Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Enhanced antioxidant activity of Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. by lactic acid bacteria: Optimization of fermentation conditions

  • Hsing-Chun Kuo,

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliations Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan, Research Center for Industry of Human Ecology, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion Research Center, CGUST, Chiayi, Taiwan

  • Ho Ki Kwong,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Institute of Biotechnology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Hung-Yueh Chen,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Supervision

    Affiliation Institute of Food Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Hsien-Yi Hsu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision

    Affiliations Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China, Shenzhen Research Institute of City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China

  • Shu-Han Yu,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Biotechnology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Chang-Wei Hsieh,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Hui-Wen Lin,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Optometry, Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Yung-Lin Chu ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft (KCC); (YLC)

    Affiliation Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan

  • Kuan-Chen Cheng

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing (KCC); (YLC)

    Affiliations Institute of Biotechnology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Institute of Food Science and Technology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Optometry, Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan, Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan


In this study, different probiotics commonly used to produce fermented dairy products were inoculated independently for Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. fermentation. The strain with the highest level of antioxidant activity was selected and the fermentation process was further optimized via response surface methodology (RSM). Lactobacillus plantarum BCRC 11697 was chosen because, compared to other lactic acid bacteria, it exhibits increased free radical scavenging ability and can produce more phenolic compounds, DPPH (from 72.6% to 93.2%), and ABTS (from 64.2% to 76.9%). Using RSM, we further optimize the fermentation protocol of BCRC 11697 by adjusting the initial fermentation pH, agitation speed, and temperature to reach the highest level of antioxidant activity (73.5% of DPPH and 93.8% of ABTS). The optimal protocol (pH 5.55, 104 rpm, and 24.4°C) resulted in a significant increase in the amount of phenolic compounds as well as the DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging ability of BCRC 11697 products. The IC50 of the DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging ability were 0.33 and 2.35 mg/mL, respectively, and both protease and tannase activity increased after RSM. An increase in lower molecular weight (<24 kDa) protein hydrolysates was also observed. Results indicated that djulis fermented by L. plantarum can be a powerful source of natural antioxidants for preventing free radical-initiated diseases.


Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) is a traditional crop from the same genus as quinoa (Chenopodiun quinoa), and it is cultivated and consumed as food or used as a wine starter in Taiwan [1]. Reports have shown that djulis exhibits beneficial effects on anti-inflammation, anti-diabetes, anti-oxidation, and immune regulation [1, 2]. Bioactive components and pigments such as peptides, betacyanin (red), betaxanthins (yellow), and polyphenols contribute to the aforementioned effects. Other ingredients, such as rutin and chlorogenic acid, can also restore the injury from UVB on HaCaT cells by reducing the level of interleukin-6 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [3].

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely known strains of probiotics. Several studies have indicated that LAB exhibit multiple functions, such as modulating gut health, improving liver function, and decreasing cholesterol levels and blood pressure [46]. LAB can also enahnce the flavor of fermented products and increase the amount of antioxidative compounds in dairy products through bioconversion [7]. For example, Hsieh et al. [8] reported that heat killed cells and cytoplasmic fraction forms of Lactobacillus acidophilus BCRC 14079 grown in taro waste medium showed enhanced anti-tumor and immune-modulatory properties. Bianchi et al. [9] reported that synbiotic fermented beverages combining quinoa and soy had favorable nutritional, rheological, and sensory characteristics.

Traditionally, optimal fermentation condition are determined using a one-factor-at-a-time approach [10]. However, this method is both time-consuming and costly in terms of materials and human resources. In worst-case scenarios, the interactions among parameters are often overlooked, resulting in misleading conclusions. As an alternative, response surface methodology (RSM) is a statistical method for simultaneously validating the effects of and interactions among different parameters [8, 11]. RSM has been used in various fermentation applications such as wine making [12], bioethanol production [13], exopolysaccharides [14], and biomass production [8, 15].

The aim of the present study was to select suitable LAB strains for djulis fermentation to enhance antioxidant activity for the development of health-promoting beverages. Antioxidant activity of LAB-fermented djulis was evaluated according to 2,2’-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS) and 2,2-diphynyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging ability. We employed RSM to determine the optimal fermentation parameters (initial pH, agitation speed and cultivation temperature) for achieving the highest level of antioxidant activity. Possible causes for the increased bioactivity after djulis fermentation and composition analysis of djulis samples before and after fermentation were also investigated.

Materials and methods


Domestic djulis was purchased from Pingtung, Taiwan. Lactobacilli MRS Broth was provided by Hardy diagnostics (Santa Maria, CA, USA). We purchased 95% Ethanol and methanol from Echo Chemical, Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan), and 2,2’-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS), gallic acid, Folin–Ciocâlteu phenol reagent, and α, α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Agar and peptone were provided by Bioshop Inc. (Burlington, ON, Canada).

Microorganisms and medium

Bifidobacterium infantis BCRC14602, Bifidobacterium adolescentis BCRC14606, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCRC14615, Bifidobacterium longum BCRC14634, Bifidobacterium breve BCRC11846, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG BCRC16000, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus BCRC10696, Lactobacillus plantarum BCRC11697, Lactobacillus acidophilus BCRC14079, Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophiles BCRC14085 were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC, Hsinchu city, Taiwan). All LAB strains were grown in MRS medium (Sigma-Aldrich, MI, USA). For storage, stock cultures were kept in 20% glycerol at -80°C. Viable cells were grown in MRS medium at 37°C for 20 hours as inoculum and sub-cultured twice a month [16]. The standard growth curve was measured at 600 nm using a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Djulis fermentation

Djulis was crushed into powder, filtered using a 0.6 mm mesh and then stored at -20°C until use. Djulis powder was combined with 10 times the amount of ddH2O (w/v) and sterilized at 90°C for 10 minutes. After cooling to room temperature, samples were inoculated with 1% LAB (~7 log CFU mL -1) as a seed culture and then fermented at 37°C for 48 hours. To determine the optimal fermentation time, LAB samples were taken every 12 hours and monitored for their pH, bacteria number, total phenolic content (TPC), ABTS, and DPPH. The optimal LAB was chosen based on the ABTS and DPPH assay results.

Anti-oxidant activity

DPPH assay.

Fermented djulis samples were freeze-dried and diluted to 5 mg/mL (deionized water). They were then mixed with DPPH ethanol solution (100 μM) at 1:1 ratio in a 96-well tissue culture plate to carry out the reaction in the dark for 30 minutes. Finally, the samples were analyzed at the 517 nm wavelength using the microplate spectrophotometer [17]. DPPH scavenging activity of the djulis extracts was calculated as follows: (1) where A0 = DPPH (without samples), A1 = Sample + DPPH, and A2 = Sample (without DPPH). We used this method to screen the optimal LAB for djulis fermentation. Once the optimal fermentation protocol was evaluated, the IC50 was calculated to provide an absolute number. IC50 of the djulis samples was obtained from the regression curve between concentration and DPPH scavenging activity.

ABST assay.

Fermented djulis samples were freeze-dried and diluted to 5 mg/mL (80% methanol). A 2.5 mM K2O8S2 solution was prepared with K2O8S2 and 7 mM 2,2’-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothia-zoline-6-sulfonic acid) solution. The solution was placed in the dark for 12−16 hours until it became blue-green due to the formation of ABTS‧+. The ABTS‧+ solution was diluted with 0.2 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4) until its OD734 reached to 0.7±0.02. Each sample (3 μL) was added to ABTS‧+ solution (300 μL) in the dark for 6 minutes [17]. After the reaction was completed, the samples were analyzed at 734 nm using the microplate spectrophotometer. The ABTS scavenging activity of the djulis was calculated as follows: (2) where AC = ABTS (without samples); AS = Sample + ABTS.

Determination of the TPC.

The TPCs was determined using Folin–Ciocâlteu’s reagent following the methods described by Wu et al. [13] but with slight modifications. Briefly, each extract (100 mg) was dissolved in a solution of 5 mL of 3% HCl in methanol/deionized water (1:1), and the resulting mixture (100 μL) was added to 100 μL of 10% aqueous sodium carbonate solution. After 2 minutes, 100 μL of 50% Folin–Ciocâlteu’s reagent was added to the mixture. After the solution had stood for 30 minutes, absorbance was measured at 750 nm against a blank. TPC was calculated based on the calibration curve of gallic acid, and this is reported as mg gallic acid equivalent per 1 g of dry djulis powder (mg GAE/1 gdw).

Enzyme activity.

Protease activity was determined by taking aliquots of 100 μL of the fermented liquid and adding 100 μL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.7). To this mixture, 100 μL of substrate was added and incubated for 30 minutes at 50°C for the two cultivars. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 μL of trichloroacetic acid at 10% (v/v) and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 5 minutes. We then added 200μL of 1.8 M NaOH to the supernatant. Readings were taken using a spectrophotometer at 280nm. For quantification, an enzymatic unit was considered the amount of enzyme required to increase the absorbance by 0.01 [18]. To measure the tannase activity, the sample solution (100 μL) was incubated with 300 μL of 1.0% (w/v) tannic acid within a 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) at 40°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was then terminated at 0°C by adding 2 mL bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL), causing the remaining tannic acid to precipitate out of the solution. The samples were then centrifuged (5,000 x g, 10 min), and the precipitate was dissolved in 2 mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–triethanolamine (1% w/v, triethanolamine) solution. Absorbency was measured at 550 nm after addition of 1 mL of FeCl3 (0.13 M). One unit of tannase was defined as the amount of enzymerequired to hydrolyze 1μ mole of ester linkage of tannic acid in 1 minute under specific conditions [19].

Optimization for djulis fermentation.

RSM using the Box-Behnken design was performed to select the optimal conditions for djulis fermentation. Three variables, namely the initial pH (5, 6, 7), agitation speed (50, 100, 150 rpm), and cultivation temperature (20, 25, 30°C), were optimized based on the results of a set of experiments. A total of 15 runs were performed to establish a model and predict the optimal conditions. Three levels of design were introduced: low, medium, and high (respectively labeled as -1, 0, and 1 in Table 1. Minitab software was used to predict the optimal values of the three variables according to the following second-order polynomial equation: where Y is the dependent variable and represents the predicted response on ABTS ability; B0 represents the fitted response at the design’s center point; Bi, Bii, and Bij are the coefficient for linear, quadratic, and cross-product regression, respectively; and Xi and Xj (with j = i + 1) are the coded independent variables (X1 = initial pH, X2 = agitation speed, and X3 = fermentation temperature).

Table 1. Range and corresponding levels of the independent variables.

SDS gel electrophoresis.

Djulis samples weighing approximately 0.1 g were mixed with 15 mL of deionized water and stirred for 30 minutes at room temperature. Next, 0.1 M NaOH was added to adjust the pH to 9.0, and the samples were stirred for another 30 minutes, centrifuged at 4,500 × g for 20 minutes, and then 0.1 N HCL was added to adjust the pH to 5.0. After removal of the supernatant, the samples were mixed with 500 μL of 63 mM Tris-HCl solution (pH 8.0). The obtained djulis protein samples were quantitated with a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) [20]. The total proteins were used for SDS gel electrophoresis analysis, and all samples were subjected to 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS−PAGE) for 180 minutes at 60 V (stacking gel) and 120 V (separating gel). The separating gel was shaken and washed with deionized water three times at 70 rpm. After the deionized water was removed, RAPIDStain was added to completely submerge the gel, and it was shaken at 70 rpm for 1 hour. Finally, the gel was washed with two to three times deionized water at 70 rpm (10–15 minutes/time).

Composition analysis of fermented djulis samples.

Fermented djulis samples were analyzed for their moisture, carbohydrate, protein, fat, and ash content following methods described in the literature [13] but with slight modifications. Crude protein content (g/100 g dry matter) was evaluated using the Kjeldahl method on the basis of nitrogen level and multiplied by 5.7. Crude fat content (g/100 g dry matter) was measured using Soxhlet extraction with petroleum ether. Moisture was determined by oven-drying at 105°C. Ash content was determined by placing samples overnight in a furnace at 600°C. Total carbohydrate content (g/100 g dry matter) was obtained by taking the difference between 100 and the sum of the ash content, moisture, crude fat, and crude protein.

Statistical analysis.

All experiments were conducted with three independent evaluations and with three replications for each sample. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Minitab software (Minitab Inc., University City, Pennsylvania, USA) was used to perform one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s new multiple range tests as well as RSM evaluation and analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant differences where p < 0.05.

Results and discussions

Strain selection for djulis fermentation

To improve the functional properties, nutritional value, and taste of djulis, we fermented djulis grains using different strains of LAB. Djulis samples were inoculated with 10 strains of LAB, and were measured for their DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity after 24 hours of fermentation. The results showed that all 10 strains of LAB promoted the antioxidant activity of djulis. However, amongst all samples, L. plantarum BCRC 16000 and 11697 exhibited relatively higher performance for DPPH activity (93.2%) (Fig 1A). Additionally, the ABTS radical scavenging activity assay demonstrated that L. plantarum BCRC 11697 showed significantly higher ABTS radical scavenging activity (76.9%) compared to the control (64.2%) (p < 0.05). Fig 1C shows the TPC was in line with the results regarding L. plantarum BCRC 11697 fermentation and antioxidant activity. L. plantarum BCRC 11697 produced more phenolic compounds than did the other strains. Past studies have reported that a correlation coefficient of R = 0.966 between ABTS and TPC, and R = 0.939 between DPPH and TPC [21]. Turkan [22] also reported that polyphenols are antioxidants that reduce ROS and reactive nitrogen species. This could explain why L. plantarum BCRC 11697 performed the best in the DPPH and ABTS tests. L. plantarum is a common LAB strain used in fermented plant-based foods, and it is often applied to the metabolic bacteria model of phenolic compounds [23]. Moreover, it can degrade phenolic compounds in food, and produce some compounds that affect food flavor and enhance antioxidant activity [23]. For example, all strains of L. plantarum secretes TanBLp (tannase), and tannase can hydrolyze the ester bond of gallic acids and protocatechuic acids [23]. Furthermore, feruloyl esterases are involved in releasing enzymes from plant cell walls and promoting antioxidant activity [24]. ABTS and DPPH assays are widely used methods for assessing antioxidant activity in natural herbal products. Both assays are spectrophotometric techniques based on the quenching of stable colored radicals (ABTS or DPPH) and show the radical scavenging ability of antioxidants even when present in complex plant extracts [25]. Both methods are rapid, simple, inexpensive and widely used to measure the ability of compounds to act as free radical scavengers or hydrogen donors, and to evaluate the antioxidant activity of complex extracts. Several studies have also adopted ABTS and DPPH assays to evaluate the quinoa antioxidant activity [17, 26, 27].

To determine the optimal djulis fermentation time for L. plantarum BCRC 11697, we carried out 54-hour cultivation with samples collected every 6 hours. As shown in Fig 1(A), all LAB strains exhibited similar DPPH scavenging effect, while BCRC11697 showed significantly higher ABTS amongst all the strains (Fig 1(B)); as such, we chose BCRC 11697 for the remainder of the study and used ABTS as the indicator.

Fig 2 shows the results of the ABTS radical scavenging activity, CFU, and pH values during fermentation. ABTS activity in the fermented djulis samples peaked after 24 hours of fermentation (77%) and then decreased gradually after 48 hours. Therefore, 24 hours was selected as the fermentation time for the remainder of the study. Moreover, lactic acidification improved the extraction of total phenols when the selected strain was used, and this has also been reported in previous research [26]. Esterase activity released the complex glycosylated-phenolic compounds into the corresponding phenolic acids during fermentation.

RSM optimization

A set of individual experiments was conducted for each variable (X1: initial pH, X2: agitation speed, and X3: temperature) in order to elucidate the specific effect of each parameter on ABTS antioxidation ability. We investigated initial pH values ranging from 2 to 10 for solutions of djulis powder mixed with deionized water for cultivation. An initial pH of 6 yielded the highest ABTS antioxidant activity (IC50: 2.59 mg/mL) among the fermented samples (S1A Fig). Initial pH values of 5, 6, and 7 were chosen as experimental values. Different agitation speeds were also evaluated for ABTS antioxidant ability. Results showed that samples obtained at 100 rpm of agitation had the best ABTS (IC50: 2.39 mg/mL). Therefore, agitation speeds of 50, 100 and 150 rpm were chosen as experimental values (S1B Fig). For the temperature parameter, we evaluated temperatures ranging from 15°C to 40°C. Results showed the best fermentation temperature to be 25°C, which gave the lowest ABTS IC50: 2.44 mg/mL). Therefore, fermentation temperatures of 20°C, 25°C, and 30°C were chosen as experimental values (S1C Fig). Based on the results from the one-factor-at-a-time approach, RSM was applied to determine and to optimize the three fermentation parameters in order to achieve the highest ABTS anti-oxidation ability in the fermented djulis product (Table 1). The results are summarized in Table 2. Multiple regression was applied to the experimentally determined data in Eq (1) to estimate the regression coefficients, and the following second-order polynomial equation was obtained using Minitab software: where Y = ABTS free radical scavenging ability-IC50; theory value: X1 = initial pH; X2 = agitation speed (rpm); X3 = fermentative temperature (°C).

Table 2. Experimental range and values in the central composite design for optimizing the fermentation conditions.

The predicted optimal parameters of X1, X2, and X3 were obtained by applying the regression analysis of Eq (2); these were pH 5.55, 104 rpm, and 24.4°C. The predicted value of ABTS-IC50 was 2.42 mg/mL which approximates our experimental result (2.35 mg/mL).

The coefficient of determination of the regression for the response related to the significant effects in the model was R2 = 0.946 (Table 3). Hence, the sample variation of 94.6% for ABTS-IC50 was associated with the three independent variables. The interaction between temperature and agitation speed can be observed from the results (p < 0.05). We hypothesize that is because the heating process can be accelerated by the increased agitation speed, resulting in a favored environment for LAB growth and TPC production. Similar results were reported by Dinarvand et al. [28]. They reported that the interaction between temperature and agitation speed affected the production of invertase from Aspergillus niger. The surface plots for ABTS-IC50 are shown in Fig 3. The initial ABTS-IC50 increased with the initial pH, reaching an optimal ABTS-IC50 value approximately 5.55, which declined gradually above the optimal pH due to inactivation of the tannase, which accords with previous reports [23, 25]. The adequacy of the full quadratic model of liquefaction was also evaluated via ANOVA. The model summary statistics in Table 3 indicate the adequacy of the models including linear, 2-factor interactions and quadratic terms (P < 0.05). The lack-of-fit error was nonsignificant (p = 0.842), verifying the accuracy fit of the second-order model (Eq 2) to the true response of ABTS-IC50.

Table 3. Estimated regression coefficients for ABTS free radical scavenging ability-IC50.

For the following assay, we chose pH 5.55, 104 rpm and 24.4°C as our fermentation conditions. Between the unfermented and fermented djulis samples, the fermented sample exhibited markedly higher antioxidant ability. For example, the IC50 of ABTS was 3.4 mg/mL before fermentation, and this decreased to 2.35 mg/ml after optimization. In addition, the IC50 of DPPH was 1.11 mg/mL before fermentation, decreasing to 0.33 mg/mL (p < 0.05) after RSM (Table 4). Compared to the TPC in the unfermented djulis samples, that in the fermented samples exhibited a significant increased from 9.33 to 28.97 (mg of gallic acid/gdw) (p < 0.05). (Table 4).

Table 4. Changes in TPC, cell number, pH, and DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity in djulis fermented with L. plantarum BCRC 11697.

The increase of TPC is due to the presence of protease (2.53 U/mg-protein), tannase (1.12 U/mg-protein), and other enzymes used in enzymatic hydrolysis. Solid-state fermentation has also been adopted for cereal grains fermentation using fungi in previous research [29] that reported significantly greater antioxidant properties in the fermented products than unfermented grains. In the case of quinoa fermentation, that study reported an increase of 2.46 mg/g in TPC content after 35 days of fermentation. For our case, the TPC content of fermented djulis increased by 19.64 mg/g after 24 hours, which provided a fast and economically feasible method for the up-scaled production of antioxidant-rich ingredients.

Changes of djulis components through fermentation

Principal components analysis showed that the freeze-dried powder of the fermented djulis contained 68.80% carbohydrates, 17.01% crude protein, 4.12% crude fat, 5.71% ash, and 4.37% moisture (Table 5). A slight decrease in carbohydrates, protein, and fat was observed due to the presence of enzymes partaking in hydrolysis and oxidation, which was discussed in a previous study [29]. LAB utilized the carbohydrates, protein and fat of the djulis since it was the only nutrient within the medium. Some nutrients could be hydrolyzed into small molecules such as peptides, oligosaccharides, and short-chain fatty acids due to the presence of related enzymes.

Table 5. Carbohydrates, protein, fat, ash and moisture of Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. fermented product.

Protein hydrolyzation

Fermented grain products are consumed in many countries and are one of the most crucial sources of bioactive peptides [29]. Grains fermented using bacteria (LAB and Bacillus spp.) yield many different types of fermented products that possess a multitudinous array therapeutic properties, such as antioxidant, antihypertensive, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and anticancer activity [29].

A previous study identified five peptides with antioxidant activity (ABTS and DPPH) after LAB fermentation through the hydrolysis of quinoa protein [26]. The size of each peptide was approximately 5–9 amino acid residues. Another study demonstrated that the bands between 53 and 41 kDa, two bands around 32 to 24 kDa, and bands under 24 kDa potentially have antioxidant activity as well [30]. The present study employed SDS-PAGE to determine the protein distribution of unfermented and fermented djulis. Our results showed that proteins of djulis had been hydrolyzed after fermentation. For example, two bands were between 24 and 32 kDa, one major band under 24 kDa disappeared after fermentation, and more bands with lower molecular weight were observed after fermentation (Fig 4). These results aligned with the behavior of wheat after L. plantarum M616 fermentation [30]. Virtanen et al. [30] also reported that milk whey protein hydrolysate weighing 4–20 kDa showed remarkably high antioxidant activity compared to that of the original milk whey protein.


We applied RSM to determine the optimal fermentation conditions and to evaluate the interaction among the initial pH, agitation speed, and temperature. Our results show that L. plantarum BCRC 11697 is the optimal LAB strain for djulis submerged fermentation among the 10 candidates of LAB strains were investigated. After RSM-assisted optimization, we observed significant improvement in the free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS and in TPC. The presence of protease and tannase activity also supports that L. plantarum BCRC 11697 enhances free radical scavenging bioactivity through protein hydrolysis and the release of bound-phenolic compounds. In conclusion, fermented djulis using LAB shows potential for commercialization as a beverage. Future studies will need to investigate the up-scaled production of djulis content, determination of the specific mechanisms of antioxidation and identification of bioactive peptides for the findings of this study to be employed in commercial applications.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

(A) Initial pH-The ABTS radical scavenging activity of Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum BCRC 11697. (B) RPM-The ABTS radical scavenging activity of Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum BCRC 11697. (C) Fermentation temperature-The ABTS radical scavenging activity of Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum BCRC 11697. Statistical differences were calculated by Duncan’s new multiple range test. Values are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments with different superscripts (a, b, c, d) are significantly different (p < 0.05).



The authors greatly acknowledge the article proofreading by Iris YS Wu who is a native speaker from Molecular Environmental Biology, University of California, Berkeley (Berkeley, CA, USA).


  1. 1. Tsai PJ, Sheu CH, Wu PH, Sun YF. Thermal and pH stability of betacyanin pigment of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) in Taiwan and their relation to antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(2):1020–5. Epub 2009/12/25. pmid:20030318.
  2. 2. Chyau CC, Chu CC, Chen SY, Duh PD. The Inhibitory Effects of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) and Its Bioactive Compounds on Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Molecules. 2018;23(7). Epub 2018/07/22. pmid:30029534
  3. 3. Lee KS, Cha HJ, Lee GT, Lee KK, Hong JT, Ahn KJ, et al. Troxerutin induces protective effects against ultraviolet B radiation through the alteration of microRNA expression in human HaCaT keratinocyte cells. Int J Mol Med. 2014;33(4):934–42. Epub 2014/02/08. pmid:24503859.
  4. 4. Higashikawa F, Noda M, Awaya T, Nomura K, Oku H, Sugiyama M. Improvement of constipation and liver function by plant-derived lactic acid bacteria: a double-blind, randomized trial. Nutrition. 2010;26(4):367–74. Epub 2009/07/25. pmid:19628371.
  5. 5. Zhang Q, Song X, Sun W, Wang C, Li C, He L, et al. Evaluation and application of different cholesterol-lowering lactic acid bacteria as potential meat starters. J Food Prot. 2020. Epub 2020/08/21. pmid:32818231.
  6. 6. Albano C, Morandi S, Silvetti T, Casiraghi MC, Manini F, Brasca M. Lactic acid bacteria with cholesterol-lowering properties for dairy applications: In vitro and in situ activity. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(12):10807–18. Epub 2018/09/24. pmid:30243635.
  7. 7. Zhao D, Shah NP. Concomitant ingestion of lactic acid bacteria and black tea synergistically enhances flavonoid bioavailability and attenuates d-galactose-induced oxidative stress in mice via modulating glutathione antioxidant system. J Nutr Biochem. 2016;38:116–24. Epub 2016/10/14. pmid:27736731.
  8. 8. Hsieh SC, Liu JM, Pua XH, Ting Y, Hsu RJ, Cheng KC. Optimization of Lactobacillus acidophilus cultivation using taro waste and evaluation of its biological activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(6):2629–39. Epub 2015/11/18. pmid:26572522.
  9. 9. Bianchi F, Rossi EA, Gomes RG, Sivieri K. Potentially synbiotic fermented beverage with aqueous extracts of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and soy. Food Sci Technol Int. 2015;21(6):403–15. Epub 2014/06/25. pmid:24958776.
  10. 10. Lin SP, Kuo TC, Wang HT, Ting Y, Hsieh CW, Chen YK, et al. Enhanced bioethanol production using atmospheric cold plasma-assisted detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate. Bioresour Technol. 2020;313:123704. Epub 2020/06/27. pmid:32590306.
  11. 11. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta. 2008;76(5):965–77. pmid:18761143.
  12. 12. Lai YT, Cheng KC, Lai CN, Lai YJ. Isolation and identification of aroma producing strain with esterification capacity from yellow water. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211356. Epub 2019/02/15. pmid:30763353
  13. 13. Wu WH, Hung WC, Lo KY, Chen YH, Wan HP, Cheng KC. Bioethanol production from taro waste using thermo-tolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus K21. Bioresour Technol. 2016;201:27–32. Epub 2015/11/30. pmid:26615498.
  14. 14. Hsu KD, Wu SP, Lin SP, Lum CC, Cheng KC. Enhanced active extracellular polysaccharide production from Ganoderma formosanum using computational modeling. J Food Drug Anal. 2017;25(4):804–11. Epub 2017/10/11. pmid:28987356.
  15. 15. Shella Permatasari Santoso C-CC, Shin-Ping Lin, Felycia Edi Soetaredjo, Suryadi Ismadji, Chang-Wei Hsieh, Kuan Chen Cheng. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by Komactobacter intermedius using statistical modeling. Cellulose 2020;27:2497–509.
  16. 16. Yang WC, Hsu TC, Cheng KC, Liu JR. Erratum to: Expression of the Clonostachys rosea lactonohydrolase gene by Lactobacillus reuteri to increase its zearalenone-removing ability. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):102. Epub 2017/06/14. pmid:28606142
  17. 17. Hu Y, Zhang J, Zou L, Fu C, Li P, Zhao G. Chemical characterization, antioxidant, immune-regulating and anticancer activities of a novel bioactive polysaccharide from Chenopodium quinoa seeds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;99:622–9. Epub 2017/03/10. pmid:28274868.
  18. 18. Luciane Santos SOUSA FdSR, Paulo Túlio de Souza SILVEIRA, Eliete da Silva BISPO, Sérgio Eduardo SOARES. Enzymatic activity of proteases and its isoenzymes in fermentation process in cultivars of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) produced in southern Bahia, Brazil. Food Science and Technology. 2016;36. Epub Nov 21, 2016
  19. 19. Jana A, Maity C, Halder SK, Pati BR, Mondal KC, Mohapatra PK. Rapid screening of tannase producing microbes by using natural tannin. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43(3):1080–3. Epub 2012/07/01. pmid:24031931
  20. 20. Aloisi I, Parrotta L, Ruiz KB, Landi C, Bini L, Cai G, et al. New Insight into Quinoa Seed Quality under Salinity: Changes in Proteomic and Amino Acid Profiles, Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Protein Extracts. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7. ARTN 656 pmid:27242857
  21. 21. Dudonne S, Vitrac X, Coutiere P, Woillez M, Merillon JM. Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(5):1768–74. pmid:19199445.
  22. 22. Turkan I. ROS and RNS: key signalling molecules in plants. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(14):3313–5. Epub 2018/06/23. pmid:29931350
  23. 23. Esteban-Torres M, Landete JM, Reveron I, Santamaria L, de las Rivas B, Munoz R. A Lactobacillus plantarum esterase active on a broad range of phenolic esters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(9):3235–42. pmid:25746986
  24. 24. Gasparova Z, Stara V, Stolc S. Effect of antioxidants on functional recovery after in vitro-induced ischemia and long-term potentiation recorded in the pyramidal layer of the CA1 area of rat hippocampus. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2014;33(1):43–52. pmid:23940087.
  25. 25. Koleva II, van Beek TA, Linssen JP, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem Anal. 2002;13(1):8–17. Epub 2002/03/20. pmid:11899609.
  26. 26. Yao Y, Shi Z, Ren G. Antioxidant and immunoregulatory activity of polysaccharides from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(10):19307–18. Epub 2014/10/25. pmid:25342323
  27. 27. Khan Nadiya Jan PSP, Sukhcharn Singh. Optimization of antioxidant activity, textural and sensory characteristics of gluten-free cookies made from whole indian quinoa flour. LWT—Food Science and Technology. 2018;93:573–82.
  28. 28. Dinarvand M, Rezaee M, Foroughi M. Optimizing culture conditions for production of intra and extracellular inulinase and invertase from Aspergillus niger ATCC 20611 by response surface methodology (RSM). Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48(3):427–41. Epub 2017/04/01. pmid:28359854
  29. 29. Bhanja Dey T, Kuhad RC. Upgrading the antioxidant potential of cereals by their fungal fermentation under solid-state cultivation conditions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;59(5):493–9. Epub 2014/06/27. pmid:24964826.
  30. 30. Virtanen T, Pihlanto A, Akkanen S, Korhonen H. Development of antioxidant activity in milk whey during fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102(1):106–15. Epub 2006/12/23. pmid:17184325.