Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The health benefit of physical exercise on COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from mainland China

  • Ruofei Lin,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

  • Xiaoli Hu,

    Roles Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation International College of Football, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

  • Lige Guo,

    Roles Software, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

  • Junpei Huang

    Roles Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China



Our study aims to investigate the health benefit of regular physical exercise participation on a series of COVID-19 outcomes including COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and cure rate.


Prefecture-level panel data related to physical exercise and the COVID-19 pandemic in China were collected from January 1 to March 17, 2020, (N = 21379). Multiple linear regression was conducted, and the ordinary least squares technique was used to estimate the coefficient.


It was shown that regular sports participation significantly negatively affected COVID-19 morbidity (estimate = -1.1061, p<0.01) and mortality (estimate = -0.3836, p<0.01), and positively affected cure rate (estimate = 0.0448, p<0.01), implying that engaging in physical exercise regularly does have a significant positive effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Then, we explored the heterogeneity of the effect of physical exercise on areas with different risk levels and it was revealed that the effect of physical exercise was more pronounced in high-risk areas in terms of morbidity (estimate = -1.8776, p<0.01 in high-risk areas; estimate = -0.0037, p<0.01 in low-risk areas), mortality (estimate = -0.3982, p<0.01 in high-risk areas; estimate = -0.3492, p<0.01 in low-risk areas), and cure rate (estimate = 0.0807, p<0.01 in high-risk areas; 0.0193 = -0.0037, p<0.05 in low-risk areas).


Our results suggest that regularly engaging in physical exercise before the pandemic has positive health effects, especially in the case of a more severe epidemic. Therefore, we urge readers to actively engage in physical exercise so that we can reduce the risks in the event of a pandemic.

1 Introduction

As an ongoing pandemic, the COVID-19 pandemic has so far infected 500 million people and killed more than 6 million people worldwide. On January 30, 2020, it was declared global health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO), and then a global pandemic on March 11, 2020 [1]. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed huge challenges to economic and social development and people’s daily life around the world. A large number of medical resources are currently occupied, and the lack of such resources has led to excess mortality [2, 3]. In addition, public health measures such as quarantine and isolation, work at home, and school closure, have seriously affected normal social order and economic production, brought huge economic losses [4], and also have caused a negative impact on the quality of life and physical and mental health of populations worldwide [5]. Therefore, intervention measures should be taken to curb the outbreak as much as possible and minimize the adverse consequences of the epidemic.

Despite a range of outbreak mitigation strategies aimed at social distancing in most countries, practices that have been effective in preventing most citizens from becoming infected during the pandemic, such strategies have paradoxically left people with no immunity to the virus and therefore vulnerable to additional waves of infection [6]. In addition, these public health policies have led to the closure of public places such as parks and gyms, resulting in an increase in sedentary behavior and a decrease in physical exercise (PEx) among individuals, which has also adversely impacted people’s immunity. It is believed that the world will not be able to return to pre-pandemic normalcy until safe and effective vaccines are available and global vaccination programs are successfully implemented [7]. Therefore, countries around the world have been actively developing and promoting COVID-19 vaccines since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. As of April 26, 2022, a cumulative total of 11.55 billion doses of the COVID-19 vaccine has been reported worldwide, with a vaccination rate of 65.16% [8]. In China, as of April 29, 2022, there have been a cumulative total of 334,308,000 doses administered, with a vaccination rate of 88.64%.

However, despite the proven effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing infection and avoiding critical conditions [9, 10], it has become evident that the SARS-CoV-2 virus can mutate very rapidly [11, 12] with strong antibody evasion [1316]. Besides, there are still potential negative effects of vaccination [17], especially the prevalence of relatively low vaccination rates but high mortality rates in the elderly [18]. Therefore, at this stage, in addition to timely and effective pharmacological interventions, non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving autoimmunity are also crucial. As an important part of a healthy lifestyle, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the health benefits of physical exercise in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Physical exercise (PEx) is regarded as an important way to promote health, as well as prevent and protect the body from a variety of diseases [19, 20], and it has been shown to have significant health benefits [21]. Likewise, it is an effective treatment for most chronic diseases and has direct, positive effects on both physical and mental health [22]. It is well documented that exercising regularly significantly improves the nervous system [23], bones and muscles [24, 25], cardiovascular [26] and cardiopulmonary functions [27], and cognitive ability [28], and it has inhibitory effects on adverse health outcomes, including premature death [29, 30], cardiovascular disease [30, 31], hypertension [32], stroke [33], osteoporosis [34], type 2 diabetes [35], obesity [3638], cancer [39], depression [4042], anxiety [43] and other health outcomes. More importantly, physical exercise can strengthen the immune system [21, 4446], improve immune function, and reduce the risk, duration, or severity of viral infections [47]. Therefore, in theory, regular physical exercise can play an important role in strengthening the body’s immune system against COVID-19 [48], and individuals can maintain the requisite immunity to fight the novel infection COVID-19 through adhering to a healthy lifestyle [21, 49].

This study aims to investigate the health benefit of physical exercise on COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and cure rate. It contributes to the extensive literature on assessing the health benefits of physical exercise. A large body of literature has concluded that PEx has a positive influence on physical and mental health, with studies showing that moderate and regular physical exercise is important for preventing premature death [29, 30], reducing obesity [3638], avoiding chronic disease, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [32], as well as strengthening bones, muscles [25], and the immune system [4446]. In addition, it can clear one’s mind and make one energetic [50], help relieve mental stress and reduce the incidence of psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety [4043, 51]. In contrast to these articles, this paper focuses on the influence of physical exercise on the public health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we selected COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and cure rates as health outcomes of interest.

In addition, our research contributes to ongoing emerging literature related to factors that influence the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the COVID-19 outbreak, the factors influencing the COVID-19 pandemic have been well-discussed in a large number of articles, mainly focusing on pharmacological interventions [52, 53], public health interventions [5457], environmental variables [5860], demographic characteristics [61, 62], and healthcare resources [63]. In addition, the benefit of physical exercise (or physical activity) on physical and mental health during the pandemic has also been documented [22, 6471]. In contrast to those investigations, this paper focuses on the effect of engaging in physical exercise before the outbreak on a series of COVID-19 outcomes during the pandemic.

2 Method

2.1 Study area

In this research, the study area was 279 prefecture-level Chinese cities. All of the provinces in mainland China were included in our analysis, which also included the great majority of prefectural cities. Cities in ethnic minority autonomous zones including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Southwest China were removed because of the significant amount of missing data, which was unreliable and unrepresentative. It is documented that more than 98% of China’s total population and more than 99% of its GDP were represented by the 279 metropolitan cities [72].

2.2 Data and variables

In this article, in order to empirically investigate the influence of physical exercise on COVID-19 morbidity, mortality and cure rates, prefectural data were collected daily from January 1, 2020 to March 17, 2020 in mainland China, N = 21379. Regarding epidemic-related data, the daily data of confirmed cases, death, and cure rates used to calculate morbidity, mortality, and cure rates were collected from official releases on the official websites of the national and provincial Health Committee. Regarding PEx-related data, the proportion of regular physical exercise participants was gathered by collecting data from provincially issued National Fitness Report, the National Fitness Development Survey Bulletin, and the National Fitness Action Program. GDP per capita, population density, and total number of publicly operated buses and taxis were obtained from the China Urban Statistical Yearbook. Applying big data mining technology, population migration data utilized to calculate effective distance were gathered from website of Baidu Migration (, and the search popularity of the term used to characterize residents’ awareness of prevention was obtained from the website of Baidu Index ( The original data for public health interventions were compiled from provincial and municipal emergency response headquarters for the prevention and control of COVID-19.

2.2.1 Dependent variable: COVID-19 outcomes.

The dependent variables in this paper included daily COVID-19 morbidity, mortality rate, and cure rate, calculated as: (1) where morbidityi,t denotes the COVID-19 morbidity rate of city i at date t, confirmi,t signifies the cumulative number of confirmed cases of city i in date t, and populationi gives us the total population of city i. (2) where morbidityi,t denotes the COVID-19 mortality rate of city i in date t, and deathi,t stands for the number of deaths of city i in date t. If the denominator confirmi,t is 0, then morbidityi,t also takes a value of 0. (3) where cure ratei,t represents the COVID-19 cure rate of city i in date t, curei,t means the number of cures of city i in date t. If the denominator confirmi,t is 0, then curei,t also takes a value of 0.

2.2.2 Independent variable: Physical exercise participation.

The independent variable of this paper was the regular physical exercise participation of city i in 2019, that is, the number of people who regularly engage in physical exercise: (4) where populationi represents the total population of city i in 2019, and regular PEx participation ratei represents the proportion of regular physical exercise participants of city i in 2019.

Data on the proportion of regular physical exercise participants were collected from official bulletins in the National Fitness Report, the National Fitness Development Survey Bulletin, and the National Fitness Action Program released by each province, which refers to the proportion of residents aged 7 years and above who participate in physical exercise, moderate intensity or above, for at least 30-minute 3 times or more per week. According to the General Administration of Sport of China, moderate-intensity physical exercise refers to activities that require some exertion but still allow you to speak easily during the activity, such as fast walking, dancing, leisure swimming, playing tennis, and playing golf. Moderate exercise intensity is often represented by brisk walking, and the lower limit of moderate intensity is a medium speed (4km/h).

To comprehend the general situation of the physical fitness participation of urban and rural residents in China and to evaluate the implementation effect of the national fitness strategy, the General Administration of Sport of China regularly organizes the investigation of the national fitness and issues the National Fitness Investigation Bulletin. According to the guiding opinions stemming from the investigation, each provincial General Administration of Sport collects information including the number of people who participate in physical exercise once or more a week, the number of people who regularly participate in physical exercise, the venues and facilities, and the content and the duration of physical exercise of the permanent population of cities, counties, and districts using multistage stratified random sampling.

2.2.3 Control variables.

With respect to control variables, social and economic factors affected the development of the epidemic, among which population density [73], economic development [55], and traffic flow [74] were important influential factors. Therefore, in this paper, we selected urban population density, per capita GDP, and the total number of public-operated buses and taxis as control variables and introduced them into the model.

The epidemic risk perception of the public helped them to take personal precautions in time and reduce unnecessary contacts, thus reducing the possibility of being infected [75, 76]. In this paper, we made use of the Baidu search index term "COVID-19" as the proxy variable of residents’ protection awareness. We converted the Baidu search index, a continuous variable, into a 0–1 dummy variable according to the mean value. If it was higher than the mean value, the value was 1, indicating high self-protection awareness of residents; otherwise, the value was 0.

In China, timely and strict public health interventions have played a crucial role in the mitigation of the COVID-19 outbreak. Referring to Huang et al. [77], we scored the public health measures implementation intensity of each city based on the epidemic prevention policy announcement issued by the health commission and converted it into a dummy variable according to the mean value. If the value was higher than the mean value, then the value was 1, indicating relatively strict prevention and control intensity; otherwise, the value was 0.

Studies have shown that population mobility does not mainly depend on the geographical distance between regions, but on the convenience of mobility, that is, the effective distance between regions [77]. Referring to Lin et al. [59], we calculated the effective distance to Wuhan, the city with the most severe epidemic in China. We retrieved the data from the Baidu migration website using big data technology.

2.3 Study design

First, the mean, standard deviation, maximum, and minimum values of all variables were calculated, as is shown in Table 1. Then, in order to analyze the effect of physical exercise participation on COVID-19 outcomes, we constructed a multiple linear regression, estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS) [78]. The empirical model is as follows: (5) where outcomesi,t is the dependent variable, representing a series of COVID-19 outcomes of city i in date t, including morbidity, mortality, and cure rates. PEi is the independent variable, which denotes the physical exercise participation of city i in 2019, i.e., the number of people who engage in physical exercise regularly. Xi represents a series of control variables, including urban population density, GDP per capita, effective distance to Wuhan city, dummy variable of residents’ awareness of prevention, dummy variable of public health measures, and the total number of public-operated buses and taxis. δc is a provincial fixed effect to control for provincial factors that do not vary over time, and δt is a time-fixed effect to control for temporal factors that do not vary with individuals. εi,t is random error term.

3 Result

3.1 Statistical description

A statistical description of the variables is shown in Table 1.

3.2 Influence of PEx on COVID-19 outcomes

Table 2 demonstrates the effects of physical exercise on COVID-19 outcomes, broken down as follows: columns (1)—(2) of Table 2 report the influence of PEx on COVID-19 morbidity, columns (3)—(4) report the influence of PE on COVID-19 mortality, and columns (5)—(6) report the PEx effect on COVID-19 cure. Columns (1), (3), and (5) report the results of regressions of dependent variables on independent variables alone. To avoid biased estimation results due to significant omitted variables, columns (2), (4), and (6) introduce a series of factors that also influence the variable of interest, i.e., control variables, based on columns (1), (3) and (5), the treatment of which helped to identify causal relationships. It can be seen that the coefficients of PEx in columns (1) and (2) are negative and significant at the 1% level, indicating that physical exercise participation shows a negative causal relationship with the COVID-19 incidence, i.e., participating in physical exercise significantly reduces the morbidity of COVID-19 epidemic. Similarly, PEx coefficients in columns (3) and (4) are also significantly negative, indicating that engaging in physical exercise can significantly reduce the COVID-19 mortality rate. As for the right-hand third of the Table 2, PEx coefficients in columns (5) and (6) were significantly positive, indicating that physical exercise positively affects COVID-19 cure rate.

3.3 Robustness test

First, considering that Hubei was the province with the most severe outbreak in 2020, in the robustness test, we excluded Hubei Province from the full sample to re-estimate the coefficients, and the results are reported in columns (1) to (3) of Table 3. Second, since the large-scale COVID-19 outbreak in China did not begin until late January 2020, there were no cases in most cities in January. To prevent the interference of too many zero values on the estimation results, we excluded the sample of January to re-estimate the coefficients, and the results are reported in columns (4) to (6) of Table 3. The results of the robustness test show that the regression coefficients of PEx on morbidity and mortality remained significantly negative, and those on cure rate remained significantly positive, which is consistent with the result of baseline regression, which proves the robustness of the results.

3.4 Heterogeneity of health benefits of PEx in high-risk and low-risk areas

Further, we defined samples with cumulative case growth rates greater than the mean value as the high-risk group and those less than the mean value as the low-risk group, and performed sub-sample regressions to explore the heterogeneous PEx benefit in high- and low-risk areas. Columns (1) and (2) in Table 4 report the subsample results for the PEx effect on morbidity; columns (3) and (4) report the results for mortality; and columns (5) and (6) report that of cure rates. The results show that the coefficient of PEx is greater in high-risk areas than in low-risk areas for both morbidity, mortality, and cure rates, especially for the effect on the morbidity of the epidemic, suggesting that the health benefits of physical exercise are relatively greater and more significant when the pandemic is more severe.

4 Discussion

There are many factors that influence COVID-19 outcomes, including public health interventions, vaccination availability and rates, demographic characteristics, environmental variables, health care resources, etc. [5254, 5861, 63]. In our research, we constructed a two-way fixed effect model of multiple linear regression to empirically investigate the effects of physical exercise on a series of COVID-19 outcomes using prefecture-daily data related to PEx and COVID-19 from January 1 to March 17, 2020 in mainland China. The results show that there is relatively lower COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and a higher cure rate during the pandemic in areas with a higher proportion of engaging in regular physical exercise before it, implying that PEx does have a significant effect on COVID-19 outcomes.

Our study expands the body of research on the health benefits of physical exercise, which has been demonstrated in existing studies to be effective not only in reducing the risk of chronic diseases [79, 80] but also in improving autoimmunity [81] and also has a positive effect on the suppression of emerging infectious diseases [46]. Furthermore, our study is consistent with the results of the existing literature exploring physical exercise effect on pandemics, demonstrating the positive role of PEx in the pandemic [8284], with the difference being that we focus on the effects of physical exercise before the outbreak on the health outcomes during it, i.e., we pay more attention to the long-term effects of physical exercise. Moreover, in contrast to the existing literature, in addition to infection and mortality rates, we also discuss the influence of PEx on COVID-19 cure rates.

Further, we also explore the heterogeneity of the physical exercise effect in areas with different risk levels, and the results show that the influence of PEx is more significant in high-risk areas, in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cure rates. In particular, the difference in PEx benefits on morbidity is greatest between high- and low-risk areas, suggesting that the effect of PEx on morbidity is most pronounced in high-risk areas. This result suggests that participating in physical exercise regularly before such an outbreak makes significant health effects, especially in the case of a more severe epidemic; therefore, we should actively engage in physical exercise to reduce risks to our health when a pandemic comes.

However, there are still some limitations that need to be explored in the future. First, restricted by the available data and the period of the selected sample in this study, we do not consider the effect of vaccination. In the following studies, we will attempt to obtain data sets for longer periods, as well as vaccination-related data. In addition, the current results fail to control individual factors that would influence COVID-19 outcomes, so we attempt to match region-level data with micro-individual data to control for the potential impact of individual information on epidemic outcomes and to explore more heterogeneous results for individual-level characteristics such as gender and age. Third, limited by the availability of physical exercise-related data, we are unable to capture information on exercise intensity, which is also a very important influential factor. In the following studies, we will try to apply data mining techniques to access exercise big data to better identify information on exercise duration, intensity, and frequency to obtain more accurate conclusions.

5 Conclusion

In this article, we constructed a two-way fixed effects model of multiple linear regression, collected daily prefectural data related to physical exercise and the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China from January 1 to March 17, 2020, and estimated the health benefit of engaging in regular physical exercise before the pandemic on a series of COVID-19 outcomes during the pandemic. We found that there is relatively lower COVID-19 morbidity, mortality, and a higher cure rate in areas with a higher proportion of individuals engaging in regular physical exercise before the pandemic, implying that PEx has a significant positive effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Finally, we also examined the heterogeneity of the health benefit of physical exercise in areas with different risk levels, and the results showed that the effect of PEx was more pronounced in high-risk areas in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cure rates.


  1. 1. WHO. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020 (2020).—11-march-2020 (2020).
  2. 2. Wang H., Paulson K. R., Pease S. A., Watson S., Comfort H., Zheng P., et al. (2022). Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. The Lancet, 399(10334), 1513–1536.
  3. 3. Adam D. (2022). COVID’s true death toll: much higher than official records. Nature, 603(7902), 562–562. pmid:35277684
  4. 4. Lenzen M., Li M., Malik A., Pomponi F., Sun Y. Y., Wiedmann T., et al. (2020). Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the Coronavirus pandemic. PloS one, 15(7), e0235654. pmid:32645023
  5. 5. Brooks S. K., Webster R. K., Smith L. E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., et al. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The lancet, 395(10227), 912–920.
  6. 6. Jeyanathan M., Afkhami S., Smaill F., Miller M. S., Lichty B. D., & Xing Z. (2020). Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies. Nature Reviews Immunology, 20(10), 615–632. pmid:32887954
  7. 7. World Health Organization. Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. WHO (2020).
  8. 8. Mathieu E., Ritchie H., Ortiz-Ospina E., Roser M., Hasell J., Appel C., et al. (2021). A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature human behaviour, 5(7), 947–953. pmid:33972767
  9. 9. Zheng C., Shao W., Chen X., Zhang B., Wang G., & Zhang W. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 114, 252–260. pmid:34800687
  10. 10. Lipsitch M., & Dean N. E. (2020). Understanding COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Science, 370(6518), 763–765. pmid:33087460
  11. 11. Menni C., Valdes A. M., Polidori L., Antonelli M., Penamakuri S., Nogal A., et al. (2022). Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. The Lancet.
  12. 12. Morales A. C., Rice A. M., Ho A. T., Mordstein C., Mühlhausen S., Watson S., et al. (2021). Causes and consequences of purifying selection on SARS-CoV-2. Genome biology and evolution, 13(10), evab196. pmid:34427640
  13. 13. Cao Y., Wang J., Jian F., Xiao T., Song W., Yisimayi A., et al. (2022). Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Nature, 602(7898), 657–663. pmid:35016194
  14. 14. Liu L., Iketani S., Guo Y., Chan J. F. W., Wang M., Liu L., et al. (2022). Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Nature, 602(7898), 676–681. pmid:35016198
  15. 15. Liu Y., Liu J., Xia H., Zhang X., Fontes-Garfias C. R., Swanson K. A., et al. (2021). Neutralizing activity of BNT162b2-elicited serum. New England Journal of Medicine, 384(15), 1466–1468. pmid:33684280
  16. 16. Koyama T., Platt D., & Parida L. (2020). Variant analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(7), 495. pmid:32742035
  17. 17. Alhazmi A., Alamer E., Daws D., Hakami M., Darraj M., Abdelwahab S., et al. (2021). Evaluation of side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi Arabia. Vaccines, 9(6), 674. pmid:34207394
  18. 18. Kupek E. (2021). Low COVID-19 vaccination coverage and high COVID-19 mortality rates in Brazilian elderly. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 24. pmid:34524364
  19. 19. Schroeder E. C., Franke W. D., Sharp R. L., & Lee D. C. (2019). Comparative effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and combined training on cardiovascular disease risk factors: A randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 14(1), e0210292. pmid:30615666
  20. 20. Garber C. E., Blissmer B., Deschenes M. R., Franklin B. A., Lamonte M. J., Lee I. M., et al. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.
  21. 21. Nieman D. C., & Wentz L. M. (2019). The compelling link between physical activity and the body’s defense system. Journal of sport and health science, 8(3), 201–217. pmid:31193280
  22. 22. Jiménez-Pavón D., Carbonell-Baeza A., & Lavie C. J. (2020). Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: Special focus in older people. Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 63(3), 386. pmid:32220590
  23. 23. Fragala M. S., Cadore E. L., Dorgo S., Izquierdo M., Kraemer W. J., Peterson M. D., et al. (2019). Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the national strength and conditioning association. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 33(8). pmid:31343601
  24. 24. Gomes M. J., Martinez P. F., Pagan L. U., Damatto R. L., Cezar M. D. M., Lima A. R. R., et al. (2017). Skeletal muscle aging: influence of oxidative stress and physical exercise. Oncotarget, 8(12), 20428. pmid:28099900
  25. 25. Kai M. C., Anderson M., & Lau E. (2003). Exercise interventions: defusing the world’s osteoporosis time bomb. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81, 827–830. pmid:14758410
  26. 26. Lavie C. J., Arena R., Swift D. L., Johannsen N. M., Sui X., Lee D. C., et al. (2015). Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation research, 117(2), 207–219. pmid:26139859
  27. 27. Vainshelboim B., Oliveira J., Fox B. D., Soreck Y., Fruchter O., & Kramer M. R. (2015). Long-term effects of a 12-week exercise training program on clinical outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lung, 193(3), 345–354. pmid:25731736
  28. 28. Northey J. M., Cherbuin N., Pumpa K. L., Smee D. J., & Rattray B. (2018). Exercise interventions for cognitive function in adults older than 50: a systematic review with meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine, 52(3), 154–160. pmid:28438770
  29. 29. Inoue M., Iso H., Yamamoto S., Kurahashi N., Iwasaki M., Sasazuki S., et al. (2008). Daily total physical activity level and premature death in men and women: results from a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan (JPHC study). Annals of epidemiology, 18(7), 522–530. pmid:18504139
  30. 30. Ekelund U., Tarp J., Steene-Johannessen J., Hansen B. H., Jefferis B., Fagerland M. W., et al. (2019). Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. bmj, 366. pmid:31434697
  31. 31. Stamatakis E., Gale J., Bauman A., Ekelund U., Hamer M., & Ding D. (2019). Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(16), 2062–2072. pmid:31023430
  32. 32. Kubota Y., Sohn J., & Kawaguchi Y. (2018). Large volume electron microscopy and neural microcircuit analysis. Frontiers in neural circuits, 12, 98. pmid:30483066
  33. 33. Durstine J. L., Gordon B., Wang Z., & Luo X. (2013). Chronic disease and the link to physical activity. Journal of sport and health science, 2(1), 3–11.
  34. 34. Lee C. D., Folsom A. R., & Blair S. N. (2003). Physical activity and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke, 34(10), 2475–2481. pmid:14500932
  35. 35. Borer K. T. (2005). Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women. Sports medicine, 35(9), 779–830.
  36. 36. Sigal R. J., Kenny G. P., Wasserman D. H., & Castaneda-Sceppa C. (2004). Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care, 27(10), 2518–2539. pmid:15451933
  37. 37. Chaput J. P., Klingenberg L., Rosenkilde M., Gilbert J. A., Tremblay A., & Sjödin A. (2011). Physical activity plays an important role in body weight regulation. Journal of obesity, 2011. pmid:20847894
  38. 38. Hills A. P., Andersen L. B., & Byrne N. M. (2011). Physical activity and obesity in children. British journal of sports medicine, 45(11), 866–870. pmid:21836171
  39. 39. Hill J. O., & Wyatt H. R. (2005). Role of physical activity in preventing and treating obesity. Journal of applied physiology. pmid:16020440
  40. 40. Wang Q., & Zhou W. (2021). Roles and molecular mechanisms of physical exercise in cancer prevention and treatment. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 10(2), 201–210. pmid:32738520
  41. 41. Edwards M. K., & Loprinzi P. D. (2016). Experimentally increasing sedentary behavior results in increased anxiety in an active young adult population. Journal of affective disorders, 204, 166–173. pmid:27351099
  42. 42. Schuch F. B., Deslandes A. C., Stubbs B., Gosmann N. P., da Silva C. T. B., & de Almeida Fleck M. P. (2016). Neurobiological effects of exercise on major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 61, 1–11. pmid:26657969
  43. 43. Huang H., Fan C., Li M., Nie H. L., Wang F. B., Wang H., et al. (2020). COVID-19: a call for physical scientists and engineers. ACS nano, 14(4), 3747–3754. pmid:32267678
  44. 44. Stubbs B., Vancampfort D., Rosenbaum S., Firth J., Cosco T., Veronese N., et al. (2017). An examination of the anxiolytic effects of exercise for people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry research, 249, 102–108. pmid:28088704
  45. 45. Peake J. (2020). Interrelations between acute and chronic exercise stress and the immune and endocrine systems. In Endocrinology of physical activity and sport (pp. 249–266). Humana, Cham.
  46. 46. Ranieri M., Megna M., Lancioni G. E., Jirillo E., Amico A. P., Nardulli M., et al. (2009). Physical exercise and the immune system. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, 22(3_suppl), 29–32. pmid:19887040
  47. 47. Brolinson P. G., & Elliott D. (2007). Exercise and the immune system. Clinics in sports medicine, 26(3), 311–319. pmid:17826186
  48. 48. Walsh N. P., Gleeson M., Pyne D. B., Nieman D. C., Dhabhar F. S., Shephard R. J., et al. (2011). Position statement part two: maintaining immune health.
  49. 49. Ranasinghe C., Ozemek C., & Arena R. (2020). Exercise and well-being during COVID 19–time to boost your immunity. Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 18(12), 1195–1200. pmid:32662717
  50. 50. Woods J. A., Hutchinson N. T., Powers S. K., Roberts W. O., Gomez-Cabrera M. C., Radak Z., et al. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2(2), 55–64. pmid:34189484
  51. 51. de Oliveira Bristot V. J., de Bem Alves A. C., Cardoso L. R., da Luz Scheffer D., & Aguiar A. S. Jr (2019). The role of PGC-1α/UCP2 signaling in the beneficial effects of physical exercise on the brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 292. pmid:30983964
  52. 52. Salmon P. (2001). Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depression, and sensitivity to stress: a unifying theory. Clinical psychology review, 21(1), 33–61. pmid:11148895
  53. 53. Andrews N., Stowe J., Kirsebom F., Toffa S., Rickeard T., Gallagher E., et al. (2022). Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron (B. 1.1. 529) variant. New England Journal of Medicine. pmid:35249272
  54. 54. Shinde V., Bhikha S., Hoosain Z., Archary M., Bhorat Q., Fairlie L., et al. (2021). Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 vaccine against the B. 1.351 variant. New England Journal of Medicine, 384(20), 1899–1909. pmid:33951374
  55. 55. Ayouni I., Maatoug J., Dhouib W., Zammit N., Fredj S. B., Ghammam R., et al. (2021). Effective public health measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19: a systematic review. BMC public health, 21(1), 1–14.
  56. 56. Lin R., Lin S., Yan N., & Huang J. (2021). Do prevention and control measures work? Evidence from the outbreak of COVID-19 in China. Cities, 118, 103347. pmid:34312572
  57. 57. Haug N., Geyrhofer L., Londei A., Dervic E., Desvars-Larrive A., Loreto V., et al. (2020). Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nature human behaviour, 4(12), 1303–1312. pmid:33199859
  58. 58. Kucharski A. J., Klepac P., Conlan A. J., Kissler S. M., Tang M. L., Fry H., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(10), 1151–1160. pmid:32559451
  59. 59. Lin R., Wang X., & Huang J. (2022). The influence of weather conditions on the COVID-19 epidemic: Evidence from 279 prefecture-level panel data in China. Environmental Research, 206, 112272. pmid:34695427
  60. 60. Shi P., Dong Y., Yan H., Zhao C., Li X., Liu W., et al. (2020). Impact of temperature on the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science of the total environment, 728, 138890. pmid:32339844
  61. 61. Bashir M. F., Ma B., Komal B., Bashir M. A., Tan D., & Bashir M. (2020). Correlation between climate indicators and COVID-19 pandemic in New York, USA. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138835. pmid:32334162
  62. 62. Jia J. S., Lu X., Yuan Y., Xu G., Jia J., & Christakis N. A. (2020). Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China. Nature, 582(7812), 389–394. pmid:32349120
  63. 63. Liu J., Hao J., Sun Y., & Shi Z. (2021). Network analysis of population flow among major cities and its influence on COVID-19 transmission in China. Cities, 112, 103138. pmid:33564205
  64. 64. Wang X., Li Q., Sun X., He S., Xia F., Song P., et al. (2021). Effects of medical resource capacities and intensities of public mitigation measures on outcomes of COVID-19 outbreaks. BMC public health, 21(1), 1–11.
  65. 65. De Sousa R A L, Improta-Caria A C, Aras-Júnior R, et al. Physical exercise effects on the brain during COVID-19 pandemic: links between mental and cardiovascular health[J]. Neurological Sciences, 2021, 42(4): 1325–1334.
  66. 66. Improta-Caria A. C., Soci Ú. P. R., Pinho C. S., Aras Júnior R., De Sousa R. A. L., & Bessa T. C. B. (2021). Physical exercise and immune system: perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 67, 102–107. pmid:34259761
  67. 67. Amatori S., Donati Zeppa S., Preti A., Gervasi M., Gobbi E., Ferrini F., et al. (2020). Dietary habits and psychological states during COVID-19 home isolation in Italian college students: the role of physical exercise. Nutrients, 12(12), 3660. pmid:33260711
  68. 68. Kaur H., Singh T., Arya Y. K., & Mittal S. (2020). Physical fitness and exercise during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative enquiry. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 2943. pmid:33250827
  69. 69. Callow D. D., Arnold-Nedimala N. A., Jordan L. S., Pena G. S., Won J., Woodard J. L., et al. (2020). The mental health benefits of physical activity in older adults survive the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(10), 1046–1057. pmid:32713754
  70. 70. Fernández-Lázaro D., González-Bernal J. J., Sánchez-Serrano N., Navascués L. J., Ascaso-del-Río A., & Mielgo-Ayuso J. (2020). Physical exercise as a multimodal tool for COVID-19: could it be used as a preventive strategy?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(22), 8496. pmid:33212762
  71. 71. Chagas E F B, Biteli P, Candeloro B M, et al. Physical exercise and COVID-19: a summary of the recommendations[J]. Aims Bioengineering, 2020, 7(4): 236–241.
  72. 72. Dwyer M. J., Pasini M., De Dominicis S., & Righi E. (2020). Physical activity: Benefits and challenges during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 30(7), 1291. pmid:32542719
  73. 73. Cheng S., Chen Y., Meng F., Chen J., Liu G., & Song M. (2021). Impacts of local public expenditure on CO2 emissions in Chinese cities: A spatial cluster decomposition analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105217.
  74. 74. Rocklöv J., & Sjödin H. (2020). High population densities catalyse the spread of COVID-19. Journal of travel medicine, 27(3), taaa038. pmid:32227186
  75. 75. Nohara Y., & Manabe T. (2022). Impact of human mobility and networking on spread of COVID-19 at the time of the 1st and 2nd epidemic waves in Japan: An effective distance approach. PloS one, 17(8), e0272996. pmid:35951674
  76. 76. Tsoy D., Tirasawasdichai T., & Kurpayanidi K. I. (2021). Role of social media in shaping public risk perception during COVID-19 pandemic: A theoretical review. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 7(2), 35–41.
  77. 77. Huang J., Lin S., Hu X., & Lin R. (2022). Are Sports Champions Also Anti-Epidemic Heroes? Quantitative Research on the Influence of Sports Champions’ Demonstration Effect on the COVID-19 Epidemic in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2438. pmid:35206626
  78. 78. Brockmann D., & Helbing D. (2013). The hidden geometry of complex, network-driven contagion phenomena. science, 342(6164), 1337–1342. pmid:24337289
  79. 79. Wooldridge J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
  80. 80. Anderson E., & Durstine J. L. (2019). Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: A brief review. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 1(1), 3–10. pmid:35782456
  81. 81. Pedersen B. K., & Saltin B. (2006). Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 16(S1), 3–63. pmid:16451303
  82. 82. Keast D., Cameron K., & Morton A. R. (1988). Exercise and the immune response. Sports Medicine, 5(4), 248–267. pmid:3287548
  83. 83. Abdelbasset W. K. (2020). Stay Home: Role of physical exercise training in elderly individuals’ ability to face the covid-19 infection. Journal of immunology research, 2020. pmid:33354578
  84. 84. Jee Y. S. (2020). Physical exercise for strengthening innate immunity during COVID-19 pandemic: 4th series of scientific evidence. Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 16(5), 383. pmid:33178638