Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Serum β2-microglobulin levels in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19): Another prognosticator of disease severity?

  • Walter Conca ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Walter Conca, Nicolaas Nagelkerke

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    wconca@kfshrc.edu.sa, concawalter6@gmail.com

    ‡ MA, FA and MWF also contributed equally to this work. WC and NN are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliations Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Department of Executive Health Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Department of Cell Biology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Mayyadah Alabdely ,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    ‡ MA, FA and MWF also contributed equally to this work. WC and NN are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Faisal Albaiz ,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    ‡ MA, FA and MWF also contributed equally to this work. WC and NN are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Michael Warren Foster ,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ MA, FA and MWF also contributed equally to this work. WC and NN are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Executive Health Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Maha Alamri,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Morad Alkaff,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Futwan Al-Mohanna,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Cell Biology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Nicolaas Nagelkerke ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Walter Conca, Nicolaas Nagelkerke

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Goetzens, Austria (retired)

    ‡ MA, FA and MWF also contributed equally to this work. WC and NN are joint senior authors on this work.

    Affiliation Department of Community Medicine, United Arab University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

  • Reem Saad Almaghrabi

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Serum β2-microglobulin levels in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19): Another prognosticator of disease severity?

  • Walter Conca, 
  • Mayyadah Alabdely, 
  • Faisal Albaiz, 
  • Michael Warren Foster, 
  • Maha Alamri, 
  • Morad Alkaff, 
  • Futwan Al-Mohanna, 
  • Nicolaas Nagelkerke, 
  • Reem Saad Almaghrabi
PLOS
x

Abstract

β2-microglobulin (β2-m), a 11.8 kDa protein, pairs non-covalently with the α3 domain of the major histocompatibility class (MHC) I α-chain and is essential for the conformation of the MHC class I protein complex. Shed β2-m is measurable in circulation, and various disorders are accompanied by increases in β2-m levels, including several viral infections. Therefore, we explored whether β2-m levels could also be elevated in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and whether they predict disease severity. Serum β2-m levels were measured in a cohort of 34 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 on admission to a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as well as in an approximately age-sex matched group of 34 uninfected controls. Mean β2-m level was 3.25±1.68 mg/l (reference range 0.8–2.2 mg/l) in patients (mean age 48.2±21.6) and 1.98±0.61 mg/l in controls (mean age 48.2±21.6). 17 patients (mean age 36.9± 18.0) with mean β2-m levels of 2.27±0.64 mg/l had mild disease by WHO severity categorization, 12 patients (mean age 53.3±18.1) with mean β2-m levels of 3.57±1.39 mg/l had moderate disease, and five patients (of whom 2 died; mean age 74.4±13.8) with mean β2-m levels of 5.85±1.85 mg/l had severe disease (P < = 0.001, by ANOVA test for linear trend). In multivariate ordinal regression β2-m levels were the only significant predictor of disease severity. Our findings suggest that higher β2-m levels could be an early indicator of severity of disease and predict outcome of Covid-19. As the main limitations of the study are a single-center study, sample size and ethnicity, these results need confirmation in larger cohorts outside the Arabian Peninsula in order to delineate the value of β2-m measurements. The role of β2-m in the etiology and pathogenesis of severe Covid-19 remains to be elucidated.

Introduction

Immune responses to the infection with SARS-CoV-2, the causative pathogen of Covid-19, were first described in China [13] and subsequently, in the wake of a global spread, in other countries and ethnicities [412]. Covid-19 is preponderantly mild and self-limiting with rapidly developing anti-viral immunity. By contrast, progression to a well characterized cytokine release syndrome resulting in acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome in critical cases with a high case fatality ratio occurs in many elderly and in the presence of comorbidities, similar to other (seasonal) viral infections [1315]. Immunosenescence with exhaustion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which form the frontline of cellular innate and adaptive anti-viral immune defense, would seem a plausible explanation of the inadequacy of the aging immune system to clear this virus efficiently [1619]. In severe or critical disease, a markedly impaired interferon (IFN) type I response was associated with a persistent blood viral load and florid inflammation, which in some patients was also related to the presence of autoantibodies against IFN type I [20, 21]. Host-pathogen interactions, distinct immunotypes and immune signatures are determinants of pathogenesis and correlate with outcomes of Covid-19 [11, 12, 22]. A fulminant cytokine release syndrome or storm, including common protagonists of inflammation such as IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, basic FGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PDGF, VEGF and TNF-α, is made responsible for life-threatening respiratory failure and multi-organ dysfunction or failure [1]. With regard to outcome, the principal, known predictors of mortality are advanced age, comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiac disease, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, mental disorders, immunosuppression, obesity and cancer, and laboratory parameters, i.e. CRP, LDH, cardiac troponin I, ferritin, D-dimers, and raised levels of IP-10, IL-10, IL-1Ra, IL-6, as well as lymphopenia [2329]. In combination with the clinical presentation and radiographic findings, some of these variables have been used to develop various prognostic models for risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with Covid-19, but a universally accepted and applicable scoring system has as yet not been established [30].

With the intention to explore whether other plausible markers could be clinically useful for assessing and predicting the response of the immune system to SARS-CoV-2, we determined the blood levels of β2-microglobulin (β2-m) in patients with Covid-19 who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. For comparison, β2-m levels were also measured in an approximately age-sex matched healthy control group.

The hypothesis that β2-m measurements could be relevant was suggested by previous findings of abnormal β2-m levels in a variety of viral infections, including those caused by EBV, CMV and influenza virus [31]. β2-m concentrations were highest in patients with CMV disease (6.5±2.0 mg/l), infectious mononucleosis (4.8±1.7 mg/l) and influenza A (4.2±1.9 mg/l). In HIV infection, a serum β2-m level of >3 mg/l predicted the development of AIDS within a period of 36 months [32]. Intriguingly, IL-1Ra, a biomarker of disease severity in Covid-19 [27], correlated positively with serum β2-m levels and negatively with circulating CD4+ T lymphocyte counts in patients during different stages of AIDS, suggesting a shared regulatory pathway among these two disparate viral infections [33]. The pathophysiologic mechanisms which are widely accepted as the cause of elevated blood levels of β2-m under these circumstances are an accelerated rate of shedding or dissociation of β2-m from the MHC class I α-chain at the cell surface of immune and non-immune cells, which relates to the cardinal function of the MHC class I system of presenting viral antigenic peptides to cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. The ensuing death of antigen presenting cells releases cellular components collectively designated as “damage-associated molecular patterns” (DAMPs) that evoke an innate and adaptive immune response which may harm the host if regulatory mechanisms fail [3437]. After engagement of the T-cell receptor with the trimeric MHC class I complex, the α-chain dissociates from β2-m, then is internalized and degraded, while β2-m is released from the cell surface [38, 39]. Apart from this mechanism of disintegration, there is evidence that up-regulation of β2-m synthesis also occurs at the transcriptional level in response to stimulation by a variety of cytokines, such as IFN type I, TNF-α and IL-1β [4042].

Methods

Setting

We conducted an observational study at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (KFSHRC), a large (~1.000.000 outpatient visits/year, 1.600 beds, ~1.000 doctors and ~13.500 employees), non-profit, tertiary referral hospital, located in the city center of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where patients are referred from other hospitals from across Saudi Arabia and adjacent regions. Participants were included consecutively in the period from 14 March to 8 April 2020. All patients were Saudi nationals except two European expatriates. The Saudi nationals were self-referrals, as these participants were long-term patients and therefore have direct access to health care in this hospital. The two European patients were admitted after special arrangements. The diagnosis of Covid-19 was suspected clinically and confirmed through the detection of SARS-Cov-2 in a nasopharyngeal sample with specific PCR (RealStar®SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit RUO altona-diagnostics, Germany), which was performed in the Section of Medical Microbiology of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at KFSHRC. Upon testing positive, the patients were admitted and isolated in negative pressure rooms. Severity of disease, i.e. mild, moderate, severe or critical, was determined on admission and modified according to the clinical course using the WHO categories of Covid-19 disease severity [43]. These are defined as follows: mild disease, no evidence of viral pneumonia or hypoxia; moderate disease, clinical signs of pneumonia (fever, cough, dyspnea, fast breathing), but not severe pneumonia, including SpO2 ≥ 90% on room air, cautioning that a SpO2 of >90–94% on room air is abnormal in a patient with normal lung and can be an early sign of severe disease; severe disease, clinical signs of pneumonia (fever, cough, dyspnea, fast breathing) plus one of the following: respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, severe respiratory distress or SpO2 <90% on room air. Chest imaging (radiograph, CT scan, ultrasound) may assist in diagnosis and identify or exclude pulmonary complications in moderate and severe disease. Critical disease, not distinguished from severe disease in our analyses (because of small numbers), is defined by onset (within 1 week of a known clinical insult, i.e. pneumonia, or new or worsening respiratory symptoms), chest imaging (radiograph, CT scan or ultrasound showing bilateral opacities, not fully explained by volume overload, lobar or lung collapse, or nodules), origin of pulmonary infiltrates (respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload by objective assessment, e.g. echocardiography) and oxygenation impairment (mild, moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome). One patient with Covid-19 had β2-m levels between 19.85 and 40.35 mg/l, but was on intermittent hemodialysis and was therefore excluded from our analyses. For comparison, we also determined β2-m levels and other parameters in a group of approximately age-sex matched controls without evidence of any infection who were recruited from hospital personnel, trainees or patients. The study was approved by the Hospital’s ethics committee, the Research Advisory Council (RAC No: 2201052) and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Data sources

Clinical, laboratory and radiographic data were handled via the electronic medical records system (PowerChart; Cerner, USA), and included participants‘ demographic details, vital signs, admission notes with chief complaint(s), history of present illness, previous diagnoses, medications, laboratory tests, radiography, and progress notes. These data were extracted from the electronic medical records, deposited and further processed using REDCap [44]. Within this project, each participant patient was assigned a unique research-specific ID number that was password-protected and accessible to one of the investigators (R.S.A). Data were exported from REDCap into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet which is included as (S1 File. DataSetCovid_Saudia.Excel).

Variables assessed

For each patient with Covid-19, we obtained and recorded electronically the following data at the time of admission to the hospital: age, sex, nationality, vital signs including SpO2, presenting symptom(s), comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests and chest X-ray. Laboratory investigations included complete blood count (CBC), absolute counts of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD56+CD16+ NK cells, levels of β2-m, ferritin, D-dimer, CRP, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, CKD-EPI equation) [45]. In the control group, after exclusion of an infectious disease, the same hematologic and biochemical parameters were measured. All variables are provided in the (S1 File. DataSetCovid_Saudia.Excel).

Quantification of β2-m, ferritin, D-dimer and CRP levels

The tests for β2-m, ferritin, D-dimer and CRP were performed within two days of admission in the Medical Laboratory of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at KFSHRC. Serum β2-m levels were quantified using an immunoturbidometric assay with a latex-bound rabbit polyclonal anti-β2-m antibody on Roche/Hitachi cobas® c system (TINA-QUANT® β2-microglobulin). The measuring linear range of this particular assay is 0.2–8.0 mg/l, and the reference range is 0.8–2.2 mg/l. Serum levels of ferritin were determined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys Ferritin®) using streptavidin-coated microparticles, biotinylated mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibody and ruthenium-complex-labeled mouse monoclonal anti-ferritin antibody on the Roche/Hitachi cobas® e 801 immunoassay analyzer (measuring range: 0.50–2000 μg/l; reference range for men: 30–400 μg/l; for women: 13–150 μg/l). D-dimer levels were determined in plasma with an immunoturbidometric assay (STA®-Liatest® D-DI PLUS) using latex microparticles coated with two different mouse monoclonal anti-D-dimer antibodies (normal level < 0.5 μg/ml FEU) and analyzed on the STA-R® Max2 instrument. CRP levels were measured in serum using an immunoturbidometric assay with latex particles coated with mouse monoclonal anti-CRP antibody (CRPHS®) on the Roche/Hitachi cobas® c system (measuring range: 0.15–20.0 mg/l). For this high-sensitivity CRP assay, levels >10 mg/l indicate systemic inflammation.

Phenotyping of circulating lymphocytes

Flow cytometry for lymphocyte subsets was performed on heparinized whole blood using BD Multitest 6-color TBNK reagent and a six-color direct immunofluorescence assay with BD Trucount tubes on BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer instrument (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) using standard quality control and instrument settings [46]. At least 5,000 lymphocytes were acquired and analysis was performed using BD FACSDiva software version 10.0 (BD Biosciences). All results were expressed as absolute counts and percentages of mature T, B, and NK lymphocyte populations as well as CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subset ratios in peripheral blood.

Statistical analysis

Tabulations, analysis of variance (ANOVA) including linear trend tests, ordinal logistic regression (proportional odds model, stepwise manually, backward selection, p-value based, p_out = 0.05), and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used. A significance level (2-tailed) of 0.05 was used throughout. As the distribution of CRP levels was highly skewed, its values were 10log transformed. Analyses were carried out with SPSS v.22 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The raw data used for statistical analysis are included in the (S1 File. DataSetCovid_Saudia.Excel).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

Demographic characteristics, main comorbidities, clinical manifestations, medications and vital signs on presentation are shown in Table 1. Individual data of each patient are presented separately in a (S1 Table). 34 consecutive participants (mean age 48.2 ± 21.6; 12 m, 22 f) presented to the emergency department with one or more of the following chief complaints (in descending order of frequency): fever, dry cough, sore throat, rhinorrhea, fatigue, headache, diarrhea, anosmia, productive cough, dyspnea, ear pain, ageusia, anorexia, abdominal pain, nausea, emesis, seizure, syncope, myalgia, rash and no symptoms. Fever and dry cough were the principal manifestations in all patients, whereas other symptoms varied among severity groups. One patient who progressed to severe disease was presymptomatic at presentation. Among the patients, comorbidities were as follows: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, leukemia in remission, colorectal cancer in remission, post-renal transplant, Hodgkin’s lymphoma in remission, and hypothyroidism. On admission, 23 participants (68%) were on one or more of the following medications: lisinopril, ramipril, perindopril, losartan, valsartan, amlodipine, diuretics (furosemide/thiazide), metformin, liraglutide, atorvastatin, amiodarone, flecainide, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, L-thyroxine, fluticasone/salmeterol, montelukast, imatinib, tacrolimus, prednisone, diphenylhydantoin, paroxetine, pregabalin, escitalopram.

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, medications and vital signs in patients admitted to the hospital with Covid-19.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247758.t001

Outcome data

Serum β2-m levels were raised above reference range in 26 patients (76%) with a mean level of 3.25± 1.68 mg/l. The lowest β2-m level of 1.16 mg/l was observed in a 25-year old woman, the highest 8.9 mg/l in a 90-year old man. The clinical impression was that those patients with moderate (12 patients) or severe disease (5 patients) had higher β2-m levels. Two patients with severe disease, a 71-year old man and a 90-year old man, did not survive respiratory failure. Their β2-m levels on admission of 6.24 mg/l and 8.9 mg/dl, respectively, were the highest observed. In an approximately age-sex matched control group of 34 individuals (mean age 48.2±21.6) without infection, mean β2-m level was 1.98±0.61 mg/l. Of interest was the strong correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.77, p<0.001) of β2-m levels with age in the control group.

Therefore, further statistical analyses (ordinal logistic regression, correlation coefficients) were performed on three groups: group A of 17 patients with mild disease, group B of 12 patients with moderate disease and group C of five patients with severe disease. Patients in group A had initial mean β2-m levels of 2.27 ±0.64 mg/l, group B 3.57 ±1.39 mg/l and group C 5.85 ±1.85 mg/l. Mean age differed among groups, with 36.9± 18.0 in group A, 53.3±18.1 in group B, and 74.4±13.8 in group C. All patients in group B and C had at least one comorbid condition. As in the control group, age and β2-m levels were significantly correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.71, p<0.001). In addition, β2-m levels were significantly correlated with several other risk factors in our patients, notably WBC (r = 0.36), D-dimer (r = 0.54), 10log (CRP) (r = 0.62) and eGFR (r = 0.75). The comparison of all groups, as well as the relationship between β2-m levels and age, is graphically shown in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. β2-m levels in Covid-19 on admission to the hospital.

Serum β2-m levels (mg/l) measured at the time of first SARS-Cov-2 detection are shown in relation to age in a group of 17 patients with mild (magenta ), 12 patients with moderate (green ) and five patients with severe Covid-19 (red ) and 34 approximately age-sex matched uninfected controls (light blue ). Each dot represents one participant. Linear regression lines of β2-m levels on age per group are also included.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247758.g001

Our analysis suggests that β2-m levels appear to be more proximate causes or correlates of disease severity than age or renal function [47], as stepwise (backward selection) ordinal logistic regression of group on age, sex, eGFR, 10log (CRP) and β2-m identified β2-m as the only significant predictor. The odds ratio of having severe disease versus mild/moderate disease per unit (mg/l) β2-m was estimated at 4.22 (95% CI:1.86–12.94). Based upon other reports we also measured the following parameters which have been implicated in disease severity: counts of WBC, lymphocytes and CD8+ T cells as well as serum levels of ferritin, D-dimer and CRP. Table 2 summarizes the values of these parameters and other lymphocyte subsets in the different groups. No variable except for age and β2-m levels was statistically different between the three severity groups, as calculated by ANOVA (significance level = 0.05).

thumbnail
Table 2. Group comparison of reported predictors of outcome including lymphocyte subsets in mild (A) versus moderate (B) versus severe (C) Covid-19 on admission to the hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247758.t002

Discussion

In a cohort of 34 patients (32 Arabs, two Europeans), who were recently diagnosed and admitted with Covid-19, increased serum levels of β2-m were found at the time of presentation to the hospital, a hitherto unreported abnormality [48]. As of February 2021, a PubMed search using the term “β2-m AND Covid-19” has resulted in three hits. In two reports, β2-m level was measured and found raised in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Covid-19-related encephalitis [49, 50], while in the third communication, measurement of β2-m was used as human cellular control in Covid-19 testing in samples from the respiratory tract [51]. The results of our study were predictable as other viral infections were also accompanied by increases in β2-m concentrations [31]. However, higher levels were noted in those participants who had severe disease with viral pneumonia, resulting in respiratory failure, invasive mechanical ventilation and death in some. This clinical observation induced us to compare patients with mild disease with those who had moderate or severe disease. A statistically significant difference in mean β2-m levels was found between the three groups (2.27 ±0.64 mg/l versus 3.57 ±1.39 mg/l versus 5.85±1.86 mg/l) suggesting that severe Covid-19 is associated with preceding higher circulating β2-m levels. Age, which consistently represents the strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes in other populations, was also associated with severity (mean age 36.9±18.0 in mild, 53.3±18.1 in moderate and 74.4±13.8 in severe disease), and there was a significant correlation between age and β2-m levels. In addition, another observation deserves attention, namely the point in time when raised β2-m levels were first determined, which was within the first 48 hours after diagnosis. The time between the first measurement of β2-m levels and critical clinical deterioration, i.e. mechanical ventilation and transfer to ICU, was shortest (24–48 hours) in the two patients who had the highest β2-m levels in this cohort and later died, whereas we observed a time lag of seven, eight and 11 days, respectively, between first β2-m measurement and deterioration of respiratory function requiring ICU transfer in the other three patients with severe Covid-19 who survived, favoring initial β2-m levels as a predictor not only of disease severity but also outcome. In contrast, other known parameters associated with disease severity and outcome that were measured at admission, such as counts of lymphocytes and CD8+ T cells, levels of ferritin, D-dimer, CRP and eGFR did not reach statistically significant differences between groups in our analysis, corroborating a potential unique role of β2-m in risk assessment very early in the disease course.

In our study, a significant correlation was found between β2-m levels and renal function (measured by eGFR). Both parameters are univariately significant correlates of disease severity. In multivariate analysis, however, it was β2-m rather than eGFR that explained disease severity. To explain this, we surmise that the kidney could, beside its pivotal role in the metabolism of β2-m, become a source of β2-m in Covid-19 for various reasons, including the fact that SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated an exquisite tropism for the kidney since its receptor, membrane-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), is highly expressed in the brush border of proximal tubular cells, and to some extent in podocytes, but neither in endothelial nor mesangial cells of the glomerulus [52, 53]. It would be interesting to study the urinary excretion of β2-m in patients with Covid-19, in order to better understand and assess the renal responses to such an intricate viral infection [5456].

Given the obvious limitations of a single-center study and the small sample size, larger cohorts, preferably in areas of the world other than the Arabian Peninsula, are needed to definitively assess the value of β2-m levels as an independent biomarker of disease severity and predictor of outcomes with the advantage of having less fluctuations or extraneous influences than other parameters, such as iron stores for ferritin, coagulopathies for D-dimers and secondary bacterial infections for CRP.

β2-m level measurements on presentation, possibly in combination with lymphocyte counting and differentiation as described by others, could be useful to foretell the short-term outcome of Covid-19 [57]. This seems important as the progression to acute respiratory failure commonly occurs rapidly within days after disease onset. Testing this hypothesis in different cohorts seems warranted as the result could facilitate early risk stratification, and thereby optimize the timing of hospitalization for close monitoring and timely therapeutic interventions [5862].

Supporting information

S1 File. DataSetCovid_Saudia.

Clinical, laboratory and radiographic data were handled via the electronic medical records system (PowerChart; Cerner, USA), and included participants‘ demographic details, vital signs, admission notes with chief complaint(s), history of present illness, previous diagnoses, medications, laboratory tests, radiography, and progress notes. These data were extracted from the electronic medical records, deposited and further processed using REDCap. Within this project, each participant patient was assigned a unique research-specific ID number that was password-protected and accessible to one of the investigators (R.S.A). Data were exported from REDCap into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet as “Raw Covid Data”. With regard to age-sex matched uninfected controls only laboratory data were extracted from electronic medical records and entered separetely into the Excel spreadsheet as”Raw Control Data”. “Raw Covid Data” and “Raw Control Data” were used for statistical analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247758.s001

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Covid-19 patients’ individual information.

Demographic data, comorbidities, symptoms at presentation and medications are shown for each patient enrolled in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247758.s002

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497–506. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Jan 30. pmid:31986264
  2. 2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507–513. Epub 2020 Jan 30. pmid:32007143
  3. 3. Shi Y, Wang Y, Shao C, Huang J, Gan J, Huang X, et al. COVID-19 infection: the perspectives on immune responses. Cell Death Differ. 2020 May;27(5):1451–1454. Epub 2020 Mar 23. pmid:32205856
  4. 4. Thevarajan I, Nguyen THO., Koutsakos M, Druce J, Caly L, van de Sandt CE, et al. Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020. pmid:32284614
  5. 5. Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, Han T, Li Z, Zhou P, et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020 Apr; 92(4):424–432. Epub 2020 Feb 7. pmid:31981224
  6. 6. Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489–1501.e15. Epub 2020 May 20. pmid:32473127
  7. 7. Ju B, Zhang Q, Ge J, Wang R, Sun J, Ge X, et al. Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):115–119. Epub 2020 May 26. pmid:32454513.
  8. 8. Pan D, Sze S, Minhas JS, Bangash MN, Pareek N, Divall P, et al. The impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 3;23:100404. pmid:32632416
  9. 9. Weiskopf D, Schmitz KS, Raadsen MP, Grifoni A, Okba NMA, Endeman H, et al. Phenotype and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci Immunol. 2020 Jun 26;5(48):eabd2071. pmid:32591408
  10. 10. Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, et al. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell. 2020 May 28;181(5):1036–1045.e9. Epub 2020 May 15. pmid:32416070
  11. 11. Mathew D, Giles JR, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Greenplate AR, Wu JE, et al. Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science. 2020 Sep 4;369(6508):eabc8511. Epub 2020 Jul 15. pmid:32669297
  12. 12. Laing AG, Lorenc A, Del Molino Del Barrio I, Das A, Fish M, Monin L, et al. A dynamic COVID-19 immune signature includes associations with poor prognosis. Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1623–1635. Epub 2020 Aug 17. Erratum in: Nat Med. 2020 Sep 9;: Erratum in: Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1951. pmid:32807934.
  13. 13. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1033–1034. Epub 2020 Mar 16. pmid:32192578
  14. 14. Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):473–474. Epub 2020 Apr 17. pmid:32303591.
  15. 15. Jester BJ, Uyeki TM, Jernigan DB. Fifty Years of Influenza A(H3N2) Following the Pandemic of 1968. Am J Public Health. 2020 May;110(5):669–676. pmid:32267748
  16. 16. Shodell M, Siegal FP. Circulating, interferon-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells decline during human ageing. Scand J Immunol. 2002 Nov;56(5):518–21. pmid:12410802
  17. 17. Hazeldine J, Lord JM. The impact of ageing on natural killer cell function and potential consequences for health in older adults. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Sep;12(4):1069–78. Epub 2013 May 6. pmid:23660515
  18. 18. Oh SJ, Lee JK, Shin OS. Aging and the Immune System: the Impact of Immunosenescence on Viral Infection, Immunity and Vaccine Immunogenicity. Immune Netw. 2019 Nov 14;19(6):e37. eCollection 2019 Dec. Review. pmid:31921467
  19. 19. Quinn KM, Fox A, Harland KL, Russ BE, Li J, Nguyen THO, et al. Age-Related Decline in Primary CD8+ T Cell Responses Is Associated with the Development of Senescence in Virtual Memory CD8+ T Cells. Cell Rep. 2018 Jun 19;23(12):3512–3524. pmid:29924995
  20. 20. Hadjadj J, Yatim N, Barnabei L, Corneau A, Boussier J, Smith N, et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science. 2020 Aug 7;369(6504):718–724. Epub 2020 Jul 13. 32661059 pmid:32661059
  21. 21. Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020 Oct 23;370(6515):eabd4585. Epub 2020 Sep 24. pmid:32972996.
  22. 22. Varghese PM, Tsolaki AG, Yasmin H, Shastri A, Ferluga J, Vatish M, et al. Host-pathogen interaction in COVID-19: Pathogenesis, potential therapeutics and vaccination strategies. Immunobiology. 2020 Nov;225(6):152008. Epub 2020 Aug 19. pmid:33130519
  23. 23. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):846–848. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Erratum in: Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr 6;: pmid:32125452
  24. 24. Du RH, Liang LR, Yang CQ, Wang W, Cao TZ, Li M, et al. Predictors of Mortality for Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Caused by SARS-CoV-2: A Prospective Cohort Study. Eur Respir J. 2020 May 7;55(5):2000524. Erratum in: Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 24;56(3): pmid:32269088
  25. 25. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Apr;18(4):844–847. Epub 2020 Mar 13. pmid:32073213
  26. 26. Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, Ding J, Huang Q, Tang YQ, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020; 5: 33. Published online 2020 Mar 2720. pmid:32296069
  27. 27. Zhao Y, Qin L, Zhang P, Li K, Liang L, Sun J, et al. Longitudinal COVID-19 profiling associates IL-1RA and IL-10 with disease severity and RANTES with mild disease. JCI Insight. 2020 Jul 9;5(13):e139834. pmid:32501293
  28. 28. Hussain A, Mahawar K, Xia Z, Yang W, El-Hasani S. Obesity and mortality of COVID-19. Meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):295–300. Epub 2020 Jul 9. pmid:32660813
  29. 29. Kermali M, Khalsa RK, Pillai K, Ismail Z, Harky A. The role of biomarkers in diagnosis of COVID-19—A systematic review. Life Sci. 2020 Aug 1;254:117788. Epub 2020 May 13. 32475810 pmid:32475810
  30. 30. Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. Erratum in: BMJ. 2020 Jun 3;369:m2204. 32265220 pmid:32265220
  31. 31. Cooper EH, Forbes MA, Hambling MH. Serum β2-microglobulin and C reactive protein concentrations in viral infections. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Oct; 37(10): 1140–1143. pmid:6092437
  32. 32. Anderson RE, Lang W, Shiboski S, Royce R, Jewell N, Winkelstein W Jr. Use of β2-microglobulin level and CD4 lymphocyte count to predict development of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):73–7. pmid:1967523
  33. 33. Kreuzer KA, Dayer JM, Rockstroh JK, Sauerbruch T, Spengler U. The IL-1 system in HIV infection: peripheral concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-1 receptor antagonist and soluble IL-1 receptor type II. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997 Jul;109(1):54–8. pmid:9218824
  34. 34. Poon IK, Hulett MD, Parish CR. Molecular mechanisms of late apoptotic/necrotic cell clearance. Cell Death Differ. 2010 Mar;17(3):381–97. Epub 2009 Dec 18. pmid:20019744.
  35. 35. Rock KL, Lai JJ, Kono H. Innate and adaptive immune responses to cell death. Immunol Rev. 2011 Sep;243(1):191–205. pmid:21884177
  36. 36. Atkin-Smith GK, Duan M, Chen W, Poon IKH. The induction and consequences of Influenza A virus-induced cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2018 Sep 25;9(10):1002. pmid:30254192
  37. 37. Liu L, Wei Q, Lin Q, Fang J, Wang H, Kwok H, et al. Anti-spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection. JCI Insight. 2019 Feb 21;4(4):e123158. pmid:30830861
  38. 38. Montealegre S, Venugopalan V, Fritzsche S, Kulicke C, Hein Z, Springer S. Dissociation of β2-microglobulin determines the surface quality control of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. FASEB J. 2015 Jul;29(7):2780–8. Epub 2015 Mar 17. pmid:25782992
  39. 39. Koutsakos M, McWilliam HEG, Aktepe TE, Fritzlar S, Illing PT, Mifsud NA, et al. Downregulation of MHC Class I Expression by Influenza A and B Viruses. Front Immunol. 2019 May 29;10:1158. eCollection 2019. pmid:31191533
  40. 40. Hermansen ML, Hummelshøj L, Lundsgaard D, Hornum L, Keller P, Fleckner J, et al. Increased serum β2-microglobulin is associated with clinical and immunological markers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2012 Sep;21(10):1098–104. Epub 2012 May 10. pmid:22577117
  41. 41. Collins T, Lapierre LA, Fiers W, Strominger JL, Pober JS Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor increases mRNA levels and surface expression of HLA-A,B antigens in vascular endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan;83(2):446–50. pmid:3455781
  42. 42. Conca W, Kaplan PB, Krane SM. Increases in levels of procollagenase messenger RNA in cultured fibroblasts induced by human recombinant interleukin 1β or serum follow c-jun expression and are dependent on new protein synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1989 May;83(5):1753–7. pmid:2540222
  43. 43. COVID-19 Clinical management: living guidance: pp. 19–21. WHO reference number: WHO/2019-nCoV/clinical/2021. Accessed online February 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021.1
  44. 44. Patridge EF, Bardyn TP. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan; 106(1): 142–144. Published online 2018 Jan 2.
  45. 45. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604–12. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Sep 20;155(6):408.
  46. 46. Colombo F, Cattaneo A, Lopa R, Portararo P, Rebulla P, Porretti L. Evaluation of a multicolor, single-tube technique to enumerate lymphocyte subpopulations. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Jul;15(7):1124–7. Epub 2008 Apr 30. pmid:18448621
  47. 47. Schardijn GH, Statius van Eps LW. β2-microglobulin: Its significance in the evaluation of renal function. Kidney Int. 1987 Nov;32(5):635–41. pmid:3323598
  48. 48. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW; and the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052–2059. Erratum in: JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2098. pmid:32320003
  49. 49. Pilotto A, Odolini S, Masciocchi S, Comelli A, Volonghi I, Gazzina S, et al. Steroid-Responsive Encephalitis in Coronavirus Disease 2019. Ann Neurol. 2020 Aug;88(2):423–427. Epub 2020 Jun 9. pmid:32418288
  50. 50. Edén A, Kanberg N, Gostner J, Fuchs D, Hagberg L, Andersson LM, et al. CSF Biomarkers in Patients With COVID-19 and Neurologic Symptoms: A Case Series. Neurology. 2021 Jan 12;96(2):e294–e300. Epub 2020 Oct 1. pmid:33004602.
  51. 51. Davies E, Whitfield T, Machin N, Ahmad S. The utility of beta-2-microglobulin testing as a human cellular control in COVID-19 testing. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104449. Epub 2020 May 20. pmid:32504943
  52. 52. Ye M, Wysocki J, William J, Soler MJ, Cokic I, Batlle D. Glomerular localization and expression of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and Angiotensin-converting enzyme: implications for albuminuria in diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3067–75. Epub 2006 Oct 4. pmid:17021266.
  53. 53. Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J Virol. 2020 Mar 17;94(7):e00127–20. pmid:31996437
  54. 54. Perico L, Benigni A, Remuzzi G. Should COVID-19 Concern Nephrologists? Why and to What Extent? The Emerging Impasse of Angiotensin Blockade. Nephron. 2020;144(5):213–221. Epub 2020 Mar 23. pmid:32203970
  55. 55. Kooman JP, van der Sande FM. COVID-19 in ESRD and Acute Kidney Injury. Blood Purif. 2020 Dec 15:1–11. Epub ahead of print. pmid:33321496
  56. 56. Argyropoulos CP, Chen SS, Ng YH, Roumelioti ME, Shaffi K, Singh PP, et al. Rediscovering Beta-2 Microglobulin As a Biomarker across the Spectrum of Kidney Diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 15;4:73. pmid:28664159
  57. 57. Chen R, Liang W, Jiang M, Guan W, Zhan C, Wang T, et al. Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a nationwide analysis in China. Chest. 2020. pmid:32304772
  58. 58. Lan SH, Lai CC, Huang HT, Chang SP, Lu LC, Hsueh PR. Tocilizumab for severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Sep;56(3):106103. Epub 2020 Jul 23. pmid:32712333
  59. 59. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19—Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17:NEJMoa2021436. Epub ahead of print. pmid:32678530
  60. 60. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19—Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813–1826. Epub 2020 Oct 8. pmid:32445440
  61. 61. Kalil AC, Patterson TF, Mehta AK, Tomashek KM, Wolfe CR, Ghazaryan V, et al. Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 11:NEJMoa2031994. Epub ahead of print. pmid:33306283
  62. 62. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/. Accessed 1 February 2021.