Inappropriate Anti-diabetic Medication Therapy (IADT) refers to a drug-related problem and includes ‘ineffective drug therapy’, ‘unnecessary drug therapy’, ‘dosage too high’, and ‘dosage too low’. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with IADT among T2DM patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda (MRRH).
A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the medical and surgical wards of MRRH from November 2021 to January 2022. One hundred and thirty-eight adult patients aged 18 years and above, with T2DM, were recruited using consecutive sampling. Patient file reviews and interviewer-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. The data were entered into and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive analysis was employed to describe the population and determine the prevalence of IADT. Types of IADTs were identified using Cipolle’s DRP classification tool. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors significantly associated with IADT. The P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.
A total of 138 hospitalized T2DM patients were studied. Eighty (58.0%) were females, and 70 (50.7%) were ≥ 60 years of age. Out of a total of 138 participants, 97 experienced at least one IADT, with an estimated prevalence of 70.3%. ‘Dosage too high’ (29.2%) and ‘dosage too low’ (27.9%) were the most common type of IADTs. Age ≥ 60 years (AOR, 8.44; 95% CI, 2.09–10.90; P-value = 0.003), T2DM duration of < 1 year (AOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11–0.35; P-value = 0.019), and HbA1c of < 7% (AOR, 9.97; 95% CI, 2.34–13.57; P-value = 0.002) were found to be factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IADTs.
The overall prevalence of inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy among T2DM patients admitted to medical and surgical wards of MRRH was 70.3%. The most common type of IADT in this study was ‘dosage too high’, accounting for almost one-third followed by ‘dosage too low’ accounting for a quarter of total IADTs. Age greater or equal to 60 years, T2DM duration of < 1 year, and HbA1c of < 7% during the current admission were found to be factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IADTs in hospitalized T2DM patients.
Citation: Nigussie KA, Shegena EA, Stephen OP, Namugambe JS, Yadesa TM (2022) Prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate anti- diabetic medication therapy among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at the medical and surgical wards of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. PLoS ONE 17(6): e0270108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270108
Editor: Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan, PAKISTAN
Received: March 26, 2022; Accepted: June 5, 2022; Published: June 29, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Nigussie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript, all data needed to replicate all figures, tables, statistics, and other values are provided.
Funding: This work was funded by Pharm-Bio Technology and Traditional Medicine Center (PHARMBIOTRAC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
List of acronyms: ADA, American Diabetes Association; CAD, Coronary Artery Disease; COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease; CKD, Chronic Kidney Disease; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; DKD, Diabetic Kidney Disease; DM, Diabetes mellitus; DVT, Deep Vein Thrombosis; DN, Diabetic Nephropathy; DR, Diabetic Retinopathy; DRPs, Drug Related Problems; FBS, Fasting Blood Sugar; TB, Tuberculosis; BPH, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; HBA1C, Hemoglobin A1c; AKI, Acute Kidney Injury; COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; IADT, Inappropriate Ant-Diabetic Therapy; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; KSA, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; SGLT2, Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2; DPP4, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor; MOH, Ministry of Health; FOM-FRC, Faculty of Medicine Faculty Research Committee; MRRH, Mbarara Regional Refferal Hospital; NCDs, Non-communicable Diseases; PAD, Peripheral Arterial Disease; PCNE, Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe; T2DM, Type two diabetes mellitus; MUST-REC, Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee; UGX, Ugandan Shilling; UCG, Ugandan Clinical Guideline; UDA, Ugandan Diabetes Association; WHO, World Health Organization
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease characterized by the state of hyperglycemia as a result of a change in insulin secretion and action . Growing urbanization, sedentary lifestyle, consumption of high caloric food, and stressful lifestyle have led to an increase in the prevalence of DM . DM is classified as type 1, type 2, gestational, and specific types of diabetes due to other causes , whereas type 2 diabetes (T2DM) accounts for 90–95% of all diabetes . Pathogenesis of T2DM and development of insulin resistance are characterized by multi-stimuli factors notably glucolipotoxicity, generation of reactive oxygen species, epigenetic factors, activation of various transcriptional mediated pathways along with the augmented levels of various pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig 1). Among the various pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is one of the most important pro-inflammatory mediators that is critically involved in the development of insulin resistance and pathogenesis of T2DM . Exposure to aflatoxin M1 and bisphenol A is also among the causative factors that potentiate the several risk factors notably inflammatory responses and oxidative stress that ultimately induce the pathogenesis of T2DM and associated metabolic disorders [6, 7]. Further, obesity, hypertension, and smoking are observed to be the most critical risk factors accompanying Pro/Ala mutation in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), thus are associated with a high risk of DM . DM is one of the most common and rapidly growing chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD), with a worldwide prevalence of 6.4% that is estimated to increase to 7.7% by the year 2030 . In Sub-Saharan Africa, diabetes prevalence has grown greatly over the years, and the prevalence rate in Tanzania, Nigeria, and Ethiopia was reported as 8.3%, 4.6%, and 3.2% respectively [10–12]. Similarly in Cameroon and urban Kenya, diabetes prevalence accounted for 5.8% and 12% respectively [13, 14].
Drug-related problem (DRP) is any undesirable event experienced by a patient that involves, or is suspected to involve drug therapy, and that interferes with achieving the desired goals of therapy. According to Cipolle DRPs can be categorized into seven types. These are ‘needs additional drug therapy’, ‘unnecessary drug therapy’, ‘dose too low’, ‘ineffective drug therapy’, ‘dose too high’, ‘adverse drug reaction’, and ‘non-compliance’ . DRP is a worldwide health problem that compromises the quality of life, increases hospitalization; increases overall health care cost and mortality . Globally, many studies have shown DRPs to be very common in primary care and hospital settings and that a substantial proportion of DRPs occurs among patients with diabetes .
Studies worldwide indicate that more than half of diabetic patients on treatment suffer from DRP . A study conducted among T2DM patients in a similar setting in India, Jordan, South Australia, Malaysia, and Ethiopia indicated the prevalence of DRP to be within the range of 71% -91.8% [19–23]. In Kenya, a study among inpatient T2DM patients reported the prevalence of DRP to be 91.1% , whereas in Nigeria prevalence of DRP was 2.1% per patient . Another study in Harar, Ethiopia, revealed ‘dosage too low’ to be the most common type of DRP encountered (36.2%), followed by ‘unnecessary drug therapy’ (19.7%) and ‘ineffective drug therapy’ (19.7%) . The occurrence of a DRP among diabetic patients could prevent or delay patients from achieving desired therapeutic goals; contributing to poor glycemic control, and leading to poorer treatment outcomes . Uncontrolled diabetes due to failure of proper use of anti-diabetic medications can lead to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with T2DM [28, 29]. Inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy (IADT) severely compromises the effectiveness of treatment making this a critical issue in population health both from the perspective of quality of life and health economics . Inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy (IADT) refers to a drug-related problem that is not most suitable for the condition and includes ‘ineffective drug therapy’, ‘unnecessary drug therapy’, ‘dosage too high’, and ‘dosage too low’.
Many associated factors have been identified to contribute to the development of DRPs in T2DM patients . These factors include; the presence of comorbidity, poly-pharmacy, age, duration of diabetes, and gender [25, 31–34]. Identifying contributing factors of IADT makes it possible for better control of diabetes and associated complications and can lead to a significant reduction in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs [35, 36]. Ugandan Ministry of Health revealed that 400,000 Ugandans are diabetic, representing 1.4% of the population (MOH, 2020 ). In rural Uganda, the prevalence of T2DM ranged from 1% to 12% [37, 38]. This situation challenges the country already heavily burdened with communicable diseases, financial constraints, and limited medical resources for diabetes care . To the best of our knowledge, there is a limited published study from Uganda on inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy. Therefore, the present study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy among T2DM patients in the medical and surgical wards of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.
Materials and methods
Study design and period
A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among inpatient T2DM patients at the medical and surgical wards of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital from November 2021 to January 2022.
The study was conducted at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Mbarara District, 260 km from Kampala, Uganda. The hospital was founded in 1940 and it is a government-owned referral hospital in the southwestern region and serves some catchment districts and counties. It is also a teaching hospital for Mbarara University of Science and Technology, currently training doctors, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory technologists, and other allied health professionals. The hospital also offers a wide range of health services in the departments of pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, surgery, cancer unit, emergency and critical care, imaging, pathology, laboratories, and outpatient department. The diabetes clinic runs once a week under the Internal Medicine department. It attracts approximately 150 to 200 patients per week as recorded in the medical report book. The medical ward is one of the busiest wards in the hospital with a bed capacity of 45 and attracts about 40 patients with diabetes per month, whereas the surgical ward attracts about 10 patients per month with a bed capacity of 60.
All adult T2DM patients admitted to the medical and surgical wards of MRRH during the period of study and fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
All adult patients with T2DM admitted to the medical and surgical ward of MRRH, 18 years of age and above, Patients who received at least one anti-diabetic drug, and Patients who consented to participate during the scheduled study period.
The sample size was calculated using single proportion formula, with a prevalence of 91.1% based on the previous study done in Kenya at Kenyatta National Hospital  with the addition of 10% contingency for nonresponse rate.
The Cochran formula was used to determine the sample size as follows .
Z- Level of significance is 1.96%
p- Prevalence of DRPs in T2DM is 91.1%
e- Precision estimate around DRPs in T2DM is 5% (0.05)
n- A sample size of DRPs in T2DM.
Assuming 91.1% of the prevalence of DRPs among these patients, the sample size was:
n = 1.962*0.911*(1–0.911) / (0.05)2 = 124.59~125
The sample size was adjusted to 10% non-response. Therefore the number of participants that were recruited for the study was 137.5 ~138.
A consecutive sampling method was used to collect data. Patients found during the study period in the study area who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were sampled.
The outcome or dependent variable was inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy.
The independent variables were:
- Patient factors include age, gender, alcohol, smoking, marital and education status
- Disease factors include duration of diabetes, comorbidities, and the number of comorbidities.
- Drug factors include the number of drugs, class of anti-diabetic drugs, concurrent medications
Research instrument and data collection
Patients who met the inclusion criteria were approached and explained the purpose of the study and a consent form was completed for patients who agreed to participate before collecting information from them. Once the consent was obtained, a structured questionnaire was used to collect patients’ demographics. A data abstraction form was used to collect data on the disease characteristic of patients with T2DM and medication characteristics such as anti-diabetics used, concurrent medication, and a total number of drugs per patient. Each documented drug therapy was evaluated to obtain information on drug appropriateness, recommended dosages, frequency, and duration, based on UCG guideline , and ADA guideline  was used to obtain some information that was not addressed by UCG. Patients were interviewed for important information missing on their files and were followed until discharge from the respective wards. The data collection was carried out by the principal investigator and one trained research assistant, who was a clinical pharmacy resident at MRRH. The average fasting blood sugar was calculated from three consecutive values to determine the level of glycemic control. DRPs were classified and assessed based on Cipolle et al., 2012 classification . The classification tool has been validated and was used in many other published studies to assess DRP Occurrence [22–24, 26, 32, 43]. The method was refined based on literature review and standard treatment guidelines with further revision, and endorsement by a panel of experts and Clinical Pharmacy Specialists. During data collection all research assistants, study participants, and the principal investigator adhered to the COVID-19 prevention protocol.
Confirmation of completion of the questionnaires took place after each interview by the principal investigator and any missing information was clarified by a particular participant. After data collection, the data was entered and stored in SPSS and for the confidentiality of participant’s information, all files and directories were protected by a password.
Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Descriptive statistics like frequency, mean, and percentage were generated for continuous and categorical variables and categorical data was expressed as percentages and continuous data was expressed as mean and standard deviation.
The prevalence of inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy was calculated by dividing the total number of T2DM patients with at least one IADT by the total number of patients studied and expressed as a percentage. The association between patient, drug, and disease characteristics with IADT was tested using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Variables with P-value < 0.25 during the univariate analysis were transferred to multivariate analysis. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval (CI).
To control the data quality, training was given to the data collector and the data abstraction form was pre-tested involving 10 patients from both the surgical and medical wards for consistency of understanding of the review tools and completeness of data items. The necessary adjustments were made to the final data extraction format and the filled formats were checked daily by the principal investigator. Also, questionnaires for collecting patient demographic data were pre-tested several times on participants who weren’t included in the data collected. To avoid the risk of picking on the same participant in the subsequent sessions, files of patients who had already participated in the study were marked and all information gathered was documented, processed, and presented anonymously and no individual identifiers were collected on the data collection forms, thus no one could trace back the patient’s identity. Data were double-checked before entry by the principal investigator.
Ethical approval was obtained from the MUST Faculty of Medicine Faculty Research Committee (FOM-FRC) and the Research Ethics Committee of Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST-REC). Site clearance was obtained from the Hospital Director of MRRH. Furthermore, written informed consent was obtained from the participants as per the Ethical Committee guidelines, after explaining to them in English or Runyankole. The consent procedure was approved by the Faculty Research Ethics Committee of MUST. Signed copies of the consent participation forms were kept in a locker that only the principal and research assistants can access them. During the data collection and analysis process, study serial numbers were generated and were used instead of patient names and contact details. For purposes of privacy, patients were interviewed after the general ward round has ended on a one-on-one basis for demographic information and information missing on their medication chart. The collected information was stored on password-protected computers, and accessed only by the principal investigator.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants
A total of 138 patients from the medical and surgical wards of MRRH were studied. Eighty (58.0%) were females and 70 (50.7%) were ≥ 60 years of age. The mean age of the study participants was 58±16.1 years. Eighty-two (59.4%) were married, 76 (55.1%) had a primary level of education, 84 (60.9%) resided in rural areas, 79(57.2%) were self-employed, and 117(84.8%) reported a monthly income of <240,000ugx (Table 1).
Disease-related and medication-related characteristics
Most (125, 90.6%) of the participants had the previous history of hospitalization, 102 (73.9%) had a family history of diabetes mellitus, and 135 (97.8%) reported at least one comorbid condition, of which 81(58.7%) patients had ≥ 2 comorbidities. Forty-three (31.2%) participants had a T2DM duration of > 10 years. The average fasting blood sugar was greater than 130 mg/dl in 58.0% and HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% in 55.9% of participants respectively. At least one diabetes complication was reported by 54 (39.1%) participants (Table 2).
The commonly prescribed class of anti-diabetic was insulin (89, 64.5%), followed by biguanides (86, 62.3%). Monotherapy with insulin was the frequently prescribed anti-diabetic regimen (51, 37.0%), followed by a combination of Insulin with metformin (32, 23.2%). Nine (6.5%) participants had clinically significant drug-drug interaction and 72 (52.2%) had reported herbal medicine use. At least one concurrent medication use was reported by 132 (95.7%) patients (Table 3 and Fig 2).
Prevalence of Inappropriate Anti-diabetic Medication Therapy (IADT)
Out of a total of 138 participants, 97 experienced at least one IADT, with an estimated prevalence of 70.3% (95% CI, 62.3–77.5%). Each patient experienced an average of 1.7 ± 0.46 IADTs. Fifty nine (42.8%) participants had 1 IADT, 34 (24.6%) had 2 IADT and 5 (3.6%) participants had 3 IADT (Fig 3).
Types of inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy
Out of a total of 247 IADTs, ‘Dosage too high’ (72, 29.2%) accounted for the highest proportion followed by ‘dosage too low’ (69, 27.9%) (Fig 4).
Factors associated with inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy
Among the factors analyzed for possible association with IADT, age ≥ 60 years (COR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.23–5.63; P-value = 0.013), history of smoking, family history of DM, T2DM duration of < 1 year (COR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.82; P-value = 0.017), HbA1c < 7% (COR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.49–11.23; P-value = 0.006), T2DM complication, biguanides class of anti-diabetics, sulfonylurea class of anti-diabetics, and DPP4-inhibitor class of anti-diabetics qualified for multivariate logistic regression analysis at P-value of < 0.25 (Table 4).
Out of the nine independent variables included in multivariate logistic regression, three variables including age ≥ 60 years, T2DM duration of < 1 year, and HbA1c of < 7% were determined to factor significantly associated with IADT (Table 4). Patients who were 60 years and older were 8.44 times (AOR, 8.44; 95% CI, 2.09–10.90; P-value = 0.003) more likely to have IADT when compared to those less than 60 years. Patients who had T2DM for less than 1 year were 63% less likely (AOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11–0.35; P-value = 0.019) to have IADT compared to patients with T2DM duration longer than 10 years. Similarly, Patients with glycated hemoglobin of less than 7% had 9.97 times (AOR, 9.97; 95% CI, 2.34–13.57; P-value = 0.002) higher odds of experiencing IADT compared to patients with HbA1c of 7% and higher.
The current study showed that 70.3% of hospitalized T2DM patients had at least one inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy with an average of 1.7 ± 0.46 IADTs. This is consistent with the prevalence’s of DRPs in patients with T2DM of 70% in the US , 71.9% in Ethiopia , 71.1% in India , and 73.7% in Pakistan . On the other hand, the prevalence of DRPs in this study is lower than in the DRP studies in Malaysia (91.8% and 90.5%) [20, 46], Nigeria (94%), Australia (96%), and Switzerland (100%) [25, 47, 48]. The discrepancy with the previous studies could be due to the use of different study populations, sample sizes, and study designs; the studies in Malaysia and Switzerland involved T2DM patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension comorbidity, had a large sample size and used retrospective study design. The discrepancies that exist could also be attributed to the difference in the study protocol and participants who had taken four or more drug therapy were the inclusion criteria in the above three studies: those patients receiving complex drug regimens are vulnerable to the existence of medication-related problems and would have more DRPs. In addition, previous studies used the PCNE classification of DRPs. On the contrary, our study used Cipolle’s DRP classification tool with the exclusion of three types of DRPs and identified DRPs involving only anti-diabetic medications, which might have contributed to the low prevalence of DRP in our setting. Our study highlights the need to prioritize the burden of DRPs for designing an effective intervention to mitigate problems related to drug therapy and underscored the need to conduct further research on the study site.
The most common type of IADT identified in this study was ‘Dosage too high’ (29.2%). This is in line with a study in Malaysia (27.9%) . This proportion is higher than three studies which reported 1.6 to 21.6% [24, 26, 47]. This difference might be attributed to a lack of assessment of patients’ renal and hepatic functions and failure to consider patients’ age and weight when prescribing anti-diabetic medications at the study site. Furthermore, the high occurrence of ‘dosage too high’ in our study is probably due to a lack of compliance to standard diabetes treatment guidelines, too frequent dosage regimen, drug-drug interaction, and inter-patient variation in drug response which was beyond the scope of the present study. This puts patients at higher risk of dosage-related adverse drug reactions. Dose adjustment of drugs in patients with impaired renal function and low estimated glomerular filtration rate may prevent adverse effects and decrease unnecessary drug expenditures [49, 50].
The second most common type of IADT in this study was ‘dosage too low’ accounting for 27.9% of the total IADTs. This is comparable with a study in Ethiopia (28.0%) and another study in Kenya (24.9%) [24, 51]. On the other hand, this proportion is higher than five studies which reported 1.3 to 15.8% [33, 45, 46, 52, 53]. Such a high occurrence of ‘dosage too low’ in our study could be attributed to incorrect storage of insulin-based regimens, ineffective dose or dosage regimen not frequent enough, and drug-drug interactions. In addition, the high proportion of ‘dosage too low’ may also be due to the underuse of standard diabetes treatment guidelines, and dose calculation for insulin-based regimens was majorly based on assumed weight. This explains the failure to attain the desired glycemic control among our study participants. The current study showed that more than half of the participants had poor glycemic control. Therefore, efforts should be made to minimize drug dosing problems by improving the adherence to standard treatment guidelines, increasing the involvement of clinical pharmacists in deciding the dosing of drugs, or the implementation of computerized dosing program .
The proportion of ‘unnecessary drug therapy’ in our study was 25.9%, which is in agreement with a study in Eastern Ethiopia (26.7%) . However, this proportion is higher than a study in Nigeria and two studies in Ethiopia, ranging from 3.6 to 17.6% [23, 32, 54]. This high proportion in our study site may be due to the underuse of standard diabetes treatment guidelines, initiation of insulin-based regimens without clear indications, and initiation of anti-diabetics when non-drug therapy is more appropriate. ‘Ineffective drug therapy’ which accounted for 17.0% was the least common IADT identified in our study and was attributed to the use of the ineffective drugs when a ‘more effective drug was available’. However, this proportion is lower than a study in Indonesia and Nigeria, which reported 50% and 29.6% respectively (Kisno et al., 2011) . This discrepancy was due to non-adherence to guidelines and inter-patient variation in drug response in the former studies.
The multivariate logistic regression showed that age greater than or equal to 60 years, T2DM duration of < 1 year, and HbA1c of < 7% were significantly associated with the occurrence of IADTs. It is found that patients greater or equal to 60 years of age were 8.44 times more likely (AOR, 8.44; 95% CI, 2.09–10.90; P-value = 0.003) to experience IADT than patients in the age group of < 60 years. This finding is in agreement with three studies in Ethiopia [23, 33, 55]. Many studies have concluded that elderly patients with multi-morbidity and taking multiple medications were more likely to experience drug-drug interactions, and thus more likely to develop DRPs, particularly dosages too high and dosages too low [56–59]. Moreover, age-related physiologic changes influence both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs in elderly patients. The slowing of metabolism and excretory process with aging increases the chance of problems arising from drugs, especially dosages too high [60, 61]. Hence, special attention is needed to prevent the occurrence of DRPs in these patients.
Additionally, participants who had a T2DM duration of less than 1 year were 63% less likely to have IADT compared to patients with a T2DM duration of more than 10 years (AOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.11–0.35; P-value = 0.019). This finding is similar to a study in Ethiopia , India , and Pakistan . This might be because those patients with a longer duration of diabetes had a higher chance of developing diabetes complications which contribute to drug-drug interactions and multiple drug therapy. In addition, these patients are likely to have comorbid conditions which influence the desired outcome of other diseases by increasing the number of drugs, causing drug-drug, drug-disease, and disease-disease interactions which collectively resulted in increased likelihood of experiencing DRP in the study patients [31–34]. It was also found that patients with HbA1c of less than 7% during the current admission had 9.97 times higher (AOR, 9.97; 95% CI, 2.34–13.57; P-value = 0.002) odds of experiencing IADTs compared to patients with HbA1c of greater or equal to 7%. To achieve HbA1c of < 7% patients are more likely to be initiated on multiple anti-hyperglycemic agents and this increases the occurrence of IADTs especially ‘dosage too high’ and ‘unnecessary drug therapy’. Furthermore, aggressive pharmaceutical therapy increases both side effects and costs. Hence, healthcare professionals should avoid aggressive goals of HbA1c in those at high risk of DRPs including the elderly.
The prevalence of IADT was compared with the prevalence of DRP in other studies as no study specifically focused on IADT. In addition, this study was conducted in only one study center. Hence, further studies, which consider these variables will be needed to solve these limitations.
The overall prevalence of inappropriate anti-diabetic medication therapy among T2DM patients admitted to the medical and surgical wards of MRRH was 70.3%. The most common type of IADT in this study was ‘dosage too high’, accounting for almost one-third followed by ‘dosage too low’ accounting for a quarter of total IADTs. Age greater or equal to 60 years, T2DM duration of < 1 year, and HbA1c of < 7% during the current admission were found to be factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IADTs in hospitalized T2DM patients.
The authors are sincerely grateful to the patients and caregivers that offered to participate in this study and most importantly, the authors are thankful for the support and approval granted by the administration of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) for allowing us to conduct the study.
- 1. Cefalu W.T., et al. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes care, 2019. 42: p. S13–S28. pmid:30559228
- 2. Hu F.B. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes care, 2011. 34(6): p. 1249–1257. pmid:21617109
- 3. ADA. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes care, 2020. 43(Supplement 1): p. S14–S31. pmid:31862745
- 4. ADA. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes care, 2017. 40(Supplement 1): p. S11–S24.
- 5. Akash M.S.H., Rehman K., and Liaqat A. Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha: role in development of insulin resistance and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018. 119(1): p. 105–110. pmid:28569437
- 6. Akash M.S.H., Qader A., and Rehman K. Biochemical investigation of human exposure to aflatoxin M1 and its association with risk factors of diabetes mellitus. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021. 28(44): p. 62907–62918. pmid:34216342
- 7. Haq M.E.U., et al. Human exposure to bisphenol A through dietary sources and development of diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Pakistani population. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020. 27(21): p. 26262–26275. pmid:32361967
- 8. Rehman K., et al. Biochemical investigation of rs1801282 variations in PPAR‐γ gene and its correlation with risk factors of diabetes mellitus in coronary artery disease. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 2020. 47(9): p. 1517–1529. pmid:32416637
- 9. Florez L., Shubina M., and Turchin A. Predictors of glycemic control after decline of insulin therapy by patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications, 2019. 33(11): p. 107418. pmid:31477552
- 10. Chiwanga F.S., et al. Urban and rural prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes and risk factors associated with diabetes in Tanzania and Uganda. Global health action, 2016. 9(1): p. 31440. pmid:27221531
- 11. Rasaki S.O., et al. Prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in Oke-Ogun region of Oyo State, Nigeria. Cogent Medicine, 2017. 4(1): p. 1326211.
- 12. Abebe S.M., et al. The prevalence of non-communicable diseases in Northwest Ethiopia: survey of Dabat health and demographic surveillance system. BMJ open, 2017. 7(10). pmid:29061601
- 13. Bigna J.J., et al. Prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus among adults residing in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018. 137: p. 109–118. pmid:29325776
- 14. Animaw W. and Seyoum Y. Increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a developing country and its related factors. PLoS One, 2017. 12(11): p. e0187670. pmid:29112962
- 15. Cipolle R.J., Strand L.M., and Morley P.C. Pharmaceutical care practice: the patient-centered approach to medication management. 2012: McGraw Hill Professional.
- 16. Al Hamid A., et al. Hospitalisation resulting from medicine-related problems in adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. 13(5): p. 479. pmid:27171100
- 17. Handelsman Y., et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan: executive summary. Endocrine practice, 2011. 17(2): p. 287–302. pmid:21474421
- 18. SIG. Management of diabetes: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2014.
- 19. Shareef J., Sandeep B., and Shastry C. Assessment of drug related problems in patients with cardiovascular diseases in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Journal of pharmaceutical care, 2014: p. 70–76.
- 20. Huri H.Z. and Wee H.F. Drug related problems in type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional retrospective study. BMC Endocr Disord, 2013. 13(1): p. 1–12.
- 21. Rao D., et al. Drug therapy problems found in ambulatory patient populations in Minnesota and South Australia. Pharmacy World & Science, 2007. 29(6): p. 647–654. pmid:17450422
- 22. Al-Taani G.M., et al. Prediction of drug-related problems in diabetic outpatients in a number of hospitals, using a modeling approach. Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2017. 9: p. 65. pmid:28814901
- 23. Argaw A.M., Hiwet T., and Derse B.B. Drug therapy problems and determinants among ambulatory type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: pharmacists’ intervention in south-east Ethiopia. Endocrinol Metab Syndr, 2019. 8(303): p. 2161–1017.
- 24. Mugane G.N. Assessment of Drug Therapy Problems in Adult Patients With Both Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Kenyatta National Hospital. 2018, University of Nairobi.
- 25. Ogbonna B., et al. Drug therapy problems in patients with Type-2 Diabetes in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Int J Innov Res Dev, 2014. 3(1): p. 494–502.
- 26. Abdulmalik H., Tadiwos Y., and Legese N. Assessment of drug-related problems among type 2 diabetic patients on follow up at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes, 2019. 12(1): p. 1–6.
- 27. Obakiro S.B., et al. Appropriateness and affordability of prescriptions to diabetic patients attending a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 2021. 16(1): p. e0245036. pmid:33400703
- 28. Olamoyegun M., et al. Burden and pattern of micro vascular complications in type 2 diabetes in a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci, 2015. 15(4): p. 1136–41. pmid:26958014
- 29. Papatheodorou K., et al. Complications of diabetes 2016. 2016, Hindawi.
- 30. Hussein M., et al. Assessment of drug related problems among hypertensive patients on follow up in Adama Hospital Medical College, East Ethiopia. Clinic Pharmacol Biopharmaceut, 2014. 3(122): p. 2.
- 31. Mechessa D.F. and Kebede B. Drug-Related Problems and Their Predictors Among Patients with Diabetes Attending the Ambulatory Clinic of Gebre Tsadik Shawo General Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 2020. 13: p. 3349.
- 32. Koyra H.C., Tuka S.B., and Tufa E.G. Epidemiology and predictors of drug therapy problems among type 2 diabetic patients at Wolaita Soddo University Teaching Hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Am J Pharmacol Sci, 2017. 5(2): p. 40–48.
- 33. Yimama M., Jarso H., and Desse T.A. Determinants of drug-related problems among ambulatory type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension comorbidity in Southwest Ethiopia: a prospective cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes, 2018. 11(1): p. 679. pmid:30249291
- 34. Sharma A., Baldi A., and Sharma D.K. Assessment of drug-related problems among diabetes and cardiovascular disease patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Pharm Aspire, 2018. 10(1): p. 7–12.
- 35. Valencia W.M. and Florez H. How to prevent the microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes beyond glucose control. Bmj, 2017. 356: p. i6505. pmid:28096078
- 36. Papatheodorou K., et al. Complications of diabetes 2017. 2018, Hindawi.
- 37. Hall V., et al. Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999–2011: epidemiology and public health implications. A systematic review. BMC public health, 2011. 11(1): p. 1–12. pmid:21756350
- 38. Mayega R.W. Type 2 diabetes in rural Uganda: prevalence, risk factors, perceptions and implications for the health system. 2014: Inst för folkhälsovetenskap/Dept of Public Health Sciences.
- 39. Kibirige D., et al. Suboptimal glycaemic and blood pressure control and screening for diabetic complications in adult ambulatory diabetic patients in Uganda: a retrospective study from a developing country. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 2014. 13(1): p. 40. pmid:24593933
- 40. Kasiulevičius V., Šapoka V., and Filipavičiūtė R. Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies. Gerontologija, 2006. 7(4): p. 225–231.
- 41. MOH. Uganda clinical guidelines: National Guidelines on Management of Common Conditions. 2016, Ministry of Health Kampala.
- 42. ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021 abridged for primary care providers. Clinical diabetes: a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2021. 39(1): p. 14. pmid:33551551
- 43. Claydon-Platt K., Manias E., and Dunning T. Medication-related problems occurring in people with diabetes during an admission to an adult teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2012. 97(2): p. 223–230. pmid:22541634
- 44. Negash Z., et al. Impact of medication therapy management service on selected clinical and humanistic outcomes in the ambulatory diabetes patients of Tikur Anbessa Specialist Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PloS one, 2021. 16(6): p. e0251709. pmid:34077431
- 45. Shareef J., Fernandes J., and Samaga L. Clinical pharmacist interventions in drug therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension in a university teaching hospital. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2015. 6(10): p. 4424.
- 46. Huri. Drug-related problems in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with dyslipidemia. BMC public health, 2013. 13(1): p. 1–13. pmid:24341672
- 47. Roozendaal V. Development of an evidence-based checklist for the detection of drug related problems in type 2 diabetes. Pharm World Sci, 2009. 31(5): p. 580–595. pmid:19626455
- 48. Eichenberger P.M., et al. Drug-related problems in diabetes and transplant patients: an observational study with home visits. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2011. 33(5): p. 815–823. pmid:21811831
- 49. Hassan Y., et al. Drug use and dosing in chronic kidney disease. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 2009. 38(12): p. 1095. pmid:20052447
- 50. Wilding J., et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2014. 16(2): p. 124–136. pmid:23911013
- 51. Demoz G.T., et al. Drug therapy problems, medication adherence and treatment satisfaction among diabetic patients on follow-up care at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One, 2019. 14(10): p. e0222985. pmid:31574113
- 52. Chin Y.R., Lee I.S., and Lee H.Y. Effects of hypertension, diabetes, and/or cardiovascular disease on health-related quality of life in elderly Korean individuals: a population-based cross-sectional survey. Asian Nursing Research, 2014. 8(4): p. 267–273. pmid:25529909
- 53. Zazuli Z., Rohaya A., and Adnyana I.K. Drug-related problems in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension: a prospective study. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 2017. 8(4).
- 54. Julaeha J., Fudjiati E., and Eff A.R.Y. Assessment of Drug Therapy Problems Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Hypertension Comorbidity in Indonesia. Borneo Journal of Pharmacy, 2020. 3(3): p. 190–198.
- 55. Belayneh Y.M., et al. A retrospective study of drug related problems and contributing factors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on follow up at public health institutions of kemisse town, north east Ethiopia. Metabolism Open, 2021. 11: p. 100098. pmid:34159307
- 56. Lenssen R., et al. Analysis of drug-related problems in three departments of a German University hospital. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. 38(1): p. 119–126. pmid:26511945
- 57. Chan D.-C., et al. Drug-related problems (DRPs) identified from geriatric medication safety review clinics. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 2012. 54(1): p. 168–174. pmid:21353318
- 58. Abunahlah N., et al. Drug related problems identified by clinical pharmacist at the Internal Medicine Ward in Turkey. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. 40(2): p. 360–367. pmid:29380236
- 59. Abdel-Daim M.M., et al. Aging, metabolic, and degenerative disorders: biomedical value of antioxidants. 2018, Hindawi.
- 60. Hailu B.Y., et al. Drug related problems in admitted geriatric patients: the impact of clinical pharmacist interventions. BMC geriatrics, 2020. 20(1): p. 1–8. pmid:31931723
- 61. Nobili A., et al. Association between clusters of diseases and polypharmacy in hospitalized elderly patients: results from the REPOSI study. European journal of internal medicine, 2011. 22(6): p. 597–602. pmid:22075287
- 62. Sheleme T., Sahilu T., and Feyissa D. Identification and resolution of drug-related problems among diabetic patients attending a referral hospital: a prospective observational study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 2021. 14(1): p. 1–10.