Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Rearing methods and life cycle characteristics of Chironomus sp. Florida (Chironomidae: Diptera): A rapid-developing species for laboratory studies

  • Roberto Reyes-Maldonado ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing,

    Affiliations Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico

  • Bruno Marie,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico

  • Alonso Ramírez

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America


The species Chironomus sp. “Florida” has several qualities that make it a potential aquatic laboratory model to be used in Puerto Rico. Its use as such, however, requires a rearing protocol and life cycle description not previously reported. The present study addresses this lack of information by first describing a rearing method obtained through three years of observations. Next we describe and discuss the life cycle and the effects of temperature and feeding on development. The species has a short life cycle (typically 11 days) and larval stages easily identified using body measurements. Temperature affects the duration of the life cycle, with warm temperatures producing faster development than cold temperatures. The effects of different food concentrations vary: in large water volumes, concentrations of 2 mg/larva/day produce faster developmental times, but at low water volumes, small food concentrations of 0.5 mg/larva/day produce faster developmental times. The rearing protocol and life cycle parameters presented in this study are intended to promote the use of this species as a laboratory model. The fast development of Chironomus sp. “Florida” makes it ideal for toxicological studies.


Chironomids are one of the most common insects inhabiting freshwater bodies. The larvae are ubiquitous and can be found in any aquatic environment, from lakes to phytotelmata [1]. A great part of the species in this group are benthonic, some of them feeding on sediment, detritus, and other types of organic matter [2]. Larval morphological characteristics are diverse, and some groups are noticeable by their red colour, which is why many of the species are commonly called bloodworms. This colouration is given by a type of haemoglobin, a protein that is used for fixing oxygen and possibly metabolizing some environmental contaminants [3]. This characteristic of chironomids and their symbiotic relation with endogenous bacterial communities give them the advantage of tolerating and colonizing polluted environments [4, 5].

Despite the larval tolerance to contaminated environments, chironomids are prone to exhibit changes and disruptions at molecular, morphological, and behavioural levels as a response to their interaction with contaminants [6, 7]. For this reason, scientists have used them as freshwater bioindicators and laboratory models, taking their tolerance to infer ecosystem conditions and their responses to assess toxicity or chemical interactions. For example, their relative abundance is used in biotic indices (e.g., [8, 9]); mouth part deformities are used as a markers for toxicity (e.g., [10, 11]); and species survivorship are often used to calculate LC50 values for chemicals (e.g., [12]). The genus Chironomus has been used as a laboratory model, in particular C. riparius and C. tentans. These species are ecologically important and are easy to culture under laboratory conditions [13]. They have been used principally in temperate zones but studies in tropical regions (e.g., Brazil, northern Argentina, and India) recommend the use of local or tropical species, even though there is little information on them [1416]. Using local species as models might result in a better alternative as they are adapted to local environmental conditions [17].

In the Insular Caribbean, native chironomid species have been used as indicators to infer stream conditions, but not as laboratory models. Researchers have focused on the use of exotic aquatic animals as model organisms for assessing chemical toxicity (e.g., Danio rerio, [18, 19]). The information collected from them, however, does not have the appropriate ecological relevance that native species have. Studies have reported using the native species Macrobrachium carcinus to assess the effects of chemical pollution [20], but this organism’s complex life cycle complicates its maintenance and reproduction under laboratory conditions. The use of a Chironomus species could solve these problems since chironomids are easy to maintain and can be found in all freshwater bodies in the Insular Caribbean region [2124].

In Puerto Rico, we have been studying a native Chironomus species to determine its use as a laboratory model for assessing toxicity and responses to chemical pollution. The species Chironomus sp. “Florida” (as provisionally called by Epler [25]) has several qualities that make it a potential laboratory model. Indeed, it has a widespread distribution through the central and north-eastern part of the island, its larvae can be found inhabiting the sediments of streams and temporary pools at any time of the year, and all of its stages can be maintained under laboratory conditions. Nevertheless, no rearing protocol and life cycle data have yet been reported to recommend this species as a laboratory model. The present study addresses this lack of information by describing the rearing method that we have developed for Chironomus sp. “Florida” through 3 years of observations. In addition, we provide details on the life cycle of the species, presenting some effects observed when animals are exposed to different temperatures and food concentrations.

Materials and methods

Field collection and species identification

We initiated all cultures by collecting egg masses in the field, thus securing hundreds of larvae of the same species without major effort. The best method for securing egg masses of Chironomus sp. “Florida” in Puerto Rico was to place water-filled dark containers in open areas. The water in these containers reflected polarized light, which gravid females used as cues for selecting places to lay eggs [26]. Eggs masses were easy to observe on the water’s surface, attached to the edge or floating, during the evening and morning 1 to 7 days after placing the containers. They were collected by suctioning with a Pasteur pipette or by detaching and lifting them with the tip of the finger or a small wooden stick. Easily identifiable, this was the only species on the island with straight flat-shaped egg masses (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Morphological diversity of chironomid egg masses collected in the field.

(Left) Chironomus sp. “Florida”. (Centre) Chironomus sp. (Right) Dicrotendipes sp.

A residential area in San Juan (18°24’5.02”N, 66°3’11.47”W, 625 meters away from Río Piedras mainstem) was used successfully since 2017 to obtain egg masses with this method. Egg masses of Chironomus sp. “Florida” also were collected in a more time-consuming way by sweep-netting emerged aquatic plants at Quebrada San Antón, Carolina (18°25’04.7”N 66°00’03.0"W), and by direct collection in temporary pools, artificial channels, and animal watering troughs at Río Bauta, Morovis (18°15’41.4”N 66°27’25.9”W) and Quebrada Buruquena, Río Grande (18°19’17.7”N 65°49’10.9”W).

Egg masses were placed in clean Petri dishes with dechlorinated tap water until hatching. A single species culture of Chironomus sp. “Florida” was started by placing the larvae from five to ten masses into a single culture aquarium, as described below. Species identity was confirmed at the larval stage using cues described in Epler [25].

Culture apparatus

Our Chironomus sp. “Florida” rearing apparatus consisted of a series of interconnected aquariums with an overflow system (Fig 2). Aquariums were made of plastic, with a capacity of 8 L (29x16x18 cm) (Fig 2.1), and an aerial enclosure (15.5 cm height) made of two curved wires (50 cm length) intersected and attached at each corner top of the aquarium (Fig 2.2). Each aerial enclosure was covered with a handmade case of mesh fabric (1 mm pore), held in place with a polyester elastic band and with a straight aperture (15 cm length) on one of the sides sewed and secured with a clasp locker (Fig 2.3). This aperture provided access to the interior of the aquarium without disturbing the enclosed adults.

Fig 2. System used for the rearing of Chironomus sp. “Florida”.

(Left) Rearing units components. (Right) Filter chamber components.

The overflow system was made by drilling an aperture (2 cm diameter) in one of the short lateral faces of the aquariums, located at 8 cm from the sides and 9 cm from the base. PVC elbows were secured to the openings of each aquarium and used as the overflow water outlets (Fig 2.4). A ring made of plastic canvas (4 cm diameter; 2 cm height) was positioned at the mouth of each outlet to prevent drifting of egg masses, large larvae, and pupae (Fig 2.5). Additional 2-cm PVC tubing was used to connect the aquariums and drain the water to the filter (Fig 2.6).

The filter was made with a 19 L container (Fig 2.7), filled with layers of gravel, activated carbon, and sand (Fig 2.8–2.10). Water was moved by gravity, exiting through holes at the bottom of the container (Fig 2.11). A handmade strainer (nominal sieve opening = 250 μm) was positioned between the filter and the incoming water to prevent the entry of coarse matter, drifting larvae, and drifting egg masses into the filter (Fig 2.12). This filter was placed inside a glass aquarium (43x29x38 cm) (Fig 2.13) provided with 16 L of dechlorinated tap water, aeration, a water pump, and a heater (Fig 2.14–2.16). The filter was reinforced biologically by adding beneficial bacteria from ImaginariumTM Biological Booster (0.13 ml/L). The water pump inside the aquarium sent the filtered water through a UV filter to decrease the number of bacteria, protozoans, algae, and diatoms (Fig 2.17). From the UV filter, the water was distributed using PVC pipe (2 cm diameter) equipped with irrigation tubing and micro-spray nozzle valves (Fig 2.18–2.19).

Culture conditions

Each culture aquarium was provided with 4 L of dechlorinated tap water. Water temperature was maintained at 27±1°C, which is an average temperature that we have observed for lowland streams in Puerto Rico. Air temperature was maintained at 25±1°C by using a 250-watt ceramic heat lamp, simulating the range of average atmospheric temperature reported for the island (24 to 29°C [27]). Both temperatures were regulated with digital thermostats. Constant aeration in the filter chamber provided oxygenated water to culture aquariums. A photoperiod of 12:12 dark/light was maintained using 10-watt LED lights with a temperature colour of 6400 K.

Substrate and diet

The substrate we use for culturing the larval Chironomus sp. “Florida” was based on the methodology given by Batac-Catalan and White [28]. A key difference in methodology is that instead of shredded paper towels soaked in acetone and boiling water, commercial coffee filters made of oxygen whitened paper was used. The bottom of each aquarium was covered with a 2-cm layer of this material. Larvae were fed with a stock suspension made of Tetramin® fish flakes with tap water. The food suspension was prepared in large batches, separated into individual 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes™, and stored at -40°C until use. The larvae in each tank were fed at a concentration of 2 mg/larva (~400 mg/aquarium) of Tetramin® daily.


Since Chironomus sp. “Florida” is a species that requires swarms to mate, adults were left in the culture aquariums after emergence. The culture aquarium enclosure provided enough space for adults to conglomerate and for males to start swarming behaviours at the beginning and end of the photoperiod. Because males must be more abundant than females for mating to occur, in some instances adults from all culture aquariums were collected and placed in a single aquarium to obtain egg masses. Adults were collected using 50-ml Falcon® centrifuge tubes and a flashlight to attract them into the container. The same method was used to release them into the recipient aquarium.

Culture maintenance

From Monday to Friday, each canvas ring was removed and cleaned under tap water. Floating dead adults and exuviae were left to move down through the overflow outlets for 15 minutes. Any decaying material was brushed and removed. The filter strainer was washed under tap water after cleaning the aquariums to remove all the accumulated material. One to two times a week, 50% of the water volume in the filter aquarium was siphoned and replaced with dechlorinated tap water adjusted at the culture temperature. This helped to compensate for water evaporation. Additional cleaning was provided if signs of stress were observed (e.g., larvae breathing at surface), bad odours were perceived, or overgrowth of bacteria or protozoa was detected. In those cases, all the water of the filter aquarium was siphoned and replaced as many times as needed to recover balance in the system. Every 3 months the sand, activated carbon, and gravel in the filter were rinsed to prevent clogging. Because larval substrate decreases over time, new shredded coffee filter was added every 3 to 4 weeks as needed.

Life cycle

Life cycle and growth were described following modifications of the methodologies presented by Zilli [29]. Briefly, we collected 45 egg masses from the laboratory colony in a period of 3 days. The eggs in each mass were quantified and incubated at 27°C until hatching. The hatching time was recorded, and the unhatched eggs were quantified under the microscope. Newly hatched larvae from 11 egg masses and with the same age were randomly separated into six 1000-ml beakers provided with oxygenated water and 2 cm of shredded paper. These larvae were incubated at 27°C and fed daily as described in the Diet section above.

Three of the six beakers were selected to determine larval growth and larval stage. Ten larvae were collected daily from each beaker and fixed in 70% ethanol. The head capsule width and total body length of each larva were measured under a dissecting microscope. Larval growth through time was modelled by relating larval body size and time, fitting the result to the best polynomic curve. Larval instars were identified by obtaining the relationship between head capsule width and total body length following the Dyar proportions [30]. This method was also used to determine the growth rate between instars. The larvae in the remaining three beakers were left to reach adulthood and observed daily to record pupae presence, adult emergence, and daily adult sex distribution. Life cycle parameters such as the time to egg hatching, egg mass hatching efficiency, mean duration of each instar, immature development time, and minimum generation time were determined.

Effect of feeding and temperature on larval emergence

Each variable was evaluated using recently hatched larvae from five egg masses, segregated individually into sets of 25 small containers (5 ml) per treatment. Each container was provided with 3 ml of dechlorinated tap water, and we did not aerate the containers, assuming good oxygen diffusion between the water and the atmosphere due to the low water volume. To evaluate the effect of feeding, we fed four larval sets either 0.5, 1, 2, or 3 mg of TetraMin® suspension daily. Five additional larvae per the first three food concentration were grown in a different setting using 20 ml of water instead of three. This was done to see if the experiment could be reproduced at higher water volumes obtaining the same results.

The same setting used in the feeding experiment was used to evaluate the effect of temperature: six larval sets were exposed to either 15, 18, 20, 25, 29, or 35°C. In both experiments, water was exchanged daily to decrease water quality deterioration. The larvae were maintained under experimental conditions until adulthood, when time to reach emergence was recorded for each treatment.

Larval biomass

Larvae from different stages and sizes were collected from the colonies and euthanized in water with formalin (5%). Each larva was measured under a dissection microscope from the anterior edge of the head capsule to the posterior end of the abdomen. Individual larvae were transferred to a pre-weighed 2-cm2 aluminium sheet, dried at 60°C for 24 hours, and weighed in an analytical scale (±0.0001 mg). Larval dry body mass was modelled as a function of larval body length using the power model.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses and models were obtained with the assistance of the statistical software GraphPad PRISM 7. Treatments were compared using analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA), and Tukey’s post-hoc test was applied to identify differences among individual treatments.


Chironomus sp. Florida egg masses had on average 236.98 (n = 45; σ = 26.87) oval eggs that turn brownish when fertilized. Embryos were visible 12 hours after being laid and developed completely in less than 24 hours when incubated at 27°C. Hatching efficiency of egg masses was 95.56% (n = 45), and for viable egg masses hatching efficiency of eggs was 98.67% (n = 43). After hatching, the larvae stayed in the gelatinous mass and fed on it for 5 to 8 hours before turning planktonic. Larvae passed through four stages or larval instars that were easily identified by morphology or by relating the head width with the body length (Fig 3A). A summary of the values for head width, body length, stage duration, and morphological appearance is presented in Table 1. The average larval developmental time was 11 days (n = 899, σ = 1.31), with a minimum and maximum of 8 and 14 days.

Fig 3. Chironomus sp. “Florida” stages.

(A) Larval stages (I to IV) based on the relation between the head capsule width and body length. (B). Average duration and overlap between stages. Abbreviations: E: embryo; I-IV: larval instars I to IV; P: pupa; Am: adult male; Af: adult female. Adult presence without occurring emergence or adult span is represented in dark grey. Oviposition period is represented by light grey.

Table 1. Stage description, life cycle parameters, larval size ranges and larval growth rates of Chironomus sp. “Florida”.

The pupal stage developed in hours, producing a pharate adult that emerged in less than 24 hours. Emergence took place between day 10 and day 15 from egg deposition (n = 899; = 13.07 σ = 1.31): males appeared between day 10 and day 13 (n = 309, = 11.52 σ = 0.64); females between day 12 and day 15 (n = 590, = 13.88, σ = 0.70). With this, the average duration of the immature stage was 13 days (n = 899, σ = 1.31), with a minimum and a maximum of 9 and 14 days. In high humidity environments (86% humidity) males survived an average of four days (n = 24; σ = 1.47) after emerging, while females survived an average of six days (n = 20; σ = 1.45). Oviposition was observed from day 13 to day 18, producing a new generation from day 13. The complete overlap and duration of stages is illustrated in Fig 3B.

Animals that were fed at a food concentration of 0.5 mg/larva/day presented shorter adult emergence times than those fed at a higher concentration (Fig 4A). These results were not reproducible at a higher water volume since inverse results were obtained, in that the larvae fed at 2 mg/larva/day were the ones that presented shorter emergence times (Fig 4B). Larvae food deprivation was observed in the 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/larva/day treatments for both water volumes. Deprivation occurred first at low food concentrations and later at high food concentrations (Table 2).

Fig 4. Effect of feeding and temperature on adult emergence.

(A) Emergence curve obtained from larvae fed at four food concentrations in a water volume of 3 ml. (B) Emergence curve generated from larvae fed at three food concentrations in a water volume of 20 ml. (C) Emergence curve obtained from larvae reared at five different temperatures. Average emergence times and standard deviations are represented in black; individual emergence values are represented in grey. Each Polynomial model can be expressed as (A) y = −0.24x2 + 2.17x + 7.12, R2 = 0.60; (B) y = 0.28x2 − 1.58 + 10.05, R2 = 0.54; (C) y = 0.08x2 − 4.69x + 77.13, R2 = 0.98.

Table 2. Time to food deprivation at different water volumes for each feeding treatment.

Rearing larvae at temperatures as low as 15°C lengthened the time for adult emergence (Fig 4C). As the rearing temperature is increased, emergence time shortened. According to our model, larvae reared above 29°C are expected to begin to show an increase in the time of emergence. Both, feeding concentration and temperature presented a polynomial relationship with emergence time (Fig 4).

Larval growth at 27°C from the first instar larva to the prepupae stage was best represented by using a polynomial model (Fig 5A). This growth model showed a rapid increase in larval size until reaching the ninth day, when growth started to decrease. Growth rates between instars increased slightly through time, with the last stage being the one with the highest growth rate value (Table 1). The relationship between body length and dry mass was best explained using the power model, rather than linear or quadratic models (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. Growth and dry biomass equivalence of the larval Chironomus sp. “Florida”.

(A) Relationship of body size and age. (B) Relationship between body size and biomass. Average values and respective standard deviations are represented in black while individual measurements are represented in grey. The polynomial and power regressions can be expressed respectively as (A) y = −1.37e-6 + x3 + 0.24x2 + 0.35e-3 x + 0.34 R2 = 0.94; (B) y = 0.006e(0.34*x), R2 = 0.94.


Our method was the result of 3 years of observations on the suitability of different methodologies, including modified versions of Biever [31], New [32], and Batac-Catalan and White [28]. The preference of collecting eggs for establishing new colonies and studies is common and favoured by various authors (e.g., [14, 29, 3335]). With the proposed recirculated system, egg masses can be used to produce and maintain robust colonies without effort for a period longer than 9 months. Although recirculated systems are not commonly used for rearing and maintaining chironomids owing to larval drifting problems, it has the advantage of producing a constant oxygenated, clean, and biologically uncontaminated environment that reduces maintenance time. In our experience, rearing methods such as the ones presented by Biever [31], Batac-Catalan and White [28], and Ingersoll [13] do not provide long-term stability, and colonies start to present problems with overgrowth of microorganisms with subsequent anoxia, something that is rarely observed with recirculated systems.

We exchanged the material used as substrate by Batac-Catalan and White [28] since shredded coffee filters offer a fibrelike medium that is easy to prepare. This media has a high acceptance by larvae and is used as burrowing and case construction material. The only disadvantage of this substrate is that it starts degrading into a fine material, hindering its posterior reuse by the larvae.

Tetramin® flakes have often been used to feed larvae [33, 3638]. Although other rearing methodologies have used a range of feeding sources (e.g., vegetative organic matter, animal chow, manure, algae, and yeast), the use of Tetramin® has been shown to provide larvae with essential amino acids that promote enhanced growth rates in laboratory cultures [39]. It is important to mention that our proposed feeding concentration is based on observing how much food the larvae were able to ingest daily. Therefore, further studies are necessary to determine possible effects of the feeding concentrations on reproduction, survivability, and biomass. As in other rearing methodologies, adults were not fed in our method. This approach is based on the idea that adults are short lived and mostly rely on energy obtained during the immature stages to reproduce [40].

Our recommended method of aerial reproduction is the optimal way to achieve mating of adults in this species. Other methods, such as confined reproduction chambers, cannot be used since adults need space to swarm to achieve mating. This aerial method has been used elsewhere to keep producing new laboratory generations of species with swarming mating behaviours [15, 41, 42]. This method has provided us with a productivity of more than 15 egg masses/day per rearing unit once colonies are established. The recommended environmental conditions (27°C; photoperiod 12light:12dark) are similar to those observed in the wild environment of the species and are in accordance with other methodologies from tropical regions [43]. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that these conditions are not necessarily the optimal ones for obtaining high biomass and progeny outputs.

Life cycle

The life cycle of most species in the genus Chironomus is similar and is characterized by an embryo enclosed in a gelatinous mass, four larval stages, a pupa, and an adult [44]. Egg masses of Chironomus sp. “Florida” are small (about 236 eggs) relative to other species. Common tropical species of Chironomus laid over 350 eggs/mass (e.g., C. calligraphus, 369–374 eggs/mass; [14]), reaching up to 3,300 in some species [45, 46]. The low number that we found is consistent with the medium body size of adult Chironomus sp. “Florida”, as small species are expected to lay fewer eggs per mass [45].

Despite the smaller number of eggs in our species, it exhibits an excellent reproductive output based on the number of hatching eggs (98.67%). This high value is in accordance with other species such as C. riparius (97.78%) [45] and C. pulcher (99%) [47]. Hatching starts in less than 24 hours, contrasting with C. calligraphus (3 days at 21.8 ±3.2°C) [29], C. xanthus (1.25 days at 30°C) [48], and C. riparius (2–6 days at 26°C) [45]. This faster embryo development could represent an adaptive advantage to increase fitness, as this species inhabits temporary habitats. The typical egg mass feeding and planktonic behaviour after hatching are preserved in this species, a topic that has been observed and discussed elsewhere [14, 36, 49].

Chironomus sp. “Florida” has a short life cycle, with a minimum duration of the immature stage (Dmin) of only 9 days at 27°C. This is comparable to other tropical species that have presented similar Dmin values in a range of the temperatures of 24–30°C such as C. strenzkei (Dmin = 10 days [50]), C. sancticaroli (Dmin = 15 days [51]), C. xanthus (Dmin = 13 days [36]), C. calligraphus (Dmin = 11 days [14]), C. crassiforceps (Dmin = 10 days [43]), and C. ramosus (Dmin = 15 days [52]). As noted for egg hatchability, this low Dmin could be explained as an advantage for inhabiting temporary habitats.

We used the Dyar proportions to identify the four larval stages, determine growth rate, and obtain stage durability values. This method has been recommended as head measurement ranges are distinctive through each larval stage, something that is not observed with body measurement ranges [29, 36, 53]. In general, head size ranges and growth rates reported in this study for each larval stage are higher than those reported for other tropical species (e.g., C. crassiforceps [43], C. sancticaroli [54], and C. xanthus [36]). The average duration of each larval stage is dissimilar from the other stages, increasing every time the larva moves to its next phase. The last larval stage is therefore longer than the previous ones. This situation has been reported for other species, and it has been explained by Tokeshi [40] as a way to acquire the necessary energy for swarming activity in adulthood.

The larval growth model for Chironomus sp. “Florida” presents an increment in body size during the initial stages until reaching a period of slow growth at the final larval stage. This kind of growth has been reported in species under the Chironomus group [29], but also in species of other genera, such as in the Goeldichironomus group [33, 34]. In this growth model, we can observe two unusual behaviours: 1) as larvae age, the variability in larval body size increases; 2) as the larvae in the cohort reach a maximum in growth, a decrease in body size is observed afterward. In the case of the first observation, the dissimilarities in body size could be produced by sexual dimorphism [55] and by intraspecific competition for food and space [56]. For the second observation, a decrease in body size could be explained by the appearance of the prepupae, a stage characterized by a decrease in thoracic length due to increased swelling. It is important to note that the growth models presented by Corbi and Trivinho-Strixino [33], Zilli [29], and Zilli [34] do not show this decrease. Our observation may result from the use of a different statistical model in our study.

It is important to take into consideration that males and females were not separated to produce the growth curve presented in Fig 5B. This detail is something that this study and other studies have ignored when executing this kind of model because of the complexity of identifying the sex at the larval stage By constructing models by sex, we could reduce variability and develop more precise growth curves that eliminate the effect of sexual dimorphism.

The pupal and adult stages in chironomids are in general short, ranging from hours to a few days [44, 57]. The pupa of Chironomus sp. “Florida” is not an exception, presenting a developmental time of hours (less than 24) similar to C. crassicaudatus (22–27 hours at 27°C [53]) and C. riparius (24 hours at 26°C [45]). The longevity of adults in this species was unexpectedly longer (more than 2 to 3 days), something rarely reported for tropical species. Our longevity values could be the consequence of our experimental conditions provoking restricted flight and reduced dehydration (due to the way we contained the animals). This is confirmed by studies in chironomids and other insects that have demonstrated how decreasing flight and dehydration increase survivability [58, 59].

Effect of temperature and feeding on adult emergence

Temperature and food availability are two variables known to control larval development in chironomids [38, 41, 45]. Regarding adult emergence, it has been shown that both variables interfere in the duration of this process [60]. Typically, adult emergence time is shortened by an increasing rearing temperature, but the emergence time may slightly increase again if the temperature rises above 30°C. This decreasing adult emergence time behaviour is present in Chironomus sp. “Florida” This species, however, presents a low tolerance to high temperatures since no survivorship was achieved at 35°C. This was unexpected given that this species inhabits the tropics and other species of chironomids can survive in temperatures above 35°C [61].

Food deprivation is known to have several effects on chironomids, from changes in fitness to changes in life cycle parameters [38, 62]. The results obtained at low water volume were surprising since an increase in emergence time was expected. Notably, these data were not reproducible at high water volumes, a finding that led us to conclude that the observed behaviour at small water volumes was caused by oxygen depletion related to bacterial overgrowth due to excess of uneaten food. Confirmatory evidence was observed after each water change in the treatments where food concentrations were greater than 1 mg/larva/day. In this case, larvae were observed at the water surface producing constant breathing movements. This behaviour was not observed in experiments with large water volumes and high food concentrations where larvae were observed at the bottom of the container with no observable breathing behaviour. Although other feeding experiments have mentioned that larvae fulfil nutritional demands at concentrations as low as 0.12 mg/larva/day [38], here we observed that, in a species that grows fast, concentrations of 2 mg/larva/day are required to avoid food deprivation. Nevertheless, in order to achieve faster adult emergence times, it is necessary to avoid unacceptable water conditions due to oxygen depletion and waste production.

In summary, this study showed that a native non-biting species of the Chironomus genus could be easily reared under laboratory conditions in Puerto Rico. The native species Chironomus sp. “Florida” is ideal for this purpose, since it is easy to obtain in the field, easy to maintain under laboratory conditions, and has a short life cycle. The use of a native species model for freshwater toxicological evaluations provides a better understanding of how contaminants affect tropical ecosystems.

Supporting information

S1 File. Original data from all experiments.



We thank Taissae Sánchez Medina for her advice and general support in the maintenance of colonies and experiments. We are also grateful to Gloria Ortiz for helping us obtain some of the materials and instruments required for this study.


  1. 1. Pinder LC V. The habitats of chironomid larvae. In: Armitage PD, editor. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. Springer; 1995. pp. 107–135.
  2. 2. Berg MB. Larval food and feeding behaviour. In: Armitage PD, editor. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. Springer; 1995. pp. 136–168.
  3. 3. Osmulski PA, Leyko W. Structure, function and physiological role of Chironomus haemoglobin. Comp Biochem Physiol—Part B Biochem. 1986;85: 701–722.
  4. 4. Senderovich Y, Halpern M. The protective role of endogenous bacterial communities in chironomid egg masses and larvae. ISME J. 2013;7: 2147–2158. pmid:23804150
  5. 5. Weber RE, Vinogradov SN. Nonvertebrate hemoglobins: Functions and molecular adaptations. Physiol Rev. 2001;81: 569–628. pmid:11274340
  6. 6. De Haas EM, Van Haaren R, Koelmans AA, Kraak MHS, Admiraal W. Analyzing the causes for the persistence of chironomids in floodplain lake sediments. Arch fur Hydrobiol. 2005;162: 211–228.
  7. 7. Azevedo-Pereira HMVS, Soares AMVM. Effects of mercury on growth, emergence, and behavior of Chironomus riparius Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidae). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;59: 216–224. pmid:20652487
  8. 8. Baptista DF, Henriques-Oliveira AL, Oliveira RBS, Mugnai R, Nessimian JL, Buss DF. Development of a benthic multimetric index for the Serra da Bocaina bioregion in Southeast Brazil. Brazilian J Biol. 2013;73: 573–583. pmid:24212698
  9. 9. Rattanachan N, Boonsoong B, Getwongsa P, Uttaruk Y, Narumon S. A Benthic Macroinvertebrate Multimetric Index for Assessment of the Ecological Integrity of Northeast Streams, Thailand. EnvironmentAsia. 2014;7: 104–111.
  10. 10. Meregalli G, Vermeulen AC, Ollevier F. The use of chironomid deformation in an in situ test for sediment toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000;47: 231–238. pmid:11139175
  11. 11. Al-Shami S, Rawi CSM, Nor SAM, Ahmad AH, Ali A. Morphological deformities in Chironomus spp. (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae as a tool for impact assessment of anthropogenic and environmental stresses on three rivers in the Juru River System, Penang, Malaysia. Environ Entomol. 2010;39: 210–222. pmid:20146859
  12. 12. Lencioni V, Bellamoli F, Bernabò P, Miari F, Scotti A. Response of Diamesa spp. (Diptera: Chironomidae) from alpine streams to newly emergent contaminants and pesticides. J Limnol. 2018;77: 131–140.
  13. 13. Ingersoll CG, Ankley GT, Burton GA, Dwyer FJ, Hoke RA, Norberg-King TJ, et al. Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates. Second edi. Duluth, Minnesota: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2000.
  14. 14. Rech KC, Guereschi RM, Torres KH, Nuñer AP de O. Subsidies for production of Chironomus calligraphus larvae (Chironomidae, Diptera) in the laboratory. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 2014;58: 199–206.
  15. 15. Bhaduri S, Sarkar P, Ghosh C, Midya T. Laboratory Rearing of Chironomus striatipennis Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae). Proc Zool Soc. 2012;65: 121–125.
  16. 16. Buso C, Rodgher S, Galante Negri R, Gaeta Espíndola EL, Daam MA. Chironomus sancticaroli (Diptera, Chironomidae) as a sensitive tropical test species in laboratory bioassays evaluating metals (copper and cadmium) and field testing. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018;76: 42–50. pmid:30349930
  17. 17. Freitas EC, Rocha O. Acute toxicity tests with the tropical cladoceran Pseudosida ramosa: The importance of using native species as test organisms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011;60: 241–249. pmid:20464548
  18. 18. De León J, Cotto MDC, Olivo CJ, Márquez FM. Effects of chronic environmental exposure to waterborne lead and copper on the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems of zebrafish. Toxicol Environ Health Sci. 2020.
  19. 19. Colón-Cruz L, Kristofco L, Crooke-Rosado J, Acevedo A, Torrado A, Brooks BW, et al. Alterations of larval photo-dependent swimming responses (PDR): New endpoints for rapid and diagnostic screening of aquatic contamination. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;147: 670–680. pmid:28934711
  20. 20. Ortiz Lugo JL, Sosa Lloréns MAC. Impacts of urbanization and river water contaminants on abundance, locomotion and aggression of a local freshwater crustacean. University of Puerto Rico. 2015.
  21. 21. Laurindo da Silva F, Wiedenbrug S, Farrell BD. A preliminary survey of the non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) of the Dominican Republic. J Chironomidae Res. 2015; 12–19.
  22. 22. Bello González O, Spies M, Téllez B. Estado del conocimiento de la familia Chironomidae (Insecta:Diptera) en Cuba. Dugesiana. 2013;20: 233–242.
  23. 23. Ferrington LCJ, Buzby KM, Masteller EC. Composition and Temporal Abundance of Chironomidae Emergence from a Tropical Rainforest Stream at El Verde, Puerto Rico. J Kansas Entomol Soc. 1993;66: 167–180.
  24. 24. Curry LL. The Chironomidae (Diptera) found in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Anegada, British Virgin Islands. New York. 1971;103: 310–314.
  25. 25. Epler JH. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. Crawford, South Carolina: John H. Epler; 2001.
  26. 26. Lerner A, Meltser N, Sapir N, Erlick C, Shashar N, Broza M. Reflected polarization guides chironomid females to oviposition sites. J Exp Biol. 2008;211: 3536–3543. pmid:18978217
  27. 27. Murphy DJ, Hall MH, Hall CAS, Heisler GM, Stehman S V., Anselmi-Molina C. The relationship between land cover and the urban heat island in northeastern Puerto Rico. Int J Climatol. 2011;31: 1222–1239.
  28. 28. Batac-Catalan Z, White DS. Creating and maintaining cultures of Chironomus tentans (Diptera: Chironomidae). Entomol News. 1982;93: 54–58.
  29. 29. Zilli FL. Biometry and life cycle of Chironomus calligraphus Goeldi 1905 (Diptera, Chironomidae) in laboratory conditions. Interciencia. 2008;33: 767–770.
  30. 30. Dyar HG. The Number of Molts of Lepidopterous Larvae. Psyche (Stuttg). 1890;5: 420–422.
  31. 31. Biever KD. A rearing technique for the colonization of chironomid midges. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1965;58: 135–136.
  32. 32. New BM, Scholl JP, McCarty JC, Bennett JP. A recirculation system for experimental aquaria. Aquaculture. 1974;3: 95–103.
  33. 33. Corbi JJ, Trivinho-Strixino S. Life cycle of two Goeldichironomus species (Diptera, Chironomidae). Rev Bras Entomol. 2006;50: 72–75.
  34. 34. Zilli F, Marchese M, Paggi A. Life cycle of Goeldichironomus holoprasinus goeldi (Diptera: Chironomidae) in laboratory. Neotrop Entomol. 2009;38: 472–6. pmid:19768264
  35. 35. Canteiro RCSA, Albertoni EF. Growth of immature Chironomus calligraphus (Diptera, Chironomidae) in laboratory conditions. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2011;83: 1279–1286. pmid:21971596
  36. 36. Fonseca AL, Rocha O. Laboratory cultures of the native species Chironomus xanthus Rempel, 1939 (Diptera-Chironomidae). Acta Limnol Bras. 2004;16: 153–161.
  37. 37. Naylor C, Rodrigues C. Development of a test method for Chironomus riparius using a formulated sediment. Chemosphere. 1995;31: 3291–3303.
  38. 38. Ristola T, Pellinen J, Ruokolainen M, Kostamo A, Kukkonen JVK. Effect of sediment type, feeding level, and larval density on growth and development of a midge (Chironomus riparius). Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999;18: 756–764.
  39. 39. Abashy MM. Culture of chironomid larvae (Insecta- Diptera Chironomidae) under different feeding systems. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2005;31: 403–418.
  40. 40. Tokeshi M. Life cycles and population dynamics. In: Armitage PD, editor. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. Springer; 1995. pp. 225–268. pmid:8667604
  41. 41. Maier KJ, Kosalwat P, Knight AW. Culture of Chironomus decorus (Diptera: Chironomidae) and the effect of temperature on its life history. Environ Entomol. 1990;19: 1681–1688.
  42. 42. Nath BB, Thorat L, Babrekar A, Datkhile K, Ghadge A, Gaikwad R, et al. Development of a new design of an insectary model for rearing and environmental assessment studies on chironomid midges. Chironomus Newsl Chironomidae Res. 2009;22: 11–13.
  43. 43. Peck MR, Klessa DA, Baird DJ. A tropical sediment toxicity test using the dipteran Chironomus crassiforceps to test metal bioavailability with sediment pH change in tropical acid-sulfate sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21: 720–728. pmid:11951944
  44. 44. Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LC V. The Chironomidae: Biology and ecology of non-biting midges. First edit. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. United Kingdom: Springer Science & Business Media; 1995.
  45. 45. Sahragard A, Rafatifard M. Biology and effect of temperature on larval development time of Chironomus riparius Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidade) under laboratory conditions. Mun Ent Zool. 2010;5: 1025–1033.
  46. 46. Nolte U. Egg masses of Chironomidae (Diptera). A review including new observations and a preliminary key. Entomol Scand Suppl. 1993;43: 1–75.
  47. 47. Dejoux C. Recherches sur le cycle de developpement de Chironoimus pulcher (Diptera: Chironomidae). Can Entomol. 1971;103: 465–470.
  48. 48. Trivinho-Strixino S, Strixino G. Observações sobre a biologia da reprodução de um quironomídeo da região neotropical (Diptera, Chironomidae). Rev Bras Entomol. 1989;33: 207–216.
  49. 49. Hein J, Mahadeva MN. Rearing & maintaining midge cultures (Chironomus tentans) for laboratory studies. Am Biol Teach. 1992;54: 236–240.
  50. 50. Fittkau EJ. Chironomus strenzkei n. sp. (Chironomidae, Dipt.), ein neues Laboratoriumstier. Zeitschrift für Morphol der Tiere. 1968;63: 239–250.
  51. 51. Strixino G, Strixino ST. A temperatura e o desenvolvimento larval de Chironomus sancticaroli (Diptera: Chironomidae). Rev Bras Zool. 1985;3: 177–180.
  52. 52. Chockalingam V, Radhika D, Kumar D. Lifecycle and larval rearing of Chironomous ramosus using different organic nutrients. Environ Ecol. 2006;24: 373–378.
  53. 53. Frouz J, Ali A, Lobinske RJ. Suitability of morphological parameters for instar determination of pestiferous midges Chironomus crassicaudatus and Glyptotendipes paripes (Diptera: Chironomidae) under laboratory conditions. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2002;18: 222–227. pmid:12322946
  54. 54. Strixino ST, Strixino G. Nova espécie do gênero Chironomus Meigen do sul do Brasil (Diptera: Chironomidae). Rev Bras Entomol. 1981.
  55. 55. Richardi VS, Rebechi D, Aranha JMR, Navarro-silva MA. Determination of larval instars in Chironomus sancticaroli (Diptera: Chironomidae) using novel head capsule structures. Zoologia. 2013;30: 211–216.
  56. 56. Biever KD. Effect of diet and competition in laboratory rearing of chironomid midges. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1971;64: 1166–1169.
  57. 57. Cranston PS. Insecta: Diptera, Chironomidae. In: Yule CM, Sen Yong H, editors. The freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysia region. 2004. pp. 710–734.
  58. 58. Benoit JB, Lopez-Martinez G, Elnitsky MA, Lee RE, Denlinger DL. Moist habitats are essential for adults of the antarctic midge, Belgica antarctica (Diptera: Chironomidae), to avoid dehydration. Eur J Entomol. 2007;104: 9–14.
  59. 59. Gibbs M, van Dyck H. Butterfly flight activity affects reproductive performance and longevity relative to landscape structure. Oecologia. 2010;163: 341–350. pmid:20372930
  60. 60. Péry ARR, Garric J. Modelling effects of temperature and feeding level on the life cycle of the midge Chironomus riparius: An energy-based modelling approach. Hydrobiologia. 2006;553: 59–66.
  61. 61. Stevens MM. Development and survival of Chironomus tepperi Skuse (Diptera: Chironomidae) at a range of constant temperatures. Aquat Insects. 1998;20: 181–188.
  62. 62. Péry ARR, Mons R, Flammarion P, Lagadic L, Garric J. A modeling approach to link food availability, growth, emergence, and reproduction for the midge Chironomus riparius. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21: 2507–2513. pmid:12389933