Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Isolation, cryo-laser scanning confocal microscope imaging and cryo-FIB milling of mouse glutamatergic synaptosomes

  • Prerana Gogoi,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America

  • Momoko Shiozaki,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America

  • Eric Gouaux

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    gouauxe@ohsu.edu

    Affiliations Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) at postsynaptic terminals mediate the majority of fast excitatory neurotransmission in response to release of glutamate from the presynaptic terminal. Obtaining structural information on the molecular organization of iGluRs in their native environment, along with other signaling and scaffolding proteins in the postsynaptic density (PSD), and associated proteins on the presynaptic terminal, would enhance understanding of the molecular basis for excitatory synaptic transmission in normal and in disease states. Cryo-electron tomography (ET) studies of synaptosomes is one attractive vehicle by which to study iGluR-containing excitatory synapses. Here we describe a workflow for the preparation of glutamatergic synaptosomes for cryo-ET studies. We describe the utilization of fluorescent markers for the facile detection of the pre and postsynaptic terminals of glutamatergic synaptosomes using cryo-laser scanning confocal microscope (cryo-LSM). We further provide the details for preparation of lamellae, between ~100 to 200 nm thick, of glutamatergic synaptosomes using cryo-focused ion-beam (FIB) milling. We monitor the lamella preparation using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and following lamella production, we identify regions for subsequent cryo-ET studies by confocal fluorescent imaging, exploiting the pre and postsynaptic fluorophores.

Introduction

Glutamate released from the presynaptic terminal acts upon the postsynaptic ionotropic glutamate-receptor ion channels (iGluRs) that include the AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid), NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) and kainate receptors, causing the influx of cations (Na+, K+ and Ca2+) and resulting in excitatory synaptic transmission [1,2]. iGluRs are mostly concentrated in the postsynaptic density (PSD) and are anchored by an intricate web of specialized protein molecules that regulate their trafficking and modulate their expression and functional properties, influencing synaptic plasticity [36]. In the “lateral” dimension of a synapse, AMPA receptors (AMPAR) and NMDA receptors (NMDAR) are arranged in a distinctive subsynaptic distribution to align with the presynaptic release site, which in turn, influences receptor activation [7]. Within the synapse, AMPARs and NMDARs are organized into subregions of higher receptor density termed nanodomains or nanoclusters [810]. A typical hippocampal synapse contains one to three nanodomains, 80–100 nm in diameter, with an estimated ~25 receptors per nanocluster and ~100 receptors per synapse [911]. However, depending on the brain region and synapse size, the number and size of the nanodomain varies [12]. AMPAR nanodomains are localized at the PSD periphery and broadly distributed across the synapse, while NMDAR nanodomains occupy the central region of the PSD. [11,1317]. A visual insight into the arrangement of the iGluRs in the postsynaptic terminal, in conjunction with the presynaptic terminal, would contribute towards understanding the molecular basis of synaptic transmission.

One attractive model for studying synapses are pinched-off synaptic nerve terminals, known as synaptosomes [18,19]. Typically, synaptosomes are ~0.5–1 μm in diameter and consist of re-sealed presynaptic and postsynaptic nerve terminals with the ability to retain functional properties such as membrane potential and depolarization-induced neurotransmitter release [2023]. A re-sealed presynaptic compartment encloses the contents of the nerve terminal such as synaptic vesicles, mitochondria and cytoskeleton. The postsynaptic termini within a synaptosome carries a portion of the postsynaptic membrane along with the postsynaptic density (PSD). Most importantly, the postsynaptic membranes bear receptors including iGluRs, along with a set of scaffold proteins that constitute the PSD and hold the receptors in position [2432]. Density gradient centrifugation using either sucrose, Ficoll or Percoll have been popularly used for isolating synaptosomes. These methods are especially useful for nerve terminals on dendritic spines and their application results in synaptosomes containing all the neurotransmitter types [3338]. Over time, attempts have been made to reduce the preparation time in order to minimize synaptosomal shrinkage and mechanical damage and to increase viability and functional integrity [3742].

Synaptosomes can be employed as an experimental system for gaining insight into the structural organization of iGluRs at the PSD using present-day structure determination techniques. Recent developments in the field of cryo-electron tomography (ET) makes it an attractive tool to elucidate the biological structures such as glutamatergic synaptosomes in their near-to-native state [4346]. Vitreous sectioning of mammalian synapses in organotypic slices or in dissociated primary neuronal cultural have been applied to image synapses using cryo-ET [4749]. However, vitreous sections suffer from substantial compression artifacts and primary neuronal cultures tend to grow into thick areas which are difficult to image. While a previous study was successful in performing cryo-ET of cultured hippocampal neurons in distinguishing excitatory and inhibitory synapses [50], methods to visualize synapses derived from native brain tissue may allow for additional insights into the structure and organization of synaptic zones. Another recent study demonstrated the advantages of utilizing a synaptosomal preparation [46]. However, no studies of cultured neurons or of synaptosomes have exploited fluorescent markers to unambiguously identify GluA2-containing glutamatergic synapses. To address this issue, we have developed a workflow to prepare artifact-free thin (~100–200 nm) dual fluorescently-labelled glutamatergic synaptosomes on cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) grids by utilizing cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling [5153]. We utilized a knock‐in mouse line that expresses a fully functional fluorescently (mVenus) labelled vesicular glutamate transporter-1 (vGLUT1), a specific presynaptic marker for glutamatergic synapses [54]. For identification of post synapses, we utilized a well characterized GluA2 subunit specific antibody fragment, 15F1 Fab, tagged with mCherry (15F1 Fab-mCherry) [55,56].

Here we detail a workflow for the preparation of glutamatergic synaptosomes using three different methods of density gradient centrifugation for subsequent cryo-ET studies (Fig 1). Irrespective of the density gradient centrifugation method used, the preparation time of synaptosomes to cryo-EM grid preparation can be completed in ~4–5 hrs. Cryo-confocal fluorescence microscopy was employed to identify glutamatergic synaptosomes. Subsequently, fluorescence guided cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling was performed for rendering lamellae suitable for cryo-ET studies.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Workflow for the preparation of cryo-FIB milled glutamatergic synaptosomes for cryo-ET studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g001

Materials and methods

The protocol described in this peer-reviewed article is published on protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kxygxz5mkv8j/v1 and is included for printing as S1 File with this article.

Expected results

We utilized fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography (FSEC) [57] to confirm the presence of glutamatergic synaptosomes in the retrieved fraction after sucrose, Ficoll or Percoll density gradient centrifugation. In all instances, the presence of the vGLUT1-mVenus and 15F1 Fab-mCherry bound AMPAR in the synaptosome preparation were indicated by fluorescence signals in the mVenus (λex: 510 nm, λem: 535 nm) and mCherry (λex: 580 nm, λem: 610 nm) channels, respectively. The elution times of the vGLUT1 (~1850 sec) and AMPA (~1450 sec) correspond to their expected molecular weights, ~175 and ~600 kDa, respectively (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. FSEC analysis of isolated glutamatergic synaptosomes.

Detection of (A) vGLUT1-mVenus and (B) AMPAR bound to 15F1 Fab-mCherry in isolated synaptosomes using Venus (λex: 510 nm, λem: 530 nm) and mCherry (λex: 580 nm, λem: 610 nm) channels, respectively, via FSEC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g002

Cryo-EM grids of glutamatergic synaptosomes prepared using a sucrose density gradient had a distinct drawback as compared to synaptosomes prepared using either Ficoll or Percoll density gradient. Synaptosomes prepared using sucrose density gradient tend to form aggregates after application on cryo-EM grids (Fig 3A–3C). A similar event could be observed for undiluted synaptosome samples prepared using Ficoll or Percoll density gradients. However, a 50-fold dilution of the synaptosomes prepared by Ficoll or Percoll density gradient results in a homogeneous distribution on cryo-EM grids (Fig 3D–3I). The presence of glutamatergic synaptosomes is marked by the presence of overlapping green and red fluorescence signals on the EM grids (Fig 3J and 3K).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Cryo-LSM images of glutamatergic synaptosomes on cryo-EM grids isolated using (A-C) sucrose, (D-F) Ficoll and (G-I) Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Fluorescence signals of vGLUT1-mVenus and AMPAR-15F1 Fab-mCherry at the pre and postsynaptic compartments of synaptosomes are in the green and red channel, respectively. Zoomed-in images of glutamatergic synaptosomes prepared using (J) Ficoll and (K) Percoll density gradient centrifugation corresponding to areas enclosed in cyan dashed box in (F) and (I). Glutamatergic synaptosomes are highlighted with white arrows. Scale bar in (A-I): 5 μm; scale bar in (J,K): 2 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g003

Further, we filtered the synaptosomes after density gradient centrifugation by passing through a 1 μm filter using a thermobarrel extruder. The filtered synaptosomes were applied on cryo-EM grids and subsequently imaged under cryo-LSM. Glutamatergic synaptosomes subjected to filtration appeared to be more monodisperse, with a uniform distribution (Fig 4A–4D).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Cryo-LSM images of glutamatergic synaptosomes on cryo-EM grids passed through 1 μm filter using a thermobarrel extruder.

Fluorescence signals from green, red and both green & red channels corresponding to (A) vGLUT1-mVenus, (B) AMPAR-15F1 Fab-mCherry and (C) both vGLUT1-mVenus & AMPAR-15F1 Fab-mCherry. (D) Zoomed-in area enclosed in cyan dashed box in (C) with glutamatergic synaptosomes highlighted with white arrows. Scale bar in (A-C): 5 μm and scale bar in (D): 2 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g004

Cryo-FIB milling of synaptosomes resulted in lamellae with a thickness range of ~100–200 nm with sample area of ~3–6 μm (Fig 5A–5C). To examine the presence of fluorescent signals associated with glutamatergic synaptosome on the milled lamella, the grids were imaged using cryo-LSM. Interestingly, the fluorescence signal from glutamatergic synaptosomes corresponding to vGLUT1-mVenus and 15F1 Fab-mCherry bound to AMPAR could be detected, indicating the successful preparation of cryo-FIB milled lamellae of glutamatergic synaptosomes (Fig 6A–6F). To further confirm the presence of synaptosome on lamella, cryo-ET imaging was performed on a FIB-milled lamella and the tomogram was reconstructed. The reconstructed tomogram revealed a typical synaptosome (diameter: < 1 μm) with a presynaptic terminal associated to a much smaller postsynaptic compartment separated by a synaptic cleft of ~ 20 nm. The presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes had a smooth and continuous appearance without any visible signs of aggregation (Fig 6G).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Cryo-SEM images of synaptosomes at different stages of FIB-milling.

(A) Cryo-SEM images of the whole cryo-EM grid with the selected squares for FIB-milling highlighted with cyan sphere. (B) Representative cryo-SEM image of a lamella preparation during rough milling. The lamella lies between the two milling patterns shown as yellow bars. Lateral micro-expansion joints [58], marked with yellow arrow, are created on both side of the lamella (only shown for the right-hand side) (C) Representative image of a polished synaptosome lamella with the sample area that can be imaged using cryo-ET enclosed in cyan dashed box. The platinum (Pt) gas injection system (GIS) layer is marked with yellow double arrow. Scale bar: 5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6.

Cryo-LSM images of glutamatergic synaptosomes in two cryo-FIB-milled lamellae, (A-C) lamella 1 and (D-F) lamella 2. Fluorescence signal from green, red and both green & red channels corresponding to (A) vGLUT1-mVenus, (B) AMPAR-15F1 Fab-mCherry and (C) overlay of vGLUT1-mVenus and AMPAR-15F1 Fab-mCherry, respectively. Glutamatergic synaptosomes are highlighted with white arrows. Scale bar: 5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.g006

The workflow presented here describes the conditions to prepare glutamatergic synaptosomes using density gradient centrifugation followed by preparation of lamellae using cryo-FIB milling suitable for cryo-ET imaging. A comparison was drawn among synaptosomes prepared by sucrose, Ficoll and Percoll to identify the conditions most suitable for cryo-EM grid set up and subsequent lamella preparation. Even though a similar amount of time is required, synaptosomes prepared using sucrose density gradient centrifugation tend to form aggregates on the cryo-EM grids. On the other hand, synaptosomes prepared using Ficoll or Percoll appear to be monodispersed upon dilution. Moreover, synaptosomes isolated by Percoll have an added advantage of involving less preparation time. Using fluorescently labelled vGLUT1 and AMPAR for the pre and postsynaptic compartments aided in distinguishing glutamatergic synaptosomes as well as acted as a guide to identify target areas or glutamatergic synaptosomes during cryo-FIB milling. The ability to obtain the fluorescence signal during cryo-LSM imaging can further be exploited for screening lamellae with glutamatergic synaptosomes and for picking targets after alignment during cryo-ET imaging.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Typical appearance of centrifuge tubes after density gradient centrifugation.

(A) Typical appearance of centrifuge tubes after sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The fraction F2 at the interface between 0.8 and 1.2 M sucrose corresponds to synaptosomes. A similar result is observed for Ficoll density gradient centrifugation with the synaptosome fraction (F2) lying between 8 and 14% Ficoll. In case of sucrose and Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, fractions F1 and F3 represent myelin & membranes and extrasynaptosomal mitochondria, respectively [33,36]. (B) Typical appearance after Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Fraction F4 at the interface between 15 and 23% Percoll corresponds to synaptosomes. Fractions F1, F2, F3 and F5 contain membranes, myelin & membranes, synaptosomes along with membrane vesicles and extrasynaptosomal mitochondria, respectively [38].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271799.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Janelia Research Campus for Aquilos cryo-FIB-SEM use, A. Goehring and A. Matsui for maintaining vGLUT1-mVenus mouse colony, A. Matsui for guidance and advice on cryo-LSM, Y. Zhao and J. Yu for providing 15F1 Fab-mCherry plasmid, Y. Zhao for initiating the project, J. Elferich for advice on cryo-EM grid preparation for cryo-FIB milling, R. Hallford for help with manuscript preparation and Gouaux laboratory members for helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1. Sheng M, Hoogenraad CC. The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: a more quantitative view. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76: 823–847. pmid:17243894
  2. 2. Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62(3): 405–496. pmid:20716669
  3. 3. Kessels HW, Malinow R. Synaptic AMPA receptor plasticity and behavior. Neuron. 2009;61(3): 340–350. pmid:19217372
  4. 4. Dosemeci A, Weinberg RJ, Reese TS, Tao-Cheng JH. The postsynaptic density: there is more than meets the eye. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2016;8: 23. pmid:27594834
  5. 5. Diering GH, Huganir RL. The AMPA receptor code of synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2018;100(2): 314–329. pmid:30359599
  6. 6. Scheefhals N, MacGillavry HD. Functional organization of postsynaptic glutamate receptors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2018;91: 82–94. pmid:29777761
  7. 7. MacGillavry HD, Kerr JM, Blanpied TA. Lateral organization of the postsynaptic density. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;48(4): 321–331. pmid:21920440
  8. 8. Tarusawa E, Matsui K, Budisantoso T, Molnár E, Watanabe M, Matsui M, et al. Input-specific intrasynaptic arrangements of ionotropic glutamate receptors and their impact on postsynaptic responses. J Neurosci. 2009;29(41): 12896–12908. pmid:19828804
  9. 9. MacGillavry HD, Song Y, Raghavachari S, Blanpied TA. Nanoscale scaffolding domains within the postsynaptic density concentrate synaptic AMPA receptors. Neuron. 2013;78(4): 615–622. pmid:23719161
  10. 10. Nair D, Hosy E, Petersen JD, Constals A, Giannone G, Choquet D, et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals that AMPA receptors inside synapses are dynamically organized in nanodomains regulated by PSD95. J Neurosci. 2013;33(32): 13204–13224. pmid:23926273
  11. 11. Tang AH, Chen H, Li TP, Metzbower SR, MacGillavry HD, Blanpied TA. A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors. Nature. 2016;536(7615): 210–214. pmid:27462810
  12. 12. Masugi-Tokita M, Tarusawa E, Watanabe M, Molnár E, Fujimoto K, Shigemoto R. Number and density of AMPA receptors in individual synapses in the rat cerebellum as revealed by SDS-digested freeze-fracture replica labeling. J Neurosci. 2007;27(8): 2135–2144. pmid:17314308
  13. 13. Kharazia VN, Weinberg RJ. Tangential synaptic distribution of NMDA and AMPA receptors in rat neocortex. Neurosci Lett. 1997;238(1–2): 41–44. pmid:9464650
  14. 14. Pérez-Otaño I, Luján R, Tavalin SJ, Plomann M, Modregger J, Liu XB, et al. Endocytosis and synaptic removal of NR3A-containing NMDA receptors by PACSIN1/syndapin1. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(5): 611–621. pmid:16617342
  15. 15. Racca C, Stephenson FA, Streit P, Roberts JD, Somogyi P. NMDA receptor content of synapses in stratum radiatum of the hippocampal CA1 area. J Neurosci. 2000;20(7): 2512–2522. pmid:10729331
  16. 16. Chen X, Winters C, Azzam R, Li X, Galbraith JA, Leapman RD, et al. Organization of the core structure of the postsynaptic density. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2008;105(11): 4453–4458. pmid:18326622
  17. 17. Dani A, Huang B, Bergan J, Dulac C, Zhuang X. Superresolution imaging of chemical synapses in the brain. Neuron. 2010;68(5): 843–856. pmid:21144999
  18. 18. Breukel AI, Besselsen E, Ghijsen WE. Synaptosomes. In: Rayne RC, editor. Neurotransmitter Methods. Springer, Totowa, NJ: 1997. pp. 33–47.
  19. 19. Evans GJ. The synaptosome as a model system for studying synaptic physiology. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2015;2015(5): pdb-top074450. pmid:25934942
  20. 20. Whittaker VP. Thirty years of synaptosome research. J Neurocytol. 1993;22(9): 735–742. pmid:7903689
  21. 21. Schrimpf SP, Meskenaite V, Brunner E, Rutishauser D, Walther P, Eng J, et al. Proteomic analysis of synaptosomes using isotope‐coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2005;5(10): 2531–2541. pmid:15984043
  22. 22. Bosch PJ, Peng L, Kivell BM. Proteomics analysis of dorsal striatum reveals changes in synaptosomal proteins following methamphetamine self-administration in rats. PloS one. 2015;10(10): e0139829. pmid:26484527
  23. 23. Hobson BD, Sims PA. Critical analysis of particle detection artifacts in synaptosome flow cytometry. Eneuro. 2019;6(3): ENEURO.0009-19.2019. pmid:31118205
  24. 24. Salvaterra PM, Matthews DA. Isolation of rat brain subcellular fraction enriched in putative neurotransmitter receptors and synaptic junctions. Neurochem Res. 1980;5(2): 181–195. pmid:6245382
  25. 25. Kornau HC, Schenker LT, Kennedy MB, Seeburg PH. Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95. Science. 1995;269(5231): 1737–1740. pmid:7569905
  26. 26. Srivastava S, Osten P, Vilim FS, Khatri L, Inman G, States B, et al. Novel anchorage of GluR2/3 to the postsynaptic density by the AMPA receptor–binding protein ABP. Neuron. 1998;21(3): 581–591. pmid:9768844
  27. 27. Naisbitt S, Kim E, Tu JC, Xiao B, Sala C, Valtschanoff J, et al. Shank, a novel family of postsynaptic density proteins that binds to the NMDA receptor/PSD-95/GKAP complex and cortactin. Neuron. 1999;23(3): 569–582. pmid:10433268
  28. 28. Kennedy MB. Signal-processing machines at the postsynaptic density. Science. 2000;290(5492): 750–754. pmid:11052931
  29. 29. Ehrlich I, Malinow R. Postsynaptic density 95 controls AMPA receptor incorporation during long-term potentiation and experience-driven synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 2004;24(4): 916–927. pmid:14749436
  30. 30. Missler M, Südhof TC, Biederer T. Synaptic cell adhesion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(4): a005694. pmid:22278667
  31. 31. Sheng M, Kim E. The postsynaptic organization of synapses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(12): a005678. pmid:22046028
  32. 32. Smart TG, Paoletti P. Synaptic neurotransmitter-gated receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(3): a009662. pmid:22233560
  33. 33. Gray E, Whittaker V. The isolation of nerve endings from brain: an electron microscopic study of cell fragments derived by homogenization and centrifugation. J Anat. 1962;96(1): 79–88.8. pmid:13901297
  34. 34. De Robertis E, Pellegrino de Iraldi A, Rodriguez De Lores G, Salganicoff L. Cholinergic and non‐cholinergic nerve endings in rat brain–I: isolation and subcellular distribution of acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase. J Neurochem. 1962;9(1): 23–35. pmid:13884490
  35. 35. Abdel-Latif AA. A simple method for isolation of nerve-ending particles from rat brain. Biochim Biophys Acta, Gen Subj. 1966;121(2): 403–406. pmid:4225463
  36. 36. Cotman CW, Matthews DA. Synaptic plasma membranes from rat brain synaptosomes: isolation and partial characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr. 1971;249(2): 380–394. pmid:4257325
  37. 37. Dunkley PR, Heath JW, Harrison SM, Jarvie PE, Glenfield PJ, Rostas JA. A rapid Percoll gradient procedure for isolation of synaptosomes directly from an S1 fraction: homogeneity and morphology of subcellular fractions. Brain Res. 1988;441(1–2): 59–71. pmid:2834006
  38. 38. Dunkley PR, Jarvie PE, Robinson PJ. A rapid Percoll gradient procedure for preparation of synaptosomes. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(11): 1718–1728. pmid:18927557
  39. 39. Booth RF, Clark JB. A rapid method for the preparation of relatively pure metabolically competent synaptosomes from rat brain. Biochem J. 1978;176(2): 365. pmid:743245
  40. 40. Dodd PR, Hardy JA, Oakley AE, Edwardson JA, Perry EK, Delaunoy JP. A rapid method for preparing synaptosomes: comparison, with alternative procedures. Brain Res. 1981;226(1–2): 107–118. pmid:7296283
  41. 41. Harrison SM, Jarvie PE, Dunkley PR. A rapid Percoll gradient procedure for isolation of synaptosomes directly from an S1 fraction: viability of subcellular fractions. Brain Res. 1988;441(1–2): 72–80. pmid:2834007
  42. 42. Nagy A, Delgado‐Escueta AV. Rapid preparation of synaptosomes from mammalian brain using nontoxic isoosmotic gradient material (Percoll). J Neurochem. 1984: 1114–1123. pmid:6088694
  43. 43. Lučić V, Förster F, Baumeister W. Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74: 833–865. pmid:15952904
  44. 44. Frank J. Electron tomography: methods for three-dimensional visualization of structures in the cell. Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
  45. 45. Doerr A. Cryo-electron tomography. Nat Methods. 2017;14(1): 34.
  46. 46. Fernández-Busnadiego R. Cryo-electron tomography of the mammalian synapse. In: Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Humana Press, New York, NY: 2018. pp. 217–224.
  47. 47. Fernández-Busnadiego R, Zuber B, Maurer UE, Cyrklaff M, Baumeister W, Lučić V. Quantitative analysis of the native presynaptic cytomatrix by cryoelectron tomography. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(1): 145–156. pmid:20065095
  48. 48. Zuber B, Nikonenko I, Klauser P, Muller D, Dubochet J. The mammalian central nervous synaptic cleft contains a high density of periodically organized complexes. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005;102(52): 19192–19197. pmid:16354833
  49. 49. Asano S, Fukuda Y, Beck F, Aufderheide A, Förster F, Danev R, et al. A molecular census of 26S proteasomes in intact neurons. Science. 2015;347(6220): 439–442. pmid:25613890
  50. 50. Tao CL, Liu YT, Sun R, Zhang B, Qi L, Shivakoti S, et al. Differentiation and characterization of excitatory and inhibitory synapses by cryo-electron tomography and correlative microscopy. J Neurosci. 2018;38(6): 1493–1510. pmid:29311144
  51. 51. Marko M, Hsieh C, Schalek R, Frank J, Mannella C. Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2007;4(3): 215–217. pmid:17277781
  52. 52. Rigort A, Bäuerlein FJ, Villa E, Eibauer M, Laugks T, Baumeister W, et al. Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012;109(12): 4449–4454. pmid:22392984
  53. 53. Villa E, Schaffer M, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W. Opening windows into the cell: focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013;23(5): 771–777. pmid:24090931
  54. 54. Herzog E, Nadrigny F, Silm K, Biesemann C, Helling I, Bersot T, et al. In vivo imaging of intersynaptic vesicle exchange using VGLUT1Venus knock-in mice. J Neurosci. 2011;31(43): 15544–15559. pmid:22031900
  55. 55. Penn AC, Zhang CL, Georges F, Royer L, Breillat C, Hosy E, et al. Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors. Nature. 2017;549(7672): 384–388. pmid:28902836
  56. 56. Zhao Y, Chen S, Swensen AC, Qian WJ, Gouaux E. Architecture and subunit arrangement of native AMPA receptors elucidated by cryo-EM. Science. 2019;364(6438): 355–362. pmid:30975770
  57. 57. Kawate T, Gouaux E. Fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography for precrystallization screening of integral membrane proteins. Structure. 2006;14(4): 673–681. pmid:16615909
  58. 58. Wolff G, Limpens RW, Zheng S, Snijder EJ, Agard DA, Koster AJ, et al. Mind the gap: Micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae. J Struct Biol. 2019;208(3): 107389. pmid:31536774