Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Inhaled corticosteroids do not adversely impact outcomes in COVID-19 positive patients with COPD: An analysis of Cleveland Clinic’s COVID-19 registry

  • Payal Sen,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Uddalak Majumdar,

    Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Joe Zein,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Umur Hatipoğlu,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

  • Amy H. Attaway

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America

Inhaled corticosteroids do not adversely impact outcomes in COVID-19 positive patients with COPD: An analysis of Cleveland Clinic’s COVID-19 registry

  • Payal Sen, 
  • Uddalak Majumdar, 
  • Joe Zein, 
  • Umur Hatipoğlu, 
  • Amy H. Attaway


Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) are commonly prescribed to patients with severe COPD and recurrent exacerbations. It is not known what impact ICS cause in terms of COVID-19 positivity or disease severity in COPD. This study examined 27,810 patients with COPD from the Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 registry between March 8th and September 16th, 2020. Electronic health records were used to determine diagnosis of COPD, ICS use, and clinical outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics, month of COVID-19 testing, and comorbidities known to be associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease. Amongst the COPD patients who were tested for COVID-19, 44.1% of those taking an ICS-containing inhaler tested positive for COVID-19 versus 47.2% who tested negative for COVID-19 (p = 0.033). Of those who tested positive for COVID-19 (n = 1288), 371 (28.8%) required hospitalization. In-hospital outcomes were not significantly different when comparing ICS versus no ICS in terms of ICU admission (36.8% [74/201] vs 31.2% [53/170], p = 0.30), endotracheal intubation (21.9% [44/201] vs 16.5% [28/170], p = 0.24), or mortality (18.4% [37/201] vs 20.0% [34/170], p = 0.80). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated no significant differences in hospitalization (adj OR 1.12, CI: 0.90–1.38), ICU admission (adj OR: 1.31, CI: 0.82–2.10), need for mechanical ventilation (adj OR 1.65, CI: 0.69–4.02), or mortality (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.43–1.49). In conclusion, ICS therapy did not increase COVID-19 related healthcare utilization or mortality outcome in patients with COPD followed at the Cleveland Clinic health system. These findings should encourage clinicians to continue ICS therapy for COPD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.


The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the greatest challenge the world has faced in the 21st century. A significant subset of infected patients are hospitalized due to severe pneumonia and may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating prolonged ICU stays, mechanical ventilation, or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [1, 2]. Unlike other comorbidities like diabetes, obesity and hypertension, the prevalence of chronic respiratory disease among patients with COVID-19 appears to be lower than the general population [3]. However, patients with underlying lung disease develop worse outcomes when infected with COVID-19, including increased rate of mortality [46]. It is hypothesized that these patients have less pulmonary reserve (due to reduced lung function, abnormal lung structure, and dysfunctional immunity) making them more susceptible to developing ARDS and poor clinical outcomes [7, 8].

The role of corticosteroids in SARS-CoV-2 infection has greatly evolved since the beginning of the pandemic. While systemic corticosteroids showed possible harm in previous coronavirus pandemics (SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS]) [9, 10], a large randomized control trial known as RECOVERY demonstrated reduced mortality in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone [11]. However, the role and benefit of ICS has been debated in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection [12, 13]. ICS therapies in COPD reduce expression of the ACE2 (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2) receptor, which is highly expressed in the upper respiratory tract of humans as the point of entry for SARS-CoV-2 [14, 15]. Pre-treatment of human respiratory epithelial cells in vitro with budesonide, in combination with long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) bronchodilators, was shown to inhibit human coronavirus HCoV-229E replication and cytokine production [16]. Another study demonstrated that the inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide blocks SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication in vitro and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 cytopathic activity, possibly reducing the risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 [17]. ICS in combination with bronchodilators is recommended in patients with severe COPD who have frequent exacerbations or those with Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome [18]. However, ICS use must be weighed with the risk of side effects, including increased susceptibility to upper airway infections [19, 20], a higher prevalence of pneumonia, and alterations to the lung microbiome [21]. On the other hand, discontinuing ICS for fear of contracting COVID-19 could place patients at a higher risk for COPD exacerbations [22].

Currently there are very few studies analyzing the safety and efficacy of ICS in patients with COPD in regards to COVID-19 infection rate or disease severity [2325]. We hypothesized that amongst patients with COPD who develop COVID-19, those who are on ICS therapy will have similar inpatient outcomes, mortality and healthcare utilization as those who are not on ICS.


Cleveland Clinic registry

Data on patients’ demographics, medications, comorbidities, history of COVID-19 exposure, disease manifestation upon presentation, disposition, and outcomes were extracted from electronic health records (EHR) for all patients from the Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 registry [26]. Registry characterization and data collection reflect the clinical characteristics recently published on COVID-19 [2731]. Uniform clinical templates were implemented across the Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) using EHR to standardize the care of patients tested for COVID-19, and to facilitate data extraction. Data extraction from EHR (Epic®, Epic Systems Corporation, Wisconsin, USA) at the CCHS was performed manually by a trained research team and using predefined processes that have previously been published [32]. All data in the registry was fully anonymized and exempted from informed consent. This study and the registry were both approved by the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB#20–391).

Testing for COVID-19 at Cleveland Clinic facilities is currently indicated for symptomatic patients (presence of fever, cough, shortness of breath or other symptoms) and those with chronic medical conditions. After March 21 2020, diarrhea was added to the qualifying symptoms [33].


Data on 170,552 individuals tested for COVID-19 at the Cleveland Clinic between March 8th, 2020 and September 16th, 2020 was available. Data was extracted from the EHR on September 20th, 2021. We limited our analysis to those with COPD who were 35 years and older because the diagnosis of COPD is unlikely in those less than 35 years old [34]. Additionally, to avoid having a biased sample, we excluded those with concurrent diagnosis of asthma and less than a 10 pack year smoking history. Out of the initial sample size of 170,552, 27,816 met our inclusion criteria (see Fig 1). Diagnosis of COPD was based on ICD-9 (491.x) and ICD10 codes (J41.0, J41.1, J41.8, J42, J43.1, J43.2, J43.8, J43.9, J44.0, J44.1, J44.9). Additional comorbidities (asthma, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus) were also extracted by ICD10 codes and are listed in S1 Table.

Laboratory confirmation

Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens were collected and pooled for testing by trained medical personnel as previously described [33]. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by laboratory testing using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 assay that was validated in the Cleveland Clinic Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute. This assay used an extraction kit (MagNA Pure; Roche) and 7500 DxReal-Time PCR System instruments (Applied Biosystems) [35]. All testing was authorized by the Food and Drug Administration under an Emergency Use Authorization and in accordance with the guidelines established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [33].

Statistical analysis

COPD patients were analyzed for associations with COVID-19 positivity, and clinical outcomes in those that tested positive (including hospitalization, ICU admission, non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality). Summary statistics included counts and percentages for categorical variables and means with standard deviations for continuous variables (which were all normally distributed). Data with missing dependent variables were excluded. Only 2 covariates had missing data which were smoking status (3.4%) and ethnicity (1.1%). Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests and normally distributed continuous variables were compared using t-tests. Models were constructed choosing covariates known a priori to be associated with COPD and COVID-19 severity and identified from clinical experience and a review of the literature [3642]. Binomial multivariate logistic regression was used to account for differences in clinical outcomes for COVID-19 infection, risk of hospitalization, risk of ICU admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality, and included: Model 1 (adjusted for gender, race [African American, Caucasian, Hispanic, and other], and age), and Model 2 (adjustment for age, gender, race, smoking status [current versus non-current], comorbidities [asthma, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, hypertension, obesity]). Our model compared current smokers to non-current smokers, the majority of which were former smokers, in order to save degrees of freedom in our model as never smokers represented less than 5% of the total cohort. Given the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and the development of new therapies [11], evidence to date has shown an improvement in mortality over time [43]. Therefore, our model also adjusted for the month of COVID-19 positivity. Additional studies were performed using the same models analyzing clinical characteristics and outcomes for COPD patients who required at least one course of oral corticosteroids (OCS) in the prior year (including prednisone, prednisolone, or methylprednisolone), the results of which are presented in S2S4 Tables. Model fit was assessed using R2 and C-index. All analyses were two-tailed, performed at a significance level of 0.05, and confidence intervals were 95%. R version 4.0.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used for statistical analyses.


A total 27,810 patients diagnosed with COPD and tested for COVID-19 were included in the final analysis, of which 1,288 (4.6%) patients tested positive. Amongst the COVID-19 (+) cohort, 568 patients utilized ICS-containing inhalers and 720 did not utilize ICS. The demographic characteristics of the patients with COPD in the final analysis are summarized in Table 1. Among the COVID-19 (+) patients, 499 (38.8%) were males, and the mean age was 63.7±12.2 years. 676 (52.7%) of the COVID-19 (+) patients were characterized as obese. The COVID (+) cohort included 5.4% on ICS alone, 3.7% on LABA alone, 26.7% on LABA/ICS, 14.8% on LAMA, 4.9% on LAMA/LABA, and 12% on ICS/LAMA/LABA. 76.7% had been treated for an exacerbation with oral corticosteroids within the past year (inpatient or outpatient), which occurred prior to the hospitalization and unrelated to the diagnosis of COVID. Amongst the COPD patients who were tested for COVID-19, 44.1% of those taking an ICS-containing inhaler tested positive for COVID-19 versus 47.2% who tested negative for COVID-19 (p = 0.033).

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with COPD tested for COVID-19.

As shown in Table 2, COPD patients on an inhaler regimen that included ICS tended to be older (65.8±14.6 vs 62.1±15.5 years, p<0.001), and had higher rates of congestive heart failure (37.6% vs 16.1%, p<0.001), hypertension (82.7% vs 69.8%, p<0.001), and diabetes mellitus (61.9% vs 51.8%, p<0.001) compared to those not on ICS. Patients on ICS also had a higher prevalence of being on other inhalers such as SABA (short acting beta-2 agonists), LAMA, and LAMA/LABA. They were also more likely to be on beta blockers, ACEI and ARBs. Of those who tested positive, 375 patients (29%) required hospitalization.

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of all patients with COPD (inpatient and outpatient) who tested positive for COVID-19 based on ICS usage.

For those hospitalized (see Table 3), 201 were on an inhaler regimen that included ICS and 170 were not on ICS. The BMI of COVID (+) patients on ICS was higher than those not on ICS (32.6±10.0 vs 30.5±8.7, p<0.001). When comparing the ICS users and ICS non-users, there was no significant difference in those who developed pulmonary embolism (12.9% vs 7.6%, p = 0.138), shock (15.9% vs 12.4%, p = 0.407), acute kidney injury (54.2% vs 45.3%, p = 0.107), acute liver failure (3.5% vs 5.3%, p = 0.549) or disseminated intravascular coagulation (20.2% vs 22.7%, p = 0.648). There was a trend towards increased ICD-10 diagnosis of pneumonia among ICS users (78.1% vs 68.8%, p = 0.056). Admission to the ICU (36.8% vs 31.2%, p = 0.303), rates of intubation (21.9% vs 16.5%, p = 0.237), and mortality (18.4% vs 20.0%) were not significantly different when comparing the groups.

Table 3. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COPD who tested positive for COVID-19 categorized by ICS usage.

As shown in Table 4, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with COPD on ICS were less likely to test positive for COVID-19 compared to COPD patients not on ICS (unadj OR 0.89, CI 0.79–0.99), which held true when adjusted for gender, age, race (Model 1: OR 0.85, CI 0.76–0.96), and when additionally adjusted for comorbidities and month of COVID positivity (Model 2 OR: 0.85, CI 0.76–0.96). While COPD patients on ICS were more likely to be hospitalized (unadj OR 1.34, CI 1.09–1.65), which held true when adjusted for gender, race, and age (Model 1 OR: 1.26, CI 1.02–1.55), this association was not significant when adjusted for comorbidities and the month of diagnosis (Model 2 OR: 1.12, CI: 0.90–1.38). Clinical outcomes including ICU admission (Model 2 OR: 1.31, CI: 0.82–2.10), need for mechanical ventilation (Model 2 OR 1.65, CI: 0.69–4.02), and mortality (Model 2 OR: 0.80, CI: 0.43–1.49) were not significantly associated with ICS usage.

Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of COPD patients comparing those on ICS versus those not on ICS.

In order to further characterize our cohort based on COPD severity, additional analyses (S2S4 Tables) were performed comparing COPD patients who had received at least one course of OCS in the prior year (prior to registry enrollment) to those who had not received OCS in the prior year. Clinical outcomes demonstrated an increased risk for hospital admission (unadj OR 1.70; CI: 1.26–2.33) and ICU admission (unadj OR 1.60; CI: 1.00–2.66) for those who had received OCS in the prior year. After model adjustment, hospital admission due to COVID-19 remained significantly associated with prior OCS usage (Model 2 OR 1.54; CI: 1.10–2.19).


In our large cohort study from the Cleveland Clinic healthcare system, we found that patients with COPD who were on ICS did not have worse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection when compared to COPD patients not on ICS. ICS usage did not increase the risk for mortality, need for hospitalization, ICU admission or mechanical ventilation.

COPD is the fourth most common cause of death in the United States [44] and the third most common cause worldwide [45]. However, chronic respiratory diseases like COPD have not demonstrated increased prevalence for COVID-19 infection. Data from China and South Korea illustrate that diabetes is far more prevalent than COPD among COVID-19 patients and is associated with worse outcomes [3, 46]. Our previous analysis of the Cleveland Clinic registry demonstrated that, while patients with COPD and COVID-19 had increased healthcare utilization, they did not have an increased risk for mortality compared to non COPD patients [47].

The reason why COPD is not prevalent amongst COVID-19 patients is unclear. The fact that telehealth studies have demonstrated feasibility to treat COPD patients with exacerbations as an outpatient may have led to greater adoption of telehealth in the management of COPD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic [48]. On the other hand, patients with COPD have less pulmonary reserve, reduced innate immunity to viral and bacterial infections, and also have a pro-thrombotic state with a number of associated cardiovascular comorbidities [7, 8]. Previous studies have shown that patients with COPD who develop respiratory viral illnesses due to influenza tend to have worse outcomes compared to those without COPD [49, 50]. Therefore, while the reason for reduced COVID-19 severity in COPD patients is unclear, the role of ICS as a potential therapeutic agent against COVID-19 requires further study [24].

While COVID-19 tends to disproportionately affect men more than women, our study comparatively had a higher number of female subjects. However, given that our study focused primarily on patients with COPD, this aligns with recent data reporting increased prevalence of COPD in women [51]. Women also have a higher symptom burden due to COPD among both smokers and non-smokers and are more likely to be hospitalized for COPD than males [52]. Therefore, it’s possible that women were more likely to present to their doctors or be tested for COVID-19, which could have explained the higher proportion of females in our sample. We also note that patients who were taking ICS had more comorbidities, especially congestive heart failure, which raises several considerations. For one, severity of airflow obstruction is associated with higher rates of heart failure, and therefore usage of ICS may be a sign of increased COPD severity [53]. Second, a number of severe COPD patients have evidence for cor pulmonale or right ventricular failure. While the ICD9 and ICD10 codes we utilized for congestive heart failure did not include codes for right ventricular failure, it is possible that non-specific codes (i.e. I50.9, heart failure, unspecified) were utilized.

The benefits of ICS, particularly when used in combination with bronchodilators like LAMA and LABAs, include reductions in COPD exacerbations, improvement in COPD symptoms and better lung function [54]. Nonetheless, ICS may alter the lung microbiome, and is known to increase the risk of pneumonia in COPD patients [55]. Interestingly, our analysis showed that ICS use among patients with COPD was associated with an increased risk for pneumonia, however the finding was not statistically significant. Our registry also does not distinguish codes for viral pneumonia (which could be used to diagnose COVID-19 pneumonia) or bacterial pneumonia, and so it is unclear whether this was a consequence of COVID-19 or represented an additional superinfection. Because none of the other outcomes related to disease severity were worse in the ICS cohort in our study, we believe it is unlikely that this finding was an adverse consequence of ICS usage.

In vitro, ICS has been shown to attenuate the antiviral innate immune responses leading to delayed virus clearance [56, 57]. In previous novel coronavirus outbreaks (SARS, MERS), studies on ICS did not demonstrate benefit or harm [13], while systemic corticosteroids demonstrated possible harm [9, 10]. However, in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, dexamethasone significantly reduced 28-day mortality, particularly in those on supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation [11]. In the largest trial studying systemic corticosteroids (RECOVERY trial; n = 2104), 28-day mortality was 22.9% in the arm treated with dexamethasone compared to 25.7% in usual care (adj rate ratio 0.83, CI 0.75–0.93). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that mortality reduction was greatest in those requiring supplemental oxygen (dexamethasone 23.3% vs. usual care 26.2%; rate ratio 0.82; CI 0.72–0.94) or mechanical ventilation (dexamethasone 29.3% vs. usual care 41.4%; rate ratio 0.64, CI: 0.51–0.81).

Clinical data has previously demonstrated a protective effect of ICS in those patients who have frequent exacerbations due to COPD [18, 55]. Since about half of all COPD exacerbations are viral-induced [22], this suggests that ICS may attenuate the inflammatory viral response. This was previously demonstrated in studies of rhinovirus and RSV infections [56], as well as inhibition of viral replication and cytokine production for the coronaviruses responsible for the common cold [16, 58]. The inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide also reduces replication and cytopathic effect of coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, in cultured cells [59]. ICS has been shown to downregulate key virus-related genes in patients with asthma and COPD, including key SARS-CoV-2 genes. These include ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in asthma patients as well as ACE2 and ADAM17 in COPD patients [14, 15, 60].

The exact role of ICS in patients with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unclear. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to demonstrate both rates of COVID-19 positivity as well as inpatient outcomes comparing ICS users and non-users in terms of risk for hospitalization, ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation or mortality. Schultze et al. reported increased risk of mortality risk among 148,557 patients with COPD on ICS but sensitivity analyses suggested this was from unmeasured confounding due to reduced baseline health status in patients on ICS [23]. Non-COVID-19-related deaths were also more common among COPD patients on ICS. Patients on triple therapy (LAMA, LABA and ICS combination) had higher mortality than patients on combined therapy (bronchodilator and ICS combination), even though the ICS exposure was the same. Bloom et al. studied inpatient clinical outcomes in patients with COPD and asthma who were hospitalized with COVID-19 in the UK. No benefit nor harm from ICS was demonstrated from their study of 12337 patients with COPD [61]. Aveyard et al. studied 8,256,161 patients with chronic lung disease from late January through April 2020, of whom 0.2% were hospitalized with COVID-19. They found that ICS was associated with a modest risk of severe COVID-19 independent of the underlying respiratory disease. The risk was reduced although not normalized when adjusted for comorbidities and demographic factors [62]. Finally, a recent retrospective observational study from Colorado, USA, reported no effect of ICS on rates of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 [25]. The authors did report a lower rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients on systemic corticosteroid therapy. While our study demonstrated lower COVID-19 positivity in the population taking ICS, it may be due to heightened sensitivity to respiratory symptoms among COPD patients during the pandemic. Patients with COPD taking ICS are also likely to have a higher symptom burden at baseline. To answer the question whether ICS use confers reduced susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection, additional prospective studies which include asymptomatic users of ICS at enrollment are needed.

Our additional analysis of outcomes related to OCS demonstrated that patients who had received OCS in the prior year were more likely to be admitted to the hospital for COVID-19. This has also been demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis of COPD patients with COVID-19 [63]. However, the fact that ICS did not impart an increased risk for healthcare utilization in our cohort of COPD patients highlights the safety of ICS in our population, and that more studies of ICS and its impact on COVID-19 disease severity are needed.

Our study has several limitations. This is a retrospective cohort study of a single center. Our registry is dependent on the local prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 which may be different compared to other regions of the world. Given the nature of the disease and patterns of behavior related to social distancing, the prevalence of the virus varies significantly based on geographic location. Our findings may also differ from other observational studies of COPD due to the fact that Cleveland Clinic and its regional facilities did not experience a surge that overwhelmed hospitals during our study period [64]. In general, ICS is only recommended for the most severe COPD patients who are symptomatic and have frequent exacerbations, or those with asthma-COPD overlap syndrome [55]. Because our data is based on ICD-10 codes extracted from EHR, the cohort could not be sub-divided based on severity of COPD by GOLD stage. Similarly, patients who were on ICS could not be subdivided by the potency and dose of their ICS. Our study sought to reduce the effect of confounding from asthma by excluding those with a diagnosis of asthma and less than 10 pack year smoking history and those younger than 35 years old. While the overall number of patients in our study with comorbid asthma and COPD was 29.4% which is within the typical range based on population studies [65], the diagnosis of asthma was higher in the ICS cohort compared to those not on ICS [66], and therefore confounding from asthma could still be present. In general, while asthma patients tend to be younger and have less comorbidities than COPD patients [67], this was not the case in our study as our population taking ICS was older and had significantly more comorbidities. Therefore, based on our study design, we believe our population of patients on ICS truly represented those with COPD and not asthma alone. Finally, while our model included clinical characteristics like age, gender, race, smoking status and comorbidities, other prognostic factors not included such as laboratory or radiologic markers of end-organ damage may improve the prediction of outcomes due to COVID-19 [68], which is an area of ongoing research.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patients with COPD who are maintained on ICS and test positive for COVID-19 have similar outcomes to those who were not on ICS. This adds to the growing body of evidence that maintaining COPD patients on ICS is safe and should be continued during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supporting information

S1 Table. ICD9 and 10 codes used for diagnosis of medical conditions or outcomes.


S2 Table. Clinical characteristics of all patients with COPD (inpatient and outpatient) who tested positive for COVID-19 based on OCS usage.


S3 Table. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COPD who tested positive for COVID-19 categorized by OCS usage.


S4 Table. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of COPD patients comparing those on OCS versus those not on OCS.



  1. 1. Kowalewski M, Fina D, Slomka A, Raffa GM, Martucci G, Lo Coco V, et al. COVID-19 and ECMO: the interplay between coagulation and inflammation-a narrative review. Critical care (London, England). 2020;24(1):205. pmid:32384917
  2. 2. Shekar K, Badulak J, Peek G, Boeken U, Dalton HJ, Arora L, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers. ASAIO J. 2020;66(7):707–21. pmid:32604322
  3. 3. Halpin DMG, Faner R, Sibila O, Badia JR, Agusti A. Do chronic respiratory diseases or their treatment affect the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):436–8. pmid:32251625
  4. 4. Cheng VCC, Wong SC, Chen JHK, Yip CCY, Chuang VWM, Tsang OTY, et al. Escalating infection control response to the rapidly evolving epidemiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(5):493–8. pmid:32131908
  5. 5. Park YJ, Choe YJ, Park O, Park SY, Kim YM, Kim J, et al. Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(10):2465–8. pmid:32673193
  6. 6. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10239):1763–70.
  7. 7. Epidemiology Working Group for Ncip Epidemic Response CCfDC, Prevention. [The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(2):145–51. pmid:32064853
  8. 8. Wu F, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Xie M, Shi Z, Tang Z, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Journal of thoracic disease. 2020;12(5):1811–23. pmid:32642086
  9. 9. Stockman LJ, Bellamy R, Garner P. SARS: systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 2006;3(9):e343. pmid:16968120
  10. 10. Cameron MJ, Ran L, Xu L, Danesh A, Bermejo-Martin JF, Cameron CM, et al. Interferon-mediated immunopathological events are associated with atypical innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J Virol. 2007;81(16):8692–706. pmid:17537853
  11. 11. Group RC, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19—Preliminary Report. The New England journal of medicine. 2020.
  12. 12. Chatterjee K, Wu CP, Bhardwaj A, Siuba M. Steroids in COVID-19: An overview. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine. 2020. pmid:32819962
  13. 13. Halpin DMG, Singh D, Hadfield RM. Inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19: a systematic review and clinical perspective. The European respiratory journal. 2020;55(5). pmid:32341100
  14. 14. Peters MC, Sajuthi S, Deford P, Christenson S, Rios CL, Montgomery MT, et al. COVID-19-related Genes in Sputum Cells in Asthma. Relationship to Demographic Features and Corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(1):83–90. pmid:32348692
  15. 15. Finney LJ, Glanville N, Farne H, Aniscenko J, Fenwick P, Kemp SV, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in COPD through suppression of type I interferon. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020. pmid:33068560
  16. 16. Yamaya M, Nishimura H, Deng X, Sugawara M, Watanabe O, Nomura K, et al. Inhibitory effects of glycopyrronium, formoterol, and budesonide on coronavirus HCoV-229E replication and cytokine production by primary cultures of human nasal and tracheal epithelial cells. Respir Investig. 2020;58(3):155–68. pmid:32094077
  17. 17. Jeon S, Ko M, Lee J, Choi I, Byun SY, Park S, et al. Identification of Antiviral Drug Candidates against SARS-CoV-2 from FDA-Approved Drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(7). pmid:32366720
  18. 18. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 2020 Report. 2020.
  19. 19. Yang M, Chen H, Zhang Y, Du Y, Xu Y, Jiang P, et al. Long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Inhal Toxicol. 2017;29(5):219–26. pmid:28714745
  20. 20. Yang M, Zhang Y, Chen H, Lin J, Zeng J, Xu Z. Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in patients with asthma: a meta-analysis. Infection. 2019;47(3):377–85. pmid:30298471
  21. 21. Contoli M, Pauletti A, Rossi MR, Spanevello A, Casolari P, Marcellini A, et al. Long-term effects of inhaled corticosteroids on sputum bacterial and viral loads in COPD. The European respiratory journal. 2017;50(4). pmid:28982774
  22. 22. Johnston SL. Overview of virus-induced airway disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005;2(2):150–6. pmid:16113484
  23. 23. Schultze A, Walker AJ, MacKenna B, Morton CE, Bhaskaran K, Brown JP, et al. Risk of COVID-19-related death among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma prescribed inhaled corticosteroids: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(11):1106–20. pmid:32979987
  24. 24. Milne S, Li X, Yang CX, Hernandez Cordero AI, Leitao Filho FS, Yang CWT, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate SARS-CoV-2-related gene expression in COPD: results from a RCT. medRxiv preprint 2020.
  25. 25. Liao SY, Petrache I, Fingerlin TE, Maier LA. Association of inhaled and systemic corticosteroid use with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) test positivity in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. Respiratory medicine. 2020;176:106275. pmid:33276252
  26. 26. Medina M, Babiuch C, Card M, Gavrilescu R, Zafirau W, Boose E, et al. Home monitoring for COVID-19. CCJM Curbside Consults.
  27. 27. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of 21 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2020. pmid:32191259
  28. 28. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, et al. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region—Case Series. The New England journal of medicine. 2020. pmid:32227758
  29. 29. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020.
  30. 30. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al. The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application. Ann Intern Med. 2020. pmid:32150748
  31. 31. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020. pmid:32091533
  32. 32. Milinovich A, Kattan MW. Extracting and utilizing electronic health data from Epic for research. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(3):42. pmid:29610734
  33. 33. Mehta N, Kalra A, Nowacki AS, Anjewierden S, Han Z, Bhat P, et al. Association of Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020.
  34. 34. Titmarsh S, Poliziani M, Russell RE. "Breathing New Life Into Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)"—Results From An Online Survey Of UK Patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:2799–807. pmid:31824144
  35. 35. FDA. Emergency Use Authorization Summary For The Cleveland Clinic SARS-COV-2 Assay. 2020.
  36. 36. Rycroft CE, Heyes A, Lanza L, Becker K. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:457–94. pmid:22927753
  37. 37. Schols AM, Broekhuizen R, Weling-Scheepers CA, Wouters EF. Body composition and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(1):53–9. pmid:16002800
  38. 38. Jones SE, Maddocks M, Kon SS, Canavan JL, Nolan CM, Clark AL, et al. Sarcopenia in COPD: prevalence, clinical correlates and response to pulmonary rehabilitation. Thorax. 2015;70(3):213–8. pmid:25561517
  39. 39. Swallow EB, Reyes D, Hopkinson NS, Man WD, Porcher R, Cetti EJ, et al. Quadriceps strength predicts mortality in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2007;62(2):115–20. pmid:17090575
  40. 40. Roig M, Eng JJ, MacIntyre DL, Road JD, Reid WD. Deficits in muscle strength, mass, quality, and mobility in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31(2):120–4. pmid:21037481
  41. 41. von Haehling S, Anker SD. Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5(4):261–3. pmid:25384990
  42. 42. Remels AH, Gosker HR, Langen RC, Schols AM. The mechanisms of cachexia underlying muscle dysfunction in COPD. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013;114(9):1253–62. pmid:23019314
  43. 43. Horwitz LI, Jones SA, Cerfolio RJ, Francois F, Greco J, Rudy B, et al. Trends in COVID-19 Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates. J Hosp Med. 2020.
  44. 44. Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(6):1–77. pmid:32501203
  45. 45. Organization WH. Global health estimates 2016: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. 2018.
  46. 46. Lee JY, Hong SW, Hyun M, Park JS, Lee JH, Suh YS, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in Daegu, South Korea. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;98:462–6. pmid:32702415
  47. 47. Attaway AA, Zein J, Hatipoğlu US. SARS-CoV-2 infection in the COPD population is associated with increased healthcare utilization: An analysis of Cleveland clinic’s COVID-19 registry. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100515. pmid:32869011
  48. 48. Leung JM, Niikura M, Yang CWT, Sin DD. COVID-19 and COPD. The European respiratory journal. 2020;56(2).
  49. 49. Cobb NL, Sathe NA, Duan KI, Seitz KP, Thau MR, Sung CM, et al. Comparison of Clinical Features and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 versus Influenza. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2020.
  50. 50. Li P, Wang Y, Peppelenbosch MP, Ma Z, Pan Q. Systematically comparing COVID-19 with 2009 influenza pandemic for hospitalized patients. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. pmid:33189938
  51. 51. Han MK, Postma D, Mannino DM, Giardino ND, Buist S, Curtis JL, et al. Gender and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: why it matters. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2007;176(12):1179–84. pmid:17673696
  52. 52. Prescott E, Bjerg AM, Andersen PK, Lange P, Vestbo J. Gender difference in smoking effects on lung function and risk of hospitalization for COPD: results from a Danish longitudinal population study. The European respiratory journal. 1997;10(4):822–7. pmid:9150319
  53. 53. Bhatt SP, Dransfield MT. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Translational research: the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2013;162(4):237–51. pmid:23727296
  54. 54. Nannini LJ, Poole P, Milan SJ, Kesterton A. Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-agonist in one inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013(8):CD006826. pmid:23990350
  55. 55. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 2019 Report. 2020.
  56. 56. Oliver BG, Robinson P, Peters M, Black J. Viral infections and asthma: an inflammatory interface? The European respiratory journal. 2014;44(6):1666–81. pmid:25234802
  57. 57. Singanayagam A, Glanville N, Girkin JL, Ching YM, Marcellini A, Porter JD, et al. Corticosteroid suppression of antiviral immunity increases bacterial loads and mucus production in COPD exacerbations. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2229. pmid:29884817
  58. 58. Homma T, Fukuda Y, Uchida Y, Uno T, Jinno M, Kishino Y, et al. Inhibition of Virus-Induced Cytokine Production from Airway Epithelial Cells by the Late Addition of Budesonide. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(3). pmid:32120846
  59. 59. Matsuyama S, Kawase M, Nao N, Shirato K, Ujike M, Kamitani W, et al. The inhaled steroid ciclesonide blocks SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication by targeting the viral replication-transcription complex in cultured cells. J Virol. 2020. pmid:33055254
  60. 60. Milne S LX, Yang CX, Cordero AIH, Filho FSL, Yang CWT, Shaipanich T, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate SARS-CoV-2-related gene expression in COPD: results from a RCT. medRxiv. 2020.
  61. 61. Bloom CI, Drake TM, Docherty AB, Lipworth BJ, Johnston SL, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes in patients with underlying respiratory conditions admitted to hospital with COVID-19: a national, multicentre prospective cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK. Lancet Respir Med. 2021. pmid:33676593
  62. 62. Aveyard P, Gao M, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J, Watkinson P, Young D, et al. Association between pre-existing respiratory disease and its treatment, and severe COVID-19: a population cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021.
  63. 63. Gerayeli FV, Milne S, Cheung C, Li X, Yang CWT, Tam A, et al. COPD and the risk of poor outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;33:100789. pmid:33758801
  64. 64. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052–9. pmid:32320003
  65. 65. Hosseini M, Almasi-Hashiani A, Sepidarkish M, Maroufizadeh S. Global prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiratory Research. 2019;20(1):229. pmid:31647021
  66. 66. Kiljander T, Helin T, Venho K, Jaakkola A, Lehtimaki L. Prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome among primary care asthmatics with a smoking history: a cross-sectional study. NPJ primary care respiratory medicine. 2015;25:15047. pmid:26182124
  67. 67. Cukic V, Lovre V, Dragisic D, Ustamujic A. Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)—Differences and Similarities. Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(2):100–5. pmid:23678316
  68. 68. Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K, Yang L, Siff EJ, Chiang SS, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review. Reviews in medical virology. 2021;31(1):1–10. pmid:32845042