Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The invisible costs of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Systematic review and cost-of-illness analysis

  • Ludovica Borsoi ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ludovica.borsoi@unibocconi.it

    Affiliation SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy

    ⨯
  • Patrizio Armeni,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy

    ⨯
  • Gleb Donin,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic

    ⨯
  • Francesco Costa,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy

    ⨯
  • Luigi Ferini-Strambi

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for several diseases and is correlated with other non-medical consequences that increase the disease’s clinical and economic burden. However, OSA’s impact is highly underestimated, also due to substantial diagnosis gaps.

Objective

This study aims at assessing the economic burden of OSA in the adult population in Italy by performing a cost-of-illness analysis with a societal perspective. In particular, we aimed at estimating the magnitude of the burden caused by conditions for which OSA is a proven risk factor.

Methods

A systematic literature review on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, integrated by expert opinion, was performed to identify all clinical and non-clinical conditions significantly influenced by OSA. Using the Population Attributable Fraction methodology, a portion of their prevalence and costs was attributed to OSA. The total economic burden of OSA for the society was estimated by summing the costs of each condition influenced by the disease, the costs due to OSA’s diagnosis and treatment and the economic value of quality of life lost due to OSA’s undertreatment.

Results

Twenty-six clinical (e.g., diabetes) and non-clinical (e.g., car accidents) conditions were found to be significantly influenced by OSA, contributing to an economic burden ranging from €10.7 to €32.0 billion/year in Italy. The cost of impaired quality of life due to OSA undertreatment is between €2.8 and €9.0 billion/year. These costs are substantially higher than those currently borne to diagnose and treat OSA (€234 million/year).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the economic burden due to OSA is substantial, also due to low diagnosis and treatment rates. Providing reliable estimates of the economic impact of OSA at a societal level may increase awareness of the disease burden and help to guide evidence-based policies and prioritisation for healthcare, ultimately ensuring appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients.

Citation: Borsoi L, Armeni P, Donin G, Costa F, Ferini-Strambi L (2022) The invisible costs of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Systematic review and cost-of-illness analysis. PLoS ONE 17(5): e0268677. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677

Editor: Tai-Heng Chen, Kaohsuing Medical University Hospital, TAIWAN

Received: February 5, 2021; Accepted: May 3, 2022; Published: May 20, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Borsoi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding: CERGAS SDA Bocconi received an unrestricted grant for research from Philips S.p.A. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: CERGAS SDA Bocconi received an unrestricted grant for research from Philips S.p.A. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Ludovica Borsoi, Patrizio Armeni, Gleb Donin and Francesco Costa have no competing interests to declare. Luigi Ferini-Strambi declares the following competing interests (last 3 years): Philips-Respironics (fee for lectures), Resmed (fee for advisory board). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disorder characterized by episodic cessation of breathing due to repeated upper airway partial (hypopnea) or total (apnea) obstructions [1, 2]. These events lead to activation of the sympathetic nervous system, sleep fragmentation, intermittent hypoxemia and, in the case of syndrome (OSAS), to excessive daytime sleepiness [3, 4]. Diagnosis of OSA usually requires overnight laboratory polysomnography in order to detect the frequency of disordered breathing events [5]. OSA’s severity is measured through the number of apnea and hypopnea events per hour of sleep (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI), which can be more than 30 in its severe form [6, 7]. The attention towards the disorder is increasing as several studies found that OSA is a risk factor for a substantial number of clinical conditions in adults, including diabetes [8–10], cancer [11, 12], cardiovascular [13, 14] and cerebrovascular diseases [15–17]. Moreover, OSA and its syndrome are associated with decreased quality of life (QoL) [18–20], impaired work performance [21–23] and increased risk of road traffic accidents [24, 25]. According to several population-based studies, prevalence of OSA is relatively high, especially among men [26–31], although methodological differences and difficulties in characterizing this disorder yielded to variability in prevalence estimates [32, 33]. Despite the prevalence of this condition, OSA is frequently undiagnosed, either because patients do not regard their symptoms (e.g., snoring, excessive daytime sleepiness) as the presence of a disorder, thus not seeking medical consultation, or because primary care physicians are often unable to recognize OSA signs and symptoms [5, 34], leading to a potential underestimation of the disease burden and to consequent undertreatment [35, 36]. Therapy with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) represents the gold standard for the treatment of OSA [37, 38]. When adherence is optimal, CPAP has been demonstrated to reduce symptoms, the possible sequelae of the disease and to improve self-reported health status [39–42]. As OSA and its related syndrome have been demonstrated to influence the onset of several health conditions and other non-clinical consequences, their low diagnosis and treatment rates are likely to result in increased clinical and economic burden. Several studies have estimated that OSA is associated with substantial economic costs, especially if untreated [43–45]. However, to date there is not available evidence for Italy. The present study aims at assessing the societal economic burden associated with OSA in the adult population in Italy by performing a cost-of-illness (COI) analysis based on a systematic literature review and population attributable fraction methodology. In particular, we aimed at estimating the proportion of the cost-of-illness of conditions for which OSA is a proven risk factor that can be attributed to OSA itself. As in the literature there is not always a clear and consistent distinction between OSA and OSAS, we focused our analyses on the broadest definition of the disease (i.e., OSA). Providing reliable estimates of the economic impact of OSA at a societal level may increase awareness of the disease burden and help to guide evidence-based policies and prioritisation for healthcare in Italy, ultimately ensuring appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for patients.

Materials and methods

A retrospective, prevalence-based COI study with a societal perspective and a one-year time-horizon was conducted to assess the economic burden of OSA and its syndrome for the Italian adult population.

Estimation of OSA prevalence

A scoping review of the literature, both grey and peer-reviewed, was performed in order to establish the prevalence of OSA in Italy among adult population (aged 15–74 years). Findings from the literature were discussed with clinical experts in order to assess their reliability and generalizability to the Italian context. Moreover, on the basis of the data provided by the Italian association of apneic patients (Associazione Apnoici Italiani Onlus) and expert opinion, we estimated the number of patients currently diagnosed and treated in Italy, in order to assess the extent of underdiagnosis and undertreatment in the national context.

Identification of conditions associated with OSA

A systematic literature review was carried out in order to identify the clinical and non-clinical conditions that have been demonstrated to be influenced by OSA in the adult population. The PRISMA guideline was used in developing this review [46]. The search was performed on PubMed according to a detailed search strategy and limited to studies providing the highest level of evidence, namely systematic reviews and meta-analyses (S1 Table). We decided to perform a “systematic review of systematic reviews” [47] since this approach is recommended when the literature is extremely heterogeneous in terms of methods, definitions and results, as in the case of OSA. The search was carried out on November 19th, 2018, and was updated on May 13th, 2021. The screening and selection of titles and abstracts first and full-texts later were conducted by two researchers in parallel on the basis of pre-defined exclusion criteria (S2 Table). Disagreements between reviewers on study inclusion were solved by consensus or by the decision of a third independent reviewer. The references and citations of the full-texts included were reviewed for additional articles according to a snowballing approach in order to ensure exhaustiveness of the review. Ultimately, studies were included if they provided quantitative evidence on the influence of OSA and its syndrome on other clinical and non-clinical conditions in the adult population. From the selected studies, the following data were extracted according to a predefined template: authors and year of publication; condition investigated (e.g., diabetes); OSA’s severity (i.e., mild, moderate, severe, overall); reference population (i.e., men, women, all); association measure (i.e., relative risk, hazard ratio, odds ratio); magnitude of association (mean value and 95% confidence intervals—CIs); statistical significance of the association (i.e., p-value). Data on magnitude of association (mean values) were used to calculate the proportion of conditions’ epidemiological burden influenced by OSA (see next section) and 95% CIs were used for sensitivity analysis. The exclusion criteria adopted and the results of the systematic review were discussed within a research board composed of health economists and clinicians specialized in different disciplines strongly related to OSA (i.e., neurology, endocrinology, internal medicine with cardiology specialization, gastroenterology). The aim of this phase was to ensure that the conditions retrieved through the review were significant from a clinical standpoint. Ultimately, only conditions for which a statistically significant association with OSA was found (i.e., p-value<0.05) and judged clinically meaningful by experts were included in the next steps of the analysis.

Estimation of conditions’ burden influenced by OSA: Population attributable fraction

An extensive review of both published and grey literature was performed to collect Italian epidemiological data of conditions included. In case we could not retrieve an epidemiological study for Italy, we searched for studies referred to other countries. In case more than one study was available for the same condition, we considered the one providing most up-to-date estimates. When prevalence rates were reported, the total number of prevalent cases was derived using data on Italian population by age and sex provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics for 2018 (Istat) [48].

In order to estimate the proportion of conditions’ epidemiological burden influenced by OSA and its syndrome, a Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) methodology was applied. The PAF can be defined as the proportional reduction in average disease risk that would be achieved by eliminating the exposure to a risk factor [49, 50]. The PAF allows to estimate the amount of disease burden caused by a certain risk factor. In the literature, there are different approaches to estimate PAF. In the present analysis, we chose the approach that was deemed more suitable according to the association data available (i.e., relative risk, odds ratio or hazard ratio). In particular, we used the formula proposed by Levin (1953) [51] when the measure of association provided was relative risk (RR): where p(E) is the prevalence of OSA; RR is relative risk.

It is important to highlight that Levin’s approach could lead to overestimation of PAF when the measure of association provided is adjusted RR [49]. However, studies included did not provide sufficient data to use alternative approaches, suitable in the presence of confounding, therefore we used Levin’s formula for both unadjusted and adjusted RR.

When the measure of association was hazard ratio (HR), a variant of the Levin’s formula was considered [52]: where p(E) is the prevalence of OSA; HR(t) is hazard ratio at time t.

Finally, when the measure of association provided was odds ratio (OR), PAF was calculated according to the method based on Eide and Heunch (2001) [53] and used in a study by Hillman and colleagues (2018) [43]. By solving simultaneously the following two equations for p(D|E) and p(D|~E) the formula for PAF calculation is obtained where p(D|E) is the probability of having the particular condition given that an individual has OSA; p(D|~E) is the probability of having the particular condition given that an individual does not have OSA; p(E) is the probability of having OSA (i.e., OSA prevalence); p(~E) is the probability of not having OSA; p(D) is the probability of having the particular condition; OR is the odds ratio for that condition for individuals with OSA.

The number of prevalent cases for each condition influenced by OSA and its syndrome was obtained by multiplying conditions’ prevalence by the relative PAF.

Cost analysis: Assessment of conditions’ costs and estimation of OSA economic burden

An extensive literature review on scientific databases (e.g., ScienceDirect, Scopus) and on Google was carried out in order to retrieve Italian cost data for the conditions included in the systematic review. A top-down approach was used for cost estimation. As a societal perspective was adopted, all cost categories (i.e., direct healthcare, direct non-healthcare and indirect costs) were included, when available. In case we could not retrieve a cost study for Italy, we included cost studies referred to other countries, adjusting for inflation and purchasing power differences. To estimate indirect costs due to all-cause mortality associated with OSA, the friction method was used. This method assumes that for long term absences, as in the case of premature death, an individual’s work can be replaced by the market, therefore the loss in production is limited to a period in which the market adapts to the changed situation, called friction period [54]. This approach is more conservative than the human capital method, which considers earnings lost over a lifetime [55]. In the present analysis, we considered only productivity losses of employed people, excluding indirect costs of people out of the labour market. Productivity costs were estimated for different age groups to account for differences in wages, considering age and gender-specific yearly paid production value [56] and employment rates [48]. People aged 65–74 were assumed to be retired, therefore their employment rate was set equal to 0. To the best of our knowledge, there are not published data on the friction period for Italy, therefore we used a plausible value of 75 days, in line with the estimates used in another European country (Spain) [57]. Moreover, for employed people, we assumed that the friction period was the same across all age groups. The mean cost per patient/year was calculated for each condition and multiplied for the number of prevalent cases influenced by OSA and its syndrome, as obtained by applying PAF methodology.

As OSA is associated with decreased quality of life (QoL) [18–20], we estimated its burden also in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) value lost due to OSA undertreatment. QALYs for a single patient can be obtained by multiplying the health utility values for the years lived [58]. Health utilities represent individuals’ preferences for different health states and can take on values from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health) [58]. Since our time perspective is one year, in the present case the QALY for a single patient coincides with the health utility value. In order to express the QALYs lost due to undertreatment in monetary terms, we evaluated them using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, which represents a measure of the amount of money a society is willing to invest in order to improve health (in this case, to obtain one additional QALY). Health utility and WTP values were retrieved from a review of the literature. In particular, the WTP threshold was sourced from an empirical work carried out by Woods and colleagues [59]. We adopted a conservative approach and considered the lower WTP value reported by the authors (i.e., $16,712, corresponding to €14,860 in 2018). In line with expert opinion, we assumed that only moderate-severe OSA has a substantial impact on patients’ QoL, therefore the present analysis was focused on this patient subpopulation. QALYs value lost was computed according to the following formulas, for alive and dead moderate-severe patients respectively:

The total economic burden of OSA for the society was estimated by summing the costs of each condition influenced by the disease, the costs due to OSA’s diagnosis and treatment and the QALYs value lost.

All costs were adjusted for inflation to 2018 (most updated data when analysis was carried out) in their national currency using gross domestic product deflators retrieved from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database [60]. Finally, all costs were adjusted for purchasing power differences using OECD Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) for GDP for 2018 [60]. PPPs serve both as currency convertors and as spatial price deflators: they convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalise their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries. This methodology can ensure better comparability between different currencies. As a one-year time-horizon was considered, no discounting on costs was applied.

Sensitivity analysis

A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed in order to account for uncertainty and test robustness of results regarding conditions’ burden influenced by OSA. In particular, all key parameters of the analysis were tested and varied according to 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or plausible ranges of variation: OSA prevalence (±10%), conditions’ prevalence (±10%), magnitude of association (95% CIs) and conditions’ costs (±10%). Each variable was tested at the upper and lower limits of its respective interval. Results were graphically reported through a tornado diagram.

Results

OSA prevalence in Italy

The review of the literature revealed that epidemiological studies on OSA in Italy are scant [61–63], and the estimates provided were either outdated or focused on a local context, therefore hardly generalizable. Moreover, as OSA is a highly undiagnosed condition, epidemiological studies conducted on sample of individuals with suspected OSA are likely to be biased and capture only diagnosed prevalence, thus underestimating the real one. On the basis of clinical expert opinion, two European-based and one literature-based studies were included for OSA’s prevalence estimate in the Italian population aged 15–74 years. In particular, prevalence data provided by one of the European studies identified (HypnoLaus [31]), a population-based study, were considered both representative of OSA epidemiology in Italy, reflecting the prevalence ratio of 2:1 among men and women observed in the Italian adult population [63], and reliable (i.e., reflecting the actual prevalence), as the sample of individuals tested with polysomnography was randomly drawn from the general population, considering all individuals regardless any OSA suspicions. The literature-based study identified [64], which used publicly available data and expert opinion to estimate the global prevalence of OSA, provided lower prevalence data for Italy than those obtained from the HypnoLaus. Therefore, in order to take into account the full range of variation of prevalence estimates, both studies were included in our analyses. The other European-based study by Hedner and colleagues [65] was used to stratify patients according to OSA severity as measured by AHI. Finally, data on the resident population in Italy in 2018 were sourced from Istat [48] and used to derive the number of prevalent cases. Additional information on prevalence estimates are reported in S1 File.

Results suggest that OSA prevalence in Italy is substantial, with moderate-severe condition (AHI≥15) affecting between 9% and 27% of the population aged 15–74 years (Table 1). On the basis of the data collected by the Italian association of apneic patients (Associazione Apnoici Italiani Onlus), in Italy patients currently treated with continuous and automatic positive airway pressure (the standard of care), are approximately 230,000, representing around 2% (model 1) and 6% (model 2) of the estimated prevalence of moderate-severe OSA. According to expert opinion, the patients currently diagnosed are approximately twofold than those treated (around 4% (model 1) and 12% (model 2) of moderate-severe OSA patients), but still far from the actual prevalence rates. These data suggest a substantial gap in both OSA diagnosis and treatment.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Prevalence of OSA for the general adult population in Italy (aged 15–74).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.t001

Conditions influenced by OSA

Of the 702 studies retrieved, 86 were included for full-text reading (Fig 1), as they did not meet any of the exclusion criteria previously established (S2 Table). If more than one study was available for the same condition, only the most recent and comprehensive one was included. However, if studies on the same condition reported discordant results on the association with OSA, they were all included in the analysis. On the basis of full-texts analysis and reference screening, 23 meta-analyses were selected [66–88] (Fig 1). Unfortunately, for some conditions judged relevant by clinicians involved in the research board (e.g., arrhythmias, psoriasis), screened studies either did not provide sufficient quantitative data on the association or provided an association measure that could not be used for PAF calculation (e.g., Cohen’s d, rate ratio), therefore they were excluded from the analysis. For each condition included, data were extracted according to a predefined template presented in the Methods section (Table 2). Four conditions included in data extraction but either judged not clinically meaningful by experts or for which there is a lack of epidemiological/cost evidence (i.e., spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak, floppy eyelids syndrome, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, pulmonary edema during pregnancy) were ultimately excluded from COI analysis, as well as conditions with a non-statistically significant association (Table 2). Overall, 26 clinical and non-clinical conditions from 18 meta-analyses were considered for the estimation of OSA’s economic burden (Fig 1, Table 2). The PRISMA checklist [46] is provided in the S2 File.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Systematic literature review—Screening process (PRISMA flow diagram).

*Reasons for full-text exclusion: 1) OSA exclusively investigated as a consequence of other conditions; 2) no quantitative data provided on the association of OSA with other conditions; 3) focus on parameters that could eventually identify a clinical condition, but not on the clinical condition itself; 4) lack of a control group of non-OSA patients; 5) unclear data on the direction of the association between OSA and the condition investigated; 6) focus on OSA together with other sleep disorders; 7) measure of association that could not be used for PAF calculation; 8) association between increase in AHI and the condition investigated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Results of systematic literature review: Association between OSA and other conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.t002

Conditions’ burden associated with OSA

For the conditions included, epidemiological data were retrieved from different sources [48, 89–110] and reported in S3 File. Conditions’ prevalence data (or incidence when appropriate) were used, together with data on magnitude of association (Table 2) and prevalence of OSA (Table 1), to estimate the proportion of burden associated with OSA through PAF methodology [43, 51, 52]. The PAF for car and work accidents was derived considering only OSA population with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), estimated at 19% [35]. Moreover, for the conditions providing only estimates for overall OSA, a conservative approach was adopted and PAF was calculated considering moderate-severe subpopulation as, according to expert opinion, these patients are more likely to develop comorbidities than mild ones. Table 3 provides the results for PAF (i.e., the proportion of each condition influenced by the presence of OSA and its syndrome) and the total number of cases/year for each condition, calculated using OSA prevalence data from either the population-based (model 1) or the literature-based study (model 2), and stratified by OSA severity.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Conditions’ burden influenced by OSA: PAF and number of cases/year among general adult population in Italy (aged 15–74 years).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.t003

OSA economic burden

For all-cause and cardiovascular premature mortality, indirect costs were estimated using the friction cost method, for both model 1 and model 2 (S4 File). Cost data of all other conditions were retrieved from the literature [107, 111–129] and expressed in 2018 Euros standardized for inflation and PPP (S5 File). In order to avoid double counting, only productivity losses due to morbidity were considered for these conditions when the original study reported separate estimates for costs due morbidity and mortality, as indirect costs due to mortality were computed separately. Unfortunately, for some conditions, it was not possible to retrieve an Italian cost study. Moreover, the majority of studies did not report estimates for all cost categories, leading to a possible underestimation of the overall economic burden. Through the multiplication of the cost per patient/year by the number of prevalent (or incident) cases due to OSA, we estimated the total economic burden influenced by OSA in Italy in one year. Mean estimates are provided in Table 4. Results suggest that the economic burden due to conditions influenced by OSA in Italy is substantial and ranges from €10.7 billion (model 2) to €32.0 billion (model 1) per year, corresponding to €177 and €530 per Italian resident respectively. The main driver of economic burden are direct healthcare costs, which account for 60% and 57% of total cost according to model 1 and model 2 respectively, followed by indirect costs (37% and 39%) and direct non-healthcare costs (both 4%). Considering the health expenditure per capita in Italy in 2018 (€3,429) [130], the direct healthcare costs per resident generated by conditions influenced by OSA represent between the 3% (model 2) and 9% (model 1) of national health expenditure.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Annual economic burden of conditions influenced by OSA in Italy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.t004

The yearly per patient cost of OSA diagnosis and treatment in Italy amounts to approximately €381 and €256, respectively (see S6 File for all details on data sources and calculation). According to the Italian association of apneic patients (Associazione Apnoici Italiani Onlus) and expert opinion, in Italy there are approximately 460,000 patients diagnosed and 230,000 treated. Therefore, the total yearly cost of OSA diagnosis and treatment amounts to €175,347,041 and €58,880,000 respectively, with an overall cost of €234,227,041.

As regards estimation of QALYs value lost due to undertreatment, health utility values were derived from a study by Català and colleagues [131], who found a significant difference in utility values between treated (utility = 0.84) and untreated patients (utility = 0.79). By using these values in the formulas presented in the methods section, we estimated a QALYs value lost ranging from €2.8 billion (model 2) to €9.0 billion (model 1) (see S7 File for additional details on calculation).

As summarized by Table 5, in Italy the total economic burden of OSA ranges from around € 13.8 billion/year (model 2) to €41.3 billion/year (model 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 5. Total annual economic burden of OSA in Italy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.t005

Sensitivity analysis

All key parameters used to estimate conditions’ burden influenced by OSA were tested in one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. The majority of them, however, did not significantly influence the results obtained in the base-case analysis. The tornado plot shows only those variables whose variation caused at least 1% increase or decrease of base-case result. For both model 1 (Fig 2) and model 2 (Fig 3), the five parameters with the highest impact on conditions’ burden influenced by OSA were the magnitude of association with OSA of metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer, and OSA prevalence.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Tornado plot for sensitivity analysis (model 1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Tornado plot for sensitivity analysis (model 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.g003

Discussion

This study aimed at providing reliable estimates of the extent of OSA consequences in Italy and assessing the societal economic burden associated with OSA in the adult population by performing a COI analysis. Several studies demonstrated that OSA is a severely underdiagnosed condition worldwide [1, 132, 133]. We estimated a prevalence of moderate-severe OSA in Italy ranging from approximately 4 to 12 million patients (9% to 27% of the adult population). However, the number of diagnosed and treated patients is substantially lower (around 460,000 and 230,000 patients respectively), suggesting a huge gap in both OSA diagnosis and treatment. The reasons underlying poor diagnosis of OSA are several, and start from lack of awareness [134, 135], both among healthcare professionals and general population, to limited routine screening and diagnostic sleep centres [136]. Even when a diagnosis occurred, evidence shows that acceptance and adherence to treatment with CPAP—despite its technological advances—is generally low, ranging from 30 to 60% [137, 138].

The systematic literature review revealed that several clinical and non-clinical conditions were found to be significantly influenced by OSA and its syndrome. Through the PAF approach, we attributed a portion of each conditions’ burden to OSA, which allowed us to estimate the economic impact associated with the sleep disorder. Results of COI revealed that the economic burden for the society due to conditions associated with OSA in Italy is very high, ranging from €10.7 to €32.0 billion per year, with the main cost driver represented by direct healthcare costs. Moreover, the QALYs value lost due to OSA undertreatment is substantial, and contributes at increasing OSA’s yearly economic burden by €2.8 to €9.0 billion.

Several studies demonstrated that appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for OSA may have a substantial impact in reducing clinical and non-clinical consequences related to the disease, whereas untreated disease may result in increased clinical and economic burden [3, 139]. In particular, therapy with CPAP was demonstrated to be effective in preventing the onset and reducing the burden of some of the associated conditions, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [140], stroke [141], car [142] and work accidents [143]. Overall, these results suggest that OSA’s underdiagnosis and undertreatment have a detrimental effect both on the onset of associated conditions and on patients’ quality of life, ultimately leading to loss of value for the society. An increasing awareness towards the disease is fundamental in order to implement appropriate diagnostic and treatment pathways for OSA patients and reduce its substantial clinical and economic burden.

Study limitations

This study has some limitations. First, the review performed may not be fully exhaustive as we did not consider individual studies but focused only on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including the latter for COI analysis. The reason underlying this choice is that evidence on OSA’s association with other conditions is very heterogeneous, therefore we opted for the “systematic review of systematic reviews” method [47], which is recommended in all cases where individual studies are heterogeneous in terms of methods, definitions and results. Moreover, we further restricted the selection on systematic reviews presenting a meta-analysis because we needed a reliable quantitative assessment of the intensity of association between OSA and other conditions. Although a vast literature exists on OSA association with other conditions, in some cases single studies either provide insufficient quantitative evidence or no quantitative evidence at all. Second, due to lack of Italian data, we had to rely on OSA epidemiological estimates derived from two different studies, a population-based study conducted in another European country and a model-based study. Estimated prevalence data, although validated by a clinical expert, should be interpreted cautiously. Further research is needed in order to provide up-to-date evidence on OSA epidemiology in Italy, which in turn might increase awareness of the extent of conditions’ burden for our country. Third, few conditions’ prevalence data were lacking for Italy, and we had to use estimates derived from other countries. The same happened for cost data, although we adjusted for purchasing power differences to ensure better comparability between different currencies. Moreover, it was not always possible to retrieve data on all relevant cost components, namely direct non-healthcare costs and productivity losses due to morbidity, potentially leading to an underestimation of OSA economic burden.

Conclusions

Results of the present COI analysis suggest that the burden of OSA in Italy is substantial but subtle, because it is greatly hidden behind the cost of other conditions for which OSA is a risk factor. Moreover, underdiagnosis and low treatment rates are observed. More appropriate diagnosis rates and clinical pathways for OSA patients, in particular for moderate-severe population, are recommended.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Search strategy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Exclusion criteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s002

(DOCX)

S1 File. Additional information on OSA prevalence estimation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s003

(DOCX)

S2 File. PRISMA checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s004

(DOCX)

S3 File. Prevalence of conditions significantly associated with OSA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s005

(DOCX)

S4 File. Indirect costs due to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s006

(DOCX)

S5 File. Cost of conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s007

(DOCX)

S6 File. Cost of OSA diagnosis and treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s008

(DOCX)

S7 File. Additional information on QALYs value lost calculation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.s009

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Livio Luzi, Prof. Nicola Montano and Prof. Roberto Penagini for their participation in the research board and for their precious feedbacks to ameliorate the research. The authors thank the Italian association of apneic patients (Associazione Apnoici Italiani Onlus) for having shared their data, which contributed at enriching the analysis.

References

  1. 1. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(17):1230–5. pmid:8464434
  2. 2. McNicholas WT, Bonsigore MR, Management Committee of of EU COST ACTION B26. Sleep apnoea as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: current evidence, basic mechanisms and research priorities. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(1):156–78. pmid:17197482
  3. 3. Knauert M, Naik S, Gillespie MB, Kryger M. Clinical consequences and economic costs of untreated obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;1(1):17–27. pmid:29204536
  4. 4. Malhotra A, White DP. Obstructive sleep apnoea. Lancet. 2002;360(9328):237–45. pmid:12133673
  5. 5. McNicholas WT. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):154–60. pmid:18250207
  6. 6. Park JG, Ramar K, Olson EJ. Updates on definition, consequences, and management of obstructive sleep apnea. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(6):549–54; quiz 54–5. pmid:21628617
  7. 7. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):136–43. pmid:18250205
  8. 8. Kent BD, Grote L, Ryan S, Pepin JL, Bonsignore MR, Tkacova R, et al. Diabetes mellitus prevalence and control in sleep-disordered breathing: the European Sleep Apnea Cohort (ESADA) study. Chest. 2014;146(4):982–90. pmid:24831859
  9. 9. Reichmuth KJ, Austin D, Skatrud JB, Young T. Association of sleep apnea and type II diabetes: a population-based study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(12):1590–5. pmid:16192452
  10. 10. Ronksley PE, Hemmelgarn BR, Heitman SJ, Hanly PJ, Faris PD, Quan H, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with diabetes in sleepy subjects. Thorax. 2009;64(10):834–9. pmid:19679579
  11. 11. Cao J, Feng J, Li L, Chen B. Obstructive sleep apnea promotes cancer development and progression: a concise review. Sleep Breath. 2015;19(2):453–7. pmid:25643765
  12. 12. Gozal D, Ham SA, Mokhlesi B. Sleep Apnea and Cancer: Analysis of a Nationwide Population Sample. Sleep. 2016;39(8):1493–500. pmid:27166241
  13. 13. Shahar E, Whitney CW, Redline S, Lee ET, Newman AB, Nieto FJ, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional results of the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(1):19–25. pmid:11208620
  14. 14. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AG. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046–53. pmid:15781100
  15. 15. Arzt M, Young T, Finn L, Skatrud JB, Bradley TD. Association of sleep-disordered breathing and the occurrence of stroke. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(11):1447–51. pmid:16141444
  16. 16. Yaggi HK, Concato J, Kernan WN, Lichtman JH, Brass LM, Mohsenin V. Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for stroke and death. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(19):2034–41. pmid:16282178
  17. 17. Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O’Connor GT, Resnick HE, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(2):269–77. pmid:20339144
  18. 18. Gall R, Isaac L, Kryger M. Quality of life in mild obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 1993;16(8 Suppl):S59–61. pmid:8178027
  19. 19. Smith IE, Shneerson JM. Is the SF 36 sensitive to sleep disruption? A study in subjects with sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res. 1995;4(3):183–8. pmid:10607157
  20. 20. Parish JM, Lyng PJ. Quality of life in bed partners of patients with obstructive sleep apnea or hypopnea after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure. Chest. 2003;124(3):942–7. pmid:12970021
  21. 21. AlGhanim N, Comondore VR, Fleetham J, Marra CA, Ayas NT. The economic impact of obstructive sleep apnea. Lung 2008. p. 7–12. pmid:18066623
  22. 22. Sherman B. Obstructive sleep apnea and health benefits purchasing: an employer perspective. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;9(3):187–9. pmid:23495337
  23. 23. Tarasiuk A, Reuveni H. The economic impact of obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19(6):639–44. pmid:24060978
  24. 24. Ellen RL, Marshall SC, Palayew M, Molnar FJ, Wilson KG, Man-Son-Hing M. Systematic review of motor vehicle crash risk in persons with sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2006;2(2):193–200. pmid:17557495
  25. 25. Karimi M, Hedner J, Habel H, Nerman O, Grote L. Sleep apnea-related risk of motor vehicle accidents is reduced by continuous positive airway pressure: Swedish Traffic Accident Registry data. Sleep. 2015;38(3):341–9. pmid:25325460
  26. 26. Bearpark H, Elliott L, Grunstein R, Cullen S, Schneider H, Althaus W, et al. Snoring and sleep apnea. A population study in Australian men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(5):1459–65. pmid:7735600
  27. 27. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Ten Have T, Tyson K, Kales A. Effects of age on sleep apnea in men: I. Prevalence and severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):144–8. pmid:9445292
  28. 28. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Lin HM, Ten Have T, Rein J, Vela-Bueno A, et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in women: effects of gender. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(3 Pt 1):608–13. pmid:11254512
  29. 29. Duran J, Esnaola S, Rubio R, Iztueta A. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and related clinical features in a population-based sample of subjects aged 30 to 70 yr. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(3 Pt 1):685–9. pmid:11254524
  30. 30. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(9):1217–39. pmid:11991871
  31. 31. Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, Marti-Soler H, Andries D, Tobback N, et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(4):310–8. pmid:25682233
  32. 32. Lee W, Nagubadi S, Kryger MH, Mokhlesi B. Epidemiology of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Population-based Perspective. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2008;2(3):349–64. pmid:19690624
  33. 33. Lindberg E, Gislason T. Epidemiology of sleep-related obstructive breathing. Sleep Med Rev. 2000;4(5):411–33. pmid:17210275
  34. 34. Reuveni H, Tarasiuk A, Wainstock T, Ziv A, Elhayany A, Tal A. Awareness level of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during routine unstructured interviews of a standardized patient by primary care physicians. Sleep. 2004;27(8):1518–25. pmid:15683143
  35. 35. Young T, Evans L, Finn L, Palta M. Estimation of the clinically diagnosed proportion of sleep apnea syndrome in middle-aged men and women. Sleep. 1997;20(9):705–6. pmid:9406321
  36. 36. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Peppard PE, Nieto FJ, Hla KM. Burden of sleep apnea: rationale, design, and major findings of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study. WMJ. 2009;108(5):246–9. pmid:19743755
  37. 37. Ronksley PE, Hemmelgarn BR, Tsai WH. Comorbidity and healthcare costs in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Breathe. 2011;8(2):95–104.
  38. 38. McMillan A, Bratton DJ, Faria R, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Griffin S, Davies RJ, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in older people: PREDICT. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(40):1–188. pmid:26063688
  39. 39. Jenkinson C, Davies RJ, Mullins R, Stradling JR. Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9170):2100–5. pmid:10382693
  40. 40. Siccoli MM, Pepperell JC, Kohler M, Craig SE, Davies RJ, Stradling JR. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on quality of life in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea: data from a randomized controlled trial. Sleep. 2008;31(11):1551–8. pmid:19014075
  41. 41. Pepperell JC, Ramdassingh-Dow S, Crosthwaite N, Mullins R, Jenkinson C, Stradling JR, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure after therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised parallel trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9302):204–10. pmid:11812555
  42. 42. Chen X, Niu X, Xiao Y, Dong J, Lu M, Kong W. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on leptin levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(4):610–8. pmid:25527507
  43. 43. Hillman D, Mitchell S, Streatfeild J, Burns C, Bruck D, Pezzullo L. The economic cost of inadequate sleep. Sleep. 2018;41(8). pmid:29868785
  44. 44. Frost & Sullivan. Hidden Health Crisis Costing America Billions. Underdiagnosing and Undertreating Obstructive Sleep Apnea Draining Healthcare System. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2016.
    • 45. Harvard Medical School & McKinsey Company. The price of fatigue: The surprising economic costs of unmanaged sleep apnea. 2010.
      • 46. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. pmid:19621072
      • 47. Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. pmid:21291558
      • 48. Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat). Statistiche Istat [Last access: 9th April 2019]. http://dati.istat.it/.
        • 49. Rockhill B, Newman B, Weinberg C. Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(1):15–9. pmid:9584027
        • 50. Rosen L. An intuitive approach to understanding the attributable fraction of disease due to a risk factor: the case of smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(7):2932–43. pmid:23863613
        • 51. Levin ML. The occurrence of lung cancer in man. Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum. 1953;9(3):531–41. pmid:13124110
        • 52. Samuelsen SO, Eide GE. Attributable fractions with survival data. Stat Med. 2008;27(9):1447–67. pmid:17694507
        • 53. Eide GE, Heuch I. Attributable fractions: fundamental concepts and their visualization. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10(3):159–93. pmid:11446147
        • 54. Koopmanschap MA, van Ineveld BM. Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(9):1005–10. pmid:1631600
        • 55. Mushkin SJ. Health as an Investment. Journal of Political Economy. 1962;70(5, Part 2):129–57.
        • 56. Pradelli L, Ghetti G. A general model for the estimation of societal costs of lost production and informal care in Italy. Farmeconomia Health economics and therapeutic pathways; Vol 18, No 1 (2017)DO— 2017.
        • 57. Oliva J, Lobo F, Lopez-Bastida J, Zozaya N, Romay R. Indirect costs of cervical and breast cancers in Spain. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(4):309–13. pmid:16133097
        • 58. Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009;12 Suppl 1:S5–9. pmid:19250132
        • 59. Woods B, Revill P, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Country-Level Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Initial Estimates and the Need for Further Research. Value Health. 2016;19(8):929–35. pmid:27987642
        • 60. OECD. OECD.Stat—GDP deflators, forecast growth [Last access: 9th April 2019]. https://stats.oecd.org.
          • 61. Cirignotta F, D’Alessandro R, Partinen M, Zucconi M, Cristina E, Gerardi R, et al. Prevalence of every night snoring and obstructive sleep apnoeas among 30-69-year-old men in Bologna, Italy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1989;79(5):366–72. pmid:2741668
          • 62. Ferini-Strambi L, Zucconi M, Castronovo V, Garancini P, Oldani A, Smirne S. Snoring & sleep apnea: a population study in Italian women. Sleep. 1999;22(7):859–64. pmid:10566904
          • 63. Ferini-Strambi L, Fantini ML, Castronovo C. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Minerva Med. 2004;95(3):187–202. pmid:15289748
          • 64. Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, Heinzer R, Ip MSM, Morrell MJ, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):687–98. pmid:31300334
          • 65. Hedner J, Grote L, Bonsignore M, McNicholas W, Lavie P, Parati G, et al. The European Sleep Apnoea Database (ESADA): report from 22 European sleep laboratories. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(3):635–42. pmid:21622583
          • 66. Xie C, Zhu R, Tian Y, Wang K. Association of obstructive sleep apnoea with the risk of vascular outcomes and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e013983. pmid:29275335
          • 67. Zhang XB, Peng LH, Lyu Z, Jiang XT, Du YP. Obstructive sleep apnoea and the incidence and mortality of cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(2). pmid:26660307
          • 68. Palamaner Subash Shantha G, Kumar AA, Cheskin LJ, Pancholy SB. Association between sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2015;16(10):1289–94. pmid:26212231
          • 69. Zhu Z, Zhang F, Liu Y, Yang S, Li C, Niu Q, et al. Relationship of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea with Diabetic Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4737064. pmid:29230409
          • 70. Leong WB, Jadhakhan F, Taheri S, Thomas GN, Adab P. The Association between Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sleep. 2016;39(2):301–8. pmid:26414891
          • 71. Wang X, Bi Y, Zhang Q, Pan F. Obstructive sleep apnoea and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Respirology. 2013;18(1):140–6. pmid:22988888
          • 72. Xu S, Wan Y, Xu M, Ming J, Xing Y, An F, et al. The association between obstructive sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:105. pmid:26391008
          • 73. Edwards C, Almeida OP, Ford AH. Obstructive sleep apnea and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2020;142:45–54. Epub 2020/11/08. pmid:33158487
          • 74. Liu L, Kang R, Zhao S, Zhang T, Zhu W, Li E, et al. Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med. 2015;12(10):1992–2003. pmid:26395783
          • 75. Sun AP, Liu N, Zhang YS, Zhao HY, Liu XL. The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2020;41(5):1153–62. Epub 2020/01/04. pmid:31897944
          • 76. Bakhsheshian J, Hwang MS, Friedman M. Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(8):733–8. pmid:26110561
          • 77. Huon LK, Liu SY, Camacho M, Guilleminault C. The association between ophthalmologic diseases and obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2016;20(4):1145–54. pmid:27230013
          • 78. Wu Y, Zhou LM, Lou H, Cheng JW, Wei RL. The Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(7):987–92. pmid:26443989
          • 79. Hou H, Zhao Y, Yu W, Dong H, Xue X, Ding J, et al. Association of obstructive sleep apnea with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8(1):010405. pmid:29497502
          • 80. Zhou X, Liu F, Zhang W, Wang G, Guo D, Fu W, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of aortic dissection: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Vascular. 2018;26(5):515–23. pmid:29566589
          • 81. Cao Y, Wu S, Zhang L, Yang Y, Cao S, Li Q. Association of allergic rhinitis with obstructive sleep apnea: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(51):e13783. Epub 2018/12/24. pmid:30572534
          • 82. Musso G, Cassader M, Olivetti C, Rosina F, Carbone G, Gambino R. Association of obstructive sleep apnoea with the presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2013;14(5):417–31. pmid:23387384
          • 83. Wu ZH, Yang XP, Niu X, Xiao XY, Chen X. The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2018. pmid:29987514
          • 84. Shi T, Min M, Sun C, Cheng C, Zhang Y, Liang M, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between gout, serum uric acid level, and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(4):1047–57. Epub 2019/03/25. pmid:30903565
          • 85. Liu L, Su G, Wang S, Zhu B. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and its association with pregnancy-related health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(2):399–412. Epub 2018/09/27. pmid:30255484
          • 86. Xu T, Feng Y, Peng H, Guo D, Li T. Obstructive sleep apnea and the risk of perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6982. pmid:25382105
          • 87. Tregear S, Reston J, Schoelles K, Phillips B. Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of motor vehicle crash: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009;5(6):573–81. pmid:20465027
          • 88. Garbarino S, Guglielmi O, Sanna A, Mancardi GL, Magnavita N. Risk of Occupational Accidents in Workers with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sleep. 2016;39(6):1211–8. pmid:26951401
          • 89. Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica—Associazione Italiana dei Registri Tumori (AIOM-AIRTUM). I numeri del cancro in Italia 2018. http://www.registri-tumori.it/PDF/AIOM2017/2017_numeri_del_cancro.pdf.
            • 90. AMD, ANAAO-ASSOMED, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, FAND-AID, FIMMG, Gruppo di Studio Complicanze Oculari della Società Italiana di Diabetologia, et al. Linee-guida per lo screening, la diagnostica e il trattamento della retinopatia diabetica in Italia 2015. https://www.fondazionebietti.it/sites/default/files/pdf/lg-rd-16sett2015.pdf.
              • 91. Associazione Medici Diabetologi—Società Italiana di Diabetologia (AMD-SID). Standard italiani per la cura del diabete mellito 2018. https://www.siditalia.it/pdf/Standard%20di%20Cura%20AMD%20-%20SID%202018_protetto2.pdf.
                • 92. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edition. 2017.
                  • 93. Tocci G, Ferrucci A, Bruno G, Mannarino E, Nati G, Trimarco B, et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the clinical practice of general medicine in Italy. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5(4):271–9. pmid:26331111
                  • 94. Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat). La salute mentale nelle fasi della vita 2018. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/219807.
                    • 95. Nicolosi A, Moreira ED Jr., Shirai M, Bin Mohd Tambi MI, Glasser DB. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction in four countries: cross-national study of the prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 2003;61(1):201–6. pmid:12559296
                    • 96. Graziottin A. Prevalence and evaluation of sexual health problems—HSDD in Europe. J Sex Med. 2007;4 Suppl 3:211–9. pmid:17394593
                    • 97. Riccò M, Vezzosi L, Balzarini F, Gualerzi G, Ranzieri S, Signorelli C, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson Disease in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(3):e2020088. pmid:32921784
                    • 98. Stevens E, Emmett E, Wang Y, McKevitt C, Wolfe C. The Burden of Stroke in Europe. Stroke Alliance for Europe. 2017.
                      • 99. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90. pmid:24974815
                      • 100. Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Donfrancesco C, Lo Noce C, Pilotto L, Vanuzzo D, et al. Cardiovascular health in Italy. Ten-year surveillance of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: Osservatorio Epidemiologico Cardiovascolare/Health Examination Survey 1998–2012. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(2 Suppl):9–37. pmid:26195612
                      • 101. Dovellini EV. Percorso diagnostico dei pazienti ipertesi. Protocolli per l’ipertensione secondaria. Ital Heart J. 2000;1 (Suppl 5):53–9.
                      • 102. Pacini D, Leone A, Belotti LM, Fortuna D, Gabbieri D, Zussa C, et al. Acute type A aortic dissection: significance of multiorgan malperfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(4):820–6. pmid:23137559
                      • 103. Younossi ZM, Blissett D, Blissett R, Henry L, Stepanova M, Younossi Y, et al. The economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and Europe. Hepatology. 2016;64(5):1577–86. pmid:27543837
                      • 104. Darba J, Kaskens L, Plans P, Elizalde JI, Coma M, Cuomo R, et al. Epidemiology and societal costs of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s syndrome in Germany, Italy and Spain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(2):225–32. pmid:21476824
                      • 105. Fox A, McHugh S, Browne J, Kenny LC, Fitzgerald A, Khashan AS, et al. Estimating the Cost of Preeclampsia in the Healthcare System: Cross-Sectional Study Using Data From SCOPE Study (Screening for Pregnancy End Points). Hypertension. 2017;70(6):1243–9. pmid:29084880
                      • 106. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Epidemiology of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. In: Magee L, von Dadelszen P, Stones W, Mathai M, editors. The FIGO Textbook of Pregnancy Hypertension: The Global Library of Women’s Medicine; 2016.
                        • 107. Meregaglia M, Dainelli L, Banks H, Benedetto C, Detzel P, Fattore G. The short-term economic burden of gestational diabetes mellitus in Italy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):58. pmid:29471802
                        • 108. Merinopoulou E, Pokras S, Pimenta JM, Blini V, Veronesi C, Buda S, et al. The cost of preterm labor and preterm birth for mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies and their infants in Italy: a retrospective cohort study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;19(2):231–41. pmid:29764243
                        • 109. OECD. OECD Statistics. Health care use 2019 [Last access: 22nd March 2019]. https://stats.oecd.org.
                          • 110. Istituto nazionale di statistica—Automobile Club d’Italia (Istat-Aci). La statistica ISTAT-ACI—Incidenti stradali 2017. http://www.aci.it/laci/studi-e-ricerche/dati-e-statistiche/incidentalita/la-statistica-istat-aci/2017.html.
                            • 111. Fattore G, Torbica A, Susi A, Giovanni A, Benelli G, Gozzo M, et al. The social and economic burden of stroke survivors in Italy: a prospective, incidence-based, multi-centre cost of illness study. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:137. pmid:23150894
                            • 112. Goldmeier D, Malik F, Phillips R, Green J. Cost implications of sexual dysfunction: the female picture. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16(2):130–4. pmid:14961049
                            • 113. Happich M, Reitberger U, Breitscheidel L, Ulbig M, Watkins J. The economic burden of diabetic retinopathy in Germany in 2002. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(1):151–9. pmid:17406883
                            • 114. Koleva D, Motterlini N, Schiavone M, Garattini L, Study Group G. Medical costs of glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Italian referral centres: a prospective study. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(5):340–7. pmid:17728557
                            • 115. Law A, McCoy M, Lynen R, Curkendall SM, Gatwood J, Juneau PL, et al. The prevalence of complications and healthcare costs during pregnancy. J Med Econ. 2015;18(7):533–41. pmid:25714263
                            • 116. Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(13):1610–9. pmid:16495286
                            • 117. Lucioni C, Mazzi S, Cerra C, Lottaroli S. I costi della sindrome metabolica. PharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles. 2005;7(2):89–99.
                            • 118. Luebke T, Brunkwall J. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1247–55. pmid:24418638
                            • 119. Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Sullivan R. Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):1165–74. pmid:24131614
                            • 120. Marcellusi A, Viti R, Mecozzi A, Mennini FS. The direct and indirect cost of diabetes in Italy: a prevalence probabilistic approach. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(2):139–47. pmid:25427540
                            • 121. Mennini FS, Marcellusi A, von der Schulenburg JM, Gray A, Levy P, Sciattella P, et al. Cost of poor adherence to anti-hypertensive therapy in five European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16(1):65–72. pmid:24390212
                            • 122. Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jonsson B, group Cs, et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(1):155–62. pmid:22175760
                            • 123. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Washington (DC)2007.
                              • 124. Pizzo E. An estimate of costs and benefits of alternative methods of delivery: an empirical analysis. 2011.
                                • 125. Romero-Aroca P, de la Riva-Fernandez S, Valls-Mateu A, Sagarra-Alamo R, Moreno-Ribas A, Soler N, et al. Cost of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema in a population, an eight year follow up. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:136. pmid:27491545
                                • 126. Schultz AB, Edington DW. Metabolic syndrome in a workplace: prevalence, co-morbidities, and economic impact. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7(5):459–68. pmid:19450154
                                • 127. Wijnen W, Weijermars W, Vanden Berghe W, Schoeters A, Bauer R, Carnis L, et al. Crash cost estimates for European countries, Deliverable 3.2 of the H2020 project SafetyCube. 2017.
                                  • 128. Wilson EC, McKeen ES, Scuffham PA, Brown MC, Wylie K, Hackett G. The cost to the United Kingdom National Health Service of managing erectile dysfunction: the impact of sildenafil and prescribing restrictions. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(13):879–89. pmid:12381240
                                  • 129. Zhou Z, Chaudhari P, Yang H, Fang AP, Zhao J, Law EH, et al. Healthcare Resource Use, Costs, and Disease Progression Associated with Diabetic Nephropathy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):555–71. pmid:28361464
                                  • 130. Armeni P, Bertolani A, Borsoi L, Costa F. La spesa sanitaria: composizione ed evoluzione. In: CERGAS, editor. Rapporto OASI 2018. Milano: Egea; 2018.
                                    • 131. Catala R, Villoro R, Merino M, Sangenis S, Colomes L, Hernandez Flix S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol. 2016;52(9):461–9. pmid:26993090
                                    • 132. Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Tymkew H, Tanaka CY, Saager L, Safer-Zadeh E, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea among adult surgical patients in an academic medical center. Sleep Med. 2009;10(7):753–8. pmid:19186102
                                    • 133. Simpson L, Hillman DR, Cooper MN, Ward KL, Hunter M, Cullen S, et al. High prevalence of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea in the general population and methods for screening for representative controls. Sleep Breath. 2013;17(3):967–73. pmid:23161476
                                    • 134. Sia CH, Hong Y, Tan LWL, van Dam RM, Lee CH, Tan A. Awareness and knowledge of obstructive sleep apnea among the general population. Sleep Med. 2017;36:10–7. pmid:28735905
                                    • 135. Stores G. Clinical diagnosis and misdiagnosis of sleep disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(12):1293–7. pmid:18024690
                                    • 136. Flemons WW, Douglas NJ, Kuna ST, Rodenstein DO, Wheatley J. Access to diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(6):668–72. pmid:15003950
                                    • 137. Weaver TE, Sawyer AM. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea: implications for future interventions. Indian J Med Res. 2010;131:245–58. pmid:20308750
                                    • 138. Weaver TE, Grunstein RR. Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):173–8. pmid:18250209
                                    • 139. Walter RJ, Hagedorn SI, Lettieri CJ. Impact of diagnosing and treating obstructive sleep apnea on healthcare utilization. Sleep Med. 2017;38:73–7. pmid:29031760
                                    • 140. Fu Y, Xia Y, Yi H, Xu H, Guan J, Yin S. Meta-analysis of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in obstructive sleep apnea with or without continuous positive airway pressure treatment. Sleep Breath. 2017;21(1):181–9. pmid:27502205
                                    • 141. Kim Y, Koo YS, Lee HY, Lee SY. Can Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Reduce the Risk of Stroke in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146317. pmid:26731604
                                    • 142. Antonopoulos CN, Sergentanis TN, Daskalopoulou SS, Petridou ET. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, road traffic accidents and driving simulator performance: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2011;15(5):301–10. pmid:21195643
                                    • 143. Tregear S, Reston J, Schoelles K, Phillips B. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces risk of motor vehicle crash among drivers with obstructive sleep apnea: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep. 2010;33(10):1373–80. pmid:21061860