Figures
Abstract
Background
Stroke is one of the leading disabling conditions in the United Kingdom. While an increasing focus on the rehabilitation care for stroke survivors has been noted, practice guidelines, targets and services tend to be tailored for the elderly population rather than young adults.
Objectives
This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on the rehabilitation care experiences and outcomes of young adults post-stroke aged between 18 and 45 years within acute and social care settings.
Methods and analysis
A scoping review was conducted to identify existing practice and published academic and evidence-based literature related to the topic. Arksey and O’Malley’s framework guided the review and reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Electronic databases and grey literature were searched to capture the potentially recent and relevant literature available in English from year 2000–2022. The databases included CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Grey literature was searched from the following sources: Google Scholar, websites of networks, organisations and charities related to stroke. Hand searches were performed on the reference lists of the included articles and grey literature to find relevant references. Data were extracted on young adults’ experiences of stroke and rehabilitation care and their outcomes and experiences of a particular stroke rehabilitation programme in acute and social care settings.
Results
Eighty-five articles were included in this review. In most instances, stroke was reported to negatively impact young adults, although positive consequences were also documented. The focus and the outcomes of stroke rehabilitation were predominantly physical especially in the areas of movement, communication and memory. Young adults experienced a lack of age-adapted stroke rehabilitation in acute and social care settings.
Citation: Chandler C, Clarissa C, Putri AF, Aviles L, Choi H, Hewitt J, et al. (2025) Young Adults Rehabilitation experiences and Needs following Stroke (YARNS): A scoping review of the rehabilitation care experiences and outcomes of young adults post-stroke. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0279523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279523
Editor: I. Gede Juanamasta, STIKES Wira Medika PPNI Bali: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Wira Medika PPNI Bali, INDONESIA
Received: December 9, 2022; Accepted: January 10, 2025; Published: January 31, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Chandler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: As this is a review of published literature, all relevant data are available from the sources cited in text and included in the reference list.
Funding: This work was supported by the SameYou Charity through an RCN Foundation grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Stroke is the third leading cause of disability worldwide and number one among neurological disorders [1,2]. In the UK context, stroke is one of the foremost disabling conditions affecting the population [3]. Although the risk of stroke increases significantly with age [4], in the UK around 6% of new strokes are in the 18–45 age group and almost half of long term stroke survivors are aged between 20–64 years [5].
Stroke in young adults may result in sudden death or a life with severe, moderate, mild or no apparent disability [6]. Post-stroke challenges can include physical, emotional and psychosocial aspects that change younger adults’ lives significantly [7,8]. These changes also impact on how they return to a variety of social activities after stroke such as family, childbearing or childrearing and work [9]. The stroke recovery journey of young adults is unique to each individual, as such this may involve reshaping their life goals and how they perceive themselves [10].
Given their unique recovery journeys and their age-specific needs around family, relationships and career or employment, stroke rehabilitation for young adults should be tailored to the individual [10]. However, research on stroke rehabilitation often assimilates people who have had a stroke as a homogenous group regardless of age. Guidelines, targets and services tend to be focused more on the elderly population and may not address the needs of younger adults following stroke [11,12]. Therefore, there is a pressing need to explore the experiences of young adults diagnosed with stroke, the scale of the needs, and the availability of rehabilitation services to support them. This scoping review aimed to explore the existing literature on the impact of stroke on young adults, the focus and the outcomes of the rehabilitation programmes available to them, and their experiences of accessing stroke rehabilitation across acute and community settings. In the literature the definition of young adults ranges from 18–45 [13–15], 18–55 [8,16,17] and 18–65 years [7,18]. For the purposes of this review we defined young adults as aged between 18 to 45 years.
Methods
The scoping review approach was used to capture and to summarise the body of literature on young adults’ experiences of stroke and stroke rehabilitation from a broad perspective and in a range of settings. The review was structured on Arksey and O’Malley’s [19] methodological framework for scoping studies, which was further developed by Levac et al. [20]. The framework has six stages: 1) identifying the research question, 2) identifying relevant studies, 3) study selection, 4) charting the data, 5) collating, summarising and reporting the results and 6) consultation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines [21] was followed. The review protocol was not published but is available on request.
Stage 1: Identifying the research question
The scoping review set out to answer the following questions:
- What is the impact of stroke on young adults?
- What are the focus and the expected outcomes of stroke rehabilitation in young adults?
- What are young adults’ experiences of stroke rehabilitation care in acute and health and social care settings?
Specific operational definitions and search terms were established in relation to the research questions, which included the rehabilitation settings and the rehabilitation scope. These operational definitions and search terms are provided in S1 Table.
Stage 2: Identifying relevant studies
A comprehensive search strategy was developed to gather the potentially relevant literature published in English over the period 2000–2022. The following databases were searched: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), PsycINFO, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Grey literature was sought through Google Scholar to identify material from the websites of networks, organisations and charities related to stroke. Hand searches were undertaken on the reference lists of the included articles and grey literature to seek any further relevant items. The full search strategy can be found in the (S2 Table).
Stage 3: Study selection
The retrieved articles were considered for inclusion if they were relevant to the aims of the scoping review. All types of publications were considered for inclusion i.e. journal articles, guidelines, books and editorials ensuring that the broadest range of literature was accessed. This review followed the approach of searching the wide spectrum of available literature. This scoping review approach focusses on identifying the broadest range of literature available on a topic regardless of the methodological quality of the articles [19]. Articles that did not report on the experiences of young adults (18–45 years) in stroke rehabilitation or did not include stroke patients within this age group in their rehabilitation programme were excluded. Only publications written in English language were included.
All references derived from the search strategy were imported into the Rayyan software for systematic reviews [22]. Two groups of reviewers (AFP and CCl; HC and LA) screened the titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1) with reasons for exclusions noted. Consensus between reviewers was reached through discussion.
Stage 4: Charting the data
Data extraction was performed using a ’descriptive-analytical’ method for extracting and summarising the information [19]. General information of each included article was collected to provide context, as well as participants’ characteristics, such as age, stroke type and time since stroke onset. Only the subset of data related to young stroke survivors (18–45 years) was extracted in articles where the range of participants’ ages extended beyond this.
Articles were classified into two main groups to facilitate data organisation: (1) young adults’ general experiences of stroke and rehabilitation care (articles that did not explicitly describe an intervention or rehabilitation programme); and (2) young adults’ experiences of particular stroke rehabilitation programmes. For the latter group, the data extraction framework was informed by the logic of realist synthesis using Pawson and Tilley’s context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) heuristic tools [23]. Information was collected regarding (1) the programme name, (2) the contexts (C), (3) the underlying mechanisms (M), and (4) the outcomes (O) of rehabilitation for the young stroke survivors [24,25]. Context referred to circumstances related to a stroke rehabilitation programme that had an impact on outcome [26]. Mechanism referred to resources offered by a stroke rehabilitation programme and how stroke survivors responded to these resources [27]. Outcome in this review included both short and long-term outcomes.
As this review aimed to map the existing literature on the lived rehabilitation care experiences of young adults post stroke informed by realist thinking, it did not seek to identify realist programme theories to provide causal explanation of how a programme works or fails in a given context [28]. Instead, the CMO heuristic tools were employed to collate and present the results.
Data extraction was undertaken by two independent reviewers (AFP, CCl) and the results were compared to assess for consistency and resolution of discrepancies by discussion within the core team (AFP, CCl, LA, HRC, CC).
Stage 5: Collating, summarising and reporting the results
The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was followed in preparing the review report (S3 Table) [21]. A PRISMA diagram [29] was used to summarise the selection process. The review findings are reported and described under three sections that addressed the review questions: (1) the impact of stroke on young adults; (2) the focus and the expected outcomes of stroke rehabilitation for young adults; and (3) young adults’ experiences of stroke rehabilitation.
Stage 6: Consultation
The scoping review was part of a larger research project aiming to explore the range of young adults’ experiences following stroke through their own digital accounts and the published literature, in relation to the formal and informal services available to support them (YARNS project) [30]. The Nursing Studies Ethics Research Panel of the University of Edinburgh approved the study on March 3rd, 2020 (Ref: Staff 173). A patient and public involvement (PPI) group of seven people with personal experience of young stroke advised on all aspects of the YARNS project and acted as ’critical friends’. Stakeholder consultation was undertaken through regular online meetings with the YARNS project partners, research team and the PPI group to provide critical comment related to their experiences on the findings of the preliminary analysis of the scoping review.
Results
Search outcome
The study selection process is summarised in Fig 1. From a total of 9320 identified articles, 404 were considered potentially relevant following title and abstract screening. A further 319 articles were excluded after full-text screening, leaving a final result of 85 articles included in this review.
The general characteristics of the included literature are summarised in Table 2.
Characteristics of included literature
From Table 2 it can be noted that 301 young adults with stroke out of the 1626 total adult stroke sample were identified in the included literature, and 47 of the 85 articles had only one or two young stroke adults in their sample.
The summary characteristics of included literature are presented in Table 3. Most studies originated from the United Kingdom (n = 31, 36.5%) and Australia (n = 19, 22.4%). Of the 85 articles, 39 (45.9%) were published between 2015 and 2022, suggesting a growing interest in the topic area. Qualitative research studies made up over three quarters of the articles (n = 66, 77.7%). Stroke rehabilitation in the studies was delivered mainly in community settings (n = 45, 52.9%).
The impact of stroke on young adults
The impact of stroke on young adults was reported in 39 articles. Both negative and positive consequences were identified. These results are presented in two groups: (1) studies reporting negative consequences and (2) studies reporting positive consequences.
Studies reporting negative consequences.
The negative consequences of stroke on young adults are presented under the following categories: physical, financial, social and psychological impacts.
Physical impacts. The most commonly reported physical impact of stroke was related to changes in body and brain function, such as movement limitations [9,32,74,83], communication problems [35,41,45,76,104] and memory deficits [35]. The influence of physical problems on performance and function seemed to be construed by young adults as a loss of self-identity as they expressed that they were not the same person following stroke [9,16,32,37,77,91]. Several young adults also spoke of their worry that physical disability would affect how other people perceived their body appearance [39,83]. When considering overall differences, participants explained how their energy levels had reduced after having a stroke. They said they “feel tired all the time” or one said, “I feel like I could just lie down all day” [105].
Financial impacts. Young adults who had no financial security reported financial consequences following stroke. They suffered from loss of income due to being unable to return to work [9,35,41,64,75,82,91,95]. Several young adults said that they were not able to access income support due to their invisible disabilities and that they were deemed able to work [82]. As a result, many of them relied on personal savings and financial support from their family [82]. Importantly, young adults attributed their low attendance at rehabilitation programmes to their financial hardships [82].
Social impacts. The social consequences of stroke in young adults were found in their relationships with their spouses or families, within their social circles and with the wider society. Stroke was deemed as altering marital dynamics resulting from a loss of sexual functioning [37,50] and role change of the stroke survivor from spouse to care recipient [9,50]. Marital or partner relationship disruptions were frequently reported in the literature [37,49,64,91,95]. Some examples were a man being left by his wife after his stroke [91] and a breakup between a young woman with a baby and her fiancé following her stroke [49]. An ethnographic study also found that husbands were more likely to leave if their wives had a stroke [64]. These findings further highlighted stroke’s profound impact on marriage and relationships.
The reported impact of stroke on family dynamics was related to physical disability, emotional changes and communication issues following stroke. One young man explained that his stroke limited his ability to interact with his little children, such as playing or carrying them [9]. Several young adults mentioned that they became easily irritated post-stroke and often exhibited anger and temper towards their children and family members [37,91]. A young woman with dysarthria was frustrated when her children silently watched her when she was speaking [45]. Another young adult said she had to send her children away when they were causing her stress and this impacted on her parenting style [105].
Young adults tended to refrain from socialising activities after stroke. They reported that they got exhausted quickly [9,74,100] and they would avoid crowds and noisy places [37,89]. However, having less social interaction could lead to feeling isolated [74,91]. In one case, a man mentioned that he had invited some unknown callers to come inside his house in his desperation to talk to someone after being discharged from the hospital [91]:
When I had the stroke and came home… nobody came… I was that desperate to talk to people, and I know it sounds awful this, but I got a knock on the door by [some unkown callers] and I invited them in for a cup of tea and a chat because they were the only people that came. [91, p6]
Social interaction could be challenging for young adults following stroke. Invisible disabilities, particularly cognitive disabilities, were perceived as being dismissed by other people [37,39]. Some young people also reported that people mistakenly assumed that they were drunk [37]. They also reported their experiences of being socially stigmatised, as it was assumed that their stroke was caused by cigarette smoking or drug use [91].
Young adults following stroke felt stigmatised by a condition that was expected only in older adults. They reported disbelief regarding their stroke diagnosis, claiming that stroke was not supposed to affect young and fit people with healthy lifestyles [16,32,39]. Young adults seemed not to associate the symptoms they experienced as a sign of stroke, nor were they aware that they had had a stroke [32,52,89]. Some examples included dismissing slurred speech as a sign of tiredness, rather than stroke [32], and rejecting a friends’ advice to go to hospital and going home instead [89].
Young adults who sought help at the hospital were often asked to go home by the healthcare staff as their stroke signs were misinterpreted, resulting in delayed treatment. Some examples included severe headache being diagnosed as an inner ear infection and vomiting as being caused by drug use [82]. A young adult reported that she given another appointment in a week despite the computerised tomography (CT) scan confirming her stroke [32]:
And he [the radiologist] held up some x-rays and marked something and said that was a blood, what do you call it? A blood clot. And "You had a stroke. We’ll make an appointment for next week" and of course I went "Yes, sure" I was totally out of it, hadn’t grasped what he just had told me and then I took the CT- pictures…and "OK, see you next week then" and I went out and I was there with a friend and told her everything and she went "Hey, XXX! Why on earth are you still here? I thought you’d had a stroke, don’t you have to get taken in to hospital or something?" "No idea." [32, p155]
Psychological impacts. Some young adults spoke of the psychological impacts of stroke, their fear of recurrent stroke [32,42,91] and death [18,43]. Many young people expressed their grief over their stroke diagnosis with common feelings of denial [9,32,39,51,91,95], bargaining [77], and depression [39,43,49,91]. Several young adults described their grief as a sudden loss of their active self or the death of their old self [9]. Bargaining in young adults was related to an expression of hope that their physical limitations after stroke could be ‘repaired’ [77]:
eh… right now, this hand is not supposed to function. It will require help from the left hand…so there were many such things that–That you in some way became used to… strangely enough. And it probably led to that I felt that–that things worked well. [77, p310]
Depression appeared to be a frequent psychological issue in the literature among the young adults following stroke, with anti-depressants prescribed to deal with their depression [43,47,77] Young adults also conveyed their frustration associated with their whole stroke journey. The frustration was apparent when they received their first stroke diagnosis, returning home, performing personal care activities or daily routines, and maintaining their relationships [8,9,35,37,48,66,88,91]. A few young adults reported experiencing fatigue when performing light jobs or daily tasks at work [35,50,100]. They also expressed that their reliance on significant others, or other people, post stroke for everyday activities led to feeling vulnerable [9,32,37,41,46,64,76,82,102]
Studies reporting positive consequences.
Positive impacts of stroke were reported in 11 of the 85 articles. Young adults said that they appreciated life more following stroke as they were still alive [9,32,100]. Stroke was also considered as shifting their life priorities to focus more on their well-being, some examples being through relaxing activities such as handicrafts and cuddling with pets [99], and learning to practice their spiritual gratitude [32]. Having more time with their spouse and children was seen as a positive impact of stroke [9,49,80], as well as being more engaged with their community [49]. Moreover, young adults shared how they developed personal strength throughout their stroke journey [9,32,41,76,84,88,91], for instance, through humour [91] and by keep pushing and trying to overcome obstacles that they encountered [84,88].
The focus and the expected outcomes of stroke rehabilitation for young adults
In the 85 included articles, only 29 of them specifically evaluated existing rehabilitation programmes [31,33,38,40,44,47,55,57–59,61–63,65,67–72,78,81,86,87,89,92,93,101,103]. The findings of the young adults’ experiences are presented in the context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configuration and summarised in Table 4.
In general, stroke rehabilitation programmes focused on three main outcomes, physical, psychological and wellbeing of stroke survivors. These were categorised into four different types of programme, (1) physical, (2) psychological and well-being, (3) neuro-pharmacological and (4) integrated.
Physical related programmes included stroke rehabilitation programmes that focused on regaining strength in movement, sensorimotor function of upper and lower limb, aerobic endurance, balance, and coordination [33,58,61,62,65,67,69,70,78,92,93,103]. The expected outcomes were improved strength, balance, and mobility. They measured indicators such as stroke survivors’ velocity, endurance, and peak oxygen uptake. The tools used to measure motor functions were the action research arm test (ARAT) and Wolf motor function test (WMFT). The stroke impact scale (SIS) was employed to measure activities of daily living, mobility, and participation. Although the focus from these types of intervention is physical outcomes, it should be noted that the social aspect of the programmes, such as interactions with peers, serve as a mechanism that brings positive impacts on the psychological state of young adults, for instance, increased self-confidence. Participants also highlighted three limitations of physical-related programmes in stroke rehabilitation, including short duration, late start of the programme, and lower priority on sensory issues.
Psychological related stroke rehabilitation programmes addressed psychological and social problems as well as promoting the well-being of stroke survivors, and included communication issues [38,40,44,47,55,57,63,72,81,86,87,89,101,111]. The programme outcomes resulted in improved quality of life and well-being.
Neuro-pharmacological related intervention referred to programmes that used drugs to improve neuro function, such as attention and initiation [31]. Integrated programmes refer to stroke programmes that included more than two stroke services or healthcare teams, such as hospitals, work support agencies, occupational therapist, speech pathologist, and physical therapist [59,68,71]. These types of programme mainly focused on preparing young adults with stroke return to work.
Lastly, our findings suggest that each stroke rehabilitation programme operated in a different context. The context in which each programme was embedded was likely to influence the outcome of the programme. Therefore, it is important to consider these contexts when implementing stroke rehabilitation programmes for young adults. Analysis of the societal health and welfare circumstances in which these rehabilitation programs are embedded is beyond the remit of this review.
Young adults’ experiences of stroke rehabilitation
Acute settings.
Of the 85 included papers, 29 took place in acute settings, including inpatient and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Twenty four of these 29 articles reported the experiences of stroke rehabilitation in the acute setting among young adults. These experiences were related to staff-patient relationships, routines and environment, and age appropriate stroke care.
Patient-staff relationships. The relationship between young adults with stroke and healthcare professionals has been identified as having a substantial influence on their experience as patients in acute settings [10]. Many young adults spoke of their satisfaction with their inpatient experience and highlighted how the care offered by the healthcare staff made them feel safe, comfortable, and reassured regarding their stroke recovery [52,75,77]. Trust was deemed as crucial before young adults could confide in staff [38].
Loss of independence and control were issues identified by young adults, and related to their inability to perform activities without staff assistance [66,81,102]. Therefore, empathy and emotional support from healthcare staff were highly valued by young adults [8,102]. Judgemental comments about their conditions were reported as negative and upsetting by many young adults [8,32,102]. Several also spoke of their negative experiences associated with the situations where their individual preferences were not taken into account by the healthcare staff [81,82,102].
Young adults’ participation in decision making appeared to be accepted as a positive experience, particularly in discharge planning. In one case, a patient was involved in the decision making and invited to attend the multidisciplinary team meetings [53]. This involvement resulted in an agreement of living in the community after hospital discharge, whereas in the first place, the patient intended to live in his previous flat despite his disability [53]. One young patient reported that home visits a week before discharge were helpful to provide expectations of life at home and what adjustments were needed to their physical environment [71].
Effective communication between patient and staff was crucial in improving young adults’ experiences in acute care. The discussion between staff and young adults about their hopes after stroke may promote optimistic thoughts [40]. The following hopes were identified: return to education, embracing spirituality and staying connected with their support system, such as friends and families [40].
Negative experiences related to a lack of communication between young adults and staff were indicated by a lack of discussion of personal goals [85], no rehabilitation assessment before hospital discharge [66], and not understanding the rehabilitation process [34]. Young adults also reported difficulty in processing information received in hospital during the acute phase of their stroke, particularly in understanding the Latin terminology and jargon used by healthcare professionals [44].
Routines and environment. Many young adults with stroke spoke of their routines and the environment of the inpatient rehabilitation setting. They commonly experienced boredom as a result of few activities during their hospital stay [60,81]. Participating in activities was reported as a way to occupy young adults’ time, such as regular rehabilitation training [66] and attending reading sessions [38]. Rehabilitation training was favoured by young adults and the time after the exercise was considered as ‘boring’ [66,102]. A patient also reported feeling optimistic and hopeful after completing an eight-week physical rehabilitation programme [93]. Several patients highlighted that training intensity and duration should be increased [72,93].
With respect to the environment, staying in a single room could feel isolating: ’a prison cell’ [102]. Nevertheless, sharing a room could lead to lack of privacy and the busy environment was described like ’a train station’ [86]. Several young adults spoke of difficulties sleeping at the hospital due to constant noise and staff carrying out observations [8,107].
Age-appropriate stroke care. The provision of appropriate stroke care in terms of patient age group and conditions was central to young adults’ experiences in the acute setting. Young adults often reported that they were admitted to an inpatient setting with no other patients of the same age group. This led to feelings of ‘no camaraderie’ and not being able to share experiences with other patients, which they felt was important [8,34,109]. Being the only young person in inpatient rehabilitation was reported to trigger feelings of terror, frustration and isolation [32] and depression [39]. Young adults reported that the inpatient facilities were designed for older people instead of young people, particularly in terms of the stroke care goals [8]. Furthermore, they mentioned that the information provided in the hospital was less relevant to young adults, for instance, the use of elderly people’s pictures in the information packs and no information about returning to work, access to income support, driving post stroke and the options for contraception [8].
In contrast, positive feelings were generated from the ability to identify with people with similar conditions. Having a shared understanding with other stroke patients in the care settings was mentioned as psychologically beneficial [8]. Many young adults felt encouraged after listening and speaking to stroke survivors who had gone through situations that they could relate to [8,63].
Community and social care settings.
Community and social care settings (beyond inpatient) were reported in 75 out of the 85 articles in this review, with 48 reporting on the rehabilitation experiences of young adults with stroke. These findings are presented under three themes, namely transition from hospital to home, outpatient stroke rehabilitation and community rehabilitation.
Transition from hospital to home. The transition of young adults following stroke from inpatient to home care seemed to be a crucial point in their recovery journey. Whilst being discharged home was perceived as a sign of progress towards resuming normality and returning to personal and calm space [46,86], many spoke of the discontinuity of services after their discharge and felt they had ’slipped through the system’ [8]. They felt that they had been forgotten, betrayed and had lost a sense of the safety provided by healthcare staff during their inpatient care [77]. Reported changes included struggles in carrying out activities at home previously assisted by the hospital staff [66] and the physical difference between the home and hospital environment, such as not having a non-slip floor at home [71].
Young adults often made adjustments to achieve their daily living activities and accommodate any limitations resulting from stroke. Reported strategies included prioritising essential activities, completing tasks one by one and choosing relaxing activities above house chores [9,48,97]. Another common approach was finding ways to compensate for physical impairment, such as using a trolley to carry groceries [103] and dedicating more time to complete a task [95]. Other types of adaptation such as writing lists for memory rehabilitation, were also discussed. One young adult described how doing things like writing lists felt like ‘cheating’ but that he was trying to not put pressure on himself [110].
Outpatient stroke rehabilitation. Most young adults following stroke agreed that outpatient rehabilitation helped them to progress their recovery, ranging from occupational therapy, speech and language therapy, functional electrical stimulation (FES), podiatry, to psychological therapy [45,46,65,68,87]. Positive comments were related to increased physical activity levels [47,65,83], improved speech [45], reduced anxiety from practicing relaxation techniques [87] and increased awareness of their own disability and limitation post-stroke [68]. Nevertheless, young adults reported some aspects of the rehabilitation that did not meet their expectations, including a mismatch between their own and healthcare staff’s rehabilitation goal settings or no clear goal setting, a lack of information about realistic timeframes for rehabilitation, or how tiring it could be, a lack of rehabilitation activities beyond mobility function and the short duration of each session [8,70,75]. Young adults described the importance of transparent goal setting in the context to their overall experiences and their feeling of not being in the ‘driver’s seat’, or being understood, showing the need to address the power imbalance between patients and staff [109].
There are a number of medical devices for use in stroke rehabilitation. Young adults using SaeboFlex®; a device for upper limb rehabilitation, described how using the equipment provided them with hope despite the limited evidence on its effectiveness [106]. Other rehabilitation devices such as exoskeletons were also discussed as having limited practical function in particular whether they could be used outside and in public [108].
Occupation seems to be an important part of young adult’s identity in the literature. Looking for jobs following stroke could trigger anxiety [47,68] and not being able to return to work could result in sadness and depression [47,89]. One young adult stated that returning to work was the ’best’ rehabilitation and it provided a sense of returning to normality by going out and interacting with colleagues [90]. However, return-to-work or vocational rehabilitation was reported to be lacking, thus contributing to the psychological and social impact of stroke for young adults [75,105].
Young adults appeared to show determination, motivation and enthusiasm for stroke rehabilitation beyond the hospital setting. These characteristics were evidenced by high attendance rates and continuous engagement of young adults in their rehabilitation programmes [41,59,69]. Many young adults reported that they wanted to challenge themselves and hard work was required to progress [67,84,88]. A young man articulated his motivation to improve his health status and to control stroke risk factors by managing his blood pressure, whereas in the past this was not his concern [101]. Nevertheless, the repetitive nature of rehabilitation training could also lead to exasperation [89].
Many young adults spoke of their experiences of follow-up services related to information provision and content. Several mentioned receiving limited information from healthcare staff about their post-stroke condition, for instance, the physical, emotional and behavioural changes [8], or when their next brain scan would be and which professional should be contacted for advice [79]. A comprehensive list of accessible services and the information about returning to work and accessing welfare, family, or income support were desired among young adults [8,14,34,82]. They also highlighted the importance of receiving practical advice and understandable information from healthcare professionals [8,44].
Young adults appeared to experience challenges in accessing a range of stroke services in social care settings. They experienced extended delays [8,79] or no access at all to particular stroke rehabilitation services, such as psychological and community-based support [8,66]. Other young adults also mentioned having inconsistent meetings with their therapists and difficulties in reaching out to them [79]. A strict schedule of follow-up services was deemed as limiting as young adults had a range of family and work responsibilities that they needed to work around and negotiate with their spouse [79].
The relationship between young people with stroke and healthcare professionals in the context of social care settings appeared to impact on their recovery journey. Healthcare staff who provided reassurance, encouragement and motivation were reported to empower young stroke survivors in achieving higher mobilisation goals in their recovery [52,88]. In contrast, insensitive and discouraging comments from healthcare staff, for instance, stating that the patient would not be able to drive anymore, were reported to be upsetting and diminishing their hope [8].
Several young adults spoke of their plans after completing the rehabilitation programme. The reported short-term plans included returning to work as a volunteer in a day centre and moving to independent accommodation after living with her carers following stroke [67]. A long-term goal described by a young woman was to be able to dance at her children’s wedding [80]. However, cessation of rehabilitation services in the community setting seems to bring tension to young adults with stroke. Young adults expressed their concern about ending their outpatient physiotherapy sessions [52]. After the rehabilitation services were withdrawn, feelings of isolation and abandonment were commonly reported [89,94]. Nonetheless, having shared experiences with people in the community helped fill the gap that was missing from the withdrawn services [89].
Community rehabilitation. Many young adults reported positive benefits of participating in a community group [8,55]. Rehabilitation programmes in community settings allowed young adults to overcome and progress beyond their set self-boundaries [67]. Group interaction with other stroke survivors and learning from their successes were reported to motivate young adults to push themselves beyond their perceived limits [97].
Young adults spoke of psychological benefits of sharing similar experiences with other young people, providing peer support and encouragement, instilling hope and improving self-esteem through the socialising process [8,55]. These similar findings were also reported by aphasic young adults. They spoke of enjoying their participation in community groups, social, art and craft activities, despite having communication difficulties [76]. Other young adults with aphasia reported the benefit of volunteering in building self-confidence and independence [57].
The group composition appeared to influence young adults’ rehabilitation experiences in the community context. They expressed experiencing difficulties in relating to older people with stroke due to the difference in life stage, including lifestyles and interests [72,79]. In one case of a young woman was admitted to a nursing home, she spoke of her feelings of estrangement being surrounded by older adults [18].
The delivery location of community rehabilitation seemed to be an important aspect of young adults’ experiences. They mentioned that the community building used to deliver the rehabilitation service introduced them to other facilities they could access beyond the programme, for example, the gym and the pools on the same site [67]. The ’youthful’ ambience of the rehabilitation centre that was described as supportive as she did not feel like a patient any more [79].
Discussion
This review aimed to scope the experiences of young adults relating to stroke rehabilitation across the continuum of care settings. Stroke represents a major disruption to life in all dimensions (bio-psycho-social) and in particular for the young adult will impact on the individual, their family, work, activities, participation in society and lifestyle. Rehabilitation and recovery or partial recovery may take years. Such a life event forces a reappraisal and reprioritisation of life goals. In this review experiences were identified at each transition phase of the young adults’ stroke journey. The journey started with the stroke and diagnosis with admission to an acute facility, followed by transfer to inpatient rehabilitation, discharge from hospital, attending rehabilitation in the community setting, and continuing to adjust to the changes resulting from stroke. We identified three key findings across these data: 1) stroke impacted young adults in both negative and positive ways, 2) the focus and the outcomes of stroke rehabilitation were predominantly physical, and 3) young adults experienced a lack of appropriate stroke rehabilitation in both acute and social care settings. These findings highlight the breadth of young adults’ experiences following stroke and the support required to meet their unmet needs.
In our review, we found that young adults experienced enormous physical, financial, social and psychological impacts following stroke. The physical and psychological consequences of stroke in young adults identified in this review are not new and are consistent with previous studies reporting the prevalence of disability, cognitive impairment and depression in stroke survivors across the age groups [112–114]. Physical deficits were perceived as the most problematic and distressing consequences of stroke that tended to lead on to psychological consequences, such as frustration and depression. The disabilities experienced by young adults with stroke were often invisible and misunderstood by others, which further intensified their frustration. With respect to financial and social aspects, the findings were consistent with a prior systematic review that working-age adults experienced financial hardships, difficulties in returning to work and challenges in maintaining relationships with family and friends, and refrained from social activities following stroke [115]. Such financial issues will be dependent on the individual and their circumstances, and the societal, health and welfare frameworks in which they live. Loss of income was a common issue and many were not able to return to work or access support funding, but relied on personal savings and financial support from family [9,35,41,64,75,82,91,95]. Hidden disabilities, such as memory, altered cognition and behavioural changes affected their abiity to return to work or gain alternative employment [82]. Financial hardship also affected their engagement with community rehabilitation opportunities [82]. Whilst the financial hardships and support required were evident in the young adults’ experiences, this area requires further exploration and research.
Stroke diagnosis was reported as triggering feelings of fear and grief among young adults. Nevertheless, several young adults spoke of positive changes following their stroke, for example, that they had more time for their spouse and children and for practising their spirituality and developing their own personal strength. These negative and positive experiences suggest that the traumatic event of stroke is internalised individually. Calhoun and Tedeschi [116] refer to positive changes in response to any traumatic event as posttraumatic growth. According to the authors, there are five dimensions of posttraumatic growth, which are personal strength, new possibilities, relating to others, appreciations of life, and spiritual change. All these dimensions were found in young adults with stroke in the included literature and this finding is echoed by other studies of young survivors of natural disasters [117] and cancer [118]. Nonetheless, how these young adults with stroke obtained posttraumatic growth and the role of healthcare professionals in supporting the process remains unexplored. Future research is warranted to better understand the trajectories of posttraumatic growth among young adults following stroke over time. Understanding this could lead to the development of interventions to foster posttraumatic growth in young adults following stroke.
Across the identified stroke rehabilitation programmes for young adults, the focus and the expected outcomes were predominantly physical. Nevertheless, some programmes were limited to performing basic daily activities, such as making tea or walking. Young adults wanted higher-level physical goals beyond their ability to perform simple daily activities, for instance, preparing them to return to work. Moreover, there were different contexts or circumstances that influenced how each stroke rehabilitation programme worked (or not) for young adults, which led to different outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of person-centred goal setting as opposed to a one-size-fits all approach. We strongly suggest that stroke rehabilitation programmes for young adults should be tailored to their personal goals, considering the different needs that young adults have from older people with stroke.
Although articles generally aimed to evaluate one outcome (e.g. physical or psychological) for each rehabilitation programme, the programmes often had impact on other aspects beyond their main aim, which was evident across the literature. For instance, Beesley et al. [55] conducted a qualitative study to evaluate the impact on wellbeing of an art therapy programme for stroke survivors. Besides the psychological impact of a feeling of accomplishment and confidence, the participants reported experiencing improvements in their speech and cognitive function [55]. In the studies conducted by Casey et al. [69] and Valkenborghs et al. [93], the focus of rehabilitation was explicitly physical. However, the social interaction from attending such programmes had implications on psychological status and well-being of stroke survivors [69,93]. Completing the rehabilitation programme seems to be empowering for young adults, in particular by improving their future outlook enabling them to reprioritize their goals. These findings show the interconnectedness of physical, psychological and social domains in stroke rehabilitation and reinforces the need to create targeted, responsive, age appropriate rehabilitation. Further research to understand the context and the mechanisms by which stroke rehabilitation programmes succeed, or not, is needed to develop future effective interventions.
Marginalisation and invisibility were apparent in the experiences of young adults with stroke in this review, it was further reflected in comments indicating how they felt excluded from stroke rehabilitation and the healthcare system. They reported experiencing stroke-related stigmatisation by society and healthcare staff related to their stroke diagnosis at a young age. They perceived self-stigma about stroke being an older people’s disease, resulting in dismissing the signs of stroke and delays in seeking medical attention. Young adults also mentioned that the stroke rehabilitation programmes were designed for older adults, and they received limited information relevant to their age group, for instance, about employment, family, and income support. It is also important to acknowledge that the healthcare settings and systems in included articles are heterogenous. Therefore, when interpreting young adults’ experiences identified in our findings, these contextual differences of individual countries should be taken into account.
The review identified that young adults were only a small proportion of the total participants included in evaluation studies of stroke rehabilitation programmes. There are two plausible explanations for this phenomenon. Firstly, the authors might not focus their evaluation study on younger adults. Secondly, the available programmes related to stroke rehabilitation did not meet young adults’ needs in the inpatient and social care settings, which meant that only a few of them attended the programmes. Such unmet needs were reported by the young adults within the included studies.
The lack of age-appropriate stroke care and support, particularly around hidden disabilities affecting psychosocial aspects and employment results in a mix of unmet needs for young adults, which could lead to negative experiences in their stroke recovery journey. These areas need to be investigated at the individual, family, community and societal levels to bring realistic change to the experiences of young people following stroke or brain injury.
Limitations
It is important to note that included articles in this review were heterogeneous in terms of outcome measures, publication types and levels of reported detail. They were drawn from the literature published in English and whilst this may lead to a degree of bias towards English speaking countries, it is noted that around 98% of the published scientific literature is published in English [119]. Future action on publication policy with regard to language could address this bias and assist authors across the world to raise the profile of their research to give a more global view.
The numbers of young adults who were reported or participated in the rehabilitation programmes in each article were often small. Whilst this reflects the lower incidence of stroke amongst this group, these individuals will have many years living with the consequences of the stroke; further research focused on this younger age group is needed to equip them for their futures.
This scoping review has addressed the research questions focussing on the impact of stroke, and the rehabilitation experience and outcome for young people following stroke. It has provided descriptions based on the available literature, but cannot be generalised due to the individual nature of the experiences and the variety of contextual issues at personal, community and societal levels.
Recommendations
The recommendations below summarise the priorities identified above from the literature. These are grouped as Research; Service; and Society.
Research.
- Further research is needed to understand the context and the mechanisms by which stroke rehabilitation programmes succeed, or not, and to develop future effective interventions.
- Financial hardships and the support required were evident in the young adults’ experiences and need further exploration and research.
- Understanding trajectories of posttraumatic growth among young adults following stroke over time is needed for the development of interventions to foster this growth.
- The provision of age appropriate stroke care and support needs to be investigated at the individual, family, community and societal levels. This is particularly important around hidden disabilities affecting psychosocial aspects and employment.
- There is a need for global and country specific research on the incidence, prevalence and life expectancies of young people with stroke to understand the impact of this condition across the world.
Service.
- The development of age-appropriate stroke services for young people with activities, demands and information relevant to their age group is needed, especially around employment, family, and income support.
- Stroke rehabilitation programmes for young adults should be tailored to their personal goals, considering the different needs that young adults have from older people with stroke.
Society.
- A greater awareness of stroke affecting young people is needed for both public and professionals to ensure timely recognition and action in the event of a stroke. Public engagement and knowledge exchange activities are required to widen the knowledge and awareness base.
- Action on publication policy with regard to language which favours English-speaking communities is needed to redress the bias and assist authors across the world to raise the profile of their research for a more globally balanced view.
Conclusion
In this review, we have gathered and summarised the experiences of young adults following stroke from literature over the past 22 years. Our findings provide insights into the negative and positive consequences of stroke on young adults’ lives. The unmet needs of young adults in terms of stroke rehabilitation and care are highlighted. This has emphasised the urgent need to research and develop effective and age-appropriate rehabilitation programmes and interventions that can support young adults following stroke.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Research questions, operational definitions and search terms.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279523.s001
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Rowena Stewart for her assistance with literature searching and Chest Heart & Stroke Scotland for support in the recruitment of our patient and public involvement (PPI) group. We are grateful for insights from the members of our PPI group that shaped our understanding of young adults’ rehabilitation experiences after stroke. We thank the wider group of YARNS Project partners for their support and contribution to the project.
References
- 1. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–80. pmid:30879893
- 2. Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795–820. pmid:34487721
- 3.
Stroke Association. Stroke Statistics. https://www.stroke.org.uk/stroke/statistics Accessed 16 Dec 2024.
- 4. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi R V., Parmar P, Norrving B, Mensah GA, Bennett DA, et al. Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990–2013: The GBD 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161–76. pmid:26505981
- 5. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global Burden of Stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–48. pmid:28154096
- 6. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. 2018. p. 1–7.
- 7. Morris R. The Psychology of Stroke in Young Adults: The Roles of Service Provision and Return to Work. Stroke Res Treat. 2011;2011:1–10.
- 8. Shipley J, Luker J, Thijs V, Bernhardt J. How can stroke care be improved for younger service users? A qualitative study on the unmet needs of younger adults in inpatient and outpatient stroke care in Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun 4;42(12):1697–704. pmid:30616439
- 9. Kuluski K, Dow C, Locock L, Lyons RF, Lasserson D. Life interrupted and life regained? Coping with stroke at a young age. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014 Jan;9:1–12. pmid:24461569
- 10. Holloway A, Chandler C, Aviles Reinso L, Clarissa C, Putri A, Choi H, et al. Young Adults Rehabilitation Needs and Experiences following Stroke (YARNS): A review of digital accounts to inform the development of age‐appropriate support and rehabilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Mar 10;78(3):869–82. pmid:34632610
- 11.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack in over 16s: Diagnosis and Initial Management. 2019.
- 12.
National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland. London: Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. 2023.
- 13. Smajlović D. Strokes in young adults: Epidemiology and prevention. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:157–64. pmid:25750539
- 14. Kersten P, Low JTS, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Jan 7;24(16):860–6. pmid:12450462
- 15. Low JTS, Kersen P, Ashburn A, George S, McLellan DL. A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to Young Stroke groups affiliated with the Stroke Association. Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jan;25(18):1052–6. pmid:12944160
- 16. Leahy DM, Desmond D, Coughlan T, O’Neill D, Collins DR. Stroke in young women: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol. 2016 May 27;21(5):669–78. pmid:24867945
- 17. Rutten-Jacobs LCA, Keurlings PAJ, Arntz RM, Maaijwee NAM, Schoonderwaldt HC, Dorresteijn LD, et al. High Incidence of Diabetes after Stroke in Young Adults and Risk of Recurrent Vascular Events: The FUTURE Study. PLOS ONE. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e87171. pmid:24466339
- 18. Dwyer A, Heary C, Ward M, MacNeela P. Adding insult to brain injury: young adults’ experiences of residing in nursing homes following acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan 2;41(1):33–43. pmid:28845724
- 19. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract. 2005;8(1):19–32.
- 20. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology. Implement Sci. 2010 Dec;5(1):69. pmid:20854677
- 21. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. pmid:30178033
- 22. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. pmid:27919275
- 23.
Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1997.
- 24. Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol—Realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11.
- 25. Pawson R. Evidence-based Policy: The Promise of `Realist Synthesis’. Evaluation. 2002;8(3):340–58.
- 26. Jagosh J. Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley’s applied scientific realism. J Crit Realism. 2020;19(2):121–30.
- 27. Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, Cunningham B, Lhussier M. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1–7.
- 28. Brown S, Lhussier M, Dalkin SM, Eaton S. Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(14):2250–66. pmid:29676217
- 29.
PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.pdf
- 30.
YARNS 2020–21—Young Adults Rehabilitation experiences and Needs following Stroke–a Scoping study [Internet]. The University of Edinburgh. 2024. Available from: https://www.ed.ac.uk/health/research/current-research/yarns-transitions/yarns-2020-21
- 31. Tolat RD, O’Dell MW, Golamco-Estrella SP, Avella H. Cocaine-associated stroke: three cases and rehabilitation considerations. Brain Inj. 2000 Jan 1;14(4):383–91. pmid:10815846
- 32.
Immenschuh U. ‘My arm and leg-they are just sleeping’ Perspectives of younger people on their experience of having a stroke. The University of Edinburgh; 2003. Available from https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/724
- 33. Kelly JO, Kilbreath SL, Davis GM, Zeman B, Raymond J. Cardiorespiratory fitness and walking ability in subacute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;84(12):1780–5. pmid:14669183
- 34. Röding J, Lindström B, Malm J, Öhman A. Frustrated and invisible—younger stroke patients’ experiences of the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Jan 7;25(15):867–74. pmid:12851097
- 35. Seibert PS, Stridh-Igo PM, Whitmore TA, Zimmerman CG. Perspectives of Awareness and Cognitive Processing During the Event of Stroke and Subsequent Recovery: Competence Versus Performance. J Cogn Rehabil. 2003;21(4):18–24.
- 36. Logan PA, Dyas J, Gladman JRF. Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2004 Sep;18(6):703–8. pmid:15473122
- 37. Murray C, Harrison B. The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 8;26(13):808–16. pmid:15371053
- 38. Higgins M, Mckevitt C, Wolfe CDA. Reading to stroke unit patients: Perceived impact and potential of an innovative arts based therapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jan 7;27(22):1391–8. pmid:16321921
- 39. Dale Stone S. Reactions to invisible disability: The experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):293–304. pmid:16040531
- 40. Arnaert A, Filteau N, Sourial R. Stroke patients in the acute care phase: Role of hope in self-healing. Holist Nurs Pract. 2006;20(3):137–46. pmid:16672814
- 41. Holland AL. Living Successfully with Aphasia: Three Variations on the Theme. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006 Jan 2;13(1):44–51. pmid:16581629
- 42. Townend E, Tinson D, Kwan J, Sharpe M. Fear of recurrence and beliefs about preventing recurrence in persons who have suffered a stroke. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Dec;61(6):747–55. pmid:17141662
- 43. Anonymous. Suddenly he had nothing. Community Care. 2007;(1659):36–7.
- 44. Allison R, Evans PH, Kilbride C, Campbell JL. Secondary prevention of stroke: using the experiences of patients and carers to inform the development of an educational resource. Fam Pract. 2008 Oct 1;25(5):355–61. pmid:18753289
- 45. Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, Clark AM, Paton G. Patients’ experiences of disruptions associated with post‐stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan;43(2):135–53. pmid:18283594
- 46. Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Reasons for recovery after stroke: A perspective based on personal experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2008 Jan 7;30(7):507–16. pmid:17852260
- 47. Ownsworth TL, Turpin M, Andrew B, Fleming J. Participant perspectives on an individualised self-awareness intervention following stroke: A qualitative case study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Nov;18(5–6):692–712. pmid:17926196
- 48. White JH, Magin P, Attia J, Pollack MR, Sturm J, Levi CR. Exploring Poststroke Mood Changes in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1701–7. pmid:18760154
- 49.
Catalano T, Kendall E, Catalano Tara, Kendall Elizabeth, Catalano , Tara and Kendall E. But stroke happens to older people doesn’t it? The experiences of ‘young’ people following stroke. In: Marshall CA, Kendall E, Banks ME, Gover RMS, editors. Disabilities: Insights from across fields around the world. Vol 1: The. Westport: Praeger; 2009. p. 35–54. (Praeger perspectives.).
- 50. Thompson HS, Ryan A. The impact of stroke consequences on spousal relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(12):1803–11. pmid:19646122
- 51. Norris M, Allotey P, Barrett G. “I feel like half my body is clogged up”: Lay models of stroke in Central Aceh, Indonesia. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(9):1576–83. pmid:20869145
- 52. Salisbury L, Wilkie K, Bulley C, Shiels J. ‘After the stroke’: patients’ and carers’ experiences of healthcare after stroke in Scotland. Health Soc Care Community. 2010 May;18(4): 424–32. pmid:20491968
- 53. Samuel M. New start for stroke survivor. Community Care. 2010;(1809):30–1.
- 54. Townend E, Tinson D, Kwan J, Sharpe M. ‘Feeling sad and useless’: an investigation into personal acceptance of disability and its association with depression following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jun 18;24(6):555–64. pmid:20483889
- 55. Beesley K, White JH, Alston MK, Sweetapple AL, Pollack M. Art after stroke: the qualitative experience of community dwelling stroke survivors in a group art programme. Disabil Rehabil. 2011 Jan 18;33(22–23):2346–55.
- 56. Northcott S, Hilari K. Why do people lose their friends after a stroke? Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 Sep;46(5):524–34. pmid:21899670
- 57. Pearl G, Sage K, Young A. Involvement in volunteering: an exploration of the personal experience of people with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2011 Jan 23;33(19–20):1805–21. pmid:21859420
- 58. Prajapati SK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE. A Novel Approach to Ambulatory Monitoring: Investigation Into the Quantity and Control of Everyday Walking in Patients With Subacute Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jan 9;25(1):6–14. pmid:20829413
- 59. Wu AJ, Radel J, Hanna-Pladdy B. Improved Function After Combined Physical and Mental Practice After Stroke: A Case of Hemiparesis and Apraxia. Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Mar 1;65(2):161–8. pmid:21476363
- 60. Kouwenhoven SE, Kirkevold M, Engedal K, Kim HS. ‘Living a life in shades of grey’: experiencing depressive symptoms in the acute phase after stroke. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Aug;68(8):1726–37. pmid:22043897
- 61. McCain KJ, Smith PS, Querry R. Ankle-Foot Orthosis Selection to Facilitate Gait Recovery in Adults After Stroke. J Prosthet Orthot. 2012 Jul;24(3):111–21.
- 62. Middleton K, Esselman P, Lim PC. Terson Syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Mar;91(3):271–4.
- 63. Morris R, Morris P. Participants’ experiences of hospital-based peer support groups for stroke patients and carers. Disabil Rehabil. 2012 Feb 12;34(4):347–54. pmid:21992465
- 64. Norris M, Allotey P, Barrett G. ‘It burdens me’: the impact of stroke in central Aceh, Indonesia. Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Jul;34(6):826–40. pmid:22103934
- 65. Wilkie KM, Shiels JE, Bulley C, Salisbury LG. ‘Functional electrical stimulation (FES) impacted on important aspects of my life’—A qualitative exploration of chronic stroke patients’ and carers’ perceptions of FES in the management of dropped foot. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(1):1–9. pmid:21801102
- 66. Gustafsson L, Bootle K. Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Aug 17;35(16):1380–6. pmid:23244213
- 67. Norris M, Kilbride C, Mohagheghi A, Victor C, Jones TM, Dean CM. Exercise instructor-led functional training programme for community dwelling stroke survivors: A qualitative study. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2013 Dec;20(12):597–605.
- 68. Saito Y, Mineo M, Yaeda J. Work support for working age persons who have experienced a stroke in Japan: Cooperation between hospitals and work support agencies. Work. 2013;45(2):267–72. pmid:23478366
- 69. Casey AF, Mackay-Lyons M, Connolly EM, Jennings C, Rasmussen R. A comprehensive exercise program for a young adult male with Down syndrome who experienced a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014 Aug;36(17):1402–8. pmid:24020424
- 70. Connell LA, McMahon NE, Adams N. Stroke survivors’ experiences of somatosensory impairment after stroke: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Physiotherapy. 2014 Jun;100(2):150–5. pmid:24239191
- 71. Gustafsson LA, Hodson TJ, Fleming JM, Hoyle MF. The impact of STRENGTH on the expected and actual transition to home experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014 Dec 27;36(26):2244–51. pmid:24670192
- 72. Kirkevold M, Martinsen R, Bronken BA, Kvigne K. Promoting psychosocial wellbeing following stroke using narratives and guided self-determination: a feasibility study. BMC Psychol. 2014 Dec 3;2(1):4. pmid:25566379
- 73. Kuluski K, Dow C, Locock L, Lyons RF, Lasserson D. Life interrupted and life regained? Coping with stroke at a young age. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):22252. pmid:24461569
- 74. Body Pallesen H., coping and self-identity. A qualitative 5-year follow-up study of stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014 Feb;36(3):232–41.
- 75. Sadler E, Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Navigating stroke care: the experiences of younger stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014 Oct 28;36(22):1911–7. pmid:24467678
- 76. Armstrong E, Hersh D, Hayward C, Fraser J. Communication disorders after stroke in Aboriginal Australians. Disabil Rehabil. 2015 Jul 31;37(16):1462–9. pmid:25365701
- 77. Arntzen C, Hamran T, Borg T. Body, participation and self transformations during and after in-patient stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Disabil Res. 2015 Oct 2;17(4):300–20.
- 78. Ferrarin M, Rabuffetti M, Bacchini M, Casiraghi A, Castagna A, Pizzi A, et al. Does gait analysis change clinical decision-making in poststroke patients? Results from a pragmatic prospective observational study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(2):171–84. pmid:25184798
- 79. Martinsen R, Kirkevold M, Sveen U. Young and Midlife Stroke Survivors’ Experiences With the Health Services and Long-Term Follow-Up Needs. J Neurosci Nurs. 2015 Feb;47(1):27–35. pmid:25565592
- 80. Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B. From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: A qualitative exploration of stroke survivors’, carers’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2015 Jan 2;37(1):64–77. pmid:24694303
- 81. White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, Jordan LA, Spratt N. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015 Mar 27;37(7):593–600. pmid:25754445
- 82. Wolfenden B, Grace M. Vulnerability and Post-Stroke Experiences of Working-Age Survivors During Recovery. SAGE Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(4):2158244015612877.
- 83. Gorst T, Lyddon A, Marsden J, Paton J, Morrison SC, Cramp M, et al. Foot and ankle impairments affect balance and mobility in stroke (FAiMiS): the views and experiences of people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Mar 12;38(6):589–96. pmid:26056857
- 84. Moorley CR, Cahill S, Corcoran NT. Life after Stroke: Coping mechanisms among African Caribbean Women. Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Nov 1;24(6):769–78. pmid:26094703
- 85. Rosewilliam S, Sintler C, Pandyan AD, Skelton J, Roskell CA. Is the practice of goal-setting for patients in acute stroke care patient-centred and what factors influence this? A qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2016 May 7;30(5):508–19. pmid:25952590
- 86. Lou S, Carstensen K, Møldrup M, Shahla S, Zakharia E, Nielsen CP. Early supported discharge following mild stroke: a qualitative study of patients’ and their partners’ experiences of rehabilitation at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Jun 1;31(2):302–11. pmid:27481568
- 87. Mavaddat N, Ross S, Dobbin A, Williams K, Graffy J, Mant J. Training in positivity for stroke? A qualitative study of acceptability of use of Positive Mental Training (PosMT) as a tool to assist stroke survivors with post-stroke psychological problems and in coping with rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017 Mar 27;40(2):259–70. pmid:28106572
- 88.
Sieber R. Return to University After a Stroke: An Autoethnography. Doctor of Occupational Therapy Capstone Projects. Paper 2. George Washington University; 2017.
- 89. Walder K, Molineux M. Re-establishing an occupational identity after stroke–a theoretical model based on survivor experience. Br J Occup Ther. 2017 Oct 31;80(10):620–30.
- 90. Palstam A, Törnbom M, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e021182. pmid:30012785
- 91. Shipley J, Luker J, Thijs V, Bernhardt J. The personal and social experiences of community-dwelling younger adults after stroke in Australia: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 1;8(12):e023525. pmid:30559157
- 92. Smith R, Burgess C, Sorinola I. The effect of a dysfunctional upper limb on community-dwelling stroke survivors and their carers: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Physiother Res Int. 2018 Oct 1;23(4):e1726. pmid:29984436
- 93. Valkenborghs SR, Visser MM, Nilsson M, Callister R, van Vliet P. Aerobic exercise prior to task-specific training to improve poststroke motor function: A case series. Physiother Res Int. 2018 Apr 1;23(2):e1707. pmid:29436126
- 94. Abrahamson V, Wilson P. Positioning the six‐month review in the recovery process post‐stroke: The ideology of personal responsibility. Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan 30;27(1):249–59. pmid:30375706
- 95. Hodson T, Gustafsson L, Cornwell P. Unveiling the complexities of mild stroke: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the mild stroke experience. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Oct 9;66(5):656–64. pmid:31598990
- 96. Jarvis HL, Brown SJ, Price M, Butterworth C, Groenevelt R, Jackson K, et al. Return to Employment After Stroke in Young Adults: How Important Is the Speed and Energy Cost of Walking? Stroke. 2019 Nov 1;50(11):3198–204. pmid:31554503
- 97. Pallesen H, Aadal L, Moe S, Arntzen C. Gateway to Recovery: A Comparative Analysis of Stroke Patients’ Experiences of Change and Learning in Norway and Denmark. Rehabil Res Pract. 2019. pmid:30775038
- 98. Theadom A, Rutherford S, Kent B, McPherson K. The process of adjustment over time following stroke: A longitudinal qualitative study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Oct 21;29(9):1464–74. pmid:29480073
- 99. Törnbom K, Lundälv J, Palstam A, Sunnerhagen KS. “My life after stroke through a camera lens”- A photovoice study on participation in Sweden. Withers MH, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0222099. pmid:31509564
- 100. Törnbom K, Lundälv J, Sunnerhagen KS. Long-term participation 7–8 years after stroke: Experiences of people in working-age. Dearborn-Tomazos J, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0213447.
- 101. White CL, Cantu A, Motz D, Patterson M, Caron JL, Birnbaum LA. Opportunities and challenges in secondary stroke prevention: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec 18;41(26):3192–7. pmid:30041552
- 102.
Wilson T. From professional to patient: hospital experiences of a stroke survivor [Internet]. Nursing Times. 2019. Available from: https://www.nursingtimes.net/clinical-archive/cardiovascular-clinical-archive/from-professional-to-patient-hospital-experiences-of-a-stroke-survivor-10-06-2019/
- 103. Bailey R. Examining daily physical activity in community-dwelling adults with stroke using social cognitive theory: an exploratory, qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Aug 27;42(18):2631–9. pmid:30973766
- 104. Pereira CM, Greenwood N, Jones F. From recovery to regaining control of life–the perspectives of people with stroke, their carers and health professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(20):2897–2908. pmid:32036730
- 105. Masterson-Algar P, Williams S, Burton CR, Arthur CA, Hoare Z, Morrison V, et al. Getting back to life after stroke: co-designing a peer-led coaching intervention to enable stroke survivors to rebuild a meaningful life after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May 7;42(10):1359–72. pmid:30508491
- 106. Millard H, Gustafsson L, Molineux M, Richards K. Understanding people’s experiences of using the SaeboFlex® following a stroke. Br J Occup Ther. 2021 May;84(5):298–306.
- 107. Purcell S, Scott P, Gustafsson L, Molineux M. Stroke survivors’ experiences of occupation in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative exploration. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun 18;42(13):1880–5. pmid:30672347
- 108. Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, Nejat G, Pons J, Patterson K. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020 Dec;17(1):123. pmid:32912215
- 109. Walder K, Molineux M. Listening to the client voice–A constructivist grounded theory study of the experiences of client‐centred practice after stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Apr;67(2):100–9. pmid:31840290
- 110. Withiel TD, Sharp VL, Wong D, Ponsford JL, Warren N, Stolwyk RJ. Understanding the experience of compensatory and restorative memory rehabilitation: A qualitative study of stroke survivors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Mar 15;30(3):503–22. pmid:29886809
- 111. Panda S, Whitworth A, Hersh D, Biedermann B. “Giving yourself some breathing room…”: an exploration of group meditation for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2021 Dec 2;35(12):1544–72.
- 112. Luengo-Fernandez R, Paul NLM, Gray AM, Pendlebury ST, Bull LM, Welch SJV, et al. Population-Based Study of Disability and Institutionalization After Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke. Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2854–61.
- 113. Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: Survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1091–8.
- 114. Jönsson AC, Delavaran H, Iwarsson S, Ståhl A, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Functional status and patient-reported outcome 10 years after stroke: The lund stroke register. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1784–90. pmid:24803595
- 115. Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, Busch MA, McKevitt C. What Are the Social Consequences of Stroke for Working-Aged Adults? Stroke. 2009 Jun 1;40(6).
- 116.
Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. Florence, UNITED KINGDOM: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
- 117. Salawali SH, Susanti H, Daulima NHC, Putri AF. Posttraumatic growth in adolescent survivors of earthquake, tsunami, and liquefaction in Palu Indonesia: a phenomenological study. Pediatr Rep. 2020 Jun 25;12(s1 SE-Supplements). pmid:32905079
- 118. Arpawong TE, Oland A, Milam JE, Ruccione K, Meeske KA. Post-traumatic growth among an ethnically diverse sample of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(10):2235–44. pmid:23554227
- 119. Ramı´rez-Castañeda V(2020) Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLoSONE15(9): e0238372. pmid:32936821