Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Pediatric fever in neutropenia with bacteremia—Pathogen distribution and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns over time in a retrospective single-center cohort study

  • Melina Stergiotis ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Melina Stergiotis, Roland A. Ammann

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

  • Roland A. Ammann ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Melina Stergiotis, Roland A. Ammann

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, Kinderaerzte Kurwerk, Burgdorf, Switzerland

  • Sara Droz,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

  • Christa Koenig,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

  • Philipp Kwame Abayie Agyeman

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    philipp.agyeman@insel.ch

    Affiliation Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Background

Fever in neutropenia (FN) is a potentially life-threatening complication of chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients. The current standard of care at most institutions is emergency hospitalization and empirical initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

Methods

We analyzed in retrospect FN episodes with bacteremia in pediatric cancer patients in a single center cohort from 1993 to 2012. We assessed the distribution of pathogens, the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and their trends over time.

Results

From a total of 703 FN episodes reported, we assessed 134 FN episodes with bacteremia with 195 pathogens isolated in 102 patients. Gram-positive pathogens (124, 64%) were more common than Gram-negative (71, 36%). This proportion did not change over time (p = 0.26). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (64, 32%), viridans group streptococci (42, 22%), Escherichia coli (33, 17%), Klebsiella spp. (10, 5%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (nine, 5%) were the most common pathogens. Comparing the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns, the antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone plus amikacin (64%; 95%CI: 56%-72%), cefepime (64%; 95%CI 56%-72%), meropenem (64%; 95%CI 56%-72), and piperacillin/tazobactam (62%; 95%CI 54%-70%), respectively, did not differ significantly. The addition of vancomycin to those regimens would have increased significantly in vitro activity to 99% for ceftriaxone plus amikacin, cefepime, meropenem, and 96% for piperacillin/tazobactam (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Over two decades, we detected a relative stable pathogen distribution and found no relevant trend in the antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Different recommended antibiotic regimens showed comparable in vitro antimicrobial activity.

Introduction

The most frequent potentially lethal complication of chemotherapy in pediatric patients with cancer is fever in neutropenia (FN) [1]. The current management with emergency hospitalization and empirical administration of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics has decreased mortality to below 1% in pediatric FN episodes [2]. Bacteremia is detected in approximately every fourth FN episode [1, 3]. Over the last decades, predominantly Gram-positive pathogens have been isolated in FN with bacteremia, likely because of increased use of antibiotic prophylaxis, introduction of long-indwelling intravascular devices, high-dose chemotherapy-induced mucositis, and use of antacids and histamine blockers [4]. Still, because of the potentially devastating course of Gram-negative bacteremia, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, broad coverage of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens is recommended for initial empirical antibiotic therapy in FN [5]. Because of lower toxicity, and advantages in administration and price, antibiotic monotherapy with an antipseudomonal beta-lactam or a carbapenem is usually recommended by recent European [57] and American [8] guidelines, which are based on systematic reviews of observational and randomized trials. A second Gram-negative agent or glycopeptide may be added in patients who are clinically unstable, if an infection with resistant bacteria is suspected, or at centers with a high rate of resistant pathogens [58]. Antibiotic resistance has been associated with prolonged bacteremia, increased length of hospitalization and worse outcome in children with cancer and FN [9, 10].

This study aimed to examine the distribution of pathogens isolated during FN with bacteremia, their in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns against selected antibiotics, and their trends over time in a single center retrospective cohort study spanning two decades in a pediatric oncology center using only oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or inhaled pentamidine diisethionate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Material and methods

Study design and patients

This retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted at the Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. All children and adolescents less than 17 years old at diagnosis of malignancy and treated with chemotherapy from 1993 to 2012 were eligible. Details of patient identification and the data acquisition process have been published elsewhere [11]. For this analysis, we only included patients with FN and bacteremia. Information on pathogens isolated in blood culture and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns were available from the laboratory database of the local Institute for Infectious Diseases. During the anonymization process the study time period was divided into 4-year intervals (1993 to 1996, 1997 to 2000, 2001 to 2004, 2005 to 2008, 2009 to 2012) [11]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Direktion Lehre und Forschung, Inselspital Bern; registration number, 13-06-11; last update, April 02, 2014), including waiver of informed consent. On June 30, 2014, data were fully anonymized before analysis, in order to comply with the request of the new Swiss Federal Law on Human Research. Other aspects of subsets of these data have been published before, specifically, data covering the years 2004 to 2007 [1, 1215], and 2004 to 2011 [2, 16].

Clinical management

Most patients were treated for their malignancy according to established international phase III protocols or therapy recommendations. Clinical management regarding prophylaxis and treatment of FN remained unchanged during the complete study period. All patients received oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jiroveci. Patients who did not tolerate oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were switched to inhaled pentamidine diisethionate. No other antibiotic prophylaxis was used [11]. Routine management of patients with cancer presenting with FN included emergency hospitalization and empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone plus amikacin as first-line therapy. Hemodynamically unstable patients at presentation of FN were treated with cefepime and amikacin, vancomycin was added if a central venous catheter was present. In patients with FN persisting for more than 48 hours, and in whom no cause of FN had been identified, empirical therapy was usually escalated to meropenem and vancomycin [14]. Aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures were sampled at presentation with FN before starting antimicrobial therapy. Subsequently, one pair of aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures was taken every 24 hours as long as fever continued or in the presence of shaking chills. Blood cultures were collected from each lumen of an existing central venous catheter or peripheral venous line in patients that did not have a central venous catheter [14].

Definitions

Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 0.5 G/L [11]. Until July 8, 2007, fever was defined as an axillary temperature ≥ 38.5°C persisting ≥ 2 hours, or a single axillary temperature ≥ 39.0°C, thereafter it was defined as a single tympanic temperature ≥ 39.0°C [2, 11]. In the setting of rising temperatures, the different limits used for the different measurement methods have been shown to be comparable [17]. Intensity of chemotherapy was described using four group classification according to the severity of myelosuppression and the expected duration of severe neutropenia, as described previously [11, 18], which is an extension of an earlier classification with two groups [19]. Several FN episodes per patient were allowed [11]. Bacteremia was defined by the growth of bacteria in blood culture, irrespective of the bacterial species. Blood cultures were analyzed by a qualitative automated culture system (BacT/ALERT®, bio-Mérieux, Geneva, Switzerland) [2]. We used the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test to determine in vitro antibiotic susceptibility. To determine the penicillin and ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations of viridans group streptococci (VGS) we used the Etest® (bioMérieux, previously AB Biodisk). For in vitro susceptibility testing of vancomycin in Enterococcus spp. a brain heart infusion agar screen plate containing six micrograms of vancomycin per milliliter was used. During the entire study period, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards were used at our Institute for Infectious Diseases [16]. Polymicrobial growth was defined as isolation of different pathogens at the same day of FN episode. If a pathogen was detected in blood cultures taken after the day of FN diagnosis (day 0), this was defined as subsequent bacteremia. Subsequent bacteremia was further subclassified into prolonged bacteremia if the same pathogen was repeatedly detected in blood cultures taken on different days.

In vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

We assessed the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated in blood culture against antibiotics commonly used for empirical therapy in pediatric FN [5]. We evaluated ceftriaxone plus amikacin, the standard empirical therapy at the study center, cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy, as well as the combinations of above therapy regimens with vancomycin. We considered an antibiotic to be active in vitro if the susceptibility pattern showed full susceptibility to the selected antibiotic and the isolated pathogen did not harbor intrinsic resistance to the selected antibiotic. We considered combination therapy (e.g. ceftriaxone plus amikacin) to be active in vitro if the susceptibility pattern showed full susceptibility to at least one of the antibiotics and did not harbor intrinsic resistance against all antibiotics of combination therapy. Enterococci spp. were considered intrinsic resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems.

Due to technical difficulties in retrieving data from the microbiology database, results of susceptibility testing were not available from 1993 to mid 1998. Therefore, we excluded the time period from 1993 to 1996 and all other isolates without available susceptibility testing from analysis of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

Statistical analysis

We presented continuous variables as median and interquartile range (IQR) and nominal data as frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We used the exact Kruskal-Wallis Test to analyze trends over time for nominal data and exact Jonckheere-Terpstra-Test for continuous data with Monte Carlo approximation. We compared the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns with the Fisher’s Exact Test.

For all statistical analyses, 2-sided P-values below 0.05 were considered significant. The exact Kruskal-Wallis test and exact Jonckheere-Terpstra test were calculated with StatXact 10 (Cytel Inc., Cambridge, MA USA). All other analyses and plots were done using R 3.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria).

Results

Patients and FN episodes

In the 20 study years, 800 pediatric patients less than 17 years old with cancer were treated at the University Children‘s Hospital Bern. 596 (75%) received chemotherapy to treat their malignancy. Of 703 eligible FN episodes, bacteremia was detected in 148 (21%). Specific information on the clinical course was available in 138 (90%) of these episodes [11]. Four (3%) episodes were excluded from analysis because of duplicate information in one and blood-culture proven invasive fungal infection due to Candida spp. in three. We thus analyzed 134 FN episodes with bacteremia caused by 195 bacteria isolated in blood culture in 102 patients (Fig 1). In total 18 of 102 (18%) patients were registered with two and seven (7%) patients with three bacteremia episodes.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart of FN episodes in pediatric patients with cancer and fever in neutropenia, from 1993 to 2012.

Multiple FN episodes per patient allowed. FN = fever and neutropenia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.g001

Clinical characteristics of FN episodes with bacteremia

The proportion of FN episodes with bacteremia did not change over time (p = 0.91). Clinical characteristics and evolution over time of the 134 FN episodes with bacteremia are presented in Table 1. Over time, we observed less FN episodes in patients with relapse of malignancy. In 107 of 133 (80%) episodes the combination of ceftriaxone plus amikacin was administered as initial antibiotic treatment. Switch of antibiotic treatment could include a de-escalation to a specific treatment based on the susceptibility testing or escalation to broaden the antibiotic spectrum like meropenem plus vancomycin. A potentially life-threatening complication (not otherwise specified) occurred in eight (6%) episodes, in seven (5%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and in two (1%) children died. Among patients treated on intensive care unit Gram-negative sepsis with E. coli was found in three (3 of 7, 43%) patients (S1 Table). CoNS bacteremia was detected in one child that died, however, the isolate was sensitive to ceftriaxone and was only isolated in one blood culture. He finally succumbed to invasive fungal infection due to Aspergillus fumigatus. The other child died on day 3 with fulminant VGS sepsis detected on day 0. He received antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone and amikacin without treatment escalation, susceptibility testing of the isolate was not performed.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of FN episodes with bacteremia in pediatric patients with cancer, from 1993 to 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.t001

Pathogens in FN episodes

124 (64%, 95% CI 56%-70%) Gram-positive and 71 (36%; 95% CI 30%-44%) Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in blood culture (Table 2). This proportion did not change over time (p = 0.26), but we observed a significant change over time in Gram-negative pathogen distribution (p = 0.021), mainly due to an increased detection of Klebsiella spp. during the last time period. (Table 2). If we excluded CoNS, pathogen distribution changed to more Gram-negative 71 (54%; 95% CI 45%-62%) than Gram-positive 61 (46%; 95% CI 38%-55%) bacteria (S2 Table).

thumbnail
Table 2. Bacteria detected in blood culture, from 1993 to 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.t002

The majority of pathogens, 134 of 195 (69%) were detected on day 0 only. All 71 Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in blood cultures taken before day 3, 61 (86%) in the first blood culture taken on day 0, nine (13%) on day 1, and one (1%) on day 2.

Subsequent bacteremia was detected in 46 of 134 (34%) episodes (Table 1). All 20 bacteria detected in blood cultures sampled after day 2 were Gram-positive, 17 CoNS, one Enterococcus faecalis and two other Gram-positive pathogens (Fig 2). Over time, fewer episodes with subsequent bacteremia at any time and day 1 or 2 were detected (p = 0.031 and p = 0.002, respectively, Table 1). This time trend remained significant when only considering CoNS if there was prolonged CoNS bacteremia (28 of 111 (25%), p < 0.001) or when only considering bacteria isolated before day 3 and excluding all CoNS (18 of 101 (18%), p = 0.002, details not shown).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Temporal distribution of bacteria detection in pediatric patients with cancer and fever in neutropenia.

Each point represents one isolated pathogen (n = 195) on the day when the blood culture was taken after FN diagnosis. All positive blood cultures taken during FN episode are shown. FN = fever in neutropenia. CoNS = coagulase-negative staphylococci. VGS = Viridans group streptococci. Day 0 = day of FN diagnosis. Day 1 = the following calendar day after FN diagnosis and so forth.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.g002

Prolonged bacteremia was detected in 12 of 134 episodes (9%), caused by CoNS in 10 and P. aeruginosa in two episodes, none had a fatal outcome. In 15 (11%) episodes polymicrobial growth was noted in blood culture.

In vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns against selected antibiotic therapy regimens

We analyzed in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of 143 of 169 (85%) bacteria isolated in blood culture between 1997 and 2012. The combination of ceftriaxone plus amikacin was active in vitro in 64% (92 of 143; 95% CI 56%-72%), cefepime 64% (91 of 142; 95% CI 56%-72%), meropenem 64% (91 of 142; 95% CI 56%-72%), and piperacillin/tazobactam 62% (89 of 143; 95% CI 54%-70%). Adding vancomycin to any empirical antibiotic therapy would have increased activity to 99% for ceftriaxone plus amikacin (138 of 140; 95% CI: 94%-100%), cefepime (139 of 140; 95% CI: 96%-100%), and meropenem (139 of 140; 95% CI: 96%-100%), while it would have increased activity to 96% for piperacillin/tazobactam (134 of 140; 95% CI: 91%-98%) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). No significant trend over time was noted (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of empirical antibiotic therapy in bacteria detected in blood culture, from 1997 to 2012.

Points indicate the point estimate for the percentage of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility for each time period in 143 of 169 isolates with full antimicrobial susceptibility information. Vertical lines present the 95% CI`s around the point estimates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.g003

The isolates not covered in vitro by ceftriaxone plus amikacin were mostly Gram-positive bacteria (51 of 52, 98%; 44 CoNS, 4 Enterococcus spp., 3 VGS) and one Gram-negative pathogen (P. aeruginosa isolate resistant to Amikacin). None of the respective patients died.

If we excluded CoNS fully sensitive to vancomycin, the antibiotic in vitro susceptibility rates for the examined antibiotic regimens were increased to 89% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 92% for ceftriaxone plus amikacin, cefepime, meropenem. In combination with vancomycin in vitro susceptibility rates reached 93% for piperacillin/tazobactam, 98% for ceftriaxone plus amikacin and 99% for cefepime and meropenem (S1 Fig). No significant trend over time was noted. Piperacillin/tazobactam was tested in vitro resistant to five E. coli and one Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.

In the study period, we did not detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Of note, one vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis (but sensitive to amoxicillin, teicoplanin, and norfloxacin) and two VGS isolates resistant to ceftriaxone (ceftriaxone E Test ≥ 4 μg/ml) were detected. Among E. coli and Klebsiella spp. 18% and 10%, respectively, were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Results of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing in the three most common Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria detected in blood culture, from 1997 to 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.t003

Discussion

Over a 20-years observation period in a single tertiary pediatric oncology center, we report a stable distribution of pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility patterns without emergence of multi-resistant pathogens in pediatric patients with cancer diagnosed with FN with bacteremia. Our results can serve as a proof that in a setting with low antimicrobial resistance rates in the general population [20], infections with multi-resistant pathogens remain uncommon in children with cancer.

Comparable to other studies in pediatric patients with cancer and FN [4, 8, 9, 21, 22], we detected more Gram-positive than Gram-negative pathogens in blood culture, and CoNS was the most frequent pathogen detected. CoNS also constituted the main pathogen detected in episodes with subsequent bacteremia. An American study found subsequent bacteremia (day 1–13) only in 4% (four of 95) episodes with persistent fever [23]. Our data support that relevant bacteremia is rarely detected in pediatric patients with cancer and FN after day 3 unless the patient becomes unstable [23]. While the addition of a glycopeptide to empirical antibiotic therapy would have led to a better in vitro coverage of isolated bacteria, current guidelines reserve this for selected patients [5, 6, 8]. The addition of a glycopeptide to initial empirical antibiotic therapy regimens in FN in patients with cancer is not associated with reduced duration of fever or a decrease in overall mortality [8], CoNS infections are rarely associated with a severe disease course [24], and the addition of a glycopeptide to initial therapy in FN has been associated with more frequent adverse effects [5].

Current guidelines—which were not available at the time of this study—do favor monotherapy with an antipseudomonal beta-lactam or a carbapenem as first-line treatment [58]. In our setting, the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns of ceftriaxone plus amikacin was comparable to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam (with or without CoNS). However, in one of five episodes with P. aeruginosa bacteremia susceptibility testing revealed resistance to ceftriaxone and amikacin, whilst the isolate would have been susceptible in vitro to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam.

All Gram-negative pathogens detected in our study were isolated in blood cultures taken before day 3, underscoring the need for a broad coverage of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens by empirical therapy regimens for FN in pediatric cancer patients. Similar to other studies, E. coli was the most prevalent Gram-negative pathogen in our study [22, 25]. While resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was more prevalent in our cohort (18%, 5 of 28) than in the general pediatric population in a comparable setting (7%, 18 of 275) [20], we did not detect ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. This is in contrast to other studies in pediatric patients with cancer and FN that have reported increased rates of multi-resistant bacterial infections [9, 10, 22, 2527].

The strengths of the study are the long observation period and a large number of FN episodes with bacteremia in a setting without relevant changes in clinical management during the study period. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the longest observational study examining the pathogen distribution, the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns and their trends over two decades in pediatric cancer patients.

Given the retrospective nature of the study, several limitations need to be mentioned. First, data on in vitro antibiotic susceptibility patterns were not available for some pathogens due to a change in the data storage system during the study period. Second, clinical data was incomplete which prevented us from drawing firm conclusions on reasons and nature of adaption of antibiotic therapies and classification of pathogens as contaminants. Third, the use of Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test might be less sensitive to the detection of changes in susceptibility rates than determining minimum inhibitory concentrations. However, given the long observation period of the study, we do not think this affects the interpretation of the results. Fourth, several FN episodes per patients were allowed and analyses were not formally corrected for multiple episodes per patient.

In conclusion, this study showed a stable local distribution of pathogens causing bacteremia during FN episodes in pediatric cancer patients with FN over a 20-years period. The currently used empirical treatment, with its advantage of once daily application, had an in vitro activity that was comparable to other recommended treatment regimens and was stable over time. In our setting, a fourth-generation cephalosporin would be preferred as antipseudomonal monotherapy, given the lack of ESBL-resistance and the relatively high rate of resistance against piperacillin/tazobactam observed in Enterobacteriaceae.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Episodes with fatal outcome or need of intensive care unit.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Bacteria detected in blood culture, from 1993 to 2012, without coagulase-negative staphylococci.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246654.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Swiss Childhood Cancer registry for helping us to identify patients, and S. Wicki, MD, A. Keisker, MD, P. Binz, MD, R. Ammann, D. Ammann and N. Amport, RN, for support in data acquisition over the two decades.

References

  1. 1. Luthi F, Leibundgut K, Niggli FK, Nadal D, Aebi C, Bodmer N, et al. Serious medical complications in children with cancer and fever in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of the prospective multicenter SPOG 2003 FN study. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2012;59(1):90–5. pmid:21837771
  2. 2. Binz P, Bodmer N, Leibundgut K, Teuffel O, Niggli FK, Ammann RA. Different fever definitions and the rate of fever and neutropenia diagnosed in children with cancer: a retrospective two-center cohort study. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2013;60(5):799–805. pmid:23193083
  3. 3. Paul M, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for fever with neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2003;326(7399):1111. pmid:12763980
  4. 4. Zinner SH. Changing epidemiology of infections in patients with neutropenia and cancer: emphasis on gram-positive and resistant bacteria. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1999;29(3):490–4. pmid:10530434
  5. 5. Lehrnbecher T, Robinson P, Fisher B, Alexander S, Ammann RA, Beauchemin M, et al. Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Recipients: 2017 Update. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35(18):2082–94. pmid:28459614
  6. 6. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Neutropenic Sepsis: Prevention and Management of Neutropenic Sepsis in Cancer Patients. London: National Institute for Health; Clinical Excellence (UK)2012.
  7. 7. Diagnostik und Therapie bei Kindern mit onkologischer Grunderkrankung, Fieber und Granulozytopenie (mit febriler Neutropenie) ausserhalb der allogenen Stammzelltransplantation AWMF S2K Leitlinie (AWMF-Reigsternummer 048/14, finale Version 23.01.2016) n.d.
  8. 8. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011;52(4):e56–93.
  9. 9. El-Mahallawy HA, El-Wakil M, Moneer MM, Shalaby L. Antibiotic resistance is associated with longer bacteremic episodes and worse outcome in febrile neutropenic children with cancer. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2011;57(2):283–8. pmid:21671364
  10. 10. Ariffin H, Navaratnam P, Mohamed M, Arasu A, Abdullah WA, Lee CL, et al. Ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in children with febrile neutropenia. Int J Infect Dis. 2000;4(1):21–5. pmid:10689210
  11. 11. von Allmen AN, Zermatten MG, Leibundgut K, Agyeman P, Ammann RA. Pediatric patients at risk for fever in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in Bern, Switzerland, 1993–2012. Sci Data. 2018;5:180038. pmid:29534058
  12. 12. Ammann RA, Bodmer N, Hirt A, Niggli FK, Nadal D, Simon A, et al. Predicting adverse events in children with fever and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: the prospective multicenter SPOG 2003 FN study. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(12):2008–14. pmid:20231680
  13. 13. Brack E, Bodmer N, Simon A, Leibundgut K, Kuhne T, Niggli FK, et al. First-day step-down to oral outpatient treatment versus continued standard treatment in children with cancer and low-risk fever in neutropenia. A randomized controlled trial within the multicenter SPOG 2003 FN study. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2012;59(3):423–30. pmid:22271702
  14. 14. Agyeman P, Kontny U, Nadal D, Leibundgut K, Niggli F, Simon A, et al. A prospective multicenter study of microbiologically defined infections in pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group 2003 fever and neutropenia study. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2014;33(9):e219–25. pmid:24618935
  15. 15. Ammann RA, Niggli FK, Leibundgut K, Teuffel O, Bodmer N. Exploring the association of hemoglobin level and adverse events in children with cancer presenting with fever in neutropenia. PloS one. 2014;9(7):e101696. pmid:25020130
  16. 16. Miedema KG, Winter RH, Ammann RA, Droz S, Spanjaard L, de Bont ES, et al. Bacteria causing bacteremia in pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia—species distribution and susceptibility patterns. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013;21(9):2417–26. pmid:23579946
  17. 17. Nimah MM, Bshesh K, Callahan JD, Jacobs BR. Infrared tympanic thermometry in comparison with other temperature measurement techniques in febrile children. Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2006;7(1):48–55. pmid:16395075
  18. 18. Schlapbach LJ, Aebi C, Otth M, Luethy AR, Leibundgut K, Hirt A, et al. Serum levels of mannose-binding lectin and the risk of fever in neutropenia pediatric cancer patients. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2007;49(1):11–6. pmid:17143875
  19. 19. Kern WV, Cometta A, De Bock R, Langenaeken J, Paesmans M, Gaya H. Oral versus intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy for fever in patients with granulocytopenia who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 1999;341(5):312–8. pmid:10423465
  20. 20. Buetti N, Atkinson A, Kottanattu L, Bielicki J, Marschall J, Kronenberg A, et al. Patterns and trends of pediatric bloodstream infections: a 7-year surveillance study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(3):537–44. pmid:27885442
  21. 21. Petty LA, Sokol EA, Bartlett AH, McNeer JL, Alexander KA, Pisano J. Repeated Blood Cultures in Pediatric Febrile Neutropenia: Would Following the Guidelines Alter the Outcome? Pediatric blood & cancer. 2016;63(7):1244–9. pmid:26970419
  22. 22. Solis Y, Alvarez AM, Fuentes D, de la Barra D, Aviles CL, Becker A, et al. [Bloodstream infections in children with cancer and high risk fever and neutropenia episodes in six hospitals of Santiago, Chile between 2004 and 2009]. Revista chilena de infectologia: organo oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia. 2012;29(2):156–62.
  23. 23. Neemann K, Yonts AB, Qiu F, Simonsen K, Lowas S, Freifeld A. Blood Cultures for Persistent Fever in Neutropenic Pediatric Patients Are of Low Diagnostic Yield. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. 2016;5(2):218–21. pmid:27199474
  24. 24. Weisman LE. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal disease: emerging therapies for the neonatal and pediatric patient. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17(3):237–41. pmid:15166827
  25. 25. Lee JH, Kim SK, Han SB, Lee JW, Lee DG, Chung NG, et al. Increase in Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Febrile Neutropenic Children. Infect Chemother. 2016;48(3):181–9. pmid:27659431
  26. 26. Greenberg D, Moser A, Yagupsky P, Peled N, Hofman Y, Kapelushnik J, et al. Microbiological spectrum and susceptibility patterns of pathogens causing bacteraemia in paediatric febrile neutropenic oncology patients: comparison between two consecutive time periods with use of different antibiotic treatment protocols. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2005;25(6):469–73. pmid:15890499
  27. 27. Han SB, Jung SW, Bae EY, Lee JW, Lee DG, Chung NG, et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in febrile neutropenic children. Microb Drug Resist. 2015;21(2):244–51. pmid:25398058