Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care?

  • The PLOS ONE Staff
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

Notice of republication

A file unintended for publication was erroneously included in the originally published article. The publisher apologizes for the error. This article was republished on May 3, 2021, to correct for this error. Please download this article again to view the correct version.

Reference

  1. 1. Stone P, Vickerstaff V, Kalpakidou A, Todd C, Griffiths J, Keeley V, et al. (2021) Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care? PLoS ONE 16(4): e0249763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249763 pmid:33909658

Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2021) Correction: Prognostic tools or clinical predictions: Which are better in palliative care? PLoS ONE 16(5): e0251757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251757

Published: May 11, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.