Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The prevalence of suicidal behavior and its associated factors among wives with polygamy marriage living in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia, 2020

Abstract

Introduction

Polygamy is a trend of marriage characterized by having two and more wives or husbands at the same time. In low and middle-income countries including Ethiopia, polygamy has a significant negative effect on the social, economic, physical, and mental well-being of women. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of suicidal behavior among wives with polygamy marriage living in the Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2020.

Methods

A community-based study employing cross-sectional design and systematic sampling technique was used to select wives with polygamy marriage who are residents of Gedeo Zone from November to December 2020. The World Health Organization Suicidal Behavior Questions (SBQ-5) was adapted to explore the outcome variable. The Logistic regression at 95% CI, p<0.05 was used to identify factors associated with suicidal behavior.

Results

This study enrolled 423 respondents. The study revealed that, the overall prevalence of suicidal behavior was 157(37%). Illiteracy, being a wife of a husband with three and more other wives, current history of depression, intimate partner violence, and poor social support were significantly associated with suicidal behavior at 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05.

Conclusion

This study found that one-third of the respondents had suicidal behavior. Different significant socio-demographic and psychosocial variables were identified. Thus, due attention should be given to minimize the practice and its effect on the mental wellbeing of a mother and their children.

Introduction

Suicidal behavior is a pattern of thinking or predispositions that situated an individual at risk of committing suicide. Suicidal behavior has three categories; suicide ideation, suicide plan or intent, and suicide attempts which are the leading cause of harm and end of life [1]. Suicide is one of the complications of a psychiatric disorder and affecting all individuals irrespective of their nation, culture, religion, gender, and class [2]. Currently, Lithuanians rank first for a suicidal rate, which accounts 31/100k [3]. Globally, while over 16,000,000 people attempt suicide, and 800,000 commit a suicide every year, other 3000 individuals also commit suicide in a daily base. The case is more prevalent among youths and women [4].

Polygamy is a state of marriage in which a husband marries more than two wives at a time and remains one of the hotly contested and acceptable practices. It is a misunderstood topic in the traditional and modern society of Africa and Ethiopia. It is acceptable in most cultures and religions, particularly in Muslim [57]. It is a very problematic and well-buried practice against freedom, equality, and human rights of a woman [8]. It has also a burden on husbands to care for all their wives and children in terms of social, economic, psychological, and physical needs [9].

Psychological and social factors such as jealousy, intimate partner violence, lack of social support, and economic dependency on their husband were contributing factors for having mental disorders among women with polygamy marriage [1012]. Several studies have documented that woman with polygamous marriages were reported of having repeated physical and psychological violence from their husbands and thus, children expressed their feelings through pain, hurt, and anger. Moreover, in low and middle-level countries, it has a risk for having sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS which also contribute for mental health problems on wives with polygamous marriage, their family and society at all [13, 14]. Psychiatric problems such as mood, anxiety, and psychosis were documented among woman with polygamy marriage in particular among senior wives and their family members [15, 16]. Developed countries such as Canada, USA and Australia were launched human and legal rights to prevent any forms of women abuse and violence happened during marriage [17]. This resulted in reduction of polygamy marriage. However, in Ethiopia polygamy cultural practices accounts 12.1% and its effect on the mental and psychological health of wives is not well-studied [18]. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factor of suicidal behavior among wives with polygamy marriage living in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia, 2020.

Methods

Study design, setting and period

This study was a community-based cross-sectional design conducted among wives with polygamy marriage and lives in Gedeo zone. The data collection period was from November to December 2020. Despite being unlawful and excluded from family and criminal code of Ethiopia, polygamy is quiet practiced due to the cultural and religious (Muslims and pagans) acceptability [19]. In Ethiopia, there are 86 nation and nationalities that have unique attitude and norm towards different social circumstances. polygamy is the most acceptable social norm among Oromo, Somalia, Sidama and Gedeo nations [20]. In Gedeo people, there was ancient ancestor called ‘‘Daraso” who practiced polygamy in the first time and starting from that a man with polygamy marriage was considered as rich, famous and acceptable by the community [21]. The zone has a population of 850, 534 and 500,000 of them were females. The fertility rate in this study area was higher as compared to other parts of the country [22]. The area located in the southern part of the country and 359 KM far from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.

Study participants

The inclusion criteria were women who are presently in polygamous marriage and age 18 and above years old, while the exclusion criteria were women who presented themselves with acute or severe illnesses and not present during the data collection period.

Sample size determination

The sample size of the current study was calculated using single population proportion formula,

Where, n = required sample size, z is reliability coefficient at 95% confidence interval (1.96), p = 0.5 (proportion for unknown prevalence of outcome variable, q (1-p) = 0.05, d (margin of error) = 0.05

= (1.96) (1.96) (0.5) (0.5) / (0.05) (0.05) = 384, 10% non-response rate = 38.4

The total sample size was, 384+ 38.4 = 423

Sampling technique

This study used a systematic random sampling technique. To get the sampling frame of the sample, we gave coding for each number households practicing polygamy marriage. There were 1692 households who practiced polygamy and living in the Gedeo zone. To calculate Kth interval, we used the formula (N/n), where N = Total number of population and n = required sample. Kth interval = (1692/423 = 4th) and include all samples by counting every 4th interval.

Study variables

Dependent/out-come variable.

Suicidal behavior (Yes/No)

Independent variables.

Socio-demographic variables. Age, educational status, employment, residence, husband work, wife’s house and religion.

Marriage and psycho-social variables: Duration of marriage, number of wives at a time, distance of the two wife’s house, family size, social support, and duration of marriage.

Data collection and instruments

The data was collected by ten health extension staffs who are working in the zonal health center. The data collection method was structured interview technique. The first part of the questionnaire was about the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. The second part of the questioner was suicidal behavioral revised questionnaire (SBQ-R) used to assess suicidal behavior of the respondents related to polygamy marriage, and a score ≥ of 7/18 considered as suicidal behavior [23]. The tool has 93% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The third part of a questionnaire was Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) used to measure intimate partner violence and score > 10/25 classified as intimate partner violence [24]. The fourth part of the questionnaire was the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)−9 tool used to assess depression, and a score > 10/21 said to have depression [25]. The final part of the questionnaire was the Oslo social support scale (Oslo -3) used to measure social support levels from participants friends, neighbors and bloody families. This measurement has been used in both clinical and population-based studies with good internal consistency. In the present study, the tool has Cronbach alpha of 0.87. The total score ranging from 3 to 14 and classified as poor (3–8), moderate (9–11), and strong social support (12–14) [26].

Data quality control

This study used reliable questionnaire which has been translated to Amharic and Gedeoffa local languages and showed good internal consistency. The issues written on the questioner were easily understandable by respondents and finished on planned time duration. The validity of the questioner was checked during pretest on 5% of respondents before two weeks of the actual data collection period. The data collected from each respondent has been putted keeping confidentiality/security. The respondents have informed about the purpose and objective of the study before the actual data collection. The collected data checked at daily basis for its completeness.

Data management and analysis

Data was entered into the Epi-Data version 3.4 software package and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. Descriptive statistics; frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used to describe the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. A logistic regression analysis at p ≤ 0.05 of the 95% CI was used to interpret the association with the independent variables.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review board of Gedeo zonal women and child health beauro. Each participant has given written informed consent to participate in the current study. The study ensured issues of voluntary participation and confidentiality throughout the data collection period.

Result

Socio-demographic results of respondents

The response rate for this study was 100%. The mean (SD) age of respondents was 30 (±6) years old and more than half of the respondents were living in rural areas. Nearly two-thirds of them have no formal education. More than two third, 329(77.8%) of them were protestant religion followers. Regarding to wives work, 250(59%) of them were house wife. Among 423 respondents, 182(43%) of them had poor social support. Of them, 212(50%) of the respondents were living with their husband for at least 6 years (Table 2).

Psycho-social variables

According to this study result, 237 (56%) of respondents had depression and 186 (44%) intimate partner violence (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Descriptive psycho-social results of respondents Dec, 2020 (N = 423).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259029.g001

Prevalence of suicidal behavior

Among 423 respondents, 157(37%) of them scored 7/18 for revised suicidal behavior scale and considered as having suicidal behavior (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Suicidal behavior items response of respondents Dec, 2020 (N = 423).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259029.t001

Factors associated with suicidal behavior

During multivariable logistic regression analysis, at 95% CI (p< 0.05), the independent variables such as educational status, number of wives, history of depression, intimate partner violence, and poor social support were associated with the outcome variable (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Variables associated with suicidal behavior, Dec, 2020 (N = 423).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259029.t002

Discussion

This community-based cross-sectional study design aimed to assess the prevalence of suicidal behavior and its associated factors among wives with polygamy marriage living in the Gedeo zone. This study found that 157 (37%) of the respondents had suicidal behavior, which was consistent with a study done in South Africa 39% [27], whereas this figure was higher than study conducted in Peru (22.6%) [28], Thailand (17.6%) [29], and Ethiopia (14%) [30]. This discrepancy could be explained by the difference in the character of study participants. Hence, the previous studies were conducted among pregnant, ante-natal and post-natal women. In-addition, polygamous marriage is related to a lack of emotional support, economic dependency, and burden in the care of children, which could be the contributing risk factors to the higher suicidal behavior [31].

The current study has also identified variables such as non-formal educational status, more than two wives, current depression, intimate partner violence, and poor social supports which were associated suicidal behavior.

The respondents with no formal education/ illiterate had AOR 3.83;95% CI (2.44–6.02) more likely to develop suicidal behavior as compared to those with primary education, which was supported by the study conducted in the United States [32] and meta-analysis done in five low and middle income countries (India, South Africa, Nepal, Uganda, and Ethiopia) [33].

Illiteracy is related with lack of awareness, knowledge, and understanding regarding the women’s rights, family, and marriage law of a country, which are vital to prevent intimate partner violence and abuse. Moreover, there is a tendency to be culturally more influenced in sharing their feelings frankly, opinions, and doubts happening in their marriage [34].

According to this study finding, being a wife of a husband with three and more other wives were AOR 2.29 95% CI (1.48, 3.53) more likely to experience suicidal behavior as compared to those with two wives, which was similar with studies done in Norway [35], Syria [36] and Turkey [37].

As the numbers of wives increase, the challenges of polygamy marriage such as social, emotional, economic crises become significant, which are common reasons for low self-esteem, helplessness, hopelessness, and thoughts of harming self [38].

Those respondents with a current history of depression had AOR 2.37 95% CI (1.60–3.52) more likely to show suicidal behavior, which was in- line with the previous studies conducted in Germany [39], South Africa [40], and meta-analysis done in Sub-Saharan African countries (Tanzania, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Uganda, Ghana and Burkina Faso) [41].

Depression is a common psychiatric disorder characterized by loss of interest, negative attitude for self, others, and the future, which all lead to the thoughts and actions of harming self [42].

According to this study result, respondents with a history of intimate partner violence had AOR 3.18 95% CI (2.09, 4.83) more likely to experience suicidal behavior. The finding in agreement with studies conducted in Thailand [29], Korea [43] and Sub- Sharan African counties (Angola, Burundi, Ethiopia, Uganda, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe) [44].

Intimate partner violence has negative health consequence on the physical, emotional, psychological, and mental health of married women, which gradually cause serious psychiatry emergency conditions such as suicidal behavior [45].

The last predictor variable related to suicidal behavior was women’s social support. Those with poor social support had AOR 3.02 95% CI (1.92, 4.75) more likely to develop suicidal behavior. Congruent findings were reported from the studies conducted in 23 European countries [46], South Africa [47] and Ethiopia [48]. Social support is a pillar for filling the gap of economic, social, and emotional crisis observed on women with polygamy marriage. Having no support results in helplessness, worthlessness, and low self-esteem, which are the main entry symptoms of depression and suicidal behavior [49].

Strength and limitation of the study

This study tried to address very interesting issue regarding women’s burden due to polygamy marriage. Moreover, the current study was conducted within traditional and cultural influenced community. Despite with the above strength, this study has also the following drawbacks. The cross-sectional nature of the study design constraint the cause effect relationship of the independent and outcome variables. In addition to this, some important variables such as husband’s educational status, income, current wives pregnancy and health status were missed which might have correlation with polygamy marriage.

Conclusion

This study found that more than one-third of wives with polygamy marriage had suicidal behavior. The most affected groups were those with no formal education, triple polygamy, current history of depression, intimate partner violence, and poor social support. Therefore, this harmful traditional and cultural practice should be avoided and reduced through the collaborative work of traditional and local community leaders, local and international women’s rights association organizations, human rights associations, religious leaders, community mental health workers, and country ministry of health. In addition, empowering women with education and encouraging them in community affairs is an essential weapon to stop this type of marriage. Mental health professional should work in collaboration with stakeholders on screening and managing mental health conditions including suicidal behavior among communities with polygamy marriage.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank study participants, Gedeo zone women counsel, and Dilla University for their invaluable support and recognition.

References

  1. 1. Levi-Belz Y, Gvion Y, Grisaru S, Apter A (2018) When the pain becomes unbearable: case-control study of mental pain characteristics among medically serious suicide attempters. Archives of Suicide Research 22: 380–393. pmid:28786756
  2. 2. Turecki G, Brent DA, Gunnell D, O’Connor RC, Oquendo MA, et al. (2019) Suicide and suicide risk. Nature reviews Disease primers 5: 1–22. pmid:30617281
  3. 3. Tsypes A, Owens M, Gibb BE (2017) Suicidal ideation and attentional biases in children: An eye-tracking study. Journal of affective disorders 222: 133–137. pmid:28697418
  4. 4. Glenn CR, Kleiman EM, Kellerman J, Pollak O, Cha CB, et al. (2020) Annual research review: a meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 61: 294–308. pmid:31373003
  5. 5. Thobejane TD, Flora T (2014) An exploration of polygamous marriages: A worldview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5: 1058.
  6. 6. Ugwu H (2020) THE AFRICAN IDENTIFY OF BIBLICAL MOSES: AN IGWEBUIKE DISCOURSE. IGWEBUIKE: African Journal of Arts and Humanities 6.
  7. 7. Timæus IM, Reynar A (1998) Polygynists and their wives in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of five Demographic and Health Surveys. Population Studies 52: 145–162.
  8. 8. Douki S, Zineb SB, Nacef F, Halbreich U (2007) Women’s mental health in the Muslim world: Cultural, religious, and social issues. Journal of affective disorders 102: 177–189. pmid:17291594
  9. 9. Tesfay GH (2017) Note on: the adverse effects of polygamy on the rights of women: a case study in Gedeo and Sidama Zones. Haramaya Law Review 6: 91–110.
  10. 10. Dissa Y (2016) Polygamy in Mali: social and economic implications on families. International Journal of African and Asian Studies.
  11. 11. Dervic K, Oquendo MA, Grunebaum MF, Ellis S, Burke AK, et al. (2004) Religious affiliation and suicide attempt. American Journal of Psychiatry 161: 2303–2308. pmid:15569904
  12. 12. Barclay KJ, Thorén RD, Hanson HA, Smith KR (2020) The Effects of Marital Status, Fertility, and Bereavement on Adult Mortality in Polygamous and Monogamous Households: Evidence From the Utah Population Database. Demography 57: 2169–2198. pmid:32935302
  13. 13. Simkhada P, Van Teijlingen E, Winter R, Fanning C, Dhungel A, et al. (2015) Why are so many Nepali women killing themselves? A review of key issues. Journal of Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences 1: 43–49.
  14. 14. Alhuzail NA (2020) Being a girl in a polygamous family Implications and challenges. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 37: 97–107.
  15. 15. Shepard LD (2013) The impact of polygamy on women’s mental health: a systematic review. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 22: 47. pmid:22794315
  16. 16. Devries K, Watts C, Yoshihama M, Kiss L, Schraiber LB, et al. (2011) Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Social science & medicine 73: 79–86.
  17. 17. Fulu E, Warner X, Miedema S, Jewkes R, Roselli T, et al. (2013) Why do some men use violence against women and how can we prevent it? Quantitative findings from the United Nations multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific.
  18. 18. Abeya SG, Afework MF, Yalew AW (2011) Intimate partner violence against women in western Ethiopia: prevalence, patterns, and associated factors. BMC public health 11: 1–18. pmid:21199570
  19. 19. Chewaka JE (2014) Bigamous marriage and the division of common property under the Ethiopian law: regulatory challenges and options. Oromia Law Journal 3: 77–133.
  20. 20. Eresso MZ (2021) Women in Ethiopia. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History.
  21. 21. Kanshie TK (2002) Five thousand years of sustainability?: a case study on Gedeo land use (Southern Ethiopia).
  22. 22. Reda MG, Bune GT, Shaka MF (2020) Epidemiology of high fertility status among women of reproductive age in Wonago district, Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2020. pmid:32523965
  23. 23. Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, et al. (2001) The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment 8: 443–454. pmid:11785588
  24. 24. Rabin RF, Jennings JM, Campbell JC, Bair-Merritt MH (2009) Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review. American journal of preventive medicine 36: 439–445. e434. pmid:19362697
  25. 25. Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, Gunn J, Kerse N, et al. (2010) Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. The annals of family medicine 8: 348–353. pmid:20644190
  26. 26. Dalgard O (2009) Social support-Consequences for individual and society. EUPHIX, EUphact Bilthoven: RIVM,< http://wwweuphixorg> EUphact\Determinants of health\Environment\Social support 16.
  27. 27. Rodriguez VJ, Cook RR, Peltzer K, Jones DL (2017) Prevalence and psychosocial correlates of suicidal ideation among pregnant women living with HIV in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. AIDS care 29: 593–597. pmid:27690544
  28. 28. Levey EJ, Rondon MB, Sanchez S, Zhong Q-Y, Williams MA, et al. (2019) Suicide risk assessment: examining transitions in suicidal behaviors among pregnant women in Perú. Archives of women’s mental health 22: 65–73. pmid:29971552
  29. 29. Peltzer K, Pengpid S (2017) Associations between intimate partner violence, depression, and suicidal behavior among women attending antenatal and general outpatients hospital services in Thailand. Nigerian journal of clinical practice 20: 892–899. pmid:28791986
  30. 30. Belete H, Misgan E (2019) Suicidal behaviour in postnatal mothers in northwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open 9: e027449. pmid:31530587
  31. 31. Sinai M, Peleg O (2020) Marital interactions and experiences of women living in polygamy: An exploratory study. International journal of psychology.
  32. 32. Cramer RJ, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Kaniuka AR, Wilsey CN, Mennicke A, et al. (2020) Preferences in information processing, marginalized identity, and non-monogamy: understanding factors in suicide-related behavior among members of the alternative sexuality community. International journal of environmental research and public health 17: 3233.
  33. 33. Jordans M, Rathod S, Fekadu A, Medhin G, Kigozi F, et al. (2018) Suicidal ideation and behaviour among community and health care seeking populations in five low-and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 27: 393. pmid:28202089
  34. 34. Jabeen S, Haq S, Jameel A, Muhammad Asif AH, Hwang J, et al. (2020) Impacts of rural women’s traditional economic activities on household economy: Changing economic contributions through empowered women in rural Pakistan. Sustainability 12: 2731.
  35. 35. Hjelmeland H, Knizek BL (2019) The emperor’s new clothes? A critical look at the interpersonal theory of suicide. Death studies.
  36. 36. Al-Krenawi A (2013) Mental health and polygamy: The Syrian case. World journal of psychiatry 3: 1. pmid:24175180
  37. 37. Ozkan M, Altindag A, Oto R, Sentunali E (2006) Mental health aspects of Turkish women from polygamous versus monogamous families. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 52: 214–220. pmid:16875193
  38. 38. Sinai M, Peleg O (2021) Marital interactions and experiences of women living in polygamy: An exploratory study. International journal of psychology 56: 361–377. pmid:33174243
  39. 39. Hegerl U (2016) Prevention of suicidal behavior. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience 18: 183. pmid:27489458
  40. 40. Mngoma NF, Ayonrinde OA, Fergus S, Jeeves AH, Jolly RJ (2020) Distress, desperation and despair: anxiety, depression and suicidality among rural South African youth. International review of psychiatry: 1–11. pmid:32310008
  41. 41. Nyundo A, Manu A, Regan M, Ismail A, Chukwu A, et al. (2020) Factors associated with depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation and behaviours amongst sub‐Saharan African adolescents aged 10‐19 years: cross‐sectional study. Tropical Medicine & International Health 25: 54–69.
  42. 42. LeMoult J, Gotlib IH (2019) Depression: A cognitive perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 69: 51–66. pmid:29961601
  43. 43. Park GR, Park E-J, Jun J, Kim N-S (2017) Association between intimate partner violence and mental health among Korean married women. Public health 152: 86–94. pmid:28869852
  44. 44. Ahinkorah BO (2021) Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys. SSM-Population Health 13: 100729. pmid:33511263
  45. 45. Caponnetto P, Maglia M, Pistritto L, Ferlito S, Cannella MC (2019) Family violence and its psychological management at the Emergency Department: A review. Health psychology research 7.
  46. 46. Šedivy NZ, Podlogar T, Kerr DC, De Leo D (2017) Community social support as a protective factor against suicide: a gender-specific ecological study of 75 regions of 23 European countries. Health & place 48: 40–46. pmid:28934635
  47. 47. Casale M, Boyes M, Pantelic M, Toska E, Cluver L (2019) Suicidal thoughts and behaviour among South African adolescents living with HIV: Can social support buffer the impact of stigma? Journal of Affective Disorders 245: 82–90. pmid:30368074
  48. 48. Amare T, Meseret Woldeyhannes S, Haile K, Yeneabat T (2018) Prevalence and associated factors of suicide ideation and attempt among adolescent high school students in Dangila Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Psychiatry journal 2018. pmid:29992132
  49. 49. Forbes CN, Tull MT, Xie H, Christ NM, Brickman K, et al. (2020) Emotional avoidance and social support interact to predict depression symptom severity one year after traumatic exposure. Psychiatry research 284: 112746. pmid:31931273