associated with increased support needs, which makes welfare state policies particularly relevant for this age group [20]. The welfare state can be categorised and examined in many ways [21]. Building on the Esping-Andersen’s typology [22], Ferrera [23] introduced a modified typology (including Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern welfare states) that focuses on differences in the way social benefits are provided rather than focusing on the quantity of welfare given [24]. An important step forward in the research on welfare regimes was the inclusion of a fifth type of regime by Eikemo et al. [25], the Eastern European regime which is characterised by a series of economic instability and social reforms [26]. A number of previous studies have investigated the link between welfare state regimes and oral health inequalities in a wide range of European countries, using the modified Ferrera typology [2730].

Understanding the extent to which the uptake of dental care lags behind other medical care, how socio-economic factors determine the use of dental care, and the extent to which welfare systems can compensate for the uptake gap is important to enable an appropriate policy response. Thus, our aim is to describe the dental care utilisation, and to compare utilisation of dental care services with other types of health care services in European countries in populations over 50 years old.

Materials and methods

Data source

This study was a secondary data analysis of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) survey, which is a cross-national panel study collecting data on health, social, and socioeconomic characteristics from individuals aged 50 years and older, as well as their partners [31]. Data are collected in 27 European countries and Israel. Four waves of the SHARE database were used for this longitudinal study, with a follow-up period of 7 years. The study is based on data from Waves 5 (2013), 6 (2015), 7 (2017), and 8 (2019/2020) of the SHARE survey [3235]. All waves contain detailed retrospective data of respondents aged 50 years or older. Detailed information with regard to the SHARE data survey is indicated elsewhere [31].

SHARE has been continuously reviewed and approved by the Ethics Council of the Max Planck Society. The country implementations of the survey were reviewed and approved by the relevant ethics committees or institutional review boards in each country. All participants provided written informed consent and all data provided by SHARE are anonymized.

Study samples

The longitudinal sample included 20,803 respondents aged 50 years or older who provided data on use of healthcare (medical doctor visits, dental care, hospitalization) and for covariates in all four waves of SHARE. Participants with other citizenship than the investigated countries were excluded from our study. Since the study is based on longitudinal data at four cross-sectional time points, we used data from those 14 European countries where data from all four waves were available: Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, Czech Republic, Estonia, and Slovenia.


Demographic, socioeconomic and health variables.

The demographic variables in the analysis included gender, age (respondents aged 50 years and older at the time of interview). Four individual-level variables were used as indicators of SES including educational attainment, income level, employment status and residential area. Educational attainment was coded to three categories using International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED): none/primary (ISCED scores 0 and 1), secondary (ISCED scores 2–4), and tertiary (ISCED scores 5 and 6) [36]. We used the self-reported household (after-tax) income and created four categories for the average monthly household income for each country, as follows: low income (0-25th percentile), middle income (25th-50th percentile), upper middle income (50th-75th percentile), and high income (75th percentile or higher). Income of non-respondents was calculated based on the provided imputations for each wave of SHARE. Employment status was categorized as employed, unemployed, permanently sick or disabled, retired and other (including homemakers), and the residential area was classified as urban or rural. Other variables regarding health status were also included in the models, as activity limitation (based on the Global Activity Limitation Index [37], number of chronic diseases (whether the respondent reported being diagnosed with chronic disease: 0, 1 and 2 or more), self-perceived health (excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor), and use of any medication.

To investigate how different European welfare state types affect the healthcare attendance, the 14 countries were categorized into the following four welfare state regimes: Scandinavian (Denmark, Sweden), Bismarckian (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Switzerland), Southern (Italy, and Spain), and Eastern (Czech Republic, Estonia, and Slovenia) [22, 38].

Outcome variables.

The use of dental care, medical care and hospitalization was explored in this study. Participants were asked the questions “During the last twelve months, have you seen a dentist or a dental hygienist?”, “During the last 12 months, about how many times in total have you seen or talked to a medical doctor or qualified/registered nurse about your health?”, “During the last twelve months, have you been in a hospital overnight?”. Regarding the medical doctor/nurse visits, a binary variable was created based on the numeric answers, which were classified as “0” and “At least 1”.

Data from Wave 8 include information about forgoing dental care and its reasons (cost and unavailability/inaccessibility). The participants in wave 8 were asked about “During the last twelve months, which of the following types of care did you forgo because of the costs you would have to pay, if any?” and “During the last twelve months, which of the following types of care did you forgo because they were not available or not easily accessible, if any?” followed by a list of types of care including dental care.

Data analysis.

Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the baseline study sample. Study participants were aggregated into groups based on attendance, and percentages of respondents for those attended and not attended healthcare were calculated across explanatory variables. The attendance rate was calculated for SES indicators and urbanization by baseline characteristics of participants to investigate the change over time.

The Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) were used to measure the absolute and relative inequalities in use of dental care and healthcare services according to SES indicators with hierarchical order (education and income level) [39]. The ridit score for estimating SII and RII was calculated [40]. Rate ratio for Poisson regression (considered as RII) and beta coefficient for linear regression (considered as SII) with 95% CI were reported. All models were adjusted for age, gender, place of residence, employment status, number of chronic diseases, activity limitation, medication use, self-reported health status and country. Educational and income level at each wave were transformed into a ridit score (scaled between 0 and 1) corresponding to the midpoint of the cumulative proportion of the population of each SES category.

The SII can be interpreted as the absolute difference in the healthcare attendance experience between the highest and lowest level SES. On the other hand, RII is the ratio of reporting healthcare attendance between the higher and lower levels of SES groups. A SII value higher than 0 and a RII value higher than 1 indicate that the use of healthcare services is more common among those with higher SES.

Chi-square test for trend analysis was performed for proportions of healthcare attendance during study period across each welfare state regime and SES indicators.

We used multilevel models, where the repeated individual observations (level 1) are nested within countries (level 2). We constructed a mixed-effect multilevel logistic regression model (as the outcome measures were binary) investigating the associations between use of medical, dental care and hospitalization and demographic, SES, urbanization and health variables.

In addition, we constructed two models separately for reasons of forgoing dental care based on data from Wave 8. First, we tested whether the odds of reporting forgone dental care varied across SES markers in Model 1, adjusted for individual level variables (age, gender, self-perceived health, number of chronic diseases, medication use, and activity limitation). In Model 2 a country-level variable (welfare state regime) was added to the previous model.

Since oral health status might be associated with use of dental care services, we conducted the following sensitivity analyses: First, a multiple imputation was used regarding missing data in wave 7, with pain in teeth/mouth variable (N = 14,389) being imputed and added to the model as potential predictor. Secondly, the analysis was performed only for the baseline year (in wave 5), and pain in teeth/mouth and number of teeth (available only in wave 5) variables were added to the model.

The model fitness was assessed using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), where the smaller AIC value is indicating a better model fit. The intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated to measure the degree of clustering of individuals within the same country. Odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. P-values smaller than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed in Stata (version 13, Stata Corp., USA).


The study sample consisted of 20,803 participants aged 50 years and older from 14 European countries, who were available during the study period (2013–2020). The mean age of participants was 65.33 (SD 8.57) at baseline (in 2013), and 57.5% of the sample were women. Overall, 16.4% of participants had none or low level of education, two-third (65.5%) of them were living in urban areas, and more than half of the respondents (57.5%) were retired. Almost half (47.8%) of them had under the median household annual net income. Majority of the study participants (44.3%) came from Bismarckian welfare state. 63.4% of the respondents visited the dentist, 89.8% seen a medical doctor and 13% of them were admitted to hospital in the preceding 12 months (Table 1).

Table 1. Distribution of study sample by dental care attendance, medical care attendance and hospitalization, by demographic, socioeconomic and health variables and welfare state regimes, at baseline (in 2013).

Overall, the highest percentage of participants with dental attendance within one year was found for the Scandinavian welfare system (85.7% in 2019/2020), followed by the Bismarckian (74.8%), Eastern European (53%), and Southern countries (38%). Regarding medical care attendance and hospitalization, lower variability was observed across welfare states (Table 2).

Table 2. Trend analysis for proportion of respondents who reported dental care, medical care, and hospital attendance during the preceding 12 months of interviews by welfare state regime.

Chi-square test for trend analysis showed that use of healthcare services among participants increased in most countries. The highest improving trend in dental care attendance was observed in Southern (p<0.001) countries, followed by Bismarckian (p<0.001) countries, while the rate of attenders did not change significantly in Scandinavian and Eastern European countries between 2013 and 2020 (Table 2).

Social inequalities were observed more likely in dental care attendance compared with the other two forms of care (see S1S3 Figs). Educational level showed the highest variability among patients regarding dental care attendance, people with lowest level showed a higher increase in attendance over time. It appears (especially in terms of income level and urbanization) that while the gap between SES groups was constant or has been declined over time in medical care and hospitalization, it was expanding in dental care. The gap in attendance rate between participants with low- and high-income level has increased from 13.3% to 17.5%, while from 3.5% to 4.6% among participants living in rural versus urban region (S1-S3 Figs).

After adjusting all covariates, absolute and relative income inequalities in use of dental care increased over the study period (p<0.001). Relative income inequalities increased from 1.14 (1.1–1.19) in wave 5 to 1.27 (1.22–1.32) in wave 8. For SII, the similar significantly increasing trend was observed, while relative educational inequalities slightly decreased (p = 0.049). However, both educational and income inequalities were higher for dental care attendance compared to medical care and hospitalization (Table 3), even after adjusting for the oral health related variables in the sensitivity analysis (S1 Table). According to the stratified estimates by welfare state regimes, the extent of educational and income inequalities in use of dental care varied more across welfare states than for other forms of care. A significant increasing trend was observed in relative and absolute income inequalities in Bismarckian and Southern countries, and not significant increase in Scandinavian countries (S2 Table).

Table 3. Relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequalities related to dental care, healthcare attendance and hospitalization.

According to the multilevel analysis, although the 55–59 and 60-64-years age groups showed significantly higher attendance rates, a continuous decline in dental care attendance was observed from 65 years onwards with significant association for those 75 years and older. Those with higher educational attainment and living in urban areas were more likely to attend both dentist and medical doctor within one year. The increasing level of average household income showed significant association with higher probabilities of dental and medical care attendance. Unemployed status was found to be significantly lowering the likelihood of having dental and medical check-up compared with employed participants. A higher number of comorbidities was significantly associated with the use of any type of service. Those with poorer self-reported health status used significantly less dental care, in contrast, the opposite trend was observed for medical care and hospitalization (Table 4).

Table 4. Multilevel logistic regression model for determinants of dental care attendance, medical care attendance and hospitalization.

For the welfare state regime in the analyses, respondents from Southern (OR = 0.1 (0.04–0.25)), and Eastern European (OR = 0.18 (0.08–0.4)) countries were significantly less likely to having regular dental care visits, which was not observed for other types of healthcare services. A rate of annual dental care visits generally increased significantly over time among participants (2019/2020 vs. 2013: OR = 1.28 (1.22–1.34)), while a significant increase was also observed in rates of medical care visit (2019/2020 vs. 2017: OR = 1.15 (1.06–1.24)) and hospitalization (2019/2020 vs. 2017: OR = 1.12 (1.05–1.18)) from wave 7 to 8 (Table 4).

The analyses including oral health status variables (presence of pain in teeth/mouth and number of teeth), performed as sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the main results (S3 Table).

Relatively small number of participants reported any reason, including forgone dental care due to cost (N = 635, 3.06%) and due to unavailability/inaccessibility (N = 233, 1.12%). In multilevel models the income level and unemployment status showed significant association with forgoing dental care due to cost and unavailability. After adding welfare state regime as second level variable to the analysis (Model 2), the country level variance reduced (ICC = 7.81% and 7.05%). The Eastern European (OR = 4.00 (1.36–11.72)) and Southern (OR = 3.71 (1.14–12.04)) welfare states were significantly associated with forgone dental care due to unavailability, regardless of individual factors (Tables 5 and S4).

Table 5. Multilevel logistic regression analysis for forgoing dental care due to cost and unavailability in wave 8.


This study compared the use of dental care with the use of medical services among the elderly by SES and welfare systems. While medical care attendance and hospitalization are increasing with age due to the general health condition, mobility and disability, the dental-care non-attendance increases from the age of 65 and is highest over 75 years. People in older age groups have limited access to dental care services for a number of reasons, including lack of dentists and long waiting time, but other common barriers are related to the cost of dental treatment, dental anxiety and fear, as Borreani and colleagues found [4]. Furthermore, the decrease in participation in regular screening can be explained by a decrease in demand for the service [41]. The perceived need for dental check-ups among people who use dental prostheses is decreasing, especially among older age groups [4]. In addition, frailty and functional disability in older ages may also have an impact on oral hygiene routines and regular dental visits [13]. Frailty in combination with a lack of belief that a dentist could improve their oral health can further contribute to lower use of dental care services [15].

We identified significant differences in attendance in dental care among the elderly between welfare state systems. The lowest level of annual non-attendance was found in Southern countries, followed by the Eastern European and the Bismarckian welfare-state regimes, while the highest attendance was observed in Scandinavian countries. A rate of annual dental care visits increased significantly over time in Bismarckian and Southern welfare state regimes, while respondents from Southern and Eastern European countries were significantly less likely to have regular dental care visits after adjusting for demographic, socio-economic and health-related factors. Our findings also showed a significant increase in income inequalities in Bismarckian and Southern welfare state regimes. The differences in dental care visits may partially be attributed to behavioral and cultural differences in how the need for access to dental care is embedded in health thinking [42]. Our findings suggest that the Scandinavian welfare state regime is associated with higher rate of dental care attendance, which is in line with the literature that suggests that the oral health of the Nordic population is better due to the more redistributive and universal welfare system [27], including better care for the elderly, as municipalities (partly) cover their dental costs, as in Denmark and Norway [43]. Sweden also provides special dental care subsidies for certain population groups [19]. Furthermore, unequal access to oral health services could be a reason for the development of oral health diseases for socially disadvantaged groups. Studies from Sweden showed that the lack of access to dental care services explained about 60% of the socioeconomic differences in poor oral health [44]. However, access to care is not the only issue, results of past studies showed that coverage of dental care costs may help in access and the usage of dental care services, but it is still scarce in socioeconomic disadvantaged groups [44].

We may speculate that the benefits and services provided by the Scandinavian and Bismarckian welfare regimes mitigate better barriers to doctor’s visit by those living at lower socioeconomic levels. Regional availability of healthcare services and providers and perception about oral health are further determinants of unequal utilisation of dental care services [45]. A recent study reports that the health system-level factor, referring to regional availability of services, and the perception of regular dental treatment as “not necessary” were more often reported as the reasons of dental non-attendance in the Southern, Eastern, and Bismarckian welfare-state regimes than in Scandinavian countries [30].

Health-related behaviors can also explain oral health inequalities across European welfare state regimes, particularly in Scandinavian and Eastern countries [46]. Previous research found an independent cultural effect in the perceived oral impact on quality of life and the need of treatment among elderlies in Britain and Greece [47]. In addition, others have found that lower SES is a risk factor for poor oral health knowledge and inadequate oral hygiene habits [48], while higher health literacy is associated with better oral health behaviours [49].

The disparities in the use of dental care between social groups were greater than for other health services. Elderlies with higher incomes had significantly higher use of dental care over time than those with lower incomes. More general poverty may play an important role when families/individuals save to use other health services. Lower-income families who reported financial hardship are less likely to be able to afford health services and more likely to postpone or cancel medical visits [50, 51]. Out-of-pocket costs can result in a higher level of unmet needs for dental care due to financial reasons compared to other types of care [52]. However, public coverage of dental care does not necessarily mean that people in any country have unlimited access to dental services. There is some evidence that cost barriers for older adults occur regardless of the cost coverage of dental care services [53]. In most countries, the normative coverage is limited to standard materials; materials that provide higher quality dental care and thus better health outcomes have to be paid for out-of-pocket by the patient. Financial protection measures exist in some countries for specific population groups, such as low-income or other vulnerable groups (the elderly). However, even mitigating measures such as the high-cost protection scheme in Sweden do not necessarily fully alleviate out-of-pocket burdens [54]. At European level, there are currently no detailed common guidelines for the treatment and management of patients with oral health problems, which makes it difficult to compare the coverage and accessibility of oral health services [19].

Similarly to our results, others found different patterns of dental attendance between urban and rural residents [5557], which may suggest that financial barriers have greater impact on access to dental services among elderlies living in rural areas [56]. In addition, in line with the literature, it was found in our study that presence of chronic diseases and poor general health are associated with less use of dental care [41].

Only small percentage of the participants reported forgoing dental care due to cost or unavailability of dental services. After adding welfare state regimes to the analysis, the main SES predictors (income level and unemployed status) remained significant. Participants living in the Eastern and Southern European countries were more likely to experience inadequate access to dental services, even after accounting for confounders. This is partly due to the design and financing of the health care system and partly due to the less favourable socioeconomic situation of the population [58].

The multiple barriers to access dental care services by elderly require specific actions [59]. One of the leading reasons, however, is the financial barrier, which requires interference in the insurance system and even a rethinking of the separation of dental care versus other medical care. Several policy options have been proposed to reduce the financial barriers to dental care. Potential fiscal policy solutions fall into two broad categories: extending dental insurance coverage and reforming population coverage to provide increased financial protection [60].

Since medical service utilisation is associated with increased probability of dental attendance [61], integration of dental with medical services could be a possible way to increase accessibility and utilisation of dental care [57]. In older age groups, there is a need for closer integration of dental care and medical care; dental care being typically provided by dentists today separately from the (primary) care team. Furthermore, health promotion and social policies should start at an early stage of life, as well as more policy actions should enhance and promote the need to seek oral care regularly and early, ensuring adequate accessibility to older age groups [62]. Although little is known about the extent to which interventions can change oral health behavior [63], the promotion of a healthy lifestyle is therefore seen as the gateway to healthy ageing [64].

Strength and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth study to investigate longitudinally the use of dental and medical care among the elderly population in European countries, taking into account socio-economic factors and welfare state characteristics when comparing the use of different services. Data were used from nationally representative SHARE study. A further strength of our study is the large sample size. In addition, our findings are based on longitudinal data (7 years follow-up) allowing the causal inference. Given the longitudinal study design, we could measure how variations in socio-economic and health-related circumstances affect dental attendance. Such high-quality results can provide the basis for evidence-based health policy decisions to refocus the organisation and financing of dental care.

Our study has limitations due to data availability, restricting our analysis to only the data available in the four waves and not being able to include lifestyle factors such as diet, smoking and physical activity. Further limitation is that data on current oral health status and number of teeth of respondents were not incorporated into the models due to their unavailability in all waves, however, we used these variables in the sensitivity analyses from all the available years.

Our analysis was based on self-reported information on SES and health status which may lead to potential bias. Self-reported responses may be affected by recall bias, as elderlies were asked about past visits of medical and dental care. Furthermore, medical care provides a broader range of services, which may also influence the higher use of medical care compared to dental care, however, we adjusted for the number of chronic diseases and self-reported health status in the multivariate analysis. Another limitation may be that selective attrition may bias our results, which is common in longitudinal studies focusing on older adults [65]. Since attrition in older age groups is more related to decreased health status [66], the participants in our longitudinal sample may have better general and oral health than the general older population. Although, there were no demographic differences between participants who remained in the study and those who were not available across all waves, with the only exception for education—those who were not eligible to the longitudinal setting were less educated. Due to this dropout, our results might underestimate the strength of association between SES and use of services. Further research is needed to include a wider range of explanatory factors, including indicators of oral health and frailty.


This longitudinal study found that inequalities in utilisation of dental care exist between welfare state regimes and are broader among social groups compared to other forms of care. The elderly population could benefit from adopting policies aiming to reduce the barriers to access to dental care and promote the need to seek regular and early dental care, especially in Southern and Eastern European countries. Given the relationship between chronic diseases and oral health, it would be worthwhile to explore the changes in quality of life and health care costs with regard to access to and utilisation of dental care in the elderly.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Trend for dental care attendance during the preceding 12 months of interviews by baseline socioeconomic characteristics of respondents (income, education, employment status, and residential area).


S2 Fig. Trend for medical care attendance during the preceding 12 months of interviews by baseline socioeconomic characteristics of respondents (income, education, employment status, and residential area).


S3 Fig. Trend for hospitalization during the preceding 12 months of interviews by baseline socioeconomic characteristics of respondents (income, education, employment status, and residential area).


S1 Table. Relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequalities related to dental care attendance in wave 5.


S2 Table. Relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequalities related to dental care, healthcare attendance and hospitalization by welfare state.


S3 Table. Multilevel logistic regression model for determinants of dental care attendance, with imputed self-reported oral health and number of teeth to the models.


S4 Table. Multilevel logistic regression analysis for forgoing dental care due to cost and unavailability in wave 8.



This paper uses data from SHARE Waves 5, 6, 7 and 8 (DOIs: 10.6103/SHARE.w5.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w6.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w7.800, 10.6103/SHARE.w8.800) see Börsch-Supan et al. (2013) for methodological details [31].


  1. 1. OECD. Health at a Glance: Europe 2020: State of Health in the EU Cycle [Internet]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2020 [cited 2022 May 11]. Available from:
  2. 2. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223–49. pmid:33069327
  3. 3. Patel R. The State of Oral Health in Europe. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2022 Mar 18]. Available from:
  4. 4. Borreani E, Wright D, Scambler S, Gallagher JE. Minimising barriers to dental care in older people. BMC Oral Health. 2008 Mar 26;8:7. pmid:18366785
  5. 5. Palència L, Espelt A, Cornejo-Ovalle M, Borrell C. Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care services in Europe: what is the role of public coverage? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;42(2):97–105. pmid:23786417
  6. 6. Allin S, Farmer J, Quiñonez C, Peckham A, Marchildon G, Panteli D, et al. Do health systems cover the mouth? Comparing dental care coverage for older adults in eight jurisdictions. Health Policy. 2020 Sep 1;124(9):998–1007. pmid:32712013
  7. 7. Eurostat. Ageing Europe, Looking at the lives of older people in the EU [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 18]. Available from:
  8. 8. Patel J, Wallace J, Doshi M, Gadanya M, Yahya IB, Roseman J, et al. Oral health for healthy ageing. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. 2021 Aug 1;2(8):e521–7. pmid:36098001
  9. 9. Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NHJ. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:126. pmid:21050499
  10. 10. Koistinen S, Olai L, Ståhlnacke K, Fält A, Ehrenberg A. Oral health-related quality of life and associated factors among older people in short-term care. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020 May;18(2):163–72. pmid:31782889
  11. 11. Spanemberg JC, Cardoso JA, Slob EMGB, López-López J. Quality of life related to oral health and its impact in adults. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;120(3):234–9. pmid:30763780
  12. 12. Brennan DS, Singh KA. General health and oral health self-ratings, and impact of oral problems among older adults. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(6):469–73. pmid:22112033
  13. 13. Hakeem FF, Bernabé E, Sabbah W. Association between oral health and frailty: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Gerodontology. 2019;36(3):205–15. pmid:31025772
  14. 14. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752–62. pmid:23395245
  15. 15. Niesten D, van Mourik K, van der Sanden W. The impact of frailty on oral care behavior of older people: a qualitative study. BMC Oral Health. 2013 Nov 1;13(1):61. pmid:24175989
  16. 16. Spinler K, Aarabi G, Valdez R, Kofahl C, Heydecke G, König HH, et al. Prevalence and determinants of dental visits among older adults: findings of a nationally representative longitudinal study. BMC Health Services Research. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):590. pmid:31429740
  17. 17. Gülcan F, Ekbäck G, Ordell S, Lie SA, Åstrøm AN. Social predictors of less frequent dental attendance over time among older people: population-averaged and person-specific estimates. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;44(3):263–73. pmid:26854281
  18. 18. Elstad JI. Dental care coverage and income-related inequalities in foregone dental care in Europe during the great recession. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;45(4):296–302. pmid:28220588
  19. 19. Winkelmann J, Gómez Rossi J, Schwendicke F, Dimova A, Atanasova E, Habicht T, et al. Exploring variation of coverage and access to dental care for adults in 11 European countries: a vignette approach. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):65. pmid:35260137
  20. 20. Kalseth J, Donisi V, Miret M, Forsman AK, Cresswell-Smith J. Exploring the Association between Welfare State and Mental Wellbeing in Europe: Does Age Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Jan;19(17):10985. pmid:36078694
  21. 21. Bergqvist K, Yngwe MÅ, Lundberg O. Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities–an analytical review. BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 27;13(1):1234.
  22. 22. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
  23. 23. Ferrera M. The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy. 1996 Feb 1;6(1):17–37.
  24. 24. Bambra C. ‘Sifting the Wheat from the Chaff’: A Two-dimensional Discriminant Analysis of Welfare State Regime Theory. Social Policy & Administration. 2007;41(1):1–28.
  25. 25. Eikemo TA, Bambra C, Joyce K, Dahl E. Welfare state regimes and income-related health inequalities: a comparison of 23 European countries. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(6):593–9. pmid:18927186
  26. 26. Kovacs JM. Approaching the EU and Reaching the US? Rival Narratives on Transforming Welfare Regimes in East-Central Europe. West European Politics. 2002 Apr 1;25(2):175–204.
  27. 27. Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Tsakos G, Sheiham A, Watt RG. Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Jun;121(3 Pt 1):169–75. pmid:23659239
  28. 28. Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Watt RG, Stafford M, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Do welfare regimes matter for oral health? A multilevel analysis of European countries. Health & Place. 2017 Jul 1;46:65–72. pmid:28500911
  29. 29. Manski R, Moeller J, Chen H, Widström E, Listl S. Disparity in dental attendance among older adult populations: a comparative analysis across selected European countries and the USA. Int Dent J. 2016 Feb;66(1):36–48. pmid:26465093
  30. 30. Listl S, Moeller J, Manski R. A multi-country comparison of reasons for dental non-attendance. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2014;122(1):62–9. pmid:24147428
  31. 31. Börsch-Supan A, Brandt M, Hunkler C, Kneip T, Korbmacher J, Malter F, et al. Data Resource Profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2013 Aug 1;42(4):992–1001. pmid:23778574
  32. 32. Börsch-Supan A. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 5. Release version: 8.0.0. [Internet]. SHARE–ERIC; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from: DOI:
  33. 33. Börsch-Supan A. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 6. Release version: 8.0.0. [Internet]. SHARE–ERIC; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from: DOI:
  34. 34. Börsch-Supan A. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 7. Release version: 8.0.0. [Internet]. SHARE-ERIC; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from: DOI:
  35. 35. Börsch-Supan A. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 8. Release version: 8.0.0. [Internet]. SHARE–ERIC; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from: DOI:
  36. 36. UNESCO—UIS. International standard classification of education—ISCED 1997. Secondary International standard classification of education—ISCED 1997; 2006.
  37. 37. Jagger C, Gillies C, Cambois E, Van Oyen H, Nusselder W, Robine JM, et al. The Global Activity Limitation Index measured function and disability similarly across European countries. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):892–9. pmid:20171842
  38. 38. Fenger M. Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences. 2007 Jan 1;3(2):1–30.
  39. 39. Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE. Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: An overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Social Science & Medicine. 1997 Mar 1;44(6):757–71. pmid:9080560
  40. 40. Boston College Department of Economics. RIIGEN: Stata module to generate variables to compute the Relative Index of Inequality [program]. 2013.
  41. 41. Manski R, Moeller J. Barriers to oral health across selected European countries and the USA. Int Dent J. 2020 Oct 28;67(3):133–8.
  42. 42. Marcus K, Balasubramanian M, Short S, Sohn W. Barriers and facilitators to dental care among culturally and linguistically diverse carers: A mixed-methods systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 27; pmid:35342972
  43. 43. Laugesen K, Ludvigsson JF, Schmidt M, Gissler M, Valdimarsdottir UA, Lunde A, et al. Nordic Health Registry-Based Research: A Review of Health Care Systems and Key Registries. Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 19;13:533–54. pmid:34321928
  44. 44. Wamala S, Merlo J, Boström G. Inequity in access to dental care services explains current socioeconomic disparities in oral health: The Swedish National Surveys of Public Health 2004–2005. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Dec;60(12):1027–33. pmid:17108297
  45. 45. Lupi-Pegurier L, Clerc-Urmes I, Abu-Zaineh M, Paraponaris A, Ventelou B. Density of dental practitioners and access to dental care for the elderly: a multilevel analysis with a view on socio-economic inequality. Health Policy. 2011;103(2–3):160–7. pmid:22018444
  46. 46. Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Watt RG, Garzón-Orjuela N, Tsakos G. Explaining oral health inequalities in European welfare state regimes: The role of health behaviours. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2019;47(1):40–8. pmid:30211446
  47. 47. Tsakos G, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Cross-cultural differences in oral impacts on daily performance between Greek and British older adults. Community Dent Health. 2001;18(4):209–13. pmid:11789697
  48. 48. Cepova E, Cicvakova M, Kolarcik P, Markovska N, Geckova AM. Associations of multidimensional health literacy with reported oral health promoting behaviour among Slovak adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Mar 14;18(1):44. pmid:29540168
  49. 49. Márquez-Arrico CF, Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM. Oral health knowledge in relation to educational level in an adult population in Spain. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Dec 1;11(12):e1143–50. pmid:31824595
  50. 50. Vilhjalmsson R. Failure to seek needed medical care: results from a national health survey of Icelanders. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1320–30. pmid:15970241
  51. 51. Vilhjalmsson R. Family income and insufficient medical care: A prospective study of alternative explanations. Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;49(8):875–83. pmid:32862783
  52. 52. Winkelmann J, Henschke C, Scarpetti S, Panteli D. Dental care in Europe: financing, coverage and provision. European Journal of Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;30(Supplement_5):ckaa165.985.
  53. 53. Farmer J, Allin S, Quiñonez C, Peckham A, Marchildon G, (North American Observatory for Health Systems and Policies). Dental Care Coverage for Older Adults in Seven Jurisdictions [Internet]. Converge3: Toronto, Canada; 2019 Aug. Available from:
  54. 54. Vanhuysse P, Medgyesi M, Gal RI. Welfare states as lifecycle redistribution machines: Decomposing the roles of age and socio-economic status shows that European tax-and-benefit systems primarily redistribute across age groups. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0255760. pmid:34432792
  55. 55. Cericato GO, Agostini BA, Costa F dos S, Thomson WM, Demarco FF. Rural-urban differences in oral health among older people in Southern Brazil. Braz oral res [Internet]. 2021 Dec 17 [cited 2022 May 11];35. Available from: pmid:34932664
  56. 56. Herkrath FJ, Vettore MV, Werneck GL. Utilisation of dental services by Brazilian adults in rural and urban areas: a multi-group structural equation analysis using the Andersen behavioural model. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):953. pmid:32552777
  57. 57. Lutfiyya MN, Gross AJ, Soffe B, Lipsky MS. Dental care utilization: examining the associations between health services deficits and not having a dental visit in past 12 months. BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 5;19:265.
  58. 58. Leggett H, Csikar J, Vinall-Collier K, Douglas GVA. Whose Responsibility Is It Anyway? Exploring Barriers to Prevention of Oral Diseases across Europe. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):96–108. pmid:32437634
  59. 59. Belsi A, Gonzalez-Maffe J, Jones K, Wright D, Gallagher JE. Care home managers’ views of dental services for older people living in nursing and residential homes in inner city London. Community Dent Health. 2013 Jun;30(2):77–82. pmid:23888536
  60. 60. Vujicic M, Buchmueller T, Klein R. Dental Care Presents The Highest Level Of Financial Barriers, Compared To Other Types Of Health Care Services. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Dec 1;35(12):2176–82. pmid:27920304
  61. 61. Nurminen M, Blomgren J. Associations of Medical Visits with Dentist Visits: A Register-Linkage Study of a Working-Age Population in Finland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 Jan;18(24):13337. pmid:34948946
  62. 62. Janto M, Iurcov R, Daina CM, Neculoiu DC, Venter AC, Badau D, et al. Oral Health among Elderly, Impact on Life Quality, Access of Elderly Patients to Oral Health Services and Methods to Improve Oral Health: A Narrative Review. J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 28;12(3):372. pmid:35330372
  63. 63. Gao X, Wong ML, Kalhan AC, Xie JJ, Hajar HS, Yeo ABK, et al. Theory-derived intervention to improve oral health of older adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e064791. pmid:36523250
  64. 64. World report on ageing and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015. 246 p.
  65. 65. Hayward RD, Krause N. Forms of attrition in a longitudinal study of religion and health in older adults and implications for sample bias. J Relig Health. 2016 Feb;55(1):50–66. pmid:25257794
  66. 66. Muszyńska-Spielauer M, Spielauer M. Cross-sectional estimates of population health from the survey of health and retirement in Europe (SHARE) are biased due to health-related sample attrition. SSM—Population Health. 2022 Dec 1;20:101290. pmid:36444337