Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Latin American Internet Survey for Men who have Sex with Men (LAMIS-2018): Design, methods and implementation

  • Michael Reyes-Díaz,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación Interdisciplinaria en Sexualidad, Sida y Sociedad (CIISSS), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martín de Porres, Peru

  • Ana Celly,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Madrid, Spain

  • Cinta Folch ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    cfolch@iconcologia.net

    Affiliations Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Madrid, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain

  • Nicolas Lorente,

    Roles Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Madrid, Spain, Coalition PLUS

  • Valeria Stuardo,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Instituto de Salud Pública, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile

  • Maria Amelia Veras,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Henrique Barros,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliations EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, Porto, Portugal, Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, Porto, Portugal

  • Paula Meireles,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliations EPIUnit—Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, Porto, Portugal, Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, Porto, Portugal

  • Dorian Ramírez,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Universidad de San Carlos, Guatemala, Guatemala

  • Kai J. Jonas,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

  • Ulrich Marcus,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Instituto Robert Koch, Berlin, Germany

  • Axel J. Schmidt,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Sigma Research, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Carlos F. Caceres ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Carlos F. Caceres, Jordi Casabona

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación Interdisciplinaria en Sexualidad, Sida y Sociedad (CIISSS), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martín de Porres, Peru

  • Jordi Casabona

    Contributed equally to this work with: Carlos F. Caceres, Jordi Casabona

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Madrid, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Despite men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) from Latin America (LA) are still a vulnerable population for known health-related conditions and social problems, availability of comparable data across LA countries for assessment and monitoring purposes is limited. The objective of this article is to present the study design and the questionnaire of LAMIS-2018 (Latin America MSM Internet Survey), its recruitment strategy, rates and sources by country, and the lessons learned from its implementation. LAMIS-2018 was a cross-sectional, internet-based survey targeting MSM living in 18 LA countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela) that gathered data about sexual behaviors, HIV/STI and viral hepatitis knowledge, prophylactic use of antiretrovirals, psychosocial health, and access to sexual health services. The survey went online for four months and was available in three languages (Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch). Promotion was carried out using dating apps, websites, social networks, and by community-based and academic organizations of each participating country directly in gay venues and in their own premises. Overall, 64,655 MSM participated in LAMIS-2018. Dating apps and websites were the most important recruitment source in most countries, except for Honduras, Nicaragua, and Suriname, where community-based organizations recruited most of the participants. Beyond the LAMIS-2018 implementation description, we highlight the feasibility of such a study in this context, based on the collaboration between community-based and academic organizations to obtain a large sample of MSM in the region. LAMIS-2018 data will contribute to identify determinants of risk behaviors and prevention needs of vulnerable MSM populations in each country of the region.

1. Introduction

Men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) are a vulnerable population with a high burden of medical and psychological conditions related to negative social experiences that affect their access to proper care, and quality of life [1, 2].

They are considered a key population for the HIV epidemic, reflected in a concentrated and high HIV prevalence (exceeding 10% in nine Latin American countries) and incidence [3, 4]. Besides HIV, MSM also have a higher prevalence of other sexually transmitted infections (STI) such as syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia [5], human papilloma virus [6], and hepatitis B virus [7], and enteric diseases related to oral-anal sexual behavior, such as Hepatitis A [8, 9], and blood-borne infections such as hepatitis C.

In addition, studies from Brazil and Mexico reported higher percentages of poor mental health among, including MSM depression, anxiety [10, 11], substance and alcohol abuse [11], and frequent sex alcohol and drug use (28%) [12], the latter being associated with riskier sexual behavior, depression and drug abuse [13].

MSM also faced structural (including demographic, social, economic, political, and cultural) barriers, considered the most relevant determinants of their increased vulnerability in LA [14]. Sex and gender-related violence, homophobia, stigma and discrimination have been frequently reported in LA countries such as Brazil [15], Mexico [16], Chile [17], Peru [18] and in Central America [19], which hinder their access to comprehensive HIV/STI preventive measures and care [14, 20, 21]. They are associated with increased psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and unhealthy practices [19, 22], including risky sex and lower adherence to antiretroviral treatment [20]. It has been shown that in several LA countries, lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with lower condom use [23], less knowledge about HIV transmission and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) [24, 25], less testing and awareness of HIV serostatus [26] but more self-reported positive HIV status [27].

Reliable multidisciplinary surveillance data among MSM is essential, but its availability is still limited in LA, not comparable across different territories or lacking periodicity.

Most multi-country available data focus to monitor the HIV epidemic. In this regard, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) have developed the Key Population Atlas (https://kpatlas.unaids.org/dashboard), which aims to collect and share country-level HIV-related data among key populations [28]. However, information from some indicators are missing in some countries since they are not measured or reported by their national health systems.

No similar data sources have been found to collect country-level population-based data regarding mental health or structural disparities among MSM, depending only on academic publications or community-based reports. However, academic publications are also highly focused on HIV/STI-related topics. Even among the HIV literature, there is a huge gap in the availability of strategic data on determinants of access to prevention and care, and the impact of programs geared to these populations in LA [29]. Robust information on behaviors and needs of MSM in LA is currently available but only for a few larger countries, mainly Brazil, Peru and Mexico [30, 31], and they use different approaches (designs, recruitment methods, data collection strategies and instruments, analysis techniques, indicators, etc.) that limit comparability across countries or even regions within the same country.

In recent years, the Internet has become an important setting for recruiting large samples of MSM in HIV research [32, 33]. Online recruitment represent a useful alternative approach to reach an important and often hidden group of MSM from different LA countries [34, 35], and collect relevant information on a wide range of topics in a single cross-sectional questionnaire [36, 37].

The Ibero-American Network of Studies on Gay Men, other MSM and Transgender People (RIGHT PLUS, from its Spanish abbreviation) is a network of both academic groups and NGOs from LA, Spain and Portugal currently part of the Coalition Plus organization (http://right-plus.ceeiscat.cat). It aims at facilitating, implementing and disseminating collaborative participatory research among vulnerable populations in Ibero-America. RIGH Plus in collaboration with researchers from the European MSM Internet Survey (EMIS-2017) project (www.emis2017.eu) [38] implemented the Latin American Internet Survey for Men who have Sex with Men (LAMIS-2018) simultaneously in 18 LA countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela). The main purpose of the LAMIS-2018 survey was to collect information on sexual behavior, HIV knowledge, risk exposure, prophylactic use of antiretroviral treatments (PEP and PrEP), psychosocial health and access to sexual health services, among MSM from the LA region in a consistent manner with the EMIS 2017 survey. These data are crucial to better understand the determinants of transmission, prevention and care, and therefore to improve prevention and control policies for HIV and other health and social problems.

Giving the lack of information regarding implementation experiences and challenges using internet-based studies in MSM, the objective of this article is to describe the methodological approach used in LAMIS-2018: the various recruitment strategies used, and the recruitment rates by country. This represents a double opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of such a study, based on collaboration between academic organizations to obtain a large sample of MSM in the region, and to discuss its contribution to sexual health prevention policies in the LA Region.

2. Methods

2.1. Study design

LAMIS was a cross-sectional, internet-based survey targeting MSM living in 18 LA countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela) and was available in three languages (Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch).

No sample size was calculated for LAMIS-2018 as we are using convenience sampling, and we also aimed to describe the number of responses obtained during the 4-month study period, giving the different recruitment strategies employed.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

LAMIS-2018 inclusion criteria were 1) self-identify as a men or transgender men who is sexually attracted to men and/or who have ever engaged in sexual interaction with other men, 2) 18 years old or older, 3) who resided in any of the 18 participating LA countries at the time of the survey, and 4) indicating that they understood the nature and purpose of the study and that they consented to take part in it. There were not additional exclusion criteria than not meeting inclusion criteria.

2.3. Questionnaire design

The LAMIS-2018 questionnaire was programmed on the Demographix online platform. It consists of slightly adapted versions of the Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch language versions used for EMIS-2017, which was conducted between 2017 and 2018 in 46 European countries, plus Lebanon, Israel, Canada, and the Philippines, and was available in 33 languages [38].

The version used in LAMIS went through peer review by the RIGHT PLUS members and was piloted in all participating countries to ensure overall clarity and interpretability.

The questionnaire covered different topics which would be later grouped in corresponding theme chapters:

  1. Sociodemographic, identity and sexuality characteristics: including information about age, sex assigned at birth and gender identity, place and size of residence, educational level, employment status, financial coping, migration and origin, relationship status and transactional sex.
  2. Psycho-socio-sexual health status: including information regarding depression and anxiety symptoms, sexual happiness, alcohol dependency, HIV diagnosis and viral suppression, diagnosed STIs (Syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, human papillomavirus), history of hepatitis B and C.
  3. Risk and precaution behavior: including information regarding age at first sex and anal intercourse, number of steady male, non-steady male, and female sexual partners, condom use, recreational, sexualized and injecting drug use, use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP); HIV treatment uptake, hepatitis A and B vaccination coverage, and detailed information about last sexual encounter with male non-steady sexual partners.
  4. Social and health needs: including information about social support, internalized homonegativity, concerns about alcohol and other drug consumption; condom use self-efficacy, knowledge about HIV transmission and preventive strategies, access and barriers to PEP, PrEP and HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART), and knowledge on STI transmission, on PEP, PrEP, and on viral hepatitis.
  5. Offer and use of health services: including information about usage of services for drug and alcohol dependency, access to condoms, access to HIV/STI information, access to PrEP information, prescriptions and pills, access to HIV testing and care services, access to STI testing, partner notification for STI treatment, and offer of hepatitis vaccination.

The LAMIS questionnaire differed from the EMIS-2017 questionnaire [38], in the following aspects: using educational levels typical for LA countries instead of the years spent in education after age 16; collection of data on homonegativity and social support scales from all participants (rather than from a randomized sub-sample as in EMIS-2017); adaptation of the questions on belonging to an ethnic minority (changed to belonging to a indigenous ethnic group, being of African descent, or belonging to a native community).

The final online version of the questionnaire had 35 core pages (62 questions) and 20 additional questions that were shown when a condition question was answered. The first page of the questionnaire constituted the introduction to LAMIS-2018 and indicated the inclusion criteria to be met by each participant. The questionnaire itself started at the second page.

2.4. Promotion and recruitment sources

Community-based organizations from each participant country were identified and invited as local partners to articulate promotion and recruitment activities in their territories. From January 24th to May 13th, 2018 (110 days), LAMIS-2018 was promoted through MSM dating apps, websites, social media, clinics, and gay men’s organizations or venues from the 18 LA countries.

The online promotion had different images, banners, and material in the three languages of the study (Fig 1). The design used for the EMIS survey promotion was maintained but using a violet tone instead of blue to represent the LAMIS study. Offline (non-virtual) promotion was also carried out using printed materials (i.e., posters and cards) placed or distributed in gay entertainment venues (e.g., discotheques, saunas, etc.).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Examples of banners for the promotion of the LAMIS-18 survey.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.g001

Recruitment sources for the LAMIS study were:

  • LAMIS-2018 website was created and the link was shared though direct messages.
  • Websites and dating apps for MSM, in particular Grindr, PlanetRomeo, Hornet. Those sent out direct messages to their users. Grinder posted six 24-hour messages in its app, strategically distributed throughout the recruitment period. PlanetRomeo broadcasted an instant message at the beginning of the recruitment period. Manhunt and Jack’d published banners in Spanish and Portuguese on their websites and in their application for mobile phones on three occasions. Hornet participated in a massive campaign at the beginning and end of the recruitment. Recruitment via websites and dating apps was arranged by the co-author at the Robert Koch Institute (Berlin), Grindr and PlanetRomeo offered their services free of charge. Additional funding was available to pay for extra promotion in Brazil using Hornet.
  • Most popular social networks and web pages such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Youtube were also used, through collaborative partners´ institutional accounts.
  • Local dissemination by the various collaborating organizations (NGOs or community-based LGBTIQ or HIV/AIDS organizations, activists, research groups, etc.) placing banners on their websites, sending invitation messages to their users through their mailing lists, sending news to digital magazines, collecting participants’ answers during outreach activities, etc.

2.5. Screening, enrollment and data collection

People reached by recruitment strategies gained access to a link that directed them to the survey web page. The first page contained the informed consent providing study information, including a brief summary of the study purpose and its relevance, institutions involved, inclusion and exclusion criteria, benefits and potential harms, estimated time to complete the survey, and data usage. Potential participants were also told that the study won’t save any identifying information from them or their servers such as TP/IC address or cookies, thus if they left the web page without completing the survey, it wouldn’t be possible to go back to continue where they left and information would be lost. Before moving on to the survey questions, all participants must have stated that they understood the nature and purpose of the study and that they consented to take part in it. After consent, the only compulsory questions were the first ones about age, sexual identity, sex assigned at birth and country of residence, to verify inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Demographix online platform only saved data from completed questionnaires, meaning those who reached to the ending screen of the questionnaire.

2.6. Analysis plan

We calculated descriptive data about attrition, recruitment rate and recruitment source of information, using percentage presented in tables, stratified by survey language version or country.

Attrition rate was defined as the percentage of people who had access to the survey but withdrew at a certain point among the total amount of people who have accessed to it. Three attrition rates will be presented: 1) Total withdrawal from first page, as withdrawal at any point along the questionnaire among all people who reached the first page 2) Withdrawal before consent, as withdrawal between first (information and consent page) and second page (where questionnaire’s questions start) among people who reached the first page; and 3) Withdrawal after consent, as withdrawal at any point along the questionnaire among people who reached the second page (where survey’s questions start). Attrition information was calculated among all potential participants and stratified by the three questionnaire language versions.

Recruitment rate was defined as the percentage of LAMIS-2018 valid responses over the number of male population between 15 and 65 years of age according to national census data until 2017. Recruitment information was calculated among the whole sample and stratified by country.

2.7. Ethical approval

For the regional implementation of the LAMIS study, the ethical approval of the Ethics Review Committees of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (Lima), the Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile (Santiago), the Santa Casa de Misericórdia (São Paulo) the National Committee for Health Ethics (Guatemala), and the Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience of the University of Maastricht (The Netherlands), were obtained.

According to preferred language by a potential participant, approved online written informed consent was available in Spanish, Portuguese or Dutch, in the first page of the questionnaire, before accessing the survey questions.

3. Results

3.1. Attrition rate

During recruitment period, 163.439 people accessed the LAMIS-2018 online questionnaire. Among them, the Demographix platform reported that 93,632 people (57.6%) abandoned the questionnaire at any point; this was higher among the Dutch version recruits (74.9%). Overall, 33.7% of recruits abandoned the questionnaire immediately after the first page (also higher in the Dutch version with 57.3%). The dropout rate from the second page (where the questionnaire started after confirming inclusion criteria) until the end of the questionnaire was 36.1% in the entire sample (Table 1). Dropouts from seven additional cases were not reported by the online server. A total of 68,800 people finished the survey.

thumbnail
Table 1. Attrition rates throughout LAMIS-2018 questionnaire by language version.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.t001

3.2. Total returns and data cleaning process

After closing the data collection there were 68,800 cases recorded. After data cleaning, 4,145 people who didn’t met inclusion criteria were removed: participants who indicated that they had not read or understood the information on the introductory page, were under 18 years of age, resided in a country other than those included in the study, did not identify as male or transgender male, were not attracted to other men, or did never have sex with another man, resulting in 94% (64,655) of qualified cases (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Data cleaning process from cases recorded online to final valid questionnaires.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.g002

3.3. Datasets

LAMIS-2018 dataset has a total of 64,655 qualified cases. National datasets are available for all 18 countries with 200 or more qualifying cases. In the LAMIS-2018 final report (see the report and executive summary published: http://www.coalitionplus.org/LAMIS/), full data analysis was performed, presenting overall descriptive results, disaggregated by geographic area and/or country if considered necessary. The country-grouping criteria by geographical areas is described in Fig 3.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Grouping criteria by geographic area among LAMIS-2018 participant countries from the Latin American region.

Geographical areas: 1. Andean countries and Surinam included Surinam and the Andean countries Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia and Venezuela. Suriname was included in this group due to its geographic proximity to Venezuela and its small population size. French Guiana was included in EMIS-2017 as a French overseas territory; Guyana was not included due to its anti-gay legislation 2. The southern cone countries include Argentina, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, located in the southernmost part of the American continent, which, like a large peninsula, defines the southern part of the South American subcontinent. 3. Central America includes Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, located between Mexico and South America. 4. Brazil, given its size and the fact that it is the only Portuguese-speaking country. 5. Mexico, given its size and northeast LA location.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.g003

The LAMIS database is the legal property of the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP)/ Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT). CEEISCAT manages the data and data assignments made to third parties.

3.4. Recruitment rate by country

The mean country recruitment rate in LAMIS-2018 was 3.3 participants per 10,000 men (Table 2). The countries with higher recruitment rates (higher than 7 participants per 10,000 men 15 to 65 years of age) were Suriname (11.7) and Chile (8.2). Lower recruitment rates (3 or lower per 10,000 men 15 to 65 years of age) were found in El Salvador (2.8), Ecuador (2.7), Paraguay (2.7), Nicaragua (2.7), Brazil (2.5), Guatemala (2.4), Venezuela (2.3), Honduras (2.3), Bolivia (2.2) and Peru (1.9) (Table 2).

The countries with the largest numbers of participants are Brazil (28.1%), Mexico (23.1%) and Colombia (12.7%) contributing 63.9% of all participants, reflection overall population sizes of participating countries (65%).

As shown in Fig 4, Grindr obtained the highest proportion of participants, representing the 65% of the whole study with Colombia and Argentina being the countries with the highest recruitment through this tool with 83% and 81% respectively, while Suriname had the lowest proportion with only 14% (Table 3).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Recruitment sources used in LAMIS-2018.

*Centrally arranged by co-author at the RKI Institute (Berlin) **Local dissemination by the various collaborating organizations (NGOs or community-based LGBTIQ or HIV/AIDS organizations, activists, research groups, etc.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.g004

thumbnail
Table 3. Recruitment sources used in LAMIS-2018 by country.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277518.t003

Hornet was the second most important dating app for recruitment in the study. It accounted for 4% of recruitment (Fig 4). In Brazil, this app was paid for a massive promotional campaign and in this country, it represented 12% of the total recruitment. In the rest of the countries, the percentage of recruitment ranged from 0% (Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, and Suriname, among others) to 4% (Uruguay) (Table 3).

Facebook was the social media with the highest recruitment share, representing 5% of the total recruitment (Fig 4). It should be mentioned that, with only a few weeks to go before the end of the promotion, advertising was paid via Facebook to reinforce recruitment in countries with low recruitment rates. Because of this advertising campaign, Facebook represented the most important recruitment source in Central America (Table 3), especially in Nicaragua and Honduras where the proportion of recruited participants was 58% and 51% respectively (Table 3).

Participation through WhatsApp messages accounted for 3.1% of the overall sample (Fig 4), and was especially relevant in Brazil, where it represented 9.8% of the overall recruitment (Table 3); in the rest of the countries, it ranged between 0% in Costa Rica and 2.1% in Ecuador. Sampling in Suriname was mostly done via networks of the local collaboration partner and offline sampling.

4. Discussion

LAMIS-2018 survey was successfully carried out, implemented and executed simultaneously in 18 LA countries, targeting MSM, and reached the largest known MSM on-line sample in the region and by country. Similar studies reached smaller sample sizes: the Global Forum on MSM & HIV (MSMGF) in 2012 reached a sample size of 5,779 participants worldwide, with 880 participants from LA countries [39]; Biello et al. conducted an online survey in 2012 that reached a total on 29,787 participants from Mexico, South and Central America, but reached a lower per country sample size, i.e. less than 500 participants, in Ecuador, Uruguay, Bolivia, Paraguay, and all Central American countries [36]; a more recent 2018 survey conducted only among MSM from Brazil, Mexico and Peru, reached 19,457 MSM without a self-reported HIV diagnosis, lower than the 29,260 equivalent cases from LAMIS-2018 in those three countries [40]. Smaller countries, like Suriname, that also do not speak Spanish or Portuguese are often not represented at all in such surveys.

We found that about 60% of people who reached the first screen of the survey (informed consent) [Table 1] completed the questionnaire, being comparable with previous studies retention: Biello et al. reported that out of 56,584 people who clicked their survey link, 30,063 completed it (about 64%) [38], and Torres et al. reported that questionnaire completion was 45% [42]. Our completion rate thus falls into the range obtained before. Probable reasons for not completing the survey are reaching people online who do not fulfill inclusion criteria, lack of interest in participation, perception that the questionnaire is taking a lot of time, internet connection problems, and fear of sexual identity disclosure if being discovered while filling in the survey. We couldn’t assess these reasons as data from drop-outs was erased, but partners from Suriname reported that fear of sexual identity disclosure was an important factor.

Benefiting from EMIS experience and resources, and the joint work with local LA research groups and NGOs, LAMIS-2018 executed a mixture of recruitment strategies, adapted to specific settings and contexts. Free Grindr promotion was very important, mainly using personal invitations / direct per user messages, accounting for 42,000 valid questionnaires (65% of the total). Other dating apps provided less participants, except for some of them in specific countries (e.g., Hornet in Brazil). In general, MSM dating apps were less popular in Honduras, Nicaragua, and Suriname, where local collaborating organizations (NGOs, community-based LGBTIQ or HIV/AIDS organizations, activists, research groups, etc.) brought the majority of participants (52%, 59%, and 74% respectively). In the case of some Central American (Honduras and Nicaragua) and other South American countries (Bolivia and Paraguay), unplanned paid Facebook promotion was used to increase recruitment rates. Cases such as the use of WhatsApp in Brazil, the only country where it yielded a significant proportion of participants, paves the way to increase its use as a source of recruitment in future studies.

Two principal sources of bias were identified in LAMIS-2018: Uneven access to the internet across countries, and self-selection bias in the recruitment process [38, 41]. As LAMIS-2018 was a study conducted using an online questionnaire, this was completed by an audience with access to mobile or desktop devices, and the internet. In addition, the promotion was focused on online dating apps, social media and web pages frequently visited by MSM, highlighting in importance the recruitment by applications for dating and encounters between men, characteristics that imply a possible lower representation of those MSM populations with fewer resources, residents of areas with little internet access, less integrated into the LGTBIQ community, and who do not frequently use these applications for dating and encounters with other men. Studies comparing internet- vs field-sampling surveys from the UK and China have previously reported that internet-based studies reached younger MSM, with higher education or socio-economic status, reporting higher risk behavior, higher HIV testing [42] and more commonly identifying as ‘gay’ [43].

Besides its limitations, LAMIS-2018 has proven the strength of conducting an online study in the LA region among the MSM population, as a feasible and, given the free promotion by Grindr and PlanetRomeo, a relatively low-cost alternative to face-to-face surveys. This project has also proved that online studies are a powerful tool to update and fill the gap of information concerning behavioral and psycho-socio-sexual health-related aspects for planning and monitoring prevention programs for MSM, which has been a constant issue in the LA region. In addition, LAMIS-2018 reached a large sample size, sufficient to perform most descriptive and comparative analysis by country or in main cities, and to ensure statistical power when performing hypothesis testing.

LAMIS-2018 contribution to science is not only related to the data obtained, but also to the network established through the implementation of this study. Researchers from different countries were able to work together and form the RIGHT PLUS network for future academic and research collaborations in the Latin-American region. With a participatory research approach in mind, the project reinforced the crucial role that community-based organizations should play in the design and implementation of research on MSM, in collaboration with academic and research institutions.

In addition, LAMIS-2018 responded to the lack of information regarding implementation experiences from internet-based research targeting LA MSM. Sharing this experience will allow the adoption of successful strategies and improvement of the less effective ones by future research and community efforts using internet-based recruitment and data collection tools.

Finally, LAMIS will be the basis for other studies strengthening community work, identifying socio-demographic characteristics, determinants of risk behaviors, and prevention needs of vulnerable MSM populations in each country; in particular, the replication of the survey in the future will also allow for assessing the evolution of these aspects overt time in the region.

Acknowledgments

Recognitions

"LAMIS-2018 has been possible thanks to contributions in the form of human, intellectual and economic resources of the member institutions of the Ibero-American Network of Studies on Gay Men, other MSM and Transgender People (RIGHT PLUS) (the CEEISCAT assumed the economic and legal aspects of hosting the database and general coordination of the project; the Instituto de Saúde Pública, da Universidade do Porto donated funding to enhances the promotion of the survey in Brazil and countries with low recruitment rate; the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Sexuality, AIDS and Society of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia paid the domain for the survey web page; and the Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo paid for the study website domain and managed its graphic design) and the Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience of Maastricht University funded the accommodation of the survey platform in Dutch. For its implementation, LAMIS-2018 had some resources used in the EMIS-2017 study, which was funded by the European Commission Health Program 2014–2020, and in particular, from Sigma Research (questionnaire design, graphic design of promotion banners, syntax of secondary variables and joint variable manual EMIS-2017) and the Robert Koch Institute (negotiations with web pages / apps for free promotion of LAMIS-2018).

LAMIS-2018 was also possible thanks to the support of the collaborating partners in each of the 18 participating countries (www.estudiolamis.org): Fundación SAVIA, Chile; IESSDEH in Peru; UNIMINUTO, seccional Bello, Colombia; Parea Suriname, Suriname; RedGayLatino, México; Federación Argentina LGBT, Argentina; Asociación Entre Amigos, El Salvador; Venezuela Igualitaria, Venezuela; SOMOSGAY, Paraguay; +VIHdas and Colectivo Ovejas Negras, Uruguay; CIPAC, Costa Rica; Fundació Sida I Societat, Guatemala; Fundación Diversencia and MANODIVERSA, Bolivia; Grupo Génesis Panamá, Panamá; Fundación Ecuatoriana Equidad, Ecuador; Centro para la Educación y Prevención del SIDA, Nicaragua; Asociación Kukulcan, Honduras.

Special thanks to Grindr© and PlanetRomeo©, who sent free instant promotional messages to their users".

"Additionally, the authors are grateful for the support provided by the Editorial Committee of the LAMIS Study in the analysis, writing and / or publication of this article".

Disclaimer: "This document/article has been prepared within the framework of the promotion and support offered by the Editorial board for the LAMIS study (CELAMIS). The content of this document/article is the sole responsibility of the authors and cannot be considered in any case as a reflection of the position of CELAMIS.

References

  1. 1. Zhang W, Wang P. Quality of life among men who have sex with men in China measured using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey: A cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2018;97(27). pmid:29979401
  2. 2. Eriksson LE, Berglund T. Health-related quality of life in homo- and bisexual men attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Sweden. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2007;18(3):207–11. pmid:17362557
  3. 3. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV / AIDS (UNAIDS). UNAIDS data 2021. Geneva; 2021.
  4. 4. Luz PM, Veloso VG, Grinsztejn B. The HIV epidemic in Latin America: accomplishments and challenges on treatment and prevention. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2019;14(5).
  5. 5. Center for Disease control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017: Men who have sex with men. Atlanta, Georgia; 2018.
  6. 6. Lu B, Viscidi RP, Lee JH, Wu Y, Villa LL, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) 6, 11, 16, and 18 seroprevalence is associated with sexual practice and age: results from the multinational HPV Infection in Men Study (HIM Study). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(5):990–1002. pmid:21378268
  7. 7. Alonso M, Gutzman A, Mazin R, Pinzon CE, Reveiz L, Ghidinelli M. Hepatitis C in key populations in Latin America and the Caribbean: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(7):789–98. pmid:26298439
  8. 8. Mariojoules J, Castro G, Pisano MB, Barbero P, Fantilli A, Borda M, et al. Hepatitis A outbreak affecting men who have sex with men (MSM) in central Argentina, occurred in July 2017-April 2018, later than the European outbreak. J Clin Virol. 2019;117:49–53. pmid:31202104
  9. 9. Rivas V, Barrera A, Pino K, Núñez R, Caceres CJ, Lopez-Lastra M, et al. Hepatitis A outbreak since November 2016 affecting men who have sex with men (MSM) in Chile connected to the current outbreak in MSM in Europe, situation up to October 2017. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(9):18–00060.
  10. 10. Terra T, Schafer JL, Pan PM, Costa AB, Caye A, Gadelha A, et al. Mental health conditions in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Asexual youth in Brazil: A call for action. J Affect Disord. 2022;298(Pt A):190–3. pmid:34715179
  11. 11. Rentería R, Benjet C, Gutiérrez-García RA, Abrego-Ramírez A, Albor Y, Borges G, et al. Prevalence of 12-month mental and substance use disorders in sexual minority college students in Mexico. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(2):247–57. pmid:32886133
  12. 12. Jalil EM, Torres TS, de APCC, Farias A, Brito JDU, Lacerda M, et al. High Rates of Sexualized Drug Use or Chemsex among Brazilian Transgender Women and Young Sexual and Gender Minorities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3). pmid:35162728
  13. 13. Mimiaga MJ, Biello KB, Robertson AM, Oldenburg CE, Rosenberger JG, O’Cleirigh C, et al. High prevalence of multiple syndemic conditions associated with sexual risk behavior and HIV infection among a large sample of Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking men who have sex with men in Latin America. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1869–78. pmid:26159862
  14. 14. Teva I, Bermúdez MP, Ramiro MT, Buela-Casal G. Situación epidemiológica actual del VIH/SIDA en Latinoamérica en la primera década del siglo XXI: Análisis de las diferencias entre países. Revista médica de Chile. 2012;140:50–8. pmid:22552555
  15. 15. Magno L, Silva L, Guimarães MDC, Veras M, Deus LFA, Leal AF, et al. Discrimination based on sexual orientation against MSM in Brazil: a latent class analysis. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019;22Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e190003. pmid:31576979
  16. 16. Mendoza-Perez JC, Ortiz-Hernandez L. Association Between Overt and Subtle Experiences of Discrimination and Violence and Mental Health in Homosexual and Bisexual Men in Mexico. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(23–24):Np12686–np707. pmid:31994433
  17. 17. Barrientos J, Silva J, Catalan S, Gomez F, Longueira J. Discrimination and victimization: parade for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride, in Chile. J Homosex. 2010;57(6):760–75. pmid:20582801
  18. 18. Suarez EB, Logie C, Arocha JF, Sanchez H, Shokirova T. Contesting everyday violence: Resilience pathways of gay and transgender youth in Peru. Glob Public Health. 2021;16(5):706–28. pmid:33284733
  19. 19. Wheeler J, Anfinson K, Valvert D, Lungo S. Is violence associated with increased risk behavior among MSM? Evidence from a population-based survey conducted across nine cities in Central America. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:24814–. pmid:25361722
  20. 20. Pan American Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. HIV Prevention in the Spotlight: An analysis from the perspective of the health sector in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2017. Washington, D.C.: PAHO UNAIDS; 2017.
  21. 21. Evens E, Lanham M, Santi K, Cooke J, Ridgeway K, Morales G, et al. Experiences of gender-based violence among female sex workers, men who have sex with men, and transgender women in Latin America and the Caribbean: a qualitative study to inform HIV programming. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2019;19(1):9. pmid:30832664
  22. 22. Baez Hernandez FJ, Márquez Vega MA, Benavides Torres RA, Nava Navarro V. Discriminación social y conducta sexual de hombres que tienen sexo con hombres en América Latina: Una revisión sistemática. Cultura de los cuidados; Núm 55DO—1014198/cuid20195511. 2019.
  23. 23. Gutiérrez JP, Molina-Yepez D, Morrison K, Samuels F, Bertozzi SM. Correlates of condom use in a sample of MSM in Ecuador. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:152. pmid:16768794
  24. 24. Gomes RRdFM Ceccato MdGB, Kerr LRFS Guimarães MDC. [Factors associated with low knowledge on HIV/AIDS among men who have sex with men in Brazil]. Cad Saude Publica [Internet]. 2017 2017/10//; 33(10):[e00125515 p.]. Available from: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29091176Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00125515.
  25. 25. Torres TS, Luz PM, De Boni RB, de Vasconcellos MTL, Hoagland B, Garner A, et al. Factors associated with PrEP awareness according to age and willingness to use HIV prevention technologies: the 2017 online survey among MSM in Brazil(). AIDS Care. 2019;31(10):1193–202. pmid:31122033
  26. 26. Billings JD, Joseph Davey DL, Konda KA, Bristow CC, Chow J, Klausner JD, et al. Factors associated with previously undiagnosed human immunodeficiency virus infection in a population of men who have sex with men and male-to-female transgender women in Lima, Peru. Medicine. 2016;95(42):e5147–e. pmid:27759645
  27. 27. Torres TS, Coelho LE, Konda KA, Vega-Ramirez EH, Elorreaga OA, Diaz-Sosa D, et al. Low socioeconomic status is associated with self-reported HIV positive status among young MSM in Brazil and Peru. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):726–. pmid:34332552
  28. 28. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Fast-tracking combination prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2015.
  29. 29. Cáceres CF. Intervenciones para la prevención del VIH e ITS en América Latina y Caribe: una revisión de la experiencia regional. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(6):1468–85. pmid:15608848
  30. 30. Tsuboi M, Evans J, Davies EP, Rowley J, Korenromp EL, Clayton T, et al. Prevalence of syphilis among men who have sex with men: a global systematic review and meta-analysis from 2000–20. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(8):e1110–e8. pmid:34246332
  31. 31. Miller WM, Buckingham L, Sánchez-Domínguez MS, Morales-Miranda S, Paz-Bailey G. Systematic review of HIV prevalence studies among key populations in Latin America and the Caribbean. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 1:S65–78. pmid:23918059
  32. 32. Chiasson MA, Parsons JT, Tesoriero JM, Carballo-Dieguez A, Hirshfield S, Remien RH. HIV behavioral research online. J Urban Health. 2006;83(1):73–85. pmid:16736356
  33. 33. Zhang D, Bi P, Hiller JE, Lv F. Web-based HIV/AIDS behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: potential and challenges. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;12(2):126–31. pmid:17884663
  34. 34. Magidson JF, Biello KB, Safren SA, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Mayer KH, et al. Engagement in HIV care and sexual transmission risk behavior among men who have sex with men using online social/sexual networking in Latin America. AIDS care. 2015;27(8):1055–62. pmid:25738655
  35. 35. Curioso WH, Blas MM, Nodell B, Alva IE, Kurth AE. Opportunities for providing web-based interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections in Peru. PLoS Medicine. 2007;4(2):e11. pmid:17326701
  36. 36. Biello KB, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Robertson AM, Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ. Epidemiology of sexual health in the virtual environment: a multinational online survey of Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking men who use an internet sexual networking site. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1675–85. pmid:24980249
  37. 37. Pan American Health Organization. Challenges Posed by the HIV Epidemic in Latin America and the Caribbean 2009. Washington, D.C.: PAHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS; 2009.
  38. 38. Weatherburn P, Hickson F, Reid DS, Marcus U, Schmidt AJ. European Men-who-have-sex-with-men Internet Survey (EMIS-2017): design and methods. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2019:1–15.
  39. 39. Ayala G, Makofane K, Santos GM, Beck J, Do TD, Hebert P, et al. Access to Basic HIV-Related Services and PrEP Acceptability among Men Who Have sex with Men Worldwide: Barriers, Facilitators, and Implications for Combination Prevention. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013;2013:953123. pmid:26316968
  40. 40. Torres TS, Konda KA, Vega-Ramirez EH, Elorreaga OA, Diaz-Sosa D, Hoagland B, et al. Factors Associated With Willingness to Use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru: Web-Based Survey Among Men Who Have Sex With Men. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019;5(2):e13771. pmid:31210143
  41. 41. Evans AR, Wiggins RD, Mercer CH, Bolding GJ, Elford J. Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(3):200–5. pmid:17135330
  42. 42. Shi L-E, Wei C, McFarland W, Yan H, Li J, Raymond HF. Comparing Samples of Men Who Have Sex with Men Recruited Online and in Venues, Jiangsu Province, China, 2013. LGBT Health. 2016;3(3):238–42. pmid:26651841
  43. 43. Prah P, Hickson F, Bonell C, McDaid LM, Johnson AM, Wayal S, et al. Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparing methods and estimates from probability and convenience sample surveys. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92(6):455. pmid:26965869