Thermal stress jeopardizes carbonate production of coral reefs across the western and central Pacific Ocean

Robert van Woesik; Christopher William Cacciapaglia

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249008

Abstract

Coral reefs protect islands, coastal areas, and their inhabitants from storm waves and provide essential goods and services to millions of people worldwide. Yet contemporary rates of ocean warming and local disturbances are jeopardizing the reef-building capacity of coral reefs to keep up with rapid rates of sea-level rise. This study compared the reef-building capacity of shallow-water habitats at 142 sites across a potential thermal-stress gradient in the tropical Pacific Ocean. We sought to determine the extent to which habitat differences and environmental variables potentially affect rates of net carbonate production. In general, outer-exposed reefs and lagoonal-patch reefs had higher rates of net carbonate production than nearshore reefs. The study found that thermal anomalies, particularly the intensity of thermal-stress events, play a significant role in reducing net carbonate production—evident as a diminishing trend of net carbonate production from the western to the central tropical Pacific Ocean. The results also showed a latent spatial effect along the same gradient, not explained by thermal stress, suggesting that reefs in the western tropical Pacific Ocean are potentially enhanced by the proximity of reefs in the Coral Triangle—an effect that diminishes with increasing distance and isolation.

Citation: van Woesik R, Cacciapaglia CW (2021) Thermal stress jeopardizes carbonate production of coral reefs across the western and central Pacific Ocean. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0249008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008

Editor: James R. Guest, Newcastle University, UNITED KINGDOM

Received: November 6, 2020; Accepted: March 9, 2021; Published: April 26, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 van Woesik, Cacciapaglia. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All data and R scripts are available on GitHub (https://github.com/rvanwoesik/Pacific).

Funding: RvW received funding from the National Science Foundation, award NSF OCE-1657633. The funder however played no role in the design or implementation of the study.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Introduction

Coral reefs reduce storm-driven wave energy by over 95% [1] protecting island and coastal inhabitants and provide other essential goods and services to millions of people worldwide [2]. Yet, after more than 5000 years of relative sea-level stability [3, 4], coral reefs worldwide are currently experiencing rapid rates of sea-level rise [5, 6]. In the geological past, healthy reefs tracked sea-level fluctuations [7], but recent increases in thermal-stress events [8, 9] and local disturbances [10] are reducing the capacity of coral reefs to keep up with sea-level rise [11, 12]. Therefore, one of the central questions today is: where will coral reefs be able to accumulate enough carbonate to keep up with the rate of sea-level rise? This question is particularly relevant as the average rate of sea-level rise is expected to increase from 2 mm to 9 mm a year into the 21^st century [13–15].

Historically, coral reefs have grown where the rates of incremental buildup of calcium carbonate, deposited by calcifying organisms such as corals and coralline algae, exceed the rates of physical, chemical, and biological erosion [16–22]. Over the last 10,000 years, through the Holocene, modal rates of net carbonate production of Indo-Pacific reefs have been estimated at ~ 10 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1, which equates to ~ 7 mm y^-1 of lateral expansion [23–26]. Yet there are regional and local differences in rates of carbonate production [25, 27]. For example, in the modern Caribbean, average net carbonate production rates (~1.5 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1 [11]) are considerably lower than average carbonate production rates in the western Pacific Ocean (~ 9.7 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1, [28]). There are also major differences in net carbonate production across reef habitats [27]. For example, the outer reefs of Palau and Yap, in the western Pacific, have higher average rates of net carbonate production of ~10 CaCO₃ kg m^-2 y^-1 than the inner reefs (i.e., nearshore reefs) of the same islands at ~ 7 CaCO₃ kg m^-2 y^-1 [28]. Carbonate production is also dependent on a suite of other interacting variables, including depth, macroalgal presence, and the abundance of excavating parrotfish [29].

As in the past, current and future rates of reef growth will depend on the persistence and the density of reef-building corals [7, 24, 30]. The most significant influence that reduces the density of reef-building corals are thermal-stress events [29]. Thermal-stress events are causing coral bleaching and mortality that are changing reef composition [31–35] and are reducing the capacity of reefs to grow and keep up with sea-level rise [29].

To date, most studies that have recorded spatial differences in carbonate production have been localized [28, 29, 36, 37], or focused on the Caribbean [11]. No studies have assessed carbonate production across large expanses of the Pacific Ocean. Here we use a field-based approach to examine carbonate production at 142 coral-reef sites spanning across the western and central tropical Pacific Ocean. We examined whether thermal stress alone is limiting carbonate production, or whether local and regional differences in carbonate production can be attributed to other environmental factors (including habitat); and whether there are any latent spatial effects not explained by thermal stress.

Methods

Field methods

Underwater surveys were conducted on the reefs of Palau (Republic of Palau) and Yap in 2017, Pohnpei and Kosrae (Federated States of Micronesia) in 2018, and Majuro (Republic of the Marshall Islands) and Kiritimati (Republic of Kiribati) in 2019 (Fig 1). In all locations, a stratified random sampling approach was used to survey the reefs for carbonate production by randomly selecting 24 sites on each island, with the exception of Kiritimati where only 22 of the 24 sites were surveyed because of inclement weather. At all locations, we stratified the sites as either (i) outer reefs, (ii) patch reefs in lagoons, or (iii) inner reefs (i.e., nearshore reefs) adjacent to islands. Although some locations had extensive lagoons (i.e., Palau and Pohnpei), other locations did not (i.e., Yap and Kosrae). Majuro and Kiritimati did not have inner reefs (i.e., nearshore reefs), and only had patch reefs (i.e., lagoonal reefs) and outer reefs. Therefore, the number of sites sampled per habitat varied according to the area of available habitat at each location.

Download:

Fig 1. The six Pacific Ocean study locations at Palau, Yap, Pohnpei, Kosrae, Majuro and Kiritimati.

The background image captures the frequency per year that the weekly sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) (from CoRTAD version 6, [39]) were greater than 1°C above the relative climatology, averaged from 6 January 2000 to 26 December 2019. Outline of land plotted from the R package ‘maptools’ [63].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g001

Benthic surveys were conducted at each of the six island locations. At each site, six 10-m long fiberglass transect tapes were laid to follow the contour of the reef substrate at a depth between 2–5 m low-water-spring tide. The end of one tape was spaced at least 2 m from the start of the next tape. The line-intercept method was applied along each transect to quantify the planar-chord length of each benthic component to the nearest centimeter. Corals were identified to species level, except encrusting Montipora and massive Porites, which were identified to life forms. Crustose coralline algae, macroalgae, sponges, ascidians, tunicates, and other benthic components were identified to the highest taxonomic resolution that was possible in the field. Along the same transects all echinoids that were located within 30 cm either side of the tape were counted and identified as either Diadema, Echinometra, or ‘Other’ urchins. The diameter of each echinoid test was measured to the nearest millimeter. Also, at each site, and directly over each of the six 10-m transect tapes that followed the reef contour, a second 10-m fiberglass transect tape was spanned tightly (from the same starting point as the contour tape). The position of the 10-m mark (i.e., the end) of the first tape along the second tape was recorded to the nearest cm. This difference in length between the two tapes (i.e., between the tightly-spanned-horizontal tape and the contour-following tape) was used to estimate reef rugosity.

In addition to the benthic surveys, each site was surveyed for herbivorous fishes (starting prior to the benthic surveys to ensure that the fishes were not scared away) using a high-definition video camera Canon HFM500 housed in a Canon WP-V4 waterproof housing. Six, 30-m long by 4-m wide belt transects were used to record the fishes at a depth between 2–5 m low-water-spring tide. The length of each transect was determined by one diver of the buddy pair attaching a spool of twine to the reef substrate with a rubber band, and then swimming forward and unravelling the twine to the 30 m mark while their dive buddy was responsible for videoing. The twine was then tugged, to break the rubber band, and then reeled back ready to start the next transect. The width of the video field of view was initially calculated by laying a 4-m tape perpendicular to the transect line. The end of one transect was spaced at least 2 m from the start of the next transect. From the videos, herbivorous parrotfishes were identified to species level [38] and their estimated size was recorded to the nearest centimeter. The calculations to estimate carbonate production and erosion at each site are provided in S1 File.

Environmental variables

Predictor variables were obtained from satellite observations. El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Degree Heating Weeks (DHW), and sea-surface temperature signals were obtained from the Coral Reef Temperature Anomaly Database (CoRTAD) (https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/cortad/Version6/), Version 6 with 4-km grid cells [39]. ENSO and PDO signals, including phase combinations, were derived by regressing the sea surface temperature (SST) time series data from “Sea Surface Temperature and Related Thermal Stress Metrics from 2005–2017” from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) climate indices on monthly atmospheric and ocean time series (https://psl.noaa.gov/data/climateindices/). DHW was considered under multiple metrics, as the maximum over the minimum for each cell in the timeframe and as the cumulative and average DHW for the 12-year timeframe. The rate of increase in thermal anomalies was derived from Extended Reconstructed Sea-Surface Temperature (ERSST) v5 (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v5) as a 2x2 degree grid using the monthly time-series data from 2010–2018 compared with a baseline from 1971–2000. To calculate the frequency of thermal-stress events the weekly data, for a given year, was summed using the number of times over the previous 52 weeks that the thermal-stress anomaly was ≥ 1°C. These values were then averaged over the years 2000–2020. The baseline climatology was generated using a harmonic analysis procedure that fit annual and semi-annual signals to the time series of weekly SSTs at each grid cell [40, 41]. A raster of the frequency of cyclones was obtained from International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ibtracs/index.php?name=ibtracsdata), using 50 years of consistent sampling effort between 1964 and 2014. The storms were collated based on wind speed following the Saffir-Simpson Scale (SSS) and a heat map was made in QGIS (http://qgis.org) matching the radius of damaging winds (> 26 ms⁻¹) to the speed of each cyclone [42]. The summed 50 years of cyclones were then converted to an average number of cyclones per year, per 9.2 km cell yr^-1 [15].

Data analysis

Variables were checked for multicollinearity using a Pearson’s correlation, and any variables with a correlation coefficient of more than positive or negative 0.7 were removed (ENSO, cyclone frequency, and PDO were removed from the analysis because ENSO was strongly positively correlated with anomalous SST, cyclone frequency was strongly negatively correlated with anomalous SST, and PDO was strongly negatively correlated with the frequency of thermal stress). We examined the relationship between the percentage live coral cover and net accretion rate for each habitat within each island, across all study sites, using a generalized additive model [43]. Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) [44] within a Bayesian framework was used to examine spatial differences in carbonate production, defined as: (1) where y_i represents the vector of net carbonate production at site i, μ is a vector of expected values, and σ is the residual standard deviation, and N is a Gaussian distribution. The expected values are represented as: (2) where α is an intercept coefficient, β is the fixed-effect coefficient vector, Z is a matrix of covariates at the location of the data points s_i, ξ(s_i) is the spatial random effect in a spatial Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF), and ε(s_i) is the measurement error defined by a Gaussian white-noise process ~ N (0, σ²_ε). The GMRF combines the Gaussian field with Matérn covariance functions using stochastic partial differential equations, which in turn use a finite element representation to define the Matérn field by triangulation of the spatial domain [45]. This study analyses the coefficients of the covariates β, to determine how much of the variance in the carbonate-production data is explained by the covariates. The variation in the spatial effect is explained by the variance-covariance matrix calculated using the Matérn correlation function. This analytical approach is appropriate for our data collected at spatially irregular intervals. Model selection was based on the lowest Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and the lowest Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC). To validate the model we used spatial leave-one-out cross validation, to assess the root mean squared error [46]. All the R scripts [47] for the calculations and the field data are available at https://github.com/rvanwoesik/Pacific and at: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/736016.

The Palau data were collected under a blanket permit of Yimyang Golbuu the Director of the Palau International Coral Reef Center. The Yap data were collected under the auspices of our collaboration with YapCAP. In Kosrae the data were collected in collaboration with Andy George the Director of the Kosrae Conservation Society (KCS), and the Pohnpei data were collected in collaboration with Eugene Joseph, Director of the Conservation Society of Pohnpei. The Majuro data were collected in collaboration with Glen Joseph, Director of the Majuro Marine Resources Authority (MIMRA) and Emma Kabua-Tibon, Coastal Division Chief of the MIMRA.

Results

The massive coral Porites lobata was a dominant coral at all six locations, and Porites cylindrica and Porites rus colonies were dominant reef-building corals study wide, except in Kiritimati, which supported mainly Dipsastraea stelligera and Pavona species (see S1 File). In addition to the three Porites species mentioned above, Acropora formosa (muricata) was a dominant reef-builder in Palau and Yap, and Acropora palifera was a dominant reef-builder in Yap, particularly in the shallow lagoon habitat. In Pohnpei and Kosrae, in addition to the afore-mentioned Porites species, encrusting Montipora, Acropora hyacinthus, and Goniastrea retiformis were dominant reef-building corals. Acropora species dominated the outer reef-building coral assemblages of Majuro, and the afore-mentioned Porites species dominated the lagoon (see S1 File).

In the last four decades, the reefs of Palau and Yap in the western Pacific Ocean have experienced two major thermal-stress events, one during the 1997–98 El Niño and another during the 2010 El Niño (Fig 2). Farther east, the reefs of Pohnpei, Kosrae, and Majuro experienced periodic low-level thermal anomalies during the same period, which were the most intensive during the recent 2015–2017 El Niño (Fig 2). By contrast, the reefs of Kiritimati in the central Pacific Ocean have experienced seven thermal stress events since 1982 (with degree heating weeks above 5) the most extreme of which was from June to November in 2015 when the degree heating weeks were consistently above 15, and sea surface temperatures (SSTs) were up to 5°C above average (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. A time series of thermal stress in the Pacific Ocean from 1982 to 2020 at Palau, Yap, Pohnpei, Kosrae, Majuro, and Kiritimati, expressed as degree heating weeks (DHWs), which is the cumulative measure of the intensity and duration of heat stress that exceeds the average summertime maximum temperature (i.e., local climatology) by 1°C, culminated over 12 weeks and expressed in the unit °C-weeks.

The timing of El Niño events are indicated with vertical dashed lines and the thickness of the lines are in proportion to the intensity of the event.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g002

The history of heat-stress disturbances were reflected in the field estimates of net carbonate production rates. The study’s western-most reefs (around Yap and Palau) had considerably higher than average net carbonate production (~9 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) than the reefs located further east (especially those of Kiritimati in the central Pacific Ocean) which averaged (~2.5 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) (Fig 3). Several outer reefs of Yap and Palau, particularly the western outer reefs, had particularly high net carbonate production rates, > 15 kg CaCO₃ yr^-1 (S1 File). The net carbonate production rates of Pohnpei, Kosrae, and Majuro were moderate (~ 7 kg CaCO₃ yr^-1) (Fig 3). In general, the inner reefs (i.e., nearshore reefs) of all four continental islands of Palau, Yap, Pohnpei, and Kosrae recorded the lowest rates of net carbonate production (~6 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) in comparison with the other reef habitats [i.e., lagoonal patch reefs and outer reefs] at the same islands (Fig 4 and Table 1). The outer reefs of this study, in general, had higher erosion rates than the patch reefs and inner reefs (Fig 4), primarily driven by the abundance of large parrotfishes (S1 File). Importantly, the value of live coral cover at which net carbonate production became negative was highest on the inner reefs of this study (Fig 5), suggesting that inner reefs require more coral cover to produce the same carbonate as outer reefs.

Download:

Fig 3. A summary of carbonate production rates (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) in the tropical Pacific Ocean for Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), and Majuro, and Kiritimati (2019), where green represents nearshore reefs, light blue represents patch reefs in lagoons, and dark blue represents outer reefs.

The thick horizontal lines are the medians, the boxes surrounding the medians are the first and third quartiles, the whiskers identify the range of the data, and the circles identify the outliers. The red boxes, lines, and circles display the erosion rates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Carbonate production rates (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) of shallow coral reefs in the tropical Pacific Ocean, stratified by island for Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), and Majuro and Kiritimati (2019).

The thick horizontal lines are the medians, the boxes surrounding the medians are the first and third quartiles, the whiskers identify the range of the data, and the circles identify the outliers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g004

Download:

Fig 5. The relationship between the percentage (%) live coral cover and the net carbonate production rates (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) for each habitat (i.e., inner, patch, and outer reefs) at each of the six Pacific Ocean study locations [i.e., at Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), and Majuro and Kiritimati (2019)].

The lines are best-fit generalized additive models, and the polygons display the standard errors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g005

Download:

Table 1. Posterior marginal distributions of fixed effects of the best-fit model for carbonate production rates and environmental covariates across the tropical Pacific Ocean at Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), Majuro and Kiritimati (2019) using integrated nested laplace approximation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.t001

The model with the lowest Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and the lowest Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC) included the covariates anomalous SST, return frequency of anomalous SST, habitat type, and an interaction between anomalous SST and return frequency of anomalous SST as fixed factors, and included a spatial random field (Table 1). Notably, the intensity of anomalous SST and the interaction between anomalous SST and the return frequency of anomalous SST both had negative effects on net carbonate production (Fig 6), although the return frequency of SST anomalies alone did not have a noticeable effect on net carbonate production. When the return frequency of anomalous SST was excluded from the model, there was a strong latent spatial trend across the Pacific Ocean (Fig 7A), which was less defined when the return frequency of anomalous SST was included in the model (Fig 7B). There was a latent spatial effect, not explained by thermal stress, across the Pacific. There were also localized latent spatial effects of low net carbonate production along the eastern outer reefs of Palau, explained by the overpass of two recent typhoons, and along the southeastern outer reefs of Pohnpei (Fig 7B). Using the spatial leave-one-out cross validation approach, our model had a root mean squared error of 4.9 (confidence intervals, 3.8, 7.2) (Fig T in S1 File).

Download:

Fig 6.

Posterior marginal distributions of fixed effects in the integrated nested laplace approximation model for: (a) sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies, (b) return frequency of SST, and (c) the interaction between SST anomalies and return frequency of SST averaged from 6 January 2000 to 26 December 2019 at each of the six Pacific Ocean study locations [i.e., at Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), and Majuro and Kiritimati (2019)]. Where the dashed lines represent zero, the pink shading represents negative effects, the green shading represents neutral effects, and the * indicates multiplication.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g006

Download:

Fig 7.

Posterior of mean spatial random effect (a) without and (b) with the frequency of return period thermal-stress covariate incorporated in the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation model averaged from 6 January 2000 to 26 December 2019 at each of the six Pacific Ocean study locations [i.e., at Palau and Yap (2017), Pohnpei and Kosrae (2018), and Majuro and Kiritimati (2019)]. Outline of land plotted from the R package ‘rworldmap’ [64].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.g007

Discussion

Over the last four decades, the western reefs in this study region have experienced less thermal stress than the central Pacific reefs. In particular, the reefs of Kiritimati suffered considerable loss in coral cover during the thermal stress associated with the 2014–2017 El Niño when, from June to November 2015, sea surface temperatures (SSTs) were up to 5°C above average [48, 49]. These thermal-stress events are reflected in the rates of net carbonate production estimated on the reefs from 2017 to 2019. Indeed, the past intensity of thermal-stress events was a strong predictor of the rates of net carbonate production across the Pacific, with the reefs of Palau and Yap, in the western Pacific, showing considerably higher average rates of net carbonate production than the reefs of Kiritimati in the central Pacific.

In general, the inner reefs (i.e., the nearshore reefs) closest to islands, tended to produce less carbonate than patch reefs (i.e., lagoonal reefs) and outer reefs. These inner reefs therefore need a higher percentage of coral cover to produce the same amount of carbonate as patch and outer reefs. The lower rates of net carbonate production nearshore were not necessarily a consequence of greater erosion rates nearshore. Our study found that the nearshore reefs in general had lower external erosion rates than outer reefs (Fig 3), primarily a consequence of fewer and smaller parrotfishes nearshore than on outer reefs (S1 File). This study did not measure internal erosion rates, which are known to be relatively higher nearshore than on outer reefs [50]. The differences in the rates of net carbonate production between inner and outer reefs seem to stem primarily from differences in species composition and coral colony morphologies, because we used the same average coral growth rates for each species across habitats, although environmental conditions that differentially influence coral community structure among habitats may contribute to additional variability.

Across the region, there were more acroporids (i.e., corymbose Acropora and encrusting Montipora) and pocilloporids on outer reefs than in lagoons and on nearshore reefs. There were also more massive, branching, and columnar Porites (i.e., Porites lobata, P. cylindrica, and P. rus) nearshore and on lagoonal reefs than on outer reefs. Although the annual rates of growth between Porites and Acropora are substantial [51], Roff [52] recently reported no relationship between growth rates of coral species and rates of reef accretion. In other words, reefs that supported massive Porites colonies accreted just as quickly as reefs that supported Acropora colonies [52]. There are however considerable differences in environmental conditions across nearshore to offshore gradients. For example, the nearshore reefs of Palau have a 1.5-fold greater light extinction coefficient than outer reefs [53]. Nearshore reefs of Palau also experience higher sedimentation rates than outer reefs [54], which can reduce juvenile and adult coral-colony densities and coral cover [10]. Irrespective of the reason why nearshore reefs produce less carbonate than outer reefs, these results suggest considerable vulnerability of nearshore reefs. These results stress the need for effective land-use practices and management at the local level as the climate continues to change.

There were over 100 coral species contributing to carbonate production in the surveyed transects at Palau and Yap (in the western Pacific) and Pohnpei, Kosrae, and Majuro (further to the east), yet less than 10% of the coral species contributed upwards of 75% of the reef’s carbonate production (see S1 File). By contrast, there were fewer than 50 coral species contributing to carbonate production in the surveyed transects at Kiritimati (in the central Pacific), but again 10% of those coral species contributed upwards of 75% of the reef’s carbonate production (see S1 File). Interestingly, while many of the main reef-building corals were common across all islands, such as Porites lobata, a few species that contributed to the majority of carbonate production differed for each island. Even islands that were geographically adjacent, had some dominant reef-building corals that differed. For example, Acropora formosa (muricata) was a major contributor of carbonate production in Palau but not in Yap, whereas Acropora palifera was a major contributor of carbonate production in Yap but less so in Palau. Similarly, Porites cylindrica was a major contributor of carbonate production in Pohnpei but not Kosrae, whereas Porites lichen was a major contributor of carbonate production in Kosrae and not in Pohnpei. Geographic circumstance and chance events may afford an advantage of one dominant coral species over another, although essentially playing a similar role in reef building across similar habitats on different islands.

Such interchangeability and substitutions of coral species in carbonate production suggests some functional redundancy across the western tropical Pacific Ocean, with different dominant coral species capable of producing similar rates of carbonate production, although these redundancies may be only effective over the long-term. In the short-term, after thermal-stress events, such substitutions are less likely. Asymmetrical contributions, with only a few coral species contributing to most of the carbonate production, might be a sign of vulnerability if these dominant reef-building coral species locally decline. Such reductions in the capacity to produce carbonate through loss of coral after thermal stress was most evident in Kiritimati. The dominant coral assemblages of Kiritimati were relatively unusual for Pacific reefs, in part because of their relative isolation [55, 56], but also because they are remnant assemblages from the 2015 thermal-stress event [49]. Increased thermal stress combined with the isolation of central Pacific reefs poses a serious threat to the ability of these reefs to recover rapidly enough from repetitive thermal-stress to keep up with sea-level rise. For example, losing the majority of Acropora reef-building colonies in the Caribbean has had similar consequences and has impeded contemporary net carbonate production throughout the Caribbean [11].

Our study also identified a localized latent effect along the eastern offshore reefs of Palau in the best-fit model (Fig 7B), which is related to the destruction caused to the eastern outer reefs by Typhoon Bopha in 2012 and Typhoon Haiyan in 2013 [57]. Low latitude cyclones are unusual, but are becoming more common with climate change [58]. Our analyses identified that the return frequency of SST decreased toward the Coral Triangle (Fig 7), but also identified a latent spatial trend across the Pacific Ocean that was not explained by thermal stress. We hypothesize that this latent trend may be related to the proximity of the Coral Triangle, which may intermittently enhance coral recovery through larval supply [59]. The reefs of the Coral Triangle, which extend from the Philippines in the north through western Indonesia, to Timor in the south and the Solomon Islands in the east, include reefs with relatively high percentages of coral cover [9, 60]. These reefs can supply frequent and massive pulses of larvae to nearby regions [59]. Pacific reefs near the Coral Triangle have also had less coral bleaching than elsewhere in the Pacific over the last two decades [9]. Therefore, the interaction between reduced thermal stress and a high larval supply [59] may have some consequences on reef provisioning on reefs adjacent to the Coral Triangle.

Although the rates of net carbonate production across the western and central study sites (i.e., Palau, Yap, Pohnpei, and Kosrae) were relatively high (i.e., 8.2 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) compared with rates in the modern Caribbean (~1.5 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1, [11]), it is very likely that the rates of net carbonate production will diminish in the future, with increasing frequency and intensity of thermal anomalies under climate change [61]. Averaging across the reef sites and habitats of Palau and Yap (in the western region of this study) in the western Pacific, the rate of net carbonate production equated to approximately 7–8 mm y^-1 of potential vertical accretion (after [28]). We add that these vertical accretion rates are classified as potential accretion rates, because other processes also play a role in reef accretion, including reef porosity, terrigenous and calcareous sedimentation rates, physical breakage, water-flow rates, and cementation, which we did not measure. Still, such potential rates of vertical accretion that we estimated are higher than projected averages of sea-level rise for the representative concentration pathway (RCP) climate-change scenarios 2.6, 4.5, and 6, but lower than the RCP scenario 8.5 [5]. By contrast, the lower rates of net carbonate production of Kiritimati (in the eastern region of this study) in the central Pacific, were approximately 2 mm y^-1 of potential vertical accretion. Such rates of vertical accretion are lower than projected average rates of sea-level rise for the representative concentration pathway (RCP) climate-change scenarios 4.5, and 6, and 8.5. Averaging across the reef sites and habitats of Pohnpei, Kosrae, and Majuro (in the mid region of this study), the rate of net carbonate production (~8.2 kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) equated to approximately 6 mm y^-1 of potential vertical accretion, which is higher than the RCP scenarios 2.6 and 4.5, but lower than the RCP scenarios 6 and 8.5.

In conclusion, the net rates of carbonate production on shallow reefs in the western tropical Pacific Ocean were considerably higher than the shallow reefs in the central tropical Pacific Ocean, which experienced coral bleaching in 2015 during a major thermal-stress event related to the 2014–2017 El Niño. The low net carbonate production rates of Kiritimati reefs (in the eastern region of this study), in the central Pacific Ocean, equated to approximately ~2 mm y^-1 of potential vertical accretion. Such rates are too low to keep up with projected sea-level rise for all representative concentration pathways (RCPs), except possibly RCP 2.6.

The results also show that in general inner reefs (i.e., nearshore reefs) do not produce as much carbonate as patch reefs (i.e., lagoonal reefs) and outer reefs. Nearshore reefs are closest to detrimental land-use practices, which may make them more vulnerable to sea-level rise than other habitats. These results stress the need to protect nearshore reefs from local pollutants and the need for effective land-use practices as the oceans continue to warm. Although sea-level rise will provide some accommodation space to shallow coral reefs, with an opportunity for Porites microatolls to commence growing vertically [62] and for coral colonization on barren reef flats—the predicted increase in the intensity and frequency of thermal-stress events, however, will seriously jeopardize net carbonate production and impede the capacity of coral reefs to keep up with sea-level rise. If reefs lose the capacity to keep up with sea-level rise, island nations that rely on reefs as habitat for critically important wave barriers are threatened, especially as sea-level rise accelerates and ocean temperatures continue to increase.

Supporting information

S1 File. Twenty supporting figures and one supporting table.

Fig A. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 24 sites in Palau, 2017. Fig B. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species, from 24 sites in Palau, 2017. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 24 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 10 patch reef sites, panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 8 outer reef sites and panel d) shows the contribution of species across the 6 inner reef sites. Fig C. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including inner, outer, and patch reefs), from 24 sites in Palau, 2017. Fig D. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 24 sites in Yap, 2017. Fig E. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species from 24 sites in Yap, 2017. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 24 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 14 inner reef sites, and panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 10 outer reef sites. Fig F. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including inner, outer, and patch reefs) from 24 sites in Yap, 2017. Fig G. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 24 sites in Pohnpei, 2018. Fig H. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species from 24 sites in Pohnpei, 2018. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 24 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 11 patch reef sites, panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 8 outer reef sites and panel d) shows the contribution of species across the 5 inner reef sites. Fig I. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including inner, outer, and patch reefs) from 24 sites in Pohnpei, 2018. Fig J. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 24 sites in Kosrae, 2018. Fig K. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species from 24 sites in Kosrae, 2018. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 24 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 6 inner reef sites, and panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 18 outer reef sites. Fig L. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including inner, outer, and patch reefs) from 24 sites in Kosrae, 2018. Fig M. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 24 sites in Majuro, 2019. Fig N. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species from 24 sites in Majuro, 2019. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 24 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 13 patch reef sites, and panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 11 outer reef sites. Fig O. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including outer, and patch reefs) from 24 sites in Majuro, 2019. Fig P. Spatial kriging of the net shallow-water coral-reef carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) from 22 sites in Kiritimati, 2019. Note that the eastern reefs of Kiritimati were only lightly surveyed because of inclement ocean conditions. Fig Q. Contribution of carbonate production (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 y^-1) by coral species from 22 sites in Kiritimati, 2019. Panel a) shows the contribution of species across all 22 sites, panel b) shows the contribution of species across the 8 patch reef sites, and panel c) shows the contribution of species across the 14 outer reef sites. Fig R. Erosional estimates for parrotfishes (kg CaCO₃ m^-2 yr^-1) using spatial kriging for shallow-water coral-reef habitats (including inner, outer, and patch reefs) from 22 sites in Kiritimati, 2019. Note that the eastern reefs of Kiritimati were only lightly surveyed because of inclement ocean conditions. Fig S. Generalized additive model examining the relationship between live coral cover and net carbonate production at all 142 sites across the western and central tropical Pacific Ocean. Where the shading represents the 95% confidence intervals, s represents the smoothing function, and the rug plots represent the raw data. Twenty-four of the 142 sites were located in the western Pacific Ocean at each of Palau and Yap in 2017, 24 sites were located progressively further east at each of Pohnpei and Kosrae in 2018, and at Majuro in 2019, and 22 sites were located in the central Pacific Ocean at Kiritimati in 2019. Fig T. Spatial cross-validation using spatial leave-one-out cross validation, comparing the observed response of carbonate production against the predicted response of carbonate production using INLAutils (Lucas et al. 2020) for all 142 sites across the western and central tropical Pacific Ocean, and where the identity function (i.e., y = x) is depicted by the line. Table 1: Site locations and corresponding model output mean and standard deviation (SD) including Live Coral Cover (LCC), gross production, net production, bioerosion and rugosity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.s001

(PDF)

S1 Data. Data and R code.

Spreadsheet data for each site of the 142 sites across the Pacific Ocean, and all the R scripts that produced the manuscript figures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249008.s002

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

We would like to sincerely thank Yimyang Golbuu and the staff at the Palau International Coral Reef Center (PICRC), Republic of Palau, for hosting us and providing collaborative research opportunities and capacity building. Our special thanks go to Geory Mereb, also from PICRC, for captaining our research vessel and sharing his expert local knowledge. The Palau data were collected under the auspices of the PICRC research permit. Bill Acker and the friendly and hospitable staff at the Manta Ray Bay Hotel and Yap Divers warmly welcomed us to the island of Yap. Mike Gaag from YapCAP (Yap Community Action Program) coordinated collaborative and educational activities and captained our research vessel while willingly sharing his expert local knowledge along with first mate Mike Ruw. The Yap data were collected under the auspices of our collaboration with YapCAP. We would also like to thank the many chiefs on Yap for granting us access to their coral reefs, including: Richard Faimau, Joe Choorang, Patricia Dugwen, John Gaan, Zachary Gamow, Sebastian Flagrong, Joe Nam, John Tamngin, and James Raech. In Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), we would like to sincerely thank the staff at the Mangrove Bay Hotel for hosting us and to Alloise Malfitani and Valentina Permiakova, from the Pohnpei Dive Club, for their warm friendship and hospitality—together with Jerry Martins, Walden Lohn and Robinson Lowdaur for captaining our research vessel, who all willingly sharing their expert local knowledge. We would also like to thank Eugene Joseph, Director of the Conservation Society of Pohnpei (CSP) his marine monitoring team, and captain Pelson for a collaborative opportunity. In Kosrae (FSM), our research was made possible by our marvelous hosts Mark, Maria, and Ochi Stevens and staff from the Pacific Treelodge and Micronesian Ecodivers, together with Carlos J Cianchini, Inston, and Salik Waguk of the Kosrae Association of Tourism Operators (KATO) who all willingly shared their intimate knowledge of their island environment and ensured our every need was met. We would also like to thank Andy George and his marine monitoring team at the Kosrae Conservation Society (KCS) for a collaborative opportunity. We would like to thank the staff at the Marshall Island’s Resort (MIR) for hosting us in Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and also send our sincere gratitude to Hiro Ueda from RAYCREW for captaining our research vessel together with first mate Lee who together shared their wealth of local knowledge and experience with us and made our research trip to Majuro both safe and successful. We would also like to thank Glen Joseph, Director of the Majuro Marine Resources Authority (MIMRA) and Emma Kabua-Tibon, Coastal Division Chief of the MIMRA, for a collaborative and educational opportunity. In the Republic of Kiribati, on the island of Kiritimati, our marvelous hosts Timei and Nona Kaitaua and staff at the Lagoon View Hotel shared their island home with us. Our research vessel was booked through Patrick Price of Ocean Adventures International (OAI) via the Villages Hotel, Kiritimati, and our special thanks go to captain Karakaua Morakia (The King) and first mate Taburuea Tomatoake (Tabii) for employing their expert seamanship to take us to our research sites in some trying weather conditions. We would also like to thank the Honorable Ministers of the Ministry of the Line and Phoenix Islands Development Kiritimati, the Principal and students at the Tennessee Primary School in Poland, and Taratau Kirata, Senior Fisheries Officer of the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development, Fisheries Subdivision, Kiritimati, for their collaborative and educational opportunities. Special thanks go to Sandra J van Woesik, Kelly J van Woesik, Liana J van Woesik, and Marina L Fleming for their invaluable voluntary field and lab assistance, and to Sandra for her voluntary travel planning and logistics work. We would also like to extend our thanks to Sandra J van Woesik and the anonymous reviewers for their editorial comments on the manuscript. This is contribution number 227 from the Institute for Global Ecology at the Florida Institute of Technology.

This paper is dedicated in loving memory of Anthony J Cacciapaglia.

8 April 1957–28 June 2019

References

1. Ferrario F, Beck MW, Storlazzi CD, Micheli F, Shepard CC, Airoldi L. The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 3794. pmid:24825660
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 2014;26: 152–158.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Chappell J, Polach H. Post-glacial sea-level rise from a coral record at Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. Nature. 1991; 349: 147–149.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Lambeck K., Chappell J. Sea Level Change Through the Last Glacial Cycle. Science. 2001; 292: 679–686. pmid:11326090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. IPCC. Climate Change 2013 –The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
6. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. 2010; 463: 747–756. pmid:20148028
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Neumann AC, Macintyre I. Reef response to sea-level rise: keep-up, catch-up, or give-up. Proc. 5th International Coral Reef Congress. 1985; 3: 105–110.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Álvarez-Noriega M, Álvarez-Romero JG, Anderson KD, Baird AH, et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature. 2017; 543: 373–377. pmid:28300113
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Sully S, Burkepile DE, Donovan MK, Hodgson G, van Woesik R. A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nature Communications. 2019; 10: 1264. pmid:30894534
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Golbuu Y, van Woesik R, Richmond RH, Harrison P, Fabricius KE. River discharge reduces reef coral diversity in Palau. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011; 62: 824–831. pmid:21251680
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Kench PS, Smithers SG, Edinger EN, Steneck RS, et al. Caribbean-wide decline in carbonate production threatens coral reef growth. Nat Commun. 2013; 4: 1402. pmid:23360993
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Perry CT, Alvarez-Filip L, Graham NAJ, Mumby PJ, Wilson SK, Kench PS, et al. Loss of coral reef growth capacity to track future increases in sea level. Nature. 2018; 558: 396–400. pmid:29904103
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009; 106: 21527–21532. pmid:19995972
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Jevrejeva S, Grinsted A, Moore JC. Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100. Environ Res Lett. 2014; 9: 104008.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Cacciapaglia CW, van Woesik R. Reduced carbon emissions and fishing pressure are both necessary for equatorial coral reefs to keep up with rising seas. Ecography. 2020;54: 789–800.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Darwin, C. (1842). The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs: Being the First Part of the Geology of the Voyage of the Beagle, under the Command of Captain Fitzroy, R.N., During the Years 1832–1836. Smith, Elder and Co, London
17. Adey WH. Coral Reef Morphogenesis: A Multidimensional Model. Science. 1978; 202: 831–837. pmid:17752443
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Davies JP. Reef growth. Perspectives on coral reefs. 1983; 69–106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Hubbard KD. Reefs as dynamic systems. Life and Death of Coral Reefs. 1997; 43–67.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Edinger EN, Limmon GV, Jompa J, Widjatmoko W, Heikoop JM, Risk MJ. Normal Coral Growth Rates on Dying Reefs: Are Coral Growth Rates Good Indicators of Reef Health? Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2000; 40: 404–425.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Perry CT, Spencer T, Kench PS. Carbonate budgets and reef production states: a geomorphic perspective on the ecological phase-shift concept. Coral Reefs. 2008; 27: 853–866.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Perry CT, Edinger EN, Kench PS, Murphy GN, Smithers SG, Steneck RS, et al. Estimating rates of biologically driven coral reef framework production and erosion: a new census-based carbonate budget methodology and applications to the reefs of Bonaire. Coral Reefs. 2012; 31: 853–868.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Smith SV, Kinsey DW. Calcium carbonate production, coral reef growth, and sea level change. Science. 1976; 194: 937–939. pmid:17748553
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Buddemeier RW, Hopley D. Turn-ons and turn-offs: causes and mechanisms of the initiation and termination of coral reef growth. Proc. 6th International Coral Reef Symposium. 1988;1: 253–261.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Montaggioni LF. History of Indo-Pacific coral reef systems since the last glaciation: Development patterns and controlling factors. Earth-Science Reviews. 2005; 71: 1–75.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Roff G, Zhao J-X, Pandolfi JM. Rapid accretion of inshore reef slopes from the central Great Barrier Reef during the late Holocene. Geology. 2015; 43:343–346.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Vecsei A. A new estimate of global reefal carbonate production including the fore-reefs. Global and Planetary Change. 2004; 43: 1–18.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. van Woesik R, Cacciapaglia CW. Keeping up with sea-level rise: Carbonate production rates in Palau and Yap, western Pacific Ocean. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0197077. pmid:29738545
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Perry CT, Morgan KM. Bleaching drives collapse in reef carbonate budgets and reef growth potential on southern Maldives reefs. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 40581. pmid:28084450
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. van Woesik R, Done TJ. Coral communities and reef growth in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs. 1997; 16: 103–115.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, Nakano Y, Sambali H, van Woesik R. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecology Letters. 2001; 4: 122–131.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Bellwood DR, Card M, Connolly SR, Folke C, et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science. 2003; 301: 929–933. pmid:12920289
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, et al. Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification. Science. 2007; 318: 1737–1742. pmid:18079392
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Pandolfi JM, Connolly SR, Marshall DJ, Cohen AL. Projecting Coral Reef Futures Under Global Warming and Ocean Acidification. Science. 2011; 333: 418–422. pmid:21778392
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. van Woesik R, Sakai K, Ganase A, Loya Y. Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011; 434: 67–76.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Januchowski-Hartley FA, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Perry CT. Drivers and predictions of coral reef carbonate budget trajectories. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017; 284: 20162533. pmid:28123092
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. van Woesik R, Cacciapaglia CW. Carbonate production of Micronesian reefs suppressed by thermal anomalies and Acanthaster as sea-level rises. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0224887. pmid:31730649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Lieske E, Myers R (2002) Coral Reef Fishes: Caribbean, Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean Including the Red Sea—Revised Edition. Princeton University Press, pp 400
39. Saha, K., Zhao, X., Huai-min, C., Casey, K.S., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., et al. The coral reef temperature anomaly database (CoRTAD). Version 6 –Global, 4 km Sea Surface Temperature and Related Thermal Stress Metrics for 1982 to 2019. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://doi.org/10.25921/ffw7-cs39. Accessed [12/4/2020].
40. Podesta GP, Brown OB, Evans RH. The annual cycle of satellite-derived sea-surface temperature in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Climate 1991; 4:457–467.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Mesias JM, Bisagni JJ, Brunner A. A high-resolution satellite-derived sea surface temperature climatology for the western North Atlantic Ocean. Continental Shelf Research 2007; 27:191–207.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Moyer AC, Evans JL, Powell M. Comparison of observed gale radius statistics. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 2007; 97: 41–55.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Zuur AF, Saveliev AA, Ieno EN. A Beginner’s Guide to Generalised Additive Mixed Models with R. Newburgh, United Kingdom: Highland Statistics Limited. 2014.
44. Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2009; 71: 319–392.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindström J. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2011; 73: 423–498.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Le Rest K, Pinaud D, Monestiez P, Chadoeuf J, Bretagnolle V. Spatial leave-one-out cross-validation for variable selection in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014; 23: 811–820.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2018.
48. Claar DC, Baum JK. Timing matters: survey timing during extended heat stress can influence perceptions of coral susceptibility to bleaching. Coral Reefs. 2019;38: 559–565.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Magel JMT, Burns JHR, Gates RD, Baum JK. Effects of bleaching-associated mass coral mortality on reef structural complexity across a gradient of local disturbance. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 2512. pmid:30792432
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Risk MJ, Sammarco PW. Cross-shelf trends in skeletal density of the massive coral Porites lobata from the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991; 69: 195–200.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Pratchett MS, Anderson KD, Hoogenboom MO, Widman E, Baird AH, Pandolfi J et al. Spatial, Temporal and taxonomic variation in coral growth—Implications for the structure and function of coral reef ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 2015; 53: 215–295.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Roff G. Reef accretion and coral growth rates are decoupled in Holocene reef frameworks. Mar Geol. 2020; 419: 106065.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. van Woesik R, Houk P, Isechal AL, Idechong JW, Victor S, Golbuu Y. Climate-change microrefugia: nearshore reefs bleach less than outer reefs during a 2010 regional thermal stress event in Palau. Ecol Evol. 2012; 2: 2474–2484. pmid:23145333
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Victor S, Neth L, Golbuu Y, Wolanski E, Richmond RH. Sedimentation in mangroves and coral reefs in a wet tropical island, Pohnpei, Micronesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006; 66: 409–416.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Wood S, Paris CB, Ridgwell A, Hendy EJ. Modelling dispersal and connectivity of broadcast spawning corals at the global scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014; 23: 1–11.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Sandin SA, Smith JE, DeMartini EE, Dinsdale EA, Donner SD, Friedlander AM, et al. Baselines and Degradation of Coral Reefs in the Northern Line Islands. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3: e1548. pmid:18301734
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Gouezo M, Golbuu Y, van Woesik R, Rehm L, Koshiba S, Doropoulos C. Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral reef communities in Palau. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2015; 540: 73–85.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Wu L, Wang B. Assessing impacts of global warming on tropical cyclone tracks. J Clim. 2004; 17: 1686–1698.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Thompson DM, Kleypas J, Castruccio F, Curchitser EN, Pinsky ML, Jönsson B, et al. Variability in oceanographic barriers to coral larval dispersal: Do currents shape biodiversity? Prog Oceanogr. 2018; 165: 110–122.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Beyer HL, Kennedy EV, Beger M, Chen CA, Cinner JE, Darling ES, et al. Risk‐sensitive planning for conserving coral reefs under rapid climate change. Conservation Letters. 2018;11: e12587.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. van Hooidonk R, Maynard J, Tamelander J, Gove J, Ahmadia G, Raymundo L, et al. Local-scale projections of coral reef futures and implications of the Paris Agreement. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 39666. pmid:28000782
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. van Woesik R, Golbuu Y, Roff G. Keep up or drown: adjustment of western Pacific coral reefs to sea-level rise in the 21^st century. Royal Society Open Science. 2015; 2: 150181. pmid:26587277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Bivand R and Lewin-Koh N. maptools: Tools for Handling Spatial Objects. R package version 1.0–2. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools
64. South A. rworldmap: A New R package for Mapping Global Data. The R Journal 2011; 3: 35–43.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Ferrario F, Beck MW, Storlazzi CD, Micheli F, Shepard CC, Airoldi L. The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 3794. pmid:24825660
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 2014;26: 152–158.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Chappell J, Polach H. Post-glacial sea-level rise from a coral record at Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. Nature. 1991; 349: 147–149.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Lambeck K., Chappell J. Sea Level Change Through the Last Glacial Cycle. Science. 2001; 292: 679–686. pmid:11326090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. IPCC. Climate Change 2013 –The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2014.

[ref6] 6. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. 2010; 463: 747–756. pmid:20148028
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Neumann AC, Macintyre I. Reef response to sea-level rise: keep-up, catch-up, or give-up. Proc. 5th International Coral Reef Congress. 1985; 3: 105–110.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Álvarez-Noriega M, Álvarez-Romero JG, Anderson KD, Baird AH, et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature. 2017; 543: 373–377. pmid:28300113
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] PubMed/NCBI

[26] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Sully S, Burkepile DE, Donovan MK, Hodgson G, van Woesik R. A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nature Communications. 2019; 10: 1264. pmid:30894534
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Golbuu Y, van Woesik R, Richmond RH, Harrison P, Fabricius KE. River discharge reduces reef coral diversity in Palau. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011; 62: 824–831. pmid:21251680
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Kench PS, Smithers SG, Edinger EN, Steneck RS, et al. Caribbean-wide decline in carbonate production threatens coral reef growth. Nat Commun. 2013; 4: 1402. pmid:23360993
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Perry CT, Alvarez-Filip L, Graham NAJ, Mumby PJ, Wilson SK, Kench PS, et al. Loss of coral reef growth capacity to track future increases in sea level. Nature. 2018; 558: 396–400. pmid:29904103
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009; 106: 21527–21532. pmid:19995972
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Jevrejeva S, Grinsted A, Moore JC. Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100. Environ Res Lett. 2014; 9: 104008.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Cacciapaglia CW, van Woesik R. Reduced carbon emissions and fishing pressure are both necessary for equatorial coral reefs to keep up with rising seas. Ecography. 2020;54: 789–800.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Darwin, C. (1842). The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs: Being the First Part of the Geology of the Voyage of the Beagle, under the Command of Captain Fitzroy, R.N., During the Years 1832–1836. Smith, Elder and Co, London

[ref17] 17. Adey WH. Coral Reef Morphogenesis: A Multidimensional Model. Science. 1978; 202: 831–837. pmid:17752443
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Davies JP. Reef growth. Perspectives on coral reefs. 1983; 69–106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Hubbard KD. Reefs as dynamic systems. Life and Death of Coral Reefs. 1997; 43–67.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Edinger EN, Limmon GV, Jompa J, Widjatmoko W, Heikoop JM, Risk MJ. Normal Coral Growth Rates on Dying Reefs: Are Coral Growth Rates Good Indicators of Reef Health? Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2000; 40: 404–425.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Perry CT, Spencer T, Kench PS. Carbonate budgets and reef production states: a geomorphic perspective on the ecological phase-shift concept. Coral Reefs. 2008; 27: 853–866.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Perry CT, Edinger EN, Kench PS, Murphy GN, Smithers SG, Steneck RS, et al. Estimating rates of biologically driven coral reef framework production and erosion: a new census-based carbonate budget methodology and applications to the reefs of Bonaire. Coral Reefs. 2012; 31: 853–868.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Smith SV, Kinsey DW. Calcium carbonate production, coral reef growth, and sea level change. Science. 1976; 194: 937–939. pmid:17748553
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Buddemeier RW, Hopley D. Turn-ons and turn-offs: causes and mechanisms of the initiation and termination of coral reef growth. Proc. 6th International Coral Reef Symposium. 1988;1: 253–261.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Montaggioni LF. History of Indo-Pacific coral reef systems since the last glaciation: Development patterns and controlling factors. Earth-Science Reviews. 2005; 71: 1–75.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Roff G, Zhao J-X, Pandolfi JM. Rapid accretion of inshore reef slopes from the central Great Barrier Reef during the late Holocene. Geology. 2015; 43:343–346.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Vecsei A. A new estimate of global reefal carbonate production including the fore-reefs. Global and Planetary Change. 2004; 43: 1–18.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. van Woesik R, Cacciapaglia CW. Keeping up with sea-level rise: Carbonate production rates in Palau and Yap, western Pacific Ocean. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0197077. pmid:29738545
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Perry CT, Morgan KM. Bleaching drives collapse in reef carbonate budgets and reef growth potential on southern Maldives reefs. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 40581. pmid:28084450
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. van Woesik R, Done TJ. Coral communities and reef growth in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs. 1997; 16: 103–115.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Loya Y, Sakai K, Yamazato K, Nakano Y, Sambali H, van Woesik R. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecology Letters. 2001; 4: 122–131.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hughes TP, Baird AH, Bellwood DR, Card M, Connolly SR, Folke C, et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science. 2003; 301: 929–933. pmid:12920289
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, et al. Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification. Science. 2007; 318: 1737–1742. pmid:18079392
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Pandolfi JM, Connolly SR, Marshall DJ, Cohen AL. Projecting Coral Reef Futures Under Global Warming and Ocean Acidification. Science. 2011; 333: 418–422. pmid:21778392
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. van Woesik R, Sakai K, Ganase A, Loya Y. Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011; 434: 67–76.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Januchowski-Hartley FA, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Perry CT. Drivers and predictions of coral reef carbonate budget trajectories. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017; 284: 20162533. pmid:28123092
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. van Woesik R, Cacciapaglia CW. Carbonate production of Micronesian reefs suppressed by thermal anomalies and Acanthaster as sea-level rises. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0224887. pmid:31730649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Lieske E, Myers R (2002) Coral Reef Fishes: Caribbean, Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean Including the Red Sea—Revised Edition. Princeton University Press, pp 400

[ref39] 39. Saha, K., Zhao, X., Huai-min, C., Casey, K.S., Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., et al. The coral reef temperature anomaly database (CoRTAD). Version 6 –Global, 4 km Sea Surface Temperature and Related Thermal Stress Metrics for 1982 to 2019. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://doi.org/10.25921/ffw7-cs39. Accessed [12/4/2020].

[ref40] 40. Podesta GP, Brown OB, Evans RH. The annual cycle of satellite-derived sea-surface temperature in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Climate 1991; 4:457–467.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Mesias JM, Bisagni JJ, Brunner A. A high-resolution satellite-derived sea surface temperature climatology for the western North Atlantic Ocean. Continental Shelf Research 2007; 27:191–207.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Moyer AC, Evans JL, Powell M. Comparison of observed gale radius statistics. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 2007; 97: 41–55.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Zuur AF, Saveliev AA, Ieno EN. A Beginner’s Guide to Generalised Additive Mixed Models with R. Newburgh, United Kingdom: Highland Statistics Limited. 2014.

[ref44] 44. Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2009; 71: 319–392.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindström J. An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2011; 73: 423–498.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Le Rest K, Pinaud D, Monestiez P, Chadoeuf J, Bretagnolle V. Spatial leave-one-out cross-validation for variable selection in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014; 23: 811–820.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2018.

[ref48] 48. Claar DC, Baum JK. Timing matters: survey timing during extended heat stress can influence perceptions of coral susceptibility to bleaching. Coral Reefs. 2019;38: 559–565.
View Article
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Magel JMT, Burns JHR, Gates RD, Baum JK. Effects of bleaching-associated mass coral mortality on reef structural complexity across a gradient of local disturbance. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 2512. pmid:30792432
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Risk MJ, Sammarco PW. Cross-shelf trends in skeletal density of the massive coral Porites lobata from the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991; 69: 195–200.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Pratchett MS, Anderson KD, Hoogenboom MO, Widman E, Baird AH, Pandolfi J et al. Spatial, Temporal and taxonomic variation in coral growth—Implications for the structure and function of coral reef ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 2015; 53: 215–295.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Roff G. Reef accretion and coral growth rates are decoupled in Holocene reef frameworks. Mar Geol. 2020; 419: 106065.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. van Woesik R, Houk P, Isechal AL, Idechong JW, Victor S, Golbuu Y. Climate-change microrefugia: nearshore reefs bleach less than outer reefs during a 2010 regional thermal stress event in Palau. Ecol Evol. 2012; 2: 2474–2484. pmid:23145333
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Victor S, Neth L, Golbuu Y, Wolanski E, Richmond RH. Sedimentation in mangroves and coral reefs in a wet tropical island, Pohnpei, Micronesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006; 66: 409–416.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Wood S, Paris CB, Ridgwell A, Hendy EJ. Modelling dispersal and connectivity of broadcast spawning corals at the global scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014; 23: 1–11.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Sandin SA, Smith JE, DeMartini EE, Dinsdale EA, Donner SD, Friedlander AM, et al. Baselines and Degradation of Coral Reefs in the Northern Line Islands. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3: e1548. pmid:18301734
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Gouezo M, Golbuu Y, van Woesik R, Rehm L, Koshiba S, Doropoulos C. Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral reef communities in Palau. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2015; 540: 73–85.
View Article
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Wu L, Wang B. Assessing impacts of global warming on tropical cyclone tracks. J Clim. 2004; 17: 1686–1698.
View Article
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Thompson DM, Kleypas J, Castruccio F, Curchitser EN, Pinsky ML, Jönsson B, et al. Variability in oceanographic barriers to coral larval dispersal: Do currents shape biodiversity? Prog Oceanogr. 2018; 165: 110–122.
View Article
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Beyer HL, Kennedy EV, Beger M, Chen CA, Cinner JE, Darling ES, et al. Risk‐sensitive planning for conserving coral reefs under rapid climate change. Conservation Letters. 2018;11: e12587.
View Article
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. van Hooidonk R, Maynard J, Tamelander J, Gove J, Ahmadia G, Raymundo L, et al. Local-scale projections of coral reef futures and implications of the Paris Agreement. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 39666. pmid:28000782
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[191] View Article

[192] PubMed/NCBI

[193] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. van Woesik R, Golbuu Y, Roff G. Keep up or drown: adjustment of western Pacific coral reefs to sea-level rise in the 21^st century. Royal Society Open Science. 2015; 2: 150181. pmid:26587277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Bivand R and Lewin-Koh N. maptools: Tools for Handling Spatial Objects. R package version 1.0–2. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools

[ref64] 64. South A. rworldmap: A New R package for Mapping Global Data. The R Journal 2011; 3: 35–43.
View Article
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Field methods

Environmental variables

Data analysis

Results

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 File. Twenty supporting figures and one supporting table.

S1 Data. Data and R code.

Acknowledgments

References