Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Correction: MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction

  • Otília Menyhart,
  • Boglárka Weltz,
  • Balázs Győrffy
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

After the publication of this article [1] it was noticed that in the Sequential methods for multiple-testing correction subsection of the Introduction, the description of the Hochberg-correction contains an error.

The correct paragraph is: The Hochberg-correction, also called the step-up method, is based on a reverse scenario when the largest p-value is examined first. Once a significant p-value is identified, all the remaining smaller p-values would be declared significant (13). For example, if n = 500, the largest p-values are 0.3, 0.05, 0.01, and α = 0.05, the following adjustments are concluded:

  1. Rank#1: 0.3 * 1 = 0.3, 0.3 > 0.05, the test is not significant
  2. Rank#2: 0.05 * 2 = 0.1, 0.1 > 0.05, the test is not significant
  3. Rank#3: 0.01 * 3 = 0.03, 0.03 < 0.05, the test is significant, reject the hull hypothesis, and all of the remaining p-values will be significant after correction.

The authors have stated that the online tool developed for multiple hypothesis testing corrections at www.multipletesting.com employs the correct Hochberg step-up algorithm.

Reference

  1. 1. Menyhart O, Weltz B, Győrffy B (2021) MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction. PLoS ONE 16(6): e0245824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245824 pmid:34106935