Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genomic characterisation of an entomopathogenic strain of Serratia ureilytica in the critically endangered phasmid Dryococelus australis

  • Joanne L. Allen ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Joanne L. Allen, Nicholas P. Doidge, Marc S. Marenda

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jlallen@unimelb.edu.au

    Affiliation Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Nicholas P. Doidge ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Joanne L. Allen, Nicholas P. Doidge, Marc S. Marenda

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne Zoo, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Christina Cheng,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne Zoo, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Michael Lynch,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Melbourne Zoo, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Helen K. Crabb,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Jean-Pierre Scheerlinck,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Animal Biotechnology, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Rhys Bushell,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software

    Affiliation Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia

  • Glenn F. Browning,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Marc S. Marenda

    Contributed equally to this work with: Joanne L. Allen, Nicholas P. Doidge, Marc S. Marenda

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Between 2014 and 2019, unexpected mortalities were observed in a colony of Dryococelus australis, an endangered stick-insect kept at the Melbourne Zoo for a breeding and conservation program. Pure cultures of Serratia spp. were obtained from the haemolymph of moribund and recently deceased individuals. The combined bacteriological and histopathological observations suggested an infectious cause of these mortalities. Genotyping of Serratia sp. isolated from the insects and their environment revealed a predominant strain profile. A representative isolate, AM923, was entirely sequenced and compared to 616 publicly available Serratia spp. genomes, including 37 associated with insects. The genomes were distributed into 3 distinct groups, with 63% of the insect-associated isolates within a single clade (clade A) containing AM923, separated from most environmental/plant-associated strains (clade B) and human isolates (clade C). Average nucleotide identity and phylogenetic analyses identified AM923 as S. ureilytica and revealed similarities with putatively entomopathogenic strains. An experimental infection model in honey bees (Apis mellifera) confirmed the pathogenic potential of AM923. A urease operon was found in most insect isolates and a PCR assay, based on the ureB gene sequence, was used to confirm the presence of AM923 in experimentally infected bees. This species-specific PCR could be applied to detect entomopathogenic Serratia spp. in infected insects or their environment.

Introduction

The Lord Howe Island stick insect (Dryococelus australis) is a critically endangered phasmid (Order Phasmatodea, also known as Phasmida) which was endemic to Lord Howe Island, a small volcanic island located between Australia and New Zealand in the Southern Pacific Ocean. The insect was assumed to be extinct following the incursion of the European black rat (Rattus rattus) onto the island in the early 20th century. A small number of D. australis were discovered on a nearby island in 2001 and some individuals were transported to Melbourne Zoo to establish a breeding colony. This colony now contains almost 500 insects [1].

In recent years, increased mortalities have occurred in this captive population. Major mortality episodes commencing in 2013 prompted histopathological and microbiological investigations into the causes of the deaths. Histopathology investigations of dead and moribund insects between October 2013 and March 2015 revealed inflammatory lesions throughout the body in 97% of all cases, with aggregates of short Gram negative rods frequently found within lesions. Bacteria from the genus Serratia were isolated from the haemocoel in more than 80% of sampled individuals and often in pure culture [2]. Haemolymph is a normally sterile site and pure growth of bacteria on a rich non-selective culture medium, such as sheep blood agar, in high numbers is deemed to be clinically important.

The genus Serratia contains 32 species, including S. marcescens, S. ureilytica and S. liquefaciens [3]. Many Serratia spp. are saprophytic organisms with the ability to survive in various environmental conditions and to utilise a broad range of nutrients; they have been isolated from water, soil and plants, as well as vertebrate and invertebrate animals [4]. Serratia spp. are also nosocomial opportunistic pathogens that have been implicated in a wide variety of infections in humans, including urinary tract, respiratory tract and wound infections, meningitis, endocarditis and septicaemia [5], mostly in immunocompromised patients and in neonates [6, 7]. The presence of multiple antimicrobial resistances in many isolates is particularly concerning [8]. The molecular epidemiology of Serratia spp. outbreaks has been investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after genomic cleavage with SpeI, and this approach has been found to yield good levels of reproducibility and discrimination [6, 912]. No multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme has been developed to date for this genus and sequencing of the 16s rRNA gene does not provide sufficient discriminatory power to characterise isolates. Other molecular typing methods have been used to characterise isolates, most recently a high throughput short sequence typing scheme (HiSST) to trace human opportunistic infections in a clinical setting [13].

Serratia spp. can infect insects belonging to various orders, including Orthoptera, Isoptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera and Phasmatodea [4, 7, 14]. Experimental inoculation of Serratia spp. into the haemocoel can lead to septicaemia and death in more than 70 insect species [15], including Drosophila melanogaster [16]. Serratia spp. have been isolated from diseased wild mole crickets (Scapteriscus borellii) [17] and from larvae and adults of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera) [7]. Variations in pathogenicity have been documented in experimentally infected honey bees, with strain KZ-19 found to be a highly virulent isolate compared to strain sicaria Ss1 [18, 19]. Some Serratia spp. and nematodes can have mutually beneficial relationships that result in entomopathogenic properties [20]. Plants found in the insect digestive tract are a potential source of Serratia spp., but the route of entry from the gut into the haemocoel is not well understood. Rupture of the gut has been suggested as a possible route of entry [7]. In addition to horizontal transmission, vertical transmission of Serratia spp. via insect eggs has been demonstrated in other insect species, including Heliothis virescens and Heliothis zea [2123]. Colonisation of both the external egg surface and the egg contents has been demonstrated and found to be associated with a reduction in egg production and hatching rates [22].

The objectives of this study were: (1) Characterisation of Serratia spp. associated with recently deceased and moribund insects of the captive D. australis colony of Melbourne Zoo; (2) Determination of the complete genomic sequences of 2 representative strains and comparison with publicly available genomes of Serratia spp., including entomopathogenic strains; (3) Assessment of the virulence potential of the predominant isolate in experimentally infected honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Materials and methods

Sample collection from D. australis

Necropsies were conducted on D. australis within the Melbourne Zoo colony that died or were found moribund and euthanised between August and October 2014, and between November 2016 and May 2017. Haemolymph samples were collected from the haemocoel and inoculated onto sheep blood agar (SBA) and MacConkey agar (MAC). The inoculated plates were incubated at 37˚C overnight. Histopathological examinations were conducted on a subset of insects to compare the lesions in insects from which: 1) Serratia spp. were isolated in pure culture; 2) Pseudomonas sp. or Proteus sp. were cultured; and 3) there was no significant bacterial growth. The lesions were assessed by Christine Bayley, Gribbles Pathology, using a previously published scoring system [2]. The variances of the lesion scores for the 3 groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Sample collection from the insect environment

Environmental samples were collected from free ranging captive insect enclosures in February 2015. Four types of samples were collected: nest boxes, floor surfaces, drinking water, and frass (insect excrement). Outer surfaces of each nest box and sections of the floor (1 m2) that were free of frass and plant material were swabbed with sterile pre-moistened gauze swabs (7.5 cm2). Plant material refers to potted plants or fresh clippings of tree lucerne or tagasaste (Chamaecytisus prolifer), Lord Howe Island tea tree (Melaleuka howeana), Morton Bay fig (Ficus macrophylla), holly oak (Quercus ilex), Baloghia sp. and Pittosporum sp. provided as a food source. Swabs were placed in sterile saline (10 mL) and agitated for 30 seconds. Drinking water (10 mL) was collected from each water dish. Pooled frass samples were collected from inside each nest box and from the floor directly below. Frass pellets were homogenised, suspended in sterile saline (0.1 g/10 mL) and left to settle for 30 minutes. All processed samples were cultured on LB agar containing cycloheximide (0.125 mg/mL), an anti-fungal agent, and incubated overnight at 37°C.

Bacterial isolation and identification

Serratia spp. colonies were identified based on the following phenotypic characteristics: oxidase negative, Gram negative rods, negative for lactose and arabinose fermentation and production of indole and positive for acetoin production, citrate utilisation and evidence of DNase activity. Gram negative bacilli that were oxidase positive were presumptively identified as Pseudomonas or Aeromonas spp. If swarming growth was evident, the colony was identified as Proteus spp. Other colonies containing organisms that were Gram positive or that were morphologically distinct from Serratia spp. were classified as “other bacteria”.

Molecular typing

For the initial molecular typing analyses, Serratia spp. from haemolymph samples that yielded a pure growth were inoculated into tryptone soya broth (Oxoid) and incubated overnight at 37˚C. Genomic DNA was prepared as described previously [24] and digested with the restriction endonuclease, SpeI. PFGE was performed using the CHEF-DRâ III System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA) under the following conditions: 1% agarose gel (0.5% TBE), 14°C for 20 hours, at 6.0 V/cm, with a 120° included angle, and initial and final switch times of 2.2 and 54.2 seconds, respectively. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/mL) for 30 minutes, destained in distilled water and photographed using a Molecular Imager® ChemiDoc XRS+ imaging system. Fingerprinting rep-PCRs [25, 26] were performed using the ThermoPolâ DNA polymerase (0.2 units/20 μL reaction volume) and 1x buffer (New England Biolabs), 1 mM dNTPs, 0.4 μM of each of the primers ERIC1 (5’-ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3’) and ERIC2 (5’-AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3’), and approximately 50 ng of genomic DNA template. The reaction conditions: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 minutes, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 50°C for 30 seconds and extension at 68°C for 3.5 minutes, with a final extension step of 5 minutes at 68°C. Amplicons were analysed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels in TAE buffer followed by staining with GelRed® (Biotium). Dendrograms were constructed from PFGE and rep-PCR data using GelJ [27]. The PFGE band patterns were analysed for similarity using the Dice method, and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA), with a 3.0% tolerance level, for linkage. The rep-PCR band patterns were analysed using Pearson curve-based similarity coefficients and the UPGMA linkage method, with a 1% tolerance level, as suggested previously [10].

Whole genome sequencing

For Illumina sequencing, S. ureilytica AM923 and S. marcescens AM1004 genomic DNAs were extracted with the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche), purified and concentrated in a final elution volume (30 μL) with the DNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo), and stored at -20°C. The quality of the genomic DNA preparations was assessed by gel electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel in 0.5 x TBE buffer (45 mM Tris, 45 mM borate, 1.0 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) containing SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen). Hyperladderä 1kb (Bioline) DNA molecular weight markers were used to determine DNA fragment size and visually assess DNA integrity. The extracted DNAs were quantified using a Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) with the dsDNA BR kit, and the RNA/DNA ratios were checked using a Nanodropä (v3.8.1) spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Genomic DNA quality testing, library preparation using the Nextera XT DNA library kit v3.0 and Illumina short read sequencing of the extracted DNA were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions by the Australian Genome Research Facility. Reads were filtered for quality scores >20 and adapters were removed using the wrapper script Trim Galore v0.4.4 [28].

For Nanopore sequencing, S. ureilytica AM923 genomic DNA was purified using the DNeasyâ kit on a QiaCube Extractor (Qiagen) and cleaned by solid phase reversible immobilisation with Agencourt AMPureX magnetic beads. The quality of the genomic DNA preparation was assessed with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and quantified with a Quantusä fluorometer using the QuantiFluorâ dsDNA reagent (Promega). Genomic DNA was sheared with a Covaris gTube to generate ~8 kb fragments. The sequencing library was prepared with the Oxford Nanopore kit SQK-LSK208, using a mixture of 2.2 μg of sheared DNA and 0.55 μg of unsheared DNA. Sequencing was performed with a MinION MK-Ib device fitted with a Flowcell R9.4 for 17 hours. Base calling was performed using Albacore version 1.1.2 to generate 2D reads in FASTQ format. Reads were filtered for length of >1 kb and mean PHRED quality of >15 with the script fastq_to_fastq.py [29].

Sequence analysis

Genome assemblies were performed with Unicycler v0.4.0 [30] using both Illumina and Nanopore reads for strain AM923 (hybrid assembly), and Illumina reads only for strain AM1004. Genome sequence data for S. ureilytica AM923 and S. marcescens AM1004 have been deposited at the NCBI under the BioProject numbers PRJNA666536 and PRJNA666537, respectively. Assembly FASTA files were annotated with Prokka [31]. Prophages were identified with the online tool, PHASTER [32]. The number and location of integrative conjugative elements (ICE) were predicted with ICEberg online server [33]. Genomic islands were explored with the online tool IslandViewer 4 [34]. The assembled genomes were screened for antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes with ABRicate [35].

Whole genome phylogenetic analysis of strains AM923 and AM1004 was performed with the program REALPHY [36] against complete sequences of Serratia spp. (S1 Table), using S. marcescens strain ATCC_13880 as reference. The REALPHY sequence alignment output was converted into a phylogenetic tree with RaxMLv8.2.11 [37] using the GTR model of nucleotide substitution with the Gamma parameter. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis of strains AM923 and AM1004 was performed against representative genomes of Serratia spp. with the program FastANI [38]. Pan-genome analysis was performed with the Roary pan genome pipeline [39] with default settings (minimum identity for BlastP of 95%, core genes possessed by at least 99% isolates), on partial or complete Serratia spp. genomes (S2 Table) downloaded from the NCBI assembly database and systematically reannotated with Prokka [31] for consistency. For phylogenetic analyses, the entire set of CDSs from the Serratia spp. genomes mentioned above were searched for a selection of core or housekeeping genes, using the corresponding AM923 CDSs as Blastn query sequences. Individual genes with at least 70% identity with and 90% coverage of each query CDS were extracted and compiled into multi-FASTA files. Genomes that did not contain a full set of query sequences were discarded from the analysis. Multiple alignments were constructed separately for each multi-FASTA file with the program MUSCLE [40], then concatenated into a single alignment file. Identical sequences were removed from the alignment to construct unrooted phylogenetic trees with RaxML v8.2.11 [37] using the GTR model of nucleotide substitution and the Gamma parameter. Trees were visualised and annotated with the Forester phylogeny decorator program [41] or the Interactive Tree of Life online tool [42].

Virulence assay in honey bees

Serratia ureilytica AM923 and Escherichia coli K12 were grown to mid-log phase in LB at 37˚C, harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in sterile phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS) (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4) to final concentrations of 1.12 10e8 cfu/mL and 3.7 10e7 cfu/mL, respectively. The inoculum was a 1:1 mixture of the bacterial suspension and sucrose/water (equal parts sucrose and water). Honey bees (Apis mellifera) were collected from a bee hive located on the University of Melbourne campus and were experimentally infected by the immersion method, as described previously [18]. Briefly, bees were separated into groups of approximately 30 insects, placed in sterile tubes (50 mL) and the inoculum (500 μL) was added to each tube. A 1:1 mixture of sterile PBS and the sucrose/water mix was used for the control. To enable screening for the presence of Serratia spp., randomly selected bees were removed and euthanised by chilling to -80°C prior to the experiment.

For each treatment group, insects from 2 tubes were mixed into a cup cage (500 mL), in duplicate (S1 Fig). Bees were maintained at 30˚C and fed 50% sucrose solution and sterile water over the course of the trial. The numbers of dead bees were recorded daily, and cadavers were removed and placed at -80˚C. After a period of 8 days, the surviving bees were counted and euthanised by chilling to -80˚C. The survival curves were analysed with the R packages survival (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival) and survminer.

The abdomens of dead bees were placed in individual sterile microtubes (1.5 mL) and crushed with a disposable tissue grinder pestle (Axygen) in sterile PBS (100 μL). A sample of this homogenate (50 μL) was plated directly on MacConkey agar using the streak-dilution technique for a semi-quantitative culture. Identification of Serratia spp. was based on the following phenotypic characteristics: oxidase negative, Gram negative rods, positive for gelatin liquefaction, DNase activity and the presence of urease after incubation at 37°C for 48 hours. Total DNA was extracted with the Wizardâ Genomic Purification kit (Promega) using the Animal Tissue protocol and diluted in nuclease-free water for PCR assays. This procedure was used to test the insects removed prior to the experiment for the carriage of Serratia spp..

PCR assays

A 67 bp fragment of the Serratia spp. nuclease gene nucA was amplified with the primers nucA_F (5’-CAATGTGTCGATCGTGCGTC-3’) and nucA_R (5’-CCAGTTGGCGAATTTGGTGG-3’). A 77 bp fragment of the Serratia spp. urease subunit beta gene ureB was amplified with the primers ureB_F (5’-CGAGATTGAGGTGGCGCTTA-3’) and ureB_R (5’-CCCAACCGTCCACCAGATTA-3’). All reactions were performed using the Thermopolâ Taq polymerase (0.2 units/20 μL reaction) in 1 x buffer (New England Biolabs), with 1 mM of each dNTP and 0.4 μM of each primer, using an initial denaturation incubation at 95˚C for 3 minutes, then incubation through 30 cycles of denaturation for 20 seconds at 95˚C, annealing for 30 seconds at 55˚C, and elongation for 40 seconds at 68˚C, with a final extension incubation for 5 minutes at 72˚C. Amplicons were visualised after electrophoresis in a 3% agarose gel stained with Gel Redâ (Biotium).

Results

Predominance of Serratia spp. infections during elevated mortalities in a captive population of D. australis

A total of 140 recently deceased or moribund D. australis were examined and 127 haemolymph samples were collected for bacteriological investigation. Non-pigmented strains of Serratia spp. were detected in 73 (57.5%) samples; of those, 47 (71.2%) were obtained in pure culture. In contrast, Proteus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. were isolated in pure culture from 5 and 6 cases, respectively (Table 1). No growth was observed for 10 (7.8%) samples. Seven isolates (2 non-pigmented and 5 red pigmented) of Serratia spp. were also detected in environmental samples collected from the drinking water, floors, nest boxes and insect frass (S3 Table).

thumbnail
Table 1. Bacteriological isolation rates from insect haemolymph samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.t001

Histopathological analysis of a subset of 25 animals found those from which Serratia spp. were isolated in pure culture had significantly higher lesion scores for the head and fat body (P < 0.05) than those from which no significant growth was obtained. No difference was seen between insects from which Pseudomonas sp./Proteus sp. were isolated and the other groups of insects (S4 Table).

Typing of the isolates from D. australis suggests the persistence of a complex Serratia spp. population associated with the insect colony

PFGE analysis of 24 insect and 5 environmental isolates of Serratia spp. defined 2 pulsotypes, designated ‘Type A’ and ‘Type B’, each further subdivided into subtypes 1 and 2 (Fig 1 and S5 Table). Profile analysis showed that Type A was predominant, representing almost 80% of the strains—21/24 insect isolates and 2/5 environmental isolates. Of the Type A isolates, 12 were subtype A1 and 8 were subtype A2, with a single outlier (AM1003). All Type A isolates were >95% similar and were non-pigmented (Fig 2). Subtype A1 contained only insect isolates, while subtype A2 contained two of the environmental isolates (5W2w, 6F1w). Type B strains had 74% similarity with Type A strains and showed a greater phenotypic heterogeneity; subtype B1 comprised 3 non-pigmented insect isolates (VW348, SM1025 and AM1004), and subtype B2 comprised 3 pigmented environmental isolates (6W2r, 6B1r and 6Fr4r).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis of Serratia spp. isolated from haemolymph of captive D. australis between August and October 2014.

# Isolates (VW347 and VW348) from insects collected prior to this study and provided by Zoos Victoria. *Strains representative of the pulsotypes A and B and selected for complete genome sequencing. Molecular weight marker: lambda PFG ladder (New England Biolabs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Dendrogram of PFGE profiles, pigmentation phenotypes and isolation sources.

Twenty two Serratia spp. isolated from D. australis. between August and October 2014 and Serratia spp. isolated from the insect environment in February 2015 were compared. Vertical bars represent restriction endonuclease cleavage fragments. # VW347 and VW348 represent isolates from insects collected prior to this study and provided by Zoos Victoria. Boxes indicate the two representative isolates selected for genome sequencing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g002

To evaluate the significance of the predominance of PFGE Type A strains within Melbourne Zoo, fingerprinting rep-PCR was performed on a panel of the more recent Serratia spp. isolates collected from insects, as well as unrelated strains from Australian companion animals (dogs, cats, horses, a rabbit and a bird) and from infected D. australis, originally sourced from the Melbourne Zoo colony and kept at two international zoos (Bristol and Toronto). Profile analysis of the amplicons broadly supported previous PFGE observations and indicated that most strains isolated from dead or moribund D. australis at the Melbourne Zoo between 2017 and 2019 were highly similar to the dominant Type A isolated between 2013 and 2014 (S2 Fig and S5 Table). A rep-PCR profile, very similar to the one yielded by Type A strains, was also detected for an isolate from the D. australis colony in Toronto Zoo. Apart from the strains 2008–163 and 2016–324, isolated from a bird and a cat, respectively, isolates from domestic animals and from the Bristol Zoo appeared to be unrelated to the Melbourne Zoo strains (S2 Fig and S5 Table).

Sequence analysis of Serratia sp. AM923 and comparison with other isolates

Two non-pigmented isolates cultured from dead insects, AM923 and AM1004, representing the dominant Type A and minor Type B1 strains, respectively, were selected for genome sequencing (Table 1). The strain AM923 sequence was chosen as the main reference genome for in-depth analysis, while strain AM1004 was used for comparative purposes. The genome of strain AM923 was completely assembled into a 5,215,760 bp chromosome and two cryptic plasmids of 38329 bp and 6891 bp. The chromosome was predicted to contain one Integrative Conjugative Element (ICE) and 3 prophages. Antimicrobial resistance genes were detected on the chromosome and were predicted to confer resistance to chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, cefotaxime, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides and macrolides. No antimicrobial resistance genes were found on the plasmids. The genome of strain AM1004 was partially assembled into 30 contigs (N50 = 550,042 bp, longest segment 2,004,609 bp), representing a total of 5,108,759 bp.

Whole-genome polymorphism analysis of 131 completely sequenced isolates from the genus Serratia with the program REALPHY placed strains AM923 and AM1004 into two distinct subsets of S. marcescens, while some other isolates fell into more distant groups on the phylogenetic tree (Fig 3). The clade containing strain AM923 also contained two Serratia ureilytica strains, as well as two undefined Serratia species. In contrast, strain AM1004 fell into a clade composed of only S. marcescens. Species identification by ANI analysis (S6 Table) strongly supported the classification of AM923 as S. ureilytica (99.0%), while AM1004 was tentatively classified as S. marcescens (95.09%).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Cladogram of 131 complete Serratia spp. genomes.

An unrooted tree was constructed from the alignment of polymorphisms produced by REALPHY using RAxML (GTR model and Gamma parameter). Red nodes: S. marcescens, orange nodes: S. ureilytica, other Serratia species: shades of brown-green. D. australis isolates AM923 and AM1004 are indicated in blue and green, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g003

To explore the phylogenetic position of these two isolates and confirm the REALPHY analysis and ANI results, a pan-genome analysis of 708 complete or partial Serratia spp. genomes, including S. ficaria, S. fonticola, S. grimesii, S. liquefaciens, S. marcescens, S. nematodiphila, S. odorifera, S. plymuthica, S. proteamaculans, S. quinivorans, S. rubidaea, S. symbiotica and S. ureilytica (S2 Table), was performed to find core genes suitable for phylogenetic analysis at the whole genus level. This analysis identified eight sequences found in at least 99% of strains across all species within the genus, namely aroK, rplM, metJ, rpsI, ptsH, lpr1, glnK and infA, which were compiled into a concatenated multiple sequence alignment representing the 650 genomes carrying this set of core genes. The alignment included 438 identical sequences (i.e., a redundant set of concatenated genes without a polymorphic position among different genomes), which were removed from the dataset, and a phylogenetic tree was built from the remaining 209 unique sequences. Within this tree, most species of Serratia were well separated from each other and all S. marcescens isolates fell into a large sub-tree divided into branches containing predominantly strains from either human or non-human sources (S3 Fig). The isolates AM923 and AM1004 were placed in two distant branches of the S. marcescens sub-tree, confirming the REALPHY results. The S. marcescens sub-tree also contained 5 S. nematodiphila and 3 S. ureilytica, placed in branches mainly composed of non-human isolates. The S. ureilytica isolates were all in the sub-tree containing AM923.

To refine this analysis and better ascertain the positions of strain AM923 and strain AM1004, individual trees were constructed from 14 non-paralogous housekeeping genes expected to be present in all S. marcescens genomes, namely aroK, parE, aroC, adk, recR, dnaJ, purA, rpoH, rho, gyrB, rpoB, dnaA, dnaK, and uvrA. A concatenated multiple alignment of 616 sequences was obtained, from which 294 identical sequences were removed. The resultant phylogenetic tree of the remaining 322 unique sequences contained three large clades (Fig 4), mainly composed of strains isolated from insects (clade A, bootstrap support value 100%), the environment or plants (clade B, bootstrap support value 52%), and humans, blood or hospitals (clade C, bootstrap support value 97%).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated alignments of 14 housekeeping genes from 616 genomes of the genus Serratia.

Panel A: mid-rooted tree built from 322 non-identical sequences, including 256 S. marcescens, S. nematodiphila and S. ureilytica isolates, with RAxML and the GTR + Gamma substitution model. Bootstrap support values were inferred from 100 replicates and represented by branch thickness on the complete tree. Branches are drawn to scale and colour-coded according to the clade: red, clade A; brown-green, clade B; blue, clade C. Nodes are colour-coded according to the origin of the strain. Insets showing the groups containing the Melbourne Zoo isolates AM923 (Panel B) and AM1004 (Panel C) with bootstrap support values >50% indicated on the branches. The scale bars indicate the number of substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g004

While insect isolates accounted for only 6% of the total 616 Serratia spp. genomes investigated, they represented almost 40% of clade A. In contrast, insect isolates were markedly less prevalent in clades B and C (Table 2). Strain AM923 fell into clade A, along with isolates from various other insects, including a moth (Orthaga achatina, strain LS-1), a mole cricket (Scapteriscus borellii, strain ADJS-2D-white), and a honey bee (Apis mellifera, strain KZ-19). Other Serratia spp. isolated from insects in the order Hemiptera (Orius laevigatus and Orius niger), as well as a low-virulence bee pathogen, strain sicaria Ss1, were also present in this group. Moreover, clade A contained at least 3 Serratia ureilytica and 1 Serratia nematodiphila, consistent with our earlier phylogenetic analysis at the genus level. Strain AM1004 was placed in clade C, which harboured most human-associated isolates, as well as 3 strains from mosquitoes (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Table 2. Origin of isolates across different phylogenetic groups of Serratia spp. defined by the multiple alignment analysis of 14 housekeeping genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.t002

Development of PCR assays for detection of entomopathogenic Serratia spp. based on genome analysis

Virulence genes or sequence markers that could potentially detect entomopathogenic Serratia spp. in clinical specimens and/or environmental samples were investigated by comparative genome analysis. The gene presence/absence output file from the Roary analysis of 708 Serratia spp. genomes, which clustered proteins with at least 90% sequence similarity, was searched for sequences preferentially associated with insect isolates. Sixty-three protein coding sequences (CDSs) with a predicted function present in all insect isolates from clade A (which includes AM923), but in less than 20% of the isolates in clades B and C, were selected for further analysis (S7 Table).

The genes encoding these 63 CDSs were mostly scattered across the AM923 chromosome rather than organised into operons, with two notable exceptions. The first locus, at nucleotide positions 4462577–4466223 and upstream of the 6-phosphogluconolactonase gene (plg), was the large, small and cytochrome subunits of the fructose dehydrogenase (fdhLSC). The second locus, at nucleotide positions 919995–926406 and upstream of the nickel/cobalt transporter gene (hoxN), contained putative genes that encode proteins involved in the control of urea transport and degradation, ureABCEFGD_utp, (Fig 5). The presence of urease activity in strain AM923 and other strains positive in the ureB PCR assay was confirmed by phenotypic testing, which detected a positive reaction on urea agar slopes after 48 hours of incubation at 37˚C (S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Genome map of strain AM923.

This map displays loci that were putatively acquired horizontally and CDSs predominantly found in the genomes of Serratia spp. isolated from insects. Features positioned in concentric circles, from outer to inner tracks as follows: 1–2, dark teal, forward CDSs; light teal, reverse CDSs; mauve, tRNA; yellow, rRNA; 3, dark red, predicted prophages (F), Integrative Conjugative Transposon (ICE); 4, red shades, putative HGT region predicted by Alien Hunter; 5, blue, CDSs predominantly found in insect isolates; 6, G+C%; 7, G+C skew. Inset, map of urease locus (top) and fructose dehydrogenase locus (bottom).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g005

Among the 542 complete and partial Serratia spp. genomes analysed, the protein sequences for the urea transporter, the urease accessory proteins UreD, UreE, UreF and UreG, and the urease subunits alpha, beta and gamma were found in all clade A isolates. In contrast, these genes were largely absent from the isolates in clades B and C, with only 16% and 9%, respectively, of genomes carrying the entire locus. This indicated that an assay specific for a urease operon sequence could be used for detection of entomopathogenic strains of Serratia spp. At the DNA level, systematic searches for the complete urease locus genes in all Serratia spp. genomes, using the AM923 sequences as Blastn queries, detected matching sequences in all members of clade A (including 19 insect isolates), 8/90 members of clade B, and 36/403 members of clade C. The matching clade C sequences included 4 insect isolates, strain AM1004 from Melbourne Zoo and 3 highly similar isolates from Anopheles stephensi, along with 32 human, plant or environmental isolates.

Since urease genes are commonly found in insect-derived isolates of S. ureilytica and S. marcescens and may contribute to the virulence of these strains, a specific PCR assay was designed based on the sequence of the ureB gene, which encodes the urease subunit beta. The expected 77 bp product was amplified from the genomic DNA of strain AM923 (S4 Fig). In addition, the sequence of the nucA gene, which was conserved in 100% of the Serratia spp. genomes analysed, was used to design a positive control PCR assay that was shown to amplify a 67 bp fragment from the same extracted DNA samples (S4 Fig).

Despite some sequence divergence within the urease operon, in silico testing suggested that the ureB PCR primers were predicted to anneal with 83 of the 93 target sequences, with 0–2 mismatches in the first 6 bases and no mismatches in the last 13 positions of the forward primer, and no mismatches in the reverse primer. The ureB PCR assay was tested on a collection of Serratia spp. isolates from insect and non-insect hosts. The assay was able to detect most suspect entomopathogenic strains from Melbourne Zoo, as well as two isolates that had rep-PCR fingerprint profiles similar to that of AM923. Products were not amplified from other isolates from domestic animals (S2 Fig).

Pathogenicity of S. ureilytica AM923 in an insect model

To assess the virulence of S. ureilytica for insects, European honey bees (Apis mellifera) were inoculated with a live culture of strain AM923 or E. coli K12, and mortality was monitored over time. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis revealed a marked difference between strain AM923 and the negative control E. coli K12, with cumulative mortalities of 40% and 5%, respectively, after 8 days (Fig 6). Log-rank test P values demonstrated a significant difference in mortality rates between the groups of bees exposed to AM923 and E. coli K12 (P < 0.05) or sterile medium (P < 0.05). In contrast, the mortality rates in the latter two groups did not differ significantly.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in honey bees challenged with a live culture of S. ureilytica.

Strain AM923 (red), E. coli K12 (blue), or exposed to sterile PBS and the sucrose/water mix as uninoculated negative controls (dark grey). Semi-transparent zone indicates a 95% confidence interval.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.g006

To address Koch’s postulates, randomly selected bees that died or survived within each group were examined for the presence of Serratia spp. by culture and PCR. The MacConkey agar cultures of abdomens of bees exposed to strain AM923 yielded varied amounts of growth, dependent upon whether they died or survived the experiment. A heavy growth of Serratia spp. was obtained from insects that died during the experiment while a light growth or no significant growth was obtained from insects that survived. The nucA-specific PCR assay indicated the presence of Serratia spp. in all bees tested from this group, and the ureB-specific PCR assay strongly suggested that strain AM923 was present. In contrast, no Serratia spp. were detected by culture or PCR in the bees screened before the experiment or in any of the E. coli K12 exposed or negative control groups (S4 Fig).

Discussion

Genomic sequence and phenotypic analyses identified the predominant strain (AM923) isolated from D. australis as Serratia ureilytica. This species was first isolated from a river in India [43] and shown to be resistant to extreme environmental conditions [44]. It has also previously been identified in the gut microbiota of honey bees [45]. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this species as a potential insect pathogen.

Although Serratia spp. can be present in the environment, it is unlikely that the isolates recovered from the affected insects were culture contaminants, because Serratia spp. was isolated in pure culture on non-selective medium from the majority of haemolymph samples. Histopathological examination revealed disseminated inflammatory lesions frequently containing Gram negative rods, further suggesting that bacterial colonisation had occurred prior to death. The presence of only two Serratia pulsotypes, with the majority of isolates belonging to one type, suggests that the most likely reason for isolation of the Serratia sp. was not opportunistic infection, which would be expected to result in isolation of diverse strains of Serratia spp., but rather that a group of specific, closely related strains were able to colonise insects and that these pathogenic strains caused most of the mortalities.

Other bacterial species, including Pseudomonas spp. and Proteus spp., were also found in dead D. australis, but their relative contribution to the disease compared to Serratia spp. remains unclear. Furthermore, while the role of viruses and fungi in disease in captive D. australis cannot be discounted, no evidence has been found of non-bacterial infectious agents associated with significant mortalities despite extensive histopathological and microbiological investigations over several years at Melbourne Zoo.

While the base-line mortality rate in the Melbourne Zoo population of D. australis is documented, the natural longevity of these insects is unknown. It is likely that host factors, such as poor genetic diversity resulting from the population bottleneck experienced by D. australis, as well as environmental factors such as hygiene and stocking densities in the captive environment, interact with pathogens and play important roles in the epidemiology of disease in D. australis. Nevertheless, isolation of Serratia spp. from the haemocoel suggests members of this species are important causal agents of disease and mortality in captive D. australis.

The phylogenetic analyses of this study raise questions about the phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Serratia. While most of the Serratia spp. associated with insect infections included in this study were originally submitted to the NCBI sequence databases as S. marcescens, our analysis suggests that several of these isolates may in fact be S. ureilytica. For clarity, our results could be re-interpreted by including the S. marcescens, S. nematodiphila and S. ureilytica genomes into a “S. marcescens sensu lato” group and renaming (or re-ranking) the strains in individual clades. However, the taxonomic reclassification of publicly available genomes would require a thorough phenotypic and genotypic analysis beyond the scope of this study. Therefore, the original classification provided in the NCBI GenBank files were maintained.

A previous comparative genomic study of the genomes of S. marcescens Db11, a pathogenic isolate from D. melanogaster, and a multidrug resistant human isolate (SM39), found 3970 genes were conserved across both strains [46]. More recently, the relatedness of complete and unfinished genomes of S. marcescens from human nosocomial infections (22 strains), the environment (17 strains) and a limited number of insect sources (4 strains) were explored in a pangenome analysis [47]. While the human-associated isolates were clearly separated from the environmental isolates, the position of the four insect isolates within these groups was more ambiguous.

Our results confirm and expand upon these previous studies by including more insect associated Serratia spp. genomes in the analyses. Most strains associated with insects, including the representative predominant strain Serratia ureilytica AM923 found in D. australis, belong to a clade distinct from those containing mainly human or environmental isolates. Serratia marcescens strain AM1004, representative of a group less frequently isolated at the Melbourne Zoo and not persistent in the captive insect population, was found within the human-associated clade C, suggesting a separate origin, and possibly a more minor role of this subgroup in the mortalities. This exemplifies the complexity of the increased mortalities and demonstrates the importance of genome analysis to accurately describe the epidemiology of such events.

Entomopathogenic strains of Serratia spp. usually cause disease in a wide range of insects by entering the haemocoel from the gut, causing septicaemia and death [48]. Other aspects of the virulence of the organism during insect infections are largely unknown. Previous work to screen a mini-Tn5 transposon mutant library in S. marcescens Db11 found 23 mutants with attenuated virulence for Caenorhabditis elegans, and 9 of these 23 mutants had reduced virulence in D. melanogaster, including mutants defective in iron transport, haemolysin production and LPS biosynthesis [49]. Chitinases and the urease encoded by strains of S. marcescens isolated from A. stephensi were also predicted to be virulence factors [50].

Urease production is rarely observed in S. marcescens [7], but is a defining characteristic of S. ureilytica. Two insect-associated strains of S. marcescens, ano1 and ano2, isolated from the midgut of the mosquito A. stephensi, were found to possess a functional urease operon, and their comparison with 101 publicly available Serratia genomes revealed that only 12 other genomes encoded a urease [50]. In our study, all of the Serratia spp. genomes of clade A, which contains most of the insect-associated isolates, including AM923, and all 6 insect isolates from clade C, including AM1004, carry a complete urease operon, in contrast with most genomes from the environmental and human isolates in clades B and C. The evolutionary origin and the function of the operon in S. marcescens strain AM1004 is unclear and will be explored in further work.

A functional urease operon (ureABCEFGD) is also found in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, an environmental member of the Enterobacteriaceae with entomopathogenic potential, but not in its evolutionary derivative, the flea-borne and flea-transmitted mammalian pathogen Yersinia pestis. Indeed, the mortality rates in two flea species, Xenopsylla cheopis and Oropsylla montana, fed a blood meal containing Y. pseudotuberculosis was higher than in those fed with Y. pestis [51]. Insects fed purified canatoxin, a variant form of bacterial urease contained within the seeds of the Jack Bean plant (Canavalia ensiformis), also experienced a high rate of mortality [52]. The effects of both Y. pseudotuberculosis and purified canatoxin can be abolished by the administration of the urease inhibitor, para-benzoquinone [51]. It is therefore possible that the urease found in AM923 and AM1004 may play an important role in their pathogenicity for D. australis. This question will be addressed in future studies.

D. australis is an endangered species, so it was not possible to optimise an experimental infection model in this species. Therefore, we sought to develop an alternative infection model to assess the virulence of strain AM923. Infection models using C. elegans and D. melanogaster have been used previously to assess the virulence of Serratia spp. [17, 48, 49]. However, more recently, the strains KZ-19, sicaria Ss1 and Db11, which we found to be genetically related to S. ureilytica AM923, were shown to kill bees whether they were fed, immersed in or injected with the different strains [18].

Our results suggest that a bee model of infection using the immersion protocol is a reliable, rapid and relatively easy method to test the virulence potential of strains isolated from D. australis. Koch’s postulates were partially confirmed, as both culture and PCR suggested S. ureilytica was isolated only from dead insects in the S. ureilytica AM923 treatment group.

Finally, we propose several genomic targets upon which to base development of detection tools specific for entomopathogenic Serratia spp. found not only at Melbourne Zoo, but other zoos and captive insect breeding facilities. These molecular tools could be used to screen frass prior to the release of insects into their native habitat. Furthermore, phylogenetic investigations of S. ureilytica and S. marcescens will facilitate further understanding of the risk these bacteria pose to the reintroduction program for a critically endangered insect species.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. An example of the cup cage used to contain honey bees during the virulence assay.

Adapted from the Sistema KLIP IT™ Utility Collection round container with strainer, 0.7 L with transfer pipette bulbs inserted to supply water and 50% sucrose solution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Rep-PCR fingerprinting analysis of Serratia spp. isolates.

A subset of Lord Howe Island stick insect isolates from Melbourne Zoo in 2017 and 2019, indicated by the red hashed box, displayed a rep-PCR fingerprint highly similar to Serratia ureilytica AM923. Dendrogram built with GelJ using Pearson curve-based similarity coefficients with the UPGMA linkage method. Isolation year, strain number, host and results of PCR assays (ureB and nucA) and the urease production phenotypic test are indicated for each lane; n/d: no data. MZ: Lord Howe Island stick insect isolates from Melbourne Zoo. Molecular weight marker: HyperLadder™ 1kb (Meridian Biosciences).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated alignments of 8 core genes from 650 Serratia spp. genomes.

A mid-rooted tree was built from 3069 positions of 212 non-identical sequences, including 169 S. marcescens, S. nematodiphila and S. ureilytica isolates, with RAxML using a GTR + Gamma model. Bootstrap analysis was performed on 100 replicates, and support values >50% are represented by circles with diameters proportional to the value. The Melbourne Zoo isolates AM923 and AM1004 are indicated on the outside ring. The scale bars indicate the number of substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Detection of Serratia spp. in honey bees challenged with a live culture of S. ureilytica AM923.

Two PCR assays were conducted to confirm detection of Serratia spp. in bees exposed to AM923, E. coli K12, or 1:1 mixture of sterile PBS and the sucrose/water mix (control). Arrows indicate the expected amplicon on the 3% agarose gel. The nature and time of the event is indicated for each bee. Dead: the individual was found dead during the experiment; Survivor: the individual was euthanised at the conclusion of the experiment; Pre-experiment: honey bee collected from the hive before inoculation; NTC: no template control. Molecular weight marker: HyperLadder™ 1kb (Meridian Biosciences).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Details of the 131 Serratia spp. used in REALPHY phylogenomic analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s005

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Features of the 708 partial or complete Serratia genomes used for phylogenomic and pan-genome analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s006

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Serratia spp. isolated from the insect environment (water, nest boxes, frass and floor samples).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s007

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Histopathological analysis of a subset of 25 dead insects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s008

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Summary of PFGE pulsotypes and rep-PCR profiles of Serratia spp. isolated from insect haemolymph and the insect environment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s009

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Fast ANI analysis to compare strains AM923 and AM1004 with reference strains of Serratia spp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s010

(DOCX)

S7 Table. CDSs present in all insect isolates from clade A and fewer than 20% of isolates from clades B and C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265967.s011

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the work of staff at Melbourne Zoo and Zoos Victoria; the zookeepers, nurses and veterinarians for their assistance in the necropsies, sample collection, record-keeping, husbandry skills and overall dedication to the cause of the Lord Howe Island stick insect and the Zoos Victoria Wildlife Conservation and Science team for their support of this project. We would also like to acknowledge the work of Christine Bayley and the staff at Gribbles Veterinary Pathology for their expertise and assistance with the pathological investigations.

References

  1. 1. Carlile N, Priddel D, Honan P. The recovery programme for the Lord Howe Island Phasmid (Dryococelus australis) following its rediscovery. Ecological Management & Restoration. 2009;10(s1):S124–S8.
  2. 2. Bayley C, Cheng C, Lynch M. Pathological and microbiological study of mortality in a captive breeding colony of the endangered Lord Howe Island stick insect (Dryococelus australis). Vet Pathol. 2018;55(5):719–30. pmid:29661123
  3. 3. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ 2020 [5607–12]. Available from: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004332
  4. 4. Grimont PA, Grimont F. The genus Serratia. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1978;32(1):221–48. pmid:360966
  5. 5. Hejazi A, Falkiner FR. Serratia marcescens. J Med Microbiol. 1997;46(11):903–12. pmid:9368530
  6. 6. Miranda G, Kelly C, Solorzano F, Leanos B, Coria R, Patterson JE. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing to study an outbreak of infection due to Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(12):3138–41. pmid:8940460
  7. 7. Grimont F, Grimont PAD. The genus Serratia. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E, editors. The Prokaryotes. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2006. p. 219–44.
  8. 8. Moradigaravand D, Boinett CJ, Martin V, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J. Recent independent emergence of multiple multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens clones within the United Kingdom and Ireland. Genome Res. 2016;26(8):1101–9. pmid:27432456
  9. 9. Henry B, Plante-Jenkins C, Ostrowska K. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens associated with the anesthetic agent propofol. Am J Infect Control. 2001;29(5):312–5. pmid:11584257
  10. 10. Ligozzi M, Fontana R, Aldegheri M, Scalet G, Lo Cascio G. Comparative evaluation of an automated repetitive-sequence-based PCR instrument versus pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in the setting of a Serratia marcescens nosocomial infection outbreak. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(5):1690–5. pmid:20237095
  11. 11. Shi ZY, Liu PY, Lau YJ, Lin YH, HU BS. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to investigate an outbreak of Serratia marcescens. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(1):325–7. pmid:8968940
  12. 12. Vigeant P, Loo VG, Bertrand C, Dixon C, Hollis R, Pfaller MA, et al. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infections related to contaminated chlorhexidine. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19(10):791–4. pmid:9801292
  13. 13. Bourdin T, Monnier A, Benoit M-È, Bédard E, Prévost M, Quach C, et al. A high-throughput short sequence typing scheme for Serratia marcescens pure culture and environmental DNA. App Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(24):e01399–21. pmid:34586910
  14. 14. Shelomi M, Sitepu IR, Boundy-Mills KL, Kimsey LS. Review of the gross anatomy and microbiology of the Phasmatodea digestive tract. J Orthoptera Res. 2015;24:29+.
  15. 15. Bucher GE. Potential bacterial pathogens of insects and their characteristics. J Insect Path. 1960;2(2):172–95.
  16. 16. Flyg C, Kenne K, Boman HG. Insect pathogenic properties of Serratia marcescens: phage-resistant mutants with a decreased resistance to Cecropia immunity and a decreased virulence to Drosophila. J Gen Microbiol. 1980;120(1):173–81. pmid:7012273
  17. 17. Aryal SK, Carter-House D, Stajich JE, Dillman AR. Microbial associates of the southern mole cricket (Scapteriscus borellii) are highly pathogenic. J Invertebr Pathol. 2017;150:54–62. pmid:28916147
  18. 18. Raymann K, Coon KL, Shaffer Z, Salisbury S, Moran NA. Pathogenicity of Serratia marcescens strains in honey bees. mBio. 2018;9(5):e01649–18. pmid:30301854
  19. 19. Burritt NL, Foss NJ, Neeno-Eckwall EC, Church JO, Hilger AM, Hildebrand JA, et al. Sepsis and hemocyte loss in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) infected with Serratia marcescens strain sicaria. Plos One. 2016;11(12):1–26. pmid:28002470
  20. 20. Abebe-Akele F, Tisa LS, Cooper VS, Hatcher PJ, Abebe E, Thomas WK. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of a putative entomopathogenic Serratia isolated from Caenorhabditis briggsae. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):531. pmid:26187596
  21. 21. Bell JV. Serratia marcescens found in eggs of Heliothis zea: Tests against Trichoplusia ni. J Invertebr Pathol. 1969;13(1):151–2.
  22. 22. Inglis GD, Lawrence AM. Effects of Serratia marcescens on the F1 generation of laboratory-reared Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol. 2001;94(2):362–6. pmid:11332826
  23. 23. Sikorowski PP, Lawrence AM. Transmission of Serratia marcescens (Enterobacteriaceae) in adult Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) laboratory colonies. Biological Control. 1998;12(1):50–5.
  24. 24. Allen JL, Begg AP, Browning GF. Outbreak of equine endometritis caused by a genotypically identical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Vet Diagn. 2011;23(6):1236–9. pmid:22362810
  25. 25. Mohapatra BR, Broersma K, Mazumder A. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;277(1):98–106. pmid:17986090
  26. 26. Versalovic J, Schneider M, De Bruijn FJ, Lupski JR. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol and Cell Biol. 1994;5(1):25–40.
  27. 27. Heras J, Dominguez C, Mata E, Pascual V, Lozano C, Torres C, et al. GelJ—a tool for analyzing DNA fingerprint gel images. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:270. pmid:26307353
  28. 28. Krueger F. Trim Galore v0.4.4 [Available from: https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore
  29. 29. Wick RR. Fast5 to Fastq tool [Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Fast5-to-Fastq
  30. 30. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Computational Biology. 2017;13(6):e1005595. pmid:28594827
  31. 31. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. pmid:24642063
  32. 32. Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W16–21. pmid:27141966
  33. 33. Liu M, Li X, Xie Y, Bi D, Sun J, Li J, et al. ICEberg 2.0: an updated database of bacterial integrative and conjugative elements. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;47(D1):D660–D5.
  34. 34. Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing G, Lau BY, Hoad G, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W30–W5. pmid:28472413
  35. 35. Seemann T. ABRicate, mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes. Github; 2017.
  36. 36. Bertels F, Silander OK, Pachkov M, Rainey PB, van Nimwegen E. Automated reconstruction of whole-genome phylogenies from short-sequence reads. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(5):1077–88. pmid:24600054
  37. 37. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. pmid:24451623
  38. 38. Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. pmid:30504855
  39. 39. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3691–3. pmid:26198102
  40. 40. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. pmid:15034147
  41. 41. Han MV, Zmasek CM. phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:356. pmid:19860910
  42. 42. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021. pmid:33885785
  43. 43. Bhadra B, Roy P, Chakraborty R. Serratia ureilytica sp. nov., a novel urea-utilizing species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55(Pt 5):2155–8. pmid:16166724
  44. 44. Filippidou S, Junier T, Wunderlin T, Kooli WM, Palmieri I, Al-Dourobi A, et al. Adaptive strategies in a poly-extreme environment: differentiation of vegetative cells in Serratia ureilytica and resistance to extreme conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(102):102.
  45. 45. Gasper J, Terentjeva M, Kántor A, Ivanišová E, Kluz M, Kačániová M. Identification of Apis mellifera gut microbiota with MALDI TOF MS Biotyper. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies. 2017;50(1):192–6.
  46. 46. Iguchi A, Nagaya Y, Pradel E, Ooka T, Ogura Y, Katsura K, et al. Genome evolution and plasticity of Serratia marcescens, an important multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(8):2096–110. pmid:25070509
  47. 47. Abreo E, Altier N. Pangenome of Serratia marcescens strains from nosocomial and environmental origins reveals different populations and the links between them. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):46. pmid:30631083
  48. 48. Petersen LM, Tisa LS. Friend or foe? A review of the mechanisms that drive Serratia towards diverse lifestyles. Can J Microbiol. 2013;59(9):627–40. pmid:24011346
  49. 49. Kurz CL, Chauvet S, Andres E, Aurouze M, Vallet I, Michel GP, et al. Virulence factors of the human opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens identified by in vivo screening. EMBO J. 2003;22(7):1451–60. pmid:12660152
  50. 50. Chen S, Blom J, Walker ED. Genomic, physiologic, and symbiotic characterization of Serratia marcescens strains isolated from the mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1483. pmid:28861046
  51. 51. Chouikha I, Hinnebusch BJ. Silencing urease: a key evolutionary step that facilitated the adaptation of Yersinia pestis to the flea-borne transmission route. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(52):18709–14. pmid:25453069
  52. 52. Carlini CR, Guimaraes JA. Isolation and characterization of a toxic protein from Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean) seeds, distinct from concanavalin A. Toxicon. 1981;19(5):667–75. pmid:7302956