Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prevalence of corneal arcus and associated factors in a German population—Results from the Gutenberg Health Study

  • Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Joanna.wasielica-poslednik@unimedizin-mainz.de

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Ulrike Hampel,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Lisa Ries,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Ruah Faysal,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Andreas Schulz,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Jürgen H. Prochaska,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Cardiology–Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany, Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Philipp S. Wild,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany, Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany

  • Irene Schmidtmann,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Thomas Münzel,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology–Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Manfred E. Beutel,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Karl J. Lackner,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Norbert Pfeiffer,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

  • Alexander K. Schuster

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg- University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to determine the prevalence of corneal arcus and to identify associated factors in the general population of Germany.

Methods

The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based cohort study in Germany, which includes an ophthalmological assessment. Refraction, distance-corrected visual acuity, non-contact tonometry and anterior segment imaging were performed for the five-year follow-up examination. Anterior segment photographs were graded for the presence of corneal arcus. Prevalence estimates were computed, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to determine associated factors for corneal arcus including sex, age, spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP), socio-economic status, smoking, BMI, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure, HbA1c, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, and lipid modifying agents.

Results

A total of 9,850 right and 9,745 left eyes of 9,858 subjects (59.2±10.8 years), 49.0% females were included in this cross-sectional analysis. 21.1% of men (95%-CI: 20.0%– 22.3%) had a corneal arcus in at least one eye, and 16.9% (95%-CI: 15.9%– 18.0%) of women. In multivariable analyses, the presence of corneal arcus was associated with male gender (OR = 0.54 for female, p<0.0001), higher age (OR = 2.54 per decade, p<0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.59, p<0.0001), hyperopia (OR = 1.05 per diopter, p<0.0001), thinner cornea (OR = 0.994 per μm, p<0.0001), higher IOP (OR = 1.02, p = 0.039), higher HDL-C-level (OR = 2.13, p<0.0001), higher LDL-C-level (OR = 1.21, p<0.0001), and intake of lipid modifying agents (OR = 1.26, p = 0.0001). Arcus was not associated with socio-economic status, BMI, arterial blood pressure, and HbA1c.

Conclusions

Corneal arcus is a frequent alteration of the cornea in Germany and is associated with ocular parameters and systemic parameters of dyslipidemia.

Introduction

Corneal arcus is a common ophthalmological finding, which may be associated with dyslipidemia or may occur independently with normal ageing processes. This mostly bilateral grey-white-yellowish opacity appears in the corneal periphery, separated from the limbus by a clear corneal zone (lucid interval of Vogt) with a sharp edge on its limbal margin and a less well-defined edge on its central margin (Fig 1) [1]. The pathophysiology of arcus stems from increased permeability of vessels of the conjunctiva and episclera which are adjacent to the anterior cornea and the ciliary vessels adjacent to the posterior cornea. These are involved in transport, delivery and removal of lipids and lipoproteins from the corneal tissue [2]. Permeability of the vascular tissue to circulating lipids may increase due to vascular pathology, limbal vascular anomalies, perilimbal inflammation, increased temperature, or a tumor. Hence, lipids are initially deposited in the warmest parts of the cornea, which are the superior and inferior periphery. Hyperlipoproteinemia is the most common systemic risk factor predisposing to this ocular lipid deposition.

In humans, the lipids are accumulated almost exclusively in the extracellular space. The initial arcs may progress circumferentially. The earliest site of the lipid deposition in eyes with visible arcus is found in the deeper layers of corneal stroma and sclera and later on in the superficial cornea adjacent to the limbal vascular plexus [3]. In advanced cases, the entire thickness of the cornea including both Bowman and Descemet membranes may show lipid deposition. There are some early reports regarding cholesterol crystals within the anterior chamber [4].

The corneal stroma resembles an artery wall in its structure, consisting of dense connective tissue as well as keratocytes and smooth muscle cells [5]. Disruption of local cholesterol homeostasis leads to extracellular accumulation of cholesterol in the corneal tissue and, as well as atherosclerosis [6], with increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels underpinning these processes. LDL-C is a major source of cholesteryl ester and apolipoprotein (Apo) B that are found in arcus [7]. The degree of arcus correlates positively with hypercholesterolemia caused by an excess of LDL-C [8]. Premature arcus may also be observed by primary or secondary hypertriglyceridemia caused by high levels of very low-density lipoproteins [2].

Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of corneal arcus to be associated with age [9, 10], male sex [11], black race [12], genotype [13], elevated plasma LDL-C level [14], alcohol intake [15], diabetes mellitus [7], smoking [16], blood pressure [8], BMI [14], lower HDL-C level [17] and deficiency of Apo A-1 [18]. Other studies, however, did not find correlations between arcus and obesity, hematocrit, serum triglyceride, HDL-C- or VLDL-levels [6]. Appearance of arcus before the age of 50 most notably in hyperlipidemic men correlates with premature development of cardiovascular diseases [19]. It is unclear whether arcus represents a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases independent of hyperlipidemia in people over 50 years of age [20].

Little is known about correlations between arcus and other ocular parameters. In this population-based study, we determine the prevalence of corneal arcus in our cohort and analyze its relation to the above- mentioned systemic risk factors. In addition, correlations between corneal arcus and ocular parameters such as corneal thickness, refractive error, and intraocular pressure (IOP) are evaluated.

Materials and methods

The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a prospective, population-based, observational cohort study conducted in the Rhine-Main region in Midwestern Germany. A study sample of 15,010 participants was drawn in waves of equal stratification to meet a standardized recruiting. More details of the study design are described by Höhn et al. [21]. For each participant, a comprehensive ophthalmological work-up was conducted. Non-cycloplegic refraction (Humphrey Automated Refractor/Keratometer (HARK) 599, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was measured and spherical equivalent was computed. Central corneal thickness was measured as part of ocular biometry with Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit Diagnostics, Koeniz, Switzerland). Non-contact tonometry (Nidek NT-2000, Nidek Co, Japan) was performed and repeated three times. Anterior segment photography was performed of both eyes at the 5-year follow-up examination. General anthropometric parameters including body height and body weight were determined and smoking habits were recorded. All examinations were performed by experienced study nurses in accordance with standardized operation procedures.

The study protocol and study documents were approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Chamber of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (reference no. 837.020.07; original vote: 22.3.2007, latest update: 20.10.2015). According to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to entering the study.

The GHS is a joint project of internal medicine, ophthalmology, psychosomatic medicine and epidemiology at the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.

The written informed consent of GHS study participants does not approve public access to the data. This was requested by the local data protection officer and ethics committee (local ethics committee of the Medical Chamber of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany). Access to data is made in accordance with the ethics vote is offered upon request at any time. Interested researchers can make their requests to the Principal Investigators of the Gutenberg Health Study (email: info@ghs-mainz.de).

Study sample

This study sample was recruited from the five-year follow-up of the GHS cohort including subjects with an age range from 40 to 80 years at time of examination. According to this criterion, 12.423 (83%) subjects came for this follow-up examination and were eligible for this study.

Data and statistical analysis

Anterior segment images were examined for the presence of corneal arcus by two trained graders (LR, RF) at Mainz Ophthalmic Reading Center. In addition, the extent of arcus was graded as corneal involvement of <180°, ≥ 180° or ≥180° with dense involvement. Masked intra- and inter-rater comparison were performed. Kappa-statistics were calculated to evaluate reliability. All questionable findings were evaluated by the supervisor (AKS).

Absolute and relative frequencies were computed for categorical variables. Median, inter quantile range, minimum and maximum were calculated for all continuous variables. For variables found to be within a normal distribution, mean and standard deviation were computed. Non-responder analysis was carried out to compare systemic and ocular characteristics between subjects with and without gradable anterior segment photographs. Diabetes was defined as having a respective diagnosis and treatment by a physician or if individuals showed HbA1c-level ≥6.5% [47.5 mmol/mol].

First, prevalence of corneal arcus was determined for the presence in right eyes, left eyes, as well as for unilateral versus bilateral cases. The weighted prevalence for the German population was computed based on the German population distribution from 2015 (December 31st).

Associated factors were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation model with consideration of the correlation structure between both eyes of the subjects.

A two-step analysis was performed. In the first model, we examined associations to anthropometric and ocular parameters and cardiovascular risk factors. This model included sex, age, spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness, socio-economic status, smoking, BMI, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure, HbA1c-level, HDL-C-level, LDL-C-level, triglyceride-level and lipid lowering medication. Lipid modifying agents, coded as c10 according to the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system (ATC code), included HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, fibrates, bile acid sequestrates, nicotinic acid and derivatives, as well as other lipid modifying agents.

The second model included only those subjects who had a corneal arcus. This model evaluated, whether there are differences between those with a dense corneal arcus comparing to those with a slightly pronounced corneal arcus.

All p-values should be regarded as a continuous parameter that reflects the level of evidence and are therefore reported exactly. Data were processed by statistical analysis software (R version 3.1.1 [2014-07-10]).

Results

In this cross-sectional study, 9,850 right and 9,745 left eyes of 9,858 subjects (49.0% female) were included. The mean age of the study participants was 59.2±10.8 years (range 40–80 years). The study sample is further characterized in Table 1. Non-responder analysis revealed that the included subjects were slightly younger, while other factors showed a comparable distribution (S1 Table).

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of the analysis sample.

Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (2012–2017).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255893.t001

1879 participants (19.1%; 95%-CI: 18.3–19.9%) had corneal arcus in at least one eye, the weighted prevalence for Germany at age 40 to 80 years was 17.4% (95%-CI: 16.6–18.1%). The prevalence increased with age (Fig 2). Of those individuals with corneal arcus, 66.9% of right eyes had corneal arcus with <180°, 18.8% had corneal arcus ≥180° and 14.4% had corneal arcus ≥180° with a dense characteristic. Left eyes with arcus demonstrated 68.6% <180°, 17.2% ≥180° and 14.2% ≥180° with a dense characteristic.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Prevalence of corneal arcus.

Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (2012–2017; n = 9.958). Prevalence estimates including 95% confidence interval.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255893.g002

In multivariable analyses, the presence of corneal arcus was associated with male gender (OR = 0.54 for women, p<0.0001), higher age (OR = 2.54 per decade, p<0.0001), smoking (OR = 1.59, p<0.0001), hyperopia (OR = 1.05 per diopter, p<0.0001), thinner cornea (OR = 0.994 per μm, p<0.0001), higher IOP (OR = 1.02, p = 0.034), higher HDL-C-level (OR = 2.13, p<0.0001), higher LDL-C-level (OR = 1.21, p<0.0001), and intake of lipid modifying agents (OR = 1.26, p = 0.0001). Arcus was not associated with socio-economic status, BMI, arterial blood pressure, and HbA1c (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Investigation of associations between corneal arcus and cardiovascular parameters.

Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (2012–2017). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with Generalized Estimation Equations (GEE) modelling was conducted to determine associated factors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255893.t002

When comparing subjects with dense and not-dense corneal arcus, those with dense corneal arcus were more likely male (OR = 0.54 for women, p<0.0001), older (OR = 1.72 per decade, p<0.0001), more hyperopic (OR = 1.11 per diopter, p<0.0001), had a thinner central cornea (OR = 0.99 per μm, p<0.0001), were more likely smokers (OR = 1.46, p = 0.02), had lower socio-economic status (OR = 0.97, p = 0.046) and a higher HDL-C-level (OR = 1.49, p = 0.008) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Investigation of associations with dense corneal arcus.

Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (2012–2017). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with GEE modelling was conducted to determine associated factors. As control group, those with corneal arcus without dense characteristic were included.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255893.t003

Our study included a subpopulation of 983 diabetic persons (40 subjects with type 1 diabetes, 728 of type 2 diabetes, one with diabetes after pancreatitis, 20 with unknown type of diabetes and 194 with screening-detected diabetes).

Discussion

From the GHS cohort, the calculated prevalence of corneal arcus in the German population aged 40 to 80 was 17.4%. These findings are comparable to results of a study from an Iranian population showing a prevalence of 23.3% [22]. In a younger Indian population, the prevalence was reported to be 10.7% [23], while in the Singapore Malay Eye Study the prevalence was 57.9%, showing a ethnic differences [24]. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study–a mainly Caucasian study investigating almost 13,000 Danish people in the late seventies–the overall prevalence of corneal arcus at baseline was 24.8% and increased with age to 80% over the age of 70. It was lower in women than in men (20.1% vs. 30.2%) [25]. Prevalence of circumferential corneal arcus in an Australian older population (>49 years) in the Blue Mountains Eye Study was 64.8% [26]. In 1965, Rifkind et al. found the prevalence of corneal arcus in a male population to be as high as 75% at age 60 to 70 [8]. Similar to our study, the prevalence of corneal arcus was lower in females. The high prevalence of corneal arcus observed in the last century may be lowered nowadays by lipid-lowering medication, which has gained popularity for the treatment of dyslipidemia and reduced the risk of cardiovascular diseases remarkably in the last three decades [27]. Similarly, we found an association between the intake of these lipid-lowering agents and the presence of corneal arcus. Thus, arcus most likely originates from a dyslipidemia and does not seem to regress despite lipid-lowering medication.

There are only a few studies on the co-existence of corneal arcus with other ocular parameters. In our analysis, the presence of corneal arcus was associated with a thinner central cornea. Similar results are reported in the Singapore Malay Eye Study [28]. This may partly be explained by systemic factors, such as age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, chronic kidney disease or metabolic syndrome which are also associated with central corneal thickness [29, 30]. Nevertheless, our multivariable analysis did show central corneal thickness as an independently associated factor.

We speculate that accumulation of lipids, which begins in the deeper corneal layers, reaches the superficial and hence visible corneal layers more readily in thinner corneas, manifesting in the demonstratable presence of arcus.

There is no widely accepted explanation for the association of corneal arcus with higher IOP. Similar to our results, the Singapore Malay Eye Study showed a higher IOP in eyes with corneal arcus [29]. This might be due to alterations in biomechanical properties such as corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis, which are reported to be related to aging and other corneal opacities [31, 32]. Such alterations may lead to a stiffening of the cornea and may influence the IOP measurement [33]. Ayhan et al. reported altered corneal biomechanical characteristics in eyes with corneal arcus [34]. As lower central corneal thickness and higher IOP are both risk factors for conversion of ocular hypertension into glaucoma, further studies should evaluate whether this risk is modified by the presence of corneal arcus [35].

In our study, corneal arcus correlated significantly with dyslipidemia parameters such as higher LDL-C-levels. Surprisingly, arcus also correlated with higher HDL-C-levels. Similar to our findings, in the Copenhagen City Heart Study plasma concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) were higher in people with corneal arcus. HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A1 levels did not differ between people with and without arcus. In the Blue Mountains Eye Study corneal arcus correlated with total cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, but not with HDL-C level. We speculate that the positive correlation between corneal arcus and increased HDL-C-level may result from an appropriate adjustment of the lipid-lowering therapy and normalization of the HDL-C-level in our study population. Development of corneal arcus probably proceeds the diagnosis of hyperlipoproteinemia and initiation of lipid-lowering therapy.

One limitation of our study is that we were not able to differentiate corneal arcus from rare entities such as genetic diseases affecting lipid clearing mechanisms, hematological disorders or embryotoxon by osteogenesis imperfecta. Genetic mutations in ABCA1 (Tangier disease), LCAT (familial lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency), ApoA1 (familial apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 deficiency), and UBIAD1 (Schnyder corneal dystrophy, SCD) all result in corneal accumulation of lipids including cholesterol. SCD characterized by a crystalline or non-crystalline central haze, which progresses to corneal arcus in the third decade and to the midperipheral haze in the late fourth decade, results from increased deposition of cholesterol and phospholipids in the cornea (SCD) [36]. Monoclonal gammopathies may lead to accumulation of immunoglobulins or of free light chains in form of a corneal arcus as well [37]. Nevertheless, these diseases are very rare and their influence on our estimates is rather low due to the population-based study design. Corneal arcus was graded on anterior segment photographs on which illumination, contrast and field of view may have had an influence. We therefore performed several sensitivity analyses and found similar results. Amini and Ameri proposed a deep learning based automatic recognition of corneal arcus [38]. Their model achieved a high accuracy in classifying images with and without arcus. Such methods may be considered in future population-based studies. Furthermore, our study investigates a mainly Caucasian population in Germany at age 40 to 80 years, and therefore these findings may not apply to other ethnicities or ages outside this range.

To conclude, our study confirmed the relationship between corneal arcus and dyslipidemia. The weighted prevalence of corneal arcus in the German population is 17.4% and seems to be lower than in previous studies, which may be due to broad application of lipid-lowering medication.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Item-non-responder analysis.

Data from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (2012–2017).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255893.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank all study participants for their willingness to provide data for this research project and we are indebted to all coworkers for their enthusiastic commitment.

References

  1. 1. Vogt A. Textbook and atlas of slit lamp microscopy of the living eye. Bonn: Wayenborgh Editions; 1981
  2. 2. Crispin S. Ocular lipid deposition and hyperlipoproteinemia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002 Mar;21(2):169–224.
  3. 3. Walton K.W. Studies on the pathogenesis of corneal arcus formation. I. The human corneal arcus and its relation to atherosclerosis as studied by immunofluorescence. J Pathol. 1973 Dec;111(4):263–274. pmid:4359796
  4. 4. Eagle RC, Yanoff M. Cholesterolosis of the anterior chamber. Albrecht von Graefes Arch für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie volume 193, pages121–134(1975) pmid:1078954
  5. 5. Flores R, Jin X, Chang J, Zhang C, Cogan DG, Schaefer EJ, et al LCAT, ApoD, and ApoA1 Expression and Review of Cholesterol Deposition in the Cornea. Biomolecules. 2019 Nov 26;9(12):785. pmid:31779197
  6. 6. Gaynor PM, Zhang WY, Salehizadeh B, Pettiford B, Kruth HS. Cholesterol accumulation in human cornea: Evidence that extracellular cholesteryl ester-rich lipid particles deposit independently of foam cells. J Lipid Res. 1996 Sep;37(9):1849–1861. pmid:8895051
  7. 7. Fernández A, Sorokin A, Thompson PD. Corneal arcus as coronary artery disease risk factor. Atherosclerosis. 2007 Aug;193(2):235–40. Epub 2006 Oct 17. pmid:17049531
  8. 8. Barchiesi BJ, Eckel RH, Ellis PP. The cornea and disorders of lipid metabolism. Surv Ophthalmol, 1991 Jul-Aug;36(1):1–22. pmid:1925941
  9. 9. Rifkind BM, Dickson C. The incidence of arcus senilis in ischemic heart disease, its relation to serum-lipid levels. Lancet 1965 Feb 6;1(7380):312–4. pmid:14247887
  10. 10. Winder AF. Relationship between corneal arcus and hyperlipidaemia is clarified by studies in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Dec;67(12):789–94. pmid:6671092
  11. 11. Pe’er J, Vidurri J, Halfon ST, Eisenberg S, Zauberman H. Association between corneal arcus and some of the risk factors for coronary artery disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Dec;67(12):795–798. pmid:6671093
  12. 12. Macaraeg PVJ, Lasagna L, Snyder B. Arcus not so senilis. Ann Intern Med.1968;68(2):345–354. pmid:5713918
  13. 13. Hoeg JM, Demosky SJ, Schaefer EJ, Starzl TE, Brewer HB Jr. Characterization of hepatic low density lipoprotein binding and cholesterol metabolism in normal and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1984 Feb;73(2):429–436. pmid:6321555
  14. 14. Chambless LE, Fuchs FD, Linn S, Kritchevsky SB, Larosa JC, Segal P, et al. The Association of corneal arcus with coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease mortality in the lipid research clinics mortality follow-up study. AJPH. 1990 Oct;80(10):1200–1204. pmid:2400030
  15. 15. Hickey N, Maurrer B, Mulcahy R. Arcus senilia: its relation to certain attributes and risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease. Br Heart J. 1970 Jul;32(4):449–52. pmid:5433305
  16. 16. Chua BE, Mitchell P, Wang J, Rochtchina E. Corneal arcus and hyperlipidemia: findings from an older population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):363–5. pmid:14962437
  17. 17. Lertchavanakul A, Laksanaphuk P, Tomtitchong T. Corneal Arcus Associated With Dyslipidemia J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85 Suppl 1:S231–5.
  18. 18. Rifkind BM. Corneal arcus and hyperlipoproteinaemia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1972 Mar-Apr;16(5):295–304
  19. 19. Chambless LE, Fuchs FD, Linn S, Kritchevsky SB, Larosa JC, Segal P, et al. The association of corneal arcus with coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease mortality in the Lipid research Clinics mortality follow-up study. Am J Public Health. 1990 Oct;80(10):1200–4. pmid:2400030
  20. 20. Halfon ST, Hames CG, Heyden S. Corneal arcus and coronary heart disease mortality. Br J Ophtahlmol. 1984 Aug;68(8):603–604. pmid:6743631
  21. 21. Höhn R, Kottler U, Peto T, Blettner M, Münzel T, Blankenberg S, et al. The ophthalmic branch of the Gutenberg Health Study: study design, cohort profile and self-reported diseases. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0120476. pmid:25775251
  22. 22. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Fotouhi A. A population-based study of corneal arcus and its risk factors in Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;21(5):339–44. pmid:25118951
  23. 23. Sujiv Vurgese S, Panda-Jonas S, Saini N, Sinha A, Nangia V, Jonas JB. Corneal arcus and its associations with ocular and general parameters: the Central India Eye and Medical Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec;52(13):9636–43. pmid:22110074
  24. 24. Wu R, Wong T, Saw S, Cajucom-Uy H, Rosman M, Aung T. Effect of corneal arcus on central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;128(11):1455–61. pmid:21060048
  25. 25. Christoffersen M, Frikke-Schmidt R, Schnohr P, Jensen GB, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Xanthelasmata, arcus corneae, and ischaemic vascular disease and death in general population: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011 Sep 15; 343:d5497. pmid:21920887
  26. 26. Brian E, Chua BE, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E. Corneal arcus and hyperlipidemia: findings from an older population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):363–5. pmid:14962437
  27. 27. Levine GN, Keaney JF Jr, Vita JA. Cholesterol reduction in cardio-vascular disease. Clinical benefits and possible mechanisms. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 23;332(8):512–21. pmid:7830734
  28. 28. Wu R, Wong TY, Saw SM, Cajucom-Uy H, Rosman M, Aung T. Effect of corneal arcus on central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;128(11):1455–61. pmid:21060048
  29. 29. Suzuki S, Suzuk Y, Iwase A, Araie M. Corneal thickness in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population. Ophthalmology 2005 Aug;112(8):1327–1336. pmid:15964631
  30. 30. Su DH, Wong TY, Foster PJ, Tay WT, Saw SM, Aung T. Central corneal thickness and its associations with ocular and systemic factors: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009 Apr;147(4) 709–716 e1. Epub 2009 Jan 18. pmid:19152872
  31. 31. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, Mendiluce L, García-Gómez PJ, Seguí- Gómez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 Mar;49(3):968–974. pmid:18326720
  32. 32. Daxer A, Misof K, Grabner B, Ettl A, Fratzl P. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998 Mar;39(3) 644–648. pmid:9501878
  33. 33. Wasielica-Poslednik J, Politino G, Schmidtmann I, Lorenz K, Bell K, Pfeiffer N, et al. Influence of Corneal Opacity on Intraocular Pressure Assessment in Patients with Lysosomal Storage Diseases. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0168698. eCollection 2017. pmid:28081172
  34. 34. Ayhan Z, Ozturk T, Kaya M, Arikan G, Gunenc U. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients With Arcus Senilis Cornea. Cornea. 2016 Jul;35(7):980–2. pmid:27124777
  35. 35. Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Torri V, Zeyen T, Cunha-Vaz J, Adamsons I. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group, Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;144(2):266–275. pmid:17543874
  36. 36. Weiss JS, Khemichian AJ. Differential. diagnosis of Schnyder corneal dystrophy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2011;48:67–96. Epub 2011 Apr 26. pmid:21540632
  37. 37. Lisch W., Wasielica-Poslednik J., Kivelä T., Schlötzer-Schrehardt U., Rohrbach J.M., Sekundo W., et al. The Hematologic Definition of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Relation to Paraproteinemic Keratopathy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2016;114:T7. pmid:28050052
  38. 38. Amini N., Ameri A. A Deep Leraning Approach to Automatic Recognition of Arcus senilis. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020 Aug 1;10(4):507–512. eCollection 2020 Aug pmid:32802798